Laserfiche WebLink
D^` <br /> tll tiIAMIHLUYLTANO . MICIUfL D. MTLROH, CIL~IR1[A<ON <br /> .1 1, <br /> GOVERNOR Of HAWAII ' ROARD O[ LWD AND MAT UAAL RI54LnC6 <br /> DEFUriLs <br /> OILS (RT COIOMA-AGARAM <br /> .r <br /> AOUACULTURE D[VRORM[M <br /> RROGR/J.1 <br /> STATE OF HAWAII AOUATC R[SOURCES <br /> CONSERVATION AHD <br /> DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES R[SOURC ES CNf ORC[MEIET <br /> <br /> ' CONV[YANCES <br /> STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION FORESTRY AHD N1LDLIFT <br /> 3J SOUTH KING 91REET, 6TH FLOOR HISTORIC PRESLflvAn ON <br /> HONOLULU, HAWAII 9681] DIN40N <br /> IANp DIVI4DN <br /> 6TATE PARRS <br /> April 1, 1998 WATEA NID WID DEVFIOPMENT <br /> Mr. Kimo Steinwascher LOG NO: 21134 <br /> Pacific Land Services, Inc. DOC NO: 9803PM02 <br /> 810 Richaz-ds Stteet. Suite 900 <br /> Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 <br /> Dear'\Qr-. Steinwascher: <br /> SUBJECT: Archaeological Inventory Survey of Four Parcels in the <br /> Kaloko Mauka Subdivision, Hao Street Hui Proposed <br /> Subdivision of Lot 4 <br /> Kaloko, North Kona, Hawaii Island <br /> TMK: 7-3-025:004 <br /> This is in reply to your letter of February 23- 1998 to Ross Cordy, .Archaeology Branch <br /> Chief. The letter dated August 7, 1997 from your consultant, Aki Sinoto Consulting, <br /> indicates that an archaeological inventory survey of the subject property was undertaken <br /> and that an archaeological inventory survey report is currently in preparation. <br /> Because no historic sites were found in the survey, we can conclude a review of the <br /> planned development, with the understanding that an acceptable inventory survey report <br /> will be submitted to our office. We believe that the project will have "no effect" on <br /> historic sites- as no sites were found. <br /> .As a note, to complete the survey report, Air. Sinoto needs to add some additional <br /> information beyond what is in this interim letter. The letter should note the elevation of <br /> the project area and indicate the acreage that was surveyed. A map showing the <br /> boundaries of the surveyed area should, of course, also be included. The report should <br /> also contain a brief description of the vegetation (a list of the dominant species), a list of <br /> other archaeological surveys in the general area and a brief description of the kinds of <br /> historic sites and settlement that might have been expected to occur in this area, a <br /> description of field methods (similar to the letter) with a location of the ttansects, and <br /> <br />