The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOM 0669.000 2010-2012William P. Kenoi Mayor March 30, 2012 County of Hawai `i 25 Aupuni Street • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 • (808) 961-8211 • Fax (808) 961-6553 KONA: 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway • Kailua-Kona, Hawai'i 96740 (808)323-4444 • Fax (808)326-5663 William T. Takaba Managing Director Wally Lau Deputy Managing Director Change of Zone Application (REZ 11-000149) Applicant: Leslie A. Botelho and Betty Jean Botelho Request: FA -2a to FA -1a Tax Map Key: 2-5-040:018 %Change of Zone (REZ 840) Applicant: Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. Request: Amend Condition C (Secure Final Subdivision Approval), Condition H (Drainage Improvements) and Condition I (Improve Kahaopea Street) of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99-116 Tax Map Key: 2-2-044.003 031 032 035 and 037 As required by Chapter 7, Sec. 6-7.5 (a), Hawaii County Charter, transmitted herewith for the County Council's consideration and action are the Windward Planning Commission's letters and enclosures regarding the above -referenced requests. Sin , William P. Kenoi Mayor Enclosures cc: Planning Department rr Gomm. No. Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Fanployer Ref. To; C'8►11 LLA) Ref. Date APR 042pi�? Honorable Dominic Yagong, Chairman =' and Members of the County Council = = - County of Hawaii ,; , v 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, HI 96720 y` - co •• S B � Dear Chairman Yagong and Members: w - Change of Zone Application (REZ 11-000149) Applicant: Leslie A. Botelho and Betty Jean Botelho Request: FA -2a to FA -1a Tax Map Key: 2-5-040:018 %Change of Zone (REZ 840) Applicant: Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. Request: Amend Condition C (Secure Final Subdivision Approval), Condition H (Drainage Improvements) and Condition I (Improve Kahaopea Street) of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99-116 Tax Map Key: 2-2-044.003 031 032 035 and 037 As required by Chapter 7, Sec. 6-7.5 (a), Hawaii County Charter, transmitted herewith for the County Council's consideration and action are the Windward Planning Commission's letters and enclosures regarding the above -referenced requests. Sin , William P. Kenoi Mayor Enclosures cc: Planning Department rr Gomm. No. Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Fanployer Ref. To; C'8►11 LLA) Ref. Date APR 042pi�? County of Hawaii WINDWARD PLANNING COMMISSION Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Phone (808) 961-8288 • Fax (808) 961-8742 4M. R307512 The Honorable Dominic Yagong, Chairman ^; - and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii 25 Aupuni Street -i Hilo, HI 96720 w Dear Chairman Yagong and Council Members: co Change of Zone (REZ 840) W Applicant: Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. Request: Amend Condition C (Secure Final Subdivision Approval), Condition H (Drainage Improvements) and Condition I (Improve Kahaopea Street) of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99-116 Tax Mgp Key: 2-2-044.003 031 032 035 and 037 The Windward Planning Commission, at its duly held public hearing on March 1, 2012, recommended for your approval the proposed legislative bill for an amendment to Condition C and an unfavorable recommendation to amend Conditions H and I of Ordinance No. 99 116, which amended Ordinance No. 96-159, which rezoned approximately 7.402 acres from the Single -Family Residential — 10,000 square feet (RS -10) district to the Neighborhood Commercial — 7,500 square feet (CN -7.5) zoning district. The request to amend Conditions C, H, and I of Ordinance No. 99 116 relates to a 5 -year time extension to secure final subdivision approval, timing of installing drainage improvements, and timing of installing roadway improvements along Kahaopea Street. The properties are located on the southeast side of the intersection of Kanoelehua Avenue (State Highway 11) and East Kahaopea Street, Waiakea Homestead House Lots, South Hilo, Hawaii. The Commission concurs with the following Planning Director's reasons for recommending favorable consideration of the request to amend Condition C and the unfavorable consideration of the request to amend Conditions H and I of Ordinance No. 99 116: Hawai `i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer The Honorable Dominic Yagong, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 2 The applicant requests amendments to Conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99 116, which amended Ordinance No. 96 159, which rezoned approximately 7.402 acres from the Single -Family Residential — 10,000 square feet (RS -10) district to the Neighborhood Commercial — 7,500 square feet (CN -7.5) district. The property consists of five parcels situated southeast of the Kanoelehua Avenue - Kahaopea Street intersection. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) that was submitted with the application, current plans are to develop the property with approximately 38,000 square feet of general retail space, a gas station with six fuel pumps and convenience store, and an approximately 4,000 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive-through. The current plan allows for five building sites with related parking for each building site. Access to the property will be via an ingress only access from Kanoelehua Avenue and a new ingress/egress access from Kahaopea Street. Due to the topography and intermittent flow of water that runs across the makai portion of the property, the property will be filled to level the buildable areas. CONDITION C The applicant is requesting a 5 -year time extension to comply with Condition C, which required that Final Subdivision Approval for consolidation and re -subdivision of the subject property be secured within five years from the effective date of the ordinance, or by October 22, 2004. In 2005, the Planning Director granted a five-year administrative time extension to October 22, 2009 to comply with Condition C. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant and are not the result of their fault or negligence. According to the applicant, the time extension to comply with Condition C is being requested because the applicant "needs additional time to obtain final approval of the entry from Kanoelehua Avenue. The plans have been under discussion with the State Department for Transportation (DOT) for several years. The layout on the Site Plan appears to be acceptable in concept to the DOT, but final construction plans need to be submitted for review and approval". The Honorable Dominic Yagong, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 3 The request to amend Condition C of Ordinance 99 116 would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. The General Plan LUPAG Map designation has not changed since the property was originally rezoned in 1996. The request continues to be consistent with the Low Density Urban designation which allows for residential (overall residential density of up to 6 units per acre) with ancillary community and public uses, and neighborhood and convenience -type commercial uses. The property is zoned Neighborhood Commercial — 7,500 square feet (CN -7.5), which allows for commercial activities such as a compact shopping center which supplies goods and services to a residential or working population on a frequent need or convenience basis. The applicant's current plan to develop retail establishments, a restaurant, a convenience store and automotive service station are permitted uses within the CN zoning district. Based on the above, the proposed amendment to Condition C of Ordinance No. 96 116 continues to be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Code. CONDITIONS H and I The applicant also requests an amendment to Conditions H and I, as shown below, so that required drainage improvements and roadway improvements to Kahaopea Street along the property's frontage are deferred until Final Plan Approval or Certificate of Occupancy. The material the applicant proposes to be deleted is bracketed/struck through; material to be added is underscored. • Condition H: "Drainage improvements, [4] as may be required[;] by the Department of Public Works, shall be constructed ['^ Fneeting with the appr-oval of the r,o,.,,,.tment of Publ e WE)Fks] prior to [ o g Final Subdivision n pp -,yal — -] the issuance of final plan approval or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the subject property, whichever occurs first." • Condition I: "Prior to [se g final stibd visi „ appr-e va e- issuance of certificate of occupancy for the subject property[, ,.,hieever- aeeur-s first,] the south side of Kahaopea Street shall be improved and widened with the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements (with pavement widening and transitions) fronting the subject property between Kanoelehua Avenue and the access road to The Honorable Dominic Yagong, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 4 the subject property meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works and shall be dedicated to the County upon its request. For the area fronting the subject property between the access road and the eastern boundary, these or other improvements may be required by the Department of Public Works provided that no major drainage structures, such as a bridge or culvert, are required by such improvements." The request to amend Conditions H and I of Ordinance 99 116 would not be consistent with the General Plan. The request is contrary to the following goals and policies of the General Plan: • Require developers to provide basic infrastructure necessary for development. • The development of commercial facilities should be designed to fit into the locale with minimal intrusion while providing the desired services. Appropriate infrastructure and design concerns shall be incorporated into the review of such developments. • Any development within the Federal Emergency Management Agency designated flood plain must be in compliance with Chapter 27. • Develop a comprehensive program for the coordinated construction of a drainage network along a single drainage system. A floodway runs from south to north through the eastern (makai) portion of the property. The floodway and floodway fringe has been identified as Flood Zone AE by FEMA, which is a Special Flood Hazard Area subject to inundation by the 100 -year flood where base flood elevations have been determined. The applicant has indicated that fill material will need to be placed on the property in order to create level buildable areas, which may require altering or relocating the Special Flood Hazard Area. When a developer alters (i.e. by placing fill) or relocates a Special Flood Hazard Area so that the base flood elevation changes, a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) must be obtained through DPW from FEMA. Generally, the first step in the CLOMR/LOMR process is for the developer to submit flood engineering data and maps to FEMA indicating the location and extent of alteration/relocation of the Special Flood Hazard Area and how the base flood elevation will be affected. If FEMA agrees with the data and maps, a CLOMR is issued and the developer can begin on-site work within the Special Flood Hazard Area, such as placing fill material. Upon completion of the on-site work, the developer submits updated flood engineering data and maps showing how the alteration/relocation affected the base flood elevation. If FEMA agrees with this data and maps, a LOMR is issued which effectively revises the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The Honorable Dominic Yagong, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 5 Conditions C and I require that the applicant install and dedicate curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements within a future 10 -foot wide road widening strip along Kahaopea Street fronting the property. Typically, these improvements are completed and dedicated to the County prior to allowing the subdivision and sale of a lot for commercial purposes. The Planning Director does not support the applicant's request to delay the installation of roadway and drainage improvements required in Conditions H and I until receipt of a Certificate of Occupancy. Should these conditions be amended as requested by the applicant, Final Subdivision Approval for a consolidation and re -subdivision could be issued and the applicant could subsequently lease or sell the commercially -zoned lots to multiple landowners, having different development schedules, before installing any required drainage or roadway improvements. This would likely cause the improvements to be completed on a piecemeal basis rather than in a coordinated manner by the current applicant. Additionally, rather than sharing the cost of installing any required roadway and drainage improvements, the burden to install these improvements would fall solely on the landowner that first develops their property. A comprehensive approach should be taken in designing and installing the infrastructure improvements necessary for commercial zoning as required in Conditions H and I. This can best be accomplished by continuing to require installation of these improvements prior to Final Subdivision Approval for the entire 7.402 -acre property, rather than potentially by multiple landowners after the property has been subdivided. For these reasons, the Planning Director has determined that the request to amend Conditions H and I would not be consistent with the General Plan. It should also be noted that Condition G of Ordinance No. 99 116 requires that the applicant obtain a LOMR prior to Final Subdivision Approval or Final Plan Approval, whichever occurs first. Since subdivision approval typically occurs prior to plan approval it is likely that a LOMR will need to be obtained prior to subdivision approval. Thus, although not recommended by the Planning Director, Condition G will also need to be amended should Condition H be amended as requested by the applicant. Based upon the above findings, the Planning Director recommends that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council to amend Condition C and an unfavorable recommendation be forwarded to amend Conditions H and I. The Director also recommends that existing conditions in the ordinance be revised to reflect the current standard language for conditions of approval. For your favorable consideration, an amendment to Ordinance No. 99-116 is transmitted. The Honorable Dominic Yagong, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 6 We are enclosing copies of the staff Background, Planning Director's Recommendation, transcripts of the February 2, 2012 and March 1, 2012 hearings, and the PowerPoint presentation for your information. Sincerely, Zendo Kern, Chairman Windward Planning Commission Lgraphi cimagesrez840wpc2 Enclosures cc: Thomas L. H. Yeh, Esq. Department of Public Works Department of Water Supply Department of Land & Natural Resources -HPD DOT -Highways, Honolulu Amy Self, Esq., Corporation Counsel BGraphicltnagesAmendREZ.doc-1/26/12 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII, INC. (formerly FINANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. and TRI - ELECTRIC, INC.) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO 99116 (REZ 840) GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII, INC. has submitted a request to amend Conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99 116, which amended Ordinance No. 96 159, which rezoned approximately 7.402 acres from the Single -Family Residential —10,000 square feet (RS -10) district to the Neighborhood Commercial — 7,500 square feet (CN -7.5) district. The amendment to conditions relates to a 5 -year time extension to secure final subdivision approval, timing of installing drainage improvements, and timing of installing roadway improvements along Kahaopea Street. The property is located on the southeast side of the intersection of Kanoelehua Avenue (State Highway 11) and East Kahaopea Street, Waiakea Homestead House Lots, South Hilo, Hawaii, TMK: 2-2-044: 003, 031, 032, 035 and 037. LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION At the time of the original change of zone to the CN -7.5 zoning district was approved in 1996, Tri -Electric, Inc., owner of the affected properties, authorized the change of zone request through its President, William M. Hirose. All of the affected parcels, with the exception of a roadway lot identified as Parcel 3, were acquired in 2001 by the current applicant, Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. 2. Title to the roadway lot (Parcel 3) became a part of the Margaret Hirose Trust. When Margaret Hirose passed away, her daughter, Florence Doi, served as successor trustee of the Trust. Florence Doi passed away and there are no remaining successor trustee(s) for this trust. 3. The Planning Director, on behalf of the Windward Planning Commission, accepted the amendment request from Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. for processing, even though the requested amendments, if approved by the County Council, will apply to Parcel 3, whose successor trustee(s) are not known at this time. In the absence of a successor trustee(s) to -1- Comm. 669 Bill 229 represent the interests of the Trust, the Planning Director will proceed with the processing of the amendment request in deference to the original authorization for the change of zone by Tri -Electric, Inc. and the fact that Margaret Hirose, a successor trustee, has never expressed any position that would convey the desire of the Trust to not preserve the rights and privileges granted by the change of zone upon the affected properties, including Parcel 3. Consideration of this request by the Windward Planning Commission will at least give both Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc., and the successor trustee(s) for Parcel 3, the opportunities to pursue the privileges afforded by the CN -7.5 zoning of the affected properties. PROPOSED ACTION 4. Applicant's Request and Reasons for Request: The applicant requests the following amendments to Conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99 116: a. Time extension to secure final subdivision approval: The applicant is requesting a 5 -year time extension to comply with Condition C, which required that Final Subdivision Approval for consolidation and re -subdivision of the subject property be secured within five years from the effective date of the ordinance, or by October 22, 2004. In 2005, the Planning Director granted a five-year administrative time extension to October 22, 2009 to comply with Condition C. On November 2, 2009, the applicant submitted a request to amend Ordinance No. 99 116, including a time extension to comply with Condition C. However, the application was deemed incomplete and returned because it did not include a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) meeting with the concurrency requirements of the Hawaii County Code. According to the applicant, the time extension is being requested because the applicant "needs additional time to obtain final approval of the entry from Kanoelehua Avenue. The plans have been under discussion with the State Department for Transportation (DOT) for several years. The layout on the Site Plan appears to be acceptable in concept to the DOT, but final construction plans need to be submitted for review and approval". -2- b. Modify the timing of installing drainage improvements: The applicant is requesting that Condition H be modified as shown below. Material requested to be deleted is bracketed and struck through; material requested to be added is underscored. "Drainage improvements, [if] as may be required[;] by the Department of Public Works, shall be constructed [' of the DepaAment f u bl )IT-1- 6-5]prior to [�� ri„ ,l Nl Axb 1 li ppr-eva1-er-] the issuance of final plan approval or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the subject property, whichever occurs first. Condition H currently requires that the applicant install any required drainage improvements before Final Subdivision Approval or Final Plan Approval, whichever occurs first. The amendment would delay the installation of these improvements to Final Plan Approval or Certificate of Occupancy (whichever occurs first). According to the applicant, the amendment is being requested because the applicant "needs to be able to achieve a consolidation and re -subdivision of the property to allow the flexibility to create two roadway lots on the property; one fronting Kanoelehua Avenue for dedication to the State and one fronting Kahaopea Street for dedication to the County. In order to be able to create these lots to satisfy government goals, they request the language changes contained herein. The necessary improvements will still be built before any use of the property is allowed under the proposed language changes, so the County maintains its control of the situation". C. Modify the timing of installing roadway improvements along Kahaopea Street: The applicant is requesting that Condition I be modified as shown below. Material requested to be deleted is bracketed and struck through; material requested to be added is underscored. -3- "Prior to [ ] issuance of certificate of occupancy for the subject property[, ..,,,ie ever- eeeufs fir- ',] the south side of Kahaopea Street shall be improved and widened with the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements (with pavement widening and transitions) fronting the subject property between Kanoelehua Avenue and the access road to the subject property meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works and shall be dedicated to the County upon its request. For the area fronting the subject property between the access road and the eastern boundary, these or other improvements may be required by the Department of Public Works provided that no major drainage structures, such as a bridge or culvert, are required by such improvements." Condition I currently requires that the applicant widen and improve the south side of Kahaopea Street along the property's frontage between Kanoelehua Avenue and the future access road before Final Subdivision Approval or Certificate of Occupancy, whichever occurs first. The amendment would delay the installation of these improvements to Certificate of Occupancy. According to the applicant, the amendment is being requested because the applicant "needs to have amendments to conditions to improve the ability to obtain the construction financing for the improvements. Financing for the Kahaopea Street improvements will be easier to arrange as a part of construction financing for the project with all other improvements rather than as a separate". (P.D. Exhibit 1- Applicant's letters dated October 26, 2011 and supporting documents; P.D. Exhibit 2 — Applicant's letter dated November 17, 2011; P.D. Exhibit 3 — Applicant's letter dated December 30, 2011 5. Current Development Plans: According to the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) that was submitted with the application, current plans are to develop the property with approximately 38,000 square feet of general retail space, a gas station with six fuel pumps and convenience store, and an approximately 4,000 square foot fast-food restaurant with -4- drive-through. The current plan allows for five building sites with related parking for each building site. Access to the property will be via an ingress only access from Kanoelehua Avenue and a new ingress/egress access from Kahaopea Street. The property will be filled to level the buildable areas, due to the topography and intermittent flow of water that runs across the makai portion of the property. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 6. Ordinance No. 96159: Change of Zone Ordinance No. 96 159 was approved on December 5, 1996 for Tri -Electric, Inc. to rezone the property from RS -10 to CN -7.5. The developer's plans at that time were to consolidate and re -subdivide the subject property into lots ranging from approximately 7,500 to 50,000 square feet in size and develop a mix of single-family and multiple -family residential uses as well as a small commercial area and community center. The extension of Awapuhi Street through the property in order to create a connection between Kahaopea Street and E. Kawailani Street was also planned. (P.D. Exhibit 4 — Ordinance No. 96 159) 7. Ordinance No. 99 116: Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99 116 was approved on October 22, 1999 to amend Conditions B, D, E, I, J and K of Ordinance No. 96 159. The amendments related to deferring the water commitment payment, removing the limitation on the location of the proposed commercial area, modifying the requirement to submit a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR), deleting the requirement to construct the Awapuhi Street extension and dedicate it to the County, reducing the requirement to install curbs, gutter and sidewalk improvements along the entire subject frontage of Kahaopea Street and removing the restriction of the access location on Kahaopea Street. At the time, the new property owners, Finance Holdings, Ltd., intended to commence with the neighborhood commercial component of the development and were seriously reconsidering whether to include a residential component as originally planned. (P.D. Exhibit 5 — Ordinance No. 99 116) AGENCIES' COMMENTS 8. Office of Housing and Community Development: P.D. Exhibit 6 — December 12, 2011 memo -5- 9. Police Department: P.D. Exhibit 7 — December 13, 2011 memo 10. Fire Department: P.D. Exhibit 8 — December 6, 2011 memo 11. DLNR Land Division: P.D. Exhibit 9 — January 12, 2012 memo 12. Department of Transportation: P.D. Exhibit 10 — January 12, 2012 letter AGENCIES - NO COMMENTS OR CONCERNS 13. Department of Public Works, Department of Water Supply, Department of Environmental Management, Department of Health. AGENCIES - NO RESPONSE 14. DLNR Historic Preservation Division, Real Property Tax Office, HELCO. PUBLIC COMMENTS 15. P.D. Exhibit 11— Letter dated January 12, 2012 from Stephanie Salazar. 16. P.D. Exhibits 12'and 13 — Letter dated January 17, 2012 and e-mail dated January 18, 2012 from Russell H. Doi. -6- ROY K. NAKAMOTO ALAN M. OKAMOTO 3EREL I. YAMAMOTO HENRY T. NAKAMOTO BJ Leithead-Todd Planning Director County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 NAKAMOTO, OKAMOTO & YAMAMOTO ATTORNEYS AT LAW, A LAW CORPORATION 187 KAPIOLANI STREET TELEPHONE (8 08) 961-0641 HILO, HAWAII 96720-2687 FAX (808)935-3872 October 26, 2011 ALAN@NOYHAWAII.COM Re: Resubmission of Request for Time Extension and Amendment to Conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99-116 Amending Ordinance No. 96-159 TMK [3] 2-2-044: 032, 035 and 037 Dear Director Leithead-Todd: I am resubmitting this request that your department initiate proceedings to submit the request of my client, Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc., to the County Council for amendment of Conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99-116. The background for this request, the specific development plan for the Subject Property, the status of those plans, the reasons why development has not commenced and a detailed explanation of the reasons for each requested amendment follows. Background This property was formerly used by Hirose Nursery for a plant nursery and related activities. The use was discontinued before Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. acquired the property. The property abuts Kanoelehua Avenue, a State Highway on its western boundary and Kahaopea Street, a County street, on its northern boundary. The property slopes downward from Kanoelehua Highway. The area to be developed is shown on the Site Plan. Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. acquired the property for which it is requesting the amendment of zoning conditions in 2001 via a foreclosure proceeding. TMK [3] 2-2-044: 003 was not a part of that sale, that parcel (which is a roadway parcel that is not connected to any roadway) is owned by the Margaret Hirose Trust. Access to Tax Parcel 3 will be via a pennanent non-exclusive easement over the Subject Property allowing access to Kahaopea Street. TMK [3] 2-2-004: 030 is owned by the Rikio Doi Family Revocable Trust. Access for that parcel will be via a permanent non-exclusive easement over the Subject Property to Kahaopea Street at the new access point as shown on the Site Plan. Planning Dept. Exhibit J_ NAKAMOTO, OKAMOTO & YAMAMOTO ATTORNEYS AT LAW, A LAW CORPORATION BJ Leithead-Todd October 26, 2011 Page 2 The Subject Property and a driveway Lot TMK [3] 2-2-044: 003 were rezoned to Neighborhood Commercial (CN -7.5) by Ordinance No. 96-159. Ordinance No. 99-116 amended Ordinance No. 96-159 by replacing the conditions of zoning. Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc., the Owner of the land bearing Tax Map Key No. [3] 2-2- 044: 032, 035 and 037 submits the proposed changes in support of its request for amendments to ordinance No. 99-116 as follows: 1. Condition C. Amendment of Condition C to allow an additional five (5) years to obtain final subdivision approval of the proposed consolidation/resubdivision of the subject property. 2. Condition H. Amend Condition H to read as follows: "H. Drainage improvements, [if] as may be required by the Department of Public Works, shall be constructed [in a manner meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works] prior to the issuance of final plan approval or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the subject property, whichever occurs first." 3. Condition I. Amend Condition I to read as follows: "I. Prior to [securing final subdivision approval or the] issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the subject property[, which ever occurs first,] the south side of Kahaopea Street shall be improved and widened with the constriction of curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements (with pavement widening and transitions) fronting the subject property between Kanoelehua Avenue and the access road to the subject property meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works and shall be dedicated to the County upon its request. For the area fronting the subject property between the access road and the eastern boundary, these or other improvements may be required by the Department of Public Works provided that no major drainage strictures, such as a bridge or culvert, are required by such improvements." Graphic Images has worked on the development of the Subject Property since it acquired the property in 2001. It reviewed and revised the development plans to better use the land under the zoning and to address current market conditions. It grubbed the property, graded and filled a portion of the property. It had a Traffic Impact Analysis Report done for the project. It had the property boundaries surveyed and obtained a topographic map from its surveyor. It confirmed the location of the flood zone in the area with the County of Hawaii. It worked with the adjoining property owners and their attorney to relocate the driveway access to a safer location. NAKAMOTO, OKAMOTO & YAMAMOTO ATTORNEYS AT LAW, A LAW CORPORATION BJ Leithead-Todd October 26, 2011 Page 3 It completed a Feasibility Analysis for the project and a Site Plan showing location of proposed improvements and features to address mitigation of traffic circulation and safety issues. It has engaged in preleasing activity to identify potential users in the project. Its engineers have prepared plans for improvement of Kanoelehua Avenue and Kahaopea Street to meet State DOT and County of Hawaii requirements. Its engineers have designed the access from Kanoelehua Avenue into the project site to meet State DOT requirements and has been in discussion with State DOT over those requirements. Current Development Plans The current development plan is shown on the site layout plan which is being submitted with this request. The initial plan which was considered for the site involved a mix of residential and neighborhood commercial uses. The potential for conflicts between residential and commercial uses and the constraints caused by the proximity of the land to Kanoelehua Avenue and the need to reduce the areas on the malcai side of the property to minimize impact on existing drainage required a reassessment of the plan. The current plan eliminates all of the residential Lots on the site. It reduces the areas that need to be filled. It provides better traffic circulation for the site with ample onsite parking for the commercial uses. The plan allows for five building sites with related parking for each building site. Access to the site will be via an ingress only from the in -bound lanes (toward Milo) of the Kanoelehua Avenue and a new entry for ingress and egress from and to Kahaopea Street. The access plan has been discussed with the State Department of Transportation, but has not yet been approved. The access to Kahaopea Street has been discussed with the Department of Public Works and the location of the access point is acceptable to that Department. One of the reasons for requesting this extension is to have sufficient time to obtain approval for the accesses. Because of the topography of the Subject Property and the intermittent flow of water that runs into the malcai part of the property, the site will be filled to level the buildable areas. The balance of the malcai portion of the land as shown on the Site Plan will not be developed. Reasons for the Requested Extension: 1. Condition C. Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. needs additional time to obtain final approval of the entry from Kanoelehua Avenue. The plans have been under discussion with the State Department of Transportation for several years. The layout on the Site Plan appears to be acceptable in concept to the State Department of Transportation, but final construction plans need to be submitted for review and approval. 2. Condition H. Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. needs to be able to achieve a Consolidation and Resubdivision of the Property to allow the flexibility to create two roadway NAKAMOTO, OKAMOTO & YAMAMOTO ATTORNEYS AT LAW, A LAW CORPORATION BJ Leithead-Todd October 26, 2011 Page 4 lots on the Property; one fronting Kanoelehua Avenue for dedication to the State and one fronting Kahaopea Street for dedication to the County. In order to be able to create these lots to satisfy government goals, they request the language changes contained herein. The necessary improvements will still be built before any use of the Property is allowed under the proposed language changes, so the County maintains its control of the situation. 3. Condition I. Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. also needs to have amendments to conditions to improve the ability to obtain the construction financing for the improvements. Financing for the Kahaopea Street improvements will be easier to arrange as a part of construction financing for the project with all other improvements rather than as a separate. Enclosures. 1. Site Plan. One full size print of the Site Plan with 8 1/2" x 11" copies; 2. A list of the owners within 300 feet of the subject property is enclosed; 3. Traffic Impact Analysis Report for Waiaka Center dated September 2011; and 4. Check No. 36158 in the amount of $250.00. Very truly yours, Alan M. Okamoto Enclosures cc w/o enclosures: Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. This Request for Time Extension and Amendment to Conditions C, H and I is Approved by Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. By: Roland Higashi Its President Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. Date: 7 N c N Q c� N (D 0 c ca Y CL W � z Traffic Impact Analysis Report for Waiaka Center Hilo, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii Tax Map Key Number (3)2-2-044: 03Z 035 & 037 SEPTEMBER 2011 Prepared for.- M. or. M. David Paul Development, LLC 700 Bishop Street, Suite 1000 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Prepared by: �L=Com 1001 Bishop Street Suite 1600 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT WAIAKA CENTER Hilo, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii Traffic Impact Analysis Report TMK: (3)2-2-044: 032,035 & 037 September 2011 1V M Y� LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER * NO. 3893—C Expiration Date: April 30, 2012 This work was prepared by me or under my direct supervision. Signature A=COM September 16, 2011 Date AECOM PAGE i Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Table of Contents SECTION PAGE Engineer's Stamp and Signature .................................................................................. i Tableof Contents ........................................................................................................... ii List of Figures"' List of Tables"' ProjectDescription ....................................................................................................... 1 ExistingConditions ....................................................................................................... 2 ExistingRoadways ............................................................................................... 2 TrafficVolumes ..................................................................................................... 3 Proposed Roadway Improvements .............................................................................. 5 TrafficForecasts ........................................................................................................... 6 AmbientTraffic Forecast ...................................................................................... 6 ProjectGenerated Traffic ..................................................................................... 9 Total with Project Forecast ................................................................................. 11 Levelof Service Analysis ........................................................................................... 11 2008 and 2014 Analysis ..................................................................................... 12 2019 Analysis ..................................................................................................... 15 2024 Analysis ..................................................................................................... 16 2034 Analysis ..................................................................................................... 19 Conclusions................................................................................................................. 22 References Figures Tables Appendices Appendix A: Traffic Turning Movement Counts Appendix B: Existing and 2014 Signalized Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Calculations Appendix C: 2019 Signalized Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Calculations Appendix D: 2024 Signalized Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Calculations Appendix E: 2034 Signalized Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Calculations AECOM PAGE H Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT List of Figures FIGURE NUMBER TITLE Figure 1 Location Map Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Existing 2008 Traffic Volumes Figure 4 Historical Trend in Daily Traffic Volumes on Kanoelehua Avenue and Puainako Street Figure 5 Hourly Traffic Volumes Kanoelehua Avenue South of Kawailani Street Figure 6 Hourly Traffic Volumes Kawailani Street West of Kanoelehua Avenue Figure 7 2014 Ambient Traffic Forecast Figure 8 2019 Ambient Traffic Forecast Figure 9 2024 Ambient Traffic Forecast Figure 10 2034 Ambient Traffic Forecast Figure 11 Project Generated Traffic Forecast Figure 12 2014 Total with Project Traffic Forecast Figure 13 2019 Total with Project Traffic Forecast Figure 14 2024 Total with Project Traffic Forecast Figure 15 2034 Total with Project Traffic Forecast List of Tables TABLE NUMBER TITLE Table 1 Trip Generation and Distribution Analysis for Ambient Retailers Table 2 Trip Generation Analysis Table 3 Trip Distribution Analysis Table 4 Existing and 2014 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Analysis Table 5 Existing and 2019 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Analysis Table 6 2024 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Analysis Table 7 2034 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Analysis AECOM September 2011 PAGE iii Project No. 60217739.00300 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT for the WAIAKA CENTER A commercial center is being proposed on Kanoelehua Avenue in Hilo, Hawaii. A traffic report was prepared in November 2008 requesting permission from the State of Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) to install a right turn -in lane from Kanoelehua Avenue, which the HDOT has conditionally approved. The County of Hawaii Department of Planning has requested an updated Traffic Impact Analysis Report on this proposed project in response to a request for a time extension by the landowner under the existing Zoning Ordinance. This report documents the methodology and results of a study that was conducted to identify future traffic conditions with the proposed right turn -in lane. The study included a review of existing roadway and traffic conditions, forecast of future conditions, and analysis of the forecast volumes to determine the need for any mitigating measures. PROJECT DESCRIPTION M. David Paul Development, LLC proposes to develop a commercially zoned (CN -7.5) property in Hilo, Hawaii. The 6.22 -acre project site is on the southeast corner of Kanoelehua Avenue and East Kahaopea Street and is identified as Tax Map Key (3) 2- 2-044: 032, 035, and 037. The location of the project site in relationship to the local road system is shown on Figure 1. The proposed project would include: • Approximately 38,000 square feet of general retail space, which could include a cell phone retailer, mailbox service retailer, barber shop, sandwich shop, clothing store, financial institution, and similar retailers; • gas station with convenience store and 6 fuel pumps; and • 4,000 square feet of fast food restaurant with drive-through. The proposed project is scheduled for full occupancy in late 2013 or early 2014. The latter date was identified as the study year for this analysis. To be in conformance with Section 25-2-46 of the Hawaii County Code, traffic forecasts were prepared for the AECOM PAGE 1 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT study years 2019, 2024, and 2034. The study years represent the five-, ten-, and 20 - year forecasts, respectively from 2014, the full occupancy year. The proposed project would have two access routes. The primary access to the site would be the currently designated access through a new roadway on East Kahaopea Street across from Awapuhi Street. The developer has received conditional approval from HDOT to install a right turn -in access lane from Kanoelehua Avenue as a second access to improve accessibility to the site. An internal roadway would connect this second access with the primary roadway on East Kahaopea Street as shown on the proposed site plan on Figure 2. The developer would also provide landscaping and sidewalks on East Kahaopea Street adjacent to the project, as conditions for County project approval. They would also widen the westbound approach of East Kahaopea Street to include a shared left-turn/through lane and a separate right -turn lane as recommended in this study. Based on the location of the proposed project in relation to the roadway system, this study analyzed the traffic impacts at the following two intersections: • Kanoelehua Avenue/Kahaopea Street • Kanoelehua Avenue/Kawailani Street These study intersections are identified on Figure 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS A survey of existing roadway and traffic conditions was conducted in September 2008. Existing Roadways Kanoelehua Avenue is a major arterial that provides north -south access between Hilo and the Keaau and Volcano districts. It is a four -lane divided arterial in the vicinity of the project site with separate turning lanes and traffic signals at major cross streets, including both study intersections. It is under the jurisdiction of the HDOT and is designated as State Route 11. Both study intersections have separate left -turn lanes on AECOM PAGE 2 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT the Kanoelehua Avenue approaches with protected left -turn signal phases. The southbound approaches at both study intersections also have separate right -turn lanes. East Kahaopea Street and East Kawailani Street are County local roads that provide access to the residential areas east of Kanoelehua Avenue. The sections of roadways west of Kanoelehua Avenue are known as West Kahaopea Street and West Kawailani Street, respectively, and provide access to the employment centers, commercial centers, and schools of Hilo. The westbound approach of East Kahaopea Street and both approaches of Kawailani Street to Kanoelehua Avenue are single lanes. The eastbound approach of West Kahaopea Street has a shared left-turn/through lane and a separate right -turn lane. Awapuhi Street is a one -block long local roadway intersecting East Kahaopea Street and serves less than 20 residential lots. The southbound approach of Awapuhi Street is stop sign controlled. Traffic Volumes Traffic turning movement counts were taken at the two study intersections between September 13 and 20, 2008. Traffic turning movement counts require traffic surveyors to station themselves by each study intersection and record each vehicle movement as through or turning movements at 15 minute intervals. Traffic counts were taken during the morning (6:00 to 8:30 a.m.) and afternoon (2:00 to 5:30 p.m.) peak periods on weekdays and on Saturdays from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. The worksheets for the traffic counts are included in Appendix A. Due to the length of the afternoon and Saturday count periods, the traffic counters were given one 15 minute period break midway into the counting period. The volumes for these break periods were averaged from the traffic volumes before and after the break periods and have been shaded to show their status as derived volumes. The resultant peak hour movements are summarized on Figure 3 with traffic volumes rounded to the nearest five vehicles per hour (vph). The dominant direction of travel on Kanoelehua Avenue is northbound in the morning peak hour and southbound in the afternoon peak hour. The Saturday traffic volumes are lower than their corresponding weekday peak hour volumes and have slightly higher AECOM PAGE 3 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT j northbound volumes through most of the analysis period. The traffic operations for 2008 at the study intersections are discussed in the Level of Service Analysis section of this report. These 2008 traffic counts are still timely for 2011 given the small amount of land use changes in the area. The U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration has issued a paper "Growth Factor for 2008 — 2010" that shows that traffic volumes on rural roadways across the state have decreased from 2008 to 2010. Also, the high fuel prices experienced in 2011 have caused a yet undetermined decrease in auto travel. Three retail changes have recently taken place in the area. The Safeway store recently relocated from the Prince Kuhio Plaza to their new location on East Maka`ala Street. The Target store opened next to Safeway in July 2011. Walgreens has replaced the Borders space in the Waiakea Center. The impact of these and other retail changes on traffic is discussed further in the forthcoming Ambient Traffic Forecast section of this report. The HDOT had taken metered traffic counts at selected locations on island of Hawaii roadways in even numbered years to 2004. One of the counts (Station 18-G) was taken at the nearby intersection of Kanoelehua Avenue and East Puainako Street. Subsequent to 2004, the HDOT changed their traffic counting policy and switched their count locations from intersections to roadway approaches so that data was not counted j for all legs of the previous study intersections. Counts taken on the north leg of Kanoelehua Avenue and on East Puainako Street in 2006 and 2008 were used with the corresponding legs of the pre -2004 counts. The data from these counts provide the historic trend in daily traffic volumes on different legs of the intersection over a 14 -year j period ending in 2008. The historical trend in two-way daily traffic volumes for the intersection is shown in tabular and graph form on Figure 4. The graphs show mixed periods of increases and decreases which would indicate little or no growth. Traffic volumes on the north leg of Kanoelehua Avenue decreased from 1994 to 1998, increased to its highest value in AECOM PAGE 4 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT 2000, declined sharply in 2002, increased slightly in 2004 and 2006, then decreased in 2008. Overall, there was a two percent (2%) increase in traffic over a 14 -year period from 1994 to 2008. Daily two-way traffic volumes on the south leg of Kanoelehua Avenue was at its highest level in 1994, decreased in 1996, increased in 1998, decreased again in 2000, then increased in 2002, and leveled off in 2004 at levels that are below the 1994 volumes. Traffic volumes on the East Puainako Street leg increased from 1994 to 1996, decreased from 1998 to 2002, increased in 2006, and then decreased in 2008. Overall there was a three percent (3%) increase in traffic over a 14 -year period from 1994 to 2008. Daily traffic volumes on West Puainako Street decreased 24% from 1994 to 2004. The HDOT data also provides information on the pattern of hourly traffic volumes. The hourly traffic volumes on Kanoelehua Avenue, south of Kawailani Street, for April 15, 2008, are shown in tabular and graph form on Figure S. The northbound traffic flow peaks in the morning between 7:00 to 9:00 AM, while the opposing southbound traffic rises to peak in the afternoon from 4:00 to 6:00 PM. Hourly traffic volumes are also available for the section of West Kawailani Street, east of Kanoelehua Avenue, on April 15, 2009. The graph on Figure 6 shows that westbound traffic volumes are higher than eastbound volumes almost the entire day. The westbound traffic travelling away from the highway shows a sharp peak at 7:00 AM and a longer afternoon peak from 3:00 to 6:00 PM. PROPOSED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Currently, there are no roadway improvements listed in the FY 2011-2014 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for the two study intersections. The nearest listed project is the realignment and widening of Puainako Street from Komohana Street to Kanoelehua Avenue, which is about a half mile south of the proposed project site. HDOT's efforts are being expended in a generally mauka to AECOM PAGE 5 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS makai direction. The first phase involves the realignment of Puainako Street between Komohana Street and Kawili Street to the north so that the new roadway, which would be north of residences lining the existing roadway, would become a local street. The STIP shows pre -right-of-way (ROW) work in FY 2013 and ROW acquisition programmed in FY 2014. The second phase would involve widening Puainako Street makai of Kawili Street. This project would not affect traffic volumes within the study area. The Hawaii Long Range Land Transportation Plan (HLRLTP), prepared by Frederic R. Harris, Inc. (1998), recommended the widening of Kanoelehua Avenue from four lanes to six. TRAFFIC FORECASTS The proposed project is expected to be fully occupied in three years and it was assumed to generate the same amount of traffic over the 20 -year forecast period thereafter. During this period, ambient traffic on the area roadways can be expected to increase due to regional growth and new projects in the area. Ambient traffic forecasts were prepared for the study years 2014, 2019, 2024, and 2034. The forecasts represent the full occupancy year, five-, ten-, and 20 -year forecast periods thereafter. The traffic that would be generated from the proposed project was added to the four sets of ambient traffic forecasts to obtain four sets of total with project traffic forecasts. Ambient Traffic Forecast Based on anecdotal evidence and other traffic studies, it is estimated that the ambient traffic volumes in the study area have remained stable for the past three years due to stagnant economic conditions. It was assumed that area traffic would increase over the 23 -year forecast period starting in 2011 due to improved economic conditions. As previously discussed, recent changes in the area's retail mix are also expected to affect ambient traffic in the study area in the short term. AECOM PAGE 6 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TZAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT The current 1998 HLRLTP for the County of Hawaii does not include traffic forecasts. In lieu of traffic forecasts from the HLRLTP, it was assumed that areal traffic would increase at the same rate as the population growth. The County of Hawaii General Plan forecasts that population in the South Hilo District will increase from 46,273 in 2005 to 49,791 in 2020, a 7.6% increase in 15 years. The 7.6% population growth rate for South Hilo is lower than the 36% island -wide growth rate forecast in the General Plan, and represents an average annual 0.5% growth rate. The annual ambient growth rate was increased to 0.67% to include infilling of adjacent industrial/mixed-use lands. The current traffic volumes shown on Figure 3 were increased by two percent (2%) to account for the 0.67% growth over three years to 2014. The traffic volumes turning into and out of East Kahaopea Street and East Kawailani Street were not increased due to the relatively stable nature of the residential neighborhoods served by the roadways. Recent and future changes in the retail mix of the nearby Prince Kuhio Plaza and Waiakea Center would have some impact on traffic. The Safeway store recently relocated from the Prince Kuhio Plaza to their new location on East Maka`ala Street. This represents a transfer in trips, and net increases in trips will not occur until the vacant store space is occupied. The Target store opened in late July next to the new Safeway and will increase the number of trips in the area. Finally, Walgreens has taken over the space previously occupied by Borders Bookstore and is expected to result in a slight increase in number of trips over the next several years. As a conservative estimate, it was assumed that all three retailers would all generate new trips. The Traffic Impact Analysis Report, Revision 1, for East Maka`ala Mixed Use Development (East Maka`ala TZAR) by M&E Pacific, Inc. (2009), forecast the number of new trips which would be generated by the Safeway and Target stores at several intersections of Kanoelehua Avenue, including the Puainako Street intersection. The through traffic volumes of directly generated trips on Kanoelehua Avenue were assigned to the two study intersections based on the current proportion of through and turning movements at each study intersection. AECOM PAGE 7 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR i WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT A trip generation, distribution, and assignment analysis was conducted to calculate the number of trips generated by the Walgreens store. The trip generation rates for a pharmacy/drugstore (ITE Land Use 880) were multiplied by the store size to calculate the total number of trips generated in each of the three analysis periods: morning, afternoon, and Saturday peak hours. The number of pass -by trips was subtracted from the total number of trips to obtain the number of directly generated trips. The trip distribution factors for directly generated trips from the previously mentioned study were i applied to the directly generated trips from Walgreens to obtain the number of Walgreens generated trips passing through the Kanoelehua Avenue/Puainako Street intersection. As with the Safeway and Target generated trips, the Walgreens directly generated trips were assigned to the two study intersections. The trip generation and distribution analysis for the three retail stores are summarized on Table 1. The values shown for the Safeway and Target stores are from Table 1 of the East Maka`ala TZAR. They also include a 15% reduction for multi -use trips, as one trip visiting two or more stores and count as two or more trips for trip generation purposes. The 2% increase in traffic and new retail generated trips were added to the 2008 traffic volumes to obtain the 2014 ambient traffic forecasts shown on Figure 7, with traffic volumes rounded to the nearest five vph. The 2014 ambient traffic volumes on Kanoelehua Avenue are 3.5% to 5% higher than their respective 2008 volumes in the morning peak hour, 10% to 15% higher in the afternoon peak hour, and 15% to 22% higher in the Saturday midday peak hour. The 2014 ambient traffic forecasts were increased by 3.4% (0.67% over a five-year period) to obtain the 2019 ambient traffic forecasts shown on Figure 8, with traffic volumes rounded to the nearest five vph. Likewise, the 2019 ambient traffic forecasts were increased by 3.4% to obtain the 2024 ambient traffic forecasts shown on Figure 9. The 2034 ambient traffic forecast was obtained by increasing the 2024 ambient forecast by 7% (0.67% over 10 years). The 2034 forecasts are shown on Figure 10, with traffic AECOM PAGE 8 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT volumes rounded to the nearest five vph. As with the 2014 ambient forecast, traffic volumes turning into and out of East Kahaopea Street and East Kawailani Street were not increased for the 2019, 2024, and 2034 ambient forecasts. The traffic operations for the 2014, 2019, 2024, and 2034 ambient forecast conditions at the study intersections are discussed in the Level of Service Analysis section of this report. Proiect Generated Traffic The traditional three-step process of trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment was used to forecast future traffic that would be generated by the proposed project. The trip generation step forecasts the number of new trips that would be produced in each of the three analysis periods. The trip distribution step allocates these new trips by direction of travel. Finally, the trip assignment step assigns the trips to the specific turning movements at the study intersections. The trip generation analysis for the proposed project is summarized on Table 2. The trip generation step forecasts the volume of vehicle trips that would be generated by the proposed project during the weekday morning and afternoon, and Saturday peak hours. The Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report (Seventh Edition, 2003) has trip generation rates and the proportion of inbound/outbound trips for many different land uses based on square footage or other trip generation factors to calculate the number of weekday morning and afternoon, and Saturday midday peak hour trips. For gasoline stations, the variable used for trip generation is the number of vehicle fueling positions, or the number of vehicles that can be fueled simultaneously, assuming two vehicles per fuel pump. The following ITE -defined land uses and sizes were utilized in this analysis: • 38,000 square foot shopping center (Land Use 820) representing the general retail space; • gas station with convenience store and 12 fueling positions (Land Use 945); and • 4,000 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-thru (Land Use 934). AECOM PAGE 9 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT The trip generation rates and proportion of inbound/outbound trips are also summarized on Table 2. The proposed project is forecast to generate 372, 442, and 586 vph in the weekday morning, weekday afternoon, and Saturday peak hours, respectively. A unique aspect of trips generated by commercial centers is that a large portion are pass -by and diverted trips. Pass -by trips are attracted from traffic passing the site on an adjacent roadway and have direct access to the commercial center. Therefore, these trips do not add to the through volumes on the roadway. They are added to the turning movements but are subtracted from the through movements where they turn off to access the commercial center. Diverted trips are attracted from the roadways in the vicinity of, but not adjacent to, the commercial center. They require a diversion from that roadway and add traffic to streets adjacent to the site. Due to the location of the proposed commercial center adjacent to the highway, only pass -by trips are expected and diverted trips were not analyzed in this study. The ITE Trip Generation Handbook (Second Edition, 2004) reports average pass -by trip factors during the weekday afternoon peak hour for various types of commercial land uses, during the morning peak hour for gas stations, and the weekend peak hour for shopping centers. If a pass -by trip factor was not reported for a specific land use's peak hour period, then the land use's afternoon peak hour was utilized. This information was utilized to derive the pass -by trip rates summarized on Table 2. Separate volumes of directly generated and pass -by trips were calculated for each of the three analysis periods. The project generated trips were then distributed by direction of travel to and from the project site. Separate trip distribution factors were developed for directly generated trips and pass -by trips. Separate sets of trip distribution factors were developed for pass -by trips in each of the three analysis periods based on the current traffic volumes on these roadways. The results of the trip distribution analysis are shown on Table 3. The traffic assignments of project generated trips in each peak hour are shown on Figure 11 with AECOM PAGE 10 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT the right turn -in lane assumed. The traffic assignment for the proposed project was assumed to remain constant over the 23 -year forecast period. Total with Prosect Forecast The proposed project generated traffic volumes from Figure 11 were added to the ambient traffic forecast volumes from Figures 7, 8, 9, and 10 to obtain the total with project traffic forecasts shown on Figures 12, 13, 14, and 15, for 2014, 2019, 2024, and 2034, respectively, with volumes rounded to the nearest five vph. The traffic operations for the total with project traffic forecast conditions at the two study intersections are discussed in the Level of Service Analysis section of this report. LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS The concept of level of service is used to quantify the quality of traffic flow on roadway facilities. The Transportation Research Board (TRB) has developed procedures to calculate level of service value(s) by measuring traffic volumes against the capacities of different types of roadway facilities. Their Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM 2000) describes the various procedures developed for freeways, highways, signalized and unsignalized intersections, etc. The two study intersections on Kanoelehua Avenue are currently controlled by traffic signals. The methodology for analyzing signalized intersections calculates the levels of service for individual movements, approaches, and the intersection as a whole based on the average stopped delay per vehicle. The results range from level of service A (best with average delays less than ten seconds) to F (worst with average delays longer than 80 seconds), as described in the table on the following page. AECOM PAGE 11 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPO SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LEVEL OF SERVICE CONTROL DELAY PER VEHICLE Seconds/Vehicle A < 10.0 B 10.1 to 20.0 C 20.1 to 35.0 D 35.1 to 55.0 E 55.1 to 80.0 F > 80.1 The County of Hawaii considers levels of service A to D as acceptable for signalized intersections, with levels of service E and F indicating the need for mitigating measures. For signalized intersections, it is a common practice to allow the minor turning movements to sometimes operate at low levels of service in order for the main streets and the intersection as a whole to operate at acceptable levels of service. The SYNCHRO computer software program was used to analyze the traffic operations for the 2008 current volumes, 2014, 2019, 2024, and 2034 ambient forecasts, as well as 2014, 2019, 2024, and 2034 total with project forecast alternatives. SYNCHRO is a computer software program used to model, optimize, and analyze traffic signal timings in a roadway network. Its mathematical calculations are based on the HCM 2000 and include the effect of traffic signal coordination and traffic actuation. 2008 and 2014 Analysis Table 4 summarizes the signalized intersection level of service analysis conducted for the existing (2008) and initial (2014) forecast year when the proposed project is expected to be fully occupied. The existing year analysis includes traffic volumes from Figure 3 while the forecast year analysis includes ambient and total with project traffic forecasts from Figures 7 and 12, respectively. The existing, ambient, and total with project traffic data are placed side-by-side for each of the morning, afternoon, and AECOM PAGE 12 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Saturday peak hour analysis. This format facilitates a comparison of levels of service for the different forecast scenarios to give an indication of the traffic impacts of ambient traffic growth and the proposed project. The level of service (LOS) and delay (DELAY) results are shown for the entire intersection, each approach, and the left -turn lane and through/right-turn lanes of the Kanoelehua Avenue approaches, for the three sets of peak hour analysis. The worksheets for the 2008 and 2014 level of service calculations are provided in Appendix B. The Kanoelehua Avenue/Kahaopea Street intersection is currently operating at an acceptable level of service B in all three peak hours. The only movement with level of service E is the northbound left -turn in the morning peak hour. Left -turn movements are allowed to operate at lower levels of service to maintain higher levels for the intersection and the main movements. The higher levels of ambient traffic volumes forecast for 2014 are not expected to cause changes in intersection, approach, and movement levels of service during the morning peak hour. The intersection levels of service are expected to change from B to C with the increased traffic during the afternoon and Saturday midday peak hours. The approach and movement levels of service are expected to remain at acceptable levels with the exception noted above. The proposed project would add traffic volumes on the westbound approach of East Kahaopea Street and the southbound left -turn lane of Kanoelehua Avenue. To maintain acceptable levels of service on these approaches, the westbound approach of East Kahaopea Street would have to be widened to two lanes to include a shared left- turn/through lane and a right -turn lane. With this improvement added, the intersection level of service during the morning peak hour would change from B (ambient) to C, and the afternoon and Saturday peak hours would remain at level of service C, which are considered acceptable. There would be changes at the movement level during the Saturday midday peak hour. The two left -turn movements from Kanoelehua Avenue are forecast to change to level of service E in order to maintain level of service C on the main through movements and would not require mitigation. AECOM PAGE 13 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT The Kanoelehua Avenue/Kawailani Street intersection is currently operating at I acceptable levels of service (B and C) in all three peak hours, although several approaches and movements are not. The West Kawailani Street eastbound single lane approach is operating at level of service E during the morning and afternoon peak hours which would indicate the need for mitigation. The Kanoelehua Avenue northbound left - turn lane is operating at level of service E during the morning and Saturday midday peak hours due to the high volumes of left turns. The Kanoelehua Avenue southbound left -turn lane is operating at level of service E during the morning peak hour. As previously discussed, minor left -turn movements may be allowed to operate at lower levels of service to improve operations on the main through movement and the intersection as a whole. The intersection is forecast to continue operating at acceptable levels for ambient traffic conditions, although the intersection level of service would change from C to D in the morning peak hour. The several approaches and movements identified above as currently operating at level of service E would continue at the same level with the exception of the southbound left -turn lane, which changes from level of service E to D in the morning peak hour. The southbound left turn movement on Kanoelehua Avenue is expected to change from level of service D (current) to E in the afternoon peak hour. As with current conditions, level of service E may be tolerated for left turns if they help to maintain an acceptable intersection level of service. The additional traffic generated by the proposed project would not have an adverse impact on the Kawailani Street intersection during the morning and afternoon peak hours. All the intersection, approach, and movement levels of service would remain essentially the same from the ambient to total with project forecasts. The additional traffic would have a minor impact during the Saturday peak hour. The intersection level of service would remain the same as ambient conditions; however, the eastbound approach of West Kawailani Street and the southbound left -turn movement on Kanoelehua Avenue are expected to change from level of service D to E. These AECOM PAGE 14 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT changes may be tolerated as they help maintain an acceptable level of service for the intersection as a whole. To maintain acceptable levels of service in 2014 with the proposed project, it is recommended that the westbound approach of East Kahaopea Street be widened to provide a shared left-turn/through lane and a right -turn lane. The estimated cost of this improvement is $500,000. It is expected that there would be gradual increases in the traffic signal cycle lengths on Kanoelehua Avenue as the ambient traffic volumes slowly rise. These increases would be beneficial to the traffic operations at the two study intersections. The single lane eastbound approach of West Kawailani Street is currently in need of mitigation. The practical alternative would be to widen the approach to two lanes but this was not analyzed for 2014. 2019 Analysis Table 5 summarizes the signalized intersection level of service analysis conducted for the five-year (2019) forecast following the expected full -occupancy of the proposed project. The forecast year analysis includes ambient and total with project traffic forecasts from Figures 8 and 13, respectively. Table 5 follows the format of Table 4, which includes the existing, ambient, and total with project analysis for each peak hour analysis for 2019. The worksheets for the 2019 level of service calculations are provided in Appendix C. The Kanoelehua Avenue/Kahaopea Street intersection is forecast to operate at acceptable levels of service B and C for all three peak hours for the ambient and total with project forecasts. Both Kanoelehua Avenue left -turn movements show level of service E for several forecast scenarios. Left -turn movements are allowed to operate at lower levels of service to maintain higher levels for the intersection and the main movements. Mitigation would not be required. AECOM PAGE 15 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TZAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT The Kanoelehua Avenue/Kawailani Street intersection is forecast to operate at acceptable levels of service C and D in all three peak hours, although several approaches and movements would not. The West Kawailani Street eastbound single lane approach would operate at level of service E for ambient and total with project forecasts during the morning and afternoon peak hours, and for the total with project forecast during the Saturday peak hour. This indicates that the approach would need mitigation with or without the proposed project. Both Kanoelehua Avenue left -turn movements show level of service E for several forecast scenarios. Left -turn movements are allowed to operate at lower levels of service to maintain higher levels for the intersection and the main movements. The northbound approach of Kanoelehua Avenue is forecast to change to level of service E for the total with project forecast during the morning peak hour. This is due to the through traffic operating near or at level of service E operation for this scenario. These conditions could be tolerated until mitigating actions are provided in the future. 2024 Analysis Table 6 summarizes the signalized intersection level of service analysis conducted for the ten-year (2024) forecast. The forecast year analysis includes ambient and total with project traffic forecasts from Figures 9 and 14, respectively. The format of Table 6 differs from Tables 4 and 5 in that it shows a separate column for mitigation of the ambient and total with project forecasts in each analysis peak hour. It does not include the existing level of service analysis. The worksheets for the 2024 level of service calculations are provided in Appendix D. The existing, 2014, and 2019 analysis identified the need for mitigating measures for the West Kawailani Street eastbound single lane approach. The 2024 ambient forecast analysis further identified the need for mitigation. The 2024 analysis assumed that the approach would be widened to two lanes to include a separate left -turn lane and a shared through/right-turn lane as a mitigating measure by 2024. Although this improvement was made at one study intersection, the traffic operations at the other AECOM PAGE 16 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TZAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT study intersection were slightly impacted since the traffic flow between the two intersections was slightly affected. The Kahaopea Street study intersection would operate at acceptable levels of service B and C with the ambient traffic conditions in 2024. The northbound left -turn movement would continue to operate at level of service E in the morning and Saturday peak hours, and remain at level of service D in the afternoon peak hour. The southbound left -turn movement would change from level of service D (for 2019) to E in the morning and afternoon peak hours and remain at level D for the Saturday peak hour. These conditions for turning movements would not require mitigation as they help maintain acceptable level of service for the intersection. The additional traffic from the proposed project would cause several changes from the ambient conditions at the Kahaopea Street study intersection. The intersection level of service would change from level B to level C during the morning peak hour and remain at level of service C during the afternoon and Saturday peak hours. The northbound left -turn movement would remain at level of service E in the morning and Saturday peak hours, and at level of service D in the afternoon peak hour. The southbound left -turn movement would remain at level of service E in the morning and afternoon peak hours, and change from level of service D to E in the Saturday peak hour. The eastbound approach of West Kahaopea Street would change from level of service D to E in the Saturday peak hour with the project generated traffic. The levels of service for the Kahaopea Street intersection and its approaches and movements are not affected by implementing the indicated mitigating measure at Kawailani Street. The only level of service change caused by the proposed widening at the Kawailani Street intersection is at the southbound left -turn movement of Kanoelehua Avenue, where the ambient level of service improves from level of service E to D in the morning peak hour. AECOM PAGE 17 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TZAR i WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT The higher volumes of ambient traffic in 2024 would have an effect on the Kawailani Street study intersection. Although the intersection levels of service would remain at their 2019 levels for each peak hour, the West Kawailani Street eastbound approach would change from level E (for 2019) to F with very high levels of delay in the morning peak hour. The levels of service during the afternoon and Saturday peak hours would remain at their 2019 levels. Widening the approach as a mitigating measure would improve the approach level of service from F to E in the morning peak hour and from E to D in afternoon peak hour. The approach level of service during the Saturday peak hour would remain constant at level D. With the higher ambient traffic volumes in 2024, the northbound left -turn movement at the Kawailani Street intersection would remain at level of service E (from 2019 to 2024) in the morning peak hour and change from level of service D (for 2019) to E for the afternoon and Saturday peak hours. With mitigation, the movement level of service would remain at level of service E in the morning and Saturday peak hours and improve from level E to D in afternoon peak hour. The southbound left -turn movement level of service would remain at levels of service D in the morning and Saturday peak hours, and remain at level of service E in the afternoon peak hour. The increased traffic volumes generated by the project would not affect traffic operations at the Kawailani Street study intersection. The total with project levels of service would remain at the same level as the 2024 ambient traffic except for the Saturday peak hour, where two movements (West Kawailani Street eastbound and southbound left -turn movements) change from level of service D to E. Implementing the approach widening would improve traffic operations on the West Kawailani Street eastbound approach in all three peak hours. Also, the northbound left -turn movement would improve from level of service E to D in the afternoon peak hour. The analysis above indicates that widening the eastbound approach of West Kawailani Street would mitigate future 2024 traffic problems at this intersection, with or without the proposed project. AECOM PAGE 18 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TZAR i WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT i 2034 Analysis Table 7 summarizes the signalized intersection level of service analysis conducted for the 20 -year (2034) forecast year. The forecast year analysis includes ambient and total with project traffic forecasts from Figures 10 and 15, respectively. The format of Table 7 follows that of Table 6 in that it shows a separate column for mitigation of the ambient and total with project forecasts. The worksheets for the 2034 level of service calculations are provided in Appendix E. The widening of the eastbound approach of West Kawailani Street proposed as a mitigating measure for 2024 was continued for the 2034 analysis. A second mitigating measure, the widening of Kanoelehua Avenue to six lanes, was assumed for the 2034 ambient and total with project analysis. The HLRLTP recommended the widening of Kanoelehua Avenue from four lanes to six, but did not estimate a future year. The Kahaopea Street study intersection is forecast to operate at level of service C in all three peak hours with the 2034 ambient traffic conditions and current four lane roadway design. The two left -turn movements from Kanoelehua Avenue are expected to operate at level of service E in the morning peak hour, and the southbound left -turn movement is expected to operate at level of service E in the afternoon peak hour. The lower levels of service for these left -turn movements help maintain the level of service C operations for the intersection and would not require mitigation. The same intersection would operate at a lower but still acceptable level of service D in all three peak hours with the additional traffic generated by the proposed project. Several approaches/movements would be at lower levels of service: • West Kahaopea Street eastbound approach at level of service E in the morning and Saturday peak hours; • East Kahaopea Street westbound approach at level of service E in the morning and Saturday peak hours; AECOM PAGE 19 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR I WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT • Kanoelehua Avenue northbound left -turn lane at level of service F in the morning peak hour and level of service E in the afternoon and Saturday peak hours; and • Kanoelehua Avenue southbound left -turn lane at level of service F in the morning and Saturday peak hours and level of service E in the afternoon peak hour. This analysis indicates that the Kahaopea Street study intersection would be operating at minimally acceptable conditions in 2034 with several movements at lower levels of service during certain periods of the day. Widening Kanoelehua Avenue as a mitigating measure would eliminate all but one lower level of service movement. The southbound left -turn movement on Kanoelehua Avenue would continue to operate at level of service E in the afternoon peak hour for both ambient and total with project forecasts. The increased 2034 ambient traffic volumes would affect changes in traffic operations at the Kawailani Street study intersection in each peak hour when compared to the 2024 ambient with mitigation results. The intersection would change from level of service C to D in the morning peak hour. The West Kawailani Street eastbound approach and the Kanoelehua Avenue northbound left turn movement would continue to operate at level of service E. The through lanes of Kanoelehua Avenue in both directions would decline from level of service C to D. The intersection would continue to operate at level of service B in the afternoon peak hour. The West Kawailani Street eastbound approach would change from level of service D to E while the East Kawailani Street westbound approach would change from level of service E to F. Finally, the intersection level of service would improve from level C to B in the Saturday peak hour. The Kanoelehua Avenue northbound left turn would improve from level of service E to D while the southbound left -turn movement would change from level of service D to E. This analysis would indicate the need for future mitigating actions at this intersection to accommodate the 2034 ambient traffic forecasts. AECOM PAGE 20 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT The Kawailani Street study intersection would experience changes in levels of service with the proposed project. The intersection level of service would remain at level D in the morning peak hour, change from B to D in the afternoon peak hour, and change from B to C in the Saturday peak hour. Several approach/movement levels of service would also change with the proposed project. The West Kawailani Street eastbound approach would change from level of service E to F in the morning peak hour, remain at level of service E in the afternoon peak hour, and change from level of service D to E in the Saturday peak hour. The East Kawailani Street westbound approach would change from level of service D to E in the morning peak hour and remain unchanged in the other two peak hours. The Kanoelehua Avenue northbound left -turn would change from level of service E to F in the morning peak hour, remain at level of service E in the afternoon peak hour, and change from level of service D to E in the Saturday peak hour. The Kanoelehua Avenue southbound left -turn would change from level of service D to E in the morning peak hour and remain unchanged in the other two peak hours. 1 The previously mentioned analysis would indicate the need for mitigation for the Kawailani Street study intersection for both ambient and total with project forecast conditions. If Kanoelehua Avenue were to be widened from four to six lanes before 2034, the levels of service in 2034 would be as shown in the "TOT w/MIT" columns on { Table 7. Both study intersections would be operating at levels of service B and C in the three peak hours, indicating acceptable conditions. Even with the widening of Kanoelehua Avenue, several movements at both study intersections would continue to operate at level of service E for ambient and/or total with project forecasts including: • Kanoelehua Avenue southbound left -turn movements at Kahaopea Street in the afternoon peak hour; • East Kawailani Street westbound approach in the afternoon peak hour; and • Kanoelehua Avenue southbound left -turn movement at Kawailani Street in the afternoon peak hour. AECOM PAGE 21 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT The analysis indicates that the HLRLTP's recommended widening of Kanoelehua 4 Avenue by 2034 would mitigate several unacceptable traffic movements. The largest benefit of the widening is the reduction in traffic signal cycle lengths to current levels. CONCLUSIONS The following design improvements are recommended to accommodate the proposed commercial center and conditionally approved right turn -in access lane: • The westbound approach of East Kahaopea Street would have to be widened to two lanes: a shared left-turn/through lane and a right -turn lane to accommodate i the additional traffic generated by the proposed project. • The traffic signal cycle lengths on Kanoelehua Avenue would gradually have to be increased and synchronized with other traffic signals on Kanoelehua Avenue in response to the increase in ambient traffic and possibly traffic from the ( proposed project. • The widening of the eastbound approach of West Kawailani Street at Kanoelehua Avenue by 2024, including a separate left -turn lane, and shared ( through/right-turn lane, would mitigate an existing problem while improving future traffic conditions. • The widening Kanoelehua Avenue from four lanes to six by 2034 as ( recommended in the Hawaii Long Range Land Transportation Plan, would improve future traffic operations. AECOM PAGE 22 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR References WAIAKA CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT References 1. Traffic Report for Kanoelehua Commercial Development, M&E Pacific, Inc., November 2008. 2. Growth Factor for 2008-2010, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, (undated). 3. FY 2011-2014 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, State of Hawaii Department of Transportation, December 2010. 4. Hawaii Long Range Land Transportation Plan, Frederic R. Harris, Inc., 1998. 5. County of Hawaii General Plan, Appendix A, County of Hawaii, 2005. 6. Traffic Impact Analysis Report, Revision 1, for East Maka`ala Mixed Use Development, M&E Pacific, Inc., 2009. 7. Trip Generation Report, Seventh Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2003. 8. Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2004. 9. Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000 Edition. 10. Synchro Studio 7, Trafficware Ltd. AECOM PAGE REF -1 Project No. 60217739.00300 September 2011 Waiaka Center TIAR igure v N PROJECT LOCATION A=COM 01 BISHOP STREET, SUITE 1600 - HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813 P A CIPI C 0 C E A N STATE OF HAWAII N 1411HAU OAHU -f L44AI KAHOOLAWE ok PROJECT � LOCATION -7, ISLAND OF HAWAII Puainako - VICINITY MAP Town 0- 0- ShoCenpfing 'r Noeaut ^NOT TO SCALE 0 L L��!E Trinity. c -.—Community Church -AIL- E YOwala" St 61 z I 4 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE /—'I STUDY t..—/ INTERSECTIONS Figure 1 Location Map Traffic Impact Analysis Report Waiaka Center September 2011 "jopea W K-bc. S' A=COM 01 BISHOP STREET, SUITE 1600 - HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813 P A CIPI C 0 C E A N STATE OF HAWAII N 1411HAU OAHU -f L44AI KAHOOLAWE ok PROJECT � LOCATION -7, ISLAND OF HAWAII Puainako - VICINITY MAP Town 0- 0- ShoCenpfing 'r Noeaut ^NOT TO SCALE 0 L L��!E Trinity. c -.—Community Church -AIL- E YOwala" St 61 z I 4 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE /—'I STUDY t..—/ INTERSECTIONS Figure 1 Location Map Traffic Impact Analysis Report Waiaka Center September 2011 I 0 MYJS V3do%jM 959VO 0 IIOZ 'M ,apwal* 'RVO 101d wd Cl:C6.40 0 IIOZ 'tl ,apwalda5 AvOM im N C o m U N L a E A a) N m m LL U 0] CL E U_ W F "^�.�\�^��\N°^i9\°�a°9 006\tlM1 ,away °h°!°M 6iLLlZ09\.'°"°N\alaafwd\'ydnw9\°t°P\100d)lrv4s°\\ 317YN�4i/NlYd e 8 � J O -z Z 0- o w U 3 1_ u�i y � o I I a Ln 1.m "^�.�\�^��\N°^i9\°�a°9 006\tlM1 ,away °h°!°M 6iLLlZ09\.'°"°N\alaafwd\'ydnw9\°t°P\100d)lrv4s°\\ 317YN�4i/NlYd I a w a w 0 Lu 0 JuJ LuJ J .WU yS Y' = i LO M M t 35 LO t 10 t 1945 N �- 1720 -1 1 '-i l 170 KANOELEHUA t 220 i 10 1 ti t AVENUE 10 1 h t r� 580 -+ u') 0 0 525 oro o 0 35 Z °O ~ 110 -1 `- LO r-_ AM PEAK HOUR a LU w z z a O W 0 JuJ W J .WU = i t 20 Cn t 10 LO LO o v N «- 1145 LO�u') `- o' `r +- 915 +j 1 L-+ t 125 KANOELEHUA �' 1 '-, t 125 25 1 +j 1 t AVENUE 10 1 -1 t r+ 1315 — LO o C)1325 — LO LO o J 90 -1 `y' "' 240 -1 -► I` PM PEAK HOUR w z a 0 W Lu J .WU = i Cn t 25 t 5 l `M M ~- 1295 t 1230 +j 1 L+ r 110 KANOELEHUA +-' 1 L-+ r 105 I 10 1 h t r- AVENUE 5 1 " t r► 920 -► Lo o 0 1065 Lo 0 0 90 l -1 co Z "' M SATURDAY MIDDAY Not to Scale EXISTING 2008 TRAFFIC VOLUMES j FIGURE 3 YEAR OF COUNT DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES KANOELEHUA AVE I PUAINAK0 ST NORTH LEGI SOUTH LEGI EAST LEGI WEST LEG 1994 31,399 36,328 16,973 20,164 1996 30,146 28,078 18,418 20,514 1998 29,004 32,255 17,508 17,290 2000 41,178 28,788 16,695 17,946 2002 30,953 34,977 14,769 18,440 2004 32,740 34,644 15,252 2006 33,600 18,156 2008 32,043 17,509 Source: State of Hawaii Department of Transportation KANOELEHUA AVE - PUAINAKO ST TRAFFIC TRENDS 45,000 40,000 35,000 lo U) 30,000 D J O 25,000 U U. U. 20,000 r J a 15,000 0 10,000 5,000 0 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 YEAR �--Kanoelehua North --m-Kanoelehua South -f Puainako East -x Puainako Wes HISTORICAL TREND IN DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON KANOELEHUA AVENUE AND PUAINAKO STREET FIGURE 4 0 W W Z J Y LL O O U) z >aLc) aw _c!) W LL J O Qz Y Cw G J O U LL 9 J O O CO O CO ct O O �0. O O M T M L' M N LO M N O T fl T M It "t T O 4- C V-- "T CO d M 1l- O O CO N Cfl r DSS O 0 Gy O' V// 00. �L ca d J Gy 000 � m N .o 00. X20, ) 0� M�,C") OO Lr) �?r6, = T 6 V Z-0 CO m r-_ 00. o co CD rl-000I'OLONN 00`` U �b 0 C tncoqzT In CV) TOOOTTOMCO o 0 0.- 7i, o: c Gi O Z 00. z° T r r r r' [� r b ILMM0 W 00.b L CC G C G cc G cc G cc G CC G cC G CC G CC G cc G cc G c G CC G cc G �o. b n.ddaaa 00.9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � b00S 0 0 0 0 0 0 �? Oo00oo00000000 o00 O O � O N C\ O O O CD O O (D IT O Cl 0 O N O anoH/sal3iyan O ti O O O T 0 W W Z J Y LL O O U) z >aLc) aw _c!) W LL J O Qz Y Cw G J O U LL 9 J O O CO O CO ct O O MO O O M T M L' M N LO M N O T fl T M It "t T O 4- C V-- "T CO M M 1l- O O CO N Cfl r M O 0 V// m N M�,C") OO Lr) MOtnTO 6 V Z-0 CO m r-_ 0 co CD rl-000I'OLONN 0 C tncoqzT In CV) TOOOTTOMCO c Gi O Z T T r r r r' [� r r ILMM0 W L CC G C G cc G cc G cc G CC G cC G CC G CC G cc G cc G c G CC G cc G n.ddaaa 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �? Oo00oo00000000 O In O ti O O O T �- T N T T N CO d LO CO 0 W W Z J Y LL O O U) z >aLc) aw _c!) W LL J O Qz Y Cw G J O U LL 9 J O 1%, 00. 00. X20, °0. O°. 00 0 p, y- wj °o! O T `%b= °O. O o °0! Cl) m O,° I °°e ,%, o� Ilk °09 %, O O O O O o O O O O CD °°S LO Vim' � M 00 N N anOH/sOIOiyOn C O ca O Q _ fSf o m o Co :n (D U = ca oCL 0 In 0 f,- O O e- t co N �.t� O r- N m d L �+ 'C O N r O � "t M M M 0 0 0 0 co y O y C Ir -N M N N N N N N N N N M N rL+ O R O N = W m '= fA d t0 00 O O O ti M N Cl d1 O N d' Cn In V 'O ti 00 M O 00 00 r M O 00 M� CO O to y Nd NNNMMdtM�qt'tCM m m > m L C C c C c G C C C C cc G cc G CC G C c c G c c C C c c C c ¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢o-aMn.as M3 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O O 0 LO Cfl 00 M O r N r N M "t to CO C O ca O Q _ fSf o m o Co :n (D U = ca oCL 0 In 0 I Q t W LO o L °o °o i- F... W °a UJ 175 10 1 -, t r � N a LU o w Y co t 35 LO o L °o °o Ln Ln dr 2015 +1 1 L+ t 175 10 1 -, t r 610 - 1 " 35 1 o °' LO o " rl- a LU o w Y co t 20 Ln Ln dr o N �- 1270 �' 1 '1 r 130 30 1 " t r- 1515 -+ C) C) LO 105 7 `- a LU o w Y co KANOELEHUA AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE PM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE C) LO C.LO t 25 to un o 1510 +' 1 L+ r 110 10 1 -1 t 1125 -+ LOco o 0 110 7 't CO KANOELEHUA AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE PM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE C) LO C.LO t 10 u') 0 o 1785 l 225 10 1 -, t r► 550 -+ 00 o� 115 Z "' z � J w W Q� N Y LO Ln Lo t 10 1030 +i .l '� t 130 10 1 -, t r- 1500 -+ 270 7 00 � ~ SATURDAY MIDDAY Not to Scale 2014 AMBIENT TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 7 t 5 u') 0 o 1440 +j 1 L, t 105 5 1 " t r 1255 - 125 7 "' CO SATURDAY MIDDAY Not to Scale 2014 AMBIENT TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 7 N t 20 LO 'ITN t 1315 +' 1 L+ t 135 a Uj w t r 1565 - °a W ( 110 1 `t "' o i 1 y. 35 LO C) M t 4-- 2085 �-i 1 '+ t 180 KANOELEHUA I j 10 1 " t r AVENUE 630 - 35 1 m o M a o w AM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE PM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE Lu Q w o LO t 20 LO 'ITN t 1315 +' 1 L+ t 135 30 1 " t r 1565 - o o Lo ( 110 1 `t "' AM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE PM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE Lu Q w o LO t 25 Ln LO o M M 1560 +j 1 '-+ t 115 10 1 �, t r 1165 1 +' 1 L. 115 7 570 `r co AM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE PM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE Lu Q w o LO m t 10 1845 -' 1 '-- F 235 10 1 +' 1 L. t r 570 o 120 1 z Q � � w w t- t 10 U') rn U*) 1065 +' 1 L. r 135 10 1 " t r- 1550 1550 CD Ln o 280 1 °' `r ti u') Ln o t 5 1490 1 t 110 5 1 r, t r 1300 130 1 00 "' C) r SATURDAY MIDDAY Not to Scale 2019 AMBIENT TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 8 N W Z a I-- CLw O w a W a w LU w w W Q w Q h t 20 t 10 t Ln o Ln t 35 o N LO t 10 M M +- 2155 140 30 S 1910 +' l L+ t 185 KANOELEHUA +J 1 L-+ r 240 10 1 " t r+ AVENUE 10 S , t r► 650 -+ M LO LO 590 120 0')o Ln I 35 -1 °' co1,-125 `o CO 7 `o F` AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR W Z a I-- CLw O w w J LU w Q h t 20 t 10 t 25 �- 1360 t «- 1100 +' 1 L+ l 140 KANOELEHUA +j 1 L+ r 140 30 S -, t r AVENUE 10 1 -1 t r+ 1620 - 0 0 Lo 1605 -� 0 LO LO 115 -1 It "' r- 290 1 °' 1340 PM PEAK HOUR Not to Scale SATURDAY MIDDAY 2024 AMBIENT TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 9 a O w J LU w Q h a co M t 25 0 t 5 M S +- 1615 Lo 0 �- 1540 +' 1 t 120 KANOELEHUA +' 1 '-+ r 115 10 1 +-, t AVENUE 5 1 -, t r♦ 1200 LO 0 0 1340 -+ 00 0 120 Z Cf)135 1 `o CO Not to Scale SATURDAY MIDDAY 2024 AMBIENT TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 9 N it 35 rn o LO °' "' +- 2305 a r � W a 0 w Lu ? r 695 -+ r+ r Q N a uJ O w Y N t 35 rn o LO °' "' +- 2305 +J 1 L-+ r 200 10 1 " ? r 695 -+ r+ r 40 7 30 CO 000 a uJ O w Y N KANOELEHUA AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE PM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE J W a w CD LO t t 20 LO LO o 2040 1725 1 L-+ r 1450 ,--' 1 r+ r 150 30 1 +, t r- 1730 -► N LO CD 120 -1 `r "' KANOELEHUA AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE PM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE J W a w CD LO t 25 Ln LO o `V �t 2040 1725 1 L-+ r 125 10 1 -, t r� 1285 - ,n It M 125 7 130 KANOELEHUA AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE PM PEAK HOUR KANOELEHUA AVENUE J W a w CD LO L t 10 `V �t 2040 1 L- r 255 10 1 +1 t r 630 -+ Ln Ln o `t 130 7 N "' 00 U') LO L t 10 m � 1175 +r 1 L-+ r 150 10 1 " t r- 1715 1715 310 7 m � 00 z � J LV W Q� Y co t 5 Ln Ln o `t 1645 1 L, r 120 5 1 " t 1435 - rn M 140 Z N LOC) SATURDAY MIDDAY Not to Scale 2034 AMBIENT TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 10 N �t m M a +j 1 L4 Lu 41 M w w -21 �r ti _Cn 0 w LO rt o a. a LU a Lu a° Lu N u� Lo 't 117 1 " t -51 -+ L t 146 +- -75 KANOELEHUA AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR W O z w w I t 114 +- -60 KANOELEHUA AVENUE PM PEAK HOUR w O z a w t 146 +--- -49 KANOELEHUA AVENUE SATURDAY MIDDAY I -- Lu a w co +- 67 58 3 -1 z J w a w Y N +- 50 ti 50 4 -1 z J w Q w N +--- 91 84 co 6 1 Not to Scale PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 11 a m M 00 +j 1 L4 Lu 41 1 «, t -21 �r ti a LU a Lu a° Lu N u� Lo 't 117 1 " t -51 -+ L t 146 +- -75 KANOELEHUA AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR W O z w w I t 114 +- -60 KANOELEHUA AVENUE PM PEAK HOUR w O z a w t 146 +--- -49 KANOELEHUA AVENUE SATURDAY MIDDAY I -- Lu a w co +- 67 58 3 -1 z J w a w Y N +- 50 ti 50 4 -1 z J w Q w N +--- 91 84 co 6 1 Not to Scale PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 11 a w CL Lu °a w LO rt o «j 1 L-+ 97 1 -1 t -51 -+ L rn a LU a Lu a° Lu N u� Lo 't 117 1 " t -51 -+ L t 146 +- -75 KANOELEHUA AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR W O z w w I t 114 +- -60 KANOELEHUA AVENUE PM PEAK HOUR w O z a w t 146 +--- -49 KANOELEHUA AVENUE SATURDAY MIDDAY I -- Lu a w co +- 67 58 3 -1 z J w a w Y N +- 50 ti 50 4 -1 z J w Q w N +--- 91 84 co 6 1 Not to Scale PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 11 N �r " ? r+ ? r+ a LU -, v a0 w Lu w KANOELEHUA 610 -i O Q_ 1 Q' Y -1 a C)_ LO t 35 275 -1 _L r "' 1940 AM PEAK HOUR +' 1 L-+ t 175 t 145 F - w W F- tn t 10 1850 r 225 50 1 " ? r+ ? r+ 10 1 -, t r- 590 - 590 1465 — KANOELEHUA 610 -i o 1550 — 1 LO 0O LO o r-_ -1 120 -1 0) 0)35 0 0 "' ~ 275 -1 o °' ,n o AM PEAK HOUR uj a O a w A w O J W H O Q fj o z Z w w Q cn Qa u~i w w CL LO N o N t 20 LO LO LO t 10 r "' �- 1210 t 115 °' It «- 1080 +' 1 L+ t 130 +' 1 '--+ t 130 125 1 •-, ? r+ 10 1 -, t r- 1465 — KANOELEHUA 1550 — 105 -1 LO in o CO `� AVENUE 275 -1 o °' ,n o PM PEAK HOUR a w A O w o z aQ w Qa u~i w w CL Y \1 Lo o� `r t 25 LO LO o `- t 5 1460 t 145 «- 1530 1 '-+ t 110 1 r 105 130 1 t r► 5 1 t r• 1075 -+ o o KANOELEHUA 1340 — 0 0 110 -1 `o "' Co AVENUE 130 -1 "' co SATURDAY MIDDAY Not to Scale 2014 TOTAL WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 12 N 1" - t r+ 10 a W 610 610 -+ O W 625 - W 35 -1 M IL W AVENUE N -1 rn o 0 "' ~ C) LO LO t 35 0� LO t 10 2010 t 145 N t +- 1915 1 '- r 180 '- F 235 50 1" t r+ 10 1" t r- 610 610 -+ KANOELEHUA 625 - Lo 35 -1 o 0 o `r ~ AVENUE 120 -1 rn o 0 "' ~ AM PEAK HOUR a W z O w W -� F. w a LO o LO C-4 t 20 LO LO LO t 10 `e 4-- 1255 t 115 °' 1115 +' 1 L t 135 +' 1L-+ r 135 125 1 4-, t r 10 1" t r 1515 - C3 KANOELEHUA 1600 — 110 1 LO `o o c° LO `- AVENUE 285 -1 o LO o PM PEAK HOUR ujz o w W w U) � a w ai C) o LO 4 C) t 25 LO � `r o `- f 5 «- 1510 t 145 +- 1580 +i 1 L+ r 115 +1 1 L t 105 130 1 -1 t r 5 1 -, t r 1110 -► m o o KANOELEHUA 1380 c:) 0 0 rn 115 -1 "' `�' AVENUE 135 -1 "' °' SATURDAY MIDDAY Not to Scale 2019 TOTAL WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 13 N it 1 4-1 t r 10 LU h t r+ 630 -+ O w I O — o w Q= cn a z w Q Cn \1 0 N C:) Ln `A oLn c t 35 o LOCN t 10 `�' «- 2080 t 145 N� 1975 �' 1L-+ r 185 -' 1 ti r 240 50 1 4-1 t r 10 1 h t r+ 630 -+ KANOELEHUA 645 — o 35 -1 °' It I, -AVENUE 125 Z 0 N C:) Ln `A AM PEAK HOUR LU o ¢ w W a w Q O W a z w C n t N o 20 N t LO LO LO t 10 `- "' �- 1300 t 115 °' +- 1150 +' 1 L+ r 140 1 ' r 140 125 1 t r- 10 1 t r, 1570 -+ KANOELEHUA 1655 -� -1 LO coCe o Ln `- AVENUE 290 1 m u� u')115 v I- PM PM PEAK HOUR uj CL Uj uj O a w wJ o z a w y a a w ai LO C) C) t 25 u')LO o t 5 `- 1565 t 145 `- t +- 1630 +' 1 L+ r 120 1 r 115 130 1 +1 t r+ 5 1 -1 t r 1150 -+ 0 0 o KANOELEHUA 1425 — o 0 0 120 1 `n C0(D 140 7 N to `o SATURDAY MIDDAY Not to Scale 2024 TOTAL WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 14 N w a w a uj Lu w UJ N o a w o z Q_ U) w w Y r 150 C) LO L t 35 10 "' — *-- 2230 4--- t 145 +-J 1 L+ r 200 t 255 50 1 +, ? r 675 40 Z M N ., w w a w 0 Lu w UJ N C) o C) It t 25 Q_ Y Cn N C)N t 20 Lo `- •- 1390 +j 1 '+ r 150 125 1 -, t r 1680 v LO 120 coo co 7 15 w a w °a Lu J w UJ N C) o C) It t 25 `- +- 1675 +' 1 L+ r 125 KANOELEHUA AVENUE AM PEAK HOUR w W w t 115 KANOELEHUA AVENUE PM PEAK HOUR w a w t 145 w w E- t 10 1225 t 150 10 1 -, t r 1765 o C) � co 310 Z r" z a Z � w w J w UJ a� Y t 5 LO LO CD y 1735 1 L, Q� Y N N t 10 4--- 2105 -' 1 L- t 255 10 1 " t r 685 - 135 7 N U-) o w w E- t 10 1225 t 150 10 1 -, t r 1765 o C) � co 310 Z r" z a � J w w a� Y t 5 LO LO CD 1735 1 L, t 120 125 1" t r 5 1" t r 1235 o KANOELEHUA 1520C) LO-+ o 125 -1 AVENUE 150 -1 N `or' "' ° ` SATURDAY MIDDAY Not to Scale 2034 TOTAL WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC FORECAST FIGURE 15 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS FOR AMBIENT RETAILERS Less 15% multi -use trips Units TG Rate # of Trips Direction of Travel Percent # of Trips* Pass -by Trips Direct Gen. Trips SOUTH TIME PERIOD Land Use % No. of Trips % # WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR Target (LU 815) 160 134 Enter 66% 76 30% 23 53 25% 13 Leave 32% 37 23 14 18% 2 Safeway (LU 850) 60 195 Enter 61% 101 30% 30 71 25% 18 Leave 39% 65 30 34 18% 6 Pharmacy/Drugstore (LU 880) 15 3.20 48 Enter 59% 28 53% 1 15 13 25% 3 Leave 1 41% 1 20 15 1 5 1 18% 1 TOTAL I I Enter Leave 1 34 10 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR Target (LU 815) 160 810 Enter 50% 344 30% 103 241 17% 41 Leave 50% 344 103 241 31% 75 Safeway (LU 850) 60 627 Enter 51% 272 30% 82 190 17% 32 Leave 49% 261 82 179 31% 56 Pharmacy/Drugstore (LU 880) 15 8.42 126 Enter 50% 63 53% 33 30 17% 5 Leave 1 50% 63 1 33 1 30 1 31% 9 TOTAL I I I Enter Leave 1 78 140 WEEKEND MIDDAY Target (LU 815) 160 1,213 Enter 51% 526 30% 158 368 25% 92 Leave 49% 505 158 347 26% 90 Safeway (LU 850) 60 646 Enter 51% 280 30% 84 196 25% 49 Leave 49% 269 84 185 26% 48 Pharmacy/Drugstore (LU 880) 15 10.68 160 Enter 49% 78 53% 42 37 25% 9 Leave 51% 82 42 40 26% 10 TOTAL I I I Enter Leave 150 149 Less 15% multi -use trips TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS Units TG Rate # of Trips Direction of Travel Percent # of Trips Pass -b Trips Direct Gen. Trips TIME PERIOD Land Use % # WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR General Retailing LU 820 Shopping Center) 38 1.03 39 Enter 61% 24 34% 8 8 Leave 39% 15 Fast Food w/ Drive-Thru (LU 934) 4 53.11 212 Enter 51% 108 50% 54 54 Leave 49% 104 Gas Station w/ Convenience Store & 12 Fueling Positions LU 945 12 1 10.06 1 121 1 Enter 50% 60 62% I 37 r7j771 r7eave I 50% 60 TOTAL 1 1 372 Enter 193 Leave 180 100 93 100 80 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR General Retailing (LU 820 Shopping Center) 38 3.75 143 Enter 48% 68 52% 36 36 Leave 52% 74 Fast Food w/ Drive-Thru (LU 934) 4 34.64 139 Enter 52% 72 50% 36 36 Leave 48% 67 Gas Station w/ Convenience Store & 12 Fueling Positions LU 945 12 13.38 161 Enter 50% 80 56% 45 45 Leave 50% 80 TOTAL 1 1 442 Enter 221 Leave 221 117 104 117 104 WEEKEND MIDDAY General Retailing (LU 820 Shopping Center) 38 4.97 189 Enter 52% 98 26% 26 26 Leave 48% 91 Fast Food w/ Drive-Thru (LU 934) 4 59.20 237 Enter 51% 121 50% 60 60 Leave 49% 116 Gas Station w/ Convenience Store & 12 Fueling Positions LU 945 12 13.38 161 1 Enter 50% 80 56% 45 45 Leave 50% 801 TOTAL 1 1 586 1 Enter 299 Leave 287 131 168 131 156 TABLE 3 TRIP DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS Direction of Travel No. of Trips NORTH SOUTH EAST TIME PERIOD Land Use % No. of Trips % No. of I Trips % I No. of Trips WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR Primary Trips Enter Leave 93 80 21% 21% 20 17 72% 72% 67 58 7% 7% 7 6 Pass -by Trips Enter Leave 100 100 21% 72% 21 72 72% 21% 72 21 7% 7% 7 7 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR Primary Trips Enter Leave 104 104 44% 44% 46 46 48% 48% 50 50 8% 8% 8 8 Pass -by Trips Enter Leave 117 117 44% 48% 51 56 48% 44% 56 51 8% 8% 9 9 WEEKEND MIDDAY Primary Trips Enter Leave 168 156 39% 39% 66 61 54% 54% 1 91 84 7% 7% 12 11 Pass -by Trips Enter Leave 131 131 39% 34% 51 45 34% 39% 45 51 7% 7% 9 9 } =O 2 -� O --� 93 I-, O N q N Ln N m M O t0 N M. I ti C0 O M N CD It N I` O LO Lq N N rn It N 00 Ln U) d: MN N U) N N N CO r.-: 0) r- N N N N W LO It Ly O U❑❑ U W U U w U U W U U w m U W U N Z W a >' 0 N N N cfl M M M r- O N d M T M M d M N M r- It N M N �- CD N rn I t 'd' ti r N 7 M N N 00 CO 00 O N O N M 00 Y Q w Q. o o U U m 0 m 0 U U❑ U v w m 0 U Ln CD 00 U) 7 U1 U) I- N 07 O O r ti M 00 r Q (n Z p J 0 wco M n lf) CD M in M M m N U) I- O M CO N It Nr O m U l m m❑ m m U m U❑ m m w m U U U X W . Q d N CO I- d C(C!O N 00 O c0 C� N JQ F- W O O N O M M r N O d L N M � C.C) •-M CM O LO HU') -;T O LO M U) Ll) M O O U m U U❑ U U❑ U m w 00 m m W m J O H Q r- d r M 7 ti Cfl �: M Lq (3) OR CO O N 0A 00 = Y Q Z w_ m - w O N M M N "t d CD t , N O M N N 00 - O O Cfl t t CD Ln O M r- O C0 M r IL a o U U❑ m❑ m U❑ U m w m m m w m } IL Z F- w W ti c O N O d 00 N d ' t rn O I` r- 00 (0 7 M r- r I,- r- M Ln N O d' N M r- CD It 't O O I� r'I r- Lq LO M M r - N O m 0 m Q m m m w m Q m❑ m W Z O W w w F- Z O LU w F- JQ F - O F- Q~ W w CD N O CD CO I-- O MN M Ln 17 r CO CO N OI` CO Ln 00 r Il M It CA OD CD U) C) M 03 00 It N f� U) to r, -r- V CR N O M LO I� M N O U❑❑ U w U m m ❑ w 0 w 0 U J Z Z Q Q -� G O LO Ln O M M (D M M M (0 O m r Un I- q U) r C3) ti M f, 1- co q O M C!? m M 0A Ln Ln CD P- M M r- N I` O LO OD N N QH Y'Z Q LU Q � j w U) a w a Q _ Q W W a/ N Z❑ Q �j Q co o m❑❑ m w Q m m w 0 w 0 U O } M LO N M 00 cM QO N 7 N Lo 00 N 0 Ln I- d N Lf) r- M06 CO CO M CM M U) Ln r- M O r- CD Ln O N cn Y 3 X w W 0Q m❑❑ m w Q m O m F - Q U w U U W U m W U W Z Q J Q W Z w > Q = J w Z O= V Wrj)/O/ I.L (L W Q F - Z J /QJy L.L W O mm W U) a) 0 L LO Y U) ca Q Y LLI m C Z �-- co C O J O L c J FF- Y Co (� cn C J Co C rn J O L J H Y J J < W O m w> c .� CO � Y m +>. CO Y W m C Z co > J ¢ C 7 C 03 Co 70 L c J IL— Y m cn CD N c co Q Co C CT :3 CD C1 o J O J H Y U) J Z a w v LU U) LL O J Ll! w J w J in r Q 00 N M f� �f ti (Da0 N CO r- Cl? d Cl? =O 2 O LU O M Lo Lo 0 'It 0 M ti Cfl ti N Lo N m Lo m N N CO Lo M N M N M Cfl N CM N O Cfl Lo N O U w U W U U W U U w U U W U U W U QH Gw. >, z W_ m a Q J 0 Lq ti r- CA M ao �- r Lo (DP,:N Lo M CM N N d' 'It N CO N M OD "t CA CA — CO N N M r- Lm Lo O N 7 O - N Cfl OO O N o m❑ m m w Q U❑ U U❑ m 0 U m w U (' Q c- Lo CO 00 Lq Lo Ln ti N M C� O r ti M 00 Q fA z H N J LLI OO ti Lo co CO M Lo r- M r- M cM m N N m CM � O N M Lo C4 N N It M d N o m U m m m m U m U❑ m m w m U U U W r- M N N OO M "J: M Co to NCfl N M (D N C7 M CD N N rte. CO M 't M M M LO N r- N CO � N CO CO W r O 0 ~ CO O U U❑ U w U U w U U w❑ m w m m w U M O I- Q (O 7 OO O I� W O M cr (3) N 7 O O CO N = Y Q Z W_ m J w N M M N dt "t P'M N O Lo 'd' N N N O M M qt LO r- M qt O N N Cfl d N C a o U U❑ m❑ m 0 U U w m m m w m IL (, Z ( Q Q S O O O N - O OO N d: d' 't O O ti r OO Cfl ct M r` r- 00 Lo 0') t N M O � It O O � r �- Ln L LO M O m U❑ m Q m❑ m m w m Q m m W Z O V U.jM Z O V Z❑ W Q 0 Q 0 Cfl ( 7 M 1- M CO MLO VO Lo M N (.4 Lo N m LO O COO M LM N C° r � N Cfl ti N N N OZ U❑❑❑ W U m❑ m w U W W U❑ U W ro g Q Q N t• 1� CO M O Lo M T- Lo N CO �- Ln O Lo ti CO CO Ln M 't O 00 CO Lo O co N 00 't CO Or-� to -'T i- T- N Ln M Lo M M N _ OZ Y Q a � j w U)cn Q w QM _ j W Z❑ J_ Q U) o m❑❑ m w m mom w U❑ w❑ U❑ U z I-- U) JQ M r N (fl M 00 CO M CO N r N CO L CO N LO Lo ti N LO r M C6 M 00 CO M M O M M Lo Lo LIj � � M O r O Lo M O N W Q Q O m❑❑ m W Q m❑ m U W U U W U m W U zm W Q J LUN Z Y z W a = W J W O z Y z O= WO U) CL Q Z J W O w CO Q .Oc Y m d Y W m a Z C Q O C O M O J O , F- L � J F- Y m U N J CU C Lc- O co O I- L -j E- Y J J w O m W CCU:T 3 N Y m M O 3 Y W m a Z c c6 Q 7 \ _N J O I- L c J I- Y m U) a J O N L O J O I--L c J I Y N J Q z Q W U W LL O J W to w w -J J z m Q U W w H z 0 W N J Q z C) 1) Iq N O N } f` N M M a0 M CO N O r M O O O O r`�: M M M to CD CO V NO Cl) h M w N w 1` M N M N N Lo M aD r m to (D r N N N CD M N 0 0 U w U w U U W U U❑ U m w m U w U N N tb M r O M N (O t` M (D O CO Cl) Cb r O J J U') O (O d' r` N r r- M N O N (O h M N 00 N 1 N O (O N LO N (O r` N N (O Lo N _M O F•' O U W O U W U U W U U W U U W U U W U W a N LO N CD t` M O N O N N M N O r N �t H m U) N Q O U❑ m U w m 0 U U O D U w m 0 U Z J M N Ln to co r N LO "t V r N M NM M et r d O O W Q N r` M N O> to O r N co M N Lo N N V N h N a0 N co F3 to Q O 0 m U W m U D U U O D U W U U❑ U O W t O CD M to O) m O M O V M N V J OM M O N r- M M M M to M M M N CO M M O r c6 ,} (. M r io O r to r 0 O U 0 0 U U w U m W m Q m W m J CD a0 m V M c0 N to r Cl M O h V J LU N O r` N It O f"M O O M N - N V N M N M M to M M It c^- to (MD O 2U) O U U O U❑ U U W U U W❑ m w m U w U WF' Q v M r M r- u) m to to w m rn: — 0 v r a 0 w -It w r M N (D to -It N 10M r o ti fV r (� ao M a m 20 U❑ O m❑ m U w U m❑ w m❑¢ m w m Q r M r to M (n (D t0 t0 UA d: (O (O r� M 00 h Ut Z W JQ M N m M co V co r co V to r M N CD tC7 q- N N M CO 1- (D r h to r r r` r 1- O O N m QO U U❑ m❑ m U W U U w m W m m w U Q co N to CD M O to CO O) O a0 co V N r, W m t.- O 1.6 O t0 ti CO m (D M 4 6 M M W O 3 NN t M N O N N (O r M (D It co CD N v co O O Z U O O U w U U W m O ❑ W O U W U U❑ U Qu H CD N f` N to h Vm LO H V M O r r Or*-: r W O LU U) N It t00 N (Lo D N N rC0 UJI o tY R O V M V' M G OUC O F- W Z w Z❑ S O U❑❑ U W U U W m LL O O w U❑ U La f' Q W N Lo h a0 n to Lu w a W C 00 d' N V' LO M CO r O Lo C() M MLO M O 't M O N LO N LO v n N Q to mN a 0 wm O O m II W m m m a U w U W U U❑ U M O J a Za 2 co t` O to t` M O V M r Q O� O a0 Cl) D. CO w 0 Q r M V r O r.- �- CO aD to O r Q O � A m CO (D (O n M N M w to M 0 Y Y Q O a m❑ O m w m m W m O LL ❑❑ W O U❑ U W Q W w N c w c :3 m N N m Z CO m IA C w w z m (o J w W >m > F— J z a u> > C m> C _ (D ¢ J O a J Q J Q J U = J 0 CL 3 F] L O 3 L = C m 7 O L 7 O L WO J J R N J {-- f CD J i--- W J J •M N •f0 N J F- N J E- rn w w m L a� 5 w W� 3 (D CD a'a O w Y Y � c O wY Y o c O c Z a Q O 3i Ld Y Y Q O W Y Y T <n } J a z a W U_ W U) LL 0 J 111 1— W LU -� J Z CO F 0 U W w w H z 0 W N J a z 0 U) M O N Q F' M M (D U, O w N d: h O M O 't r- <- 2 W co C3 wC3 N N m N N V N M O LO M h O O U❑ U U❑ U U❑ U m❑ am cc m m❑ m N (D N N c} co 't t}' UO (D M M O M M Q O Cl) P.- M co n M N m N N LOn (+M') N O N O N _ F- W O O ❑ W w w U U LL U U W U U w m U W U a cL } CD r 6 (n �, M n N n O cD r- c'- V 7V O W I-- coV ti O N to O N V M (n M M 1 � 3 Q M to U) o m❑ m m❑ Q U❑ U m m m m m m r¢ m i Q z J I- M N M v O (Da0 M O Il- In m (O 00 W W N d' N N O (O r N (-- d* co N (17 N O N N cn 00 N .- 0) (O co �- m � r Q O U❑ U U❑ m 0 U m U U❑ m m W m Q H 00 (D c- - In to tt cn W V M C O h J W N O M N V N N N O V V `- r N lOn (D 00 U m U U❑ U U w U m❑ W m❑ Q m❑ m J CO to n r n r M .- O M O 7 O (*- M m M M W M M N '� M M N (D a0 M M f� M 00 (n C6r (D o o O to m f- o ❑ 0 U w 0 w ❑ w LL m w Q m W m WF' } iY M M I� M O In (O 00 co V M V O M N w (L n 0 M NM ( W V O (D �t (D .-- M N co LO v N (C) .- O d' CD r (D t O .- N (D Ln N r d In y QO U❑❑ 0 m U w U M W m Q m W m Q F- O f- e- V N Co (n V N N (D (D .- N O M ao W J WO (n N N O h h N OD a0 to 00 M CD °� N cn V m N 7 (n N N CO N M a0 r (n to QO U❑ O 0 m U W U m W LL m W Q m W m J a0 co 1 (n co M O O O M N N M to O a0 (D (n �- N M N N N N V S O N It N D 00 m U U m❑ m U❑ m p U❑ U U❑ m m❑ m } w M O V (n M (n O O N L) N Ln '7 V ao M N LO (n N M N Q W N M c�D n M 0M0 M N A fl- V' r-- M (D LO LO 'IT 00 00 V (A N M G W W m~ Oz❑ w w❑ LL U U LL m z LL w LL U w U Y J _ _ f' Q W Cl? (D O N -: M N I� O W M 7 00 N O O m a w m m m LO o N r ao w � o w N ao ao Cl) �-- Fes., N M N N Q N m h Q a o a m U U m❑ a m❑ in Q O❑ U U❑ m a❑ a J O 00 M— O (n O M't ' 'C z Q Q = O ' V w 00 N a- M(0 M W O M N co C' P --N 'It N m (D m f- w Lln (- N st Lo O N �t N V (D (D m M N M w d' (n M m Q < OQ F U❑❑ U W m m w m F- Q❑ W 0 w U❑❑ W W w w N N 7 z m m m m '� U) m C z m m m m J m h CD C 1 LLI W Z 2' m J > W> > Z Q' m J z Q (n 0) N L C 01 > m L C O Q ;> (n N L C to > N C L O _ Q m m Q Q Q Q Q n� m J O m J 0 M @ C m J O m J 0 W Q W J m N J F- N J H w J m N J F J F -- (n W 4 4 m L N N W Co (o 0) Q d' a O w `L Y c c O w Y Y I c Z Q Q O 2i w Y Y Q O �i W Y Y Traffic Turning Movement Counts TRAFFIC TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT MDPD KANOELEHUA COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO HILO TO PUNA LOCATION: Kanoelehua Avenue / Kawailani Street RED ROOF 7 81 9 WHITE ROOF DATE: Saturday, September 13, 2008 BEIGE HOUSE 1 L ► BEIGEHOUSE TIME: 9:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. 1 l L 10 WEATHER: Clear 2 11 RECORDER: Carole Darby 3 1 l 12 KANOELEHUAJ ti T r► AVENUE 4 5 6 KAWAILANI STREET TIME MOVEMENT NUMBER PERIOD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL 9:00-9:15a 2 204 31 28 6 10 0 11 1 1 291 28 613 9:15-9:30a 1 307 24 52 10 10 5 7 2 1 310 15 744 9:30-9:45a 1 287 28 41 20 6 5 12 4 3 306 35 748 9:45-10:00a 0 267 23 36 16 4 4 14 4 1 321 29 719 10:00-10:15a 0 229 24 40 10 6 3 13 4 1 270 24 624 10:15-10:30a 1 240 27 19 11 5 3 12 3 0 241 28 590 10:30-10:45a 2 253 25 37 13 8 3 11 1 1 294 25 673 10:45-11:00a 0 266 21 30 16 11 4 16 2 3 272 20 661 11:00-11:15a .`': 1 145 19 29 : ',' 14.. 12 3 ` r 17 3 ,- 2 264 526 11:15-11:30a 2 23 17 28 11 13 2 18 3 1 255 17 390 11:30-11:45a 0 226 16 28 9 13 6 15 3 2 268 19 605 11:45-12:00n 0 235 17 34 17 18 5 8 2 2 292 17 647 12:00-12:15p 1 214 14 28 9 15 0 12 4 2 266 16 581 12:15-12:30p 1 233 19 35 8 12 2 14 3 1 267 21 616 12:30-12:45p 0 221 15 18 9 13 3 17 2 0 279 21 598 12:45-1:00p 1 207 14 18 17 17 2 6 3 1 233 18 537 9:00a -1:00p 13 3557 334 501 196 173 50 203 44 22 4429 352 9872- 9:00-10:00a 4 1065 106 157 52 30 14 44 11 6 1228 107 2824 PHF 0.88 0.83 0.97 TRAFFIC TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT MDPD KANOELEHUA COMMERCIAL PROPERTY I TO HI LO TO PUNA LOCATION: Kanoelehua Avenue / Kawailani Street RED ROOF 7 8 9 WHITE ROOF DATE: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 BEIGE HOUSE J BEIGE HOUSE TIME: 6:00a -8:30a / 2:00p -5:30p 1 1 T- 10 WEATHER: Rain / Clear 2 11 RECORDER: Carole Darby 3 7 C 12 KANOELEHUA 7 T 1-1 AVENUE 4 5 6 KAWAILANI STREET TIME MOVEMENT NUMBER PERIOD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL 6:00-6:15a 4 56 6 15 3 12 1 3 5 6 197 30 338 6:15-6:30a 5 72 14 37 5 20 1 8 2 9 268 30 471 6:30-6:45a 2 96 9 37 9 15 3 9 3 3 302 44 532 6:45-7:00a 3 123 21 46 6 21 4 14 9 3 377 35 662 7:00-7:15a 1 132 18 35 22 13 4 20 14 4 457 60 780 7:15-7:30a 4 131 31 41 4 21 5 40 15 3 413 47 755 7:30-7:45a 1 136 33 47 8 17 4 44 9 2 423 57 781 7:45-8:00a 4 127 26 55 15 19 5 22 8 2 425 54 762 1 8:00-8:15a 10 118 39 44 8 14 3 14 8 5 442 46 751 8:15-8:30a 2 160 29 37 8 17 4 12 6 3 343 35 656 6:30-8:30a 36 1151 226 394 88 169 34 186 79 40 3647 438 6488- 7:00-8:00a 10 526 108 178 49 70 18 126 46 11 1718 218 3078 PHF 0.95 0.83 0.93 ( TIME MOVEMENT NUMBER PERIOD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL 1 2:00-2:15p 2 251 45 26 4 8 1 22 6 3 227 25 620 2:15-2:30p 0 236 52 31 9 14 0 14 3 1 258 42 660 2:30-2:45p 0 234 39 31 20 20 5 22 8 1 218 22 620 2:45-3:00p 1 301 33 51 15 20 4 14 5 0 275 31 750 3:00-3:15p 1 264 41 27 7 15 2 32 12 3 263 35 702 3:15-3:30p 3 249 51 39 12 12 5 13 9 5 314 38 750 3:30-3:45p 3 289 35 23 9 19 4 16 9 5�t 282 37 730 .a 3:45-4:00pf3 , .,; 19 8 4 249 36 732 4:00-4:15p 4 340 56 20 10 17 1 23 16 0 235 37 759 4:15-4:30p 4 327 65 21 11 18 5 24 8 3 224 32 742 4:30-4:45p 0 344 75 11 15 17 7 27 12 3 205 22 738 4:45-5:00p 2 318 56 29 8 20 2 23 11 3 210 37 719 5:00-5:15p 0 303 64 24 13 24 1 23 15 4 163 28 662 5:15-5:30p 5 302 58 28 16 29 1 23 15 5 158 21 661 2:00-5:30p 29 4073 716 383 159 251 41 295 137 40 3281 443 9844 3:45-4:45p 12 1326 242 74 46 70 16 93 44 10 913 127 2932 PHF 0.94 0.96 0.83 0.91 TRAFFIC TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT MDPD KANOELEHUA COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO HILO TO PUNA LOCATION: Kanoelehua Avenue / Kahaopea Street GREEN ROOF 7 8 9 EMPTY DATE: Saturday, September 20, 2008 RED HOUSE I 1 L ► LOT TIME: 9:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. 1 l t 10 WEATHER: Clear 2 11 RECORDER: Carole Darby 3 Z r 12 KANOELEHUA h T r- AVENUE 4 5 6 KAHAOPEA STREET TIME MOVEMENT NUMBER PERIOD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL 9:00-9:15a 0 146 11 10 6 14 1 8 2 8 297 17 525-- 9:15-9:30a 2 154 14 19 5 6 3 10 2 9 325 16 565 9:30-9:45a 5 178 14 24 10 12 4 1 2 6 360 17 633 9:45-10:00a 3 150 9 12 4 17 5 8 11 3 384 31 637 10:00-10:15a 0 174 13 29 4 5 6 3 4 10 350 25 623 10:15-10:30a 7 205 6 22 9 7 5 11 1 2 378 26 679 10:30-10:45a 4 159 16 20 4 0 8 7 3 5 328 29 583 10:45-11:00a 4 200 19 17 9 12 1 8 1 4 320 33 628 11:00-11:15a 3 227 24 19. 13 8 4 10 1 4 324 28 f 662 11:15-11:30a 1 253 28 21 17 4 7 11 0 3 327 23 695 11:30-11:45a 2 199 15 32 4 5 12 9 2 10 359 25 674 11:45-12:00n 3 239 23 43 7 13 8 4 7 10 286 35 678 12:00-12:15p 3 225 12 35 3 8 3 6 4 11 274 22 606 12:15-12:30p 2 270 18 27 6 13 4 15 7 2 240 32 636 12:30-12:45p 1 192 14 22 8 16 2 7 5 1 229 18 515 12:45-1:00p 0 295 18 40 2 3 2 9 5 4 280 19 677 9:00a -1:00p 40 3266 254 392 111 143 75 127 57 92 5061 396 10011- 11:00-12:00a 9 918 90 115 41 30 31 34 10 27 1296 111 2709 PHF 0.90 0.74 0.91 TRAFFIC TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT MDPD KANOELEHUA COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO HILO TO PUNA LOCATION: Kanoelehua Avenue / Kahaopea Street GREEN ROOF 7 8 9 EMPTY DATE: Thursday, September 18, 2008 RED HOUSE 1 L-+ LOT TIME: 6:00a -8:30a / 2:00p -5:30p 1 ? L 10 WEATHER: 2 11 RECORDER: 3 7 l 12 KANOELEHUA ti T ri I AVENUE 4 5 6 KAHAOPEA STREET TIME MOVEMENT NUMBER PERIOD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL 6:00-6:15a 0 53 2 3 1 8 3 10 7 5 272 26 390 6:15-6:30a 1 74 4 6 4 7 1 6 2 2 178 16 301 6:30-6:45a 0 79 8 6 3 11 5 7 6 4 490 44 663 6:45-7:00a 5 133 5 5 3 11 2 3 5 5 377 35 589 7:00-7:15a 5 143 3 14 7 14 7 8 9 7 455 44 716 7:15-7:30a 1 159 9 15 5 14 4 7 10 2 533 43 802 7:30-7:45a 1 130 12 27 11 23 5 9 5 19 460 36 738 7:45-8:00a 4 147 10 31 12 20 1 6 11 5 496 47 790 8:00-8:15a 7 133 9 8 7 14 6 11 3 7 320 21 546 8:15-8:30a 4 149 17 11 12 20 6 9 3 2 275 18 526 6:30-8:30a 28 1200 79 126 65 142 40 76 61 58 3856 330 6061 7:00-8:00a 11 579 34 87 35 71 17 30 35 33 1944 170 3046 PHF 0.92 0.77 0.93 TIME MOVEMENT NUMBER PERIOD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL 2:00-2:15p 5 237 17 14 9 34 5 7 7 1 258 26 620 2:15-2:30p 2 309 23 9 6 30 6 7 8 5 267 30 702 2:30-2:45p 4 250 16 13 23 41 1 8 5 7 258 21 647 2:45-3:00p 4 331 21 7 14 31 1 13 6 2 338 34 802 3:00-3:15p 7 323 22 12 8 33 3 8 6 3 163 23 611 3:15-3:30p 5 328 22 9 20 39 6 11 4 7 321 35 807 V'Z3:30-3:45p 3 335 25 9 8 36°r�4 7 s 323 800 Wo 3:45-4:00p 5 359 29 " 13 10 46 f' 6 14 7 a 10, 1 �' 844 �E-ra�,: w � �,.:�. _ z � .,. r. �. ..�uz 4-�.� < r - _ <<_ . '� _�: :9t.,....�.,.�: �., � ..:'4 r. _i.x..?swt � L-.' 4:00-4:15p 6 383 32 17 12 55 5 17 10 13 302 35 887 4:15-4:30p 7 376 32 7 11 42 0 16 5 2 243 16 757 4:30-4:45p 5 389 39 9 11 39 4 7 12 8 241 19 783 4:45-5:00p 3 412 50 13 12 44 4 8 10 4 217 23 800 5:00-5:15p 6 373 32 9 9 43 3 19 17 13 281 19 824 5:15-5:30p 9 445 31 8 13 51 2 14 14 3 273 21 884 2:00-5:30p 71 4850 391 149 166 564 52 160 115 85 3795 372 10768- 3:454:45p 23 1317 90 37 50 139 16 43 20 19 1143 127 3020 PHF 0.83 0.67 0.90 Existing and 2014 Signalized Intersection Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 j Lane Configurations 01 4 r 1 11535s T: t tt r Volume (vph) 85 35 70 35 30 170 1945 10 580 35 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.7 37.7 37.7 37.7 37.7 19.8 53.5 8.8 42.5 42.5 Total Split (%) 37.7% 37.7% 37.7% 37.7% 37.7% 19.8% 53.5% 8.8% 42.5% 42.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.8 70.4 5.2 53.7 53.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.70 0.05 0.54 0.54 } v/c Ratio 0.61 0.26 0.39 0.71 0.87 0.12 0.33 0.04 Control Delay 51.3 10.3 36.8 62.1 8.5 47.5 15.2 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 51.3 10.3 36.8 62.1 8.5 47.5 15.2 5.5 LOS D B D E A D B A Approach Delay 36.2 36.8 12.8 15.2 Approach LOS D D B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 81 (81%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: W Kahaonea St R Knnnalehun Ava Waiaka Center ExistingAM 5/24/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 01 I o2 o4 1 11535s T: 371,t 19.8s 42.5 d� 37.7 s Waiaka Center ExistingAM 5/24/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 1 o2 �" o4 1.U.7 s 50.9 05 �ti>S© 08 t 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Acre idr 38.4 8/14/2011 Lane Gtoup .. EBL - :. ! BT; . U+iBL' WBT . NBL - NOT, . SBL S67 S8R Lane Configurations +T}` Volume (vph) 180 50 45 125 220 1720 10 525 110 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase r Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 $ Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 27.0 50.9 10.7 34.6 34.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 27.0% 50.9% 10.7% 34.6% 34.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 28.3 28.3 17.5 57.2 6.1 37.7 37.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.18 0.57 0.06 0.38 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.46 0.77 0.93 0.10 0.43 0.18 i Control Delay 68.1 31.3 55.5 31.1 56.4 20.3 9.8 - Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.1 31.3 55.5 31.1 56.4 20.3 9.8 LOS E C E C E C A _ Approach Delay 68.1 31.3 33.9 19.1 Approach LOS E C C B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 33 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated d Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 33.9 Intersection LOS: C $6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 Salits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 01 1 o2 �" o4 1.U.7 s 50.9 05 �ti>S© 08 2}S. r6 v idr 38.4 Waiaka Center ExistingAM 5/24/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 i Timings t o2 o4 3.7 s 53.7"s. 37.6 s o5 06 �4- 08 23s- I 1139.4s 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 37.6s 8/14/2011 i Lane:Group , EBL EBT, , 'EBR WBL " WBT' NBk% :NBT SBL : SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' ' ` tt Volume (vph) 90 35 70 35 30 175 2015 10 610 35 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 j Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 23.0 53.7 8.7 39.4 39.4 l Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 23.0% 53.7% 8.7% 39.4% 39.4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 . 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.0 69.9 5.2 53.1 53.1 j Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.70 0.05 0.53 0.53 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.25 0.39 0.72 0.90 0.12 0.35 0.04 Control Delay 51.3 10.0 36.3 63.7 9.1 47.5 15.9 5.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 51.3 10.0 36.3 63.7 9.1 47.5 15.9 5.7 LOS D B D E A D B A Approach Delay 36.5 36.3 13.4 15.9 Approach LOS D D B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 76 (76%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection, Capacity Utilization 85.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 .qnlitc and Phasas• 3, W Knhnnnea of R KannPlPhim Ave 01 t o2 o4 3.7 s 53.7"s. 37.6 s o5 06 �4- 08 23s- I 1139.4s = 37.6s Waiaka Center Ambient AM 5/29/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoeiehua Ave 8/14/2011 Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave x`01 1 K o4 1,0.17_i.! 5Q9 l o5 oB Lane Group , . EBL EBT,.::., ,WBL " WBT NBL NBT .. 'SBL SBT SBR , Lane Configurations tT tt r Volume (vph) 185 50 45 125 225 1785 10 550 115 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24,4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 27.0 50.9 10.7 34.6 34.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 27.0% 50.9% 10.7% 34.6% 34.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 28.8 28.8 17.8 56.7 6.1 37.1 37,1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.18 0.57 0.06 0.37 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.45 0.78 0.97 0.10 0.46 0.19 Control Delay 67.7 30.9 55.9 37.6 50.7 22.8 11.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 67.7 30.9 55.9 37.6 50.7 22.8 11.5 LOS E C E D D C B Approach Delay 67.7 30.9 39.6 21.3 Approach LOS E C D C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 32 (32%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.97 Intersection Signal Delay: 37.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.1% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave x`01 1 K o4 1,0.17_i.! 5Q9 l o5 oB 08 1.27,s ; :;:. 34:5`.' ,.. `... ;; :' .....:< .... "" 38.4 s` i Waiaka Center Ambient AM 5/29/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 f i Timings t o2 o4 87 s`<I 053.7i' 37:6 s o5 t 06 08 22.5 s L 139.5 s 37.8 s' 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave i 8/14/2011 Larte. UVBL` .:; W8T WBR ' " N8L` NBT NBR SBL . ' -SBT Si3g Lane Configurations 4 r tt r tt r Volume (vph) 85 45 70 115 35 110 175 1940 35 50 590 35 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 j Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 22.9 53.7 53.7 8.7 39.5 39.5 l Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 22.9% 53,7% 53.7% 8.7% 39.5% 39.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag ' Lead -Lag Optimize? { Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 17.9 17.9 17.9 17.9 15.0 59.3 59.3 7.7 50.3 50.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.59 0.59 0.08 0.50 0.50 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.22 0.73 0.32 0.72 1.00 0.04 0.39 0.36 0.05 Control Delay 51.5 8.8 56.2 10.2 61.1 23.1 0.0 51.6 17.8 6.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 51.5 8.8 56.2 10.2 61.1 23.1 0.0 51.6 17.8 6.4 LOS D A E B E C A D B A Approach Delay 36.6 36.7 25.8 19.7 Approach LOS D D C B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 42 (42%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Signal Delay: 26.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 3: W Kahaopea St & KanoelPhim AvP " 01 t o2 o4 87 s`<I 053.7i' 37:6 s o5 t 06 08 22.5 s L 139.5 s 37.8 s' Waiaka total AM 5/30/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings t o2 o4 l o5 4 i 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 E E # LanGroup E L EBT WBL ;WBT "e NBL NBT SBL, SBT ; . SBR. Lane Configurations a i ' 0 'i tt Volume (vph) 190 50 45 125 225 1850 10 610 120 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase f Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38,4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 26.0 50.9 10.7 35.6 35.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 26.0% 50.9% 10.7% 35.6% 35.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6,4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 t Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 29.2 29.2 17.5 56.3 6.1 36.9 36.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.18 0.56 0.06 0.37 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.45 0.79 1.02 0,10 0.51 0.20 1 Control Delay 68.9 30.5 57.2 47.9 53.0 23.7 9.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.9 30.5 57.2 47.9 53.0 23.7 9.6 LOS E C E D D C A Approach Delay 68.9 30.5 48.9 21.8 Approach LOS E C D C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.02 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min)15 Cn6+e onrl Dhncna- R• W VniAtni1nni qt A Vnnnalahua Ava 01 t o2 o4 l o5 o6 08 a Waiaka total AM 5/30/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave t o2 04 8/14/2011 4 06 08 Lane.Gro�ip. EBL EBT.. WBL W. ,>' NBL.,"NBT SBL: -. SBT :SBR Lane Configurations 0 'fit r Volume (vph) 75 45 45 95 12.5 915 10 1325 240 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 11.0 45.9 10.7 45.6 45.6 Total Split (%) 40.4% 40.4% 40.4% 40.4% 11.6% 48.3% 11.3% 48.0% 48.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 15.9 15.9 14.2 64.7 6.1 48.6 48.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.15 0.68 0.06 0.51 0.51 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.69 0.52 0.42 0.10 0.80 0.28 Control Delay 58.1 49.2 44.6 9.0 54.5 13.3 0.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 58.1 49.2 44.6 9.0 54.5 13.3 0.8 LOS E D D A D B A Approach Delay 58.1 49.2 13.2 11.7 Approach LOS E D B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 95 Actuated Cycle Length: 95 Offset: 32 (34%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (ruin) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 01 t o2 04 05 4 06 08 Waiaka Center Existingpm 5/24/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 r Timings i o2 o4 8:8$ 153.6x' 37:6s o5 4 06 08 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 37:6 s 8/14/2011 # Lane Gr9iap EBC EBT. :EBR ' : `, WBL'" " WBT NBL� NBT` SBL S..BT Lane Configurations 4 r Vi tt r Volume (vph) 40 50 145 20 45 130 1270 30 1515 105 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 12.2 53.6 8.8 50.2 50.2 Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 12.2% 53.6% 8.8% 50.2% 50.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? ( l Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 11.3 11.3 11.3 14.4 69.0 6.4 57.5 57.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.69 0.06 0.58 0.58 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.56 0.45 0.55 0.57 0.29 0.81 0.12 Control Delay 52.2 21.9 42.1 46.1 11.7 50.4 22.3 2.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 52.2 21.9 42.1 46.1 11.7 50.4 22.3 2.8 LOS D C D D B D C A Approach Delay 33.4 42.1 14.8 21.6 Approach LOS C D B C Intersection Summary I Cycle Length: 100 f Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 54 (54%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 I Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.81 Intersection Signal Delay: 20.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.1 % ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 c r+� Ana Dk'2. 1N Vnhnnnan C+ R. Wnnnahnhna Qva ` 01 i o2 o4 8:8$ 153.6x' 37:6s o5 4 06 08 12.2 37:6 s Waiaka Center Ambient pm 5/29/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 f Timings S: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 1#Wit . IA/nT in. e,l _n. Lane Configurations I o2 c 0i7 s.-1 15C► g s , I tT* '� tt r _ Volume (vph) 85 45 45 95 130 1030 10 1500 270 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 12.0 50.9 10.7 49.6 49.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 12.0% 50.9% 10.7% 49.6% 49.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 f Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 17.9 17.9 13.9 67.6 6.1 51.8 51.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.14 0.68 0.06 0.52 0.52 We Ratio 0.85 0.64 0.57 0.47 0.10 0.89 0.30 s Control Delay 60.9 46.8 50.0 10.2 60.8 16.0 0.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 60.9 46.8 50.0 10.2 60.8 16.0 0.8 LOS E D D B E B A Approach Delay 60.9 46.8 14.6 13.9 Approach LOS E D B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 96 (96%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.1% ICU Level of Service D r Analysis Period (min)15 SDIItS and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 01 I o2 o4 0i7 s.-1 15C► g s 38.4 " 0, 06 r- 08 42:e. 49.6 s 38 4 Waiaka Center Ambient pm 5/29/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 I- Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave t 02 04 12.7.s " : 45:7 s,.. _ Wi 37.6 s`. 05 06 8/14/2011 12.3 s . ;: 50:1 s 37.6 s EBT ..'EBR, ; WBL WBT .:" WBR ...NBL IN tBR %SBL SST< SBR Lane Configurations 4 if ' tt r tt Volume (vph) 35 60 145 125 50 125 130 1210 20 125 1465 105 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 12.3 49.7 49.7 12.7 50.1 50.1 Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 12.3% 49.7% 49.7% 12.7% 50.1% 50.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 19.4 19.4 19.4 19.4 13.1 51.4 51.4 12.4 50.7 50.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.51 0.51 0.12 0.51 0.51 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.36 0.73 0.33 0.61 0.72 0.03 0.62 0.89 0.13 Control Delay 37.3 7.4 52.9 7.4 49.0 25.7 6.0 54.6 31.4 3.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.3 7.4 52.9 7.4 49.0 25.7 6.0 54.6 31.4 3.6 LOS D A D A D C A D C A Approach Delay 19.2 33.9 27.6 31.4 Approach LOS B C C C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 58 (58%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 29.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases- 3- W Kahannea St R Knnnalehi is Ava 01 t 02 04 12.7.s " : 45:7 s,.. _ Wi 37.6 s`. 05 06 08 12.3 s . ;: 50:1 s 37.6 s Waiaka total pm 5/30/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 01 I o2 o4 7753.4: '. o5 o6 08 { t Timings ":, 18.4 s" 6: W Kawailani St & Kanaelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Group ,;_ EBL '. � . EBT:VVBL VVBT - ; NBL :" NBT SBL: ` SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4� tt+ Vi tt r Volume (vph) 90 45 45 95 130 1080 10 1550 275 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm r Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4' 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 12.0 50.9 10.7 49.6 49.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 12.0% 50.9% 10.7% 49.6% 49.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min i Act Effct Green (s) 18.7 18.7 13.7 66.8 6.1 51.2 51.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.14 0.67 0.06 0.51 0.51 I` v/c Ratio 0.84 0.61 0.58 0.50 0.10 0.93 0.31 Control Delay 59.9 44.1 50.8 11.0 55.9 18.2 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.9 44.1 50.8 11.0 55.9 18.2 0.5 LOS E D D B E B A - Approach Delay 59.9 44.1 15.2 15.8 Approach LOS E D B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.93 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 01 I o2 o4 7753.4: '. o5 o6 08 122 1 149.6s ":, 18.4 s" Waiaka total pm 5/30/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report } Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 1 1 o2 o4 8:7 s `1 043.7-S 37:6 s:' 05 8/14/2011 05 08 13.2s H 392 6 RA, 37.6s Lane.Group EBL ,; EBT .."EBR r BL,:, WB T-' NSC ° - .NBT' . SBL Lane Configurations ` tT+ ' tt if Volume (vph) 115 40 30 10 35 110 1295 10 920 90 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot - Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 13.2 43.7 8.7 39.2 39.2 Total Split (%) 41.8% 41.8% 41.8% 41.8% 41.8% 14.7% 48.6% 9.7% 43.6% 43.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1,7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6,6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 13.4 13.4 13.4 8.3 34.1 4.7 25.5 25.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.13 0.55 0.08 0.41 0.41 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.09 0.21 0.51 0.74 0.08 0.69 0.14 Control Delay 31.1 9.1 15.6 36.5 15.1 33.5 19.7 4.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 31.1 9.1 15.6 36.5 15.1 33.5 19.7 4.1 LOS C A B D B C B A Approach Delay 27.5 15.6 16.8 18.5 Approach LOS C B B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 62 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 3: W Kahaonea St & Knnnaleh in Ava 01 1 1 o2 o4 8:7 s `1 043.7-S 37:6 s:' 05 05 08 13.2s H 392 6 RA, 37.6s Waiaka Center Existing Saturday 5/24/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kannelehua Ave 01 I o2 o4 107s ' 1 140.9,i-:, _; 38:4ss o5 06 08 10 s" 1 1141.6 d Timings t I 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 I Lane EBL " .' EBT ; NBL NBT; SBL SBT SBR r Lane Configurations r t tt Volume (vph) 155 50 10 45 105 1230 5 1065 105 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm r - Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6s. Permitted Phases 4 8 6 ` Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 L. Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 10.0 40.9 10.7 41.6 41.6 r Total Split (%} 42.7% 42.7% 42.7% 42.7% 11.1% 45.4% 11.9% 46.2% 46.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 16.7 16.7 6.3 35.3 6.3 26.4 26.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.53 0.09 0.40 0.40 We Ratio 0.72 0.17 0.68 0.71 0.03 0.82 0.16 Control Delay 35.3 17.9 58.1 16.7 34.8 24.1 3.9 -" Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0_ Total Delay 35,3 17.9 58.1 16.7 34.8 24.1 3,9 LOS D B E B C C A Approach Delay 35.3 17.9 20.0 22.3 Approach LOS D B B C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 66.5 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kannelehua Ave 01 I o2 o4 107s ' 1 140.9,i-:, _; 38:4ss o5 06 08 10 s" 1 1141.6 s" :. „: % 38.4s.. Waiaka Center Existing Saturday 5/24/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 E t i Timings t o2 04 8.7 s< 1 53.7 s.; . 37.6 s 05 06- 08 14s ':> 484s K437.6s 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 ;EBT EBR . NBT SBL SBT -SBR Lane Configurations c r ' f t+ '� tt r Volume (vph) 135 40 30 10 35 110 1510 10 1125 110 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 14.0 53.7 8.7 48.4 48.4 Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 14.0% 53.7% 8.7% 48.4% 48.4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 Ail -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 16.4 16.4 16.4 8.9 42.6 4.8 30.8 30.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.12 0.58 0.07 0.42 0.42 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.09 0.22 0.56 0.82 0.10 0.82 0.16 Control Delay 37.7 9.9 17.3 45.4 18.3 41.3 25.2 3.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.7 9.9 17.3 45.4 18.3 41.3 25.2 3.8 LOS D A B D B D C A Approach Delay 33.6 17.3 20.1 23.4 Approach LOS C B C C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 73.6 Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Snlits and Phases I W Kahaooea St & Kanoelehua Ave 01 t o2 04 8.7 s< 1 53.7 s.; . 37.6 s 05 06- 08 14s ':> 484s K437.6s Waiaka Center Ambient Saturday 5/29/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 -* --* *- I Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 01 EBL EBT EBR WBL. ; ' VV ', NB.L, , . NBT : 56L SBT SBR ,'. Lane Configurations 45.4s,, .. " . ;i7.6 s;.:• ' ;:. ` ' t Vi tt r Volume (vph) 35 50 140 20 45 125 1145 25 1315 90 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 12.0 48.6 8.8 45.4 45.4 Total Split (%) 39.6% 39.6% 39.6% 39.6% 39.6% 12.6% 51.2% 9.3% 47.8% 47.8% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 10.6 10,6 10.6 13.1 67.0 6.0 54.5 54.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.71 0.06 0.57 0.57 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.52 0.46 0.56 0.51 0.24 0.70 0.10 Control Delay 48.9 17.0 40.1 44.4 9.4 46.8 18,1 2.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48,9 17.0 40.1 44.4 9.4 46.8 18.1 2.9 LOS D B D D A D B A Approach Delay 29.0 40.1 12.8 17.6 Approach LOS C D B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 95 Actuated Cycle Length: 95 Offset: 90 (95%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.70 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 01 1 m2" u4 37.6 s o5 4 06 08 12 s 45.4s,, .. " . ;i7.6 s;.:• ' ;:. Waiaka Center Existingpm 5/24/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W KaWailani St & Kan®elehua Ave 1 o2 o4 �a.777. «... 8/14/2011 i 06 08 11 s Sa.S s . 38.4: t Lane Group EBL EBT: WBIL WBT NBL .` NBT,,,,:,SBL .SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' 0 tt r Volume (vph) 180 50 10 45 105 1440 5 1255 125 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm i Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 t Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 11.0 50.9 10.7 50.6 50.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 11.0% 50.9% 10.7% 50.6% 50.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3,7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1,5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 i Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 ! Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 21.1 21.1 7.3 45.9 6.2 36.1 36.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.56 0.08 0.44 0.44 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.17 0.72 0.79 0.04 0.87 0.18 Control Delay 44.9 21.7 68.2 19.8 43.2 28.4 3.6 (- Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.9 21.7 68.2 19.8 43.2 28.4 3.6 LOS D C E B D C A (_ Approach Delay 44.9 21.7 23.1 26.2 Approach LOS D C C C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 81.5 Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0,87 Intersection Signal Delay: 26.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Snlits anri Pha-P.,,• 6- W Kiwailani St & Kannelehua Ave 01 1 o2 o4 �a.777. «... 05 06 08 11 s Sa.S s . 38.4: Waiaka Center Ambient Saturday 5/29/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 d Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave t o2 "'w" a4 12.2 s. °' 50.2 s 37:6 s e5 a5 8/14/2011 13.9s ;...1 148.5s `WBL; ; WBT 1NBR NBL. NBT Lane Configurations tt r tt r Volume (vph) 130 50 30 150 40 150 110 1460 25 130 1075 110 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 13.9 50.2 50.2 12.2 48.5 48.5 Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 13.9% 50.2% 50.2% 12.2% 48.5% 48.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -(vain Act Effct Green (s) 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 10.3 48.4 48.4 12.0 50.1 50.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.48 0.48 0.12 0.50 0.50 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.09 0.85 0.33 0.66 0.93 0.03 0.67 0.66 0.14 Control Delay 60.3 9.3 65.2 6.3 67.5 23.9 0.7 59.7 22.5 3.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 60.3 9.3 65.2 6.3 67.5 23.9 0.7 59.7 22.5 3.8 LOS E A E A E G A E C A Approach Delay 52.9 39.2 26.6 24.6 Approach LOS D D C C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 38 (38%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.93 Intersection Signal Delay: 28.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Solits and Phases: 3: W Kahaooea St & Kanoelehua Ave u1 t o2 "'w" a4 12.2 s. °' 50.2 s 37:6 s e5 a5 08 13.9s ;...1 148.5s Waiaka Total Saturday 5/30/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave LariQ Group, EBL .. EBT ','WBL WBT , : ' NSL ;` NBT , ; , $BL , SBT 8/14/2011 i SBR- i Lane Configurations 41, �1- 08 tt if _ Volume (vph) 185 50 10 45 105 1530 5 1340 130 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm (- Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 i Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 I, Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 11.0 50.9 10.7 50.6 50.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 11.0% 50.9% 10.7% 50.6% 50.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 24.3 24.3 10.0 61.3 6.0 49.3 49.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.61 0.06 0.49 0.49 i v/c Ratio 0.84 0.18 0.64 0.77 0.05 0.84 0.17 Control Delay 55.8 23.4 62.2 19.7 58.2 24.0 2.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.8 23.4 62.2 19.7 58.2 24.0 2.2 LOS E C E B E C A t - Approach Delay 55.8 23.4 22.5 22.2 Approach LOS E C C C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 100 _ Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 96 (96%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated f Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Sniits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 01 1 m2 04 05 4 06 �1- 08 Waiaka Total Saturday 5/30/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 I 2019 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Calculations Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 lit 5450 - Lane Configurations tt r Volume (vph) 95 35 70 35 30 180 2085 10 630 35 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 23.2 53.7 8.7 39.2 39.2 Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 23.2% 53.7% 8.7% 39.2% 39.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Min None C-Min C-Min Act Effct Green (s) 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.3 69.5 5.2 52.3 52.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.70 0.05 0.52 0.52 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.24 0.38 0.72 0.94 0.12 0.37 0.04 Control Delay 51.2 9.9 35.9 62.1 11.1 47.5 16.6 5.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 51.2 9.9 35.9 62.1 11.1 47.5 16.6 5.9 LOS D A D E B D B A Approach Delay 36.7 35.9 15.1 16.5 Approach LOS D D B B NZIORx Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 44 (44%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum We Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka Center 2019 Ambient AM 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report WY Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 -0. - t If. 4/ Lane Configurations d ��•,�,tE - �',Y a ,� ,�{ t` �r'�' 7�# `r��,.{{,,rryry.�TT'IT" r��%W �,r')f e' ,i h f-{&#�` � , . � r •:. Py:�q�_ � .'(d�fn�ij?,�I� F.h�`�'m'n"""�rp?3. ,. t�� r` l 3s `++J+ALU:,.fLi.,r_L-'L�S.IS.SF_„�,.:.f�v^.-. i 0 Vi tt r Volume (vph) 190 50 45 125 235 1845 10 570 120 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 27.0 50.9 10.7 34.6 34.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 27.0% 50.9% 10.7% 34.6% 34.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 29.2 29.2 18.2 56.3 6.1 36.2 36.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.18 0.56 0.06 0.36 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.45 0.79 1.01 0.10 0.48 0.20 Control Delay 68.9 30.5 56.6 47.1 53.5 23.3 11.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.9 30.5 56.6 47.1 53.5 23.3 11.4 LOS E C E D D C B Approach Delay 68.9 30.5 48.2 21.7 Approach LOS E C D C L �4:?*s�i,!?U�„�,�!�+tJ4!,��u'�fl#isf,!✓.�l�rrJr1/,G�`la�.,'rrfJi�r;'�tt %,€iY#��%„�'i.E �{'t fr .,r,,:.. 1,�1 , rff. ,i,,,:;'ta ,> f,i. .r,.ff , •,i . !t'r>r.. ;:X6,tt , � r„ �, ��r~d.ar, �k ��<r �:Ir}FtL'ri„r'1,�; Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:1.01 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.5 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.0% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka Center 2019 Ambient AM 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report wy Page 1 d ��•,�,tE - �',Y a ,� ,�{ t` �r'�' 7�# `r��,.{{,,rryry.�TT'IT" r��%W �,r')f e' ,i h f-{&#�` � , . � r •:. Py:�q�_ � .'(d�fn�ij?,�I� F.h�`�'m'n"""�rp?3. ,. t�� r` l 3s `++J+ALU:,.fLi.,r_L-'L�S.IS.SF_„�,.:.f�v^.-. i �yy�d--.rr�rsrs?T err r�;` . frr*u "%"t' q it { f ;�.:�N I, _ �'"'-:r,^r• .;'7-f' � +i+ s��{* P� ^ � �xJle.•'lf�Ns��. i;� ' � v�._ ;. TJf , �}tr�d�i�` ditia. ' F' .�} � fF"1 ,�`� >.� trf'r I F./%i ! ��}l.t:*».rl,,�J.ti Waiaka Center 2019 Ambient AM 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report wy Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 --* --I- *_ *'- Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r tt r Vi tt r Volume (vph) 90 40 70 115 35 110 180 2010 35 50 610 35 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 23.2 53.7 53.7 8.7 39.2 39.2 Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 23.2°% 53.7% 53.7% 8.7% 39.2% 39.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 17.9 17.9 17.9 17.9 15.3 59.3 59.3 7.7 49.9 49.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.59 0.59 0.08 0.50 0.50 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.22 0.73 0.32 0.72 1.04 0.04 0.39 0.38 0.05 Control Delay 52.6 8.8 56.2 10.2 59.4 34.1 0.0 51.6 18.2 6.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 52.6 8.8 56.2 10.2 59.4 34.1 0.0 51.6 18.2 6.5 LOS D A E B E C A D B A Approach Delay 37.3 36.7 35.6 20.0 Approach LOS D D D B Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 42 (42%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum We Ratio: 1.04 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2019 total AM 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Analysis Period (min)15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2019 total AM 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Lane Configurations 0 Vi tt r Volume (vph) 195 50 45 125 235 1915 10 625 120 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot • Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 22.0 50.9 10.7 39.6 39.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 22.0% 50.9% 10.7% 39.6% 39.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 29.5 29.5 16.7 56.0 6.1 37.4 37.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.17 0.56 0.06 0.37 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.44 0.86 1.06 0.10 0.51 0.19 Control Delay 69.9 30.3 68.1 61.2 54.4 22.5 8.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA Total Delay 69.9 30.3 68.1 61.2 54.4 22.5 8.4 f i LOS E C E E D C A '- Approach Delay 69.9 30.3 62.0 20.7 Approach LOS E C E C `..F+rft �i �+�',�+.r ;gra ;�, �r+, r•,�. pr r r : F Ple>fl?5;iff111..;i,�f` Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.06 Intersection Signal Delay: 51.8 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min)15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2019 total AM 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations �` '1 fti, " Volume (vph) 40 50 145 20 45 135 1315 30 1565 110 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 12.0 53.6 8.8 50.4 50.4 Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 12.0% 53.6% 8.8% 50.4% 50.4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 11.3 11.3 11.3 15.4 69.0 6.4 56.5 56.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.69 0.06 0.56 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.57 0.45 0.54 0.59 0.29 0.85 0.13 Control Delay 52.2 22.2 42.1 44.9 11.7 50.4 24.8 2.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 52.2 22.2 42.1 44.9 11.7 50.4 24.8 2.8 LOS D C D D B D C A Approach Delay 33.6 42.1 14.8 23.8 Approach LOS C D B C Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 58 (58%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum We Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 St A Knnnalahua Ava Waiaka Center 2019 Ambient pm 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 ' %:' ,I.f.7`!�irl Oi UN 11111671111$0 Lane Configurations tt Volume (vph) 90 45 45 95 135 1065 10 1550 280 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm �- Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 ! Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 11.0 50.9 10.7 50.6 50.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 11.0% 50.9% 10.7% 50.6% 50.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 f Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.9 18.9 15.5 66.6 6.1 49.2 49.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.16 0.67 0.06 0.49 0.49 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.61 0.53 0.50 0.10 0.97 0.33 Control Delay 59.4 43.9 48.1 11.0 62.6 24.2 0.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.4 43.9 48.1 11.0 62.6 24.2 0.9 �- LOS E D D B E C A Approach Delay 59.4 43.9 15.2 20.9 Approach LOS E D B C w fl +✓i.",tf(G'.dff",f7 t /1/}"Yfld s>.t,:£r ,W-rlfr.;tys h# `F `f^T7i t� `r'llf• jf Ifo. �1" d { {:'1 .. it.... .lY ed f f.F � � elf a tl '. f 1 ..I/ r .f ��'� i .i..y,`r fr J. �, 1. _ Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow . Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.97 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.6% ICU Level of Service E s Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases- 6- W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Report Re 7 - nchro Waiaka Center 2019 Ambient pm 8/14/2011 Baseline S Y P Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations +` r 4 r vi tt r tt ? Volume (vph) 35 60 150 125 50 125 135 1255 20 125 1515 110 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 14.0 56.5 56.5 15.9 58.4 58.4 Total Split (%) 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 12.7% 51.4% 51.4% 14.5% 53.1% 53.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 13.6 60.2 60.2 12.2 58.8 58.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.55 0.55 0.11 0.53 0.53 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.38 0.75 0.33 0.67 0.70 0.03 0.69 0.87 0.13 Control Delay 42.4 7.8 59.2 7.9 55.5 29.2 9.0 65.0 30.2 3.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 42.4 7.8 59.2 7.9 55.5 29.2 9.0 65.0 30.2 3.3 LOS D A E A E C A E C A Approach Delay 21.2 37.8 31.4 31.0 Approach LOS C D C C Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 68 (62%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87 Intersection Signal Delay: 31.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2019 total pm 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2019 total pm 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 c Lane Configurations ' 0 tt r Volume (vph) 90 45 45 95 135 1115 10 1600 285 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm - Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 j Permitted Phases 4 8 6 t_. Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 13.0 60.9 10.7 58.6 58.6 [ Total Split (%) 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 11.8% 55.4% 9.7% 53.3% 53.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 j Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? ' Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 20.6 20.6 14.7 74.9 6.1 58.3 58.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.68 0.06 0.53 0.53 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.61 0.62 0.51 0.11 0.93 0.31 Control Delay 67.2 48.1 58.1 11.2 62.7 18.6 0.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 67.2 48.1 58.1 11.2 62.7 18.6 0.6 LOS E D E B E B A - Approach Delay 67.2 48.1 16.3 16.2 Approach LOS E D B B r Lr,r`e pp+r(/�ta�, �Fj¢¢j�}},g,.,.r .i` y 181A 1 }.. )YV`.7�I"s 1% . 1(i' °'' l�e�'I//F!x W �� i'is f?Y.'#.°.fa�%'1Pkff yflX�T.1F3�t?�..II'l"..ff,'�.YNf.;:`:.fbrl.Fr£l, tetrl,1':ti FfatFk J,. rkr: els.{if l �flf. t' S 4/dt f+. dl ra7tl.i��nlf .$fik Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.93 t Intersection Signal Delay: 20.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2019 total pm 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 c Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 a. Lane Configurations, , tt r Volume (vph) 140 40 30 10 35 115 1560 10 1165 115 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 11.4 43.7 8.7 41.0 41.0 Total Split (%) 41.8% 41.8% 41.8% 41.8% 41.8% 12.7% 48.6% 9.7% 45.6% 45.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Min None C-Min C-Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.3 18.3 18.3 11.2 56.8 5.2 43.6 43.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.63 0.06 0.48 0.48 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.09 0.24 0.57 0.77 0.11 0.74 0.15 Control Delay 44.2 9.5 18.2 56.6 7.8 42.1 24.0 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.2 9.5 18.2 56.6 7.8 42.1 24.0 3.9 LOS D A B E A D C A Approach Delay 39.1 18.3 11.1 22.3 Approach LOS D B B C . , Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 43 (48%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka Center2019 Ambient Saturday 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Approach Delay Approach LOS 48.8 19.9 22.6 19.1 D B C B Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave u. � -.. i � t �� "��P...f., P�Y,� t �ilJ�.u';� iLIL4:.i�.Sr�.'�:8:.`�'78_ ^ �.'.u�l�'F d� 3 Y• `F a.i E�.F.a eP �t Waiaka Center2019 Ambient Saturday 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Lane Configurations 4+ ' +T+ ' tt r Volume (vph) 185 50 10 45 110 1490 5 1300 130 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 10.0 40.9 10.7 41.6 41.6 Total Split (%) 42.7% 42.7% 42.7% 42.7% 11.1% 45.4% 11.9% 46.2% 46.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 22.7 22.7 10.7 52.9 6.0 40.2 40.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.12 0.59 0.07 0.45 0.45 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.17 0.57 0.78 0.04 0.89 0.18 Control Delay 48.8 19.9 51.5 20.5 61.2 20.8 0.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.8 19.9 51.5 20.5 61.2 20.8 0.9 LOS D B D C E C A Approach Delay Approach LOS 48.8 19.9 22.6 19.1 D B C B Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave u. � -.. i � t �� "��P...f., P�Y,� t �ilJ�.u';� iLIL4:.i�.Sr�.'�:8:.`�'78_ ^ �.'.u�l�'F d� 3 Y• `F a.i E�.F.a eP �t Waiaka Center2019 Ambient Saturday 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r tt r tt r Volume (vph) 135 50 30 150 40 150 115 1510 25 130 1110 115 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8:0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 14.8 50.4 50.4 12.0 47.6 47.6 Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 14.8% 50.4% 50.4% 12.0% 47.6% 47.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 10.5 48.2 48.2 12.0 49.6 49.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.48 0.48 0.12 0.50 0.50 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.08 0.86 0.33 0.67 0.96 0.03 0.67 0.69 0.15 Control Delay 62.7 9.3 67.3 6.2 67.4 27.7 0.6 59.7 23.6 3.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.7 9.3 67.3 6.2 67.4 27.7 0.6 59.7 23.6 3.8 LOS E A E A E C A E C A Approach Delay 55.2 40.3 30.1 25.4 Approach LOS E D C C Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 42 (42%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Signal Delay: 30.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Waiaka 2019 Total Saturday 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 ,r.�:: �il{pRt/�j+-p Ifl7:?iA ,�%.: -5r [{p}�>.�}n •.Y'r Fr �"�vfll��s}r�f�'r�if`�. �!� f'sd !/£'�!!,f{�fy{{ rrirz//,7 f�f`'..r�,.r J �f N �! rf �/'.'p !J f - ri,,� tr 1.:„�hNr�s°r.t1R� r'' Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86 Intersection Signal Delay: 26.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave uA FI ��..wTr�r':^'�'eS."...'.. "^ '•%' j, IAF.. f :a �f �v}`:lam��il''�t �u�iF. i'Gi�.; ayi j ' d- �,1' ,9 ..13--..J.�.:�.,..:d1<liiis'il TvNO," ?T., f f ff't' J'fi{ ! 1 1 Jt��iaeusst+/rur L, I `yr}. ��J.'��'u2-,..2v�T{riFaA..,hn,�„�y 7 Ff % rK?fiL.f �� "Yi '"f':;`�.s'n""% r ,..1, f Y �, � 1 �°�D.�`a ._Gp,�f��.Fl�#� Lane Configurations Vi +T I tt r . Volume (vph) 190 50 10 45 105 1580 5 1380 135 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 - Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase _ Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 11.0 50.9 10.7 50.6 50.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 11.0% 50.9% 10.7% 50.6% 50.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 { Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? I Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 24.7 24.7 9.9 60.9 6.0 49.0 49.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.61 0.06 0.49 0.49 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.18 0.66 0.80 0.05 0.86 0.17 Control Delay 56.8 23.2 63.1 21.0 60.4 25.3 2.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.8 23.2 63.1 21,0 60.4 25.3 2.1 4 LOS E C E C E C A r Approach Delay 56.8 23.2 23.6 23.3 Approach LOS E C C C ,r.�:: �il{pRt/�j+-p Ifl7:?iA ,�%.: -5r [{p}�>.�}n •.Y'r Fr �"�vfll��s}r�f�'r�if`�. �!� f'sd !/£'�!!,f{�fy{{ rrirz//,7 f�f`'..r�,.r J �f N �! rf �/'.'p !J f - ri,,� tr 1.:„�hNr�s°r.t1R� r'' Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86 Intersection Signal Delay: 26.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave uA FI ��..wTr�r':^'�'eS."...'.. "^ '•%' j, IAF.. f :a �f �v}`:lam��il''�t �u�iF. i'Gi�.; ayi j ' d- �,1' ,9 ..13--..J.�.:�.,..:d1<liiis'il TvNO," ?T., f f ff't' J'fi{ ! 1 1 Jt��iaeusst+/rur L, I `yr}. ��J.'��'u2-,..2v�T{riFaA..,hn,�„�y 7 Ff % rK?fiL.f �� "Yi '"f':;`�.s'n""% r ,..1, f Y �, � 1 �°�D.�`a ._Gp,�f��.Fl�#� Waiaka 2019 Total Saturday 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 ti f 2024 Signalized Intersection Level o Service Calculations f r Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations 4 if 0 tt r Volume (vph) 95 35 75 35 30 185 2155 10 650 35 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 27.4 73.7 8.7 55.0 55.0 Total Split (%) 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 22.8% 61.4% 7.3% 45.8% 45.8% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.9 87.8 5.4 68.0 68.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.73 0.04 0.57 0.57 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.28 0.46 0.76 0.92 0.14 0.35 0.04 Control Delay 66.9 11.2 48.5 70.8 10.0 58.4 16.3 5.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 66.9 11.2 48.5 70.8 10.0 58.4 16.3 5.4 LOS E B D E B E B A Approach Delay 46.4 48.5 14.7 16.4 Approach LOS D D B B Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 47 (39%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.92 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka Center 2024 Ambient AM 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report wy Page 1 Timings ` 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 I %77 of rSWD�'-"%7111.:3"7.tft.M1�'i5{i'�IaA Lane Configurations *4 tT+ tt fir _ Volume (vph) 195 50 45 125 240 1910 10 590 125 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm - Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 L Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 ° Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 39.2 39.2 39.2 39.2 32.0 70.1 10.7 48.8 48.8 Total Split (%) 32.7% 32.7% 32.7% 32.7% 26.7% 58.4% 8.9% 40.7% 40.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6,0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 32.8 32.8 21.7 72.7 6.1 49.1 49.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.18 0.61 0.05 0.41 0.41 v/c Ratio 1.08 0.48 0,82 0.97 0.12 0.44 0.19 Control Delay 114.8 39.9 66.6 37.8 46.9 35.3 16.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 114.8 39.9 66.6 37.8 46.9 35.3 16.9 LOS F D E D D D B Approach Delay 114.8 39.9 41.0 32.3 Approach LOS F D D C ��;:� FI}Fi.£I`/'. :r�f:;Nyn, i";Fefw ' �:fl`��T}rf,. N;SICO � , , f J :f ,,�„ ,,,f, x ,. µr; tf f , ,U r _ , ff ,r, frH3f, r� y.,...�+.5.5'��JJb3�r��F.��ifitfi�`t.�;Gf, II��. �iX �fsr 1Y'rr�t'`a '�l f/!�"f+}*+1111ttt,��.fE�S1 �&a �ll�J f>{ ftt yf�:; lt[ �1N t`�tl �lr r�`�+�dr�i�sC•s il�a�'r�i�:.� ,`f .+,. �, i��'"l�t"P�a+ Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.08 Intersection Signal Delay: 46.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave r-- Waiaka Center 2024 Ambient AM 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report wy Page 1 6 i Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations 4 tt Volume (vph) 95 35 75 35 30 185 2155 10 650 35 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 25.6 63.7 8.7 46.8 46.8 Total Split (%) 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 23.3% 57.9% 7.9% 42.5% 42.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 16.2 16.2 16.2 16.8 78.9 5.3 60.2 60.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.72 0.05 0.55 0.55 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.27 0.43 0.75 0.94 0.13 0.36 0.04 Control Delay 59.6 10.5 42.7 66.7 11.5 53.0 16.4 5.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.6 10.5 42.7 66.7 11.5 53.0 16.4 5.7 LOS E B D E B D B A Approach Delay 41.5 42.7 15.8 16.4 Approach LOS D D B B Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 43 (39%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2024 Ambient AM w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report wy Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 -- .4\ t,�' -' - Lane Configurations , 4+ ' 0 ' tt r Volume (vph) 195 50 45 125 240 1910 10 590 125 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 30.0 60.9 10.7 41.6 41.6 Total Split (%) 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 27.3% 55.4% 9.7% 37.8% 37.8% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6,4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag "Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 25.3 25.3 25.3 20.2 70.2 6.1 48.1 48.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.64 0.06 0.44 0.44 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.31 0.55 0.80 0.93 0.11 0.41 0.18 Control Delay 86.5 18.0 40.7 61.1 28.0 45.7 27.1 14.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 86.5 18.0 40.7 61.1 28.0 45.7 27.1 14.4 LOS F B D E C D C B Approach Delay 59.7 40.7 31.7 25.2 Approach LOS E D C C "rr .tdize'.5..; `i ft#», 8u!�N r L�'. x� p✓{s"t R ri Jy'�1/i pp §�i` i}�;�° . -}t J�r7t1 rr2}-, r,.� J"1, ,,t xstt t y�i p�.{{�� +; f { ��' ,£tA d .i..dsl jl,Jt 1 f { { 31 '3 �I,��,tt�a{�f�c��r.°,:t��`'xN�„/f.°{`fl,��u 1.,n, 4�r'��4.. ..',.}}" !.„ ,.'I��,�r 1N f?r#r a.,te',{{si r,=x <.'�r i:��i�+,f'.i%}'j3t�tll, Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 33.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2024 Ambient AM w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report tF wy Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoefehua Ave 8/14/2011 -A ---r. -,�r {"��j7/ - t l 4/ Lane Configurations 4 r 4 Vi tt tt r Volume (vph) 90 40 75 115 35 110 185 2080 35 50 630 35 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 27.1 73.7 73.7 8.7 55.3 55.3 Total Split (%) 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 22.6% 61.4% 61.4% 7.3% 46.1% 46.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 17.9 76.5 76.5 7.7 64.5 64.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.15 0.64 0.64 0.06 0.54 0.54 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.24 0.80 0.35 0.76 1.00 0.04 0.47 0.36 0.04 Control Delay 69.0 9.7 74.4 18.6 68.5 21.7 0.1 67.9 18.5 6.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 69.0 9.7 74.4 18.6 68.5 21.7 0.1 67.9 18.5 6.3 LOS E A E B E C A E B A Approach Delay 47.2 50.7 25.2 21.4 Approach LOS D D C C Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 42 (35%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Signal Delay: 27.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2024 total AM 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations 4+ ' ' tt r Volume (vph) 200 50 45 125 240 1975 10 645 125 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 I Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 32.0 70.3 10.7 49.0 49.0 Total Split (%) 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 26.7% 58.6% 8.9% 40.8% 40.8% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? i Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 32.6 32.6 21.7 72.9 6.1 49.3 49.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.18 0.61 0.05 0.41 0.41 t v/c Ratio 1.11 0.48 0.82 1.01 0.12 0.48 0.19 Control Delay 124.4 40.1 66.6 44.7 47.8 33.9 15.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 124.4 40.1 66.6 44.7 47.8 33.9 15.2 LOS F D E D D C B Approach Delay 124.4 40.1 47.1 31.1 Approach LOS F D D C �i� t��J/i"talk/ Z lr:';{fJf J6t4x.r.r f �p{�,, - X '..'rrrtt { !! -::e .r.. s s ,. •. Jp/f tltt°� {� t�,lt;% i f�;1 d �irs„dF d r3E��t e'f'f fi+71 %s>f! If -'. ffF�. ylf, _ irT1P FfI.��1 � t.,e+:F__ t t tf§ f13 ;`; �fi F :�` t�i"}ff ,Jt��/��/.%J.` lI •,%�: zfi�'f114� i+�GS��7!��'I.Xilrifl;'�Ifs�:J�sr��'�i1'ff`s��4�11.�r�,l�in,uS�I.S�f r%dif'T.f„. F�as;.4;�t1��1`�±,��f r•x' � _ +st.? rrF{l�..dt�$h!„':prF:ri',�tlfil��'��ag'�}d�?/r`FI.xx-r�ii,�`�fh�P'U;�t:"},"9FJ Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.11 Intersection Signal Delay: 50.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2024 total AM 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page i Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r I tt r tt r Volume (vph) 90 40 75 115 35 110 185 2080 35 50 630 35 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 26.8 73.7 73.7 8.7 55.6 55.6 Total Split (%) 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 22.3% 61.4% 61.4% 7.3% 46.3% 46.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 17.9 76.5 76.5 7.7 64.5 64.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.15 0.64 0.64 0.06 0.54 0.54 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.24 0.80 0.35 0.76 1.00 0.04 0.47 0.36 0.04 Control Delay 69.0 9.7 74.4 18.6 69.9 25.3 0.1 67.9 18.5 6.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 69.0 9.7 74.4 18.6 69.9 25.3 0.1 67.9 18.5 6.3 LOS E A E B E C A E B A Approach Delay 47.2 50.7 28.5 21.4 Approach LOS D D C C �` �� ,, Ming Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 42 (35%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Signal Delay: 29.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Waiaka 2024 total AM w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings � .t/t��ilSr...i'/i��;tsr)f/l..rlfVeT:,"�f:.�,,,1�tritfJ3ff'i; tTr- � /'i. �- : gay tL •lt+� Ym�_:Guwit,:u.lv..1 -� ti • U • 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations Vi T+ ' 0 ' tt r L_ Volume (vph) 200 50 45 125 240 1975 10 645 125 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 32.0 70.9 10.7 49.6 49.6 Total Split (%) 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 26.7% 59.1% 8.9% 41.3% 41.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 i Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 21.7 77.4 6.1 53.9 53.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.64 0.05 0.45 0.45 , v/c Ratio 0.96 0.31 0.54 0.82 0.95 0.12 0,44 0.17 Control Delay 95.4 21.4 43.9 66.6 31.0 48.2 30.7 14.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 95.4 21.4 43.9 66.6 31.0 48.2 30.7 14.7 LOS F C D E C D C B Approach Delay 66.9 43.9 34.8 28.4 Approach LOS E D C C Iz f/k:,s, lir%i}„f�f'1�^+E>'ri$,. <&; If r� / •.1 t.. j�7Yr��i6 tenla��'In�.t� q, Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated t Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Signal Delay: 36.8 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.3% ICU Level of Service G r Analysis Period (min)15 Snlits and Phases- 6- W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2024 total AM w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 _ � .t/t��ilSr...i'/i��;tsr)f/l..rlfVeT:,"�f:.�,,,1�tritfJ3ff'i; tTr- � /'i. �- : gay tL •lt+� Ym�_:Guwit,:u.lv..1 -� ti • U • mfi� /+ �1F e{�'.f r.4�bJ�e2,{u:.&Gaw/�:'f1i.� f .nLf tr fiLe.u.-sL, .E1�lm u'x.� a•. xn.:'1.�ya u..eA....:,,lii..�«.:4.-.. Waiaka 2024 total AM w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 _ Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 1,11 M Lane Configurations ,T, Vi 0 Vi tt Volume (vph) 40 50 155 20 45 140 1360 30 1620 115 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 13.5 63.6 8.8 58.9 58.9 Total Split (%) 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 12.3% 57.8% 8.0% 53.5% 53.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 16.3 78.2 6.6 64.9 64.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.71 0.06 0.59 0.59 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.62 0.47 0.58 0.60 0.31 0.84 0.13 Control Delay 59.0 27.9 48.1 48.3 15.5 56.5 24.5 2.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.0 27.9 48.1 48.3 15.5 56.5 24.5 2.6 LOS E C D D B E C A Approach Delay 39.3 48.1 18.5 23.6 Approach LOS D D B C Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 62 (56%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka Center 2024 Ambient pm 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings ` 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 m : i p 1�rlt `j ';l�'flGSrh Lane Configurations f ' tt r Volume (vph) 90 45 45 95 140 1100 10 1605 290 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38,4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 13.0 60.9 10.7 58.6 58.6 Total Split (%) 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 11.8% 55.4% 9.7% 53.3% 53.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 20.9 20.9 15.2 74.6 6.1 57.6 57.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.14 0.68 0.06 0.52 0.52 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.61 0.62 0.50 0.11 0.94 0.32 Control Delay 66.4 47.6 57.7 11.3 67.7 20.5 0.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 66.4 47.6 57.7 11.3 67.7 20.5 0.8 LOS E D E B E C A Approach Delay 66.4 47.6 16.5 17.8 Approach LOS E D B B 1 i a Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 104 (95%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum We Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.5 "; Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka Center 2024 Ambient pm 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 4 . Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 ---* --p. 4- *\ Lane Configurations *' r tT Vi tt ff Volume (vph) 40 50 155 20 45 140 1360 30 1620 115 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 13.5 63.6 8.8 58.9 58.9 Total Split (%) 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 12.3% 57.8°% 8.0% 53.5% 53.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 16.3 78.2 6.6 64.9 64.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.71 0.06 0.59 0.59 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.62 0.47 0.58 0.60 0.31 0.84 0.13 Control Delay 59.0 27.9 48.1 46.7 16.5 56.5 24.5 2.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.0 27.9 48.1 46.7 16.5 56.5 24.5 2.6 LOS E C D D B E C A Approach Delay 39.3 48.1 19.3 23.6 Approach LOS D D n B C Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 68 (62%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2024 Ambient pm w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations 1� ' ti� ' tt- r Volume (vph) 90 45 45 95 140 1100 10 1605 290 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 13.0 60.9 10.7 58.6 58.6 Total Split (%) 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 11.8% 55.4% 9.7% 53.3% 53.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 15.3 15.3 15.3 16.9 80.2 6.1 61.4 61.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.73 0.06 0.56 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.44 0.81 0.56 0.47 0.11 0.88 0.31 Control Delay 76.3 22.9 71.3 51.4 8.1 61.4 13.1 0.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 76.3 22.9 71.3 51.4 8.1 61.4 13.1 0.6 LOS E C E D A E B A Approach Delay 45.8 71.3 12.9 11.5 Approach LOS D E B B Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2024 Ambient pm w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 68 (62%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization. 81.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2024 total pm 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 35 60 155 125 50 125 140 1300 20 125 1570 115 Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm 4 8 5 2 1 6 4 4 8 8 2 6 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 14.0 56.5 56.5 15.9 58.4 58.4 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 12.7% 51.4% 51.4% 14.5% 53.1% 53.1% 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 14.2 60.2 60.2 12.2 58.3 58.3 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.55 0.55 0.11 0.53 0.53 0.41 0.39 0.75 0.33 0.67 0.73 0.03 0.69 0.91 0.14 42.4 7.8 59.2 7.9 54.9 30.4 8.5 65.0 33.5 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.4 7.8 59.2 7.9 54.9 30.4 8.5 65.0 33.5 3.3 D A E A D C A E C A 20.9 37.8 32.5 33.8 C D C C Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 68 (62%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization. 81.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2024 total pm 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings ` 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations ' tT+ tt r _ Volume (vph) 95 45 45 95 140 1150 10 1655 290 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm F- Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 13.0 60.9 10.7 58.6 58.6 Total Split (%) 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 11.8% 55.4% 9.7% 53.3% 53.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? E Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min °`C -Min ( . Act Effct Green (s) 21.4 21.4 14.9 74.1 6.1 57.3 57.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.14 0.67 0.06 0.52 0.52 s v/c Ratio 0.87 0.59 0.64 0.53 0.11 0.98 0.32 Control Delay 66.5 46.1 58.8 12.0 63.4 24.0 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t Total Delay 66.5 46.1 58.8 12.0 63.4 24.0 0.5 LOS E D E B E C A �- Approach Delay 66.5 46.1 17.0 20.7 Approach LOS E D B C {f( ,:.: rj j =r.. t lL ! r+-..- -„ t o .7 ,:•. k f i .! ri } t 3 F F%tlT. .. f/ J i 19 t s;.fs !1 5 Iffffjjj //� X Ii F� f}}.{{F Ytff &Y YFf jl itt F}J IfF Y"t'1`vft i f7 i s sl M£ill, ..- r�t�ViGXYt.•�.`.�.v JX..f �S{-hIYY f?,71tf.i,/r-1}.fie,.l. : Y..= x. ... Vii.•.;; t1.},r r:Fh.•:.. .'t `2✓e fr,, ., _.4 J:.iY,.e(.tr.,ff. s,s�rtX:J.�. /PlPAe ;ltF+' Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow } Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.98 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.0% ICU Level of Service E E Analysis Period (min)15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2024 total pm 8/1412011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 f s Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 -.-* -►. ' *%- *\ 1' r� ./ Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r I tt r I tt r Volume (vph) 35 60 155 125 50 125 140 1300 20 125 1570 125 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 13.7 58.9 58.9 13.5 58.7 58.7 Total Split (%) 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 12.5% 53.5% 53.5% 12.3% 53.4% 53.4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 '6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 14.4 59.6 59.6 12.8 58.1 58.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.54 0.54 0.12 0.53 0.53 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.39 0.75 0.33 0.66 0.74 0.03 0.66 0.91 0.15 Control Delay 42.4 7.8 59.2 7.9 53.9 31.6 10.4 62.5 33.9 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 42.4 7.8 59.2 7.9 53.9 31.6 10.4 62.5 33.9 3.2 LOS D A E A D C B E C A Approach Delay 20.9 37.8 33.4 33.8 Approach LOS C D C C Cycle Length: 110 f Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 68 (62%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91 Intersection Signal Delay: 33.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2024 total pm w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations "+ + Vi 0 tt r Volume (vph) 95 45 45 95 140 1150 10 1655 290 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 13.0 60.9 10.7 58.6 58.6 Total Split (%) 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 11.8% 55.4% 9.7% 53.3% 53.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 15.3 15.3 15.3 16.9 80.2 6.1 61.4 61.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.73 0.06 0.56 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.44 0.81 0.56 0.49 0.11 0.91 0.31 Control Delay 81.4 22.9 71.3 51.4 8.3 57.2 13.4 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 81.4 22.9 71.3 51.4 8.3 57.2 13.4 0.5 LOS F C E D A E B A Approach Delay 48.6 71.3 13.0 11.7 Approach LOS D E B B Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave i- u� .:'•`�"aJ-siura.&w..r.:.-t::�t,L6r..r =:sg .��i�Lrdu�l � � `dL'.b.rF�'u1.�- :' £L?ga&:u'�,a� :'IG [/If:�.:.t J f,; 4� :,ate, zh�7 7�'�� Y ii'"i . N7" ?T*^J•+ a fes....,.. �.._ rz7,�,.7�,�,�� .f�:t � ».L::;.�- ..` �Z'��i�t-"'. 'rte•.,.. �{ �/� r�'i� fn#� .�:.- _... Waiaka 2024 total pm w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 4 Timings I W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations f` r 0 tt r Volume (vph) 145 40 35 10 35 120 1615 10 1200 120 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 12.4 53.7 8.7 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 12.4% 53.7% 8.7% 50.0% 50.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 17.4 17.4 17.4 8.4 48.9 4.7 37.9 37.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.10 0.61 0.06 0.47 0.47 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.10 0.21 0.70 0.83 0.11 0.79 0.16 Control Delay 42.8 9.4 18.5 59.5 19.4 43.1 23.0 3.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 42.8 9.4 18.5 59.5 19.4 43.1 23.0 3.4 LOS D A B E B D C A Approach Delay 37.5 18.5 22.1 21.4 Approach LOS D B C C Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 80.7 Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka Center2024 Ambient Saturday 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations 0 ' tt r Volume (vph) 190 50 10 45 115 1540 5 1340 135 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 12.0 50.9 10.7 49.6 49.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 12.0% 50.9% 10.7% 49.6% 49.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 22.2 22.2 8.1 50.9 6.1 40.4 40.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.58 0.07 0.46 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.17 0.76 0.82 0.04 0.89 0.18 Control Delay 51.2 22.3 71.4 21.1 44.0 30.9 3.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 51.2 22.3 71.4 21.1 44.0 30.9 3.5 LOS D C E C D C A Approach Delay 51.2 22.3 24.6 28.4 Approach LOS D C C C '01 %�f+f A,Y.MJo.3/YPffd.)i41.1+ifs'{fff1E>frNl>fireHfYtFki!%lf�/�fjrFtG¢`rfr.,Y38ro°.#k,�.Ji-.�tf ski: fld�.fe%..tbl.,r t1J.Yf .. �,aF ktf�Y �f�. f1t s $i.,�.t3.f..FJr,�r.i.tt,�fi.Cr M1.J4�i`�krL'f Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 87.5 Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 28.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka Center2024 Ambient Saturday 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report t Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations *T r Vi tT tt r Volume (vph) 145 40 30 10 35 120 1615 10 1200 120 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 12.4 53.7 8.7 50.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 12.4% 53.7% 8.7% 50.0% 50.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 17.4 17.4 17.4 8.4 48.9 4.7 37.9 37.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.10 0.61 0.06 0.47 0.47 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.09 0.22 0.70 0.83 0.11 0.79 0.16 Control Delay 42.7 9.8 17.7 59.6 19.4 43.1 23.1 3.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 42.7 9.8 17.7 59.6 19.4 43.1 23.1 3.4 LOS D A B E B D C A Approach Delay 38.0 17.7 22.2 21.4 Approach LOS D B C C { Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 80.7 Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 22.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2024 Ambient Sat w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 -0. #r 4-* Lane Configurations ' '� tl� I tt r Volume (vph) 190 50 10 45 115 1540 5 1340 135 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 12.0 50.9 10.7 49.6 49.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 12.0% 50.9% 10.7% 49.6% 49.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 17.0 17,0 17.0 8.1 50.0 6.1 39.5 39.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.10 0.62 0.08 0.49 0.49 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.22 0.20 0.71 0.77 0.04 0.85 0.17 Control Delay 48.0 19.9 24.0 61.8 17.0 40.8 25.0 3.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.0 19.9 24.0 61.8 17.0 40.8 25.0 3.1 LOS D B C E B D C A Approach Delay 39.7 24.0 20.1 23.1 Approach LOS D C C C :.tt t,Yil.C4kl Y.r J's:?"d"& , f...wtl rlrAt f •.+ix J 7 �F�1 !'!'r1'1- d rr' `.Yrr t%'£, n , ,-<;,.. ..t ,Yt, i� A, Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 81.3 Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v1c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2024 Ambient Sat w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 i Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations 4 if 4 if Vi tt r Vi tt if Volume (vph) 140 50 30 150 40 150 120 1565 25 130 1150 120 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 15.5 59.1 59.1 13.3 56.9 56.9 Total Split (%) 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 14.1% 53.7% 53.7% 12.1% 51.7% 51.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) . 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 10.9 56.4 56.4 11.4 56.9 56.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.51 0.51 0.10 0.52 0.52 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.08 0.90 0.33 0.74 0.94 0.03 0.77 0.68 0.15 Control Delay 74.0 10.3 78.5 6.7 77.1 23.9 0.4 76.2 23.6 3.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 74.0 10.3 78.5 6.7 77.1 23.9 0.4 76.2 23.6 3.4 LOS E B E A E C A E C A Approach Delay 65.2 46.8 27.3 26.8 LOS E D C C pApproach t1Mf/I Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 42 (38%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 31.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2024 Total Saturday 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Lane Configurations +T# a f -T 9 N.�li-.rr �� . t1r L S.r¢L,c..�ua-�, ��%•�- ' tT Vi tt r Volume (vph) 200 50 10 45 115 1630 5 1425 140 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 12.0 60.9 10.7 59.6 59.6 Total Split (%) 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 10.9% 55.4% 9.7% 54.2% 54.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 27.1 27.1 10.4 68.5 6.0 56.1 56.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.62 0.05 0.51 0.51 We Ratio 0.87 0.18 0.75 0.81 0.05 0.86 0.17 Control Delay 62.3 26.6 76.6 21.3 56.8 29.1 4.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.3 26.6 76.6 21.3 56.8 29.1 4.1 LOS E C E C E C A Approach Delay 62.3 26.6 25.0 27.0 Approach LOS E C C C Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.87 Intersection Signal Delay: 28.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 M , /� r,Tf ��t.'1��L'�w-'�.fa�'u'i�iCfr fry Hj`- i a f -T 9 N.�li-.rr �� . t1r L S.r¢L,c..�ua-�, ��%•�- .P - f ,L,r�f .' /. _., s7.YGra� Waiaka 2024 Total Saturday 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave # 8/14/2011 Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r tt r Vi tt r Volume (vph) 140 50 30 150 40 150 120 1565 25 130 1150 120 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 15.5 59.1 59.1 13.3 56.9 56.9 Total Split (%) 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 14.1% 53.7% 53.7% 12.1% 51.7% 51.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 10.9 56.4 56.4 11.4 56.9 56.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.51 0.51 0.10 0.52 0.52 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.08 0.90 0.33 0.74 0.94 0.03 0.77 0.68 0.15 Control Delay 74.0 10.3 78.5 6.7 71.8 30.3 1.3 76.2 23.6 3.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 74.0 10.3 78.5 6.7 71.8 30.3 1.3 76.2 23.6 3.4 LOS E B E A E C A E C A Approach Delay 65.2 46.8 32.8 26.8 Approach LOS E D C C Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 40 (36%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 33.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2024 Total Saturday w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/14/2011 -A - #'' 4% t 'fir► `lJ i11 Lane Configurations ' , , +T, tt r Volume (vph) 200 50 10 45 115 1630 5 1425 140 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 12.0 60.9 10.7 59.6 59.6 Total Split (%) 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 34.9% 10.9% 55.4% 9.7% 54.2% 54.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4,5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 20.9 20.9 20.9 13.0 74.7 6.0 59.7 59.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.68 0.05 0.54 0.54 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.24 0.22 0.60 0.74 0.05 0.81 0.16 Control Delay 63.6 25.9 31.0 59.0 16.0 62.4 23.8 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 63.6 25.9 31.0 59.0 16.0 62.4 23.8 3.2 LOS E C C E B E C A Approach Delay 52.8 31.0 18.8 22.1 Approach LOS D C B C �tr gj,WPNDOW Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 108 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.81 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2024 Total Saturday w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 2034 Signalised Intersection Level of Service Calculations Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/23/2011 t Lane Configurations ` 0 Volume (vph) 105 35 80 35 30 200 2305 10 695 40 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 28.5 73.7 8.7 53.9 53.9 Total Split (%) 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 23.8% 61.4% 7.3% 44.9% 44.9% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.3 18.3 18.3 19.0 86.8 5.4 66.0 66.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.72 0.04 0.55 0.55 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.28 0.45 0.78 1.00 0.14 0.39 0.05 Control Delay 66.8 10.5 47.1 69.5 18.9 58.4 17.9 5.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 66.8 10.5 47.1 69.5 18.9 58.4 17.9 5.6 LOS E B D E B E B A Approach Delay 46.3 47.1 22.9 17.8 Approach LOS D D C B Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 44 (37%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka Center 2034 Ambient AM 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report wy Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & kanoelehua Ave 8/23/2011 4N t Lane Configurations ' tt E= Volume (vph) 210 50 45 125 250 2040 10 630 130 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 33.0 70.9 10.7 48.6 48.6 r ' Total Split (%) 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 27.5% 59.1% 8.9% 40.5% 40.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 29.1 29.1 29.1 22.5 76.4 6.1 52.1 52.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.19 0.64 0.05 0.43 0.43 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.31 0.52 0.82 0.99 0.12 0.45 0.18 Control Delay 93.3 20.8 42.8 66.1 39.3 48.3 35.4 17.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 93.3 20.8 42.8 66.1 39.3 48.3 35.4 17.4 LOS F C D E D D D B L Approach Delay 65.6 42.8 42.2 32.6 Approach LOS E D D( C f I Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum We Ratio: 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 42.4 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.6% ICU Level of Service G I Analysis Period (min)15 -r4 Dhoenc F• 1N Kawailani St R KannPlehita Ave Waiaka Center 2034 Ambient AM 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 Lane Configurations 4 r tT+ tt r Volume (vph) 105 35 80 35 30 200 2305 10 695 40 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 9.8 73.7 8.7 72.6 72.6 Total Split (%) 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 8.2% 61.4% 7.3% 60.5% 60.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.3 18.3 18.3 6.1 86.8 5.4 82.4 82.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.72 0.04 0.69 0.69 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.28 0.45 0.25 1.00 0.14 0.31 0.04 Control Delay 66.8 10.5 47.1 70.5 17.0 58.4 9.3 3.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 66.8 10.5 47.1 70.5 17.0 58.4 9.3 3.1 LOS E B D E B E A A Approach Delay 46.3 47.1 17.5 9.7 Approach LOS D A /B jD�� Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 44 (37%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum We Ratio:1.00 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka Center 2034 Ambient AM 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report wy Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 Lane Configurations '+ 0 tt r Volume (vph) 210 50 45 125 250 2040 10 630 130 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 33.0 70.9 10.7 48.6 48.6 Total Split (%) 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 27.5% 59.1% 8.9% 40.5% 40.5°% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 29.1 29.1 29.1 22.5 76.4 6.1 52.1 52.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.19 0.64 0.05 0.43 0.43 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.31 0.52 0.82 0.99 0.12 0.45 0.18 Control Delay 93.3 20.8 42.8 66.1 39.3 47.2 36.8 17.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 93.3 20.8 42.8 66.1 39.3 47.2 36.8 17.4 LOS F C D E D D D B Approach Delay 65.6 42.8 42.2 33.7 Approach LOS E D D C Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 42.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka Center 2034 Ambient AM 8/2212011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report wy Page 1 ( Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/23/2011 Lane Configurations 4 r ) ttT ) ttT Volume (vph) 100 35 80 35 30 200 2305 10 695 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 14.5 33.7 8.7 27.9 Total Split (%) 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 18.1% 42.1% 10.9% 34.9% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 Lead/Lag -6.6 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 13.9 13.9 13.9 15.7 51.3 5.1 33.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.20 0.64 0.06 0.42 We Ratio 0.62 0.25 0.33 0.62 0.78 0.10 0.38 Control Delay 40.7 8.0 25.9 42.1 7.5 36.7 17.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 40.7 8.0 25.9 42.1 7.5 36.7 17.9 LOS D A C D A D B Approach Delay 28.6 25.9 10.2 18.2 LOS C C B B rApproach Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 44 (55%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 01 1 1 o2 1---w o4 05 1 * 06 1 08 Waiaka Center 2034 Ambient AM w/61anes 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report wy Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka Center 2034 Ambient AM w/61anes 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report wy Page 1 i Lane Configurations ' t i ' t+T+ ' ttT Volume (vph) 210 50 45 125 255 2040 10 630 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot r Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 10.0 30.9 10.7 31.6 Total Split (%) 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 12.5% 38.6% 13.4% 39.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 19.7 19.7 19.7 18.3 45.9 6.0 25.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.23 0.57 0.08 0.32 I We Ratio 0.85 0.29 0.51 0.68 0.76 0.08 0.51 t Control Delay 55.1 10.7 27.8 42.9 18.5 48.3 9.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 , Total Delay 55.1 10.7 27.8 42.9 18.5 48.3 9.0 LOS E B C D B D A - Approach Delay 38.1 27.8 21.2 9.5 Approach LOS D C C A s, d. .1; f' rJd/rij""'PN 0110 t... {.i MON jFr:°�r{r<.l, %11F110t✓,,.;hid# °�aturf �5f1��flr� ��✓ t�#1C1�,$GCtlg� �� t��t�1'7%t��ld��71r';' �:f�.L4„t3ft;�7il1t%� t'{..f1rt '}tel z z.h..:?7,.€Sr... , ;ltt:h ff Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 20.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka Center 2034 Ambient AM w/61anes 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report wy Page 1 i Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 Lane Configurations '► r I tt r Volume (vph) 100 35 85 115 35 110 200 2230 35 50 675 40 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 33.1 103.3 103.3 9.1 79.3 79.3 Total Split (%) 25.1% 25.1% 25.1% 25.1% 25.1% 25.1% 22.1% 68.9% 68.9% 6.1% 52.9% 52.9% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 25.9 25.9 25.9 25.9 22.4 100.3 100.3 7.1 84.9 84.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.15 0.67 0.67 0.05 0.57 0.57 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.26 0.90 0.37 0.82 1.02 0:04 0.65 0.37 0.05 Control Delay 99.9 10.9 104.3 29.1 83.1 32.8 2.8 101.5 20.0 5.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 99.9 10.9 104.3 29.1 83.1 32.8 2.8 101.5 20.0 5.4 LOS F B F C F C A F B A Approach Delay 65.6 72.4 36.5 24.5 Approach LOS E E D C Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 22 (15%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.02 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2034 total AM 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 0 Ks. �r'.. - � ., . - ; .. /!��,fi=If �IIG��`� r,f��r��✓��,4�t '%Yr,�°�� Ntr��g/ x �,`�.' .,+Fb�i3� � r� �. .... .. . Lane Configurations Vi T+ . 4* Vi 0 Vi .��r tt r Volume (vph) 215 50 45 125 255 2105 10 685 135 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm �- Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase _ Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4,0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 41.2 41.2 41.2 41.2 39.0 98.1 10.7 69.8 69.8 Total Split (%) 27.5% 27.5% 27.5% 27.5% 26.0% 65.4% 7.1% 46.5% 46.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? ` Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 34.8 34.8 34.8 27.5 98.6 6.2 71.3 71.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.66 0.04 0.48 0.48 v/c Ratio 1,08 0.33 0.56 0.85 0.99 0.15 OA4 0.18 Control Delay 136.4 32.8 56.4 82.3 41.4 62.5 32.6 11.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 136.4 32.8 56.4 82.3 41.4 62.5 32.6 11.3 LOS F C E F D E C B L - Approach Delay 97.4 56.4 45.8 29.5 Approach LOS F E D C tj{d}'f(�/(((��}�s�[rz�t%f£"k •'tYti""��i'Y�12Y1l�I Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.08 Intersection Signal Delay: 47.5 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.7% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2034 total AM 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report r Page 1 i Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 Lane Configurations ttt r ttT Volume (vph) 100 35 85 115 35. 110 200 2230 35 50 675 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 14.8 33.7 33.7 8.7 27.6 Total Split (%) 47.0% 47.0%' 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 18.5% 42.1% 42.1% 10.9% 34.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6:2 6.2 4.0 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 44.4 44.4 7.0 32.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.56 0.56 0.09 0.40 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.24 0.66 0.30 0.63 0.86 0.04 0.35 0.38 Control Delay 38.6 7.2 41.9 6.9 43.7 13.4 0.2 39.8 19.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 38.6 7.2 41.9 6.9 43.7 13.4 0.2 39.8 19.0 LOS D A D A D B A D B Approach Delay 26.5 27.1 15.7 20.4 Approach LOS C C B C Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 42 (53%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2034 total AM w/61anes 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 -* 'r -+-- �► Lane Configurations ' '+ ' tO ) ttt Volume (vph) 215 50 45 125 255 2105 10 685 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 10.0 30.9 10.7 31.6 Total Split (%) 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 12.5% 38.6% 13.4% 39.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 20.1 20.1 20.1 17.9 45.5 6.0 25.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.22 0.57 0.08 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.29 0.50 0.70 0.80 0.08 0.55 Control Delay 54.6 10.5 27.2 44.3 19.5 46.8 12.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 54.6 10.5 27.2 44.3 19.5 46.8 12.5 LOS D B C D B D B Approach Delay 38.0 27.2 22.2 12.9 Approach LOS D C C B Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.1 % ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Waiaka 2034 total AM w/61anes 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 --lb. *--- Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Cycle Length: 120 1 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 78 (65%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 130 1 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka Center 2034 Ambient pm 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 *T r tT I tt r 45 50 165 20 45 150 1450 30 1730 120 Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm 4 8 5 2 1 6 4 4 8 6 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 15.0 73.6 8.8 67.4 67.4 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 12.5% 61.3% 7.3% 56.2% 56.2% 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min 13.2 13.2 13.2 18.3 86.8 6.8 71.7 71.7 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.72 0.06 0.60 0.60 0.62 0.64 0.47 0.61 0.63 0.33 0.89 0.13 66.4 29.1 52.1 51.0 17.2 62.5 28.4 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.4 29.1 52.1 51.0 17.2 62.5 28.4 2.6 E C D D B E C A 42.7 52.1 20.4 27.3 D D C C Cycle Length: 120 1 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 78 (65%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 130 1 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka Center 2034 Ambient pm 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave F' Waiaka Center 2034 Ambient pm 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 i Lane Configurations ' T tT Vi tt if Volume (vph) 95 45 45 95 150 1175 10 1715 310 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 14.0 70.9 10.7 67.6 67.6 Total Split (%) 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 11.7% 59.1% 8.9% 56.3% 56.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 16.4 16.4 16.4 19.0 89.1 6.1 68.2 68.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.74 0.05 0.57 0.57 We Ratio 0.83 0.46 0.88 0.58 0.49 0.12 0.93 0.32 Control Delay 94.5 27.1 88.6 56.1 8.2 65.8 14.8 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 94.5 27.1 88.6 56.1 8.2 65.8 14.8 0.5 LOS F C F E A E B A Approach Delay 56.2 88.6 13.6 12.9 Approach LOS E F B B ar f.. t'jr {.' :r.J I. {3i�3✓! {.Il d�ll t'A/f 1itft, t.iF,./,r�f,ff F.(I' FF Y'Y e �4 ::i:i't :.s F�..i fN / .'. C�%/{r, r 't-i..� ,.:?i: �{�f rl:.. iII-llYlf ,'Yi1rFy. .:,�Y .,'�i` li frJi'��S *.eX:ffi.. 1 11-00,300", "f :�s"�Y'GYi'�7"?"I Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.93 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave F' Waiaka Center 2034 Ambient pm 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 i Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/23/2011 Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2024 Ambient pm w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 ~ Lane Configurations +I* tt r Volume (vph) 40 50 155 20 45 140 1360 30 1620 115 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 13.5 63.6 8.8 58.9 58.9 Total Split (%) 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 34.2% 12.3% 57.8% 8.0% 53.5% 53.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 16.3 78.2 6.6 64.9 64.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.71 0.06 0.59 0.59 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.62 0.47 0.58 0.60 0.31 0.84 0.13 Control Delay 59.0 27.9 48.1 46.7 16.5 56.5 24.5 2.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.0 27.9 48.1 46.7 16.5 56.5 24.5 2.6 LOS E C D D B E C A Approach Delay 39.3 48.1 19.3 23.6 Approach LOS D D B C Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 68 (62%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2024 Ambient pm w/mitigation 8/14/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 Lane Configurations Vi "+ ) +tT ) ttT Volume (vph) 95 45 45 95 150 1175 10 1715 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10..7 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 13.0 50.8 10.8 48.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 13.0% 50.8% 10.8% 48.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 14.2 14.2 14.2 16.4 71.3 6.1 53.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.71 0.06 0.53 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.43 0.77 0.56 0.36 0.10 0.83 Control Delay 69.0 19.4 61.4 46.4 6.9 56.5 12.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 69.0 19.4 61.4 46.4 6.9 56.5 12.3 LOS E B E D A E 8 Approach Delay 40.8 61.4 11.3 12.5 Approach LOS D E B B Y F.,B;'•t' " ,rs "!d'7'*:r8/r't' , L t E r { r,+, J r t J t L' ,c 1 �:.•.,p�r u f Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 56 (56%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2034 Ambient pm w/6 lanes 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2034 total pm 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Lane Configurations c ' tt r ' tt r Volume (vph) 40 60 165 125 50 125 150 1390 20 125 1680 120 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 15.2 65.5 65.5 16.9 67.2 67.2 Total Split (%) 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 12.7% 54.6% 54.6% 14.1% 56.0% 56.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.2 15.5 68.4 68.4 12.7 65.5 65.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.13 0.57 0.57 0.11 0.55 0.55 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.41 0.77 0.34 0.71 0.75 0.02 0.73 0.95 0.14 Control Delay 49.4 8.1 65.5 8.4 62.1 31.0 11.7 73.9 38.0 3.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.4 8.1 65.5 8.4 62.1 31.0 11.7 73.9 38.0 3.0 LOS D A E A E C B E D A Approach Delay 23.7 41.7 33.7 38.1 Approach LOS C D C D Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 78 (65%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.95 Intersection Signal Delay: 35.8 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2034 total pm 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 Lane Configurations _ ' T+ tT+ 'i tt r Volume (vph) 100 45 45 95 150 1225 10 1765 310 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 14.0 70.9 10.7 67.6 67.6 Total Split (%) 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 11.7% 59.1% 8.9% 56.3% 56.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 16.5 16.5 16.5 18.9 89.0 6.1 68.2 68.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.74 0.05 0.57 0.57 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.46 0.88 0.58 0.51 0.12 0.95 0.32 Control Delay 101.4 27.0 87.9 56.3 8.6 61.9 16.8 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 101.4 27.0 87.9 56.3 8.6 61.9 16.8 0.4 LOS F C F E A E B A Approach Delay 60.1 87.9 13.7 14.6 Approach LOS E F B B •��irJ�c ol�+j�s5�F7AG�� µrtt+ti fJr �F f',� f tY J'fA' �.tt 3l �tEi .- 1I' 1 F/ ff �i(1 1 aft 1 •1,1: . f./, „f ..fi£ fylfFil ;DS F3 ,,..��"if'Ftwv. _ Glx Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.95 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2034 total pm 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 Lane Configurations r W r ' Volume (vph) 40 60 165 125 50 125 150 1390 20 125 1680 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 15.0 47.2 47.2 15.2 47.4 Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37,6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 15.0% 47.2% 47.2% 15.2% 47.4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 19.4 19.4 19.4 19.4 13.5 52.0 52.0 11.8 50.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.14 0.52 0.52 0.12 0.50 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.40 0.73 0.33 0.68 0.57 0.03 0.65 0.77 Control Delay 38.7 7.3 53.1 7.4 49.7 22.1 9.5 56.6 24.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 38.7 7.3 53.1 7.4 49.7 22.1 9.5 56.6 24.4 LOS D A D A D C A E C Approach Delay 19.1 34.0 24.6 26.5 Approach LOS B C C C Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 58 (58%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2034 total pm w/6 lanes 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings ' 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 -- ,- t Lane Configurations I T 4 Vi ttT ) ttT Volume (vph) 100 45 45 95 150 1225 10 1765 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 4 8 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 13.0 50.8 10.8 48.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 13.0% 50.8% 10.8% 48.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? !`! Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min f Act Effct Green (s) 14.2 14.2 14.2 16.4 71.3 6.1 53.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.71 0.06 0.53 r v/c Ratio 0.78 0.43 0.77 0.56 0.37 0.10 0.85 Control Delay 74.3 19.4 61.4 46.4 7.0 51.0 11.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 74.3 19.4 61.4 46.4 7.0 51.0 11.7 LOS E B E D A D B Approach Delay 43.8 61.4 11.3 11.9 Approach LOS D E B B t Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 _ a Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated g Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2034 total pm w/6 lanes 8122/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 t- =o a fid[.' O ft :�71T ��'�:Miyi %r ��e`E.¢..f, //t x `::. ff s .`" 1 "bL..�.: . d1 kt l' j, f r 1�'tFld:Y^). d --II Waiaka 2034 total pm w/6 lanes 8122/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 t- Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 t Lane Configurations 4 if tT& tt r Volume (vph) 155 40 35 10 35 125 1725 10 1285 125 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 12.8 53.7 8.7 49.6 49.6 Total Split (%) 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 37.6% 12.8% 53.7% 8.7% 49.6% 49.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All-Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 .6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Min None C-Min C-Min Act Effct Green (s) 20.9 20.9 20.9 12.0 64.2 5.2 50.3 50.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.12 0.64 0.05 0.50 0.50 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.10 0.22 0.64 0.84 0.12 0.78 0.16 Control Delay 49.3 9.5 20.4 50.6 19.0 47.5 26.1 3.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.3 9.5 20.4 50.6 19.0 47.5 26.1 3.5 LOS D A C D B D C A Approach Delay 43.2 20.4 21.1 24.3 Approach LOS D C C C Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 58 (58%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka Center2034 Ambient Saturday 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 Lane Configurations T tT+ ' tt r Volume (vph) 205 50 10 45 120 1645 5 1435 140 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 11.0 50.9 10.7 50.6 50.6 Total Split (%) 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% 11.0% 50.9% 10.7% 50.6% 50.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 21.1 21.1 21.1 12.9 64.5 6.0 49.6 49.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.64 0.06 0.50 0.50 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.23 0.20 0.57 0.79 0.05 0.89 0.18 Control Delay 49.6 20.1 25.8 52.7 18.5 59.6 13.8 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.6 20.1 25.8 52.7 18.5 59.6 13.8 0.3 LOS D C C D B E B A Approach Delay 41.0 25.8 20.8 12.8 Approach LOS D C C B t"7.at%`hFI✓+'}r(.,�d52t�,, .:"v.,:�rl�.�`��' j+l'�.r,�f lJ '�'xl +� ,j/ td � 1!lpr j !d t r ,4 ;F, t }r. 1 F?it l .�., �1 �;,. jFt . 1<t ,7�"'xr /.•.'.J nf•Tj%�f✓v,� rFFY f, .�ft n.�P.rJ�llo�d�{I lci';)£�tis`;'"'adrl�lJf'�11 �:L�"t✓�s%:d„�rS e%1� tt .z..��, i.,,'hfNi:�.istrt ,. z.rd`. l,.rr :fr �f/f �>,F1f,:lro�.�.,,,:�1tLs,.,.t. �I rEfff-:�f,rr./2,*d. 'fi.�fra7f•ie:��i7rYt Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka Center2034 Ambient Saturday 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report r Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/23/2011 Lane Configurations tt t t`t* Volume (vph) 155 40 35 10 35 125 1725 10 1285 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 8.7 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 11.1 33.7 8.7 31.3 Total Split (%) 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 13.9% 42.1% 10.9% 39.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 4.0 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 17.9 17.9 17.9 11.2 47.2 5.1 34.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.59 0.06 0.43 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.10 0.21 0.55 0.63 0.10 0.71 Control Delay 40.7 7.8 16.0 48.5 7.4 36.7 23.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 40.7 7.8 16.0 48.5 7.4 36.7 23.2 LOS D A B D A D C Approach Delay 35.7 16.0 10.1 23.3 Approach LOS D B B C yOVIO ME F�Ay it;[56, 211, 1 Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 38 (48%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2034 Ambient Sat w/6 lanes 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/23/2011 r Lane Configurations ' T+ ttt+ +0 Volume (vph) 205 50 10 45 120 1645 5 1435 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 S Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 i Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 10.0 30.9 10.7 31.6 Total Split (%) 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 12.5% 38.6% 13.4% 39.5% f Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? { Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 17.9 17.9 17.9 11.6 47.7 6.0 34.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.60 0.08 0.43 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.22 0.19 0.50 0.59 0.04 0.80 Control Delay 44.4 15.5 19.6 38.7 13.4 47.4 10.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.4 15.5 19.6 38.7 13.4 47.4 10.0 LOS D B B D B D B �- Approach Delay 36.0 19.6 15.1 10.1 Approach LOS D B B B {r Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow # Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated I 2 Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 and Phasas• F• W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2034 Ambient Sat w/6 lanes 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report r Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/23/2011 - - moi►--- *`` t 1'*" Lane Configurations '� tt Volume (vph) 150 50 35 150 40 145 125 1675 25 125 1235 125 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 16.9 68.4 68.4 14.0 65.5 65.5 Total Split (%) 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 14.1% 57.0% 57.0% 11.7% 54.6% 54.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 11.8 64.1 64.1 10.8 63.2 63.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.53 0.53 0.09 0.53 0.53 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.09 0.94 0.32 0.78 0.96 0.03 0.85 0.72 0.15 Control Delay 89.3 11.0 92.1 7.2 79.0 32.4 0.8 94.4 25.4 3.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 89.3 11.0 92.1 7.2 79.0 32.4 0.8 94.4 25.4 3.1 LOS F B F A E C A F C A Approach Delay 77.6 55.2 35.2 29.3 Approach LOS E E D C Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 42 (35%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Signal Delay: 37.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Waiaka 2034 Total Saturday 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/23/2011 -� 4' *_ 4\ Lane Configurations 'i ' tt r - Volume (vph) 210 50 10 45 120 1735 5 1520 150 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 € Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 E Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 13.0 70.9 10.7 68.6 68.6 Total Split (%) 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 10.8% 59.1% 8.9% 57.2% 57.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 F Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 23.5 23.5 23.5 13.0 82.1 6.0 67.1 67.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.11 0.68 0.05 0.56 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.25 0.22 0.68 0.78 0.06 0.84 0.17 Control Delay 71.0 27.7 33.8 70.0 17.9 60.0 28.3 5.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 71.0 27.7 33.8 70.0 17.9 60.0 28.3 5.0 LOS E C C E B E C A Approach Delay 58.6 33.8 21.3 26.3 Approach LOS E C C C j 6f�tp�tvf fLgd S ,94" Cycle Length: 120 L - Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84 E Intersection Signal Delay: 26.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.1 % ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phaccc• R• W Kawnilani St R KnnoPlehua Ave Waiaka 2034 Total Saturday 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 3: W Kahaopea St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 -Ip. 4-- t Analysis Period (min)15 St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2034 Total Sat w/6 lanes 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 r t Lane Configurations 4 r 4 if I ttt r I t+T Volume (vph) 150 50 35 150 40 150 125 1675 25 125 1235 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 •8 8 2 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 37.6 37.6 37.6 8.7 25.2 25.2 8.7 26.2 Total Split (s) 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 11.2 32.4. 32.4 10.0 31.2 Total Split (%) 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 14.0% 40.5% 40.5% 12.5% 39.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Min C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 19.6 19.6 19.6 19.6 10.6 32.0 32.0 11.6 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.13 0.40 0.40 0.14 0.41 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.09 0.78 0.32 0.58 0.89 0.04 0.53 0.71 Control Delay 46.1 7.1 47.1 5.3 45.9 23.8 1.9 41.4 23.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 46.1 7.1 47.1 5.3 45.9 23.8 1.9 41.4 23.7 LOS D A D A D C A D C Approach Delay 40.3 28.6 25.0 25.2 Approach LOS D C C C s. Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 42 (53%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 26.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 St & Kanoelehua Ave Waiaka 2034 Total Sat w/6 lanes 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Timings 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave 8/22/2011 Lane Configurations T I ttT ) t#T Volume (vph) 210 50 10 45 120 1735 5 1520 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.4 38.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 25.0 10.7 31.0 Total Split (s) 38.4 38.4 38.4 38.4 10.0 30.9 10.7 31.6 Total Split (%) 48.b% 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 12.5% 38.6% 13.4% 39.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.5 3.7 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Min None C -Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.2 18.2 18.2 11.5 47.4 6.0 33.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.14 0.59 0.08 0.42 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.22 0.19 0.51 0.63 0.04 0.85 Control Delay 44.2 15.3 19.3 39.0 14.4 42.0 17.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.2 15.3 19.3 39.0 14.4 42.0 17.1 LOS D B B D B D B Approach Delay 35.9 19.3 15.9 17.1 Approach LOS D B B B rl 'r fe ,�%�f:+t.'r'�t�i�f�fiF', ,,riHi ir`ri(rfi�d J,r .rf, �f,Kiy {� rfs t• , Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum We Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 6: W Kawailani St & Kanoelehua Ave i� '•` ,lt ',,..k.:r{ .4; :ms�*, s%bl�'f1�3 dm i"FrK. lL!rr 1 _ u. n. r"�"•;as' 1 rjf > f' j J ax i�.• c f r�.t>^.. .!_t�x,s ;�;Z4/ii Waiaka 2034 Total Sat w/6 lanes 8/22/2011 Baseline Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 ROY K. NAKAMOTO ALAN M. OKAMOTO JEREL I. YAMAMOTO HENRY T. NAKAMOTO BJ Leithead-Todd Planning Director County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 NAKAMOTO, OKAMOTO & YAMAMOTO ATTORNEYS AT LAW, A LAW CORPORATION 187 KAPIOLANI STREET TELEPHONE (8 08) 961-0641 HILO, HAWAII 96720-2687 FAX (8 08) 935-3872 November 17, 2011 ALAN@NOYHAWAII.COM Re: Resubmission of Request for Time Extension and Amendment to Conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99-116 Amending Ordinance No. 96-159 TMK [3] 2-2-044: 003, 031, 032, 035 and 037 ("Property") Dear Director Leithead-Todd: I am writing to confirm that the request in my October 26, 2011 letter inadvertently omitted Tax Parcel 31. That parcel, as well as Tax Parcels 32, 35 and 37 are the areas being developed. I would also note that title to Tax Parcel 3 is held by the Margaret Hirose Trust and we understand that the rezoning ordinance includes that parcel as well. William Hirose, President of Tri -Electric, Inc., was the original applicant for the change in zoning that was requested in 1996. Subsequently to the rezoning of the Property, Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. acquired the Property. The current request is being made to preserve the entitlements that were originally granted to Tri -Electric, Inc. Very truly yours, Alan M. Okamoto Planning Dept. Exhibit NAKAMOTO, OKAMOTO & YAMAMOTO ATTORNEYS AT LAW, A LAW CORPORATION BJ Leithead-Todd Planning Director County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attn: Maija Cottle, Planner Re: Supplement to Request for Time Extension October 26, 2011 Ordinance No. 99-116 Amending Ordinance No. 96-159 TMK [312-2-044: 003, 031, 032, 035 and 037 Dear Director Leithead-Todd: Planner Maija Cottle correctly pointed out to me that I had misquoted the language of existing Condition H of Ordinance 99-116 in my October 26, 2011 letter to you. The request to amend Condition H should have read: "H. Drainage improvements, [if] as may be required[,] by the Department of Public Works, shall be constructed [in a manner meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works] prior to [securing Final Subdivision Approval or] the issuance of final plan approval or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the subject property, whichever occurs first." (Language to be deleted is in brackets_. language to be added is underscored.) The language above shows existing Condition H and the changes being requested by Graphics Images, Inc. Please consider this as a correction and amendment to the request to amend Condition H. Very truly yours, IL2�1 Alan M. Okamoto cc: Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. 076131 Planning Dept. Exhibit_ �} G 'd '� s:' �I?* 4�e.iit s ROY K. NAKAMOTO tg 187 KAPIOLANI STREET TELEPHONE (8 08) 961.0641 ALAN M. OKAMOTO - ... HILO, HAWAII 96720-2687 FAX (808) 935-3872 7EREL I. YAMAMOTO HENRY T. NAKAMOTO ALAN@NOYHAWAII.COM December 30, 2011 BJ Leithead-Todd Planning Director County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attn: Maija Cottle, Planner Re: Supplement to Request for Time Extension October 26, 2011 Ordinance No. 99-116 Amending Ordinance No. 96-159 TMK [312-2-044: 003, 031, 032, 035 and 037 Dear Director Leithead-Todd: Planner Maija Cottle correctly pointed out to me that I had misquoted the language of existing Condition H of Ordinance 99-116 in my October 26, 2011 letter to you. The request to amend Condition H should have read: "H. Drainage improvements, [if] as may be required[,] by the Department of Public Works, shall be constructed [in a manner meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works] prior to [securing Final Subdivision Approval or] the issuance of final plan approval or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the subject property, whichever occurs first." (Language to be deleted is in brackets_. language to be added is underscored.) The language above shows existing Condition H and the changes being requested by Graphics Images, Inc. Please consider this as a correction and amendment to the request to amend Condition H. Very truly yours, IL2�1 Alan M. Okamoto cc: Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. 076131 Planning Dept. Exhibit_ COUNTY OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII BILL NO. 343 (Draft 4) ORDINANCE NO. 96 159 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25-114 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP), ARTICLE 3, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE, BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS -10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN -7.5) AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY 2-2-44:3,31,32,35 AND 37. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. Section 25-114, Article 3, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) of the Hawaii County Code, is amended to change the district classification of property described hereinafter as follows: The district classification of the following area situated at Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii, shall be Neighborhood Commercial (CN -7.5): Beginning at the northwest corner of this parcel of land, being also the northwest corner of Lot 2-A and at the southeast comer of the intersection of Kanoelehua Avenue and Kahaopea Street, the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station "HALAI", being 9,712.77 feet South and 10,610.05 feet East, thence running by azimuths measured clockwise from true South: 1. 2650 42' 384.00 feet along Kahaopea Street; 2. 3550 42' 444.24 feet along Lots 3 and 4; 3. 380 45' 122.06 feet along Lot 4; 4. 2650 42' 108.06 feet along Lot 4; 5. 355° 42' 130.51 feet alonj Lot 4; 6. 2650 42' 75.25 feet along Lot 4; Planning Dept. Exhibit 7. 3550 42' 236.06 feet along Grant 13,091 to Hanichi and Chiye Masuda Matsumoto; 8. 850 42' 474.00 feet along Grant 10,461, Part 2 to Mrs. Hatsuyo Kawahara Ihori (Lot 21, Roadway Lot A, Lots 10 and 11, Ruthie Subdivision); 9. 1750 42' 50.00 feet along Kanoelehua Avenue; 10. 2650 42' 248.45 feet along Lot 1-B; 11. 1550 12' 206.89 feet along Lot 1-B; 12. 940 42' 188.31 feet along Lot 1-B; 13. 1750 42' 626.75 feet along Kanoelehua Avenue to the point of beginning and containing an area of 322,414 Square Feet. All as shown on the map attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2. This change in district classification is conditioned upon the following: A. The applicant, successors or assigns shall be responsible for complying with all of the stated conditions of approval. B. The anticipated maximum daily water usage shall be submitted and the required water commitment payment shall be submitted to the Department of Water Supply in accordance with its "Water Commitment Guidelines Policy" within ninety (90) days from the effective date of the rezoning. C. Final Subdivision Approval of the proposed consolidation/resubdivision of the subject property shall be secured within five J5) years from the effective date of -2- the rezoning. The subdivision plans shall delineate a 10 -foot road widening strip along the Kahaopea Street frontage. D. In conjunction with the submittal of plans for subdivision review or plan approval review, a master plan for the subject property shall be filed with the Planning Director. Final Plan Approval for the subject property and related improvements shall also be secured from the Planning Director. Plans to be submitted for final subdivision approval or final plan approval shall also comply with the approved master plan and all conditions of approval set forth in this ordinance. The purpose of the master plan is to provide comprehensive principles and guidelines for the commercial and residential development within the subject property in order to assure that the development is compatible with the surrounding area. The master plan shall include, but not be limited to, standards and guidelines relative to open space, architecture building controls (appearance, siting, heights, building materials, signs, etc.), terrain, topography, off-street parking, landscaping, setbacks from property lines and buildings, lot coverage ratio, etc. and enforcement procedures. Plans shall include landscaping along property boundaries, for the purpose of mitigating any potential adverse noise and visual impacts to adjoining parcels and the intersection. Multiple -family residential structures shall be designed to be in keeping with the single family residential character of the surrounding area. To ensure that uses of the subject property meet the intent of the "Low Density" designation of the General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map, all commercial uses, with the exception of any required parking, shall be limited to the land area between the proposed extension of Awapuhi Street and the Kanoelehua Highway. Further, the maximum residential density shall be three thousand square feet of land area for each dwelling unit. E. A Traffic Impact Analysis Report shall be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Public Works and the Department of Transportation prior to the submittal of plans for subdivision review. Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for any portion of the subject property, the applicant shall be responsible for constructing and/or paying for its pro rata share of intersection improvements at the intersection of Kanoelehua Avenue and Kahaopea Street subject to the traffic mitigation measures required by the Traffic Impact Analysis Report for the subject property. F. A Solid Waste Management Plan for the subject property shall be submitted for review and approval to the Department of Public Works in conjunction with the submittal of subdivision plans or plan approval to the Planning Director. G. The applicant shall obtain, if required, a FEMA letter of Map Revision (LOMR) for the subject property prior to securing Final Subdivision Approval or final plan approval, whichever occurs first. H. Drainage improvements, if required, shall be constructed in a manner meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to securing Final Subdivision Approval or final plan approval for the subject property, whichever occurs first. I. The applicant shall construct an extension of Awapuhi Street across the subject property to Kahaopea Street and shall dedicate the street extension to the County upon its completion. The street extension shall be constructed to county dedicable standards or to such other standards as may be specified in a planned unit development permit. -4- J. Prior to securing final subdivision approval or the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the subject property, which ever occurs first, Kahaopea Street shall be improved and widened with the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements (with pavement widening and transitions) fronting the subject property meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works and shall be dedicated to the County upon its request. K. Accesses to the property and all roadways within the subject property shall meet with the requirements and approval of the Department of Public Works and/or the State Department of Transportation. The applicant shall close the existing driveway access on Kahaopea Street and access to the subject property shall be by way of the Awapuhi Street extension. L. The applicant shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and requirements of affected agencies. M. To ensure that the goals and policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan ate implemented, the applicant shall secure the concurrence of the Office of Housing and Community Development that the applicant's affordable housing requirements for the residential development of the subject property, if any, have been mutually agreed to prior to Final Subdivision Approval for any portion of the subject property. N. The applicant shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the subject property with respect to parks and recreation, fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities, and roads. The amount of the fair share contribution shall be the sum which is the product of multiplying the number of residential units proposed to be developed by the amounts allocated hereinbelow for each such unit, and shall become due and payable prior to final subdivision -5- approval or final plan approval for any portion of the subject property or its increments. If the subject property is developed in two or more increments, the amount of the fair share contribution due and payable prior to final subdivision approval or final plan approval of each increment shall be a sum calculated in the same manner according to the number of additional proposed residential units in each such increment. The fair share contribution may be in a form of cash, land, facilities, or any combination thereof acceptable to the director in consultation with the affected agencies. The fair share contribution shall have a maximum combined value of $4,645.29 per multiple -family residential unit and $7,239.16 per single-family residential unit. Based upon the applicant's representation of intent to develop up to 37 residential units, the indicated total fair share contribution is $116,132.25 for the multiple family residential units and $86,869.92 for single-family residential units, whichever is applicable. However, the total amount shall be increased or reduced in proportion with the actual number of units according to the calculation and payment provisions set forth in this Condition N. The fair share contribution shall be allocated as follows; $2,291.39 per multiple -family residential unit for an indicated total of $57,284.75 and $3,490.85 per single-family residential unit for an indicated total of $41,890.20 to the County to support park and recreational improvements and facilities; 2. $72.42 per multiple -family residential unit for an indicated total of $1,810.50 and $168.40 per single-family residential unit for an indicated total of $2,020.80 to the County to support police facilities; 3. $222.77 per multiple -family residential unit for an indicated total of $5,569.25 and $332.61 per single-family residential unit for an indicated total of $3,991.32 to the County to support fire facilities; S'1 4. $99.29 per multiple -family residential unit for an indicated total of $2,482.25 and $145.62 per single-family residential unit for an indicated total of $1,747.44 to the County to support solid waste facilities; $1,959.42 per multiple -family residential unit for an indicated total of $48,985.50 and $3,101.68 per single-family residential unit for an indicated total of $37,220.16 to the State or County to support road and traffic improvements. The fair share contributions described above shall be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective date of the change of zone, based on the percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index (HCPI). In lieu of paying the fair share contribution, the applicant may construct and contribute improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation, fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities, and roads within the region impacted by the proposed development, subject to the approval of the director. The cost of providing and constructing the improvements required in Conditions E, I, ,-and K shall be credited against the sum specified in Condition N(5) for road and traffic improvements. For purposes of administering Condition N, the fair market value of land contributed or the cost of any improvements required or made in lieu of the fair share contribution shall be subject to the review and approval of the director, upon consultation with the appropriate agencies. O. Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for the imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance. -7- P. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: 1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence; 2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code; 3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of the change of zone; and 4. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance (i.e., a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for up to one additional year). Q. Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Director may initiate rezoning of the area to its original or more appropriate designation. SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other parts of this ordinance. in SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. Hilo, Hawaii Date of Introduction: Date of 1 st Reading: Date of 2nd Reading: Effective Date: INTRODUCED BY: COUNCIL S4EER,"CoOlfTY OF HAWAII October 16, 1996 October 16, 1996 November 6, 1996 December 5, 1996 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY DEPUTY CORPORATION COUNSEL DATED: 1//?- G Al' In 1 IR5'EO D 'D 3 1 # # rualnako town £ r^ R5 10 O # f Center s --i a M G N 10 NOEAUSTREET o rn-i 9.712.77 S10,610.05 1—ij E "HALAI" ASTREET__ -- -- ROAD WIDENING LINE L - KAHAOPEA -- 6 FUTURE - - SINGLE FAMILY o ; z RESIDENTIAL C O (RS -10) TO rn NEIGHBORHOOD I = COMMERCIAL I o I Rs -lo D 91c (CN -7.5) 101 D r I o I ' AREA: 322,414 SQ.FT Izf z r_ z I I D R5- 10 1 � m I i z c 1 1 I m 1 D I m I z R5-10 D R5-10 �i f � po I I I # O oN I l n m 1 I ANONA PL• O f t R5-10 I 1 AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE AMENDING SECTION 25-114 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP) ARTICLE 3, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE, BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS -10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN -7.5) AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII. PREPARED BY : PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF HAWAII TMK: 2-2-44: 3,31,32,35 and 37 OCTOBER 15 1996 EXHIBIT "A" cmm-CLECrnic) OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK County of Hawaii Hilo Hawaii Introduced By: Date introduced: First Reading: Published: REMARKS: Reconsideration: maxomma": November 21, 1996 To Mayor: November 25, 1996 Returned: December 5, 1996 Effective: December 5, 1996 Published December 13, 1996 REMARKS: 11/21/96 - Reconsideration of Bill 343Draft 4. ROLL CALL VOTE ( DRAFT 4 ) I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing BILL was adopted by the County Council and published as indicated above. Approved/Bieapprvwd this 15 day Of 0a"W .19qne _. // ' 1 ►. . , ' ill C CIL CHAIRMAN J COUNTY CLERK Bill No.: 343 ( Draft 4 ) Reference: C-1382/PC-1 1 Ord. No.: ROLL CALL VOTE AYES NOES ABS EX Arakaki x Easley X Childs x De Lima x Domingo x Osorio x Van De Car x Ray x smith x 9 0 0 0— I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing BILL was adopted by the County Council and published as indicated above. Approved/Bieapprvwd this 15 day Of 0a"W .19qne _. // ' 1 ►. . , ' ill C CIL CHAIRMAN J COUNTY CLERK Bill No.: 343 ( Draft 4 ) Reference: C-1382/PC-1 1 Ord. No.: OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK County of Hawaii Hilo Hawaii Introduced By: Takashi DcmiNgo Date Introduced: October 16 1996 First Reading: October 16, 1996 _ Published: October 23, 1996 REMARKS: Second Reading: thvpmhpr 6, 1996 To Mayor: t�byemher 7. 1996 Returned: November 14, 1996 _ Effective: N/A Published N/A REMARKS: 11/14/96 -Returned from Mayor's Office for reconsideration. (DRAFT 3 ) ( DRAFT 4 ) ROLL CALL VOTE AYES NOES ABS EX Arakaki X Easley x Childs X De Lima x Domingo x Osorio x Van De Car X Ray X Smith X 8 0 1 0 ( DRAFT 4 ) I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing BILL was adopted by the County Council and published as indicated above. Approved/Disapproved this day Of 19 MAYOR, CO UNTY OF HAWAII Bill No.: 343 (Draft 4 ) Reference: C�-j1382/PC- 61 Ord No.: ROLL CALL VOTE AYES NOES ABS EX Arakaki Easley X Childs X De Lima X Domingo x Osorio x Van De Car x Ray X Smith x 8 1 0 0 I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing BILL was adopted by the County Council and published as indicated above. Approved/Disapproved this day Of 19 MAYOR, CO UNTY OF HAWAII Bill No.: 343 (Draft 4 ) Reference: C�-j1382/PC- 61 Ord No.: "P , ' i COUNTYOF HAWAT j STATE a �• �eii�wa} ORDINANCE NO. 99 116 OF HAWAII BILL NO. 74 __ _ (Draft 3) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 96-159, WHICH RECLASSIFIED THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS -10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN -7.5) AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY 2-2-44:3, 31, 32,35 AND 37. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 96-159 is amended as follows: "SECTION 2. This change in district classification is conditioned upon the following: A. The applicant, successors or assigns shall be responsible for complying with all of the stated conditions of approval. B. The anticipated maximum daily water usage shall be submitted and the required water commitment payment shall be submitted to the Department of Water Supply in accordance with its "Water Commitment Guidelines Policy" [within ninety (90) days from the effective date of the rezoning] prior to securing Tentative ShbdivWon Approval. C. Final Subdivision Approval of the proposed consolidation/resubdivision of the subject property shall be secured within five (5) years from the effective date of the rezoning. The subdivision plans shall delineate a 10 -foot road widening strip along the Kahaopea Street frontage. D. In conjunction with the submittal of plans for subdivision review or plan Planning Dept. Exhibit �_ approval review, a master plan for the subject property shall be filed with the Planning Director. Final Plan Approval for the subject property and related improvements shall also be secured from the Planning Director. Plans to be submitted for final subdivision approval or final plan approval shall also comply with the approved master plan and all conditions of approval set forth in this ordinance. The purpose of the master plan is to provide comprehensive principles and guidelines for the commercial and residential development within the subject property in order to assure that the development is compatible with the surrounding area. The master plan shall include, but not be limited to, standards and guidelines relative to open space, architecture building controls (appearance, siting, heights, building materials, signs, etc.), terrain, topography, off-street parking, landscaping, setbacks from property lines and buildings, lot coverage ratio, etc. and enforcement procedures. A Lai scarring IQ [Plans shall] include landscaping along property boundaries, for the purpose of mitigating any potential adverse noise and visual impacts to adjoining parcels and the intersection. Multiple -family residential structures shall be designed to be in keeping with the single family residential character of the surrounding area. [To ensure that uses of the subject property meet the intent of the "Low Density" designation of the General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map, all commercial uses, with the exception of any required parking, shall be limited to the land area between the proposed extension of Awapuhi Street and IN the Kanoelehua Highway. Further the maximum residential density shall be three thousand square feet of land area for each dwelling unit.] E. If r q it d by he Planning Director. [A] a Traffic Impact Analysis Report shall be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Public Works and the Department of Transportation (DOT I prior to the submittal of plans for subdivision review. Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for any portion of the subject property, the applicant shall be responsible for constructing and/or paying for its pro rata share of intersection improvements at the intersection of Kanoelehua Avenue and Kahaopea Street subject to the traffic mitigation measures required by the Traffic Impact Analysis Report for the subject property meeting with thC annroval of the Doartment of Public WQrks and Department of Transportation should the nronosed inters �grovements not be commenced by the DOT. F. A Solid Waste Management Plan for the subject property shall be submitted for review and approval to the Department of Public Works in conjunction with the submittal of subdivision plans or plan approval to the Planning Department. G. The applicant shall obtain, if required, a FEMA letter of Map Revision (LOMAR) for the subject property prior to securing Final Subdivision Approval or final plan approval, whichever occurs first. H. Drainage improvements, if required, shall be constructed in a manner meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to securing Final Subdivision Approval or final plan approval for the subject property, whichever 511 occurs first. [I. The applicant shall construct an extension of Awapuhi Street across the subject property to Kahaopea Street and shall dedicate the street extension to the County upon its completion. The street extension shall be constructed to county dedicable standards or to such other standards as may be specified in a planned unit development permit.] [J.]I Prior to securing final subdivision approval or the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the subject property, which ever occurs first, the south side of Kahaopea Street shall be improved and widened with the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements (with pavement widening and transitions) fronting the subject property between Kanoelehua Avenue and the access road to e subjectpro, perty meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works and shall be dedicated to the County upon its request. For the area fronting the subject =,Wert -between the access road and the a tern bound= these or other ixn rn ovements may be mquired by the Dr,12artment of Public Works p oryidrd that no major drainage structures, agch as a bridge or culvert. are required b_y such improvements, [K.]L Accesses to the property and all roadways within the subject property shall meet with the requirements and approval of the Planning Dir=r. or upon consultation with the Department of Public Works and/or the State Department of Transportation. [The applicant shall close the existing driveway access on Kahaopea Street and access] Access to the subject property shall be by the way -4- of the Awapuhi Street extension or an alternate access point as Rgreed upon by the Planning_ Director. upon consultation with the Doartment of Public Work, and/or State Department of TransR rta ion. [LJKy The applicant shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and requirements of affected agencies. [M.JL To ensure that the goals and policies of the Housing Element of the General Flan are implemented, the applicant shall secure the concurrence of the Office of Housing and Community Development that the applicant's affordable housing requirements for the residential development of the subject property, if any, have been mutually agreed to prior to Final Subdivision Approval for any portion of the subject property. [N.IK The applicant shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the subject property with respect to parks and recreation, fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities, and roads. The amount of the fair share contribution shall be the sum which is the product of multiplying the number of residential units proposed to be developed by the amounts allocated hereinbelow for each such unit, and shall become due and payable prior to final subdivision approval or final plan approval for any portion of the subject property or its increments. if the subject property is developed in two or more increments, the amount of the fair share contribution due and payable prior to final subdivision approval or final plan approval of each increment shall be a sum calculated in the same manner according to the number of additional -5- i • proposed residential units in each such increment. The fair share contribution may be in a form of cash, land, facilities, or any combination thereof acceptable to the director in consultation with the affected agencies. The fair share contribution shall have a maximum combined value of $4,645.29 per multiple - family residential unit and $7,239.16 per single-family residential unit. Based upon the applicant's representation of intent to develop up to 37 residential units, the indicated total fair share contribution is $116,132.25 for the multiple family residential units and $86,869.92 for single-family residential units, whichever is applicable. However, the total amount shall be increased or reduced in proportion with the actual number of units according to the calculation and payment provisions set forth in this Condition [N] M. The fair share contribution shall be allocated as follows: 1. $2,291.39 per multiple -family residential unit for an indicated total of $57,284.75 and $3,490.85 per single-family residential unit for an indicated total of $41,890.20 to the County to support park and recreational improvements and facilities; 2. $72.42 per multiple -family residential unit for an indicated total of $1,810.50 and '$168.40 per single-family residential unit for an indicated total of $2,020.80 to the County to support police facilities; 3. $222.77 per multiple -family residential unit for an indicated total of $5,569.25 and $332.61 per single-family residential unit for an indicated total of $3,991.32 to the County to support fire facilities; IRI • • 4. $99.29 per multiple -family residential unit for an indicated total of $2,482.25 and $145.62 per single-family residential unit for an indicated total of $1,747.14 to the County to support solid waste facilities; 5. $1,959.42 per multiple -family residential unit for an indicated total of $48,985.50 and $3,101.68 per single-family residential unit for an indicated total of $37,220.16 to the State or County to support road and traffic improvements. The fair share contributions described above shall be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective date of the change of zone, based on the percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index (HCPI). In lieu of paying the fair share contribution, the applicant may construct and contribute improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation, fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities, and roads within the region impacted by the proposed development, subject to the approval of he director. The cost of providing and constructing the improvements required in Condition E, I, end J [and K] shall be credited against the sum specified in Condition [N] _M(5) for road and traffic improvements. For purposes of administering Condition [N] M, the fair market value of land contributed or the cost of any improvements required or made in lieu of the fair share contribution shall be subject to the review and approval of the director, upon consultation with the appropriate agencies. [O JhL Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for the imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions -7- • • included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance. [Ra An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: 1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence; 2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code; 3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of the change of zone; and 4. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance (i.e., a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for up to one additional year). [Q.IL Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Director may initiate rezoning of the area to its original or more appropriate designation." SECTION 2. Material to be deleted is bracketed. New material is underscored. SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, such invalidity shall. not affect the other parts of this ordinance. -8- 0 0 SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: Hilo, Hawaii Date of Introduction: July 8, 1999 Date of 1st Reading: July 8, 1999 Date of 2nd Reading: October 14, 1999 Effective Date: October 22, 1999 i<ertRetea COMM. 275.004 a APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY r - CORPORATION COUNSEL DATED: �Gc�i C a� UNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAII In 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 O � 1 1 JWON& Pl.. t � AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE AMENDING SECTION 25-114 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP) ARTICLE. 3, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE, BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS -10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN -7.5) AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII. PREPARED 8Y : PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF HAWAII TL1K: 2-2-44: 3.31.32.35 one 37 0CT08ER 15.1ise EXHIBIT "A" c"l-Ummiq OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK County of Hawaii Hilo , Hawaii ( DRAFT 3) Introduced By: Bobby can Leithead-Todd Date Introduced: July 8, 1999 First Reading: July 8, 1999 Published: July 21 , 1999 (HTH & WHT) oaTuly 49, 1999 (RFD Publ. ) REMARKS: REMARKS.- Deferred - 07/28/99 ROLL CALL VOTE AYES NOES ABS EX Arakaki X Chung X Elarionoff rn Jacobson X Second Reading: 'October 14, 1999 To Mayor: October 18, 1999 Returned: October 25, 1999 Effective: October 22, 1999 Published: November 1, 1999 REMARKS.- Deferred - 07/28/99 I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing BILL was adopted by the County Council pithlished as indicated above. APPROVED AS TO F A D LEGALI DEPUTY CORPORATION COUNSEL COUNTY OF HAWAII Date Appruved/4i`.- +, t this 22 day a/• QQ-4 /, 19 Q Q !MAYOR C0 I�OF HAWAII L CHAIRM.4N CLERK Bill No.: 74 (Draft 3 Reference: C-275.004/PC-30 Ord. No.: 116 ROLL CALL VOTE AYES NOES ABS EX Arakaki X Chung X Elarionoff X Jacobson X Leithead-Todd X Pisicchio X Smith X Tyler X Yagong X 9 0 0 0 I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing BILL was adopted by the County Council pithlished as indicated above. APPROVED AS TO F A D LEGALI DEPUTY CORPORATION COUNSEL COUNTY OF HAWAII Date Appruved/4i`.- +, t this 22 day a/• QQ-4 /, 19 Q Q !MAYOR C0 I�OF HAWAII L CHAIRM.4N CLERK Bill No.: 74 (Draft 3 Reference: C-275.004/PC-30 Ord. No.: 116 ROLL CALL VOTE AYES NOES ABS EX Arakaki X Chung X Elarionoff X Jacobson X Leithead-Todd X Pisicchio X Smith X Tyler X Yagong X 9 0 0 0 I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing BILL was adopted by the County Council pithlished as indicated above. APPROVED AS TO F A D LEGALI DEPUTY CORPORATION COUNSEL COUNTY OF HAWAII Date Appruved/4i`.- +, t this 22 day a/• QQ-4 /, 19 Q Q !MAYOR C0 I�OF HAWAII L CHAIRM.4N CLERK Bill No.: 74 (Draft 3 Reference: C-275.004/PC-30 Ord. No.: 116 William P. Kenoi- i"y AT vwunfv Of F,abial Li (offire af'ausiug nub dammuuif E �1a�rmEn# 50 Wailuku Drive • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 • (808) 961-8379 • Fax (808) 961-8685 KONA: 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway • Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 (808)323-4305 • Fax(808)323-4301 December 12, 2011 MEMORANDUM TO: Bobby -Jean Leithead Todd Planning Department FROM: JS ne Jin H uistrator SUBJECT: Change of Zone Application (REZ 840) Request: Amend Condition C (Secure Final Subdivision Approval), Condition H (Drainage Improvements) and Condition I (Improve Kahaopea Street) of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99-116 Applicant: Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. Tax Map: (3) 2-2-044:003, 031, 032, 035,037 Stephen J. Arnett Housing Administrator Niniau K. Simmons Assistant Housing Administrator The Office of Housing and Community Development has reviewed the application and determined that Affordable Housing Conditions are applicable to the subject request. However there are no affordable housing requirements until such time the project develops residential units or the mix retail space exceeds the equivalent of 100 full-time employees. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. G:/Planning/2108pasr.docx Planning Dept. Exhibit 4-..._. 71 ..Ii s 075'784 �1 qn EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY 'HAWAI'I COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY PROVIDER AND EMPLOYER" William P. Kenoi Mayor " 3 December 13, 2011 F l'gly STS : n• Mow. F� 4rE•OFN P� County of Hawaii POLICE DEPARTMENT 349 Kapiolani Street Hilo. Hawaii 96720-3998 (808)935-3311 Fax(808)961-8865 TO BJ LETT AD TODD, PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM HENR ES,ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF AREA P;AVAR RATIONS SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE (REZ 840) APPLICANT: GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII, INC. REQUEST: AMEND CONDITION C, H, AND I TAX MAP KEY: 2-2-044:003, 031, 032, 035, AND 037 Harry S. Kubojiri Police Chief Paul K. Ferreira Deputy Police Chief Staff, upon reviewing the provided documents, does not anticipate any significant impact to traffic and/or public safety concerns. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please contact S. Hilo Patrol Captain Robert Wagner at 961-2214. RW:Ili 110819 Planning Dept. Exhibit "Hawai'i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer" SCANNED, ��. 6 201E ByCO 5564 fyi s.jT William' °+enol Mayot r December 6, 2011 QCountp of 'abi it HAWAI'I FIRE DEPARTMENT 25 Aupuni Street • Room 2501 • Hilo, Hawaii 96120, (808) 932-2900 • Fax (808) 932-2928 TO: BJ LEITHEAD TODD, PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: DARREN J. ROSARIO, FIRE CHIEF Darren J. Rosario Fire Chief Renwick J. Victorino Deputy Fire Chief SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 840 APPLICANT: GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAPI, INC. REQUEST: AMEND CONDITION C (SECURE FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL), CONDITION H (DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS) AND CONDITION I (IMPROVE KAHAOPEA ST) OF CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE No. 99-116 TAX MAP KEY: 2-2-044:003,031,032,035 and 037 In regards to the above-mentioned request for amendment Change of Zone Ordinance, the following shall be in accordance: Fire apparatus access roads shall be in accordance with UFC Section 10.207: "Fire Apparatus Access Roads "Sec. 10.207. (a) General. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of this section. "(b) Where Required. Fire apparatus access roads shall be required for every building hereafter constructed when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story is located more than 150 feet from fire department vehicle access as measured by an unobstructed route around the exterior of the building. "EXCEPTIONS: 1. When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the provisions of this section may be modified. "2. When access roadways cannot be installed due to topography, water nonnegotiable grades or other similar conditions, the chief may require addi fire protection as specified in Section 10.301 (b). A Planning Dept. f SCA NN E 6 Exhibit _ R4 5" 3 Hazvai'i Coixnty is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Ernployer. BJ Leithead Todd December 6, 2011 Page 2 1. When there are not more than two Group R, Division 3 or Group M Occupancies, the requirements of this section may be modified, provided, in the opinion of the chief, fire -fighting or rescue operations would not be impaired. "More than one fire apparatus road may be required when it is determined by the chief that access by a single road may be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions or other factors that could limit access. "For high -piled combustible storage, see Section 81.109. "(c) Width. The unobstructed width of a fire apparatus access road shall meet the requirements of the appropriate county jurisdiction. "(d) Vertical Clearance. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. "EXCEPTION: Upon approval vertical clearance may be reduced, provided such reduction does not impair access by fire apparatus and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating the established vertical clearance. "(e) Permissible Modifications. Vertical clearances or widths required by this section may be increased when, in the opinion of the chief, vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to provide fire apparatus access. "(f) Surface. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all- weather driving capabilities." (20 tons) "(g) Turning Radius. The turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be as approved by the chief." (45 feet) "(h) Turnarounds. All dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. "(i) Bridges. When a bridge is required to be used as access under this section, it shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the applicable sections of the Building Code and using designed live loading sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. "(j) Grade. The gradient for a fire apparatus access road shall not exceed the maximum approved by the chief." (15%) BJ Leithead Todd December 6, 2011 Page 3 (k) Obstruction. The required width of any fire apparatus access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and clearances established under this section shall be maintained at all times. "(1) Signs. When required by the fire chief, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both." Water supply shall be in accordance with UFC Section 10.301(c): "(c) Water Supply. An approved water supply capable of supplying required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which buildings or portions of buildings are hereafter constructed, in accordance with the respective county water requirements. There shall be provided, when required by the chief, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow. "Water supply may consist of reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, water mains or other fixed systems capable of providing the required fire flow. "The location, number and type of fire hydrants connected to a water supply capable of delivering the required fire flow shall be protected as set forth by the respective county water requirements. All hydrants shall be accessible to the fire department apparatus by roadways meeting the requirements of Section 10.207. DARREN J. ROSARIO Fire Chief KT:lpc NEIL ABERCROMBIE GOVERNOROFNAWAG STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 OI,$ HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 January 12, 2012 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attention: Ms. Maija Cottle 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Cottle: WILIJAAI J. AILA, JR. atA MEMON 1W W)(W1AM)AM1NAllllW.RW )1ML7+s LYRM1lL M ON WATFA R+VR11LLK MMfAGIMIdl1 via email: mcottle@co.hawaii.hi.us SUBJECT: Change of Zone (REZ 840) — Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc.'s Request to Amend Condition C (Secure Final Subdivision Approval), Condition H (Drainage Improvements), and Condition I (Improve Kahaopea Street) of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99-116 Iocated at South Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-2-044:003,031,032,035 and 037 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Department of Land and Natural Resources' (DLNR) Land Division distributed or made available a copy of your report pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR Divisions for their review and comments. At this time, enclosed are comments from (a) Engineering Division; and (b) Land Division — Hawaii District on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call Darlene Nakamura at 587-0417. Thank you. Sincerely, ssell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures Planning Dept. Exhibit �� NEIL ARERCROMEIE GOVERNOR OF HAWAII !t O Nob e WILLIAM J.,VILA, JR. CIIARO'F]6" 00ARPOI IANDAMINAIIRW Kf,%jHR11:5 _ RFCw RWUN WAIIRRh4M-RU, MANM1LAHXI UND DIVISION Rr STATE OF HAWAII 10 A 81 191 DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOUR ES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 December 22, 2011 NATURAL RESOURCES STATE OF HAWAII MEMORANDUM TO: DLNR Agencies: —.Div. of Aquatic Resources _Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation r3FsrtgejgbDti+szox; _Div. of Forestry & Wildlife _Div. of State Parks -& Commission on Water Resource Management -& Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands ! Land Division — Hawaii District X Historic Preservation FROM:M ussell Y. Tsuji, Land Administr oarr (_..- SUBJECT: hange of Zone (REZ 840) — Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc.'s Request to Amend Condition C (Secure Final Subdivision Approval), Condition H (Drainage Improvements), and Condition I (Improve Kahaopea Street) of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99-116 LOCATION: South Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-2-044:003, 031, 032, 035 and 037 APPLICANT: City and County of Honolulu on behalf of Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. Transmitted for your review and comment on the above referenced document. We would appreciate your comments on this document. Please submit any comments by January 3, 2012. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at 587-0417. Thank YOU. Attachments ( ) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. (� Comm nts are attached. Signed: _ Date: S cc: Central Files DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LD/ Russell Y. Tsuji REF: Change of Zone (REZ 840), Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc.'s Request to Amend Condition C (Secure Final Subdivision Approval), Condition Il (Drainage Improvements), and Condition I (Improve Kabnopea Street) of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99-116, South Hilo Ilawaii.011 COMMENTS () We confine that the project site, according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), is located in Flood "Lone (X) Please take note that the eastern area of the project site, according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), is located in Flood Zones AE and X (shaded). The National Flood Insurance Program regulates developments within Zones AE and X (shaded) as indicated in bold letters below. The remainder of the project site is located in Flood Zone X. The National Flood Insurance Program does not have any regulations for developments within Zone X. () Please note that the correct Flood Zone Designation for the project site according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) is (X) Please note that the project site must comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) presented in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44CFR), whenever development within a Special Flood Hazard Area is undertaken. If there are any questions, please contact the State NFIP Coordinator, Ms. Carol Tyau-Beam, of the Department of Land and Natural Resources, Engineering Division at (808) 587-0267. Please be advised that 44CFR indicates the minimum standards set forth by the NFIP. Your Community's local flood ordinance may prove to be more restrictive and thus take precedence over the minimum NFIP standards. If there are questions regarding the local flood ordinances, please contact the applicable County NFIP Coordinators below: () Mr. Mario Sin Li at (808) 523-4247 of the City and County of I lonolulu, Department of Planning and Permitting. (X) Mr. Frank DeMarco at (808) 961-8042 of the County of Hawaii, Department of Public Works. () Mr. Francis Cerizo at (808) 270-7771 of the County of Maui, Department of Planning. () Ms. Wynne Ushigome at (808) 241-4890 of the County of Kauai, Department of Public Works. () The applicant should include project water demands and infrastructure required to meet water demands. Please note that the implementation of any State-sponsored projects requiring water service from the Honolulu Board of Water Supply system must first obtain water allocation credits from the Engineering Division before it can receive a building permit and/or water meter. () The applicant should provide the water demands and calculations to the Engineering Division so it can be included in the State Water Projects Plan Update. () Additional Comments: (} Other: Should you have any questions, please call Mr. De mada of the Planning Branch at 587-0257. Signed: CARTY S C ANG IEF FNGINEF.R Date: j [L MEMORANDUM TO: DLNR Agencies: R ' Div. of Aquatic Resources ` _Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation -KEngineering Division —Div. of Forestry & Wildlife _,.._Div. of State Parks > -LCommission on Water Resource Management X Office of Conservation &Coastal Lands �! 41" , ��Ltl��`ts��rr�- ��aw�Y�Dl�trl�t: X Historic Preservation FROM:I,% Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator (_ SUBJECT: hange of Zone (REZ 840) – Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc.'s Request to Amend Condition C (Secure Final Subdivision Approval), Condition H (Drainage Improvements), and Condition I (Improve Kahaopea Street) of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99-116 LOCATION: South Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-2-044:003, 031, 032, 035 and 037 APPLICANT: City and County of Honolulu on behalf of Graphic images Hawaii, Inc. Transmitted for your review and comment on the above referenced document. We would appreciate your comments on this document. Please submit any comments by January 3, 2012. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at 587-0417. Thank you. Attachments ( ) We have no objections. (� We have no comments, ( ) Comments are attached. Signed: `Zr Date: , cc: Central Files tE OF h� NEIL ABERCROMME GOVERNOR OF HAWAII o�� TVILLIAM J. AILA, JR. CRASWOMON GOAROOFLAM ANONATWULRESOUSCES COMMESMS ON WATER RESCRMCE MANAGEMENT 0% and STATE OF HAWAII 2011 ONE- 29 J P 1: 01 DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 RECEIVED LAND DIVISION Hlp..Fa 11 December 22, 2011 MEMORANDUM TO: DLNR Agencies: R ' Div. of Aquatic Resources ` _Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation -KEngineering Division —Div. of Forestry & Wildlife _,.._Div. of State Parks > -LCommission on Water Resource Management X Office of Conservation &Coastal Lands �! 41" , ��Ltl��`ts��rr�- ��aw�Y�Dl�trl�t: X Historic Preservation FROM:I,% Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator (_ SUBJECT: hange of Zone (REZ 840) – Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc.'s Request to Amend Condition C (Secure Final Subdivision Approval), Condition H (Drainage Improvements), and Condition I (Improve Kahaopea Street) of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99-116 LOCATION: South Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-2-044:003, 031, 032, 035 and 037 APPLICANT: City and County of Honolulu on behalf of Graphic images Hawaii, Inc. Transmitted for your review and comment on the above referenced document. We would appreciate your comments on this document. Please submit any comments by January 3, 2012. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at 587-0417. Thank you. Attachments ( ) We have no objections. (� We have no comments, ( ) Comments are attached. Signed: `Zr Date: , cc: Central Files NEIL ABERCROMBIE GOVERNOR ♦ Axe3.tlji� rTRI 1 �rtOFp>t,,.:;y� '�{� =�{rte``, GLENN M. OKtMOTO r ikJ o'ti' { DIRECTOR r e® Deputy Directors 4� ` 4 57 ��e�. o- JADE T. BUTAY FORD N. FUCHIGAMI � t z RANDY GRUNE STATE OF HAWAII JADINE URASAKI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN REPLY REFER TO: 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813-5097 HWY-PS 2.0570 January 12, 2012 Ms. BJ Leithead Todd, Director County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Leithead Todd: Subject: Change of Zone (REZ 840) Applicant: Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. Request: Amend Condition C, H and I of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99-116 Hawaii, South Hilo TMK: (3) 2-2-044: 003, 031, 032, 035 and 037 We have reviewed the request to amend Conditions C, H and I of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99-116 for the proposed Waiaka Center, which was formerly known as the Kanoelehua Commercial Development. The State of Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) understands that the amendment to Condition C is needed to allow sufficient time for the Applicant to receive all the necessary approvals for construction to commence. HDOT has no objections to the amendment of Conditions C, H, and I, provided that the Applicant continues coordination efforts with HDOT and satisfactorily addresses HDOT's prior comments (HWY-PS 2.8177 dated April 15, 2011, as attached) regarding the improvements to Kanoelehua Avenue. Further coordination and review will also be required for the Traffic Impact Analysis Report dated September 2011 that was included with the amendment request. If you have any questions, please contact Ken Tatsuguchi, Engineering Program Manager, Highways Division, Planning Branch, at (808) 587-1830. Very truly yours, GLENN M. OKIMOTO, Ph.D. Director of Transportation Attachment -976400 Planning Dept. Exhibit -10 mss✓'•• ' NEIL ABERCROMBIE GLENN M. OKIMOTO GOVERNOR y fart' . DIRECTOR Deputy Directors FORD N. FUCHIGAMI . °PQX JAN S. GOUVEIA �aeffu eve RANpY GRUNE JADINE URASAKI STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN REPLY REFER TO: 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813-5097 1.1V7y-PS April 15, 2011 2'8177 Mr. Russell Figueiroa President' R.M. Towill Corporation 2024 North King Street, Suite 200 Honolulu, Hawaii 96819 Dear Mr. Figueiroa: Subject: Request for Access from a State Highway Kanoelehua Commercial Development State Route No. 11, Kanoelehua Avenue Hilo, Hawaii TMK: (3) 2-2-004:032, 035 and 037 We have received your letter dated September 1, 2010 requesting access from Kanoelehua Avenue for the subject project and apofogize "for the delay in response. Our Highways Division has reviewed the provided informational documents and understands that the request is for a right -in access only from Kanoelehua Avenue into the subject commercial property at the southeast corner of the Kanoelehua Avenue and East Kahaopea Street intersection in South Hilo. As a result of our review, it is our determination that there will be no objections to the aforementioned project access from Kanoelehua Avenue provided that the developer agrees to satisfactorily mitigate our concerns as stated below: 1. The proposed roadway modifications shall be designed to meet the Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) standards. 2. As shown on the plans, the shifting lane taper on Kahaopea Street crossing Kanoelehua Avenue is not acceptable as it not compliant with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 3. Proposed driveway connection layout shall be revised to include a deceleration lane separated from the right turn lane to Kahaopea Street under both interim and future conditions (i.e., two separate and distinct deceleration lanes which are not concurrent but rather parallel to each other). Mr. Russell Figueiroa HW -PS Page 2 2.8177 April 15, 2011 4. In the proposed future condition, sharrow is not acceptable for this situation. Accommodation for a separate 5 -foot wide bike lane is required at the proposed driveway and right turn lane to Kahaopea Street. 5. The drive-thru entry should be relocated to minimize back ups onto Kanoelehua Avenue. The developer should continue coordination efforts with HDOT to ensure these concerns are addressed appropriately and that all revised plans shall be provided to the Highways Division for approval. If you should have any questions, please contact Mr. Ken Tatsuguchi, Engineering Program Manager, Highways Division, Planning Branch at 587-1830. Very truly yours, GLENN M. OKIMOTO, Ph.D. Director of Transportation r � January 12, 2012 FROM: STEPHANIE SALAZAR TO: Planning Department Ail { r.i 1 A 9, 51 SUBJECT: Submission of request for time extension and amendment to conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99-116 Amending Ordinance NO. 96-159 TMK [3] 2-2-044: 032, 035 and 037 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING: THURSDAY FEBRUARY 2,2012,9:00 A.M. SITE LOCATION: Southeast corner of Kanoelehua and East Kahaopea Street I am writing to object to the time extension and amendment sought in this application for the commercial development of the above land, which is the site of the Old Hirose Nursery. I am a resident of 78 East Kahaopea Street, and beneficiary of the Rikio and Florence Doi Family Trust. Mr. and Mrs. Doi are deceased and the property in the trust, including my residence, located on TMK: (3) 2-2-044-030. (To verify my interest in the property I have attached a copy of the trust. Florence Doi died in 2009 and Rikio Doi died in September 2011.) I have lived at this address sincel987, for almost 25 years. My residence is on a one -acre parcel that abuts the proposed development site on three sides, and has access through an easement on the proposed development site. I object to allowing the developer/landowner getting approval to sell parcels without first complying with the requirements under the law and to make traffic/road/sidewalk improvements. • Time extension -- It appears the developer has had ample time to pursue developing the property and does not deserve an extension. Since the original application was made a long time ago, it would warrant an entirely new application, given the change in the economy, environmental concerns, growth of residential population, ample business spaces that are unoccupied now, etc. • Flooding -- in the 20 years since I have lived here, the back of the property has flooded, not only this one acre, but several acres behind. when Roland last bulldozed the property he affected the drainage off his property onto this property often causing flooding in the basement of the Doi house. (there are two homes on this one acre parcel, the larger "white Doi house" and my small residence, "small brown house".) • Traffic - traffic has increased significantly both on Kanoelehua and Kahaopea Street since this permit was first approved. While Kanoelehua has several commercial developments, Kahaopea Street on this side is a residential street. There are now several homes at the bottom of the hill off the highway, and while that loop subdivision of homes has sidewalks, there are NO sidewalks on Kahaopea Street. Motorists often speed up the hill to make the traffic light at the Kanoelehua/ Kahaopea intersection. There are speed bumps on portions of Kahaopea, but not for the first few blocks off the highway. The paved portion of Kahaopea Street as it abuts the development property is very narrow, with no shoulders along the old Hirose Nursery property. • Access to development - I understood this development was to have access directly to Kanoelehua Avenue. If that is correct, I believe the developer is trying to avoid the expense off acquiring such access through the State Highways, and rather trying to put the burden on a small,narrow, residential, county road - Kahaopea Street, East. • Speeders -- Kanoelehua Avenue fronting the old Hirose Nursery property -- the development site - is notorious for speeders. The speed limit is 35 mph, but most drive at least 45 miles per hour. I do not have traffic statistics, but I hope you have access to records from the HPD. There are no pedestrian sidewalks along Kanoelehua and there in no parking allowed on Kanoelehua. • Pedestrians. It is dangerous for pedestrians to walk up to the highway along Kahaopea Street. We have many people walk down Kahaopea Street after school, and headed too and from work. Kahaopea is used by pedestrians who live on the first street (used to be called the Japanese subdivision) and in the Hawaiian homes lots. These are working class people who often ride the bus or walk to nearby shops. Adding commercial traffic to this stretch of Kahaopea, even with sidewalks, would not be conducive to a residential neighborhood. Page Two Jan 12, 2011 SCAINNE � Planning Dept. • ' f fig 218 Exhibit Salazar's Letter to Planning Department re: Submission of request for time extension and amendment to conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99-116 Amending Ordinance NO. 96-159 TMK [3] 2-2-044: 032, 035 and 037 • Easement for 78 East Kahaopea Street -- The previous owners rejected attempts to relocate the easement and I would also object to relocating the easement. Attached is a September 20, 2008 letter from geometrician Associates regarding an earlier attempt to move the easement. Mr. and Mrs. Doi objected and rejected attempts to move the easement and refused to sell their property to landowner Roland Higashi. • FoliageAesthetic concerns. Hilo does not need a strip mall. There is a beautiful border of green along the highway that includes palm trees and a huge mango tree. I would object to the developer removing this greenery. Roland Higashi bulldozed most of the former Hirose nursery plants even though he was told there were rare, indigenous plants. He has shown a poor track record for preserving plants for landscaping. (You can see his lack of concern for landscaping by the ugly frontage of the Hawaii Printing site that he used to own, and the T-shirt place he owns.) • Remnant roadway parcel ownership Geometrician also attempted to have Mrs. Doi convey the remnant roadway lot, still held by the Margaret Hirose Trust, to the developer. At the time she consulted her family attorney, Roy Nakamoto, who advised' her not to pursue clearing title into her name, as there was no threat that anyone else could acquire it. • There are ethical concerns and an obvious conflict of interest if the current developer's attorney, Alan Okamoto, is representing a party who is trying to acquire this remnant roadway lot, as he is in the same law firm as Mr. Nakamoto, who was attorney for the Dois and drew up their family trust.. • Illegal fill on development property. The landowner used rubbish and fill from the former Hilo Hospital that included rebar. when he was told to remove all the rebar, workers first used equipment to remove rebar, but when that broke down, they only cut out what was visible. there is still lots of rebar in the concrete fill. The fill does not seem to be stable either, as it was just dumped and i do not believe it was reinforced to prevent shifting (due to earthquake, etc.) Thank you for considering my concerns. If you need more information or clarification, please let me know right away, as I wanted to make these points before the Planning Director, Bobbi Jean Leithead-Todd,made a recommendation to the Planiing Commission. As disclosure, I was once an employee for the Corporation Counsel -Family Support Division, when Mrs. Leithead-Todd was a deputy corporation counsel. This was for a period of about four years in early 1990's. THE RIKIO DOI FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST TRANSFER On this 4th day of September , 2009, RIKIO DOI and FLORENCE HISAKO DOI, aka Florence H. Doi, husband and wife, of 78 E. Kahaopea Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720, hereinafter called the Settlors, do hereby transfer the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) and all other property hereinafter added to the trust fund, to RIKIO DOI and FLORENCE H. DOI, husband and wife, of 78 E. Kahaopea Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720, hereinafter called the Trustees, upon the following trusts: NAME OF TRUST 1. This Trust shall be called "THE RIKIO DOI FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST DATED September 4 2009." ADDITIONS 2. The Trustees may receive from time to time additions whether of real or personal property to any trust fund then being held hereunder from the Settlors or from any person in any manner and by any means. DURING THE SETTLOR'S LIFE 3. During the lives of the Settlors, all income shall be added to the principal so that ' 1 076334 there shall always be only one fund and the Trustees shall from time to time distribute to or apply for the benefit of either or both of the Settlors all or such portions of the income and principal as either or both of the Settlors shall direct and to the extent not so directed the Trustees may distribute to or apply for the benefit of either or both of the Settlors, all or such portions thereof at such times, amounts and manner as the Trustees shall from time to time in the Trustees' discretion determine. A. Upon the death of the first Settlor, the Trustees shall pay to the surviving Settlor, or his or her order, so much of the net income and principal thereof as the surviving Settlor shall direct in writing and to the extent not so directed the Trustee may distribute to or apply for the benefit of the surviving Settlor all or such portions thereof at such times, amounts and manner as the Trustee shall from time to time in the Trustee's discretion determine. ON SURVIVING SETTLOR'S DEATH 4. Upon the death of the surviving Settlor, this trust shall terminate and the remaining assets of the trust shall be distributed as follows: A. One-half (1/2) undivided interest in the real property designated as TMK (3) 2-2-44: 30, including the residential home, to Settlors' son, EDMUND RIKIO DOI; B. One-half (1/2) undivided interest in the real property designated as TMK (3) 2-2-44: 30, including any interest Settlors' may have in the oha.na house constructed by RUSSELL HISAO DOI, to RUSSELL HISAO DOI, and if he should predecease the Settlors, then to ELAINE STEPHANIE SALAZAR, and if he should also predecease the Settlors, then this undivided interest shall fall into the residue: C. All of Settlors' shares in Verizon Corporation to Settlors' daughter, 2 Trustee shall be vested with and may exercise all of the rights, powers, duties and discretion herein given to the Trustees when acting. A. The determination whether the original Settlors/Trustees are competent shall be made by a medical doctor and that determination shall be binding on all persons interested in the trust estate. EFFECT OF POWER OF ATTORNEY 10. If the Settlor has granted a power of attorney, including a general power of attorney without referring to this trust, to any person, persons, corporation or partnership, then on behalf of the Settlor, the said person, persons, corporation or partnership shall have the power to amend and/or revoke this trust, and if the Settlor is also the Trustee of this Trust, then the person, persons, corporation or partnership who has the said power of attorney shall be authorized to act and use all of the powers, rights and privileges of the Trustee herein. EXECUTION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Settlors and Trustees have executed this instrument on the day and year first above written. RIKIO DOI FLO I`IdSA i I" aka Florence H. Doi Settlors and Trustees geometrician ASSOC I A T E S, LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 PO Box 396 Hawaii 96721 merry@hawaii.rr.com September 20, 2005 Dear Agency/Organization Official or Neighboring Resident: Subject: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Kahaopea Center, TMK 2-2-044:035 & 037, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii I have been contracted by M. David Paul Development LLC (MDP) to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) in compliance with Chapter 343, HRS, MDP plans to develop a commercial center in Hilo on the corner of Kahaopea Street and Kanoelehtua Avenue on about 2.9 acres of the former 5.2 -acre Hirose Nursery (sec attached maps). The property is already zoned commercial, and an EA is necessary because it is expected that some use of County and/or State highway right-of-way at the corner will he involved. The precise size and layout of the buildings, parking areas and landscaping on the property have not yet been determined, but the EA will provide a conceptual design plan. All plans will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department through the Plan Approval process prior to construction. The areas of investigation in the EA will include but not be limited to the following: water quality assurance; wastewater treatment; flora, fauna, and ecosystems; traffic impacts; geology, soils, and hazards; flooding and drainage impacts (a part of the property that will not be impacted includes a designated flood zone); social, cultural and community impacts; historic sites; and economic impacts. I would appreciate your comments on any special environmental conditions or impacts related to the development. Please contact me at (805) 969-7090 (Big Island) if you have any questions or require clarification. Kindly indicate whether you wish to receive a copy of the EA when completed. Sincerely, Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates i T awt Ht:^.e3 U:Iv 1 M'nMAHI S Ff.P '�: K:r, F• f i:i...1?., f i.. fyy / Pv'.IKnN:KA�wcIAu w.!Ls. Puak6 Waimea a Walkoioa Ilage MAV 'A KEA rteAh+e r,wq KUM, HONOKOHAU N.H.P. !?UAULAI ioe Project kalau Location KAFALtS MTF ^-PK 0, 1 NOEL ANI •LOOP- +'- ' 1 I •y p .«J.wJ I,-e+r...Jroe.rJ, w.N q9IR ... J r r. .i✓1. �• 1 ata Lo�'T � � q..+e ., ♦ J � rJ � .w, ,oe,a vnvj �t .� 4 'J'3J: + � v .f �. r... u. `NOFLONI ,+eJr .a�i00P�i. W .. •� l:.'- I-`•"el],+_'l. t'l''1 . 1 ' ;� e.l L •• • ' of ~ _ • -�. .... �iJ .._ a• s v 'iJ.... �. + r.. ,�. �'�.... 7 �'�.—•� � • »a�- Y� r.wJ, ,rr pwJ I'.'Y a 7 V 119 p 1 ,�•. �,'J' ... +s P .+., r.,w,..r » ..s..r +�.�'+ ,y..r ...s n ^::� : �a•'�t Q Subject .� Q In' to • , �� r, ` Y Propertyr 82 l • 1a er,...- a ..r.s r+ ...- ..:•. ��w� wa �wpes P '� .{+seM ' 3 ..! te.♦ si Kanoelehua Avenue (State Highway 11) DIV ISIOn _.-._.r••---- ... .-+__.. _.__.._ 44 F ONE Ec PLA .__-- •I - .. _ _ —.__ 0e r , I 1 DATE: January 17, 2012 HAND DELIVERED ! + !>• r- r FROM: RUSSELL H. DOI 78 EAST KAHAOPEA STREET MLO, HI 96720 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION County of Hawaii 777 Kilauea Avenue Hilo, Hawaii 96720 RE: Submission of request for time extension and amendment to conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99-116 Amending Ordinance NO. 96-159 TMK [3] 2-2-044: 032, 035 and 037 SUBJECT: Objection to Request for extension and Amendments to conditions C, H and I PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING: THURSDAY FEBRUARY 2,2012,9:00 A.M. SITE LOCATION: Southeast corner of Kanoelehua and East Kahaopea Street - OLD HIROSE NURSERY Dear Commission Members: I OPPOSE the application by developers "Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc." to have a time extension and avoid having to make road and drainage improvements (Conditions I and H). FLOODING I have lived on the property next door to the Old Hirose Nursery for most of my life. Since I was a child I worked with my grandmother Margaret Hirose and my mother, aunt and uncle on the nursery so I know this land better than anyone. It is mostly in flood zone. The nursery building was up near the highway. The lower half of the property, down toward Awapuhi Street, was in flood zone and used by my grandmother only for plants, such as bananas. 1996 application by people now deceased The application that is about to expire, was made first made approved in 1996, 12 years ago, from an application made by people who are now dead. My uncle, William Hirose, of Oahu, died in 2002 and my aunt, Helen Doi, of Oahu, died in 2004. Easement and Entrance to Site Off Kahaop a Strect The Hirose Nursery Property had a business address in the 2200 block of Kanoelehua Avenue, however, it always had access off Kahaopea Street. Tour buses would enter and leave from the Kahaopea Street entrance. My home has an address of 78 East Kahaopea Street. I enter my home along a driveway that is over an easement that runs parallel to Kanoelehua Avenue for approximatelyIEVO feet. The land is currently held by the Rikio Doi Family revocable Trust dated September 4,2009. 1 am a beneficiary of the trust and heir to the Doi property. (Copy of Trust attached) This is Land Court Land and the Deed (copy attached) includes TOGETHER with a right of way for road and utility purposes to be enjoyed in common with others,over, across,and under the 25 foot wide road easement as show on said Map 2 of said Land court application No. 1675. How can a neighbor take away part of my property? When Roland Higashi bought all the old Nursery property - he tried to purchase my parents' land and also offered to'buy' the easement in exchange for access via land that is in a flood zone. My parents have never agreed to these proposals. I inherited the land from my parents and I also object to moving the easement. Remnant parcel held by the Mar caret Hirose Trust The developer is trying to include land that he does not own: Namely TMX (3) 2-2-044:003 - the remnant roadway parcel that has been held by the Margaret Hirose Trust since at least 1990. A few years ago a developer tried to have my mother, as a beneficiary of the Margaret Hirose Trust, give, exchange or transfer the parcel to the developer. She sought legal advice from her family attorney, Roy Nakamoto, who said that it was so complex, not to bother, as the land would just sit there unused. He said it would take a lot of work to notify all the descendants of the trust beneficiaries, that is,all the grand children. So my mother did not pursue clearing up title to that piece of land that sits right below the Doi property. So she did not pursue it. If anyone should own that parcel, it should go to my parents' property. Roland Higashi has plenty of room on the land he owns without trying to take away our family trust land. I do not understand how his attorney, Alan Okamoto, is a partner with Roy Nakamoto, and is trying to take away land from his partner's client. That seems like a conflict of interest in their law firm. There is a second conflict of interest in this application. The developers/ owners of the land is Graphic Images HaNvaii,lnc. owned by Roland Higashi. He has long been in business with -Creative Arts, which is still managed by his business partner, Rand' Kurohara. Randy is an executive with Mayor Billy Kenoi's staff. I have attached copies of the State of Hawaii, DCCA, Business Registration print out that shows the direct business link between Roland and Randy Kurohara. I believe there is political pressure to approve this application when it is not in the public interest and the developer is trying to avoid doing it the right way. How can anyone appointed by Billy Kenoi to either the planning department or the Planning Commission appointed vote on this application? Planning Dept. Exhibit 1% Shouldn't they recuse themselves, that is NOT vote on this application. How can the appointed Planning Director make a recommendation, as this project is financially tied to Mayor Kenoi's top aide. Both Randy and Roland and their families worked on Mayor Kenoi s campaign. Hi STORY OF TH LA ND: All the land involved as the Hirose Nursery, operated by my grandparents, first downtown Hilo, and then moved to Kanoelehua after the 1960 tsunami. My grandparents bought this land when Kanoelehua was a dirt road and set side one portion, about six acres, for the nursery, and several other one -acre parcels for their children. My mother told me that her widowed mother gave her the first lot, provided she pay for the subdivision. Lot TMK (3) 2-2-44-:30 is the Doi lot owned by my parentsand where I have lived most of my life. We have always had access via the easement over the nursery lot. The county waterline to my home is along that easement. This is the easement that Roland Higashi is trying to take away. Lot TMK (3) 2-2-44:31 is the one acre lot on the Puna side of my home. It was always known as Uncle Willie/George's lot. He never built on that lot. This lot has repeatedly flooded during my lifetime. In fact we used to play in a rowboat every time the heavy rains flooded this lot as well as the back of my parents' lot. I understand Roland does not want to include this lot in his plans anymore. I guess it is because it floods. This is the lot he wanted to exchange with my parents if they gave up their easement. Lot TMK (3) 2-2-44:32 is the one acre lot that was owned by my aunt, Hilda Morishita. She had a home there until she lost it in foreclosure and Roland had the house tom down. Lot TMK (3) 2-2-44:35 is about four acres and includes the land that has my home's roadway easement. this is where most of the Hirose Nursery outdoor planting area was located. Lot TMK (3) 2-2-44:37 is one acre and where the Hirose Nursery building, shop, certified green house and Grandma Hirose's home was located. Roland tore down these structures. There are two other lots behind the Hirose Nursery: Lots TMK (3) 2-2-44: 33 and :34 which are owned by the Chock Trust. They have never been developed, likely because the two lots are in a flood zone. SUMMARY: Thank you for taking time to speak to me,listen to my information and read this letter. I plan to testify at the February 2, 2011 hearing. I have asked my attorney, Sandra Song, to help me at the meeting, as she knows the law and land zoning matters. My main points are: 1. The application was first made by people who are now dead. There has been time to meet all the requirements and they should not get an extension. 2. Roland has no right to the Margaret Hirose Trust land 3. Roland has no right to move or take away the Doi property driveway easement without our permission and I do not give that permission. 4. If Roland wants to make a driveway off Awapuhi,and Extend Awapuhi from Kahaopea over his own land back to the Ruthie Subdivision off Kawailani that is his business, but I will not give up my existing easement from Kahaopea. Thank -you very much, Russell H. Doi 91010. , 78 East Kahaopea Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Tel: 808 959 3242, email: rainierdoi0ayahoo.com ATTACHMENTS: 1. Deed to 78 East Kahaopea Street (TMK (3) 2-2-44: 30 2. Rikio Doi Family Trust 3. DCCA business Information: Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. 4. DCCA Business Information: Creative Arts Hawaii LLC 5. Obituary: William Megumi Hirose 2002 6. Obituary: Helen Hirose Doi 2004 7. Tax web site maps showing location of each lot affected by this application. t:. r SEP 18 2009 OFFICE OF THE; ASSISTANT REGIS'T'RAR, LAND COUI T STATE OF HAWAII (Bureau of Conveyances) The original of this document was recorded as follows:. DOCUMENT t Doc 3898071 CTI 958,280 DATE---------RP-15-wmq nR-tr» nen LAND COURT SYSTEM REGULAR SYSTEM AFTER RECORDATION, RETURN BY Mail (X) Pickup ( ) Nakamoto, Okamoto & Yamamoto 187 Kapiolani Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Order of Recording TITLE OF DOCUMENT: DEED PARTIES TO DOCUMENT: Grantors: RIKIO DOI and FLORENCE HISAKO DOI, also known as Florence H.. Doi, husband and wife; Grantees: RRUO DOI and FLORENCE H. DOI, Trustees of the Rikio Doi Family Revocable Trust dated September 4, 2009 whose address is 78 E. Kahaopea Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720. Affects: TMK (3`d) 2-2-44: 30 1 This document contains _62 pages. DEED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That RIKIO DOI and FLORENCE HISAKO DOI, also known as Florence H. Doi, whose address is 78 E. Kahaopea Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720, hereinafter called the Grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) to them in hand paid by RIKIO DOI and FLORENCE H. DOI, Trustees of the Rikio Doi Family Revocable Trust dated September 4. 2009 , whose address is 78 E. Kahaopea Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720, hereinafter called the Grantees, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have sold and by these presents do hereby bargain, sell, assign, convey and transfer unto the said Grantees, all of the property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. TOGETHER with all and singular the improvements, tenements, rights, easements, privileges, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the said Grantees, their heirs and assigns and successors in trust, forever, for the uses and purposes set forth in said Rikio -Doi Family Revocable Trust, as the same now exists or as it may hereafter be amended, with full power in the Trustee to sell, convey, exchange, mortgage, lease, assign, hold, or otherwise deal with and dispose of the said property in accordance with the terms of said Rikio Doi Family Revocable Trust. And the said Grantors do hereby covenant to and with the said Grantees, their heirs and assigns and successors in trust, that they are seized in fee of the said granted premises; that they have good right and lawful authority to sell and convey the same; that the same is free and clear of 2 encumbrance of every kind and character, save and except as noted on said Exhibit A; and that they will and their heirs and assigns shall WARRANT and DEFEND the title thereto against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantors have hereunto set their hands on this 4th day of September .5 2009. RIKIO DOI / FLORENCE' HISAKO DOI aka Florence H. Doi 3 • STATE OF HAWAII } ) SS: COUNTY OF HAWAII } P -j On this _4th day of September , 2009, before me personally appeared RIKIO DOI, to me personally known who, being by me duly sworn or affirmed, did say that such person executed the foregoing instrument as the free act and deed of such person and if applicable in the capacity shown, having been duly authorized to execute such instrument in such capacity. Doc. Date: Name: Ja ice Y. Kanes 'r Notary Public State of Hawaii My commission expires: 7/4/2011 September 4, 2009 Janice Y. Kaneshiro Document Description: Deed to the Rikio Doi Family Revocable Trust Pages: 6 3`d Circuit 9/4/09 . d4 Notary i nature Date NOTARY CERTIFICATION (Seal or Stamp) 4 STATE OF HAWAII ) ) SS: COUNTY OF HAWAII ) On this 4th day of September , 2009, before me personally appeared FLORENCE HISAKO DOI, also known as Florence H. Doi, to me personally known who, being by me duly sworn or affirmed, did say that such person executed the foregoing instrument as the free act and deed of such person and if applicable in the capacity shown, having been duly authorized to execute such instrument in such capacity. a ice Y. Kanes . o Notary Public State of Hawaii My commission expires: 7/4/2011 Doc. September 4, 2009 Date: Name: Janice Y. Kaneshiro Document Description: Deed to the Rikio Doi Family Revocable Trust Pages: 6 3`d Circuit ��9/4/�09� 6.'i!�No ar Signature NOTARY CERTIFICATION (Seal or Stamp) 5 EXHIBIT A All of that certain parcel of land situate at Waiakea, District of South Hilo, Island and County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii, described as follows: LOT 1-B, area 1.015 acres, as shown on Map 2, filed in the Office of the Assistant Registrar of the Land Court of the State of Hawaii with Land Court Application No. 1675 of David Kaaumoana Kalarna and Noah Kaaumoana Kalama; TOGETHER with a right of way for road and utility purposes to be enjoyed in common with others, over, across, and under the .25 foot wide road easement as shown on said Map 2 of said Land Court Application No. 1675. Being the same land described in Transfer Certificate of Title No. 75,590. SUBJECT HOWEVER, to the following: 1. The provisions of Section 73 (g) of the Hawaiian Organic Act. 2. Any abutters' rights of vehicle access into and from Volcano Road as were acquired by the State of Hawaii in that certain proceeding designated as Law No. 2642 in the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit, State of Hawaii. C THE RIKIO DOI FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST TRANSFER On this 4th day of September , 2009, RIKIO DOI and FLORENCE HISAKO DOI, aka Florence H. Doi, husband and wife, of 78 E. Kahaopea Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720, hereinafter called the Settlors, do hereby transfer the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) and all other property hereinafter added to the trust fund, to RIKIO DOI and FLORENCE H. DOI, husband and wife, of 78 E. Kahaopea Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720, hereinafter called the Trustees, upon the following trusts: NAME OF TRUST 1. This Trust shall be called "THE RIKIO DOI FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST DATED September 4 , 2009." ADDITIONS 2. The Trustees may receive from time to time additions whether of real or personal property to any trust fund then being held hereunder from the Settlors or from any person in any manner and by any means. DURING THE SETTLOR'S LIFE 3. During the lives of the Settlors, all income shall be added to the principal so that .r 1 0 there shall always be only one fund and the Trustees shall from time to time distribute to or apply for the benefit of either or both of the Settlors all or such portions of the income and principal as either or both of the Settlors shall direct and to the extent not so directed the Trustees may distribute to or apply for the benefit of either or both of the Settlors, all or such portions thereof at such times, amounts and manner as the Trustees shall from time to time in the Trustees' discretion determine. A. Upon the death of the first Settlor, the Trustees shall pay to the surviving Settlor, or his or her order, so much of the net income and principal thereof as the surviving Settlor shall direct in writing and to the extent not so directed the Trustee may distribute to or apply for the benefit of the surviving Settlor all or such portions thereof at such times, amounts and manner as the Trustee shall from time to time in the Trustee's discretion determine. ON SURVIVING SETTLORS DEATH 4. Upon the death of the surviving Settlor, this trust shall terminate and the remaining assets of the trust shall be distributed as follows: y A. One-half (1/2) undivided interest in the real property designated as TMK (3) 2-2-44: 30, including the residential home, to Settlors' son, EDMUND RIKIO DOI; B. One-half (1/2) undivided interest in the real property designated as TMK (3) 2-2-44: 30, including any interest Settlors' may have in the ohana house constructed by RUSSELL HISAO DOI, to RUSSELL HISAO DOI, and if he should predecease the Settlors, then to ELAINE STEPHANIE SALAZAR, and if he should also predecease the Settlors, then this undivided interest shall fall into the residue; C. All of Settlors' shares in Verizon Corporation to Settlors' daughter, 9 AIMEE MARGARET DOI; D. If any of the Settlors' children should predecease the Settlors, then his or her share shall fall into the residue of the estate, except for the share of RUSSELL HISAO DOI in l/z of the real property designated as TMK (3) 2-2-44: 30 which shall go to ELAINE STEPHANIE SALAZAR, if she survives the Settlors, but if she also predeceases the Settlors, then this share shall fall into the residue of the estate; E. All of the rest, residue and remainder of the property, both real and personal, wherever situate, equally to the Settlors children, RUSSELL HISAO DOI, EDMUND RIKIO DOI and AIMEE MARGARET DOI and if any of them should not be surviving, then the issue of the deceased child shall take his or her share, per stirpes, and if any of the Settlor's children should predecease the Settlor without leaving issue surviving, then his or her share shall drop out, thereby increasing the shares of the survivors and/or surviving issue of deceased children as the case may be. F. Provided, however, when any issue who is entitled to receive a share of the trust property has not attained the age of twenty five (25) years, the said issue's share shall be continued to be held in trust and the Trustee shall pay to or for his or her benefit, for his or her health, support, maintenance and education in accordance with his or her needs as determined by the Trustee, all or such portion of the income or principal as the Trustee shall deem necessary or advisable and shall accumulate all surplus income and add the same to the principal of his or her share. The separate trust for the said issue shall terminate when he or she has attained the age of twenty five (25) years or has died prior to attaining said age, and the said share shall be distributed to the issue and if he or she has died, to his or her heirs; provided, notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any trust created herein shall terminate no later than twenty one (2 1) years after the death of the last to survive of the Settlor, the Settlor's spouse, the Settlor's children and the issue of the Settlor living at the time of the Settlor's death. TRUSTEE'S POWERS 5. The Trustee shall, in addition to all powers now or hereafter conferred by law, have the following powers: A. Property Management and Control To manage, improve, transfer, sell, mortgage, partition, subdivide or change the character of any trust property or otherwise dispose of any trust property, when, in the judgment of the Trustee, it is in the interests of the beneficiaries to do so; to enter into any lease as Lessor or lessee whether the term goes beyond the duration of the trust; to grant or take an option to purchase or lease; B. Debt. To borrow funds, with or without trust property as security; to mortgage, grant security interests or hypothecate trust property to secure the payment of debts and performance of obligations arising from loans made to the Settlor or at the Settlor's request, as well as extensions, renewals or refinancing thereof; C. Retention of Property. To retain indefinitely any property received as part of the trust estate until, in the Trustee's judgment, it should be disposed of, regardless of any risk, nonproductivity or lack of diversification, and although, except for this express authority, it might be of a kind or in an amount which would be considered improper for the trust estate; D. Investment. To open and maintain any banking and financial accounts and to invest and reinvest principal and income in every kind of property (including, among other things, bonds redeemable at par to pay any estate tax imposed by the United States because of the Settlor's death), real and personal, without being limited by any statute or rule of law affecting 2 the investment of trust funds. E. Entrustment. To place trust assets in the hands of agents selected by the Trustee, to facilitate transactions and record keeping; F. Business. To continue or participate in the operation of any business or other enterprise and to effect any changes in the form of the organization thereof; G. Determination of Principal and Income From time to time, in the Trustee's sole discretion and without reference to prior determinations, to determine what is principal and what is income of the trust estate and to allocate receipts and disbursements to those accounts, with full discretion to allocate any receipt to principal to provide funds for the payment of any charge against principal; H. Proxies. To give revocable or irrevocable general or specific proxies or authorizations for voting or acting with respect to securities, with or without power of substitution and discretionary or nondiscretionary; I. Distribution. To make distribution of property in kind or in money and in divided or undivided interest, and to allocate property among shares and adjust resulting differences in valuation; . J. General. And generally to exercise the same control over and rights with respect to the trust estate as could be exercised personally by an absolute owner of the trust property. COMPENSATION 6. The Trustees shall receive reasonable compensation allocated between and payable out of income and principal whether more or less than the amounts provided or permitted W- by statute or rules of law. REVOCABILITY 7. While both Settlors live, they reserve the right to jointly withdraw from this Trust any or all of the property, to revoke this Trust in its entirety, and to amend, alter any of its provisions and to add new provisions by an instrument signed by the Settlors together personally, voluntarily and while legally competent, and delivered to the Trustees. No exercise of any power shall exhaust it. Each power may be released, extinguished or restricted by a like instrument so signed and delivered. After the first of the Settlors to die, the surviving Settlor acting solely shall have the same rights and powers reserved above. THIRD PARTIES 8. No corporation, transfer agent or other person dealing with any Trustee shall be obliged to see to the application of any money or property delivered to such Trustees or to examine into the trust upon which any property administered under this instrument is held, but any such corporation, transfer agent or other person may deal with any such property and with any Trustee as if it were the owner thereof free of any trust. SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE 9. If either of the original Trustees should resign, die or become incompetent, the other. original Trustee shall act as sole Trustee. In the event of the resignation, death or incompetency of both of the original Trustees, then AIMEE MARGARET DOI shall be the sole successor Trustee of this Trust. The original Trustees, surviving original Trustee or successor 1.1 Trustee shall be vested with and may exercise all of the rights, powers, duties and discretion herein given to the Trustees when acting. A. The determination whether the original Settlors/Trustees are competent shall be made by a medical doctor and that determination shall be binding on all persons interested in the trust estate. EFFECT OF POWER OF ATTORNEY 10. If the Settlor has granted a power of attorney, including a general power of attorney without referring to this trust, to any person, persons, corporation or partnership, then on behalf of the Settlor, the said person, persons, corporation or partnership shall have the power to amend and/or revolve this trust, and if the Settlor is also the Trustee of this Trust, then the person, persons, corporation or partnership who has the said power of attorney shall be authorized to act and use all of the powers, rights and privileges of the Trustee herein. EXECUTION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Settlors and Trustees have executed this instrument on the day and year first above written. - � �- L- - �- �-- �" L 14 C RIKIO DOI FLO1?J3RC—B�-HJSAKCQMTf aka Florence H. Doi Settlors and Trustees 0 ' . '10 STATE OF HAWAII ) SS: COUNTY OF HAWAII ) On this 4th day of September , 2009, before me personally appeared RIKIO DOI, to me personally known who, being by me duly sworn or affirmed, did say that such person executed the foregoing instrument as the free act and deed of such person and if applicable in the capacity shown, having been duly authorized to execute such instrument in such capacity. ice Y. Kane it �J Notary Public 7 State of Hawaii My commission expires: 7/4/2011 Doc. September 4, 2009 Date: Name: Janice Y. Kaneshiro Document Description: The Rikio Doi Family Revocable Trust made by Rikio Doi and Florence Hisako Doi aka Florence H. Doi i L—�V47V4 9/4/09 Nota Signature Date NOTARY CERTIFICATION Pages: 9 3rd Circuit (Seal or Stamp) Y } N STATE OF HAWAII ) ) SS: COUNTY OF HAWAII ) On this 4th day of Se_ptember_, 2009, before me personally appeared FLORENCE HISAKO DOI, aka Florence H. Doi, to me personally known who, being by me duly sworn or affirmed, did say that such person executed the foregoing instrument as the free act and deed of such person and if applicable in the capacity shown, having been duly authorized to execute such instrument in such capacity. &ac'Y.Kanes Notary Public State of Hawaii My commission expires: 7/4/2011 Doc. September 4, 2009 Pages: 9 Date: Name: Janice Y. Kaneshiro 3`d Circuit Document Description: The Rikio Doi Family Revocable Trust made by Rikio Doi and Florence Hisako Doi aka Florence H. Doi //`'`9 4/09 Nota Signature Date NOTARY CERTIFICATION (Seal or Stamp) 9 Posted on: Friday, November 5, 2004 Obituaries Advertiser Staff 1 HELEN HIB.OSE DOI, 74, of Honolulu, died Nov. 2, 2004. Born in Hilo, Hawai'i. A retired florist at NEX Flower Shop. Survived by son, Bryan; daughter, Sheryl; two grandchildren; sisters, Florence and Hilda Morishita. Memorial gathering 9 to 11 a.m. Thursday at Diamond Head Mortuary; private scattering of ashes. No flowers. Casual attire. Arrangements by Hawaiian Memorial Park Mortuary. Obituaries Monday, July 8, 2002 William Megumi Hirose, 64, of Mililani died Wednesday in Wahiawa General Hospital. He was born in Hilo. He is survived by wife Debbie; sons Chris, Scott, Keaka and Willie; daughters Robin Higa and Gabrielle; sisters Hilda Morishita and Florence and Helen Doi; and five grandchildren. Private services. No flowers. DCCA State of Hawaii Downloaded on January 16, 2012. The information provided below is not a certification of good standing and does not constitute any other certification by the State. Website URL: httpV/hbe.ehawaii.gov/documents Business Information MASTER NAME BUSINESS TYPE FILE NUMBER STATUS PURPOSE PLACE INCORPORATED INCORPORATION DATE MAILING ADDRESS CROSS REFERENCE NAME TERM i AGENT NAME AGENT ADCRESS Annual Filings FILING YEAR 2011. 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 i 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001- 2000 001 2000 1999 Officers GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII, INC. Domestic Profit Corporation 47369 D1 Active COMPLETE GRAPHIC SERVICES/SCREEN T-SHIRT PRINTING Hawaii UNITED STATES May 8, 1981 500 KALANIANAOLE AVE HILO, Hawaii 96720 UNITED STATES IMAGES HAWAII, INC. PER ROLAND HIGASHI 500 KALANIANAOLE AVE HILO, Hawaii 96720 UNITED STATES DATE RECEIVED Apr 1 2011 May 27, 2010 Jun 5, 2009. Apr 9, 2008 Apr 17, 2007 Apr 4,.2006 Apr 5, 2005: Apr 28, 2004 Jun 26, 2003` STATUS Processed Processed Processed Processed Processed Processed Processed Processed Processed Not Required Processed Processed Processed NAME OFFICE DATE HIGASHI,ROLAND P/S/D Dec 31 1997 HIGASHI,JANICE V/T/D Dec 31, 1997 HIGASHI,LAURIE D Dec 31, 1997 Stocks ' DATE CLASS SHARES PAID SHARES PAR VALUE STOCK AMOUNT Dec 31, 1988 - COMMON 100 100' Trade Names NAME TYPE CATEGORY ANY KINE DESIGNS Trade NO CATEGORY Expired Name SELECTED AUTHENTIC KONA COFFEE DYED Trade NO CATEGORY Mark SELECTED COQUI COLLECTION HAWAII Trade NO CATEGORY i Name SELECTED COQUI HAWAII Trade NO CATEGORY Name SELECTED CREATIVE ARTS HAWAII Trade NO CATEGORY Name - SELECTED CREATIVE ARTS HAWAII Trade NO CATEGORY Name SELECTED GYOTAKU-SAN'S; FISH MARKET (& Trade DESIGN OF A FISH ON A... Mark - CLOTHING (25) HAWAIIAN FISH & GAME COLLECTION Trade CLOTHING (25) Mark HAWAIIAN FISH AND GAME COLLECTION Trade NO CATEGORY Name SELECTED HFG Trade CLOTHING (25) Mark HFG COLLECTION; ENCIRCLED WITH Trade HAWAIIAN, FISH & GAw.: Mark CLOTHING (25) HI.PERFORMANCE MOTORSPORTS (& Trade DESIGN OF CHECKERED ... Mark CLOTHING (25) KONA COFFEE DYED Trade NO CATEGORY Mark SELECTED' LOCAL CLASSICS HAWAII (& DESIGN OF Trade RUBBER SLIPPERS... Mark CLOTHING (25) MORE COLLECTION (& DESIGN OF THE Trade MORr FAMILY "MON"... Mark CLOTHING (25)' NAPILI HAWAII (& DESIGN OF WORDS Trade SURROUNDED BY MON... Mark CLOTHING (25) ORIGINAL KONA'COFFEE DYED, Trade NO CATEGORY Mark SELECTED PUNAHELE ISLAND ORIGINALS Trade NO CATEGORY Name SELECTED REGISTRATION STATUS DATE Jan 24, 2008 Active Dec 9, 1997 Expired Jun 17, 2005 Expired Jun 17, 2005 Expired Mar 3 2003 Expired May 27, 2005 Cancelled Jun 16, 2003 Expired Mar 3, 2003 Expired Jun 17, 2005 Expired Mar 3, 2003 Expired May, Z7,2005, Expired Jun 16, 2003 Expired Dec 9 1997 Expired Jun 16, 2003 Expired Jun 17, 2003_ Expired Jun 17, 2003 Expired Dec 9 1997 Expired Jan 22, 2008 Active DCCA State of Hawaii Downloaded on January 16, 2012. The information provided below is not a certification of good standing and does not constitute any other certification by the State. Website URL: http://hbe.ehawaii.gov/documents Business Information MASTER NAME BUSINESS TYPE FILE NUMBER STATUS PURPOSE PLACE INCORPORATED REGISTRATION DATE MAILING ADDRESS MANAGED BY AGENT NAME AGENT ADDRESS Annual Filings CREATIVE ARTS HAWAII, LLC Domestic Limited Liability Company (LLC) 66450 C5 Active SCREEN PRINTING, EMBROIDERY, PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS, AND WHOLESALE Hawaii UNITED STATES Dec 15, 2008 500 KALANIANAOLE AVE HILO, Hawaii 96720 UNITED STATES MANAGER(S) RANDALL M. KUROHARA 500 KALANIANAOLE AVE HILO, Hawaii 96720 UNITED STATES FILING YEAR DATE RECEIVED STATUS 2011Oct- 5, 2011': Processed 2010 Oct 7, 2010 Processed 2009 Oct 27, 2009 Processed Officers NAME OFFICE DATE KUROHARA,RANDALL M MGR Dec 15, 2008 Trade Names NAME TYPE CATEGORY REGISTRATION DATE STATUS ALOHA GROWN Trade Name NO CATEGORY SELECTED Dec 10, 2009 Active ALOHA GROWN MEDIA Trade Name NO CATEGORY SELECTED Dec 22, 2009 Active Hawaii County Parcel Data Sales Permits Land Residential Commercial Det. Structures Sketch Values - 2011 Assessment Year TMK Maps ► Map Tax Bill Tax Details 2011 Tax Details 2010 Tax Details 2009 Tax Details 2008 Tax Details 2007 Tax Details 2006 Tax Details 2005 Tax Details 2004 Tax Details 2003 PARID:220440030000 HIROSE,MARGARET TRUST EST http://www. hawai ipropertytax.com/Forms/MapDatalet.aspx?s 1... N COWACPUS N NfffLP Home Property Search Address Parcel Number Advanced CURRENT RECORD 1 of 1 + _ Return to Search Results 220 4033 2a44e� 2204403 —�1 22044032 22044003 22044030 22044031 2204-fUiS Hawaii county Last GIS Data Update: 1 -Sep -2008 REPORTS Permit t R rt Ca Printable Version Data Copyright Hawaii County [Disclaimer] Last Updated: 12 Jan 2012 Site Design Copyright 1999-2007 Akanda Group LLC. All rights reserved. 1 of 1 1/16/12 7:33 PM Hawaii County Parcel Data Sales Permits Land Residential Commercial Det. Structures Sketch Values - 2011 Assessment Year TMK Maps ► Map Tax Bill Tax Details 2011 Tax Details 2010 Tax Details 2009 Tax Details 2008 Tax Details 2007 Tax Details 2006 Tax Details 2005 Tax Details 2004 Tax Details 2003 http://www.hawaiipropertytax.com/FonTis/MapDatalet.aspx?sI.-- I CIDMffACT UIS II HELP Home Property Search Address Parcel Number Advanced PARID:220440310000 GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII INC CURRENT RECORD I of 1 `+ e id N F Return to Search Results K�� Hawaii County Last GIS Data Update: 1 -Sep -2008 Data Copyright Hawaii County [Disclaimer] Last Updated: 12 Jan 2012 Site Design Copyright 1999-2007 Akanda Group LLC. All rights reserved. REPORTS Permit Report Printable Version I of 1 1/16/12 7:34 PM 124 22044095 204- 2 0440, 7 22044094 204 125 2204403 411 Y 1 7204 22044093 2 2 2 411 722044032 20 .204,109 22 t 03 112i 22044030 22044091 2 t 22044031 1141 204405 22044015 0440 0440 2 22044071 22044005 14 114405 2'0440 2 04 062 2 04.10 3 20411 0440 3 t t. t. Hawaii County Last GIS Data Update: 1 -Sep -2008 Data Copyright Hawaii County [Disclaimer] Last Updated: 12 Jan 2012 Site Design Copyright 1999-2007 Akanda Group LLC. All rights reserved. REPORTS Permit Report Printable Version I of 1 1/16/12 7:34 PM Hawaii County Parcel Data Sales Permits Land Residential Commercial Det. Structures Sketch Values - 2011 Assessment Year TMK Maps Map Tax Bill Tax Details 2011 Tax Details 2010 Tax Details 2009 Tax Details 2008 Tax Details 2007 Tax Details 2006 Tax Details 2005 Tax Details 2004 Tax Details 2003 PARID:220440320000 GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII INC M 01a 11=3 0 RUN http://www.liawaiipropertytax.com/Forms/MapDatalet.aspx?sl... I COME ^Cr US II NLP Home Property Search Address Parcel Number Advanced CURRENTRECORD Iof1 + - Return to Search Results 22Er4-1E►93 20440.37 22044033 22044f*4 22044035 22044093 22044032 22044092 22 44003 22044030 2204409 22044031 0441+15 20440.2 22 rtawan county Last GIS Data Update: 1 -Sep -2008 REPORTS Permit Report fa Printable Version Data Copyright Hawaii County [Disclaimer] Last Updated: 12 Jan 2012 -7110 Site Design Copyright 1999-2007 Akanda Group LLC. All rights reserved. I of 1 1/16/12 7:22 PM Hawaii County http://www.hawai ipropertytax.com/Forms/MapDatalet. aspx?sI... u ioDwr,0Aci us u a+ELP HAWAII PROPERTY TAX OFFICE Home Property Search Address Parcel Number Advanced Parcel Data Sales Permits Land Residential Commercial Det. Structures Sketch Values - 2011 Assessment Year TMK Maps I► Map Tax Bill Tax Details 2011 Tax Details 2010 Tax Details 2009 Tax Details 2008 Tax Details 2007 Tax Details 2006 Tax Details 2005 Tax Details 2004 Tax Details 2003 PARID:220440350000 GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII INC Q 0 CURRENTRECORD Iof1 + - Return to Search Results —y Last GIS Data Update: I -Sep-2008 REPORTS ----a Permit Report; � f Ca Printable Version Data Copyright Hawaii County [Disclaimer] Last Updated: 12 Jan 2012 Site Design Copyright 1999-2007 Akanda Group LLC. All rights reserved. 1 of 1 1/16/12 7:28 PM 22040F03 22090104 2 i 40006 04099 2204007522040076 �tt 220_7.9 2 0401 9 1204410- 2 049 '3 204112 0 204409. $1.11 ?20440 . 204409 -204112 204113 204409 9 204172' 22044035 201,409 22 411 9 22 28 -f1 37 20.91f2<1 204409, 22044037 220440., 204111 2 0411 S 4 04409 22 41 '1 2041111 .204409' t4 2 0411 6 22044032 2204111 22 41 7 44092 2204403 22! 003 0 —y Last GIS Data Update: I -Sep-2008 REPORTS ----a Permit Report; � f Ca Printable Version Data Copyright Hawaii County [Disclaimer] Last Updated: 12 Jan 2012 Site Design Copyright 1999-2007 Akanda Group LLC. All rights reserved. 1 of 1 1/16/12 7:28 PM Hawaii County of 1 http://www.hawaiipropert7ytax.com/Fonns/MapDatalet.aspx?sl... w CCKFALT US @ HE aP a REAL PROPERTY a_ _..> TAX OFFICE Home Property Search Address Parcel Number Advanced Parcel Data Sales Permits Land Residential Commercial Det. Structures Sketch Values - 2011 Assessment Year TMK Maps ► Map Tax Bill Tax Details 2011 Tax Details 2010 Tax Details 2009 Tax Details 2008 Tax Details 2007 Tax Details 2006 Tax Details 2005 Tax Details 2004 Tax Details 2003 1 PARID:220440370000 13RaA�P(HIIC�IMAGES HAWWAAAII INC Wa f ,.,,.y Last GIS Data Update: 1 -Sep -2008 CURRENT RECORD 1 of 1 Return to Search Results REPORTS -7 Permit Report to Printable Version Data Copyright Hawaii County [Disclaimer] Last Updated: 12 Jan 2012 0 Site Design Copyright 1999-2007 Akanda Group LLC. All rights reserved. 1/16/12 7:31 PM 22044100 1 822041121 22044099 0440 22041122 .204409 39 204409. 22041123 22044035 -204409 411 9 221 1 28 7 221741124 2044095 22044037 2 )4403 118 2 0411 5 2044094 22'4.1 J 1117 _204403:.. 2 0411<G 22'411 i i116 22044032 04409 22t 4. 003 041127 220-14030 220440, ,.,,.y Last GIS Data Update: 1 -Sep -2008 CURRENT RECORD 1 of 1 Return to Search Results REPORTS -7 Permit Report to Printable Version Data Copyright Hawaii County [Disclaimer] Last Updated: 12 Jan 2012 0 Site Design Copyright 1999-2007 Akanda Group LLC. All rights reserved. 1/16/12 7:31 PM Hawaii County 1 of I http://www.hawaiipropertytax.com/Forms/MapDatalet.aspx?sl.., a B CI(D WrACT IIS u MEILJP HAWAII REAL PROPERTY TAX OFFICE Home Property Search Address Parcel Number Advanced Parcel Data Sales Permits Land Residential Commercial Det. Structures Sketch Values - 2011 Assessment Year TMK Maps 11 Map Tax Bill Tax Details 2011 Tax Details 2010 Tax Details 2009 Tax Details 2008 Tax Details 2007 Tax Details 2006 Tax Details 2005 Tax Details 2004 Tax Details 2003 PARID: 220440330000 CHOCK,KYLE TRS�T� F (� I i IC3� t _ Last GIS Data Update: 1 -Sep -2008 CURRENT RECORD 14 4 1of4 F M Return to Search Results REPORTS Permit Report ' 1`2� Printable Version Data Copyright Hawaii County [Disclaimer] Last Updated: 12 Jan 2012 7 Site Design Copyright 1999-2007 Akanda Group LLC. All rights reserved. 1/16/12 9:42 PM 22044) 220.44098 22044103 20 2 04403 22044097 12044104 220 ?2044096 2204410522` 2044035 22044 73 22044095 2204 t 0440 22044033 x2044 12 2204/09 i 220441'07 220.14101} 2 224144093 22044109 2 2211441132 204409' 22 4 003 22044030 �f 2 d4 1 220.i4t)!?7 2 tt4 #t1 0 L.---.. 44031 Last GIS Data Update: 1 -Sep -2008 CURRENT RECORD 14 4 1of4 F M Return to Search Results REPORTS Permit Report ' 1`2� Printable Version Data Copyright Hawaii County [Disclaimer] Last Updated: 12 Jan 2012 7 Site Design Copyright 1999-2007 Akanda Group LLC. All rights reserved. 1/16/12 9:42 PM Hawaii County Parcel Data Sales Permits Land Residential Commercial Det. Structures Sketch Values - 2011 Assessment Year TMK Maps t Map Tax Bill Tax Details 2011 Tax Details 2010 Tax Details 2009 Tax Details 2008 Tax Details 2007 Tax Details 2006 Tax Details 2005 Tax Details 2004 Tax Details 2003 PARID:220440340000 CH{OCK,KYLE TRST IK �'y nttp://www.nawatipropeiTyLax.L;uiiiirL)iiiiw 1v1aN1Jatalct.abpx : 61..• I COWACT US N NIEIl_P Home Property Search Address Parcel Number Advanced CURRENTRECORD 4 1of4 ► "` + _ Return to Search Results Hawaii County Last GIS Data Update: 1 -Sep -2008 REPORTS Permit Report ra Printable Version Data Copyright Hawaii County [Disclaimer] Last Updated: 12 Jan 2012 7 Site Design Copyright 1999-2007 Akanda Group LLC. All rights reserved. 1 of 1 1/16/12 9:40 PM 2040103 22k1 ft19t34 2?il5itik/? 2 0590 1 22057001 ;:05 2i. 59 c0( 2 22040076 220. 79, 9 2040075 22044101 2 22044100 220441412 2 220440.99 22044034 22044098 22044103 2 22 2204441135 220441 5 221144097 22044104 t 22044+096 220441415 20440:7 7 04403 22044095 22044106 a Hawaii County Last GIS Data Update: 1 -Sep -2008 REPORTS Permit Report ra Printable Version Data Copyright Hawaii County [Disclaimer] Last Updated: 12 Jan 2012 7 Site Design Copyright 1999-2007 Akanda Group LLC. All rights reserved. 1 of 1 1/16/12 9:40 PM Dacayanan, Melissa ,,: ,t ;r els"'T From: R D [rainierdoi@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:22 PM To: planning@co.hawaii.hi.us 3: 47 Subject: For Planning Commission hearing 2.2.2012 Attachments: App1675Map0002.pdf Jan 18, 2012. I have attached the Land Court Map for the Easement to my residence at 78 East Kahaopea Street. this is for Lot 1-B, Land Court Application 1675, Map 2. My residence TMK is :(3) 2-2-044:30 Thank you. Russell Doi Planning Crept, Exhibit_3 SCANNED 'AN�� 0 0 T 1 — I oy I N Q c O ul i p[ N O 1 N U Z 1+ U<i 0 O .z ati' LL DCI Z it-, T ~ I Lal U ❑ N O a^ p o W JI '� J ~ ~�ODi ~ 10 F Q O a 0 �� L n p Q , X LL CD d 0 LLO J O Q Q F- W to W I N U ? Z Q �3 d)> U t t7 O 0 3 w O o �. �-. 0 O 12i N 0_ 4 `� 0 rot T- 0 a¢ 0 C1( >d U ° Q~ °w 0 ~ J W zY (YF Q O x= CO d)poQ - u 2 s r- ► _ W LL Q O N zZ< u 4 r o o LL VE DI Q U N U v O1 Q14 z s .r � f 'ot 0 7 Of L1 0 Z O W s' 0 --� Q = L. 3 Z 3 s r S f O d 0 Q F- [4 cl W A 1-0 Q ° kn ° R GT AI °o v L U co H �. N I + • r yOy 809 + V d it X45 i�' + m Q dl w YI0. ° O U 0 Ln O PPI N N P 1 Q m ^ L �. v bo2m _ '. 4561 �3 .2i.sij s5E �kyA osv .. ihSl1 E N- a ovo0f ONV3"IOq °oue��on01 QT v a' z RGmphiclmagesAmendREZ.doc- I /26/7 2 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII, INC. (formerly FINANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. and TRI - ELECTRIC, INC.) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO 99116 (REZ 840) Upon careful review of the request, the Planning Director recommends that a favorable recommendation for the request to amend Condition C and an unfavorable recommendation for the request to amend Conditions H and I of Ordinance No. 99116 be forwarded to the County Council. Since this recommendation is made without the benefit of public testimony, the Director reserves the right to modify and/or alter this position based on additional information presented at the public hearing. These recommendations are based on the following findings: The applicant requests amendments to Conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99 116, which amended Ordinance No. 96 159, which rezoned approximately 7.402 acres from the Single -Family Residential —10,000 square feet (RS -10) district to the Neighborhood Commercial — 7,500 square feet (CN -7.5) district. The property consists of five parcels situated southeast of the Kanoelehua Avenue - Kahaopea Street intersection. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) that was submitted with the application, current plans are to develop the property with approximately 38,000 square feet of general retail space, a gas station with six fuel pumps and convenience store, and an approximately 4,000 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive-through. The current plan allows for five building sites with related parking for each building site. Access to the property will be via an ingress only access from Kanoelehua Avenue and a new ingress/egress access from Kahaopea Street. Due to the topography and intermittent flow of water that runs across the makai portion of the property, the property will be filled to level the buildable areas. -1- Comm. 669 Bill 229 CONDITION C The applicant is requesting a 5 -year time extension to comply with Condition C, which required that Final Subdivision Approval for consolidation and re -subdivision of the subject property be secured within five years from the effective date of the ordinance, or by October 22, 2004. In 2005, the Planning Director granted a five-year administrative time extension to October 22, 2009 to comply with Condition C. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant and are not the result of their fault or negligence. According to the applicant, the time extension to comply with Condition C is being requested because the applicant "needs additional time to obtain final approval of the entry from Kanoelehua Avenue. The plans have been under discussion with the State Department for Transportation (DOT) for several years. The layout on the Site Plan appears to be acceptable in concept to the DOT, but final construction plans need to be submitted for review and approval". The request to amend Condition C of Ordinance 99116 would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. The General Plan LUPAG Map designation has not changed since the property was originally rezoned in 1996. The request continues to be consistent with the Low Density Urban designation which allows for residential (overall residential density of up to 6 units per acre) with ancillary community and public uses, and neighborhood and convenience -type commercial uses. The property is zoned Neighborhood Commercial — 7,500 square feet (CN -7.5), which allows for commercial activities such as a compact shopping center which supplies goods and services to a residential or working population on a frequent need or convenience basis. The applicant's current plan to develop retail establishments, a restaurant, a convenience store and automotive service station are permitted uses within the CN zoning district. Based on the above, the proposed amendment to Condition C of Ordinance No. 96 116 continues to be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Code. -2- CONDITIONS H and I The applicant also requests an amendment to Conditions H and I, as shown below, so that required drainage improvements and roadway improvements to Kahaopea Street along the property's frontage are deferred until Final Plan Approval or Certificate of Occupancy. The material the applicant proposes to be deleted is bracketed/struck through; material to be added is underscored. a Condition H: "Drainage improvements, [41 as may be required[;] by the Department of Public Works, shall be constructed [in a manner meeting with the appr-eva4 of ra urt erP bh V- ] prior to[ ] the issuance of final plan approval or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for anv portion of the subject property, whichever occurs first." a Condition I: "Prior to [ ] issuance of certificate of occupancy for the subject property[, .-, ieh ever--`Guf s -KAL-19-tv'] the south side of Kahaopea Street shall be improved and widened with the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements (with pavement widening and transitions) fronting the subject property between Kanoelehua Avenue and the access road to the subject property meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works and shall be dedicated to the County upon its request. For the area fronting the subject property between the access road and the eastern boundary, these or other improvements may be required by the Department of Public Works provided that no major drainage structures, such as a bridge or culvert, are required by such improvements." The request to amend Conditions H and I of Ordinance 99 116 would not be consistent with the General Plan. The request is contrary to the following goals and policies of the General Plan: Require developers to provide basic infrastructure necessary for development. -3- • The development of commercial facilities should be designed to fit into the locale with minimal intrusion while providing the desired services. Appropriate infrastructure and design concerns shall be incorporated into the review of such developments. • Any development within the Federal Emergency Management Agency designated flood plain must be in compliance with Chapter 27. • Develop a comprehensive program for the coordinated construction of a drainage network along a single drainage system. A floodway runs from south to north through the eastern (makai) portion of the property. The floodway and floodway fringe has been identified as Flood Zone AE by FEMA, which is a Special Flood Hazard Area subject to inundation by the 100 -year flood where base flood elevations have been determined. The applicant has indicated that fill material will need to be placed on the property in order to create level buildable areas, which may require altering or relocating the Special Flood Hazard Area. When a developer alters (i.e. by placing fill) or relocates a Special Flood Hazard Area so that the base flood elevation changes, a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) must be obtained through DPW from FEMA. Generally, the first step in the CLOMR/LOMR process is for the developer to submit flood engineering data and maps to FEMA indicating the location and extent of alteration/relocation of the Special Flood Hazard Area and how the base flood elevation will be affected. If FEMA agrees with the data and maps, a CLOMR is issued and the developer can begin on-site work within the Special Flood Hazard Area, such as placing fill material. Upon completion of the on-site work, the developer submits updated flood engineering data and maps showing how the alteration/relocation affected the base flood elevation. If FEMA agrees with this data and maps, a LOMR is issued which effectively revises the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). Conditions C and I require that the applicant install and dedicate curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements within a future 10 -foot wide road widening strip along Kahaopea Street fronting the property. Typically, these improvements are completed and dedicated to the County prior to allowing the subdivision and sale of a lot for commercial purposes. -4- The Planning Director does not support the applicant's request to delay the installation of roadway and drainage improvements required in Conditions H and I until receipt of a Certificate of Occupancy. Should these conditions be amended as requested by the applicant, Final Subdivision Approval for a consolidation and re -subdivision could be issued and the applicant could subsequently lease or sell the commercially -zoned lots to multiple landowners, having different development schedules, before installing any required drainage or roadway improvements. This would likely cause the improvements to be completed on a piecemeal basis rather than in a coordinated manner by the current applicant. Additionally, rather than sharing the cost of installing any required roadway and drainage improvements, the burden to install these improvements would fall solely on the landowner that first develops their property. A comprehensive approach should be taken in designing and installing the infrastructure improvements necessary for commercial zoning as required in Conditions H and I. This can best be accomplished by continuing to require installation of these improvements prior to Final Subdivision Approval for the entire 7.402 -acre property, rather than potentially by multiple landowners after the property has been subdivided. For these reasons, the Planning Director has determined that the request to amend Conditions H and I would not be consistent with the General Plan. It should also be noted that Condition G of Ordinance No. 99 116 requires that the applicant obtain a LOMR prior to Final Subdivision Approval or Final Plan Approval, whichever occurs first. Since subdivision approval typically occurs prior to plan approval it is likely that a LOMR will need to be obtained prior to subdivision approval. Thus, although not recommended by the Planning Director, Condition G will also need to be amended should Condition H be amended as requested by the applicant. Based upon the above findings, the Planning Director recommends that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council to amend Condition C and an unfavorable recommendation be forwarded to amend Conditions H and I. The Director also recommends that existing conditions in the ordinance be revised to reflect the current standard language for conditions of approval. The accompanying draft bill -5- reflects these recommendations and changes. (Material to be deleted is bracketed and struck through; material to be added is underscored). -6- COUNTY OF HAWAII ORDINANCE NO. STATE OF HAWAII BILL NO. (v( at, n Dip-) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 99 116 WHICH AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 96 159 WHICH AMENDED SECTION 25-8-33 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP), ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE, 1983 (2005 EDITION) (formerly referred to as Section 25-114, City of Hilo Zone Map, Article 3, Chapter 25, Zoning Code) BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL —10,000 SQUARE FEET (RS -10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL — 7,500 SQUARE FEET (CN -7.5) AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY NOS. 2-2-044:003, 031, 032, 035, AND 037. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 99 116 is amended as follows: I SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 25-2-44 Hawaii County Code 1983 (2005 Edition), the County Council finds the following conditions are: (1) Necessary to prevent circumstances which may be adverse to the public health, safety and welfare; or (2) Reasonably conceived to fulfill needs directly emanating from the land use proposed with respect to: (A) Protection of the public from the potentially deleterious effects of the proposed use, or (B) Fulfillment of the need for public service demands created by the proposed use. SEE ATTACHED CONDITIONS BE SECTION 2. Material to be deleted is bracketed and struck through and material to be added is underscored. SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other parts of this ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. Hawai `i Date of Introduction: Date of 1 st Reading: Date of 2nd Reading: Effective Date: INTRODUCED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAII -2- Z5-10 717 7S ko own town Genter O C N [,o— C 10,610.05 E 1 C �1 R5 -109,2. m C m "HALAL" A KAHAOPEA R5-10 m m c D G m z c m R5-10 pa i 85_10 _ STREE7 -10' FUTURE ROAD WIDENING LINE — SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS -10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN --7.5) AREA: 322,414 SQ.FT R5-10 I MAHONA 0 V 0 0 O R5-10 AMENDMENT TO TIE ZONING CODE- AMENDING SECTION 25-114 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP) ARTICLE 3, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE, BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS -10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN -7.5) AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII. PREPARED BY : PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF HAWAII TMK: 2-2-44: 3,31,32,35 and 37 EXHIBIT "A" FOR REFERENCE ONLY (TRI -ELECTRIC) C 10,610.05 E m C m "HALAL" A KAHAOPEA R5-10 m m c D G m z c m R5-10 pa i 85_10 _ STREE7 -10' FUTURE ROAD WIDENING LINE — SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS -10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN --7.5) AREA: 322,414 SQ.FT R5-10 I MAHONA 0 V 0 0 O R5-10 AMENDMENT TO TIE ZONING CODE- AMENDING SECTION 25-114 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP) ARTICLE 3, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE, BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS -10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN -7.5) AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII. PREPARED BY : PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF HAWAII TMK: 2-2-44: 3,31,32,35 and 37 EXHIBIT "A" FOR REFERENCE ONLY (TRI -ELECTRIC) CGiaphichnagesAmendREZ.doe-1 /19/l2 GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII, INC. (formerly FINANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. and TRI - ELECTRIC, INC.) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO 99116 (REZ 840) A. The applicant, successors or assigns shall be responsible for complying with all of the stated conditions of approval. B. The anticipated maximum daily water usage shall be submitted and the required water commitment payment shall be submitted to the Department of Water Supply in accordance with its "Water Commitment Guidelines Policy" prior to securing Tentative Subdivision Approval. C. Final Subdivision Approval of the proposed consolidation/resubdivision of the subject property shall be secured within five (5) years from the effective date of [flie+ezeniag]this amended ordinance. The subdivision plans shall delineate a 10 - foot wide road widening strip along the Kahaopea Street frontage. D. In conjunction with the submittal of plans for subdivision review or plan approval review, a master plan for the subject property shall be filed with the Planning Director. Final Plan Approval for the subject property and related improvements shall also be secured from the Planning Director. Plans to be submitted for final subdivision approval or final plan approval shall also comply with the approved master plan and all conditions of approval set forth in this ordinance. The purpose of the master plan is to provide comprehensive principles and guidelines for the commercial and residential development within the subject property in order to assure that the development is compatible with the -surrounding area. The master plan shall include, but not be limited to, standards and guidelines relative to open space, architecture building controls (appearance, siting, heights, building materials, signs, etc.), terrain, topography, off-street parking, landscaping, setbacks from property lines and buildings, lot coverage ratio, etc. and enforcement procedures. A Landscaping Plan, in accordance with Planning Department's Rule 17 shall also be submitted to include landscaping along property boundaries, for the purpose of mitigating any potential adverse noise and visual impacts to adjoining parcels and the intersection. Multiple -family residential structures shall be designed to be in keeping with the single family residential character of the surrounding area. E. If required by the Planning Director, [a]an updated Traffic Impact Analysis Report shall be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Public Works and the Department of Transportation (DOT) prior to the submittal of plans for subdivision review. Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for any portion of the subject property, the applicant shall be responsible for constructing and/or paying for its pro rata share of intersection improvements at the intersection of Kanoelehua Avenue and Kahaopea Street subject to the traffic mitigation measures required by the Traffic Impact Analysis Report for the subject property meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works and Department of Transportation, should the proposed intersection improvements not be commenced by the DOT. F. A Solid Waste Management Plan for the subject property shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Management for review and approval [te4 ie plans or plan appreval to the Plamiiag Departm ]prior to Final Plan Approval. G. The applicant shall obtain, if required, a [FEMA letter] Letter of Map Revision [(LOM 1R)] (LOMR) from FEMA for the subject property prior to securing Final Subdivision Approval of final plan approval, whichever occurs first. H. Drainage improvements, if required, shall be constructed in a manner meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to securing Final Subdivision Approval or final plan approval for the subject property, whichever occurs first. I. Prior to securing final subdivision approval or the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the subject property, which ever occurs first, the south side of Kahaopea Street shall be improved and widened with the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements (with pavement widening and transitions) -2- fronting the subject property between Kanoelehua Avenue and the access road to the subject property meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works and shall be dedicated to the County upon its request. For the area fronting the subject property between the access road and the eastern boundary, these or other improvements may be required by the Department of Public Works provided that no major drainage structures, such as a bridge or culvert, are required by such improvements. Accesses to the property and all roadways within the subject property shall meet with the requirements and approval of the Planning Director, upon consultation with the Department of Public Works and/or the State Department of Transportation. Access to the subject property shall be by the way of the Awapuhi Street extension or an alternate access point as agreed upon by the Planning Director, upon consultation with the Department of Public Works and/or State Department of Transportation. -3- MW Twrr.w Tp in olkwis _ MERIN W- INK •• • - •. Im girl ?,7,- oily •�•�� -5- ONION 1 Ilk - girl ?,7,- oily •�•�� -5- ONION 1 girl ?,7,- oily •�•�� -5- KIM X2 PTI-IMIT7.T.W K The method of sewage disposal shall meet with the requirements of the State Department of Health. L All development -generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site and shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties. M Comply with Chapter 11-55 Water Pollution Control Hawaii Administrative Rules, Department of Health which requires a NPDES permit for certain construction activity. N All earthwork activity including grubbing and grading shall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentation Control of the Hawaii County Code. O Construction activities must comply with the provisions of Hawaii Administrative Rules Chapter 11-46 "Community Noise Control." P Should M remains of historic sites such as rock walls terraces, platforms, marine shell concentrations or human burials be encountered work in the immediate area shall cease and the Department of Land and Natural Resources — State Historic Preservation Division (rDLNR-SHPD) shall be immediately notified. Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearance from DLNR-SHPD when it finds that sufficient mitigation measures have been taken. Q If the applicant successors or assigns develop residential units or lots on the subject properties the applicant successors or assigns shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the development with respect to parks and recreation fire police solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution shall become due and payable prior to receipt of Final Subdivision Approval or Final PlanApproval whichever is applicable The fair share contribution shall be based on the actual number of residential units or lots developed. The fair share contribution in a form of cash land facilities or anv combination thereof shall be determined by the County Council The fair share contribution may be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective date of this ordinance, based on the percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index (HCPI). The fair share contribution shall have a maximum combined value of $7,903.35 per multiple family residential unit -($12,316.47-,per single familv residential unit). The total amount shall be determined by the actual number of units or lots according to the calculation and p_ment provisions set forth in this condition The fair share _contribution per, multiple family residential unit (single family residential units) shall be allocated as follows: 1. $3,898.50 per multiple family residential unit ($5,939.22 per single family residential unit) to the County to support park and recreational improvements and facilities-, 2. $123.21 per multiple family residential unit ($286-51 per sin a family residential unit) to the Cogply to support police facilities; 3. $379.01 per multiple family residential unit ($565.89 per single family residential unit) to the County to support fire facilities' 4. $168.93 per multiple family residential unit ($247-75 per sin le family residential unit) to the Coun to support solid waste facilities- and 5. $3,333.69 per multiple family residential unit ($5.27710 per single family residential unit) to the County to support road and traffic improvements. In lieu of paving the fair share contribution the applicant successors or assi ris may contribute land and/or construct improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation, fire, police solid waste disposal facilities and roads within the regio impacted by the proposed development subject to the review and -7- recommendation of the Planning Director, upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the County Council. The cost of providing and constructing the im_.provements required in Condition E I and J shall be credited against the sum specified in Condition Q(5) for road and traffic improvements. R Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for the imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance. S To ensure that the Goals and Policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan are implemented the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 11, Article 1 Hawaii County Code relating to Affordable Housing Policy. This requirement shall be approved by the Administrator of the Office of Housing and Community Development prior to Final Subdivision Approval. T The applicant successors or assigns shall comply with all applicable County State and Federal laws rules regulations and requirements. U If the applicant should require an additional extension of time, the Planning Director shall submit the applicant's request to the County Council for appropriate action Further, should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion the Director may initiate rezoning of the area to its original or more appropriate designation. WINDWARD PLANNING COMMISSION .. COUNTY OF HAWAII HEARING TRANSCRIPT FEBRUARY 2, 2012 A regularly advertised hearing on the application of GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII, INC. (formerly FINANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. and TRI -ELECTRIC, INC.) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 99116 (REZ 840) was called to order at 9:07 a.m. in the County of Hawaii, Aupuni Center Conference Room, 101 Pauahi Street, Hilo, Hawaii, with Chairman Zendo Kern presiding. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Zendo Kern, Dean Au, Takashi Domingo, Wallace Ishibashi, and Raylene Moses STAFF PRESENT: Ivan Torigoe (Deputy Corporation Counsel), B. J. Leithead Todd (Planning Director), Daryn Arai (Planning Program Manager), Phyllis Fujimoto (Staff Planner), Maija Cottle (Staff Planner), Jeff Darrow (Staff Planner), Kelly Gomes (representing Chief Engineer from 9:36 a.m.), and Sharon Nomura (Secretary) And approximately 17 people from the public in attendance. ABSENT & EXCUSED: Stephen Ono APPLICANT: GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII, INC. (formerly FINANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. and TRI -ELECTRIC, INC.) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 99 116 (REZ 840) Request to amend Conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99 116, which amended Ordinance No. 96- 159, which rezoned approximately 7.402 acres from the Single -Family Residential -10,000 square feet (RS -10) district to the Neighborhood Commercial -7,500 square feet (CN -7.5) zoning district. The amendment to conditions relates to a 5 -year time extension to secure final subdivision approval, timing of installing drainage improvements, and timing of installing roadway improvements along Kahaopea Street. The properties are located on the southeast side of the intersection of Kanoelehua Avenue (State Highway 11) and East Kahaopea Street, Waiakea Homestead House Lots, South Hilo, Hawaii, TMK: 2-2-044: 003, 031, 032, 035 and 037. KERN: First item on the agenda, applicant Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc., amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 99 116 (REZ 840), request to amend Conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99 116, which amended Ordinance No. 96-159, on TMK: 2-2-044:003, 031, 032,035 and 037. So with that, we'll go to staff's presentation. Maija? COTTLE: Thank you Mr. Chairman. Good morning everyone. COMMISSIONERS: Good morning. Comm. 669 Bill 229 COTTLE: And, welcome back, Commissioner Domingo. It's good to have you here. DOMINGO: Good to be back. COTTLE: We missed you. Before I go into the presentation, I just want to bring your attention to a few items of testimony that have been submitted. Exhibit 11 and Exhibit 12 are letters from Stephanie Salazar and Russell Doi. And in those letters they question whether or not it was appropriate for the Planning Department to accept this application on behalf of the Planning Commission. The reason they are questioning that is because not all of these properties are owned by the applicant, Graphic Images. There is a road lot identified as Parcel 3 that is owned by the Margaret Hirose Trust. We did not get authorization from the Hirose Trust because there are no living successor or trustees to get authorization from. So the Department felt that it was appropriate in order to preserve the existing entitlements that were granted to the original applicant to go ahead and accept the application and move forward with its processing. And I don't know if the Director wants to add any more to that or -. KERN: Madam Director? LEITHEAD TODD: Yes. When this issue came to my attention we kind of looked at it in terms of the fact that the Trust has not, there has been no activity to name who the beneficiaries of the Trust are, it's a very small piece of this ordinance. The Graphic Images is not going to be using that property or doing anything with it. And I felt that it was appropriate to allow this to go forward because in the absence of someone speaking legally on behalf of the trust moving this forward preserves the property value of the trust, cause as most of you know when you have a rezoning it increases the value. If at some time in the future the potential beneficiaries actually get action to be legally recognized, they can petition to have the property rezoned back to its former classification. But at the time that this was originally done it was done with the consent of the then trustee for this particular piece of property. It also became a problem that do you hold up or prevent the property owner of the other parcels from seeking amendments which applied to their four pieces of property because the potential beneficiaries of the trust have not sought to get any kind of legal declaration done as to who actually is the beneficiary who can speak on behalf of the Trust. So I'm trying to weigh all of those equities. I thought it was best to allow this to proceed and bring it before the Planning Commission, and then ultimately in front of the County Council for a determination. And then at some point I guess if the beneficiaries are determined, they can then make a decision as to what they, whether they want to develop their property or whether they want their property to go back to its former classification. KERN: Any questions for the Director? Commissioner Domingo. DOMINGO: I can understand and appreciate what the Planning Director has just stated. But I'm concerned that in the future, in any case if I am -. I live in Hamakua and there are certain residential lots that I have, and there are parcels, overhead parcels between me, my residential lot, and the highway or the driveway going to the parcel. Would you folks go ahead and also rezone or take any land use action on that property which is not totally owned by me or those surrounding property owners? LEITHEAD TODD: Well, this is a situation in which at the time of the original action there was a trustee and the trustee consented to this action and to the rezoning. Since then both the trustee and the 2 beneficiary named under the Trust have passed away and no activity that I am aware of has named who's the successor/beneficiary. There has been no legal determination. So when this came forward, in the absence of any legal determination of someone that can actually speak on behalf of the Trust, I thought the best action was to allow this to proceed because it preserves the potential value to the beneficiaries. Otherwise, what you basically end up having is the applicant would then have to go back and initiate a rezone of their properties without this piece in it; and the time and effort that that would take really puts them at a disadvantage. And so it was just trying to weigh the equities in terms of this kind of unusual situation. Because if at some point in the future the beneficiaries are determined, they can then do a petition to have their property downzoned if that's what they want. But that's kind of an unusual circumstance. But I'm just trying to preserve what I think is at this point, in the absence of someone to speak legally on behalf of the Trust, to try and preserve the trust's assets. DOMINGO: You know, I'm not, I'm not trying to be a hindrance to us going forward and taking action on this particular application. But what I am concerned is from the legal aspect in the future if anyone would come before the Planning Director and apply for the same kind of action that we're contemplating taking now. Would we be able to justify that in any case at any time? I think Corp. Counsel should be able to answer that. I would like to hear from him. KERN: Mr. Torigoe, would you like to speak to that? TORIGOE: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Actually this is a very unusual situation. I don't know that we've seen this before the Planning Commission before. And I really, I think we need to hear positions from, you know, interested persons and their attorneys if they have any. I'm not in a position to, you know, just make that determination on my own. KERN: Thank you, Mr. Torigoe. Anything else? Madam Director? LEITHEAD TODD: If I'm hearing Corp. Counsel correctly, what we may be looking at is asking the applicant to perhaps submit a memo, a memorandum of law or something to the Commission stating their position on why this should go forward, if I'm hearing Corp. Counsel correctly. TORIGOE: Well, that is one option. The matter is on the agenda now already, and we've opened the item. So public testimony is also in order, so you could allow that also. KERN: Commissioner Domingo. DOMINGO: Just one question to clarify matters. Does the Pplanning Department have any documentation as to the wishes of the Trust at that time when she was living to indicate that we can go ahead and process the application involving that Parcel 3? KERN: Madam Director? LEITHEAD TODD: Maija, our files indicate that at the time of the original application, right? COTTLE: At the time of the original application all five properties were owned by Tri -Electric, which was owned or the president of Tri Electric was William Hirose. And so he owned all of those properties. Then in 1999 when they came in for an amendment we did get authorization from Florence Doi who was the successor/trustee of the Margaret Hirose Trust. So the last authorization was in 1999. And we do have that letter, we could provide it. KERN: Thank you, Maija. Any other questions for the Planning Director? Seeing none, Maija, we'll go ahead and continue with the staff presentation, please. Thank you. COTTLE: Okay. Thank you. Just give me one second. All right. If I can direct your attention to the screen. The subject property is located in the South Hilo district. You can see the property outlined in black in the middle of the slide. You have Kanoelehua Avenue running in a north -south direction to the middle of the slide; and Kahaopea Street running east -west. The subject property is located in the southeast corner of that intersection. The current zoning is CN -7.5, which is shown here in the light pink. And the surrounding zoning is Single -Family Residential -10,000 square feet, which is shown in the yellow. And then just kind of caddy corner to the property across the intersection is CN -10 zoning which is shown in the darker pink. And that's the location of Subway. Baskin and Robbins is located right here in this corner. You can see that the property is made up of five parcels. The road lot we were just discussing is located right in this area. This is the General Plan designation map for the property. The entire property and surrounding area is in the Low Density designation. And, again, just opposite of the intersection is High Density which is shown in red. And then further to the west is Medium Density Urban, which is shown in the orange. This is an aerial photo of the property. I didn't outline it on the slide because the configuration was a little unique. But the properties are located in this area here. You can see the highway on the west side. There is a floodway that runs along the makai boundary of the property in this general area here. So the applicant is requesting to amend three conditions of the existing ordinance, 99-116. Condition C requires that they secure subdivision approval within five years. That's the standard. And then they did get one administrative time extension. So they're asking for another five-year time extension to secure final subdivision approval. Condition H currently requires that they install drainage improvements at final subdivision approval. They are now requesting to delay the installation of these improvements to final plan approval or certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first. And then Condition I is similar to H. Currently it requires that they install improvements, including drainage improvements, curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements along the property's Kahaopea Street frontage; and they're requesting to delay that installation of improvements to certificate of occupancy. This is a site plan showing the applicant's conceptual development plan. The highway is located at the bottom of the slide. The project would get right -in access only into the property. And then the main entrance would be an extension of Awapuhi Street, located here, for ingress and egress. You can see there are five commercial structures. One large one here, here, here, here and all the way to the south here. And this is a view of Kahaopea Street looking towards the highway. You can see the intersection up at the top here. And then the property is on the left side of the slide. This is the existing access easement onto Kahaopea Street. This is a view again of Kahaopea Street looking makai. The property is on the right side over in this area here, and then another view looking towards the intersection of the highway. This is Awapuhi Street here. So the proposed project entrance would 0 be located just across from there, and a view of the intersection looking towards the existing access easement, and then this is the highway looking Puna bound. The Planning Director is recommending a favorable recommendation for the time extension request, which was Condition C; and an unfavorable recommendation for the request to amend Conditions H and I. And basically the reason we're not supporting the amendment request for Conditions H and I is that we think it's more appropriate that the conditions remain as they are now, that the drainage improvements and roadway improvements be installed prior to subdivision. This way the development can be done in a more comprehensive way, rather than having the property be subdivided and sold off to multiple landowners that then have to come in and do the drainage or roadway improvements more on a piecemeal basis. And with that, I want to just mention a couple more correspondences. The applicant was originally represented by Nakamoto, Okamoto and Yamamoto. You should have a letter stating that they are no longer representing the client. And then you should have another letter of January 27th from Yeh and Moore letting you know that they are now the client's representative and addressing some of the issues that were raised in the Doi and Salazar letter. Are there any questions? KERN: Any questions for staff? Commissioner Domingo. DOMINGO: Is there a floodplain on this property? COTTLE: The property is located within a floodplain, yes. There is also a floodway running along the makai edge of the property. It's a natural floodway. DOMINGO: Yeah. I understand that there's a possibility that that floodway will be diverted or part of it would be filled so that they can go ahead and build one of the structures. COTTLE: Yeah, the applicants represented in their application that they do intend to place some fill on the property in order to develop the property; and some of that fill may be in the floodway. DOMINGO: Your drawings do not indicate what part of the property is in the floodway and what building would be situated on that particular corner. Do you have anything showing that? COTTLE: I don't but we could provide that. I don't at this time. DOMINGO: Thank you. COTTLE: And part of the reason why we didn't provide anything is that FEMA just did a remapping or reevaluation of the area, and they are in the process of releasing new maps for this particular area. So those changes haven't been adopted yet by FEMA, but I could provide the current flood boundaries for you to see. KERN: Any other questions for staff? Seeing none, thank you, Maija COTTLE: Okay. KERN: Okay, can I get the applicant or their representative to please come forward. Good morning. I'll get you all to raise your right hands, whoever is going to speak today. Do you swear to tell the truth today before the Windward Planning Commission? TESTIFIERS: I do. KERN: Very good. For a matter of process, I think it would be important to look at the roadway lot, or the lot that is in question first, maybe speak to that first and see if there's a, how that could be resolved; and then we'll move on to the rest of it. If you wouldn't mind? YEH: Sure thing. Thank you. Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission, good morning. KERN: And give me your name and address. YEH: And then my name is Thomas Yeh, I'm the legal representative for the applicant. You know as the staff noted, you know, this is somewhat of a unique situation. What had happened is the original applicant, of course, had owned all these properties, including that small road lot which is really, if you take a look at it from a functional standpoint it's a total of, I think, 4500 square feet, 30 feet in width. It doesn't really have any real practical use to it. And then what happened, I guess, is when Tri - Electric owned the property it then had a mortgage or something on the property, and then Graphic Images thereafter acquired the four larger lots. So we take a look at it from the standpoint of an owner's perspective. If I was to buy one of those lots, which could have been done because there were already four separate lots, and you buy those entitlements with it, and you also then seek to obtain a time extension and still be willing to comply with all the various conditions of the zoning ordinance, I think as a landowner I would have the expectation that I would be able to do that if an absent, the joining of all the other lot owners. Now in this particular instance we have the owner of all the four real developable properties seeking the extension of time and being willing to comply with whatever conditions the County imposes that are appropriate. So from a, you know, just looking at it from a standard due process kind of standpoint, you know, it's pretty clear to me that as a landowner having the right under the Zoning Code as a property owner to apply for the rezoning extensions, time extensions, that the Code does give you a right to do that. It doesn't prevent you from getting that zoning extension, whatever applicable conditions apply to those properties that are appropriate to that development. There's nothing that prevents you from doing that, whether we're in the context of a rezoning, or time extension, or even a new zoning application for that matter. And that's how we're looking at it at this point, is because the road lot that we're talking about is not a necessary component of this development, it's not going to be affected by it. There has been no objection. The previous consent was given by the prior trustee. Some of the beneficiaries to that trust do have notice of this proposed extension and have not issued any objection. And so, you know, from a legal standpoint, yes, we certainly believe that we're entitled to move forward with this extension request. Whether it's in the context of this extension request, a new zoning application, they are separate parcels, not part of the same property. So that's kind of the analysis that 0 we have on that issue. And we would certainly ask today that the Commission move forward, send this on up to the Council without getting hung on some of these practical, I mean, the issues that have been raised because we don't see them as real issues at this point. Thank you. KERN: Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Yeh? Commissioner Domingo? DOMINGO: Yeah, Mr. Yeh. And the history of this indicates that Hirose Nursery came in for a rezoning of the entire parcel which included Parcel 3; and then thereafter, after acquisition of that zoning, then Graphic Images bought the property, but not Parcel 3. YEH: And maybe Mr., you know, Higashi can speak to that history. HIGASHI: I'm Roland Higashi. KERN: Please use your microphone, and name and address please. HIGASHI: Roland Higashi. I'm president of Graphic Images. The sequence of this was Finance Factor foreclosed on this, on the mortgage; and Graphic Image bought the parcel from Finance Factors. That's the sequence of this transaction. DOMINGO: That total, all that parcels, the -? HIGASHI: We did not buy the roadway lot. DOMINGO: Parcel 3 including? HIGASHI: Was not included under the mortgage. Originally when they advertised they put Parcel 3; but later they informed us that Parcel 3was not included in the sale and in the foreclosure. But we did apply for the rezoning for the entire, including Parcel 3. It seems to me that Parcel 3, it seems like it was a roadway lot to the back lot that provided access to the back lot, if you look at the map carefully. Otherwise their back lot would have been landlocked. YEH: Right. In other-. DOMINGO: And that back, the so-called back lot is now owned by Graphic Images also? HIGASHI: Graphic Images, that's correct. YEH: In other words, what would have probably happen is when Finance Factors got their mortgage interest on the properties, through some oversight or not, you know, it didn't include that road lot as part of that mortgage. So, therefore, when they foreclosed on the property they didn't have the right to sell that lot. So it was a separate -. DOMINGO: You know, that was the question that I was leading to. Why have not Graphic Images sought to acquire the property? HIGASHI: Yeah, we had no interest in that property. Because of the size and shape it was not economically feasible for us, and it was in a trust. So our acquisition was strictly from Finance Factors. YEH: And I think what BJ has probably correctly done is, you know, tried not to cut it out of the proposed extension just so that there's no derogation or interference with whatever rights that parcel has. I mean in theory the Council could as with any other similar issue rezone or extend the time for the rezoning for the four parcels we're talking about, cut out that road lot because it's not a formal part of this application. Then, of course, you know, the time extension wouldn't apply to that parcel so -. I mean that's always, that's a possibility also. But we just don't want that kind of interfering with the ability of these four parcels to move forward. KERN: Commissioner Domingo DOMINGO: Should the conditions be approved, how would you folks handle the floodplain and the building of that specific structure? KERN: What I'd like to do is kind of separate this lot issue out first. DOMINGO: Okay. KERN: We're kind of going to make it a two-part ordeal, if you will. DOMINGO: Okay, sure. KERN: Would you mind holding that question? DOMINGO: I've got no problem, I've got no problem. KERN: Okay, thank you. Any other questions regarding this lot issue? .Lot 3 is in this application. YEH: Well, that's a very good question. Because when Graphic Imagines applied for the rezoning or the time extension, I should say, it did not include Lot 3. KERN: Okay. And the Lot 3 got put in there for the reason of-? YEH: I think the Planning Department felt it would be a good idea to kind of include it as part of the analysis. LEITHEAD TODD: It's part of the original ordinance -. YEH: Right, that's correct. LEITHEAD TODD: In the description, which is why it's part of this. It's not that the applicant asked for it. It's that if you look at the title of the ordinance and the description and the references to the various parcels, it's included. YEH: So one of the, one of the examples we gave is you can actually have one parcel and have two different zonings on that parcel. So, in other words, if I had a 100 -acre parcel and I wanted to rezone half of it to a Neighborhood Commercial and leave the other 50 percent Residential, we could come in and seek that kind of a rezoning application. So the point to be made there is that you can have parts or portions of any parcel; and in this instance they are in fact separate parcels carrying different zoning designations. So that's another illustration of how, you know, what we're proposing to do is certainly appropriate. KERN: Any other questions regarding this lot issue? Seeing none, if you gentlemen can have a seat. I'm going to afford some public testimony specifically for this lot issue. And then we'll get you all to come back up and move forward on the rest of the application. So I'm going to use the list that I have here. If you choose not to come up and give testimony based on this part, you will have an opportunity to give testimony based on the second section of this application, so to speak. So, Sandra Song, Stephanie Salazar, and Russell Doi, any of you would like to speak. And this is, please, specifically for the roadway lot and -. SALAZAR: Lot 3? KERN: Lot 3. SALAZAR: Okay. My name is Stephanie Salazar. I've lived on the property next to the old -. KERN: One second. SALAZAR: Oh, you want all three of us here? KERN: I'm just going to -. Yeah, you can all come up, whoever would like. I need to swear you in first. And then, just procedure, thanks. Will you, all three of you, raise your right hand today. Do you swear to tell the truth today before the Windward Planning Commission? TESTIFIERS: Yes. KERN: Okay, name and address and you may begin, or area you represent if you don't feel comfortable giving your address. SALAZAR: Okay. My name is Stephanie Salazar. I live at 78 East Kahaopea Street in Hilo. KERN: Okay, you may go forward. SALAZAR: Do you want me to go ahead? KERN: Yes. SALAZAR: Okay. I've lived at the property next to the old Hirose Nursery, which I'll refer to as the Doi property or Lot 30, for more than 20 years. As far as the roadway lot, the reason I would bring it up is because it was in the application. And William Hirose died in 2002. His sister Helen Hirose died in 2004. And when this came up for, I think the renewal in 1996 Florence Doi, a beneficiary of the Margaret Hirose Trust, testified against these, this application. Florence Doi died in 2009. Prior to that Roland Higashi asked her if she would give up Roadway Lot 3 and the easement and she said no. In fact she went to her attorney, Roy Nakamoto, and asked her, asked him to see if he could get the titled clarified; and he kind of said, well, don't worry about it because nothing is ever going to happen to that land, it's just going to sit there. So she didn't pursue it at the time. And this is, Florence Doi died in 2009. KERN: Thank you. Any questions for the applicant? Seeing none, thank you. Thank you for sticking to the point of the roadway lot. DOI: Yes, my chance now? KERN: Yes. We're dealing with a little paperwork here. Hold on one second real quick. Okay, thanks. Yeah, so Russell Doi? DOI: Yes. KERN: Yeah, give me your name and address or area you represent and you may begin. But please do stick to the roadway lot issue. DOI: Yeah, my name Russell Doi. I live over there, in, by the Nursery. About 50 years I've lived there. And I was trying for get the roadway lot and then -. My aunty work for that, the other lawyer, Nakamoto or whatever, who when bow out. And she told me I no can get `um, the land. But bullshit because when I look at the whole situation, what when happen, how they make all the lawyer stuff -. And now Sandy when help us and then they got to bow out because they know they doing wrong was, yeah? Otherwise that Nakamoto guy they'd still be here yet today. And my aunty she the secretary for them and she do rotten stuff, like change the power of attorney when my mother was dying. And that's kind of like why cripple -. Cause the ...(expletive) land and all these ... (expletive) greedy -. KERN: Please try to watch your language if you would -. DOI: Sorry but -. KERN: Out of respect, yeah? DOI: You know, and kind of like bullshit plenty. But lucky Sandy help us. KERN: Thank you. Any questions? DOI: And the flood zone too, get the flood zone, get one culvert behind, and the thing fill up with water in the back plenty times -. KERN: We can speak to that on the next round. Thank you. Any questions for the testifier? Commissioner Domingo. 10 DOMINGO: I just have a question for Stephanie. Having, if in any way possible having resolved that Parcel 3 issue, what do you think about the project in itself with this rezoning? SALAZAR: In general the whole rezoning thing? DOMINGO: In general, in general. SALAZAR: In general the whole rezoning thing? DOMINGO: Yes. SALAZAR: I've written a letter about it, and I have some issues to raise about it. But the Chairman asked us to stick to No. 3 -. DOMINGO: Okay. SALAZAR: So I'll talk about that later, if that's okay. DOMINGO: Thank you. SALAZAR: Thank you. KERN: Thank you. Thank you. Any other questions? Seeing none, name and area you represent. SONG: Good morning. KERN: Name and area you represent. Thanks. SONG: Good morning, Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission. I'm Sandra Song and I'm here representing Stephanie Salazar and Russell Doi. And this roadway issue came up because I opened my mouth this morning to Amy Self who is the attorney for the Planning Director. And she talked to the staff, and they raised this issue. And I heard Mr. Yeh this morning give his arguments and in due respect -. And I would like to note Mr. Yeh just came in the picture so he's new to this case. And I heard Ms. Leithead Todd give her analysis. But in due respect, when I first started practicing law I was told when you have the law pound the law, when you have the facts pound the facts, and when you have neither pound the table. And all I've heard today is pounding the table. The Zoning Code says what you're supposed to do when you apply for an amendment. Section 25-2- 42 specifically says that any application for an amendment must be submitted by a property owner, by the property owner, or any other person with the property owner's consent. The Ordinance 99 116 involves five separate parcels of property. The property owners that are affected by Ordinance 99 116 are Graphic Images and the Hirose Trust. There are two property owners. This application required consent by two property owners. Now although Mr. Yeh may say this application is only part of it, if this Commissioner and the County Council takes any action that affects Ordinance 99 116 it is going to 11 affect the interest of the Hirose Family Trust property; and they did not consent, the Trust did not consent to this application. Now although they say they don't know who the trustee is, Florence Doi was the trustee of the Trust, and Florence Doi did pass away. However, there is still another family member that's alive, Hilda Morishita that could be the trustee. And even if she refused to be the trustee under the State Law, under Hawaii Statutes, there is a provision where any interested party can go to court and get a trustee appointed. So if Graphic Images really wanted to file this application properly and couldn't find a trustee, they could go to Court and get a trustee appointed to consent to this application. This was not done. And I might also point out that before Mrs. Doi died I did represent her, and Mr. Higashi's associate did approach me about this parcel; and Mrs. Doi didn't want to participate, she didn't want to do anything about it while she was trustee. I also would like to point out that Mr. Domingo's concern is a legitimate concern. Because if this application is allowed to proceed without all the owners' consent, what's going to happen the next time when there are seven property owners and one out there just doesn't sign off? Are they going to allow the application to go through? Because that one owner could have a significant interest. That one owner might have been one Hawaiian that's going to be ousted from the property The Department has been consistent in requiring all owners to sign consents. When I had to do a subdivision application for Stanley Hara's family, there were so many property owners I had to run around all over and get consent of property owners so we could subdivide major property into three, just three lots. Actually it was a consolidation and resubdivision, just to reconfigure the ownership. And I know of no applicant that doesn't run around and do that, to make sure that all the owners participate. I submit to you that the Department shouldn't have even accepted this application this way. And, yes, this is a problem, but it's not an insurmountable problem. It's a problem that the applicant should have dealt with. I won't address any of the other issues in this application at this point. But I seriously suggest this Commission is the gatekeeper, and you hold an important role because you have to make sure planning is done well. That's why you're the gatekeeper, to make sure we're doing things properly in this County and we don't turn into Honolulu. One of the things that needs to be done is owners must agree, and must consent to applications; and this wasn't done in this case. The Department cannot isolate out the roadway parcel, nor can the Department, this Commission or the Council really proceed with this application without all the owners agreeing. Thank you. KERN: Thank you. Are there any questions for Ms. Song? ISHIBASHI: I got one question. KERN: Yeah, Commissioner Ishibashi. ISHIBASHI: Thank you, Brother Chair. In regards to the replacement of the trustee, we're working on that, or not even -? 12 SONG: Nobody has asked about it. But, I mean, I've done it in other cases when there are no trustees where you go to court and you get a trustee appointed. That can be done. KERN: Thank you. Any other questions? Seeing none, thank you. You all may have a seat. Madam Director would you like to speak on what Ms. Song said regarding being able to accept the application? LEITHEAD TODD: Well, I think at this point Ms. Song has raised some legitimate concerns based on the Code. And we should kick it to Corp. Counsel and get an opinion because, I guess particularly since Ms. Song has raised the issue of whether you could have somebody appointed to represent the Trust and possibly the landowner has to submit an entirely new application for just these four parcels. So I think that this matter should be deferred, and we should get Corporation Counsel to weigh in on the application and determine whether it can proceed. And, we've never had this actually occur before. But the problem is if you look at the description in the ordinance it refers to all of the parcels. So I don't know that you can come in and apply for an extension just on behalf of four out of the five. And so I would prefer that we defer the matter, ask Corporation Counsel for an opinion on it, and then let the applicant and the interested party know what the decision is. KERN: Okay. Can I please get the applicant/representative to come forward. Before we speak to the possibilities that we have here, could we clarify who Helen Doi is. I have a letter here from her in 1998. YEH: Helen, and I apologize because I am kind of coming into this relatively cold. I think Helen Doi was one of the original trustees of that Trust that owned Parcel 3. KERN: So the letter basically serves as document consenting to the proposed amendment of the referenced ordinance -? YEH: Correct. KERN: By Finance Holdings which was back in 1998? YEH: Which she was at that time, yes. KERN: Okay. So would you like to speak to the matters at hand? YEH: Yeah, thank you. Yeah, and I understand the Planning Director's concern. You know, as we've articulated, basically, you know, we shouldn't be held hostage to zoning conditions which really apply, for which we're seeking only for the parcels in question. You know, from a legal standpoint we're able to seek a zoning amendment as to the four parcels in question. As a practical matter that's what we're doing here. We're not seeking anything else. And let me just, if I may, let's say for example, that the Commission decided to go forward with seeking a zoning amendment or extension for just these four parcels. What would remain is Parcel 3 would stand on its own. It still actually carries, it would still actually carry the zoning entitlements, until those were somehow rescinded or a vote, under the prior conditions. From a practical standpoint 13 nothing is going to happen. Now the owners of that property, whoever it is, have not come in and sought a time extension for that parcel. So it seems pretty clear to me that, you know, from both the functional, practical, as well as a legal standpoint, we are entitled to seek this extension of time, exclusive of Parcel 3. We didn't come in seeking an extension for that particular parcel, but only as to the zoning entitlements that apply to the four parcels. So I do respectfully disagree currently with the Planning Director, but I understand that there is some hesitancy there. LEITHEAD TODD: Mr. Yeh -. YEH: Yes? LEITHEAD TODD: What I'm going to be asking Corporation Counsel is whether in an amendment to an existing ordinance the amendment can be made to just include the four parcels and to delete the disputed parcel where there is no property owner -. YEH: Understood. LEITHEAD TODD: Or whether it so fundamentally changes the existing ordinance that that can't be done. So it's not just a question of whether you can do a time extension for the five parcels with just the owners of four parcels or whether you can amend the original ordinance to just proceed with the four parcels and delete that fifth parcel from the original ordinance. And so it's more than just, you know, that one issue. It's you filed an application for four parcels, can the original ordinance be amended to just refer to those four parcels, you know, and that no time extension is granted to that fifth parcel? And it, kind of is it legal limbo because it does have that zoning but it doesn't have a time extension to comply? And then the time extension conditions would only apply to the four parcels? So that's the question we're going to ask Corporation Counsel. Cause we've never, this is new territory. And it seems a little odd to me in the sense that normally you would want to preserve the interest of the Trust but you have someone who is probably a beneficiary of the Trust who is not interested in that and has not sought to seek that a trustee be appointed. So it's a very strange situation but potentially repeatable. So we should probably weigh in on what do you do when you have an ordinance that originally, let's say, had 300 acres and now through the passage of time the current property owner, the applicant has 250 acres out of the 300 and the other 50 is in legal limbo, what do you do? Can you proceed? Can you kind of bifurcate those four of it? So that's what I'm going to be asking Corp. Counsel to take a look at. YEH: Yeah. And, you know, from a functional standpoint this is, in fact, like a request for an amendment to the Zoning Code that only applies to those four parcels, with the same kinds of conditions that would typically apply. So that's how we would look at it. And, certainly, you know, from a timing perspective because, you know, there is a TIAR in place and those kinds of issues, we certainly want to try to get this issue resolved sooner rather than later. So if that's going to be the wishes of the Commission -. Thank you. KERN: Are you agreeable to deferring? YEH: Well, I'm going to leave that to the Commission. I, you know, we still want to move on as stated. So, thanks. 14 KERN: Okay. Thank you very much. So point of clarification on process — if indeed this does get deferred, could you let us know how that would go, Madam Director, as far as which Corporation Counsel would take care of that, and will the applicant and the testifiers' attorney, will they have a chance to weigh in on those? LEITHEAD TODD: Well, because this is an issue that applies to the Zoning Code and the application process, it would go to Corporation Counsel and probably go to the attorney who advises the Department, Ms. Self, for a determination on what you can do. And then I'm assuming she would take into consideration, since she's here, take into consideration some of the issues raised. And both the attorney for the applicant as well as the attorney for the people who testified, Ms. Song, who was opposed, have an opportunity to communicate with Ms. Self and raise what they think the legal issues are. And then Ms. Self can advise my department as to what we should do, you know. And ultimately they filed an application, you know, I guess, and we processed it, you know. No guarantee that you get to the Council and with these legal issues still in limbo that the Council would move for the time extension. So I think we need to resolve that. KERN: And the fact of the TIAR, is there any -? LEITHEAD TODD: TIARS are only valid for a particular length of time. KERN: Yeah. LEITHEAD TODD: And so the problem for the property owner is that without a time extension and if he had to start all over again, the existing TIAR might not be valid. And they would have to then go and have a new one, and pay for a new one to be done. KERN: Which I believe that date is coming up. (Commissioner Au stepped out at this time.) LEITHEAD TODD: But I don't think that that's an issue; and that shouldn't be the determination on whether this application moves forward or not. It should be purely based on whether the requirements of having all of the property owners apply is applicable or whether you can proceed to just amend conditions to a portion of the properties that were included in the original ordinance. KERN: Okay. LEITHEAD TODD: And so it, and I don't think whether the life of the TIAR is really an issue and it shouldn't be a factor in the decision. And I'll leave that up to Ms. Self to take a look at the legal issues. KERN: Okay. Just lost one of our Commissioners. And we're basically are at the impasse of looking for a motion to potentially defer. Is that right? TORIGOE: Yes. 15 (Commissioner Au returned at this time.) KERN: Do you want to speak to this, Mr. Torigoe? TORIGOE: Yeah, at this point if you want to have a motion to defer it seems clear what the Planning Director intends to do. I'd just also mention that, you know, I am here to advise the Commission. And so if the Commission has its own questions that arise from whatever Ms. Self may have to say, then the Commission can ask me for advice as well. KERN: Okay. So just for process clarification, if we have a motion now that comes up to defer and that motion fails then we still continue to move on with the application? Is that correct? TORIGOE: Right. KERN: Right, okay. So Planning Director? LEITHEAD TODD: And positive or negative if there is a vote on the application it then goes to the County Council with either a positive or negative recommendation. KERN: Right. LEITHEAD TODD: And then at that point I suspect the Council would kick it to Corp. Counsel for a legal opinion. KERN: Okay. So it would be good to get a motion to potentially defer right now. Mr. Yeh, yes? YEH: Yes, Mr. Chairman. You know, rather than put a great burden on the Commission in trying to wrestle with this, you know, we're okay with deferring it. And we'll try to work it out with Corp. Counsel and see what they come up with, and see if there is some alternative. So deferral is okay. KERN: I appreciate that from -. YEH: Thank you. KERN: Being a Commissioner. So if we could get a motion, we'll see where that goes. Commissioner Au. AU: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I move to defer applicant Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. KERN: To when -? YEH: Mr. Chairman, and I apologize for interfering while this motion is -. KERN: No problem. I6 YEH: We really do want to try to get this question resolved sooner rather than later. So maybe at least to phase this deferral until the next scheduled Planning Commission meeting? At least we can try to work towards getting some solution by then. KERN: I think that would be good, yeah, to have a timeframe on it. Would you -? AU: Yeah. Defer to our next meeting which is March 1St KERN: Okay. Is there a second for that? DOMINGO: Second. KERN: Okay, any discussion? Seeing none, take the vote. Maija? COTTLE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The motion is to defer this application until the March 1St hearing. Commissioner Au? AU: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Domingo? DOMINGO: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Ishibashi? ISHIBASHI: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Moses? MOSES: Aye. COTTLE: And Mr. Chair? KERN: Aye. COTTLE: Okay, motion passes five -zero. KERN: Thank you. I hope you all can work together to figure this out. It's very interesting. Okay. The discussion ended at 10:02 a.m. 17 Respectfully submitted, Sharon M. Nomura, Secretary Windward Planning Commission WINDWARD PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY OF HAWAII HEARING TRANSCRIPT MARCH 1, 2012 A regularly advertised hearing on the application of GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII, INC. (formerly FINANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. and TRI -ELECTRIC, INC.) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 99116 (REZ 840) was called to order at 10:25 a.m. in the County of Hawaii, Aupuni Center Conference Room, 101 Pauahi Street, Hilo, Hawaii, with Chairman Zendo Kern presiding. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Zendo Kern, Dean Au, Takashi Domingo, Wallace Ishibashi, Stephen Ono and Raylene Moses STAFF PRESENT: Ivan Torigoe (Deputy Corporation Counsel), B. J. Leithead Todd (Planning Director), Daryn Arai (Planning Program Manager), Phyllis Fujimoto (Staff Planner), Maija Cottle (Staff Planner), Jeff Darrow (Staff Planner), and Sharon Nomura (Secretary) And nine people from the public in attendance APPLICANT: GRAPHIC IMAGES HAWAII, INC. (formerly FINANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. and TRI -ELECTRIC, INC.) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 99116 (REZ 840) Request to amend Conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99 116, which amended Ordinance No. 96- 159, which rezoned approximately 7.402 acres from the Single -Family Residential -10,000 square feet (RS -10) district to the Neighborhood Commercial -7,500 square feet (CN -7.5) zoning district. The amendment to conditions relates to a 5 -year time extension to secure final subdivision approval, timing of installing drainage improvements, and timing of installing roadway improvements along Kahaopea Street. The properties are located on the southeast side of the intersection of Kanoelehua Avenue (State Highway 11) and East Kahaopea Street, Waiakea Homestead House Lots, South Hilo, Hawaii, TMKERN: 2-2-044: 003, 031, 032, 035 and 037. KERN: Application No. 8, Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc. (formerly Finance Holdings, Ltd. and Tri - Electric, Inc.), amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No.99 116 (REZ 840), request to amend Conditions C, H and I of Ordinance No. 99 116, which amended Ordinance No. 96-159, on TMK: 2-2-044: 003, 031, 032, 035 and 037. With that, Maija. COTTLE: Thank you, Mr. Chair. You'll recall that this item was considered at your last Planning Commission hearing. And the Commission decided to defer a decision on the application so that the applicant and his attorney, as well as Ms. Song and her clients, could discuss whether or not it was appropriate to proceed with processing the amendment request for just the four properties owned by the applicant, even though all five properties were included in the original rezone. On February 21St, actually before February 21St Mr. Yeh, Ms. Song and both the Planning Department and Commission Comm. 669 Bill 229 Corporation Counsels met to discuss this and came up with a solution, and then Mr. Yeh submitted a letter on February 21" which you should have. So as part of that solution the Planning Director would like to suggest a change or revision to the Ordinance. You should have a yellow sheet that I just passed out to you. You'll see that the heading on the Ordinance refers to all five properties, because those were all covered under the original rezone. And then if you read Section 2 it says the "The following amendments to Ordinance No. 99 116 shall apply only to TMKs 31, 32, 35 and 37." So you'll notice that Lot 3 would not be affected by any recommendation and bill that you forward up to the County Council. What this does is it allows the applicant to proceed with their request for their property, but it preserves the rights and entitlements for the owner of Lot 3 so that if a successor/trustee is ever identified they have those preserved rights in place for their property. So if the Commission is comfortable with proceeding with this application, with the proposed revision to the Ordinance, I can either answer questions or I can do another presentation to refresh your memory on the property. KERN: Okay, any questions for staff regarding this? Does anyone desire to go through a more formal presentation? Looks like not. Thank you, Maija. What we'll do is maybe give each, the applicant and the testifier's representative, Sandy, a quick chance to go over kind of how it was worked out; and then we'll move into the formal process. So we'll start with the applicant's representative. YEH: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. Basically staff, Maija, did a great job in summarizing what the context of the discussion was. What we did is we did provide that letter to the Commission just so you can understand some of the legal context pursuant to which this proposed condition has now been circulated. So I didn't want to go further than that cause I think we just wanted to provide the Commission with some background on what the ordinance and the statutes allow the Commission to do, so it felt had a certain comfortable level, so to speak, with what has now been proposed by staff. So from a procedural perspective we're fine with what has been submitted. KERN: Okay. A little housekeeping here. I'll swear you in real quick. YEH: Oh, thank you. Sorry. KERN: Raise your right hand. Do you swear to tell the truth today before the Windward Planning Commission? YEH: Yes, and I did so far also. KERN: I bet you did. Thank you very much. Great. And then I'll call you back up when we actually get to the formal application. Sandy, would you like to, a chance to come to speak to that? This is kind of separate than the public testimony side of it which I have at the beginning of the meeting. I'll limit it to three minutes, being that I thought there would be a lot more testimony with the lengthy agenda that we have. So this is just talking about the process in which -. Do you swear to tell the -? 2 SONG: Do you want me sworn in? KERN: I certainly do. Do you swear to tell the truth today before the Windward Planning Commission? SONG: I do. Good morning, Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission. My name is Sandra Song, and I represent Russell Doi who is a beneficiary of the Margaret Hirose Trust. We did have a meeting and I did receive a copy of Mr. Yeh's letter from the Planning Department, not from Mr. Yeh. But I respectfully submit that we still object to this petition. And I understand what the Commission's, what the Corporation Counsel's position is and your attorney's position is. But it's still our position that since this change of zone involved all these parcels it just cannot go through. And I understand, I understand your attorney's position. But in my, as I see this it's no different than when you have land that has title that is encumbered and you have to do a quiet title in court. There is a problem; and I think that technical problem with the landownership prevents this application from going through. But it's the Commission's decision as to how they want to proceed. KERN: Thank you very much. Do we have any questions for either applicant or testifier? Not at this point, okay. So, Amy, would you like to comment. And I'm going to swear you in too. Raise your right hand. Do you swear to tell the truth today before the Windward Planning Commission? Your other right hand. SELF: Yes, yes. Deputy Corporation Counsel Amy Self. What -? KERN: Your other right hand. SELF: Sorry about that. KERN: Do you swear to tell the truth today before the Windward Planning Commission? SELF: Yes. I guess it's the first time I've ever been sworn in. We did meet and at the table everyone was in agreement with the solution we came up with. But I guess things have changed since that time. But I just want to explain to the Commission what the Planning Director's position is. It's that we couldn't take the TMK off the title of the zoning because that zoning is the zoning for all five properties. So you cannot, you know, we're not downzoning the property, their property, Parcel 3. It's, so the only other way we could do this to satisfy the issue of not getting all the signatures, in other words not getting consent from all the property owners, was to indicate in the ordinance that the amended conditions, the conditions that you're amending, do not affect Parcel 3. It only affects the other four parcels. So by doing that, cause none of these conditions do affect Parcel 3. And you're not rezoning. These properties, all five properties have already been rezoned. So all you're doing is simply changing some of the conditions of the rezone ordinance which do not in any way affect Parcel 3. So with that being said, there's no reason why this cannot go forward from the Commission up to the Council, because you're not changing anything for Parcel 3. If you were doing something that was changing, like if any of the conditions actually affected Parcel 3 that you're changing, then my, I would be saying, no, we need consent from all the property owners. But since that's not happening and you're not rezoning the property without a property owner's consent, there's no reason why this shouldn't go forward. So that's the solution we came up with, was to make it explicitly stated in the ordinance that these amended conditions only apply to the four parcels and not to Parcel 3. KERN: Thank you. Any questions, Commissioner Domingo? DOMINGO: So that question that all the signatures have not signed on to it is not relevant to what we're contemplating acting upon? SELF: In my opinion no because you're not rezoning anything. But all five properties have already been rezoned. The only thing that's happening is that you are amending some of the conditions of that rezoned ordinance, but none of those affect the property that, the subject property, the Parcel 3. So if it was something you were, if it was an action that was going to be taken that would affect that property, my opinion would be, yes, you need the consent of that owner. But that's not what's going on. The conditions are not, the conditions that are being amended are only affecting those four parcels and not Parcel 3. DOMINGO: Because the original ordinance reflects upon all the properties, in the most extreme case scenario if this is challenged, can the County defend its position by, as to what you elaborated upon? SELF: Well, any legislative act is presumed by the Courts to be valid until otherwise proven. So even if it were to be challenged in Court, there would be a presumption that it's a valid act, a valid legislative act. And then the Appellants would have the difficult burden of proof to show that they were somehow arbitrary or capricious in the legislative act that they took, which is a difficult burden. It's a high burden of proof. DOMINGO: Thank you. KERN: Thank you. Any other questions? Seeing none, thank you. You may have a seat. What I would like to do is have staff give us just maybe a summary presentation, cause there are two different things here that we're dealing with. One is the amendment to the conditions and, secondly, the time extensions which are all part of the same application but separate. Maybe you could just refresh us on the nature of the requested amendments to the conditions and the time extension. Thank you. COTTLE: Sure. Let me go ahead and direct your attention to the screen. I'll just quickly refresh you on the location of the property. The subject properties are outlined in black; and they're shown in pink which is the CN, Neighborhood Commercial, zoning. You have Kahaopea Street running east and west at the top of the property. And then you have the highway running north and south along the western boundary of the property. This is the General Plan designation, which is Low Density Urban for the property. An aerial photo, the properties are in this area here. And then the applicant's requests: So the first request is for a time extension, a 5 -year time extension to secure final subdivision approval. The second request is to delay the installation of drainage improvements to final plan approval or certificate of occupancy. Currently the drainage improvements are required before subdivision approval. And then the third request is to delay the installation of improvements to the property's Kahaopea Street frontage, that would be curb, gutter and sidewalk 1i improvements. And they're requesting to delay those to certificate of occupancy. And currently those improvements are required at subdivision approval. And did you want the full presentation? KERN: No. And then you guys have your recommendation based, for those? COTTLE: Yes. So the recommendation, basically the Director is supporting the applicant's request for the time extension to secure final subdivision approval. That would be an additional five years that they have to secure subdivision approval. However, the Director is not supporting the applicant's request to delay the installation of the drainage and roadway improvements until after subdivision. And the reason for that is when this property was originally rezoned back in 1996, one of the conditions called for a master plan so that all four parcels would be developed with a comprehensive plan, and drainage and roadway improvements would be considered all at once. The best way to do that is to have those improvements done at final, prior to final subdivision approval. If that's not done, what will often happen is an owner will get approval to do subdivision, the lots are split, and then you have multiple new landowners potentially having to install these drainage and roadway improvements. So it's not done as comprehensively. So the Director feels it's more appropriate to keep the conditions as is. Those, both conditions were recommended by the Department of Public Works. This time when Public Works reviewed the application, they didn't provide any comments; and we're assuming that's because they are hoping that the conditions stays as is, which is what they originally recommended. KERN: Okay. Thank you, Maija. Any questions for staff? Seeing none, do you want to add anything else? COTTLE: No. KERN: Okay. Thank you. No questions. So now we'll have the applicant or the representative please come forward. You're going to be speaking today? HIGASHI: Yes. KERN: Okay, raise your right hand. Do you swear to tell the truth today before the Windward Planning Commission? Could you use your mike. HIGASHI: I do. KERN: Very good. So if you do, just give us your name and area you represent. HIGASHI: Roland Higashi. I'm president of Graphic Images Hawaii. KERN: Very good. You guys have received the background report and recommendation. Are there any comments you'd like to make at this time? YEH: Yes, just briefly. What we tried to do was to try to first explain the fact that in this context what the applicant/developer is proposing to do is not to add any additional lots to what's there now. There are four lots which the applicant owns. There probably would be some adjustment of lot lines in a consolidation and resubdivision which doesn't increase the number of lots. So the concern was, you know, given the language of the condition that has been proposed, the term subdivision could include even a consolidation/resubdivision that doesn't encompass the addition of any lots which normally then does trigger improvements. What we did circulate the last time, and I'm not sure the Commissioners got it, is we did circulate a draft revision to the conditions that the Department has proposed that basically said that if any portion of any of this property does get developed, either in the context of plan approval or certificate of occupancy where you actually have a use going on, it really should be at that time that the required drainage improvements and/or traffic or road improvements would then get triggered, just to kind of avoid this kind of consolidation/resubdivision context that is actually being proposed. You know, we're looking basically, from what I understand, you know, road improvements of about half a million dollars alone. So if this consolidation/resubdivision were to trigger that, it doesn't really make a lot of sense. Because when you try to get financing, get lenders involved, you first need to adjust your lot lines. Then the security is placed on that property to do the financing. To me so long as you can't really actually physically develop the property when you get plan approval or certificate of occupancy you're really not implicating any public health, welfare concerns. So this situation is a little bit different given the, you know, how this particular development is intended to proceed. So even in the context that staff mentioned about, you know, having multiple owners which is unlikely in the first place, even one owner of the lot couldn't proceed forward with developing until those improvements were put in. So there, from the way that we've tried to propose the condition when you develop any portion, then it triggers this requirement. So that's the limited comment we have. Otherwise, all the other conditions and proposed conditions that the Planning Staff has submitted are entirely acceptable. If you take a look at the Planning Department's recommendations they incorporate provisions of the flood control code requirement that all drainage be dealt with on site. There is not going to be actually any development within the flood plain. They're going to stay out of that area. There was a site plan that was submitted also that basically verifies that. The developer doesn't want to be dealing with flood plain issues, trust me. It would, implicates all kinds of issues. So that's basically where we're at. KERN: Thank you. Are there any questions of the applicant/representative? Commissioner Domingo. DOMINGO: Not the representative, but I'd like to ask a few questions to the staff afterwards. KERN: I'd like to maybe ask the Planning Director briefly how do you feel about a lot consolidation and resubdivide where there's no additional lots being created? Is that different outside the intention of your recommendation or is it still in alignment? LEITHEAD TODD: The basic concern is development of the land incrementally. So if there were some type of a condition that the improvements had to be done before any one of the lots could be developed I think we could live with that. But the concern is that having separate lots and then one 0 being developed and not triggering the improvements, we don't want any construction occurring unless the improvements are in place. KERN: Commissioner Ishibashi? ISHIBASHI: Thank you, Brother Chair. I'm kind of disappointed you guys couldn't reach any type of agreement with that other lot. But in regards to the flooding or the improvements there, cause I lived right below, Pilipaa Street is right below the hill. That's where I was raised. And we had a lot of flooding in the earlier days. So you guys proposing that you're not in agreement with developing or any type of condition in regards to the drainage, until you come in and get permits to do the subdivision? That's the only time? YEH: Not really. I mean what we're saying is if we're not touching the land and it stays as it is, then it shouldn't trigger anything. And if you're just doing a paper consolidation/resubdivision of the same number of lots, that's an example of not really touching the land before any plan approval or certificate of occupancy is issued. And I think perhaps in the drainage context, before you get plan approval even, not even going so far as certificate of occupancy, once you've got these lots laid out, financing in place, you come in with your development plan or master plan and you're then ready to come in - yes, before you get that plan approval to do any development, that's when those drainage improvements have to be put in. So that's what we're suggesting in this point, yeah. ISHIBASHI: Yeah, cause I remember being raised down there. Pilipaa was flooded all the time in our back yard. So we were concerned with the drainage and the flooding. Thank you. YEH: Right. And then whatever work occurs on the property, it has to deal with drainage issues at that time. So that's the purpose of that. KERN: Thank you. Any other questions? And so, I've got a question. So Condition H as you have it underlined right now, you're saying that that is in accordance with what you're saying that you can do, a lot consolidation/resubdivide, but there cannot be any development occurring until those are taken care of. Is that right? YEH: Correct, correct. KERN: We're going to take a five-minute recess to review some of this; and then we'll get right back to it and start off where we stopped. YEH: Thank you. KERN: Thank you, five-minute recess. RECESSED — The Chair called a recess at 10:45 a.m. RECONVENED — The Chair reconvened the meeting at 11:00 a.m. 7 KERN: Okay, calling the Windward Planning Commission back to order. Okay, so here we are. Has any, you want to comment on -? YEH: Oh, yeah. Thank you, thank you. I think the context certainly has been, is something that we can have a consensus on about the fact that, you know, really from a real practical standpoint until you really develop the property you're really not implicating any public health safety issues. And I think the Planning Director did agree with that concept. However, however, I think in order to kind of keep things as simple as possible maybe we can deal with that issue at the Council level, but -. So we're willing to go with what the Planning Director or Planning Department has recommended as conditions, as they stand in the Planning Director's recommendation as has been provided. Okay? KERN: Okay, thank you. Any other questions then? Any other comments? YEH: Did you want to say something? HIGASHI: I'd just like to point out that in this project it's in escrow. We have a developer who's ready to go. So pending approval we'll proceed with the designing highway plans. The reason for the length it took us is we finally got approval from the Department of Highways to have an access to right in; and the staff has been working with us and understanding our dilemma. We finally got that approval. Our developer is ready to go, we're ready to create jobs in the construction. We're ready to create jobs on a long-term basis. The developer is from mainland, they're well financed. And it's something that I just want to remind you that it's not something that we're going to sit on for another five years. Thank you. KERN: Thank you. Any other questions for the applicant/representative? Commissioner Au. AU: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have a question. Thank you guys for coming up and, you know, agreeing with our Director. A question, how will this -? Whatever the outcome is today with that parcel, I understand it's like a sliver of parcel, what's, I'm assuming it's all going to change, the whole development is going to change. Or if it is, maybe if you can kind of talk about that, I mean, you know, depending what happens. Because it seems like from your proposed site plan, you know, you've got an entrance that will go right through that sliver of property, if I'm not mistaken. YEH: Now, maybe I'm not quite following. But when you talk about the sliver of property you're talking about that Parcel 3 that had been discussed before, that road parcel? AU: Yes. And, you know, maybe it's a little bit premature to talk about it right now. But, you know, I just want to just get a feel from the applicant what, how is the development going to be changed? Because based off of the site plan, I'm looking at Figure 2, Site Plan, it was in from the background report, that thick binder we have -. YEH: Yes, yes. AU: You know, I just want to get an idea of what could happen and what would happen if whatever happens today. YEH: Okay, if you take a look at that site plan, it's actually, it's a preliminary site plan with that in mind. But that's figure 2. It's part of the TIAR. And if you're looking at it now you'll see on the right side of the page what's called Parcel -. KERN: The long low rectangle on the area, parcel, right on the right? YEH: Yes. That you'll see is really not part of the development. So it's really not included. At one point in time the applicant and developer had inquired of the then surviving trustee whether there was an interest in selling that parcel. For whatever reason Ms. Song who was representing them at the time indicated there was no desire to sell the property. So as a result of that the design components then excluded that parcel from the development plan. So that's why we're saying there really is no affect on that parcel, and nothing is being requested in the way of changing that parcel itself. So it's not included in the development plans at all. Au: Okay, thank you. YEH: Thank you. KERN: Thank you. Any other questions? Seeing none, thank you. You all may have a seat. Moving on to public testimony, we're waiting to get our timer in place. But I'll call you all up to start with and swear you in. So Stephanie Salazar, Russell Doi, and Sandra Song, will you please come forward. I'll swear you in. And at the very beginning of the meeting I did limit public testimony to three minutes, as I've stated earlier. So we will have a timer in place; and when that goes off I'll ask you to please finish your testimony. And I'll get you all to raise your right hand so I'll swear you in. Do you swear to tell the truth today before the Windward Planning Commission? SONG: Yes. SALAZAR: Yes. DOI: Yeah. KERN: Okay, verygood. And before you begin, we'll wait till the timer is ready to go. Just give us your name and area you represent or address, whatever you feel most comfortable with. DARROW: Okay. KERN: Okay, we'll start with Stephanie Salazar. SALAZAR: Good morning. My name is Stephanie Salazar. I'm a former county employee, still a news reporter (part-time) and work for Diana Van De Car. So I tell you that so that you will know that I'm familiar with facts, half truths, and legal ethics. I've lived next to the subject property, the Hirose Nursery, for 24 years; and I object to the approval. I was here last month. And this is a complex case. The developer has had ample time to make the improvements, and I fear he will come back in five M years and again ask for changes. I object to the request for approval to develop without any drainage and street improvements. Why? Because the subject land has lots of flood areas and low areas. The bottom of Kahaopea Street where Awapuhi goes in where he wants to make a new access has flooded. The back of the Doi property has flooded. There's a big culvert under the highway below there. And let me give you an example of the flooding. The area right below on your site plan where that parcel is, he shows on his site map, the Roadway 3 that he says has not occurred, there's a parcel right there. I had a couple of billy goats about ten years ago and I tethered one in that area. And I was out shopping with my daughter and it started to thunder and storm and rain, and I said we better go check on that goat. I tied him to an old Ford Bronco. And there was thunder and lightning, and the goat was in the Bronco and the water was up to his shoulders. And my daughter and I had to wade into the area up to our necks to untie the goat and walk him out. We never know when it's going to rain heavily to cause the flooding. This rain in the past few days has not caused flooding. So I don't know what the issues are. In the letter I submitted before the February Planning Commission I explained more my objections to the road as it was also an issue. The Lot 3, I believe the staff is wrong. It is still owned by the Margaret Hirose Trust since 1980. She died in '81. Mr. Yeh's letter of recently said that Parcel 3 was owned by Tri -Electric or Willy Hirose at the time of the initial application; and that's wrong. He never was the trustee of that. So that ordinance, I don't know if that was even correct because I don't think that Margaret Hirose Trust was in the initial application. I'd like to ask the Planning Department in the future or now to require certified copies of land ownership or current title for each, from each of the applicants. Awapuhi Street floods. And as far as developer's rights, I believe that Roland has a right to do what he wants with the land; but if this won't work it won't work. I think it would be great area for an urban park or even a dog park. Thank you. KERN: Thank you. Any questions for the testifier? Seeing none, thank you. Russell Doi? DOI: No, she going, yeah? KERN: We can change that. That's fine. So just give us your name and area you represent, or address if you prefer; and you've got three minutes. SONG: Sure, sure. My name is Sandra Song and I'm representing Russell Doi. And I was asked to speak today. I spoke on that, the other issue on the land ownership before and I won't address that. I just want to be very brief. When the applicant submits, we do something in Hilo that's different on the location of property. If people want to know where this building is they say it's the old JC Penney building. If it's something in Hilo Shopping Center, they say the old Sears. All right, the applicant when they submitted the application, when they submitted the request for this extension said this property was the old Hirose Nursery property. And there is a lot of significance to the old Hirose Nursery property. And I just want to provide some background to the Commission and why this is so important to Russell Doi. In 1930 Russell's grandfather brought the first orchids into the State of Hawaii. And as you may know the orchid industry is an important industry in the State of Hawaii today. The first cut flowers were shipped from Hawaii in 1942 and within the next eight years Hawaii became the world's leading 10 commercial orchid growing industry, all due to Mr. Hirose. And today the industry produces more than $21,000,000 to this State and over half of that comes from the Big Island. Again, that started at Hirose Nursery. Hirose Nursery was originally downtown. And then we had the tidal wave in 1960; and in 1960 they moved to where they are right now. So to Russell who's a beneficiary of the trust, it's really important that this property is treated right. He's concerned about flooding, he's concerned about, that this property will not be developed correctly. And so you heard Russell being very emotional at the last hearing and he's going to have some other things to say about it. But I ask this Commission to consider this aspect in making a decision on the application. Thank you. KERN: Thank you. Any questions for the testifier? Seeing none, thank you very much. Just give us your name and area you represent and you may begin. DOI: Yeah, my name Russell Doi. And I live at the Hirose, kind of long now, must be about 40 something years, I think. And I see all the changes over there. Never had Hawaiian Home, only bushes, no more KTA, nothing. And then now Roland when buy the land, they like do any kind on the land. But he own the land, but plenty thing they do no good. They dump the old hospital over there and they still get rebar in the cement yet; and I think not supposed to get all that. And Planning Department they no do nothing. Because he changed the elevation in the land, the water run through our land now, and I grumble to him. But nobody do nothing that he do illegal filling, and the grading wrong. And I tell Myra and I got to go to Public Works? Why that's my job for grumble Public Works? This guy develop illegal, and then I live there all my life and no can do nothing. Something wrong with the law. But you guys got to decide if he like go make any kind of changes, supposed to be right way, not any kind way that just because he know Randy Kuruhara, and that's Billy's campaign co-chairman, they can do anything they like. If I neva had Sandy you guys walk all over me and pass on everything. But thanks to Sandy you guys got to u'm right, you know. And I when get jam up neck because of this land. And Nakamoto guys unethical, who is Roland's own lawyer, and they make any kind. They change the power of attorney. My sister call the cops and then my neck when get jam up. And then now County get one Federal law suit because I called for help after the cop did this to me. And all the lawyer they used -. And Janice Kaneshiro, she was my aunty but now she the secretary for Nakamoto, and then they pull all this power of attorney thing when my mother dying because they know I never like sell the land. And I when turn down the $3,000,000 in five seconds when they when offer because these guys no good. You know what I mean? They only like make money if they can. They no even care. He destroy everything my grandmother when plant. No more nothing left. He no more respect. Thank you. And I sorry I talk about, but I no can help -. KERN: Understood, understood. Thank you. Any questions for the testifier? Seeing none, thank you. You all may have a seat. Is there anyone else signed up from the public to testify? I'm willing to entertain a motion. Commissioner Domingo? DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman, could I have staff come up so I can ask them some questions before we entertain any motions? KERN: Yeah, and if we feel inclined to take an executive session we can do that as well, if we'd like to. So it's an option. 11 DOMINGO: Okay. KERN: But you want to ask -? DOMINGO: Yeah, I just want to ask staff -. You know, with the proposed zoning a Neighborhood Commercial -7.5 square feet district, there are a lot of uses that can be used for that property. And the proposed ordinance does not restrict them from any uses; and that's one of my concerns. It's whatever uses they decide to, regardless of what the type of design of the buildings or the configuration of the buildings may be, they can increase the density of the use of those lots. Am I right? COTTLE: That's true. DOMINGO: Yeah, no matter what the limit may be. So, in other words, there's no way that you can limit the amount of traffic that will be generated by those uses, unless when they come in with their plans. And upon plan approval they should then establish or create a number of lots according to the use of that, with those particular lots. Right? COTTLE: Yes. DOMINGO: So there's no use -. Okay, that's one of the major questions that I had with regards to limiting of the density and use of that property. Thank you. COTTLE: There's currently no limit on specific uses that can be developed on the property. Any use that's a permitted use under CN zoning would be allowed. DOMINGO: Could you mention, off hand, some of the uses that can be used that may entail an increase in density? COTTLE: Sure. Some uses would be a gas station, convenience store, any type of like personal service establishments like a laundromat or offices. Another example would be even single family residential could be developed on the property. So there's a wide range of uses. DOMINGO: Can apartments be established on those properties? COTTLE: Yes, as long as it meets the density requirements for the zoning. DOMINGO: Okay. Thank you. COTTLE: You're welcome. KERN: Thank you. Since we have staff up there, any questions for staff from anybody else? Seeing none, thank you. So I'm willing to entertain a motion. Anyone? DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? 12 KERN: Commissioner Domingo. DOMINGO: I move for the Planning Director's recommendation -. KERN: Did you move for a favorable recommendation? DOMINGO: Yes, a favorable recommendation to be sent to the Council based on the Planning Director's recommendations. KERN: With said conditions? DOMINGO: Yes. KERN: Okay. Is there a second, anyone? MOSES: I second. KERN: Okay. Discussion? Commissioner Domingo? DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? KERN: Yes. DOMINGO: You know, I haven't assumed or taken a position in the past with respect to opposing any kind of a development. But I've taken strong positions in prior employment with the County with regards to having -- infrastructures put in so that in the event, in this particular case -- infrastructures put in so that it can address additional traffic and flooding; and those are the major concerns. And I think the present County Council also -- I think, by having adopted a concurrence bill along the same principles -- is making sure that infrastructures are put in before the land is used, or the uses intended for those lands are in before anything happens. And I think to go ahead and delete the condition would, I would say, put the families and the residents below, who live below there, in jeopardy of having, being affected negatively by the development. KERN: Thank you. Any other discussion? Madam Director? LEITHEAD TODD: I just wanted to try and bring this application into perspective. This is a time extension request, essentially. And so when these come forward, you know, we're looking at the fact that do we treat this like we treat every other time extension request that comes in? And generally speaking we recognize that we routinely give time extensions because of the changing economy. In this case, part of the difficulty was getting the State DOT to agree on access. And frequently it's conditions that are beyond the control of the applicant who came in for the original rezoning request. So at looking at this I'm not necessarily looking at the specific uses of the property. I'm looking at whether in treating this like other applications if there are similar circumstances that have necessitated the time extension, if it's the economy changed, if they couldn't get, it took a long time to work out, and let me tell you it takes a long time to get responses from State DOT. So if all of those types of 13 conditions are similar to the reasons why we have granted time extensions to other rezonings then our recommendation is going to be consistent with what we have done with other applications. And that is basically what's going on with this one. This is consistent with how we have treated other applications for time extensions. KERN: Thank you, Madam Director. Any other comments? Commissioner Ono? ONO: No, pass. KERN: Any other discussion? Land use, challenging. You know, sometimes it's an easy win-win, sometimes it's a lose -lose, sometimes it's a win -lose. You know, this being that it is already entitled for this and it is a time extension, it's harder to say no to. I feel for the Doi family. I, you know, I definitely feel for Stephanie. And this is challenging. I think it's what we're going to see more of as time goes on and growth occurs and it starts, you know, kind of expanding outward more. People that were, you know, once living in somewhat of a more urban residential area are going to see the growth start to occur and encroach upon them. I don't know how we make that always a win-win. But being that this is a, you know, time extension, the conditions are there, infrastructure, safety needs to be put into place. And we would hope that everybody would move forward in a manner which was in accordance with all laws and was, you know, taken care of -- drainage as it is the County Code -- and everything gets done in the proper form. It's hard for me to say no to that even though I really do feel for the people that are affected in that area. So land use, challenging. Commissioner Au? AU: Thank you, Mr. Chair. You know, I support my Fellow Commissioners. This application is very appropriate. Although, you know, I'd like to remind us Commissioners, you know, we are on this Commission and we do represent our districts and we do represent our community. So, you know, there's a reason why we were each chosen to be here. And, you know, I just to make comment on that. KERN: Commissioner Ishibashi? ISHIBASHI: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Hirose Nursery was one of my favorite playgrounds when I was growing up. I moved in, Hirose, Hawaiian Home back in '65 I lived in Panaewa. The first increment, the first houses in Hawaiian Homes I moved there. So that was one of my favorite playgrounds. The place was beautiful. So I really appreciate the comments made about Hirose Nursery. I used to go there and drink sodas over there. So it was one favorite spot on mine growing up riding a bike. So it was back in the sixties, that's a long time ago. And the changes inevitably will change again; and it's changing again right before my eyes in Panaewa with all the shopping center. Before it was all bushes, just like what Russell said. And I appreciate the history and remembering the great place Hirose Nursery was. But, yeah, I get a hard time supporting this, but I will, I will support this. And I just feel for the Doi family, I feel for them. And I appreciate trying to work things out but cannot. So, but I will be supporting this, this motion. Thank you. KERN: Thank you, Commissioner Ishibashi. Any other discussion? Seeing none, Maija, take the vote. 14 COTTLE: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just want to clarify the motion. So it is to send a favorable recommendation for Condition C, and then an unfavorable recommendation for Conditions H and I, as recommended by the Planning Director? Is that correct, Commissioner Domingo? DOMINGO: Yes. COTTLE: And Commissioner Moses? MOSES: Yes. COTTLE: Okay. I'll take the vote. Commissioner Domingo? DOMINGO: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Moses? MOSES: Aye. LEITHEAD TODD: I-. KERN: Pause. Madam Director? LEITHEAD TODD: Sorry. I want to clarify, is it with the language that eliminates Lot 3? COTTLE: Thank you. KERN: Commissioner Domingo? DOMINGO: That means I should amend, amend that motion to reflect that elimination of Lot 3? KERN: Yes. You're doing that? DOMINGO: I would so do that. But is there any specific wording that should be inserted before we act on that? COTTLE: Commissioner Domingo, I think I gave you a yellow form. DOMINGO: Okay. COTTLE: That is what the Planning Director is recommending. DOMINGO: Yes. COTTLE: So if you agree with that -. 15 DOMINGO: Yes, I agree with that. COTTLE: Okay. KERN: Based on the Planning Director's recommendation? DOMINGO: Yes. KERN: And the second? MOSES: Second. YEH: Mr. Chair, just briefly, just -? KERN: Sure. Since we're in time-out mode anyway, come on up YEH: I think earlier on the record we did indicate that we were not objecting to the Planning Department's proposed conditions. So I think it's a little fuzzy for the motion to indicate an unfavorable recommendation on Conditions H and, I think, I that had been recommended by the Planning Department. So I think it's just more consistency to indicate that there is a favorable recommendation based on the Planning Department's proposed conditions. So I just wanted to kind of see if we could work through that, cause otherwise this is a bit confusing. KERN: Thanks. How do you feel about amending it to that, or do you want to comment on that, Madam Director? Does that make sense? Cause I kind of felt it a little fuzzy as well. Oh, do you want to address that? TORIGOE: Yes. KERN: Corporation Counsel Ivan Torigoe is going to address the motion. TORIGOE: Okay. Yeah, the way that you normally do these recommendations is you follow what, you know, basically if your intention is to follow what the Planning Director has recommended then you basically, you know, state the motion the way the Planning Director has stated it. And in this case that is a favorable recommendation for the request to amend Condition C, and then an unfavorable recommendation on the request to amend Conditions H and I, along with the additional amendments that were presented today on the yellow sheet. And I think the record reflects that the applicants have stated that for purposes of moving things along at this stage they're basically not going to stage a strong objection to the Director's recommendations at this point. But they've also stated on the record that they plan to take it up again at Council, I believe. And so I think the record reflects that and it's not discounting, you know, what the applicants have stated on the record here. So I think basically you can make that motion, again, to send a favorable recommendation to the request to amend Condition C and then an unfavorable recommendation to the request to amend the Conditions H and I, along with the amendments that were presented by staff today. 16 KERN: Which is the current motion that we have in place now, correct? COTTLE: Correct. KERN: Okay. So I guess we can move forward now, now that we've got clarity. ONO: I need a clarification. KERN: Yes, Commissioner Ono. ONO: How can we submit a favorable recommendation and have items that are not favorable? LEITHEAD TODD: Well, what you have is an application, and they ask you for 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 on it. And we do a recommendation that says 1, 2 and 3 are okay and we recommend approval; but 4 and 5 we don't agree with so we recommend that the application which asks for those amendments that that portion of the application have an unfavorable recommendation. Because the application as it comes in asks for several different actions. And so what we're saying is on some of them we're saying okay and on the other two we're saying not okay. And that's basically what the recommendation from the Department is. And that goes up to the Council so that in the event that there's a discussion about changing those specific requests regarding drainage and stuff at the Council there is a record that both the Department as well as the Commission agreed that those amendments should not be made. KERN: Thank you, Madam Director. Commissioner Ono. ONO: I'm still puzzled. The total proposal is that we send a favorable recommendation. As an example, on these two we're saying we're not comfortable with it. How can we send a recommendation of approval when there are, in this example, conditions that are not satisfactory to the Commission? LEITHEAD TODD: So, basically the recommendation is written up and then we attach the draft of how it's supposed to look. The draft doesn't have the amendments that they asked for in H and I; and that's what gets incorporated into the bill. But the recommendation has to reflect that if you asked for five different things and we're only recommending that the first three be approved, but you have to address the application as they come in. So if there was an application that requested all of these different changes, you have to respond to each one. And so that's why sometimes you have what looks like a strange thing we're recommending it but we're not recommending it. What we're saying is we're okay with certain requests and a couple of the others we think should remain as is, and specifically those requirements for the improvements to drainage. KERN: Does that make sense, Commissioner Ono, to you? ONO: No. How do you-? KERN: Well, I mean, basically those conditions are already in there. The applicant was requesting an amendment to that so it's not, the original conditions still exists. 17 ONO: Okay. KERN: And we're just saying that they're asking for that change, no. But the first, you know, with the time extension, yes. ONO: Okay, thank you. KERN: No problem. Maija, oh, Commissioner Au. AU: I have a question. KERN: Okay, fire away. AU: It's something that I'd like to clarify. You know, when we started Ms. Song mentioned that, she mentioned something that we cannot do. And I, you know, I could be wrong but the original application was for five lots. Okay, so now we're dropping it down to four lots. So now is this a whole new application or are we on the same application? Because I know, I do understand it is an amendment, we're going to take out that one lot, okay. But is it a new application, or is it the same application? But I do, like I said I do understand it's an amendment. Maybe you can clarify that. KERN: Anybody, Maija, you want to clarify that? COTTLE: I can try to address that. So the request was for covering the five lots, because that's what the original rezone ordinance covered. The Planning Director with this revised bill is stating that her recommendation is for these changes, which is the favorable time extension; and other conditions that go along with that would only apply to the four lots that Mr. Higashi owns. So if this is, if the vote is, if the motion passes, what would happen is we would send up a cover letter to the County Council that says that the Planning Commission at their hearing voted to forward a favorable recommendation for Condition C, unfavorable for Conditions H and 1. We would forward this first page as the first page of the bill which shows that it only applies to the four parcels, as well as the conditions that are recommended in the orange or in the goldenrod. And so just to point out Condition C, if you read Condition C of the goldenrod, it says "Final subdivision approval of the proposed consolidation and resubdivision of the subject property shall be secured within five years from the effective date of this amended ordinance." So that time extension request is reflected in Condition C. That's giving them five more years. Then you'll see Conditions H and I have not been amended because the Director is not supporting that amendment. Is that clear? Does that help? ONO: Okay. KERN: Amy Self, do you want to -? SELF: I think I can add some more explanation. This is, okay, I think the applicant, my understanding is the applicant, the original application did not include five properties. It only included the four properties. But when you're going to amend an ordinance that already exists, you cannot change the title of the ordinance. The original title of this rezone ordinance included all five properties. They all got rezoned at the same time cause it was originally one property. And so you cannot, you cannot take one of those properties out of the title of that ordinance, cause you're not downzoning a property. So they're all still under the same rezone ordinance. However, the amendments to the conditions that you're doing right now do not affect that one parcel, the Parcel 3, because they're not developing Parcel 3. So the conditions are only as they apply to the four parcels that they're developing. If you just, you know how a rezone ordinance or an ordinance in itself looks when it passes? That's what this is. You're just amending something that has already been passed previously. And so you can't change the original title of the ordinance, cause otherwise if you left that Parcel 3 out of the title, it wouldn't have a zoning any more. So you don't want it to lose its zoning. But at the same time you want to make certain that these conditions are not affecting Parcel 3. That was just to clarify that the conditions are only as to the parcels that are going to be developed. And that's all that was applied for to begin with. I hope that helps. KERN: Commissioner Domingo? DOMINGO: Yeah, but what about the ownership of Parcel 3? SELF: Well, there's nothing that's being done to Parcel 3. There's, none of the amendments to the conditions affect Parcel 3. So now if later on they get a trustee for the Trust who can sign on behalf of the Trust and they want to do something to Parcel 3, then the same process would apply to Parcel 3. They would apply for whatever changes they want. If they wanted to, let's say they wanted to change the zoning of their property, then they would apply for change of zoning. I guess they'd have to then amend this zoning so that it would reflect that they all have the same zoning. DOMINGO: I recall an earlier conversation that they had approval of the ownership of Parcel 3 in the original, time of the original rezoning. Am I right? SELF: That I couldn't, I don't know. SONG: No. SELF: I don't know if the applicant or Sandy - SONG: No, it was never -. Somehow it was amended. SELF: Oh, it was amended originally? SONG: It was amended. DOMINGO: I don't know -. I heard some kind of conversation that they had approval of, concurrence from the owner of Parcel 3. LEITHEAD TODD: Well, -. 19 KERN: Madam Director. LEITHEAD TODD: Back in 1991 the original ordinance was done by Tri -Electric, right? SONG: They didn't own the property at the time. LEITHEAD TODD: They didn't? SONG: No. NOMURA: Please use the microphone. KERN: Sandy, you want to come up and grab the mike? SONG: The Margaret Hirose Trust was created in 1980 or 1981, and the property was transferred in '81 to the Hirose Trust. Tri -Electric never owned that property. I don't, I think it was just a glitch; and the property owner never signed off on it. When there was an amendment to this ordinance back in the early nineties or late, late nineties, Helen Hirose -. DOI: Doi. SONG: Doi who was then the trustee did consent to the amendment. So, but after that Florence Doi who became the trustee was never asked to sign this present amendment. She was, as Mr. Yeh indicated, asked if she wanted to sell the property which she turned down. KERN: Thank you. Any other questions while Sandy is up here? Seeing none, thanks. Any other questions for Corporation Counsel Amy Self? Seeing none, do we have any other questions for anyone? DOMINGO: No. KERN: Okay, so we're right back to where we were with a motion on the floor, and seconded. And I think two votes already had been made. Is that right? COTTLE: That's correct. KERN: And so we'll just move on forward from there. Wasn't there two votes made? COTTLE: Yes, Commissioner Domingo and Commissioner Moses voted aye. DOMINGO: Do I have to restate the motion to include this here. MOSES: It was already on there. KERN: I think, I'm pretty sure that that was already done. 9C DOMINGO: That was done, okay. KERN: Yeah. But thanks for checking in on that. COTTLE: Commissioner Au? AU: Yes. COTTLE: Commissioner Ishibashi? ISHIBASHI: Aye, COTTLE: Commissioner Ono? ONO: Aye. COTTLE: And Mr. Chairman? KERN: Aye. COTTLE: Okay, the motion passes six -zero. KERN: You'll be notified in writing. YEH: Thank you very much for your patience and sorry to make it so complicated. The discussion ended at 11:45 a.m. Respectfully submitted, `n Sharon M. Nomura, Secretary Windward Planning Commission 21 Comm. 669/Bill 229 C.� W C.� cm 4) c O N 4- O cc co End cc r y i Qi cm w O C, z o � 0-- 0 •-0 0 c iV ma. O s � I- V AW 0 4) L 0). �+ 0 �1•+ � m L Q 4) � 0 o 0= Ocr O L. L > O > ,0 O L m Q� m��a. s = v L CLO •-o.�4) .Cooa) L s m 4) 0.- S Q 0 - M .r ALL E 0 0 o O CL woo - U0 E E C. .0 O O 0 E-0 tA 0� =L• 0 M.- CL r.0Z3 r. O V ■. V V N AW 4) 0). �1•+ m L Q 4) Ov o 0= .� v� M ,0 U)QLM m m��a. v L CLO .Cooa) L 4) Q 4) M S M 0 - M 0 %- E woo - U0 E -w C. .0 O 0 E-0 0� =L• 0 M.- CL r.0Z3 r. O .► v L I" e 11 ► z � z, d 0 C a J 4. f 1 Y c WIC H _ t� ► + ► .�w f :si a 0 i Q 0 3 0 0 0 �� i 1111111111111 I �O= O.�o VLm G� ._�__ m 0 =p� w— LL =E -c �"Los.>M CSS O.w tU .o C s_ 4wmE E3o�>, 0 I. m.Cw 0= BW E >� 1... to Lm m=CLV= w Ow= w=as.w