My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0526.012 2010-2012
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2010-2012
>
COM 0526.012 2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2021 12:57:05 PM
Creation date
8/24/2012 9:11:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2010-2012
Communication
0526
Point
012
Author
Graham Wood
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
REP PC 063 07/31/2012 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2010-2012\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 3 <br /> community <br /> truly, i cannot believe that any consideration is being given to this application. <br /> there are innumerable commercial properties crying out for redevelopment in <br /> Mountain View. please do not make this property commercial, if the owners want <br /> to do business in Mountain View, i would welcome that, but please insist they do so <br /> on the existing commercial property, not creating a new one and spoiling what is a <br /> really nice residential addition to our community <br /> all the best in the upcoming election <br /> graham <br /> Cut & Paste <br /> Comment #2, again sent to council member J Yoshino with a copy to council <br /> testimony <br /> greetings j <br /> i am saddened to learn that this bill is all but a done deal <br /> may i make one last plea to you for your help, please? let's try to "Keep Country <br /> Country" as a favorite Puna bumper sticker says <br /> in that respect may i ask that this item be sent back to the Planning Dept for <br /> reconsideration after <br /> 1. the applicants have erected "story poles" that will show the outline of the <br /> proposed structure both as a footprint and the height of the proposed <br /> structure. this can be done in outline form with lumber that will be reusable <br /> for construction so the expense is minimal <br /> 2. then can we ask the Planning Dept and the Planning Commission to review the <br /> site and see if it still meets standards. i actually talked to one commissioner <br /> who did not realize where the property was located! if we cannot rely upon <br /> our Planning Dept and Planning Commissioners to enforce zoning regulations <br /> and only make exceptions where there is a crying public need, why have <br /> either activity? that could be an easy budget reduction if all these entities <br /> are going to do is rubber stamp every application <br /> f the bill must go forward and we can no longer remain "country" may i ask that <br /> tiere be requirements placed on the approval <br /> 7/30/2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.