My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RES 156 Draft 01 2012-2014
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Resolutions
>
2012-2014
>
RES 156 Draft 01 2012-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2013 10:28:00 AM
Creation date
8/1/2013 10:46:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
RES
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2012-2014
Bill/Resolution
156
Draft
01
Introducer
Margaret Wille, Council Member
Referred To
COUNCIL
Action 1
Council: Adopts Res. 156-13 - 08/21/13
Status
Adopted
Date To Mayor or Adoption Date
8/21/2013
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
8/21/2013
Ayes
9-Eoff;Ford;Ilagan;Kanuha;Kern;Onishi;Poindexter;Wille;Yoshimoto
Noes
0
Absent
0
Excused
0
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2013/08/21 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Council
COM 0367.000 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2012-2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit A •B • INO. <br /> A BILL FOR AN ACT <br /> RELATING TO THE COUNTY AUTHORITY CONCERNING AGRICULTURE <br /> BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII: <br /> 1 SECTION 1 . The primary objective of the Hawaii Right To Farm <br /> 2 Act was to protect agricultural land and promote the use of <br /> 3 agriculturally suitable lands for agriculture, as well as to <br /> 4 prevent conflicts arising due to encroaching development . On <br /> 5 the other hand each County has an interest in preventing the <br /> 6 establishment of agricultural technologies that are adverse to <br /> 7 what are generally accepted agricultural practices within that <br /> 8 county. In particular this amendment makes clear that each <br /> 9 County, through its elected county council, has the right to <br /> 10 regulate the cultivation of genetically modified crops . <br /> 11 <br /> 12 The Counties are aware that, in light of the danger of cross <br /> 13 pollination, such that the cultivation of genetically modified <br /> 14 crops in one location can undermine the cultivation of <br /> 15 neighboring non-GMO crops . In light of the substantial <br /> 16 controversy surrounding the cultivation of GMO crops and the <br /> 17 differential in the likelihood of cross pollination depending <br /> 18 upon the type of crop being cultivated, County level oversight <br /> 19 concerning the cultivation of GMO crops is appropriate . <br /> 20 <br /> 21 The Counties are also aware that in 2013 the biotech <br /> 22 companies lead an effort to gut the jurisdiction of the <br /> 23 counties, such that they would not longer have any authority <br /> 24 over matters concerning the health and wellbeing of their <br /> 25 residents . See for example 2013 Senate Bill 727 . In addition <br /> 26 Biotech companies advocated to further erode the ability of <br /> 27 either the state or the counties to regulate the cultivation of <br /> 28 genetically modified crops . See for example 2013 Senate Bill <br /> 29 590 . The Counties abhor these efforts to undermine local <br /> 30 government and prevent meaningful public input on the local <br /> 31 level . <br /> 32 <br /> 33 SECTION 2 . Section 165-1, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is <br /> 34 amended to read as follows : <br /> 35 Findings and purpose. The legislature finds that when <br /> 36 nonagricultural land uses extend into agricultural areas, <br /> 37 farming operations often become the subject of nuisance lawsuits <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.