Laserfiche WebLink
2011 Tax Board of Review Annual Report 4 <br />2. The workshop, which included the Real Property Tax staff and Board Members held <br />prior to the start of this year's appeal hearings, was very informative and productive. <br />Future workshops is encouraged to continue with attendees limited to the current Board <br />Members as well as those Members who are in the process of being approved, the <br />Finance Director, Deputy Director, Tax Administrator, Assistant Tax Administrator, <br />Appraisal Supervisor, Clerical Supervisor, Board Clerk and Corporation Counsel. <br />Again, all information discussed and suggestions presented at the workshop should be <br />provided to the appraisers at a separate meeting or workshop. The Board recommends <br />that the separate workshop be continued and that Administration organize a mandatory <br />island -wide workshop to include all Appraisers prior to the start of the appeal hearings. <br />3. The presence of Corporation Counsel at each meeting /hearing is very helpful and is <br />encouraged to continue. The Board has relied upon Corporation Counsel in many <br />instances for clarification and interpretation of rules and /or laws. <br />4. The Board of Review Statewide Conference with participants from other Counties <br />provided Board Members with the opportunity to review issues and laws from each <br />County that affects Real Property Tax Board of Review policies and functions. <br />Providing the Members with a chance to gain more knowledge in different issues as <br />well as being able to interact with other Members from the various Boards, Real <br />Property Tax staff, and Corporation Counsel benefits all those involved. It was great to <br />know that the organizers of this year's conference followed the Board Members' <br />recommendations to continue having the interactive sessions between Attorneys, Board <br />Members and staff, more importantly, agendized break -out sessions which separated <br />all Board Members, Attorneys, Board Secretaries as well as clerical support personnel, <br />and appraisal staff into smaller groups. The purpose of the break -out sessions was the <br />benefit all attendees would receive as discussions could be held on practices, issues, <br />experiences and outcomes for each specific group. The Board recommends that the <br />statewide conference be continued and that the Board's attendance be funded. <br />5. The Board Members appreciated the Appraisers' efforts to follow their recommendation <br />to standardize the formatting of their data packet and keeping the attachments to a <br />minimum. Maps showing the location of the appealed parcel and the comparables used <br />by some appraisers were very helpful. Such maps should be one of the standard <br />attachments to the appeal data packet. The satellite pictures were also helpful and <br />impressive. <br />6. The Board again appreciated the presence of the Assistant Tax Administrator who was <br />able to anticipate questions of the Board and had the information at hand or was able to <br />remotely access property tax information via laptop. <br />7. While the Division has made significant efforts to improve, a few Appraisers could not <br />respond fully to the Boards inquiries. The Board suggests that greater training <br />emphasis be done on establishing additional training on mass appraisal standards. The <br />Board also recommends that in initiating their presentations that the Appraisers identify <br />the data and methodology used for their assessment. <br />