My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0629.000 2010-2012
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2010-2012
>
COM 0629.000 2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2012 4:05:57 PM
Creation date
3/15/2012 10:49:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2010-2012
Communication
0629
Point
000
Author
Lincoln S.T. Ashida, Corporation Counsel
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Motion to concur with the recommendation of Corporation Counsel failed due to a vote count of 4-ayes; 3-nos & 2 absent (see agenda actions) - 03/21/12
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 03/21/2012 2010-2012
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Council
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ashida, Lincoln <br /> From: Jennifer.Z.Brooks @ hawaii.gov <br /> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:29 AM <br /> To: Ashida, Lincoln <br /> Cc: Rodillas, Martha; Lorna.L.Aratani @hawaii.gov <br /> Subject: Re: Proposed language for Hawai'i County Council agenda <br /> Lincoln, <br /> This agenda item will adequately notify the public that the Council is considering retaining special counsel for all claims, <br /> etc., relating to the three named and one unnamed former employees. I also ran the language by Lorna Aratani, who <br /> agrees with my assessment. <br /> Although one claimant is unnamed, the description does indicate both that there is another person whose potential claims <br /> will be addressed by the special counsel, and that those claims will be related to former county employment (at least <br /> implicitly), so the language gives the public adequate notice as to what the scope of the special counsel's representation <br /> will be. <br /> Please don't hesitate to call if you have further questions on this or other issues. <br /> Aloha, <br /> Jennifer <br /> Jennifer Z. Brooks <br /> Staff Attorney <br /> Office of Information Practices <br /> From "Ashida, Lincoln"<LASHIDA(a)co.hawaii.hi.us> <br /> fo <Jennifer.Z.Brooks(ahawaii.gov> <br /> Cc "Rodillas,Martha"<mrodillas(a�co.hawaii.hi.us> <br /> Date 03/13/2012 10:02 AM <br /> Subject Proposed language for Hawaii County Council agenda <br /> Hi Jen, <br /> Here is what we are proposing for the heading of our letter to the Council (this is what will normally be placed on the <br /> agenda): <br /> RE: Request for executive session regarding any and all claims, administrative appeals and other related legal <br /> hearings and matters (including present and subsequent litigation involving the County) pertaining to Glen <br /> Shikuma, Patricia Nakamoto, Shyla Ayau and an unnamed former employee of the County of Hawai'i: A request <br /> to hire special counsel to represent only the County of Hawai'i in the aforementioned legal matters and areas; <br /> said request for special counsel is NOT for the purpose of hiring attorneys for the aforementioned former <br /> employees, or for any Council member or the County Clerk who may be sued in their individual capacities. <br /> We will also place in the body of the letter the exact request we are making of the Council; specifically that they authorize <br /> the hiring of a special counsel (an attorney for limited duration and purpose)to represent the organizational client County <br /> of Hawaii only. We will again make clear the scope of services will include any and all claims, administrative appeals and <br /> other related legal hearings and matters (including present and subsequent litigation involving the County, and that it <br /> pertains to cases involving the three already named former County employees, and a yet unnamed fourth former <br /> employee. We will further point out and make clear attorneys are not being hired to represent the former employees (as <br /> was unfortunately erroneously reported in our local media), nor are they being hired to represent any Council member or <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.