My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0409.000 2012-2014
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2012-2014
>
COM 0409.000 2012-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2013 8:57:52 AM
Creation date
9/9/2013 10:10:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2012-2014
Communication
0409
Point
000
Author
William P. Kenoi, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
NTC PC 2013/10/01 2012-2014 (Continuation of Sept. 17 mtg (see Agendas folder))
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Notices\2012-2014\Committees\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE COUNCIL 2013/10/16 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Council
AGE COUNCIL 2013/11/06 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Council
AGE COUNCIL 2013/11/20 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Council
AGE PC 2013/09/17 2012-2014
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 119 Draft 01 2012-2014
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2012-2014
BIL 120 Draft 01 2012-2014
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2012-2014
REP PC 046 2013/10/01 (2012-2014)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2012-2014\Planning Committee (PC)
REP PC 047 2013/10/01 (2012-2014)
(Message)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2012-2014\Planning Committee (PC)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
539
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman <br /> and Members of the County Council <br /> Page 2 <br /> The commission shall not approve an amendment of a land use district boundary <br /> unless the commission finds upon the clear preponderance of the evidence that the <br /> proposed boundary amendment is reasonable, not violative of section 205-2, Hawai`i <br /> Revised Statutes, and consistent with the policies and criteria established pursuant to <br /> sections 205-16, 205-17, and 205A-2, HRS. In its review of any application for <br /> reclassification of district boundaries pursuant to this chapter, the Planning Commission <br /> shall specifically consider the following decision-making criteria: <br /> 1) The extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable <br /> goals, objectives, and policies of the Hawaii State Plan and relates to the <br /> applicable priority guidelines of the Hawaii State Plan and the adopted functional <br /> plans; <br /> 2) The extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable <br /> district standards; <br /> 3) The impact of the proposed reclassification on the following areas of state <br /> concern: <br /> a) Preservation or maintenance of important natural systems or habitats; <br /> b) Maintenance of valued cultural, historical, or natural resources; <br /> c) Maintenance of other natural resources relevant to Hawai`i's economy <br /> including,but not limited to agricultural resources; <br /> d) Commitment of state funds and resources; <br /> e) Provision for employment opportunities and economic development; and <br /> 0 Provision for housing opportunities for all income groups, particularly the <br /> low, low-moderate, and gap groups; <br /> 4) In establishing the boundaries of the districts in each county, the commission shall <br /> give consideration to the general plan of the county in which the land is located; <br /> 5) The representations and commitments made by the petitioner in securing a <br /> boundary change, including a finding that the petitioner has the necessary <br /> economic ability to carry out the representations and commitments relating to the <br /> proposed use or development; and <br /> 6) Lands in intensive agricultural use for two years prior to date of filing of a petition <br /> or lands with a high capacity for intensive agricultural use shall not be taken out <br /> of the agricultural district unless the commission finds either that the action: <br /> a) Will not substantially impair actual or potential agricultural production in <br /> the vicinity of the subject property or in the county or State; or <br /> b) Is reasonably necessary for urban growth. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.