My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0526.002 2010-2012
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2010-2012
>
COM 0526.002 2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2021 12:57:05 PM
Creation date
2/7/2012 10:36:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2010-2012
Communication
0526
Point
002
Author
Susan Langer
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
REP PC 063 07/31/2012 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2010-2012\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 18, 2012 <br />Hawaii County Council Planning Committee <br />co,,,* jTY CLLR K <br />r+ r A <br />2012 Jill 18 All 9: 37 <br />RE: Opposition to Bill 168, Souza /Mulliken rezone, CV -10 to RS -10 <br />Aloha, <br />PlPc. <br />CoMM. 526 <br />My name is Susan Langer and I live at 18 -1358 Nichols Rd. with my husband and <br />90 year old Mother. Our RS -10 residence is situated on a hill adjacent to <br />and overlooking the Souza /Mulliken property. We purchased our home <br />in 1994 because we wanted to live in a rural /agricultural neighborhood. <br />We like being near Mt. View Village, but the village is a separate area from our <br />neighborhood. <br />We oppose this rezone amendment and are in complete agreement with the <br />Planning Department's original "unfavorable" recommendation stating <br />that this proposed rezoning was not consistent with the Land Use and <br />Commercial Elements of the General Plan. A copy of the Planning <br />Department's original recommendation is attached as Exhibit "A ". We agree with <br />the reasoning provided in this recommendation: 1) the project location is <br />situated in the Low Density Urban area, 2) immediate surrounding <br />properties are in single - family use, and 3) existing commercial zoned <br />lands are already located in Mountain View Village where commercial uses <br />and traffic patterns have already been established. <br />To summarize the application: <br />Our neighbors purchased a vacant RS -1o, 13,784 ft. lot in 2010 and <br />constructed a two story house with a 1,750 sq. ft. footprint. They are <br />proposing to build an 1,800 sq. ft. car repair shop in their front yard in <br />an area comprising 7660 sq. ft. with 6 parking stalls (Please refer to engineer's <br />site plan measurement Exhibit "B "). To put things in perspective, i800 sq. feet is <br />the size of a 3 bay commercial auto shop. The business will share parking ,with the <br />existing residence. The area of the parcel where the house and proposed <br />business is located is entirely "Low Density Urban" on the LUPAG map <br />(Exhibit "C "). A small and inaccessible area of the property is <br />designated "Medium Density Urban. The property and its access are <br />entirely within the Nichols Road neighborhood as there is no physical <br />connection between it and Mt. View Village. <br />We strongly oppose this rezoning request for many reasons: <br />1. The change of zone allows for unsuitable present and future uses for <br />this small parcel with poor access. Any business now or in the future can have <br />up to five employees without consideration of limited parking. The Applicants <br />could now, without changing their building permit, open a retail store with even <br />Comm. No, S 2-(.. L <br />Ref. To: /2)/ <br />Ref. Date JAN 1 8 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.