My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
ORD 2013-115 2012-2014
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Ordinances
>
2013
>
ORD 2013-115 2012-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2013 1:03:48 PM
Creation date
11/8/2013 1:01:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinances - Type
ORD
Ordinances - Council Term
2012-2014
Year
2013
Ordinance
115
Effective Date
11/6/2013
Document Relationships
BIL 129 Draft 03 2012-2014
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2012-2014
REP AWESC 011 09/17/2013 (2012-2014)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2012-2014\Agriculture, Water, Energy, & Sustainability Committee (AWESC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(13) Hydraulic fracturing has contributed to releases of toxic gases to the atmosphere, <br /> contamination of potable water, and health problems in plants, animals, and humans in <br /> mainland locations; and <br /> (14) The risks of hydraulic fracturing are both great and unknown so that it is banned in some <br /> countries and many states or municipalities in the U.S. Countries that have stopped <br /> hydraulic fracturing include: Argentina, Austria, Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech <br /> Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Ireland,Netherlands, New South Wales, New <br /> Zealand, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom; and <br /> (15) Hydraulic fracturing requires between four and 10 million gallons of fresh water to <br /> achieve permeability and porosity in an underground geologic formation. The Island of <br /> Hawai`i and its people, businesses, animals, plants, rivers, shoreline marine life, and <br /> ocean cannot afford to lose these millions of gallons of fresh water. Even using partially <br /> treated waste water for hydraulic fracturing may pollute our aquifers, rivers, and ocean. <br /> Salt water may not be a viable solution for hydraulic fracturing due to corrosion which <br /> might require additional anti-corrosives to be placed in the well to protect the drilling <br /> equipment, the well itself, or its various parts. Such anti-corrosives may contribute even <br /> more chemicals and toxins into the environment that could infiltrate the aquifers; and <br /> (16) Remediation of water used for hydraulic fracturing is not currently possible in the County <br /> of Hawai`i because there is no waste water treatment plant on the island able to handle <br /> the chemicals and toxins introduced or produced by hydraulic fracturing. Evaporation is <br /> not a viable option as it degrades air quality. Therefore, the water must be removed to <br /> another location within the United States for safety and is irreversibly lost to the island's <br /> hydrologic cycle; and <br /> (17) Large areas of the Island of Hawai`i need potable water for the people and fresh water for <br /> plants and animals. The ocean and shoreline areas need the fresh water to move from <br /> mauka to makai to sustain a healthy environment. Wasting millions of gallons of water to <br /> achieve hydraulic fracturing is not conducive to supporting the people, the environment, <br /> or natural resources of which the County has an affirmative duty to protect; and <br /> (18) Many chemicals required by hydraulic fracturing are toxic or can create toxic gases and <br /> fluids in the air or water that may damage people, animals, plants, the land, and the <br /> ocean, however full disclosure of those chemicals is prevented through claims of <br /> proprietary rights; and <br /> (19) A company's net worth may be insufficient to cover the costs associated with managing a <br /> hydraulic fracturing disaster. In that case, those costs may be forced on those who have <br /> suffered property damage or injuries, and the County might be liable for the cost of <br /> repairing public infrastructure and the relocation of families. Loss of property taxes may <br /> also create unnecessary financial distress to the County; and <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.