Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
COM 0409.000 2012-2014
.'0Y OF h.., -..c•1'�� +•• Walter K.M.Lau We Managing Director William P.Kenoi • •: ' 1 PC '• ' Mayor ''.-_ -. ' ' , : —.,: _ Randall M.Kurohara ;Iii t44- . Deputy Managing Director T�os•„'.M - County of Hawai`i Office of the Mayor 25 Aupuni Street,Suite 2603 • Hilo,Hawaii 96720 • (808)961-8211 • Fax(808)961-6553 KONA: 74-5044 Me Keohokalole Hwy.,Bldg.C • Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 August 21,2013 (808)323-4444 • Fax(808)323-4440 J Yoshimoto, Council Chair (-) and Members of the County Council `"`' 7)c7 County of Hawai`i µ5 .:,,t 7 25 Aupuni Street t•.,) -4 Hilo,HI 96720 o. --` a Dear Chairman Yoshimoto and Members: �„Pi N T /State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application(SLU 12-000033) co = Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application(REZ 12-000155) Request: A-1a to CV-10 Applicant: B. T. Kuwahara, LLC Tax Map Key: 1-5-007:006, 069,070 Change of Zone(REZ 1018,Docket No. 03-000004) Applicant: Vince M.Kimura Request: Five-Year Time Extension to Comply With Condition C(Complete Construction)of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 03-109 Tax Map Key: 2-2-050:037, 038 Planning Director Initiated Change of Zone Application(REZ 13-000166) Request: A-la and RS-10 to UNV and Deletion of Proposed 80-Foot Right of Way Connecting Komohana Street and Kumukoa Street TMK: 2-4-001:005,portion 007,041, 162, 163, 167 and 2-4-056:017 As required by Chapter 7, Sec. 6-7.5 (a), Hawai`i County Charter,transmitted herewith for the County Council's consideration and action are the Windward Planning Commission's letters and enclosures regarding the above-referenced requests. Sincerely, Z -;7;:), V J • William P. Kenoi Mayor Enclosures Comm. No. //CI l cc: Planning Department 1 +�y^ Ref.To:__, 2� cl31 Its l 19 4- ,(n County ofHawai iisanEqua lOpportunityProviderandEmploye} Ref. Dote A�f7G 8 201 .,---?!‘t .il,".% County of Hawaii WINDWARD PLANNING COMMISSION Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 • Hilo,Hawai`i 96720 Phone(808)961-8288 • Fax(808)961-8742 ALT 2J. 2D3 The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Chairman Yoshimoto and Council Members: State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application(SLU 12-000033) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application(REZ 12-000155) Request: A-la to CV-10 Applicant: B. T. Kuwahara, LLC Tax Map Key: 1-5-007:006, 069, 070 The Windward Planning Commission, after a duly held public hearing on August 1, 2013, voted to recommend for your approval the proposed legislative bills to change the State Land Use district from Agricultural to Urban and a Change of Zone from Agricultural— 1 acre(A-la)to Village Commercial— 10,000 square feet (CV-10) for approximately 9.93 acres of land. The property is the location of Bryson's Cinders and is located west of Pahoa Village Road,just south of the Pahoa Village Road—Kahakai Boulevard intersection, Pahoa, Puna, Hawai`i. The Commission concurs with the following findings as recommended by the Planning Director: State Land Use Boundary Amendment The applicant is requesting to reclassify 9.93 acres of land identified as TMK Nos.: (3) 1-5-007:006, 069, 070 from the State Land Use Agricultural District to the Urban District in order to change the zoning of the property from Agricultural (A-1 a) to Village Commercial (CV-10) to allow the development of an approximately 104,326- square foot commercial center. Hawai`i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 2 The commission shall not approve an amendment of a land use district boundary unless the commission finds upon the clear preponderance of the evidence that the proposed boundary amendment is reasonable, not violative of section 205-2, Hawai`i Revised Statutes, and consistent with the policies and criteria established pursuant to sections 205-16, 205-17, and 205A-2, HRS. In its review of any application for reclassification of district boundaries pursuant to this chapter, the Planning Commission shall specifically consider the following decision-making criteria: 1) The extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the Hawaii State Plan and relates to the applicable priority guidelines of the Hawaii State Plan and the adopted functional plans; 2) The extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable district standards; 3) The impact of the proposed reclassification on the following areas of state concern: a) Preservation or maintenance of important natural systems or habitats; b) Maintenance of valued cultural, historical, or natural resources; c) Maintenance of other natural resources relevant to Hawai`i's economy including,but not limited to agricultural resources; d) Commitment of state funds and resources; e) Provision for employment opportunities and economic development; and 0 Provision for housing opportunities for all income groups, particularly the low, low-moderate, and gap groups; 4) In establishing the boundaries of the districts in each county, the commission shall give consideration to the general plan of the county in which the land is located; 5) The representations and commitments made by the petitioner in securing a boundary change, including a finding that the petitioner has the necessary economic ability to carry out the representations and commitments relating to the proposed use or development; and 6) Lands in intensive agricultural use for two years prior to date of filing of a petition or lands with a high capacity for intensive agricultural use shall not be taken out of the agricultural district unless the commission finds either that the action: a) Will not substantially impair actual or potential agricultural production in the vicinity of the subject property or in the county or State; or b) Is reasonably necessary for urban growth. • The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 3 With regard to criteria number 2, in determining the boundaries for the Urban District, the following standards shall be used: 1) It shall include lands characterized by"city-like" concentrations of people, structures, streets, urban level of services and other related land uses; 2) It shall take into consideration the following specific factors: a) Proximity to centers of trading and employment except where the development would generate new centers of trading and employment; b) Availability of basic services such as schools, parks, wastewater systems, solid waste disposal, drainage, water, transportation systems, public utilities, and police and fire protection; and c) Sufficient reserve areas for foreseeable urban growth; 3) It shall include lands with satisfactory topography, drainage, and reasonably free from the danger of any flood, tsunami, unstable soil condition, and other adverse environmental effects; 4) Land contiguous with existing urban areas shall be given more consideration than non-contiguous land, and particularly when indicated for future urban use on state or county general plans; 5) It shall include lands in appropriate locations for new urban concentrations and shall give consideration to areas of urban growth as shown on the state and county general plans; 6) It may include lands which do not conform to the standards in paragraphs (1) to (5): a) When surrounded by or adjacent to existing urban development; and b) Only when those lands represent a minor portion of this district; 7) It shall not include lands, the urbanization of which will contribute toward scattered spot urban development, necessitating unreasonable investment in public infrastructure or support services; and 8) It may include lands with a general slope of twenty per cent or more if the commission finds that those lands are desirable and suitable for urban purposes and that the design and construction controls, as adopted by any federal, state, or county agency, are adequate to protect the public health, welfare and safety, and the public's interests in the aesthetic quality of the landscape. The approval of the reclassification from the State Land Use Agricultural to the Urban District for approximately 9.93 acres will not be in violation of Section 205-2, Chapter 205, Hawaii Revised Statutes,nor will it be inconsistent with the Land Use Commission Rules, the County General Plan and the Hawaii State Plan. The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 4 The Hawai`i State Plan, County General Plan and Puna Community Development Plan (CDP) all encourage new urban growth to occur near existing urban areas where adequate public facilities are already available or can be provided with reasonable public or private expenditures, and away from areas where beneficial resources are present such as important agricultural land, natural, historic or cultural resources. These plans also suggest that communities should be planned to ensure that adequate support services and facilities are provided to accommodate population growth. The subject property is located in Pahoa,the largest town in the lower Puna district, near existing urban areas that are zoned commercial and industrial, which include Woodland Center, Pahoa Marketplace, and Pahoa Auto Parts. Other urban uses such as a church, self-storage facility and feed and fertilizer store have also been established nearby with special permits. As urban uses already exist in the immediate area, the urbanization of the project site will not contribute towards scattered urban development. Nearby public facilities include a fire station, police station, post office,regional park, and medical clinics. Water, electricity and commercial-standard transportation facilities are available or can be made available with reasonable public and private expenditures. Although Pahoa does not currently have a public sewer system or municipal solid waste collection, wastewater and solid waste generated by development of the land with urban land uses can be disposed of in compliance with Federal, State and County regulations. The Puna district is one of the fastest growing districts in the State; however, the development of urban lands with commercial and light-industrial businesses to provide goods and services to the population has not kept pace with growth. The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide(LUPAG) Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals, policies, standards and courses of action. It is also a graphic depiction of the physical relationship between the various land uses and establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the County. The General Plan's LUPAG Map for Pahoa Village was recently amended to encourage rezoning of lands to urban zoning districts in order to provide these necessary goods and services. One of the primary reasons for the LUPAG Map amendment was to support the policies contained in the Puna CDP to develop Pahoa as a regional town center for the lower Puna district by increasing the designated urban density within the town center and directing commercial and industrial uses away from the Pahoa Bypass Road. With this amendment, the LUPAG map designation for the subject property was changed from Low Density Urban, which includes single-family residential and neighborhood commercial uses, to Medium Density Urban which allows for higher density urban uses such as village shopping centers and multiple-family residential. The reclassification action would be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Hawai`i State Plan, County General Plan and Puna Community Development Plan by providing future employment opportunities and improved living standards and stimulating the development and expansion of economic activities in the lower Puna district. The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 5 Since the subject property is located over five miles from the shoreline its development with urban land uses is not expected to have a significant adverse impact on coastal resources. The property is the site of a former base yard for a cinder quarry operation. Thus, there are no unique natural, cultural or historic resources on the property that require preservation or protection. The property is Unclassified on the State of Hawai`i ALISH Map and the Land Use Study Bureau's Overall Master Productivity Rating for the property's pahoehoe lava soils is "E" or "Very Poor". Additionally, the property is not considered important agricultural land and has not been used for sustained commercial agriculture in the recent past. The Hawai`i Right to Farm Act, HRS chapter 165, was enacted to protect farming operations on land in the State Land Use Agricultural District when adjacent land is reclassified out of the Agricultural District. A condition of approval will require the applicant notify prospective purchasers, tenants or lessees of the Hawai`i Right to Farm Act. Therefore, the reclassification of this 9.93-acre area from the Agricultural to the Urban designation will not be detrimental to the reduction of this area from the agricultural land inventory in the County of Hawai`i. Furthermore, an Urban classification would complement the existing and future land use pattern of the surrounding area in view of the urban uses already in existence in close proximity to the property. Based on the above, the approval of the State Land Use Boundary Amendment from the Agricultural to the Urban District complements the State Land Use District Regulations and County General Plan and is supportive of the Hawaii State Plan. Change of Zone The applicant is requesting a Change of Zone from Agricultural - 1 acre(A-1 a)to Village Commercial - 10,000 square feet(CV-10) for approximately 9.93 acres of land comprising three properties in order to develop a commercial center consisting of approximately 104,326 square feet of leasable space. The proposed development is likely to include a supermarket(40,000 square feet), garden center(10,000 sq ft), family medical clinic(11,250 sq ft), quality restaurant(5,000 sq ft),high-turnover restaurant (2,000 sq ft), medical/dental clinic (5,040 sq ft), specialty retail stores (18,000 sq ft), paint and hardware store(10,000 sq ft), a full service restaurant (3,036 sq ft) and an outdoor stage performance area. The commercial center will be developed on three contiguous parcels fronting Pahoa Village Road. The applicant is proposing four entrances/exits to the property; two from Pahoa Village Road and two from Kahakai Blvd, which will be extended in a westerly direction over the adjacent road reserve lot (TMK 1-5-007:055) that is currently owned by the State. Total project construction costs are estimated at $20 The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 6 million. Construction would commence upon completion of permitting and design and is estimated to be completed as soon as 2015. According to the Zoning Code, the purpose of the Village Commercial district is to provide a broad range or variety of commercial and light industrial uses that are necessary to serve the population in rural areas where the supplementary support of the general business uses and activities of a central commercial district is not readily available. The subject property is located in Pahoa town, which is the largest town in the area providing goods and services to the population in rural areas of lower Puna. The Change of Zone Application from an Agricultural (A-la) to Village Commercial(CV-10) zoned district will conform to the following goals,policies and standards of the General Plan. The General Plan is intended to be used as a policy guide for the coordinated growth and development of all sectors of the County. It sets forth goals, policies, standards and courses of action to accommodate growth without congestion, to designate and preserve the lands needed for residential use, commercial and visitor services, industry, agriculture and open space, and to coordinate these uses with the County's service and circulation systems. The overall goals, policies and standards are set forth to physically plan the lands in the County in the best interest of the island's residents. These state the following: LAND USE—GENERAL • Zoning requests shall be reviewed with respect to General Plan designation, district goals,regional plans, State Land Use District, compatibility with adjacent zoned uses, availability of public services and utilities, access, and public need. LAND USE—COMMERCIAL- PUNA DISTRICT • Centralization of commercial activities in Pahoa Town, rather than along the Pahoa By-Pass, to serve the residents of Lower Puna shall be encouraged. According to 2010 U.S. Census data, after the South Hilo District 50,927 residents, the Puna District contains the second highest population in the County with 45,326 residents. Additionally the population of the district has experienced significant growth over the last 30 years (76.8% from 1980-1990, 50.8% from 1990-2000, 44.8% from 2000-2010) and will continue to rapidly grow due to the affordability of property in Puna. Comparatively, the population of the South Hilo district increased only 7.5% from 2000 to 2010 and is projected to be lower than the population of the Puna district by 2015. However,job growth and the provision of goods and services such as grocery stores and medical clinics have not kept pace with the population growth. Clearly there is The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 7 a great public need for additional commercially-zoned lands in the Puna district, particularly in Kea'au and Pahoa which have been identified in the Puna Community Development Plan as regional town centers for the district. The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) is a graphic representation of the General Plan's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. The General Plan's LUPAG Map for Pahoa Village was recently amended to encourage rezoning of lands to urban zoning districts in order to provide these necessary goods and services. One of the primary reasons for the LUPAG Map amendment was to support the policies contained in the Puna CDP to develop Pahoa as a regional town center for the lower Puna district by increasing the designated urban density within the town center and directing commercial and industrial uses away from the Pahoa Bypass Road. With this amendment, the LUPAG map designation for the subject property was changed from Low Density Urban, which includes single-family residential and neighborhood commercial uses, to Medium Density Urban which allows for higher density urban uses such as village shopping centers and multiple-family residential. Thus, approval of the CV zoning request would allow for uses that are consistent with the Medium Density form depicted on the LUPAG Map. The property has been used as a base yard for Bryson's Cinders, which provides soil, cinder and rock mixtures for construction, agricultural and landscaping projects since the early 1980's. Immediately surrounding lands are zoned commercial and agricultural. North of the property is a 9.5-acre lot zoned A-la that is developed with a dwelling. Further to the north is the Pahoa Marketplace shopping center on property zoned MCX-20. Other nearby commercial uses include Woodland Center located to the northeast and Pahoa Auto Parts located to the east across Pahoa Village Road, both on properties zoned CN-20. Properties to the southeast and south are zoned A-la and include two dwellings and a church and self-storage facility which were established through special permits. West of the subject property is an approximately 5,000- acre State-owned property zoned A-20a. The establishment of CV zoning on the subject property would be consistent with the existing land use pattern established within this portion of Pahoa. The applicant will comply with the requirements of the Zoning Code for the CV zoning district which would include but not be limited to building height restrictions, property setbacks, landscaping, onsite parking. Therefore, the request to change the zoning to CV-10 is consistent with the General Plan and Puna Community Development Plan. All utilities and services are available to the site. Access to the property is currently from Pahoa Village Road; however, the applicant is proposing to extend Kahakai Blvd in a westerly direction in order to provide two accesses to the property from Pahoa Village Road and two accesses to the property from the Kahakai Blvd Extension. Pahoa Village Road is a two-lane County roadway within a 50-foot wide right-of-way The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 8 fronting the property. The General Plan identifies Pahoa Village Road as a collector street which requires a minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet. Thus, 5 feet of additional right-of-way is required from the subject property for future road widening. The Kahakai Blvd Extension will be constructed over a 50-foot wide State-owned road reserve lot. This extension will be constructed to meet commercial roadway standards which require a 60-foot right-of-way width. Therefore, 5 feet of additional right-of-way will also be required from the subject property fronting the Kahakai Blvd Extension. Curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements will also be required along the property frontage of both roadways in order to meet commercial roadway standards established in the General Plan. The County will accept dedication of the Kahakai Blvd extension upon completion of improvements to County dedicable standards, and prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed development. The applicant proposes to establish an approximately 104,326-square foot commercial center on the subject property. To determine the proposed project's traffic impacts on nearby transportation facilities, a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) and Signal Warrant Study was prepared in June 2013 by Witcher Engineering LLP. The TIAR was completed in compliance with Chapter 25, Section 25-2-46 (Concurrency Requirements) of the Hawai`i County Code, which indicates that mitigation is required "if the level-of-service(LOS) for any transportation facility in the project area is a) currently worse than the acceptable LOS, or b) projected to become worse than the acceptable LOS during the 5 year period of the TIAR, any rezoning of the property, if approved, shall contain conditions that require mitigation of adverse traffic effects before occupancy of the project is permitted, or that occupancy be delayed until the LOS has reached the acceptable level and is no longer projected to be worse than the acceptable level." The TIAR determined that the Pahoa Bypass (Highway 130)/Pahoa Village Road intersection requires mitigation because during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour periods the northbound left-turn movement currently operates at LOS "F", which is the worse level- of-service and represents extreme traffic delay. To mitigate this existing LOS "F" condition, the State is planning to install a roundabout. This project is included in the Department of Transportation's Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP) Revision#13 dated April 17, 2013, which indicates that construction is estimated to occur during fiscal year 2013. Concurrency Requirements indicate"Mitigation requirements will be deemed satisfied when a public agency has committed funds for area mitigation that will remove the LOS deficiency. In the case of the State, commitment of funds means that the governor has released funds to complete the improvement." Thus, mitigation requirements will have been met for this intersection, and the proposed development can receive a Certificate of Occupancy from the County, once the governor releases funding for the State's roundabout project. The TIAR also determined that the Kahakai Blvd/Pahoa Village Road intersection requires mitigation because during the p.m. peak hour period both the eastbound and westbound left-turn movements will The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 9 operate at LOS "F" five years from project build out. To mitigate this impact, the TIAR and Signal Warrant Study recommend, and the applicant proposes to install a traffic signal at the intersection and provide dedicated left-turn lanes at all four legs of the intersection. All other study intersections will operate at acceptable levels-of-service. The applicant also proposes to install four crosswalks at the Kahakai Blvd/Pahoa Village Road intersection and install a bus stop shelter and sidewalk on the west side of Pahoa Village Road fronting the property in order to improve pedestrian circulation between the shopping centers in the area. In memos dated August 6, 2012 and June 3, 2013, the Department of Public Works concurred with the transportation system improvements proposed in the TIAR. It is unlikely that the State DOT roundabout project and the applicant's project will be constructed at the same time; however, should timing of these projects overlap, the applicant has committed to working with DOT to minimize any adverse traffic impacts on area roadways. Since it is likely that traffic between lower Puna and Hilo will be re-routed along Kahakai Blvd and Pahoa Village Road during the State's roundabout project, the applicant has agreed do the following, as needed, to reduce traffic impacts: delay construction of improvements along Pahoa Village Road, expedite the installation of the traffic signal at the Kahakai Blvd/Pahoa Village Road intersection so that it can be utilized during the detour, and re-route applicant's construction traffic. County water is available from existing 6-inch and 12-inch waterlines within Pahoa Village Road fronting the subject property. Current water availability in the area allows 14 units of water per pre-existing lot of record; therefore, DWS has determined that 42 units of water are available to the project site consisting of 3 separate properties. The existing 12-inch waterline fronting the property is adequate to provide 2,000 gallons per minute of flow for fire protection for commercial land uses. There is no County sewer system in Pahoa; therefore, individual wastewater system(s)meeting Department of Health requirements will need to be installed for any future development. There are no municipal waste collection services in the County. All solid waste generated by the development will require private disposal at the Pahoa Transfer Station or Hilo landfill. The project has no severe geological or topographical problem which cannot be properly rectified or which would render the land unusable. The property is situated in Flood Zone"X", which is an area determined by FEMA to be outside of the 500-year flood plain. Electric and telephone services are available to the property. Police, fire and medical services are available nearby in Pahoa. This favorable recommendation is based on discussions with the applicant and various affected agencies during the review of this application and the preparation and eventual acceptance of the Final Environmental Assessment along with the issuance of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). A number of meetings and discussions were The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 10 held with the Department of Water Supply to ensure adequate water commitments were available to support the project; with the Department of Public Works to address necessary improvements to Pahoa Village Road and the Kahakai Blvd Extension; with the State Department of Transportation to understand the details of the proposed Pahoa Bypass (Highway 130)/Pahoa Village Road intersection and its affect upon regional and local traffic flows in the vicinity of the project site; and with the State Depal linent of Land and Natural Resources regarding the disposition and conveyance of the Kahakai Blvd Extension right-of-way to the County upon its completion to commercial standards. These meetings and discussions were essential to ensuring coordinated development of the commercial project with its support facilities and appropriate mitigating improvements. This favorable recommendation is also made with the understanding that the applicants remain responsible for complying with all other applicable governmental requirements in connection with uses permitted within the Village Commercial zoning district, prior to its commencement or establishment upon the subject property. Additional governmental requirements may include the issuance of building permits, the installation of approved wastewater disposal systems, compliance with the Fire Code, installation of improvements required by the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), among many others. Compliance with all applicable governmental requirements is a condition of this favorable recommendation; failure to comply with such requirements will be considered a violation that may result in enforcement action by the Planning Department and/or the affected agencies. Based on the above findings, approval of the Change of Zone request from Agricultural(A-la) to the Village Commercial (CV-10)zoning district would result in an appropriate land use pattern that will further the public convenience, necessity and general welfare. For your favorable consideration, amendments to the SLU Boundaries Maps and Section 25-8-26 (Pahoa Zone Map)of the Hawai`i County Code are transmitted. The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 11 We are enclosing a copy of the staff background, Planning Director's Recommendations, the Powerpoint presentation, and the hearing transcript for your information. Sincerely, ,�/( /eetC.c/ lit— i Wallace A. Ishibashi, Jr., Chairman Windward Planning Commission Lkuwaharaslurezwpc2 Enclosures cc: Mr. Jon E. McElvaney B. T. Kuwahara, LLC Department of Water Supply Department of Public Works DOT-Highways,Honolulu State Land Use Commission William Brilhante, Esq. BKuwaharaREZ.doc-7/25/13 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT B.T.KUWAHARA,LLC STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (SLU 12-33) CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION(REZ 12-155) B.T. KUWAHARA LLC has submitted applications for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban and a Change of Zone from Agricultural— 1 acre(A-1 a) to Village Commercial - 10,000 square feet(CV-10) for approximately 9.93 acres of land. The property is the location of Bryson's Cinders and is located west of Pahoa Village Road,just south of the Frahm Village Road-Kahakai Blvd intersection, Pahoa, Puna, Hawai`i,TMK Nos.: 1-5- 007:006, 069, 070. PROPOSED ACTION 1. Request: State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban and a ( Change of Zone from Agricultural- 1 acre(A-1 a)to Village Commercial - 10,000 square feet(CV-10) for approximately 9.93 acres of land comprising three properties. According to the Zoning Code,the purpose of the Village Commercial district is to provide a broad range or variety of commercial and light industrial uses that are necessary to serve the population in rural areas where the supplementary support of the general business uses and activities of a central commercial district is not readily available. Requirements for establishing a land use in the CV district, including a list of the variety of permitted land uses, are shown in Section 25-5-120 to 128 of the Zoning Code. (P.D. Exhibit 1 —Zoning Code Requirements for Village Commercial District) 2. Reason for Request: The applicant is requesting the State Land Use Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone to develop a commercial center consisting of approximately 104,326 square feet of leasable space, which is likely to include a supermarket(40,000 square feet), garden center(10,000 sq ft), family medical clinic (11,250 sq ft), quality restaurant(5,000 sq ft),high-turnover restaurant(2,000 sq ft), -1- Attachment to: Comm. 409 Bill 119 and Bill 120 medical/dental clinic(5,040 sq ft), specialty retail stores(18,000 sq ft),paint and hardware store(10,000 sq ft), a full service restaurant(3,036 sq ft) and an outdoor stage performance area. The commercial center will be developed on three contiguous parcels fronting Pahoa Village Road. To provide primary access to the development,the applicant will extend Kahakai Blvd in an easterly direction over the road reserve lot (TMK 1-5-007:055)that is currently owned by the State. Total project construction costs are estimated at$20 million. Construction would commence upon completion of permitting and design and is estimated to be completed as soon as 2015. (P.D.Exhibit 2 -Letter from applicant dated July 14,2013 requesting the FEA/FONSI be used as the County Environmental Report) (P.D. Exhibit 3 - State Land Use Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone Application including FEA/FONSI) 3. Landowners: B T Kuwahara LLC. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 4. Environmental Review: Compliance with Chapter 343, Hawai`i Revised Statutes regarding Environmental Impact Statements is required because the applicant proposes to extend Kahakai Blvd by improving TMK: 1-5-007:055, which is a 50-foot wide State- owned road lot. To comply with this requirement, a Final Environmental Assessment (FEA)and Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI) declaration(included in P.D. Exhibit 3)was made by the Planning Department on July 10,2013. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 5. State Land Use District: Agricultural. 6. General Plan LUPAG Map Designation: Medium Density Urban. This designation allows for village and neighborhood commercial and single family and multiple family residential and related functions(multiple family residential up to 35 units per acre). 7. County Zoning: Agricultural - 1 acre(A-1 a). 8. Puna Community Development Plan (PCDP): The PCDP identifies village centers that are intended to contain a mix of land uses to provide goods and services to the surrounding agricultural and rural communities. Pahoa is identified as one of the regional town centers for the district. The PCDP divides the Pahoa Regional Town Center into -2- two areas. The northern area,which straddles Highway 130 near the Pahoa Village Road intersection, is intended for regional uses and services. The southern area,which straddles Pahoa Village Road between Apaca Road and the Highway 130/Kapoho Road intersection, is intended to contain uses that are oriented primarily to residents of the Pahoa community itself. The subject property is located outside of and adjacent to the northern area of the Pdhoa Regional Town Center. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA 9. Subject Property: The subject property consists of three parcels that are approximately 3.3 acres in size and rectangular in shape. The east side of the property fronts Pahoa Village Road for about 600 feet and the north side of the property fronts the Kahakai Blvd Extension road reserve for approximately 829 feet. A 16-foot wide road easement, located along the south property boundary, provides access to TMK: 1-5-007:051 from Pahoa Village Road. Structures on the property include: • Parcel 6: A 3-bedroom, 2 bath dwelling built in 1975 with Building Permit No. 58990. The applicant is proposing to demolish this dwelling. • Parcel 69: A telecommunication tower permitted by Special Permit No. 1081 and Building Permit Nos. B2007-2582H and 020690. These permits have not been finalized. • Parcel 69: A 3-bedroom,3-bath dwelling built in 1985 with Building Permit No. 831279. This permit was finalized. The applicant proposes to convert this structure into a restaurant. • Parcel 69: A 5,000-square foot warehouse built in 1982 with Building Permit No. 801164. This permit was finalized. The warehouse has been used for the applicant's business, Bryson's Cinders,which provides soil, cinder and rock mixtures for construction, agricultural and landscaping projects. The applicant proposes to demolish the warehouse. Parcel 70 is vacant. The remainder of the property has been grubbed and is devoid of vegetation. -3- 10. Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning: Immediately surrounding lands are zoned commercial and agricultural. A 50-foot wide undeveloped road reserve lot is located immediately north of the subject property. Beyond this property is a 9.5-acre lot zoned A-la that is developed with a dwelling. Further to the north is the Malama Market shopping center on property zoned MCX-20. Other nearby commercial uses include Woodland Center located to the northeast and Pahoa Auto Parts located to the east across Pahoa Village Road,both on-properties zoned CN-20.-Properties to-the-southeast-and-south are-zoned A-1 a and include two dwellings and a church and self storage facility which were established through special permits. West of the subject property is an approximately 5,000- acre State-owned property zoned A-20a. 11. Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawai`i(ALISH): Unclassified. 12. Land Study Bureau's Detailed Land Classification System: "E"or"Very Poor"for agricultural productivity. 13. U.S.D.A. Soil Survey: Lava flows,pahoehoe(rLW). Pahoehoe lava has no soil covering and is typically bare of vegetation except for mosses and lichens. 14. Flood Zone: Zone X, an area determined by FEMA to be outside the 500-year flood plain. 15. Flora/Fauna Resources: A botanical survey,performed by Botanist Layne Yoshida on September 24 and November 14, 2012, found no listed, candidate or endangered animal or plant species on the property except two lo`ulu palms that were planted by the applicant and will be incorporated into the landscaping plan of any development on the property. 16. Archaeological/Cultural/Historical Resources: In a letter dated April 17, 2013 contained in the FEA/FONSI,the State Historic Preservation Division concluded that due to previous grading of the property,no historic properties will be affected by the proposed development of the subject property or construction of the Kahakai Blvd extension. According to the applicant, there is no evidence of any traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the property, nor existence of any known valued cultural,historical or native resources in the area. -4- 17. Public Access: There is no public access to the mountains or the shoreline that traverses the property. 18. Traffic: A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR) and Signal Warrant Study was prepared in June 2013 by Witcher Engineering LLP to determine the impacts of developing a proposed 104,326- square foot commercial center project (included in P.D. Exhibit 3 as Appendix 4). In order to mitigate impacts identified in the TIAR,the applicant is proposing to install the following transportation improvements: • Extend Kahakai Blvd approximately 829 feet to the west from its intersection with Pahoa Village Road and improve to County dedicable commercial standards. • Signalize the Kahakai Blvd/Pahoa Village Road intersection, install four crosswalks, and install turning lane improvements,which will include but not be limited to, dedicated left-turn lanes for all movements and a dedicated right-turn lane for the southbound movement onto Kahakai Blvd. • Widen Pahoa Village Road pavement fronting the property and install turn lanes, curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements. • Install a bus stop of the west side of Pahoa Village Road fronting the property. Other regional transportation improvements that were assumed in the TIAR include the installation of a roundabout at the Pahoa Village Road/Pahoa Bypass intersection by the State. This project is included in the Department of Transportation's Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP)Revision#13 dated April 17,2013 (P.D. Exhibit 4), which indicates that construction is estimated to occur during fiscal year 2013. UTILITIES AND SERVICES 19. Access: The applicant is proposing four entrances/exits to the property; two from Pahoa Village Road and two from the Kahakai Blvd extension. Pahoa Village Road is a two- lane County roadway within a 50-foot wide right-of-way fronting the property. The General Plan identifies Pahoa Village Road as a collector street which requires a minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet. Thus, 5 feet of additional right-of-way is required from the subject property for future road widening. Primary access to the -5- property will be provided via the extension of Kahakai Blvd over the 50-foot wide State- owned road reserve lot. This extension will be constructed to meet commercial roadway standards which require a 60-foot right-of-way width. Therefore, 5 feet of additional right-of-way will also be required from the subject property fronting the Kahakai Blvd extension. Curb,gutter and sidewalk improvements will also be required along the property frontage of both roadways in order to meet commercial roadway standards established in the General Plan. The County will aecept dedieation of the Kahakai Blvd - extension upon completion of improvements to County dedicable standards. 20. Water: County water is available from existing 6-inch and 12-inch waterlines within Pahoa Village Road fronting the subject property. Parcels 6 and 69 are both currently served by 5/8-inch water meters that are each limited to a maximum daily usage of 600 gallons. Current water availability in the area allows 14 units of water per pre-existing lot of record; therefore, DWS has determined that 42 units of water are available to the project site consisting of 3 separate properties. The existing 12-inch waterline fronting the property is adequate to provide 2,000 gallons per minute of flow for fire protection for commercial land uses. 21. Wastewater: There is no County sewer system in Pahoa;therefore, individual wastewater system(s)meeting Department of Health requirements will need to be installed for any future development. 22. Solid Waste: There are no municipal waste collection services in the County. All solid waste generated by the development will require private disposal at the Pahoa Transfer Station or Hilo landfill. 23. Utilities and Services: Electric and telephone services are available to the property. Police and fire services are available nearby in Pahoa. Emergency medical services are available in Hilo. AGENCY AND ORGANIZATION COMMENTS 24. The State Land Use Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone applications submitted in June 2012 were transmitted to the following agencies and organizations for review and comment: Department of Public Works, Department of Water Supply,Police -6- Department, Fire Department, Department of Environmental Management, Office of Housing and Community Development, Civil Defense Agency, Real.Property Tax Office, State Department of Transportation, State Department of Health, DLNR- Land Division, State Land Use Commission, State Office of Planning, State Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service,US Fish and Wildlife Service, HELCO, and Mainstreet Pahoa Association. These agencies and organizations-were provided another opportunity to review and submit comments on the proposed commercial center project when the Draft Environmental Assessment was released for public review in February 2013. In an effort to reduce duplicative comments,please refer to Appendix la and lb of the Final Environmental Assessment in P.D. Exhibit 3, for the most current agency and organization comments and concerns. The following comments are those that were received from agencies and organizations that either did not comment on the FEA, or have additional relevant information that was not provided in the FEA: • Department of Public Works: P.D. Exhibit 5—June 3,2013 memo • Department of Water Supply: P.D.Exhibits 6 and 7-September 12,2012 and August 20,2012 memos • Fire Department: P.D. Exhibit 8-July 11,2012 memo • Office of Housing and Community Development: P.D.Exhibit 9 -July 17, 2012 memo • State Department of Health: P.D.Exhibit 10-July 12,2012 memo • State Office of Planning: P.D.Exhibit 11 - September 4,2012 letter • Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee: P.D.Exhibit 12- November 13,2012 memo PUBLIC COMMENTS 25. None at the time of this writing. -7- § 25-5-120 HAWAII COUNTY CODE Division 12.CV,Village Commercial Districts. Section 25-5-120.Purpose and applicability. The CV(village commercial)district provides for a broad range or variety of commercial and light industrial uses that are necessary to serve the population in rural areas where the supplementary support of the general business uses and activities of a central commercial district is riot readily available. (1996, Ord. No. 96-160, sec.2;ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-121.Designation of CV districts. Each CV(village commercial) district shall be designated by the symbol"CV"followed by a number which indicates the minimum land area,in number of thousands of square feet,required for each building site. (1996, Ord.No. 96-160, sec.2;ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-122.Permitted uses. (a) The following uses shall be permitted in the CV district: (1) Adult day care homes. (2) Amusement and recreation facilities,indoor. (3) Art galleries,museums. (4) Automobile sales and rentals. (5) Automobile service stations. tt (6) Bars. (7) Bed and breakfast establishments,as permitted under section 25-4-7. (8) Boarding facilities,rooming, or lodging houses,provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (9) Business services. (10) Cemeteries and mausoleums, as permitted under chapter 6,article 1 of this Code. (11) Churches,temples and synagogues. (12) Commercial parking lots and garages. (13) Community buildings, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (14) Convenience stores. (15) Crematoriums, funeral homes, funeral services,and mortuaries. (16) Crop production. (17) Day care centers. (18) Dwellings,double-family or duplex,provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (19) Dwellings,multiple-family,provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (20) Dwellings, single-family. (21) Family child care homes. (22) Farmers markets. When the vending activity in a farmers market involves more than just the sale of local fresh and/or raw produce,plant life, fish and local homegrown and homemade products for more than two days a week,the director,at the time of plan approval, shall restrict the hours of use,maintenance and operations and may require improvements as determined appropriate to ensure its compatibility with the existing character of the surrounding area. (23) Financial institutions. (24) Group living facilities. (25) Home occupations,as permitted under section 25-4-13. Planning Dept. Exhibit § 25-5-122 HAWAI`I COUNTY CODE (26) Hospitals, sanitariums, old age,convalescent,nursing and rest homes and other similar uses. (27) Hotels,when the design and use conform to the character of the area,as approved by the director. (28) Laboratories,medical and research. (29) Lodges. (30) Manufacturing,processing and packaging light and general,except for concrete or asphalt products, where the products are distributed to retail establishments located in the immediate community, as approved by the director. (31) Medical clinics. (32) Meeting facilities. (33) Model homes, as permitted under section 25-4-8. (34) Neighborhood parks,playgrounds,tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar neighborhood recreational areas and uses. (35) Offices. (36) Personal services. (37) Photography studios. (38) Public uses and structures,as permitted under section 25-4-11. (39) Publishing plants for newspapers,books and magazines,printing shops,cartographing, and duplicating processes such as blueprinting or photostating shops,which are designed to primarily serve the local area. (40) Repair establishments,major,when there are not more than five employees, as approved by the director. (41) Repair establishments,minor. (42) Restaurants. (43) Retail establishments. (44) Schools. (45) Telecommunication antennas, as permitted under section 25-4-12. (46) Temporary real estate offices, as permitted under section 25-4-8. (47) Theaters. (48) Utility substations,as permitted under section 25-4-11. (b) In addition to those uses permitted under subsection(a)above,the following uses may be permitted in the CV district,provided that a use permit is issued for each use: (1) Golf courses and related golf course uses,including golf driving ranges, golf maintenance buildings and golf club houses. (2) Major outdoor amusement and recreation facilities. (3) Yacht harbors and boating facilities. (c) Residential uses in connection with the operation of any permitted uses shall be permitted in the CV district. (d) Buildings and uses similar to the permitted uses listed in subsection(a)above shall be permitted in the CV district,as approved by the director. (e) Buildings and uses normally considered accessory to the uses permitted in this section shall also be permitted in the CV district. (1996, Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2; ratified April 6, 1999;Am 2012, Ord.No. 12-28, sec. 14.) Section 25-5-123.Height limit. The height limit in the CV district shall be thirty feet. (1996, Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) § 25-5-124 HAWAII COUNTY CODE Section 25-5-124.Minimum building site area. The minimum building site area in the CV district shall be seven thousand five hundred square feet. (1996,Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2;ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-125.Minimum building site average width. Each building site in the CV district shall have a minimum building site average width of sixty feet, (1996,Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2;ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-126.Minimum yards. The minimum yards in the CV district shall be as follows: (1) Front or rear yards, fifteen feet; and (2) Side yards,none, except where the adjoining building site is in an RS,RD,RM or RCX district. Where the side yard adjoins the side yard of a building site in an RS,RD,RM or RCX district, there shall be a side yard which conforms to the side yard requirements for dwelling use of the adjoining district. (1996,Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2;ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-127.Landscaping of yards. (a) All front yards in the CV district shall be landscaped,except for necessary access drives and walkways, and except for the construction of one single-family dwelling and accessory buildings per lot. (b) Where any required side or rear yard in the CV district adjoins a building site in an RS,RD,RM or RCX district,the side or rear yard shall be landscaped with a screening hedge not less than forty-two inches in height,within five feet of the property line, except for necessary drives and walkways, and except for the construction of one single-family dwelling and accessory buildings per lot. (1996,Ord.No. 96-160, sec.2;ratified April 6, 1999;Am. 2005, Ord.No.05-155, sec. 14.) Section 25-5-128. Other regulations. (a) Plan approval shall be required for all new structures and additions to existing structures in the CV district,except for construction of one single-family dwelling and any accessory buildings per lot. (b) Exceptions to the regulations for the CV district regarding heights,building site areas,building site average widths and yards,may be approved by the director within a planned unit development. (1996,Ord.No. 96-160, sec.2;ratified April 6, 1999;Am. 2005, Ord.No. 05-155, sec. 15.) DE, r,Tt ENT • grit ul rIROUGcsheMe[10 an in 15 PH 3: 440 REALTY CORPORATION July 14, 2013 Daryn Arai,Manager County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo,HI 96720 State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 12000033) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application(REZ 12000155) Request: A-la to CV-10 Applicant: B.T. Kuwahara, LLC Tax Map Key: (3) 1-5-007: 006, 069, 070& 055 Dear Daryn, Applicant request that County of Hawaii Planning Department continue the processing of the Rezone and State Land Use Boundary Amendment application. As you know the County of Hawaii Planning Department received and accepted the above referenced application on June 25, 2012. On June 28,2012 applicant and County of Hawaii Planning Department agreed that the application would be deferred until and environmental assessment could be completed in compliance with HRS 343. The Environmental Assessment has been completed and finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)determination was made by County of Hawaii Planning Department on July 10,2013 and transmitted to the Office of Environmental Quality Control. Applicant request that the County Environmental Report and outdated site plan that was submitted with the original application be replaced with the Final Environmental Assessment since this document was created through extensive community and public agency input and contains the most currant and accurate project scope, impacts, and mitigation measures. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact me at(808)938-2033. Sincerely, 9, aticav \ / on E. McElvaney f =SCANNED Consultant B.T.Kuwahara, LLC Cc B.T. Kuwahara Planning D Exhibit a P.O. Box 4338 101 Aupuni Street, Suite 1001 Telephone: (808) 935-2995 Hilo, Hawai'i 96720-4338 Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4259 Fax: (808) 935-8269 ) ) B.T,Kuwahara LLC SLUBoundaryAmendment& Change of Zone ) STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (15 ACRES OR LESS) ) COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT PETITIONER: B.T.Kuwahara LLC PETITIONER SIGNATURE: k• \c 1 J-°"`�-- DATE:June 2012 ADDRESS: 15-2714 Pahoa Village Road Pahoa,Hawaii 96778 PETITIONER'S INTREST IF NOT OWNER: Managing Member TELEPHONE:(Bus.) 808-965-8218 (Res.) (Fax.) LANDOWNER(S): Bryson T.Kuwahara, Lorna T.Kuwahara,Royce T.Kuwahara,Kayla K. Kuwahara LANDOWNER SIGNATURE(S):� 1 DATE: June 012 ADDRESS: c/o 15-2714 Pahoa Village Road,Pahoa,HI 96778 TAX MAP KEY: 1-5-007: 006, 069&070 ) STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY 15-2714 Pahoa Village Road ZONING: Ala SIZE OF PROPERTY: 9.93 acres CURRENT STATE LAND USE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION: Agriculture REQUESTED STATE LAND USE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION: Urban AGENT: Jon E.McElvaney RA ADDRESS: 101 Aupuni Street Suite 1001 Hilo,HI 96720 TELEPHONE :(Bus.) (808)935-2995 (Res.) (808)938-2033 (Fax) (808) 935-8269 Please indicate to whom original correspondence and copies should be sent. ORIGINAL: Jon E. McElvaney COPIES: B.T. Kuwahara 4 Planning Dept. Exhibit 3 p a B.T. Kuwahara LLC SLUBoundaryAmendment& Change of Zone a Change of Zone Application Form COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT a APPLICANT: B.T. Kuwahara, LLC APPLICANTS SIGNATURE: DATE:June 2012 ADDRESS: 15-2714 Pahoa Village Rd.,Pahoa,HI 96778 LIST APPLICANT'S INTREST IF NOT OWNER: ) LIST PRINCIPAL(S)INCLUDING NAMES OF MAIN OFFICERS: Bryson Toshiki Kuwahara, ) Managing Member PHONE: (Bus.) 808-965-8218 (Res.) (Fax.) LANDOWNERS: Bryson T.Kuwahara,Loma T.Kuwahara,Royce T. Kuwahara,Kayla K. Kuwahara LANDOWNERS SIGNATURE(S): iiU FI►4ifi_i tom, �► LANDOWNER(S)ADDRESS: do 15-2714 Pahoa Village Road, Pahoa,HI REQUEST: A 1 a CV-10 (Existing zoning) (Proposed zoning) .TAX MAP KEY: 1-5-007: 006, 069&070 ) STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: . 15-2714 Pahoa Village Road SIZE OF PROPERTY OR AFFECTED AREA(S)TO BE REZONED: 9.93 acres AGENT: Jon E. McElvanev ADDRESS: Inoue Hawaii Realty Corporation 101 Aupuni Street, Suite 1001 Hilo,HI 96720 TELEPHONE :(Bus.) (808) 938-2033 (Fax.) (808) 935-8269 Please indicate to whom the original correspondence and copies should be sent. 9 ORIGINAL: Jon E.McElvaney COPIES: Bryson T.Kuwahara 5 B.T.Kuwahara LLC SL U Boundary Amendment& Change of Zone I I B.T. Kuwahara, LLC Members 1. Bryson T. Kuwahara, Managing Member 2. Lorna T. Kuwahara,Member 4. Royce T. Kuwahara,Member 5. Kayla K. Kuwahara, Member 1 p 0 r ► ► ► 1 1 1 P 6 0 p B.T.Kuwahara LLC SLUBoundaryAmendment& Change of Zone APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE DEPARTMENTAL ZONING QUESTIONNAIRE ATTACHMENT Commercial, RM,Resort&Industrial ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT i COUNTY OF HAWAII ® APLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE 1. If your request is approved, do you intend to subdivide the subject the land in accordance with the approved change of zone? ) No If yes,please answer the rest of question 1 and then to question 3. a. How many acres of the requested area do y ou intend to subdivide? b. Into what lot sizes? c. If your request to subdivide,approximately how long after the date of approval do you expect to submit your sub division plans to the Planning Department for preliminary approval? ) If you intend to subdivide,please submit a preliminary schematic subdivision plan together with your charge of zone application form. 2. If you have no firm plans of subdividing the subject area, do you intend to: ) a. Sell or lease the land to someone who has firm plans? No b. Sell or lease the land to someone who has tentative plans? No c. Sell or lease to someone who has no plans? No d. Keep it? Yes 7 ) B.T. Kuwahara LLC SLUBoundaryAmendment& Change of Zone ) ) e. Other(please state) if the application is approved applicant plans to consolidate the three TMKs f. If you intend to do either a,b, or c,please elaborate on the kind of plans the other party has. Please,also,include in your answer approximately how soon after approval of your rezoning do you expect to transfer the subject land to another party? 3. What specific building plans do you have for the subject land?Include your answer the following:type of building(apartment,office, launderette, etc.,);Financing arrangement;timetable for construction; and any other information which you feel might ) help us in evaluating your request. Applicant intends to construct a retail shopping center consisting of approximately 104,250 square feet of Leasable space The proposed new construction includes a Super Market (40 000 ) sf), a Garden Center, (10,000 sf) a family medical clinic, (11,250 sf)a quality Restaurant,(5,000 sf)a high-turnover restaurant,(3,000 sf)a Medical/Dental,(5,000 sf)a Retail, General Merchandise,(15,000 sf)a Paint and Hardware,(10,000 sf)a Specialty Retail, ( 10,000 sf) 4. Have you performed any study which would demonstrate a need for your proposed building and/or development? no If so,please elaborate on your findings in the space provided below. ) 5. Have you performed any study which discusses the environmental impacts your request would have on the surrounding area and/or the County? yes If so,please elaborate on your finding in the space provided below. A Traffic Impact Analysis Report has been completed for the proposed project 6. Are there any buildings on the subject area? y es ) ) If so, what kind? ) The subject area contains three contiguous TMK's of approximately 3.3 acres each as mentioned before. ) TMK 3-1-5-7-6 consist of an approximately 2,088 s.f. 3 bedroom 2 bath residence built in 1975. The driveway to this house is the southeast driveway easement shown on the site plan. 8 ) ) B.T.Kuwahara LLC SLUBoundaryAmendment& Change of Zone This house and the back storage sheds will be removed to allow for the construction of the new shopping center. TMK 3-1-5-7-69 consist of an approximately 3,036 s.f. ranch style 3 bedroom 3 bath residence built in 1985.The driveway to this house is the center driveway shown on the site plan. This house will be remodeled to become a full service restaurant. Also on this TMK is a 4,000 s.f warehouse and office space built in 1980.The warehouse takes access from the center driveway shown on the site plan. This warehouse will be removed to allow for the proposed project. To the back or west property line of TMK 3-1-5-7- 69 there is a cell phone tower constructed in 1995. This structure will not be removed and is identified on the site plan. Is the subject currently being used for any agricultural activity? no If so,please list the kinds of products grown and how many square feet of acres of land per product. ) 8. To your knowledge, has there been any flooding and/or drainage problem on the subject area? no If so,please describe the problem. 9. 'Do you think the roads leading to the subject area need improvement? yes If so,what kind?The applicant at applicants expense will construct the following off-site improvements if the proposed project is approved: 1.)The 600 foot frontage of the proposed project running southeast along Old Pahoa Village Road will be widened. 2.) Kahakai Blvd. will be extended mauka approximately 600 ft. from the Pahoa Village Road/ Kahakai Blvd. intersection to allow for the main entrance to the proposed project. 3.)a four-way traffic signal will be installed at the above referenced intersection the roads will then be adequate for the proposed traffic volume. (See Traffic Impact Analysis Report) Is the road adequate for the proposed traffic volume or load? no 10. What sort of governmental assistance and/or improvements do you feel will be needed in the subject area when developed? NO YES a. Schools x 9 ry� B.T. Kuwahara LLC SL U Boundary Amendment& Change of Zone b. Roads x ) c. Sewer x d. Drainage x e. Police Protection x f. Fire Protection x g. Recreational Facilities x For those checked"yes",please elaborate what`y ,p type or kinds of improvements and/or assistance are needed. All of the off site and on site improvements mentioned above will be provided by the applicant. The Hawaii State Department of Transportation will be constructing a traffic roundabout )( at the Malama Market/Old Pahoa Village Rd. and Old Pahoa Village Rd./Keaau Pahoa Bypass ) Road intersections. ) 11. Have you preformed any historic sites study and/or survey of the subject area?If so,what were ) the results?Please, also submit a copy of the study together with this change of zone ) supplement. No study or survey was conducted.However,the subject property has been developed and used as a base yard for Bryson's Cinders for the last approximately 30 years. ) The Department of Land and natural Resources-Historic Preservation Division has determined ) that the proposed State land use reclassification and associated change of zone will have no ) effect on any historic site or property.Please see Exhibit 9 of the subject applications. ) ) ) Signature: -- - Address: I y y l�u h� . Id -i ) Telephone: 5 `T Date: � \ Y ) 10 r ■ William P.Kenoi ,011•11'. ,,� - Duane Kanuha Mayor " \‘ 114. ... Director . Bobby Command .o : . Deputy Director West Hawai`i Office East Hawaii Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy • • 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 County.of Hawaii. Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)323-4770 Phone(808)961-8288 ' Fax(808)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(808)961-8742 July 10, 2013 Ms. Genevieve Salmonson,Interim Director Office of Environmental Quality Control Department of Health,State of Hawaii 235 S.Beretania Street,Room 702 Honolulu,HI 96813 Dear Ms. Salmonson: With this letter,the County of Hawaii Planning Department hereby transmits the final environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact(FEA-FONSI) for the B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land situated at Tax Map Key: (3) 1-5-007: 006,055, 069 and 070,in the Puna District on the island of Hawai`i for publication in the next available edition of the Environmental Notice. The County of Hawaii Planning Department has included copies of public comments and the corresponding responses from the applicant that were received during the 30-day public comment period on the draft environmental assessment and anticipated finding of no significant impact(DEA-AFONSI). Enclosed is a completed OEQC Publication Form,two copies of the FEA-FONSI,an Adobe Acrobat PDF file of the same and the publication form. If there are any questions,please contact Daryn Arai of this department at(808)961-8142. Sincerely, ANE NUHA i Planning Director i P:/wpwin60/dsa/2013/LKuwaharaCommercialFONSLdoc 'tvi Q Enclosures p cc: Mr. Graham Knopp, GK Environmental, LLC _ n m Mr. Jon McElvaney _ 1,M_1 p 2013 www.cohplanningdept.com Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer planning @,co.hawaii.hi.us FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT B.T. KUWAHARA PRIVATE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED USE OF STATE LAND TMKs (3rd): 1-5-007:006, 055, 069 & 070 Pahoa, Puna District, County of Hawai`i, State of Hawai`i July 2013 Prepared for: B.T. Kuwahara LLC P.O. Box 421 Pahoa, Hawai`i 96778 B.T. KUWAHARA PRIVATE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED USE OF STATE LAND FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TMKs (3rd): 1-5-007:006, 055, 069 & 070 Pahoa, Puna District, County of Hawai`i, State of Hawai`i APPLICANT: B.T. Kuwahara LLC P.O. Box 421 Pahoa, Hawai`i 96778 APPROVING AGENCY: County of Hawai`i Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street Hilo, Hawai`i 96720 CONSULTANT: GK Environmental LLC P.O. Box 1310 Honoka`a, Hawai`i 96727 CLASS OF ACTION: Use of State Land This document is prepared pursuant to: The Hawai`i Environmental Policy Act Chapter 343,Hawai`i Revised Statutes,and Title 11,Chapter 200 Hawai`i Department of Health Administrative Rules. [this page intentionally left blank] B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED ACTION, iv PART 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION, BACKGROUND 1 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS 1 1.1 Project Description, Location, and Property Ownership 1 1.2 Summary of Regulatory Requirements 2 1.3 Public Involvement and Agency Coordination 3 1.5 Property Ownership 4 PART 2: ALTERNATIVES 4 2.1 Proposed Action 4 2.2 No Action 4 PART 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 5 3.1 Physical Environment 6 3.1.1 Geology, Soils, Geologic Hazards and Climate 6 3.1.2 Water Features, Flooding, Drainage and Water Quality 7 3.1.3 Flora, Fauna and Ecosystems 9 3.1.4 Air Quality, Noise, and Scenic Resources 13 3.1.5 Hazardous Substances, Toxic Waste and Hazardous Conditions 14 3.2 Socioeconomic and Cultural 16 3.2.1 Socioeconomic Characteristics 16 3.2.2 Economic Impacts . 18 3.2.3 Cultural Setting 19 3.2.4 Archaeology and Historic Sites 21 3.3 Utilities, Public Facilities, and Traffic 22 3.3.1 Utilities and Public Facilities 22 3.3.2 Traffic 23 3.4 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts 30 3.5 Required Permits and Approvals 30 3.6 Consistency with Government Plans and Policies 31 3.6.1 County Zoning 31 3.6.2 County of Hawai`i General Plan 31 3.6.3 Puna Community Development Plan 33 3.6.4 Hawaii 2050 37 3.6.5 Hawai`i State Plan 37 3.6.6 State Land Use District 38 PART 4: ANTICIPATED DETERMINATION 42 PART 5: FINDINGS AND REASONS 42 ii B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 Project Location Map 2 FIGURE 2 Project Area TMK Map 3 FIGURE 3 Preliminary Site Plan and Roadway Improvements 5 FIGURE 4 Pahoa-Kalapana CCD Boundary 17 FIGURE 5 Pahoa Village Road—Kahakai Boulevard Laneage Plan 29 FIGURE 6 Pahoa Village LUPAG Map 32 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 Plant Species List 9 TABLE 2 Selected Socioeconomic Characteristics 17 TABLE 3 Existing Project Area Intersection LOS 25 APPENDIX 1 a Comments Received in Response to Early Consultation APPENDIX lb Comments Received on the Draft EA and Responses APPENDIX 2 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment APPENDIX 3 SHPD Consultation and Archaeological Field Inspection Report APPENDIX 4 Traffic Impact Analysis Report B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED ACTION, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES B.T. Kuwahara LLC, the applicant, plans to develop a commercial center at 15-2714 Pahoa Village Road in the community of Pahoa Village, Island of Hawai`i. The project site is located along Pahoa Village Road and adjacent to the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection. The commercial center would consist of 104,326 square feet of leasable space, and is likely to include a super market (40,000 square feet), garden center(10,000 square feet), family medical clinic (11,250 square feet), a quality restaurant(5,000 square feet), a post office high turnover restaurant (2,000 square feet), a medical/dental clinic (5,040 square feet), a specialty retail store (8,000 square feet), a paint/hardware store (10,000 square feet), a second specialty retail store (10,000 square feet), and a full service restaurant(3,036 square feet). The project would utilize three privately-owned parcels totaling 9.93-acres with Tax Map Key numbers of(3`d) 1-5-007:006, 069 & 070 and a 50-foot-wide by 829.60-foot-long State of Hawaii property, the Kahakai Boulevard extension, with a Tax Map Key number (3`d) 1-5- 007:055. No public funds would be used for the proposed project, including roadway improvements. Total project construction costs are roughly estimated at $20 million. Construction would commence in 2013 upon completion of permitting and design; construction would probably be completed as ( soon as 2014 2015. The proposed project would extend Kahakai Boulevard 829.60 feet toward the west(i.e., mauka direction). Primary access to the project site would be via this Kahakai Boulevard extension and two access driveways along Pahoa Village Road. Additional roadway improvements include widening of the portion of Pahoa Village Road fronting the project site to allow for turning lanes, sidewalks, curb and gutter, construction of a traffic light with four pedestrian crosswalks at the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection, and a bus stop. The Kahakai Boulevard extension would include improvement to full commercial standards along the entire property frontage. The proposed project would have significant positive economic and social impacts by providing both short-term and long-term employment and by providing access to services, including health care, in an area with a distinct lack of such services. Traffic impacts would occur, but would be mitigated by signalization of the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection, as well as by the addition of turning lanes. Other minor, short-term construction-phase impacts including noise, air, and water quality are mitigable. No other significant impacts are expected to occur to cultural and historic sites, archaeological resources, and flora and fauna, or they are negligible. iv B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land PART 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION, BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS 1.1 Project Description, Location, and Property Ownership B.T. Kuwahara LLC, the applicant, plans to develop a commercial center at 15-2714 Pahoa Village Road in the community of Pahoa Village, Island of Hawai`i. The project site is located along Pahoa Village Road and adjacent to the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection (See Figures 1 & 2). The commercial center would consist of 104,326 square feet of leasable space, and is likely to include a super market (40,000 square feet), garden center (10,000 square feet), family medical clinic (11,250 square feet), a quality restaurant(5,000 square feet), a pest-effiee-high turnover restaurant (2,000 square feet), a medical/dental clinic (5,040 square feet), a specialty retail store (8,000 square feet), a paint/hardware store (10,000 square feet), a second specialty retail store (10,000 square feet), and a full service restaurant(3,036 square feet).. Design of the site is in progress and input has been solicited from the community regarding the overall design and appearance. Figure 3 shows a preliminary site plan, although it must be emphasized that the interior site layout design is in process. Additional amenities that would be constructed include an outside stage performance area and covered bicycle racks. No public funds would be used for the proposed project, including roadway improvements. Total project construction costs are roughly estimated at $20 million. Construction would commence in 2013 upon completion of permitting and design; construction would probably be completed in 2044 2015. The project site is currently the base yard for Bryson's Cinders, Inc., providing construction material including soil, sand, cinders, and rock mixtures for construction, agriculture,and landscaping projects. The project site currently contains an office, warehouse, and two residences. The project would utilize three privately-owned parcels totaling 9.93-acres with Tax Map Key (TMK) numbers of(3r) 1-5-007:006, 069 & 070 and the 50-foot-wide by 829.60 foot-long State-owned Kahakai Boulevard extension property with a TMK number of(3r) 1-5-007:055. Primary access to the project site would be via and two driveways along Pahoa Village Road and the unimproved Kahakai Boulevard parcel, that would be extended 829.60 feet toward the west. Additional roadway improvements include widening a 600-foot portion Pahoa Village Road fronting the project site to allow for turning lanes and sidewalks, curb and gutter, and construction of a traffic light with four pedestrian crosswalks at the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection. The Kahakai Boulevard extension would include improvement to full commercial standards along the entire property frontage. A covered bus stop with turnout would also be constructed along Pahoa Village Road(i.e., the west side of Pahoa Village Road). The business provides material including soil, sand, cinders, and rock mixtures for construction, agriculture, and landscaping projects. The project site also currently contains two residences. The Kahakai Boulevard extension parcel is currently owned by the State of Hawai`i, managed by the Department of Land and Natural Resources Land Division, and conveyance of this property to the County of Hawai`i is in progress. B.T Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land fir. Fi.ure 1 -Pro'ect Location Ma I .i. f „,,, ,,. . ,,, , 4:\-441. -: .\\ zok, , • too b ...3 let. . o. r A. q ' yllik%„..NAt,WTIFIIIP" .-* , 1 ;,' -N, -,...,„j A,100.:,,..lik,,,--...77":;>_. •-44elke 0. .., -,,,,, ,0,04 vilip,,,,07.71:-:tk, .5 i 0.‘ it I ,0 :,•:. , -_-,,ak , .,.,..,;, ,,,..!,„ c,,;-k: ,1/4.4.!„*„..dipt., , .e 4 ..I i,m _ 4,6 0‘^w,;. }0 ice.. / .., \le- Yrrio „ , ,,,,,,!..: , , ,--Ir*,7.1 '''''' ff; f , ----•-•-..,:(---' 0 ittpii:,4 - 4:7„t" *4:4"j& ilk "".---41N ■ 1.2 Summary of Regulatory Requirements This Environmental Assessment(EA)process is being conducted in accordance with Chapter 343 of the Hawai`i Revised Statutes(HRS) This law, along with its implementing regulations, Title 11,Chapter 200 of the Hawai`i Administrative Rules (HAR), is the basis for the environmental impact assessment process in the State of Hawai`i. According to Chapter 343,an EA is prepared to determine impacts associated with an action, to develop mitigation measures for adverse impacts, and to determine whether any of the impacts are significant according to thirteen specific criteria. Part 4 of this document states the anticipated finding that no significant impacts are expected to occur; Part 5 lists each criterion and presents the preliminary conclusions for each made by the County of Hawai`i Planning Department,the approving agency. If, after considering comments to the Draft EA,the Planning Department concludes that, as anticipated, no significant impacts would be expected to occur,then the Planning Department will issue a Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI), and the action will be permitted to occur. If the agency concludes that significant impacts are expected to occur as a result of the proposed action,then an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) will be prepared. 2 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land Fi ure 2 - Project Area TMK Ma r o9 N��t rO „__ • C �•N. °• _.µ �i ,„ 4.4 H, .„ , .c-A� ..yr+ I f..i zy..--nr.-+/c F�' o 1�M�- . •Fa r ISIr Q7 hoy- �+ rd .t ti s ..c �s�, "�l cz,�A7y 93eoAc. d �' 4,,;,„''',„,...‘y .,.....-..6.„,,747..,. fort e � sT EA'cs ter a`" `O ^ ..> , 4 , r�rC� �b� : r r/C i '\ err' If�• •! '• ,1cc..,tea ,7 'r"',� a ;Lee�CJep r3s!® ,.n.,. AI -•.'�s cry ..e Ac r\ �.. fib•,et, 4.901.Ac- fig 0 e 7a 0 9� H/en 5.,,10 G. Counlyo/Hryr.)n '.;,� 647 'F!. q � t4.r 4 Q — "°' q F ^ .•' �. wf, R�hars fuw>pin��✓✓ _ ,..5.-to Y'71!' lxec 0r 544 .i `- 1; '-00! d 'S q4° 1: .#.j `vy�_C #L '9WV .. Qi . $ar a,,,a� n r.s a y ry .e. 24 t.•4IO das. ' /L L AGE leca 3 ..*f �54 .i s ...y ° yet � ,� �jm� '� ,22 2.4... .;L1r- zq.na�a Tsubola 'r•°. ,. (�r °° <s. PAHOA VILLAGE' ,° r''x.„,,,. aca.ac _o L O .5 f t 0 i9. 1 Project 0,... 3EE /,war g-r5syo r ti ° t Site , C- °Kahakai i' 'g `a'r, �e D s Blvd. �!' _ 4 . Extension ,,!! .Al •tfi .GAe.. y;„ SET THIRD DIVISION 7 4 Qy,0 70 r $IISA Ae '. io.�,o see 1,-, ZONE SEC. PLAT �� cr 5`aaT sfc,,,m ofsQ,...;i 644-4,4y, oa.00 4 '''': I 5 07 '9nyy E- %Il,'�f CONTAINING PARCELS SCALE!I in•=30O.ft• 1.3 Public Involvement and Agency Coordination The following agencies and organizations were consulted in development of this environmental assessment. Federal: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service State: Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism Department of Civil Defense Department of Education Department of Health, Environmental Planning Office Department of Land and Natural Resources, Historic Preservation Division Department of Land and Natural Resources,Engineering Division Department of Land and Natural Resources, Land Division Department of Transportation State Legislators County: Department of Water Supply County Council Fire Department 3 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land Mass Transit Agency Mayor Planning Department Police Department Public Works Department Private: Malama 0 Puna Main Street Pahoa Association Adjacent Property Owners Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee Puna Traffic Safety Committee Hawai`i Cave Conservancy Copies of communications received during preconsultation are contained in Appendix 1 a. Appendix 1 b contains written comments on the Draft EA and the responses to these comments. Various places in the EA have been modified to reflect input received in the comment letters; additional or modified non-.rocedural text is denoted b double underlines as in this .ara'ra.h. 1.5 Property Ownership Parcels TMK (3`d) 1-5-007: 006, 069 & 070 are owned by B.T. Kuwahara LLC. The 50-foot wide portion of Kahakai Boulevard, TMK (3`d) 1-5-007:055, is currently property of the State of Hawai`i under management by the Department of Land and Natural Resources Land Division, and conveyance of this property to the County of Hawai`i and management by the Department of Public Works is in progress. PART 2: ALTERNATIVES 2.1 Proposed Action The only action alternative, or build alternative, under consideration is the construction of the commercial center and appurtenant improvements. No alternative sites are under consideration as the project site is the only appropriate site available to the owner for development. 2.2 No Action Under the No Action Alternative, the shopping center and associated improvements would not be constructed. The No Action Alternative and consequent anticipated impacts are discussed as a baseline against which the build alternative's impacts are compared. Because the project site is privately owned, the owner considers the No Action Alternative highly undesirable. Unless there is a difference between impacts from the proposed action and the No Action Alternative it is not explicitly discussed below. 4 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land Figure 3 - Preliminary Site Plan and Roadway Improvements [see pocket insert] 5 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land 1 r' I ____ ---- ...--------- - -----.1--------- ----- _. ---- --- .' _...- / / * '. •••-,, ......- .... SC ! , . . . .... . _... ..- IF--.-- -- ------- .----- . . . . .. . .. ' \ -573:'-' x... G:7,8 • . \ '..`•/.:. '':•>1. ' ':::•.›;,:' • .':1-' -.,.. .,., „. .... , ,... Ill. • g E. . , '..•: . . - If ii i v ',‘ 0,..._•---.---.,.:. 1 ......„ k\ ■\ - IH .-; . . ■ ' 1 \ t ''''' .. , \ V \--• '''' r.'1 ':.' til —] iliiitiiiiiiMiiiiiiiiiiii ' ' 41.1i„ :''. >' -',• ‘. • e 1 1 i -.' r)• 1 ,IS'A Oilliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiililip \,.\, ;E ! un co F- • tl. \ ' 'i 7`. •o oliiiiiiiiiiiiin ... R.f.. 1.1+ 4.) ummiliiiiiiu . 1. 1 . - '\ :=3" 1= t,,,,w• t _ _ y, _ t1/ = • g S 1 Thi - - . - /,!-71-1 • s.... = .J111111111111111. J11111111 6111111a 1,-- --- 7,VI 2 E gA = •1111111111.1,11L 111111110111111111111111 4 O 44....* . IF. . • r 11- . . .. ___.... ._, 0 • . .0 ,116),,,,, ...... -_... ......„,.....„.... . ‘ , n 0 --- tz ..... rj ' 511 _LD i. 07, i.,16.iner .At viroxriftviro* sioni:,..tl.T.iv 7_ ___ N, ........::::v\ZH:... ; j • lik.. .4r/7 , . ..- '■e, . '. .=.. > — Q+. JP' . /•-• / . . •,, --- ---- Iv 40Ns. . .' 1 ,4' • .., 7S IN _______._.,, IL --.'.. •4, j4;4"-ilit, e., _It, , . ;X., ' MI 4. ,eftit' 4/ , lir Al 41P , 0 1 -1 g , • -....._,....._ - ,,, MI ra III, .g, 4/. \ , • ., H , ---.7—cr..k.: --- i /' 921-. • .. ' • I . • - 0 _. *,- • ----i--- .----- O.' .. i • . .tli41111" .■ ''''' - i tAr i. • 1,14I;401 / ' __, ______, / . ... 1,./,',' • /•/ , ".,...,:..III' \\,\......., _ _ ___- -_--- / • / • ''''.. / ' ''..\. ' . 11 ....---- -- _ - ____.--- . , . ---- t...- - / • _ . ._,,__.-.--- __ -- ... / . •. / ',..;•'••• \ --- __ __ ' _ __.--- ... "•,-:';`.', -' . ! 1 --- ......,,, 1 ■ . .. „. . . ..,-; , . . ....-..--- • \ ....,....-' , . .. I. . , \ . PART 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Basic Geographic Setting The parcels upon which the commercial center would be constructed and roadway improvements would be made are referred to throughout this EA as the project site. The term project area is used to describe the general vicinity of Pahoa Village, and in some cases, the Puna District. The project site is located adjacent to, and to the south and west of, the intersection of Pahoa Village Road and Kahakai Boulevard (see Figures 1 & 2), located diagonally across Pahoa Village Road from Woodland Center. The vegetation of the project area has been extensively modified by past and ongoing uses, and the interior of project site is largely unvegetated. Adjacent land is a mix of residential and commercial uses along with vacant lands. The project site is approximately 630 feet above mean sea level and is sloping slightly upwards towards the southwest. 3.1 Physical Environment 3.1.1 Geology, Soils, Geologic Hazards and Climate Environmental Setting Geologically, the project site is located on the lower flank of Kilauea volcano. The surface consists of lava flows of the Puna Basalt series of 200 to 750 years in age, originating from the { Kilauea summit area(Wolfe and Morris 1996). The project site's soil is classified by the National Resource Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service 1973) as pahoehoe Lava Flows (rLW). This surficial geology is described as being excessively drained with a wide range in hydraulic permeability, from moderately low(0.06 inches/hour)to moderately high (0.20 inches/hour). Its Land Capability Classification is 8s; Classification 8 soils are defined as miscellaneous areas having limitations that preclude their use for commercial plant production and limit their use to recreation, wildlife, or water supply or for aesthetic purposes. Subclass "s" soils are soils that have limitations within the rooting zone, such as shallowness of the rooting zone, stones, low moisture-holding capacity, low fertility that is difficult to correct, and salinity or sodium content. The entire Big Island is subject to geologic hazards, especially lava flows and earthquakes. Volcanic hazard as assessed by the United States Geological Survey in the project area as 2 on a scale of ascending risk of 9 to 1. This relatively high hazard risk is based on the fact that Kilauea is an active volcano. Volcanic hazard zone 2 areas are located adjacent to and downslope from zone 1 and have had 15-25% of land area covered by lava since the year 1800 and 25-75% covered within the past 750 years (Wright et al. 1992). Lava tubes and caves may present geological hazards as they may jeopardize the integrity of structures, and may present a safety hazard to construction workers. They may also present a long-term hazard as their presence may not be recognized during the construction phase. The risk of such hazards is very difficult to assess. In addition to the geological hazard presented by lava 6 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land tubes and caves, they are unique and valuable natural resources, representing biota not found anywhere else on Earth. Several large lava tube caves are known in the project area, including the famous Kazumura Cave, possibly the longest known traversable cave on Earth with a length of about 35 miles (Allred& Allred 1997). The developer has drilled extensively on the project site in order to locate near-surface voids, but no voids were observed. In order to gain local knowledge of the potential presence of caves under or near the project site, Fred Stone, Ph.D., of the Hawai`i Cave Conservancy was contacted. Dr. Stone had no knowledge of caves or lava tubes under the project site (Stone 2012). In terms of seismic risk, the entire Island of Hawai`i is mapped within the High Seismic Risk Zone (Government Accounting Office 1992) with only the Very High Risk Zone being of higher risk. Although Hawai`i Island has significant seismic risk, these issues are mitigated as structural design is required to conform to the International Building Code (2006), as adopted by the Hawai`i County Code, which considers site-specific information to govern the structural design of buildings. The average daily temperature is approximately 73 degrees F., and annual rainfall averages approximately 130 inches (University of Hawai`i at Hilo 1998). Hawaii's climate is generally characterized as mild with uniform temperatures, moderate humidity, and two identifiable seasons. The "summer" season, between May and October is generally warmer and drier. The "winter" season, between October and April is cooler and wetter. The project area is situated along the "windward" side of the Island of Hawai`i which is exposed to the prevailing northeasterly trade winds that causes relatively high rainfall (University of Hawai`i at Manoa 1983). Impacts and Mitigation Measures While seismic and volcanic hazards exist on the project site and vicinity, other developments including the community of Pahoa Village and the Puna District have equivalent or greater risks, yet development of the area is ongoing. In view of this consideration, as well as the fact that the proposed project is a private action, the proposed project is not unreasonable to construct. While the No Action Alternative would avoid risks related to geology and geologic hazards on the project site, other sites in the project area would face the same risks and thus would yield no preference. 3.1.2 Water Features, Flooding, Drainage and Water Quality Existing Environment There are no fresh surface water bodies in the immediate area. A small, ephemeral stream is located about 500 feet to the north of the project site near the southern property boundary of the Pahoa Marketplace shopping center. 7 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land No stream poses a flooding hazard to the project site. The Flood Insurance Rate Map 1551661350C (9/16/88) is unprinted, indicating that the project site is designated Flood Zone "X", or Special Flood Hazard areas outside of the 100- or 500-year flood plains. Therefore, a relatively low hazard from the principal sources of flooding in the area exists, although local sources can still cause flooding. The State of Hawai`i Department of Health's (DOH) Underground Injection Control (UIC) maps show that the project site is located above the UIC line, meaning that the underlying aquifer is considered a drinking water source. Impacts and Mitigation Measure No impacts to stream banks, stream waters or other surface water features will occur, as none are present. In order to minimize the potential for the release of polluted stormwater runoff, the contractor will perform all earthwork and grading in conformance with Chapter 10, Erosion and Sediment Control, Hawai`i County Code. Because the project will disturb more than one acre of soil, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) will must be obtained by the contractor before the project commences, and application for this permit is in progress. This permit requires the completion of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP). In order to properly manage storm water runoff, the SWPPP will describe the emplacement of a number of best management practices (BMPs) for the project. These BMPs may include, but will not be limited to, the following: { • Minimization of soil loss and erosion by revegetation and stabilization of slopes and disturbed areas of soil, either by hydro-mulching on slopes and seeded on graded, flat surfaces, as soon as possible after working; • Minimization of sediment loss by emplacement of structural controls possibly including silt fences, gravel bags, sediment ponds, check dams, and other barriers in order to retard and prevent the loss of sediment from the site; • Application of sediment waddles and protective covers to soil and material stockpiles; • Gravel check dams in swales or gutters; • Construction and use of a stabilized construction vehicle entrance, with designated vehicle wash area that discharges to a sediment pond; • Washing of vehicles in the designated wash area before they egress the project site; • Use of drip pans beneath vehicles not in use in order to trap vehicle fluids; • Routine inspection and maintenance of structural BMPs by adequately trained personnel; and • Significant leaks or spills, if they occur, shall be properly cleaned up and disposed of at an approved site. Although the project would construct impermeable surfaces and would therefore increase the volume and rate of stormwater runoff, the project would not increase the volume of stormwater leaving the site as required by Hawai`i County Code (Chapter 27 - Drainage). This would be achieved through construction of dry wells requiring Underground Injection Control permits 8 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land from the State of Hawai`i Department of Health, in compliance with Chapter 11-23, Hawai`i Administrative Rules. Wastewater from the project's facilities will be treated using individual wastewater treatment systems and will be permitted by the State of Hawai`i Department of Health, as per Hawaii Administrative Rules Chapter 11-62. Total daily wastewater volume is estimated at 12.000 gallons. Thr-- drink' • water wells are located in the •ro'ect vicini _ two of them . the 512 6.3-acr- tate . Hawaii .arc-1 ad'a ent MK 3rd 1-5-108:001 to the su.'ect .ro.ert to the west and another on TMK(3rd) 1-5-008:006. The first of these is located about 0.8 mile north-northwest of the .ro'ect ite the second 's located about 0.8 west of the •ro'ect site and the third is located about 0.5 mile southwest of the project site on TMK (3rd) CWRM 2005 . All three of these wells are located either us•radient .f the sr.'ect site with res sect to the 'resumed direction of ground water flow, which is expected to be in a downhill direction(i.e., roughly northeast in the .ro'ect vicini .r the .re located cross-gradient with ressect ts the dire on of• ound water flow i.e., at about the same elevation . Therefore it is hi'hlv u likel that activities at the pro'-ct site could influence the water •uali .f these drinkin• water sources. No other drinkin• water wells as sear to be located in the .ro'ect vicini . 3.1.3 Flora, Fauna and Ecosystems Existing Environment The natural vegetation of this part of Puna was most likely lowland rain forest dominated by `ohi`a(Metrosideros polymorpha), kuolohia(rhynchospora sp.) and uluhe (Dicranopteris linearis) (Gagne and Cuddihy 1990). This pre-existing ecosystem, however, has been destroyed or heavily degraded by previous and ongoing site activities and the colonization and succession of invasive plant communities. Now only a narrow strip of vegetation somewhat resembling this pre-existing lowland rain forest may be found within the Kahakai Boulevard extension parcel. A walk-through botanical survey of the project site was performed by Botanist Layne Yoshida on September 24 and November 14, 2012. Table 1 is a list of plant species detected on the project site. Table 1 - Project Site Plant Species List Scientific Name Family Common Name Life Form Status* Ageratum conyzoides Asteraceae Ageratum Herb A Ageratum houstonianum Asteraceae Ageratum Herb A Aleurites moluccana Euphorbiaceae Kukui Tree A Alpinia purpurata Zingiberaceae Red Ginger Herb A Alpinia sp. Zingiberaceae Alpinia Herb A Ananas comosus Bromelicaeae Pineapple Herb A Andropogon virginicus Poaceae Andropogon Herb A Anthurium sp. Araceae Anthurium Herb A Apium sp. Apiaceae _Celery Herb A Archontophoenix alexandrae Arecaceae Alexandra Palm Tree A Ardisia elliptica Myrsinaceae Shoebutton Ardisia Tree A 9 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land Scientific Name Family Common Name Life Form Status* Arundina graminifolia Orchidaceae Bamboo Orchid Herb A Axonopus fissifolius Poaceae Carpet Grass Herb A Begonia sp. Begoniaceae Begonia Herb A Bidens sp. Asteraceae Bidens Herb A Bougainvillea sp. Nyctaginaceae Bougainvillea Shrub A Brachiaria mutica Poaceae California Grass Herb A Buddleia asiatica Buddleiaceae Dog Tail Shrub A Calotropis sp. Asclepiadaceae Crown Flower Shrub A Camellia sp. Theaceae Camellia Shrub A Castilleja arvensis Scrophulariaceae Indian Paintbrush Herb A Cecropia obtusifolia Cecropiaceae Cecropia Tree A Chamaecrista nictitans Fabaceae Partridge Pea Herb A Christella parasitica Thelypteridaceae Christella Fern A Cibotium glaucum Dicksoniaceae Hapu`u Fern E Clidemia hirta Melastomataceae Clidemia Herb A Clusia rosea Clusiaceae Copey Herb A Cocos nucifera Arecaceae Niu Tree A Codiaeum sp. Euphorbiaceae Croton Shrub A Colocasia esculenta Araceae Kalo Herb A Commelina dsa Commelinaceae Honohono Herb A Conyza bonariensis Asteraceae Conyza Herb A Cordyline fruticosa Agavaceae Ki Shrub A Crotalaria lanceolata Fabaceae Crotalaria Herb A Crotolaria sp. Fabaceae Crotalaria Herb A Cucurbita maxima Cucurbitaceae Pumpkin Vine A Cuphea carthagenensis Lythraceae Cuphea Herb A { Cuphea ignea Lythraceae Cigar Flower Herb A l Cycas sp. Cycadaceae Cycas Shrub A Cyperus halpan Cyperaceae Cyperus Herb A Cyperus sp. Cyperaceae Cyperus Herb A Desmodium sandwicense Fabaceae Desmodium Herb A Desmodium tortuosum Fabaceae Desmodium Herb A Desmodium trorum Fabaceae Desmodium Herb A Dicranopteris linearis Gleicheniaceae Uluhe Fern I Dissotis rotundifolia Melastomataceae Dissotis Herb A Dracena marginata Agavaceae Dracena Shrub A Dracena sp. Agavaceae Dracena Shrub A Drymaria cordata Caryophyllaceae Drymaria Herb A Eleocharis geniculata Cyperaceae Spikerush Herb A Emilia fosbergii Asteraceae Emilia Herb A Emilia sonchifolia Asteraceae Emilia Herb A Epidendrum sp. Orchidaceae Epidendrum Herb A Epipremnum sp. Araceae Pothos Herb A Eragrostis sp. Poaceae Eragrostis Herb A Erechtites hieracifolia Asteraceae Fireweed Herb A Erechtites valerianifolia Asteraceae Fireweed Herb A Ficus microcarpa Moraceae Banyan Tree A Fimbristylis dichotoma Cyperaceae Fimbristylis Herb I Hibiscus sp. Malvaceae Hibiscus Shrub A Hypericum mutilum Clusiaceae Hypericum Herb A Hyptis pectinata Lamiaceae Hyptis Herb A Ilex sp. Aquifoliaceae Ilex Shrub A Indigofera suffruticosa Fabaceae Indigo Herb A 10 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land Scientific Name Family Common Name Life Form Status* Ipomoea indica Convolvulaceae Morning Glory Vine I Ipomoea sp. Convolvulaceae Ipomoea Vine A Jatropha sp. Euphorbiaceae Jatropha Herb A Kyllinga brevifolia Cyperaceae Kyllinga Herb A Lantana camara Verbenaceae Lantana Herb A Lepisorus thunbergianus Polypodiaceae Pleopeltis Fern I Lindernia sp. Scrophulariaceae Lindernia Herb A Ludwigia octovalvis Onagraceae Ludwigia Herb A Macaranga tanarius Euphorbiaceae Macaranga Tree A Macroptilium atropurpureum Fabaceae Macroptilium Herb A Melastoma sp. Melastomataceae Melastoma Shrub A Metrosideros polymorpha Myrtaceae Ohia Tree E Michelia sp. Magnoliaceae Michelia Tree A Mimosa pudica Fabaceae Sensitive Plant Herb A Nandina domestica Berberidaceae Heavenly Bamboo Shrub A Nephrolepis multora Nephrolepidaceae Sword Fern Fern A Nolina recurvate Agavaceae Ponytail Shrub A Oplismenus sp. Poaceae Oplismenus Herb A Paederia foetida Rubiaceae Maile Pilau Vine A Panicum maximum Poaceae Guinea Grass Herb A Panicum repens Poaceae Torpedo Grass Herb A Paraserianthes falcataria Fabaceae Albizia Tree A Paspalum conjugatum Poaceae Hilo Grass Herb A Paspalum sp. Poaceae Paspalum Herb A Paspalum urvillei Poaceae Vasey Grass Herb A Pennisetum purpureum Poaceae Napier Grass Herb A Persea americana Lauraceae Avocado Tree A Philodendron sp. Araceae Philodendron Herb A . Phlebodium aureum Polypodiaceae Phlebodium Fern A Phoenix sp. Arecaceae Phoenix Shrub A Phyllanthus sp. Euphorbiaceae Phyllanthus Herb A Phymatosorus gross us Polypodiaceae Maile Scented Fern Fern A Pittosporum sp. Pittosporacae Pittosporum Shrub A Pityrogramma austroamericana Pteridaceae Gold Fern Fern A Pityrogramma calomelanos Pteridaceae Silver Fern Fern A Pluchea symphytifolia Asteraceae Pluchea Shrub A Pluchea symphytifolia Asteraceae Sourbush Herb A Plumeria sp. Apocynaceae Plumeria Shrub A Polygala paniculata Polygalaceae Polygala Herb A Polygonum capitatum Polygonaceae Polygonum Herb A Portulaca sp. Portulacaceae Portulaca Herb A Pritchardia affinis Arecaceae Loulu Tree End Psidium cattleianum Myrtaceae Waiawi Shrub A Psilotum nudum Psilotaceae Moa Fern Ally I Pteris cretica Pteridaceae _ Pteris Fern I Pterolepis glomerata Melastomataceae Pterolepis Herb A Pycreus polystachyos Cyperaceae Cyperus Herb I Pycreus sanguinolentus Cyperaceae Cyperus Herb A Rhapis sp. Arecaceae Rhapis Shrub A Rhododendron sp. Ericaceae Azalea Shrub A Ricinus communis Euphorbiaceae Castor Bean Shrub A Rubus rosifolius Rosaceae Thimbleberry Herb A Rubes sp. Rosaceae Blackberry Shrub A 11 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land Scientific Name Family Common Name Life Form Status* Sacciolepis indica Poaceae Glenwood Grass Herb A Schefflera actinophylla Araliaceae Octopus Tree Tree A Schizachyrium condensatum Poaceae Beardgrass Herb A Scleria testaceae Cyperaceae Scleria Herb I Setaria palmifolia Poaceae Palm Grass Herb A Solanum americanum Solanaceae Popolo Herb I Sonchus oleraceus Asteraceae Pualele Herb A Spathoglottis plicata Orchidaceae Spathoglottis Herb A Spermatococe sp. Rubiacae Buttonweed Herb A Sphagneticola trilobata Asteraceae Wedelia Herb A Stachytarpheta sp. Verbenaceae Stachytarpheta Herb A Syzygium malaccense Myrtaceae Mountain Apple Tree A Thunbergia fragrans Acanthaceae White Thunbergia Vine A Torenia glabra Scrophulariaceae Torenia Herb A Trema orientalis Ulmaceae Gunpowder Tree Tree A Vigna sp. Fabaceae Vigna Herb A Waltheria indica Sterculiaceae Waltheria Herb I Youngia japonica Asteraceae Youngia Herb A Zamia sp. Zamiaceae Zamia Shrub A A=alien, E=endemic, I= indigenous,End=Federal and State listed Endangered Species The botanical survey identified 124 non-native plant species, 2 endemic species, and 10 indigenous species. One native plant species identified was the lo'ulu palm (Pritchardia affinis), a species listed as endangered by the Endangered Species Act (United States Fish and Wildlife Service 2012). Two individuals of this species were identified on the project site and are part of ornamental landscaping. According to Wagner et al. (1999) the project site is not within the natural range of this species, and would not normally be found in the project area without having been cultivated. These two lo'ulu palms were, in fact, planted by the applicant. As such, they are not representative of habitat of which they would normally be an ecological component. The completeness of this botany survey may be limited as it represents a"snap shot" in time, and may not list some species actually present on the project site in the future due to the ongoing processes of colonization due to seed dispersal. However, such adventive species would be, in all likelihood, non-native and invasive plant species. The area supports a variety of common alien mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians. The Hawaiian Hawk or 'io (Buteo solitarius), an endangered species, is likely to forage or fly over the site, and is also likely to nest in the project area. The project site contains only low trees, generally less than 30 feet tall, and apparently contains no large trees appropriate for nesting by endangered Hawaiian Hawks. Foraging habitat for Hawaii's only non-marine mammal, the endangered Hawaiian Hoary Bat, or `ope`ape`a, (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) may also be present, as it may forage over the site, although it is not likely to roost on the project site due to the lack of quality sites. Given the character of the site and lack of quality habitat, it is highly unlikely that any other candidate, proposed, or listed threatened or endangered species are present on the project site. Although a zoological study was not performed, no animal species were observed on the project site during site studies, apart from the mongoose. 12 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land Impacts and Mitigation Measures No listed, candidate or proposed endangered animal or plant species were found or would be expected to be found on the project sites apart from the two lo`ulu palms identified. In terms of conservation value, no botanical or zoological resources requiring special protection are present. Because of the lack of native ecosystems, or threatened or endangered plant species, no adverse impacts would occur as a result of landscaping and improvements. The two lo`ulu palm trees located on the project site will be incorporated into landscaping. 3.1.4 Air Quality,Noise, and Scenic Resources Environmental Setting Air pollution in the Puna District is mainly derived from volcanic emissions of sulfur dioxide from Kilauea Volcano, which react chemically with sunlight, oxygen, dust particles, and water in the air to produce a volcanic haze ("vog") that occasionally blankets the district. Although the prevailing trade winds usually keep the region free of vog, it may become severe during periods of weak trade winds, particularly during the winter. Noise on the project site varies widely from low to moderate, and is derived mainly from motor vehicles, equipment and truck operation, as well as helicopters. The County of Hawai`i General Plan lists areas of particular natural beauty. Neither the project site nor any sites in the project vicinity are noted for their particular natural beauty in the General Plari. Sight lines into the project site are presently obscured by vegetation. Impacts and Mitigation Measures The potential for fugitive dust emissions exists during grading and construction. Short-term direct and indirect impacts on air quality could occur due to project construction, principally through fugitive dust from vehicle movement, soil excavation and exhaust emissions from on-site construction equipment. The State of Hawaii Air Pollution Control Regulations (Chapter 11-60, HAR)prohibit visible emissions of fugitive dust from construction activities beyond the property line. Thus, an effective dust control plan for the project construction phase is essential. Adequate fugitive dust control can usually be accomplished by the establishment of a frequent watering program to keep bare-dirt surfaces in construction areas from becoming significant sources of dust. In dust-prone or dust-sensitive areas, other control measures such as limiting the area that can be disturbed at any given time, applying chemical soil stabilizers and placing mulch may be necessary. Control regulations stipulate that open-bodied trucks be covered at all times when in motion if they are transporting materials that could become airborne. Trucks tracking dirt onto paved streets from unpaved areas is often a significant source of dust in construction areas. Washing of vehicles leaving the construction site within a designated construction wash area may be appropriate. Establishment of landscaping as early in the construction schedule as possible can also lower the potential for fugitive dust emissions. 13 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land On-site mobile and stationary construction equipment also would emit air pollutants from engine exhaust. The largest of this equipment is usually diesel-powered. Nitrogen oxide and particulate emissions from diesel engines can be relatively high compared to gasoline-powered equipment, but the standards for these pollutants are based on long averaging times, and are not likely to be violated on the project site. In addition, in order to avoid air quality impacts from slow-moving construction vehicles traveling to and from the site on major roadways, heavy construction equipment should be moved on- and off-site during periods of low traffic volume and avoid passing through the center of Pahoa Village. The proposed project would modify the appearance of the project site through landscaping and removal of visual barriers of the project site interior. Areas within the project site that are presently unmaintained would be landscaped. The proposed project would remove the vegetative barrier currently obscuring sight lines into the project site and would include professional landscaping that would improve the overall appearance of the site. The construction phase would involve grading, use of compressors, and vehicle and equipment operation. These activities may, at times, generate noise exceeding 95 decibels, potentially impacting nearby areas. Two single-family residences are in the area and may be particularly affected by construction noise. Mitigation of potential construction noise impacts will be achieved through compliance with the Administrative Rules of the Department of Health, Chapter 11-46 "Community Noise Control". In the long-term, noise levels on the site are not expected to change significantly. 3.1.5 Hazardous Substances, Toxic Waste and Hazardous Conditions A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was performed on the project site by Myounghee Noh & Associates (MNA) and is attached in Appendix 2. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment aims to identify recognized environmental conditions that exist on the project site, and existing recognized environmental conditions in the project area that have the potential to impact the subject property. The term recognized environmental conditions means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on the property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. In a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, evidence of recognized environmental conditions may be obtained by execution of the following activities in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E1527-05 (American Society for Testing and Materials, 2005): • A records search of federal and State databases of hazardous material use, storage, and releases, including, but not limited to, hazardous material generators, leaking underground storage tanks, and reported hazardous material releases; • Interviews with landowners, nearby residents, and regulatory agency members concerning the subject property's history of land use; • Other records searches, including tax records, aerial photography, and, when available, fire insurance maps; and • A visual survey of the property and immediately surrounding areas. 14 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Findings MNA's findings are as follows: • During site reconnaissance it was noted that the project site warehouse had five barrels/drums of motor and hydraulic oil, one aboveground storage tank(AST), and many oil cans, empty, unlabeled, and old buckets, oil tubing, and lots of scrap materials. Because there was no evidence of a release from these containers they are not considered a recognized environmental condition. • One Hawaii Electric and Light Company (HELCO) owned pole-mounted transformer was located on the subject property. It was identified as not containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Due to the absence of PCBs, the fair condition of the transformer, and observation of no material threat of release of hazardous substances or petroleum products from the transformer, this is not a recognized environmental condition. • The records search identified one underground storage tank (UST) within 1/4 mile of the subject property at Woodland Center located 370 feet northeast of the subject property Woodland Center had two gasoline tanks and one diesel tank currently in use. No violations were found during a facility inspection conducted by Hawai`i Department of Health (HDOH) Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch (SHWB) on August 9, 2011. Additionally, no UST leaks were reported in the in the records reviewed, including the HDOH SHWB records for this facility. Therefore, this is not a recognized environmental condition. • FirstSearch identified one additional UST at a location non-geocoded. The facility was identified as Aloha Petroleum and located approximately 1,056 feet from the subject property at 15-2660 Pahoa Village Road. Aloha Petroleum had four gasoline tanks and two diesel tanks currently in use. HDOH SHWB and Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response (HEER) Office files showed that there were no administrative violations associates with this facility. • Additionally, there were files related to a release from the diesel tank located on the Aloha Petroleum property described above. Cleanup of this site appears to be ongoing, based upon available records. As this property is located at a lower elevation than the subject property, potential spills and contamination in groundwater flows from this property would not migrate in the direction of the subject property. Therefore, this is not reconsidered a recognized environmental condition. • The records review identified nine release incidents from two non-geocoded locations within the zip code of the subject property on the State Release List. Seven release incidents occurred at Puna Geothermal Venture, which was located at 14-3860 Pahoa Pohoiki Road, approximately five miles away and down gradient from the subject property. Therefore, these seven release incidents are not considered recognized environmental conditions. Two release incidents occurred at a HELCO transformer pole located on Kahakai Boulevard, which were on an adjoining property to the west. Further 15 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land inquiry with HELCO revealed that a release of approximately three gallons of non-PCB mineral oil was discovered on September 26, 2011. On September 27 and October 3, 2011, the petroleum-affected soil was excavated. Analytical results from confirmation soil samples indicated that Site Cleanup Program requirements were satisfied. HELCO submitted a final release report to the HDOH HEER Office on December 7, 2011. Therefore,this is not a recognized environmental condition. In summary, the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment identified no recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property or in connection with adjacent and nearby properties that have the potential to impact the subject property. The project site and adjacent properties were not listed in the federal and State databases searched. No other sources of offsite potential contamination were found to exist in the project area. Impacts and Mitigation Measures As no recognized environmental conditions were identified in connection with the project site, no hazardous environmental conditions are likely to be present that may have adverse impacts. 3.2 Socioeconomic and Cultural 3.2.1 Socioeconomic Characteristics Environmental Setting and Impacts The project would affect and benefit the Pahoa Village area and the Puna District most directly. Table 2 provides information on the socioeconomic characteristics of the project area, here defined as both the Pahoa-Kalapana Census County Subdivision(CCD) and the Keaau-Mountain View CCD (see Figure 4), we well as Pahoa Village, and Hawai`i County as a whole for comparison. Several demographic characteristics of the project area are notable. Both the Pahoa CDP and Pahoa-Kalapana CCD regions have per capita incomes significantly less than that of the County of Hawai`i as a whole. Additionally,poverty is very high for the Pahoa-Kalapana CCD as compared to both Pahoa Village and the County. The proposed project's primary social benefit to residents of the Puna District would be by provision of additional services that may not presently exist in the area. With the No Action Alternative, the project area would not benefit from the services provided by the proposed project. 16 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land Table 2 - Selected Socioeconomic Characteristics (2011) ISLAND PAHOA PROJECT CHARACTERISTIC OF HAWAII CDP AREA Total Population 186,738 983 38,711 Percent Caucasian 33.7 14.9 35.3 Percent Asian 22.2 43.5 18.2 Percent Hawaiian 12.1 12.6 11.3 Percent Two or More Races 29.5 26.1 32.2 Median Age (Years) 40.9 41.6 38.9 Percent Under 18 Years 22.8 23.3 25.6 Percent Over 65 Years 14.5 17.4 11.9 Percent Households with Children 31.8 32.1 31.8 Average Household Size 2.70 2.94 2.74 Percent Housing Vacant 18.5 9.8 17.2 Per Capita Income $26,079 $19,774 $19,184 Population Below Poverty Line 21.5% 15.3% 25.1% Note:Project Area=Sum of Pahoa-Kalapana CCD and Keaau-Mountain View CCD Source:U.S.Bureau of the Census,Jan.2013.Profiles of General Demographi Characteristics Fi.ure 4 - Pro'ect Area Demo ra s hic Bounda refer to Table 2) ri$: A r "g - .? _ Lek* i, c ' d *.ro .1-' 41` II - ,,, NI , ...,...i; - 4,,j y <'---;-:,,'.� ' `'-• 1 Atc } \ L .uKv..1: F•- ---- ' ' ..- . t.. .0. Jr tT fir . . 1 :4 r a tat ♦ 4'Y 11{ * r: j y . Xtku.{) fit.i• t y • '. :.:' . ,"'Z., ....X. kik,/ ,...." 4,-pu - ak r _.-_--_ .,,-,..f:..,_...•,-._timFili- -,, ,....,- 21,. . „ -<- ,,,..,-. -,.'s:7t, k2-44.'''.,t, 0.:,�jt t'. r\' K 1. 4pv ,b. ' o's .�k r t 1 .c , zk17 1 'di5,,, - . a 't,, 7' i. -.�. .�,,. V., '; a ,ki y ) R 304 •04,51kI,p r 3v $r + -,,Y � :,:::„.-1-1.:',,' ,j inole 0 5 10 { z.,,,,,,, 1- ..•j.- ,4 - r 4 .o Bay 0 10 2t Q k.'•••,‘� 17 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land 3.2.2 Economic Impacts Existing Environment and Impacts According to the State of Hawai`i Department of Labor and Industrial Relation's (2012) most recent unemployment report for July 2012, unemployment in the County of Hawai`i is relatively high at 9.3%, compared to that of the State of Hawai`i at 6.4% and the nation at 8.6%. The project would have positive economic impacts to the project area for both the short- and long-term. Short-term direct positive economic impacts would result from construction employment and construction spending on construction materials and equipment. Indirect economic impacts result from spending consequent from construction employment and payments to contractors, subcontractors, material suppliers. As a result of this indirect spending the total economic impact from the proposed project would be much greater than the proposed project's total construction budget, roughly estimated at about $20 million. The total economic impact of a project, including direct, indirect, and induced impacts, may be estimated using the State of Hawai`i Department of Business, Economic Development, & Tourism's (DBEDT) input-output economic impact model, updated every five years and last published in 2007 (DBEDT 2007). The input-output model includes tables that show the economic relationship between different sectors of the economy (i.e., agriculture, transportation, health services, government, etc.). The tables describe the consequence of investments in various industries using so-called "Type I" and "Type II" multipliers. "Type I"multipliers estimate the "direct" effect of demand, that is, the effect on all other industries of an investment in a particular industry, including indirect effects, or secondary payments. The "Type II"multiplier adds to this the effect of induced demand, or demand created from payments to households. Thus Type II multipliers are considered to be more accurate and reflective of the real economic consequences of investment. The "Type II" multiplier for the Construction Sector is 2.12, meaning that for every $1 million of construction spending or investment the net result is $2.12 million of impact to the State economy. As the total project construction budget is estimated at $20 million the total impact to the State of Hawai`i economy is $42.4 million, strictly for the proposed project's construction phase. The applicant estimates that the project would employ 300 full-time employees (with part-time positions weighted at 0.5 of full-time positions). According to the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average County of Hawai`i weekly wage is $681, or $35,412 annually (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 2012). Assuming that the project's employment is on par with this average County of Hawai`i wage, the project will pay out $10.6 million in wages annually, implying that the project will increase total County income by 1.0%, a very significant positive long-term economic impact for a single private action. It should also be noted that the per capita income for the project area is presently much smaller than that of the entire County of Hawai`i and that the proposed project will also be a significant source of employment for the project area. 18 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land In summary, the project's short-term and long-term economic impact is expected to be significant, as the proposed project would be a major source of employment in the project area. 3.2.3 Cultural Setting Existing Environment The purpose of this section is to document the presence of any historic properties or traditional cultural properties that might exist within the project area, assess the significance of any such resources, and provide an assessment of impact to any such resources as a result of the construction of the proposed project. This assessment relies upon published cultural and archaeological studies in order to provide a context for the search for potential historic or traditional cultural properties. Most significant among these studies is work performed for the Keaa`u-Pahoa Road Environmental Assessment prepared by Cultural Surveys Hawai`i (CSH 2011). We draw primarily from this work in this discussion; other sources are referenced. The project site is located within the ahupua'a of Keonepoko Iki and derives its name from an apparent description of its shoreline, literally "the short sand" (Soehren 2002). CSH notes that there is not much information available concerning this ahupua`a, which may be because it was held by the high ali`i before being returned to the Kingdom of Hawai`i in the Mahele of 1861. Puna is one of six major districts on the island that remain intact today. This district organization (and likely all of the smaller land divisions) extends back in time to at least A.D. 1475 in the time of Chief Liloa. The districts were brought together under a single ruler when `Umi a Liloa (son of Liloa) came to power in about A.D. 1525 (Maly 1999). Barrere (1959) summarized the Precontact politics of the Puna District as follows: Puna, as a political unit, played an insignificant part in shaping the course of history of Hawai`i Island. Unlike the other districts of Hawaii, no great family arose upon whose support on or another of the chiefs seeking power had to depend for his success. Puna lands were desirable, and were eagerly sought, but their control did not rest upon conquering Puna itself, but rather upon control of the adjacent districts, Ka`u and Hilo. Native Hawaiian traditions of Puna illustrate the area's significance and connection with the people of ancient times. Mythological literature shows Puna prominently associated with legendary and historical figures including Kane, Pele, Hi`iaka, Hopoe, Kuka`ohi`akalaka, Keamalu, Iwa, Chief Kumukahi, Chief Kali`ikuku, Kalohalani, Halemano, Kamalalawalu, and Kamapua`a. These associations suggest an ancient and continuous occupation of the area, and indicate that there are several wahi pana (places sacred to Hawaiian culture and spirituality) associated with these deities and people at various locations in the Puna district. Research and legendary sources demonstrate that the people of Puna settled primarily in the coastal region, with temporary habitation in the uplands related to agriculture with the exception 19 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land of the inland settlement of`01a`a. These settlements were located primarily along the Ala Loa (the ancient trail system that circuits the island of Hawai`i). The Puna District was generally under the control of outside chiefs until Kalani`opu`u's reign in the 18th century. Shortly before his death in 1782, Kalani`opu`u's dominion over Puna and portion of Ka`u was challenged by the Puna chief`Imakakoloa. Kalani`opu`u resolved the unrest, but following his death the disposition of Puna once again became an issue until Kamehameha I successfully brought the entire island under his control in 1793. Coastal Puna, well-populated by Hawaiians before 1800, was nearly abandoned in the 19th century. Ranching and agriculture dominated land use in Puna in the late 1800s. The Ala Loa was eventually improved and renamed in the 1800s and began to be called the "Old Government Road." While this path was essentially the main thoroughfare through the Puna district before the late 1800s, as communities on the coastline began to die out, focus began to shift to the center of the Puna District and the developing sugar and related industries near Ola`a, Hilo, and the volcano region. The Hilo Railway Company was established and in 1900 extended tracks along the coast to the sugar fields in Kapoho passing through Kea'au, Kahuwai, Pu`ala`a, Kauaea, and Kaueleau Ahupua`a. In Puna, as it is elsewhere in Hawai`i, agricultural practices are environmentally and ecologically adaptive. As a result of developing industries in the upland regions of Puna, and the presence of remaining communities along the coast, the original mauka-makai trail that led from the coast to the Maku'u region was improved and extended to the recently constructed Volcano Road, effectively linking the Hilo, Volcano, and lower communities of Puna, first by foot, then { by horse, cart and buggy, and finally by automobile. Keonepoko Iki Ahupua'a was retained as Government Land during the Mahele, and no Land Commission Award claims were made within the ahupua'a(Waihona `Aina database 2013). Beginning in 1903 a mauka portion of the ahupua'a (in the vicinity of the current study area) was commuted as grant parcels and homestead lots. Impacts and Mitigation Measures No resources with traditional association of a potential traditional cultural nature (i.e., such as special landforms, groves of trees, lava tube openings, etc.) appear to be present on or near the project site. No streams or wetlands would be affected by the project. No biological resources (e.g. valuable native or Polynesian gathering plants) are found on the project site, or would be expected to be impacted by project activities. None of the entities contacted during early consultation contributed any knowledge of traditional uses or the existence of Traditional Cultural Properties on or near the project site. The project site does not support any traditional resource uses, nor are there any Hawaiian customary and traditional rights or practices known to be associated with it, including the privately owned parcels and the Kahakai Boulevard extension parcel. In conclusion, no cultural features are present and none are likely to be impacted by the proposed project. The Draft EA has been distributed to groups knowledgeable in the area's resources to ensure that this conclusion is valid. 20 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land 3.2.4 Archaeology and Historic Sites Existing Environment, Impacts and Mitigation Measures Archaeological inventory surveys performed in the project area include those for the following; for the Pahoa Elementary School site selection Environmental Impact Statement, which examined an 8-acre site located approximately 0.4 miles south of the project site along Cemetery Road (State of Hawai`i 1988); an archaeological survey in the nearby Maku`u ahupua'a (Rechtman Consulting 2003); a archaeological survey performed for the Pahoa Fire and Police Sub Station Environmental Assessment(Rechtman 2005) located approximately 500 feet northeast of the project site; and an archaeological survey performed as part of the Kea`au-Pahoa Road Widening Project Environmental Assessment (Cultural Surveys Hawai`i 2009). These surveys identified no archaeological or cultural features that might be within the area of impact of their respective projects. Additionally, in their work for this project(Appendix 3), Rechtman Consulting noted the following: Only a few archaeological studies have been completed in Keonepoko Iki and most have been in the coastal portion of the ahupua`a. However, one prior study (Rechtman 2004)was completed for TMK: 3-1-5-07:017, which is located approximately 500 meters to the north of the current study area. The ground surface of that project area was found to have been extensively mechanically disturbed in the past and one lava tube was encountered and explored that proved to be culturally sterile. No historic properties were recorded during that study. The project site is located outside of the Pahoa Historic District(SIHP 50-10-45-7388). No other site registered in the State or National Register of Historic Places is located in the project area. Based on available information, the history of land use, and the current condition of the project area, the State Historic Preservation Division issued a letter dated June 18, 2012 (Appendix 3) stating that they concur that no historic properties on the privately-owned parcels would be affected by the proposed project. With regard to the State-owned Kahakai Boulevard extension parcel, Rechtman Consulting, LLC performed a field inspection of this parcel on December 28, 2012, and observed no surface archaeological resources and concluded that the likelihood of encountering subsurface resources is extremely remote. A letter describing the findings of this archaeological field inspection is attached in Appendix 3. Based on these negative findings, Rechtman Consulting requested that the State Historic Preservation Division issue a determination of"no historic properties affected", and concurrence with this recommendation has been received(Appendix 3). Due to past and ongoing uses of the project site and the lack of archaeological resources on or near the project site, it is not anticipated that there will be any impacts archaeological resources or historic sites. 21 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land In the unlikely event that archaeological resources are encountered during future development activities within the current study area, work in the immediate area of the discovery should be halted and DLNR-SHPD contacted as outlined in Hawai`i Administrative Rules 13§13-275-12. 3.3 Utilities, Public Facilities, and Traffic 3.3.1 Utilities and Public Facilities Existing Facilities and Services Electrical power to the project site is supplied by Hawai`i Electric Light Company (HELCO), a privately owned utility company regulated by the State Public Utilities Commission, via their island-wide distribution network. A transmission line is located along Pahoa Village Road; roadway improvements to Pahoa Village Road would require relocating four transmission line poles. The owner/developer is working with Hawai`i Electric Company to coordinate this work. Electrical power would be supplemented by a photovoltaic electrical generation system installed on the supermarket's roof. Water would be supplied by the Hawai`i County Department of Water Supply. Telephone service is available and would be provided by Hawaiian Telcom. Emergency Fire and Medical services are provided by the Hawai`i Fire Department. Police services are provided by Hawai`i Police Department. A police/fire substation is located a short distance from the project on Pahoa Highway. No sewer service is available in the project area. Wastewater treatment would be provided by construction of individual wastewater treatment facilities (see Section 3.1.2). Solid waste collection for non-households is performed by commercial haulers in the County of Hawai`i. The applicant plans to arrange for segregation of organic waste for composting, as well as collection of used cooking oils. Impacts and Mitigation Measures The proposed action would not have any substantial impact on existing electrical facilities or HELCO's ability to provide electricity. No other utilities would be affected in any way. Electrical demand by the proposed project would be partially mitigated by construction of a photo-voltaic electrical generating array placed on the roof of the supermarket. Demand on solid waste collection facilities would be reduced through separate collection of organic wastes and cooking oils. The Department of Water Supply has expressed that 42 units of water(14 units per parcel) at 400 gallons per unit per day would be available to the project. The applicant anticipates that this would satisfy the water demands of the proposed project(see Appendix lb, DWS letter dated Sept. 12, 2012). 22 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land In summary, the utility infrastructure for the facility is adequate and no adverse impacts are expected. 3.3.2 Traffic Background The project site is occupied by two single-family rental residences in addition to the B.T. Kuwahara, Inc. baseyard and office. One of these residences uses a driveway located along the southern periphery of the project site; this driveway is a portion of an easement used to access parcel TMK (3rd) 1-5-007:051 at the rear of the site. The baseyard, office, and one of the residences together utilize a second driveway near the midpoint of the site. Ongoing activities at the project site produce approximately 20 vehicle trips per day using these two driveways. The adjacent roadways of Kahakai Boulevard and Pahoa Village Road are both two-lane thoroughfares. Kahakai Boulevard has curb, gutter, and sidewalks on the Woodland Center side (i.e., north) and a left-turn lane at the Pahoa Village Road intersection. Pahoa Bypass road becomes Malama Market Road to the north of the Kahakai Boulevard intersection. Speed limits throughout the area are generally 30 mph and 45 mph on the Pahoa Bypass. In order to assess existing conditions and the anticipated traffic impacts of the proposed project a Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR) was performed by Witcher Engineering LLP (Appendix 4). In this section we summarize the TIAR and discuss its recommendations. Section 25-2-46 of the Hawai`i County Code stipulates concurrency requirements for zoning changes. As this Environmental Assessment is a component of a Change of Zone Application (REZ 12-155), assessment and mitigation of traffic impacts, if any, is specifically required. The pertinent portion of Section 25-2-46 of the Hawai`i County Code states the following: (1) If the LOS for any transportation facility in the project area is (A) currently worse than the acceptable level of service, or (B) projected to become worse than the acceptable level of service during the five year period of the TIAR, any rezoning of the property, if approved, shall contain conditions that require mitigation of adverse traffic effects before occupancy of the project is permitted, or that occupancy be delayed until the level of service has reached the acceptable level and is no longer projected to be worse than the acceptable level. (2) Where the LOS deficiency is due to roadway or intersection deficiencies in the immediate vicinity of the project, the conditions of zoning shall require local mitigation. Where the deficiency in LOS is due to insufficient capacity in the transportation facilities serving the project area, the conditions of zoning shall require area mitigation. (3) If there is more than one way to mitigate an adverse effect, the director shall present to the council the pros and cons of the alternatives. (f) Mitigation requirements will be deemed satisfied when: (1) A public agency has committed funds for area mitigation that will remove the LOS deficiency. In the case of the State, commitment of funds means that 23 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land the governor has released funds to complete the improvement. In the case of the County, commitment of funds means that the council has appropriated funds to complete the improvement; or (2) The private developer's commitment to implement mitigation has been secured by bond or equivalent security, or mandatory participation in an improvement district, community facilities district, or other equivalent means of guaranteeing performance. The a.nlicant will comely with concurrence requirements which require a dela in project occupancy until traffic mitigation has been completed. TIAR Introduction The performance of traffic operations on roadway segments and intersections is reflected by the term Level of Service (LOS), a scale with ratings of"A", meaning no traffic congestion, to "F" , meaning extreme congestion and delay. Transportation engineers and planners aim to design roadways to achieve an LOS "C", or better, although LOS "D" is acceptable during peak periods in urban areas. LOS "E" and LOS "F" are typically considered unacceptable. As congestion is worst at peak hours the TIAR examines existing conditions and models future congestion for the peak AM and PM hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM, and 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM. The TIAR examines current conditions and impacts on the following intersections: • Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road • Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Bypass • Pahoa Village Road-Pahoa Bypass • Pahoa Village Road-Malama Market Road The TIAR also makes predictions for LOS at the two proposed project site driveways (i.e.,the "Center" and "South" driveways) along Pahoa Village Road. In addition to modeling LOS at project-vicinity intersections, the TIAR also modeled queuing at these intersections, a measure of the average number of vehicles that backup at intersections during these peak times. This is done primarily to assess if poor LOS at one intersection can adversely affect the LOS at another intersection. Also shown in the TIAR is a signal warrant study, performed to assess whether a signal light at the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection would be justified as determined by specific warrant criteria. The TIAR is presented in its entirety in Appendix 4. Current Conditions Values of vehicles movements for each traveling direction, in each intersection listed above, were observed during August 2011. The Level-Of-Service (LOS) at four project area intersections implied by vehicle counts is summarized in Table 4 (also see Appendix 4, Table 4). Traffic movement near the project site is presently acceptable, with the exception of left-turning northbound traffic at the intersection of Pahoa Bypass-Pahoa Village Road intersection (i.e., turning onto Hwy. 130 Hilo-bound lane), with a LOS "F". We note that the State Department of Transportation is planning to construct a roundabout near the intersection of Pahoa Bypass and 24 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land Pahoa Village Road, that will mitigate the LOS at this intersection. This roundabout is listed on the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) revision#11 (State Department of Transportation 2012). Table 3 - Existing Project Area Intersection LOS Movement AM PM Kahakai Blvd. & Pahoa Village Road Westbound Left B C Westbound Right A B Southbound Through A A Pahoa Bypass and Pahoa Village Road Westbound Left A A Northbound Left F F Northbound Right B B Malama Market Rd. & Pahoa Village Rd. Eastbound Left C B Eastbound Right B B Northbound Left A A Kahakai Blvd. & Pahoa Bypass Northbound Right j B B Future Traffic Conditions Without Improvements The projected traffic volumes were forecast in accordance with the "Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, 2nd Edition" of the Transportation Research Board (1992) and the Highway Capacity Software from the Federal Highway Administration and McTrans Center of the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, based upon existing conditions. The methodology assumes that a particular land use, broken down by type of commercial project(e.g., retail, clinic, quality restaurant,post office, etc., see Appendix 4, Table 5) will generate a specific number of vehicle trips. The TIAR's traffic projections also assume a 2% annual increase in overall traffic due to population change. Furthermore, a set of assumptions of traffic movement are made, including that of the particular fractions of all traffic using each entrance/exit on the proposed commercial center site, as well as the assumption that that 25% of the project- generated traffic comes from the existing traffic. The TIAR uses slightly larger areas to calculate projected traffic, as interior site design has changed slightly since project inception, however, the TIAR is still valid as it may only slightly overestimate generated traffic. LOS computations (Appendix 4, Table 8)were performed for both with and without a roundabout at the intersection of Pahoa Bypass and Pahoa Village Road and both with and without a traffic signal at the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection. Further discussion assumes the roundabout's construction, as it appears that this action is very likely to be completed. Impacts and Mitigation Measures The proposed project would generally increase traffic on Pahoa Village Road, although traffic would also increase given the anticipated increase in population of the project area. The TIAR projects that the Pahoa Bypass Road-Kahakai Boulevard intersection will have adequate LOS 25 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land through the 20-year period if this intersection is signalized, and if a roundabout is constructed by HDOT at the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection. Without construction of a traffic signal at this intersection, the LOS becomes inadequate 5 years from build-out during PM peak hours. The most critical intersection for the proposed project is that of Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road. The County has directed the developer to change this intersection from its current configuration as a "T" intersection to a 4-way junction with a traffic signal, allowing primary access to the proposed project from Kahakai Boulevard. This intersection will have dedicated left-turn lanes for all approach directions. The TIAR predicts that the LOS for all intersection movements will have a LOS of"D" or better at project build-out, meeting the State criterion, and that the approach LOS meets the criterion of being LOS "D" or better out to 20 years from project build-out. In fact, the overall LOS for this signalized intersection would be maintained at LOS "C" or better until 20 years from build-out. Even with construction of the roundabout the intersection of Malama Market Road-Pahoa Villa.e Road has inadesuate L• of"E"twent ears from •ro'ect build-o t. The TIAR notes that HDOT will not allow a left-turn onto Pahoa Village Road to Malama Market Road. The LOS predicted for both proposed driveways accessing the site along Pahoa Village Road are LOS "B" for both AM and PM peak hours throughout the twenty year study period, with the exception of the South Driveway 20 years from project build-out, which would have an LOS "C" for both AM and PM periods. The TIAR also determined that allowing left turns from the two drivewa s would not adversel affect traffic movements at the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Villa•e Road intersection. The roundabout planned for construction near the Pahoa Village Road-Pahoa Bypass intersection is predicted to mitigate poor LOS on Malama Market Road by eliminating the backup of traffic approaching the Pahoa Bypass on Pahoa Village Road. If the existing configuration for Malama Market Road is maintained, with no left-turns allowed, all intersection movements, and overall intersection LOS are maintained at LOS "C" or better through to 20 years from project build-out, with the exception of the overall PM LOS at 20 years from build-out, which is LOS "E". A conceptual laneage plan is shown in Figure 5, depicting roadway improvements that will be made as part of the proposed project. In all, the project site would have four entrances/exits: one on Kahakai Boulevard near the rear of the site used for supermarket deliveries; a primary project entrance located along Kahakai Boulevard near the mid-point of the site; and central and southern driveways located along Pahoa Village Road. Fronting the site, a turn lane would be added in the median between the two driveways. All approach directions to the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road would include left-turn lanes. The southbound approach to this intersection would include a dedicated right-turn lane (onto Kahakai Boulevard). The center 26 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land driveway would have both a left- and right-turn lane for egress. The south driveway would have a single lane for egress. These roadway improvements have been developed through consultation with the County of Hawai`i Department of Public Works (DPW), the County of Hawai`i Planning Department and with the State of Hawai`i Department of Transportation Highways Division (HDOT). The TIAR concludes that this laneage plan and roadway improvements would support adequate LOS through 20 years from project build-out. All improvements would follow • ASHTO standards as well a federal State and ount •uidelines. Other mitigation includes widening of Pahoa Village Road to 600 feet southeast of the Kahakai Boulevard intersection in order to accommodate the turning lanes, sidewalks, curb and gutter. A bus sto would be located on the west side of Pahoa Villa.e Road a..roximatel 150 feet south of the Kahakai Boulevard intersection. Pahoa Village Road would be widened to about 200 feet north of the Pahoa Villa.e Road-Kahakai Boulevard extension to accomm.date a ri•ht-turn lane. The len.th of this ri•ht-turn lane a.sears to be ade•uate as it maintains a L•S of"A"throu•h the 20-year timeline. The westbound a.'roach to the Pahoa Village Road-Kahakai Boulevard intersection would therefore have two lanes i ludin• . dedicated left-turn lane. The len•th of t o's turn lane is limited by the Woodland Center driveways, but will extend as far as possible in this direction (i.e. about 140 feet). This configuration is predicted to maintain a peak-hour LOS of "D" or better throu•h 20 ears from construction. The Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection would include four crosswalks, allowing safe pedestrian access to the bus stops and nearby businesses. The west side of Pahoa Village Road, along the front of the project site, would have sidewalks in order to accommodate pedestrians. In other areas the project's roadway improvements would include paved shoulders, which would safely accommodate bicycles and pedestrians. Pedestrian ingress and egress to the site would be via sidewalks that would be adjacent to the vehicular access points.•. . . . - . . . . . . . • - -- . . 9- :. - .. - . , . . . the State Department of Transportation. Traffic impact mitigation would preserve pedestrian safety with four crosswalks planned for the signalized Pahoa Village Road-Kahakai Boulevard intersection, allowing safe movement to and from the bus stops, as well as nearby facilities. Pahoa Village Road widening would be sufficient to safely accommodate bicyclists, as would the Kahakai Boulevard extension. Covered bicycle parking is planned on the interior of the project site. Sidewalks would front the site along Pahoa Village Road and the Kahakai Boulevard extension on the project side of the street. We anticipate that shoulders would be wide enough to accommodate bicyclists. As construction of the proposed project's intersection improvements and construction of the SR 130 roundabout by HDOT are not expected to be concurrent, we do not anticipate adverse traffic impacts during roadway construction apart from single-lane closures. Recent communications with HDOT have indicated that construction on the roundabout is not likely to occur before mid- 27 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land 2014. sis ma allow construction of the .ro'ect's roadwa improvements before roundabout constructi. •e•ins. If t 's is not the case the applicant will -nsure that the proposed .ro'ect's roadway improvements are not constructed at the same time as HDOT's roundabout construction as this situation would result i undesirable traffic impacts. The applicant anticipates that. if roundabout construction is ongoing when project construction begins, construction on the Kahakai Boulevard extension would commence first with no other roadwa improvements performed until roundabout co struction is com.leted. The recommended traffic miti•ation considered other mitigation strate pies for the Pahoa Villa:e Road-Kahakai Boulevard intersection includin• a four-wa sto. a roundabout and other laneage configurations. A four-way stop is considered to be too hazardous to pedestrians, .articular)_liven that childr-n and elderl would utilize the b s stops. A roundabout is not considered to be a feasible solution to the applicant. as it would resuire use of lands owned b no less than six landowners including the State, County and four private landowners. If a roundabout were to be the recommended traffic mitigation at this intersection, its construction would be like) to re•uire condemnation .roceedin•s b tate and ount a•- cies in order to ac'uire reauired lands. Furthermore the recommended traffic miti•ation is ex.ected to provide of ective traffic miti•ation throw h a 20- ear horizon and no other miti•ation i.e. improvements to other. more distan t intersections), is recommended b the TIAR or b consulting regulatory agencies. The recommended traff c miti. .tion and con -•uent lanea•e plan was achieved under some constrai t . For example it ma be 'referable to have a dedicated ri•ht-turn lane on the westbound a. .roach to the Pahoa Villa:e Road-Kahakai Boulevard intersection however this is not possible as there is not adequate space within the right-of-wa . Regional traffic impacts resulting from the proposed project are not assessed in the TIAR. However, the proposed project would result in net positive regional traffic impacts by reducing the total traffic load on Highway 130 north of Pahoa. In other words, the proposed project would move traffic loads closer to the project site, thereby improving overall regional traffic loads, and hence LOS, in other areas. Having additional services and employment would reduce the need Puna District residents have for travel to other commercial service areas in Kea'au, Hilo, and other areas on Hawai`i Island. While the net change in traffic load to the Hilo-Kea'au-Pahoa portion of Highway 130 is difficult to assess, it can be estimated to be very roughly equivalent to the number of vehicle trips to the project site. Total •arkin• on the .ro'ect site is estimated at 360-375 total stalls. Eight stalls would be ADA accessible and would be a..ro.riatel distributed. There would be no street .arkii• allowed al•n Pahoa Vi a.e Road but treet •arkin• ma be allowed on •ortion .f Kahakai Boulevard near its west end i.e. near the rear of the project si e with the intent to accommodat- em•lo ee •arkin•. To . low fo this .ossibili and a sociated •edestrian mo vements the Kahakai Boulevard Exten ion would be 'm proved to full commercial t. dards. Emile ee parkin' would also utilize underutilized parking areas on the interior of the site. 28 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land Figure 5 - Pahoa Village Road—Kahakai Boulevard Intersection ' 1 c.7 ( j_, iiiIIIIIIMIliliktN., ..... ... ___, :.„.. •- al :+_-- M Fe -41- 1r =-_-_-• . .r.._ =zif6----- (loutuistion—/- - 1 SPECIALTY RETAIL 1,. .. - SPECIALTY i , ,1,-..... 100'X 50' BLDG RETAIL -... 5,000 S.F. L11 200.X50'BLDG f 17 STALLS REO'D , ,', 34 STALLS .1 BUS 1 i/PI RFO'D SHE T BY BHC,\R`, 1 . , 8,000 S.F. I---, SP. RETAIL i .'.'• ).. ,. - SPECIALTY RETAIL S.F 100'X 50' BLDG .. . , HIGH VOLUME 5.000 S F O'D _ - RESTAURANT , 17 STALLS RE . 1 ) L { \ ...- ... .,...)i I I 1 C......-- .. I„ t I . _ FE lxii.sLT.13!VploCE HIS AN I - I i 3036 SF - DUALITY 4t 1 10 STALLS RIOT RESTAURANT 'p 1001t50' - 17 STALLS • , Ran) I .i• - STAGING AREA 4. .- • \ .) ,...1 1 A 1 1 1 . 0. _, '• • ..411111112. i , MEDICAL DENTAL 60'X 84' BLOG 5.040 S.F. 17 STALLS REO'D MEDICAL CLINIC 150' X 75LD ' BG '' 11.250 S.F. 38 STALLS RIOT h140ME . I L i I 1 i 1' I i 29 B.T. Kuwahara Private Development and Related Use of State Land No Build Alternative With the No Build Alternative, the roadway improvements would not be constructed, including the signalized intersection and Kahakai Boulevard extension. As the proposed project would not be built and hence there would be no consequent increase in traffic volume along Pahoa Village Road. The LOS at particular intersections in the project area would remain inadequate however, and there would be, perhaps, less impetus to construct other roadway improvements in the area(i.e.,the Pahoa Bypass Roundabout). While some adverse, but mitigable, traffic impacts would not be observed with the No Build Alternative, the lack of additional services in the project area would mean that these services would be accessed more distantly, resulting in more vehicles traveling to those services in more distant locations and greater total use of roadways. 3.4 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts The project would not involve any secondary or cumulative impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Although the project would provide short-term construction jobs, these would almost certainly be filled by local residents as unemployment is relatively high in the County of Hawai`i (see Section 3.2.1). Cumulative impacts result when implementation of several projects that individually have limited impacts combine to produce more severe impacts or conflicts in mitigation measures. The adverse effects of the project - very minor and temporary disturbance to air quality and noise during construction - are limited in severity, nature and geographic scale, or are mitigable. At the current time, there are no other development projects known to have been planned near the project site that would combine in such a way as to produce adverse cumulative effects or involve a commitment for larger actions. However, it is possible that properties near the project site may be developed in a manner consistent with pertinent community and government plans. It may be anticipated, in this case, that the most significant impacts may be traffic impacts, traffic demands in the project area would increase significantly, and should be alleviated by construction of the noted roundabout at the Pahoa Bypass/Highway 130 intersection, as well as by roadways improvements required by County of Hawai`i Concurrency requirements. 3.5 Required Permits and Approvals The following permits and approvals would be required: County of Hawaii Department of Public Works Building Permit Grading & Driveway Permits Planning Department State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application Change of Zone Application Plan Approval State of Hawai`i Board of Land and Natural Resources approval for conveyance of road lot to the County of Hawai`i Department of Health Underground Injection Control Approval of Wastewater Treatment Systems National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Department of Transportation—Highways Division Permit to Work Upon State Highways 3.6 Consistency with Government Plans and Policies 3.6.1 County Zoning The project site is in Hawai`i County Agricultural Zoning Designation. The owner/developer has applied for a zoning change from Agricultural (A-1 a)to Village Commercial (CV-10— 10,000 square feet), that would result in conformance between zoning and the proposed use. Hearing on this application has been deferred by the County of Hawai`i Planning Department until completion of this Environmental Assessment. The property is not situated within the County's Special Management Area(SMA). 3.6.2 County of Hawai`i General Plan The County of Hawai`i General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG). The LUPAG map component of the General Plan is a graphic representation of the Plan's goals, policies, and standards as well as of the physical relationship between land uses. It also establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the planned public and cultural facilities, public utilities and safety features, and transportation corridors. The project site is classified as medium density urban in the LUPAG (Figure 4, Hawai`i County 2012), as adopted by County of Hawai`i Ordinance no. 12-89 on June 27, 2012. The project is consistent with the medium density urban designation, which is intended for village and neighborhood commercial and single family and multiple family residential and related functions (Hawai`i County 2005). The County of Hawai`i General Plan: The General Plan for the County of Hawai`i is a policy document expressing the broad goals and policies for the long-range development of the Island of Hawai`i. The General Plan itself is organized into thirteen elements, with policies, objectives, standards, and policies for each. There are also discussions of the specific applicability of each element to the nine judicial districts comprising the County of Hawai`i. Figure 6 - P_ whoa Village LUPAG Map ♦♦•`x••1.1-∎ / ', . ..... .. • 4.,.. ..ifs..... -*- - 4,4, • •••• „c:,,,-7, ,, ❖:❖•❖•❖:❖:•;:••••‘ •'iii♦i••iiiiiiii♦iii 4` '""'•• .�O♦♦••........•,;•••O. M►' �, i• _ ` It II ill •�♦♦.♦•si♦..♦♦♦♦•♦•♦fir. +•. •••••ii••••i♦iiii••i!.`se* 'tea .•.♦♦•♦•.4,......♦•♦.•♦•.•:• 4.0 •O•♦. t .• ,i, virt__t. ��:N•+♦�i.�i''♦•♦iO:.O•♦•♦•♦•i♦♦•♦•i i•♦wi. 1 4 . ---,-,P,,tffrt 'f itriallr •■•''''• A t..4z: Nimiri*:41: ilk , \ . .„. , ,,.., :: Legend: Orange—medium density urban,Yellow—low density urban,Crosshatch—urban expansion,White—extensive agriculture Most relevant to the project are the following Goals, Standards, Policies and Courses of Action of the Economic Chapter: Chapter 2: Economic, Section 2.2 Goals (a)Provide residents with opportunities to improve their quality of life through economic development that enhances the County's natural and social environments. (b)Economic development and improvement shall be in balance with the physical, social, and cultural environments of the island of Hawai`i. (c) Strive for diversity and stability in the economic system. (d)Provide an economic environment that allows new, expanded, or improved economic opportunities that are compatible with the County's cultural, natural and social environment. (e) Strive for an economic climate that provides its residents an opportunity for choice of occupation. (f) Strive for diversification of the economy by strengthening existing industries and attracting new endeavors. (g) Strive for full employment. (h)Promote and develop the island of Hawai`i into a unique scientific and cultural model, where economic gains are in bal ance with social and physical amenities. Development should be reviewed on the basis of total impact on the residents of the County, not only in terms of immediate short run economic benefits. Discussion: The project satisfies relevant goals in the Hawai`i County General Plan, Economic Chapter. The proposed project would improve the supply and diversity of employment available in the project area, would provide both short- and long-term employment. This environmental assessment facilitates assurance that development will be in balance with social and physical amenities. Chapter 2: Economic, Section 2.3 Policies (d)Require a study of the significant cultural, social and physical impacts of large developments prior to approval. (f) Support all levels of educational, employment and training opportunities and institutions. (I)Identify and encourage primary industries that are consistent with the social, physical, and economic goals of the residents of the County. (p)Identify the needs of the business community and take actions that are necessary to improve the business climate. (y)Encourage new industries that provide favorable benefit-cost relationships to the people of the County. Benefit-cost relationships include more than fiscal considerations. Discussion: The proposed project satisfies relevant policies in the Hawai`i County General Plan, Economic Chapter. The proposed project would support a range of education and training opportunities in addition to employment. The economic impact has been discussed in Section X of this EA and is anticipated to be positive and significant. 3.6.3 Puna Community Development Plan The Community Development Plans, developed for each judicial district on the Island, are mandated by 2005 County of Hawai`i General Plan in order to translate broad General Plan goals, policies, and standards into implementation actions. They are also intended to serve as a forum for community input into land-use, delivery of government services, and any other matters relating to the planning area. The Puna Community Development Plan (PCDP), as amended, was adopted by Ordinance No. 08-116 on September 10, 2008 and identifies "village centers" or"town centers" as the model on which Puna's future land use pattern will be based. The PCDP designates Pahoa as a Regional Town Center mean to provide a wide range of services and amenities to the communities in the region (Figure 7). The Regional Town Center designation includes areas adjacent to the project site. As the PCDP is an ongoing process, the Pahoa Community Plan Steering Committee (PPSC) has been actively soliciting community input. The applicant has sought input on the project's design from the PPSC. Recently the Pahoa Regional Town Center Steering Committee has published draft design guidelines for the Pahoa Design District, of which the proposed project site is a part(Planning Department 2013). The purpose of these design guidelines is to ensure that the unique sense of place represented by the unique characteristics of Pahoa Town are preserved. In order to accomplish this all projects requiring Planning Department plan approval will undergo review by the Pahoa Design Review Committee to ensure compliance. In the following section we summarize and discuss the sections and excerpts of the Puna Community Development Plan pertinent to the proposed project. Land Use Patterns, 3.1.3 Actions b. Establish the following general classifications and locations for village and town centers in Puna: 1) Kea'au, Pahoa, and Hawaiian Paradise Park shall serve as Regional Town Centers to provide a wide range of services for the Puna district; c. Facilitate land use entitlements and other tools for the development of existing and future village/town centers and special design districts by: 1) Recommending approval of applications for commercial zoning or use permits for existing commercial uses in designated village/town centers that do not presently have appropriate entitlements, and for proposed uses at appropriate nearby locations, provided that the size and use of the expansion area conforms to the criteria applicable to the type of village/town center at that location; Discussion: The project site is adjacent to areas designated as the Pahoa Regional Town center. The proposed us is consisted with the uses specified for Regional Town centers. 3.0 Social Services and Housing. 3.3.1 Goals a. Puna residents have improved access to emergency and primary medical care and preventive public health programs. 3.0 Social Services and Housing. 3.3.3 Actions a. Develop a centrally-located, 24-hour, full-service medical facility, with trauma care, in Puna. Establish multiple clinic level facilities offering primary medical and dental services in village centers in Upper and Lower Puna. Expand existing County-funded transportation services to carry people from subdivisions to medical facilities. ( ( Discussion: The project satisfies relevant goals and actions relating to Social Services and Housing in the Puna Community (- Development Plan, as it would include a medical clinic where primary medical care would be available and public health programs would be supported. Project site medical facilities would (_ be located very near Hele-On Bus Stops. 4.0 Transportation, 4.1 Traffic Demand Management. 4.1.1 Goals ( b. The percentage of residents who commute to employment or travel for services outside of Puna is reduced. 4.0 Transportation, 4.1 Traffic Demand Management. 4.1.2 Objectives - c. Provide more services and employment within Puna's village ( and town centers. d. Create new employment opportunities in Puna in order to reduce long commuting. ( Discussion: The project satisfies relevant goals and actions relating to Social Services and ( Housing in the Puna Community Development Plan, as it will include a medical clinic where primary medical care will be available and public health programs will be supported. ( 4.0 Transportation, 4.1 Traffic Demand Management. 4.2.1 Goals a. Mass transportation options are increased for all Puna residents. b. Transit service and improvements reinforce and complement the development of village/town centers. ( 4.0 Transportation, 4.1 Traffic Demand Management. 4.2.2 ( Objectives d. Strengthen County capability and resources to operate the transit ( system and increase ridership. (" e. Ensure that pedestrians can access bus stops safely. Discussion: The project satisfies relevant goals and objectives specified in the Puna Community Development Plan. The proposed project would construct a second bus stop along Pahoa Village Road. 4.3 Roadway Network, 4.3.1 Goals (c. Roadways are pedestrian and bicycle friendly. d. Traffic congestion and traffic-related health risks are reduced. ( 4.3 Roadway Network 4.3.3 Actions ( Include pedestrian and bicycling requirements in all projects. Discussion: The project satisfies relevant goals and actions relating to Roadway Network in the Puna Community Development Plan, mitigation will ensure that adverse traffic impacts are avoided. The intersection would include pedestrian crosswalks, and the project would be designed in order to protect pedestrian safety. Although site design is ongoing,the applicant plans to include sheltered bicycle racks in the project. ( ( 3.6.4 Hawaii 2050 In 2005 the State legislature enacted Act 8 which provided for the development of a ( sustainability plan to address the vital needs of Hawaii through the year 2050. This plan, the Hawaii 2050 Sustainability Plan,was published in 2008 and enumerated the following 9 priority actions as intermediate steps for the year 2020: (_ 1. Increase affordable housing opportunities for households up to 140% of ( median income. 2. Strengthen public education. 3. Reduce reliance on fossil fuels. ( 4. Increase recycling,reuse, and waste reduction strategies_. 5. Develop a more diverse and resilient ( 6. Create a sustainability ethic. 7. Increase production and consumption of local foods and products, particularly agriculture. 8. Provide access to long-term care and elderly housing. ( 9. Preserve and perpetuate our Kanaka Maoli and island cultural values. Discussion: The grocery store tenant has expressed intent to produce electricity via a (_ photovoltaic array. Landscaping would not require irrigation(i.e.,xeriscaping), and ( composting of organic waste would performed. ( 3.6.5 Hawai`i State Plan ( Adopted in 1978 and last revised in 1991 (Hawai`i Revised Statutes, Chapter 226, as amended), the Hawai`i State Plan establishes a set of themes, goals, objectives and policies that are meant to guide the State's long-run growth and development activities. ( The three themes that express the basic purpose of the Hawai`i State Plan are individual and family self-sufficiency, social and economic mobility and community or social well- ( being. The project would promote these goals primarily by enhancing employment opportunities and by providing essential services (i.e.,medical services) for the Puna District. ( The policies and goals of the Hawaii State Plan determine a strong economy within a healthy economy and physical, social, and economic well-being for individuals and families that would enhance the character and strength of our communities. Economic health is an often-repeated theme of the Hawaii State Plan, and states that the State shall promote a healthy business climate and industries that facilitate economic health, particularly in places that have high rates of underemployment. Concerning transportation,the Hawaii State Plan's objectives and policies endeavor to create a (" transportation system of adequate capacity to accommodate growth. Discussion: The proposed project is consistent with the Goals of the Hawai`i State Plan, as it would serve to create a strong, viable economy and, as such, would enhance physical, social, and economic well-being for individuals in the Puna District. Apart from the provision of employment and economic opportunity,the proposed project represents appropriate development, as there is a widely-acknowledged lack of services in the project area, including medical clinics. So the proposed project would serve to manage population growth by, in part,providing roadway improvements to both State and County lands and roadways in an area that has seen very rapid growth, and in this respect is consistent with this section of the Hawai`i State Plan. The proposed project is consistent with relevant portions of the Hawai`i State Plan Objectives and Policies for the Economy section as it would result in a large number of jobs. Roadway improvements were developed in coordination with appropriate regulatory agencies. The project is being design to consider sustainability of the natural environment; the applicant is advocating to have rooftop photovoltaic systems constructed on the proposed buildings wherever possible, and to compost and use food waste for soil amendment. Mass transit would be supported with construction of a bus stop along Pahoa Village Road. 3.6.6 State Land Use District All land in the State of Hawai`i is classified into one of four land use categories — Urban, Rural, Agricultural, or Conservation —by the State Land Use Commission, pursuant to Chapter 205 HRS. The project site's State Land Use District designation is Agricultural, however, an application to change the LUD designation to Urban has been submitted to the County of Hawai`i Planning Department(SLU 12-033). Section 205-17 HRS and Section 15-15-77 HAR specify the decision-making criteria for boundary amendments. Section 205-17 HRS states the following in its entirety; In its review of any petition for reclassification of district boundaries pursuant to this chapter, the commission shall specifically consider the following: (1) The extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the Hawaii state plan and relates to the applicable priority guidelines of the Hawaii state plan and the adopted functional plans; (2) The extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable district standards; (3) The impact of the proposed reclassification on the following areas of state concern: (A) Preservation or maintenance of important natural systems or habitats; (B) Maintenance of valued cultural, historical, or natural resources; (C) Maintenance of other natural resources relevant to Hawaii's economy, including agricultural resources; (D) Commitment of state funds and resources; (E) Provision for employment opportunities and economic development; and (F) Provision for housing opportunities for all 'ncome groups, particularly the low, low-moderate, and gap groups; 4 If e tand. d •d criteri. fe r the ec .s i cati•n or rezonfn. o (_ important agricultural lands in section 205-50; 5 Th e era an a communit dev 1 t r community development plans adopted pursuant to the county general plan, as they relate to the land that is the subject of the reclassification ( petition; and (6) The representations and commitments made by the petitioner in ( securing a boundary change. HAR 17-17-77 states the following in its entirety: DECISION-MAKING CRITERIA FOR BOUNDARY AMENDMENTS §15-15-77 Decision-making criteria for boundary amendments. (a) The commission shall not approve an amendment of a land use district (. boundary unless the commission finds upon the clear preponderance of the ( evidence that the proposed boundary amendment is reasonable,not violative of section 205-2, HRS, and consistent with the policies and criteria established pursuant to sections 205-16,205-17, and 205A-2, ( HRS. (b) In its review of any petition for reclassification of district boundaries pursuant to this chapter,the commission shall specifically consider the following: (1) The extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to th- . . .1. . .le goals • ••-ctiv-s d .o • 'e • e Hawaii state plan and relates to the applicable priority guidelines of the Hawaii state plan and the adopted functional plans; (2) The extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable district standards; (3) The impact of the proposed reclassification on the following areas of state concern: (A) Preservation or maintenance of important natural systems or habitats; ( (B) Maintenance of valued cultural,historical, or natural resources; (C) Maintenance of other natural resources relevant to ( Hawaii's economy including, but not limited to agricultural resources; (D) Commitment of state funds and resources; (E) Provision for employment opportunities and economic (_ development; and ( (F) Provision for housing opportunities for all income groups, particularly the low, low-moderate, and gap groups; (4) In establishing the boundaries of the districts in each county, the commission shall give consideration to the general plan of the county in which the land is located; (5)The representations and commitments made by the petitioner in securing a boundary change, including a findin• that the .etitioner has the necessary economic ability to carry out the representations and commitments relating to the proposed use or development; and (6) Lands in intensive agricultural use for two years prior to date of filing of a petition or lands with a hi•h ca.a • _ for 'nten 'v- agricultural use shall not be taken out of the agricultural district unless the commission finds either that the action: (A) Will not substantially impair actual or potential agricultural production in the vicinity of the subject property or in the county or State; or (B) Is reasonably necessary for urban growth. (c)Amendments of a land use district boundary in conservation district involving land areas fifteen acres or less shall be determined by the commission pursuant to this subsection and section 205-3.1, HRS. (d)Amendments of land use district boundary in other than conservation districts involving land areas fifteen acres or less shall be determined by the appropriate county land use decision-making authority for the district. (e) Amendments of a land use district boundary involving land areas greater than fifteen acres shall be determined by the commission, pursuant to this subsection and section 205-3.1,HRS. Discussion: We have discussed conformance of the proposed project with the Hawaii State Plan and its functional plans, Hawaii County General Plan, and the Puna Community IP evelopment Plan, and determined it to be consistent with these. The project would conform to applicable district standards upon reclassification. The proposed project would be located within the urban expan sion area of Pahoa Village and is therefore consistent with the Hawaii County General Plan. The proposed pro_ect would not adversely affect any important natural systems or habitats, valued cultural, historical, or natural resources, and would not utilize lands of agricultural importance. The .ro•ect would .e co sletel funded b srivate fun.s. The .ro•ect would re.uire us- of State lands including the Kahakai Boulevard extension. The propject would provide employment opportunities and would be beneficial to the economy of the project area (i.e., The Puna District). The project would not cause significant stress on public facilities. Lastly,the applicant would be solely responsible for the cost and construction of recommended traffic improvements. PART 4: ANTICIPATED DETERMINATION Based on the findings below, and upon consideration of comments to the Draft EA,the applicant expects that the County of Hawai`i Planning Department will determine that the Proposed Action will not significantly alter the environment, as impacts will be minimal, and thus will issue a Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI). PART 5: FINDINGS AND REASONS Chapter 11-200-12, Hawai`i Administrative Rules, outlines those factors agencies must consider when determining whether an Action has significant effects: 1. The project will not involve an irrevocable commitment or loss or destruction of any natural or cultural resources. No valuable natural or cultural resources would be committed or lost. 2. The project will not curtail the range of beneficial uses of the environment. No restriction of beneficial uses would occur. 3. The project will not conflict with the State's long-term environmental policies. The State's long-term environmental policies are set forth in Chapter 344, HRS. The broad goals of this policy are to conserve natural resources and enhance the quality of life. The project fulfills aspects of these policies calling for an improved social environment. It is thus consistent with all elements of the State's long-term environmental policies. 4. The project will not substantially affect the economic or social welfare of the community or State. The project is expect to have positive impacts on the economic or social welfare of the County or State, and would improve the social welfare of the project area, including the Puna District. 5. The project does not substantially affect public health in any detrimental way. The project would affect public health and safety in only beneficial ways by providing access to medical and dental care. Traffic impacts would be mitjated though roadway a d .- •e tri•n im. .v-ment s c as cros wal idew.lks . d . .0 to. .t ts mention the DOT roundabout project. 6. The project will not involve substantial secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. No secondary effects are expected to result from the proposed action.No population changes are expected as a result of the action, and impacts on public facilities are negligible. 7. The project will not involve a substantial degradation of environmental quality. Environmental quality will not be adversely impacted, as impacts are minor and mitigable. The potential for noise impacts and water and air quality impacts during construction would be mitigated. 8. The project will not substantially affect any rare, threatened or endangered species of flora or fauna or habitat. The project site supports overwhelmingly alien vegetation. Impacts to rare, threatened or endangered species of flora or fauna will not occur, with the exception of two individual listed plants that will be preserved and incorporated into landscaping. ( 9. The project is not one which is individually limited but cumulatively may have considerable effect upon the environment or involves a commitment for larger actions. Although properties near the project site may be developed,the project is not related to other activities in the region in such a way as to produce adverse cumulative effects or ( involve a commitment for larger actions. 10. The project will not detrimentally affect air or water quality or ambient noise (. levels. No adverse effects on these resources would occur. Mitigation of construction- phase impacts will preserve water quality. Ambient noise impacts due to construction will be temporary and restricted to daytime hours, and mitigated through permit compliance. ( 11. The project does not affect nor would it likely to be damaged as a result of being located in environmentally sensitive area such as a flood plain, tsunami zone, erosion- prone area, geologically hazardous land, estuary,fresh water, or coastal area. Although the project is located in an area with volcanic and seismic risk, the entire Island of Hawaii shares this risk,and the project is not imprudent to construct. The project site is not located near surface water features, nor is it located near the shoreline or flood plains. ( 12. The project will not substantially affect scenic vistas and viewplanes identified in county or state plans or studies. No scenic vistas and viewplanes will be adversely affected by the project. 13. The project will not require substantial energy consumption. The project would require electrical generation, which would be supplemented by electrical generation with photovoltaics.No adverse effects would be expected. For the reasons above,the proposed Action will not have any significant effect in the context of Chapter 343, Hawai`i Revised Statues and section 11-200-12 of the State Administrative Rules. • ( ( ( REFERENCES Allred, K. & Allread, C., 1997.Development and Morphology of Kazumura Cave, Hawai`i. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, 59(2): 67-80. American Society for Testing and Materials 2005.ASTME 1527-05 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (Phase I ESA). Barrere, W. 1959. "Political History of Puna" as in Natural and Cultural History Report on the Kalapana Extension of the Hawai`i Volcanoes National Park Vol. I, pp. 15-65. Compiled by Emory, K.P., Bonk, W.J., Sinoto, Y.H., Barrere, D.B. Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Inc., 2011.Addemdum Archaeological Inventory Survey for the Keaau-Pahoa Road Widening Project: Keaau Ahupuaa to Waiakahiula Ahupuaa, Puna District, Hawaii Island. Prepared for SSFM International. Gagne, W., and L. Cuddihy. 1990. "Vegetation,"pp. 45-114 in W.L. Wagner, D.R. Herbst, and S.H. Sohmer, eds., Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawai`i. 2 vols. Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press. Government Accounting Office 1992. "Reducing Earthquake Losses Throughout the United States, United States Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2005-3052. Hawai`i County Planning Department. 2005. The General Plan, County of Hawai`i. Hilo. Hawai`i County Research and Development Department. 2010.Hawai`i County Data Book. Hilo. Hawai`i State Department of Transportation 2012. State of Hawai`I Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, Revision#11. Downloaded from http://hawaii.gov/dot/highways/STIP, December 1, 2012. Heliker, C. 1990. Volcanic and Seismic Hazards on the Island of Hawai V. Washington: U.S. GPO. Holcomb, R. 1987. "Eruptive History and Long-Term Behavior of Kilauea Volcano." As in: Volcanism in Hawaii. U.S. Geological Professional Paper 1350, Vol. 1 (Eds.: R.W. Decker, T.L. Wright and P.H. Stauffer). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.,261-350. International Building Code 2006, ninth printing. International Code Council, Inc. Transportation Research Board 1992.Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 209, 2nd Edition. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. i Kamakau, S. 1961.Ruling Chiefs of Hawaii. Honolulu: The Kamehameha Schools Press. Maly, K. 1999. The Historic Puna Trail—Old Government Road(Kea'au Section): Archival Historical Documentary Research, Oral History and Consultation Study, and Limited Site Preservation Plan. Kumu Pono Associates Report, prepared for Na Ala Hele Progream, DOFAW, Hilo. McEldowney, H. 1979. "Archaeological and Historical Literature Search and Research Design: Lava Flow Control Study, Hilo Hawai`i." Manuscript on file, Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division. Planning Department 2013.Pahoa Town Center Draft Design Guidelines, Perpared by the Pahoa Town Center Design Working Group, January 25, 2013. Retrieved from: http://records.co.hawaii.hi.us/Weblink8/DocView.aspx?dbid=l&id=63816. Rechtman,R.B., 2003.Archaeology and Limited Cultural Assessment for the Proposed DHHL Maku`u Water System (TMK 3-1-5-08:01). Halona and Maku`u Ahupua`a, Puna District, Island of Hawai`i. Rechtman Consulting LLC,Keaau,Hawaii. Rechtman,R.B. 2004 Request for SHPO Concurrence with a Determination of No Historic Properties Affect Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act and in Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act(TMK: 3-1-5-07:17), Keonepolo Nui and Keonepoko Iki ahupua`a, Puna District, Island of Hawai`i. Rechtman Consulting,LLC, Keaau, Hawaii. Rechtman,R.B., 2005.Request for SHPO Concurrence with a Determination of No Historic Properties Affected Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act and in Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, (TMK: 3-1-5-07:17). Keonopoki Nui and Keonepoko Iki auhpua`a. Puna District, Island of Hawai`i. Rechtman Consulting LLC,Keaau,Hawaii. Soehren, L.J., 2002.A Catalog of Hawaiian Place Names: Compiled from the Records of the Boundary Commission and the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles of the (_ Kingdom of Hawaii. Ulukau Digital Library(http://ulukau.org/cgi-bin/hpn). State of Hawai`i Department of Business, Economic Development& Tourism(DBEDT) 2007. Retrieved December 2012 from ( http://hawaii.gov/dbedt/info/economic/data reports/2007-io/State2007IO-7-2011.pdf State of Hawai`i. 1988. Site Selection Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement _ for the New Pahoa Elementary School, Pahoa, Hawaii. Prepared for the State of Hawaii (Department of Accounting & General Services. Prepared by Wilson Okamoto & Associates, Inc., Honolulu, Hawai`i. ( ( ( State Department of Transportation 2012. Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, revision#11, effective 11/2/2012. Honolulu, Hawai`i. Stone., F. 2012. Personal communication. Stokes, J., and T. Dye. 1991. "Heiau of the Island of Hawai`i."Bishop Museum Bulletin in Anthropology 2. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census, 2012, http://factfinder.census.gov/ . U.S. Soil Conservation Service. 1973. Soil Survey of Island ofHawai`i, State ofHawai`i. Washington: U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. University of Hawaii at Hilo, Dept. of Geography. 1998.Atlas of Hawai7. 3rd ed. Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press. University of Hawai`i at Manoa, Dept. of Geography. 1983.Atlas of Hawai`i. 2nd ed. Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2013. Threatened and endangered plants in Hawai`i. Washington: GPO. http://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/us-species.html United States Bureau of Labor Statistics 2012. Retrieved December 2012 from http://www.bls.dov Wagner, W.L., Herbst, D.R., & Sohmer, S.H. 1999. Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawai`i. Revised Edition, Vol. 1, pp. 1364-1367. Waihona `Aina database, 2013. http://www.waihona.com/ Wolfe, E.W., and J. Morris. 1996. Geologic Map of the Island of Hawai7. USGS Misc. Investigations Series Map i-2524-A. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey. Wright, T.L., Chun, J.Y.F. ,Exposo, Jean, Heliker, Christina, Hodge, Jon, Lockwood, J.P., and Vogt, S.M., 1992, Map showing lava-flow hazard zones, Island of Hawaii: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2193, scale 1:250,000. APPENDIX la COMMENTS RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO EARLY CONSULTATION K #7 -j.�7; NEIL ABERCROMB11; r1 : AM/El M. MASACATATlf C,QV[R<;UR 3 _ —� i ' MAN DFSIGNA'1R NTATF:OF ILkWAII %• ' 1' HAWAIIAN HAWN L'OMMISSION mss. MICHELLE K.KAUHANE - - LIYVT?TO THE CIUfladAN STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HAWAIIAN HOME LANDS P.0 BOX 1879 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96805 October 22 , 2012 GK Environmental LLC Attn: Graham Knopp, Principal P.O. Box 1310 Honokaa, Hawaii- 96727 Dear Mr. Knopp: Subject: Environmental Assessment (EA) for Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and Related Roadway Improvements, Island of Hawai 'i, TMK (3rd) 1-5-007 : 6, 69 & 70 Thank you for the opportunity to review the Environmental Assessment (EA) for Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and Related Roadway Improvements . The Department of Hawaiian Homes Lands has no comment to offer at this time. If you have any questions, please contact our Planning Office at (808) 620-9480 . Aloha, Jobie M.K. Masaga i, Chairman Designate Hawaiian Homes Commission ° e, ( Nth.IAaERCII NH6t1i R , � GOV1 NNOROFHAWwN 1451'.,_ ear PAL I`A „M iR, A .w INtA1*HI LAM MPMitt/AI i1M1*$ E tllMltl4MMIIMWM;R WIWIit 1 Y474M4At114I AVINd 44:N A0111011111) t r STATE OF HAWAII - 1 . DEPARTM ENT ON LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION (_ POST OFFICE BOX 621 statecitive0 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 ( October 23,2012 ( OK Environmental LLC Attention: Mr.Graham Knapp via email:gpl nopp(u`gkenvllc`com P.O. Box 1310 Honokaa,Hawaii 96727 ( Dear Mr.Knopp: SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment(EA)for Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and Related Roadway Improvements, OK Environmental LLC for B.T. Kuwahara LLC,Pahoa, Puna,Hawaii;TMK: (3) 1-5-007:6,69&70 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Department of Land and Natural Resources' (DLNR) Land Division distributed or made available a copy of your report pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR Divisions for their review and comments. At this time enclosed are comments from the Engineering Division on the subject matter. Should you have any questions,please feel free to call Kevin Moore at(808) 587-0426. Thank ( you. Sincerely, I .,_ 'Russell Y.T'- ji Land Administrator (. Enclosure(s) ( ( t, �� NIULANIRCRONIUS ookaalcilkorlima . '120CT•2 011041 I M!(1Wl14 0k CEiVEu `1"'"'""°` • ' --rr t C aw�i�o�"�oieN"►wn+lut.�eo"aKa p #' r, e (� w�r+aRawr�tww"ow.a STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES 2012 001 1B A LAM)DIVISION DE HO & �,�.t, POSTOFtCEBOX621 N r�lJf1C 5 J4061 ► HONNbIwOF.H►WAH 96809 `�AI� October 1,2012 MEMORANDUM TO: DLNR Agencies: . iv,of Aquatic Resources Div.of Boating&Ocean Remotion X Engi u 3ivisian ____Div.of Forestry&Wildlife Div.of State Parks Commission on Water Resonice Managesnent Office of Conservation&Coastal Lands X Land Division—Hawaii District .201istoric?reservation PROM: ussell Y.Tsuji,Land Administrator SUBJECT; / Environmental.Assessment (�) for Pahoa Village lage Road Shopping Center and Related Roadway Improvements LOCATION: Peboa,Puna,Hawaii;TMK: (3) 1-5-007:6,69&70 APPLICANT: OK Environmental LLC for 13.T.Kuwahara LLC Transmitted for your review and comment on the above referenced document. We would appreciate your comments on this document. Please submit any comments by pctober 22,2012. If no response is received by this date„we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this.request,please contact Kevin Moore at 587-0426. Thank you. Attachments ( ) We have no objections, ( ) We have no comments. ( ) Comments are.attached. Signed: f4 er Ar cc: Central Files ( ( ( ( ( DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION ( LD/KevinMoore ( REMAPaboaVillageRoadShoppingCenter Hiewall.583 (_ COMMENTS ( () We confirm that the project site,according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM),is located in ( Flood Zone (X) Please take note that the project site,according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM),is located in an area of Mithillal TSUSIVOI Inundation. The Flood Insurance Program does not ( have any regulations for developments within the MInintal Tsunami Inundation areas.. () Please note that the connct Flood Zone Designation tor the project site according to the Flood ( Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)is () Please note that the project must comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood ( Insurance Program(NFL?)presented in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations(44CFR), ( whenever development within i Special Flood Hazard Area is smdataltes. If there are any questions,please contact the State NFIP Coordinator,Ms.Carol Tyau-13earn,of the Department of ( Land and Natural Resources,Engineering Division at(808)587-0267. ( Please be advised that 44CFR,indicates the minimum standards set forth by the NFIP. Your ( Community's local flood ordinance may prove to be more tesuietive and thus take precedence over the mininunSNFIP-standards. If there are questions regarding the local flood ordinances, ( please contact the applicable County NFIP Coordinators below: () Mr.Mario Siu Li at(808)768-8098 or Ms.Ardis Shaw-Kim at(808)768-8296 of the City and County ofHonolulu,Depattntent of Flaming'and Pennitting. ( () Mr.Frank DeMarco at(808)9614042 of the County of Hawaii,Department of Public Worts. () Mr.French*Cerizo at(808)270-7771 of the County of Maui,Department of Planning. () Ms.Wynne Ushigome at(808)241-4890 of the County of Kauai,Department of Public ( Works. ( () The applicant should include water demands and infrastnicture lecosired to meet project needs. Please note that projects within State lands requiring water service from the Honolulu Board of Water Supply system will be requited to pay a resource development charge in addition to Water ( Facilities Charges for transmission and daily storage. ( () The applicant should provide the water demands and calculations to the Engineering Division so it can be included in the State weer Projects Plan Update. ( 0 Additional Comments: ( ( () Other: ( ( Should you have any questions,please call Ms.Suck S.Agraan of the Planning Branch at 587-0258. (_ ( ( Signed: _if Art `Ad C '49: g r Ci,CHIEF ENGINEER A- ( Date: 4 fl ' ( ( ( ( ( � rr w HEIR o ROUB E _ _ j; a 7 LORETTA J.FUDDY,A.C.S.W.,M.P.H. -. :-` DIRECTOR OFHEALM STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH '^reph.Please refer b: P.0.BOX 3378 HONOLULU,HI 968014378 12-166 Pahoa Village September 26,2012 Mr. Graham Knopp,Principal GK Environmental LLC P.O. Box 1310 Honokaa,Hawaii 96727 Dear Mr.Knopp: SUBJECT: Pre-Environmental Assessment for Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and Related Roadway Improvements,Hawaii,TMK: (3) 1-5-007: 6,69 & 70 The Department of Health(DOH), Environmental Planning Office(EPO),acknowledges receipt of your letter,dated September 20,2012; Thank you for allowing us to review and comment on the subject document. The document was routed to the various branches of the Environmental Health Administration. We have no comments at this time, but reserve the right to future comments. We strongly recommend that you review all of the Standard Comments on our ( website: www.hawaii.gov/healthlenvironmentaUenv-planning/landuseilanduse.html. Any comments specifically applicable to this application should be adhered to. The United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)provides a wealth of information on their website including strategies to help protect our natural environment and build sustainable communities at: http://water.epa.gov/infrastructure/sustain/. The DOH encourages State and county planning departments,developers,planners, engineers and other interested parties to apply these strategies and environment principles whenever they plan or review new developments or redevelopments projects. We also ask you to share this information with others to increase community awareness on healthy, sustainable community design. If there are any questions about these comments please contact me. Sincerely, f Laura Leialoha Phillips McIntyr AICP Environmental Planning Office Manager Environmental Health Administration Department of Heath 919 Ala Moana Blvd., Ste. 312 Honolulu,Hawaii 96814 Phone: 586-4337 laura.mcintyre@doh.hawaii.gov ( 4 r y4 • M L ABENCROIMSIB f LORETTA J.RAW A.C.S.W., aovOnatcFwxaN IVRECTCROF xEurx STATE OF HAWAII (- DEPARTM NT OF HEALTH inackpitanteir b. P.0.1303378 HONOLULU,HI 98801.3378 1001 OPST.12 October 5, 2012 Mr. Graham Knopp Principal GK Environmental LLC P.O. Box 1310 Honoka'a, Hawaii 96727 Dear Mr. Knopp: ( SUBJECT: Comments on the Draft Environmental Assessment for the Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and Related Roadway Improvements,Pahoa, island of Hawaii, Hawaii The Department of Health (DOH), Clean Water Branch (CWB), acknowledges receipt of your letter, dated September 20, 2012, requesting comments on your project. The DOH-CWB has reviewed the subject document and offers these comments. Please note that our review is based solely on the information provided in the subject document and its compliance with the Hawaii Administrative Rules(HAR), Chapters 11-54 and ( 11-55. You may be responsible for fulfilling additional requirements related to our program We recommend that you also read our standard comments on our website at http://www.hawaii.vov/healthlenvironmental/env-planning/landusefCWB- standardcomment.Ddf. 1. Any project and its potential impacts to State waters must meet the following criteria: a. Antidegradation policy(HAR, Section 11-54-1.1),which requires that the existing uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses of the receiving State water be maintained and protected. ( b. Designated uses(HAR, Section 11-54-3), as determined by the classification of the receiving State waters. c. Water quality criteria (HAR, Sections 11-54-4 through 11-54-8). (, 2. You may be required to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (_ (NPDES) permit for discharges of wastewater, including storm water runoff, into State surface waters(HAR,Chapter 11-55). For the following types of discharges into Class A or Class 2 State waters, you may apply for an NPDES general permit (" coverage by submitting a Notice of Intent(NOI)form: ( Mr. Graham Knopp 10010PST.12 October 5, 2012 Page 2 a. Storm water associated with construction activities, including clearing, grading, and excavation, that result in the disturbance of equal to or greater than one (1) acre of total land area. The total land area includes a`contiguous area where multiple separate and distinct construction activities may be taking place at different times on different schedules under a larger common plan of development or sale: This Includes areas used for a construction base yard and the storage of any construction related equipment, material, and waste products. An NPDES permit is required before the start of the construction activities. b. Storm water associated with industrial activities. Please verify the North American Industrial Classification System(NAICS) United States Structure Code(s)and the corresponding Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code(s)for the facility. See http://www.census.qov/epcd/www/naicstab.htm to determine the NAICS Code(s)and corresponding SIC Code(s). Facilities with SIC Codes categorized in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40 (Protection of Environment), Parts 122:26(b)(14)(i) through 122.26(b)(14)(ix) and 122.26(b)(14)(xi) are required to obtain NPDES permit coverage for the discharges of storm water associated with industrial activities. c. Treated effluent from leaking underground storage tanks. d. Once through cooling water less than one (1) million gallons per day. e. Hydrotesting waters. f. Construction dewatering effluent. g. Treated process wastewater associated with well drilling activities. h. Circulation water from decorative ponds or tanks. You must submit a separate NOI form for each type of discharge at least 30 calendar days prior to the start of the discharge activity, except when applying for coverage for discharges of storm water associated with construction activity. For this type of discharge, the NOI must be submitted 30 calendar days before to the start of construction activities. The NOI forms may be picked up at our office or downloaded from our website at: htto://www.hawaii,gov/health/environmental/water/cieanwater/formslgent-index.html. 3. For other types of wastewater not listed in Item No. 2 above or wastewater discharging into Class 1 or Class AA waters, an NPDES individual permit will need to be obtained. An application for an NPDES individual permit must be submitted at least 180 calendar days before the commencement of the discharge. The NPDES application forms may be picked up at our office or downloaded from our website at htto://hawaii.gov/health/environmental/water/cieanwater/forms/envirogmenta)/water/c leanwateriforms/indiv-index.html. Mr. Graham Knopp 10010PST.12 (;_ October 5, 2012 ( Page 3 4. If your project involves work in, over, or under waters of the United States, it is highly recommend that you contact the Army Corp of Engineers, Regulatory Branch (Tel: 438-9258) regarding their permitting requirements. Pursuant to Federal Water Pollution Control Act(commonly known as the"Clean Water Act"(CWA)], Paragraph 401(a)(1), a Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC)is required for"[ajny applicant for Federal license or permit to conduct any activity including, but not limited to, the construction or operation of facilities,which may result in any discharge into the navigable waters..." (emphasis added). The ( term"discharge" is defined in CWA, Subsections 502(16), 502(12), and 502(6): Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 122.2; and Hawaii Administrative (_ Rules (HAR), Chapter 11-54. 5. Please note that all discharges related to the project construction or operation activities, whether or not NPDES permit coverage and/or Section 401 WQC are required, must comply with the State's Water Quality Standards. Noncompliance with water quality requirements contained in HAR, Chapter 11-54, and/or permitting requirements, specked in HAR, Chapter 11-55, may be subject to penalties of$25,000 per day per violation. ( If you have any questions, please visit our website at: http://www.hawaii.gov/health/environmental!water/cleanwater/index.html, or contact the ( Engineering Section, CWB, at(808) 586-4309. Sincerely, . ; N'kLEC WONG, P.E., CHIEF Clean Water Branch ST:jst c: Mr. Graham Knopp, GK Environmental LLC [via email pcknopp( ghenvllc.com only] (_ DOH-EPO [via email only] ( ( William P.Kenai �: a`. �� Warren H.W.Lee Meow H Director William T.Takaba Brandon A.K.Gonzalez Managing Director +...; `` Deputy Director I > rxmacr i DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 7 • Hilo,Hawaii 96720-4224 (808)961-8321 • Fax(808)961-8630 October 19,2012 Mr. Graham Knopp, Principal GK Environmental P. O. Box 1310 Honokaa, HI 96727 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PREPARATION NOTICE Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and Related Roadway Improvements Owner: B.T. Kuwahara, LLC Re ferences: State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application SLU 12-000333 Change of Zone Application REZ 12-000155 `., Tax Map Keys: (3) 1-5-007: 006, 069 and 070 We have reviewed the subject project as described in your letter dated September 20,2012 and offer the following comments for your consideration. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on site and not directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared and the recommended drainage system shall be constructed meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works. The subject parcels are in an area designated as Zone X on the Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Zone X is an area determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain. All earthwork activity, including grading and grubbing, shall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentation Control,of the Hawaii County Code. The General Plan classifies Pahoa Village Road as a collector with an existing right-of-way width of approximately 50 feet fronting the subject parcels. Access shall conform to Chapter 22,County Streets, of the Hawaii County Code. We recommend the applicant provide improvements to the development's entire Pahoa Village Road frontage consisting of, but not limited to, pavement widening with concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk,drainage improvements,and any required utility relocation,meeting the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the approval of the Department of Public Works. ("Amity of i-laumi'i is am Ftmcl r tnnnrltiinity Prn,,:rin•onA ( Letter to Graham Knopp October 19, 2012 (_ Page 2 of 2 ( ( We are amenable to the recommendations made in the Traffic Impact Analysis Report. Notably,the (_ installation of a traffic signal, two-way left turn lane, and driveways meeting acceptable levels of service. The installation of streetlights and traffic control devices shall meet the approval of the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works. The applicant will be responsible for the design, purchase,and installation of such devices. ( A completed copy of the Environmental Assessment will not be necessary. Questions may be referred to Mr. Kelly Gonnes, P.E. of the Engineering Division at 961-8327. (. ( efi,./BEN E, I HII,P.E. Engineering Division Chief ( KG ( ( County of Tiawai`i is an Enual Oonortunity Provider and Emnlover ( NEIL ABERCROMBI � �9 s ,'�- GLENN M.OKIMOTO GOVERNOR h K`= ""`.:- DIRECTOR K!..L9 t4;12 ,,= = Deputy Directors JADE 7.BUTAY FORD N.FUCHIGAMI Vii•-_: RANDY GRUNE JADINE URASAKI STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT,OF TRANSPORTATION IN REPLY REFER TO 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET HWY-PS HONOLULU,HAWAII 96813-5097 2.3206 October 23,2012 Mr. Graham Knopp Principal GK Environmental LLC P.O. Box 1310 Honokaa,Hawaii 96727 Dear Mr.Knopp: Subject: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Kahakai Boulevard Extension Related to a Shopping Center,B.T. Kuwahara, Pahoa, Puna, Hawaii, TMK: (3) 1-5-007: 006, 069 and 070 Thank you for the opportunity to provide early consultation for the subject Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA) for the Kahakai Boulevard Extension that will provide access to a shopping center proposed on 9.93 acres of private Iand adjacent to Pahoa Village Road. We understand that a DEA is required because the applicant is proposing to extend and improve Kahakai Boulevard to the west of its intersection with Pahoa Village Road,on the Department of Land and Natural Resources owned land. We have the following comments: 1. We reviewed and commented on an initial Traffic Impact Analysis(TIA) that was part of a State Land Use Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone Application for the subject shopping center. 2, Prior to completion of the Chapter 343 compliance process, a revised TIA should be submitted for our review and acceptance. The applicant should be advised to continue. coordinating the subject project and the TIA with the Department of Transportation. If you have any questions,please call Ken Tatsuguchi,Head Planning Engineer,Highways Division,at(808) 587-1830. Very truly yours, A-t/144-A4 G LENN M. OKIMOTO,Ph.D. Director of Transportation William P. Kenoi • Darren J.Rosario Mayor Firs Chtff 74 • ; Renwick J.Victorino Deputy FINOtfl Dump of Ii9ritvari (_ HAWAI'I FIRE-DEPARTMENT 25 Aupu ti Street •Room 2501 a Hilo,listwri9 96720 (808)932-1900 • Fax(808)932-2928 ( ( October 4,2012 ( Mr.Graham Knopp OK Environmental PO Box 1310 Honokaa,HI 96727 Dear Mr.Knopp, SUBJECT: EA for Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and related Roadway Improvements TMK: 1-5-0070:6,69&70. The Hawaii Fire Department does not have any comments to offer at this time regarding the above-referenced early consultation on Environmental Assessment. Thank you for the opportunity to comment.A copy or Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment is not needed when completed. Sincerely, (_ DARREN J. ROSARIO Fire Chief KT:lc Alt;_ Harrrai'i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. 111 - ( -0-1;;;,q� �9iti. William P.Kenoi T„, • Harry S.Kubojiri Alityor =':" Police Chief' 9Toa K'�+*~ Paul K.Ferreira Deputy Police Chief County of H awai`1 POLICE DEPARTMENT 349 Kapiolani Street • Hilo,Hawaii 96730-3998 (808)935-3311 • Fax(8081961-8865 October 2, 2012 Mr. Graham Knopp Principal GK Environmental P. 0. Box 1310 Honokaa, HI 96727 Dear Mr. Knopp: Subject: Environmental Assessment (EA)for Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and Related Roadway Improvements, Island of Hawaii TMK: (3rd) 1-5-007:6, 69 & 70 Staff, upon reviewing your letter of September 20, 2012, and visiting the proposed site, does not anticipate any significant impact to traffic and/or public safety concerns. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please contact Acting Captain Reed Mahuna, Puna Patrol, at 965-2716. Sincerely, HENR J T VARES ASST T POLICE IEF AREA I OPERATIONS BUREAU RM:lli 120577 ''Hav,ai'i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employe?' DANIEL ORODENKER (- NEIL ABERCROMBIE Executive Officer Governor �� �»sa, e' BERT K.SARUWATARI ✓a Planner BRIAN SCHATZ f Lieutenant Governor - }'`7 SCOTTA.K.DERRICKSON,AICP (_ Planner RICHARD LIM '`� Director LAND USE COMMISSION FRED A.TALON ( Department of Business,Economic Development&Tourism Drafting Technician {- MARY ALICE EVANS State of Hawaii Deputy Director RILEY K.HAKODA Chief Clerk ( September 26,2012 Mr.Graham Knopp GL<Environmental,LLC P.O. Box 1310 Honoka'a, Hawai'i 96727 (- Dear Mr. Knopp: On September 21, 2012, the Commission received your Pre-Assessment comment request for the Draft Environmental.Assessment (EA) for the Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and Related Roadway (- Improvements. We have reviewed the Project Summary and have the following comments: 1. The subject properties appear to be within the State Land Use Agricultural District. Therefore, a State ( Land Use Boundary Amendment would be necessary. Since the total acreage of the project is less than 15 acres, the boundary amendment would be processed through the County of Hawai'i. We recommend ( your draft EA address this requirement. 2. The identified trigger for compliance with Chapter 343, Hawai'i Revised Statutes(HRS), is the use of State lands. Will the project require a County General Plan(GP)amendment? If so, we assume that the applicant will be seeking the GP amendment prior to petitioning for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment. Please clarify the sequence the applicant will pursue in seeking regulatory approvals and identify the accepting authority for the EA. We have no further comments to offer at this time. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact Scott Derrickson,AICP of our office at 587-3921. ( Sincerely, DANIEL ORODENKER (- Executive Officer cc: County of Hawai'i, Planning Department ( 235 Sot,r BrRrrANI%STREET 0 Sum 406 O )IoNouEt.',}lMvul 9¢813*Tu.(808)587-3822*Fm.(808)587-3827* Emu..tuc@dbedt.hawaii.gov Mailing Address: P.O.Box 2369,Honolulu,Hawaii 96804 ( APPENDIX lb COMMENTS RECEIVED ON DRAFT EA AND RESPONSES • William P.Kenoi Mayor - Dora Beck,P.E. • - Acting Director of.w'a'r toxxtdd of Anfilan DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 25 Aupuni Street • Hilo,Havyai`i 96720 (808)961-8083•Fax(808)961-8086 http://co.hawaii.hi.us/directory/dir envmng.htm March 12,2013 Mr. Graham Paul Knopp,Ph.D. Ms. Maija Cottle Principal Hawaii County Planning Department GK Environmental 101 Pauahi St., Ste. 3 P. O. Box 1310 Hilo, HI 9672 Honoka`a, HI 96727 RE: Publication of DEA for B. T.Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land, Pahoa,Island of Hawaii, TMKs: 1-5-007:006, 055, 069&070 We have no comments to offer on the subject project. Thank you for allowing us to review and comment. Sincerely, kela Dora Beck,P.E. ACTING DIRECTOR County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. ( WILLIAM J.AIL AAil (— ClIAMPFkSOK 'NEIL A1;ERCRo�iBIE q6 C i h� WARP OFLarMANDRMIntALKesot.7tt7g LJ' coMMISSION oK WTEA.KK5OVRCT MA:M.EMEF�T r 959 t Gov aNOROFI4LWAtl «. ESrMERKIAAINA ( Ia �1#�I f±f y t WILLIAM h1,TAM gy�,�.� '. L��j k $ DEM.(o1Ec= WATER /\.mzemensoultets 4� _.. .'f' l+b;$"', Roy 7I(K; l OF[pMVMANCEs ``a „ r MAMMSSIONNLR.'WARAILI S LIKT AUtuGEME1.T ��� COME/MAIM k/.1)COASTAL LAM ( �.}I� CONSERVATION A�RE9Ot1RC74 E?A�RCTMF�.T HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION GI2T�rWIL. �7�. pOKF.}TkY ANDMYLOUSE ! DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LustpRlCPRFSgtvienux ( LAND 601 KamokilaBoulevard,Suite 555 STATT MKS ( Kapolei,HI 96806 April 17,2013 ( Mr.Graham Knopp. LOG NO;20132242 ( OK Environmental DOC NO; 1303SN23 PO Box 1310 Archaeology Honoka`a,Hawaii 96727 ( Dear Mr. Knopp: ( SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review— ( Draft Environmental Assessment for Commercial Development and Use of State Land Keonepoko Iid Ahupua`a,I'uua District,Island of Hawaii TIVIK:(31 1-5 00'7:006.055.069&070 ( Thank you for the opportunity to provide comnients for the draft environmental assessment. We received your ( submittal March 12, 2013.According to your draft environmental assessment, Mr. Kuwahata plans to develop a commercial center on the aforementioned TMKs.A total of 9.93 acres of privately owned land including a 0.93 acre parcel owned by the State of Hawaii will be.included in the proposed commercial development and roadway improvements. ( Our office has previously reviewed various actions on these parcels,beginning in X000,when we reviewed a Special Permit for a telecommunication tower and were informed that that Parcel 069 was previously graded in connection with a cinder operation(Log 26139,Doc 0009PM0S).In 2012,we reviewed a stockpiling permit for Parcel 006 and a change of zoning application for Parcels 006,069 and 074. In both reviews,we indicated we have no record of ( historic properties within TMKs (3) 1-5-007:006,.069,and 070); these parcels are in the Keonepoko Homesteads and outside of the Piihoa Historic District(SIHP 50-10-45-7388;Log 2012.0413, Doe 1203TD05;Log 2012.1612, ( Doe.1206TD22). ( In response to a notice of EA preparation for this project, SHPD staff conducted a site inspection and found that undisturbed land existed within a portion of Parcel 055; we requested a full inspection/inventory survey by a qualified archaeologist (Log 2012.2538, Doe, 1212SN02). A survey was conducted and no evidence of historic ( properties were identified(Rechtman 2013);Our office approved the report and concurred with the conclusion that no historic properties would be affected by the proposed roadway construction(Log 2013.0081,Doe 13015802). ( We have received no ne*information to suggest that historic properties might be present Within this project area. Based on current information, we believe that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed project. Please contact Sean Naleimaile at(808) 933-7651 or Sean.P.Naleiriiaile Hawaii.gov if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. ( Aloha, ( (_ /4Alif . .------- ( Theresa K.Doriham Archaeology Branch Chief M4po- NEIL ABERCIROMBIB \._; WII.1.1AMJ.AILA.JR. HAWAII 171AN HA GOVERNOR OF UiNIX11N 'f'. I. ,=P, ( MOM MEO(IN 1 AND WAIN( P:41(M 1.1MANA M4, $ lT IL41Lti3NIN[N!WAIINt N/:ti1 NIN[1'MANA[aN.14N1- [ J . 4.41-7-1-1141� �d ary ��gNer>STATE OF HAWAII = DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 State of 0201 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 April 5, 2013 GK Environmental LLC Attention: Mr. Graham Knopp via email: gpknonb@glcenvllc.com P.O. Box 1310 Honokaa, Hawaii 96727 Dear Mr. Knopp: SUBJECT: Publication of Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land, GK Environmental LLC for B.T. Kuwahara, LLC, Applicant, Puna, Hawaii; TMK: (3) 1-5-007:006, 069, 070 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Department of Land and Natural Resources' (DLNR) Land Division distributed or made available a copy of your report pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR Divisions for their review and comments. At this time, enclosed are comments from (i) the Engineering Division, and (ii) the Hawaii District Land Office on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call Kevin Moore at (808) 587-0426. Thank you. Sincerely, Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosure(s) . . tg OF N--- r7 (- NEILABERCROMBIE 0 X17.lick ( AIl 9 ,47 ENGINEERING (- WILLI .?$cW JiC- WVERNOAOFHAWAp . C� (. ! 1 (� E OFLi1 TuRAL A j'T`1 - ∎ ,1R, CO ONtNN WATERI<rO- CE1 �- -sjt'.- cp G� �P Q try. (_ and . % -.1) GL ...4%°41 �� STATE OF HAWAII o 1' cr 9 C (_ DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES y j 0 ( —��� LAND DIVISION Y3G GI POST OFFICE BOX 621 'V 0 gr Q. ( IeofH$0 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 `,p March 7,2013 ( ( MEMORANDUM ( :fRpIM DLNR Agencies: ( Div. of Aquatic Resources ( Div. of Boating&Ocean Recreation ( )(EngineeringtDivision: _Div. of Forestry&Wildlife ( Div. of State Parks ( Commission on Water Resource Management ( Office of Conservation&Coastal Lands ( Land Division—Hawaii District X Historic Preservation ( F M: ,tRussell Y. Tsuji,Land Administrator-2-- SUBJECT: Publication of Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land ( LOCATION: Puna,Hawaii;TMK: (3) 1-5-007:006, 069,070 ( APPLICANT: GK Environmental LLC for B.T. Kuwahara, LLC ( Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above referenced project. ( The complete DEA will be available on line March 8, . 2013 at ( http://oegc.doh.hawaii.gov/Shared%20Documents/Environmental_Notice/current_issue.pdf. We ( would appreciate your comments on this document. Please submit any comments by April 5, 2013. ( ( If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If ( you have any questions about this request,please contact Kevin Moore at 587-0426. Thank you. ( Attachments - ( ) We have no objections. ( We have no comments. (_ ( ✓f Comments are atta hed. ( Signed: ,i I 4 or Print name•Co S.�' ',Chief Engineer Date: It /(, (cc: Central Files ( ( DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LD/Russell Y.Tsuji REF: DEA for Proposed Commercial Center Development by B.T. Kuwahara LLC, Pahoa Village Hawaii.004 COMMENTS (X) We confirm that part of the project site,according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM),is located in Flood Zone X. The National Flood Insurance Program does not have any regulations for developments within Zone X. () Please take note that the remainder of the project site according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM),is located in Zones_ () Please note that the correct Flood Zone Designation for the project site according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM) is . ( ) Please note that the project site must comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP)presented in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations(44CFR), whenever development within a Special Flood Hazard Area is undertaken. If there are any questions,please contact the State NFIP Coordinator,Ms.Carol Tyau-Beam,of the Department of Land and Natural Resources,Engineering Division at(808)587-0267. Please be advised that 44CFR indicates the minimum standards set forth by the NFIP. Your Community's local flood ordinance may prove toibe more restrictive and thus take precedence over the minimum NFIP standards. If there are questions regarding the local flood ordinances, please contact the applicable County NFIP Coordinators below: () Mr.Mario Siu Li at(808)768-8098 or Ms.Ardis Shaw-Kim at(808)768-8296 of the City and County of Honolulu,Department of Planning and Permitting. () Mr. Frank DeMarco at(808)961-8042 of the County of Hawaii,Department of Public Works. () Ms.Carolyn Cortez at(808)270-7813 of the County of Maui,Department of Planning. () Ms.Wynne Ushigome at(808)241-4890 of the County of Kauai,Department of Public Works. () The applicant should include project water demands and infrastructure required to meet water demands. Please note that the implementation of any State-sponsored projects requiring water service from the Honolulu Board of Water Supply system must first obtain water allocation credits from the Engineering Division before it can receive a building permit and/or water meter. () The applicant should provide the water demands and calculations to the Engineering Division so it can be included in the State Water Projects Plan Update. () Additional Comments: () Other: Should you have any questions,please call Mr.Dennis Imada of the Planning Branch at 587-0257. Signed: CART ./1'5 C ` ,CHIEF ENGINEER Date: /l t, of , ( NEILADERCROMBIE m 1 ', M �� WILLIAM J.MLA.JR _ GOVERNOR OP HAWAII --' CIIAa1r1 1N A ,i;-� IRMRO MI LAN:NI:NA'111RA1.RIiW 111R1.'W ,.,� �'. II r,lj . l∎ COMMLWON ON WVlaw RIRCR MARROW/7G 1S k k r� - a�nd and 45,`' +aarato c`� STATE OF HAWAII 2013 I�1AR —8 P 12: (DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ��1_ LAND DIVISION ( I%ECEI VED POST OFFICE BOX 621 ND DIVISION I-., ( stare ofRYN HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 ILO, HAW�I r_ ( March 7, 2013 1 = rrt'r.',, rnrr c, rn N C:)r-r-, MEMORANDUM °rn1 C =vn>. u,r- (. TO: DLNR Agencies: �_= a ( Div. of Aquatic Resources - R' Div. of Boating&Ocean Recreation in CZ X Engineering Division ( Div. of Forestry& Wildlife ( _Div. of State Parks ( Commission on Water Resource Management Office of Conservation&Coastal Lands ( X°Land Divisi°onf#Hawaii Distr ct ' X Historic Preservation ( FROM: /Russell Y. Tsuji,Land Administrator--"2---- SUBJECT: Publication of Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land ( LOCATION: Puna,Hawaii; TMK: (3) 1-5-007:006, 069,070 APPLICANT: GK Environmental LLC for B.T. Kuwahara, LLC Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above referenced project. The complete DEA will be available on line March 8, . 2013 at http://oegc.doh.hawaii.gov/Shared%20Documents/Environmental Notice/current_issue.pdf. We would appreciate your comments on this document. Please submit any comments by April 5, _201•3. . If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request,please contact Kevin Moore at 587-0426. Thank you. ( Attachments - ( ( ) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. ( ( t Comme iI .are ,ttached. #%1,Signe• - %/ (_ r (_ Print name: '�rvr4pDl) C- NS') ( • Date: 374s- i3 (.. cc: Central Files - (. flFR+ Wf.LUMt J.All.A.JR. .SPfI y ' t'NAINI1 AIM NEII.ABERCROMBIE 'q,j Huai)soI"I ANN AND NAIIItAI kt.M)11141 /N/V1 itNIIR III IIAW.%II 1YIA1NIVAN IN 1 IN WA II It MNNO1 AIANA1,IAIINI ph. 1.i 4:04 Nat, dam- Oh STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL.RESOURCES ��—�— LAM)DIVISION 75 Aupuni Sunk,.Room 204 state ofHavl Hilo.Hawaii 96720 PHONE:(808)961-9590 FAX:(808)961.9599 March 15, 2013 MEMORANDUM TO: Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator FROM: Candace Martin, Land Agent, HDIO -- SUBJECT: Publication of Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land, Pahoa, Island of Hawaii; TMKs (3rd) 1-5-007:006,055, 069& 070. In response to your request for comments dated March 7, 2013 on the subject matter, we offer the following: The parcel of land identified as Tax Map Key: (3) 1-5-007:055 and described in the above-referenced Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) on page 1 as the "State-owned Kahakai Boulevard extension property" appears on Registered Map No, 2084 "Hawaii Territory Survey Plan of Keonepoko Homestead Lots Puna Hawaii", dated September 1903, as a "Road Reserve". This label has been perpetuated on subsequent subdivision maps submitted to the County of Hawaii in 1955 and 1972. The dimensions of this parcel are consistent with the proposed use as a public roadway and historical maps indicate the property was originally laid out to be used as a roadway through Keonepoko Homesteads. There is a longstanding disagreement between the State and the counties regarding ownership of certain roads deemed "roads in limbo". The Highways statute and Act 288 of the 1993 Session Laws of Hawaii provide that any "public highway" that is not a State highway is a county highway. While ownership has been transferred by operation of law pursuant to these statutory sections, the counties have continued to dispute that they own these roads because they do not have paper title. The Public Lands statute excludes "land being used for roads and streets" from the description of the types of lands over which the Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) 4 1 C has jurisdiction (HRS Section 171-2). Accordingly, the subject land may not be under the BLNR ( jurisdiction,even though it is not presently developed as a public road. The County of Hawaii has not approached the State to have the parcel "set aside" for a (_ roadway which may indicate they accept ownership of the "road reserve". However, to prevent ( this jurisdictional issue from being an impediment to the proposed project, it is suggested that the County publically accept ownership of the parcel as a county roadway. - In the alternative, the State could issue a construction right-of-entry permit to the developer contingent upon an agreement with the County to accept the road when completed to county standards and the road would not be open for public use until the County of Hawaii accepts the road into their inventory. (. ( If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(808)961-9590. Thank you. ( cc: District Files ( iatq is,„ ENIIMONIUNTAL U.0 phone: (808)938-8583 fax:(808)775-1530 P.O.Box 1310 Honoka`a,Hawai`i 96720 gplcnopp@gkenv11c.com Russell Y. Tsuji,Land Administrator Department of Land and Natural Resources,Land Division PO Box 621 Honolulu,Hawaii 96809 April 30,2013 Dear Mr. Tsuji: Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA)for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land,Pahoa,Island of Hawaii,TMK(3rd) 1-5-007:006,055,069& 070. Thank you very much for your comments regarding this Draft Environmental Assessment from (i)DLNR Engineering Division and(ii)the Hawaii District Land Office. Regarding the comments concerning ownership of the property TMK(3rd) 1-5-007:055,the County of Hawaii has expressed intent to assume ownership of the property,and,as the DEA states conveyance to the County of Hawaii is in progress. If conveyance is not completed before construction would commence,the applicant would then request a right-of-entry permit from the State for construction. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Graham Knopp,Principal—GK Environmental Cc: Candace Martin,Land Agent; Maija Cottle,COH Planning Department,Jon McElvaney, Project Consultant 10ai q=. NEIL ABERCROMBIE LORETTA J.FUDDY,A.C.S.W.,M.P.H. GOVERNOR OFHAYVNI * GRECTOROFHEALTH � ��}—.• '� STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT.OF HEALTH In reply,please refer a: P.0.BOX 3378 (_ HONOLULU,HI 968013378 13-053 March 8,2013 BTKuwabara ( Graham Paul Knopp,Ph.D.,Principal GK Environmental LLC P.O.Box 1310 Honokaa,Hawaii 96727 (_ Dear Dr.Knopp: SUBJECT: Publication of Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA)for B.T.Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land,Pahoa, Island of Hawaii,TMK: (3) 1-5-007: 006,055,069&070 ( The Department of Health(DOH),Environmental Planning Office (EPO), acknowledges receipt of your letter dated March 4,2013. Thank you for allowing us to review and comment on the subject document. Your document was routed to the Clean Water, Safe Drinking Water,and Wastewater ( Branches. They will provide specific comments to you if necessary. EPO recommends that you review the Standard Comments(www.hawaii.gov/health/epo under the land use tab). You are required to adhere to all Standard Comments specifically applicable to this application. ( EPO suggests that you examine the many sources available on strategies to support the sustainable design of communities,including the: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's sustainability programs: www.epa.gov/sustainability ( U.S.Green Building Council's LEED program: www.new.usgbc.org/leed The DOH encourages everyone to apply these sustainability strategies and principles early in the (. planning and review of projects. We also request that for future projects you consider conducting a Health Impact Assessment(MA). More information is available at: www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/hia.htm. We request you share all of this information with others to increase community awareness on sustainable,innovative,inspirational,and healthy community design. We request a written response confirming receipt of this letter and any other letters you receive from ( DOH in regards to this submission. You may mail your response to 919 Ala Moana Blvd., Ste. 312, Honolulu,Hawaii 96814. However,we would prefer an email submission to epo @doh.hawaii.gov. We anticipate that our letter(s)and your response(s)will be included in the final document. If you ( have any questions,please contact me at(808) 586-4337. Mahalo, Laura Leialoha Phillips NI, .'tyre,AICP Manager,Environmental Planning Office c: Maija Cottle, County of Hawaii ( ri llly*IIONu $AL Lit phone:(808)938-8583 fax: (808)775-1530 P.O.Box 1310 Honoka`a,Hawai`i 96720 gpknopp@gkenv11c.com Laura Leialoha Phillips McIntyre,AICP Manager,Environmental Planning Office State of Hawaii Department of Health PO Box 3378 Honolulu,HI 96801-3378 May 14,2013 Dear Ms. McIntyre: Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA)for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land,Pahoa,Island of Hawaii,TMK(3'd) 1-5-007:006,055,069& 070. Thank you very much for your comments regarding this Draft Environmental Assessment. We acknowledge your recommendation that we review the Standard Comments on your website at www.hawaii.gov/health/environmental/env-planning/landuse/landuse.html. We have done so upon the recommendation of your letter dated September 26,2012,which was in response to our request for early consultation. At your request,we include a comment letter dated March 27,2013 received from the Hilo office of the Department of Health and our response to that comment letter. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Graham Knopp,Principal—GK Environmental Cc: Maija Cottle, COH Planning Department,Jon McElvaney,Project Consultant ( osN1ti NEIL ABERCROMBIE ;;' LORETTA Z FUMY,AC.S.W.,M.P.H. OOVERNOROMWAN 1! 1 `� ;... pRECTOROFHEALiH STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH In reply,please refer lx P.O.90X 916 ( HILO,HI 96721-0916 ( March 27,2013 ( Graham Paul Knopp, Ph.D. GK Environmental LLC P.Q. Box 1310 Honokaa,HI 96727 ( ( Subject: Publication of Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA) for B.T.Kuwahara ( Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land,Pahoa, Island of Hawaii, 'FMK(3rd) 1-5-007:006,055,069, & 070 ( Dear Mr. Knopp, The Department of Health(DOH) acknowledges receipt of your letter dated March 12, 2013. Thank you for allowing us to comment on the subject document. Food Establishments will need to comply with Department of Health's Hawaii Administrative (Rule Title 11, Chapter 12:Food Establishnment Sanitation or current regulations at the time of development. Wastewater generated from the subject project shall be handled by wastewater systems that comply with Chapter 11-62,Hawaii Administrative Rules. ( Dry wells shall be constructed in compliance with Chapter 11-23, Hawaii Administrative Rules. We also recommend you review all of the Standard Comments on our website: http://Hawaii.gov/healthlenvironmentallenv-planning/Ianduse/landuse.html, If you have any questions feel free to contact me and 808-933-0917. Sincerely, ka Newton Inouye Hawaii District Environmental Program Chief c: Hawaii County Planning Department Department of Health Environmental Planning Office ( imaiTir it.IIIIO 1Yl11TAL Uu phone: (808)938-8583 fax: (808)775-1530 P.O.Box 1310 Honoka`a,Hawai`i 96720 gpknopp@gkenv11c.com Mr.Newton Inouye State of Hawaii Department of Health P.O. Box 916 Hilo, Hawai`i 96721-0916 May 14, 2013 Dear Mr.Newton: Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA) for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land,Pahoa, Island of Hawaii,TMK(3rd) 1-5-007:006,055, 069 & 070. We acknowledge receipt of your letter dated March 27, 2013. Thank you very much for your comments on the DEA. ( We appreciate your comments and have reviewed the Standard Comments at: www.hawaii.gov/health/epo. Based on your comments, we will also note that dry wells shall be constructed in compliance with Chapter 11-23, Hawaii Administrative Rules, as we will that wastewater from the proposed project shall me managed in compliance with Chapter 11- 62, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Sincerely, Alp Graham Knopp, Principal—GK Environmental Cc: Maija Cottle, COH Planning Department, Jon McElvaney, Project Consultant • NEIL ABERCROMBIE c* sa tr GLENN M.OKIMOTO GOVERNOR \:1. .%. ' DIRECTOR (. i $ I Jay �ti F Deputy Directors JADE T.BUTAY FORD N.FUCHIGAMI Vxeres'or. RANDY GRUNE JADINE URASAKI ( STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN REPLY REFER TO: ( 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813-5097 HWY-PS April 25, 2013 2.4544 (_ Ms. BJ Leithead Todd Director ( Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720-4224 (_ Attention: Ms. Maija Cottle ( Dear Ms. Leithead Todd: ( Subject: -Draft Environmental Assessment for B. T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land(fka Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and Related Improvements)Pahoa,Puna,Hawaii, TMK: (3) 1-5-007: 006, 055, 069 and 070 Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA) dated March 2013 for a proposed shopping center in Pahoa. We understand that the DEA is required by Chapter 343 HRS due to the proposed use of State lands, as the Applicant will ( extend and improve a currently unimproved State-owned portion of Kahakai Boulevard to allow access to the site from the Kahakai Boulevard/Pahoa Village Road intersection,which is under State jurisdiction. The main access will be from the Kahakai Boulevard Extension and two secondary accesses are planned from a part of Pahoa Village Road that is under County jurisdiction. The proposed project would provide 104,143 square feet of leasable space, including a 40,000 square foot super market, a 10,000 square foot garden center, a 11,250 square foot family medical clinic, a 5,000 square foot quality restaurant, a 2,000 square foot post office, a 5,040 (_ square foot medical/dental clinic, an 8,000 square foot specialty retail store, a 10,000 square feet second specialty retail store or two stores of equivalent total area, and a 2,853 square foot full ( service restaurant. We understand that construction would commence in 2013 or 2014 and construction would be completed in 2015. ( We have the following comments: 1. The project will impact three State routes, the Keaau-Pahoa Road(State Route 130),the (- section of Pahoa Village Road from its northern terminus at Route 130 through its intersection with Kahakai Boulevard, and Road A,the short connection between the other two State routes. The DEA and its Appendix 4,Revised Traffic Impact Analysis (RTIA) ti Ms..BJ Leithead Todd, Director HWY-PS April 25,2013 2.4544 Page 2 dated December 2012, do not adequately analyze and address the traffic impacts of the proposed project to the State routes. Accordingly, the RTIA is not acceptable and shall be revised and submitted for our review and acceptance prior to receiving zone change approval from the County of Hawaii. 2. Trip generation for the Post Office seems lower than indicated by the Trip Generation Manual and may be too low, as Pahoa doesn't have home mail delivery,necessitating trips to the Post Office to pick up mail. We suggest observing traffic at the existing Pahoa Post Office to validate or correct the trip generation used in the RTIA. The narrative of the RTIA should explain if the Post Office in the shopping center is an addition to or a replacement for the existing Pahoa Post Office. 3. The Department of Transportation(DOT) concurs with the two percent annual traffic growth rate,which rate was used for the design of the roundabout at the Route 130/Road A intersection. 4. The traffic analyses and level of service(LOS)tables shall include the(1)horizon year without the project, (2)horizon year with the project, without recommended mitigation improvements, and(3)horizon year with the project, with recommended mitigation improvements for horizon year(full buildout) scenarios. 5. Table 1 and Table 2 in the RTIA,Appendix P and Table 8 of the RTIA should include the LOS for the northbound through,northbound right, southbound through and southbound right movements,based on the previously projected trip distribution and route assignment. 6. It is DOT's policy that the Applicant mitigates all transportation impacts due to the project in order to maintain the satisfactory operating traffic LOS and delay levels at the without the project conditions for the horizon year. In addition, should the LOS without the project be lower than the desirable DOT threshold of LOS "D",the Applicant may be required to provide mitigation improvements to improve the State facilities to LOS "D" or better with the project. Table 2 of Appendix P of the RTIA, Level of Service tables for buildout at the Kahakai Boulevard intersection with Pahoa Village Road show unacceptable LOS F in the PM peak hour for the eastbound left turn, the westbound left turn, and the eastbound approach based on the two percent annual traffic growth rate. The Applicant shall mitigate all LOS E and LOS F shown in Table 2 with recommended improvements that are acceptable to DOT at no cost to the State. 7. The proposed shopping center will result in additional turns into Kahakai Boulevard from Route 130. The Applicant shall provide results of the queuing analysis in tabular form and analyze those impacts and consider and discuss in the DEA and the RTIA such improvements as lengthening the right-turn lane on the Pahoa Bypass,lengthening the left turn lane on Kahakai Boulevard at the approach to Pahoa Village Road and providing ( Ms..BJ Leithead Todd,Director HWY-PS April 25, 2013 2.4544 - Page 3 ( ( a separate dedicated right-turn lane on Kahakai Boulevard instead of a shared right-turn (_ and through lane. ( 8. The DEA states that although a signal warrant study for the Kahakai Boulevard/Pahoa ( Village Road intersection showed that no warrants were met out to twenty years from (" project build-out, the Applicant will construct a traffic signal at the intersection. DOT will not permit construction of a traffic signal in the State highway right-of-way unless it is warranted and deemed appropriate for the location and conditions,subject to DOT acceptance. The signal warrant study for the Kahakai Boulevard intersection with Pahoa Village Road that was included in the RTIA is incomplete and not acceptable to DOT. ( 9. Upon the request of DOT,the Applicant shall be required to submit a traffic signal warrant study or studies at the Kahakai Boulevard intersection with Pahoa Village Road ( to the DOT for review and acceptance. The warrant studies shall be performed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii. The Applicant shall plan,design ( and construct, at no cost to the State,a traffic signal at the Kahakai Boulevard/Pahoa Village Road intersection when it is warranted and permitted. 10. The curve radii at the Kahakai Boulevard/Pahoa Village Road intersection shall ( accommodate the largest delivery trucks anticipated to regularly go to the shopping center. ( 11.. DOT is in the design process for providing a roundabout at the Road A intersection with the Keaau-Pahoa Road(Route 130). Construction is planned to start in 2013 and end in 2014. The shopping center project should be coordinated with the DOT roundabout project. ( 12. The DEA and the RTIA do not adequately address bicyclist and pedestrian traffic in the ( area. The FEA should contain a conceptual plan that shows the proposed project,Pahoa Market Place, Woodland Center, Pahoa Village Road from its northern terminus to the ( southern end of the shopping center,Route 130, and Kahakai Boulevard from Route 130 to the end of the Kahakai Boulevard Extension. Additional plans should delineate the laneage, sidewalks and crosswalks and clearly show vehicular,pedestrian and bicyclist connections between the three shopping centers. The Applicant shall coordinate the (- conceptual plans and designs for the proposed project with the Highways Division. 13. There are numerous omissions and inconsistencies in the RTIA and between the RTIA (- and the DEA that should be addressed in the Final Environmental Assessment and a further revised RTIA. a. The switching of directions for Kahakai.Boulevard from east-west in the RTIA, Appendix C, Level of Service,Kahakai Blvd. &Old Pahoa Village Road, and (_ Appendix M, Traffic Movement Diagrams,to north-south for computing proposed in Tables 3, 4 and 8 is confusing and should be changed or better (- Ms..BJ Leithead Todd, Director HWY-PS April 25, 2013 2.4544 Page 4 described and explained throughout the RTIA. A plan or plans showing the laneage, projected traffic movements, and LOS for each movement on one or two sheets would be extremely helpful. b. The layout of the DOT roundabout referred to on page 14 of the RTIA should be provided in the FEA. c. The RTIA site plan depicts the two way left turn lane on Southbound Pahoa Village Road extending from the Kahakai Boulevard/Pahoa intersection to the south driveway access yet the DEA in Figure 3 —Preliminary Site Plan depicts a dedicated left turn lane at the Kahakai Boulevard intersection. d. The site plan in Appendix A of the TIA does not match the Figure 5 Conceptual Laneage Plan or Figure 6 Laneage Plan,Kahakai Boulevard—Pahoa Village Road Intersection in the DEA. e. The DEA in figures 5 and 6 depict a crosswalk that has been added on the north side of the intersection on the Pahoa Village Road but is not shown in the RTIA. _The DEA is not clear as to the limits of the sidewalk improvements. We do not recommend any street parking on Old Pahoa Village Road fronting the development. f. The issue of employee parking in both the DEA and the analysis are not ( discussed. The site plans for both the DEA and the report appear to accommodate onsite container storage areas yet neither the DEA nor the RTIA include discussion regarding the increased commercial truck traffic. g. A bus pullout and shelter appear to be proposed along the Southern leg of Old Pahoa Village Road yet no discussion is provided. The pullout depth for the bus appears to interfere with the sight distance for the center driveway access on Old Pahoa Village Road. h. The RTIA and DEA need to address the necessity of providing ADA compliant facilities. i. The DEA should include a Permit to Perform Work Upon State Highways from the DOT Highways Division on page 33 in Section 3.5 Required Permits and Approvals. 14. A revised RTIA and the FEA should address the comments in this letter and items 2, 7, 9 through 15, and 17 to 18 in our enclosed previous letter to the County Planning Director (HWY-PS 2.3114) dated September 28, 2012. The drawings and information previously requested are needed to determine if the desired mitigative improvements can be provided. 15. The Applicant shall coordinate with DOT and provide a pro rata contribution to the cost of regional improvements to State highways that will help to mitigate the transportation impacts generated by the Project as determined by Applicant and DOT. In an effort to address bicyclist and pedestrian traffic in the area,the Applicant shall provide mitigative improvements, including four crosswalks at the Kahakai Boulevard intersection with Pahoa Village Road and an 8-foot sidewalk, curb and gutter along the west side of Pahoa Village Road from the Kahakai Boulevard intersection to the northern driveway of Pahoa ( Ms..BJ Leithead Todd,Director HWY-PS April 25,2013 2.4544 Page 5 ( Village Market Place,to satisfy part of the Applicant's regional pro rata contribution. A portion of the pro rata contribution shall also be applied to the cost of public educational (_ efforts on how to use a roundabout. 16. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way for the applicable recommended transportation mitigation improvements to the State, as required and approved by DOT. 17. The Applicant shall send a written request for access to the Pahoa Village Road at the Kahakai Boulevard intersection and shall pay to DOT the fair market value for access rights to State Highways in addition to any recommended and required mitigation measures for potential project-related traffic impacts on State facilities. ( ( 18. All recommended improvements shall follow federal guidelines,AASHTO standards and State requirements. We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments. If you have any questions,please contact Gary Ashikawa, Systems Planning Engineer,Highways Planning Branch,at(808) 587-6336. ( Very truly yours, ( GLENN M. OKIMOTO, Ph.D. Director of Transportation ( Enclosure: HWY-PS 2.3114 dated September 28, 2012 c: Mr. Graham Knopp, Principal, GK Environmental LLC ( ( ( ( ( (- • ( YgILABERCROMBIE ass GLENN M.OKIMOTO GOVERNOR 4 r•' }% ( •( s DIRECTOR . - � =t' Deputy Directors � JADE T.BUTAY �; FORD N.FUCHIGAMI RANDY GRUNE STATE OF HAWAII JADINE URASAq DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN REPLY REFER TO: 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813-5097 HWY-PS 90 September 28, 2012 2.3.114 Ms. BJ Leithead Todd Director County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Panahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4224 Dear Ms. Leithead Todd: Subject: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 12-000033),Agricultural to Urban, Change of Zone Application (REZ 12-000155),A-la to CV-10, Shopping Center, - B. T. Kuwahara,Hawaii, Puna, Pahoa, TMK: (3) 1-5-007:006, 069, 070 Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject request for a 9.93 acre property proposed for development of a shopping center in Pahoa, adjacent to and west of Pahoa Village Road, diagonally opposite of Woodland Center, and south of the commercial development that includes Malama Market. The proposed project would provide approximately 104,250 sq ft of leasable space, including a 40,000 sq ft super market, a 10;000 sq ft garden center, a 11,250 sq ft family medical clinic, a 5,000 sq ft quality restaurant, a 3,000 sq ft high-turnover restaurant, a 5,000 sq ft medical/dental office, a 15,000 sq ft retail general merchandise, a 10,000 sq ft paint and hardware, and a 10,000 sq ft specialty retail. An outside entertainment area with a stage, a sheltered County Hele On bus stop, and a U.S. Post Office are also planned within the property. The applicant plans to commence construction by 2013, with completion by 2015. We have the following comments and recommendations. 1. The proposed shopping center will impact three roads under State jurisdiction: the Keaau-Pahoa Road(Route 130, aka Pahoa Bypass), the Pahoa Village Road(Route 134) from its northern dead end at Route 130 through the Kahakai Boulevard intersection, and Road A, which connects Pahoa Village Road with Keaau-Pahoa Road. 2. The Traffic Impact Analysis(TIA),prepared by Witcher Engineering, LLP, dated May, 2012, is not acceptable and shall be revised to address our comments in this letter. The revised TIA shall be submitted for our review and acceptance prior to County Council approval of the requested subject district boundary amendment and change of zone. t -(7? { Ms. BJ Leithead Todd HWY-PS Page 2 2.3114 September 28, 2012 3. The descriptions of the proposed facilities in Table I of the TIA are not consistent with the facilities in Table 5 - Trip Generation, and the facilities shown on the Site Plan. (_ Table 5 omits the 3,000 square feet High Turnover Restaurant proposed on page 8 of the ( application and shown on the Site Plan. A 2,000 sq ft Post Office included in Table 5 is • not mentioned in the application nor shown on Exhibit 4 - Site Plan. The inconsistencies should be addressed. 4. Land Use Code 810, which is referenced in Table 5 for Retail General Merchandise is not listed in the ITE Trip Generation. The revised TIA should provide an appropriate Land Use Code. ( 5. An operating level of service (LOS)"D"or better shall be required for all movements at the above three State roads and intersections with the project at buildout and with transportation improvements. ( 6. It is recommended that concurrence with our department is completed for foregoing comments 3 to 5 prior to proceeding with addressing the following comments 7 through 19. - 7. Provide Figures to show the existing and proposed conceptual lane geometry forthe Kahakai Boulevard/Pahoa Village Road intersection, Kahakai Boulevard/Keaau Pahoa ( Road intersection,Kahakai Boulevard between the two intersections, and the proposed Kahakai Boulevard Extension. The work sheets should also indicate the lane geometries ( with schematics. 8. Discussion of the Roadway Network in Section VI of the application states that the applicant will construct a fully channelized intersection at Kahakai Boulevard and Old Pahoa Road(Pahoa Village Road). The fully channelized intersection, including the proposed southbound right turn lane on Pahoa Village Road into the proposed Kahakai Boulevard extension, as shown on the Site Plan,should be described and recommended in the TIA. The two-way left turn lane median at this intersection shall be replaced with a left turn lane, if warranted. 9. Although the main access to the shopping center is from the Kahakai Boulevard extension,the Proposed Site Plan shows no improvements to the east side of the intersection. The existing right turn lane and left turn lane on westbound Kahakai (. Boulevard at the Pahoa Village Road intersection are shown on the proposed Site Plan ( with no through lane and no crosswalks to cross Pahoa Village Road. The Site Plan shall be revised to show the intersection improvements as analyzed in the work sheets. A list of recommendations shall include the intersections improvements, including the lengths (of the auxiliary lanes and locations of the crosswalks. ( . ( . Ms. BJ Leithead Todd HWY-PS Page 3 September 28, 2012 2.3114 10. The TIA recommends a traffic signal at the Pahoa Village Road/Kahakai Boulevard intersection as the mitigation for the project's impact to State highways. The TIA indicates that the projected LOS for the Kahakai Boulevard/Pahoa Village Road intersection will be poor without a traffic signal. Therefore,the revised TIA shall include a traffic signal warrant study and recommended improvements. 11. A conceptual design overlying a map-showing any known physical,cultural and/or environmental constraints and the State right-of-way lines shall be submitted with the revised TIA for the Kahakai Boulevard intersections with Pahoa Village Road. Laneage, crosswalks, and entire auxiliary lanes shall be shown and the improvements shall be included in the Conclusions and Recommendations section. 12. The revised TIA should use queue analysis to insure that the distance along the extension of Kahakai Boulevard to the Shopping Center first driveway is sufficient to prevent queuing on Pahoa Village Road and that the Shopping Center internal circulation will also prevent such queuing by provision of adequate throat lengths in the parking lot. 13. The TIA shall assess if improvements are needed on Kahakai Boulevard between Route 130 and Pahoa Village Road to accommodate the additional traffic generated by ` the Shopping Center and to prevent queuing on Keaau-Pahoa Road. 14. The TIA shall determine if the auxiliary lanes for the right-turn in, right-turn-out(RIRO) on Route 130 at Kahakai Boulevard will accommodate the Shopping Center's additional traffic or if lanes need to be lengthened. 15. The applicant stated in Appendix 0 that the County Code does not require bicycle and pedestrian information. The Department of Transportation(DOT)requires that improvements to roads under its.jurisdiction accommodate motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians,transit riders and persons of all ages and abilities. Such improvements should be included in the Conclusions and Recommendations section of the TIA. 16. Queue analysis should be performed to insure that the shopping center generated traffic • will not cause queues on Keaau-Pahoa Road north of the Kahakai Boulevard intersection and on Pahoa Village Road south of the future roundabout. 17. Schematics for traffic volumes and LOS for the whole intersection and the individual movements shall be provided to show the existing (2011), full buildout, 5 year, 10 year and 20 year scenarios at the Keaau-Pahoa Road/Kahakai Boulevard intersection and the Pahoa Village Road/Kahakai Boulevard intersection. 18. The access for service trucks should be identified on the site plan and included in a discussion of internal circulation in the site. -Preferably, deliveries should be made outside of peak traffic hours. Ms.BJ Leithead Todd HWY-PS Page 4 2.3114 ( September 28, 2012 ( 19. All required transportation improvements to roads under State jurisdiction shall be planned, designed and constructed to current State requirements and provided by the (_ applicant at no cost to the State. ( 20. The DOT's roundabout project at Keaau-Pahoa Road,Road A and Pahoa Village Road is in the design phase and completion of construction is anticipated in 2013. The majority ( of Hilo-bound traffic generated from the proposed shopping center will use the roundabout. Therefore, as part of the regional traffic mitigation for the shopping center, the applicant shall be required to make a fair.share contribution to the roundabout's construction cost. (_ ( If you have any questions,please call Ken Tatsuguchi, Head Planning Engineer,Highways ( Division, at(808) 587-1830. (_ Very truly yours, /)11'1"),- 462 -zage___ GLENN M. OKIMOTO, Ph.D. Director of Transportation ( ( EIVISONAI131TAL 1-LC phone: (808)938-8583 fax: (808)775-1530 P.O. Box 1310 Honoka`a,Hawai`i 96720 gpknopp@gkenvIlc.com Glenn M.Okimoto,Ph.D. State of Hawaii Director of Transportation 869 Punchbowl Street Honolulu,HI 96813-5097 May 14,2013 Dear Mr. Okimoto: Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA)for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land,Pahoa,Puna District,Island of Hawaii,TMKs(31d) 1-5-007:006, 055,069 & 070. Thank you for your comments regarding this Draft Environmental Assessment. We offer the following responses to your specific comments: 1. You state that the RTIA is "not acceptable"but do explain this statement. A more recent revised Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIA Report or TIA)than was available in the DEA has been provided to HDOT but this comment does not acknowledge receipt of this document. This more recently revised TIA dated April 2013 was prepared in response to your comments of September 28, 2012 concerning the State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 12-000033) and Change of Zone Application(REZ 12-000155)for the proposed project. 2. The applicant no longer plans to have a Post Office on the site. This structure is likely to be occupied by a high-turnover restaurant. 3. Noted. 4. The traffic analyses and level of service (LOS)tables include the information that you enumerate. 5. The information that you note—LOS for the northbound through, northbound right, southbound through and southbound right movements, are already shown in the Tables you list. 6. We acknowledge that it is the DOT's policy that the Applicant mitigate transportation impacts due to the project in order to maintain satisfactory LOS and delay levels without the project conditions for the horizon year, and further note that the TIA predicts LOS "E"and "F" for some movements without mitigation. t emApAry it, ULC The Draft Environmental Assessment, which you reviewed, discusses mitigation of these traffic impacts, and recommends signalization of the Pahoa-Village Road/Kahakai Boulevard Intersection, as well as widening of a portion of Pahoa Village Road in order to accommodate traffic lanes, as mitigation of these impacts. (_ 7. The queue information is contained for each intersection of the computer printout contained in the appendices of the report. The queuing analysis information is contained in the tabular elements as Volume/Capacity ratio (horizontal) and Expected Maximum Number of Vehicles in the Queue (vertical). Note that the computer reports all contain v/c and the expected number of vehicle lengths. The Final Environmental Assessment will include a discussion of the queuing analysis and the options that you mention. However, it appears that the design for (. the intersection of Kahakai Blvd. and Old Pahoa Village Rd. is adequate. The (. addition of a dedicated right-turn lane on Kahakai Boulevard approaching the intersection(i.e.,westbound) appears to be precluded by right-of-way width. This mitigation would also result in maintenance of a LOS of"A"through 20 years from project build-out for the center and south driveways along Pahoa Village Road. 8. A signal warrant study has been performed by the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works has been performed and has found warrants for signalization of the Pahoa Village Road—Kahakai Boulevard intersection. This signal warrant (. study will be attached to the FEA. 9. The signal warrant study will be provided to your agency. The applicant intends to construct a traffic signal at the Pahoa Village Road—Kahaka Boulevard intersection as it is warranted. 10. The intersection would be constructed with the largest allowed curve radius allowed by street design standards and would accommodate all but the longest semi-trailers. ( 11. Construction of the proposed project will be coordinated with construction of the DOT roundabout, as discussed in the DEA. Recent discussions with your agency indicate that roundabout construction will likely occur no sooner than mid-2004. This may allow time for the project's proposed roadway improvements before ( roundabout construction commences. If this does not occur, improvement of the project site and Kahakai Boulevard will take place while the roundabout is being constructed, with other roadway improvements being performed after roundabout construction is completed. The FEA will include an updated discussion of this construction phasing. ( 12. As design was in process when the DEA was published, certain elements were not (_ presented therein. For example, the Pahoa Village Road-Kahakai Boulevard ( Ai of [tomotain1TAL.ilt intersection will include four crosswalks. The FEA will also include laneage diagrams showing the extent of improvements. We would also like to point out that one of the problems with mitigating impacts to bicyclist safety in roadway design is that there are no standards or guidelines in the State and County of Hawai`i, although development of these standards and guidelines appears to be in progress, as required by the Complete Streets Law(HRS 264-20.5). 13. Responses to individual items are as follows: a. The diagrams appear to be consistent in direction. b. As design of the roundabout is in process by your agency, as you note, we are not able to provide a diagram of it. c. The most recent revision of the TIA, provided to your agency in April 2013, is consistent with DEA Figure 3 —Preliminary Site Plan, and depicts a dedicated left-turn lane at the Kahakai Boulevard Intersection. d. See 13.(c) above. e. Page 26, paragraph 4 of the DEA discusses sidewalks, and seems to be adequate. However, the FEA will include updated design information. Street parking is not planned f. As project site design is in process,the DEA did not discuss employee parking. We anticipate employees to use areas designated by their employers in order to accommodate customers. Additionally, commercial truck traffic servicing the site will be largely done at off-peak hours. We will include a discussion of these issues in the FEA. g. The bus stop and pullout are noted on page 26, paragraph 4 of the DEA. While buses may interfere with the sight distance for the center driveway, this interference will only occur as often as buses stop here. h. The FEA will note the number of ADA accessible parking stalls. i. We will add the Permit to Perform Work Upon State Highways from the DOT Highways Division to Section 3.5 Required Permits and Approvals as DOT has management over a portion of Pahoa Village Road. 14. The drawings and information previously requested has been provided to your agency. Below we address items 2,7,9-15, 17 and 18 of your previous letter to the County of Hawaii Planning Director dated September 28, 2012 (HWY-PS 2.3114). 2. The TIA has now been revised twice since the May 2012 revision and we have done our utmost to satisfy HDOT's concerns with it. 7. Engineering Partners Inc. has completed the conceptual lane geometry and the current version will be shown in the FEA. (_ ( „ix ENVIR*NMSMTAI U t 9. As mentioned before Engineering Partners Inc. has corrected the through lanes design and crosswalks at Pahoa Village Road-Kahakai Blvd. intersection and will be shown in the FEA 10. The traffic Signal Warrant Study has been completed and found that 2 warrants were met at this intersection. It has already been provided to your (_ agency and will be included in the FEA. An independent signal warrant study has been performed by the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works and has found warrants; this signal warrant study will be provided to your agency and also will be included in the FEA. 11. The conceptual design overlay has been provided to your agency and will be shown in the FEA. 12. The TIA has been revised to include a queue study and has been (- provided to your agency. 13. The queue study and revised TIA address this issue and has been discussed in the DEA. 14. As (13) above. ( 15. The safety and welfare of the residents and visitors to Pahoa is the applicants' number one concern. Applicant(at applicants expense) is providing the following safety measures: widening of the County roadway six hundred feet south of Kahakai Boulevard and Pahoa Village Road, sidewalks along the roadway frontage, a signal light, crosswalks, a ( covered bus stop, pedestrian sidewalks, and covered bicycle racks. None ( of the above improvements presently exists. All of these improvements are being constructed at applicants cost at or near the Kahakai (- Boulevard/Pahoa Village Road intersection which is the immediate intersection to the project. It is clear to most observers that a bicycle path (: or pedestrian walkway along State Highways in the vicinity of Malama Market intersection/Keauu-Pahoa Bypass Road (State Highway 130) is ( presently unacceptable for safety reasons. These issues have been ( addressed in the DEA. 17. Schematics for traffic volumes and LOS for the whole intersections (- and the individual movements have been provided in the TIA. ( 18. The site plan has been revised to address these concerns. We anticipate that deliveries will be made almost entirely outside of peak traffic hours. 15. Four crosswalks are planned for the Pahoa Village Road-Kahakai Boulevard intersection and sidewalks are planned for the project site frontage. The applicant is providing and completely paying for a number of improvements including (a) a (_ signalized intersection at the Pahoa Village Road—Kahakai Boulevard intersection; (b) pir widening Pahoa Village Road from the Pahoa Village Road-Kahakai Boulevard intersection southward 600 feet; (c) construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the same 600 feet; (d)moving a minimum of four utility poles; (e) a fully-covered bus stop located off of the road for safety; (f) extending a new roadway 55 feet wide and 820 feet long as the new Kahakai Boulevard extension; (g) adding curb, gutter and sidewalk along the west side of the Kahakai Boulevard extension; and (h) a new dedicated right-turn lane approximately 200 feet long on Pahoa Village Road turning right into the Kahakai Boulevard extension. We feel that these improvements are an adequate contribution to roadway infrastructure, and requiring the applicant to construct, for example, a 1,000 foot long sidewalk well outside of the applicant's project area is completely unfair and would cause unreasonable financial hardship on the applicant. 16. Your agency has expressed interest that the Kahakai Boulevard extension parcel TMK(3`d) 1-5-007:055 be conveyed to the County of Hawai`i. Other areas currently under DOT ownership or management will be dedicated to the State, as approved and required by DOT. 17. The Applicant will send written request for access to Pahoa Village Road at the Kahakai Boulevard Intersection. The environmental assessment has determined that other environmental impacts to State facilities are negligible or non-existent. 18. The FEA will note that all recommended improvements shall follow federal guidelines,AASHTO standards and State requirements. Sincerely, Graham Knopp, Principal—GK Environmental Cc: Maija Cottle, COH Planning Department,Jon McElvaney,Project Consultant (!'F WAT�_ a ■at l are DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY • COUNTY OF HAWAII �G?)-a•-;'Pi 345 KEKUANAO'A STREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAII 96720 L TELEPHONE (808) 961-8050 • FAX (808) 961-8657 ( ( Apri123,2013 Graham Knopp ( GK Environmental,LLC ( P.Q.BOX 1310 Honoka`a,HI 96727 ( ( DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ( ,PAIJOA VILLAGE ROAD SHOPPING CENTER AND RELATED ROADWAY (_ IMPROVEMENTS TAX MAP KEY 1-5-007:006,069 AND 070 ( We have reviewed the subject Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA)and have the following comments: 1. Please note that a water commitment has not been officially effected. Therefore,water availability for the proposed project is subject to change,depending on the water situation. ( ( 2. In order to effect a water commitment for the proposed project,the applicant must submit estimated ( maximum daily water usage calculations,prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii,for review and approval. The water usage calculations should include the total estimated ( maximum daily water usage(in gallons per day)and the estimated peak flow(in gallons per minute). Based on the water usage calculations provided,we will determine if water can be made available. If ( the applicant's estimated water usage is beyond what our current water availability conditions can (_ provide,extensive improvements will be required,which may include,but not be limited to,additional source, storage, and booster pump facilities. ( Should there be any questions,please contact Mr.Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070,extension 256. ( (_ S inc 0 yours, ( Quiri Antonio,Jr.,P.E. ( Mana.. r=Chief Engineer (_ RQ:dfg ( ( ( . . .Water, Our Most Precious Resource, . . Ka Wai.A pane.. . . (- The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer, ( £NYIRONUZNTAL U.t phone: (808)938-8583 fax: (808)775-1530 P.O.Box 1310 Honoka`a,Hawai`i 96720 gpknopp @gkenvllc.com Mr. Quirino Antonio, Jr., P.E. County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply 345 Kekuanaoa Street, Suite 20 Hilo, Hawai`i 96720 May 14, 2013 Dear Mr. Antonio: Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA) for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land,Pahoa, Island of Hawaii, TMK(3rd) 1-5-007:006,055, 069 & 070. We acknowledge receipt of your letter dated March 23, 2013. Thank you very much for your comments on the DEA. We understand from your letter that a water commitment has not been officially effected,and for one to be effected,the applicant must submit estimated daily water usage calculations prepared by a licensed engineer. The water demand calculation would be submitted to DWS for review and approval prior to DWS approval of construction drawings. We would also like to point out that, while a water commitment effected, the DWS has expressed written availability of 42 units of water for the proposed project. We have attached this letter from the DWS dated September 12, 2012. Sincerely, Graham Knopp, Principal—GK Environmental C: Maija Cottle, Planning Department,Jon McElvaney, Project Consultant attachment R.,,• /\ �,' DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY • COUNTY OF HAWAII itEC+��t' 34 5 KE"UANAO A STcEET_ SUITE 20 HiLO. HAWAI i 96720 TELEP*iONIE 1808) 961.6050 FAX is,} !) .6.1 665.7 (_ September 12,2012 ( TO: Ms. 13J Leithead Todd,Director Planning Department ( FROM: Quirino Antonio,Jr.,Manager-Chief Engineer ( SUBJECT: STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT(SLU 12-000033) CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION(REZ 12-000155) APPLICANT—B.T.KUWAHARA,LLC REQUEST-A-1A TO CV-10 TAX MAP KEY 1-5-007:006,069,AND 070 ( Based on our previous determination and correspondence with the applicant regarding water availability to the subject parcels(see attached letter dated September 13,2011),please be informed that there are a maximum of 14 units of water available to each of the subject parcels. Each unit of water is equal to an average daily usage of 400 gallons. ( The remaining comments and conditions from our August 20,2012,letter to your department regarding the subject applications still stand. Should there be any questions,please contact Mr. Finn McCall of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at ( 961-8070,extension 255. Sincerely yours, ( ( Quiri Antonio,Jr.,F.E. Man r-Chief Engineer ( FM:dfg Enc. (_ copy— B.T.Kuwahara,LLC Inoue Hawaii Realty Corporation ( ( . ,Writer, Our Most Pr eious l vurce . . _ 2(11'Wai `2 %ra.- T e Renartmena of water 6,,p:ty is an Equa+ODponunav prow der and emp cyer V I II MAINSTREET PAHOA ASSOCIATION ESTABLISHED IN 1992 MAINSTREETPAHOA @GMAT L.COM PO BOX 1 189 PAHOA, HI. 96778 GK Environmental, LLC P.O. Box 1310 Honoka'a, HI 96727 Subject: Public Comment of DEA for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land, Pahoa, Island of Hawai'i, TMKs 1-5-007: 006, 055 ,069 and 070. Dear Graham, At our most recent Maintreet Pahoa Assciation Board of Director's Meeting, the DEA was reviewed and we have numerous concerns. Chief among our concerns is the obvious undercounting of traffic and the low traffic projections into the future. U.S. Census data indicates well over a 2% growth per year for the Puna Region and by most accounts, it is much higher than that. Installing a signal intersection at this intersection with two `, roposed roundabouts within a quarter-mile is just not realistic. Traffic will be backed-up during many hours of the day. We highly recommend that you consider installing a modern roundabout which will assure the flow of traffic into and out of the Village. We are working closely with the Pahoa Regional Town Center Steering Committee and believe that additional roundabouts within Pahoa Village will assure a much safer and more efficient mode of transportation well into the next Century. There are far too many electrical black-outs in the lower Puna region and traffic signals are a most-ineffective way of regulating traffic flow. We appreciate your consideration on this matter, and as the de-facto Chamber of Commerce, our mission is to enhance the economic vitality and quality of life for Pahoa Town. Mahalo Nui, Mark Hinshaw President, Mainstreet Pahoa Association CC: County of Hawai'i Planning Department, Attention Maija Cottle Mainstreet Pahoa Association A 501 C (6) Non-profit Corporation of Businesses and Citizens "Seeking to enhance the economic vitality and quality of life of Pahoa since 1992" 40 q Au. cNwaonw SAX a�rAt ec phone: (808)938-8583 fax: (808)775-1530 P.O.Box 1310 Honoka`a,Hawai`i 96720 gpknopp @gkenvllc.com Mr. Mark Hinshaw Mainstreeet Pahoa Association PO Box 1189 Pahoa, HI 96778 mainstreetpahoa @gmail.com May 14, 2013 Dear Mr. Hinshaw: Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of , State Land, Pahoa, Island of Hawaii, TMK (31.d) 1-5-007:006, 055, 069 & 070. Thank you very much for your comments regarding this Draft Environmental Assessment. We appreciate that Mainstreet Pahoa Association is interested in the proposed project. The Traffic Impact Analysis Report assumes both 1% and 2% increases in traffic over a 20-year period, at the recommendation and requirement of both the State of Hawaii Department of Transportation, Highways Division, and the County of Hawai`i Department of Public Works. An annual increase of traffic of 2%results in an increase of i traffic of about 20% over ten years. We would also like to point out that the increase in traffic over a period of time is not the same as the increase in population, and that the US DOT Federal Highways Administration reports the number of vehicles per capita in the State of Hawai`i as 0.76. Finally, our Traffic Impact Analysis report predicts that signalization of the Pahoa Village Road-Kahakai Boulevard Intersection would maintain reasonable traffic flow out to 20 years from project build-out. We understand that you are advocating for a roundabout at the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection. Construction of such an intersection would be beyond the abilities of the applicant, as such an intersection would occupy lands owned by no less than six entities, including the State, County, and four private landowners. Therefore, this is not a feasible alternative for the applicant, and besides, a signalized intersection here is predicted to maintain traffic LOS over a 20-year timeline. We encourage you to consider the positive traffic impacts of this project, as it would require fewer vehicle trips to Hilo and Keaau and therefore would improve traffic on the _ Pahoa Highway. f ." ENYIRONM[NTAL LLL Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Au) Graham Knopp, Principal—GK Environmental Cc: Maija Cottle, COH Planning Department, Jon McElvaney, Project Consultant L MAIAMA 0 PUNA ¢` - P. 0. Box 1520 Pahoa, Hawaii, 96778 (808) 965-2000 r s ; f � www.ma}arz aapuna.or malarnaopunacyahoo.com r. Preserving Hawai`i's precious natural heritage April 9,2013 ( GK Environmental,LLC P.O.Box 1310 Honoka'a,HI.96727 ( RE: BRYSON KUWAHARA,TMK(3)1-5-007:006,069,070 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Dear Mr. Knoff: ( I attended the EA presentation that you gave at HAAS school on March 20th. 1 signed the list requesting a copy of the EA. My request has thus far been ignored. Please be advised that part of the EA/EIS process requires the applicant to provide copies to members of the public upon request,so that they can submit meaningful testimony. Your failure to do so has compromised the process. I am therefore able to comment only on what was presented at that meeting, although I reserve the right to ( add to that if and when I receive my copy of the EA. The first thing I noted at the presentation was that the North arrow on your map was pointed in the wrong direction. You need to change this. The projections for population growth at the intersection are well below the real numbers.The 2010 Census noted a population growth rate for Puna of 24.5%,but your projections are only for 1 and (_ 2%. A recently released update from the Census Bureau gives the increase in Puna between 2010 and ( 2012 as 2.2%. And, barring a major catastrophe,population tends to grow at(minimally)geometric progressions and(more usually)exponentially, Thus,the 5,10 and 20 year projections are neither realistic nor accurate,and any decisions based on these numbers will be incorrect. It is likely that the project will be obsolete before construction is even completed. This will benefit neither the community that the project is being designed to serve, nor the applicant who is investing heavily in it.You need to go back to the drawing board,because the Traffic Impact Analysis is not acceptable on this basis. The State DOT will be doing work on Hwy 130 and closing off and/or severely limiting access to Pahoa town and the Pahoa Marketplace during construction. This will constitute a major inconvenience for the public, hit the business sector in the pocketbook,and will probably not even alleviate the safety problems as a counter balance.The timing of your project will only add to the problems, leaving Pahoa ( town with only the single lane Post Office road or the entry/exit to town by the traffic light, The latter area is already jammed with school buses and school traffic twice a day,and would be unable to handle (the additional traffic if your project and that of HDOT are in construction phase concurrently. Your ( Traffic Impact Analysis and,to the best of my knowledge,the EA,(since you haven't sent me one I can only assume)do not seem to address this or offer alternatives.Thus,the only alternative I can see is to delay your project until HDOT has completed theirs. Until such time as these issues are satisfactorily addressed,I must withhold support for your project. Sincerely, Rene Siracusa President cc: Maija Cottle, HCPD (- ( ENVMO►INZMTAL UC ( phone:(808)938-8583 fax: (808)775-1530 P.O.Box 1310 Honoka`a,Hawai`i 96720 gpknopp @gkenvllc.com ( (_. Rene Siracusa Malama 0 Puna PO Box 1520 Pahoa, HI 96778 ( May 14, 2013 ( ( Dear Ms. Siracusa: ( Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA) for B.T. ( Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of ( State Land,Pahoa, Island of Hawaii, TMK(3rd) 1-5-007:006, 055, ( 069 & 070. Thank you very much for your comments regarding this Draft Environmental Assessment. We appreciate that you and Malama 0 Puna are interested in this proposed project. The Traffic Impact Analysis Report assumes both 1% and 2% increases in traffic over a ( 20-year period, at the recommendation of both the County of Hawaii DPW and the State ( of Hawaii DOT. We reiterate that this assumption was made at the recommendation and requirement of regulatory agencies. We would also like to point out that the increase in ( population may be proportional to the increase in traffic, but the two are not equivalent. And, a 2% annual increase in traffic results in an increase of about 20% over ten years, (` reasonably close to the 24.5% increase in population that you claim. Therefore we think that the 5, 10, and 20-year traffic projections are both realistic and accurate. ( We do not understand your claim of premature obsolescence for the proposed project as it seems apparent that providing services that do not exist in the area would undoubtedly benefit the community. ( The applicant no longer plans to have a post office occupy the site. ( We understand that the proposed roundabout construction at the Pahoa Bypass-Pahoa Village Road intersection has the potential to conflict with construction of the proposed project's roadway improvements. The applicant will ensure that the two projects will not ( conflict and will not occur at the same time. ( (_ ENV*RONMDd AL Lit We encourage you to consider the positive traffic impacts of this project, as its construction will result in fewer vehicle trips to Hilo and Keaau and would therefore improve traffic on the Pahoa Highway. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Graham Knopp, Principal—GK Environmental Cc: Maija Cottle, COH Planning Department, Jon McElvaney, Project Consultant .'O f���s959.u ��;; NEIL ABERCROMBIE ' e FN OFFICE OF PLANNING GOVERNOR A. : ' JESSE K.SOUKI xIY, z® STATE OF HAWAII oulecroR ( � OFFICE OF MANNING S`~ -` e4''' 235 South Beretania Street,6th Floor,Honolulu,Hawaii 96813 <.14 Telephone; (808)587 _�me, .eP--,,''', Mailing Address P,O.Box 2359,Honolulu,Hawaii 96804 Fax: (808)587-2b44 ( Web: httpa/hawaii_gov/dbedUop/ (. Ref.No. P-13942 ( (_ April 10,2013 ( Ms.Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd, Director Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 ( Attention: Ms.Maija Cottle (_ Dear Ms. Leithead-Todd: ( Subject: Draft Environmental Assessment B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development Pahoa,Island of Hawaii ( Tax Map Keys: (3) 1-5-007:006, 055, 069, and 070 ( The Office of Planning(OP)has reviewed the Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA) ( for the above referenced project. The proposed project would develop approximately 104,143 ( square feet of mixed commercial use on 9.93 acres of land located in the State Agricultural District. The applicant has indicated that an application to change the State Land Use District from Agricultural to Urban has been submitted to the County of Hawaii Planning Department, (_ pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes(HRS) §205-3.1. ( OP offers the following comments on the subject DEA: (. 1. Section 3.3.1 Utilities and Public Facilities. Given the project site's location above ( the Underground Injection Control line,the EA should elaborate on the anticipated ( wastewater demand,the manner in which wastewater will be treated,and the presence of any drinking water wells in the project vicinity. For water,the projected demand ( for potable and non-potable water should be provided. Landscaping should use non- ( potable water if such source is available. ( 2. Section 3.1.1 Soils. In consideration of the site's Agricultural District classification, ( the EA should assess soils and agricultural productivity relative to Land Study Bureau ( classifications and Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii. Any previous agricultural use of the site and any agricultural uses in neighboring areas should also be described. ( Ms.Bobby Jean Leithead- odd Page 2 April 10,.2013 3. Section 3.6.1.Hawaii State Plan. There should be an expanded discussion of compliance and conformity with the Hawaii State Plan,including priority guidelines and functional plans,as this is required for any land use district boundary amendment pursuant to IRS §205-16. In particular,we would like to see reference to recently enacted priority guidelines for sustainability and climate change adaptation. Relative to these guidelines,the EA should discuss ways in which energy,water,and resource conservation measures will be pursued,including low impact development practices. 4. Section 3.6.2 State Land Use District. As this project will undergo a land use district boundary amendment,the EA should provide a detailed discussion and assessment of the proposed amendment relative to the decision-making criteria for boundary amendments in HRS §205-17,and Hawaii Administrative Rules §15-15-77. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the DEA, If you have any questions, please contact Scott Forsythe of our Land Use Division,at(808) 587-2805. Si rely, f K. •uki P ector c: tiGK Environmental LLC 1 If LNYIRONMiNTAL UC phone: (808)938-8583 fax: (808)775-1530 P.O.Box 1310 Honoka`a,Hawai`i 96720 - gpknopp @gkenvllc.com Director Jesse K. Souki Office of Planning State of Hawaii 235 South Beretania Street, 6th Floor Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 May 14, 2013 Dear Mr. Souki: ( Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA)for B.T. ( Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land,Pahoa,Island of Hawaii,TMK(3rd) 1-5-007:006, 055, 069 & 070. Thank you very much for your comments regarding this Draft Environmental Assessment. We respond to your specific comments below: 1. Section 3.3.1 Utilities and Public Facilities—The Draft Environmental Assessment discusses wastewater treatment, and the volume of wastewater is estimated at approximately 12,000 gallons per day. The County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply has expressed that 42 units of potable water ( (equivalent to 16,800 gallons per day) are likely to be available to the project. The proposed project would require a minimum of irrigation water as it is located in a ( rainforest with approximately 130 inches of annual rainfall. The Final Environmental Assessment will discuss the locations of nearby wells. 2. Section 3.1.1 Soils—There do not appear to be any ongoing agricultural operations in the project vicinity. The proposed project site lands are not ( classified as Agricultural Lands Important to the State of Hawaii (ALISH)nor do they contain soils that would make them desirable for agricultural production. We will include this information in the Final Environmental Assessment. (_ 3. Section 3.6.1 Hawaii State Plan—An expanded discussion of the proposed ( project's compliance and conformity with the Hawaii State Plan will be provided (- in the Final Environmental Assessment. However, the functional plans concern implementation of the State Plan by State government agencies, and as the proposed project is a private action the functional plans are not pertinent. We would like to point out several sustainability practices that would be performed by business on the project site. The grocery store, by far the largest business on the site, would have a photovoltaic array for electrical power supply, low-flow toilets ( (- ( ENiHNONY[tITA(.u.0 C and faucets, and would compost organic waste. The Climate Change adaptation Priority Guidelines do not appear to be pertinent to the project. 4. Section 3.6.2 State Land Use District—The proposed project is consistent with the criteria of HRS 205-17 and a discussion of this will be provided in the Final Environmental Assessment. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Graham Knopp, Principal—GK Environmental Cc: Maija Cottle, COH Planning Department, Jon McElvaney, Project Consultant �ZY G!/y•' _ William P. Kenoi ' t BJ Leithead Todd Mtryor ;J < Director . 4 ;/ Margaret Masuna! ( br 1►�'�r" Deputy Director County of Hawaii PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUNA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ACTION COMMITTEE Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street.Suite 3 • Hilo.Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)9614288 • Pax(808)961-8742 ( ( April 9, 2013 Mr. Graham Knopp GK Environmental LLC ( P.O.Box 1310 Honoka'a, Hawaii 96727 Subject: B,T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA) Dear Mr. Knopp, ( The Puna Community Development Plan (PCDP)Action Committee offers the following comments on the subject DEA for your consideration. Section 3.3.2—Traffic should include a discussion on the use of a modern roundabout at the Kahakai (- Blvd. and Pahoa Village Rd. intersection as an alternative to the construction of a traffic signal. The - PCDP(Sec. 4.4.2) identifies the use of roundabouts as the preferred intersection improvement for improving safety and traffic flow. Further discussion in Sec. 3.3.2 on page 29 states that concurrent construction of the SR 130 roundabout by HDOT and the proposed project intersection is not expected. According to the HDOT project timeline construction of the SR 130 roundabout is expected to begin in the summer of 2013 and (. to be completed in the summer of 2014,which appears to coincide almost exactly with the construction ( time frame for the Kuwahara project. ( As stated under Future Traffic Conditions Without Improvements on page 27, the TIAR assumes a 1% (_ annual traffic increase due to population increase, which appears to be roughly half of the 24.5% total population growth in the Puna between 2000 and 2010. Additionally, the Census Bureau has recently reported that the Hawaii Island population grew an additional 2:2% between 2010 and 2012 and we believe that Puna continues to account fora disproportionate contribution to the county's overall population growth.. Rawtzi`i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer ( Mr.Graham Knopp GK Environmental LLC April 10 2013 Page 2 We would also like to note that the North pointing arrow on your maps need to be adjusted so as to point to the actual North. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject DEA and we look forward to your response to our concerns and comments. Sincerely, (2„.. Patti Pinto, Chair Puna CDP Action Committee xc: B.T. Kuwahara LLC P.O. Box 42I Pahoa, HI 96778 BJ Leithead Todd,Planning Director Director Office of Environmental Quality Control 235 South Beretania Street,Suite 702 Honolulu HI 96813 A (- CNVIRONMOITAL LLC phone: (808)938-8583 fax: (808)775-1530 P.O.Box 1310 Honoka`a,Hawai`i 96720 gpknopp@gkenvllc.com ( Patti Pinto, Chair Puna CDP Action Committee County of Hawai`i Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 ( Hilo, Hawai`i 96720 May 14, 2013 Dear Ms. Pinto: ( ( Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA) for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land,Pahoa,Island of Hawaii, TMK(3") 1-5-007:006, 055, (. 069 & 070. Thank you very much for your comments regarding this Draft Environmental Assessment. We appreciate that you and the Puna CDP Action Committee are interested in this proposed project. ( We understand that you are advocating for a roundabout at the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection. Construction of such an intersection would be beyond the ( abilities of the applicant in this case, as it would occupy lands owned by no less than six landowners, including the State, County, and four private landowners. Therefore, this is not a feasible alternative for the applicant. And, a signalized intersection here is predicted (- to maintain traffic LOS over a 20-year timeline. We have added a discussion of this issue to the Environmental Assessment. (- We understand that the proposed roundabout construction at the Pahoa Bypass-Pahoa (_ Village Road intersection has the potential to conflict with construction of the proposed project's roadway improvements. The applicant will ensure that the two projects will not ( conflict and will not occur at the same time. More recent information from HDOT suggests that the Pahoa Bypass-Pahoa Village Road intersection roundabout may not begin construction before mid-2014. As stated in the Draft Environmental Assessment,the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (_ assumes both a 1% and 2% annual increase in traffic. A 2% increase over ten years implies an increase of about 20%, reasonable close to the 24.5% increase in population ( A iilf ...... ENVMONYENTAL 1.1-C that you note. It is important to realize, also, that traffic and population are not equivalent, although they are certainly directly related. The number of vehicles per capita for Hawaii in 2007 is reported as 0.76 by the Federal Highways Administration. This means that a 24.5% increase in population would imply in an increase in the number of vehicles of 19%. We also encourage you to consider the positive traffic impacts of this project, as its construction will result in fewer vehicle trips to Hilo and Keaau and would improve traffic on the Pahoa Highway. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, - , eallp Graham Knopp, Principal—GK Environmental ( Cc: Maija Cottle, COH Planning Department, Jon McElvaney, Project Consultant ralioa Kegional Town Center Steering Committee PO box 586, rakoa hi 96778 (_ rahoarlan @gmail.com GK Environmental, LLC P.O. Box 1310 (_ Honoka'a, HI 96727 ( Subject: Public Comment of DEA for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land, Pahoa, Island of Hawai'i, TMKs 1-5-007: 006, 055 ,069 and 070. ( Dear Mr. Knopp, ( The DEA was reviewed and discussed by the Steering Committee and many issues of concerns came up. Chief among our concerns is the obvious undercounting of current traffic and the low ( traffic projections into the future. U.S. Census data indicates well over a 2% growth per year for the Puna Region and by most accounts, it is much higher than that. Installing a signal intersection at this ( intersection with two proposed roundabouts within a quarter-mile is just not realistic. Traffic will be backed-up during many hours of the day. Under the Puna Community Development Plan, the Pahoa Regional Town Center Steering ( Committee is tasked with making planning recommendations to the County Planning Department for the Regional Town Center. We are advocating roundabouts and most every major interchange to (- assure the continued movement of traffic. Signaled intersections, while they may be a bit less expensive to construct, have been proven to be inefficient and a higher traffic safety risk over the long-term, especially with the numerous power outages that Pahoa experiences. ( Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. ( Mahalo Nui, (- Gilbert Aguinaldo Kaleo Buckley ( Madie Greene Mark Hinshaw Jon Olson Oshi Simsarian (_ Rene Siracusa Dan Taylor ( CC: County of Hawai'i Planning Department, Attention Maija Cottle 1 IV ENVIRONMENTAL LLC phone:(808)938-8583 fax: (808)775-1530 P.O.Box 1310 Honoka`a,Hawai`i 96720 gpknopp @gkenvllc.com ( (_ Pahoa Regional Town Center Steering Committee PO Box 586 Pahoa, HI 96778 (- May 14, 2013 ( ( Dear Pahoa Regional Town Center Steering Committee members: ( Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA) for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land, Pahoa,Island of Hawaii,TMK(3rd) 1-5-007:006, 055, ( 069 & 070. ( Thank you very much for your comments regarding this Draft Environmental Assessment. We appreciate that the Pahoa Regional Town Center Steering Committee is interested in this proposed project. The Traffic Impact Analysis Report assumes both a 1% and 2% increase in traffic over a 20-year period, at the recommendation of regulatory agencies involved in development of ( traffic mitigation. We reiterate that this assumption was made at the recommendation and requirement of both the State of Hawai`i Department of Transportation and the County of Hawai`i Department of Public Works. We would also like to point out that the increase in population may be proportional to the increase in traffic, but the two are not equivalent. The US DOT Federal Highways Administration reports that Hawai`i has 0.76 vehicles per capita. ( We understand that you are advocating for a roundabout at the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection. Construction of such an intersection would be beyond the abilities of the applicant in this case, as it would occupy lands owned by no less than six owners, including the State, County, and four private landowners. Therefore,this is not a ( feasible alternative for the applicant, and besides, a signalized intersection here is predicted to maintain traffic LOS over a 20-year timeline. ( Nwaaiu.�.cc We also encourage you to consider the positive traffic impacts of this project, as it would require fewer vehicle trips to Hilo and Keaau and would therefore improve traffic on the Pahoa Highway. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, eip Graham Knopp, Principal—GK Environmental Cc: Maija Cottle, COH Planning Department,Jon McElvaney, Consultant ( : Y OiM�' (_ William P.Kenoi BJ Leithead Todd Mayor • \‘19". Director Director ••; Margaret Masunag �r�rE OF 110! Deputy Director ( County of Hawaii PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUNA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ACTION COMMITTEE Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 • Hilo,Hawai`i 96720 Phone(808)961-8288 • Fax(808)961-8742 ( April 9, 2013 Mr. Graham Knopp GK Environmental LLC (. P.O. Box 1310 Honoka`a, Hawai`i 96727 Subject: B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land (" Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) Dear Mr. Knopp, The Puna Community Development Plan (PCDP)Action Committee offers the following comments on the subject DEA for your consideration. Section 3.3.2—Traffic should include a discussion on the use of a modern roundabout at the Kahakai t Blvd. and Pahoa Village Rd. intersection as an alternative to the construction of a traffic signal. The PCDP (Sec. 4.4.2) identifies the use of roundabouts as the preferred intersection improvement for improving safety and traffic flow. Further discussion in Sec. 3.3.2 on page 29 states that concurrent construction of the SR 130 roundabout by HDOT and the proposed project intersection is not expected. According to the HDOT project timeline construction of the SR 130 roundabout is expected to begin in the summer of 2013 and to be completed in the summer of 2014, which appears to coincide almost exactly with the construction time frame for the Kuwahara project. As stated under Future Traffic Conditions Without Improvements on page 27, the TIAR assumes a 1% annual traffic increase due to population increase, which appears to be roughly half of the 24.5% total population growth in the Puna between 2000 and 2010. Additionally,the Census Bureau has recently (_ reported that the Hawai`i Island population grew an additional 2.2% between 2010 and 2012 and we believe that Puna continues to account for a disproportionate contribution to the county's overall population growth. (- Hawai`i Counry is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer ( ( Mr. Graham Knopp GK Environmental LLC April 10 2013 Page 2 We would also like to note that the North pointing arrow on your maps need to be adjusted so as to point to the actual North. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject DEA and we look forward to your response to our concerns and comments. Sincerely, ARC Patti Pinto, Chair Puna CDP Action Committee xc: B.T. Kuwahara LLC P.O. Box 421 Pahoa, HI 96778 BJ Leithead Todd, Planning Director Director {. Office of Environmental Quality Control 235 South Beretania Street, Suite 702 Honolulu HI 96813 (_ £NV1*ONUU TAL LL[ phone:(808)938-8583 fax:(808)775-1530 P.O.Box 1310 Honoka`a,Hawai`i 96720 gpknopp@gkenvllc.com ( Patti Pinto, Chair Puna CDP Action Committee County of Hawai`i Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 ( Hilo,Hawai`i 96720 (_ May 14, 2013 Dear Ms. Pinto: ( Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA)for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land,Pahoa,Island of Hawaii, TMK(3rd) 1-5-007:006, 055, ( 069 & 070. Thank you very much for your comments regarding this Draft Environmental ( Assessment. We appreciate that you and the Puna CDP Action Committee are interested in this proposed project. ( We understand that you are advocating for a roundabout at the Kahakai Boulevard-Pahoa Village Road intersection. Construction of such an intersection would be beyond the ( abilities of the applicant in this case, as it would occupy lands owned by no less than six landowners, including the State, County, and four private landowners. Therefore, this is ( not a feasible alternative for the applicant. And, a signalized intersection here is predicted (- to maintain traffic LOS over a 20-year timeline. We have added a discussion of this issue to the Environmental Assessment. We understand that the proposed roundabout construction at the Pahoa Bypass-Pahoa Village Road intersection has the potential to conflict with construction of the proposed project's roadway improvements. The applicant will ensure that the two projects will not ( conflict and will not occur at the same time. More recent information from HDOT suggests that the Pahoa Bypass-Pahoa Village Road intersection roundabout may not begin construction before mid-2014. As stated in the Draft Environmental Assessment,the Traffic Impact Analysis Report assumes both a 1% and 2% annual increase in traffic. A 2% increase over ten years implies an increase of about 20%, reasonable close to the 24.5% increase in population ( 4„Lay that you note. It is important to realize, also, that traffic and population are not equivalent, although they are certainly directly related. The number of vehicles per capita for Hawaii in 2007 is reported as 0.76 by the Federal Highways Administration. This means that a 24.5% increase in population would imply in an increase in the number of vehicles of 19%. We also encourage you to consider the positive traffic impacts of this project, as its construction will result in fewer vehicle trips to Hilo and Keaau and would improve traffic on the Pahoa Highway. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Graham Knopp, Principal—GK Environmental Cc: Maija Cottle, COH Planning Department, Jon McElvaney, Project Consultant Puna' Traffic Safety Committee (_ 13-631 Leilani Avenue, Pahoa HI 96778 ( ( ( (_ April 8, 2013 (_. GK Environmental, LLC P.O. Box 1310 Honoka'a, HI 96727 Dear Mr. Knopp, This letter is in response to your request to seek community input in the Environment ( Assessment on the property located on TMK's: (3) 1-5-007: 006, 055 ,069 and 070. (. Due to our past experience with the State of Hawai'i Department of Transportation's ( designed and built projects along Hwy 130, we believe it would be prudent for the developer of this project to explore all options, which include, but are not limited to; signaled lights, roundabout, four way stop, or any other intersection alternative that may be available. ( Further, we have no faith in the State of Hawai'l Department of Transportation's traffic projections, they have been consistently low which has been detrimental to our traffic safety. ( People's lives are at stake here and we ask that you design this extremely busy intersection with that in mind. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 443-1036 or email me at (- jon631 @earthlink.net ( Sincerely, (- Jon Olsen Chair Puna Traffic Safety Committee ( CC: Maija Cottle, Hawai'i County Planning Department (- ( EsvaoMYLMTaL tic phone: (808)938-8583 fax: (808)775-1530 P.O.Box 1310 Honoka`a,Hawai`i 96720 gpknopp @gkenvllc.com Puna Traffic Safety Committee 13-631 Leilani Avenue Pahoa, HI 96778 May 14, 2013 Dear Mr. Olsen: Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA) for B.T. Kuwahara Private Commercial Development and Related Use of State Land, Pahoa, Island of Hawaii, TMK(3rd) 1-5-007:006, 055, 069 & 070. Thank you very much for your comments regarding this Draft Environmental Assessment. We appreciate that the Puna Traffic Safety Committee is interested in this proposed project. ( We would like to emphasize that alternatives to the recommended traffic mitigation(i.e., signalization of the Pahoa Village Road-Kahakai Boulevard intersection) were considered. Signalization was chosen because it would both alleviate negative traffic impacts from the proposed project and, with four pedestrian crosswalks,would preserve pedestrian safety. We also encourage you to consider the positive traffic impacts of this project, as its construction will result in fewer vehicle trips to Hilo and Keaau and would therefore improve traffic on the Pahoa Highway. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Graham Knopp, Principal —GK Environmental Cc: Maija Cottle, COH Planning Department, Jon McElvaney, Project Consultant APPENDIX 2 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT ( PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT TMK (3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, AND :070 PAHOA, HAWAI'I 96778 MNA PROJECT 01539_5 NOVEMBER 21, 2012 A Myounghee Noh & Associates Environmental Studies and Consulting Services 94 Kohola Street, Hilo, Hawai'i, USA 96720 . 808.935.8727 99-1046 lwaena Street, Suite 210A,Aiea, Hawai'i, USA 96701 • 808.484.9214 Phase I ESA report is prepared for: Bryson T. Kuwahara 1142 Kaumana Drive Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT TMK (3) 1 -5-007:006, :055, :069, AND :070 PAHOA, HAWAI'I 96778 TMK(3) 1-5-007:006 3.311 acres TMK(3) 1-5-007:055 0.937 acres TMK(3) 1-5-007:069 3.311 acres TMK(3) 1-5-007:070 3.311 acres MNA Job No. 015395 November 21, 2012 I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of environmental professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Myounghee Noh Principal Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. Environmental Studies& Consulting Services 99-1046 Iwaena Street, Suite 210A Aiea, Hawai'i 96701 Tel (808)484-9214 Fax (808) 484-4660 www.noh-associates.com Bryson T. Kawahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3)1-5-007:006,:055,:069,AND:070—November 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii FINDINGS viii RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PURPOSE 1 1.2 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES 1 1.2.1 Site History 1 1.2.2 Regulatory Records 3 1.2.3 Site Reconnaissance 3 1.2.4 Site Geology and Hydrogeology 3 1.2.5 Data Evaluation and Reporting 4 1.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS 4 1.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS 4 1.5 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 4 1.6 USER RELIANCE 4 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 5 2.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5 2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS 5 2.2.1 Geology 5 2.2.2 Hydrogeology 7 2.3 CURRENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 8 2.4 STRUCTURES,ROADS,AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 8 2.5 PAST USES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 10 2.6 CURRENT AND PAST USES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES 11 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 13 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS 13 3.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE 13 3.3 VALUATION REDUCTION 14 3.4 OWNER,PROPERTY MANAGER,AND OCCUPANT INFORMATION 14 3.5 REASON FOR PERFORMING THE PHASE I ESA 14 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW 14 4.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES 14 4.1.1 Federal National Priorities List 15 4.1.2 Federal RCRA CORRACTS TSD Facilities List 15 4.1.3 State Sites of Interest 16 4.1.4 Delisted NPL Site List 16 4.1.5 Federal CERCLIS List 16 4.1.6 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP Site List 16 4.1.7 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities List 16 4.1.8 State Brownfield Sites 16 01539_5 iii Myounghee Noh&Associates, LL.C. c son T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 4.1.9 State Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites 17 4.1.10 State LUST List 17 ( 4.1.11 State Voluntary Cleanup Sites 17 ( 4.1.12 Federal RCRA Generators List 17 ( 4.1.13 Federal ICs and ECs Registries 17 4.1.14 State ICs and ECs Registries 18 4.1.15 State Registered UST List 18 ( 4.1.16 Federal ERNS List 18 4.1.17 State Releases List 18 4.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES 19 4.2.1 Subject Property 19 ( 4.2.2 Surrounding Properties 19 4.3 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 22 4.3.1 Historical Aerial Photographs 22 4.3.2 Historical Topographic Maps 22 (. 4.3.3 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map 23 ( 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 23 5.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 23 ( 5.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING 23 5.3 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS 24 5.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS 25 ( 5.5 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS 25 ( 5.6 ABOVEGROUND AND UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS 26 6.0 INTERVIEWS 26 6.1 Denise Oguma 27 6.2 Cherish Almeida 27 6.3 Shea Kahookaulana 27 (_ 6.4 Candace Martin 27 7.0 DATA GAPS AND DEVIATIONS 28 ( 8.0 KEY FINDINGS & OPINION 28 8.1 Subject Property 28 ( 8.2 Surrounding Properties 29 9.0 CONCLUSION 29 REFERENCES 30 ( ( FIGURES (_ Figure 1. Site Location Map 2 Figure 2. TMK Map 6 Figure 3. Site Map 9 ( ( TABLES Table 1. Pahoa Aquifer Classification System 8 ( Table 2. Users and Primary Uses of Subject Property 10 ( I 01539_5 iv Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ( ( Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 Table 3. Users and Primary Uses of Surrounding Properties 11 Table 4. State Releases Sites 19 Table 5. HELCO Transformer Information 20 Table 6. Photograph Details 22 APPENDICES Appendix A Environmental FirstSearchTM Report and Maps Appendix B Site Reconnaissance Photographs 01539_5 v Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. son T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069,and :070—November 2012 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AST Aboveground Storage Tank ( ASTM American Society of Testing and Materials CFR Code of Federal Regulations CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CESQG Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators ( CORRACTS RCRA Facilities that are undergoing"corrective action" ERNS Emergency Response Notification System ( EPA Environmental Protection Agency ( ESA Environmental Site Assessment ( HDOH Hawai'i Department of Health HEER Office Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response ( HELCO Hawaii Electric and Light Company ( LQG Large Quantity Generator ( LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank ( MNA Myounghee Noh &Associates, L.L.C. ( NFA No Further Action NFRAP CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned ( NLR No Longer Regulated generators ( NPL National Priorities List (- ppm Parts per million RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (- REC Recognized Environmental Condition SHWB Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch SQG Small Quantity Generator TMK Tax Map Key (_. TSD Treatment/Storage/Disposal ( UIC Underground Injection Control _ UST Underground Storage Tank VRP Voluntary Response Program (_ ( ( 01539_5 vi Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ( Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Myounghee Noh & Associates, L.L.C. (MNA), was retained in October 2012 to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the subject property located in Pahoa, Island of Hawai'i, and identified by four Tax Map Keys (TMK), Island 3, Zone 1, Section 5, Plat 007, and Parcels 006, 055, 069 and 070, TMK (3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070, respectively. The subject properties at (3) 1-5-007:006, was owned by Bryson T., Lorna Kakeko, Royce Takeo, and Kayla Kiana Kuwahara. The subject properties at TMK (3) 1-5-007:069, and :070 were owned by BT Kuwahara LLC, and the subject property at TMK (3) 1-5-007:055 was owned by the State of Hawaii. This Phase I ESA was completed for Bryson T. Kuwahara. The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to identify recognized environmental conditions (REC) at the subject property, with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and petroleum products. A Phase I ESA consists of four parts. Three of those parts are intended to collect information that will aid in the identification of REC at the subject property. The information generating parts of the Phase I ESA consists of a review of state, federal, and local environmental records; a site reconnaissance visit; and interviews with key site personnel and other individuals with knowledge regarding the subject property. The fourth part of a Phase I ESA is a report that documents the collection of information about the subject property and evaluation of that information towards making a determination of the presence of REC at the subject property. The subject property was located in Pahoa, in eastern Hawai'i, approximately nine miles west of the Kapoho Tide Pools. The subject property at parcel 006 was improved with a single-story residential structure. Adjacent to the building was a garage, a driveway, and a storage shed. The building was a three-bedroom, two-bathroom home built in 1975, approximately 2,088 square feet. The property was approximately 144,227 square feet. At the time of this Phase I ESA, this parcel was owned by Bryson T. Kuwahara. The subject property at parcel 055 was an unimproved vacant lot, approximately 40,815 square feet. At the time of this Phase I ESA, this parcel was owned by the State of Hawaii. The subject property at parcel 069 was improved with a two-story residential structure, a single- story warehouse, and a television tower. The two-story residential structure was a three- bedroom, three- bathroom home built in 1985, approximately 3,036 square feet. The single-story warehouse was built in 1981, approximately 4,000 square feet. At the time of this Phase I ESA, the warehouse was used to store petroleum products and the machinery being used to clear and restructure the subject property. The television tower was built in 2002, approximately 40 square feet. The property was approximately 144,227 square feet. At the time of this Phase I ESA, this parcel was owned by BT Kuwahara LLC. The subject property at parcel 070 was an unimproved vacant lot, approximately 144,227 square feet. At the time of this Phase I ESA, this parcel was owned by BT Kuwahara LLC. 01539_5 vii Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. b. Jn T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 FINDINGS During the October 30, 2012, site reconnaissance, it was noted that the warehouse located on parcel 069 had five barrels/drums of motor and hydraulic oil, one aboveground storage tank (AST), and many oil cans, empty, unlabeled, and old buckets, oil tubing, and lots of scrap materials. No staining was observed on the concrete beneath any of these items. The AST was unlabeled, old, and rusty with no observed holes and no staining on concrete ground. According to the owner of the property, it was used to store used motor oil. The three drums containing petroleum products were in good condition. According to the property owner, these drums were being used to fuel the heavy equipment that were involved with the restructuring of the subject (- property. While there was a motor oil odor present, no visual evidence of release from these ASTs and drums was present. Therefore, the petroleum products and containers present in the warehouse are not considered a recognized environmental condition. One Hawaii Electric and Light Company (HELCO) owned pole-mounted transformer was located on the subject property. It was identified as not containing polychlorinated biphenyls ( (PCB). Due to the absence of PCB, the fair condition of the transformer, and observation of no material threat of release of hazardous substances or petroleum products from the transformer, this is not a recognized environmental condition. ( ( Environmental FirstSearchTM (FirstSearch) identified one underground storage tank (UST) facility within '/4 mile of the subject property. The facility, Woodland Center, was located 370 feet northeast of the subect property at 15-1450 Kahakai Boulevard. Woodland Center had two gasoline tanks and one diesel tank currently in use. According to a facility inspection conducted (- by Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch (SHWB) on August 9, 2011, no violations were found. No UST leaks were reported in the FirstSearch (_ Report or HDOH SHWB records for this facility; therefore, this is not a recognized environmental condition. FirstSearch identified one additional UST at a location non-geocoded. The facility was ( identified as Aloha Petroleum and located approximately 1,056 feet from the subject property at 15-2660 Pahoa Village Road. Aloha Petroleum had four gasoline tanks and two diesel tanks currently in use. HDOH SHWB and Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response (HEER) Office files showed that there were administrative violations associates with this facility. Additionally, there were files related to a release from the diesel tank located on the property. A resolution and indication of the status of the cleanup of this release was not provided. However, ( this property is located at a lower elevation than the subject property. Therefore, potential spills and contamination in groundwater flows from this property would not migrate in the direction of the subject property. Therefore,this is not reconsidered a recognized environmental condition. FirstSearch identified nine release incidents from two non-geocoded locations within the zip code of the subject property on the State Release List. Seven release incidents occurred at Puna Geothermal Venture, which was located at 14-3860 Pahoa Pohoiki Road, approximately five miles away and down gradient from the subject property. Therefore, these seven release incidents are not considered recognized environmental conditions. Two release incidents (_ occurred at a HELCO transformer pole located on Kahakai Boulevard, which were on an adjoining property to the west. Further inquiry with HELCO revealed that a release of 01539_5 viii Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 approximately three gallons of non-PCB mineral oil was discovered on September 26, 2011. On September 27 and October 3, 2011, the petroleum-affected soil was excavated. Analytical results from confirmation soil samples indicated that Site Cleanup Program requirements were satisfied. HELCO submitted a final release report to the HDOH HEER Office on December 7, 2011. Therefore,this is not a recognized environmental condition. RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS MNA performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527-05 of the property located at TMK (3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070, Pahoa, Island of Hawai'i. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 2.4 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. 01539_5 ix Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. b. on T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069,and :070—November 2012 1.0 INTRODUCTION ( This report presents the results of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted during October and November 2012 for the subject property consisting of four Tax Map Keys (TMK), identified by the TMK of Island 3, Zone 1, Section 5, Plat 007, and Parcels 006, 055, 069, and 070 [TMK (3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070] in Pahoa, Island of Hawai'i. The location of the subject property is identified in Figure 1. This Phase I ESA was conducted by (_ Myounghee Noh & Associates, L.L.C., herein referred to as MNA, for Bryson T. Kuwahara. At the time of this Phase I ESA, the subject property at parcels 006, 055, and 070 were owned and operated by Bryson T. Kuwahara. The subject property at parcel 069 was owned and operated by the State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources. ( ( 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to identify any recognized environmental conditions(REC) at ( the subject property, with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and petroleum products. This practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner defense in CERCLA liability, "all appropriate inquiry into ( the previous ownership and uses of the site consistent with good commercial or customary practice." The term recognized environmental condition denotes the presence, or likely ( presence, of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on the property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release into structures on ( the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property (ASTM (- International, 2005). ( This report is part of the Phase I ESA process which was conducted for the subject property ( specified above. The assessment was conducted in accordance with the practices described in ( Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process(ASTM International, 2005). 1.2 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES A Phase I ESA has four components: records review, site reconnaissance, interview, and report. MNA conducted this ESA utilizing information sources with the potential to identify past or (_ current releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products into the subject property. ( Adjoining properties were also evaluated for their potential to impact the subject property. Per the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Phase I ESA Standard, adjoining properties include parcels touching the subject property as well as those across a roadway ( property (ASTM International, 2005). (_ 1.2.1 Site History Where available, and as needed, MNA researched historical and current topographic maps, tax records, fire insurance maps, and aerial photographs to identify previous and current uses of the subject property, adjoining properties, and surrounding areas. - ( 01539_5 1 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. 0 a \ 0 # ' r \ % \ mil 1 . al" IfilWillillikill111111111kM1116.—al \ 0 41111111116.-- 411„He'"' ,ipripl BM , • - 611 'N'1114 -...., • 0 /P. • -... 41111*11111111M. 4 • \10,*. Ae .104 • v -. _ • N, 40 ..e,9 4„ ...e./.' V4:11•04'1VV • (51 • ef 0,. it Subject 4101 Property i 404 A NA , * , a 4 NIL& AA._ ° M \ci J , 1 KE* EPOKO MI iglook • ,. N lUt Al •N ' •KO\ a 8,7 s / 6 N A J . , ,0 • HO ... Sillio, ' $.1'..e...• `.„ . ONEPO . 111 l : A c, A, a 0 il, (111W1111161hcu rsitiva g iti • 2 AM ‘4111411111rr 111111;kflailillitWalk Paho Ilijkl . a „.. • . Nvion - °BM' • 4/r 'a 4.577 .. • is r u . . 4 a,.... • ... mouse as • i ou 1 . 0 • • • • * *Ise , *al .4ttea4, , • J is ip„v Ilk Nier. • • er a k a / • II II • ••• i. 0 / •) C- . et= L v. •4 . .. • IR 4110 , )00 11 Allk p.if, 00.0--- AerierrAtP` iiiii !iiiiii ir *es • i, 4. Scale Figure 1. Site Location Map Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report I I 900' TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069,and:070 alNovember 2012 Myounghee Noh &Associates, L.L.C. 01539_5 Page 2 r _,on T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 1.2.2 Regulatory Records MNA examined government records with respect to environmental conditions, citations, complaints, and permits at the subject property, at adjoining properties, and within the surrounding area. MNA utilized a records search, provided by Environmental FirstSearchTM, to (- review records from the following federal and state programs. ( • National Priorities List(NPL) • Delisted NPL • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities that are undergoing "corrective action" (CORRACTS) • RCRA-Treatment, Storage, & Disposal (TSD) • Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation & Liability Information System (CERCLIS) List • CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) List • Federal and Hawai'i State Brownfields ( • Hawai'i Solid Waste & Landfill • Leaking Underground Storage Tank(LUST) • RCRA-Violators/Enforcement ( • Underground Storage Tank(UST) • Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) • RCRA—Generators, including those No Longer Regulated (NLR) • Hawai'i Sites of Interest • Hawai'i Releases • Federal and Hawai'i State Land Use Controls • Hawai'i Voluntary Cleanup Sites • Tribal Lands ( Additionally, MNA reviewed state environmental databases and case files from the Hawai'i ( Department of Health (HDOH), and Hawai'i Electric and Light Company (HELCO). County of Hawai'i Fire Department records were not available for review at the time of this writing. (_ ( 1.2.3 Site Reconnaissance MNA performed a site reconnaissance to obtain information indicating the likelihood of contamination, to interview available site personnel, and to conduct a brief assessment of the adjoining properties. During the site reconnaissance, MNA looked for a variety of indicators of environmental hazards including, but not limited to, stained surface soil, dead or stressed vegetation, hazardous substances, aboveground and underground storage tanks, disposal areas, groundwater wells, drywells, and sumps. Sampling and testing of soil and groundwater were not part of this assessment. 1.2.4 Site Geology and Hydrogeology MNA reviewed published information, for the property and surrounding area, on surface and subsurface conditions such as topography, drainage, surface water bodies, subsurface geology, and 01539_5 3 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ( Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 groundwater. MNA used this information to assess the potential for migration and impact of the subject property by releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products at off-site properties. 1.2.5 Data Evaluation and Reporting MNA evaluated the information collected and prepared this report as part of the overall assessment. Section 2 presents the site background information; Section 3 user provided information; Section 4 information collected from records review; Section 5 site reconnaissance; Section 6 interviews; Section 7 data gaps; Section 8 key findings and opinion; and Section 9 conclusion. 1.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS The conclusion presented in this report is based upon the assumption that reasonably ascertainable and relevant information pertaining to the environmental condition of the subject property was made available to MNA during the assessment. Information obtained from government agencies and other resources is presumed to be accurate and updated. Additionally, information collected in interviews was collected in "good faith" and believed to be true and accurate to the best knowledge of the interviewee. 1.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS This Phase I ESA report provides a "snapshot" of the property conditions at the time of the assessment. Findings, opinions, and conclusions apply to property conditions existing at the time of the investigation and those reasonably foreseeable. They do not apply to conditions at, or changes to, the property, of which MNA is not aware, could not reasonably be aware, and has not had the opportunity to evaluate. This report is based upon visual observations of the property and surrounding vicinity, interpretations of the available historical and regulatory information, reviewed documents, and interviews of individuals with knowledge of the subject or surrounding property. MNA cannot ensure the accuracy of the historical or regulatory information. This report is intended exclusively for the purpose outlined and applies only to the subject property. This Phase I ESA excludes asbestos, lead paint, and investigation of geotechnical concerns. No surface or subsurface sampling was involved. 1.5 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS This Phase I ESA was conducted and prepared by MNA for the exclusive use of Bryson T. Kuwahara. This report shall not be relied upon or transferred to any other party without written authorization from Bryson T. Kuwahara. 1.6 USER RELIANCE This report is an instrument of service of MNA, which summarizes its findings and opinions with respect to recognized environmental conditions at the subject property. Findings and opinions are predicated on information that MNA obtained from individuals, a site reconnaissance, public records reviewed, and ancillary Phase I ESA activities on the dates, stated herein. 015395 4 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. _.yson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069,and :070—November 2012 ( This assessment relies upon the accuracy and completeness of the information provided. The information obtained for this assessment is used without extraordinary verification. It is possible that other information exists and may be discovered, or that environmental conditions change subsequent to the submittal of this Phase I ESA report, to which MNA shall not be held (._ responsible for exclusion. ( 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION This section contains location and legal description information; site and vicinity general characteristics; current subject property uses; structures, roads, and other improvements; past subject property uses; and current and past uses of adjoining properties. ( 2.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property is located at TMK (3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070 in Pahoa, Island of Hawai'i. According to the County of Hawai'i tax records, all four parcels are zoned as agricultural. Parcel 006 consists of a 2,088 square foot residential structure on a 144,227.46 ( square foot property. Parcel 005 consists of a 40,815.72 square foot vacant property. Parcel 069 consists of a two-story 3,036 square feet residential structure, a single-story 4,000 square foot warehouse, and a 40 square foot television tower on a 144,227.46 square foot property. Parcel 070 consists of a 144,227.46 square foot vacant property (County of Hawaii, 2012). A TMK map is presented in Figure 2. 2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS The subject property was located in Pahoa, in eastern Hawai'i, approximately nine miles west of the Kapoho Tide Pools. The subject property was located adjacent to Keaau Pahoa/Pahoa ( Village Road. 2.2.1 Geology The Big Island of Hawaii is the youngest and most southeasterly of the emerged volcanic edifices of the Hawaiian chain largest of the Hawaiian-Emperor Seamount Chain. The area spans 90 miles from North to south and 80 miles east to west(10,478 km2). Five large volcanoes ( (Kohala, Mauna Kea, Hualalai, Mauna Loa, and Kilauea) coalesce to make the visible part of the island. A sixth, Loihi Seamount, 20 miles from the coast lies 3,100 feet beneath the waves. The geology of the island of Hawaii has been extensively studied because of the island's recent geological history, the stages of volcano development has barely advanced beyond the erosional ( stage as seen in Kohala (, the oldest at about 0.7 Ma). Mauna Kea and Hualalai (last active in 1800-01, its oldest rocks may be greater than 0.12 Ma) have reached the post-caldera stage, while Mauna Loa and Kilauea (divided into two ages, Hilina Basalt (>25,000 years) and the younger Puna Basalt (<25,000 years)) have only advanced to the caldera development and filling stages (George A.L. Yuen and Associates, Inc., 1990). The subject property is situated in eastern Hawai'i, on the northern slope of Kilauea, the islands (__ only active volcano, which is located on the southeast slope of Mauna Loa. 01539_5 5 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ( TMK(3)1-5-007:080 r'ahoa e 1'pass Road -5 d"- TMK(3)1-5-007020 d 0 d0, TMK(3)1-5-007:007 'CMk1311,00.7..056 pp1 058 ak ,A BoU\evatd Kah TMK(3)1-5-007:060 TMK(3)1-5-007:021 in°9 ysW3 Pdd�ess socked.No 1MK X911 5 n01..°56 p�oceM 10 g�b1ect 5 p01 ss TMK(3)1-5-007:059 vjktk N Pby iG Pddte ti .pcoPe g9 too 31 OVOage TMK(3)1-5-007:054 SMKI Pahoa 152114 Road pcoPec s/p6 a ,,0 sosle 36 TMK(3)1-5-007:022 A-1.-7-122 Road TMK(3)1-5-007:071 TMK(3)1-5-007:051 TMK(3)1-5-007:005 TMK(3)1-5-008:001 Project Site Island Map Scale Figure 2. TMK Map Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report 300' TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069,and:070 November 2012 Myounghee Noh &Associates, L.L.C. 01539_5 Page 6 ( ,son T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 The rocks of Kilauea are made up of the oldest, the Hilina volcanic series, which were deposited by the volcano prior to the deposition of the Pahala ash and are comprised of lava flows and pyroclastic rocks. Additionally, the Puna volcanic series covers most of Kilauea. This was deposited during the Holocene and latest Pleistocene time. Lava tubes are numerous (Stearns, 1985). In 1990, Mink and Lau described the geology in the vicinity of the subject property as follows: (_ Recent Puna Basalt covers the entire surface. Ash and cinder blown out of vents along the rift are common(Mink& Lau, 1990). ( The United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service classifies the soil at the subject property as Keaukaha higly decomposed plant material, 2-10 percent slopes. Typically, Keaukaha higly decomposed plant material is well-drained and composed of highly decomposed plant material from 0 to 4 inches, and bedroom from 4 to 14 inches (United States Department of Agriculture). 2.2.2 Hydrogeology The HDOH Safe Drinking Water Branch has established an Underground Injection Control (UIC) line to serve as a boundary between drinking water and non-drinking water portions of Hawaii's ( aquifers. In general, areas above (mountain side)the UIC line are within drinking water portions of the aquifer, while areas below(ocean side)the UIC line are in the non-drinking water portions of the underlying aquifer. The subject property is located above the UIC line in a drinking water portion of the aquifer(Hawai'i Department of Health Safe Drinking Water Branch, 1999). ( The hydraulic gradient of the basal groundwater within basaltic formations, in general, are from mountain areas to the shoreline. According to the Mink and Lau Technical Report #191, the subject property is located above the Pahoa Aquifer. Mink and Lau described the hydrogeology (- and aquifer as follows: ( The Pahoa Aquifer System lies north of the Kilauea east rift zone, which stretches from (- Kilauea Crater to Cape Kumukahi. The northern boundary is the Kilauea/Mauna Loa contact, which touches the sea at Kea'au. Average annual rainfall increases from 100 inches at the coast to 180 inches before diminishing to 60 inches. Noticeable erosion has ( . not occurred. The volcano is still building. Off the rift zone high-level and basal waters occur in great volume. Except near the coast the basal water is fresh. Near the rift zone geothermal conditions prevail. Perched and dike water may occur. Along the coast basal springs discharge the basal lens (Mink&Lau, 1990). ( Aquifer classification information for the Pahoa Aquifer is provided in Table 1 (Mink & Lau, 1990). 01539_5 7 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ( Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 Table 1. Pahoa Aquifer Classification System Island Code 8—Hawaii Aquifer Sector 08-Kilauea Aquifer System 01-Pahoa Aquifer Type,hydrogeology 1—Basal Aquifer Condition 1-Unconfined Aquifer Type, geology 1-Flank U Q o ° mot, £ s � � w t� xi°. -,�. m.«� ' a#... ' ��. gin Development Stage 1—Currently Used Utility 1—Drinking Salinity(in mg/L Cr) 1—Fresh(<250) Uniqueness 1—Irreplaceable Vulnerability to Contamination 1—High mg/L CY-milligrams per liter of chloride 2.3 CURRENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property at parcels 006, 055, and 070 was owned and operated by Bryson T. Kuwahara as residential rental and Bryson's Cinders, Inc. The subject property at parcel 069 was owned and operated by the State of Hawai'i Department of Land and Natural Resources and is vacant land. 2.4 STRUCTURES, ROADS, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS The subject property at parcel 006 was improved with a single-story residential structure. Adjacent to the building was a garage, a driveway, and a storage shed. The building was a three- bedroom, two-bathroom home built in 1975, approximately 2,088 square feet. The property was approximately 144,227 square feet. At the time of this Phase I ESA, this parcel was owned by Bryson T. Kuwahara. The subject property at parcel 055 was an unimproved vacant lot, approximately 40,815 square feet. At the time of this Phase I ESA, this parcel was owned by the State of Hawaii. The subject property at parcel 069 was improved with a two-story residential structure, a single- story warehouse, and a television tower. The two-story residential structure was a three- bedroom, three-bathroom home built in 1985, approximately 3,036 square feet. The single-story warehouse was built in 1981, approximately 4,000 square feet. At the time of this Phase I ESA, the warehouse was used to store petroleum products and the machinery being used to clear and restructure the subject property. The television tower was built in 2002, approximately 40 square feet. The property was approximately 144,227 square feet. At the time of this Phase I ESA, this parcel was owned by BT Kuwahara LLC. The subject property at parcel 070 was an unimproved vacant lot, approximately 144,227.46 square feet. At the time of this Phase I ESA, this parcel was owned by BT Kuwahara LLC. The electric service was provided by HELCO. Telephone service was provided by Verizon. Water service was provided by the County of Hawai'i. A site map is presented in Figure 3. 015395 8 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. � � \ �/ —� ( 4411e 3 Property Entrance �i� �i� s' Bryson's Cinders i� - Warehouse i- � oad c. / - \'Ua9eFL cow // Paroa IA Four Bedroom i House -0. /i� \ ( Studio 1011 ( i 111c-'•••..........._.....) //�i� /,�,i i �.:•� Three Bedroom and One Loft House �! \ k �� AST ,�V'\\`_fir\ ; \\ ( Shed ♦!.:o \ \\; \ i I \ ( \ ( I \ I \ I \ ( /".. \ // 1 j I- i ♦ ( Subject Property I Boundary iI Television Tower ( \ `\`-J/ (. . ( ( ( Scale 1 120' I 4, AST ( ( Figure 3. Site Map ---- Path Walked Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report ..._.... TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069,and :070 Tall Vegetation dal November 2012 ter► ( Myounghee Noh &Associates, L.L.C. 01539 5 Page 9 Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 2.5 PAST USES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Information regarding past uses of the subject property was obtained from a review of tax records (County of Hawaii, 2012), historic topographic maps and aerial photographs (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012), and interviews. Bryson Toshiki Kuwahara, Lorna Takeko Kuwahara, Royce Takeo Kuwahara, and Kayla Kiana Kuwahara Bryson have owned the property located at 15-2722 Pahoa Village Road since 2011. Bryson Kuwahara has owned the property located at 15-2714 Pahoa Village Road since 1980, and he also has owned the property located at Puna Road since 2001. The State of Hawaii has owned the property located at (3) 1-5-007:055, with no physical address, since 1967. Table 2 summarizes available information regarding the historical use and users of the subject property. Table 2. Users and Primary Uses of Subject Pro petty Period Area (approx.) Owner/Property User (acres) Primary Use Residential/ 2011-2012 Bryson Toshiki Kuwahara,Lorna Takeko Kuwahara, 3.311 Quarry/ Royce Takeo Kuwahara,Kayla Kiana Kuwahara Baseyard Residential/ 1972-2011 Harold Kawai,Amy Kawai 3.311 Quarry/ Baseyard 1972 Yoso Kuwahara 9.926 Residential 1963-1972 Joseph Lasic 9.926 Residential 1959-1963 Hataimi Nakamura 9.926 Residential 1954-1959 Toshio Aramori 9.926 Residential 1948-1954 Frances T. Lyman 10.7 Residential Undeveloped/ 1967-2012 State of Hawaii 0.937 A icultural J Residential/ 2007-2012 B T Kuwahara LLC 3.311 Quarry/ Base and Residential/ 1984-2007 BK Exotics,Inc. 3.311 Quarry/ Baseyard 1980-1984 Bryson T.Kuwahara 3.311 Residential 1972-1980 Yoso Kuwahara,Kikuko Kuwahara 3.311 Residential Residential/ 2007-2012 B T Kuwahara LLC 3.311 Quarry/ Baseyard 01539_5 10 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. json T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 ( Period Area (approx.) Owner/Property User (acres) Primary Use ( ( Residential/ (- 2001-2007 Bryson Toshiki Kuwahara 3.311 Quarry/ ( Baseyard (- Residential/ 1995-2001 Kuwahara Family Partners 3.311 Quarry/ ( Baseyard ( Residential/ ( 1973-1995 Yoso Kuwahara,Trust 3.311 Quarry/ Baseyard ( 2.6 CURRENT AND PAST USES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Information regarding past uses of the adjoining properties was obtained from review of tax ( records (County of Hawaii, 2012), historic topographic maps and aerial photographs (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012) and interviews. The property use information is summarized in Table 3.. ( ( Table 3. Users and Primary Uses of Surrounding Properties ( Period Owner/Property User MI Primary Use ( a• 1 rox. 1952-2012 Kela Abraham,Philip Abraham,William Abraham, 10.000 Residential He Kauhi All deceased ( ( 1993-2012 NHS Inc. 9.572 Commercial Sadamu Tsubota,Russell Tsubota,Nancie Subota, ( 1991-1993 Clyde Nakashima, Suzan Nakashima,Roy Amano, 9.572 Residential (_ Hazelynn Amano ( 1967-1991 Sadamu Tsubota 9.572 Residential (- 1948-1967 Sadamu Tsubota 9.6 Residential 2008-2012 HNMP LLC/Longs Drugs Stores 4.901 Commercial ( 2001-2008 HNMP LLC 4.901 Commercial ( 1989-2001 Kaneshiro& Sons Enterprise Limited 4.901 Commercial ( 1987-1989 Kazumi Shimizi,Iyono Shimizu 4.901 Residential 1966-1987 Kazumi Shimizi, Iyono Shimizu 11.207 Residential ( 1960-1966 Kazumi Shimizi,Iyono Shimizu 11.6 Residential ( 1947-1960 Toshiko Shimizu 11.6 Residential ' 01539_5 11 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ` ( Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA ! TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 Period Owner/Property User Primary Use (al I rox.) - - t;- s rK. � � "tom' ,. y e t ! I f' � e _ 2006-2012 Metcalf Family Partners LP 1.500 Residential 2003-2006 Sadamu Tsubota Trust,May Tsubota Trust,Metcalf 1.500 Residential Family Trust r 1999-2003 Sadamu Tsubota,May Tsubota, Duane Metcalf,Joan 1.502 Residential Metcalf 1998-1999 Sadamu Tsubota,May Tsubota 1.502 Residential 1969 Sadamu Tsubota,May Tsubota 1.756 Residential 1969 Sadamu Tsubota, May Tsubota 3.756 Residential i 1968-1969 Sadamu Tsubota,May Tsubota 6.968 Residential 1967-1968 Sadamu Tsubota, May Tsubota 6.916 Residential 1967 Ah Chong Lee Kai 10.10 Residential 1956-1967 Ah Chong Lee Kai 25.70 Residential .fA,i �.. 1993-2012 Hawaii Assemblies of God,Inc. 3.338 Church 1980-1993 Peter Lee,Hawaii Assemblies of God,Inc. 3.338 Church 1974-1980 Peter Lee, Grace Lee 3.338 Residential 1968-1974 Ah Chong Lee Kai 10.00 Residential 1967-1968 Ah Chong Lee Kai 15.60 Residential 2011-2012 Leslie K. Wilson, Cheri T.Wilson 0.774 Residential 1974-2011 Harold M.Kawai,Amy E. Kawai 0.774 Residential 1955-1974 Harold Sherfy, Gloria Sherfy 0.774 Residential 1998-2012 Mitsuo Miyatake Trust,Tokimi Miyatake Trust 3.184 Keonepoko Homesteads 1966-1998 Mitsuo Miyatake,Tokimi Miyatake 3.183 Residential ?., aati v41 g_sf B &may ,,`'" -V z .w :... Keonepoko 1967-2012 State of Hawaii 0.847 Homesteads 1989-2012 Sidney Tsubota,Renee Horie,Guy Tsubota 3.213 Residential 1967-1989 Sidney Tsubota, Renee Horie 3.212 Residential 01539_5 12 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ,son T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 Period Owner/Property User Ein Primary Use a• I rox. (... 2009-2012 State of Hawaii 5,125.593 Well& Reservoir Site 1996 State of Hawaii 5,127.093 Well& (_ Reservoir Site 1995 State of Hawaii 5,129.321 Fallout Shelter (Pahoa Cave (- 1992 State of Hawaii/County of Hawaii,Civil Defense 5,129.321 Fallout Shelter A_enc (Pahoa Cave State of Hawaii/County of Hawaii,Civil Defense 1978 A:ency 5,128.184 Agriculture 1976 State of Hawaii/County of Hawaii, Civil Defense 5,131.952 Agriculture (_ Atency (. 1968 State of Hawaii 5,133.674 Agriculture 1967 State of Hawaii 5,138.715 Agriculture 1945 W.H. Shipman Limited,Ruddy Fah Tongg --- --- TMK-Tax Map Key ( 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION MNA personnel obtained user provided information by interviewing property owner Bryson Kuwahara on October 30, 2012. The following information was obtained from the interview. (. 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS (. Mr. Kuwahara was unaware of any environmental cleanup liens or activity use limitations for the subject property. 3.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE On October 30, 2012, MNA personnel interviewed Bryson Kuwahara. Mr. Kuwahara informed ( MNA that a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was required for the property as part of his future plans to develop a shopping mall on the subject property. He noted that property TMK 1- 5-007:007 was owned by the State and would eventually be developed into a thoroughway road; this road would serve as an entry and exit route for the future shopping mall. ( Mr. Kuwahara was the property owner and operator for Bryson's Cinders, a quarry and baseyard for cinders, for approximately 30 years. At the time of the site reconnaissance, Mr. Kuwahara's brother owned and operated Bryson's Cinders from the warehouse located on the subject (1 property at parcel 069. Mr. Kuwahara informed MNA personnel of a catch basin he created on the property at parcel 069, which was adjacent to Pahoa Village Road and approximately 50 feet northeast of the 015395 13 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 warehouse. According to Mr. Kuwahara, the implementation of a catch basin was required under B T Kuwahara's Notice of General Permit Coverage; however, Mr. Kuwahara has observed that no water has collected in the catch basin, and no storm water runs off the property. Mr. Kuwahara was aware of the drums containing petroleum products and two ASTs on the subject property; he indicated that the diesel AST near the shed was out of use for more than five years, and the AST located in the warehouse was used to hold used motor oil, which was regularly disposed of off the property by a contractor. According to Mr. Kuwahara, the drums located in the warehouse were being used to fuel the heavy equipment that were involved in the current restructuring of the subject property at the time of the site reconnaissance. MNA inquired about the adjoining property to the southwest of the subject property, which was not clearly delineated from Mr. Kuwahara's property. Mr. Kuwahara stated that particular property, TMK 1-5-007:051, was a baseyard; he also mentioned that the rest of the adjoining area to the west of his property was a forest reserve owned by the State. Mr. Kuwahara indicated that he had no knowledge of any spills, chemical releases, environmental cleanups, environmental cleanup liens, engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls at the site. 3.3 VALUATION REDUCTION The user had no information pertaining to the valuation reduction of the site. 3.4 OWNER, PROPERTY MANAGER, AND OCCUPANT INFORMATION The subject property was owned by Bryson Kuwahara and operated as Bryson's Cinders, a quarry and baseyard for cinders. The subject property also consisted of a studio house, a three bedroom house, a four bedroom house, and one studio unit located within the warehouse. All residential structures were occupied by tenants at the time of the Phase I ESA. 3.5 REASON FOR PERFORMING THE PHASE I ESA The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to identify any recognized environmental conditions at the subject property, within the scope of ASTM Standard 1527-05 to satisfy the requirements of the future development of this property. 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW Under ASTM 1527-05, records are to be reviewed by an environmental professional who may help identify REC in connection with the subject property. 4.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES MNA used Environmental FirstSearchTM (FirstSearch) to search standard federal and state government databases for hazardous substance or petroleum product releases that could impact the subject property. A copy of the report is provided in Appendix A. 01539_5 14 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. /son T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 ASTM E 1527-05 specifies a minimum search distance for particular environmental record (sources. The following sources are specified for incidents or sites within 1 mile of the subject property: ( • Federal NPL site list • Federal RCRA CORRACTS TSD facilities list (_ • State Sites of Interest The following sources are specified for incidents or sites within Y2 mile of the subject property: • Federal Delisted NPL site list • Federal CERCLIS list • Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list • Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list • State Brownfield Sites • State landfill and/or solid waste disposal site list (_ • State leaking UST list • State voluntary cleanup program sites The following sources are for incidents on the subject and adjoining properties: ( • Federal RCRA generators list • State registered UST list ( • State IC and EC Registries • Federal Institutional Controls (IC) and Engineering(EC)Registries ( Finally, the following are for incidents for the subject property: (" • Federal ERNS list ( • State releases list 4.1.1 Federal National Priorities List The NPL, maintained by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is a list of highly contaminated sites that have been identified by Superfund. FirstSearch identified no NPL ( sites within one mile of the subject property (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). (" 4.1.2 Federal RCRA CORRACTS TSD Facilities List (- The RCRA CORRACTS TSD facilities list, maintained by the EPA, contains treaters, storers, and disposers of hazardous waste that have reported violations and are subject to corrective actions. FirstSearch identified no RCRA CORRACTS TSD facilities within one mile of the (- subject property(FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). ( 015395 15 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ( Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 4.1.3 State Sites of Interest The State Sites of Interest List, maintained by the HDOH Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response (HEER Office), contains facilities, sites, or areas in which the HEER Office has, or had an interest, or may investigate. This list includes CERCLIS sites. FirstSearch identified one site at a non-geocoded location within the zip code of the subject property (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). The site, Puna Geothermal Venture, was issued an NFA—Type Undetermined, on April 15, 1996. 4.1.4 Delisted NPL Site List This list, maintained by the EPA, contains delisted NPL sites. FirstSearch identified no delisted NPL sites within 1/2 mile of the subject property (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). 4.1.5 Federal CERCLIS List The CERCLIS list, maintained by the EPA, contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the NPL list, as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. FirstSearch identified one CERCLIS non-geocoded site within the zip code of the subject property (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). This site, Puna Geothermal Venture, received an NFRAP preliminary assessment on July 20, 2009, and had a `Not Proposed' status. 4.1.6 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP Site List The CERCLIS NFRAP list, maintained by the EPA, contains designated CERCLA sites that, to the best of the EPA's knowledge, assessment has been completed and it has been determined that no further steps will be taken to list the sites on the NPL. FirstSearch identified no CERCLIS NFRAP non-geocoded sites within 1/2 mile of the subject property (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). 4.1.7 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities List The RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list, maintained by the EPA, contains RCRA permitted facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. FirstSearch identified no RCRA TSD facilities within 1/2 mile of the subject property (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). 4.1.8 State Brownfield Sites The state brownfield site list, maintained by the HDOH HEER Office, is an inventory of state designated brownfield sites. Under the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act, a brownfield is defined as "real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant." The EPA provides grants and loans to state and local governments for the assessment, cleanup, and redevelopment of these properties. Properties located on the state brownfield list may have received federal funding under this program or be designated a brownfield for state administration or funding purposes. FirstSearch identified no 01539_5 16 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. E ;son T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069,and :070—November 2012 state brownfield sites within 1/2 mile of the subject property (FirstSearch Technology (_ Corporation, 2012). (- 4.1.9 State Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites The HDOH records contain an inventory of permitted landfills in the State of Hawai'i. No ( permitted solid waste landfills, incinerators, or transfer stations were identified within %2 mile of the subject property(FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). 4.1.10 State LUST List The state LUST list, maintained by the HDOH Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch (SHWB), contains an inventory of sites with LUSTs. FirstSearch identified no LUST facilities within V2 mile of the subject property(FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). 4.1.11 State Voluntary Cleanup Sites (' ( The state voluntary cleanup sites list, maintained by the HDOH HEER Office, contains sites (_ participating in the state's Voluntary Response Program. FirstSearch identified no sites ( participating in the state Voluntary Response Program (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). (. ( 4.1.12 Federal RCRA Generators List ( The RCRA Generators list, maintained by the EPA, contains small and large quantity generators of RCRA hazardous waste. The determination of generator size is used to establish the risk that the facility poses to public health and the environment and consequently, the amount of regulation and reporting required. Large Quantity Generators (LQG) are facilities that generate more than 1,000 kilograms per month of hazardous waste and/or more than 1 kilogram per ( month of acute hazardous waste. Small Quantity Generators (SQG) are facilities that generate less than 1,000 kilograms per month but more than 100 kilograms per month of hazardous waste and/or less than 1 kilogram per month of acute hazardous waste. Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG) are facilities that generate less than 100 kg/month of hazardous ( waste and/or less than 1 kilogram per month of acute hazardous waste. The EPA also maintains the RCRA No Longer Regulated (NLR) list. This list contains facilities that were once on the RCRA generators list but are now no longer in business entirely, no longer in business at the listed address, or are no longer generating hazardous wastes in quantities that require reporting. This list also identifies the facilities of hazardous waste transporters. FirstSearch identified one LQG site at Puna Geothermal Venture, a non-geocoded location within the zip code of the subject property. Twenty-two violations were found for these sites in the FirstSearch Report; 15 of the violations were resolved on August 27, 2008, and 7 violations were resolved on December 12, 2012. 4.1.13 Federal ICs and ECs Registries ( These sites are federally listed sites that have either an IC or EC. Because the sites may continue to be impacted by past use, future use of the property may be restricted in order to protect human health and the environment. Land use controls can be either ICs or ECs. Institutional controls 01539_5 17 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ( Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 are limitations on how the property may be used, such as limiting use to industrial activities. Engineering controls are physical structures or devices located on the property that contain or limit exposure to contamination. Engineering controls need to be maintained or protected to be effective. FirstSearch identified no federal ICs or ECs within '/4 mile of the subject property (HDOH Safe Drinking Water Branch, 1999). 4.1.14 State ICs and ECs Registries The State of Hawai'i maintains a list of properties that have been remediated to a particular standard. Because the sites may continue to be impacted by past use, future use of the property may be restricted in order to protect human health and the environment. Land Use Controls can be either ICs or ECs. Institutional controls are limitations on how the property may be used, such as limiting use to industrial activities. Engineering controls are physical structures or devices located on the property that contain or limit exposure to contamination. Engineering controls need to be maintained or protected to be effective. No sites within 1/4 mile of the subject property were listed in this database (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). 4.1.15 State Registered UST List The HDOH SHWB maintains a database of known underground storage tanks. FirstSearch identified one UST facility within 1/4 miles of the subject property (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). The facility, Woodland Center, was located approximately 370 feet northeast from the subect property at 15-1450 Kahakai Boulevard. Woodland Center had two gasoline tanks and one diesel tank currently in use; all three tanks were installed on April 25, 2006. FirstSearch identified one additional UST at a location non-geocoded. The facility was identified as Aloha Petroleum and located approximately 1,056 feet from the subject property at 15-2660 Pahoa Village Road. Aloha Petroleum had four gasoline tanks and two diesel tanks currently in use; six tanks were installed on March 1, 2005. 4.1.16 Federal ERNS List The ERNS list, maintained by the EPA, contains CERCLA hazardous substance releases or spills, as maintained at the National Response Center. FirstSearch identified two ERNS incidents from Puna Geothermal Venture, which was listed as a non-geocoded site located within the zip code of the subject property (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). One incident was a hydrogen sulfide spill which occurred on June 12, 1991. The status of this incident was reported as fixed. The second incident was a hydrogen sulfide spill which occurred on February 8, 1993; the material released through a vent during well cleaning. The status of this incident was reported as fixed. 4.1.17 State Releases List The HDOH HEER Office maintains a database of known releases to the environment of hazardous material or petroleum products. FirstSearch identified nine release incidents from two non-geocoded locations within the zip code of the subject property (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). Seven release incidents occurred at Puna Geothermal Venture, which was located at 14-3860 Pahoa Pohoiki Road, approximately five miles away from the subject property. Two release incidents occurred at a HELCO transformer pole located on Kahakai 01539_5 18 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ,'son T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 Boulevard, which was an adjoining property. Error! Reference source not found. provides summary data for nine spill incidents. (- Table 4. State Releases Sites 4�' � ti.5 SV z u"`"it' '} A.e a 1�`4 <...t... .� ._ _, -§. . .. _.a . _ *;0.'- Puna Geothermal Venture 14-3860 Kapoho Pohoiki Road Non-GC SOSC NFA Puna Geothermal Venture 14-3860 Kapoho Pohoiki Road Non-GC SOSC NFA Puna Geothermal Venture 14-3860 Kapoho Pohoiki Road Non-GC SOSC NFA Puna Geothermal Venture 14-3860 Kapoho Pohoiki Road Non-GC 65 gallons of turbine oil Puna Geothermal Venture 14-3860 Kapoho Pohoiki Road Non-GC SOSC NFA Puna Geothermal Venture 14-3860 Kapoho Pohoiki Road Non-GC SOSC NFA Puna Geothermal Venture 14-3860 Kapoho Pohoiki Road Non-GC SOSC NFA HELCO transformer P55 Kahakai Boulevard Non-GC More than 3 gallons of transformer oil HELCO transformer P55 Kahakai Boulevard Non-GC More than 3 gallons ( of transformer oil Ft.—Feet GC—Geocoded HELCO—Hawaii Electric and Light Company NFA—No Further Action SOSC—State On-Scene Coordinator ( 4.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES MNA reviewed additional environmental record sources as needed. Additional record sources reviewed include HDOH SHWB and HELCO records. ( MNA submitted records requests to the HDOH HEER Office and County of Hawai'i Fire Department. However, no records were found at the HDOH HEER Office, and no response was provided by the County of Hawai'i Fire Department. 4.2.1 Subject Property The HDOH HEER Office, SHWB, and County of Hawai'i Fire Department identified no case files for the subject property. MNA identified no USTs for the subject property from the HDOH UST database (Hawai`i Department of Health, 2012). ( HELCO records indicated that the subject property located at 15-2722 Pahoa Village Road contained a non-PCB transformer, No. 34369, which was manufactured in 2001. No spills or leaks were reported for this transformer. Therefore, this is not a REC. 4.2.2 Surrounding Properties ( First Search identified two release incidents from P55 HELCO transformer pole located on Kahakai Boulevard, which was an adjoining property. Further inquiry with HELCO revealed 015395 19 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ( Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 that a release of approximately three gallons of non-PCB mineral oil was discovered on September 26, 2011. On September 27 and October 3, 2011, the petroleum-affected soil was excavated. Analytical results from confirmation soil samples indicated that Site Cleanup Program requirements were satisfied. HELCO submitted a final release report to the HDOH HEER Office on December 7, 2011. Therefore, this is not a REC. HELCO information for transformers located nearby the subject property are presented in Error! Reference source not found.. According to HELCO, all untested mineral oil transformers purchased prior to July 1, 1979 must be considered PCB-contaminated by law. However, U.S. EPA results regarding PCBs allow their use at any concentration in transformers for the remainder of their use subject to certain conditions. Since HDOH records or FirstSearch reported no spills at the following transformers, these are not considered RECs. Table 5. HELCO Transformer Information Transformer No. Location Manufacture PCB Status Year Unknown 15-2745 Pahoa Village --- NTD Road 42355 15-2745 Pahoa Village 2010 Non-PCB Road 42067 15-2721 Pahoa Village 2010 Non-PCB Road 33460 15-2707 Pahoa Village 1999 Non-PCB Road Unknown P185,Pahoa Village ---- NTD Road Unknown P204,Pahoa Village ---- NTD Road R331 Pahoa Village Road ---- NTD R330 Pahoa Village Road ---- NTD R319 Pahoa Village Road ---- NTD 42243 P1X,Kahakai Blvd 2010 Non-PCB 38450 P2,Kahakai Blvd 2006 Non-PCB 39117 P1,Kahakai Blvd 2006 Non-PCB 39116 P1,Kahakai Blvd 2006 Non-PCB 39115 P1,Kahakai Blvd 2006 Non-PCB 41646 Kahakai Boulevard 2010 Non-PCB NTD—No Test Data PCB—Polychlorinated biphenyls MNA requested a review of HDOH HEER Office and SHWB case files for the adjoining and surrounding properties with the potential to affect the subject property. Files were provided by the SHWB for TMK(3)1-5-007:020 and 15-2660 Pahoa Road Amala Place (no TMK). 4.2.2.1 Aloha Petroleum, Limited, 15-2660 Pahoa Road, No TMK This facility is a gas station owned and operated by Aloha Petroleum located approximately 1,056 feet northeast from the subject property. On April 12, 2004, HDOH SHWB received an Application for an Underground Storage Tank Permit from this facility, ID 9-603780, for the 01539_5 20 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. )(son T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070-November 2012 installation of two 12,000-gallon gasoline, and one 12,000-gallon diesel UST steel tanks on July (_ 1, 2004. HDOH SHWB approved the permit and issued an Installation and Operation Permit to the owner on May 20, 2004 under Permit No. P-2004-3. This permit was renewed, Permit No. P-2004-3-R1, by HDOH SHWB on February 12, 2009, and would be effective until May 20, 2014. ( In a HDOH SHWB letter dated March 7, 2008, it was noted that between August and October 2007, several fuel alarms for a period ranging 3-14 days were not addressed. The letter warned ( Aloha Petroleum that HAR Section 11-281-63 required ownere and operators of USTs to investigate and confirm suspected releases within seven days following its discovery, for similar incidents that may occur in the future. In a September 17, 2009 letter, HDOH SHWB issued a fine, Field Citation No. 2926, to the facility due to the following violations: the owner/operator failed to maintain results of monitoring for both the tank and piping in accordance with HAR Section 11-281-54(b)(2) and ( HAR Section 11-281-45. On October 15, 2009, HDOH SHWB acknowledged these violations were corrected by the owner. These violations was strictly administrative, therefore not considered a REC. In an inspection conducted by HDOH SHWB on August 9, 2011, no further violations were found at the facility. ( In a Confirmed Release Notification Form dated November 4, 2010, it was indicated that the diesel tank had a suspected release which triggered an interstitial alarm. Aloha Petroleum found two gallons of diesel in the interstitial space of the tank. As a result the Environmental Health and Safety Manager of Aloha Petroleum planned to empty the tank and check for the source of the leak; it was unknown if the product had leaked into the soil. On November 5, 2010, the diesel UST was modified to be temporarily out of use. After its repair, the diesel tank was indicated to be in use on December 22, 2012. No further information on the diesel UST leak was provided. However, in the case of a potential petroleum release, this property is located at a ( lower elevation than the subject property. Therefore, potential spills and contamination in groundwater flows from this property would not migrate in the direction of the subject property. Therefore,this is not reconsidered a REC. 4.2.2.2 Woodland Center, 15-1450 Kahakai Boulevard, TMK(3)1-5-007:020 ( Located approximately 370 feet northeast from the subject property, this facility was owned by Paul's Repair Service and was doing business as Woodland Center Station. On April 6, 2006, HDOH SHWB received an Application for Underground Storage Tank Permit for a 10,000- ( gallon gasoline and a 10,000-gallon compartmentalized tank (6,000-gallon gasoline and 4,000- gallon diesel) to be installed at this facility, ID 9-603792. The application was approved on April 19, 2006 under Permit No. P-2006-1 and renewed by HDOH SHWB on April 21, 2011. The renewed permit, Permit No. P-2006-1-R1, would be effective until April 19, 2016. According to a facility inspection conducted by HDOH SHWB on August 9, 2011, no violations were found. No UST leaks were reported in the FirstSearch Report or HDOH SHWB records for this facility; therefore,this is not a REC. ( 01539_5 21 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ( Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 4.3 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY MNA reviewed historical use information for the subject property including aerial photographs and United States Geological Survey (USGS)topographic maps. 4.3.1 Historical Aerial Photographs Aerial photographs of the subject, adjoining, and surrounding properties were provided by FirstSearch. Photographs from the years 1954, 1961, 1977, and 2009 were reviewed (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). Error! Reference source not found. provides the details for those photos. Table 6. Photograph Details Date Image Type Plane Elevation (feet) Approximate Scale 2009 C ---- 1":500' 1977 B/W ---- 1":500' 1961 B/W ---- 1":500' 1954 B/W ---- 1":500' ----Information not provided B/W-Black and white photograph C—Color photograph For the reviewed aerial photographs, the following observations were made: 1954: No building structures were visible on the subject and adjoining properties. The surrounding area was undeveloped and covered in vegetation. No roads were observable on the map, which was low in resolution. A few building structures were observed approximately 1,500 feet southeast from the subject property. 1961: Pahoa Village Road was developed adjacent to the subject property and extended through the area which consisted of the few building structures observed in the 1954 map. More buildings were observed approximately 1,500 feet southeast of the subject property, and a few buildings were developed within 1,500 feet northwest of the subject property. 1977: No development was observed on the subject property; however, a few building structures were depicted on the east adjoining properties. Kahakai Boulevard was depicted. More building structures and some squared areas of cleared vegetation were shown northwest and southeast of the subject property, along Pahoa Village Road. 2009: The subject property and adjoining properties to the north, east, and west included structures. Development of commercial and residential buildings was depicted in the surrounding area to the north, east, and south of the subject property. The surrounding area to the west of the subject property remained undeveloped and covered in vegetation. More road structures and modernization were shown to the east of the subject property, including the development of Pahoa Bypass Road. 4.3.2 Historical Topographic Maps USGS topographic maps that cover the subject property and vicinity were reviewed. Maps were available for the years 1955, 1983, and 1999 (FirstSearch Technology Corporation, 2012). A 01539_5 22 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ,son T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 copy of the historical topographic maps provided by FirstSearch is included in Appendix A. The maps of the subject property and surrounding area depicted the following: ( 1924: The subject property was depicted to lie within the Keonepoko Homesteads. Nanawale ( Homesteads was depicted to 1/2 mile southeast of the subject property, and the National Guard Reservation property was located approximately one mile northwest of the subject property. Building structures were observed within one mile south of Nanawale (_ Homesteads. ( 1965: More building structures were observed within Keonepoko Homesteads and within one mile south of Nanawale Homesteads. Pahoa Airstrip was depicted approximately two ( miles northwest of the subject property. A cinder pit was indicated 1 1/2 miles southeast ( of the subject property, and a well was indicated two miles southeast of the subject property. Waiakahulu was delineated within the Nanawale Homesteads. ( 1981: Kahakai Boulevard was developed to intersect Pahoa Village Road. A cemetery was depicted about two miles southeast of the subject property. More building structures were found on the Keonepoko Homesteads and south of Nanawale Homesteads. 1997: More roads and subdivision development were visible to the north, east, and south of the subject property. The National Guard Reservation property was shaded red. A cemetery was developed two miles south of the subject property. 4.3.3 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map No Sanborn Fire Insurance maps were available for the subject property. 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE The site reconnaissance was conducted on October 30, 2012, by Tiana Magsanoc of MNA. The site visit focused on identifying recognized environmental conditions with the ability to impact the subject property. A site map of the subject property is presented in Figure 3. (_ 5.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS The site reconnaissance was conducted by visually inspecting all accessible exterior and interior (_ areas of the subject property. Entry to the second level of the warehouse was inaccessible due to equipment and materials blocking the stairway. 5.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING ( At the time of the site reconnaissance, the subject property was located in a residential and commercial area and was owned and operated by Bryson Kuwahara. The subject property was surrounded on the north, east, and south by residential properties and was surrounded on the west by forest land owned by the State of Hawaii. (_ ( ( . 01539_5 23 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ( ( Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 Photographs of the general site setting and adjoining properties are included in Appendix B, Photographs 1 through 52. 5.3 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS Approximately one-fourth of the subject property consisted of one warehouse, one shed, three residential buildings, and a television tower. These structures were present on parcels 006 and 069. At the time of the site reconnaissance, the subject property was undergoing exterior construction activities. More than three-fourths of the subject property was observed to be open land with sporadic mounds of red dirt, fill material, and demolition debris. The shed, which was located northwest of the warehouse, consisted of wood materials, heavy equipment parts, paint buckets, and one old five-gallon bucket of motor oil. An old corroded diesel AST of unknown volume was approximately three feet east of the shed. No staining was observed to the soil surrounding the AST. Adjacent to Pahoa Village Road and approximately 50 feet northeast of the warehouse was a pit created by the property owner. According to the property owner, his implementation of a catch basin was required under B T Kuwahara's Notice of General Permit Coverage; however, the property owner has observed no water to have collected in the catch basin, and no storm water runs off the property. MNA personnel observed the catch basin to consist of dry soil at the time of the site reconnaissance(Photograph 4). The one story warehouse building at 15-2714 Pahoa Village Road (parcel 069) was constructed in 1981 and had a total footprint of approximately 4,000 square feet. The building was a metal warehouse. The exterior area to the south of the warehouse was dirt-covered and utilized as a parking area. No staining was observed in this parking area. Hawaii tax records indicated that the subject property at 15-2714 Pahoa Village Road was improved with a two-story building for single-family occupancy in 1985. The two-story building, which consisted of three bedrooms and three bathrooms, was constructed with, plaster board, wood, plywood and roof material of corrugated iron. Hawaii tax records indicated that the subject property located at 15-2722 Pahoa Village Road (parcel 006) was improved with a one-story building for single-family occupancy in 1975. The one-story building, which consisted of three bedrooms and two bathrooms, was constructed with, plaster board, wood, plywood and roof material of corrugated iron. No information was found regarding the studio MNA visually inspected on the subject property. On the east edge of the subject property at 15-2714 Pahoa Village Road (parcel 069) was a Verizon television tower, which connected to power lines and poles extending to Pahoa Village Road. The television tower was built in 2002 and had a total footprint of approximately 40 square feet. The fenced-in power source surrounding the television tower was also built in 2002 and had a total footprint of approximately 40 square feet (Photographs 21-24). The adjoining property, TMK 1-5-007:051, located immediately southwest of the Verizon television tower was observed to have two partially rusted ASTs, old tires, and scrap metal parts 015395 24 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. yson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 ( (Photographs 44-46). No staining was observed to the ground surrounding the AST. According Mr. Kuwahara,this adjoining property was used as a baseyard. 5.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS The interior of the warehouse and residential buildings were observed by walking systematically through all accessible areas. The residential buildings consisted of one studio, one three- bedroom house, and one four-bedroom house. The warehouse contained one office space, one storage room, an occupied studio unit with a short term tenant, and a second level loft. MNA was unable to access the second level loft due to equipment obstructing the stairwell pathway; (. the property owner informed MNA that the second loft was being used for storage. Bryson's Cinders has operated out of the warehouse for approximately 30 years and was in process of relocating its business to another property at the time of this site reconnaissance. The interior of the warehouse, which served as a storage area for the current construction activities in addition to operating as Bryson's Cinders, was observed to have a strong motor oil odor. Some areas of oil stains were found on the concrete floor of the warehouse (Photograph 8). Within the warehouse MNA personnel observed one backhoe, one construction vehicle, one water heater, and many salvage parts and materials. These included one AST, construction equipment and tools, tires, gasoline cans, oil tubing, various 5-gallon buckets, various 55-gallon drums, two 300-gallon tanks of motor oil, and one portable 200-gallon tank of diesel. The AST appeared to be old and rusted. Two 55-gallon drums of hydraulic oil, one 300-gallon tank of motor oil, one 300-gallon tank of engine oil, and one 200-gallon tank of diesel were currently in use and observed to be in fair condition; these five fuel sources were congregated in the same (- area. According to the owner, these drums and tanks were being used to fuel the onsite construction activities on the subject property. The three residential buildings on the property were all occupied with tenants. One tenant from each of these buildings was interviewed by MNA. No hazardous substances or petroleum (- products within the houses were identified during the site reconnaissance. • (. Photographs of interior observations are presented in Appendix B, Photographs 6-16, 26-28, 30- 32, and 34-36. 5.5 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS ( Hazardous substances and petroleum products were observed on the subject property during the (- site reconnaissance. On the exterior of the subject property, one corroded, old diesel AST was found adjacent to the shed. No staining was observed to the soil surrounding the AST. Within the warehouse of the subject property, an old, rusted, and unlabeled AST was found (Photograph 9). According to the property owner, the AST on the exterior of the subject property used to contain diesel but had been out of use for more than five years. The property owner informed MNA personnel that the AST within the warehouse was used to collect used oil generated from the subject property and was regularly disposed of by a contractor. MNA also found two 55- gallon drums containing hydraulic oil, one 300-gallon tank of motor oil, one 300-gallon tank of engine oil, and one 200-gallon tank of diesel, which were currently in use and observed to be in 01539_5 25 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 fair condition (Photographs 9-10). According to the owner, these drums and tanks were being used to fuel the onsite construction activities on the subject property. The warehouse contained many salvage parts and materials, including used oil lines and various empty 5-gallon buckets (Photographs 6-7). The overall interior of the warehouse was observed to have a strong motor oil odor. Some areas of oil stains were found on the concrete floor of the warehouse. One pole-mounted transformer was located on the subject property located at 15-2722 Pahoa Village Road. The transformer, No. 34369, was owned by HELCO, manufactured in 2001, and identified as not containing PCB. No spills, leaks, or staining were observed at this transformer. 5.6 ABOVEGROUND AND UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS During the site reconnaissance, two ASTs were observed on the subject property. An old corroded diesel AST of unknown volume was located approximately three feet east of the shed (Photograph 19). According to the property owner, this AST was empty and had been out of use for more than five years. No stained soil or stressed vegetation was observed beneath the exterior AST. The second AST was located within the warehouse and was observed to be old and rusted; no staining was observed on the concrete floor beneath the warehouse AST. According to the property owner, the AST was being used to store used oil, which was regularly disposed of by a contractor. MNA inspected the adjoining property to the southwest of the subject property, (3) 1-5-007:051 and observed a partially rusted diesel AST, in addition to old tires and scrap metal parts (Photograph 45). MNA inspected the adjoining property to the north of the west end of the subject property, TMK (3) 1-5-007:007, and found two old and rusted diesel ASTs. No tank holes were observed. Leaks from these tanks were difficult to discern since the ASTs were surrounded by dark soil with no nearby vegetation. Adjacent to these diesel ASTs were old and rusted heavy equipment parts. This north adjoining property contained large amounts of fill material from the construction activities at the subject property (Photographs 47-51). Mr. Kuwahara informed MNA that the fill material will be removed during the future development process. MNA did not observe any indications of UST on the subject property, such as vent pipes, fill ports, or dispensers. 6.0 INTERVIEWS MNA interviewed three residential tenants of the subject property — Denise Oguma, Cherish Almeida, and Shea Kahookaulana. The interviews were conducted by Tiana Magsanoc of MNA. MNA interviewed Candace Martin, Land Agent for the HDLNR, owner and operator of the subject property located at TMK (3) 1-5-007:055. The interview was conducted via email by Jessica Walsh of MNA. 01539_5 26 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. yson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 6.1 Denise Oguma On October 30, 2012, MNA interviewed Denise Oguma. Ms. Oguma was a three-year tenant of the three bedroom house on the subject property. She indicated that she was aware of the diesel AST on the subject property, as well as the fuel sources onsite, which she explained were being used for machinery operations. Ms. Oguma was also aware of the catch basin on the subject property. Ms. Oguma indicated that she has only known the subject property to be used for Bryson's Cinders and residential housing. Ms. Oguma indicated that she had no knowledge of any spills, chemical releases, environmental cleanups, environmental cleanup liens, engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls at the site. ( 6.2 Cherish Almeida On October 30, 2012, MNA interviewed Cherish Almeida. Ms. Almeida was a one-year tenant of the four bedroom house located on the south side of the subject property. She indicated that ( the subject and adjoining properties were being used for residential and commercial purposes. She was also aware of the catch basin pit located on the subject property. ( Ms. Almeida indicated that she had no knowledge of any spills, chemical releases, environmental cleanups, environmental cleanup liens, engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls at the site. ( ( 6.3 Shea Kahookaulana On October 30, 2012, MNA interviewed Shea Kahookaulana. Ms. Kahookaulana was a tenant (_ of the studio located on the south side of the subject property. She indicated that she ( remembered the general area of the subject property was filled with overgrown bushes over 30 years ago. When inquired about any hazardous chemicals to impact the subject property, Ms. ( Kahookaulana mentioned that Puna Geothermal may be a possible source; however, since Puna Geothermal was about ten miles away, she was highly doubtful that releases from facility could impact the subject property. Ms. Kahookaulana indicated that she had no knowledge of any environmental cleanups, environmental cleanup liens, engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls at the site. ( 6.4 Candace Martin On November 14, 2012, MNA interviewed Candace Martin. Ms. Martin was a Land Agent for the HDLNR, owner and operator of the subject property located at TMK (3) 1-5-007:055. She indicated that the past use of the TMK was vacant and unencumbered, with a county road located on the east side. Ms. Martin also stated that Bryson Cinder Business operated on the property to (the south,parcels to the north and west are vacant and unencumbered. 01539_5 27 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ( Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 Ms. Martin indicated that she had no knowledge of any spills, chemical releases, environmental cleanups, environmental cleanup liens, engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls at the site. 7.0 DATA GAPS AND DEVIATIONS Minor data gaps were encountered during this Phase I ESA. MNA was unable to visually inspect the soil under the concrete floor surface in the warehouse building located at parcel 069 to determine if petroleum products have been released. MNA was unable to visually inspect the loft in the warehouse, as the access stairwell was blocked with equipment. MNA was unable to inspect the west side exterior of both the shed and the studio on the subject property due to tall impenetrable vegetation. MNA was unable to visually determine if there was a release from the ASTs located at TMK (3) 1-5-007:007 (the adjoining property to the north and west) as they were surrounded by dark soil with no nearby vegetation. No deviations from the Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process were conducted(ASTM International, 2005). 8.0 KEY FINDINGS & OPINION This section evaluates the key findings of this assessment and makes a determination as to the presence of a REC. 8.1 Subject Property During the October 30, 2012, site reconnaissance, it was noted that the warehouse located on parcel 069 had five barrels/drums of motor and hydraulic oil, one AST, and many oil cans, empty, unlabeled, and old buckets, oil lines, and lots of scrap materials. No staining was observed on the concrete beneath any of these items. The AST was unlabeled, old, and rusty with no observable holes and no staining on concrete ground. According to the owner of the property, it was used to store used motor oil. The three drums containing petroleum products were in good condition. According to the property owner, these drums are being used to fuel the heavy equipment that are involved with the current restructuring of the subject property. While there was a motor oil odor present, no visual evidence of release from these ASTs and drums was present. Therefore, the petroleum products and containers present in the warehouse are not considered a recognized environmental condition. One HELCO owned pole-mounted transformer was located on the subject property. It was identified as not containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB). Due to the absence of PCB, the fair condition of the transformer, and observation of no material threat of release of hazardous substances or petroleum products from the transformers, this is not a recognized environmental condition. 01539_5 28 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. yson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 8.2 Surrounding Properties FirstSearch identified one UST facility within 1/4 miles of the subject property. The facility, Woodland Center, was located 370 feet northeast from the subect property at 15-1450 Kahakai Boulevard. Woodland Center had two gasoline tanks and one diesel tank currently in use. According to a facility inspection conducted by HDOH SHWB on August 9, 2011, no violations ( were found. No UST leaks were reported in the FirstSearch Report or HDOH SHWB records for (_ this facility;therefore,this is not a recognized environmental condition. FirstSearch identified one additional UST at a location non-geocoded. The facility was identified as Aloha Petroleum and located approximately 1,056 feet from the subject property at 15-2660 Pahoa Village Road. Aloha Petroleum had four gasoline tanks and two diesel tanks currently in use. HDOH SHWB and HEER Office files showed that there were administrative violations associates with this facility. Additionally, there were files related to a release from the diesel tank located on the property. A resolution and indication of the status of the cleanup of ( this release was not provided. However, this property is located at a lower elevation than the subject property. Therefore, potential spills and contamination in groundwater flows from this property would not migrate in the direction of the subject property. Therefore, this is not reconsidered a recognized environmental condition. ( FirstSearch identified nine release incidents from two non-geocoded locations within the zip code of the subject property on the State Release List. Seven release incidents occurred at Puna Geothermal Venture, which was located at 14-3860 Pahoa Pohoiki Road, approximately five miles away and down gradient from the subject property. Therefore, these seven release incidents are not considered recognized environmental conditions. Two release incidents ( occurred at a HELCO transformer pole located on Kahakai Boulevard, which were on an adjoining property to the west. Further inquiry with HELCO revealed that a release of approximately three gallons of non-PCB mineral oil was discovered on September 26, 2011. On September 27 and October 3, 2011, the petroleum-affected soil was excavated. Analytical ( results from confirmation soil samples indicated that Site Cleanup Program requirements were satisfied. HELCO submitted a final release report to the HDOH HEER Office on December 7, 2011. Therefore, this is not a recognized environmental condition. ( ( 9.0 CONCLUSION MNA performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527-05 of the property located at TMK (3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070, Pahoa, Island of Hawai'i. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 2.4 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. ( (-_ ( 015395 29 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ( Bryson T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069,and :070—November 2012 REFERENCES ASTM International. (2005). Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. West Conshohocken: ASTM International. County of Hawaii. (2012, October 31). Hawaii County Real Propery Tax Office Property Search. Retrieved October 31, 2012, from Hawaii County Real Property Tax Office: http://www.hawaiipropertytax.com FirstSearch Technology Corporation. (2012). Environmental FirstSearch Report for TMK (3) 1- 5-007:006, :055, :069, :070. George A.L. Yuen and Associates, Inc. (1990, June). Commission on Water Resource Management. Retrieved November 6, 2011, from Commission on Water Resource Management: http://www.state.hi.us/dlnr/cwrm/planning/wrpp 1990.pdf Hawai`i Department of Health. (2012, August 21). Hawai`i Department of Health Solid and Hazardous Waste Section - Undergound Storage Tank Section. Retrieved November 9, 2012, from Hawaii UST-LUST Databse: http://hawaii.gov/health/environmental/waste/ust/data.html Hawai'i Department of Health Safe Drinking Water Branch. (1999, September). UIC Map of Hawaii. Retrieved November 14, 2012, from Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program: http://hawaii.gov/health/environmental/water/sdwb/uic/pdf/oahuic.pdf Hazlett, R. W., & Hyndman, D. W. (1996). Roadside Geology of Hawai'i. Missoula, Montana: Montana Press Pubishing Company. Mink, J. F., & Lau, L. S. (1990). Technical Report No. 191: Aquifer Identification and Classification for Hawaii: Groundwater Protection Strategy for Hawaii. University of Hawaii, Water Resources Research Center. Morgan, J. (1996).Hawai'i:A Unique Geography. Honolulu: The Bess Press, Inc. Stearns, H. T. (1985). Geology of the State of Hawari. Palo Alto: Pacific Books. United States Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). Natural Resources Conservation Service. Retrieved November 14, 2012, from Web Soil Survey: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm 01539_5 30 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ,son T. Kuwahara-Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 ( APPENDIX A Environmental FirstSearchTM Report and Maps (. ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 015395 A Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. FIRSTSEARCH ENVIRONMENTAL FIRSTSEARCH REPORT TARGET PROPERTY: PAHOA PH1 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD PAHOA, HI 96778 JOB NUMBER: 51539 PREPARED FOR: Myounghee Noh and Associates, LLC 99-1046 Iwaena Street, Suite 210A Aiea, HI 96701 October 24, 2012 Environmental FirstSearch k Search Summary Report I. Target Site: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD ( PAHOA, HI 96778 FirstSearch Summary Database Sel Updated Radius Site 1/8 1/4 1/2 1/2> ZIP TOTALS (_ ( NPL Y 09-20-12 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NPL Delisted Y 09-20-12 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 ( CERCLIS Y 08-01-12 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 1 1 NFRAP Y 08-01-12 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 RCRA COR ACT Y 09-11-12 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RCRATSD Y 09-11-12 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 RCRAGEN Y 09-11-12 0.25 0 0 0 - - 1 1 RCRA NLR Y 09-11-12 0.12 0 0 - - - 0 0 Federal Brownfield Y 10-14-12 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 ERNS Y 10-04-12 0.12 0 0 - - - 2 2 Tribal Lands Y 12-15-08 1.00 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 State/Triba Sites Y 03-12-12 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 State Spills 90 Y 03-10-12 0.12 0 0 - - - 9 9 C State/Triba SWL Y 01-09-09 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 State/Triba LUST Y 06-08-12 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 State/Triba UST/AST Y 06-08-12 0.25 0 1 0 - - 1 2 State/Triba EC Y 03-12-12 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 State/Triba IC Y 03-12-12 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 ( State/Triba VCP Y 03-12-12 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 State/Triba Brownfields Y 03-12-12 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 Releases Y 10-04-12 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 State Other Y 03-01-09 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 C Federal IC/EC Y 09-18-12 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 0 -TOTALS- 0 1 0 0 2 16 19 c Notice of Disclaimer Due to the limitations,constraints,and inaccuracies and incompleteness of government information and computer mapping data currently available to FirstSearch ( Technology Corp.,certain conventions have been utilized in preparing the locations of all federal,state and local agency sites residing in FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s databases. All EPA NPL and state landfill sites are depicted by a rectangle approximating their location and size. The boundaries of the rectangles represent the eastern and western most longitudes;the northern and southern most latitudes. As such,the mapped areas may exceed the actual areas and do not represent the actual ( boundaries of these properties. All other sites are depicted by a point representing their approximate address location and make no attempt to represent the actual _ areas of the associated property. Actual boundaries and locations of individual properties can be found in the files residing at the agency responsible for such ( information. ( Waiver of Liability ( Although FirstSearch Technology Corp.uses its best efforts to research the actual location of each site,FirstSearch Technology Corp.does not and can not warrant the ( accuracy of these sites with regard to exact location and size. All authorized users of FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s services proceeding are signifying an understanding of FirstSeaarch Technology Corp.'s searching and mapping conventions,and agree to waive any and all liability claims associated with search and map results showing incomplete and or inaccurate site locations. ( /( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Environmental FirstSearch Site Information Report Request Date: 10-24-12 Search Type: AREA Requestor Name: Jessica Walsh 0.032 sq mile(s) Standard: ASTM-05 Job Number: 51539 Filtered Report Target Site: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD PAHOA, HI 96778 Demographics Sites: 19 Non-Geocoded: 16 Population: NA Radon: -0.4-0.4 PCI/L Fire Insurance Map Coverage: No(>350 Ft. From Coverage) Site Location Degrees (Decimal) Degrees (Min/Sec) UTMs Longitude: -154.956635 -154:57:24 Easting: 294649.706 Latitude: 19.502164 19:30:8 Northing: 2157434.432 Elevation: N/A Zone: 5 Comment Comment: • Additional Requests/Services Adjacent ZIP Codes: Services: ZIP Code City Name ST Dist/Dir Sel Requested? Date Fire Insurance Maps Yes 10-24-12 Aerial Photographs Yes 10-24-12 Historical Topos Yes 10-24-12 City Directories No Title Search No Municipal Reports No Liens No Historic Map Works No Online Topos No Environmental FirstSearch ( Target Site Summary Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 TOTAL: 19 GEOCODED: 3 NON GEOCODED: 16 SELECTED: 0 ( Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No. ( ( ( No sites found for target address ( ( ( Environmental FirstSearch Sites Summary Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 TOTAL: 19 GEOCODED: 3 NON GEOCODED: 16 SELECTED: 0 Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No. 1 UST WOODLAND CENTER 15-1450 KAHAKAI BLVD 0.07 NE N/A 1 9-603792/CURRENTLY IN USE PAHOA HI 96778 2 TRIBALLA PUNA 0.79 NW N/A 2 CENSUS-TL-2176/ HI 3 TRIBALLA MAKUU 0.88 NW N/A 3 CENSUS-TL-2207/ HI r Environmental FirstSearch ( Sites Summary Report (_ ( Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 (, PAHOA, HI 96778 TOTAL: 19 GEOCODED: 3 NON GEOCODED: 16 SELECTED: 0 ( Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No. CERCLIS PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE 14-3860 KAPOHO PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 4 (_ HID984469536/NOT PROPOSED PAHOA HI 96778 ( RCRAGN PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE 14-3860 KAPOHO PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 5 HIR000001057/LGN PAHOA HI 96778 ERNS PUNA GEO-THERMAL VENTURE 14 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 9 ( 305756/FIXED FACILITY PAHOA HI 96778 ERNS PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE 14 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 10 226229/FIXED FACILITY PAHOA HI ( STATE PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 11 ( HIST_520/NOT REPORTED PAHOA HI 96778 / SPILLS PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 12 HIHR19910221-2/NOT REPORTED PAHOA HI 96778 ( SPILLS PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 13 HIHR20011212-1345/NOT REPORTED PAHOA HI 96778 ( SPILLS PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 14 ( HIHR19910614-1/NOT REPORTED PAHOA HI 96778 ( SPILLS PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE 14-3860 KAPOHO PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 15 HIHR20110526-1115/NOT REPORTED PAHOA HI 96778 ( SPILLS PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 16 ( HIHR19930224/NOT REPORTED PAHOA HI 96778 SPILLS PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 17 ( HIHR19940729-25/NOT REPORTED PAHOA HI 96778 SPILLS PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 18 HIHR19970807-0935/NOT REPORTED PAHOA HI 96778 ( SPILLS P55 KAHAKAI BLVD NON GC N/A 19 ( HIHR20111004-1227/NOT REPORTED PAHOA HI 96778 ( SPILLS P55 KAHAKAI BLVD NON GC N/A 20 HIHR20111213-1058/NOT REPORTED PAHOA HI 96778 ( UST ALOHA PETROLEUM 15-2660 KEAAU-PAHOA RD NON GC N/A 21 ( 9-603780/CURRENTLY IN USE PAHOA HI 96778 TRIBALLA BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS CONTACT I UNKNOWN NON GC N/A 22 (_. BIA-96778/ HI 96778 (. (- ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 UST SEARCH ID: 1 DIST/DIR: 0.07 NE ELEVATION: N/A MAP ID: 1 NAME: WOODLAND CENTER REV: 06/08/12 ADDRESS: 15-1450 KAHAKAI BLVD ID1: 9-603792 PAHOA HI 96778 1D2: HAWAII STATUS: CURRENTLY IN USE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: HI DOH Tank ID Number: 1 Tank Status Description:Currently In Use Tank Capacity: 10000 Substance Description:Gasoline Date Installed:25-Apr-06 Date Closed Owner Name:PAUL S AUTO REPAIR P.O. BOX 384 Pahoa HI 96778 Tank ID Number:2 Tank Status Description:Currently In Use Tank Capacity:6000 Substance Description:Gasoline Date Installed:25-Apr-06 Date Closed Owner Name:PAUL S AUTO REPAIR P.O. BOX 384 Pahoa HI 96778 Tank ID Number:3 Tank Status Description:Currently In Use Tank Capacity:4000 Substance Description:Diesel Date Installed:25-Apr-06 Date Closed Owner Name:PAUL S AUTO REPAIR P.O.BOX 384 Pahoa HI 96778 Site Details Page - 1 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 ( TRIBALLAND SEARCH ID: 3 DIST/DIR: 0.79 NW ELEVATION: MAP ID: 2 (. ( NAME: PUNA REV: 7/15/09 ADDRESS: ID1: CENSUS-TL-2176 �. HI ID2: STATUS: CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CENSUS United States Census Bureau,American Indian Areas/Alaska Native Areas/Hawaiian Home Lands Cartographic Boundary Files.This data was produced from the 2000 Census. SITE INFORMATION NAME:PUNA NAMELSAD00 PUNA HAWAIIAN HOME LAND AIANNHCE00:OKLAHOMA TRIBAL STATISTICAL AREA AIANNHID00:5206T LEGAL DESCRIPTION CODE:HAWAIIAN HOME LAND CLASSFPOO:F1 COMPTYPOO:OFF-RESERVATION TRUST LAND AIANNHROO:FICTITIOUS ENTITY CREATED TO FILL THE CENSUS BUREAU S GEOGRAPHIC HIERARCHY. MTFCCOO:HAWAIIAN HOME LAND ( FUNCSTATOO:NONFUNCTIONING LEGAL ENTITY. ALAN D00:120407 ( AWATER00:0 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Site Details Page - 2 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 TRIBALLAND SEARCH ID: 2 DIST/DIR: 0.88 NW ELEVATION: MAP ID: 3 NAME: MAKUU REV: 7/15/09 ADDRESS: ID1: CENSUS-TL-2207 HI 1D2: STATUS: CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: CENSUS United States Census Bureau,American Indian Areas/Alaska Native Areas/Hawaiian Home Lands Cartographic Boundary Files.This data was produced from the 2000 Census. SITE INFORMATION NAM E:MAKU U NAMELSAD00 MAKUU HAWAIIAN HOME LAND AIANNHCEOO:OKLAHOMA TRIBAL STATISTICAL AREA AIANNHID00:5146T LEGAL DESCRIPTION CODE:HAWAIIAN HOME LAND CLASSFPOO:F1 COMPTYPOO:OFF-RESERVATION TRUST LAND AIANNHROO:FICTITIOUS ENTITY CREATED TO FILL THE CENSUS BUREAU S GEOGRAPHIC HIERARCHY. MTFCCOO:HAWAIIAN HOME LAND FUNCSTATOO:NONFUNCTIONING LEGAL ENTITY. ALAN D00:7922641 AWATER00:0 Site Details Page - 3 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 ( CERCLIS SEARCH ID: 4 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: ( ( NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 8/1/12 ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO PAHOA RD ID1: HID984469536 ( PAHOA HI 96778 ID2: 0904637 STATUS: NOT PROPOSED CONTACT: EUGENIA CHOW PHONE: 4159723160 ( SOURCE: EPA ( ( ACTION/QUALITY AGENCY/RPS START/RAA END preliminary assessmentEPA Fund-Financed7/20/2009 NFRAP:No further Remedial Action planned ( preliminary assessmentEPA Fund-Financed12/22/1993 Low priority for further assessment discovery State,Fund Financed 11/20/1992 ( ( DESCRIPTION: ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Site Details Page - 4 ( Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 RCRAGN SEARCH ID: 5 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: • NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 9/11/12 • ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO PAHOA RD ID1: HIR000001057 PAHOA HI 96778 1D2: STATUS: LGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION:RONALD P QUESADA PO BOX 30 PAHOA HI 96778 PHONE:8089652848 - OWNER NAME:PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE OWNER TYPE:P-PRIVATE OPERATOR:PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE OPERATOR_TYPE:P-PRIVATE MAILING ADDRESS:PO BOX 30 PAHOA,HI 96 - UNIVERSE INFORMATION: - RECEIVED DATE:02/16/2012 SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION(SUBJCA) SUBJCA:N-NO SUBJCA TSD 3004:N-NO SUBJCA NON TSD:N-NO SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC):N-NO BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC: PERMIT WORKLOAD:---- CLOSURE WORKLOAD: POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD:---- PERMITTING/CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS:---- CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD:N-NO GENERATOR STATUS:LQG-LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS:GENERATES MORE THAN 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL:N-NOENGINEERING CONTROL:N HUMAN EXPOSURE:N-NOGW CONTROLS:N-NO LAND TYPE:P-PRIVATESHORT TERM GEN:N TRANS FACILITY:NREC WASTE FROM OFF SITE:N IMPORTER ACTIVITY:N-NOMIXED WASTE GEN:N-NO TRANS ACTIVITY:N-NOTSD ACTIVITY:N-NO RECYCLER ACTIVITY:N-NOONSITE BURNER EXEMPT:N-NO FURNACE EXEMPTION:N-NOUNDER INJECT ACTIVITY:N-NO REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE:N-NOUNIV WASTE DEST FAC:N USED OIL TRANS:N-NOUSED OIL PROCESSOR:N-NO USED OIL REFINER:N-NOUSED OIL FUEL BURNER:N-NO UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER:NUSED OIL SPEC MARKETER:N-NO NAIC INFORMATION 221119-OTHER ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION - Continued on next page- Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report (_ Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 (_ PAHOA, HI 96778 (_ ( RC RAG N SEARCH ID: 5 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: ( ( NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 9/11/12 ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO PAHOA RD ID1: HIR000001057 PAHOA HI 96778 ID2: STATUS: LGN (- CONTACT: PHONE: ( SOURCE: EPA ( ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ( AGENCY:STATEDATE:08/09/2008 ( TYPE:WRITTEN INFORMAL AGENCY:STATEDATE:08/25/2008 TYPE:WRITTEN INFORMAL ( AGENCY:STATEDATE:08/23/2008 TYPE:LETTER OF INTENT TO INITIATE ENFORCEMENT ACTION ( VIOLATION INFORMATION: VIOLATION NUMBER: 1 RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 TYPE:GENERATORS-GENERAL VIOLATION NUMBER:5RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 TYPE:GENERATORS-PRE-TRANSPORT VIOLATION NUMBER:6RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 - TYPE:GENERATORS-PRE-TRANSPORT (__ VIOLATION NUMBER:7RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 TYPE:PERMITS-GENERAL INFORMATION VIOLATION NUMBER:8RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE ( DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE - CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 (_ TYPE:TSD IS-PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION VIOLATION NUMBER:9RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 - TYPE:TSD IS-PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION VIOLATION NUMBER: 10RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE ( CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 TYPE:TSD IS-PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION ( ( ( -Continued on next page- ( (- Site Details Paae-6 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 RC RAG N SEARCH ID: 5 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 9/11/12 ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO PAHOA RD ID1: HIR000001057 PAHOA HI 96778 ID2: STATUS: LGN CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA VIOLATION NUMBER:11 RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 TYPE:TSD IS-PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION VIOLATION NUMBER: 12RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 • TYPE:TSD IS-PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION VIOLATION NUMBER:13RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 TYPE:TSD IS-CONTINGENCY PLAN AND EMERGENCY PROCEDURES • VIOLATION NUMBER: 14RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE • CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 • TYPE:TSD IS-CONTAINER USE AND MANAGEMENT VIOLATION NUMBER:15RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 • TYPE:TSD IS-CONTAINER USE AND MANAGEMENT • VIOLATION NUMBER: 16RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE • DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 TYPE:UNIVERSAL WASTE-SMALL QUANTITY HANDLERS VIOLATION NUMBER: 17RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 TYPE:UNIVERSAL WASTE-SMALL QUANTITY HANDLERS VIOLATION NUMBER: 18RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:08/09/2008DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED:08/27/2008 TYPE:USED OIL-GENERATORS VIOLATION NUMBER: 19RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:12/31/2012DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED: 12/12/2012 TYPE:GENERATORS-GENERAL • VIOLATION NUMBER:20RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE - Continued on next page- cit., nctailc Pn.,o- 7 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report t_ Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 RC RAG N ( SEARCH ID: 5 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: ( (_ NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 9/11/12 ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO PAHOA RD ID1: HIR000001057 PAHOA HI 96778 1D2: STATUS: LGN CONTACT: PHONE: ( SOURCE: EPA ( DETERMINED: 12/31/2012DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED: 12/12/2012 ( TYPE:TSD IS-CONTAINER USE AND MANAGEMENT VIOLATION NUMBER:21 RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED:12/31/2012DETERMINED BY:S-STATE ( CITATION:RESOLVED: 12/12/2012 TYPE:PERMITS-GENERAL INFORMATION ( VIOLATION NUMBER:22RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE DETERMINED: 12/31/2012DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED: 12/12/2012 TYPE:UNIVERSAL WASTE-SMALL QUANTITY HANDLERS VIOLATION NUMBER:23RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE ( DETERMINED: 12/31/2012DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED: 12/12/2012 TYPE:UNIVERSAL WASTE-SMALL QUANTITY HANDLERS VIOLATION NUMBER:24RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE ( DETERMINED: 12/31/2012DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED: 12/12/2012 TYPE:USED OIL-GENERATORS VIOLATION NUMBER:25RESPONSIBLE:S-STATE ( DETERMINED: 12/31/2012DETERMINED BY:S-STATE CITATION:RESOLVED: 12/12/2012 TYPE:TSD IS-CONTINGENCY PLAN AND EMERGENCY PROCEDURES ( HAZARDOUS WASTE INFORMATION: D001 -IGNITABLE WASTE D002-CORROSIVE WASTE D004-ARSENIC D006-CADMIUM D008-LEAD D009-MERCURY D018-BENZENE ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Site Details Paae -8 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 • ERNS SEARCH ID: 6 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: • NAME: PUNA GEO-THERMAL VENTURE REV: 2/8/1993 ADDRESS: 14 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD ID1: 305756 PAHOA HI 96778 ID2: HAWAII STATUS: FIXED FACILITY CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: EPA SPILL INFORMATION DATE OF SPILL:2/8/1993TIME OF SPILL:0902 PRODUCT RELEASED(1):HYDROGEN SULFIDE QUANTITY(1): 162 UNITS(1):LBS PRODUCT RELEASED(2): • QUANTITY(2): • UNITS(2): • PRODUCT RELEASED(3): QUANTITY(3): UNITS(3): • MEDIUM/MEDIA AFFECTED • AIR:YESGROUNDWATER:NO • LAND:NOFIXED FACILITY:NO • WATER:NOOTHER:NO • WATERBODY AFFECTED BY RELEASE: CAUSE OF RELEASE DUMPING:NOEQUIPMENT FAILURE: NO • NATURAL PHENOMENON:NOOPERATOR ERROR:NO OTHER CAUSE:NOTRANSP.ACCIDENT:NO • UNKNOWN:NO ACTIONS TAKEN:NONE RELEASE DETECTION:MATERIAL VENTED DURING GEO-THERMAL WELL CLEANING MISC.NOTES: DISCHARGER INFORMATION DISCHARGER ID:305756DUN&BRADSTREET#: TYPE OF DISCHARGER:PRIVATE ENTERPRISE NAME OF DISCHARGER:PUNA GEO-THERMAL VENTURE ADDRESS:POB 30 PAHOA HI 96778 Site Details Page - 9 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report (_ Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 ( _ PAHOA, HI 96778 ( ERNS SEARCH ID: 7 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: ( NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 6/12/1991 ADDRESS: 14 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD ID1: 226229 PAHOA HI ID2: UNKNOWN STATUS: FIXED FACILITY CONTACT: PHONE: ( SOURCE: EPA ( SPILL INFORMATION DATE OF SPILL:6/12/1991 TIME OF SPILL:2307 PRODUCT RELEASED(1): HYDROGEN SULFIDE ( QUANTITY(1):0 UNITS( ( CAUSE OF RELEASE DUMPING:NOEQUIPMENT FAILURE:NO NATURAL PHENOMENON:NOOPERATOR ERROR:NO OTHER CAUSE:NOTRANSP ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( { ( Site Details Page - 10 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 STATE SEARCH ID: 8 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 03/12/12 ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD ID1: HIST_520 PAHOA HI 96778 1D2: STATUS: NOT REPORTED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: HI DOH Organization:Puna Geothermal Venture HID Number: Facility Registry ID:110000518146 Supplemental Location: Environmental Interest:Puna Geothermal Venture(HID984469536) Lead Agency: Program:State • Project Manager:Unassigned • Potential Hazards and Controls:Hazard Undetermined Hazard Priority:NFA Action:4/15/1996 Assessment:Assessment Ongoing Response: Nature of Contamination: • Nature of Residual Contamination: Designated Areawide Contamination: • Use Restrictions: Undetermined • Engineering Controls: • Description Restrictions: Institutional Controls: Site Closure Type:NFA-Type Undetermined Document Number: • Document Subject: Document Date:4/15/1996 Site Details Page- 11 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report ( Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 SPILLS SEARCH ID: 9 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: ( NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 03/10/12 ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD ID1: HIHR19910221-2 PAHOA HI 96778 ID2: STATUS: NOT REPORTED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: HI DOH ( THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OFFICE OF HAZARD EVALUATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE(HEER)RELEASE LIST: Island:Hawaii Filed Under:Puna Geothermal Venture Unit:Puna Geothermal Venture,H2s&Steam ( Case Number: 19910221-2 Secondary Location Address: ( Supplemental Location: Activity Type:Response Lead and Program:HEER EP&R Activity Lead: Emergency Response: Substances:Hydrogen Sulfide Amount(Less or Greater Than): Assignment End Date: Result:SOSC NFA (" ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (_. ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Site Details Page - 12 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 SPILLS SEARCH ID: 10 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 03/10/12 ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD ID1: HIHR20011212-1345 PAHOA HI 96778 1D2: STATUS: NOT REPORTED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: HI DOH THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OFFICE OF HAZARD EVALUATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE(HEER)RELEASE LIST: Island:Hawaii Filed Under:Puna Geothermal Venture Unit:Alleged Dumping Case Number:20011212-1345 Secondary Location Address: Supplemental Location: Activity Type:Response Lead and Program:HEER EP&R Activity Lead:Mike Cripps Emergency Response:No Substances:Heavy metals containing brine fluid Amount(Less or Greater Than): Assignment End Date: Result:SOSC NFA Site Details Paae- 13 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report (_ Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 ( SPILLS ( SEARCH ID: 11 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: ( (_ NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 03/10/12 ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD ID1: HIHR19910614-1 ( PAHOA HI 96778 ID2: STATUS: NOT REPORTED CONTACT: PHONE: ( SOURCE: HI DOH ( THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OFFICE OF HAZARD EVALUATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE(HEER)RELEASE LIST: Island:Hawaii Filed Under:Puna Geothermal Venture Unit:PGV Uncontrolled Steam Flow ( Case Number: 19910614-1 Secondary Location Address: ( Supplemental Location: Activity Type:Response Lead and Program: HEER EP&R Activity Lead: Emergency Response: Substances:Hydrogen Sulfide Amount(Less or Greater Than): ( Assignment End Date: Result:SOSC NFA ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( i ( Site Details Page - 14 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 SPILLS SEARCH ID: 12 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 03/10/12 ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO PAHOA RD ID1: HIHR20110526-1115 PAHOA HI 96778 ID2: STATUS: NOT REPORTED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: HI DOH THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OFFICE OF HAZARD EVALUATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE(HEER)RELEASE LIST: Island:Hawaii Filed Under:Puna Geothermal Venture Unit:Puna Geothermal turbine oil Case Number:20110526-1115 Secondary Location Address: Supplemental Location: Activity Type:Response • Lead and Program:HEER EP&R • Activity Lead:Terry Corpus • Emergency Response:None • Substances:Turbine Oil • Amount(Less or Greater Than): 65 Gallons Assignment End Date: Result: Site Details Paae- 15 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report (_ Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 ( SPILLS ( SEARCH ID: 13 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 03/10/12 ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD ID1: HIHR19930224 PAHOA HI 96778 1D2: STATUS: NOT REPORTED CONTACT: PHONE: ( SOURCE: HI DOH ( THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OFFICE OF HAZARD EVALUATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE(HEER)RELEASE LIST: Island:Hawaii Filed Under:Puna Geothermal Venture Unit:Well KS-9 at Puna Geothermal Venture ( Case Number: 19930224 Secondary Location Address: ( Supplemental Location: Activity Type:Response ( Lead and Program:HEER EP&R Activity Lead: Emergency Response: Substances:Hydrogen Sulfide Amount(Less or Greater Than): 162 Pounds ( Assignment End Date: Result:SOSC NFA ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( { { { ( { ( { ( ( Site Details Page - 16 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 SPILLS SEARCH ID: 14 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: • NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 03/10/12 ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD ID1: HIHR19940729-25 PAHOA HI 96778 ID2: STATUS: NOT REPORTED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: HI DOH THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OFFICE OF HAZARD EVALUATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE(HEER)RELEASE LIST: Island:Hawaii Filed Under:Puna Geothermal Venture Unit:Puna Geothermal Venture Case Number:19940729-25 Secondary Location Address: Supplemental Location: • Activity Type:Response Lead and Program:HEER EP&R • Activity Lead: Emergency Response: • Substances:SEE INCIDENT DESCRIPTION • Amount(Less or Greater Than): • Assignment End Date: Result:SOSC NFA Site Details Page - 17 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report (_ Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 (_ PAHOA, HI 96778 SPILLS SEARCH ID: 15 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: (_ NAME: PUNA GEOTHERMAL VENTURE REV: 03/10/12 ADDRESS: 14-3860 KAPOHO-PAHOA RD ID1: HIHR19970807-0935 PAHOA HI 96778 ID2: STATUS: NOT REPORTED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: HI DOH ( THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OFFICE OF HAZARD EVALUATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE(HEER)RELEASE LIST: Island:Hawaii Filed Under:Puna Geothermal Venture Unit:PGV Pentane Release Case Number:19970807-0935 Secondary Location Address: Supplemental Location: Activity Type:Response Lead and Program:HEER EP&R Activity Lead:Bill Perry Emergency Response: Substances:n-Pentane Amount(Less or Greater Than): ( Assignment End Date: - Result:SOSC NFA ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Site Details Page - 18 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 SPILLS { SEARCH ID: 17 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: NAME: REV: 03/10/12 ADDRESS: P55 KAHAKAI BLVD ID1: HIHR20111213-1058 PAHOA HI 96778 1D2: STATUS: NOT REPORTED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: HI DOH THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OFFICE OF HAZARD EVALUATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE(HEER)RELEASE LIST: Island:Hawaii Filed Under: Unit:HELCO transformer pole mounted#110583 release Case Number:20111213-1058 Secondary Location Address: Supplemental Location: Activity Type:Response Lead and Program:HEER EP&R Activity Lead:Curtis Martin Emergency Response:None Substances:Transformer Oil Amount(Less or Greater Than):>3 Gallons ( Assignment End Date: Result: ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( { Site Details Page - 20 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 SPILLS SEARCH ID: 16 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: NAME: REV: 03/10/12 ADDRESS: P55 KAHAKAI BLVD ID1: HIHR20111004-1227 PAHOA HI 96778 ID2: • STATUS: NOT REPORTED CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: HI DOH THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OFFICE OF HAZARD EVALUATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE(HEER)RELEASE LIST: Island:Hawaii Filed Under: Unit:HELCO transformer pole-mounted#k454312k71a release Case Number:20111004-1227 Secondary Location Address: Supplemental Location: Activity Type:Response Lead and Program:HEER EP&R Activity Lead:Curtis Martin Emergency Response:None Substances:Transformer Oil Amount(Less or Greater Than):>3 Gallons Assignment End Date: Result: Site Details Page- 19 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 UST SEARCH ID: 18 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: NAME: ALOHA PETROLEUM REV: 06/08/12 ADDRESS: 15-2660 KEAAU-PAHOA RD ID1: 9-603780 PAHOA HI 96778 1D2: STATUS: CURRENTLY IN USE CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: HI DOH Tank ID Number:TBI-87 Tank Status Description:Currently In Use Tank Capacity: 12000 Substance Description:Gasoline Date Installed:01-Mar-05 Date Closed Owner Name:ALOHA PETROLEUM,LTD. 1132 Bishop Street,Suite 1700 Pahoa HI 96778 • Tank ID Number:TBI-87 Tank Status Description:Currently In Use • Tank Capacity: 12000 Substance Description:Gasoline Date Installed:01-Mar-05 Date Closed • Owner Name:ALOHA PETROLEUM,LTD. 1132 BISHOP STREET,SUITE 1700 Pahoa HI 96778 - Tank ID Number:TBI-diesel Tank Status Description:Currently In Use • Tank Capacity: 12000 Substance Description:Diesel Date Installed:01-Mar-05 Date Closed Owner Name:ALOHA PETROLEUM,LTD. 1132 Bishop Street,Suite 1700 Pahoa HI 96778 Tank ID Number:TBI-diesel Tank Status Description:Currently In Use Tank Capacity: 12000 Substance Description:Diesel Date Installed:01-Mar-05 Date Closed Owner Name:ALOHA PETROLEUM,LTD. 1132 BISHOP STREET,SUITE 1700 Pahoa HI 96778 Tank ID Number:TBI-92 Tank Status Description:Currently In Use Tank Capacity: 12000 Substance Description:Gasoline Date Installed:01-Mar-05 Date Closed Owner Name:ALOHA PETROLEUM,LTD. 1132 Bishop Street,Suite 1700 Pahoa HI 96778 Tank ID Number:TBI-92 Tank Status Description:Currently In Use Tank Capacity: 12000 Substance Description:Gasoline Date Installed:01-Mar-05 Date Closed Citc rlctnilc Pnnc _ 11 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report (_ Target Property: 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD JOB: 51539 PAHOA, HI 96778 ( TRIBALLAND (- SEARCH ID: 19 DIST/DIR: NON GC ELEVATION: MAP ID: NAME: BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS CONTACT INFORMATION REV: 01/15/08 ADDRESS: UNKNOWN ID1: BIA-96778 HI 96778 ID2: HAWAII STATUS: CONTACT: PHONE: SOURCE: BIA BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS CONTACT INFORMATION ( OFFICE: Pacific Regional Office CONTACT:CLAY GREGORY,REGIONAL DIRECTOR OFFICE ADDRESS:2800 Cottage Way ( Sacramento CA 95825 OFFICE PHONE:Phone:916-978-6000 OFFICE FAX:Fax:916-978-6099 The Native American Consultation Database(NACD)is a tool for identifying consultation contacts for Indian tribes,Alaska Native villages and ( corporations,and Native Hawaiian organizations.The database is not a comprehensive source of information,but it does provide a starting point for the consultation process by identifying tribal leaders and NAGPRA contacts.This database can be accessed online at the following web address ( http://home.nps.gov/nacd/ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Site Details Page -22 Environmental FirstSearch Descriptions NPL: EPA NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST-The National Priorities List is a list of the worst hazardous waste sites that have been identified by Superfund.Sites are only put on the list after they have been scored using the Hazard Ranking System (HRS), and have been subjected to public comment.Any site on the NPL is eligible for cleanup using Superfund Trust money. A Superfund site is any land in the United States that has been contaminated by hazardous waste and identified by the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment.FINAL-Currently on the Final NPLPROPOSED-Proposed for NPL NPL DELISTED: EPA NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST Subset- Database of delisted NPL sites.The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan(NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e),sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate.DELISTED-Deleted from the Final NPL CERCLIS: EPA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY INFORMATION SYSTEM (CERCLIS)-CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List(NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.PART OF NPL-Site is part of NPL siteDELETED- Deleted from the Final NPLFINAL-Currently on the Final NPLNOT PROPOSED-Not on the NPLNOT VALID- Not Valid Site or IncidentPROPOSED-Proposed for NPLREMOVED-Removed from Proposed NPLSCAN PLAN - Pre-proposal SiteWITHDRAWN-Withdrawn NFRAP: EPA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY INFORMATION SYSTEM ARCHIVED SITES-database of Archive designated CERCLA sites that,to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment has been completed and has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List(NPL).This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site;it only means that, based upon available information,the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site.NFRAP—No Further Remedial Action PlanP-Site is part of NPL siteD-Deleted from the Final NPLF-Currently on the Final NPLN -Not on the NPLO- Not Valid Site or IncidentP-Proposed for NPLR- Removed from Proposed NPLS- Pre-proposal SiteW—Withdrawn RCRA COR ACT: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES- Database of hazardous waste information contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information (RCRAInfo),a national program management and inventory system about hazardous waste handlers. In general,all generators,transporters, treaters,storers,and disposers of hazardous waste are required to provide information about their activities to state environmental agencies.These agencies, in turn pass on the information to regional and national EPA offices.This regulation is governed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA),as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984.RCRAInfo facilities that have reported violations and subject to corrective actions. RCRA TSD: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM TREATMENT, STORAGE, and DISPOSAL FACILITIES.-Database of hazardous waste information contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information(RCRAInfo),a national program management and inventory system about hazardous waste handlers. In general, all generators,transporters,treaters, storers,and disposers of hazardous waste are required to provide information about their activities to state environmental agencies.These agencies, in turn pass on the information to regional and national EPA offices.This regulation is governed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA), as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984.Facilities that treat,store,dispose,or incinerate hazardous waste. RCRA GEN: EPA/MA DEP/CT DEP RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM GENERATORS- Database of hazardous waste information contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information(RCRAInfo),a national program management and inventory system about hazardous waste handlers. In general,all generators,transporters,treaters,storers,and disposers of hazardous waste are required to provide information about their activities to state environmental agencies.These agencies,in turn pass on the information to (_ regional and national EPA offices.This regulation is governed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA),as ( amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984.Facilities that generate or transport hazardous waste or meet other RCRA requirements.LGN -Large Quantity GeneratorsSGN-Small Quantity GeneratorsVGN—Conditionally (- Exempt Generator-included are RAATS(RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System)and CMEL(Compliance Monitoring &Enforcement List)facilities. CONNECTICUT HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST—Database of all shipments of hazardous waste within, into or from Connecticut.The data includes date of shipment,transporter and TSD info,and material shipped and quantity.This data is appended to the details of existing generator records. MASSACHUSETTES HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR—database of generators that are regulated under the MA DEP.VQN-MA= generates less than 220 pounds or 27 gallons per month of hazardous waste or waste oil.SQN-MA= generates 220 to 2,200 pounds or 27 to 270 gallons per month of waste oil.LQG-MA= generates greater than 2,200 lbs of hazardous waste or waste oil per month. ( RCRA NLR: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES- Database of hazardous waste information contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information(RCRAInfo), a national program management and inventory system about hazardous waste handlers. In general,all generators,transporters,treaters, storers, and disposers of hazardous waste are required to provide information about their activities to state environmental agencies.These agencies, in turn pass on the information to regional and national EPA offices.This regulation is governed ( by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA), as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984.not currently classified by the EPA but are still included in the RCRAInfo database. Reasons for non classification: Failure to report in a timely matter. No longer in business. No longer in business at the listed address. No longer generating hazardous waste materials in quantities which require reporting. Fed Brownfield: EPA BROWNFIELD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (BMS)-database designed to assist EPA in collecting, tracking,and updating information,as well as reporting on the major activities and accomplishments of the various Brownfield grant Programs./n CLEANUPS IN MY COMMUNITY(subset)- Sites,facilities and properties that have been ( contaminated by hazardous materials and are being,or have been, cleaned up under EPA's brownfield's program. ( ERNS: EPA/NRC EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION SYSTEM (ERNS)- Database of incidents reported to the National Response Center.These incidents include chemical spills, accidents involving chemicals(such as fires or ( explosions),oil spills,transportation accidents that involve oil or chemicals, releases of radioactive materials, sightings of oil sheens on bodies of water,terrorist incidents involving chemicals, incidents where illegally dumped chemicals have (been found,and drills intended to prepare responders to handle these kinds of incidents. Data since January 2001 has been received from the National Response System database as the EPA no longer maintains this data. ( Tribal Lands: DOI/BIA INDIAN LANDS OF THE UNITED STATES-Database of areas with boundaries established by treaty,statute,and(or)executive or court order, recognized by the Federal Government as territory in which American Indian tribes have primary governmental authority.The Indian Lands of the United States map layer shows areas of 640 ( acres or more, administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Included are Federally-administered lands within a reservation which may or may not be considered part of the reservation.BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFIARS CONTACT- Regional contact information for the Bureau of Indian Affairs offices. ( State Spills 90: HI DOH RELEASES LISTING-The Hawaii Department of Health's Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response(HEER) Releases inventory of facilities, sites,or areas in which HEER has an interest,has investigated, ( ( or may investigate. State/Tribal SWL: HI DOH HI DOH SOLID WASTE SECTION LANDFILL DATABASE- Landfills listings for the islands of Hawaii from the Hawaii Department of Health's Office of Solid Waste Management. State/Tribal Sites: HI DOH STATE RESPONSE LISTING-The Hawaii Department of Health's Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response(HEER) inventory of facilities, sites,or areas in which HEER has an interest,has investigated, or may investigate under HRS 128D(includes CERCLIS sites). State/Tribal IC: HI DOH INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS LISTING-The Hawaii Department of Health's Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response(HEER) inventory of sites with institutional controls. State/Tribal LUST: HI DOH LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS-The Hawaii Department of Health's inventory of sites with leaking underground storage tanks. State/Tribal UST/AST: HI DOH UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS-The Hawaii Department of Health's inventory of underground storage tanks. State/Tribal VCP: HI DOH VOLUNTARY RESPONSE PROGRAM LISTING-The Hawaii Department of Health's Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response(HEER) inventory of sites participating in the state's Voluntary Response Program. State/Tribal Brownfields: HI DOH STATE BROWNFIELDS LISTING-The Hawaii Department of Health's Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response(HEER)inventory of brownfields sites. Federal IC/EC: EPA FEDERAL ENGINEERING AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS-Superfund sites that have either an engineering or an institutional control.The data includes the control and the media contaminated. RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES(RCRA)—RCRA site the have institutional controls. Environmental FirstSearch Database Sources NPL: EPA Environmental Protection Agency ( Updated quarterly ( NPL DELISTED: EPA Environmental Protection Agency ( Updated quarterly ( CERCLIS: EPA Environmental Protection Agency ( Updated quarterly ( NFRAP: EPA Environmental Protection Agency. Updated quarterly RCRA COR ACT: EPA Environmental Protection Agency. Updated quarterly ( RCRA TSD: EPA Environmental Protection Agency. ( Updated quarterly RCRA GEN: EPA/MA DEP/CT DEP Environmental Protection Agency, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection,Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Updated quarterly ( RCRA NLR: EPA Environmental Protection Agency ( Updated quarterly ( Fed Brownfield: EPA Environmental Protection Agency Updated quarterly ERNS: EPA/NRC Environmental Protection AgencyNational Response Center. Updated annually (_ ( Tribal Lands: DOI/BIA United States Department of the InteriorBureau of Indian Affairs Updated annually (. ( ( State Spills 90: HI DOH Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response, Hawaii State Department of Health Phone Number: (808) 586-4249 Updated biannually State/Tribal SWL: HI DOH The Hawaii Department of Health Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch Phone Numbers: Phone: (808) 586-4226 Fax: (808) 586-7509 Updated annually/when available State/Tribal Sites: HI DOH Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response, Hawaii State Department of Health Phone Number: (808) 586-4249 Updated biannually State/Tribal IC: HI DOH Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response, Hawaii State Department of Health Phone Number: (808) 586-4249 Updated biannually State/Tribal LUST: HI DOH The Hawaii Department of Health, Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch Phone: (808)586-4226 Updated biannually State/Tribal UST/AST: HI DOH The Hawaii Department of Health, Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch Phone:(808) 586- 4226 Updated biannually State/Tribal VCP: HI DOH Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response, Hawaii State Department of Health Phone Number: (808) 586-4249 Updated biannually State/Tribal Brownfields: HI DOH Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response, Hawaii State Department of Health Phone Number: (808) 586-4249 Updated biannually Federal IC/EC: EPA Environmental Protection Agency Updated quarterly crivironrneri at r rs-c earcri .�,�te..\ 1 Mile Radius from Area 4'41i; SC,gle Ma p: FIRS ARCH S 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD, PAHOA, HI 96778 x x x 1 x y '1` <-' `c\•,,\(.,,>,,, 4 w— •i °tea i,! { .,:,..(x,-, re ,,,,,,--4.:-,...?,- ccn� x •6� -t� � � ` y. YiY �� k 0(, t, Y te / g� ♦ k • :r\�✓ pr , u xcO n›,,, >� s j, d` .„ Y / :, O\ , r i r ,,,, 4"\ a r� j;f / \ a -,vvd , .1 l eak \-- as ' '/2' \,"\ �� Dy � a \`\ ,,z„ �. Iti`s -. r � %1 . , / 7 t 1. �/ (r 1 ti ---} \\t 'j+ r 4\., `1 /1/ of 1 di I d. .Q io -Oi=Rd=n H 4, Source. Tele Atlas Area Polygon 0 Identified Site,Multiple Sites,Receptor ® CI i NPL,DELNPL,Brownfield,Solid Waste Landfill(SWL),Hazardous Waste S: Triballand WA Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft.Radius cA 0 Environmental F-lrstbearch 9i ,* 1 Mile Radius from Area it:, ASTM-05: NPL, RCRACOR, STATE FIRSTSE RCH d' N,''.'">,'11.,:..:. y15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD, PAHOA, HI 96778 "...‘s+.0...TVM144.1,1"..1'' '4..t... -VS:."*:;44.'".._ . ,_ , 4t,...NO.,*.S41t,,AR,044+.40...„Olt, alli,ItA,.: '.:';''AlltV+:44'.4%***1,4$1.4:g.'':''''--:'-' - ' -1 i ' e:s''..,'- ' a - -- -- Ittot•:".1t4,41' V`Nt, • t - - -</,--...,:',..-,,,(,-;',:,:: - _ , . s •..,...•. os.A te , ,,,,,;,- . . _ ,-..-,-.... .>„:-.,,,,,,,,, . . , , _ _, ../..„, ...„.•,......,..440, ,.....„..„,w,444., . i::, __ - ' -: ,X.:*,;„>,)?;,.:...: . - - ' „..,Z= /X *.>4*.itt.t4:::::*414Riat:41V , 4.-... _,,/ x -.,..„-idtzw„i'vititto. w' - -6/ ./%" �. r „,- it /% it r !!..' :-='` ...----;11 ...• �/ .% a , _7',{'�'\:\ y- '6'r.#, Nkt, /1:/' .. . \1:).-- %:,,,, Q� �\ fi ,3O tl S Jp a y,k t /- '•tip N',..--,✓/'��y %l ir \� r,f'' 0 1 J r 'J ' t ct',. is 7 o+ '45 t% 6Cr l,' b l';:.,, f' a S -.)ounce: Tele Atlas Area Polygon ed Site,Multiple Sites,Receptor ® GI ■ Nr,, DELNPL,Brownfield,Solid Waste Landfill(SWL),Hazardous Waste ;♦'�f Triballand l`Z,1 Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft.Radius ✓4/ tnvIronmental Firstsearch iiir.� .5 Mile Radius from Area 1` ' ASTM-05: Multiple Databases F1FRSTSE RCH cis 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD, PAHOA, HI 96778 4 a ,ti *w. // °.\ ., /f t.\ /. /V \'';',/,''''/ /' ij' j' � � , ,,r- .\, "f, : t- x / ' dal' (. � 44 J-' :'' \ as 4_. . F `ya `\ I �4 ( � vow .'. ''.' `a �` r :','..,,I, �_/.;/, )t i \5- r/f ;t\ Source: Tele Atlas ( Area Polygon Q r Identified Site Multiple Sites,Receptor ® ao ■ k NPL, DELNPL,Brownfield,Solid Waste Landfill(SWL),Hazardous Waste :2, Triballand V1 - " Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft.Radius ( 6 s' Environmental HrstSearch .25 Mile Radius from Area e HIRSTSERCH ����i ASTM-05: Multiple Databases 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD, PAHOA, HI 96778 r. 4 d 34•,. *T �i ,lt 'y araN--4" a• �I •t., .•t • ,.x I,t't \\ \ .source; Tele Atlas Area Polygon l I ! ed Site,Multiple Sites,Receptor ® C N. DELNPL,Brownfield,Solid Waste Landfill(SWL),Hazardous Waste Triballand EZA Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft.Radius Environmental i-irstsearch III .12 Mile Radius from Area HIV i; ee .wy�y ASTM-05: RCRANLR, ERNS, SPILLS90 FIRS •TSE RC1-U 15-2714 PAHOA VILLAGE RD, PAHOA, HI 96778 5. 3�`✓i 15'5 551` Source: Tele Atlas Area Polygon I I Identified Site,Multiple Sites,Receptor ® CP ■ NPL,DELNPL,Brownfield,Solid Waste Landfill(SWL),Hazardous Waste 5 Triballand r` Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents 500 ft.Radius } I RST E R H 1 1 Historical Topographic Map 1 Quad Name: Pahoa North, HI I Year: 1997 Original Map Scale: 1:24,000 1 15-2714 Pahoa Village Rd, Pahoa, HI 96778 . _At C _° ` , 131 !� _f i r'r ~"� 't". -•f" I fit __ her { 6 P/ �.` ••Jam- // p- J. '''', .) \ I ....\ Ja, r, el,.., / . , •• '''■ p (1--1 \ Z.'," t----4 i'M '1 i-- ; .\\Ct 11. 9 \ •N ; ,; f , I ' ' P) 4 — LA i v i. .. 16 \, /i." 5 , REIM/VON Q 1 .�, 1 � ') 1 1 --- • • - ' C 1-14 1"--' - 1 _,-;\ C t. KE•• • • •( ' #. C+ -. EQ ►KO �r � . R r. fie, [�: Pahoa, .. • 4 V. d_ rte.' I . '' - '$M' '.• _1 ' c }.rte— ! _ . _ _,"_ '�`�`G� ' . -� T•: -• '� . , . ?ti'IAi�`` I � t �+="-" f .1..,,.. .„.. , .. t I.`., ft: J.r < 1 ,-- jam I).FS.: ,,, ' - t t ` •'''--- ---- 1.----'—e--"'"3 'k ‘ • ' Ig i . d,. ---,..4 4 1\,..... I- ,.. 4.816 \ (..-.1:-..4 ,t.. ,_ . _. .„...„, ii . s 41 S + j ~'` qt.-`, a Via.,®'r�.`" •`� \ _if.,---1--,, 2 \ e xt‘ may = �rti !r . . ;: 1 L. ", \,,. �`` . ` L. \, . S # . ) 1 -- P , # - � ts! 1 Job Number:51539 — -- ----—' i 'target Situ 19.502164,-154.956635 0 miles 0.5 I 1 S Quad Name: Pahoa South,HI Building ...I/W..1_,1 Railroad Year 1994 I Topo Contour ,---ram — Tanks •• i Depression r '. Primary Highway i Quarry or Open Pit Mine it Trail _._._- 1 ............ 1 FIRSTSEARCH 1 IV4 74EO Historical Topographic Map Quad Name:Name: Pahoa North, III r Year: 1981 Original Map Scale: 1:24,000 LI- r 15-2714 Pahoa Village Rd, Pahoa, HI 96778 . ( / . ,'t..'7,,''S,..'. -, _ \ ' IN\itt ., ST / , ., 0' .,?..., , / i 44 i- f (I- '7 r 0 , - 5 t1 ' ' ,,' ,. - / _ = - .' ,..s„ .. ', . t., ) / t'-"-- ''' . .,.., IF '.,- •, . , . .,, \s . / y),! •,,. , ,... (I \ / ,,,,,:-1 % , • /'''v //' .,' i .$e,G __,_ -, ,---, ' - \ I A .N. , ii, , rr'-''.. r .\ -A, --"* i- , "r-,' 1 °- '''-`-' -'''' ',.t, ' ; ‘ r-r›.'e';' 'r • r t NATIO141. GUARD 1 ' - -" - --' . ' **''- ' -/,--`7-- SA_ RES,VA11.914..."'" , ---e =\ r.°9" -. '0 814 \ ' ., 'N . - . - 611 \ r., ' --,,..,'-' - ' -- -_....../ , 4k, .- .,,,..-°- - `--- ,-,-;/ '''S.- -- 7- I. - ,, ___„0---, . - -! - .....-'-----s - , - , p.- -.' f "" , ^.-------7,,,--.4.--_,-,-, ...i. , ' v'-,. , '^ '' ' ',- ----,,...-:- ....-.4ff i. — .,•''''-- ' L ,- i . et- . —..,—.1 ,&.- ,t , 7.--- -----4_, -, 77e: ; ,^-^^ ,- .4_..wir-to- : .."......^-. .;r--- - t 4. .. . * ,..., • It 444'. ....it 1_ -7-c, ,,.. - Aida, i %.-i ,< ' ' „t=*at ' i /4 A N i).W V" ' ' *4 ,'; __.,- ^,--- '" 4. ..- ‘4, -- , , - '-.-- ' ' - I --A' ' *k abOa --." 4' ''' ' ',--'/' ..'' -.' ' '' '-' - - ''' - ''s --"' , *. ' #-'-..‘ :."'" ,, _ ,, ,,,..,...„ , .l' 4' ...t,- .-; 4-0-77* ..4 latX'l''` "*"471 Ito di 4 -..` `:''' ., t,„ ..':...;.,,-347 -::/-1-:'7`.77.7= ..; ,,... „. ,,. ,,,,...- -,-- ..v,..-' -:0r.e. -.-,.i.t t• 0-47,,,,,,.' ,f,_.,-, .,,„__ :•',,,,,,, E ?--- ' ', 4§$144' -`2...—„,,-,:-.:-7,,,,,,:. ,r,.. _-'40frre,.., p: #t'•:- -4' '4.1:,:'' ''''.1t, .Al,',1-0.??: " - , s , i• , „,r,,,A. , ,,o ,.. , ,,,----- .-:,.-7., *(:' :',d: - 1 . :,...,*,.,-2-,- 4-, t"--;-7" .:',,..70" -04: ',0-_,,-- • ,--41"-;* . _0- - .„..,,,7- ..' '*7,,,,'-'.,...-,-, ,-2-0"-- ' .',_ 47 y ''.`' '•/7 4-144 4. 0,,,k .- - .,.,„-, .. _.:-...,...---"7:. -... -- _ .:. :.-:-.,,-,-4-... .-f. ,,-.-7-41x_... 4r.'"'", r- - `14 ." '''',' A ' , - i, , - 1 ,,.. -ri*','''-- ' --V4r." ,...L„,_."r - .10z;:;-•1:,-' . , ,p*V-g ', *^.11 • ,''' 't.' -,-f „ :,.;4'''4.. < 4, t 14, ' ■*.,-1.in;17,,,▪°-, ,',. ./ ' '.: .--1 ''N '"'-'7 ';'''"V':34,: ' - ,-.. --, 4s-= '-4.. --e'' 7,-- ' *',0 * •7' 0- ' ▪ - 7'.,-: 17071 _,.5i'l 7' -0-1;,47. , ,-t.'„..-''0..., 'i'/;.,` , ,-0' "'' ' 4. ''''' r 4,.°J.%--t1 ... :f -4„ ,, . , I. 4 , 1 *00 - *1 ..,14,1 .,,,": ,..,;..-'..,,,,, `T!......4. *1 , i'.' 'C''''' • t '''.1.-, , * ' , .ei 1*. ielr ( *%,. ..f.;=7,-'=,-'. .4.,.V , *:....2 :16, ,“,..:;'-.,•';:',';. ..'7:, .t. ..7=--. i V , :'7 . . !..1 , ,:::*'17;,,...„..... ° rp ''..,...4. "".. 1,' *'1:;'.:«4*:.!rc, A. r ,,...i5 .., it, c:# 4, 'P.. '* .7*14:1'-'44:7,01';'1'.."*.Vv1W T :"C'Z no% 4:'N''.,,, '%i''l ,11 ", . ' ** -01?•:-; ' --$ ' _,..,?:. I. ,, _ ::. ..cf'''' 00:c," , tt1.,.. r•$5.„,*.o. '''.*--7,71 7";S:, VI Z''''.1.4.*.:*: '•:::4„t:N, .4%,... •g.....:,Ir.'''''''-%.'"'414.". ' '.-q-: 4. : se';_!,:r.:•_-_"':',,,z73"4";' - ....';'-•- ,-,,,C -,". z '.- ' 4.'!4.?--k-1-- ...:-•4 ` •ri.4-,'\'•'', --.',CtKr..t- '''''' 1"-.*.. ' , ' t itct--. -''. g•Z",1,- .. '''''' --- ' - 4'''''".*•.<:', '', Tr*/ '''''..° . 14 4.* e N N,;1`''' ,:: --, - .„ , r: .:- „., - 4 .,„„ . . ., cf., -- -. — . , ..17—, ,. 2 • , 4"P ;,..!."7:-.:,,11-.*7071.:i'-',;,""" -,A`-':=Jdr.1.1.... ' l■„ _f i:-7,4 -141 ; II Ct.,",r1a*,,,,..::.* Al!,„ =•,, P.'',.0,' .:1='.:' ;:`,.4,Z,/*-',":74■,. , ` „*# 4, 4 ' '''.--,T?-447if"747,T.::*V/1'. it ,-.., , -.-. -. p. Y.5'.7-Cd''7,7*S..,-;*,, 0.„. ..0.-. # ---;-it',*,=* s-- -- jfk S.lt V '', ' ','" ".", ‘,.; -.- -'---; ":../` „---' -.,-," ' * * t 4 1, ' ' " -,4 ,...7,,,-- ........1„,i, t• e:4 , -,,,.., - .,: '-,'- - - •- , * ''‘,t, 4t. ' • tvir.ti.:-. .4 4,4 1 _ 1 , , Y4 - f;;Vr , , .,,,- ., ,...., ,- -- -- .^ _ I ( ____ ,._ ,.._________ 0.5 1_ 0 miles Job Number:51539 ,., i Ra ilroad ,1- Target Site-19.502164,-154 956635 Building •-IMILW2'-t '000 S Quad Name; Pahoa South,HI [ Year: 1980 Topo Contour ,--two. 1"---:, Tanks 1. 1 -'15‘. Primary Highway ----- 1 1epression ,,,...,........, Trail --- i Quarry or Open Pit Mine 5e i /( FIRSTSEARCH ( Historical Topographic Map 41. r, I Quad Name: Pahoa North, HI Year: 1965 Original Map Scale: 1:24,000 r 15-2714 Pahoa Village Rd, Pahoa, HI 96778 i s S' x ik'y- x r"r"*x"" :; 4 t v ,. sue, .¢ A ..-- x °i I r t 5 `! , B t x a lei#I- �# c g� J a � AS Ixo„-1,,,,,,X794-' / -- S'7,„„4... ..-N . __ _, ........„...,,_ ,,,i, ...__ „ _ „.... ..„.....f",. . „"..h x,� '� �x �s£ may" ,t f° s i :x'' •' 'k 3TS*ti - i�,'°9'_.ir '` _'Y4 ' �i �e f N. : ,ice.# - , x, ,s rer r `ki,„%.;t1.fir. s+" ram iti i, ,-a,, ti ::c"4::;-....° Na .,4' �+r,SY =S.,.; 4r,6"E''`a - -t.t I ,- 15... '#1 * x a w< g :'1�- 'fi! t ,' 1"Y*. tT /• w a.y..-�'s t,-;: „,,1.1,2.4.„,,,<<a. 9 . ,t�, .`f 4t '..� ' .., ..,'.1r�.+ ,. acs r I 'L'K k 1 x� L h,t t.?;;;,,,t. t r�Zr.. # 1', $.r�+ry` ,e- '.w +a 1p-` ` pa Jr , ',s�`r„,-;4,-- � .'+�� R ;- .11-,-p d"ti .u414,` .'y ,+ .»t -,.....v, d} ... 1 °1'2• `”''' 9 .. " : „ 4 •x ;_ f 7''ai-�'.�.. '+y: ti ',- - _+ j.., '...At ems. M 3 { A dl� l F +,,, 'vt.. au k"� "y s. ; ,. � 'va`-� ,3 � :.« < ∎ ," -1, `''k :4T : : '.` 7, - . '�- 7� - y ybtH + .''`-'`"` +ab. �(A �,rr,I. 4iar+� C w. },P-4,,,--fie.;--7-.,� ' s !"? :1'� a -'�` -�, � '� ,� 6�' , "�C' ----(4' 444 4� �,.. ,+ ' it r',} ++" s . ° , &fin" *" t- t�,. 1.. el" !,?. ' X' s r iGa mou r 11;'''`'', . rp.; '1\•\';9,x *451 - .t �; ,�.�...yx,.q t&BLS «,� ' .. t > s;�.. k y#�}A ''k'S. .*..4:4‘t'.. �• * h"», ':4, C . � t" ' ._ i 4". ',,.i ''' <1 ary" _ •�*Yr» "re yr .er+ES.:. �.� k�.'... 9�,*r - x!driL t�.i- M+t T r .3.1.,:.A.* .1 1.- - : `. +"e :`'L ' �`'" fi Yi4 °" .' '� e "�1^ M Ago M v r,k #t ".s L� vV try yx S' PYALF r _ $ r ,.^. . .: �, 7 _,„r 5:;;/ 371 W A L - • • - ' •or;.--r >• � se .s . �a„ ar w,:' +g s+ a s r • .. .i # ` • aJ E p ar t�% ,41„%-....4.,.. t 's' 1� a r ir i .. I +4 �,- :P+'' * ' r '• Art fi ,. - . M spa k 4" �'+ r d i .t �� �• *L. 14,a rk °r' V,. .. r I . ..., .. qr aY r, 8 �'712 fit. �T I ' r : y ,�93f4 s'1f .- ice. #;..s.S", '- - .s`g•�:*..5` s a 3 'e.,s t ...r...,.�i1�61 6 .-f- .#! �,!.M" '1E, _4i '"KEG"..,'�!. 1 ' Job Number S 1539 • Target Si;.: 19 502164,-154.956635 11 miles 0.5 1 1 S Quad Name, Pahoa South,HI Building )♦ ,c f .f Railroad Year: 1966 1 Togo Contour ,-- f� Tanks ••0'=:' Depression i`i, r- Primary Highway Quarry or Open Pit Mine )t` Trail - ---- I ......... . i FIRSTSEARCH 1 41. V4V Historical Topographic Map 1 ,y Quad Name: Makuu, HI r ( Year: 1924 Original Map Scale: 1:62,500 15-2714 Pahoa Village Rd, Pahoa, HI 96778 ( , 4:''-',':.. 1: ,.,'-'-'1, ,-,,,5 .-'' ;f:-7--..:-•='-':%-4. ''''' - '''' -- "'' 1 li*--...„........,,,, • it-,.... .t, 'A -tr- 4 •i / ''. '" i •; 6 ei, *.:* 4.- ::#4. en0 ., . ?.e:,- •4, 4 , 4,,,, _ .:444,; .-. e---,4 . • 1 ..,4.:04,-,v0.,,,,,._ „"#, ,,, , ,,,te 14t. .44..r. , ."."'V' ) A'94 1 * • , -.--.... 6'-t."•,..y,.,,., ,• - _ , -'---N2t, '''',1,- V ' 0,',e,-;',',i- '.= 1,-•-'-' .'-''' ''',.' ,,E-,;-,,c!-•1 7'-''' l'''. , ,t '-',' -4 i."":4-io-X.,;;;--=,-. -,-.•'1', ,„,:.-- '-3-', - - '.- .-",--' --. ---'1-..?-," - --,,, y.„7f" -,-$4.4'.. ,„ ,, .4i cif-;,,,- 'r .,,,,,,- ,,_ z .1,04,-,-tft, 2t-A,--. n „--,.1,:t.,,,4„,,,,,,,, ..,f__,,,.„0„,,: ,,, ,.... 4 Zi,,, ,,,, , , , ' ,.." x --J.-,, • .. rit-----rrsta-4*.„:--- -e,"''..-%, ' t ' ,-Ee'- , ,--i-rP,'?„," ,-, _ ... f'''''' ''''-'-'---..,`I;-40' .,,,,--,, 1.-11,' ''.),. • . ,e,-., -.1 A. "7,1.-,,,,10 .;:,,. ,-.-... t. .,-...—,...r.-.:- $--.. --- :r... -_,„,......,, -‘- () Ap,t,...4.,,,r ;_.-1:-,, r , , -'t---ttra 4 41,1'i ":,',..rr:',..,.•-,:-., ...r j ,-.:7,.ZA'... .-'',. ',- - ::,i4',--1.::Z",r:-,,,, _,,,:7-;*-,,,,atrr.„. --.,-.V':-. ,„ '''fii?:,,,s,=, 7 ‘: -;:.„-- ''.'''-'•.„„: •'0„. ::" • Nit . ( , t ,p.stowr it:..-..-- ..-i-Y'-!=':;:''---,-41tr!Pr- '''''''''' '''' ' '- ' k 043'Ita. ...t ! ...., I': - 1:4':'" (I: , ---. •,, = - -,Mr",A. ' .,, (11 ...,,,, -`,.... ,,,..... ...; •,,.. L•i*----4* "L'''''''' '-''- --' -•-, :.' ...*,.. -ti,,- - ., 5k.-114 . L., ..,:A t.t._ c . _.- 4, i • 4.:. , lor It .. . ,.... , ,, V ;_,,,,, - ' 7 ' 7,,,, .1 = •-•,'-'--`,-"' „,,, ,,,, 'edwg%=,- ,,,24,11,..plouseN.--. f' i 4---- -- /lb' ..... ' iii ---- 1 L 0 miles- 0.5 Job Number:51539 _......._ Target Site: 19.502164,-154.956635 Building •a IIIIM''r—.-".:_,3 Railroad S Quad Name: Kalapana,111 woo---- Tanks I Topo Contour ...--- Year 1924 Primary Highway Depression ..,,,,,,_.... I Quarry or Open Pit Mine sr Trail I Bryson T. Kuwahara- Phase I ESA TMK(3) 1-5-007:006, :055, :069, and :070—November 2012 APPENDIX B Site Reconnaissance Photographs 01539_5 B Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. Ei, s e � R ,•, o¢ .i suer f O T .I.-' e tst F � Ili: ', . , 2::: 4. •• ,. } : ✓ d Y E yr, t t f r,•F j l 9. •t it r/ [ 4 v. . e.: � • C 4 .�' ti{. x 'P fir Y ''.. �f t y a VD ii f o Y .n • ' E MAO L7 y • } k.j it. / G krr ''-1' ' ,, - -' , '- '.•7(•*,•‘0 •5; ,-: r...„ , . .... . . . . , ... . ,..,,,,_. . : . , ..,,..; t ,!,-40,...*:,.p. ...,. ,..„ ..._ ,.., ...."...0 .i. ,. . .. .,. .4 C‘I ,, ,,,- •_ N•- ` N Ili - \. 'P! i • J.. —I _ i N bA ,-.0 O O r O U O U f r 0 0. 0 o 0.. E r: C`7 ! .i.- a ':i 7 OEE t V M r- ,_ ,i; 4 41._! G 4 j 4--, •".r.: o ' r O 1 *( G" -t7 ii ` N cn N - ?..• e,-•14.f R� 3 O r N4(,-•f 0 Q R;e -• o y O F s`. N o 1 - -� f,'4 6 4t' ^ • ctp j .S.'i .. l Vii ,_-. ld" e r 4' 4- N y 3 :. o• k' on o o 0 p, o ^ o a. a a v) 4- 0 0 cn ?t c > o it T L o 1,1",:, \ - `,P, 3 4t4*!• ' � + / ' t. •••••:11:` ' ''.trk'l ... ' 0.) k----:„...„--,,..: I Imo;;- Ii - a-2 ,h, ,. _ _ Fa. , . ,,. ...,.._., _.,. ii R . : JJJ + i O o ca u li D M ti O cu o 0,-,-, \ > - ' 'if ,,,..„';.,' Des o ctt cC {y bA _0 ccD t0 s= p 0,{\ O m Q s, z o t o. o. It I` �/ - air P} f!( f t/. / rI cu I t 1}, It j I r r t�«„ (I. ,/. O I f -r# - tot•( tip J•cu- ( , / it —. p aiz k O'': N ' ,, .,....,,,,, ,,... - WA . t' r� Q4_ Q O N• • ,rr i r " - ,� O O O O O N t o ° O ti L M 0- ., 4-. 0 ccii 0 7 7"411%' 0 ' 0 cu cn It.:,., Y . 41 . -.aF �. - - 3. 4 -,i.:- , -, cn -.4.44.., ct CU MI { O N r { - U cC• I. a O 1 i a' CU - . iv - y L cn t 11 "� ° Li- _ 3 � r „: ; N )i 1 fr kf`' o ti i� o 1 s p....._.-o o i .'. oz O p o U_ .-,-,:'.,-;.:•i''' c cu o O� aa s o a)= Lel a 4 o Q Z o a. ....0 i r 1..............O ` 0 I o Y :. F I : 0 tn O o o IIII \ : tit i ...... Ea- imr- 3 E- CID 4—. 4- o ° > N 11 , ¢ 1-A a _ s N.0 O CO 0yM 0 N O o O O o O f 2 o ‘\ �' d 2 t, 2 o 1 cu g ;, �, � o 1 ■ o !� o t ,, 4 N cu i C o t ,., w s 3 + 4 y o sue. x k f/1 mit ,. ,,,,,,_,.. , , „ o — at . fr......._____ \ ,,,,,.„,,,,,, r if o tlb.0 a$ L Q• Eo 0 a. O p O U 0, O U 0 up O r�� Y N 2 o "'" '\ ,� # a /! �� - _ .. - - O cu gni 111 hilli o 3 . ,..r.le", , , i lkiel, ' .. ilL. k,, t`'r } Nr.740,1,1. i a i v y L❑ ct _I i r y 0 v)w y R o • N „i k i o U� .JJt'1R as . T N O 2 p O.t El..c:, L, 6 t .O O O O D., ...„ - . / — :E�' E,.. = o y a) --o O cu m cu += ,., O �, f 3 J r O � E 50 — • w c a> ;Y - Y .. y., �, r c4 N ! s `� O O O ` ` 3 3 N .; oo O O O• � - < N U �z r _.�: ._._ _ .0 O _. , - 0 os ca.M Ci ODD O O 0 O a,) U ., o O8 ...0 0 4 0 a RI' N i G mt O.... A: ,... . -,..„ , , 9 0 R, .„, , . . c-.4 1. � t ,, �y ��. N " f -t'of U 7..._ :' O gI y _ t• pi _ U 5, f :r f:,. c 0 i 1 j "};*,..- ,�,f Y '`; om" h t N N r 4 a'" n , t r " t L C: A. ,r „4.tt..t.- • .: ' > "Cl CU 47,k 5 u) + .: •—' et _L. -A:laira *-0-5.'- "7" O to tap O v O O „�� LL 0. 3 Y U O y E. ,X f Y o 3 #! O v; o 'si t 4 N a - 8`43 s -'1.` ..,r!f.:+'+e�i ms - L. - -,:-.,, : -..- i ; 1 ..-;,..-- ' at fi ¢cc: � y 44" i c 'F „x �� :a'.` `icy` r O O. .■ ' '. iii ' - p�t i F. A4r PX y ".,-;. 4 az bA a O O O U O ¢O I O / a. p o _ z 2 N ct o L N o O J O Q b o L �1. Q-. y N N ) E'C O O Y cA o C1. C O 3 N o 1 > N O 0 4"' O 3 i u o •> Q s L O O U cu O O ct 0 0_ ca c, O O O N o (V o 2 • Tp;� j:•'-''' ',..1:'-' a) t. °�' L1 N Ot O N N wtA s '�4 a`f I ' ° 70 .) a l� 0 ou f.f 1 1, ° c aa '\I \` m ,.o Y y. r • t N cc bD U sal) reri Q Z P O N j. .�t.^ ^' N O M O V O 7 O 1 I " x a � �� � o [ p 3 kY•'4�YyLSJ: p„ V A �Ke 1 V .i«;. ' V a7 amt I rag,_,T. • ;w o a) la t o o . IA., .,, ,t. .. +- E N N co C. co L tb bet 0 0 O -0 a a O O` s N O U co .c co O O O v--; .T f r L` . /".— [fi t . . s cz o O 4 U 1 O Q O O # { — O N _ a) O p > M _ -....�' - M ii 00 Q z r, 2 o N M L y 9 V c .� r0 _� O O 7 Q • a, A'..- .1.17.,Va_ ..:),,,,,__.. a y o o• c o al ti N P ..c -.....\ 0 o o i,f : U • o U 11::� y \ '6 a � 0. P 04 rcl c o ti ai s s o O o U d) d ``...er.-.. G. o O t a- n. t CU = t c -to f I t I..__ O s .;`. .. V 0 O I C O O,.._ O O s, .5 .0 tt .„ _t t • O i O 71 N w w o 0 tikct ; Q it.: ` M M sO N o o o� o.. N YY �� v 0 o Z an L o M N O L ti o rys O , kif 0. a) o c. I N N t t ' I O O N f y O s t��} '..�4 4 � 'ti7 o 4 .,YY -. N I :.. ati , ._ ... f , t..4. .. R{ . A� i s r y w w 0 0 NM 5 M M M a ti Op 0q O N O N 0. N 0. N on _ . . .,.,..jaw_. ,:. ;.-z-,,,,-... ....,,IA,„--, :1,!..._ 7 x O. N p �` O s . 1 ,t,, _ ' - a I StiAr � I N{ , 0,"O T x $ Vl M O L N , E1 CLI , r - O O } i p [O O L. — L ›..c a.) . ._ , . ‹ . _. . „ . < ,, -ter, a�O O N o.0 O . , ,, .... , __ cc:, , . , c... ...._ p 3 O O Q.0 y O. 1 o Q oct z to o O cn c I p i .iiii.„. ,;-• ill . .,.. -a,N 3 ,,Yx i. ;, : i ed O 11'1,4..s,/ •O Pi-- S „.... , t ' j „. . , __ __ ,..,:, f._.2enc%-4.. 4,..._ ii.7 7 pQ � a'w i y,,,i7i,-7.......7-..7, _ _.,=-., . f O. O CL On Y v) Cct ■-. J y Ii Q. bA i r ` Oq O = r O t/ c0 03 c4,1 Ot.b�' ,,,.. - O C. t4 {*fti� H o > a) ' > o e o r � a.)p. s.. cd h o o a) ,_ *0 . I o a o a� 0 o < Y V 0 Cl) i a fry a) o :$ t °o `.. o R` to •0 _ t' b; t - 3 as .M *"s. O t. N ►O r . O N _4 A ri ' -";,, , ... .t„,,...,,,,,, . ,,, , , .. y .A V-r M dT 3 O �: ' a O 3 O a - r G. Q p. M O 7.. ••- N O g O g O O O N U a, Q. to ° '_ a o �f ,,, C F c. a o' + �`: ., l' --,----f- i,i ' ",y•- t '- 3: €- . - •► 1 !{ V 0 r "'1x o ue 7.,.)eY ' - ] --,71•':i --% i- R is R‘'I''' a t ik c ,f( C ~ er<a� . 1, e! � f - £ N`fr m F E'F .���+ ,�a fix. , R N+k i.± v f s O Lc O Al LCI- 1' 1"' t ' 4 •'' '-•• ,'r c t - - - ' IT . ... .. . _ ,..: . , .., ...., 1 o ° o Y ...._.. .,_.,: .7 ._. , __ .. 1_„y 1� A 3 . . Nd . ,,,i;,•..,_ ,' 3 w .;rr ' a v d O ; 1.; '4 Q ° '4`:i to .q f:� C `..-.- ..._. -�. :�_ x ...^"vs�j v >' 4 RHO MS O OO'C O Q O ° ° a O �, s Q z U CO a ' O y ` 4+ Y i f i *} ° o S 0. RI N{ .-t ! MI o co o • i w ¢ w F w° • o 3 N N*1 - \-` > 4, Cl. n c.- o 3 C s O ai a N c Q w O z 5 o 3 v 6' Y N ' i _ O ..T.,_. . p ...-„.... A '''... ' ._ •OO N • ..: ` y V • O t.`�` :--- rtef7 ✓ v '� r” i Q Op; y O CD b o O i.' t b 3 , Q t wpi`' __, V• f-,. �"" Q o 0 a s ob o o N O V G .,-. 4 ,,,) Q z , _ x,nf71' `: ':t'` ,,`.`:: �fit r,s t Air!, fit! • `+ J' ur k � ,* N .�.+ i• - t li F`.. .J 9 0 V o r.% . 4 € .k e'' .= , i e, o a ' 1 ., ..,.. .., .: ' ; :.... ..:,„_!,iit;or":1:,...'''111:7.7*.i,j4:: L - { a.O f. Y .7. 7 C a k 1 O D - t' ca r,, i a? f t� ° o r 9 - c be tic o v n • r:. E ,� ca = } rr ' r r f'! 4= c 3 ys �f" fit ' 1, ,• 0 t. f v.: ,., ..; .4 a. L Q. V 2 a a.> i a O E p U ti V o °c ',E' G G vii APPENDIX 3 SHPD CONSULTATION AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT WILLIAM J.AILA,JR. 4.„_ A'TER1M CHAIRPERSON hEILA$ERCROMBIE •p'�I,+''^'•'•"""..4., ROAM:1OFL∎NDANT/NATUR.LLAMERCES GOVERNOR OF HAWAII ,/.Cf *195D wN_,. COMMR5IOn'OY WATER RESOLRCE MANAGEMENT GUY H.KAULUHUKUI p f*y!� ��tt INTERIM FIRST DEPUTY d and M.y s� 'j 1, ! WILLIAM TAM 'i9 �i INTERIM Donn",DIRECTOR-WATER AQUATIC RFD:a:RCM „,W.. BOATING AND OCEAN RECREATION BLUM,0#CONVEYANCES _.. COMMISSION ON WATER RESOGRCE MAN.AGEMENET � CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDS STATE OF HAWAII CONSERVATION AND INEERRasE.FORCEUea `�uPOrtl><+ DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES HISTORIC AND PRESERVATION HISTORIC rRESERVnnaN Y.AHOOLA WE ISLAND RESERVE COMMISsi N: LIMO STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION STATE?NILO 601 KAMOKILA BOULEVARD,ROOM 555 KAPOLEI,HAWAII 96707 June 18,2012 Jon McElvaney,RA LOG NO: 2012.1612 Inoue Hawaii Realty Corp. DOC NO: 1206TD22 101 Aupuni Street,Suite 10001 Archaeology Hilo,Hawai`i 96720 (zp_nash @yahoo.com) Aloha Mr.McElvaney: Subject: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review— State Land Use Boundary and Hawai`i County Change of Zone Application for 9.93 Acres Keonepoko Iki Ahupua`a,Puna District,Island of Hawaii TMK: (3)1-5-007:006,069 and 070 Thank you for requesting our review of the proposed application, received May 24, 2012. The applicant is requesting a change in State zoning from agriculture to urban; and a change in County zoning from A-la Agricultural to CV-10 Village Commercial, for the purpose of constructing a retail shopping center. Each of the three parcels are comprised of 3.3 acres and currently being used as a base yard for Bryson's Cinders, and for residential purposes.According to the application,the existing dwellings date to 1975 and 1985. The parcels are located within the Keonepoko Homesteads subdivision and are outside the Pahoa Historic District (SIHP 50-10-45-7388),and we have no records of historic properties within or adjacent to these parcels. We have recently reviewed a stockpiling permit for Parcel 006,and determined that no historic properties would be affected (Log 2012.0413,Doc 1203TD05). In 2000,we reviewed a special permit application for a 150-ft telecommunication tower on Parcel 069 and were informed that the parcel had been previously graded (Log 26139, Doc 0009PM05). Photographs submitted with the current application indicate that the project area has been significantly altered in connection with the current business. Based on available information,the history of land use,and the current condition of the project area,we believe that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed change in zoning and future construction activities. In the event that historic resources,including human skeletal remains,artifacts,structural remnants or lava tubes are identified during the construction activities,please cease work in the immediate vicinity of the find,protect the find from additional disturbance, and contact the State Historic Preservation Division, Hawaii Island Section at(808) 933-7653. Please contact me at Theresa.K.Danhan'ahawaii.Lov if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Mahalo, Theresa K.Donham Archaeology Branch Chief ( W ILLIAM J.AILA.JR. ` O F H 4II(IRMiRSOA NEILABERCROMHIE »�' A (OtKDDtl*L AND\NDAAlt'R!LRF,S0t.InIS '11'1'..'s 958 Y' CI(IAt IS+KM OAKITLRR)SOL'R(1.h7 Vti.1(.F M):AT GO\'FRVOR OF I I:\N'AII Af r wtf�. ti, ES I tIER ICU'AINA 1..-/, - S (IRO DI;PL'TS 1,- )'d and t .. 1:-:' WILLIAM M.7:AM �(1.1) G41't l .t�j IN:PE-71 MRL(TDR WATT% 444"""..���... JJJ��� r ,101 lT1[%F�QL NL'tJ J a (O(IAIISSION Oh N(TI R MSOCR(1%IANA(MINI (OASER\ATR)A AND COASTAL LANDS (' I:ONSII(V1TIOA(AD RI SOURCES I'GFORI'I:(IFNI --t. HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION I.(IAFFRIN F(liftN Dt AND W ILMLIFI (- DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES 'USW/LK%MLR(111ON ' TC+MI KAH(M%SSW ISI(AD RI:S(0,1 toSIMI SIO ._ LAND 601 Kamokila Boulevard.Suite 555 ST An I•.4ILK5 Kapolei,HI 96806 ( ( December 11,2012 ( Mr,Graham Knopp LOG NO:2012.2538 GK Environmental 2012.2769 P.O.Box 1310 2012.3424 l-ionoka`a,Hawaii 9672,1-1310 DOC NO: 1212SN02 ( Dear Mr.Knopp: ( SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review—Environmental Assessment ( Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and Roadway Improvments Keonepoko lki Ahupua`a,Puna District,Island of Hawaii ( TMK:(3)1-5-007:006,069,070 and 055 Roadway ( Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments for the proposed Environmental Assessment (EA) for Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and Related Roadway Improvements. We received your submittal September 21, 2012; we apologize for the delayed review and thank you for your patience. The proposed project will include a ( shopping center on a 9.93 acres of privately-owned land along Pahoa Village Road. As a result of the proposed (- project, roadway improvements will be nessecary as well as a .937 acre extension of Kahakai Boulevard to allow access to the proposed project. ( Our records indicate that this area is outside the boundaries of the Pahoa Historic District (SIHP Site 50-10-55- 7388);however,there is a potential for archaeological resources,based on findings in nearby parcels. On December 1, 2012, a field inspection of the proposed shopping center project area and roadway extension of Kahakai Boulevard was conducted by SHPD staff archaeologist Sean NAleimaile(Parcel 055). The inspection found that the project area has been previously grubbed and graded, and much of the proposed roadway has been impacted by stockpiling of materials from the adjacent project area. A portion of the proposed extension is intact and it is ( recommended that additional fieldwork be conducted in this area to verify the presence or absence of historic properties. ( We recommend that an archaeological inspection be conducted of the undisturbed portions of Parcel 055 by a qualified archaeologist. If evidence of historic properties is found, an inventory survey report documenting the ( archaeological fieldwork and findings should be submitted to the SHPD for review and approval prior to any further ( land alteration in undisturbed areas.We will await completion of the EA prior to approval of any related grading or stockpiling permits connected with this project. Please contact Sean Naleimaile at (808) 933-7651 or ( Sea p.P.Naleimailera Hawaii.cov if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. ( Aloha, 4:lei ( Theresa K. Donham (- Archaeology Branch Chief . ( ( ( RECHTMA =:.• NS - - MG, LLC 507-A E.La t. .o,Hawaii 96720 phone: (80: • •.• • (808)443-0065 e-mail: •• • • ting.com ARCHAEOLOGI • ULTU _ STORICAL STUDIES January 2,2013 RC-0830 Sean Naleimaile, M.A. Assistant Hawai`i Island Archaeologist DLNR-SHPD 40 Po`okela Street Hilo,HI 96720 Dear Sean: In response to a DLNR-SHPD comment letter (DOC NO: 1212SN02) concerning the use of a state-owned parcel (TMK: 3-1-5-07:055) for the extension of Kahakai Blvd in conjunction with the development of the Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center, Graham Knopp of GK Environmental asked Rechtman Consulting, LLC to conduct a field inspection of the roughly 1 acre parcel, which is situated in Keonepoko Iki Ahupua`a, Puna District, Island of Hawai`i (Figures 1 and 2). Extending for roughly 820 feet west from Pahoa Village Road (Figure 3), this narrow (50 feet wide) parcel was briefly inspected by DLNR-SHPD staff on December 1, 2012, •` r and was found to be mostly previously grubbed and graded. However, DLNR-SHPD noted that a small portion of the parcel was intact and they recommended that additional fieldwork be conducted to verify the presence or absence of historic properties. Keonepoko Iki Ahupua'a was retained as Government Land during the Mdhele, and no Land Commission Award claims were made within the ahupua`a(Waihona `Aina database). Beginning in 1903 a mauka portion of the ahupua`a(in the vicinity of the current study area)was commuted as grant parcels and homestead lots (Figure 4). Only a few archaeological studies have been completed in Keonepoko Iki and most have been in the coastal portion of the ahupua`a. However, one prior study (Rechtman 2004) was completed for TMK: 3-1-5-07:017, which is located approximately 500 meters to the north of the current study area. The ground surface of that project area was found to have been extensively mechanically disturbed in the past and one lava tube was encountered and explored that proved to be culturally sterile.No historic properties were recorded during that study. On December 28, 2012, Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D., Dave Nelson, B.A., Amy Ketner, B.A., and Lauryl Zenobi, B.A. conducted a thorough surface examination of the study parcel. Ground visibility was fair within the small undisturbed portion of the parcel (Figure 5) and excellent within the previously disturbed portion of the parcel (Figures 6 and 7). As a result of the fieldwork, there were no surface archaeological resources observed and the likelihood of encountering subsurface resources is extremely remote. Based on these negative findings, on behalf of our client, we are requesting that DLNR-SHPD issue a written determination of"no historic properties affected"in accordance with HAR 13§13-284-5(b)1. RC-0830 2 ( ( In the highly unlikely event that archaeological resources are encountered during subsurface development activities within the current study area,work in the immediate area of the discovery will be halted and DLNR-SHPD contacted as outlined in Hawai`i Administrative Rules 13§13- 275-12. Should you require further information,please contact me directly. Respectfully, ( ( Bob Rechtman,Ph.D. ( Principal Archaeologist ( References Cited ( Rechtman,R (- 2004 Request for SHPO Concurrence with a Determination of No Historic Properties Affected Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act and in Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (TMK:3-1-5-07:17), Keonepoko Nui and Keonepoko Iki ahupua a, Puna District, Island of Hawai`i. ( Rechtman Consulting Letter Report RC-0277. Prepared for Brian Nishimura, ( Hilo,Hawai`i. ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( RC-0830 3 ''578 .�'Y1'a.. .' r Facitit ', >° - �, ,� Communication Pit i ��' ° Tower• • t` !• t fa. S �• - / may 1 = Ps i fh r ----. r lip •t _ . V t ✓ G . j.''1 .525 w+ �'\ , 0 600 ? - ' — t a- Q _ /! � f 1:' ... �, f s f 5C0 2 t Bhd _.! -i J, '_ - $--- Pahoa f l� _ ` Lai-din xri i 9 P 1,_ r G 0° 'i - .i . r � . C ,, t:i r - -/.' -t _ — 1 4^ t r \. �I - - \•!`, i. �:;y s ' ' \ s• : \\l'o \ • NATIONAL Gtr 1RI3' `", __ --$.,t4 ' . Study Arear �f , Portion of USGS 7.5 minute series quadrangle Pahoa North,HI 1997 - y tv\y:^ ' , N A • 4 Figure 1. Study area location. t,_ ( RC-0830 4 (_ T :Y4) •v -0.. `q t• 45 .a ♦ y Pj ' :�i� NM r us C v ii�2 , I' mt n N (• r0 A.ri C 8�`ti W y°��i N� O ��.. a0 w v e ,,„11 3 °�p�'� m S a t., �; i (- i•v■C q , r 2 ar h p�O t °' '` ''44 4 0 -�5'', l iy 41 04 on o CC %"' ct 00 e°�� -t 0 mk.� ao,p..e v.°v°`�4 ;l id �•r4.41 0 t10. h 4 � � p _ M e r�$�ta p m • n I t . GI ei ,e t c t I"' p s Al ar � k i k 1 _.sO 4 col i• ,‘ .. -_s_a±5!z •t°.� g .;1 a1 6.q•04° L iZ. t «� v•C& --m A myy tlC`` (_ o oho ' _ o o 0s ,s r� hN Ua Q1 \ osL°i S� 4 .4* °BQ�0 t.)61 h It 1 ........... illIli.v.k � k %I. all1 6u 0 • � yTi '.1.-° n ti l ' 4 • ' i \ _ A W n q ;� ia -1. Q � 0 d aty ( 2.0/ Ni . i ( v. • o 'W F ; u� p t �CVj.11 e- 9,; 0 D _ u o o u U 2 N`t oa•oo> I 1 C (. o Y .di z it Sx O fti "• N oi . a t9 o es' , , 00•oo0Ncorn 6,0900 co d` a> (Cd n. -It 8 4 1 z O k. V i N "o V f p I or; ev) ♦��� \ / \ /%, 0 ....se.* p ( •/ ♦/ /\ O Q 0 y-0 k t :i N t Y ID 0 a i h Fl n ~ p ts . ('.$ o r. ti C >, 140 z4-4.9 Mil 0 ( t3�- 82 0 W , 4 © � � y 0 6a NO oh t tvrl11 `tt Q. 0• 0 D i2 ° 4k o l L'Q4 s N-11 84 N h 0 t` i y k Q �,x4•sra 9 j V O 0 '41 liia:� h (• �� SI 4. Y ' t ` y rYSi r . � 0 i ;®'C� p� iv 96•011 1 o o st•P4 � . 7 4•, ct rl 0 b tl. �. ` o O 'gl�s ,BY�� i ;sz��eyY� o 0) o d u yi ry l ,�I` ° ,�,.w�sp sqs. . , y r'. )fir:' �� -p (- i qq '•RR oFe r 0 0 .G�YpZ'iaz ;. 9?' " •• O 1.°) Q IjY A ® 0�3 8 �i.�`." n® Cam, p `� d0 w ( RC-0830 5 . f'i / _ ?fir= I ! ,.. .„----- ,,,--4 ,,,,., , , ,„,, ...,,,,,--- Aez..y sz,:vt.‘,.„.N... 3Y £ � ,00" _ ......... arrai6 Figure 3. Study area as seen from existing portion of Kahakai Blvd,view to the west. RC-0830 ( I 6 , ( I I .. , ... ( I , - , I — II— la t II I!..p.wAll i EF111,'CMY St.'',\/1.-v 1 r` f 1 KEONEPOKO HOMESTEAD LOTS • PUNA HAWAII ( I \, ,' 22\ -- — — ( ./ . ( I Su,VOY 0.0s.,.op III..11/ 9 .•ran/1 23 \\ 'N.:Z. ,E.a..)thd./..era 0.61se m Cit.,. ..... ........ •I.'`-'iVI '"f.•I' • 20 ( 21 . ( I , ..■ - .......4. ( (.. , /9 , 1.1 s .., ( a, \ ... — ....„..... s 17 i II 14 ' ....,........... ( ..,......- ' .. .,,,t, ( I 2 1 ( 1\ ....._... .. . ( — — V ,iNt., .'./.... . \,.„,,,,....t.....,.„... .k I 1.: ' • 1'4./7... , \ 1.\ i 9 ■ ....„.....----\ Current Study Area----------'; ■ — _ ___ L_. __ ,L.. _ — ,. 4,.... _ __..\ _ _ _ ( ...,..-,..".. ‘,, ( ".....'... \.% A I ( .\......._ '1'7'■ 1.'1.'\ 1 ( — — — _ \ *. ,A,„;,, • '' '''/ ( . ANAIVALI ■ I ( I I I s ... • :-'71''' .1. ' I 1 — --i.— t t i ! i - ( Figure 4. Hawail Registered Map 2084 originally prepared in 1903 and updated in 1947,showing current study area. ( ( (. RC-0830 7 tt^ ..r 7• T+> .vY iy + 4 ,....,_ P '7.;-• '41.. 0:' ' It *.4.-- *ur. x y VW. . r ' • ,R'' yy - - geeyfi r arr ti�yy • Figure 5. Small intact portion of study area,view to the east. r 1 . 0A 4'max r v Figure 6. Graded mauka portion of study area, view to the west. 11ILL1AM J.AILA..IR. ;151111'Vd 61\F) 1-1,11 lV)S.AR 1 1.:')t RI FT ABERC'RC)1181E S A T A 1959 h 1I ,.[ 511 .IO%s)\\•it'.145111 e[t 5•.s.t.tl�* d'F5 K�ti:K011115'x'Slf J y ES[HER KIVAINA ( Yv+ 0.} VIRTU'I pd and 1It LI 1M M.1 • 1111 ^n IRI t.,a ,171 l: ...,J Iii.rkTiNo 1'+1 KI5 121 hl TI C \1[)!1)',11\\\(IS. 1, �„� .,.�'`f ly\Ail itll d-'�4lT h At 4 lI n-\.i"•7 _ ' ((115-A\'11( 5N)('N51 It l\5 1 () Iii .1151\ Rki >.rl 1 f i'K(1 .f �' HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION of „ 1r,1 U1111L1 DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ""' 1\` ^"T' 1111 151 t aIH t t f.A.A l,15•'. 601 Kamokila Boulward,Suite 555 51'`'1 Kapolei.Ht 96806 January 14,2013 Robert Rechtman,Ph.D. LOG NO:2013.0081 Rechtmen Consulting, LLC DOC NO: 1301 SNO2 507-A E. Lanikaula St. Archaeology Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Dr. Rechtman: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review— Archaeological Field Inspection of the Proposed Kahakai Boulevard Extension Kconepoko lid Ahupua`a,Puna District,Island of Hawaii TMK:(3) 1-5-007:055 Thank you for your response to the DLNR-SHPD comment letter requesting additional fieldwork for the proposed Environmental Assessment (EA) for Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center and Related Roadway Improvements (Log No. 2012.2769 Doc. No. 1212SN02). We received your letter on January 2nd. 2013. The proposed roadway improvements will include a .937 acre extension of Kahakai Boulevard to allow access to the proposed Pahoa Village Road Shopping Center. A field inspection of the proposed roadway extension of Kahakai Boulevard by SHPD staff archaeologist Sean Naleimaile (Parcel 055) indicated that a portion of the proposed roadway extension was recently impacted by stockpiling of materials. A portion of the proposed extension was undisturbed and it was recommended that additional fieldwork be conducted in this area to verify the presence or absence of historic properties (Log No. 2012.2769 Doc. No. 1212SN02).. Your letter describes the methods and findings of an archaeological field inspection that was conducted of the undisturbed portions of Parcel 055. No evidence of historic properties were identified during the inspection. Based on these findings,we concur with your recommendation that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed extension of Kahakai Blvd. Please contact Sean Naleimaile at (808)933-7651 or Scan.P.\a1eimailc a ail.5co1 if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Aloha. 444t - Theresa K. Donham Archaeology Branch Chief cc. Mr.Graham Knopp GK Environmental PO Box 1310 Honoka.a,HI 96727 APPENDIX 4 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT REVISED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND A SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY FOR A PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER PAHOA, HAWAII TMK (3)1-5-007:006, 069, 070 JUNE,2013 PREPARED FOR: B. T. KUWAHARA LLC V err,•._ _Z �.'j,\ THIS WORK WAS PREPARED By ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION PREPARED BY: WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP P.O. BOX 348 HOLUALOA, HI 96725 (808)334-0322 (808)324-0327 Fax TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 II. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 Table 1 Proposed Facilities 1 III. STUDY AREA CONDITIONS 2 A. Study Area 2 B. Site Accessibility 2 C. Land Use 2 D. Concurrency 2 E. Assumptions 3 IV. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 A. Physical Characteristics 4 B. Traffic Volumes 4 Table 2 Peak Hours Tabulation 4 Table 3 Traffic Counts for Peak Hours 5 C. Level of Service 6 Table 4 Levels of Service 7 V. PROJECTED TRAFFIC 7 A. Methodology 7 B. Trip Generation 8 Table 5 Trip Generation 8 C. Traffic Distribution 9 Table 6 Trip Distribution Directionals 9 D. Trip Assignments 9 Table 7 Trip Distribution and Assignment 10 VI. LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPUTATIONS 12 Table 8 Levels of Service 12 VII. DISCUSSION 15 A. Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road and Old Pahoa Village Road 15 Page 1 of 3 B. Malama Market Road and Old Pahoa Village Road 15 C. Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road and Kahakai Boulevard 16 D. Old Pahoa Village Road and Kahakai Boulevard 16 E. Center Driveway 17 F. South Driveway 17 VIII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 APPENDICES APPENDIX A Location Map, Tax Map Key Map and Site Plan APPENDIX B Level of Service Criteria APPENDIX C Level of Service—Kahakai Blvd. & Old Pahoa Village Road (Computer Printout) • Existing Conditions AM and PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM and PM Peak Traffic (includes 5,10 and 20 year) APPENDIX D Level of Service—Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road& Old Pahoa Village Road (Computer Printout) • Existing and Buildout Conditions AM and PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM and PM Peak Traffic using Roundabout(includes 5,10 and 20 year) APPENDIX E Level of Service—Malama Market Road& Old Pahoa Village Road (Computer Printout) • Existing Conditions AM and PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM and PM Peak Traffic (includes 5,10 and 20 year) APPENDIX F Level of Service—Kahakai Blvd. &Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road(Computer Printout) • Existing Conditions AM and PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM and PM Peak Traffic (includes 5,10 and 20 year) APPENDIX G Level of Service—Center Driveway(Computer Printout) • At Buildout, 5 Years AM and PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM and PM Peak Traffic (includes 10 and 20 year) APPENDIX H Level of Service— South Driveway(Computer Printout) Page 2 of 3 • At Buildout, AM and PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM and PM Peak Traffic (includes Pualani Estates Buildout, 5, 10 and 20 year) APPENDIX I Level of Service— Keaau-Pahoa ByPass Rd & Old Pahoa Village Rd. using Roundabout Intersection Data • Existing Conditions and Buildout AM&PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM &PM Peak Traffic (includes 5,10 and 20 year) APPENDIX J Traffic Movement Diagrams—Kahakai Blvd. & Old Pahoa Village Road • Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic (includes 5,10 and 20 year) APPENDIX K Traffic Movement Diagrams—Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road&Old Pahoa Village Road • Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM&PM Peak Traffic using Roundabout(includes 5,10 and 20 year) APPENDIX L Traffic Movement Diagrams—Malama Market Road & Old Pahoa Village Road • Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic (includes 5,10 and 20 year) APPENDIX M Traffic Movement Diagrams—Kahakai Blvd. &Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road • Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic (includes 5,10 and 20 year) APPENDIX N Traffic Movement Diagrams—Center Driveway • Conditions at Buildout, 5 Years AM &PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic (includes 10 and 20 year) APPENDIX 0 Traffic Movement Diagrams— South Driveway • Conditions at Buildout AM & PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic APPENDIX P Signal Warrant Study Data Page 3 of 3 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER, PAHOA, HAWAII SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PAHOA VILLAGE ROAD AND KAHAKAI BOULEVARD TMK (3)1-5-007:006, 069, 070 I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to evaluate the traffic impact of the proposed development at the above location which is southwest of the intersection of Old Pahoa Village road and Kahakai Boulevard. It is assumed that the primary entering and exiting will be to the westward extension of Kahakai Boulevard with some entering and exiting along Old Pahoa Village Road. This report will analyze the impact on the following intersections: Kahakai Boulevard and Old Pahoa Village Road Kahakai Blvd and Keaau-Pahoa By Pass Old Pahoa Village Road and Keaau-Pahoa By Pass Old Pahoa Village Road and Malama Market Two Driveways on Old Pahoa Village Road II. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The project is located in the Puna District of the Big Island of Hawaii. It will be diagonally opposite of the Woodland Center at the intersection of Old Pahoa Village Road and Kahakai Boulevard The proposed project is approximately 9.93 acres on TMK(3)1-5-007:006,(3)1- 5-007:069 and (3)1-5-007:070. Current plans include the following (See Table 1). TABLE 1 PROPOSED FACILITIES Facility Area in Square Feet Supermarket 40,000 Specialty Retail (3) 18,000 Paint and Hardware 10,000 Garden Center 10,000 Clinic 11,250 1 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 Facility Area in Square Feet Medical/Dental 5,040 Quality* Restaurant(2) 8,853 High Volume Restaurant 2,000 *As defined in"Trip Generation", Institute of Traffic Engineers III. STUDY AREA CONDITIONS A. Study Area The project area is surrounded by a mixture of single-family residences,commercial, and agricultural developments. Zoning varies from commercial-industrial to AG20 to Ag5 and neighborhood commercial. Traffic from this development will have an impact on the surrounding roads. This impact will be measured for the intersections stated above. B. Site Accessibility The proposed development will be accessed primarily from the extension westwardly of Kahakai Blvd from Old Pahoa Village Road Secondary access will be from two driveways along Old Pahoa Village Road, one located in the approximate center of the development and one at the southerly boundary. The Center Driveway and South Driveway are full movement. C. Land Use The project area is currently designated agricultural. The area is currently being used as a base yard for a cinder operation. There are two dwelling units on-site, one of which which may be converted to a restaurant. Also,there is a warehouse once used for flower distribution which currently is used as an office and equipment repair facility for Byson's Cinders. D. Concurrency Pursuant to Section 25-2-46, Concurrency Requirements of the Hawaii County Zoning Code, the County requires a traffic impact analysis report(TIAR) of major developments be prepared or updated within six (6)months before the submission of any change of zone that can generate 50 or more peak hour trips. The TIAR shall include projections for future traffic growth for a minimum of five-,ten-and twenty- years including other approved or proposed development expected to impact the area with reasonable assumptions about the build-out of such development. Based on the 2 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 current recession and economic conditions, we can only assume that future development within the area of the Project over the next five years will be limited. Based on the projected growth in traffic in this area, the Project will have a minimal impact on the traffic conditions in the general area. There are several parcels in the area of study that could be developed during the five- to twenty-year period. The following is a list of these parcels: TMK Size in Acres (3)1-5-007:005 10.00 (3)1-5-007:023 5.60 (3)1-5-007:007 9.57 Under the present circumstances, it is difficult to predict when and if these parcels will develop, and with what zoning. Therefore, it is assumed that their impact will be part of the 2% annum increase in traffic volume used in this report. E. Assumptions 1. Sixty-two percent of the shopping center traffic enters the development by way of the Kahakai Boulevard extension. 2. Forty-eight percent of the shopping center traffic exits the development by way of the Kahakai Boulevard extension. 3. Thirty percent of the shopping center traffic enters the development by way of the center driveway on Old Pahoa Village Road 4. Forty percent of the shopping center traffic exits the development by way of the center driveway on Old Pahoa Village Road 5. Eight percent of the shopping center traffic enters the development by way of the south driveway on Old Pahoa Village Road 6. Twelve percent of the shopping center traffic exits by way of the south driveway on Old Pahoa Village Road 7. Based upon conversations with the County of Hawaii traffic engineer, an annual increase in traffic of two percent is assumed for this report. 8. Directional distribution is based upon the directional distribution of the traffic counts except for Center Driveway and with those exiting through Kahakai Boulevard the right turn is weighted. 9. Center Driveway allows for all turning movements, but assumes minimal left-turn-out. 10. South Driveway allows for all turning movements 11. Buildout is estimated to be December, 2014. 12. Twenty-five percent of trips generated are from pass-by traffic. 13. Shopping Center traffic remains constant. 3 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 14. The State DOT will not allow a left turn onto Old Pahoa Village Road from Malama Market or a left turn into Malama Market from Old Pahoa Village Road. 15. The State DOT is building a roundabout at the intersections of Malama Market Road/Old Pahoa Village Road and Old Pahoa Village Road/Keaau- Pahoa Bypass Road. IV. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Physical Characteristics Kahakai Boulevard is a two-lane thoroughfare with left turn lanes in the center. It has curb, gutter and sidewalk on the Woodland Center side.The County is requiring that the project extend Kahakai Boulevard(west or mauka) of Pahoa Village Road approximately 830 feet as a two-lane thoroughfare with curb, gutter and sidewalk with through left turns into the project. Old Pahoa Village Road is a two-lane road with left turn lanes. Ma lama Market Road is actually part of the Old Pahoa Village Road before the By Pass. Speed limits throughout the area are 30 mph and 45 mph on the By Pass. B. Traffic Volumes Traffic counts were take at four locations as follows: Kahakai Boulevard and Old Pahoa Village Road Keaau-Pahoa Bypass and Old Pahoa Village Road Malama Market Rd and Old Pahoa Village Road Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa Bypass These counts were performed on August 31, 2011 and September 1, 2011. The following is the peak hour tabulation. TABLE 2 PEAK HOUR TABULATION Location Peak Hour Vehicles Per Hour(vph) Kahakai Blvd&Old Pahoa 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 662 Village Road Kahakai Blvd&Old Pahoa 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM 872 Village Road Keaau-Pahoa Bypass&Old 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 1470 Pahoa Village Road Keaau-Pahoa Bypass&Old 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM 1767 Pahoa Village Road 4 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 Location Peak Hour Vehicles Per Hour(vph) Malama Market Road and 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 824 Old Pahoa Village Road Malama Market Road and 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM 1052 Old Pahoa Village Road Kahakai Boulevard& 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 1170 Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Kahakai Boulevard& 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM 1019 Keaau-Pahoa Bypass For clarification purposes, the directional traffic flow is as follows: Eastbound—traveling from the west to the east. An eastbound left would be making a left turn from traveling eastbound. An eastbound right would be making a right turn from the eastbound travel. Westbound—traveling from east to west.A westbound left would be making a left turn from traveling westbound. A eastbound right would be making a right turn from the westbound travel. Northbound— traveling from south to north. A northbound left would be making a left turn from traveling northbound. A northbound right would be making a right turn from the northbound travel. Southbound— traveling from north to south. A southbound left would be making a left turn from traveling southbound. A southbound right would be making a right turn from the southbound travel. TABLE 3 TRAFFIC COUNTS FOR PEAK HOURS Movement AM PM AM** PM** Kahakai Boulevard and Old Pahoa Village Road Westbound Left 30 42 31 43 Westbound Right 55 99 56 101 Northbound Through 171 207 174 211 Northbound Right 71 123 72 125 Southbound Left 102 145 103 148 Southbound Through 233 256 238 264 5 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 Movement AM PM AM** PM** Keaau-Pahoa Bypass and Old Pahoa Village Road Eastbound Through 408 387 416 395 ■ Eastbound Right 254 304 259 310 i Westbound Left 140 113 143 115 Westbound Through 446 300 455 306 Northbound Left 177 260 181 265 Northbound Right 45 103 46 105 Malama Market Road and Old Pahoa Village Road Eastbound Left 99 168 101 171 Eastbound Right 97 161 99 164 r Northbound Left 75 131 76 134 Northbound Through 151 175 154 178 Southbound Through 244 227 249 232 Southbound Right 158 190 161 793 Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Eastbound Through 442 446 451 5 Eastbound Right 36 53 37 54 Westbound Through 603 383 615 391 Northbound Right* 89 137 91 140 *For computing purposes, Kahakai Blvd is assumed to be northbound/southbound and Keaau-Pahoa Bypass, eastbound/westbound. **One year adjustment at 2% per year. C. Level of Service Level of service is defined as "a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream; generally described in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety." There are six levels of operational conditions defined as follows: 6 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 Level of Service A Little or no traffic delays Level of Service B Short traffic delays Level of Service C Average traffic delays Level of Service D Long traffic delays Level of Service E Very long traffic delays Level of Service F Extreme traffic delays Levels of service were calculated for these intersections using the data gathered on August 31, 2011 and September 1, 2011. The following table shows the existing conditions. TABLE 4 LEVELS OF SERVICE Movement AM PM Kahakai Boulevard and Old Pahoa Village Road Westbound Left B C Westbound Right A B Southbound Through A A Keaau-Pahoa Bypass and Old Pahoa Village Road Westbound Left A A Northbound Left F F Northbound Right B B Malama Market Road and Old Pahoa Village Road Eastbound Left C B Eastbound Right B B Northbound Left A A Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Northbound Right* B B *For computing purposes, Kahakai Blvd is assumed to be northbound/southbound and Keaau-Pahoa Bypass, eastbound/westbound. V. PROJECTED TRAFFIC A. Methodology Highway capacity analysis was performed in accordance with the"Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, 2nd Edition" of the Transportation Research Board (1992) and the Highway Capacity Software from the Federal Highway 7 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 Administration and McTrans, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Levels of service for the various intersections were computed for the existing condition in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual. Level of service has been defined previously. Level of service calculations and volume- capacity-ratios are tabulated herein for both AM and PM peaks for existing and the post development condition. Each intersection is diagramed in the appendix showing existing and post development conditions. The trip generation methodology used in this report is based upon applications developed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)and published in"Trip Generation", 8th Edition, 2011. Trip generations have been developed for a variety of land uses (or facility types) which correlate trips with dwelling units, area, population, vehicle ownership and intensity of use. Each facility type has a catalog number for identification purposes.As an example,Classification 210,single-family detached, is used when determining trip generation for an RS Subdivision. The various uses for this development are listed below. B. Trip Generation As stated previously,the shopping center will have a multitude of different business, retail sales, eating establishments and medical facilities. The following is a tabulation of these various businesses with land use codes from ITE, "Trip Generation", 8th Edition, 2011. TABLE 5 TRIP GENERATION Facility Land Area AM PM Use 1000ft2 Code Trip Enter Exit Trip Enter Exit Gen Gen % Trip % Trip % Trip % Trip Super Market 850 40 3.59 49 70 51 73 10.50 53 222 47 197 Paint&Hardware 816 10 4.91 52 26 48 24 4.74 54 26 46 22 Garden Center 817 10 1.34 52 7 48 6 3.80 - 51 19 49 19 Specialty Retail 814 5 6.84 48 16 52 18 2.71 44 6 56 8 Specialty Retail 814 5 6.84 48 16 52 18 2.71 44 6 56 8 Specialty Retail 814 8 6.84 48 26 52 28 2.71 44 10 56 12 Quality Restaurant 931 5 5.57 82 23 50 5 9.02 62 28 38 17 Quality Restaurant 931 2.853 5.57 82 13 18 3 9.02 62 16 38 10 High Volume Rest. 932 2 13.53 52 14 48 13 18.49 54 20 46 17 8 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 Dental 720 5.04 3.62 66 12 51 10 4.45 40 9 60 13 Medical Clinic* 630 11.25 31.45* 50 39 34 39 31.45* 50 39 50 39 Totals 105.14 262 237 401 362 *Per weekday per 1,000 ft2 for 9-hour period C. Traffic Distribution Since this development will be at the intersection of Kahakai Boulevard and Old Pahoa Village Road, traffic directional distribution will be based upon the existing directional distribution and the assumptions previously made. Traffic traveling toward the intersection will determine the directional distribution for entering the shopping center, and traffic leaving the intersection will determine the directional distribution of the traffic exiting the shopping center. The following table shows this relationship. TABLE 6 TRIP DISTRIBUTION DIRECTIONALS Direction Percentage AM PM To the intersection Northbound 37 38 Southbound 50 46 Westbound 13 16 Away from the intersection Northbound 34 35 Southbound 40 34 Eastbound 26 31 The other three intersection turning movements are based upon the existing directional distribution determined by the traffic counts. D. Trip Assignments Trips were assigned in accordance with the above traffic distribution discussion. For comparison purposes, the distribution and assignment is shown for the existing condition and future conditions on the following table. 9 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 TABLE 7 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT AM PM Direction Exist Build 5 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Exist Build 5 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Out 2017 2022 2032 Out 2017 2022 2032 KAHAKAI BOULEVARD & OLD PAHOA VILLAGE ROAD Eastbound Left 38 38 38 38 60 60 60 60 Eastbound Through 30 30 30 30 53 53 53 53 Eastbound Right 45 45 45 45 59 59 59 59 Westbound Left 31 31 34 38 46 43 40 44 49 61 Westbound 20 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 Through Westbound Right 56 45 51 57 72 101 93 104 115 142 Northbound Left 60 60 60 60 93 93 93 93 Northbound 174 170 188 208 255 211 126 148 172 228 Through Northbound Right 72 72 79 88 107 125 77 90 104 137 Southbound Left 103 97 148 188 222 148 138 247 274 337 Southbound 238 224 305 311 415 264 244 366 406 499 Through Southbound Right 81 81 81 81 113 113 113 113 KEAAU-PAHOA BYPASS& OLD PAHOA VILLAGE ROAD Eastbound Through 416 416 459 507 618 395 395 436 482 587 Eastbound Right 259 283 310 340 408 310 337 369 405 488 Westbound Left 143 156 171 187 225 115 125 137 150 181 Westbound 455 455 502 555 676 306 306 338 373 455 Through Northbound Left 181 202 172 192 230 265 252 211 235 289 Northbound Right 46 55 45 49 58 105 100 84 94 120 MALAMA MARKET ROAD&OLD PAHOA VILLAGE ROAD Eastbound Left 101 101 0 0 0 171 171 0 0 0 Eastbound Right 99 114 236 259 312 164 225 431 469 559 Northbound Left 76 80 0 0 0 134 121 0 0 0 10 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 AM PM Direction Exist Build 5 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Exist Build 5 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Out 2017 2022 2032 Out 2017 2022 2032 Northbound 154 178 282 309 370 178 160 314 349 452 Through Southbound 249 274 312 340 407 232 269 293 320 382 Through Southbound Right 161 161 176 196 239 193 193 213 235 287 KAHAKAI BOULEVARD&KEAAU-PAHOA BYPASS Eastbound Through 451 451 492 550 670 455 455 502 555 676 Eastbound Right 37 57 61 65 75 54 94 100 106 120 Westbound 615 615 679 750 914 391 391 432 477 581 Through Northbound Right 91 117 182 199 236 140 193 303 328 388 SOUTH DRIVEWAY Eastbound Left 13 13 13 13 4 4 4 4 Eastbound Right 15 15 15 15 39 39 39 39 Northbound Left 10 10 10 10 14 14 14 14 Northbound 315 348 384 468 330 364 402 490 Through Southbound 328 418 462 562 385 520 573 699 Through Southbound Right 11 11 11 11 18 18 18 18 CENTER DRIVEWAY Eastbound Left 10 10 10 10 14 14 14 14 Eastbound Right 84 84 84 84 130 130 130 130 Northbound Left 37 37 37 37 53 53 53 53 Northbound 291 306 321 355 281 295 310 343 Through Southbound 255 338 373 454 273 396 437 533 Through Southbound Right 41 41 41 41 66 66 66 66 11 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 VI. LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPUTATIONS Level of service computations were performed for the existing condition and future conditions for each of the intersections. Computations were for both, with and without. A roundabout on Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road and Old Pahoa Village Road. TABLE 8 LEVELS OF SERVICE AM PM Direction Exist Build 5 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Exist Build 5 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Out Out KAHAKAI BOULEVARD&OLD PAHOA VILLAGE ROAD(WITHOUT SIGNAL) Eastbound Left C D E F E F F F Eastbound Through B C C D D E C Eastbound Right B C C D C D E C Westbound Left B C D E F C D F F F Westbound Through B B C C C D E C Westbound Right A B B C C B C D E C Northbound Left A A A A A A A A Southbound Left A A A A A A A A A A Southbound Through A EB 16.5 21.9 25.6 42.6 23.7 78.2 199.1 1394 Approach Delay 11.3 WE 19.4 22.8 39.9 12.9 20.4 50.2 110.5 1125 15.3 EB C C D E C F F F Approach LOS B B WB C C C E C F F F KAHAKAI BOULEVARD&OLD PAHOA VILLAGE ROAD(WITH SIGNAL) Eastbound Left C C C C C C D D Eastbound Through C C C C C C D D Eastbound Right A A A A A A A A Westbound Left C C C C C C D D Westbound Through C C C C C C D D Westbound Right A A A A A A A A 12 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 AM PM Direction Exist Build 5 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Exist Build 5 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Out Out Northbound Left C C C C B B B B Northbound Through B B B B B B C C Northbound Right A A A A A A A A Southbound Left C D C C B C C C Southbound Through B B B C C C C C Southbound Right A A A A A A A A Intersection Delay 13.8 15.5 15.9 17.8 15.8 19.6 21.6 24.8 Intersection LOS B B B B B B C C KEAAU-PAHOA BYPASS&OLD PAHOA VILLAGE ROAD(WITHOUT ROUNDABOUT) Westbound Left A A A A A A A A A A Northbound Left F F F F F F F F F F Northbound Right B B B B B B B B B B Control Delay WB 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.8 9.1 8.4 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.8 Approach Delay NB 98.5 239.9 474.4 708.7 146.9 89.5 98.9 194.5 357 868.4 Approach LOS NB F F F F F F F F F F KEAAU-PAHOA BYPASS& OLD PAHOA VILLAGE ROAD(WITH ROUNDABOUT) Approach Delay EB - 7.94 8.70 9.69 12.80 - 8.10 8.82 9.85 12.93 Approach LOS EB - A A A B - A A A B Approach Delay WB - 7.36 7.44 8.18 10.13 - 6.60 6.48 7.00 8.43 Approach LOS WB - A A A B - A A A A Approach Delay NB - 8.58 8.52 9.67 13.00 - 9.27 8.44 10.21 14.50 Approach LOS NB - A A A B - A A B B Intersection Delay - 8.08 8.40 9.39 12.34 - 8.47 8.59 9.65 13.04 Intersection LOS - A A A B - A A A B MALAMA MARKET ROAD& OLD PAHOA VILLAGE ROAD(WITH ROUNDABOUT) Eastbound Left B C - - - C C - - - Eastbound Right B B B B B B B C C E 13 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 AM PM Direction Exist Build 5 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Exist Build 5 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Out Out ■ Northbound Through A A A A A A A A A A i Control Delay NB 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.1 8.0 8.0 7.8 7.9 8.0 Approach Delay EB 12.5 13.0 12.2 13.0 15.7 16.5 15.9 16.2 18.9 35.3 Approach LOS EB B B B B C C C C C E KAHAKAI BOULEVARD&KEAAU-PAHOA BYPASS(WITH ROUNDABOUT) i Northbound Right* B B B C C B B C C F Approach Delay 11.9 12.3 14.1 15.6 21.0 12.7 13.6 18.3 22.2 51.6 Approach LOS B B B C C B B C C F SOUTH DRIVEWAY(WITH SIGNAL LIGHT) t Eastbound Left B B B B B B B C Eastbound Right B B B B B B B C Northbound Left A A A A A A A A Control Delay EB 12.0 13.2 14.0 6.2 11.3 12.7 13.4 15.3 Control Delay NB 7.9 8.2 8.3 8.6 8.1 8.5 8.7 9.1 Approach Delay 12.0 12.3 14.0 16.2 11.3 12.7 13.4 15.3 Approach LOS B B B C B B B C CENTER DRIVEWAY(WITH SIGNAL LIGHT) Eastbound Left B B C C B C C C Eastbound Right B B B B B B B B Northbound Left A A A A A A A A Control Delay EB 13.6 14.8 15.6 17.5 14.5 16.5 17.5 20.1 Control Delay NB 7.9 8.1 8.2 8.5 8.1 8.4 8.5 8.9 Approach Delay 10.6 11.3 11.7 12.6 11.3 12.6 13.2 14.6 Approach LOS B B B B B B B B *For computing purposes, Kahakai Blvd is assumed to be northbound/southbound and Keaau-Pahoa Bypass,eastbound/westbound. 14 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 VII. DISCUSSION A. Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road and Old Pahoa Village Road From the traffic counts it was found that the level of service for Old Pahoa Village Road at the Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road is already at level of service"F". This,during peak hours, caused some backups past Malama Market Road, particularly in the morning. The State Department of Transportation (DOT) is taking mitigating measures to correct this problem immediately. It is understood that DOT will construct a roundabout for this location,and the design is completed. (a copy of the layout is included). Construction was scheduled to be completed by 2013, a year ahead of this project's buildout,however,DOT has slipped this to a later time. The project will coordinate with the DOT to confirm that the two projects will not be working in the roadways at the same time. With the roundabout in place, the levels of service can be expected to be no worse than `B" for all movements at this location. The queue for the AM Peak will be reduced from 11.70 vehicle lengths for the AM existing on Old Pahoa Village Road to 2.7 vehicle lengths on Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road eastbound and 2.1 vehicle lengths northbound on Old Pahoa Village Road twenty years out. The PM Peak situation should be much the same, 15.95 vehicle lengths northbound on Old Pahoa Village Road to 3.0 vehicle lengths. The geometry of the roundabout design appears to have queue space to meet this requirement. Currently Malama Market Road is adversely affected by the back up of traffic northbound at the Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road on Old Pahoa Village Road. The queue sometimes blocks the intersection at Malama Market Road. The existing condition is 11.70 vehicle lengths in the AM Peak and 15.95 vehicle lengths in the PM Peak. This situation will be mitigated by the construction of the roundabout at Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road and Old Pahoa Village Road. Also, current DOT thinking is for right- turn only from Malama Market Road onto Old Pahoa Village Road and no left turn from Old Pahoa Village Road to Malama Market. The worst case for the queue' occurs twenty years out in the PM Peak with three vehicle lengths. B. Malama Market Road and Old Pahoa Village Road As stated above, DOT will not allow a left-turn onto Old Pahoa Village Road from Malama Market Road, or from Old Pahoa Village Road to Malama Market Road. The Malama Market Road intersection is expected to have a level of service"B"to "C"through the twenty years for both AM and PM peaks with the eastbound right level of service being as low as"C" and"E"ten and twenty years out. This level of service "E" condition could change with a change in driving patterns over the next twenty years. 15 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 The queue eastbound has been computed to be 2.5 vehicle lengths for the AM Peak and 8.5 vehicle lengths in the PM Peak at twenty years. With right-turn only,there appears to be enough storage to accommodate these lengths as existing or in the roundabout design. C. Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road and Kahakai Boulevard The intersection of the Keaau-Pahoa Bypass and Kahakai Boulevard is basically a right turn in and right turn out intersection. Eastbound traffic exits right from the Bypass road to Kahakai Boulevard, and Kahakai Boulevard exits right onto the Bypass road to proceed eastbound. This intersection does not need any improvements for the twenty year period. The AM Peak level of service twenty years out has been computed to be a"C"with only 21.0 sec/veh approach delay. For the PM Peak the computed level of service is a"C"for ten years and an"F" for twenty years in the future with a 22.2 sec/veh approach delay for ten years and 51.6 sec/veh for twenty years. This drop in level of service can be attributed to the traffic from Malama Market Road right-turn only. In both cases,the queue length are 3.0 vehicle lengths for the AM Peak and 4.1 vehicle lengths for the PM. The geometry as now existing is adequate to accommodate these lengths. Level of service"C"is the worst case for any turning movements at this location. D. Old Pahoa Village Road and Kahakai Boulevard The intersection of Old Pahoa Village Road and Kahakai Boulevard is the principal intersection in this discussion. Initially (existing), it is a "T" intersection. The majority of the traffic to and from the project enters and exits through this intersection. The County has directed the developer to extend Kahakai Boulevard so that most of the traffic enters and exits the project along this new thoroughfare. The remaining traffic enters and exits from and to Old Pahoa Village Road south of this intersection. As is,the level of service for the intersection is good, with the lowest level of service of"C" in the afternoon, in the westbound left turning movement. The design for an intersection to serve the project has left turn lanes for each of the four directions. Southbound into the intersection,the design is for designated lanes for southbound left, southbound through and southbound right. For the other directions— westbound, eastbound and northbound, the through and right turn movements are shared with sufficient room for the right turn movement to store one vehicle to the side of the lane. Level of service calculations were performed for the buildout through twenty years, using a 2% growth factor, with the assumption that 25% of the generated traffic comes from the existing traffic. As such, the operating level of service for all movements meets the State criteria that all movements have a"D"or better level of service at buildout. 16 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 At twenty years out the approach level of service for the intersection will be"C"with a"D" for eastbound left and eastbound through for the PM peak. A signal warrant study was performed for this twenty year condition and three warrants were met for the twenty years.These are Warrant#1,Eight-hour Vehicular Volume, Warrant#2, Four-hour Vehicular Volume, and Warrant#3, Peak Hour. Appendix P contains the results of this warrant study. The data is divided into three parts— the warrant summary, the warrant volumes and the warrant report. Each shows the number of warrants met. The warrant summary describes the warrants and shows warrants met. The warrant volume report show major and minor volumes for the major street and minor street. The warrant report shows the data upon which the report was based. In the AM queuing varies from 1.45 vehicle lengths to 2.41 vehicle lengths in the eastbound direction from buildout to twenty years (worst case). In the PM, the eastbound queue varies from 0.98 vehicle lengths to 1.34 vehicle lengths. There is adequate storage for all movements. (See computer report for queue for all movements.) The Kahakai Boulevard/Old Pahoa Village Road intersection would include four crosswalks, allowing safe pedestrian access to the bus stops and nearby businesses. The west side of Old Pahoa Village Road, along the front of the project site, would have sidewalks in order to accommodate pedestrians. In other areas the project's roadway improvements would include paved shoulders, which would safely accommodate bicycles and pedestrians. Pedestrian ingress and egress to the site would be by using sidewalks that would be next to the vehicular access points. E. Center Driveway For the Center Driveway, it was assumed that left turn out (eastbound left) movements were minimal since it should be easier to exit by way of Kahakai Boulevard. At buildout during the AM peak hour,the level of service eastbound will be"B"and at twenty years,"C". The queue vehicle lengths were computed to be less than one for all movements. For the PM peak hour, the level of service and queue vehicle length is much the same"B"to"C"for level of service and still less than one vehicle length in the queue. Allowing eastbound left at this location does not adversely affect traffic movements at Old Pahoa Village Road and Kahakai Boulevard. F. South Driveway The South Driveway performs much like the Center Driveway. It has intersection level of service of"B"for both AM and PM peak hours throughout the twenty years being studied. Again queue lengths are less than one vehicle length. 17 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 VIII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS As stated above,the primary access to the project is through the Old Pahoa Village Road and Kahakai Boulevard intersection. Traffic enters and exits from three different directions through this intersection. The County has already made the requirement that Old Pahoa Village Road shall be widened along the project to accommodate turn lanes into and out of the project. The lane layouts,provided by Engineers Partners, for the intersection of Old Pahoa Village Road and Kahakai Boulevard is adequate to insure a level of service of "C" for the intersection for the AM peak through the twenty-year study period. For the PM peak the intersection level of service drops to "F" for the end of the twenty-year study period if no signal, or"C" with a signal. According to the signal warrant study, a signal at this location is warranted since three warrants are met. The lanes, as designed,have sufficient storage to satisfy queue requirements. With the construction of the roundabout at the Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road and Old Pahoa Village Road, a level of service of"B" can be maintained through the twenty-year study period. There is adequate queue available for all movements. At the Keaau-Pahoa Bypass Road and Kahakai Boulevard intersection, the "as-is" configuration will provide adequate service throughout the twenty-year study period. The latest design of the roundabout does not allow for a left turn onto Old Pahoa Village Road at Malama Market Road. This analysis has been included in the report. This traffic study concludes that the levels of service for the primary access to the project can be maintained at acceptable levels throughout the project in compliance with the concurrency requirements for development of the project,and in compliance with traffic analysis reports of the County of Hawaii Code Section 25-2-46. The level of service can also be maintained at the secondary and tertiary accesses. 18 of 18 REVISED 6/27/13 APPENDIX A LOCATION MAP, TAX MAP KEY MAP SITE PLAN, AND ROUNDABOUT DIAGRAM 6 H I WO,E NORTH lir KOH• A ( S /-" e HptK (AA KAWANA WM£ ,0 SOUTH KOHALA / \, / /' NORTH HILO 0 HAMAKUA f" _ _ - -s..-3 / I /' I 1 NORTH KONA / .� SOUTH HILO ►ilio • 7--------,____. K 4�UA / \ / \ / / \ / { \ / \ �` i- \ / `-- 130 ' \ PROJECT LOUTH/ J PUNA KONA / KAU 0 1 /t / / /- NAALEHU kWITCHER ENGINEERING LLP L , LOCATION MAP P.O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers Holualoa,HI 96725 Construction Managers (808)334-0322 o I •I J u , ! 4 _i.oI, i hi Iii V//f........_._._........_..f:„.........e...„..e._.„...„...„......:..j 4 ,....___________--------- ri Q S V . -- k.,..■? y �. it i , u ,NI _,-pI.. t j.-- I °i .4 t c 4- i ® Q Ytk e .� & r o 2 i t 1 e ki f e,h ad `� IS Z ■ a ,t re ate ' 2 RI ' '...-5 ' 1 + 1.:l'1' 1 -1 t - . 4 4. ;t1 r Vit .P.r `':.1 I 1 ...'t w 7. P r r �I:t 1pj}(� y♦ `Y ;iii ;• wi• •3 2 q� \�1 a .' r y,.+"X• , 2 it 1 • ...,u s it a • •+i •j.�'i. t ..6 \b 0 I II i1ii, Ai d % y.;i a ; ��' 3 $ R n N'. 1i f '� A. 0 9 / ,4 (( 1 ° _t, Q_=. 4; ' a . CYO I t „ at.ee '•s ° a+ s it Ir r `1 w , k ft 4'1=1-77y K;t,2. t t e ♦ _ h t �-� / .1 ° ' z '° _ i y a*Rrr� — t ? 2 r 2 I.all) i d 11 a ,µ,` IDS itilt V 1 �: \``r �_ F t i t i ' i'l. i 'IP}, i u "" E! x g• a W i :1--i$is - _ IL v` .t - '' .. I, . >,,1 !'=;;+r i-3L'::—�l7 fin- « - * # sa , • . r 1 ,st it, ,Fli g'"1 i 4.-,. . . . . , yl......, s.!.....;.,, :.; . ., •s. ' J--1/4. _ - - - - MOM - _ . _______--,.., •. = ..- — -- = 1/ .....,m,..m..,.oo amui,---........imaimai•■■■•••••"""""Iinilinual. - If —1•••■■••••■••mm.-°m■ .,.. 4c1i . . . . —itititim:iti# _....imiii.,........ 1,021xi.,.....,4000._ , Vie 7-1- ,,, ,,‘“,,,,,,,,,,v,\ \lINN,N11‘,N,l -a I I • 1 # \ WAI ,!, — -,,,,,,\\___ -- 7,-- I IIIIIIIIIIPA WI L, JII I _ _- \ \ \ I \ " .7_,.• . I - _ \ ,._,_p3 — \ ■., -1_,.._■•■ nj r, \ \ 1.za.z.,.,i,,:i IF vol 1 i, _ \ 1 : i Es PLId * II M 1 — \ - 5 )11 g1.4 e all: 0.4a — II Z , I < ._.) e -/4---- ' 111111111111111r i I wl- 1 4 JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIb r!--i , • , , , , g 01.111 ! 1.11111111111111 ,11HID ) 1 1, 111111111111111111 1111:11 .. . , 1 / 1 1 11111111111111/111 /1 /11/IIIIIIIIIIII 4 / ; .4 , / 1 6 a / ' • \ I . D . I i \ 44 \ l'Im \ ' 1.3 \ \ , \ ....4fz....4...444rL, - I" -', •=1 i ::77vos c..), / 0 2(s z 4 21■1 < r ' . ■ y r,. \ ‘ ti .‹ ?s•., 1 m \ >-' 1 \‘ L.,,, i-- a p e 1140 \ c) y, :0 i,-72., ,,,,,-f". ‘,/-• , i <c N •„: ■ 5: y i '\ W fle-05 „,3 .ziN 1 i max Hulas \ «.5 --.3.4ro— xma. li 1 1 . \\-:\:-\*.\\I '.‹ .41,..' :r°1('Iiiir',„,..... 1......:,'' ,1.....y- 1:1:1ii':1°-:---* 0) . .1 g ca 75.7". I 1 M r' 11 as al t ii,11 CL 0 ..e,.. #. 4.:,..... .c i s.':, :3 4. E o ca ) a. -,,,,„ ...._2 ' E l' 4 ' . o 2 4 a) Z 0 E ..\ / r ., #...............,.... = E 1... 1/ a) = 1 1 I ,......... ., .c ..c a) . .—E aac c cn>) -1...'5. t._.,-. c > IV et a: ..... X .> 0 ›,. .,\ I a) a) a) 0 J X CD e 0 0 0 CD "• i: t 1■..-1.- a> 7:1 = a, \ ,/ O 0 S\ \‘ '1 0 et 2 :;.= ' ", • 75. 0 a 0 tt " '' i '' i i I CU .0 co aol , ',1 —. c () O o 2 , t ,,I a) 0_ E 0 cc> co cll C I , 1 , CO 0 0 a) 0 > .c 0_ V ON* 1 t_,_. •F O m• C .r... CI) 0 • ..0 W 1 I •= "0 0 C 4.0 C C'i 0 CO 0 0 o : i I 0 CU IP 4".• ' I , 0 0 ..0 , : ,(•, ,,› 0 ° Co 1 1 ,.. APPENDIX B LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA AVERAGE TOTAL LEVEL OF EXPECTED DELAY TO DELAY (Seconds/Vehicle) SERVICE MINOR STREET TRAFFIC z 5 A Little or no delay 5.1 to 10.0 B Short traffic delays 10.1 to 20.0 C Average traffic delays 20.1 to 30.0 D Long traffic delays 30.1 to 45.0 E Very long traffic delays >45 F Extreme traffic delays Appendix B APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE KAHAKAI BLVD. & OLD PAHOA VILLAGE ROAD INTERSECTION, WITH AND WITHOUT SIGNAL AM & PM PEAK HOURS Two-Way stop Control rage 1 oI 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2033 Analysis Time Period PM 20YR Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRKPM201320YR East/West Street: Kahakai Blvd 'North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 93 228 137 337 499 113 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 93 228 137 337 499 113 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 _ — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 1 Configuration L TR L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 60 53 59 61 40 142 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 •1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 53 59 61 40 142 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay,Queue Length, and Level of Service _ pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR L TR (veh/h) 93 337 61 182 60 112 C (m) (veh/h) 977 1352 20 204 21 137 v/c 0.10 0.25 3.05 0.89 2.86 0.82 95%queue length 0.32 0.99 24.27 11.91 23.35 8.14 Control Delay(s/veh) 9.1 8.5 4126 119.9 3765 123.2 LOS A A F F F F pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 1125 1394 pproach LOS — -- F F Copyright©2010 University of Florida,At Rights Reserved HCS+>N Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 1:40 PM file•//CATlnrnrnPntc and SPttinac\WitrhPr Pnar T T P\T nral CPttincrc\TPmn\r Ole 1 CA.tmn (i/7n/')n1'2 Two-Way Stop Control rage i or I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2033 Analysis Time Period AM 20YR Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRKAM201320YR East/West Street: Kahakai Blvd North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 60 255 107 222 415 81 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 60 255 107 222 415 81 (veh/h) , Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 I 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T R L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 , Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 38 30 45 46 _ 20 72 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 38 30 45 46 20 72 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L _ TR Delay, Queue Length,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR L TR (veh/h) 60 222 46 92 38 75 C(m) (veh/h) 1078 1322 91 366 88 249 /c 0.06 0.17 0.51 0.25 0.43 0.30 95%queue length 0.18 0.60 2.73 1.00 2.10 1.27 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.5 8.3 83.3 18.1 76.1 25.7 LOS A A F C F D pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 39.9 42.6 pproach LOS -- -- E E Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 1:03 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\TemiD\u2k13C.tmp 6/20/2013 1 wo-Way Stop Control rage 1 or 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2023 Analysis Time Period PM 10YR Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRKPM201310YR EastNVest Street: Kahakai Blvd North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 93 172 104 274 406 113 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 93 172 104 274 406 113 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 1 Configuration L TR L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 60 53 59 49 40 115 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 53 59 49 40 115 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR L TR v (veh/h) 93 274 49 155 60 112 C (m) (veh/h) 1057 1417 53 272 56 207 /c 0.09 0.19 0.92 0.57 1.07 0.54 95%queue length 0.29 0.72 7.63 3.74 10.54 3.31 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.7 8.1 348.0 35.4 491.5 42.4 LOS A A F E F E •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- - 110.5 199.1 •pproach LOS - -- F F Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 1:38 PM file.//C•\flnenments and Seitinus\Witcher P.nrrr T,T.P\Local Settinlls\Temp\u2k1 54.tmn 6/20/2013 Two-Way Stop Control rage i 01 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2023 Analysis Time Period AM 10YR Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRKAM201310YR East/West Street: Kahakai Blvd North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 60 208 88 181 311 81 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 208 88 181 311 81 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - • - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 I 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T R L TR Upstream Signal _ 0 0 , Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 38 30 45 38 20 57 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 30 45 38 20 57 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized I 1 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L _ TR L TR Delay, Queue Length,and Level of Service•pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR L TR (veh/h) 60 181 38 77 38 75 C (m) (veh/h) 1178 1375 146 430 143 338 /c 0.05 0.13 0.26 0.18 0.27 0.22 95%queue length 0.16 0.45 1.04 0.65 1.06 0.85 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.2 8.0 38.3 15.2 39.2 18.7 LOS A A E C E C •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 22.8 25.6 •pproach LOS - -- C D Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 1:01 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k13C.tmp 6/20/2013 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period PM 5YR Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRKPM20135YR East/West Street: Kahakai Blvd North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 93 148 90 247 366 113 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 93 148 90 247 366 113 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 1 Configuration L TR L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 60 53 59 44 40 104 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 53 59 44 40 104 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized I I Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR L TR v(veh/h) 93 247 44 144 60 112 C (m) (veh/h) 1094 1446 72 307 79 245 v/c 0.09 0.17 0.61 0.47 0.76 0.46 95%queue length 0.28 0.62 3.72 2.57 5.86 2.44 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 8.0 126.3 27.0 164.5 31.9 LOS A A F D F D •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- - 50.2 78.2 •pproach LOS -- - F F Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 1:36 PM file://CATlncuments and Settings\Witrher F.nur T.T.P\T.nnal Settinp's\Temn\n7.k1 54 tmn h/70/7011 two-way 3f:op uoniroi 1 126,, 1 .,i 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period AM 5YR Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRKAM20135YR East/West Street: Kahakai Blvd North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 60 188 79 148 305 81 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 188 79 148 305 81 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T R L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound _ Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 38 30 45 34 20 51 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 30 45 34 20 51 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 _ Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR L TR (veh/h) 60 148 34 71 38 75 C (m) (veh/h) 1184 1398 176 461 173 376 /c 0.05 0.11 0.19 0.15 0.22 0.20 95%queue length 0.16 0.35 0.71 0.54 0.83 0.74 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.2 7.9 30.3 14.2 31.6 17.0 LOS A A D B D C •pproach Delay(s/veh) - - 19.4 21.9 •pproach LOS -- - C C Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 12:58 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k13C.tmp 6/20/2013 Iwo-way 6top Lontrot rage J. at TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year BUILD OUT Analysis Time Period PM BO Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRKPM2013BO East/West Street: Kahakai Blvd North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 93 126 77 138 244 113 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 93 126 77 138 244 113 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided . RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 1 Configuration L TR L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 60 53 59 40 40 93 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 53 59 40 40 93 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 I Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR L TR (veh/h) 93 138 40 133 60 112 C (m) (veh/h) 1213 1473 165 450 179 400 /c 0.08 0.09 0.24 0.30 0.34 0.28 95%queue length 0.25 0.31 0.95 1.25 1.48 1.16 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.2 7.7 33.8 16.3 35.2 17.5 LOS A A D C E C •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 20.4 23.7 •pproach LOS -- -- C C Copyright m 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 1:33 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher EnWr LT,P\Local Settings\Temn\u2k154.tmn 6/20/201'1 I wo-Way stop Control rage 1 ui TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year BUILD OUT Analysis Time Period AMBUILD OUT Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRKAM2013BO East/West Street: Kahakai Blvd North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 60 170 72 97 224 81 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 60 170 72 97 224 81 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 _ - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T R L TR Upstream Signal _ 0 _ 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 38 30 45 31 20 45 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 30 45 31 20 45 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR L TR (veh/h) 60 97 31 65 38 75 C(m) (veh/h) 1267 1420 258 539 253 480 /c 0.05 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.16 95%queue length 0.15 0.22 0.41 0.41 0.53 0.55 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.0 7.7 20.9 12.6 21.7 13.9 LOS A A C B C B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- - 15.3 16.5 •pproach LOS -- -- C C Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 12:56 PM file:1/C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k13C.tmp 6/20/2013 1 wo-Way stop Control rage 1 or 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2013 Analysis Time Period PM 2013 Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRKPM2013 East/West Street: Kahakai Blvd North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 211 125 148 264 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 211 125 148 264 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — _ -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal 0 _ 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 43 101 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 0 0 43 0 101 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length, and Level of Service _ •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 148 43 101 C (m) (veh/h) 1372 304 770 /c 0.11 0.14 0.13 95%queue length 0.36 0.49 0.45 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 18.8 10.4 LOS A C B •pproach Delay(s/veh) — -- 12.9 •pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+Trn Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 1:27 PM file://C•\T)ncnmentc and Settings\Witcher Rnpr T,T.P\Tncal Settings\Temn\u2k154.tmn 6/20/2013 Two-Way Stop Control 1 ay., ' "` TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2013 Analysis Time Period AM2013 Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRKAM2013 East/West Street: Kahakai Blvd North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 174 72 103 238 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 174 72 103 238 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — -- 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 _ 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 31 56 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 31 0 56 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length, and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 103 31 56 C (m) (veh/h) 1415 403 835 /c 0.07 0.08 0.07 95%queue length 0.24 0.25 0.22 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 14.7 9.6 LOS A B A •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 11.4 •pproach LOS — — B _ Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 12:51 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k13C.tmp 6/20/2013 --, W O f.' O 0 0 0 ° O co y - a�-D N O Q (Ni CO ° 1.- O N^ R oo '1y 0 MI O II 11 cA I- .- I- N N 0 N M Ni° O . C-) 0 crj (.9 rp N .O CO N N . O J ^ J N OO e O O M O N Z O O cs,i 0 ch O p p O N II II O ° O O 0 >-• c0 Q CC ^ Cr N 0 M rO N Z O M � II U 10 Q a) O fr «) C a) Z I- e- I- N O - nj N 0 O ° ° r) N 7 a) m p cD (-$g m � ^ .`c II II , Z ti N. --1 O I— ~ 0 >- U Z O oU O I— p N N O o J 1-- J �° N O M O M e 0 o r . E co N C N O ca, o _ co o co co O O II I�j ca @ ^ N O (Ni (Ni O ^ Z O Z N CC o a) o >-- C7 "'v U c � �� N a) a) N ca m = O o o O ° N iT)- = Q Q > F- �- I- N N o (L (V cV M NI (,.). ° eN-• O 0 6 ^ 01, 3 N `° a) o H I— o II u OJ e- -I c^.) N O N• N M cpj O n Z 0 0 >- N C a. ) 0) C o v) ce cc ^ 00 0 0 0 ° O cc cam) 0 N CV (Ni M ci O ,-- co)Z 0 W• Z ° OO ,a- to Cl) 11 II d ^ a" 0 >- m - m _ O N W f- ^ p N O C). °. ° O yy ^ N N 6 M 0 W O w p W J W M ^ H 'a s-, O N C J e- J M N OO Q. O O M O O N Z 0 G ^ N N ci e- A N ▪ II 11 cc co O . '- 0 >- a) °j ^ N CI bA F-- o C C/D Cl O � O Z c E ^ V CL QS .q. >; ^ > L O � m C Q 0 E o) ~ > 11 II -c V rte+ W c W co iii o a� ~ ca i- 111 co o a cm 3 0 U O C U o -o '13 J a C a) v N o 0 •y f- co = = a) Q 7 o sZ 0 L m > (a a E .o E f) E 0 c m w • I o) 0 °) C7 0 Q <O I >° Z > o a CL in W < D a � a a. m 2 0 - < .� N - - - a cn 4-+ O 0 N O i..i N o OD 0 O 1- rn Is O bA O 1r 0 O O O O Q fh N P•4 0 N O ,:t- 0) to 0) tt O r m ca m m O O 1- O C c w O O N C`') 0 0 N. O N. a' •- v O ui 0 N U O O N O O O O O O 1- O v- 0 0 O O 0) O Q O 1-: O O O O N 1- N et to O O (Ni m CO O O 1- O ti V) c N co o co O O co O JO g U c O 0 N O N N o f U ¢, h 5 cr) O 0 0 0 O 0 C 0 N 0 0 10 O °) O Q Z U O O o o -. x N O O O ¢, 1N- 0) to O cp 0 <t CO O 0 N O 1- N r' bA CO e- 0') O CO 00 v ti N U 4-0.1 O O N O (/) cV 0 O 0 O LO O 0 0 O 0) O Q O 1_ O O O a a O 0 CO in co o 6 O 0 O N 0 N U m 1, W O O N O N v U 0 ti L0 M O cO w O 0 N d N 1^ N U d c Et) t1D L O) a Q C/D 01 C LL ID N 0 a) co co >- > 0 > ,� TD ro co 3 0 m O T J 2 N co O 0 N O N 2- 0 J c 0 Q t o a 0 c0 U c O o O 0 U U O O l.L O N Q 0 N d lL c c C CL _a) rn c) L. C N 0 LL O (fl 0 Q n iti ..z C/D > OD 0 .G 0.. U J Q Q c 0 t4 z, Oy - c O O O M O O N Z O M N t: • • M e- M W O r N 7.+ o Cn f- e- b"- O O O O O N it II N O J J c) `\I O 0 . ") . O Z O -<- C r 0 CO O 1 o p p r et) O II II O H O O 0 >- to N p O O co O p Z O II M Q U N r ts. CO = t H C CD Cr>- Z 03 1 1- t- co N O co N co M O (-'CCD O M O V co co c .0 II 1I ', Z r � `m0U � I- 0 >- U L. -- 0 0 Q' Cr-) J e- �I 0)j N 4 N N M M 0 - Z O p 1S M 0) OQ. QZ03 1 Epp °' !t o 1-- co o a coo v s1, C6 C N tt N- cc O N O IL N c�i co t•y O Z O Z 11 II co E O a'0 y U' } pM) W C 0H V '� — x d i as p N up Q -) Q 1- ,- cv O a N N co M p .N-' O O M O Caq d ,z{ coe a) O H o CA O O O J e- J O O 0 M O N Z O U >a r N • • O W I d , a) 0.e 0 C.") I- ~ S 0 O O O 6 0 0 CC Cr 2 N 8 a. N N M o. O Z O O = M O = O O O E o) c a U) I II II d ) 0 )- m CO 1 CD W F- V- I-- frl N O [L N N CO M O e O O cvj V) CO O CO c`')w W H c J -.-. J O ty p a. C:). O M CD. o N o 0 5 (00 CO V 'o N a .- Z v T L 11 II 0 O N ~ O > a) `0 to _ I-. O O O oo c a) ON, m c 00L a) a `O ° in c O Q E P w II u 6 o m m coo C rn D o ,2 ca > y Q Cl) •� a) F. 0 > ~ r a) C w o p c o 15 m Ca ca C w o °' o 6 a. 3 0 v C c U o = a Q a) o p) •N F- a) 7 I a) Q = _O o o 0 4- > > Q a X - L 0 0 d 4- p a Q O R O p >, O J C >, a) .D U Z Q O L W O . 1 >, a) a) cu a) L a) > a) O 1- Y m O Q? C 0 -o i m` >, U Il a E E E N C C O C o) o a) 0 U o 76 w i33 o c io _ o = co o , 2 2 i x •E C a) (Cl (Cl co o c t E c co .=o (a a) rc 0 Q Q 0 F- > Z -) > W a (!) w Q 2 n. J IZ a m `2 IZ H 0 -1 Q J tz N 2 M a .-. 4.4 0 c N N h O O -O t- to N �' O O O O t7) O Q to O O 6 O m cd N a o N 0 N O u N 6 N. to dam'. O N U CO aa)i O O 1- O m at c ca 0 O O O O O Nt. O M N N cc; 10 O pp m O O .I- O t^ , O to o 0 N.-- to t- O O O Q 6 O O O 0 O N N pop' 0 O rn Co oi CO O O e- O 1- cO v, 0 u6 co co vt- o 0 00 .Is- - o•us c N O tJ •- O 0 O t; > P O N- to N- c U O O to p O p [c T W O O O M N C6 O O t0 N CO 1C0) N O N (.) tN-' 41 O 0 N O In pD O l'" 1- V 0 c0 O N d; I.0) N 0 t0 0 4 0 0 N O N 1D Td U O 0 0 to 0 at 0 a O O O O O O Q a . a co a co o 0 t6 O 00 Co 0' 0 to a0 0 o N 0 M N U °' . I, v U r e- N. O N O O "' M `- O v O Co C) m O 0 N O N w tap iz Q N V) 'o 'd LL M O C) fN Q) TD • C to Q''' >' 0 4)U y. RS ,- > d Q O tp 0 f73 O U co C O 0 O0 t O N Q O O ix N 2 co N u c C a a t c d 0 u. o m a s .«- a ai -0 > 0 D 0 _= a. O .� Q < _F. ,0 w a' T Tro N 0 O O c> O O N 0 N N CV �) T 2 e- 0 O CO 1.0 N ^, 0 CO m O II ii m H T I— p N O Q. N N cti 6 O O 0 M 0 Lt-) T M •- m p co m M n O O O o I-e - J 't N 0 Q. N N M • 0 N Z 0 0 VO a O O p N II II O• H o� O O O O O CD } co Cr T N O N N co M O Z O II v� cn U T r m = o IY in c g F- Z H T CO N O a. N N c`') M 0 _ O O M °� N et J O T co s II p Z co 0 cL O j , J T J ccoo N O N CV O O Z O O in Q 'LIO E O N C rt) M C]. o H _ p p a op d. 5i, N c�a CC v- CC O N o a c\i cV M M O 0 Z II II cti CNi 1- 0 a) Cp } (� O CO U T Nv . . C IT N a: O 0 vs N c Q -> co Q H T !� N N O q N M M p O 0 r A �• V N a) O H ~ H O O 11 II cn 0 J T J co N O cl. N N c') O O Z O Q > 0 `` v w 1 0 C M T f) O H T ct N 00 a O O M O O N Z 0 = 0 r; N N M T c,,) O 0 I 0 0 0 E a 0 a I I C) T CD >-- C) W H '- ti M N O N N o') en O O O C`\II (� bA CC C O N J T J of N 00 0_ O O 6 O O N Z O at3 tn et cC N N 6 T 7 L II 11 II° co ^ 3 0 cn CIO o C) Z 0 C cn '+ co O w a) N O II V "C:: `) a) a O \ O C — C7 0 E co 0 r v. plu n1 C1 a O H W II II t V O .� > C C C7 >- co to 0) (p Y 6��-+ l+ m ¢ C CO 'Q U O ` .0 '� w .0 Q CD r E ai F= C co �_ IY a CD co U m p • ns .E H W o O o -a C 0. U c.) 0 C U o o = w j a > Q 8 o a .2 ce s 0 2 d < 7 o o. 0 1) I] 't '� t4 o o _ T o C �+ 2 H .0 (. = o O I� a {� o a) -a o ff cp -- -- a E C a o in uaa °)o °� ° x '� c c $ = rn o °? C7 U c ca a) z o E C = LL o a� > W C Y Y y .� C m _ -o 0 ¢ ¢o i= >° z >° o a Cl- in w a a 1°� a a m n o Q co w m N a . 0 m N 0 O N N 0 O O LC) O o O O Q 00 O .- O O D O czt a o N f° o ,- 0)O O m a)a N v m r: m 0 O .- o a) C a) 0 0 O - 0 O O M O 0 0 N O ., N- n i co h 0 0 O 1- O 1- O O L0 O 0) O Q O O O O O " Co N ' to p O N co r CO O O •— O .— e_ F 0) v h N N-• 0 d O O o 0 0 N O (Ni N N U O N It O O O O O O N 0 o h O o) O Q O O O O .- N cn O PL. C M O c0 O O O ,- cO U m O O N O N bA O N Z o- O N 0 U O O N O N-: (NI a.) . C/3 .-.t Cd U c) o O O O h O 0 a 0 0 O O O O Q O e= O O O Cdr W W O to i� O pp 0) O d t(Oj co O O m 0 0 N O CV r N U (p W t■ a) -o U ,- O CO O CO O W 2 0 N `'- el; h N O ^ U y 0 0 N O ,- N d O: v) o 00 L m ..r iC Q N v b `o LL O ,-..vs N A' (1) N 0 N t T .Y 0 OJ 5 0 0 =•C U Q., Cl, o CO (P.' a p _j c o 0 0 a) O c o D i0 U U '�)ra +d' N O ro N LL N O O i (-% > O D O S d O J Q Q 41 ,-, w N H O O O O N O CI N N M O Z ) O V r -‘+ O CO 2 to O O O O O N II 11 U) I- r Ir CO N O 0- N N M 6 O O O M C9 >- to N M r CO co )� CO M "(t J r J tt• N O Q. • M t''> O N Z O 0 N O c. r p tJ O N to II p O• 4 p i- O O O O O ) ›- t0 __ r p N °' N N M th O 0 11 M Q 0 • Y- C1) CO 1 p IX N C g >. Z 1_ r N O IZ N N M vi O O O M °25 r v a) CO N -C11 II ;, co - v e ~ C9 >- U- jj O O > '� J O CO N O� Q (V CV M CO O e Z O O O r O) Zr)Q - ZN E M tc C a) h o ~ a O O O O O D.. r VI. SD. IP (X(00 N `� O N O N. N M M O `N�' Z O co 11 11 V, CO E _CO a) O � 0 >- O w '�.l T"'' N _ r r M C a) H , V) 1. to > O N N N M O O )• in E Q 4 Q e.- O d O r O S.y O H M -1 1- J V* N O Q. N N M M O CV O 7 >O Q. Nr o o cn as Tii Ce 0 fY r Cr 2 N O0 Q N CV M th O N Z O 0 C M O•I co O o E cr) co Lo Lo H H i r 0 ›- Cam) a W LIJ N N O 0 6 co 1- r I-- 2 N 0 O_ M tO CV O f bA 0 m M u W J W h r II t-. J r `I 2 N p0 a, O O M O O tV Z O o2$ ui R) r CV CV th r ` > —•c II II ca O 'z')c9 > Ts r 0 rn OA o t~ p O o o r.) Z E co M « N N 11 U 'C3 � O � N c Q 0 E E >11 � � y >+ o C O a) C I— W II II V ,, w m Q c o as y) Q N U a) to E u) as y 0 > c `� m m E '° c v m E n = m m U E o ° E c0 L t= 3 F w o 0 o o C Cz 3 U C o <Z N O N d o 'Ot .o:o co o p �, C T aa, a SD C9 2 a c O O -o p C as a) N E C = = Il '� 't= a) Ti W c .Y Y CO c co C fah C j a) 7 C) c 0,m .E O E tB O , i E t0 c b C a) a3 N as .0 E 3 R 'p C9 Q Q o I- > Z > ' a_ n. co w < D a. -J Cl_ Il CO a R o < N - - - - a en C o) O O O o i+i N N Q O N O co to 0; O O b0 O e- O O O rD c 0 g1-1 0 CV N CD Co O (o e- N N co io o M U N V m O O N O N- m c w O Co o1 t.... O G) O 0 "t N M O U 0 0 r o N 0 co O O N- Lo r O O O c O o) d Q O .-: O O O O N O O O C) os ) obi co 6 CO O O .1- O v" CJ) v, O co Co N O O co O o O O O � O � e- m C ; U CC S,r � + p O O h V O O O Q = W O O O O Cr) N i o Co_ co R, co co MOC) O O of cV CO O 0 N O N U Cl, bA O N g N• ti c: `n c'.i O N U O 0 N O C/)a) cO U 0 0 • 0 O ^ O O O O O Q a o O co bA M co wi to cd o rN, U o CO .°-- W O 0 N O `- N '0 U N O ai ▪ e— t- O N O Z O O N O 9 !~ i a) QC/) ca- v o LL al 17 A iii 0) u ca co 7 co = 0 T Y Q m A N .J Q O O 2 ` N p n D .J O o N 7 N Q U L O U - O L L 15 0 O co Fi fX N 0 ca N 119 O N 0 0 i o) N . o p a Q p j. N � U � C N U LL O t4 t1 d +' n C/) 5- 0 __ D C d U J Q Q S. U A - - - - - — - - rn 4- _ 7 O I— O O CO O ° N Cr r„, t' O N O a. N N ° NZ O 1.- c O CNI e- ti cp -,_t 0 O 11 CO I-- e- I` r N 0 O O c,.) O O (Ni O N CD } e- e- M e- N N c`i e- O ri m e- cp M O I- t- O O O O ° J e- -..1 c7) N O N N c`) „.: ° eN - Z o O cc co c ^O p O e- o') II p °• o () } (o `- °o (V ° a N N (7 c'-i ° N Z ° I I co 03 U ao c O o~ ›- Z i— e` N O N N (O CO N O C' N el. y CO v ct (0 m CO cp t II It �, Z N CO J co I— O 0 Q ..0 Q J e- J co N ° a N N M cj O ^ Z O = O N `_ O M co Q 2 °N E d. r) o F- O ° a iii ee- V. E E O C e` N a N N M ri ° eN Z ° Z II it 0-) W CC O o a'0 - } O e- W C UU) I— u� N i c0 co 2 O fn = Q Q F e- •♦• N N O a CV cV CI O ° ° ("i O 0. N 1 a) O H I— O 0 II 11 J J c`') N O 2 ° N M 0. O � Z O 0 `r 0 a co w _ C/) re O CCCr e- CC v N p O O CO O O oN Z 0 C 0 0 e- N N CO CO O = O O co . Lo a U) II 11 ) a U' >- d F O 0 a al I- e- Is OM N O Q N ° h O O � O O e- M Cl) b.°0 CO O o W J W M e- .O CC O N = .-C J e- J O N 00 a ° ° c`) O O cV Z O 05 h .v. +-■ e; N (V ri e- i t 11 II ct O co 0 aA 2c. .. O 4-. a) ° p Z c E ti U) QMC(y 3 a) 0 ar 11 .. C O - C Q 0 E t� L cd _ ( a E c 11J N 01 a O 0 } _ w C) O za S Q C ? O N LU Q e) a E co (1)) a) aa)) > `� «� >` to E t:C a V a 11 j o �j• E .0 -0 _1 Q .c N w o CO ° n = ate) Q = o 0 0 C 0 0 C 4O C E- > Q p C III. c cc t m O 6. a o O a 7 Q A ` O a) > J m a C7 2 O E C B O in U a a a� C� a .y x 3 rn v) C o) o a? C7 U jC ca a) - N 3 E c = S LL '� = 2 W a) - - N -- @ C c`a C j a) a) m . o o _ x "c a� ca ca c s E (a a m 6 4 0 Q Q O I- > z J > a a s (n w Q U a J a a m a a 1= a -I Q J w N - - a M .-, Occ°., N N Cf) O O O - tU N N y O O to p CA O Q co CCU O e- O O O N 0.1 0 N O 7 � Cy)CO O O c\' O CO m d N O CO m O O e- q 1 N W c N o O e!' O) a) O N O r tC) - LC) CO 0 ad U O 0 (Nt 6 ' N O CO O O O e- u) ',-- 0 0 O O o) O Q O e= O O O CO e- O N O r.-,CO C • : UC) e= O Lri CO eN-. m O O '- O e' w c N CO o) er 0 N 00 ^ OJ c O U c O CJ N O r` N O Co h m 5 o O O O 0 O O C S W O 6 O O O O Q W x N Cn O • A.O C") O CO O• 0 � Co m N 0 0 O e` N bA 0 et ' e- O 1‘, 0 ^ . N e- .1: O nj 0 U a)O N J N V) Cd C.) O O 0 0 O N O a O O e- O O O O O Q - W O O CA C-0 0 0 0 N cm t O N U cc; W,ri O O N O ^ •r- a) U e- O t- O Ih O d: Z O 0 N O to N O� N U a) cn m b!1 t 0 d y Q a at o u_ Cn N CO cTC at ,... >, — 0 T OJ f6 0 0 j U fo ' @ N 0 oo 0 a) O Co 0 Ws C 6O 0 o �L ) 0 Cv Q P4 lb' c U O (� 2 2 N 0 Co 2 u- c c 1 CZ N % N O a..4 > O D c U Q Q - v M 7 N O N .-.4 CC e- IX r N O Q. M ° NZ O 0)r N M N-. M O 1' N c CO V -1.4 O CO 1 7 ° N ° O ° II 11 CO I- e- I• N O a c�i M c ° N o c j 0 › I CO CO 0) CI) r- to J N N O e- .1 N ° M M O Z ° e} M N N' O 1s- O O p p N (0 . 11 it o•} 00 I- O ° M IY ti O N O N N M O ° Z fl of '':L 0 ° O � Lo E, g >.. O Z H .- ^ N O Cl. CV N M M ° N ° b_- a CO Oi Q 0 .c It II C)• Z — O j mO ~ 0 >. 0 cL Y 0 O J C) N o a co c,.; c\i Z O O ' J r co M M O O cp Q Q O 4 Q 2 N E 10 o ~ O ° O a_ NNt. R N C[ a NN- N ° a N N M c). O N Z ° CO I I 11 M c a) Z CO O O a0 (7 >- ^ M C °fl- -- N L a) cA O CD a) °- - I- O O a N N °) cri ° ° C)Cl) Q Q O a) o H H ° p II II v) C- J .- J 0. N 0 a N N M (h ° Z O 0 >- 0 Q v- ti W o )X ° ►+ o 0 o o V Z o N ° M o c c o 4 N V 0) O M • u') I o o p to U) II u S- a .-.1 0 >- .P1-3 W co 1=- r- I- N O O O O ° N 0 a ti a N N co 0) ° ti ° o M in bA O CO M W J W ' t- J e- J O N O (1 N N M M p N Z O d. CO �- � ' L 11 11 co O co r3 ~ U > a) `° 0 OA O w N O o c C) Z a E C Oo A N C Q W .c V T 0 m � a. c a > o - 0 >- =• a a) '-' a)a) o E ai a a) a�ci > t° w �' U CO n. �, E a3 c m E a °"'i co co a 3 o • H c r c 1= W c O a� O a c O. o U E II J Q L a) ) »- 0 a) •y H a 5 I a) Q c o 0 O sa c o f .o o o > Q o c c a C� 2 cn n 0 O u. 5 (� a� -o J o a� -- -- a c 'n L N >a a. °'a O °' °' a c m W 'm CO c ° 5 c 0) g °? C� U 5 u)C co co O N 5 E c c = u- T-1,„ c_o a) 'C '= -3 c Y C as •c = 3 C 4) c C3)O .- co O o I C. .. X • C a) N ca co 5 .c E 5 as 13 co N -� 0 Q Q O I- > Z J > 0- 0. fn W Q 0 a J a a to 2.�Cl I- 0 J < J N - - g M (4-IO a O N N N. O O o e- t0j t- c' O y 0 0 O O 0) O Q c0 ,- On O O O O h i o a 0 tg O N CO ccoo ()) p j CO two 0 0 U N U U m d d N 0 r , `) c a) 0 0 to a - 0 eh 0 CO • Cn d to cV O c\i 0 d d N O N co � o O co r to r O o kn d rn o Q d d o 0 o r` o 0) 0N') 0 ti o N U ter-' CO O O N O CO v, tO MN c0 o 0o O o oD r m C Eli O O r O r 0 j h 0 0 0 r v- 0 ID, U 0 d O O O O Q = M Lti N an 0 O 0 a, O Nt o to to r n oo 0 v p oi CO o d an o r 4/. On 0 0 ,. c0 N. CO t If CO o p d d 01 d r y up U co o O O o O Lo ---a O O O Q d 1,-:. 0 d O O r c0 bn O� O• d M O r en yy N m U t[) co er co '. co - u 3 0 o M c r `� ur bn t k a) Q C4 01 7:1 O O co co LL a) U Oy @ a O f °) C T ❑ to o o�- m a a 0 o 0 co ❑ a C o ❑ p C L N Q O V U U 0 124 co E E of U' o co y r + CC N N N V- C C Q Q _� .T O o E N U LL o to a d a > CD ❑ ❑ E LL U J Q Q 5 U M O "D }- 0 O c\i O O 0 N Cs e• T N O 0, co M O Z O 0 r F CO o N e- c co ■. ,y O CO 1 e O 0 II II O N (n I- e- Is e- N 0 0 N M (i O N O U >- o co -cr. e- m - (D co V' (0 co .•. J J N N 0 0. (V . M ("• O Z 0 o 0 N O p O N (M') II II O O O o O U } (00 z X e- Cr O N cp 0_ N N M m. O Z 0 II h M U o Lo QQ L C7 0 CL o a)am O N 0 e- J>-- Z I- e-- I" L() N 0_ M O N- O (i N e* LO co N C y W s II II j, Z N ((00 O S Q J e- J N 00 0. O O co O o N Z O up _ M (0 M M CL Q T N E NI. m e, a,E o C N .- T N O Q N N M M p (V Z 0 Z � II N 01 W L ° N CO 0 >- I� 1.0 w C a) H - (n N (n co o 7 O Cl) ° H - I- N o N O P.n Q Q V N (> O t ,a- N e- N O H O p CC I- J e-- J (I N O 0. N (Ni r,) N o c\i Z O U � N. 0 OD CL d' ti a) W= 'V) CL 0 r O O O O c U 0 d N 0 CV CV co (`7 O r Z O M O = (y 0 = O O o E 7 to co U) II II d . (1. U } y o a W I=- ti I- Mo N o 0. N N M N o N o O M br) wo 2 Z °) X C .4 J 0 °S .- (�e- J co M N co O (' O N 0 try' C V e` N N CO r ` ,_' L II II (4 0 N. H0 > o M 3 OD o •E..� L O o c a L) Z C E "_ V -0 0 (,-) (j 7 N O a0 II O \ N C Q 0 a) E (O � ` = ai .- a) c F= W II II v V .� O m � (moo Q c a o - (Ca ,0 >- (n Q. a) -5 a) a E to ai a) a) > N c >, m F m E o Cl) C) c� c 1.3 as 3 w U o a -J a a) N o a) •y E- c = = a) Q O o n 0 Q c o 'a°i .� d o o a > v o a�Ci = a d ° o y i in 0 a a a) 0 a) a) . '(n x Y > °) 0) ° = c rn 0 C7 v U U d �, (� .o E ° E c c io W m c c C C as �.0. O 3 E _ = = LL +=• �" .O+ .> = "0 C •y SC co E- N C (`6 C o N 3 a1 c 0) (6 .� O c as 0 c 2 c r X L- C Cl) O (6 co 7 - L L- o (o '0 co .-9i 4 U' < < C I= > Z J > a a. co W Q D Q. J n. CL m 2 [1 H J Q J 4, N a 0 O o N N to O O O r O r O O O Q bA O O O O d -. co N CL. _N 0 aJ Q) CO N M 16 10 a O N U N U CO m O O r d r a) c a) CD to 0)) O o O o° c0 r U O O N O r �N') O r In r O O 0 O O ° O Q O O O d co co r) o O O N r) cv) d: Lo O cro m v m O O r O co d. o Oco o) e 0 N 0 . o 0 U c H O O N O ' N- O a) a) f L } $ 0 45 CO O o 0 .- cq r c t) O O O O O o, O Q = W O .= O O O N U) O 0 S, .—M0 ui C O N U O m f: O O N O r v„ bQ O O O O co O 0 O O N O `� ._ N U C) C/J cd 0 0 O 0 0 to 0 0 M O O O O 0) O Q a O r O O O W O O N b0.0 O) 0O O O N 0 0 N U W O O N O r co a) a)0 CO o ao 00 ,,c,„c, Z j r N r xi. L() N N (,) w O O N O T a) t ca D •V Q ) a a) .b D O g LL O N�+ "0 z,Tii 0) CC co f0 > Cy” ° ,c a) O m co a) 0 O 0 0 C14 = 0 ) O c) C 0ICI 0) j o a) O w C N o O U U U LL m L r N 4 .) li C N Q O. %O U zt C N U u.. 0 co Q d - a a) � O D o E U ¢ ¢ 5 , Co N O .--o - N Z c O O W c0 .4 o cO O 11 it en 1=- .- 1- v N o a c,i N `n M O O o M 0 > m o c i en a N N M 0 J .- J 0 N 0 4 CO 0 .N' Z 0 O 0) !t VO cep O O O tl II O o CD 0 >" CO `� it M N O Q M j OZ O N..- N N . II t\ cn CO to Q 0 I- OS 0 M 0) y C� >.. Z 1- r 1• N N O t N N M M O .N- O O i N er y a0 n co L 11 It 1, Z N 10 j � 0 I- C.D >- 0 Ojj� I- p o > J .- J OMi N O N N CO M o o Z 0 V- Q •-- Q Mp O to a. Q Z N E t- a) O 1 - N 0 0 0- N �t Q.. -/ L M me- O Z O 5[,C • • Z I I it N M E c a (.9 >- O o o. g ~ r M NU .0 IT y,c f0 co � / CV H - - N N 0 O M. _ O 6 N O Sao r o c Q ) Q CO O r, 5., •- ) , p O p II II 0 CC J `I ." O Q. co o Z 0 >- co O N N M ^ cO n. W C/) CG O co co o Ce ct N O 0_ • CV CO of O .N- Z O co O c c+� o 2 o 0 0 i n 0 U) II It d a,• CD >- co , a O W 1- ti I- ti N O el CO V N O M c* o o 0 N r'i 0 dA M O W-J CO O J .- J (00 N O CD 0 0 O CO O O N Z 0 a2S RS CV N M .- 7L c M 3 .0 H II c o M H 0 Q O e- • ro O O +C a) Z c E 0 v) M 3 ai a7 o II V 0 2 0 a op E p_ co w. ` cot O W N C Q N E cm 1- w 11 Il . tJ «�-+ W � � � _c d o Y c 0 >- us 0 ;? �' CO � 0 Q N 0 a) tiO co E to co N a) a > co �. 10 Ip a) 5 E - - C Ti f6 E d 7 N t0 V X f6 L • 0 H _ H W o p o c C a 3 U v ti p o E ca :c O ,.. c� " -p J d -C N U y p a) •� f- c6 O = d Q 3 _0 sZ O P o f 'c ` a >, - o T c. a�ci o_ 0 2 a ° W o L To a s E E c w m c c m rn ° a' 0 U_ o c as aci - E c c 2 tL a� ) ` w c Y Y N 5 m •F c C c c d c m(t1 O = a3 O o = 2 +. X i C a) mks to .c 7 cC -0 co N 0 < Q o f- > Z J > o a d C1) W Q D d J d n. m M a. F- 0 -1 < J N d 1-4 ,, O C O N, N N I4 O O O e— LO e- in a) O O h O O) O Q r) bO O .= 6 O O CC N a 0 N `a O n CO 0 LO O U u U N U O o N o M m C C a) (7 O N. (0 O 0 <• O 0) N. Cr) N Qj O .— 0 d d N O - M O 0) O 0 O '— to 1— O O O d 0) d Q O .- O O O .— O of 0 N O , . V M N N O N 0 m O O N O r' CO v u) .N— C) � � 0 O h d d .v- O O v- m QC U 0) 2 f1. i + " 0 0) O O •" r C x O O O O 0) O Q W O .= O O O c'r1 .S: N cn O O .- - .- O Oj O L0 06 O Q Oi CO O O M O v- OA Co co `CT O O t0 +4—' O a) O o Lt j o C/) cci U O er O O O to O Cn O Q O .= O O O 0-+ ■-� o co OD co in O M U N• p C.4 W 0 0 co O ^ M y,a N -o U +' ° °Cp. y 3 ta u) b�.y L 0 oL •.--1 ci) ni .b s cci LL cn O i-+ -D ' . a) t6 Co co 0 O m N 0 4.., �, •14 (n U O 0 0 - N 0. O OJ 0 CO Q N U ++ O N t c - U, E CO O` 2 2 N r o U C d ... U t1 o Cp a a a .4 > 0 n 0 _ tl O J Q < C V t}, APPENDIX D LEVEL OF SERVICE KEAAU-PAHOA BYPASS RD. & OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AM & PM PEAK HOURS TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 12/3/12 Analysis Year Build Out Analysis Time Period AM Build Out Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBPOPVAMBO East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 412 278 154 450 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 412 278 154 450 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 200 50 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 200 0 50 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration ' L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v(veh/h) 154 200 50 C (m) (veh/h) 1158 186 644 v/c 0.13 1.08 0.08 95%queue length 0.46 21.17 0.25 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.6 297.2 11.1 LOS A F B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 239.9 ■pproach LOS -- -- F Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved NCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/3/2012 10:45 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Emu LLP\Local Settings\Tema\u2kBF.tn1n 12/3/2012 .L VYV- VT C1.J VLVp �V1141V1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 12/3/12 Analysis Year Build Out Analysis Time Period PM Build Out Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBPOPVPMBO East/West Street: Keaau-Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 391 334 124 303 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 391 334 124 303 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 _ — — 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal _ 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 250 99 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 250 0 99 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v(veh/h) 124 250 99 C (m) (veh/h) 1179 263 662 v/c 0.11 0.95 0.15 95%queue length 0.35 16.39 0.53 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 133.6 11.4 LOS A F B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 98.9 •pproach LOS — -- F Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/3/2012 11:16 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2kD8.tmp 12/3/2012 -- TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 9/8/20L1 I Z/3//Z Analysis Year 5 YR Analysis Time Period AM 5YR Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBPOPVAM5Y East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street _ Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 433 307 162 493 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 433 307 162 493 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L I T R L T R olume (veh/h) 210 53 _ Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 210 0 53 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles I 0 I 0 1 0 0 I 0 I 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service _ pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (veh/h) 162 210 53 C (m) (veh/h) 1137 166 627 /c 0.14 1.27 0.08 95%queue length 0.50 31.88 0.28 Control Delay (s/veh) • 8.7 591.3 11.3 LOS A F B pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 474.4 pproach LOS -- — F Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/3/2012 10:50 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Rnar T.T.P\Local Settings\Temn\uO.kC.S tmn 19./1/7.017. .1. YY V-YY a.y 01-Up 1..V114.1.V1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed -9//.2011 /2/31/'L.. Analysis Year 5YR Analysis Time Period PM 5YR Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBPOPVPM5Y East/West Street: Keaau-Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 411 351 130 318 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 411 351 130 318 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L • T R L T R olume(veh/h) 263 104 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 263 0 104 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (veh/h) 130 263 104 C (m) (veh/h) 1159 245 645 v/c 0.11 1.07 0.16 95% queue length 0.38 24.87 0.58 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.5 266.8 11.7 LOS A F B pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 194.5 pproach LOS — — F Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/3/2012 11:08 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2kDC.tmp 12/3/2012 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 12/3/12 Analysis Year 10YR Analysis Time Period AM 10YR Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBPOPVAMIOY East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 _ 2 _ 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 455 339 170 497 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 455 339 170 497 0 (veh/h) _ , Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 _ 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 221 55 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 221 0 55 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service •pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 170 221 55 C (m) (veh/h) 1116 154 609 /c 0.15 1.44 0.09 95%queue length 0.54 41.49 0.30 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 882.2 11.5 LOS A F B pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 708.7 •pproach LOS -- -- F Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+n+ Version 5.6 Generated: 12/3/2012 10:53 AM 1 YYU- YY ay Uo-Ip VU11ILUi -a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 12/3/12 Analysis Year 10YR Analysis Time Period PM 10YR Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBPOPVPMIOY East/West Street: Keaau-Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 432 369 137 335 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 432 369 137 335 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 276 109 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 276 0 109 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized • 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service•pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v(veh/h) 137 276 109 C (m) (veh/h) 1138 226 628 v/c 0.12 1.22 0.17 95%queue length 0.41 36.38 0.63 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 493.3 11.9 LOS A F B Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 357.0 •pproach LOS — -- F Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/3/2012 11:12 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2kE0.tmp 12/3/2012 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 12/3/12 Analysis Year 20YR Analysis Time Period AM 20YR Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBPOPVAM20Y EastM/est Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 503 339 188 549 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 503 339 188 549 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal _ 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 244 61 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 244 0 61 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length,and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R - (veh/h) 188 244 61 C (m) (veh/h) 1072 124 573 lc 0.18 1.97 0.11 95%queue length 0.64 65.58 0.36 Control Delay(s/veh) 9.1 1833 12.0 LOS A F B pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 1469 •pproach LOS -- — F Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/3/2012 10:59 AM fi1es•//0•\Tlr.nnmantc and Cattinac\Wit-1, .r Prior T T P\T.nral CettinaC\Tevnn\tt"kfn trnn 17./1/7.0 17 J.wv-vv ay �wp�.vuuvi ••s• , TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 12/3/12 Analysis Year 20YR Analysis Time Period PM 20YR Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBPOPVPM20Y East/VVest Street: Keaau-Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 477 408 157 370 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 477 408 157 370 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 305 121 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 305 0 121 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v(veh/h) 157 305 121 C (m) (veh/h) 1096 187 592 v/c 0.14 1.63 0.20 95%queue length 0.50 65.94 0.77 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.8 1208 12.6 LOS A F B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 868.4 •pproach LOS — — F Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 12/3/2012 11:14 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2kE6.tmp 12/3/2012 APPENDIX E LEVEL OF SERVICE MALAMA MARKET RD. & OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AM & PM PEAK HOURS 1 wo-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2013 Analysis Time Period AM2-01-1 Z 6 r 3 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WOPVMMAM2013 East/West Street: Malama Mkt North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 76 154 249 161 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 76 154 0 0 249 161 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 101 99 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 101 0 99 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 1 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 76 101 99 C (m) (veh/h) 1328 468 795 /c 0.06 0.22 0.12 95% queue length 0.18 0.82 0.43 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 14.8 10.2 LOS A B B pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 12.5 pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 10:48 AM file•//P.\Tlnrnmpntc anti CP1-tinac\WTitr1i r Pnrrr T T P\T oral Cattinrtc\Tama\11')1.A 7 1-,-,,,, 4 nn/')n 1 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2013 Analysis Time Period PM2013 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WOPVMMPM2013 East/West Street: Malama Mkt North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 134 178 232 193 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 134 178 0 0 232 193 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 171 164 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 171 0 164 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 1 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v(veh/h) 134 171 164 C(m) (veh/h) 1348 379 812 /c 0.10 0.45 0.20 95% queue length 0.33 2.41 0.76 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.0 22.2 10.6 LOS A C B pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 16.5 pproach LOS -- -- C Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM+ Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 11:11 AM file•//C.•\flonnmetnts and Settings\Witcher Rngr T.T.P\T,ocal Settings\Temp\u2kRA.tmn 6/20/2013 Two-Way Stop Control rage 1 01 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year BUILD OUT Analysis Time Period AM2044 Z co G3 Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WOPVMMAM2013B0 East/West Street: Ma lama Mkt North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 80 178 274 161 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 80 178 0 0 274 161 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized I I Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 101 114 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 101 0 114 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 1 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 80 101 114 C (m) (veh/h) 1301 432 770 /c 0.06 0.23 0.15 95% queue length 0.20 0.91 0.52 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 15.9 10.5 LOS A C B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 13.0 •pproach LOS — -- B Copyright m 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 10:51 AM .gi.•/Irm-1nniimor,tn onr+` Ca1-14n"0\1174,1— r Pnry,T T D\T nno] Co1-1.innn\Tomrt11171i Al trnn .N7n/7n12 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year BUILD OUT Analysis Time Period PM2013 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WOPVMMPM2013B0 East/West Street: Malama Mkt North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 121 160 269 193 , Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 121 160 0 0 269 193 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — _ — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 r Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal ( 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 171 225 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 171 0 225 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach I N ( 1 N I Storage 0 1 0 RT Channelized 0 1 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L I R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 121 171 225 C (m)(veh/h) 1306 386 775 /c 0.09 0.44 0.29 95%queue length 0.31 2.34 1.22 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.0 21.7 11.5 LOS A C B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- — 15.9 •pproach LOS -- — C Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.6 Generated: 6/20/2013 11:14 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Tema\u2kBA.tmn 6/20/2013 Two-Way Stop Control rage I or 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period AM2 4 t evr Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WOPVM MAM20135Y East/West Street: Matama Mkt North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 0 282 312 176 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 282 0 0 312 176 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 _ — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided ' RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 236 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 236 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 1 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L R (veh/h) 0 236 C (m) (veh/h) 1260 733 lc 0.00 0.32 95%queue length 0.00 1.42 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 12.2 LOS A B •pproach Delay(s/veh) — — 12.2 •pproach LOS — — B Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/27/2013 12:16 PM files•//('•\Tlnriimpntc and CPitinrrc\Witnhpr Friar T T P\T nasal CPttinac\TPmn\ii')1,1A. tmn 4/77/7(111 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period PM2018 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WOPVMMPM20135YR East/West Street: Malama Mid North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 0 314 293 213 i Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 314 0 0 293 213 (veh/h) i Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized I 1 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 r Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R r olume (veh/h) 431 r Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR r (veh/h) 0 0 431 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 1 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L R (veh/h) 0 431 C (m) (veh/h) 1280 751 r /c 0.00 0.57 95%queue length 0.00 3.94 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.8 16.2 LOS A _ C •pproach Delay(s/veh) — — 16.2 •pproach LOS -- -- C Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/27/2013 12:26 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Eno-LLP\Local Settings\Tema\u2k25.tmn 6/27/2013 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6121/13 Analysis Year 2023 Analysis Time Period AM2023 Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WOPVMMAM201310Y East/West Street: Malama Mkt North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 0 309 340 196 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 309 0 0 340 196 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R r olume(veh/h) 259 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 259 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 1 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L R (veh/h) 0 259 C (m) (veh/h) 1230 707 /c 0.00 0.37 95%queue length 0.00 1.72 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 13.0 LOS A B pproach Delay(s/veh) - -- 13.0 •pproach LOS - -- B Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/27/2013 12:17 PM .:1. •11/'.1T1...,,,.......-4-, .....A CO-++:«...,1 IIT: .,1.....-c -...T T T)\T ......1 o.,4+:.......,\m..........\..71.1 T) 4-.....- LP-VI/n/111 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2023 Analysis Time Period PM2023 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WOPVMMPM20135YR East/West Street: Malama Mid North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 0 320 320 235 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 320 0 0 320 235 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — _ — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized I I Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 1, olume (veh/h) 469 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 469 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 1 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 . Configuration R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L R (veh/h) 0 469 C (m) (veh/h) 1251 725 /c 0.00 0.65 95%queue length 0.00 5.28 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 18.9 LOS A C pproach Delay(s/veh) — -- 18.9 pproach LOS — -- C Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/27/2013 12:27 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Tema\u2k29.tmn 6/27/2013 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2033 Analysis Time Period AM2033 Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WOPVMMAM201320Y EastNVest Street: Ma/ama Mkt North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R ' olume(veh/h) 0 370 407 239 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 370 0 0 407 239 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R { olume (veh/h) 312 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 312 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 _ 1 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L R (veh/h) 0 312 C (m) (veh/h) 1163 _ 648 /c 0.00 0.48 95%queue length 0.00 2.74 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.1 15.7 LOS A C •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 15.7 •pproach LOS -- — C Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/27/2013 12:18 PM f:1o•//0.\T",",,,,,-,o,.,+„ .,,,l1 eo4+:,,,.,.1vir:+„1.,"«r„.+.. T T U\T ..,,.,1 0,-.++:.,,,,\T---1..'11.'11 +....... GP1'7/7ill n Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2033 Analysis Time Period PM2033 Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WOPVMMPM201320YR t, East/West Street: Malama Mkt North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 0 432 382 287 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 432 0 0 382 287 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 1 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 559 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 0 559 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 1 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay,Queue Length, and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L R (veh/h) 0 559 C (m) (veh/h) 1188 670 /c 0.00 0.83 95%queue length 0.00 12.36 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.0 35.3 LOS A E •pproach Delay(s/veh) — _ — 35.3 •pproach LOS -- -- E Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/27/2013 12:28 PM file•//C.•\Tlnrmmmpntc and Bettina\Witcher Rnar T.T.P1T.nral Rettinas\Temp\u2k2ftmn 6/27/2013 APPENDIX F LEVEL OF SERVICE KAHAKAI BLVD. & KEAAU-PAHOA BYPASS RD. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AM & PM PEAK HOURS 1 wo-Way Stop Control rage 1 or 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2013 Analysis Time Period AM2013 Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBRKAM2013 East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Kahakai Blvd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 451 37 615 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 451 37 0 615 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided ' RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 91 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 91 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 91 C (m) (veh/h) 613 /c . 0.15 95%queue length _ Control Delay(s/veh) 11.9 LOS B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- — 11.9 •pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 9:45 AM f 1a•//r•\Tlnn»mar,+c on.-1 Cal-tinrto\«/i+nl-iar hir,`rr T T 13\T nno1 Cc1-1-ir"no\Tcmr,\1171,07 +,•.r hill/7r11 Z Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2013 Analysis Time Period PM 2013 Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBRKPM2013 East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass (North/South Street: Kahakai Blvd intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 455 54 391 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 455 54 0 391 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided ` RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 onfiguration T R T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R plume(veh/h) 140 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 0 140 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 140 C (m) (veh/h) 609 /c 0.23 95%queue length 0.89 Control Delay(s/veh) 12.7 LOS B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- — 12.7 •pproach LOS -- -- 8 Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM+ Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 10:21 AM file•//C'•\Tlncnments and Settinac\Witcher Rnar T,T,P\T,nca1 Settings\Temp\u2k104.tmn 6/21/2013 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year BUILD OUT Analysis Time Period AM BO Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBRKAM201380 East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass (North/South Street: Kahakai Blvd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 451 37 615 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 451 37 0 615 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 117 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 0 117 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 117 C (m) (veh/h) 613 /c 0.19 95%queue length 0.71 Control Delay(s/veh) 12.3 LOS B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 12.3 •pproach LOS -- — B Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+tee Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 9:45 AM fi7__//!�,\T__________i_ ___J Ct_. ____\�T7_. _1___. T'__�_ TT Tl\T _ __7 ("1_�.i• _ _l T_ \ A7.A/ . /Int /—nfin Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year BUILD OUT Analysis Time Period PM BO Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBRKPM2013BO East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Kahakai Blvd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 455 94 391 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 455 94 0 391 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 193 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 193 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay,Queue Length, and Level of Service •pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 193 C(m) (veh/h) 609 /c 0.32 95%queue length 1.38 Control Delay(s/veh) 13.6 LOS B •pproach Delay(s/veh) — — 13.6 •pproach LOS — — B Copyright G 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+r'^ Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 10:23 AM files•//rArinrnmpnte and Qattinnc\«Titrhpr Pr tar T T P\T nral RPttinrte\Tpmn\»')1,1(1d tmn (,/11/')f111 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period AM2018 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBRKAM2013Y5 East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Kahakai Blvd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 497 61 679 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 497 61 0 679 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal 0 _ 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ( olume(veh/h) 182 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 0 182 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 182 C(m) (veh/h) 577 /c 0.32 95%queue length 1.37 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.1 LOS B •pproach Delay (s/veh) -- — 14.1 •pproach LOS — — B Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 10:05 AM ("7_ /1", %TN_ _. i_ _ _� Cl_u'____\TT 7'1_7__.. T.__._. T T TI\T ___1 [7_a..'__�_\T______\__'17_T`T L__.- e/-1 /-1!11'1 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period PM 2018 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBRKPM2013Y5 East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass 'North/South Street: Kahakai Blvd Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 502 100 432 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 502 100 0 432 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 303 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 303 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N , Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay,Queue Length, and Level of Service •pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 303 C(m) (veh/h) 573 /c 0.53 95%queue length 3.29 Control Delay(s/veh) 18.3 LOS C _ •pproach Delay(s/veh) — -- 18.3 •pproach LOS — — C Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 10:24 AM fi1P•//t^.•\TlnrnmPntc and SPitinac\WitnhPr P.nar T.T.P\T.nra1 Rettincrc\Temn\tt7k104.tmn 6/21/2013 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2023 Analysis Time Period AM2023 Project Description Woodland T1AR Job#602-01-11 WKPBRKAM2013Y10 East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Kahakai Blvd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 550 65 750 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 550 65 0 750 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 199 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 0 199 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service•pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 199 C (m) (veh/h) 539 /c 0.37 95%queue length 1.74 Control Delay(s/veh) 15.6 LOS C •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 15.6 •pproach LOS -- — C Copyright ei 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 10:02 AM /-1 I IF-4 . I M ..• 1 IV 1•. I T T T T1 7 1 11 ..• 1 T 1 /11 !1/1 , /011 I.'\"1^1 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2023 Analysis Time Period PM 2023 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBRKPM2013Y10 East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Kahakai Blvd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 555 106 477 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 555 106 0 477 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 onfiguration T R T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 328 r Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 328 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 ` Configuration R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service _ pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 328 C (m)(veh/h) 535 /c 0.61 95%queue length 4.55 Control Delay(s/veh) 22.2 LOS C •pproach Delay(s/veh) — — 22.2 pproach LOS — -- C Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+n'^ Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 10:26 AM file•//C•\Tlnrttmentc and SPttinas\Witcher F.nur T.T.P\T.nral Settincrs\Temn\n7.1c104 tmn 6/71/2.()1 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2033 Analysis Time Period AM2033 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBRKAM2013Y20 East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Kahakai Blvd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 670 75 914 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 670 75 0 914 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal 0 _ 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R t olume(veh/h) 236 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 236 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 • Configuration R Delay, Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v(veh/h) 236 C (m) (veh/h) 460 /c 0.51 95%queue length 3.08 Control Delay(s/veh) 21.0 LOS C •pproach Delay(s/veh) — — 21.0 •pproach LOS — -- C Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 10:04 AM Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2033 Analysis Time Period PM 2033 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WKPBRKPM2013Y20 East/West Street: Keaau Pahoa Bypass North/South Street: Kahakai Blvd Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 676 120 581 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 676 120 0 581 0 (veh/h) ■ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R T Upstream Signal 0 0 inor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 388 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 0 388 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay,Queue Length, and Level of Service•pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 388 C (m) (veh/h) 457 , /c 0.85 , 95%queue length 12.41 Control Delay(s/veh) 51.6 LOS F •pproach Delay(s/veh) — -- 51.6 •pproach LOS -- — F Copyright®2010 University of Florida,Al Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 10:27 AM filo•//r•\Tlnniimanto and Co#inrrc\NXIitnl,ar Pnm•T T TAT nasal CottinrTC\Tama\»71x1 Ad tm„ A/)1/7111 1 APPENDIX G LEVEL OF SERVICE CENTER DRIVEWAY UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AM & PM PEAK HOURS Iwo-Way Stop Uontrol rage 1 or 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year Build Out Analysis Time Period AM Build Out Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRCDWLTAM13BO East/West Street: Center Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 37 291 255 41 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 37 291 0 0 255 41 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L _ T R olume(veh/h) 10 84 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 0 84 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 37 10 84 C (m) (veh/h) 1277 429 768 /c 0.03 0.02 0.11 95%queue length 0.09 0.07 0.37 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 13.6 10.3 LOS A B B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 10.6 •pproach LOS -- — B Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 10:42 AM flP•//P•\TlnnnmPntc anr1 C\Z T fr1., r Pnrrr T T MT nr•al Qa++inryc\TA,,,,,\1171,-1 GO 4m,-, 4111/1M 2 Two-Way Stop Control rage 1 01 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year Build Out Analysis Time Period PM Build Out Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRCDWLTPMI3BO East/West Street: Center Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 53 281 273 66 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 53 281 0 0 273 66 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes , 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 , Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 14 130 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 14 0 130 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 53 14 130 i C(m) (veh/h) 1231 394 739 /c 0.04 0.04 0.18 95%queue length 0.13 0.11 0.64 ` Control Delay(s/veh) 8.1 14.5 10.9 LOS A B B •pproach Delay(s/veh) — — 11.3 pproach LOS — — B Copyright©2010 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 11:00 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k177.tmp 6/21/2013 1 wo-Way Stop Control rage 1 or 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period AM 2018 , Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRCDWLTAM13Y5 EastNVest Street: Center Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street - Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 37 306 338 41 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 37 306 0 0 338 41 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 10 84 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 10 0 84 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (veh/h) 37 10 84 C (m) (veh/h) 1191 376 691 /c 0.03 0.03 0.12 95%queue length 0.10 0.08 0.41 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.1 14.8 10.9 LOS A B B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 11.3 •pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 10:43 AM 171_.//!�.\Tl..---..«a.. ,...,7 0,.44:....-..\"117:4..1..,...L`....-..T T MT ......1 0-+÷:—.-....\'7,.............\..'11.1 G/l÷......+ 4/'11 /'1A1 Z Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period PM 2018 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRCDWLTPM13Y5 East/West Street: Center Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 53 295 396 66 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 53 295 0 0 396 66 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 14 130 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 0 130 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 0 RT Channelized 1 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length, and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 53 14 130 C (m) (veh/h) 1110 327 630 /c 0.05 0.04 0.21 95%queue length 0.15 0.13 0.78 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 16.5 12.2 LOS A C B pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 12.6 •pproach LOS — — B Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+T"^ Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 11:01 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temn\u2k17C.tmu 6/21/2013 Two-Way Stop Control Wage 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 20232 Analysis Time Period AM 2023 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRCDWLTAM13Y10 East/West Street: Center Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 37 321 373 41 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 37 321 0 0 373 41 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 10 84 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 10 0 84 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service _ pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 37 10 84 C (m) (veh/h) 1156 350 659 /c 0.03 0.03 0.13 95%queue length 0.10 0.09 0.44 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.2 15.6 11.3 LOS A C B •pproach Delay(s/veh) — -- 11.7 pproach LOS -- — B Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 10:44 AM .01_.iin.\TN----------.- -_.1 O■,.a:-_,-..\TTTa_L__T?-,__T T MT ..,,.,7 0..+4:........\T.,-..--\..'11.1 Gr\ ii^11 1)n1 Two-Way Stop Control rage t or i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2023 Analysis Time Period PM 2023 Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRCDWLTPM13Y10 East/West Street: Center Driveway (North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 53 310 437 66 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 53 310 0 0 437 66 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 _ — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 _ 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound , Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 14 130 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 0 130 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R _ Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 53 14 130 , C (m) (veh/h) 1072 302 598 /c 0.05 0.05 0.22 95%queue length 0.16 0.15 0.83 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.5 17.5 12.7 LOS A C B pproach Delay(s/veh) — -- 13.2 pproach LOS -- -- _ B Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 11:03 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k16A.tmp 6/21/2013 Two-Way Stop Control rage 1 oI 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2033 Analysis Time Period AM 2033 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRCDVVLTAM13Y20 East/West Street: Center Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 37 355 454 41 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 37 355 0 0 454 41 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal _ 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 10 84 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 10 0 84 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration _ L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 37 10 84 C (m) (veh/h) 1079 299 595 /c 0.03 0.03 0.14 •5%queue length 0.11 0.10 0.49 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.5 17.5 12.0 LOS A C B •pproach Delay (s/veh) — -- 12.6 •pproach LOS -- -- _ B Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM+ Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 10:46 AM flA•//C•\Tlnnllmarlto orlrl CPttinrro\\IT+r.lhar Prtrrr T T 13\T nnal CPttinrro\TPmrl\1171,1 50 tmn 4/')1/')(11 1 Two-Way Stop Control Page I or I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2033 Analysis Time Period PM 2033 Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRCDWLTPM13Y20 East/West Street: Center Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound _Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 53 343 533 66 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 53 343 0 0 533 66 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 14 130 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 14 0 130 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service•pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 53 14 130 C (m) (veh/h) 988 252 528 /c 0.05 0.06 0.25 95%queue length 0.17 0.18 0.98 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.9 20.1 14.0 LOS A C B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 14.6 •pproach LOS — — B , Copyright®2010 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved HCS+TM+ Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 11:04 AM file://C:\Documents and Settinss\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settinss\Temp\u2k16A.tmp 6/21/2013 , APPENDIX H LEVEL OF SERVICE SOUTH DRIVEWAY UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AM & PM PEAK HOURS I wo-Way stop control rage 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year Build Out Analysis Time Period AM Build Out Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRSDWLTAMI3BO East/West Street: South Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 10 315 328 11 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 315 0 0 328 11 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 13 0 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 0 15 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR (veh/h) 10 28 C (m) (veh/h) 1231 541 /c 0.01 0.05 95%queue length 0.02 0.16 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 12.0 LOS A B •pproach Delay(s/veh) — — 12.0 •pproach LOS — — B Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 11:41 AM file•//r•\TlnrnmPnte and Rattinac\Witrdhar Pnar T T P\T nral q'attinae\Tam„\11')1,11:2 +m„ 4/')1/7!112 Iwo-Way stop control rage i ui I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year Build Out Analysis Time Period PM Build Out Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRSDWLTPMI3BO East/West Street: South Driveway 'North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound _ Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 14 330 385 18 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 330 0 0 385 18 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration L T TR Upstream Signal _ _ 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound _ Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 4 0 39 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 0 39 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR (veh/h) 14 43 C(m)(veh/h) 1167 616 /c 0.01 0.07 95%queue length 0.04 0.22 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.1 11.3 LOS A B •pproach Delay(s/veh) — — 11.3 •pproach LOS — -- B Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida,AD Rights Reserved HCS+nn Version 5.8 Generated: 6/21/2013 11:53 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k206.tmp 6/21/2013 Two-Way Stop Control gage 1 of i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period AM 2018 Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRSDWLTAM13Y5 EastNVest Street: South Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 _ 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 10 348 418 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 348 0 0 418 11 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 ' Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 13 0 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 0 15 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length,and Level of Service•pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR (veh/h) 10 28 C (m) (veh/h) 1141 467 /c 0.01 0.06 95%queue length 0.03 0.19 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.2 _ 13.2 LOS A B •pproach Delay(s/veh) -- — 13.2 •pproach LOS -- — B Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 11:43 AM file://C.:\Dnrnments and Rettinac\Witrher P..nar T.1.P\T.nna1 RPttinac\Temn\n')kl F1 tmn (/71/7(11' 1 wo-way stop control ragc 1 u1 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2018 Analysis Time Period PM 2018 Project Description Woodland TZAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRSDWLTPM13Y5 East/West Street: South Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 14 364 520 18 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 14 364 0 0 520 18 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 4 0 39 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 4 0 39 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service•pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR (veh/h) 14 43 C (m) (veh/h) 1040 513 /c 0.01 0.08 95%queue length 0.04 0.27 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.5 12.7 LOS A B •pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.7 •pproach LOS -- — B Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 11:55 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k206.tmu 6/21/2013 1 wo-Way stop Control rage 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2023 Analysis Time Period AM 2023 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRSDWLTAM13Y10 East/West Street: South Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 10 384 462 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 10 384 0 0 462 11 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 13 0 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 0 15 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR (veh/h) 10 28 C (m) (veh/h) 1099 427 lc 0.01 0.07 95%queue length 0.03 0.21 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.3 _ 14.0 LOS A B •pproach Delay(s/veh) — -- 14.0 pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 11:44 AM file•//C•\Tlnritmpnte and Rettinae\Witriipr Friar T T P\T nral Cpttinrre\TPmr,\n)1r1 F; trm 4/71 hn11 Two-Way Stop Control ?age I or I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2023 Analysis Time Period PM 2023 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRSDWLTPM13Y10 East/West Street: South Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 14 402 _ 573 18 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 14 402 0 0 573 18 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — _ — 0 — _ — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 4 0 39 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 4 0 39 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 0 RT Channelized 1 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR (veh/h) 14 43 ■ C (m) (veh/h) 995 474 /c 0.01 0.09 •5%queue length 0.04 0.30 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.7 13.4 LOS A B •pproach Delay(s/veh) — -- 13.4 •pproach LOS — — _ B Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 11:56 AM ■ file://C:\Documents and Settines\Witcher Eno-LLP\Local Settings\Tema\u2k206.tmn 6/21/2013 Iwo-way stop uontroi rages I ui TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2033 Analysis Time Period AM 2033 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRSDWLTAM13Y20 EastNVest Street: South Driveway North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound • Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 10 468 562 11 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 468 0 0 562 11 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — — Median Type Undivided ` RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 ' Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 13 0 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 0 15 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR (veh/h) 10 28 C (m) (veh/h) 1010 348 - /c 0.01 0.08 95%queue length 0.03 _ 0.26 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.6 16.2 LOS A C •pproach Delay(s/veh) — -- 16.2 •pproach LOS -- -- C Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 11:46 AM file://CAT)ncnments and Rettinfxs\Witcher F.nur T.T.P\T,nral Rettinuc\Temn\n21c1 F; tmn 6/71/7011 Two-Way Stop Control rage 1 01 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst BEW Intersection TEE Agency/Co. Woodland Jurisdiction DOT/Hawaii CO Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2033 Analysis Time Period PM 2033 Project Description Woodland TIAR Job#602-01-11 WPVRSDWLTPM13Y20 East/West Street: South Driveway 'North/South Street: Old Pahoa Village Rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period(hrs): 1.00 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 14 490 699 18 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 490 0 0 699 18 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — _ — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 onfiguration L T TR Upstream Signal _ 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 4 0 39 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 4 0 39 0 0 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 1 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 ! Configuration LTR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service •pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR (veh/h) 14 43 C (m) (veh/h) 893 393 /c 0.02 0.11 95%queue length 0.05 0.37 Control Delay(s/veh) 9.1 15.3 LOS A C •pproach Delay(s/veh) — — 15.3 •pproach LOS -- — C Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 6/21/2013 11:58 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engl.LLP\Local Settings\Tema\u2k206.tmp 6/21/2013 APPENDIX I LEVEL OF SERVICE KEAAU-PAHOA BYPASS RD. & OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD. ROUNDABOUT INTERSECTION AM & PM PEAK HOURS Formatted Report rage 1 01 2 ROUNDABOUT REPORT General Information Site Information Intersection Analyst BEW ENV Street Name KEEAU-PAHOA BYPASS Agency or Co. WOODLAND N/S Street Name OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year BUILD OUT ,. Time Period AM BUILD OUT WOODLAND TIAR JOB#602-01-11 • Project ID WRKPBPAM13B0 . Project Description: Volume Adjustment and Site Characteristics EB WB NB SB L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R U Number of Lanes(N) 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Volume (V),veh/h 0 415 283 0 156 455 0 0 202 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh.Adj. (fHV), % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak Hour Factor(PHF) 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 No. of Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 Crossing Entry Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway(sec) 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 Follow-Up Headway(sec) 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 Flow Computations 4 EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Circulating Flow(Vc), pc/h 175 226 465 910 Exiting Flow(Vex), pc/h 527 735 0 492 Entry Flow(Ve), pc/h 368 317 -1 270 226 62 Entry Volume veh/h 357 308 0 262 219 60 Capacity and v/c Ratios EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Capacity(cPCE), pc/h 949 949 901 901 710 710 455 Capacity(c),veh/h 921 921 875 875 689 689 442 v/c Ratio(X) 0.39 0.33 -0.00 0.30 0.32 0.09 Delay and Level of Service EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay(d), s/veh 8.3 7.5 4.1 7.4 9.2 6.2 Lane LOS A A A A A A Lane 95%Queue 1.9 1.5 -0.0 1.3 1.4 0.3 , Approach Delay, s/veh 7.94 7.36 8.58 Approach LOS,s/veh A A A Intersection Delay,s/veh 8.08 files•//f•\Tlnrnmante and CPttinac\WitrhPr Friar T.T P\T nral CPttinae\Tama\n')1r7d2 turn A/')1/')I111 Formatted Report rage 2 of 2 Intersection LOS I A Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM 2010 6.1 Roundabouts Generated: 6/21/2013 2:43 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k248.tmp 6/21/2013 rormattea xeport rase i • ROUNDABOUT REPORT General Information Site Information Intersection Analyst BEW ENV Street Name KEEAU-PAHOA BYPASS Agency or Co. WOODLAND N/S Street Name OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year BUILD OUT Time Period PM BUILD OUT WOODLAND TIAR JOB#602-01-11 Project ID WRKPBPPMI3BO Project Description: Volume Adjustment and Site Characteristics EB WB NB SB L T R UL T R U L T R U L T R U Number of Lanes(N) 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Volume(V),veh/h 0 395 337 0 125 306 0 0 252 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh.Adj. (fHv), % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak Hour Factor(PHF) 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 No. of Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 Crossing Entry Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway(sec) 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 Follow-Up Headway(sec) 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 Flow Computations EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Circulating Flow(Vs), pc/h 140 282 442 765 Exiting Flow(Vex), pc/h 554 625 0 517 Entry Flow(Ve), pc/h 385 377 -1 182 282 112 Entry Volume veh/h 374 366 0 177 274 109 Capacity and v/c Ratios EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Capacity(cpcE), pc/h 982 982 852 852 726 726 526 Capacity(c),veh/h 953 953 827 827 705 705 511 v/c Ratio(X) 0.39 0.38 -0.00 0.21 0.39 0.15 Delay and Level of Service EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay(d), s/veh 8.2 8.0 4.3 6.6 10.3 6.8 Lane LOS A A A A B A Lane 95% Queue 1.9 1,8 -0.0 0.8 1.8 0.5 Approach Delay,s/veh 8.10 6.60 9.27 Approach LOS, s/veh A A A Intersection Delay,s/veh 8.47 file://C•\T)ncnmentc and Settinac\Witnher Rnar T.T.P\T.nnal Settinac\Temn\ii21c9SA tmn 601/9011 Formatted Report rage Z or L (Intersection LOS I A Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM 2010 6.1 Roundabouts Generated: 6/21/2013 2:56 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k25A.tmp 6/21/2013 t'ormattea Report rage 1 01 h ROUNDABOUT REPORT General Information Site Information Intersection Analyst BEW ENV Street Name KEEAU-PAHOA BYPASS Agency or Co. WOODLAND N/S Street Name OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2018 Time Period AM2018 WOODLAND TIAR JOB#602-01-11 Project ID WRKPBPAM13Y5 Project Description: Volume Adjustment and Site Characteristics EB WB NB SB L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R U Number of Lanes(N) 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Volume(V),veh/h 0 459 310 0 171 502 0 0 172 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh.Adj. (fHv), % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak Hour Factor(PHF) 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 No.of Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 Crossing Entry Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway(sec) 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 Flow Computations , EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Circulating Flow(Vs), pc/h 191 193 514 946 Exiting Flow(Vex), pc/h 564 755 0 538 Entry Flow(Ve), pc/h 405 347 -1 298 193 50 Entry Volume veh/h 393 337 0 289 187 49 Capacity and v/c Ratios EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Capacity(cPCE), pc/h 934 934 932 932 676 676 439 Capacity(c),veh/h 907 907 905 905 656 656 426 v/c Ratio(X) 0.43 0.37 -0.00 0.32 0.29 0.07 Delay and Level of Service EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay(d), s/veh 9.2 8.2 4.0 7.4 9.1 6.3 Lane LOS A A A A A A Lane 95%Queue 2.3 1.8 -0.0 1.4 1.2 0.2 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.70 7.44 8.52 Approach LOS,s/veh A A A Intersection Delay,s/veh 8.40 file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temn\u2k248.tmn 6/21/2013 rormar[ea xeport ragc L ui c Intersection LOS I A Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM 2010 6.1 Roundabouts Generated: 6/21/2013 2:45 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k248.tmp 6/21/2013 rormattea Keport rage 1 (HZ ROUNDABOUT REPORT General Information Site Information Intersection Analyst BEW ENV Street Name KEEAU-PAHOA BYPASS Agency or Co. WOODLAND N/S Street Name OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2018 Time Period PM 2018 WOODLAND TIAR JOB#602-01-11 Project ID WRKPBPPM13Y5 Project Description: Volume Adjustment and Site Characteristics EB WB NB SB L T R UL T R U L T R U L T R U Number of Lanes(N) 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Volume(V),veh/h 0 436 367 0 137 338 0 0 211 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh.Adj. (fHV), % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak Hour Factor(PHF) 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 No.of Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 Crossing Entry Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway(sec) 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 Follow-Up Headway(sec) 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 Flow Computations EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Circulating Flow(Vs), pc/h 153 236 488 767 Exiting Flow(Vex), pc/h 582 614 0 564 Entry Flow(Ve), pc/h 423 411 -1 200 236 94 Entry Volume veh/h 411 399 0 194 229 91 Capacity and v/c Ratios EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Capacity(cpcE),pc/h 970 970 892 892 694 694 525 Capacity(c),veh/h 942 942 866 866 674 674 510 v/c Ratio(X) 0.44 0.42 -0.00 0.22 0.34 0.14 Delay and Level of Service EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay(d), s/veh 8.9 8.7 4.1 6.5 9.8 6.9 Lane LOS A A A A A A Lane 95%Queue 2.2 2.1 -0.0 0.9 1.5 0.5 - Approach Delay,s/veh 8.82 6.48 8.94 Approach LOS,s/veh A A A Intersection Delay,s/veh 8.59 file•//C'.•\Tlnnnmentc and Cettinac\Witcher Pnar T T.P\T nral Cettinae\TPmn\171r')5A tmn A1')1/')(11 Z Formatted Report Page 2 of 2 'intersection LOS A Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM 2010 6.1 Roundabouts Generated: 6/21/2013 2:58 PM { file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k25A.tmp 6/21/2013 Formatted Report Page 1 of 2 ROUNDABOUT REPORT General Information Site Information Intersection Analyst BEW ENV Street Name KEEAU-PAHOA BYPASS Agency or Co. WOODLAND N/S Street Name OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2023 Time Period AM2023 WOODLAND TIAR JOB#602-01-11 Project ID WRKPBPAM13Y10 Project Description: Volume Adjustment and Site Characteristics EB WB NB SB L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R U Number of Lanes(N) 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Volume(V),veh/h 0 507 340 0 187 555 0 0 192 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh.Adj. (fHv), % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak Hour Factor(PHF) 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 No.of Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 Crossing Entry Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway(sec) 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 Follow-Up Headway(sec) 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 Flow Computations EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right !Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Circulating Flow(Vs), pc/h 209 215 568 1045 Exiting Flow(Vex), pc/h 623 836 0 590 Entry Flow(Ve), pc/h 446 381 -1 329 215 55 Entry Volume veh/h 433 370 0 319 209 53 Capacity and v/c Ratios EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Capacity(cPCE), pc/h 917 917 911 911 640 640 397 Capacity (c),veh/h 890 890 884 884 621 621 385 v/c Ratio(X) 0.49 0.42 -0.00 0.36 0.34 0.09 Delay and Level of Service EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay(d), s/veh 10.3 9.0 4.1 8.2 10.4 6.8 Lane LOS B A A A B A Lane 95%Queue 2.8 2.1 -0.0 1.7 1.5 0.3 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.69 8.18 9.67 Approach LOS, s/veh A A A Intersection Delay,s/veh 9.39 r_i_.iie^1 •_ ___ \AT -- L.-.....T T Tl\T ......1 0-44:....`.,\T...-....\..'l l.'lA 0 +........ L/'li MA17 Formatted Report Page 2 of 2 'Intersection LOS I A Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM 2010 6.1 Roundabouts Generated: 6/21/2013 2:47 PM { file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k248.tmp 6/21/2013 Formatted Report Page 1 of 2 ROUNDABOUT REPORT General Information Site Information Intersection Analyst BEW E/W Street Name KEEAU-PAHOA BYPASS Agency or Co. WOODLAND N/S Street Name OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2023 Time Period PM 2023 WOODLAND TZAR JOB#602-01-11 Project ID WRKPBPPM13Y10 Project Description: Volume Adjustment and Site Characteristics EB WB NB SB L T R U L T R U L T R UL T R U Number of Lanes(N) 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Volume(V),veh/h 0 482 405 0 150 373 0 0 235 0 94 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh.Adj. (fHv), % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak Hour Factor(PHF) 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 No. of Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 Crossing Entry Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway(sec) 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 Follow-Up Headway(sec) 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 Flow Computations EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Circulating Flow(Va), pc/h 168 263 540 849 Exiting Flow(Vex), pc/h 645 681 0 621 Entry Flow(Ve), pc/h 467 453 -1 222 263 105 Entry Volume veh/h 453 440 0 216 255 102 Capacity and v/c Ratios EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Capacity(cPCE),pc/h 955 955 869 869 659 659 483 Capacity(c),veh/h 927 927 844 844 640 640 469 v/c Ratio(X) 0.49 0.47 -0.00 0.26 0.40 0.16 Delay and Level of Service EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay(d), s/veh 10.0 9.7 4.3 7.0 11.3 7.5 Lane LOS A A A A B A Lane 95%Queue 2.7 2.6 -0.0 1.0 1.9 0.6 Approach Delay,s/veh 9.85 7.00 10.21 Approach LOS, s/veh A A B Intersection Delay,s/veh 9.65 filo•//r•\Tlnn„montc and Cattinrrc1 Nx1;tr•llor Fnrrr T T U\T nnal Cottinrro\Tom,,\„'')U')c A *w„•, 4r) /)(11 Formatted Keport rage L or z Intersection LOS A Copyright 0 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM 2010 6.1 Roundabouts Generated: 6/21/2013 2:59 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k25A.tmp 6/21/2013 Formatted Report Page 1 of 2 ROUNDABOUT REPORT General Information Site Information Intersection Analyst BEW E/W Street Name KEEAU-PAHOA BYPASS Agency or Co. WOODLAND N/S Street Name OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD Date Performed 6/21/13 Analysis Year 2033 Time Period AM2033 WOODLAND TIAR JOB#602-01-11 Project ID WRKPBPAM13Y20 Project Description: Volume Adjustment and Site Characteristics EB WB NB SB L T R UL T R U L T R U L T R U Number of Lanes(N) 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Volume(V),veh/h 0 618 408 0 225 676 0 0 230 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh.Adj. (fHV), % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak Hour Factor(PHF) 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 No. of Pedestrians 0 p 0 0 Crossing Entry Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway(sec) 5.19295.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.18583.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 r Flow Computations EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Circulating Flow(Vc), pc/h 252 258 692 1267 Exiting Flow(Vex), pc/h 757 1015 0 709 Entry Flow(Ve), pc/h 540 457 -1 401 258 65 Entry Volume veh/h 524 444 0 389 250 63 Capacity and v/c Ratios EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Capacity(cPCE), pc/h 878 878 873 873 566 566 318 Capacity(c),veh/h 852 852 848 848 550 550 309 v/c Ratio(X) 0.62 0.52 -0.00 0.46 0.46 0.11 Delay and Level of Service EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay(d),s/veh 14.0 11.4 4.2 10.1 14.3 8.0 Lane LOS B B A B B A Lane 95%Queue 4.7 3.2 -0.0 2.5 2.5 0.4 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.80 10.13 13.00 Approach LOS, s/veh B B B Intersection Delay,s/veh 12.34 \tt7:4 L,,.. T T TNT ..... t O...si:-. _ \T Y�\_. 11_�1AO a _ L/' 1 /nn1 n Formatted Report Page 2 of 2 (Intersection LOS 8 Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM 2010 6.1 Roundabouts Generated: 6/21/2013 2:48 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Enar LLP\Local Settings\Temp\u2k248.tmp 6/21/2013 Formatted Report Page 1 of 2 ROUNDABOUT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Intersection nalyst BEW Agency or Co. WOODLAND ENV Street Name KEEAU-PAHOA BYPASS Agee y or Co. WOODLAND N/S Street Name OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD Time Period PM 2033 Analysis Year 2033 Project ID WOODLAND TIAR JOB#602-01-11 WRKPBPPM13Y20 Project Description: Volume Adjustment and Site Characteristics EB WB NB SB L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R U Number of Lanes(N) 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Volume(V),veh/h 0 587 488 0 181 455 0 0 289 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh.Adj. (fiiv), % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak Hour Factor(PHF) 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 No. of Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 Crossing Entry Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway(sec) 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 5.1929 Follow-Up Headway (sec) 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 3.1858 Flow Computations EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Circulating Flow(Vs), pc/h 203 324 657 1036 Exiting Flow(Vex), pc/h 791 833 0 749 Entry Flow(Ve), pc/h 565 546 -1 270 324 134 Entry Volume veh/h 549 530 0 262 315 130 Capacity and v/c Ratios EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Capacity(cPCE), pc/h 922 922 817 817 586 586 401 Capacity(c),veh/h 895 895 793 793 569 569 389 v/c Ratio (X) 0.61 0.59 -0.00 0.33 0.55 0.23 Delay and Level of Service EB WB NB SB Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay(d), s/veh 13.2 12.7 4.5 8.4 16.6 9.3 Lane LOS B B A A C A Lane 95%Queue 4.3 4.0 -0.0 1.4 3.4 0.9 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.95 8.42 14.50 Approach LOS, s/veh B A B Intersection Delay,s/veh 13.04 Formatted Report Page 2 of 2 Intersection LOS B Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM 2010 6.1 Roundabouts Generated: 6/21/2013 3:01 PM file.•//C•\Tlnriime.ntc anti Re.ttinvc\Witcher Fnor T.T.P\T.ncal SettinsrR\Temn\n2k25A.tmn 6/21/2013 APPENDIX J TRAFFIC MOVEMENT DIAGRAMS KAHAKAI BLVD. & OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD. INTERSECTION, WITH AND WITHOUT SIGNAL AM & PM PEAK HOURS Kahakai Blvd. & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - Existing Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 341 230 238 103 174 56 4 O ce uJ O . j L--(115 6 i \ 87 31 0. KAHAKAI BOULEVARD 103 1 175 iiii - 72 I a O 0 0 238 31 174 72 16x,..1 N 16.1V11.14 269 246 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P.O.sox 348 6&13 Hdualoa,H1 9G725 Consulting Civil Engineers vtrPVRKPM2013 raos� zz Construction Managers Kahakai Blvd. & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - Existing Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM 412 312 264 148 211 101 Q { O � r Li! O r 5 J i 101 144 43 KAHAKAI BOULEVARD 148 273 f — �r.•— 125 O T. O 264 43 211 125 307 336 w WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P.O.Sox 348 6/13 Holua oa HI 96725 Consulting Civil Engineers WPVRKPM2013 (808)334-0322 Construction Managers Kahakai Blvd. & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - Buuldout Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 202 253 81 224 97 38 170 45 lk rn ¢ O 0: w O J J_ 81 45 161 20 - 20 96 i 60 31 KAHAKAI BOULEVARD 38 — 97 113 30 - 30 199 45 72 ,7r----- 1 HL 45 224 31 60 170 72 300 302 sv WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P.o.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6/13 (8 34-03= Construction Managers INPVRKAMR2013B0 Kahakai Livd. & Old Pahoa Vill. je Road Traffic Movement - Buildout Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM 495 279 IP 113 244 138 60 126 93 ( Q O rt uU O 1 ( 113 - - 93 246 40 40 173 ---)193 — 40 KAHAKAI BOULEVARD 41414 60 138 172 53 53 268 59 77 ( ( <t 0 I Q 0. 0 59 244 40 93 126 ?7 343 296 ( WITCHER ENGINEERING LIE JN 602-01-11 PA).Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6113 Hotualos,Hawaii 86725 Construction Managers WPVRKPM2013BO (805)334-0322 Kahakai Blvd. & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - 5-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 534 277 41-1-k 81 305 148 38 188 51 0 81 51 161 20 — 20 105 60 34 KANAKAI / BOULEVARD 38 "�r-d 148 113 30 30 257 45 79 0 r 0. 0 J 0 45 305 34 60 188 79 384 327 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P.O.Box 348 Consultin Civil Engineers 6/13 8°'` 25 Construction Managers WPVRKAMR20135Y Kahakai Livd. & Old Pahoa VilLae Road Traffic Movement - 5-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM 756 312 (4410-k 113 366 247 60 148 104 0 Q O a w O 1 r i 113 104 246 40 -- 40 188 93 -- 44 KAHAKAI BOULEVARD t 60 247 172 53 53 390 59 90 4 z a D O i f 59 244 40 93 148 90 ‘milairmij 4411.V.111 465 331 i t Wke WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6113 ( 96725 Construction Managers WPVRKPM20135V Kahakai Blvd. & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - 10-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 580 303 81 311 188 38 208 57 a Q O o w O d J J_ 81 57 161 20 - 20 115 60 �,r 38 KAHAKAI BOULEVARD 38 188 113 30 30 306 45 I ` 88 Q O J • 4 45 311 38 60 208 88 394 356 svk WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P0.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6/13 Hauaba,Hawaii 96725 Construction Managers c a WPVRKAMR241310Y Kahakai L,1vd1 & Old Pahoa Vik.ige Road Traffic Movement - 10-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM 793 347 Ifk 113 406 274 60 172 115 ( 0 O c w 4 J_ 113 115 246 IC 40 - 40 204 93 -- 49 KAHAKAI BOULEVARD 60 274 172 53 53 431 59 104 ( 0 I Q a O ,J 0 ( t 59 406 49 93 172 104 ( t 514 369 inillik*, WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP ( JN 602-01-11 P.O.Box 248 Consulting Civil Engineers c 6113 98726 Construction Managers WPVRKPM201310Y Kahakai Blvd. & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - 20-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 718 365 '..lnion rahalli /01111"'' 81 415 222 38 255 72 it .11 n O w t9 5 Ai. - 81 -� 72 161 20 20 130 ( 60 — 46 N KAHAKAI BOULEVARD 38 ----- 222 113 30 - 30 359 45 107 Q 0 I Q a in 0 1 t 1 45 415 46 60 255 107 506 422 1.,.14fAkei WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP Jta 602-01-11 P.O.Box$48 Consulting Civil Engineers 6/13 s� Hawaii 96725 Construction Managers WPVRKAMR201320Y Kahakai 1vd. & Old Pahoa Vihdge Road Traffic Movement - 20-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM ( 949 430 r' "1 r-'N-N 113 499 337 60 228 142 0 O rr w ( 113 - 142 246 40 40 243 93 61 KAHAKAI BOULEVARD 60 337 411101111 } 172 53 53 527 ( 59 137 ( O 0 J 0 ( ( 59 499 61 93 228 137 619 458 M��A2 WITCHER ENGINEERING LIP JN 602-01-11 P.O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6113 Holualoa,Hawai 96725 Construction Managers (806)334-0322 WPVRKPM201320Y APPENDIX K TRAFFIC MOVEMENT DIAGRAMS KEAAU-PAHOA BYPASS RD. & OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AM & PM PEAK HOURS Proposed ., opping Center, Para, Hawaii Keaau-Pahoa Bypass and Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement-Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour - 7:15AM to 8:15 AM elm h0 gyp~ ,z0 co ilik fCs.A • ass <Z--o 0((/ 2 Oz) 's9 0 'ga / / srp2 Tai csiss:6. 22> WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP P.O.Boos 346 Consulting Civil Engineers JN 602 -15 (SOS) 3 HI 96;25 6�ts ��g�g3q 032a Construction Managers WKPBPOPVAM2OI3 Proposed `lopping Center, Par \a, Hawaii Keaau-Pahoa Bypass and Old Pahoa Village Road i Traffic Movement-Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour - 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM ( ( e/icso ( �o� N 4 � it ( N. O i icz- oq,s, ( �pq it ssR O40 QO O g(I oo`O ,i,' O 0‘//// <fre / ,.:) ,::, 0 f,. 7:6 /1 5% 26s f . `?''o r WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP P.O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers JN 602-0141 HoWaloa,H196725 6MS OW)334.0= Construction Managers WKPBPOPVAM2013 Proposed „nopping Center, PatbJa, Hawaii Keaau-Pahoa Bypass and Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - Buildout Conditions AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM Ory cv 4 if P cb ti ilk 46, , 1.-,c, -.1ssR xio , /) QO d cr vi,c0 1 iii‘ 4., ,„ v. f O ,.,(9,9 pp- C3// j'$'6 f g"'9 202 / ss 26-N JSZ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP P.O.Brn:346 Consulting Civil Engineers 611602 fl i-i 1 WKPBPQPVAM2013S0 Holualoa.H195725 t 334.0322 Construction Managers Proposed hopping Center, Pa' )a, Hawaii Keaau-Pahoa Bypass and Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - Buildout Conditions PM Peak Hour - 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM 0) N hr� 141k if xiQ Po !'Q� Q op ? Jam' h � �� *OO o4j Q� 0, Q 3oj o� T,'S / r i o\6, N:°0 ! r f WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP ` P O•Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers JM 602-01-11 Holualoa.HI 96725 6113 (808)334-032 Construction Managers WKPBPOPVAM2013BO Keaau-Pahoa LIPass Road & Old P,..1ioa Village Road Traffic Movement - 5-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 674 Westbound Through & Northbound Left 769 Ilk Eastbound Through & Eastbound Right 1 (. ROUNDABOUT Eastbound Right& ■ Westbound Left& Westbound Left Westbound Through 481 Northbound Left& 673 217 Northbound Right Eastbound Through & Northbound Right 504 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P.O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6/13 Holualoa,Hawaii 98725 Construction Managers (808)334-0322 WPVRKAMR201 35Y Keaau-Pahoa ' /Pass Road & Old P Village Road Traffic Movement - 5-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM 549 Westbound Through & Northbound Left 5/\:0 805 Eastbound Through & Eastbound Right ROUNDABOUT Eastbound Right& Westbound Left& Westbound Left Westbound Through 506 t Northbound Left& { 295 Northbound Right 475 Eastbound Through & Northbound Right 520 ( WITCHER ENGINEERING LL, JN 602-01-11 P.O.Box sae 6-13 Ho��.��,96725 Consulting Civil Engineers , 6-13 MR20135Y (808)334-0312 Construction Managers Keaau-Pahoa ./Pass Road & Old P1 1 oa Village Road Traffic Movement - 10-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 747 Westbound Through & Northbound Left 847 Illik Eastbound Through & Eastbound Right ROUNDABOUT Eastbound Right& ■ Westbound Left& Westbound Left Westbound Through 527 Northbound Left& 742 241 Northbound Right Eastbound Through & Northbound Right 556 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P.O,Box 348 6/13 �l�l�,H�eU 98725 Consulting Civil Engineers Construction Managers W PVRKAMR201310Y c808>3340322 Keaau-Pahoa yPass Road & Old P 'ioa Village Road Traffic Movement - 10-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM 628 Westbound Through & Northbound Left 887 Eastbound Through & Eastbound Right ROUNDABOUT Eastbound Right& 9 Westbound Left& Westbound Left Westbound Through 555 Northbound Left& i 349 Northbound Right Eastbound Through & 523 Northbound Right 576 f WITCHER ENGINEERING LL. JN 602-01-11 P.O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6-13 Holualoa.Hawaii 98725 Construction Managers WPVRKAMR201310Y (808)334-0 g Keaau-Pahoa ..0yPass Road & Old F .xhoa Village Road Traffic Movement - 20-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 906 Westbound Through & 411—k Northbound Left 1026 Eastbound Through & Eastbound Right t ROUNDABOUT Eastbound Right& Westbound Left& Westbound Left Westbound Through 633 Northbound Left& 901 288 Northbound Right Eastbound Through & Northbound Right 676 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P.O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6/13 �8 0 "96725 Construction Managers WPVRKAMR201320Y Keaau-Pahoa ' /Pass Road & Old P 'ioa Village Road Traffic Movement - 20-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM 744 Westbound Through & E Northbound Left 1075 Eastbound Through & Eastbound Right ROUNDABOUT Eastbound Right& Westbound Left& Westbound Left Westbound Through 669 (, Northbound Left& 409 Northbound Right Eastbound Through & 636 Northbound Right 707 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLB JN 602-01-11 P.O.Box348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6-13 Holuaba,Hawse 96725 Construction Managers (sos)3s WPVRKAMR201320334-0322 Proposed chopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Malama Market Road & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour - 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM 335 327 164171134193 c .?5, L ` f,f' �� ,.�' ter, CGS. A \\•______ / 0, ( ( 164 232134178 t 1.. ..00 11a.ay,.. 0 ( 396 312 JA602Oi-11 WITCHER ENGINEERING LIP 6113 P<a.Box 348 1R'QPVMt�SPM2Qi? H0 334-0322 HI 96725 CaConstructian Managers PS)334-03 Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Ma lama Market Road & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - Buildout Conditions AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 205 241 rnsAluniirmANNN 114101 80161 j si T5°:\ c9 , .0\'' ) • ,, A, 114 274 80 178 388 258 ,� a1,„ 6l13 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP woPvt IM C013 o P 0.Box�4S Consulting Civil Engineers Hatualoa.Hi 96725 tsos? {ys Construction Managers Proposed chopping Center, Par1oa, Hawaii Malama Market Road & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - Buildout Conditions PM Peak Hour - 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM 396 314 * , 225171121193 �� �b'� •to Z 0 t9 u('?7 , A // */ .. , CC / 4P° o , - ' -v,„::„...._____- ' t. ,,,,, 225 269121160 1l'-Y"'J 494 281 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP Jh 632-01-11 e413 woPvi APa1`513s0 P ,Sox 336 Consulting Civil Engineers Holualos,HI 95725 (BM 3344822 Construction Managers Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Ma lama Market Road & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - 5-Year Conditions No Eastbound Left & No Northbound Left AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to8:15AM eA `1 / 236 176 236 0 0 170 .-41\c:.9 r;: ."Ce- \\ 41: ''''s■ /.„ , / c?.\c(5:0 r,r ''' "Ir 13 \ \ rr \\\ 1 \ a • ..t I 236 312 0 282 548 282 .AcQ_.0, i, WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP WOPVMS�At�1�.t �l' P.O.Box;'� Consulting Citi it Engineers HoWaiya,HI 99 25 (SOS) • a�� Construction Managers Proposed ,hopping Center, Pai 1oa, Hawaii Malama Market Road & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - 5-Year Conditions No Eastbound Left & No Northbound Left PM Peak Hour - 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM ev.N r 431 213 431 0 0 213 , `5661 / `')' • 431 293 0 314 16"%e'i ""wr"J 724 314 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 802-01-11 8113 WOPVMMPNL'0136.Y P.O.Box 3.46 Consulting Civil Engineers HOlualoa,HI.96 725 (SOS)324-0322 Construction Managers Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Ma lama Market Road & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - 10-Year Conditions No Eastbound Left & No Northbound Left AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM r'N 1 / 259 196 259 0 0 196 �` jc9 LP6' 0 � f i•-) o o� r / / r 1 / __._. ft I 3 1 r, 259 340 0 309 599 309 e;,s`` ,;j; 1 1P1MtafSM 31Q1 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP P 0 so"2.48 Consulting Civil Engineers Holuaba,Hi 9,3 03S)times Construction Managers Proposed bhopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Malama Market Road & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement 10-Year Conditions No Eastbound Left & No Northbound Left PM Peak Hour - 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM * , 469 235 r"'"".w.""...1 469 0 0 235 ' 2 \ul‘o`:r p 'C� t �r V„, J t1 II i f 469 320 0 349 1 "%fm°i "11"° 789 349 JNfiU`01-11 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 6113 WOPVIAMPA O1S1oY P.Q.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers Holuaba.HI 93725 (80.4)34-0322 Construction Managers ( Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Ma lama Market Road & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - 20-Year Conditions No Eastbound Left & No Northbound Left AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM (IN vii, , 312 239 i"''s"un.."..41 312 0 0 239 6' A 77 cam, 76' 4 .-'' o •' ..� 'f dP �o 1 i Y • I I V E 312 407 0 370 "'Y' 719 370 W TCHER ENGINEERING LIP JN t,L-01-11 6.;13 • LA�OP��M17h'IF.rJL^073'_OY P.°.sox 348 Consulting Civil Engineers XS)Hoialoa,HI 33,25 XS)32.4-0,32.2 Construction Managers Proposed 6hopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Malama Market Road & Old Pahoa Village Road Traffic Movement - 20-Year Conditions No Eastbound Left & No Northbound Left PM Peak Hour - 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM e-vN 559 287 559 0 0 287 ‘7) • cir, I' O tp 1 4 At a • I V 559 387 0 432 941 432 JN WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 6/13 woP'VMMPN2o1320Y P.O.Box 46ssr=s Consulting Civic Engineers tiolualoa,tom)334.� Construction Managers APPENDIX M TRAFFIC MOVEMENT DIAGRAMS KAHAKAI BLVD. & KEAAU-PAHOA BYPASS RD. UNSIGNALIZED AM & PM PEAK HOURS Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa ByPass Road Traffic Movement - Existing Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15AM to 8:15AM ied aV co ylift:17'. ''''-..--„„,„, 61pq CFA -9,SS co e4 Co C KAHAKAI BOULEVARD Ci; --IN y 0,,,, ty. p06.0 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP ��s,��,rt_;y P.0_Sox s 8 Consulting Civil Engineers Holualoa,H!95725 E13 isosi 334-0322 Construction Managers WKPBRKAM2O1.3 Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa ByPass Road Traffic Movement - Existing Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM keaa t/ 0 D� b, V.p#1y Yp�S °' KAHAKAI BOULEVARD h Aah oa r WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP P° Box 3 78 Consulting ivil Engineers JN 602-01-11 Holualoa,HI 65725 9 9 6/1S WI PBRKAM2013 (8031 334 0a'2 Construction Managers Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa ByPass Road Traffic Movement - Buildout Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM ired a,, N. co �tbQ' 11 0, q y � �q 4?)_;;;`,,,„ qss '--,,,, N-..4 ''‘' co KAHAKAI BOULEVARD y- t..... pah oe WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP rra€02-01-i1 P d sox 348 Consulting Civil Engineers HoWaloa,HI 725 6113 (6p8?32J-33= Construction Managers WKPBRK46M01350 Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa ByPass Road Traffic Movement - Buildout Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM ire aa4 op 4604� N KAHAKAI BOULEVARD :// CO A ahoy WITCHER ENGINEERING LIP JN 602-01-11 348 HI 725 Consulting Civil Engineers 6/13 (508)334-Ce= Construction Managers WKP6RKAM?013B0 Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa ByPass Road Traffic Movement - 5-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 4-ea co1cb 43 o,`U co*` CI. 4/Y04 6,rA 4619 0) Co c4 KAHAKAI BOULEVARD l pah WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JA 80Z-01-11 P.o.sox:;s Consulting Civil Engineers Holualoa,H1906725 6113 V {scjs 4 r3 Construction Managers PBRKAM309SSY Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa ByPass Road Traffic Movement - 5-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM tee cle o, eicv "tiovt) o4 e f -16,61 M r ° KAHAKAI BOULEVARD oN E () cze A dhow WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 How HI3 96725 Consulting Civil Engineers t 6/13 MOM S34-03r, Construction Managers WKPBRKAM_0135Y Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa ByPass Road Traffic Movement - 10-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM fret ,,,, Q. h co .1/Y0 ).-Aq SS o KAHAKAI BOULEVARD ho N Fell oa WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP P.O.Box 348 JN 60W M-11 Holualoa,HI 967 25 Consulting Civil Engineers 6;13 (803)334-0322 Construction Managers L4 Z SRKAM22o1310Y - f Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa ByPass Road Traffic Movement - 10-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM ika A, Co YAq {8 S ` KAHAKAI BOULEVARD j4) A a)0 a WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP P_o.Bcec Sa8 Consulting Civil Engineers JN 6M-01-11 Hakmba,Ht 96725 g g 6/13 MOS)324-03M Construction Managers WKPBRKAM201310Y Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa ByPass Road Traffic Movement - 20-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM d� "14104, N. tyc, # co s>.,14% 'ass F, M KAHAKAI BOULEVARD ,�o N °° CU i:)060 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP �ro ea^-01-15 PO.6oz a3R Consulting Civil Engineers 6115 T Hotvaloa,HI 96725 (ce) Construction Managers tM PBRLhM_2O15 OY Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Kahakai Boulevard and Keaau-Pahoa ByPass Road . F Traffic Movement - 20-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM p:19 O AI Sibzo {&) cb do co KAHAKAI BOULEVARD off71 co A WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 325 Consulting Civil Engineers 6/13 (SOS)334-0322 Construction Managers WKPBRKAM20132OY APPENDIX N TRAFFIC MOVEMENT DIAGRAMS CENTER DRIVEWAY UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AM & PM PEAK HOURS Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & Center Driveway Traffic Movement - Buildout Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AMto8:15 AM 296 301 41 255 10 291 I i i 0 CC w (n Q ( 41 -.4 -------'"f -J 78 37- -011111. ( . CENTER DRIVEWAY 94 84 Q 0 0_ 0 0 84 255 37 291 ti... 111j 16.11S-...j 339 328 sy WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6113 8 Hduaba,w 96725 Construction Managers WPVRCDWLTAM20130 (s0s)3aa-0322 Pro p osea Shopping Center, Pa. .oa, Hawaii ` Old Pahoa Village Road & Center Driveway Traffic Movement = Buildout Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM 339 295 66 273 14 281 \ ) Q O tY Lii 0 66 119 53--01 CENTER DRIVEWAY 14 144 130-------Th.,,,,, Q Z d Q_ J C) T , f 130 273 53 281 403 334 iVice WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-0141 P.O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6/13 Holuaioa.HI 96725 Construction Managers WPVRCDWLTPM2013B0 (808)334-0322 Proposed Shopping Center, Panoa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & Center Driveway Traffic Movement - 5-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 379 318 41 338 10 306 i■ 0 Q 2 r W •U 41 ---s- __-- - —1 78 5/ 37 '' - / CENTER DRIVEWAY 10 \\ 84 -.�`�. Q ) i Q a_ 0 0 I k I , E f 84 338 37 306 422 343 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 �x3 Consulting Civil Engineers 6/13 "��� a.III 96725 Construction Managers WPVRCDWLTAM20135y P.O.O.Boa-0322 Propose.. Shopping Center, PL. goa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & Center Driveway Traffic Movement - 5-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM 462 309 t` ' irrAtank rorAtank 66 396 14 295 ❑ 0 G w <t J 66 J 119 if , 53 CENTER DRIVEWAY IC 14 144 130--- ---_, Q 0 a. J 0 130 396 53 295 526 348 { k`/' WITCHER ENGINEERING LIP JN 602-01-11 P.O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6113 Holua'oa,HI 98725 Construction Managers WPVRCDWLTPM20135Y (808)334-0322 Proposed Shopping Center, Panoa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & Center Driveway Traffic Movement - 10-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AMto8:15 AM 414 331 41 373 10 321 i . i i Q 0 Ce � 4 J 41 78 IC 5 37-0011111111 1' r CENTER DRIVEWAY 10 94 84 n a 0 Q iZ 0 J 0 i 84 373 37 321 1111."11.1114 gaill"Selmi 457 358 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-i1 P.O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers X13 Holuatoa,H 96725 Construction Managers WPVRCDWLTAM20131 Oy (808)3340322 Proposes. Shopping Center, P ...oa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & Center Driveway Traffic Movement - 10-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM 503 324 irmsi i / 66 437 14 310 { A 0 0 W 6s ...i 119 if 53 -o CENTER DRIVEWAY 14 144 13 Q 0 Z CL In 0 { 130 437 53 310 11616.11V...j 4.11.y..ai 567 363 WE WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P.O.BOX 34s Consulting Civil Engineers 6/13 Holualoa,HI 96725 Construction Managers WPVRCOWLTPM201310Y (808)334-0522 { Proposed Shopping Center, Parma, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & Center Driveway Traffic Movement - 20-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 495 365 i/ i 41 454 10 355 , , } Q O Q tY W . J 41 J 78 37 i CENTER DRIVEWAY 94 N 84 Q O Q f1. 0 84 454 37 355 538 392 Wee WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 6O2 01-11 P.O.9°R 348 Consulting Civil Engineers sirs "°"` °HI 96725 Construction Managers WPVRCDWLTAM201320y .O.Bo€-4s2z r Proposed Shopping Center, Pa. ioa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & Center Driveway Traffic Movement - 20-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM 599 357 * irmAnni 1 66 533 a 14 343 A f Q 0 0 Q 119 > ( i 53 CENTER DRIVEWAY 14 144 i 1 Q i Q Q t ta., 0 J 5 r 130 533 53 3 i ‘IIIIVIIIIJ 161.1V11.1° 343 663 396 f t itik WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP jw 002-01-11 P.O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 8113 Howaioa.HI 96725 Construction Managers ■ WPVRCDWLTPM201320Y (805)334-0322 r APPENDIX 0 TRAFFIC MOVEMENT DIAGRAMS SOUTH DRIVEWAY UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AM & PM PEAK HOURS Proposed Shopping Center, Panora, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & South Driveway Traffic Movement - Buildout Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 339 328 ' 11 328 13 315 / ‘ , / 0 F i) 5 11 J 1 21 > I f/ 10 .10001 SOUTH DRIVEWAY _- 13 `° 28 15 0,,,,. <\\\ O \ Q a o J O 15 328 10 315 343 325 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P.O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers s+g3 Hoivataa,HI sst_s Construction Managers WPVRSDWLTAM2013B0 {808)334-0322 Proposes Shopping Center, Pa..oa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & South Driveway Traffic Movement - Buildout Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 AM to 5:15 AM 403 334 18 385 4 330 Q 1Y t. W J 18 J Q 32 14 SOUTH DRIVEWAY 4 43 39 O Q � Cl. 39 385 14 330 161.14101.1111 ‘1.111V...r 424 344 `� WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P.O.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 12111 Holualoa,HI 96725 Construction Managers f WPVRSDWLTPM2013BO (809)334-0322 Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & South Driveway Traffic Movement - 5-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 429 361 11 418 13 348 A 0 Q 0 Ce W <C J 11 ._.[ 21 { > / 10 / SOUTH DRIVEWAY ,,,-iol 13 -- 28 15 Q O z Q lz 0 O 15 418 10 343 433 358 &MierWITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 PAD.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 6113 "°"'a'°a HI ssi:s Construction Managers WPVRSQWLTAM2o135Y (8? -0322 Proposed Shopping Center, Pa. boa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & South Driveway Traffic Movement - 5-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 AM to 5:15 AM 538 368 8 5 364 { 412O4 A . { Q _________) o W C 5 r 32 r't 14 .a.a'4 — '°- .-.--. SOUTH DRIVEWAY :�= 43 `' 0 N\\ 2 1 Q 0 • } i k i 39 520 14 364 161.1%,"111 iiiiiimNeuld { 559 378 { 4 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP at 602-01-11 A.O.Sox 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 12/11 Hoivaloa,HI 96725 WPVRSDWLTPM20135Y (80SM4-0322 Construction Managers { Proposed Shopping Center, Partoa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & South Driveway Traffic Movement -10-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AMto8:15 AM 473 399 t-.'-� taken, 11 13 384 � Q IX W d 11 .__1 5 2 21 10 SOUTH DRIVEWAY 28 15 < 1 O I Q 0 0 J O 1 1 15 462 10 384 475 394 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P.0.Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers s�13 womawa,�i 96725 Construction Managers WPVRSDWLTAM201310Y .0.B a-os22 Proposes. Shopping Center, Pu. 1oa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & South Driveway Traffic Movement - 10-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 AM to 5:15 AM 591 406 18 573 4 402 f O Eli Lr F Q 18 -.L-z� -J 32 w i/ 14 --- SOUTH DRIVEWAY 43 39 Q 0 Q 1 ' 0 —J O 39 573 14 402 16.. E 4..1111temi `. 612 416 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 802-01-11 P.O.sox 34.8 Consulting Civil Engineers 12J11 Holualoa,HI 96725 Construction Managers i WPVRSDWLTPM201310Y (5051334-0322 Proposed Shopping Center, Pahoa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & South Driveway Traffic Movement -20-Year Condition AM Peak Hour - 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 573 481 i fmAarmill ________l, 11 562 13 468 i ❑ r Q tL N V Q 11 J_ 21 � 10 1 i SOUTH DRIVEWAY ,,�,. 4 28 � 15 Q O Q \\ 11. J O 15 562 10 468 ‘aliNemi 1.114e111114 577 478 wk. WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 P.O.Box 346 Consulting Civil Engineers 6/13 M Holualoa,HI 96725 Construction Managers WPVRSDWLTA201320Y (808W4-0322 Proposed Shopping Center, Pa._ .oa, Hawaii Old Pahoa Village Road & South Driveway Traffic Movement - 20-Year Condition PM Peak Hour - 4:15 AM to 5:15 AM 717 494 18 699 4 490 o E Q r O tY � W 18 _1 jJ 32 14 SOUTH DRIVEWAY ,l 4 43 39 <t <L 0t o O ( I ( 39 699 14 490 738 504 S iVjg- c WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 602-01-11 PA,Box 348 Consulting Civil Engineers 12/11 "°'08ba,HI 96725 Construction Managers WPVRSDWLTPM201320Y (808)334-83 22 APPENDIX P SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY DATA warrants summary rage 1 or Z Warrants Summary Information Analyst BEW Intersection 2 WAY Agency/Co KUWUHARA Jurisdiction DOT Date Performed 6/21/13 Units U.S.Customary KUWUHARA#602 02 12 Project ID %N Time Period Analyzed WOPVRKB2 East/West Street WOPVR I BKVD North/South Street OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD File Name WOPVRKB2%NOMM Major Street North-South Project Description KUWUHARA#602-02-12 WOPVRK82%N General Rom Network Major Street Speed (mph) 35 F Population < 10,000 Two Major Routes F Nearest Signal(ft) 0 F Coordinated Signal System Weekend Count F Crashes(per year) _ 0 i Adequate Trials of Alternatives 5-yr Growth Factor 2 EB WB NB SB Geometry and Traffic LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane usage L T R L T R L T R L T R Vehicle Volume Averages(vph) 50 47 41 40 24 84 61 166 85 229 356 77 Peds(ped/h)/Gaps(gaps/h) — 0/0 — — 0/0 — — 0/0 — -- 0/0 — Delay(s/veh)/(veh-hr) — 0/0 -- — 0/0 — — 0/0 — -- 0/0 — Warrant 1:Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume F 1 A. Minimum Vehicular Volumes (Both major approaches--and-- higher minor approach) --or-- I- 1 B. Interruption of Continuous Traffic(Both major approaches—and--higher minor approach) --or-- r 1 80%Vehicular—and— Interruption Volumes(Both major approaches--and— higher minor approach) F Warrant 2:Four-Hour Vehicular Volume F 2 A. Four-Hour Vehicular Volumes(Both major approaches--and—higher minor approach) F Warrant 3:Peak Hour F 3 A. Peak-Hour Conditions(Minor delay--and— minor volume—and—total volume)—or— F 3 B. Peak-Hour Vehicular Volumes(Both major approaches--and-- higher minor approach) F Warrant 4:Pedestrian Volume 4 A. Pedestrian Volumes(Four hours--or--one hour)--and-- 1— 4 B. Gaps Same Period(Four hours--or--one hour) r- Warrant 5:School Crossing F 5. Student Volumes--and-- F 5. Gaps Same Period F Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System i 6. Degree of Platooning (Predominant direction or both directions) F Warrant 7: Crash Experience F 7 A.Adequate trials of alternatives,observance and enforcement failed--and-- F 7 B. Reported crashes susceptible to correction by signal (12-month period)--and-- 7 C. 80%Volumes for Warrants 1A, 1B—or—4 are satisfied F • file•//C`.•\Tlnrurn ntc and Settinac\Witnher Friar T.T.P\T.nnal Rettinac\Temn\uw7kSF.tmn 6/7RnOl; Warrants summary rage z or z Warrant 8:Roadway Network r 8 A.Weekday Volume(Peak hour total—and—projected warrants 1, 2 or 3)—or— (- 8 B.Weekend Volume(Five hours total) r Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.5 Generated: 6/28/2013 3:21 PM { ( file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\w2k5E.tmp 6/28/2011 Warrants Volume rage 1 of Z Warrants Volume Information Analyst BEW Agency/Co KUWUHARA Intersection 2 WAY Date Performed 6/21/13 Jurisdiction DOT KUWUHARA#602-02-12 Units U.S.Customary Project ID Time Period Analyzed WOPVRKB2%N North/South Street OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD East/West Street KAHAKAI BKVD Major Street North-South File Name WOPVRKB2%NOMM Project Description KUWUHARA#602-02-12 WOPVRKB2%N Warrant 1 Condition A-Minimum Vehicular Volume Condition B•Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles per hour on Vel>iclo higher-volume ftigl Number of lanos for Vehicles per hour on major street rni -street approach Number of Lanes for Vehicles ow hour on major street minor-s moving traffic on each approach (total of both approaches) (one direction otllyi !taming traffic on each approach ftt:431 of both:approaches') (one c ' Major Street Minor Sweet 100W B0°4` 70%' 100W 80%' 70% Major Street Minor Stall 100r' 90?<` 70% 100A' 1 1 . 500 400 350 150 120 105 •2 or more... 1................. 000 480 420 150 120 105 1 t............... 750 600 525 75 .2 or more.,. 2 or more.,. 600 480 420 200 160 140 2 or mote... 1 . 900 720 630 75 r 1 2 or more.... 500 400 350 200 160 140 2 or more... 2 or more... 900 720 630 100 - . 1.-.............. 2 or more.... 750 600 525 100 Warrant 2 I Warrant 3 I 500 a 600 ■M,'■■■■■■. 2 OR MORE LANES t 2 OR MIRE LANES = 400 ( I I , 500 -� ?OR MORE LANES&20R MORE L+IJi C 20R MORE LANES d t LANE r- 400 E11,''� 200 �Itt` ikl• _ .1 LAME 8 1 LANE w '� 208 LORE 1E5E 1 L u 203 ¢T ■■■..,�`R:._,t LA NE 6 too '80 z-. too ■�����` �`_ _ = 300 400 500 600 702 809 000 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 40) SOO 60) 700 800 640 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1000 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-VPH MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-' 400 OR MORE LANES iI2 OR MARE LANES I I I I f Z. r tJ u30 ( R _ 400 .� .2 OR MORE LANES 6 2+MORE LANES— Lct G 208 MORE LANES I LANE w ` / 2 OR MORE LANES&1 LANE al E 2� ���,ii%Tiwrigipiii 1(.J4E&1 LANE cal fit, t`i_`��� 1 LANE fl 1 to Cr 100 = t.2 'c0 S 20D 300 440 000 00v 700 600 003 1000 300 400 000 102 700 000 00_+ 1000 1100 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-VF'H MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROAOI Volume Summary I Major Street Lanes 2+ Minor Street Lanes 2+ Speed 35 Population <10000 Hours Major Minor Total 1A 1A 1B 1B 2 3A 3B Volume Volume Volume (70%) (56%) (70%) (56%) (70%) (70%) (70%) 07-08 1122 136 1390 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 08-09 794 108 1001 No No _ Yes Yes Yes No No 09-10 766 110 979 No No Yes Yes No No No 10-11 808 117 1039 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 11-12 754 117 983 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 12-13 800 126 1052 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 13-14 902 132 1157 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 14-15 1035 164 1336 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 15-16 1270 212 1669 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes file)/C:\T)nenments and Seltincrs\Witcher Rno-r T.T,P\T.ncal Spttino-s\Tern\w2kSfl tmn 60R/2011 warrants volume rage .. Vl G 16-17 1352 237 1779 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 17-18 1206 208 1594 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 18-19 898 156 1189 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Totals 11707 1823 15168 5 10 12 12 11 0 5 Copyright©2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.5 Generated: 6/28/2013 3:21 PM ( f ( file://C:\Documents and Settings\Witcher Engr LLP\Local Settings\Temp\w2k5D.tmp 6/28/2013 Hr : MUTCD Signal Warrants Relr 'e 5 . 5 Analyst : BEW Intersection: 2 WAY Agency: KUWUHARA Jurisdiction: DOT Date : 6/21/13 Units : U.S . Customary ^roject ID: KUWUHARA#602-02-12 WOPVRKB2%Nysis Year: 20YR Street : KAHAKAI BKVD NS Street : OLD PAHOA VILLAGE RD General Information Major St . Speed (mph) : 35 Population: Less than 10000 Nearest Signal (ft) : 0 Coordinated Signal System: N Crashes per Yr: 0 School Crossing Students in Highest Hour: 0 Adequate Gaps in Period: 0 Minutes in Period: 0 Roadway Network Two Major Routes : 0 Weekend Count : 0 5-yr Growth Factor: 2 _Geometry and Traffic I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 neUsage I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Results Warrant 1 : Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume [X]_ 1 A. Minimum Vehicular Volumes [ 1 B . Interruption of Continuous Traffic [X] 1 80% Vehicular --and-- Interruption Volumes [X] Warrant 2 : Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 2 A. Four-Hour Vehicular Volumes [X] Warrant 3 : Peak Hour [X] 3 A. Peak-Hour Conditions [ ] 3 B. Peak-Hour Vehicular Volume Hours Met [X] Warrant 4 : Pedestrian Volume [ 4 A. Pedestrian Volumes [ ] 4 B. Gaps Same Period [ Warrant 5 : School Crossing [ ] 5 A. Student Volumes [ ] 5 B . Gaps Same Period [ ] Warrant 6 : Coordinated Signal System Degree of Platooning [ Warrant 7 : Crash Experience [ ] 7 A. Adequate trials of alternatives [ ] 7 B. Reported crashes [ 7 80% Volumes for Warrant; A, 1B --or-- 4 [X] Warrant 8 : Roadway Network [ 8 A. Weekday Volume [ l 8 B. Weekend Volume [ ) Summary Major Minor Total Delay 1A 1A 1B 1B 2 3A 3B Hours Volume Volume Volume (Veh-hr) 70% 56% 70% 56% 70% 70% 70% 07-08 1122 136 1390 0 . 0 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 08-09 794 108 1001 0 . 0 No No Yes Yes Yes No No 09-10 766 110 979 0 . 0 No No Yes Yes No No No 10-11 808 117 1039 0 . 0 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 11-12 754 117 983 0 . 0 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 12-13 800 126 1052 0 . 0 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 13-14 902 132 1157 0 . 0 No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 14-15 1035 164 1336 0 . 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 15-16 1270 212 1669 0 . 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 16-17 1352 237 1779 0 . 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 17-18 1206 208 1594 0 . 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 18-19 898 156 1189 0 . 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Total 11707 1823 15168 5 10 12 12 11 0 5 Traffic Volumes (vph) �. Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 51 40 45 45 20 67 60 251 107 219 404 81 38 37 33 33 15 51 44 171 74 160 286 59 39 39 32 32 16 55 45 160 73 160 276 52 42 41 34 34 18 62 49 159 74 172 291 63 44 40 33 32 18 62 48 143 70 166 266 61 47 44 35 35 20 71 52 145 73 180 284 66 44 43 36 34 22 76 54 139 73 244 324 68 44 49 44 41 28 95 67 159 87 252 387 83 69 63 55 55 35 122 85 185 106 317 473 104 70 61 59 59 40 138 93 188 112 345 501 113 66 61 53 51 35 122 83 167 100 308 447 101 50 46 39 38 27 91 62 125 74 228 334 75 Pedestrian Volumes and Gaps (Per Hour) Volume Gap Volume Gap Volume Gap Volume Gap O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delay sec/veh veh-hrs sec/veh veh-hrs sec/veh veh-hrs sec/veh veh-hrs 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0* 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 i" 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 O . 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 - 0 . 0 O . 0 0 . 0 _ . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 O . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 r r f^ i f t It I! 1I 1 1i 1i l! 1i 'I 1i IY 1! r 'o m m m xmgg3 m m x m m m mAII � 6a 1 U 11, 6f ; 111Ul I i ..II 1 @ ! VI' it fit lit tit 1ft 41 VII ti i Illi+ is €$` ° ! � g ill L��� gel - i I it zit E . i s li f < [ i e Iss ls $ s ;hi gild 4 OE' ill t _� � s ol � s m a _ fi S 1 I 1 3 S « b1 z ;G W. 1 £ g ggg 1 / gill 8 08 81 xil 511E �� _ N i 3 «�a a j i8 1 sg oU -at 88 8 1F:'p w m x 4 . m s i «5 1 s t st 05 t ' SS $ us sg �'' O N 9 y tEl 9 4!'. w s Sri ` s; o 9 '+2 i 1 p 1 —Arm wp9T $ v- p°Oi $'p 'wig psp omni 8 :i--mil R co.co-1 _ _ 1. ;4%$li° y�y4 EVmo so3% S S w �i 515 z z oS -A' w 3 F w nn a a5x_: =3 up. 3 og m `i x o it s t"ya�^ £ 3 3. 0 8°0 'BSS! °a p p Q_ i'Om e 3v v S i B r S� It u o I'P"a ,s "e 1 ., a = 0 s "g Fm+D O:`C V" 0 0 i S S � s e gS=a i V7*,' x i I ix N 02 2 x g a o- w w` w w - - m Fm '� 2 m m m 6 E T g s o° a. 3 Planning Dept. Exhibit N PLAtirn D PM tIEil-1 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORII$3 Sti, 12 pH 1: 23 COUNTY OF HAWAII HILO, HAWAII DATE: June 3,2013 Wiendrialtidait TO: Daryn S.Arai, Planning Department FROM: Department of Public Works, Engineering Division SUBJECT: BT KUWAHARA EA KAHAKAI BLVD EXTENSION State Land Use Boundary Amendment App. (SLU 12-0000033) Change of Zone Application (REZ 12-000155) Applicant: B.T. Kuwahara, LLC Request Agricultural to Urban and A-la to CV-10 Tax Map Keys: 1-5-07: 006, 069, &070 t In response to your email of May 30, 2013,we provide the following. Regarding Department of Public Works, the process should be as determined by Office of the Corporation Counsel with the accepting authority being the Hawaii County Council. We'll recommend dedication provided it's constructed to dedicable standard as set by standard detail R-32. The non-standard aspect is that it'll be 55'wide instead of 60'. To accommodate the non-standard width, we propose a slight modification to the detail to extend the opposite side pavement from 21' to 25'. This would also allow for a smooth transition into the Pahoa Village Road that has a similar section without curb, gutter, & sidewalk. Refer to the enclosed sketch (enlarged to show detail). Note: If constructed to dedicable standard the County of Hawaii must accept dedication [see HRS 264-1(c)(2) below]: "In every case where the road, alley, street, bikeway, way, lane, trail, bridge, or highway is constructed and completed as required by any ordinance of the county or any rule, regulation, or resolution thereof having the effect of law,the legislative body of the county will accept the dedication or surrender of the same without exercise of discretion." If the Extension is to be built to a lessor standard, then we believe the Hawaii County Council will have discretion. Questions may be referred to Kelly Gomes at ext. 832�ianning Dept. SCANNED Enclosure Exhibit ! ! X013 S. Byo86348 County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer . ., E E 1 60' ' - ----- ---- '1.1 I 7' 2 21' 4* 21' 2' p 7' I in. . ..iipi ..wil• , 41=2"111.112=1.111.....11.111.11112.=.111121‘111"1.11111"."."111.1.11"1".11.1".1.1.611.C2:211"1"1.1j1 C)‘e'i 41t ' t '""fk•A BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL STREETS it .19 • !~•' 2' 21' 4.$- 14.' it c ,.... ..1 1--... i [ al"="1"0=amemm■msw"www . . ...... - BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL STREETS • STREET CROSS SECTIONS WITH SIDEWALK COUNTY OF HAWAII [ : STREET CROSS-SECT1ONS WITH SIDEWAUt STANDARD DETAILS R-32 SCALE NTS SEPTEMBER 2008 REVISED „' WATER' 79: 49 `•oG �:,, DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY • COUNTY OF HAWAII ). 0-■ ppHAwpp.",,,° 3 4 5 KEKUANAO'A STREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAII 96720 TELEPHONE (808) 961-8050 • FAX (808) 961-8657 September 12, 2012 TO Ms. BJ Leithead Todd,Director Planning Department FROM: Quirino Antonio,Jr., Manager-Chief Engineer SUBJECT: STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT(SLU 12-000033) CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION(REZ 12-000155) APPLICANT—B.T.KUWAHARA,LLC REQUEST-A-lA TO CV-10 TAX MAP KEY 1-5-007:006,069,AND 070 Based on our previous determination and correspondence with the applicant regarding water availability to the subject parcels(see attached letter dated September 13,2011),please be informed that there are a maximum of 14 units of water available to each of the subject parcels. Each unit of water is equal to an average daily usage of 400 gallons. The remaining comments and conditions from our August 20,2012, letter to your department regarding the subject applications still stand. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Finn McCall of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070, extension 255. Sincerely yours, Quiri Antonio,Jr., P.E. Man r-Chief Engineer FM:dfg Enc. copy— B.T. Kuwahara, LLC Inoue Hawaii Realty Corporation '°"`"'""'--------• I SCANNED Dept. , ;tip Plannin g Exhibit c 10 2 _Water, Our Most Precious Resource. . . Ka Wai A Kline. . . The TMnartmnr.t of dttstnr Ci,nnh■ Pr”..t r7 , r 0 WATER s 19 4yi °'0 3�;' DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY • = 7AWAll Y OF• 20 TELEPHONE (808) 961-8050 • FAX (808) 961-8657 September 13,2011 Bryson T.Kuwahara P.O.Box 421 Pahoa,HI 96778 WATER AVAILABILITY TAX MAP KEY 1-5-007:006,069 AND 070 This is in response to your inquiry of water availability to the subject parcels. Water is available from an existing 6-inch waterline within Pahoa Village Road fronting the subject parcels. The current water availability conditions in the area,which are subject to change without notice,allow for a maximum of 14 units of water,at 400 gallons per day,per unit,or a total average daily usage of 5,600 gallons per day,per pre-existing lot of record. Pursuant to the Planning Department's determination of three(3)pre-existing lots of record,each subject parcel would be allowed up to the maximum of 14 units of water for a combined total of 42 units of water. Please keep in mind that this letter shall not be construed as a water commitment. In other words,unless a water commitment is officially effected,water availability is subject to change,depending on the water situation. Should there be any questions,please contact Mr.Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070,extension 256. Sincerely yours, I /Milto ►.Pavan,P.E. Man:,. -Chief Engineer RQ:dfg . . .W a t e r, Our Most'Precious R e s o u r c e . . . K a W a i A`Zane . . . The Department of Water Sopp'y 4 2n Egr at Opportunity prowler and employer • • FWAiER ,‘ 19 49•• � P;`? DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY • COUNTY OF HAWAII - oFenwt•\` P,t 3 4 5 KEKUANAO'A STREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAII 96720 TELEPHONE (808) 961-8050 • FAX (808) 961-8657 August 20,2012 TO: Ms. BJ Leithead Todd, Director Planning Department FROM: Quirino Antonio, Jr., Manager-Chief Eningeer SUBJECT: STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT(SLU 12-000033) CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION(REZ 12-000155) APPLICANT—B. T.KUWAHARA,LLC 1,,r1 REQUEST: A-la TO CV-10 TAX MAP KEY 1-5-007:006,069,AND 070 We have reviewed the subject applications and have the following comments and conditions. Water can be made available from existing 6-inch and 12-inch waterlines within Pahoa Village Road fronting the subject parcels. Parcel Nos. 6 and 69 are both currently served by 5/8-inch meters, each are limited to a maximum daily usage of 600 gallons. The Department has no objection to the proposed commercial center, which includes a grocery store,family medical facilities, garden center, restaurants, retail shops, and hardware store, subject to the following conditions: 1. The current water availability conditions in the area of the proposed development can provide up to a maximum of 14 units of water per pre-existing lot of record. Each unit of water is equal to a maximum daily usage of 600 gallons. Please note our records show that the subject parcels were created from a previous subdivision (Subdivision Application No. 72-129,Tax Map Key 1-5-007:006)and therefore each parcel does not qualify as a pre-existing lot of record. In other words,the total amount of water available to the proposed development is 14 units of water or a maximum daily usage of 8,400 gallons. 2. Prior to effecting a water commitment for the subject application,the applicant must submit estimated maximum daily water usage calculations,prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawai`i,for review and approval. The water usage calculations should include the total estimated maximum daily water usage(in gallons per day)and the estimated peak flow(in gallons per minute). Based on the water usage calculations provided,we will determine if water can be made available. If the applicant's estimated water usage is beyond what our current water availability conditions can provide, extensive improvements will be required,which may include, but not be limited to, additional source, storage, and booster pump facilities. 3. The proposed land use will require the installation of a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly,within five(5)feet of the meter on private property, for any meter serving the proposed development. The installation of the backflow prevention assembly(s)must be inspected and approved by our department before water service can be activated. SCANNED Planning Dept. ;Aug Exhibit `Water, Our v[ost Precious resource . . . Ida Wai.�!Kane . . . •.____ .,. The 11o..a./mev.f ni lAin�a.C..n..i.. ......C......i Il...,..w.....a.......,..:.1........ -......i,....,- Ms.BJ Leithead Todd, Planning Director Page 2 August 20,2012 4. Subject to other agencies'requirements to construct improvements within the road right-of-way fronting the property affected by the proposed development,the applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and adjustment of the Department's affected water system facilities, should they be necessary. 5. For your information,the existing 12-inch waterline fronting the property is adequate to provide 2,000 gallons per minute of flow for fire protection, as required per the Department's Water System Standards for the proposed type of land use. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Finn McCall of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070, extension 255. Sincerely yours, Quirin Antonio,Jr., P.E. Mana r-Chief Engineer FM:dfg copy— B.T. Kuwahara,LLC Inoue Hawaii Realty Corporation „,,,,,,,,, William P.,Kenai z Darren J. Rosario Mayor f $ i✓.�l. Fire Chief 1_7 xjtx a r:.1 t;. c '���+rgrr _• .M�_ Renwick J. Victorino OL M„ •' _ `”°'� ���.....��—= Deputy Fire Chief QCountp Df athat t HAWAII FIRE DEPARTMENT 25 Aupuni Street • Room 2501• Hilo,Hawaii 96720 (808)932-2900 • Fax(808)932-2928 July 11, 2012 TO: BJ LEITHEAD TODD,PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: DARREN J. ROSARIO,FIRE CHIEF SUBJECT: STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDEMENT APPLICATION (SLU 12-000033) REQUEST: AGRICUTURAL TO URBAN CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION(REZ 12-000155) REQUEST:A-la to CV-10 APPLICANT:B.T. KUWAHARA, LLC TAX MAP KEY: 1-5-007:006, 069, 070 In regards to the above-mentioned SLU and REZ application, the following shall be in accordance: NFPA 1, UNIFORM FIRE CODE,2006 EDITION Note:NFPA 1, Hawai'i State Fire Code with County amendments. County amendments are identified with a preceding "C--,"of the reference code. Chapter 18 Fire Department Access and Water Supply 18.1 General. Fire department access and water supplies shall comply with this chapter. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature,or where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy, or where access for fire apparatus is unduly difficult, or areas where there is an inadequate fire flow, or inadequate fire hydrant spacing, and the AHJ may require additional safeguards including, but not limited to, additional fire appliance units,more than one type of appliance, or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved. 18.1.1 Plans. 18.1.1.1 Fire Apparatus Access. Plans for fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. 18.1.1.2 Fire Hydrant Systems. Plans and specifications for fire hydrant systems shall b; �AwAO '. submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. Planning Dept. i�t p 0 0 j t , Exhibit Hawai'i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. ® 0 y.. �'.. .� ', a ...............: • BJ Leithead Todd July 11, 2012 Page 2 C—18.1.1.2.1 Fire Hydrant use and Restrictions.No unauthorized person shall use or operate any Fire hydrant unless such person first secures permission or a permit from the owner or representative of the department, or company that owns or governs that water supply or system. Exception: Fire Department personnel conducting firefighting operations, hydrant testing, and/or maintenance, and the flushing and acceptance of hydrants witnessed by Fire Prevention Bureau personnel. 18.2 Fire Department Access. 18.2.1 Fire department access and fire department access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Section 18.2. 18.2.2* Access to Structures or Areas. 18.2.2.1 Access Box(es). The AHJ shall have the authority to require an access box(es)to be installed in an accessible location where access to or within a structure or area is difficult because of security. 18.2.2.2 Access to Gated Subdivisions or Developments. The AHJ shall have the authority to require fire department access be provided to gated subdivisions or developments through the use of an approved device or system. 18.2.2.3 Access Maintenance. The owner or occupant of a structure or area, with required fire department access as specified in 18.2.2.1 or 18.2.2.2, shall notify the AHJ when the access is modified in a manner that could prevent fire department access. 18.2.3 Fire Department Access Roads. 18.2.3.1 Required Access. 18.2.3.1.1 Approved fire department access roads shall be provided for every facility,building, or portion of a building hereafter constructed or relocated. 18.2.3.1.2 Fire Department access roads shall consist of roadways, fire lanes, parking lots lanes, or a combination thereof. 18.2.3.1.3* When not more than two one- and two-family dwellings or private garages, carports, sheds, agricultural buildings, and detached buildings or structures 400ft (37 m2) or less are present,the requirements of 18.2.3.1 through 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be modified by the AHJ. BJ Leithead Todd July 11, 2012 Page 3 18.2.3.1.4 When fire department access roads cannot be installed due to location on property, topography, waterways, nonnegotiable grades, or other similar conditions, the AHJ shall be authorized to require additional fire protection features. 18.2.3.2 Access to Building. 18.2.3.2.1 A fire department access road shall extend to within in 50 ft (15 m)of at least one exterior door that can be opened from the outside and that provided access to the interior of the building. 18.2.3.2.1.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13, NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R, the distance in 18.2.3.2.2 shall be permitted to be increased to 300 feet. 18.2.3.2.2 Fire department access roads shall be provided such that any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located not more than 150 ft (46 m) from fire department access roads as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. 18.2.3.2.2.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13, NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R, the distance in 18.2.3.2.2 shall be permitted to be increased to 450 ft (137 m). 18.2.3.3 Multiple Access Roads. More than one fire department access road shall be provided when it is determined by the AHJ that access by a single road could be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, or other factors that could limit access. 18.2.3.4 Specifications. 18.2.3.4.1 Dimensions. C- 18.2.3.4.1.1 FDAR shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20ft with an approved turn around area if the FDAR exceeds 150 feet. Exception: FDAR for one and two family dwellings shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 15 feet, with an area of not less than 20 feet wide within 150 feet of the structure being protected. An approved turn around area shall be provided if the FDAR exceeds 250 feet. C- 18.2.3.4.1.2 FDAR shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less then 13ft 6 in. C- 18.2.3.4.1.2.1 Vertical clearances may be increased or reduced by the AHJ, provided such increase or reduction does not impair access by the fire apparatus, and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating such approved changes. • BJ Leithead Todd July 11,2012 Page 4 18.2.3.4.1.2.2 Vertical clearances shall be increased when vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to accommodate fire apparatus. C- 18.2.3.4.2 Surface. Fire department access roads and bridges shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads (25 Tons) of the fire apparatus. Such FDAR and shall be comprised of an all-weather driving surface. 18.2.3.4.3 Turning Radius. C- 18.2.3.4.3.1 Fire department access roads shall have a minimum inside turning radius of 30 feet, and a minimum outside turning radius of 60 feet. 18.2.3.4.3.2 Turns in fire department access road shall maintain the minimum road width. 18.2.3.4.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 ft (46 m) in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the fire apparatus to turn around. 18.2.3.4.5 Bridges. 18.2.3.4.5.1 When a bridge is required to be used as part of a fire department access road, it shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with county requirements. 18.2.3.4.5.2 The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 18.2.3.4.5.3 Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges where required by the AHJ. 18.2.3.4.6 Grade. C- 18.2.3.4.6.1 The maximum gradient of a Fire department access road shall not exceed 12 percent for unpaved surfaces and 15 percent for paved surfaces. In areas of the FDAR where a Fire apparatus would connect to a Fire hydrant or Fire Department Connection, the maximum gradient of such area(s) shall not exceed 10 percent. 18.2.3.4.6.2* The angle of approach and departure for any means of fire department access road shall not exceed 1 ft drop in 20 ft (0.3 m drop in 6 m) or the design limitations of the fire apparatus of the fire department, and shall be subject to approval by the AHJ. BJ Leithead Todd July 11,2012 Page 5 18.2.3.4.6.3 Fire department access roads connecting to roadways shall be provided with curb cuts extending at least 2 ft (0.61 m)beyond each edge of the fire lane. 18.2.3.4.7 Traffic Calming Devices. The design and use of traffic calming devices shall be approved the AHJ. 18.2.3.5 Marking of Fire Apparatus Access Road. 18.2.3.5.1 Where required by the AHJ, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained to identify fire department access roads or to prohibit the obstruction thereof of both. 18.2.3.5.2 A marked fire apparatus access road shall also be known as a fire lane. 18.2.4* Obstruction and Control of Fire Department Access Road. 18.2.4.1 General. 18.2.4.1.1 The required width of a fire department access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including by the parking of vehicles. 18.2.4.1.2 Minimum required widths and clearances established under 18.2.3.4 shall be maintained at all times. 18.2.4.1.3* Facilities and structures shall be maintained in a manner that does not impair or impede accessibility for fire department operations. 18.2.4.1.4 Entrances to fire departments access roads that have been closed with gates and barriers in accordance with 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be obstructed by parked vehicles. 18.2.4.2 Closure of Accessways. 18.2.4.2.1 The AHJ shall be authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across roads, trails, or other accessways not including public streets, alleys, or highways. 18.2.4.2.2 Where required, gates and barricades shall be secured in an approved manner. BJ Leithead Todd July 11,2012 Page 6 18.2.4.2.3 Roads, trails, and other accessways that have been closed and obstructed in the manner prescribed by 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be trespassed upon or used unless authorized by the owner and the AHJ. 18.2.4.2.4 Public officers acting within their scope of duty shall be permitted to access restricted property identified in 18.2.4.2.1. 18.2.4.2.5 Locks, gates, doors,barricades, chains, enclosures, signs, tags, or seals that have been installed by the fire department or by its order or under its control shall not be removed, unlocked, destroyed, tampered with, or otherwise vandalized in any manner. 18.3 Water Supplies and Fire Hydrants 18.3.1* A water supply approved by the county, capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are hereafter constructed, or moved into or within the county. When any portion of the facility or building is in excess of 150 feet (45 720 mm) from a water supply on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on- site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided when required by the AHJ. For on-site fire hydrant requirements see section 18.3.3. EXCEPTIONS: 1. When facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system the provisions of section 18.3.1 may be modified by the AHJ. 2. When water supply requirements cannot be installed due to topography or other conditions, the AHJ may require additional fire protection as specified in section 18.3.2 as amended in the code. 3. When there are not more than two dwellings, or two private garage, carports, sheds and agricultural. Occupanicies, the requirements of section 18.3.1 may be modified by AHJ. 18.3.2*Where no adequate or reliable water distribution system exists, approved reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, fire department tanker shuttles, or other approved systems capable of providing the required fire flow shall be permitted. 18.3.3* The location, number and type of fire hydrants connected to a water supply capable of delivering the required fire flow shall be provided on a fire apparatus access road on the site of the premises or both, in accordance with the appropriate county water requirements. 18.3.4 Fire Hydrants and connections to other approved water supplies shall be accessible to the fire department. BJ Leithead Todd July 11,2012 Page 7 18.3.5 Private water supply systems shall be tested and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25 or county requirements as determined by the AHJ. 18.3.6 Where required by the AHJ, fire hydrants subject to vehicular damage shall be protected unless located within a public right of way. 18.3.7 The AHJ shall be notified whenever any fire hydrant is placed out of service or returned to service. Owners of private property required to have hydrants shall maintain hydrant records of approval, testing, and maintenance, in accordance with the respective county water requirements. Records shall be made available for review by the AHJ upon request. C-- 18.3.8 Minimum water supply for buildings that do not meet the minimum County water standards: Buildings up to 2000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 3,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings 2001- 3000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 6,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, 3001- 6000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 12,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, greater than 6000 square feet, shall meet the minimum County water and fire flow requirements. Multiple story buildings shall multiply the square feet by the amount of stories when determining the minimum water supply. Commercial buildings requiring a minimum fire flow of 2000gpm per the Department of Water standards shall double the minimum water supply reserved for firefighting. Fire Department Connections (FDC)to alternative water supplies shall comply with 18.3.8 (1)-(6) of this code. NOTE: In that water catchment systems are being used as a means of water supply for firefighting, such systems shall meet the following requirements: (1) In that a single water tank is used for both domestic and firefighting water, the water for domestic use shall not be capable of being drawn from the water reserved for firefighting; S BJ Leithead Todd July 11,2012 Page 8 (2) Minimum pipe diameter sizes from the water supply to the Fire Department Connection(FDC) shall be as follows: (a) 4"for C900 PVC pipe; (b) 4"for C906 PE pipe; (c) 3"for ductile Iron; (d) 3' for galvanized steel. (3) The Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall: (a)be made of galvanized steel; (b)have a gated valve with 2-1/2 inch,National Standard Thread male fitting and cap; (c)be located between 8 ft and 16 ft from the Fire department access. The location shall be approved by the AHJ; (d)not be located less than 24 inches, and no higher than 36 inches from finish grade, as measured from the center of the FDC orifice; (e)be secure and capable of withstanding drafting operations. Engineered stamped plans may be required; (f) not be located more than 150 feet of the most remote part, but not less than 20 feet, of the structure being protected; (g) also comply with section 13.1.3 and 18.2.3.4.6.1 of this code; (4) Commercial buildings requiring a fire flow of 2000gpm shall be provided with a second FDC. Each FDC shall be independent of each other, with each FDC being capable of flowing 500gpm by engineered design standards. The second FDC shall be located in an area approved by the AHJ with the idea of multiple Fire apparatus' conducting drafting operations at once, in mind. (5)Inspection and maintenance shall be in accordance to NFPA 25. (6) The owner or lessee of the property shall be responsible for maintaining the water level, quality, and appurtenances of the system. EXCEPTIONS TO SECTION 18.3.8: (1) Agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and shade houses with no combustible or equipment storage. (2)Buildings less than 800 square feet in size that meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements. (3) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and detached garages 800 to 2000 square feet in size, and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements, the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 1000 feet. (4) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, and storage sheds �f~ BJ Leithead Todd July 11, 2012 Page 9 greater than 2000square feet, but less than 3000 square feet and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements, the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 500 feet. (5) For buildings with an approved automatic sprinkler system, the minimum water supply required may be modified. If there are any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Fire Prevention Bureau at (808) 932-2912. DARKEN J. ROSARIO Fire Chief KT/lc William P. Kenoi' r b. � '` Stephen J. Arnett a Mayor Housing Administrator Count r of Rainan ®ffirE of Anusing nth eammunit!rSrrlapmenf 50 Wailuku Drive • Hilo,Hawaii 96720 • (808)961-8379 • Fax(808)961-8685 KONA: 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway • Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 (808)323-4305 • Fax(808)323-4301 July 17, 2012 MEMORANDUM TO: Bobby-Jean Leithead Todd Planning Department 4e6a,C r ail,C�i�FROM: eS he J. Arnett (' Housing Administrator SUBJECT : STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT (SLU-12-000033) REQUEST: AGRICULTURAL TO URBAN CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 12-000155) REQUEST: A-la to CV-10 APPLICANT: B.T. KUWAHARA, LLC TAX MAP KEY: 1-5-007 : 006,069,070 The Office of Housing and Community Development has reviewed the application and determined that Affordable Housing Conditions are applicable to the subject request . Thank you for the opportunity to comment. 4 CAN POI� G:/Planning/2189pasr.docx »e -7-6 kJ 3 s A Planning Dept. m k EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY "HAWArI COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY Exhibit PROVIDER AND EMPLOYER" NEIL ABERCROMBIE 44, Mq r r LORETTA J.FUDDY,A.C.S.W. M.P.H. OF � GOVERNOR � ea ��, Director of Health STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH P.O.BOX 916 HILO,HAWAII 96721-0916 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 12, 2012 TO: Bobby Jean Leithead Todd Planning Director, County of Hawaii FROM: Eric Honda Acting District Environmental Health Program Chief SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application(SLU 12-000033) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application(REZ 12-000155) Request: A-la to CV-10 Applicant: B.T. Kuwahara, LLC Tax Map Key: 1-5-007:006, 069, 070 We have no objection to the proposed project. Please be informed that the wastewater system(s) for the proposed project shall comply with applicable provisions of Hawaii Administrative Rules, Chapter 11-62, "Wastewater Systems." Dispensing site locations and food preparation areas would need to meet the requirements of Chapter 12,Food Establishment Sanitation Code. The applicant may call Ph. 933-0917 to discuss the content of this communication. Underground Injection Systems (Ph. 586-4258)which receive wastewater or storm runoffs from the proposed development need to address the requirements of Chapter 23, Hawaii State Department of Health Administrative Rules, Title 11, "Underground Injection Control." The applicant would need to meet the requirements of our Department of Health Air Pollution Rules, Chapter 60.1, Title 11, State of Hawaii for fugitive dust control. If there is need to discuss these requirements, please contact our Clean Air Branch staff at Ph. 933-0401. The Department of Health(DOH), Clean Water Branch(CWB), acknowledges receipt of the subject document on July 10, 2012. The CWB has reviewed the limited information contained in the subject document and offers the following comments: 1. The Army Corps of Engineers should be contacted at (808) 438-9258 for this project. Pursuant to Federal Water Pollution Control Act(commonly known as the"Clean Water Act" (CWA)), Paragraph 401(a)(l), a Section 401 Water Planning Dept. Quality Certification(WQC) is required for"[a]ny applicant for Federal license or Exhibit 10 CI el la 9 BJ Leithead Todd July 12, 2012 Page 2 of 4 permit to conduct any activity including,but not limited to, the construction or operation of facilities,which may result in any discharge into the navigable waters...". The term"discharge"is defined in CWA, Subsections 502(16), 502(12), and 502(6); Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 122.2, and Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR), Chapter 11-54. 2. In accordance with HAR, Sections 11-55-04 and 11-55-34.05, the Director of Health may require the submittal of an individual permit application or a Notice of Intent(NOI) for general permit coverage authorized under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). a. An application for an NPDES individual permit is to be submitted at least 180 days before the commencement of the respective activities. The • NPDES application forms may also be picked up at our office or downloaded from our website at: http://www.hawaii.gov/health/environmental/water/cleanwater/forms/indi v-index.html. b. An NOI to be covered by an NPDES general permit is to be submitted at least 30 days before the commencement of the respective activity. A separate NOI is needed for coverage under each NPDES general permit. The NOI forms may be picked up at our office or downloaded from our website at: http://www.hawaii.gov/health/environmental/water/cleanwater/forms/genl -index.html. i. Storm water associated with industrial activities, as defined in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Sections 122.26(b)(14)(i)through 122.26(b)(14)(ix) and 122.26(b)(14)(xi). [HAR, Chapter 11-55, Appendix B] ii. Construction activities, including clearing, grading, and excavation,that result in the disturbance of equal to or greater than one(1) acre of total land area. The total land area includes a contiguous area where multiple separate and distinct construction activities may be taking place at different times on different schedules under a larger common plan of development or sale. An NPDES permit is required before the commencement of the construction activities. [HAR, Chapter 11-55, Appendix C] iii. Discharges of treated effluent from leaking underground storage tank remedial activities. [HAR, Chapter 11-55,Appendix D] iv. Discharges of once through cooling water less than one (1)million gallons per day. [HAR, Chapter 11-55,Appendix E] v. Discharges of hydrotesting water. [HAR, Chapter 11-55, Appendix F] BJ Leithead Todd July 12,2012 Page 3 of 4 vi. Discharges of construction dewatering effluent. [HAR, Chapter 11-55, Appendix G] vii. Discharges of treated effluent from petroleum bulk stations and terminals. [HAR, Chapter 11-55, Appendix H] viii. Discharges of treated effluent from well drilling activities. [HAR, Chapter 11-55,Appendix I] ix. Discharges of treated effluent from recycled water distribution systems. [HAR, Chapter 11-55, Appendix J] x. Discharges of storm water from a small municipal separate storm sewer system. [HAR, Chapter 11-55, Appendix K] xi. Discharges of circulation water from decorative ponds or tanks. [HAR, Chapter 11-55, Appendix L] 3. In accordance with HAR, Section 11-55-38, the applicant for an NPDES permit is required to either submit a copy of the new NOI or NPDES permit application to the State Department of Land and Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Division(SHPD), or demonstrate to the satisfaction of the DOH that the project, activity,or site covered by the NOI or application has been or is being reviewed by SHPD. If applicable,please submit a copy of the request for review by SHPD or SHPD's determination letter for the project. 4. Any discharges related to project construction or operation activities,with or without a Section 401 WQC or NPDES permit coverage, shall comply with the applicable State Water Quality Standards as specified in HAR, Chapter 11-54. Hawaii Revised Statutes, Subsection 342D-50(a)requires that"[n]o person, including any public body, shall discharge any water pollutants into state waters, or cause or allow any water pollutant to enter state waters except in compliance with this chapter,rules adopted pursuant to this chapter, or a permit or variance issued by the director." If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Alec Wong, Supervisor of the Engineering Section, CWB, at(808) 586-4309. As a demolition and renovation activity, the Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 61, National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Asbestos NESHAP Revision; Final Rule, November 20, 1990, requires the owner/operator to inspect the affected areas to determine whether asbestos is present. Under the Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Response Act(ASHARA), all persons who conduct inspections (i.e. perform sampling and assessment of suspected asbestos-containing material) in schools or public and commercial buildings must have an active Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response (AHERA) certificate-of-training from an accredited training provider. y v , 3 BJ Leithead Todd e July 12, 2012 Page 4 of 4 Under NESHAP's regulation,the owner/operator would be required to file with the Department of Health,Noise, Radiation and Indoor Air Quality Branch, an Asbestos Demolition/Renovation notification 10 working days prior to demolition of each building or the disturbance$Mf regulated asbestos-containing material. All regulated quantities and types of asbestos-containing materials would be subject to emission controls,proper collection, containerizing, and disposal at a permitted landfill. Under a renovation project, if the amount of friable or non-friable material rendered friable is less than 160 square feet, the project would not be subject to the NESHAP requirements. However,the persons who conduct activities related to abatement and/or disturbances to friable material greater than three square feet or three linear feet,must have an active AHEI certificate of training from an accredited provider for that specific discipline (i.e.,project designer, abatement supervisor and worker). If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact the Indoor Air &Radiological Health Branch at(808) 586-5800. Construction activities must comply with the provisions of Hawaii Administrative Rules, Chapter 11-46, "Community Noise Control." 1. The contractor must obtain a noise permit if the noise levels from the construction activities are expected to exceed the allowable levels of the rules. 2. Construction equipment and on-site vehicles requiring an exhaust of gas or air must be equipped with mufflers. 3. The contractor must comply with the requirements pertaining to construction activities as specified in the rules and the conditions issued with the permit. Should there be any questions on this matter,please contact the Department of Health at 933-0917. We recommend that you review all of the Standard Comments on our website: http://hawaii.gov/health/environmental/env-planning/landuse/landuse.html. Any comments specifically applicable to this project should be adhered to. The same website also features a Healthy Community Design Smart Growth Checklist (Checklist) created by Built Environment Working Group (BEWG) of the Hawaii State Department of Health. The BEWG recommends that state and county planning departments, developers,planners, engineers and other interested parties apply the healthy built environment principles in the Checklist whenever they plan or review new developments or redevelopments projects. We also ask you to share this list with others to increase community awareness on healthy community design. WORD:SLU 12-000033 REZ 12-000155.my ' E�o F.y4iy NEIL ABERCROMBIE ,';�Pr••b 59.Sg ••.,tiy�; GOVERNOR RICHARD C.LIM q":, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS, DIRECTOR MARY ALICE EVANS DEPUTY DIRECTOR °, 'k;,1 - 001 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & TOURISM JESSE K.S DIRECTOR / M DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PLANNING ®°mpa° ' OFFICE OF PLANNING Telephone: (sos)587-2846 235 South Beretania Street,6th Floor, Honolulu,Hawaii 96813 Fax: (eos)587-2824 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2359,Honolulu, Hawaii 96804 Ref. No. P-13699 SEP. 0 2012 r LIVED -:ount WWI September 4, 2012 PLAftanii DtPt Ms. Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd, Director Planning Department County of Hawai`i 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawai`i 96720 Dear Ms. Leithead-Todd: Subject: State Land Use District Boundary Amendment Application (SLU 12-000033) State Agricultural District to Urban District B.T. Kuwahara, LLC Tax Map Key No. (3) 1-5-007: 006, 069 & 070; 9.93 acres Pahoa, Hawai`i The Office of Planning(OP)has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments. The Office has no objection to the proposed application. However,there are several issues of State concern that we believe should be addressed if the application is approved. The applicant proposes to amend the State land use district boundaries for three contiguous parcels from the Agricultural District to the Urban District, for the development of a commercial complex in Pahoa Village. The applicant proposes to construct a retail shopping center with approximately 104,250 square feet(sf) of leasable space, to include a supermarket (40,000 sf), a garden center,paint and hardware (10,000 sf/10,000 sf), medical clinic and medical/dental office space(11,250 sf/5,000 sf),two restaurants, general merchandise, and specialty retail space. The site currently has two single-family dwellings and a warehouse and baseyard operations for a cinder operation. The proposed district boundary amendment would conform to recently adopted amendments to the County's General Plan Land Use Plan Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map for land use designations within and around Pahoa Village. The purpose of the LUPAG Map amendments was to support policies contained in the County's Puna Community Development Plan to develop Pahoa as a regional town center, by increasing the designated urban density within the town center and directing commercial and industrial uses away from the Pahoa Bypass Road. Planning Dept. Exhibit IL 080960 Ms. Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd Page 2 September 4, 2012 OP's concerns regarding the proposed boundary amendment include the following items: 1. Mitigation of potential impacts to State road and highway facilities in the vicinity. A Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR)has been prepared in support of the application. OP defers to the State Department of Transportation regarding the adequacy of the TIAR and any recommendations for proposed mitigation of foreseeable impacts to State roads and highways in the vicinity of the project, which includes the Kea'au-Pahoa Road (State Route 130),the State portion of Pahoa Village Road, and the planned roundabout at the intersection of Pahoa Village Road and the Kea`au-Pahoa Road. 2. Adequacy of wastewater treatment facilities to accommodate increased commercial and land use intensity within the village/town center. It is our understanding that Pahoa Village/Town lacks a community wastewater collection and treatment system, and that commercial and industrial users in the town rely on individual onsite septic systems. We encourage consultation with the State Department of Health as to alternatives to individual septic systems, such as package community wastewater treatment plants that could service the town center as it develops and land uses intensify within the center. 3. Adequacy of onsite stormwater management to avoid contaminants from leaching into groundwater or subterranean cave systems, if any. The application indicates that drywells will be used for onsite stormwater management, which it states will require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit from the State Department of Health. We encourage the applicant to consider how the incorporation of low impact development techniques might complement planned onsite stormwater management systems. 4. Incorporation of sustainable design and green building practices in project development to mitigate and minimize the project's energy and resource use. OP recommends the project identify specific measures that will be undertaken in the development of the project to promote sustainability in accordance with Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 226-108,priority guidelines and principles to promote sustainability. 5. Incorporation of rural town design guidelines/best practices in the project's site and building design to promote a rural town streetscape and development pattern within Pahoa Village. OP encourages the County and the applicant to examine how the proposed site plan and building plans might be modified to create and/or promote a more rural town character and avoid the intrusion of suburban or urban commercial development patterns in rural areas. Ms. Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd Page 3 September 4, 2012 We have also enclosed for your consideration a copy of our standard issues list for applications and petitions seeking State land use boundary amendments. Thank you for the opportunity to offer these comments. If you should have any questions, please contact Ruby Edwards of our Land Use Division at (808) 587-2817. SiIcerelyi it__ 00 ler' J : K. suki 1 -ctor Enclosure a Attachment A Issues of Concern in District Boundary Amendment Proceedings Based on LUC Decision-Making Criteria The following issues are commonly discussed and analyzed for project proposals in petitions and their supporting environmental assessments(EAs)or environmental impact statements(EISs)prepared pursuant to Chapter 343,Hawaii Revised Statutes(HRS). This list reflects the range of issues the State Land Use Commission (LUC)must take into consideration in its decision-making under Chapter 205,HRS,and Chapter 15-15,Hawaii Administrative Rules(HAR). This list is not exhaustive or complete. 1. Water Resources. Groundwater and surface water resource protection and water quality are critical State issues. A thorough evaluation of these resources includes identifying and discussing: (a)estimated water demand by types of land use;(b)proposed potable and non-potable water sources to be used for the project and measures to reduce water demand and promote water reuse in the project;(c)whether the proposed project is within a designated Water Management Area; (d)the impact of the project on the sustainable yield and water quality of affected aquifers and surface water sources;(e)permits or other approvals required for proposed water source use;and (f)the consistency of the project and impact of the project in terms of proposed water use and system improvements and priorities contained in the County water use and development plan, prepared pursuant to the State Water Code,Chapter 174C,HRS. 2. Agricultural Lands. Article XI,Section 3,of the Hawaii State Constitution provides that"[t]he State shall conserve and protect agricultural lands,promote diversified agriculture,increase agricultural self-sufficiency,and assure the availability of agriculturally suitable lands." Protecting agriculture is a policy objective in the Hawaii State Plan,Chapter 226,HRS,and in the State Administration's New Day Comprehensive Plan,which is available at http://hawaii.gov/gov/about/a-new-day. Agricultural activity in the vicinity of the proposed project should be identified,and the impact of urban use or conversion of project lands on existing and future agricultural use and the viability of agricultural use of adjoining agricultural lands needs to be examined. Please discuss how the proposed project meets policy objectives to promote and protect agriculture,particularly in cases where the lands have high agricultural value. 3. Affordable Housing. Increasing the supply of affordable housing is a critical State and County issue. Every County has an affordable housing policy and both the Hawaii State Plan,Chapter 226,HRS,and the State Administration's New Day Comprehensive Plan identify affordable housing as a policy priority. Please discuss specifically how the proposed project will meet State and County affordable housing policy objectives,to include a discussion of how the project's proposed residential product types will be allocated among the market and various affordable housing target populations,and the expected price ranges for the different product types. 4. Coastal Zone Management(CZM). The Office of Planning is the lead agency for the Hawaii CZM Program,which is a Federal-State partnership for protecting,restoring,and responsibly developing coastal communities and resources. The coastal zone is defined as all lands of the State and the area extending seaward from the shoreline to the limit of the State's police power and management authority,including the United States territorial sea(HRS§205A-I). EA/EISs should reference this definition of the coastal zone. State agency actions must be consistent with the CZM program objectives and policies under Section 205A-2,HRS. The EA/EIS needs to discuss the project in terms of its consistency with the following CZM objective areas. a. Coastal and Ocean Resources. The State has an interest in protecting coastal and marine ecosystems and resources,as well as coastal and marine water quality. The EA/EIS should identify any coastal and marine resources and ecosystems that may be impacted by the proposed project,and the potential for nonpoint sources of pollution from the project to adversely affect coastal and marine water quality. Project impacts on existing site and offsite hydrology and measures to manage stormwater and runoff need to be discussed. The Office LUC District Boundary Amendment Issues List(December 20111 Page 1 of Planning recommends the use of low impact development(LID)techniques and other best management practices(BMPs)that promote onsite infiltration and minimize runoff from storm events. More information on LID and stormwater BMPs can be found at http://hawaii.gov/dbedt/czm/initiative/lid.php. b. Coastal and Other Hazards. The EA/EIS should describe any hazard risks that are relevant to the site and describe the measures that are proposed to mitigate any hazard impacts,such as from tsunami,hurricane,wind,storm wave,sea level rise,flood,erosion,volcanic activity, earthquake,landslide,subsidence,and point and nonpoint source pollution. This should include a discussion of any wildfire hazard and any mitigation measures that might be required to address potential threats from wildfires. The EA/EIS process also provides an opportunity to address the sustainability of proposed projects in terms of natural hazards and hazard mitigation,and the potential impact of climate change on the proposed project over time. To this end,OP recommends the final EAJEIS include a discussion of the proposed project with respect to the State Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2010 Update,adopted in September 2010,available at http://www.scd.hawaii.gov/documents/HawaiiMultiHazardMiti gationPlan2010PUB LIC.pdf, as well as the respective County Hazard Mitigation Plan. c. Coastal-dependent Uses and Beach Protection. If the project is located on or near the coast,the EA/EIS should discuss why the proposed development needs to be located on the coast,the economic uses that will be of benefit to the State,as well as potential impacts on beach access. The discussion should identify measures to protect beach systems and ensure short-and long-term public access to beaches. d. Coastal Recreational Resources. If the project is located on the coast,the EA/EIS should include a description of recreational uses and facilities on or near the project site,and discuss how the impact of increasing users on coastal and ocean recreational resources and competing uses will be mitigated and managed during project development and buildout. e. Scenic Resources. The EA/EIS should discuss the impact of the proposed project on scenic views to and from the coast and along the coast and coastal open space,and how any impacts on these scenic and open space resources will be avoided,minimized,or mitigated. f. Special Management Area(SMA)Permitting. The SMA is defined by the Counties and includes areas in the coastal zone that are particularly sensitive so that it requires special attention. Please identify whether the proposed project is within the SMA and how SMA permitting requirements pursuant to Chapter 205A,HRS,will be satisfied. For additional resources and information,visit http://hawaii.gov/dbedt/czm. 5. Cultural,Archaeological,and Historic Resources. Another CZM objective is to protect,preserve,and where desirable,restore those natural and manmade historic and prehistoric resources in the coastal zone that are significant in Hawaiian and American history and culture. If archaeological or historic properties or artifacts,including native Hawaiian burials,are identified in an archaeological inventory survey on the property,the EA/EIS should discuss how the petitioner has consulted with the State Historic Preservation Division(SHPD),what plans will be prepared to monitor or protect identified resources,and how the petitioner intends to comply with Chapter 6E,FIRS,related to historic preservation,and the CZM objective and policies for historic resources contained in Sections 205A-2(b)and(c). SHPD has information and guidance available at http://hawaii.gov/dinr/hpd/hpgrtg.htm. The EA/EIS document should identify any cultural resources and cultural practices associated with the property,including visual landmarks,if applicable,and discuss the impact of the proposed project on identified cultural resources and practices as well as proposed mitigation measures. While a cultural impact assessment is not a content requirement for EAs under Chapter 343,HRS,the LUC is obligated LUC District Boundary Amendment Issues List[December 20111 Page 2 under Article XII,Section 7 of the Hawaii.State Constitution to protect the reasonable exercise of customarily and traditionally exercised native Hawaiian rights. Thus,the LUC requires information as to the presence of cultural resources and cultural practices associated with the project site and vicinity for decision-making on petitions. The State Office of Environmental Quality Control provides guidance for preparing a cultural assessment at http://oeqc.doh.hawaii.gov,at"Environmental_Assessment_PrepKit" (http://oegc.doh.hawaii.gov/Shared%20Documents/Forms/Allltems.aspx?RootFoldet=%2fShared%20Docu means%2fEnvironmental%5fAssess ment%5 fPrepKit%2fCultural%5flmpact%5 fAssessments&View=%7b C0C5 C897%2d3 066%2d4821%2d864E%2d3 6FB3D77F5D5%7d) 6. Biota. The EA/EIS should include an inventory and assessment of flora and fauna,including invertebrates,found on or in proximity to the project site and in any lava tubes and caves on the property that are listed on the federal or State list of endangered or threatened species. Please also discuss species of concern and candidates for listing. The petitioner should consult with the Database Manager at the Hawai`i Biodiversity and Mapping Program,Center for Conservation Research and Training,University of Hawaii,(808)956-8094,as to the potential for the presence of rare species in the project area. The EA/EIS should discuss measures to be taken to protect rare,threatened,or endangered species or.ecosystems of concern as required by law. The design of the biological survey should consider both wet and dry season observations to capture the fullest range of flora and fauna. 7. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal. The EAJEIS needs to identify the anticipated volume of wastewater to be generated by type of user,as well as the proposed means of wastewater treatment and disposal. A discussion of the availability of County wastewater collection and treatment capacity and its existing service levels,design capacity,and allocated capacity is also needed. The EA/EIS should also identify whether any facility improvements would be required to accommodate additional wastewater generated within the service area,including the proposed project. If a private wastewater treatment system is identified as the preferred option,the EA/EIS should discuss the type of plant to be used,permitting requirements,plans for reuse and/or disposal of treated effluent and waste solids,and how the private system will be operated and maintained. 8. Energy Use and Impacts. The State Hawai`i Clean Energy Initiative has adopted a goal of using efficiency and renewable energy resources to meet 70 percent of Hawai`i's energy demand by • 2030,with 30 percent from efficiency measures and 40 percent from locally-generated renewable sources. The EA/EIS should quantify the projected energy requirements of the project and discuss measures to be taken to reduce energy demand,promote energy efficiency,and to promote use of alternative,renewable energy sources. Please discuss how energy efficiency and energy demand reduction,including reduced transportation energy use will be incorporated in the design of the project. OP encourages petitioners to consult with the State Department of Business,Economic Development,and Tourism's Strategic Industries Division staff to identify the kinds of green building and sustainable design practices that could be used to promote energy and resource conservation in the proposed project. Please also identify any generating or transmission capacity constraints that may arise as a result of the proposed project and other projects planned for the region. 9. Impact on State Facilities and Resources. The EA/EIS should quantify the impacts of the proposed project on State-funded facilities,including schools,highways,harbors,and airports,and discuss these impacts in terms of existing and planned capacity of the impacted facilities. The EA/EIS should cite the mitigation measures proposed to be used in the development of the project and describe efforts to address identified State agency concerns. Regarding transportation impacts,consider project design options that limit the need to drive,including mixed land uses, compact site design,walkable neighborhoods,and providing a variety of transportation choices (e.g.,biking,public transit,etc.). LUC District Boundary Amendment Issues List 1December 20111 Page 3 10. Conservation District. If the proposed project is within the State Conservation District,the EA/EIS should provide an inventory of conservation resources,and discuss how the loss of these resources(habitat,watershed area,etc.)will impact the public. 11. Conformance with County Plan Designations and Urban Growth or Rural Community Boundaries. Act 26,Session Laws of Hawai`i 2008,reaffirmed the Land Use Commission's duty to consider any proposed reclassification with respect to the Counties'adopted general, community,or development plans. If the proposed project is not consistent with the County plans or lies outside a County urban growth or rural community boundary,the EA/EIS should provide an analysis and discussion of the following: a. Alternative Sites Considered. Describe and discuss alternative sites that were considered for the project,and discuss why the project could not be accommodated on lands within the urban growth or rural community boundary,if the county plan delineates such boundaries,or on land already designated by the county for similar uses. b. Impact on Surrounding Lands. Discuss what the impacts of changing the county plan designation or extending the urban growth or rural community boundary would have on the surrounding lands. c. Significant Public Benefit. Discuss what,if any,public benefits are provided by the proposed project above that already required under existing approval and permitting requirements. d. Plan Amendment. Provide a timeframe for application for and approval of any required plan amendment. 12. Environmental Health Hazards. The EA/EIS should discuss the potential for the project or project users to generate hazardous materials or release possible contaminants to the air,soil,or water,as well as measures to be taken to ensure that environmental and public health and safety will be protected during construction and after buildout. The EA/EIS should also identify and discuss any potential health and environmental threats that may be present due to site-specific contamination from past or current use. If contaminants of concern are identified for the project site,OP recommends that the petitioner consult with the State Department of Health's Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response Office as to measures to be taken to address possible or actual contamination at the site. 13. Solid Waste Management. The EA/EIS should quantify the volume of solid waste likely to be generated by the project by types of users,and describe the impact the project will have on the County's existing and planned capacity for managing solid waste as represented in the County's solid waste management plan. The EA/EIS should discuss specific mitigation measures to be taken to reduce solid waste generation and ensure that recycling and reuse are incorporated within the project area by residential,commercial,and institutional users. 14. Sustainability Analysis. OP is implementing the sustainability elements of the State Administration's New Day Comprehensive Plan and Act 181, Session Laws of Hawaii(SLH) 2011(the new sustainability priority guideline of the Hawai`i State Planning Act)by asking petitioners to prepare sustainability plans for their projects in anticipation of district boundary amendment proceedings before the LUC. LUC Dockets A06-771,DR Horton-Schuler Homes (Ho`opili)and A11-793,Castle&Cooke Homes(Koa Ridge Makai/Castle&Cooke Waiawa) provide a good point of reference for sustainability plans. The Koa Ridge Sustainability Plan and Ho`opili Sustainability Plan can be found on the LUC's web site under each respective docket's exhibits. Links to additional helpful resources can be found at the OP website at http://hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/land_use.htm. LUC District Boundary Amendment Issues List(December 20111 Page 4 • OP evaluates sustainability plans based on the Healthy Community Design Smart Growth Checklist prepared by the Hawai`i State Department of Health,Built Environment Working Group,which recommends that State and county planning departments,developers,engineers,and other professionals apply healthy built environment principles when they plan or review new developments or redevelopments. See http://hawaii.gov/health/environmental/env- planni ng/land use/hcdcheckl i st.pdf. The Checklist is adapted from the Smart Scorecard for Development Projects(Congress for New Urbanism and the U.S/Environmental Protection Agency,2002)and East Garrison Smart Growth Checklist(Monterey,CA). The checklist applies Smart Growth principles to accomplish the following: • Promote fitness through safe walking,biking,and other active transportation through connectivity of planned bikeways and paths with existing and adjacent networks,designing travelways that connect multiple destinations and encourage non-vehicular travel. • Promote clean air by making transit convenient and comfortable,minimizing petroleum- fueled car and truck use,and minimizing fossil energy use. • Promote a healthy environment by buying green products,reducing,reusing,and recycling, and minimizing waste in construction,operations,and demolition. • Promote fitness and health by encouraging home and community gardens. Factors to consider include Close Proximity to Existing/Future Development and Infrastructure; Site Optimization and Compactness;Mix and Balance of Uses;and Accessibility and Mobility Choices. The Checklist is flexible so that developers can implement what works for their particular development. It is also consistent with the objectives of Act 181, SLH 2011,and can help petitioners address reasonably foreseeable impacts caused by a proposed project on areas of State concern listed under Section 205-17,HRS. 15. Development Timetable. The LUC requires that projects seeking reclassification be substantially completed within ten years or seek incremental approvals,pursuant to Section 15-15-50,HAR. The EA/EIS and/or petitioner should provide a schedule of development for each phase of the total project and a map showing the location and timing of each phase or increment of development. Regarding infrastructure(e.g.,highway improvements),the petitioner should discuss how improvements will be completed to ensure that mitigation coincides with the impact created by the proposed project. LUC District Boundary Amendment Issues List[December 2011 J Page 5 Lrtc s !x OFk, . William P. Kenoi =, �°'c- BJ Leithead Todd Mayor F+ DER' { \�* .. + Director €7 $ t s, n Margaret Masunaga 4 ►�Tp oc N'��' Deputy Director • County of Hawai i PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUNA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ACTION COMMITTEE Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 • Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)961-8288 • Fax(808)961-8742 Memorandum Date: November 13, 2012 To: BJ Leithead Todd Planning Director From: Dan Taylor Chair,PCDP AC SUBJECT: Change of Zone Application No. 12-155 and State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application No. 12-33 Applicant: B. T. Kuwahara, LLC Tax Map Keys: 1-5-007:006, 069 &070 This is in response to your request for comments from the Puna CDP Action Committee on the subject applications pending before the Windward Planning Commission. We understand that the applicant is proposing to change the State Land Use designation for the subject properties from Agricultural to Urban and the County zoning from Agricultural (A-la) to Village Commercial (CV-10). The eventual development being proposed by the applicant is a shopping center that will include related roadway improvements over the portion of Pahoa Village Road fronting the subject parcels and the State of Hawaii owned roadway parcel (TMK 1-5-007:055), which will become an extension of Kahakai Boulevard. The Puna Community Development Plan (PCDP), as amended, identifies "village centers"or"town centers" as the model on which Puna's future land use pattern will be based. The PCDP designates Pahoa as a Regional Town Center meant to provide a wide range of services and amenities to the communities in the region. The PCDP further stipulates that development of regional town centers should be guided by a plan "prepared through an inclusive community based process that involves major stakeholders, including landowners, community representatives, and public agencies." At its February 14, 2012 meeting, the PCDP Action Committee voted to form a subcommittee for the purpose of developing a Pahoa Regional Town Center Plan (PRTCP). The PRCTP subcommittee is comprised of a grass-roots initiated steering committee of citizen volunteers and four members of the Action Committee. - --- Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer f Planning Dept. = Exhibit II_ BJ Leithead Todd Planning Director November 13, 2012 Page � 2 The planning area for the PRTCP includes all of the lands around Pahoa Town that are designated for urban type uses in the Hawai'i County General Plan as depicted on the LUPAG map as amended by Ordinance 12-89. Since the submittal of the subject applications the applicant has sought input from the PRTCP Steering Committee and the Action Committed on the proposed project including suggestions for site layout and building design. In view of the above, the Action Committee finds that the proposed change of zoning and State Land Use boundary amendment are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Puna CDP and has no objections to the applications or proposed development. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these significant applications for land use entitlements within the Puna CDP planning area. Sincerely, (Dt.,-'144 Dan Taylor, Chair PCDP Action Committee LMB: \\Coh33\planning\public\wpwin6o\CDP\PUNA CDP\Action Committee\Communications\AC Correspondence\2012\AC-PD Kuwahara REZ Comments.doc cc: Mr. Mark Hinshaw, Chair Pahoa Regional Town Center Plan Steering Committee RR 2,Box 4585 Pahoa, HI 96778 RKuwaharaSW 7/30/13 COUNTY OF BAWA I PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION • B.T. KUWAHARA, LLC } STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION(SLU 12-33) Upon careful review of the request,the Planning Director recommends that a favorable recommendation for the State Land Use Boundary Amendment application be forwarded to the County Council. This recommendation does not,however, endorse the specific plans submitted with the application as they may be subject to change given the specific code and regulatory requirements of the affected agencies. Since this recommendation is made without the benefit of public testimony,the Director reserves the right to modify and/or alter this position based upon additional information presented at the public hearing. The favorable recommendation is based on the following findings: . The applicant is requesting to reclassify 9.93 acres of land identified as TMK Nos.: (3) 1-5-007:006,069,070 from the State Land Use Agricultural District to the Urban District in order to change the zoning of the property from Agricultural(A-1 a)to Village Commercial(CV-10)to allow the development of an approximately 104,326- square foot commercial center. The commission shall not approve an amendment of a land use district boundary unless the commission finds upon the clear preponderance of the evidence that the proposed boundary amendment is reasonable,not violative of section 205-2,Hawai`i Revised Statutes,and consistent with the policies criteria established pursuant to sections 205-16,205-17,and 205A-2,HRS. In its review of any application for reclassification of district boundaries pursuant to this chapter,the Planning Commission shall specifically consider the following decision-making criteria: 1) The extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable goals,objectives, and policies of the Hawai`i State Plan and relates to the applicable priority guidelines of the Hawaii State Plan and the adopted functional plans; -1- Attachment to: Caren. 409 Bill 119 • • 2) The extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable district standards 3) The impact of the proposed reclassification on the following areas of state concern: • a) Preservation or maintenance of important natural systems or habitats; b) Maintenance of valued cultural,historical,or natural resources; c) Maintenance of other natural resources relevant to Hawai`i's economy including,but not limited to agricultural resources; d) Commitment of state funds and resources; e) Provision for employment opportunities and economic development; and 0 Provision for housing opportunities for all income groups, particularly the low, low-moderate, and gap groups; 4) In establishing the boundaries of the districts in each county,the commission shall give consideration to the general plan of the county in which the land is located; 5) The representations and commitments made by the petitioner in securing a • boundary change,including a finding that the petitioner has the necessary economic ability to carry out the representations and commitments relating to the proposed use or development;and 6) Lands in intensive agricultural use for two years prior to date of filing of a petition or lands with a high capacity for intensive agricultural use shall not be taken out of the agricultural district unless the commission finds either that the action: a) Will not substantially impair actual or potential agricultural production in the vicinity of the subject property or in the county or State;or b) Is reasonably necessary for urban growth. -2.. With regard to criteria number 2,in determining the boundaries for the Urban District,the following standards shall be used: 1) It shall include lands characterized by"city-like" concentrations of people, structures,streets,urban level of services and other related land uses; 2) It shall take into consideration the following specific factors: a) Proximity to centers of trading and employment except where the development would generate new centers of trading and employment; b) Availability of basic services such as schools,parks,wastewater systems, solid waste disposal,drainage,water,transportation systems,public utilities,and police and fire protection;and c) Sufficient reserve areas for foreseeable urban growth; 3) It shall include lands with satisfactory topography,drainage,and reasonably free from the danger of any flood,tsunami,unstable soil condition,and other adverse environmental effects; 4) Land contiguous with existing urban areas shall be given more consideration than non-contiguous land, and particularly when indicated for future urban use on state or county general plans; 5) It shall include lands in appropriate locations for new urban concentrations and shall give consideration to areas of urban growth as shown on the state and county general plans; 6) It may include lands which do not conform to the standards in paragraphs (1)to(5): a) When surrounded by or adjacent to existing urban development; and b) Only when those lands represent a minor portion of this district; 7) It shall not include lands,the urbanization of which will contribute toward scattered spot urban development,necessitating unreasonable investment in public infrastructure or support services;and -3- • 8) It may include lands with a general slope of twenty per cent or more if the • commission finds that those lands are desirable and suitable for urban purposes and that the design and construction controls,as adopted by any federal, state,or county agency,are adequate to protect the public health, welfare and safety,and the public's interests in the aesthetic quality of the • landscape. The approval of the reclassification from the State Land Use Agricultural to the Urban District for approximately 9.93 acres will not be in violation of Section 205-2,Chapter 205,Hawaii Revised Statutes,nor will it be inconsistent with the Land Use Commission Rules,the County General Plan and the Hawaii State Plan. • The Hawai`i State Plan,County General Plan and Puna Community Development Plan (CDP)all encourage new urban growth to occur near existing urban areas where adequate public facilities are already available or can be provided with reasonable public or private expenditures,and away from areas where beneficial resources are present such as important agricultural land,natural,historic or cultural resources. These plans also suggest that communities should be planned to ensure that adequate support services and facilities are provided to accommodate population growth. The subject property is located in Pahoa,the largest town in the lower Puna district,near existing urban areas that are zoned commercial and industrial,which include Woodland Center,Pahoa Marketplace, and Pahoa Auto Parts. Other urban uses such as a church,self-storage facility and feed and fertilizer store have also been established nearby with special permits. As urban uses already exist in the immediate area,the urbanization of the project site will not contribute towards scattered urban development. Nearby public facilities include a fire station,police station,post office,regional park,and medical clinics. Water,electricity and commercial-standard transportation facilities are available or can be made available with reasonable public and private expenditures. Although Pahoa does not currently have a public sewer system or municipal solid waste collection,wastewater and solid waste generated by development of the land with urban land uses can be disposed of in compliance with Federal, State and County regulations. -4- r • The Puna district is one of the fastest growing districts in the State;however,the development of urban lands with commercial and light-industrial businesses to provide goods and services to the population has not kept pace with growth: The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide(LUPAG)"Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals,policies,standards and courses of action. It is also a graphic depiction of the physical relationship between the various land uses and establishes the basic_urban and non-urban form for areas within the County. The General Plan's LUPAG Map for,Pahoa Village was recently amended to•encourage rezoning of lands to urban zoning districts in order to provide these necessary goods and services. One of the primary reasons for the LUPAG Map amendment was to support the policies contained in the Puna CD?to develop Pahoa as a regional town center for the lower Puna district by increasing the designated urban density within the town center and directing commercial and industrial uses away from the Pahoa Bypass Road. With this amendment,the LUPAG map designation for the subject property was changed from Low Density Urban,which includes single-family residential and neighborhood commercial uses,to Medium Density Urban which allows for higher density urban uses such as village shopping centers and multiple-family residential. The reclassification action would be consistent with the goals,objectives and policies of the Hawaii State Plan,County General Plan and Puna Community Development Plan by providing future employment opportunities and improved living standards and stimulating the development and expansion of economic activities in the lower Puna district. Since the subject property is located over five miles from the shoreline its development with urban land uses is not expected to have a significant adverse impact on coastal resources.The property is the site of a former base yard for a cinder quarry operation. Thus,there are no unique natural, cultural or historic resources on the property that require preservation or protection. The property is Unclassified on the State of Hawaii ALISH Map and the Land Use Study Bureau's Overall Master Productivity Rating for the property's pahoehoe lava soils is "E" or"Very Poor". Additionally,the property is not considered important agricultural land and has not been used for sustained commercial agriculture in the recent past. -5- • The Hawai`i Right to Farm Act,•HRS chapter•165,was enacted to protect farming operations on land in the State Land Use Agricultural District when adjacent land is reclassified out of the Agricultural District. A condition of approval will require the applicant notify prospective purchasers,tenants or lessees of the Hawaii Right to Farm Act. Therefore,the reclassification of this 9.93-acre area from the Agricultural to the Urban designation will not be detrimental to the reduction of this area from the agricultural land inventory in the'County of Hawaii. Furthermore,an Urban classification would complement the existing and future land use-pattem of the surrounding area in view of the urban uses already,in existence in close proximity to the property. Based on the above,the approval of the State Land Use Boundary Amendment from the Agricultural to the Urban District complements the State Land Use District Regulations and County General Plan and is supportive of the Hawaii State Plan. The accompanying draft bill to amend the State Land Use Boundaries Map is provided for your favorable consideration. In addition, conditions of approval are recommended as follows: A. The applicant shall notify prospective purchasers,tenants,or lessees of the subject properties that farming operations and practices on adjacent or contiguous land in the State Land Use Agricultural District are protected under Hawaii Revised Statutes chapter 165,the Hawaii Right to Farm Act. This notice shall be included in any disclosure required for the sale or transfer of the subject properties. B. Any action that would interfere with or restrain farming operations on adjacent or contiguous properties shall be prohibited;provided the farming operations are conducted in a manner consistent with generally accepted agricultural and management practices on adjacent or contiguous lands in the agricultural district -6- COUNTY OF HAWAII ';f**) ` • „ti.,, STATE OF HAWAI I BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. ptaii n;115 9e [.) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STATE LAND USE BOUNDARIES MAPS FOR THE COUNTY OF HAWAII BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM THE AGRICULTURAL TO THE URBAN DISTRICT AT KEONEPOKO IKI,PUNA,HAWAI`I (TAX MAP KEY: 1-5-007:006, 069&070). BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. The State Land Use Boundaries Maps for the County of Hawaii are amended to change the district classification of property described hereinafter as follows: The district classification of the following area situated at Keonepoko Iki, Puna, Hawaii, shall be Urban: Beginning at the Southwest corner of this parcel of land,the Northwest corner of Lot 7 and on the Southwesterly side of Puna Road,the coordinates of which referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station"PAHOA"being: 1.70 feet South and 630.10 feet East and running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: 1. 70° 34' 613.53 feet along Lot 7; 2. 148° 50' 306.21 feet along Parcel 51; 3. 70° 34' 112.47 feet along same; 4. 148° 50' 306.22 feet along government Land; 5. 250° 34' 829.60 feet along Road Reserved; 6. 338° 34' 600.00 feet along the Southwesterly side of Puna Road to the point of beginning, and containing an area of: 9.933 Acres,more or less. All as shown on the map attached hereto,marked Exhibit"A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2. This change in district classification is conditioned upon the following: SEE ATTACHED CONDITIONS SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other parts of this ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAI`I Hilo,Hawaii Date of Introduction: Date of 1st Reading: Date of 2nd Reading: Effective Date: -2- URBAN URBAN AGRICULTURAL KP,g��0 AGRI t TMK:{3I1-6-007:006,069 3 070 .+.t ),6• AGRICULTURAL TO URBAN URBAN 9.95 ACRES TOTAL a �,`z°2-;:`°• I. • RAC - Y'Kx,•Y ' • /;;I..+ . ,.-t u` 7 t..`i. ''315_0070711.:,,"'"*,.!,., _ ,0.',' j,. _ - . „...i..1:.-xi*a:•x., ....�•. •tip. AGRICULTURAL :!••.:,..-,..k....,„,..4.!.,' �.*fL[•}' 'S R F• i1 tl•. vG- - '\ F.:^a•'fi`0I '' v l'. -.•v , 4 r. p „y r a i 1.: tr 4”r 71 tY.' r.,,$!'.,; � S315007069 Nom' •'• .F ` ;z --.,.•'!- v.• .: 6?1A-•, s?r5. .5,1''.. d . - s4.) !tw:,S; i._=,. N,1"...'• ow r a o ;'.3t* e' s% AGRI k a P•f•f;t�.'pt Y rei• .ti'L1 —.4.e�"Si$(�`S '\ f �Jfbi � �".�K4.:1• 'QJX!J F hr• O s :: ^ _ '',.:9,'". . 5, 4,ti s :; .Z."1 50070063:. a-` .4 • • {.N . y r9 Ii,1 ,.7.;--:',i-\; ,Ca' C AGRI ii,s: l x !. tx •r RN AGRICULTURAL AGRI N AGRICULTURAL t AGRI I Feet 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 AMENDMENT TO THE STATE LAND USE BOUNDARIES MAPS AMENDING THE STATE LAND USE BOUNDARIES MAP FOR THE COUNTY OF HAWAII, BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM THE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO THE URBAN DISTRICT AT KEONEPOKO IKI, PUNA, HAWAI'I MAP PREPARED BY: ICOUNTY OF HAWAII, PLANNING DEPARTMENT TMK:(3)1.5 007.008,069 8 070 DATE:JUL 11,2012 EXHIBIT"An B.T.Kuw aha,LLD Map: RKCuwahaxaR EZ.7/30113 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION B.T.KUWAHARA,LLC CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 12-155) Upon careful review of the request against the guidelines for granting a change of zone, the Planning Director is recommending that a favorable recommendation of the request be forwarded to the County Council. This recommendation does not,however, sanction the specific plans submitted with the application as they may be subject to change given the specific code and regulatory requirements of the affected agencies. Since this recommendation is made without the benefit of public testimony,the Director reserves the right to modify and/or alter this recommendation based upon additional information presented at the public hearing. This favorable recommendation is based on the following findings: The applicant is requesting a Change of Zone from Agricultural - 1 acre(A-1 a)to Village Commercial - 10,000 square feet(CV-10)for approximately 9.93 acres of land comprising three properties in order to develop a commercial center consisting of approximately 104,326 square feet of leasable space. The proposed development is likely to include a supermarket(40,000 square feet),garden center(10,000 sq ft), family medical clinic(1 1,250 sq ft),quality restaurant(5,000 sq ft),high-turnover restaurant (2,000 sq ft),medical/dental clinic(5,040 sq 1k),specialty retail stores(18,000 sq ft), paint and hardware store(10,000 sq ft),a full service restaurant(3,036 sq ft)and an outdoor stage performance area. The commercial center will be developed on three contiguous parcels fronting Pahoa Village Road. The applicant is proposing four entrances/exits to the property;two from Pahoa Village Road and two from Kahakai Blvd,which will be extended in a westerly direction over the adjacent road reserve lot (TMK 1-5-007:055)that is currently owned by the State. Total project construction costs are estimated at$20 million. Construction would commence upon completion of permitting and design and is estimated to be completed as soon as 2015. • -1- Attachment to: Come. 409 Bill 120 According to the Zoning Code,the purpose of the Village Commercial district is • to provide a broad range or variety of commercial and light industrial uses that are necessary to serve the population in rural areas where the supplementary support of the general business uses and activities of a central commercial district is not readily available. The subject property is located in Pahoa town,which is the largest town in the area providing goods and services to the population in rural areas of lower Puna. The Change of Zone Application from an Agricultural(A-1a)to Village Commercial(CV-10)zoned district will conform to the following goals,policies and standards of the General Plan. The General Plan is intended to be used as a policy guide for the coordinated growth and development of all sectors of the County. It sets • forth goals,policies,standards and courses of action to accommodate growth without congestion,to designate and preserve the lands needed for residential use,commercial and visitor services,industry,agriculture and open space, and to coordinate these uses with the County's service and circulation systems. The overall goals,policies and standards are set forth to physically plan the lands in the County in the best interest of the island's residents. These state the following: LAND USE—GENERAL • Zoning requests shall be reviewed with respect to General Plan designation, • district goals,regional plans, State Land Use District,compatibility with adjacent zoned uses,availability of public services and utilities,access,and public need. LAND USE—COMMERCIAL-PUNA DISTRICT • Centralization of commercial activities in Pahoa Town,rather than along the Pahoa By-Pass,to serve the residents of Lower Puna shall be encouraged. According to 2010 U.S. Census data,after the South Hilo District 50,927 residents,the Puna.District contains the second highest population in the County with 45,326 residents. Additionally the population of the district has experienced significant growth over the last 30 years (76.8%from 1980-1990, 50.8%from 1990-2000, 44.8% from 2000-2010) and will continue to rapidly grow due to the affordability of property in Puna. Comparatively,the population of the South Hilo district increased only 7.5%from -2- 2000 to 2010 and is projected to be lower than the population of the Puna district by 2015. However,job growth-and-the.provision of goods and services such as grocery stores and medical clinics have not kept pace with the population growth..Clearly there is a great public need for additional commercially-zoned lands in the Puna district,. particularly in Kea`au and Pahoa which have been identified in the Puna Community Development Plan as regional town centers for the district. The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide(LUPAG)is a graphic representation of the General Plan's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County: The General Plan's LUPAG Map for Pahoa Village was recently amended to encourage rezoning of lands to urban zoning districts in order to provide these necessary goods and services. One of the primary reasons for the LUPAG Map amendment was to support the policies contained in the Puna CDP to develop Pahoa as a regional town center for the lower.Puna district by increasing the designated urban density within the town center and directing commercial and industrial uses away from the Pahoa Bypass Road. With this amendment,the LUPAG map designation for the subject property was changed from Low Density Urban,which includes single-family residential and neighborhood commercial uses,to Medium Density Urban which allows for higher density urban uses such as village shopping centers and multiple-family residential. Thus,approval of the CV zoning request would allow for uses that are consistent with the Medium Density form depicted on the LUPAG Map. The property has been used as a base yard for Bryson's Cinders,which provides soil,cinder and rock mixtures for construction,agricultural and landscaping projects since the early 1980's. Immediately surroundinglands are zoned commercial and agricultural. North of the property is a 9.5-acre lot zoned A-1 a that is developed with a dwelling. Further to the north is the Pahoa Marketplace shopping center on property zoned MCX-20. Other nearby commercial uses include Woodland Center located to the northeast and Pahoa Auto Parts located to the east across Pahoa Village Road,both on properties zoned CN-20. Properties to the southeast and south are zoned A-l a and include two dwellings and a church and self-storage facility which were established through special permits. West of the subject property is an approximately 5,000-acre -3- • State-owned property zoned A-20a. The establishment of CV-zoning on the subject property would be consistent with the existing land.use pattern'established within this portion of Pahoa.`The applicant will comply with the requirements of the Zoning Code for the CV zoning district which would include but not be limited to building height restrictions,property setbacks,landscaping,onsite parking.Therefore,the request to change the zoning to CV-l0 is consistent with the General Plan and Puna Community ' Development Plan. • • All utilities and services are.available to the site. Access to the property is 'currently from Pahoa Village Road;however,the applicant is proposing to extend Kahakai Blvd in a westerly direction in order to provide two accesses to the property from Pahoa Village Road and two accesses to the property from the Kahakai Blvd Extension. Pahoa Village Road is a two-lane County roadway within.a 50-foot wide right-of-way fronting the property. The General Plan identifies Pahoa Village Road as a collector street which requires a minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet. Thus, 5 feet of additional right-of-way is required from the subject property for future road widening. The Kahakai Blvd Extension will be constructed over•a 50-foot wide State-owned road reserve lot. This extension will be constructed to meet commercial roadway standards which require a 60-foot right-of-way width. Therefore,5 feet of additional right-of-way will also be required from the subject property fronting the Kahakai Blvd Extension. Curb,gutter and sidewalk improvements will also be required along the property frontage of both roadways in order to meet commercial roadway standards established in the General Plan. The County will accept dedication of the Kahakai Blvd extension upon completion of improvements to County dedicable standards,and prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed development. The applicant proposes to establish an approximately 104,326-square foot commercial center on the subject property. To determine the proposed project's traffic impacts on nearby transportation facilities, a Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR)and Signal Warrant Study was prepared in June 2013 by Witcher Engineering LLP. The TIAR was completed in compliance with Chapter 25, Section 25-2-46(Concurrency Requirements)of the Hawai`i County Code,which indicates that mitigation is required -4- "if the level-of-service(LOS)for any transportation facility in the project.area is a) currently worse than the acceptable LOS,orb)projected to become worse than the acceptable LOS during the 5 year period of the TIAR,any rezoning of the property,if approved,shall contain conditions that require mitigation of adverse traffic effects before occupancy of the project is permitted,or that occupancy be delayed until the LOS has reached the acceptable level and is no longer projected to be worse than the acceptable level." The TIAR determined that the Pahoa Bypass(Highway 130)/Pahoa Village Road intersection requires mitigation because during the a.m. and p.m.peak hour periods the northbound left-turn movement currently operates at LOS "F",which is the worse level- ; of-service and represents extreme traffic delay. To mitigate this existing LOS"F" condition,the State is planning to install a roundabout. This project is included in the Department of Transportation's Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP) Revision#13 dated April 17,2013,which indicates that construction is estimated to occur during fiscal year 2013. Concurrency Requirements indicate"Mitigation requirements will be deemed satisfied when a public agency has committed funds for area mitigation that will remove the LOS deficiency. In the case of the State,commitment of funds means that the governor has released funds to complete the improvement."Thus, mitigation requirements will have been met for this intersection,and the proposed development can receive a Certificate of Occupancy from the County,once the governor releases funding for the State's roundabout project. The TIAR also determined that the Kahakai Blvd/Pahoa Village Road intersection requires mitigation because during the p.m.peak hour period both the eastbound and westbound left-turn movements will operate at LOS"F"five years"from project build out. To mitigate this impact,the TIAR and Signal Warrant Study recommend,and the applicant proposes to install a traffic signal at the intersection and provide dedicated left-turn lanes at all four legs of the intersection. All other study intersections will operate at acceptable levels-of-service. The applicant also proposes to install four crosswalks at the Kahakai Blvd/Pahoa Village Road intersection and install a bus stop shelter and sidewalk on the west side of Pahoa Village Road fronting the property in order to improve pedestrian circulation between the shopping centers in the area. In memos dated August 6, 2012 and June 3,2013,the -5- Department of Public Works concurred with the transportation system improvements - proposed in the TIAR. It is unlikely that the State DOT roundabout project and the - applicant's project will be constructed at the same time;however, should timing of these projects overlap,the applicant has committed to working with DOT to minimize any adverse traffic impacts on area roadways. Since it is likely that traffic between lower Puna and Hilo will be re-routed along Kahakai Blvd and Pahoa Village Road during the State's roundabout project,the applicant has agreed do the following,as needed,to reduce traffic impacts: delay construction of improvements along Pahoa Village Road, expedite the installation of the traffic signal at the Kahakai Blvd/Pahoa Village Road intersection so that it can be utilized during the detour,and re-route applicant's construction traffic. County water is available from existing 6-inch and 12-inch waterlines within Pahoa Village Road fronting the subject property. Current water availability in the area allows 14 units of water per pre-existing lot of record;therefore,DWS has determined that 42 units of water are available to the project site consisting of 3 separate properties. The existing 12-inch waterline fronting the property is adequate to provide 2,000 gallons per minute of flow for fire protection for commercial land uses. There is no County sewer system in Pahoa;therefore,individual wastewater system(s)meeting Department of Health requirements will need to be installed for any future development. There are no municipal waste collection services in the County. All solid waste generated by the development will require private disposal at the Palma Transfer Station or Hilo landfill. The project has no severe geological or topographical problem which cannot be properly rectified or whichtwould render the land unusable. The property is situated in Flood Zone"X",which is an area determined by FEMA to be outside of the 500-year flood plain. Electric and telephone services are available to the property. Police,fire and medical services are available nearby in Pahoa. This favorable recommendation is based on discussions with the applicant and various affected agencies during the review of this application and the preparation and eventual acceptance of the Final Environmental Assessment along with the issuance of a Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI). A number of meetings and discussions were -6- • held with the Department of Water Supply to ensure adequate water commitments were • available to support the project;with-.the Department of Public Works to address necessary improvements to Paoli Village Road and the Kahakai Blvd Extension; with the State Department of Transportation to understand the details of the proposed Pahoa Bypass(Highway 130)/Pahoa Village Road intersection and its affect upon regional and local traffic flows in the vicinity of the project site; and with the State Department of Land and Natural Resources regarding the disposition and conveyance of the Kahakai Blvd Extension right-of-way to the County uponits completion to commercial standards. These meetings and discussions were essential to ensuring coordinated development of • the commercial project with its support facilities and appropriate mitigating improvements. This favorable recommendation is also made with the understanding that the applicants remain responsible for complying with all other applicable governmental requirements in connection with uses permitted within the Village Commercial zoning district,prior to its commencement or establishment upon the subject property. Additional governmental requirements may include the issuance of building permits,the installation of approved wastewater disposal systems, compliance with the Fire Code, installation of improvements required by the American with Disabilities Act(ADA), among many others. Compliance with all applicable governmental requirements is a condition of this favorable recommendation;failure to comply with such requirements will be considered a violation that may result in enforcement action by the Planning • Department and/or the affected agencies. Based on the above findings,approval of the Change of Zone request from Agricultural(A-la)to the Village Commercial(CV-10)zoned district would result in an appropriate land use pattern that will further the public convenience,necessity and general welfare. The accompanying draft bill to amend Section 25-8-26(Pahoa Zone Map)of Chapter 25 Zoning Code of the Hawaii County Code, is provided for your favorable consideration. Please note the proposed conditions of approval attached to the draft bill. -7- r.-. _ waLarnREZ.doc 07/3 ,CKu 0/13 KUWAHARA LLC __ CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION(REZ 12-155) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. The applicant,successors or assigns,shall be responsible for complying with all of the stated conditions of approval. B. The applicant shall secure Final:Subdivision Approval to consolidate Tax Map Key Nos. 1-5-007:006,069 and 070 within one(1)year from the effective date of this ordinance.• C. Site layout and building design of the proposed development shall adhere to any design guidelines established for Pahoa Village that are in effect when plans are submitted for Final Plan Approval. D. Construction of the development shall be completed within five(5)years from the effective date of this ordinance. Prior to construction,the applicant shall secure Final Plan Approval for the development from the Planning Director in accordance with Section 25-2-70,Chapter 25 (Zoning Code),Hawaii County Code. Plans shall identify all existing and/or proposed structures, fire protection measures,paved driveway access and paved parking stalls associated with the proposed development. Landscaping shall be indicated on the plans for the purpose of mitigating any adverse noise or visual impacts to adjacent properties in accordance with the requirements of Planning Department Rule No. 17 (Landscaping Requirements)and-Chapter 25(Zoning Code), Hawaii County Code. E. The applicant shall submit estimated maximum daily water usage calculations prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii,and a water commitment deposit in accordance with the"Water Commitment Guidelines Policy"to the Department of Water Supply within 180 days from the effective date of this ordinance. The water usage calculations should include the total estimated maximum daily water usage in gallons per day and the estimated peak flow in gallons per minute. The applicant shall provide prevailing facilities charge(s), service lateral(s)and water meter(s), and any other water system improvements as required by the Department of Water Supply to provide County water to the proposed development. F. _ If required,the applicant shall install a fire hydrant,fronting the subject property meeting • - with the:requirements of the Department of Water Supply prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.for any portion'of the proposed development. G. The applicant shall install a reduced pressure typebackflow prevention assembly on private property within five(5)feet of any water meter(s)serving the proposed development,which must be inspected and approved by the Department of Water Supply before water service can be activated. H. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and adjustment of the Department of Water Supply's affected water system"facilities, should they be necessary,due to construction of improvements within the Paliba Village Road right-of-way. I. As agreed to by the applicant,prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for any portion of the proposed development,the'applicant shall install a traffic signal at the Kahakai Blvd/Pahoa Village Road intersection meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works and State Department of Transportation. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any portion of the proposed development,crosswalks and turning lanes recommended in the TIAR and shown in Figure 3 of the Final.Environmental Assessment,titled "Preliminary Site Plan and Proposed Roadway Improvements"shall be installed by the applicant at this intersection. J. Prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval,the applicant shall secure a right-of-entry from the Board of Land and Natural Resources to extend Kahakai Blvd approximately 829 feet west from its intersection with Pahoa Village Road. The extension of Kahakai Blvd along its entire frontage with the project site shall be constructed to Department of Public Work's R-32 standard detail for business'and industrial streets with an exception to the north-side pavement width of 25 feet to accommodate an improved right-of-way width of 55 feet in lieu of the standard 60 feet. A five(5)foot wide future road widening strip along the property's Kahakai Blvd frontage shall be provided by the applicant in order to implement this improvement. These improvements,meeting the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the approval of the Department of Public Works, shall be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any commercial use or when required by the Department of Public Works,whichever occurs first. -2- K. A five.(5)foot wide future road widening strip along the property's Pahoa Village Road frontage shall be subdivided and dedicated, at no cost`tn the County,prior to the issuance of Final Plan Approval for any commercial use on the subject property. The applicant shall provide improvements to the property's frontage along Pahoa Village Road consisting of,but not limited to, installation of a two-way left-turn lane,pavement widening with concrete curb,gutter and sidewalk,drainage-improvements and any :required utility relocation,meeting the.requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the approval of the Department of Public Works.The curb,gutter, sidewalk and drainage improvements shall be located within the future road widening strip. These improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any commercial use or when required by the Department of Public Works,whichever occurs first. L. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,the applicant shall install a bus stop and shelter as shown in Figure 3 of the Final Environmental Assessment,titled "Preliminary Site Plan and Proposed Roadway Improvements",meeting the requirements of the Department of Public Works. M. = Driveway connections to Pahoa Village Road and the Kahakai Blvd Extension shall conform to Chapter 22, County Streets,of the Hawai`i County Code. N. A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued for the proposed development until funding for construction of the Department of Transportation's intersection improvement project at the Pahoa Bypass(Highway 130)/Pahoa Village Road intersection have been released by the State. O. Throughout the course of developing this commercial project,the Applicant shall manage construction-related traffic in order to optimize traffic flow through the Kahakai Blvd.- Pahoa Village Road intersection,especially during construction of improvements to the Pahoa Bypass(Highway 130)/Pahoa Village Road intersection that will direct traffic flow through this intersection. P. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site and shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties. Q. All earthwork activity,including grading and grubbing,shall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentation Control,of the Hawai`i County Code. -3- R. Comply with Chapter-11-55,Water_Pollution Control,'Hawai`i Administrative Rules, Department of Health,:which requires,a:NPDES permit for certain construction activity. - S. The method of sewage disposal shall meet with the requirements of the Department of Health. . T. Should any remains of historic sites,such as rock walls,;terraces,platforms,marine shell concentrations or huinan:burials be encountered, work in the immediate area shall cease and the Department of Land and Natural Resources,—State Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-SHPD)shall be immediately notified. Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearance from the DLNR-SHPD when it finds that sufficient mitigation measures have been taken. U. If the applicant, successors,or assigns develop residential units on the subject properties, the applicant,successors or assigns shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the development with respect to parks and recreation, fire, police,solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution shall become due and payable prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval, The fair share contribution for each lot shall be based on the actual number of residential units developed. The fair share contribution in a form of cash,land,facilities or any combination thereof shall be determined by the County Council. The fair share contribution may be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective date of this ordinance,based on the percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index(HCPI). The fair share contribution shall have a maximum combined value of$8,394.57 per multiple family residential unit ($13,081.99 per single family residential unit). The total amount shall be determined by the actual number of units according to the calculation and payment provisions set forth in this condition. The fair share contribution per multiple family residential unit(single family residential units)shall be allocated as follows: • 84,140:80 per multiple family residential unit($6,308.37 per single family residential unit)to the County to support park and recreational improvements and facilities; • $130.87 per multiple family residential unit($304.32 per single family residential unit)to the County to support police facilities; -4- • $402.57 per.Multiple fiddly residential unit $601.06 per single family residential unit)to the'County to-.support fire facilities, • : $179.43.per.multiple family residential unit(S263:15-per single family residential unit)to,the County.:to support'solid"waste facilities-and:. a. $3,540.90 per multiple'family residential unit($5,605 09 per single family residential unit)to_the County to support road and traffic improvements. In lieu of paying the fair,share•contribution,tl e.applicant, successors or assigns may contributeland and/or construct•improvements/facilities related to parks,and recreation, fire,police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads Within-the region impacted;by the . proposed=development,subject-to the review:_and recommendation of the Planning Director,upon consultation:with the approprate.agencies and approval of the County. Council. P. Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact;Fees Ordinance setting'forth criteria for imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance. Q. To ensure that the goals and1policies`of the Housing Element of the General Plan are implemented,'the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 11,Article 1, Hawai`i County Code relating to the AffordableHousing Policy. This requirement shall be approved by the Administrator of the Office of Housing and Community Development prior to Final Plan Approval. - R. The applicant,successors or assigns shall comply with all applicable County,State and Federal laws,rules,regulations and requirements. S. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: 1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. 2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. 3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of the change of zone. -5- -° . 4 The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period 'originally granted for performance(i.e.,a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for;:up to one additional year). 5. If the applicant should require an additional extension of time,the Planning.Director shall submit the applicant's request-to.the County Council for appropriate action Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially:complied-within-a timely fashion,the Planning.Director may initiate rezoning of the subject area to its original or more appropriate designation: • -6- V M k ,. COUNTY OF HAWAII ' STATE OF HAWAII BILL NO. �, ORDINANCE NO. t - ` '1 J AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-26(PAHOA ZONE MAP),ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE)OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2005 EDITION), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL— 1 ACRE (A-1 a)TO VILLAGE COMMERCIAL— 10,000 SQUARE FEET(CV-10)AT KEONEPOKO IKI,PUNA,HAWAII,COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY 1-5-007:006, 069&070. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. Section 25-8-26,Article 8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code)of the Hawaii County Code 1983 (2005 Edition), is amended to change the district classification of property described hereinafter as follows: The district classification of the following area situated at Keonepoko Iki,Puna, Hawaii, shall be Village Commercial— 10,000 square feet(CV-10): Beginning at the Southwest corner of this parcel of land,the Northwest corner of Lot 7 and on the Southwesterly side of Puna Road,the coordinates of which referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station"PAHOA"being: 1.70 feet South and 630.10 feet East and running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: 1. 70° 34' 613.53 feet along Lot 7; 2. 148° 50' 306.21 feet along Parcel 51; 3. 70° 34' 112.47 feet along same; 4. 148° 50' 306.22 feet along government Land; 5. 250° 34' 829.60 feet along Road Reserved; -1- • 6. 338° 34' 600.00 feet along the Southwesterly side of Puna Road to the point of beginning, and containing an area of: 9.933 Acres,more or less. All as shown on the map attached hereto,marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 25-2-44,Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2005 Edition),the County Council finds the following conditions are: Necessary to prevent circumstances which may be adverse to the public health, safety and welfare; or (1) Reasonably conceived to fulfill needs directly emanating from the land use proposed with respect to: (A) Protection of the public from the potentially deleterious effects of the proposed use,or (B) Fulfillment of the need for public service demands created by the proposed use. SEE ATTACHED CONDITIONS SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid,such invalidity shall not affect the other parts of this ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAII ,Hawai`i Date of Introduction: Date of 1st Reading: Date of 2nd Reading: Effective Date: -2- MCX-20 CN-20 A-t a SNP` 4� AGRICULTURAL-0 F ACRE(A-1a) A-1 a TO VILLAGE COMMERCIAL-10A00 SOFT(CV 19) ,__`- 993 ACRES TOTAL . ''' CN-20 rosd1 .▪'t' r x m,.4. K;"t:;.:1'..";.f:4-'`. "" = .-11,'45315007076t'7 �v . i T i ill A-la "? , . ,' x ' .."°07, ^ ,. .• ' • 1 :7. a '`a 4 N e. xK {"` ' 315009069 Y 4,4,., `fN:., ';te', n 4 -. a t . y.,. 4.x• s,�:'t r 1+F'".ti T 1 Cvd 4 4 0 "'' C`i ' a .r 4. . V r 4 .,K 4 & , ;:." : i.0 h,k A-1a't S s W J wt S.• - k rt a k• '4 4* ! g'0i• : 315007006 r ? , ,,>- '. • • . 0 • - 4 't f:r;,f w w''s x 1xp 4r+ ,—_'3 'u• f*<t, `. • � •^r 1 " AZ. c , A-1 a.t ,- ° . ,° i .. 7r+ .• ,;'u' , 1.70'6 12:, 560.147 ' ,:.,.4 s..• ' A-20a 7 • A-la N jtt_ A-la A-la s Feet 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-26 (PAHOA ZONE MAP) ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2005 EDITION), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL - ONE ACRE (A-1 a) TO VILLAGE COMMERCIAL - 10,000 SQFT (CV-10), AT KEONEPOKO IKI, PUNA, HAWAII , MAP PREPARED BY: COUNTY OF HAWAII, PLANNING DEPARTMENT TMK:(3)1-5-007:006,069&070 DATE:JUL 11,2012 EXHIBIT"A" 6.Kuwahara,LLC Mao 1325 M 0 c� Co) pwo rIZS V LI= ,o � � o � O • a b�A CO Attachment to: Comm. 409 Bill 119 and Bill 120 I___ ilik li Is%,...„.. ..... 0 / /7 z"\ -\. 11-- li44■ 47:A* /// / \ ( ar / f/ • 7/0 0. ., :,4 4:4 0,4:4 e i 4.1:4::::17/trivol 1 mv- ii _ , gir A --=.44 - _ reitiloop 0 \ \ . 4 44 o IP ■ ,00,* 4 Z O I Q U 0 j \ ~r _ it t / l't ,N4orl -44"/ Arld til#11 1 )\ ! Net-"..' \ /1401 :11■ a,„ 0/44 6 7 S%,4 _$FA \ * %1. et_ ii. \ fxdio„v/ wv- -J F-- • 4 ,44 V * opp,„„....A.,„. . - 4 1 4.-7..4 Ay „, 5 I-- ;;..'''' koi .\, „7'-'( \#4 g W I 0 \ii --- _ ,t . S ,..,.ti) z 0 z L r .L rm I.IJ a Q r- V 4 to ‘;',„-:'''''": ' , ------;,.:-, ''44'\:, 7- 4r / - r d _ 7 \ X 07 •' \ /k om t : • • \\ t = i Vii!• 11 .4* l _ ,dV , �` � • , .11••Di+iliii 111!1 111.1♦ ,,,..„7"-11, / ____,,,,;..---,--,,c,- > • 1••••• x.111!!♦• Q i'' r'i4 i`0+iii•+ Dii•.�!�Oii1+ 0 o ♦ !• 11111. Y • • .1°0'`111❖1•.1•! -��., 4 ♦.111`!1•.••••• •••�** �II /1+•}•11.+:1111+1 !1.11111111.1•11�111••1/111111.1111111 • , ..4„,..„,„0".„„a„...:\ G? ♦ ••!!•1.1.1•!•1.1.11.111.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1•+• `' 0 �10Q.•i•.4N. 1 11111.1111111111.•1.111.1.11111+111+1 ♦1.•••4 1.1+1+1111•.1111+1+11 ♦11111+111/+♦1.1•+11•.+11•••• ••i '� �i1111111.1•.1.1.1111.1..1.1.1110! 1+!♦♦ • ••. •+ •1111111.•• •••• / ♦ •ODODOOi• Oi •'•1i❖i•OOi1i1i•OOiii•OO.•i0•Di:• •l 1/4∎••• • .1••••.•.••••••"11••••• .111111. .e,W ♦11.11..+•.1•.11.• ♦111••••••••••••••••• .11111 111.1.11.11•.••• •••• •1.1+••.1.1.1.1.1 Z t 1+•+ 1+ 1+ 11+ •••1.1/1.1.1/•1•/11•.1/1.11••1.1.1.1.11.••% .1 i• 444444•'.•44 ••Oi1.`.•i•0•••D••.. ••••i1•••Oc!• • :.•�•i`. .•�4�10•+1.1 •• •••••••1 .a• ••1.1••1•1��i`,,, 4*••* .4.•i/i/0,1i/i+iv•�+i+• '.O•i``.•i i •OO••❖i•!O•+•••• i•.• •4.,••O•.+1❖s,•, •.!!1•.., •.11•.•.1••1•\ ** J ;.'*vo •.•i•••1•e 1• ii• 1• i•.••• �• ••••••••••••••••••••• i.�••��••1•1.1••`�•••` •i.1!•. 1+1.••1•.++1.+•11.1111+� +.+111111+1•+•+.• ^ ♦♦ .'11.1111•..11♦111••.♦/♦♦1.1.11/1•c.1••1.11.11•+•.1.1•. iii '•`+•••1 1••+••1••••+•• •••••••••+••+••••••••••••••+••1••11•••11•••••••••1.1••••+11•❖❖•••••••❖••••••••••1•• 'P•111' •••.♦♦•1♦ "s�l11.11....1♦11111.111.1 1111111.111+-i' 1....1..11++.11♦ . •1 i�1+•1•i�1:>+11114i•.!`+i i•!!❖1•••1.1.1.1•••1.1•.••••.••1.11.1••1.11!•••••!•1••••11.44;.•1❖11•!•1•••1.1.1+1.1❖1.1•! /.1/•.111.11/111*..- v1•+1111.11• .•1. 1+1++111+••1.1.15♦♦•+•1.1••1•+1••1 A.••t 11 v''1•+•1•1❖4••••1.11.4'.1•1•+••1•1• 1••!•1.1•!•••1•111.11•1.1•+•••1•+•1•••••••••••1+•111•11••••1••*1••1•••:st+•1•••••••1•+•••••••••••1•1••••••• NI. 1♦ 0+. 111+•1111.11.111..1111♦11 .1.11. .1+•1 .`11.1111.1111• .•`•+•.1+•+•+/+4+•+•+•+.+•0+1+.+•+1+1+•+•+•+•+•••+1+•+•+•+•1.•.•••••!•+•••••1.❖+•••1•+•+•••1.1••••••1.1•••••1.1.1•.4.1•+•••1•+•1•VA.:,••,• V1 •�.•+1„Q•••+.+1••1,..1.1.•••••••••••••+11+11.1+•111.11+1.1.1••.11.1111.1++1.144 ..• ♦.11.1•+•1'.x•1•••••+•1•1•1•11.1•••••1•••1.1.•+•••11•+••1.1•••1•••+••1+•• ••1.1•+•• ••••••••1•••1•+� •1• ��111111`•10 • 1 .•111+111•.1•♦1111111+111+••1••1•••.•11••••1.11.1••1++1.•.-• • 111♦ ♦♦01.11♦�1•♦♦1♦111111111111111 111111++11++♦.1111.1+111.1!• ••••!1••111 .1 11++•ot. __40•••+++••••.1•.•••1+1+•••1.11•••❖••1•++11••+•11•.••••••••••❖•••❖1•••••••••1••••••••11.1.1.1.1.1.1•.•1.•••1.1•+11••1+ 1�11�0�1�i��1 111•.1�1�1�1�1�1�1�111�1�1�1�+ 1 �1�1�1�� ••. ••••.• .41,/ •1�1�1• •••1•••••IA�1�1�1�1�+��1�1�1�+�1 • �•! .•1,.04.�A•1•!•••,•1.+•❖••••!•�!••••1•!•❖•1•❖•1•••.•❖1 • �•1•❖••11••1•••1•❖•1•❖1••1•••.•••1.1.1•❖1.1111•••11•11••♦•.1111..1•+.•++••11.1.11•+++••++1.11-11•• ••••++11•+1+•+1++•111••1++1+•• W ,•.1••11•//•1•.•1111• •❖•...••••1/•11+11111111��1!❖1+1••11.1.1..11••1+•11••1+11+111111�•l•1.+♦1111••�1�!•! 1�+• 1. ••�+�!,:•�•1�1..1�1.1••••+��!:••! 1�l�!9•�!)!`!`•:1:1:❖•❖••:1`!*.•❖+❖•..•••`❖••:!•`❖:❖•❖:11 • • •Z •1111.111.11111.111.1!!1.1111♦1!♦♦.�' ► ♦♦11.111.1.11.111.•111.111!•1!♦ 1•i•i•i•i•i•i•i•i•1`:.•i•i i•.•4i•i•!••••••!❖.•..•1 •i•••!•i•..•i.. >i!;',.O•i•••!•.•.•i•i❖i•i❖•.111.••❖•O❖.❖i i❖❖.••Oi •i i i•i i i ii•••!.Oi ii i i1i i i•.•.•..❖••••••••+•••44 '•-+•.•i i•+•i•.•!•a1i •i❖a••••••...•. .i i+iii• •1.1•••1••••••••••,•.,/,(4,1•.!1••••1••1.1.1.1 1•••••!•••1••111^:"..0.;�1,••�.•1 1•,•• (1..,.•••,•.•.•,••.•• •••.���.•.•••1•11 W •iiiiiiiii iii i i i i i i1i i i1i i i1 i i i i••i i i iO•i+i i i i i i iii+iii•/i01i1iii❖•••i• •1��•••���•••�1�•����••����,•••••+1•••••+•11•••••�1�•1••���•11••�1�• ••�•�•�1�•�•�•�•�1�•�����••1••�•� . w !/•+!•••4••••••' ••••••.••.•.••••11!!1!!!11!!!11!•••!!!11!•1111 V +1+•♦••••••+•••+•••♦1••+• ••1••+•+••♦•l••♦•1♦•••♦❖•❖1❖•❖❖❖❖•••••❖•♦❖❖• +111❖1++1+.;�1•!+•.0�•111•+1++1+1111 11+11+.11++.111!+•••••+••1••11•+1.•••••1!• •••11/11/.l11<1111 11 1+11.1 1+/.11.1.1/111.1!/.111111/1!•1! L. _ � C� '•* _• VJam'___. v • Y f C I v v • r •• • il 1. ....,,...11.4,} `• I•I•I • ..% •• ;• ... • • • .J % x • • A,..,0),„ • • t C ...,,,,,,N......c..4 . • • f • - • • • W 1 .. ,e, .. iav • a • •• ..v..7...„.. •O f s. .. ` ‘� aV -741. , 4 rI• in `� V co ..„ v--- t . a_ [ . . 0 • U CO 4'4 I o CD "Ci (Cc)) Ct 0 ;-4 ;-4 6 4) c ,.-1 hiCO I-- E E o oar L.1..1 p4 , 4 o W CO 1 CO Co) ct W ce o aA 1 o N ° o z 14 a) P" V . v c� r-I J .1-, • bb i0 I 0... 4 0 • O CO tip rCi 0 ' O _� . �'' O •,1 O v 4) �' c� WO Ct CO U ct 'ct WO �_ I - IZ CCS N O ct O cd U V- c a) O > ct ,tz -I—, U ;-+ O O • co rli O C� �+ 4—) II CCS— '� a N U >~ •n t r • o to U U C.) CI) > 1•2 P4 scT) I Ct CI) 1—s rC -4-(13 cn co w � r rte - 0 � ct o � � M a) �' E gl 4 c� •= v -1■I tl'-c- 1 LL! co I 0 A - O N aIIO - c • O O d' N "4 • ct O "� 1...4 U E U ct U U +' CI) rai O co •5 I — - Cam.) rn a•-) Z C�j -4—+ U �"� a •N O Q., , CU co b ct ;..40 ,---1 n);.-1 ;-0 ci.) - ., 4- •rte O a, rip c/ E ct .t O p -4 ❑ ❑ ❑ o -- s. iii - R f t >— -- ., ,� _ •0• L.L. . . • .. 0 „. • L r. , . i st; It , .. . ._. .. O • I w • j O \ % .. u," •. . t a Wtr r* w^` . ./r , . _. _....,....„,.... .4#. _ . •• • . ..,...„.., , c• -5 .. t . • Esze .i 53 ti 6 6 4 OK 511 z •4t- -. - -- — ......-.11■1■111..m...-.mi.111•1 Ns...... ,...., ,...41.1111116•••' —...- — a - - .-71.• , _ „......3.,..__.....7i- 11111 .11 i. LLJ 5 I 1 . . , Tr_Ttr- ---7 - 4- Imin TITFI rirrrrinmi i i I, 1)in i IT I■ • ... I 1 ; 111ffil 1111111,1)11111r (I) 1 -::-.... Aiiko --1731 1: .- /r (177-- 1 . -_-.:. i ' i . LL :. , ...., in - vi L L. -. -'"` • - gx 1 5 .. i - < , --• -i...4 .... c_._. wo. ,-,'...904, - . .„, Z 1 1 _...., 1 /. • Guilii-III.1 iwiffn -..1.4 I) x , h,,,,,, mur,,,,,„,„ • , 1 . iiiiiiiiludiniainil : -- LLI , / . ' 1 ittW II li Et Li am ' ti) Immime I I 1 :13 ..,.. g- 8 -' ,§. z <lat C.- .-.173 r 1 ri Fr iir- ..--_-_----- U q 0 O. CL < ,,r; ,4. , , ‘ fqrs ,., ..,.... „. . , %, . g.. ,, Elr .1. . . , 1 ..,. - 1 er r , . ,y' t V-1 :— � ,f4 .4 r _ it I tL -k +' ,L ..) r 4 ".uY- k 1 n� 1 t ' s p , , I-- .. oi .4. ' ,; - Q. ; rjo "1i , y E- t t s 4. „ if ,,s jib ' ;�, il 4 II I\ MN I /f1 � m f / 4I ' \ l / 4,t 1 \ II I / ill• Pt w A / 11 177 O 1 r-- o ,. __........ . = 0... , .. 1 _ I Ww• i d 1 t N 4 a. K.e ti i1. • 'It! '''' ,, ,,,,,„,,:', • ,,, . „4 NI ,4 d '`---;;,:::;.4,,!:;.,..::,..,:,,,,r4:',„,c'„ - :,,,,,.:. ,,,,:::, . n 5^ $):t y J r tri 4 ''''',,11::&,‘",.. -'''''ff:H..'''''''': . "j` V 4 O `� 3 .. " y' i ii \ l • \ \ d .. ' Li) 1 1 / e / \\ \ � 1 j ' o . ' t .. 4.,f ,, , -•:i . .!,,,,lit..'3': •• .7 • , , i . .. • . • 1 •. 41..„ .i; • f. ........ , . ,„ , . ., . . --:',, s.— ,.*••-4,i. 11, ..-4 • ',''', •.%g . 4 Clir . r_ . __. ... ., /\ _ . , , . .. . .„. , . .,, .. ., a. . ,4 . 4... .. 4% j.. A H I I , 1 11.1 / 1; . / . T 0 I .. . , 0 ,, . / ■ = • A 0.. O. , . , __._ W F k.... . . , , „____ ...... , . \, : v, 1 / \,,, ,, i IL A V. \� r • • 1 1 I I '.. .,.':",1:: 1. .\\\ ' \\:\ • \\ ‘ at: ifi - . I r t ,7 ■ •I! , •0 t 0 ,i a. i W 1 : . . E- ;..i ■ 4 11 w , t '(1, / 1 \ I\f � � � „ \ -f / '.. ,\ ,, t i iht' s , -ter_: 7t y pp a tt 4r , , \ 4, ' O .. m $ v 0 `� r r W . , ,/ tr ♦+ I. i.,* q .r f,. ar a) Z ct o cz pnri 0 1 1— co 0 +...e 2 z ;_i -0 O W W 4-� o E S O o •►--4 ^^poi ll W V Ct w c c E e71' O o E re (i) w O 0 r4 N o o i 'I 0 (1) a10 Z w � U a a_ iimpa•MNINIIIIIIMM■ir - . , ' ,--- • . , .,- . . ---" - . ' • ... , .. -... . ' - • /,/. . .•./, I • - i I • - / L.. .. ,- /:-1.., / .-.0411,-•/1 , • ,.; ..--- . 4 ,,, - , • . . l , . .. ' 7 A`R • ';'?-lit Ii. II 11„ 1 . J .. .. ' . ,..,. . .. -; ,1 .g• • - . , ,./. N.;■•li Li a- : . a. . >a .. .ot 2 ■ 1 -11 11 i $ I - % ,,:....N' s.. .:' 0.4.` • .... g 4 : 0 ,..4.7 , 4* s• 7 . ,--•\. -\ N,...: _ .._,_,.,' ,I..IL...j1 ''_ -, t. \\-‘ 3,,,.: — -1-- ---- -1.v—i•--------;"---------' ' 0c4 .. ..t. ILI?,.„*.. .2z_________„_.. .F.,,_..„... , „, s,8.A D t .....--..•.-: 7.'1--72,---"-1-7FG= 20'--77. c:;:Zz•,,-s •:-' -'1'... 43 1 '''''''''' • -------,--- a i . _..1...1.............--"---',..............4::::44..-."-:;.,- '- - 7 .____...._,,,,-......I.., 01 1! I- 4- -A- _ _-.._ -.., , 1,7111111(11:1111111C trIIIITTIIIIIII3 1 , , , -_=.. g •t 1111111111:1111• -'7. 17.• 5 --=,....... # 1 ,•-_-.. \\' , .1 . :« , fit. -; - 1": 11 ------- U.) E--. _ „ . ___ 1 . S3 i \ ', - ‘ • 1 1,\ t 1 1 ' --------— NYITRIfillin MN 6.S.SWANSA !' • S awrmrTirrtmorn) rit 5w a' Illi,1111111:11III, , < 74 41 c4 \ \ N . \ 1 S S )1 11 I _________________, I'' 0 Ii i 1 1A'a' e.8 e-,,, .----4------------1- = al < \\ 5 ;. . a. S I i; T S ) t 1 , Ai ---------- D . ,,,.. • f ' / 11/r a 4 r li % ' fir . t‘I'' -• rf A i . 1 A .`\, - -- / ,i)liti, ..04kr \\ z t III i t �. N.. . �� wy,' a� ., • • ,v tom ` �;� /f •. �., - \\', M1 a1\ c • P I . ift.I, , f.. '-'*. ' O lli 11141‘ . , -7;-T-P- ' ......,... . , ' . , , . . *i t . . / I 1 imr, . . . .. , I • / , -„, • _ . . . / •‘• :i . , 4 . i ' I 1 / 41111P . t i '- ,' , . .I 1 „ , . I .411,t . , „,,, 4 i I / .. d r illEf ...4, ir- .” '' 1 4,.. ----.................... , l'.....„ ' . . . . .r.. - ■ -,--; . ./.11•4../ e, 7 I , ,, /:-/ //i '''._ -•„. ----... --A- .•...--- - .-----. ---.-.1) -""--1---------‘' - .,--"- ,/ ---- w / / , / / / / / . / / -„, .. .7-- , . , / • .-',/ f./ .--<77----' , ./.-... . / .7---- -- . / . ,• -. . , 7 . , .. .. ... • 7 • - 1111* i.., ... ,1 01 • , . I 0/... • 1 l • ■ • • .... . • 0, 44 .4, 5,_ .., • • r 11, . '.. WINDWARD PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY OF HAWAI`I HEARING TRANSCRIPT AUGUST 1, 2013 A regularly advertised hearing on the application of B.T. KUWAHARA,LLC (SLU 12- 033/REZ 12-155)was called to order at 9:38 a.m. in the County of Hawai`i, Aupuni Center Conference Room, 101 Pauahi Street, Hilo, Hawai`i, with Chairman Wallace Ishibashi presiding. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Wallace Ishibashi, Ronald Gonzales, Charles Heaukulani, Gregory Henkel Myles Miyasato, Raylene Moses, Stephen Ono STAFF PRESENT: Margaret Masunaga(Deputy Corporation Counsel), Duane Kanuha (Planning Director), Daryn Arai (Planning Program Manager), Phyllis Fujimoto (Staff Planner), Maija Cottle, Jeff Darrow (Staff Planner), and Sharon Nomura(Secretary) And approximately 16 people from the public in attendance APPLICANT: B.T. KUWAHARA,LLC (SLU 12-033/REZ 12-155) Applications for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban and a Change of Zone from Agricultural— 1 acre(A-1 a) to Village Commercial - 10,000 square feet (CV-10) for approximately 9.93 acres of land. The property is the location of Bryson's Cinders and is located west of Pahoa Village Road,just south of the Pahoa Village Road-Kahakai Blvd intersection,Pahoa, Puna, Hawai`i, TMK Nos.: 1-5-007:006, 069, 070. ISHIBASHI: Moving on to Item No. 4, Kuwahara, LLC. COTTLE: The next item on the agenda is a request for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment and a Change of Zone. The applicant is B.T. Kuwahara, LLC. The subject property is located in the Nina District in the town Pahoa. And if you look at the slide you have the Pahoa Bypass running through the middle of the slide here. And then Pahoa Village Road runs just west of that. This is the old Pahoa town here. And then this is Apaa Road that goes out to the Pahoa transfer station. So the subject property, actually let me orient you a little bit more as well. This property here that's shown in purple is known as the Pahoa Market Place that has Malama Market in it. The property shown here in pink is known as Woodland Center. That's the location of the new Longs Drug Store in Pahoa. And then this little pink rectangle here is Pahoa Auto Parts. That has been there quite a while. So the subject property is outlined in red, actually consists of three lots in this area right here. It's located south of the Kahakai Boulevard extension which is shown here as a white outlined parcel; and it's located just west of Pahoa Village Road. The properties are currently zoned Agricultural-1 acre, which is shown in the light green. And as I mentioned Malama Market property is zoned Industrial/Commercial mixed; and the Woodland Center and Pahoa Auto Parts properties are zoned Neighborhood Commercial. And then you have a very large State parcel, I think it's over 2,000 acres, that backs up to the applicant's 1 Attachment to: Cann. 409 Bill 119 and Bill 120 property that's zoned Agricultural-20 acres. This is the State land Use District designation for the property. The light green is Agricultural, so the properties are currently in the Agricultural District. And the pink is Urban. So you can see Pahoa town is primarily Urban, as well as those commercial uses that I mentioned before. So the applicant is requesting to change the State Land Use District for the properties to Urban. This is the General Plan Map for Pahoa. You can see that the properties are in an area designated Medium Density Urban that's shown by the orange color. And that allows for Single- Family Residential, Multiple-Family Residential, as well as Commercial uses. This is the Puna Community Development Plan map for Pahoa. It shows the regional town center in two separate areas that are outlined by these little circular dash marks. So you have old Pahoa town on the right side of the slide and then, which the Community Development Plan designates this area mostly for community uses that serve the people living in Pahoa. And then you have a regional use town center out near the Bypass that is intended to serve the greater lower Puna area for commercial uses. And the subject property is outlined in green here; and it's not in the town center but it's just adjacent to that area. So as I mentioned before the applicants are requesting a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban for 9.93 acres; and a Change of Zone from Agricultural-1 acre to Village Commerical-10,000 square feet. And the reason they're requesting these changes is because they plan to develop a commercial center consisting of about 104,000 square feet of leasable space. The applicant, in order to serve the commercial development, will need to extend Kahakai Boulevard over a State-owned road lot; and that will serve as the primary access. They're currently proposing two driveways off of the Kahakai Boulevard extension. They'll also have a secondary access off of the Pahoa Village Road. And I believe now they're also proposing two driveways off of Pahoa Village Road. Other transportation improvements that they will implement is to signalize the Kahakai Boulevard/Pahoa Village Road intersection,provide four crosswalks and dedicated turn lanes,as well as widen the Village Road fronting the property,provide turn lanes there,in and out of their driveway accesses, as well as curb, gutter, sidewalk and drainage improvements. They're also, as I mentioned,going to construct the Kahakai Boulevard extension to County dedicable commercial standards that would include curb, gutter, sidewalk and drainage improvements. And they're also proposing to install a bus stop along the west side of Pahoa Village Road fronting the property. So these improvements will make a little bit more sense once you see the map. This is an aerial view of the property. You have Malama Market Place here, Woodland Center here. Pahoa Auto Parts is this building. And then the subject property, I'm just going to run along here with the outline, is in this area here. The Kahakai Boulevard is in this location here. So the Kahakai Boulevard would be extended to the rear property line in this direction here. And then you have Pahoa Village Road running in a north-south direction. This is the applicant's preliminary site plan. If the zoning were to be approved, they would be allowed to establish any of the uses that are in the Village Commercial Zoning District. At this time though they're proposing a supermarket, and a paint and hardware store, a garden center, a 2 medical clinic, I think they're proposing three restaurants, as well as some specialty retail, and a dental clinic. So, again, this area here is the Kahakai Boulevard Extension. You can see they would improve that and have two driveways; and then Pahoa Village Road they're proposing a driveway in the middle, and a south driveway. This property currently has an easement from Pahoa Village Road that extends to the rear to provide access to this lot back here which I believe has currently a house and a baseyard operation. So the applicant would have to preserve that easement so that this lot owner could continue to get access to Pahoa Village Road. This is a site photo that shows the property. I don't know if any of you are familiar with Pahoa. But if you've heard of Bryson's Cinders operation, this is the Bryson Cinder's property. So you can see the warehouse for Bryson's Cinders. There's a little, a little sign here that's hard to read. The property also has two houses on it. There's one here, and I'll show you another one in a minute. And then there's also a telecommunication pole on the property that was permitted quite a few years ago with a special permit. The warehouse will be demolished and one of the houses will be demolished. One of the homes at this time they're proposing to convert into a restaurant. And then the telecommunication tower will also remain on site. This is, again,the warehouse. And then you can see a picture of the other house over here. Again, Pahoa Village Road, and this would be the south driveway entrance. This is the current easement to that property in the back. This is looking towards Pahoa Village. And then this is a view standing on Kahakai Boulevard near the Longs Drug Shopping Center looking at the, where the Kahakai Boulevard extension would be built. So this area here would be improved and extended. This is Pahoa Village Road running across the middle of the slide. So this intersection will also be signalized. And then this is a view standing on Kahakai Boulevard looking down Pahoa Village Road towards Pahoa; and the subject property is on the right side of the slide in this area. And a view of, standing on Pahoa Village Road looking out towards the Pahoa Bypass. You've got Longs Drugs here, Kahakai Boulevard, the applicant's property on the left side, and then the extension would go in this area here. The Planning Director is recommending a favorable recommendation be sent to the Council for both the State Land Use Boundary Amendment and the Change of Zone. And I want to bring your attention to two recommendations that were in your folders this morning; and I also want to apologize for giving those to you so late. We also did receive a letter that should be in your folder from the Department of Transportation. We invited them here today to answer any questions you may have; but the letter states that they were not able to attend today's hearing. And then you also have three letters sent from Drs., one is from Dr. Nakamura, Dr. Arakaki, and Dr. Kobayashi. These are in support of the project. Are there any questions? ISHIBASHI: Any questions, Commissioners? GONZALES: I have a question, Mr. Chairman. 3 ISHIBASHI: Go ahead, Commissioner Gonzales. GONZALES: Maija, the Malama Market, the Woodland Center and the Auto Parts Store, were those, would you even know, were they once agricultural lots too that were permitted? COTTLE: Yes,they were, yeah. I believe Malama Market property was rezoned back in, I think Malama and Woodland were both rezoned back in the early 90s. Pahoa Auto Parts may have been the late 90s. GONZALES: Okay,thank you. ISHIBASHI: Commissioner Henkel. HENKEL: What's the timeframe of this construction? COTTLE: The applicants are proposing to start construction upon approval of the zoning and receiving any permits that they need. Right now their timeframe I believe is, let me check here, they're estimating completion of construction as soon as early 2015. GONZALES: Okay. And off-hand do you know the timeframe of the construction of the roundabout that they're going to be building on the Bypass Road? COTTLE: The most current information we have is fiscal year 2013, which for the State runs from August of this year to July of 2014. GONZALES: Okay. COTTLE: So it is possible that the two projects could overlap a bit. We've actually included a condition in the Change of Zone to account for any overlap that may occur so that the applicant can coordinate with DOT and Department of Public Works to ensure that the traffic flow isn't hindered during construction. And that would be Condition O. The background report also refers to that. The top paragraph on page 6 mentions that the applicant has agreed to do the following as needed to reduce traffic impacts due to the State's roundabout project, that would be delaying construction of improvements on Pahoa Village Road. So the applicants propose to just do the work on Kahakai Extension so that traffic won't be affected on Pahoa Village Road, or expediting the installation of a traffic signal. DOT has informally told us that it would be beneficial to them to have the traffic signal installed because they need to detour traffic through Kahakai Boulevard. So they were planning on installing a temporary traffic signal. And also, the applicant may have to detour their construction traffic, so either use the Pahoa Village Road entrance, or the Kahakai entrance, depending on how traffic is being detoured through that area at the time. GONZALES: Thank you. ISHIBASHI: Okay, thank you. Any further questions, Commissioners? We have two public testifiers. Should we do them first? Okay, we can have the Max Newberg and Mark Hinshaw. 4 If you can come up, please. Good morning. If you could raise your right hand. I'll swear you in. Do you affirm to,do you swear to tell the truth before the Windward Planning Commission over this matter? TESTIFIERS: I do. ISHIBASHI: Okay,thank you. You can go first Max. Can you use the mike please. If you could state your name and address for the record. NEWBERG: My name is Max Newberg. I live in Waikoloa, Hawai`i. I am representing the Hawaii Regional Council of Carpenters. We're better known as the Hawaii Carpenters Union. We're in support of responsible community development. We feel this project falls within those guidelines quite well; and I think it would be good for Pahoa and the surrounding area. More so,we also advocate for area standard wages. Area standard wages is not a catch-phrase. It's a livable wage for trades people to be able to build up family/community and also give back to the community. It creates a level playing field within the building industry for things like unfair trade practices,misclassification; and, you know, sometimes it gets to a point where it's a race to the bottom. A tradesperson sometimes has to sacrifice the welfare of the family to try and compete in sometimes unfair practices in the labor industry. More so, we advocate for this development within the community as it builds and grows to become part of the community. I think it will be good for people to have options in the area with the commercial areas that will be developed; and we're looking forward to the project. And we support your Commission allowing them to move forward with this project. Thank you. ISHIBASHI: Thank you,Mr. Newberg. Any questions for the testifier? Okay, thank you. Mr. Hinshaw, please state your name and address for the record. Thank you. HINSHAW: Good morning. My name is Mark Hinshaw and I live in Pahoa. It's Rural Route 2, Box 4585. I am the chairperson of the Pahoa Regional Town Center Steering Committee. We are a subcommittee of the Puna Community Development Plan's Action Committee. At our meeting this morning, at 8 o'clock this morning, we voted unanimously in support of this project. We actually look forward for construction to begin, and looking forward to the new shopping center. So that's all. Any questions? ISHIBASHI: Thank you. Any questions, Commissioners? Okay, you may be seated. Thank you. If we can have the applicant come up, representatives. Is there anybody else from the public who would like to testify? I'll give you an opportunity now. Okay. Raise your right hand, please. Do you swear and affirm to tell the truth before the Windward Planning Commission over this matter? MCELVANEY: I do. KUWAHARA: I do. ISHIBASHI: Thank you. You can state your name and address for the record. Go ahead. 5 MCELVANEY: I'm Jon E. McElvaney, Post Office Box 1080, Volcano, Hawai`i. KUWAHARA: Bryson Kuwahara, 1142 Kaumana Drive. ISHIBASHI: Go ahead. You can say whatever you want. MCELVANEY: Okay. I'm, when we started this project a couple of years ago one of the things we were concerned about was the health, safety and welfare of the people in the region. That's why we really concentrated on the traffic situation. Studying all four intersections, could you put up a map of the site plan? As you can see,the main intersection we're concerned with is right there where we offered to put in the signal light. The next one is Malama Market Intersection, which is going to be changed now. And the other one is the Bypass Road and Old Pahoa Village Road, the most dangerous intersection. Then coming down here that's the Kahakai Boulevard Bypass Road Intersection which there have been no accidents in the last couple of years. But all of these intersections needed to be studied; and we actually revised and studied this for the last two years. That's how we ended up with the idea of supporting a signal light there. And this is before we knew the roundabout was going to go in. So we had tried to figure out how to mitigate each one of these intersections prior to the roundabout. Luckily the roundabout came along because that really took care of the problems that we saw on those two intersections. So, I don't know if you saw the roundabout diagram. No?No? Well, I don't know if we need to bring that out. But up in the north part, the curve there by Longs, oh,okay-. Okay, on the north part of the diagram, actually the Bypass Road and Old Pahoa Village Road,that is where the roundabout is going to go. It actually is going to leave a portion of the palms. I don't know if you're familiar with that area,but when you turn there's some beautiful palms right there before you go into Malama market. That portion is going to be left. And so just to, almost parallel or just north of Longs there will be a roundabout there. So traffic will come, when they're coming from Hilo now, they will be able to turn, go straight, and turn right into Malama Market without going-. It's just a straight right-turn in. Coming out they'll have to go up on the roundabout, or they can turn right and go straight down into Pahoa town. So all of this has been-. HEAUKULANI: Excuse me. This is important enough—. Could you use the pointer so that everyone could track where you're-. MCELVANEY: Okay. HEAUKULANI: What you're talking about, please. MCELVANEY: Okay. HEAUKULANI: Thank you. MCELVANEY: How does thing work. Okay, yeah. So the roundabout is going to go right about there. This has never been opened before. Usually the traffic had to come and turn right here to get into Malama Market, which required two intersections to go through,which was 6 where all the accidents happened. Now they're going to come straight in and turn right into Malama Market or Pahoa Market Place. But when they come out they can only turn right to go into Pahoa town or they can go up on the roundabout, and they can go this way or that way. So that saves a whole lot of accidents. And if you combine the roundabout-. Now what happens in a roundabout, it slows the traffic down to about 25 miles an hour. That's why they are so safe, actually more safe than an intersection with a signal light. But, so they'll come down and they'll hit a signal light. So the combination of the signal light and the roundabout is going to make this area more like a hub. I think everybody will benefit and everyone will be much safer. So I just wanted to -,that's really important. We put four crosswalks. And we have a new covered bus stop right here so people can come in, get off the bus, walk easily into the area. And I suppose, we talked about photovoltaics on the roof. We're doing bio-swales in the ground in terms of trying to, you can get less drywells. We're going to compost all the waste from the restaurant; and that compost will go back on the property on the landscaping. The new design which is not here, we have street trees and sidewalks all the way around every building. They'll have a 12- foot overhang when you come out of any building. So if you're shopping you're not going to get soaking wet when you come, try to get to your car. So these are just some pluses that I think are really important. Any questions? ISHIBASHI: Thank you. Job well done. Any questions, Commissioners? Commissioner Ono. ONO: Yes. I'm not, I'm not following you in the sense of what the traffic patterns that you've introduced have to do with the request for the development? MCELVANEY: Up here you mean? ONO: Yeah, the development is on the lower half of the-. MCELVANEY: Right. Oh, the development right here? ONO: I'm sorry, what? MCELVANEY: This is the development. Right? Right here. So coming in,this whole section has been,we're going to extend Kahakai Boulevard by 830 feet this direction. So the main entrance to the Center will be right here. So you're coming in and come in this way, or you can come in and come in this way, or you can come in this way. So this creates a real nice circulation pattern. So you can get in and out in three different, actually three different directions. So if it's too crowded to go in this way, you can go this way or come this way. And people who drive will find their best solution. Right? Oh, any other questions? Does that make sense? ONO: I'm not very good at graphics, so thank you. MCELVANEY: Well, you know, it's kind of, it's a little difficult to understand unless you live out there or spend a lot of time out there. Like I, I don't live out there but I spend a lot of time 7 out there. So I've watched the, I've had counters out there personally and done a lot of work. And I'm really happy with what's coming up in terms of safety. ISHIBASHI: Any further questions, Commissioners? HENKEL: Chair? ISHIBASHI: Oh, Commissioner Henkel. HENKEL: I think I understand the traffic flow improvements you're going to make. Right now it's just a,it's probably the, it's known as the most dangerous intersection in the State,right there where the Pahoa sign is. I'm okay with all the changes that you're going to make. I really want to, you know, feel confident that both of these constructions aren't going on concurrently and pretty much bottleneck everybody in lower Puna that's down there. So, you know -. MCELVANEY: I agree with that, with you. HENKEL: If I have your best assurances that that's going happen I would feel a lot better. MCELVANEY: Okay,that I agree with you. Is this off? ARAI: It's working. MCELVANEY: Hello? HENKEL: You're on. MCELVANEY: Okay,okay. I totally agree with you. I think even without us doing any construction,that's going to be a mess because they're routing all the traffic-. When they're under construction with the roundabout, they're routing all, coming out of lower Puna on the Bypass Road, you cannot go this way. You're going to have to go this way and out. So that means all traffic now coming out of Hilo is going to have to come this way and go out this way--all 16,000 cars a day, including emergency vehicles and trucking and everything. So without construction that's going to be a mess. They're planning that, DOT is planning to put a temporary stop light here,but we don't think, and some of us don't think that that's going to be good enough. So if we possibly can get in before the DOT, we have offered to put in the signal light, a complete signal light there, to help the Department of Transportation in that whole mess, not mess,could be a mess. So we've agreed, the applicant has agreed that we will not do any construction in the State right-of-way and block any of the activity that's going on. In other words, we will not be operating at the same time as the DOT. And we can accomplish that by doing interior work on the back side without having to access the intersection going north. HENKEL: Thank you. ISHIBASHI: Thank you, Commissioner Henkel. Any further questions? Motion is in order, Commissioners. 8 MOSES: I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council on the application for a Change of Zone(REZ 12-155),based on the Planning Director's recommendation and proposed conditions. COTTLE: Excuse me, Mr. Chair. Is there any way we could get a motion on the State land Use Boundary Amendment first? MOSES: Yeah. COTTLE: Thank you. MOSES: I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council on the application for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment, Doc. No. SLU 12-033, based on the Planning Director's recommendation. ISHIBASHI: It has been moved by Commissioner Moses and seconded by -? MIYASATO: I second. ISHIBASHI: Commissioner Miyasato. Any questions? Discussion? Okay,Maija. COTTLE: Okay,the motion before you is to send a favorable recommendation to the Council for the State Land Use Boundary Amendment. Commissioner Moses? MOSES: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Miyasato? MIYASATO: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Gonzales? GONZALES: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Heaukulani? HEAUKULANI: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Henkel? HENKEL: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Ono? ONO: Aye. COTTLE: And Mr. Chair? 9 ISHIBASHI: Aye. COTTLE: The motion passes seven-zero. ISHIBASHI: Thank you. COTTLE: And then the Change of Zone? MOSES: I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council on the application for a Change of Zone(REZ 12-155)based on the Planning Director's recommendation and proposed conditions. ISHIBASHI: Thank you, Commissioner Moses. MIYASATO: Second. ISHIBASHI: And seconded by Commissioner Miyasato. Any discussion, questions, Commissioners? Thank you. Maija. COTTLE: Okay. The motion is to send a favorable recommendation for the Change of Zone from Agricultural to Village Commercial. Commissioner Moses? MOSES: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Miyasato? MIYASATO: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Gonzales? GONZALES: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Heaukulani? HEAUKULANI: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Henkel? HENKEL: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Ono? ONO: Aye. COTTLE: And Mr. Chair? 10 ISHIBASHI: Aye. COTTLE: The motion passes seven-zero. ISHIBASHI: Okay. Thank you, Maija. Thank you. You'll be notified in writing of the decision. MCELVANEY: I would like to thank all of you for your hard work. I know it's a busy day for you; and thank you very much. ISHIBASHI: Thank you. A job well done,important project. The discussion ended 10:12 a.m. Respectfully submitted, c: Ca.OL-■-trr-- YV Sharon M. Nomura, Secretary Windward Planning Commission 11