Laserfiche WebLink
WHEREAS, HRS, Section 486-120.5, Macadamia nuts; labeling requirements, <br /> subsection (b), states in part that (underscoring provided for emphasis only): "If a label on a <br /> consumer package contains language that a portion of the raw or processed macadamia nuts <br /> contained in the package was grown in Hawaii, the label shall be worded "Hawaii-Grown <br /> Macadamia Nuts",preceded by the per cent by weight of the macadamia nuts contained in the <br /> package that were grown in Hawaii, and shall appear on the principal display panel of the <br /> package." <br /> WHEREAS, HRS, Section 486-120.6, Hawai`i-grown roasted or instant coffee; labeling <br /> requirements, states in part that (underscoring provided for emphasis only): <br /> "(a) In addition to all other labeling requirements, the identity statement used for <br /> labeling or advertising roasted or instant coffee produced in whole or in part from Hawaii-grown <br /> green coffee beans shall meet the following requirements: <br /> (2) For roasted or instant coffee consisting of a blend of one or more Hawaii- <br /> grown coffees and coffee not grown in Hawaii, the per cent coffee by weight of one of <br /> the Hawaii-grown coffees used in the blend, followed by the geographic origin of the <br /> weight-specified coffee and the term "Coffee Blend"; and <br /> "(c) "It shall be a violation of this section: <br /> (2) To use a geographic origin in labeling or advertising, including in conjunction with a <br /> coffee style or in any other manner, if the roasted or instant coffee contains less than ten per cent <br /> coffee by weight from that geographic origin." <br /> WHEREAS, the practice of protecting milk(90%) but disadvantaging both macadamia <br /> nuts (10%) and coffee (10%), as well as many other crops, is discriminatory to the growers of <br /> these crops and contradicts several sections of the HRS, such as (underscoring provided for <br /> emphasis only): <br /> 1. The definition of"misbranding" (HRS 486-1) for providing incomplete <br /> information, misrepresentation as to the identity or point of origin, identifiable geographical <br /> location, and the historical usage by a people, misrepresentation of the consumer commodity as <br /> an imitation of another or as an imitation of a generic product, or misrepresentation in any other <br /> manner tending to confuse the prospective purchaser. If country of origin or the majority <br /> percentage of the product is not identified on the front label in large font, then the consumer <br /> cannot determine if the product meets his or her needs. Therefore, the consumer needs to be <br /> protected from misbranding of any food product by identifying the majority of the product by <br /> country or region of origin instead of only ten to fifty percent of the product; and <br /> 2. The definition of "practices" (HRS 486-1) "to assure that amounts of <br /> commodities or services sold are determined in accordance with good commercial practice and <br /> are so determined and represented as to be accurate and informative to all parties at interest." If <br /> the front label is not informative as to country or region of origin for the majority of the product, <br /> the consumer may inadvertently purchase a non-Hawaiian commodity product. Therefore, the <br /> consumer as a party at interest needs information to determine what he or she is actually buying <br /> on the front label; and <br /> 4 <br />