My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
REP AWESC 002 05/16/2012 2010-2012
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Reports
>
2010-2012
>
Agriculture, Water, Energy, & Sustainability Committee (AWESC)
>
REP AWESC 002 05/16/2012 2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2021 2:58:57 PM
Creation date
5/30/2012 10:03:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reports
Reports - Type
REP
Reports - Council Term
2010-2012
Report
002
Committee
AWESC
Meeting date
2012-05-16
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 06/06/2012 2010-2012
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Council
BIL 256 Draft 01 2010-2012
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2010-2012
COM 0710.000 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2010-2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AWESC-2 Page 2 May 16, 2012 <br /> Mr. Yagong replied that the reference to Lower Puna was part of the original language and that <br /> he left it in so that these areas didn't feel like they were being excluded from receiving any <br /> public safety devices. <br /> Ms. Smart was concerned that based on the language in Bill No. 256, if a geothermal plant was <br /> developed in another area of the island, the funds from that plant would go to Lower Puna; <br /> therefore, Section 2-181 should be amended to reflect that any funds collected from a geothermal <br /> facility should be expended in the same area of that facility. In addition, instead of saying <br /> ``public safety" in various sections, it should say "public health and safety" in order to be <br /> consistent throughout the bill, since the intent of the bill is to address both public health and <br /> public safety issues. Ms. Smart asked if there will be some type of management plan to keep <br /> squatters out from the vacant properties. Mr. Yagong replied that he would like to see the <br /> structures relocated to other areas, but right now the main priority is to relocate the owner- <br /> occupants and leave the properties uninhabited. Disposal, relocation or management of the <br /> uninhabited structures can be addressed later. Ms. Smart then asked for clarification on Section <br /> 2-181(5) on whether the Civil Defense Administrator has to make the recommendations for <br /> expenditures relating to public health and safety. Mr. Yagong explained that the relocation fund <br /> is managed by the Planning Director, but all health and safety issues fall under Civil Defense. <br /> The Civil Defense Administrator is the expert and should be the one to make recommendations <br /> related to health and safety. Lastly, Ms. Smart expressed her concerns on the removal of <br /> ``community benefits" from the program, because the Pahoa Office will be affected and may <br /> have to close. <br /> Ms. Ford made the following suggestions: 1) Section 2-178 should include the word "lease," so <br /> it would say "purchase or lease of..."; 2) the Planning Director does not purchase properties, so <br /> Section 2-178 should be amended to say that the Planning Director recommends to the Finance <br /> Director which properties to purchase; 3) the description of Lower Puna in Section 2-181 should <br /> be deleted so that expenditures relating to public health and safety can be applied to any area of <br /> the island where a geothermal plant is located, should another one be developed; and 4) to <br /> prevent problems with squatters, the amendment in Section 2-178 should be reworded so that <br /> the structures are not left uninhabited. Instead, it should say that the structures are either <br /> demolished or moved by the owner within a designated time frame. <br /> Planning Director Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd was called forward and also made some <br /> suggestions as follows: 1) the bill should give authority to sell or auction the structure to <br /> someone who will move it; 2) if someone is willing to purchase and move the structure, <br /> authority should be given to negotiate the price of the structure; 3) the geothermal funds <br /> should pay for all costs associated with demolishing the structure; and 4) what are the priorities <br /> when looking at expenditures. Will purchasing properties be on a first-come-first-serve basis? <br /> Is it to those that live closest to the geothermal plant? With limited funds, should the funds be <br /> spent first on relocating or safety issues? Ms. Leithead-Todd also had concerns that there are <br /> not enough funds to purchase all the properties within the one-mile radius. There is only <br /> $2,155,000 remaining, which could purchase about eight to ten properties. Mr. Yagong asked <br /> Ms. Leithead-Todd to confirm the amount, because he was told that there was $3.7 million <br /> remaining. Ms. Leithead-Todd explained that some funds may already be encumbered for other <br /> pending projects, but not yet expended. She also informed the Council that they are already <br /> working with Mr. Blas, the Mayor's Office and Civil Defense to coordinate a geothermal <br /> evacuation drill based on the emergency response plan submitted by PGV. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.