Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0492.001 2012-2014 William P.Kenoi �!• BJ Leithead Todd � '' � =:, °' Mayor _ J. Director • �� John A.Medeiros Walter K.M.Lau 4 o.M�.-' Managing Director Deputy Director Olouttfv of Paitta41441. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 345 Kekuanao•a Street,Suite B • Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Street,Suite B • Hilo,Hawai'i 96720 (808)961-8083 •Fax(808)961-8086 htto://www.hawaiicounty.govienvironmental-mannement/ December 12, 2013 Council Chair J Yoshimoto And Hawai'i County Council Members t? 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, HI, 96720 Re: Resolution 120-11 Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District r "� North Kona, Hawai'i " ' Communication 492 to u.r Dear Chair Yoshimoto and Council Members, Please find enclosed, an amended DIRECTOR'S REPORT replacing the original report submitted to you on October 29, 2013. This report includes an updated project schedule as follows: § Submit Feasibility Report to Council-- 12/13/13 § Council Resolution Proposing the Making of ID-- 1/22/14 § Public hearing--Mar 2014(assuming 6 wks from Council 1/22 mtg) § HRS 343 Final EA--Apr 2014 § Council Resolution to Define ID—Apr 2014 § Procure and complete plans&specs--Oct 2014 § Bid price determined--Nov 2014 § Ordinance to fix assessments—Jan 2015 § Bond closing--Apr 2015 § Notice to proceed—Jun 2015 § Substantial completion and hookups--Jun 2016 Comm.No, "4"2" 1 Ref.To: P./EMC Ref.Date, DEC 17 2013 County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. Resolution 120-11 has been agendized for the December 27, 2013 Environmental Management Commission meeting. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contract Ms. Dora Beck, P.E., Wastewater Division Chief at 961-8513 or dbeck @co.hawaii.hi.us. Sincerely, / K' cf BJ Leithead Todd DIRECTOR ENCLOSURE: Director's Report—Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District amended December 11, 2013 cc: Billy Kenoi, Mayor Wally Lau, Managing Director Randy Kurohara, Deputy Managing Director Dora Beck, P.E., WWD Chief County of Hawai'i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. County of Hawai'i Department of Environmental Management DIRECTOR'S REPORT Lona Kona Sewer Improvement District North Kona, Hawai'i December 11, 2013 Contents 1. Introduction 2 A. Location 2 B. Purpose and Need 3 C. Project Financing 3 D. Process 4 2. Character and Extent of Proposed Improvements 5 3. Proposed Method of Assessment 6 4. Land and Easements to be Acquired 8 5. Recommended Materials 8 6. Improvement District Boundaries 8 7. Estimated Cost of the Improvement .8 8. Necessary Plans, Data, Detail, and Specifications 9 9. Conclusion 9 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A.Location Map EXHIBIT B.Improvement District Boundary Map EXHIBIT C.Letter of Conditions EXHIBIT D. Preliminary Engineering Report for Lono Kona Sewer System Improvements EXHIBIT E.Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost EXHIBIT F.Proposed Assessment Roll for Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District EXHIBIT G.Lono Kona Sewer ID Easements Map 1. Introduction This report has been prepared in response to Hawai'i County Council Resolution No. 120-11 dated September 8,2011 ("Resolution"). The Resolution directed the Director of the Department of Environmental Management to prepare and submit to the Council a report containing the information required by Hawai'i County Code section 12-10(a)as follows: (1) Preliminary data concerning the special improvement proposed to be opened, constructed, or improved; (2) The general character and extent of any improvement to be proposed; (3) The proposed assessment unit and method of assessment; (4) Whether any new land will be necessary to be acquired, and the estimated cost thereof and the proportion of the cost which should be borne by the County; (5) The materials recommended to meet the conditions of the improvement; (6) The boundaries of the proposed improvement district and any subdistricts or_ones therein as to which different portions of the cost of improvements should be charged; (7) The estimated cost of the improvement, the portions of the cost to be borne by the County,and the portions of the cost to be assessed against the assessment units specially benefited with the maximum unit of assessment to be made against each assessment unit to be assessed;and (8)All necessary plans and other data, details, and specifications for the improvements and any other matters or details intended to apply thereto. The proposed improvement district,initiated by the Hawaii County Council,is for the design and installation of a sewer system for the Lono Kona subdivision in North Kona that will meet the Department of Environmental Management standards("Project"). The County will own,operate,and maintain the system. The proposed improvements consist exclusively of a sewer system including the incidental restoration of roadways,meeting the definition of a"sewer system improvement district"under Hawai'i County Code(HCC)chapter 11. A. Location The Lono Kona Subdivision is located in Kailua-Kona,ahupua'a of Keopu 2nd,Keopu 3rd,and Honua'ula,North Kona District,island and County of Hawai'i("Project Area")(see EXHIBIT A). The Project Area offers affordable housing opportunities within close proximity to the Kailua Village core. This subdivision was created in 1962(Subdivision No. 692-A),prior to the first section of the Kailua- Kona Sewer System installed by the County in 1965. The proposed sewer system would service 110 parcels within the Project Area(see EXHIBIT B). LO`C)KONA SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DIRECTOR'S REPORT The Project Area is a mix of single-family,duplex.apartment,vacant land,and commercial uses totaling approximately 43 acres(see EXHIBIT B). Most of the properties use cesspools with a few on septic systems. The Project will connect to and be part of the County's North Kona Sewer System that conveys the sewage to the Kealakehe Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Project will be installed entirely within the existing County road rights-of-way,with the exception of downstream segments that will require easements over private property to connect to the sewer main in Hualalai Road. B. Purpose and Need The tmtreated cesspool leachates have a high potential to contaminate grotmdwater,especially in the highly permeable lava rock substrate of this area. Because the Project Area is within the Department of Health's Critical Wastewater Disposal Area and less than a mile from the shoreline,there is a probability for contaminated groundwater to seep into the nearshore coastal waters. To stem further water quality degradation from cesspools,the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)banned large capacity cesspools pursuant to the Underground Injection Control provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act.' The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)regulations required all large capacity cesspools to be replaced by an alternative wastewater system by April 5, 2005. EPA started issuing violation notices to property owners within the Project Area in 2010. Several property owners within the Project Area have received such violation notices from EPA. One means to comply with EPA is to replace the cesspool with an onsite septic system. However,the Project Area is a higher density urbanized area where the lot sizes generally do not have sufficient area for onsite disposal systems that require leach fields. Thus,a sewer system is the most cost-effective means to comply with EPA requirements. In new developments,the County requires the developer to install the sewer system where appropriate. In this case,the Project Area is an older subdivision pre-dating sewer requirements and now needs to retrofit a sewer system. The County's primary role in terms of providing sewer service is to provide the backbone components—the main transmission lines,pump stations for these main transmission lines,treatment plants and reuse/disposal systems. The local collection systems are the responsibility of the developer or property owners. However,for retrofit situations such as this Project,while government recognizes that property owners should pay for local collection systems,government can play a proactive role to organize the community,advance costs to mobilize the process,and seek subsidies as appropriate to ensure affordability. C. Project Financing The property owners connecting to the proposed sewer system will be responsible to pay for the Project development costs through the Improvement District assessments. To assist with the financing,the County applied to the U.S.Department of Agriculture(USDA)Rural Development,Rural Utilities Water 2 EPA defines a cesspool to be a"large-capacity cesspool"as follows: Residential multiple-dwelling,community, or regional systems(e.g.,townhouse complexes or apartment buildings)that dispose of sanitary waste,or Non- residential cesspools that have the capacity to serve 20 or more persons per day(e.g.,rest areas or churches)if the cesspools receive solely sanitary waste. LOYO KO A SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRKT DIREC`TOR'S REPORT and Waste Disposal loan and grant program. The program offers below-market interest rates,amortization periods longer than conventional loans,and the possibility of grants to partially subsidise the costs. The USDA approved the application with a grant of$4,024,800 and loan of$2,437,000 to cover the total development costs of$6,464,800(see EXHIBIT C). The grant constitutes 62%of the total development cost,an exceptional proportion in recognition of the public health and safety situation indicated by EPA's large capacity cesspool violation notices and the need to maintain housing affordability in this area.The lien powers under an Improvement District provide an enforceable means to address delinquencies. The County will secure loan repayment to USDA by way of a reimbursable General Obligation bond authorized through the Improvement District process. D. Process The process to construct the sewer system requires an integration of the USDA grant/loan procedures and the Improvement District procedures. The steps to integrate these two procedures involve preliminary engineering,environmental compliance,design,loan closing,and construction as follows: LONO KONA SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DIREC`TOR'S REPORT •County initiated Improvement District process with adoption of Resolution No.izo-u •County prepared USDA application package,including preliminary engineering report and environmental report Step is Initiate Action -USDA determined that project is categorically excluded to comply with NEPA •USDA issued Letter of Conditions approving the loan and grant prc • LCp s rntkas -Adopt Resolution regarding feasibility of Improvement District We are here -Hold public hearing •Process Chapter 343 Environmental Assessment to enable additional public review I •Design and prepare construction documents -Bid and select contractor •Establish definitive costs and assessments ep 4 r e,;" 1 •Establish Improvement District by ordinance •Authorize G.O.Bond to secure loan •Close USDA loan Execute construction contract U`'t = t_` i •Issue notice to proceed 2, Character and Extent of Proposed Improvements The Project is an all gravity system with no pump stations. The sewer system consists of approximately 5,640 linear feet of 8-inch sewer pipe.360 linear feet of 10-inch sewer pipe.34 sewer manholes, sewer laterals to 110 parcels, and restoration of roadway pavements. Eight-inch sewer lines would be installed LOYO KONA SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5 DIRECTOR'S REPORT on Alahou Street,Lamaokeola Street,Alakai Street,Alanoe Place,Kalani Street,Ala Onaona Street,and within the sewer easements on private properties. The 10-inch portion would be installed in Hualalai Road and connect to an existing 30-inch line in Kuakini Highway(see EXHIBIT D,Alternative 2 layout in Appendix C of Preliminary Engineering Report). Based on the preliminary design,five parcels on Alahou Street and Alanoe Place may be lower than the elevation of the laterals and may require private sewage pumps. 3. Proposed Method of Assessment The"assessment unit"as defined by HCC chapter 11 is a subdivided parcel or condominium unit with a unique tax key number. Since the amount assessed to each assessment unit should be proportional to the special benefits conferred on the assessment unit(HCC §12-2),the proposed assessment is proportional to the estimated wastewater generation from the assessment unit. The amount of wastewater generated by a single-family dwelling differs from a duplex,apartment building,or commercial use. To account for the differences in land use,the estimated wastewater generation was converted to a"single-family equivalent"("SFE"). The SEE was determined based on the existing land use of the assessment unit,irrespective of zoning. The existing zoning was used only if the assessment unit was vacant. The benefit based on existing use was given greater weight over a skeptical future maximum benefit based on zoning. To determine the existing use,Real Property Tax data provided the existing number of single family, duplex or apartment units per parcel. To estimate the wastewater generation by land use,the standard of 80 gallons per capita per day was used,and a standard capita per land use was used as follows: • Single-family dwelling(RS zoning): 4 capita/unit • Duplex(RD zoning): 2.8 capita/unit • Apartment(RM zoning): 2.8 capita/unit • Commercial(CV): the engineer estimated the commercial capita as explained in PER Appendix A. The per capita assumption for each parcel was converted to a single-family equivalent(SFE)by dividing by 4. For example,a parcel with a six-unit apartment has an occupancy of 16.8 persons(6 units x 2.8 capita/unit),resulting in a SFE of 4.2(16.8 divided by 4 equals 4.2).The total SFEs within the proposed Improvement District is 247. Dividing the total development costs by the total SFEs results in the unit cost per SFE. The total development cost reduced by the grant amount equals the Net Project Costs which is equivalent to the USDA loan amount. The annual assessment pays the debt service on the USDA loan. The USDA Letter of Conditions (EXHIBIT C)includes the terms to calculate the debt service as follows: • Loan amount: $2,437,000 • Interest rate: 2.125% LONO KONA SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 6 DIRECTOR'S REPORT • Amortization: interest only for two years.amortization factor for the remaining 33 years of $42.471$1000 • Debt service: $103,499.00 annual payment The fixed assessment per SFE is$9,868,as summarized in the table below. Table 1.Fixed Assessment Calculation Fixed Assessment Cost Total Development Cost $6,461,800 Agency Grant Amount $4,024,800 Loan Amount/Fixed Assessment Cost $2,437,000 Fixed Assessment per SFE Fixed Assessment Cost $2,437,000 Total SFEs 247 Fixed Assessment per SFE $9,868 The total fixed assessment amount is amortized over the life of the loan into annual assessment installments in order to pay debt service. Each year,the annual assessment includes administrative fees for the County to cover its cost to administer the Improvement District in addition to debt service. The estimated annual assessment per SFE is$541,as summarized in the table below. Table 2.Annual Assessment Calculation Total Annual Cost Annual Debt Service $103,499 Annual Administration Costs $30,000 Total Annual Cost $133,499 Annual Assessment per SFE Total Annual Cost $133,499 Total SFEs 247 Annual Assessment per SFE $541 The fixed and annual assessments per parcel are calculated by multiplying the fixed or annual assessment per SFE by the number of SIEs for that assessment unit. EXHIBIT F,Proposed Assessment Roll,Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District,based upon information provided by the County's Real Property Tax Division,identifies the owners of the properties,number of SFEs,and proposed fixed and annual assessments by assessment unit. The proposed Improvement District includes 145 assessment units on 110 parcels. Narr LONO KONA SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DIRECTOR'S REPORT 4. Land and Easements to be Acquired The majority of the system is located in existing public rights of way. Easements through seven private properties are required(see EXHIBIT G). These parcels are located at the downstream end of the sewer collection system and must be crossed to gain access to the County sewer in Hualalai Road. These easements are 10'wide located in the zoning setback portions of the affected properties. The total land area required for the easements is approximately 0.26 acres. The estimated land cost based on tax assessed values is$200,000,conservatively assuming fee simple values. 6. Recommended Materials The recommended materials for the proposed sewer system,in conformance with the Department of Environmental Management Standards,shall include but not be limited to the following: • 5,640 Lin.Ft.,8-inch PVC SDR-26 sewer pipe and fittings • 360 Lin.Ft., 10-inch PVC SDR-26 sewer pipe and fittings • 29 Each,sewer manholes 5.0'to 9.5'deep • 4 Each,lined shallow drop sewer manholes 10.0'to 14.99'deep • 1 Each,lined drop sewer manholes 15.00'to 20.00'deep • 110 Each,sewer lateral connection. As part of the Project,the design engineer will coordinate the location of laterals to each property with the respective owner to optimize connection convenience for the owner. The property owners will be responsible for the improvements on their private property to connect their plumbing to the lateral,as well as to close their existing cesspool or septic system. The sewer lines will be installed in trenches ranging in depth from 5' to 12'. The roadway will be restored to the existing pavement width(i.e.,not limited to a patch over the trench). 6. Improvement District Boundaries The 110 lots included in the Improvement District are shown in the map titled"Proposed Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District" (EXHIBIT B). 7. Estimated Cost of the Improvement The total project cost—including design,construction,financing,and land costs—is$6.4 million, detailed as follows: Mobilization $ 846,000 Demolition $ 1,500 Sewer System $ 1,920,800 Paving Restoration $ 1r 440000, Backfill of Lava Tubes $ 250,000 Hualalai Road Tie-In $ 50,000 LONO ION SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DIRECTOR'S REPORT Easement Costs $ 200,000 Subtotal $ 4,708,300 Contingency(20%) $ 941,700 Total Construction Cost $ 5,650,000 Other Costs " Feasibility Study $ 185,300 Design $ 285,000 Reserve Fund(Not Required) 1 $ - Legal Fees $ 75,000 ID Formation $ 50,000 Misc(4%of Construction Cost) $ 216,500 Total Other Costs $ 811,800 Total evel©pmrent Cost A more detailed breakdown of the construction cost is in EXHIBIT E,Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost. 8. Necessary Plans, Data, Detail, and Specifications All necessary plans and other data,details and specifications for the improvements and any other matters or details intended to apply thereto are contained in the exhibits listed below and appended to this report. The information in this report and the exhibits are in such form and contain such information as is reasonably necessary to inform the owners of assessment units and other interested parties at least generally of the nature and scope of the proposed sewer system improvements to be constructed and installed in the Improvement District. 1. EXHIBIT A.Location Map. 2. EXHIBIT B.Improvement District Boundary Map. 3. EXHIBIT C.Letter of Conditions. 4. EXHIBIT D.Preliminary Engineering Report for Lono Kona Sewer System Improvements. 5. EXHIBIT E.Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost. 6. EXHIBIT F. Proposed Assessment Roll for Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District. 7. EXHIBIT G.Lono Kona Sewer ID Easements Map. 9. Conclusion Given the public health and safety concerns associated with the existing cesspools and pending citations by the EPA,it is imperative that a County sewer system be constructed within the subdivision. It is the finding of this report that the proposed sewer improvement district fully meets the"public interest" standard specified in Chapter 12-10(i)of the Hawaii County Code to warrant a Council-initiated improvement district resolution. Moreover,given that alternative measures and proposals have been studied exhaustively,and that the most feasible,enforceable and affordable plan is to implement a gravity sewer system financed through a combined USDA loan/grant and a Council-initiated improvement LONO KONA SEWER IMPROVEME:tiT DISTRICT �3 DIRECTOR'S REPORT 14i district,it is the recommendation of the Director of Environmental Management that the Council move .00 forward with this effort. Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd,Director. Department of Environmental Management EXHIBIT A. Location Map EXHIBIT B. Improvement District Boundary Map EXHIBIT C. Letter of Conditions EXHIBIT D. Preliminary Engineering Report for Lono Kona Sewer System Improvements EXHIBIT E. Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost EXHIBIT F. Proposed Assessment Roll for Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District EXHIBIT G. Lono Kona Sewer ID Easements Map Aft, LONO KONA SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 10 DIRECTOR'S REPORT EXHIBIT A: Lono Kona Sewer ID Location Map * • r a + A s x .i�- ar+.v.i ` F t r rr w { ** i � Ai limp f f 'tt' i 101 'mo ollf s 4.to, outh tFia' .••H2o 4 *%**1:41104,+c ' ar.e NW).Kona 774‘711:Jaw, o tia„e., * •i ir. Puna W'*''°'VO, % `�' ;; y,t'ri „4-•', j Kau - . cD s t U'!`Y.. .Ott i „,�t,tri C IN** :iii 00' N \v&.. 4' . ��*‘ r �-1a � ��� ej/ ifb �; � :=tea C ✓ tVA ,»F , , r ,-- ,......":‘.R — q 0 ow 414 ,441Ft 40' - h ,,...,,,,,..,..„. ,,,,,, ,,:,,,,, ,,, •,,,,,,,,,, 4 gii,,,-...,,,-,,,,,,,,,r_.,. (it*,,,,14, - - f Iljk MU •` Or The 4111i...•,11111111mmilim Sources Esri,DeLorme,NAVTEQ,TomTom Intent , .\\� increment P Corp.,GEBCO,USGS,FAO;NPS ',, v. I GeoBase,IGN,Kadaster NL,Ordnance§urve Esn Japan, 4I I METI,Esn China(Hong Kong),and III- t•I : 't., unhly 111 N Legend .-- North Kona Sewer System o 0-5 1 2 ID Boundary I 1 I I Miles EXHIBIT B: Lono Kona Sewer ID Boundary Map \ , �` "�� ib ~�� y , .ee<K\� „�,.,''t�'.. North Kona youth Nib ' \ \.r'fj ` \ y° v Pena 5 ^'`' r J .," -' ,pia' i / ~ s / \ • t t • ti _"- • , ,AL! • ' ' WS - ,' ,0,„0" \ ;i' ,/ ., i Jr i' 1 /. \ e .N 'tom ■ ..`'_..-..--.'.".-- • s x ..'" \ ' y P�} -'' ,,. l , C i ' i `� i_ L / . Legend • Sewer Manhole Vacant parcels G..... Sewer Line Single-Family ID Boundary 1 Duplex 0 250 500 1.000 Apartment I i I i I I Feet Commercial Other EXHIBIT C: Letter of Conditions USDA united States Department of Agriculture Rural Development August 13,2013 Hawaii State Office Ms. Robin Bauman, Business Manager 154 Waianuenue Ave, County of Hawaii, Department of Environmental Management Suite311 25 Aupuni Street Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Hilo, HI 96720 Voice 808.933.8380 Fax 808.933.8327 Dear Ms. Bauman: Subject: Letter of Conditions for the County of Hawaii Department of Environmental Management Wastewater Financing Lona Kona Sewer Project Loan: $2,437,000 Grant: $4,024,$00 The purpose of your request of funds is to do improvements to the Lono Kona Subdivision's existing sewer system. The subdivision is under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)mandate to close large-capacity cesspools. This Letter of Conditions(LOC)with enclosures establishes conditions which you must understand and agree to before further consideration may be given to your application. The State staff of USDA Rural Development(RD)will administer the loan and grant on behalf of the Rural Utilities Program(RUS), Wateriand Environmental Program(WEP), hereafter referred to as the Agency. You must report any changes in design,project cost,source of funds,scope of services,or any other significant changes in the project to the Agency for review and approval. A written amendment to this letter will be prepared for approved changes. Changes not approved by the Agency may be cause for discontinuing processing of the application. Your documents concerning the creation and legal existence of your entity are administratively acceptable; however,the documents will be reviewed further by our Office of the General Counsel (OGC)at the time your file is forwarded for closing instructions. Any changes required by OGC will be included in the closing instructions. This LOC is not to be considered as loan approval or as representation to the availability of funds. You may be required to refinance(graduate)the unpaid balance of the Agency loan, in whole or in part,if at any time the Agency determines your entity is able to obtain a loan for such purposes from responsible cooperative or private sources at reasonable rates and terms for loans for similar purposes and periods of time. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination,complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form,found online at httpj/www.ascr.usda.gov/complalnt filing_cust.htmi,or at any USDA office,or call(866)632-9992 to request the form.You may also wile a tester containing all at the information requested in the form.Send your completed complaint brim or Wier to ui by mall at U.S. Department of Agriculture,Director,Office of Adjudication,1400 Independence Avenue,S.W Washington.D.C.20250-9410.by lax (202)690-7442 or email at ptogram.intake @usda.gov. Ms.Robin Bauman,Business Manager County of Hawaii,Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 2 Please provide copies of this letter to your engineer,attorney, and accountant, All parties may access our web-site located at www.rurdev.usda.gov/UWEP_Homepage.html : a. Title 7 Code of Federal Regulation,Part 1780, (7 CFR 1780) b. Bulletin 1780-26,"Guidance for the Use of EJCDC Funding Agency Edition Documentation" The conditions referred to above are as follows: 1. Project Budget--Funding from all sources has been budgeted for the estimated expenditures as follows: Project Costs: Total Budgeted Engineering Design(Fees) $ 285,000 Engineering-Pre-development(Feasibility Study) 185,300 Legal Services(Fees) 75,000 Other(Improvement District Formation) 50,000 Development(Construction Costs) 5,650,000 Project Contingence 216,500 Total Costs: $ 6,461,800 2. Protect Funds—The project funding is planned in the form of a loan and grant from the following sources and amounts: Project Funding Source: Funding Amount Agency Loan $ 2,437,000 Agency Grant 4,024.$00 Total Project Funding(All Sources): $ 6,461,800 Any changes in funding sources following obligation of Agency funds must be reported to the processing official.You must assure that all project funds are expended only for the eligible items included in the project budget of this letter of conditions or as amended by the Agency in writing at a later date. 3. Disbursement of Funds—The Agency funds may be advanced as they are needed in the amounts necessary to cover the Agency's proportionate share of any disbursements required of your entity,over 30-day periods. Funds would be disbursed by electronic transfer of funds. Interim financing should be used for the Agency loan portion of funding if the loan amount exceeds$500,000. You must provide the Agency with a copy of the interim financing instrument. Loan funds will be the first funds into the project,and then grant funds. Ms. Robin Bauman, Business Manager County of Hawaii, Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 3 4. Use of Remaining Funds—Applicant contributions and connection or tap fees will be the first funds expended in the project. Remaining funds may be considered in direct proportion to the amounts obtained from each source and handled as follows: a. Remaining funds may be used for eligible loan and grant purposes,provided the use will not result in major changes to the original scope of work and the purpose of the loan and grant remains the same. b. Agency loan funds that are not needed will be applied as an extra payment on the Agency indebtedness unless other disposition is required by the bond ordinance, resolution,or State statute. c. Grant funds not expended for authorized purposes will be cancelled within 60 days of project completion. Prior to actual cancellation,you and your attorney and engineer will be notified of the Agency's intent to cancel the remaining funds and given appropriate appeal rights. You must establish a separate account,to be known and hereafter referred to as the Construction Account,with a participating 31 CFR Part 202 collateral depository,federal agency,or Federal Reserve Bank acting as a fiscal agent in the United States. All project funds will be deposited into this account. The account shall be used solely for the purpose of paying authorized costs of the project as outlined in the project budget. Financial institutions or depositaries accepting deposits of public funds and providing other financial agency services to the Federal Government are required to pledge adequate,acceptable securities as collateral. General requirements for designating depositaries and regulations governing the pledging of collateral are identified in 31 CFR Part 202 ("Depositaries and Financial Agents of the Federal Government"). Treasury's current acceptability and valuation requirements are identified in 31 CFR Part 380("Collateral Acceptability and Valuation")and specific eligibility and valuation guidance is provided in Treasury's procedural instructions and on Treasury's Bureau of the Public Debt website at www.publicdebt.treas.gov. All funds in the account will be secured by a collateral pledgee equaling at least 100%of the highest amount of funds expected to be deposited in the Construction Account at any one time. Any Agency grant funds not disbursed immediately upon receipt must be deposited in an interest bearing account except as follows: a. Federal grant awards(includes all federal funding sources)are less than $120,000 per year. b. The best available interest bearing account would not be expected to earn in excess of the following: Public Bodies: Interest earned on grant funds in excess of$100 per year will be submitted to the Agency at least quarterly as required in 7CFR3016. Ms. Robin Bauman,Business Manager County of Hawaii,Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 4 c. The depository would require a minimum balance so high that it would not be feasible. 5. Security—The loan will be secured by a General Obligation(GO)bond with the United States of America, acting through the Department of Agriculture,Rural Utilities Service in first lien position in the amount of$2,437,000. The bond will be fully registered as to both principal and interest in the name of the"United States of America, acting through the Department of Agriculture". The bond and any ordinance or resolution relating thereto must not contain any provision in conflict with the RUS Loan Resolution, applicable regulations, and law: In particular, there must be no defeasance or refinancing clause in conflict with the graduation requirements of 7 USC 1983 (c). Additional security requirements are contained in RUS Bulletin 1780-12,"Water or Waste System Grant Agreement,"Form RUS Bulletin 1780-28,"Loan Resolution Security Agreement,"which also serves as an assignment of income,and Form RD 1942- 8,"Resolution of Members or Stockholders." A Form UCC-I,"Financing Statement,"must be filed to perfect a security interest in collateral,including fixtures. We will provide you with this document at loan closing. 6. Loan Repayment—The loan will be scheduled for repayment over a period of 35 years. The payments due the first two years will consist of interest only. Payments for the remaining 33 years will be equal amortized annual installments. For planning purposes use a 2.1250%interest rate and an annual amortization factor of$42.47/81000,which provides for an annual payment of$103,499.00. The interest rate will be the lower of the rate in effect at the time of loan approval or the time of loan closing,whichever is less,unless you choose otherwise. Should the interest rate be reduced,the payment will be recalculated to the lower amount. The payment due date will be established as the day that the loan closes. Interest only payments during the 24-month deferral period will be made by your applicant funds on an annual basis. You will be required to complete Form RD-3550-28, "Authorization Agreement for Preauthorized Payments"for all new and existing indebtedness to the Agency. It will allow for your payment to be electronically debited from your account on the day your payment is due. 7. Reserves—Reserves must be properly budgeted to maintain the financial viability of any operation. Reserves are important to fund unanticipated emergency maintenance and repairs, and assist with debt service should the need arise. Reserves can also be established and Ms. Robin Bauman, Business Manager County of Hawaii, Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 5 maintained for the anticipated and expected expenses including but not limited to operation and maintenance, customer deposits,and asset management for short-lived assets. The RUS loan would be secured by a General Obligation bond("GO Bond") and not an Improvement District bond. Since a G.O. Bond is backed by the County of Hawaii to cover the debt service on the GO bond,and the County of Hawaii will get reimbursed through the Improvement District for the debt service it pays,a debt service reserve is not necessary 8. Users—This letter of conditions is based upon you providing evidence or a certification that there will be at least 248"equivalent"users on the proposed system when construction has been completed. Before the Agency can agree to the project being advertised for construction bids,you must provide evidence or a certification that the total required number of users are currently using the system or signed up to use the system and that the monthly water usage projected for each by the engineer is reasonable. In the event any of the large volume users discontinue the offered service, you must obtain enough additional revenue (i.e.,increase in user rates, sign up of an adequate number of other users,reduction in project scope to reduce debt service and O&M,etc.)to make up the projected income that would be lost by not having those users on the system. 9. Income Available—You must maintain a rate schedule that provides adequate income to meet the minimum requirements for operation and maintenance, debt service,and reserves. 10. Operation and Maintenance Expenses—O&M expenses must be properly budgeted to ensure the financial viability of any operation. For planning purposes,we have projected O&M expenses based on the information provided in the preliminary engineering report which should be representative of a typical year.This information is utilized to determine loan repayment and should be reflected in your proposed operating budget. It is expected that O&M will change over each successive year and user rates will need to be adjusted appropriately. 11. Proposed Operating Budget and User Rate Analysis—You will be required to submit a copy of your proposed annual operating budget and rate analysis to the Agency which supports the proposed loan repayment prior to the Agency giving you written authorization to proceed with the bidding phase. The operating budget should be based on a typical year cash flow after completion of the construction phase. The rate analysis will be required to show the number of users, their average consumption based on a twelve month consecutive average, and rate structure to support the necessary revenue to make the operating budget cash flow. Form RD 442-7"Operating Budget"attached or similar form may be utilized for this purpose. 12.Insurance and Bonding Reuuirements—Prior to loan closing or start of construction, whichever occurs first, you must acquire the types of insurance and bond coverage shown Ms. Robin Bauman,Business Manager County of Hawaii,Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 6 below. The use of deductibles may be allowed providing you have the financial resources to cover potential claims requiring payment of the deductible. The Agency strongly recommends that you have your engineer,attorney,and insurance providers review proposed types and amounts of coverage,including any exclusions and deductible provisions. It is your responsibility and not that of the Agency to assure that adequate insurance and fidelity or employee dishonesty bond coverage is maintained. a. General Liability Insurance—Include vehicular coverage. b. Workers' Compensation—In accordance with appropriate State laws. c. Position Fidelity Bonds — All positions occupied by persons entrusted with the receipt and/or disbursement of funds must be bonded. You should have each position bonded in an amount equal to the maximum amount of funds to be under the control of that position at any one time. The minimum coverage acceptable to the Agency will be for each position to be bonded for an amount at least equal to one annual installment on your loans. The coverage may be increased during construction of this project based on the anticipated monthly advances. The amount of coverage should be discussed and approved by the Agency. d. National Flood Insurance—If the project involves acquisition or construction in designated special flood or mudslide prone areas,you must purchase a flood insurance policy at the time of loan closing. e. Real_Property Insurance—Fire and extended coverage will normally be maintained on all structures except reservoirs,pipelines and other structures if such structures are not normally insured and subsurface lift stations except for the value of electrical and pumping equipment. Prior to the acceptance of the facility from the contractor(s), you must obtain real property insurance(fire and extended coverage)on all facilities identified above. 13.Accounting Services—You may be required to obtain the services of an independent licensed Certified Public Accountant(CPA). When permitted by state statutes or with the approval of the Agency,a state or Federal auditor may perform the audit in lieu of a CPA. A CPA will be considered independent if the CPA: a. Meets the standards for independence contained in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants(AICPA)Code of Professional Conduct in effect at the time the CPA's independence is under review: b. Does not have any direct financial interest or any material indirect financial interest in the borrower during the period covered by the audit;and c. Is not,during the period of the audit,connected with the borrower as a promoter, underwriter,trustee,director,officer or employee. Ms. Robin Bauman,Business Manager County of Hawaii, Department of Environmental Management August 13, 2013 Page 7 Audit Agreement: You must enter into a written audit agreement with the auditor and submit a copy to the Agency prior to advertisement of bids. The audit agreement may include terms and conditions that the borrower and auditor deem appropriate; however, the agreement should include the following: d. A statement that the auditor will perform and document the audit work in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards,(GAGAS),,as outlined in the attached booklet,"Government Auditing Standards(Revised 1994)",and the professional standards of the AICPA; e. A statement that the auditor will submit the completed audit and accompanying letters to your governing body 30 days prior to the date the audit is due to the Agency; f. A statement that the auditor will make all audit-related documents, including work papers, available to the Agency or its representatives, upon request;and g. A statement that the auditor will immediately report, in writing,all irregularities and illegal acts to your governing body and the Agency. Prior to the advertisement for bids, your accountant must certify to you and the Agency that the accounts and records as required have been established and are operational. Quality Review Requirement: As required by GAGAS, the auditor must belong to and participate in an external quality review program and provide you with a copy of the most recent quality review report. These reviews are performed every 3 years by an independent organization to determine if the auditor is following established audit procedures and applicable auditing standards. Audit Requirements: The following management data will be required from you on an annual basis and be submitted to the Agency as specified below: h. A borrower that expends$500,000 or more in federal financial assistance per fiscal year shall submit an audit performed in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-133. As described above, the total federal funds expended from all sources shall be used to determine federal financial assistance expended. Projects financed with interim financing are considered federal expenditures. OMB Circular A-133 audits shall be submitted no later than 9 months after the end of the fiscal year. In addition to submitting two(2)copies of the audit report to the Agency,the borrower is also required to submit copies of OMB Circular A-133 audits, accompanying audit letters(the"reporting package"),and the Data Collection Form to the Federal clearinghouse designated by OMB to retain as an archival copy. The Federal clearinghouse address is: Federal Audit Clearinghouse,Bureau of the Census, 1201 E. 10th Street,Jeffersonville, Indiana 47132. RUS Bulletin 1780- Ms.Robin Bauman,Business Manager County of Hawaii,Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 8 31,"Water Programs Compliance Supplement for OMB Circular A-133 Audits" outlines the requirements of OMB Circular A-133 audits. 1. A borrower that expends less than$500,000 in Federal financial assistance per fiscal year and an outstanding Agency loan balance of$1,000,000 or more,shall submit All audit performed in accordance with Water and Waste audit requirements(i.e..a GAGAS audit). These audits shall be submitted to the Agency no later than 150 days after the end of the fiscal year. Two(2)copies of the audit report are required by RD. An audit performed in accordance with Water and Waste audit requirements should not be submitted to the Federal clearinghouse. RUS Bulletin 1780-30,"Water Programs Audit Guide and Compliance Supplement"outlines the requirements for Water Programs Audits. j. A borrower that expends less than$500,000 in Federal financial assistance per fiscal year and has an outstanding Agency loan balance of less than$1,000,000 may submit a management report in lieu of an audit report unless notified by the Agency otherwise. Management reports shall be submitted to the Agency no later than 60 days after the end of the fiscal year. A year-end management report shall consist of: Form RD 442-3,"Balance Sheet",and Form RD 442-2,"Statement of Budget, Income and Equity",or forms that provide the information in a similar format. Form RD 442-2 should have Schedule 1,all Columns completed on page 1,and page 2. Schedule 2 is not required for year-end reports.An annual audit report or similar financial statements may be submitted in lieu of Forms RD 442-2 and 442-3. The financial report must be submitted no later than 150 days after the end of the borrower's fiscal year. Compensation for preparation of the A-133 audit or your annual audit is not included in project funds and should be paid from the operational revenues generated from your system operation. Annual Budget and Projected Cash Flow:Thirty days prior to the beginning of each fiscal year,you will be required to submit an annual budget and projected cash flow to this office. You should submit two copies of Form RD 442-2,Statement of Budget, Income and Equity,Schedule 1,page 1;and Schedule 2, Projected Cash Flow. The only data required at this time on Schedule 1,page 1,is Columns 2&3. All of Schedule 1, page 2 and Schedule 2, Projected Cash Flow will be required.You may submit annual budgets on other financial statements for cash flow projections rather than Form RD 442-2.With the submission of the annual budget,you will be required to provide a current rate schedule,a current listing of the Board or Counsel members and terms. Quarterly Reports—Borrowers receiving their first loan from RD,will be required to submit two copies of Form RD 442-2,Schedule 1,page 1,columns 2-6,as appropriate, and page 2. You may submit historical quarterly financial statements on a format other Ms.Robin Bauman, Business Manager County of Hawaii, Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 9 than Form RD 442-2. This information should be received in the servicing office thirty days after the end of each of the first three quarters of the fiscal year. 14. Legal Services—The Agency will review the"Legal Services Agreement." This agreement will address the fees necessary for the services outlined in this agreement. At closing the owner's attorney will certify that the executed contract documents,including performance and payment bonds on contracts over$100,000 are adequate and that the persons executing these documents have been properly authorized to do so in accordance with RUS Instruction 1780.61(b). The Agreement should be submitted for Agency concurrence and approval. Project funding included for this purpose should be outlined in the Agreement. 15. Property Rights--Acquisitions of necessary land and rights must be accomplished in accordance with the Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Act. Prior to advertisement for construction bids, you must furnish satisfactory evidence that you have or can obtain adequate continuous and valid control over the lands and rights needed for the project. Such evidence of control over the lands and rights must be in the following form: a. A right-of-way map showing clearly the location of all lands and rights needed for the project. The map must designate public and private lands and rights and the appropriate legal ownership thereof. b. Preliminary Title Work—(Title Opinions). A copy of deeds,contracts or options for any lands needed other than rights-of-way,along with a preliminary title opinion covering such lands. A separate Form RD 1927-9,"Preliminary Title Opinion"may be used for each property currently owned or to be acquired. i.A certification and legal opinion relative to title to rights-of-way and easements. Form RD 442-22,"Opinion of Counsel Relative to Rights-of-Way,"may be used. This form may contain a few exceptions such as properties that must be condemned;however,prior to the start of construction or loan closing,whichever occurs first,a new Form RD 442-22 must be provided which does not provide for any exceptions. ii.A narrative opinion from your attorney concerning all permits,certificates, licenses and other items necessary to show that all legal requirements can be met and stating how they will be met. c. Preliminary Title Work—(Title Insurance)A title insurance binder will be required on all real estate now owned and property to be acquired in connection with this project. The binder will be in the amount of the proposed loan and name the United States of America, acting through the United States Department of Agriculture,as the proposed insured. Ms. Robin Bauman,Business Manager County of Hawaii,Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 10 d. Final Title Work—On the day of loan closing,your attorney must furnish a separate final title opinion on all existing land(s) and those to be acquired on the day of loan closing. Form RD 1927-10,"Final Title Opinion"may be used. ' 16. Engineerinn Services—The Agency must approve any agreements or modifications to agreements for professional design services. The agreement for engineering services should consist of the EJCDC documents as indicated in RUS Bulletin 1780-26, "Guidance for the Use of EJCDC Standard Documents on Water and Waste Projects with RUS Financial Assistance"or other approved form of agreement, 17.Resident Inspection—Full-time inspection is required unless waived or modified by RD in writing prior to advertisement for bids. This service is to be provided by the consulting engineer or other arrangements as approved by the Agency. Prior to the pre- construction conference, a resume of qualifications of the resident inspector(s)will be submitted to the owner and Agency for review and approval. The owner will provide a letter of acceptance for all proposed inspectors to the engineer and Agency. The resident inspector(s)must attend the pre-construction conference. 18.Restrictions on Lobbying—In order to comply with Section 319 of Public Law 101-121 which prohibits applicants and recipients of Federal contracts,grants and loans from using Federal appropriated funds for lobbying,the Federal Government in connection with the award of a specific contract,grant or loan,the Applicant,and all contractors and subcontractors must: 1. Execute the attached Certification for Contracts,Grants,and Loans. 2. Complete Standard Form LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities",if they have made,or agreed to make payment,using funds other than Federal appropriated funds, to influence or attempt to influence a decision in connection;with the contract. 3. The Certification and,if appropriate,the Disclosure must be provided to USDA, Rural Development. 19.Environmental Requirements—Mitigation-At the conclusion of the proposal's environmental review process,specific actions were determined necessary to avoid or minimize adverse environmental impacts. The following lists of actions are required for successful completion of the project and must be adhered to during project design and construction. MITIGATION 1: The Great Wall of Kuakini was constructed by Governor John Quincy to prevent cattle from destroying the agricultural plots in the Kona-Kailua region. Construction of the wall began in the early 1800s and was completed by the mid-1850s.The wall is Ms. Robin Bauman, Business Manager County of Hawaii,Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 11 approximately five miles long and extends from Palani Road in Kailua-Kona to Kahalu'u Bay south of Kailua-Kona.Some historians suggest the wall was constructed to keep cattle away from the coastal homes and garden plots,while others suggest'the garden walls,and perhaps the Kuakini Wall, prevented cattle from damaging the upland gardens in the region. On May 31,2012,Glenn G. Escott, MA,Senior Archaeologist of Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. surveyed the lots that will be potentially impacted by the sewer line construction and the vacant lots proposed as the possible staging areas for construction activities. Mr. Escott noted the Kuakini Wall along the east boundary of TMK: (3)7-5- 04:35 is the only archaeological site located within the project area. The remaining lots have been grubbed and graded;therefore no archaeological sites were located on the remaining lots. Mr. Escott has made a determination that the proposed sewer main installation will not impact the Kuakini Wall in any way.The vacant lots that border the Kuakini Wall shall not be used as construction staging areas. If the State Historic Preservation Division deems it necessary,a monitoring plan shall be prepared. MITIGATION 2: The Hawaiian Hoary Bat and Hawaiian Hawk are two protected species known to transit through the project area for foraging and breeding and they may be affected. • The Hawaiian Hoary Bat roosts in exotic and native woody vegetation. While foraging, the adults leave their young unattended in nursery trees and shrubs. If the trees or shrubs are cleared during roosting and breeding season, there is a risk the young bats could be harmed or killed. Woody plants greater than 15 feet tall should not be removed or trimmed from June 1 to September 15. • The Hawaiian Hawk is/are sensitive to loud, irregular,and unpredictable activities such as using heavy equipment or building a structure. The Hawaiian Hawk will have problems nesting. Harrassment of the nesting sites can alter feeding and breeding patterns,or nest and chick abandonment. Also nest disturbance can increase exposure of chicks and juveniles to inclement weather or predators. If a Hawaiian Hawk is observed transiting the proposed area during the breeding season of March through September, a nest search of the proposed construction site and surrounding area should be conducted by a qualified"Ornithologist"immediately prior to the start of work. If an active nest is detected during construction, construction activity shall be halted within 1,600 feet of the nest,and consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service shall be conducted. a. Project Modifications—The project as proposed has been evaluated to be consistent with all applicable environmental requirements. If the project or any project element deviates Ms. Robin Bauman,Business Manager County of Hawaii,Department of Environmental Management August 13, 2013 Page 12 from or is modified from the original approved project,additional environmental review may be required. 20. Vulnerability Assessments (VA)and Emergency Response Plans (ERPP- Congress enacted the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness Response Act of 2002,Public Law 107-188 (Bioterrorism Act). The Bioterrorism Act amended the Safe Drinking Water(SDWA)to require all medium and large sized community water systems(serving populations greater than 3,300)to assess vulnerability to terrorist attack and develop emergency plans for response to such an attack. Medium and large community water systems are being monitored by the U.S.EPA for completion of VA's and ERP's. The Agency requires all financed water and wastewater systems to have a vulnerability assessment(VA)and an emergency response plan (ERP)in place. New water or wastewater systems must provide a certification that an ERP is complete prior to the start of operations. A certification that a VA is complete must be submitted within one year of the start of operations. All other borrowers must provide a certification that a VA and ERP are completed prior to bid authorization. You will also be required to provide a certification that the VA and ERP are complete and are current every three years after the start of operations. The Agency does not need or want a copy of the VA or ERP. The requested certification will be sufficient to meet our needs. Technical assistance providers are available to provide on site assistance if desired. 21. Permits—The owner,contractor or responsible party will be required to obtain all required permits for the project prior to advertisement for construction bids. A narrative opinion from your attorney concerning all permits,certificates,licenses and other items necessary to show that all legal requirements can be met and stating how they will be met. 22.Contract Documents,Final Plans and Specifications— a. The contract documents should consist of the EJCDC Construction Contract Documents as indicated in RUS Bulletin 1780-26 or other approved form of agreement. b. The contract documents,final plans,and specifications must comply with RUS Instruction 1780,Subpart C—Planning,Designing,Bidding,Contracting, Construction and Inspections and be submitted to the Agency for approval prior to advertisement for bids. Ms. Robin Bauman, Business Manager County of Hawaii, Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 13 c. The use of any procurement method other than competitive bidding must be requested in writing and approved by the Agency. d. The Agency requires a pre-construction conference,pre-final, final, and warranty inspection. e. The Agency requires prior Agency concurrence of all Change Orders,Invoices,and Payment Estimates. f. The Agency will monitor construction through routine inspections and review of monthly payment estimates,change orders,and inspector's daily record to protect the interest of the Agency. • g. Any construction in excess of$2,000 will include the Labor Standards Provisions stated in RD Instruction 1940-C, Exhibit A. 23.Graduation -By accepting this loan, you are also agreeing to refinance (graduate)the unpaid loan balance in whole,or in part, upon request of the Government., If at any time the Agency determines your entity is able to obtain a loan for such purposes from responsible cooperative or private sources at reasonable rates and terms, you will be requested to refinance. 24.System for Award Management (SAM),—You as the recipient must maintain an active and current registration at all times in the SAM system. See https://www.sam.gov/index.htrnl for further information. a. You as the recipient may not make a sub-award to an entity unless the entity has provided its Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS)number to you. Sub- recipients with sub-awards of$25,000 or more must also have and maintain a current SAM registration. b. Recipient Repgrtina`You as the recipient must report each first tier sub-awards of $25,000 or more in non-Recovery Act funds to http_//www.fsrs.gov no later than the end of the month following the month the obligation was made. See the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act(FFATA)website (listed above)for additional recipient and sub-recipient reporting requirements. 25. Applicable State Statutes and Requirements—The applicant must provide copies of the following documents for review and approval to USDA Rural Development prior to bid authorization: County of Hawaii's Bond Documents, Ordinances,and applicable Legislative Documents. 26. Processing Forms--You must adopt and properly execute the following forms: Ms.Robin Bauman,Business Manager County of Hawaii,Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 14 a. Form RD 400-1 "Equal Opportunity Agreement" b. Form RD 400-4-"Assurance Agreement" c. Form AD 1047-"Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and other Responsibility Matters" d. Form AD 1049-"Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace Requirements" e. Form RD 1910-11 "Applicant Certification,Federal Collection Policies" f. Form RD 1942-46,"Letter of Intent to Meet Conditions" g. RD Instruction 1940-0,Exhibit A-1,"Certification for Contracts,Grants and Loans" h. Standard Form LLL- "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities"(If Applicable) i. RUS Bulletin 1780-22,"EIigibility Certification" j. RUS Bulletin 1780-27-"Loan Resolution(Public Bodies)" k. Form RD 1940-1 -"Request for Obligation of Funds" Please complete and return the enclosed Form RD 1942-46,"Letter of Intent to Meet Conditions,"if you desire further consideration be given your application and Form RD 1940-1 "Request for Obligation of Funds". The loan will be considered approved on the date a signed copy of Form RD 1940-1,"Request for Obligation of Funds,"is mailed to you. Attached is a copy of RUS Bulletin 1780-12,"Water and Waste System Grant Agreement,"for your review. You will be required to execute a completed form at the time of grant closing. 27.Civil Rights&Equal Opportunity-You should be aware of and will be required to comply with other federal statute requirements including but not limited to: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973—Under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,as amended(29 U.S.G.794),no handicapped individual in the United States shall,solely by reason of their handicap,be excluded from participation in,be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Agency financial assistance. Civil Rights Act of 1964—All borrowers are subject to,and facilities must be operated in accordance with,title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964(42 U.S.C.20004 et seq.)and subpart E of part 1901 of this title,particularly as it relates to conducting and reporting of compliance reviews. Instruments of conveyance for loans and/or grants subject to the Act must contain the covenant required by paragraph 1901.202(e)of this title. The Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)of 1990—This Act(42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) prohibits discrimination an the basis of disability in employment,State and local government services,public transportation,public accommodations, facilities,and telecommunications. Title I1 of the Act applies to facilities operated by State and local public entities which provides services,programs and activities. Title III of the Act Ms. Robin Bauman,Business Manager County of Hawaii, Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 15 applies to facilities owned,leased,or operated by private entities which accommodate the public. Age Discrimination Act of 1975—This Act(42 U.S.C.6101 et seq.)provides that no person in the United States shall on the basis of age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of,or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Agency financial programs must be extended without regard to race,color, religion, sex, national origin,marital status,age,or physical or mental handicap. 28. Bid Authorization -Once all the conditions outlined in this letter have been met,the Agency may authorize you to advertise the project for construction bids. Such advertisement must be in accordance with appropriate State statutes. No Notice of Award will be issued until the Agency concurs with the engineer's recommendations. Immediately after bid opening you must provide the Agency with(a)bid tabulation,and (b) your engineer's evaluation of bids and recommendations for contract awards. if the Agency agrees that the construction bids received are acceptable, adequate funds are available to cover the total project costs,and all the administrative conditions of loan approval have been satisfied, loan closing instructions will be issued to you setting forth any further requirements that must be met before the loan can be closed, then a Notice of Award may be issued. Obligated loan and grant funds not needed to complete the proposed project will be de-obligated prior to construction. Any reductions will be applied to grant funds first. When all parties agree that the closing requirements can be met, a mutually acceptable date for the loan closing will be scheduled. 29. Cost Overruns,—Cost overruns must be due to high bids or unexpected construction problems that cannot be reduced by negotiations,redesign, use of bid alternatives, rebidding or other means prior to consideration by the Agency for subsequent funding. Such requests will be contingent on the availability of funds. Cost overruns exceeding 20%of the development cost at time of loan or grant approval or where the scope of the original purpose has changed will compete for funds with all other applications on hand as of that date. If the conditions set forth in this letter are not met within 12 months from the date of this letter, the Agency reserves the right to discontinue processing of the application. In the event the project has not advanced to the point of loan closing within 24 months and it is determined the applicant still wishes to proceed, it may be necessary to review the conditions outlined in this letter. If during that review, it is determined the conditions outlined are no longer adequate,the Agency reserves the right to require that the letter of conditions be revised or replaced. Ms.Robin Bauman,Business Manager County of Hawaii,Department of Environmental Management August 13,2013 Page 16 We believe the information in this letter clearly sets forth the conditions with which you must comply;however,this letter does not relieve you from meeting the requirements of RUS Instruction 1780. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact Saniantha Shimizu, Community Programs Specialist at(808)933-8307 or me at(808)933-8313. Since , TIMOTHY W. O'CONNELL Acting Community Programs Director Enclosures cc: Area Director Position 3 Form RD 1942-46 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FORM APPROVED (Rev.6-10) RURAL DEVELOPMENT OMB NO.0575-0015 OMB NO,0570-0021 OMB NO.0570-0061 LETTER OF INTENT TO MEET CONDITIONS oMB NO.0570-0062 Date TO: United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development (Name of USDA Agency) 154 Waianuenue Ave. Suite 311 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 (USDA Agency Office Address) We have reviewed and understand the conditions set forth in your letter dated 08-13-2013 ,It is our intent to meet all of them not later than 08-01-2014 County of Hawaii, D-.t of Env Mgt / ( 'j I f,4s ' r ton / BY 41../ l Bobby Jean Deithead-Todd,. Director (Tide) According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1095,an agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a persons is not required to respond to o collection of information unless it display's a valid OMB control number. The valid 0MB control number for this information collection is 0575.0015.0570-0021.0570-0061 and 0570-006?. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 1 hour per response.including the time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources.gathering and maintaining the data.needed.and completing and reviewing the collection of information, Form RD 1942-46(Rev.6-10) USDA Form RD 1940.1 REQUEST FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS FORM APPROVED (Rev.08-10) OMB No.0570-0062 INSTRUCTIONS-TYPE IN CAPITALIZED EUTE TYPE IN SPACES MARKED( ) Complete Items 1 through 29 and applicable Items 30 through 34.See FMI. 1.CASE NUMBER LOAN NUMBER FISCAL YEAR ST CO BORROWER ID 61-001-*****0567 2.BORROWER NAME 3.NUMBER NAME FIELDS County of Hawaii I (1.1,or.front hem7) 4.STATE NAME Hawaii 5.COUNTY NAME Hawaii GENERAL BORROWER/LOAN INFORMATION S.RACE/ETHNIC 7.TYPE OF APPLICANT 8.COLLATERAL CODE 9.EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION s-P AMU. $: � SIC corm S LIVESTOCK ONLY RELATIONSHIP CODE I-wog 4•NL7PANIC 3•CORPORA1tDN O.NMAROMPA1m BASED 2-REALESTATE I.CROPS ONLY t.Emik rnia 2-BLACK S-NP1 4-PUBLIC BODY -INDMMTRUE AND CHATTEL T-SECURED BY 2-iMFANEit�FAA4LY 5 13-MAN 4 I3 FAWIERS itaTMERCOLLEMPUMVERSm 7 I C OLOOYN vR O.pLp Acoy 4.A OCREUTNE 1D.SEX CODE E myna 11.MARITAL STATUS 12.VETERAN CODE I 13.CREDIT REPORT 6 I1.MALB S•CI AM FEMALE OWMED t.NARIBED 3-UMIARRIED INCLUDES t.YES 1•YE5 1•FEIAAIE i•PUBLICBOOY I 2.BEPARAIED YIIDo'e cI�oRCo i I 17.80 2 13•tom 14.DIRECT PAYMENT 15.TYPE OF PAYMENT 16.FEE INSPECTION i•WORMY 3 seawarivAliv I YES I (SOOFAil) 2I2•AMNUALLY 4 OUMYFEALY 2 I 17 COMMUNITY SIZE 18.ISE OF FUNDS CODE I.awooeLESS no memo (see FMI) •OYER 30,030 e+PDONLYI _ COMPLETE FOR OF FUNDS 1S.TYPE OF 20.PURPOSE CODE 21.SOURCE OF FUNDS 22.TYPE OF ACTION ASSISTANCE i-013LIaATKHS KE 06$ I ls4eJ 4 ) � I a. `gow Crca 23.TYPE OF SUBMISSION 24,AMOUNT OF LOAN 25.AMOUNT OF GRANT I •NIIII. lI 2� $2,437,000.00 $4,024,800.00 26.AMOUNT OF 27.DATE OF 28.INTEREST RATE 29.REPAYMENT TERMS IMMEDIATE ADVANCE APPROVAL MO DAY YR I 2.1250 % 35 COMPLETE FOR COMMUNITY PROGRAM AND CERTAIN MULTIPLE-FAMILY HOUSING LOANS 30.PROFIT TYPE 3.LIYttEO PROFIT II.FULL PROFIT 3-NONPROFR •, ., •. COMPLETE FOR EM LOANS ONLY COMPLETE FOR CREDIT SALE-ASSUMPTION 31.DISASTER DESIGNATION NUMBER 32.TYPE OF SALE I (Se• I 2.AASUMP1faM Q( Y 4.ASSUYPr Otot m f aIT SALE ONLY 3CREOIT S4LEwrTH EUBlEsj.ew T LOAN uas au r LOAN FINANCE OFFICE USE ONLY COMPLETE FOR FP LOANS ONLY 33.OBLIGATION DATE 34.BEGINNING FARMER/RANCHER MO DA YR (SOD FMB ph* dshow in IhI.fonu mole In eknMi.mMrno wcware(lintn ofUS.ST/mr4►mrt yap ernt•eyyroi iAti declaim ainflaiee hearts may"costa mow W lieu Os imAns• Arun we theJiewt w haw arIeiMfor Ws purpose. PosiGan 2 ORIGINAL-Borrower's Case Folder COPY 1-Finance Office COPY 2-Applicant/Lender COPY 3•State Office &watts meOr Arrow*IttrfronfonArtofp9O 5.entmoeywaynorrootolcrorspas Ortdnprison seetrflutird Po rayaadmee otkrpa eofinfonoalloa Was 1tdnptafr*marl OMB ronndlNOtMr.7Me+e1id Cadsraurotm46Arfor sift irls suaNae esikraae Is 4541-0441. The dmrnpuirwfso easpint efM 144nsttbw rofl etio•u ratiroial a swage II mimics pi.rsoparrse.Ards,ibis r Mire Mtrwing MahVeriwu■ acmeifnteseaer:low seserrr.✓Prow mod eooArsAUnE rho dam.rad&,aid ra°7krnS mudminiros rcoltmloA o/srfosetaao4. CERTIFICATION APPROVAL For All Farmers Programs EM,OL,FO,and SW Loans This loan is approved subject to the availability of funds.II'this loan does not close for any reason within 90 days from the date of approval on this document,the approval official will request updated eligibility information.The undersigned loan applicant agrees that the approval official will have 14 working days to review any updated information prior to submitting this document for obligation of funds.If there have been significant changes that may affect eligibility,a decision as to eligibility and feasibility will be made within 30 days from the time the applicant provides the necessary information. If this is a loan approval for which a lien and/or title search is necessary.the undersigned applicant agrees that the 15-working-day loan closing requirement may be exceeded for the purposes of the applicant's legal representative completing title work and completing loan closing. 35. COMMENTS AND REQUIREMENTS OF CERTIFYING OFFICIAL Approval is subject to the availability of funds, legal requirements of USDA Rural Development's Regional Attorney, and the County of Hawaii's Department of Environmental Management's acceptance of the Letter of Conditions dated August 13, 2013. 36. I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am unable to obtain sufficient credit elsewhere to finance my actual needs at reasonable rates and terms,taking into consideration prevailing private and cooperative rates and terms in or near my community for loans for similar purposes and periods of time.I agree to use the sum specified herein,subject to and in accordance with regulations applicable to the type of assistance indicated above,and request payment of such sum.1i agree to report to USDA any material adverse changes,financial or otherwise,that occur prior to loan closing.I certify that no part of the sum specified herein has been received.I have reviewed the loan approval requirements and comments associated with this loan request and agree to comply with these provisions. (For FP loans at eligible terms only)If this loan is approved.I elect the interest rate to be charged on my loan to be the lower of the interest rate in effect at the time of loan approval or loan closing.If I check"NO".the interest rate charged on my loan will be the rate specified in Item 28 of this form. ��,✓/' YES NO WARNING: Whoever,in any matter within the Jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies,conceals or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact,or makes any false,fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations,or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain anxr false,fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined under this title or priso of more thartfive ars,or both." Date pq (Signature of Applicant; Date , 20 (Signature of Co-Applicant) 37. I HEREBY CERTIFY that all of the committee and administrative determinations and certifications required by regulations prerequisite to providing assistance of the type indicated above have been made and that evidence thereof is in the docket,and that all requirements of pertinent regulations have been complied with.I hereby approve the above-described assistance in the amount set forth above,and by this document,subject to the availability of funds,the Government agrees to advance such amount to the applicant for the purpose of and subject to the availability prescribed by regulations applicable to this type of assistance. (Signature of Approving Official, Typed or Printed Name; CHRIS .1. KANAZAWA Date Approved: Title: State Director 38. TO THE APPLICANT:As of this date ,this is notice that your application for financial assistance from the USDA has been approved,as indicated above,subject to the availability of funds and other conditions required by the USDA.If you have any questions contact the appropriate USDA Servicing Office. USDA � Rural Development WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that: 1. The organization is aware of and in compliance with other Federal statute requirements including, but not limited to: 2. The organization is unable to finance the proposed project from its own resources or through commercial credit at reasonable rates and terms. 3. The organization has no known relatives or close associates that are current USDA Rural Development employees. 4. Prior to USDA Rural Development approval, the organization will not take action (e.g., initiation of construction) or incur obligations which would limit the range of alternatives to be considered or which would have an adverse effect on the environment. County of Hawaii Department of Environmental Management Name of Organization Sign urea Aut prized Official Date • EXHIBIT D: Preliminary Engineering Report Preliminary Engineering Report for Wastewater Facilities Name of Project: Lana Kona Sewer Improvement District Project Owner/Sponsor: County of Hawaii Department of Environmental Management Prepared By: Belt Collins Hawaii LLC With: PBR HAWAII & Associates, Inc. Goodwin Consulting Group Date PER Completed: June 13,2012 (Updated August 1, 2012 for number of laterals and total project costs;Updated September 14, 2012 to revise annual budget) Date PER Submitted to USDA Rural Development: June 13,2012 (Resubmitted August 2, 2012,September 14,2012) Contents General Information 1 1.1 Applicant/Borrower 1 1.2 Project Financing 1 2 Project Area 2 2.1 Location 2 2.2 Land Use Designations 2 2.3 Environmental Resources Present 2 2.4 Growth Areas and Population Trends 5 2.4.1 Regional Population/Income Data 5 2.4.2 Project Area Population and Wastewater Generation 5 3 Existing Facilities 6 3.1 Region and Project Area Existing Wastewater Facilities 6 3.1.1 Kailua-Kona Sewer System 6 3.1.2 Project Area Existing Wastewater Facilities 7 3.2 History . 7 3.3 Condition of Facilities 7 3.4 Financial Status of Any Existing Facilities 7 4 Need for the Project 7 4.1 Health,Sanitation,and Security 7 4.2 System O&M 8 4.3 Growth 8 5 Alternatives Considered 8 5.1 Alternative 1: No Action/Maintain Status Quo 8 5.1.1 Description 8 5.1.2 Design Criteria 8 5.1.3 Map 8 5.1.4 Environmental Impacts 8 5.1.5 Land Requirements 8 5.1.6 Construction Problems 8 5.1.7 Cost Estimates 8 5.1.8 Advantages/Disadvantages 9 5.2 Alternative 2: Gravity Sewer System 9 5.2.1 Description 9 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report 5.2.2 Design Criteria 9 5.2.3 Map 9 5.2.4 Environmental Impacts 9 5.2.5 Land Requirements 9 5.2.6 Construction Problems 9 5.2.7 Cost Estimates 10 5.3 Alternative 3: No Easements 10 5.3.1 Description 10 5.3.2 Design Criteria 10 5.3.3 Map 10 5.3.4 Environmental Impacts 10 5.3.5 Land Requirements 10 5.3.6 Construction Problems 10 5.3.7 Cost Estimates 11 5.3.8 Advantages/Disadvantages 11 5.4 Alternative 4: No Private Sewage Pumps 11 5.4.1 Description 11 5.4.2 Design Criteria 11 5.4.3 Map 11 5.4.4 Environmental Impacts 11 5.4.5 Land Requirements 11 5.4.6 Construction Problems 11 5.4.7 Cost Estimates 12 5.4.8 Advantages/Disadvantages 12 6 Selection of an Alternative 12 7 Proposed Project(Recommended Alternative) 12 7.1 Project Design 12 7.1.1 Collection System Layout 12 7.1.2 Pumping Stations 13 7.1.3 Treatment 13 7.2 Total Project Cost Estimate..... 13 7.3 Annual Operating Budget 16 7.3.1 Income 16 7.3.2 Operation and Maintenance Costs 17 7.3.3 Debt Service 18 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report 7.3A Net Income(or Deficit) 19 8 Conclusions and Recommendations 19 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report 1 General Information This preliminary engineering report(PER) is in support of a proposal to construct wastewater system improvements within the Lono Kona Subdivision funded through the United States Department of Agriculture(USDA), Rural Development(RD), Rural Utilities Water and Waste Disposal Loan and Grant Program. Several landowners within Lono Kona have received violation notices from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for their continued use of large-capacity cesspools. Cesspool leachate has the potential to contaminate the groundwater and Kailua Bay. The project offers a cost-effective solution to replace cesspools with a sanitary sewer system. This PER describes the present situation,analyzes alternatives,and proposes a specific course of action from an engineering perspective following the format specified by the USDA(U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service,October 2003). This document has been prepared concurrently with an Environmental Report(PBR Hawaii&Associates, Inc.,2012)in order to consider environmental issues as part of the engineering analysis. Pertinent findings from that environmental review have been incorporated or referenced in this document. 1.1 Applicant/Borrower The Applicant/Borrower is a public body,the County of Hawaii, Department of Environmental Management: Address:25 Aupuni Street,Hilo, HI 96720 County: Hawaii Contact Person: Dora Beck Contact Person's Title:Acting Director Contact Telephone Number:808-961-8028 Contact Fax Number:808-961-8644 Contact E-mail Address: dbeck @co.hawaii.hi.us 1.2 Project Financing The property owners connecting to the proposed sewer system will be responsible to pay for the Project development costs. To assist with the financing,the County has applied to the U.S.Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development,Rural Utilities Water and Waste Disposal loan and grant program. The program offers below-market interest rates,amortization periods longer than conventional loans,and the possibility of grants to partially subsidize the costs. The County has initiated the process to establish an Improvement District whereby the assessments collected would be used to repay the loan. The lien powers under an Improvement District provide an enforceable means to address delinquencies. The County will guarantee loan repayment to USDA by way of a reimbursable General Obligation bond authorized through the Improvement District process. Lono Kona Sewer improvement District PER 1 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report 2 Project Area 2.1 Location The Lono Kona Subdivision is located in Kailua-Kona,ahupuaa of Keopu 2"d, Keopu 3rd,and Honuaula, North Kona District, island and County of Hawaii("Project Area") (see Figure 1). This subdivision was created in 1962(Subdivision No.692-A),prior to the construction of the Kailua-Kona Sewer System.The Project Area includes various Tax Max Key parcels within Zone 7,Section 5. The Project Area includes parcels that were studied for potential sewer connection. The alternative sewer plans described herein would serve 110 parcels within the Project Area. The Latitude/Longitude of the Project Area is approximately bounded by: 19 deg 38 min 35 sec; 155 deg 59 min 16 sec 19 deg 38 min 29 sec; 155 deg 59 min 05 sec 19 deg 38 min 22 sec;155 deg 59 min 13 sec 19 deg 38min 15 sec; 155 deg 59 min 25 sec 19 deg 38min 28 sec; 155 deg 59 min 30 sec 2.2 Land Use Designations The Project Area is located in the vicinity of the Kailua-Kona Village core. The State and County land use designations for the Project Area reflect the higher-density urban character. A church and Salvation Army community center border the higher-density residential area on land designated as Agricultural. The Project Area land use designations are as follows: State Land Use Districts: Urban with a small portion in the Agricultural District County General Plan(LUPAG Map): Medium Density Urban County Zoning: Double-Family Residential (RD-3.75), Multi-Family Residential(RM-1),Single- Family Residential(RS-7.5),and Agricultural(A-5a) Special Management Area(SMA): outside the SMA. The Environmental Report(PBR Hawaii&Associates, Inc., 2012)has maps of the land use designations. 2.3 Environmental Resources Present The Environmental Report found no endangered or threatened species within the Project Area. If the Hawaiian hawk is observed in the vicinity during construction,the Environmental Report includes mitigation measures to minimize impacting that species. There are no archaeological or cultural resources within the areas directly impacted by construction—i.e.,the rights-of-way and easements where the sewer lines would be constructed and the vacant lots that are potential construction staging areas(see Figure 2 for a map of the Area of Potential Effect). There are no wetlands,streams,or other sensitive resources within the Project Area. A 100-year flood zone traverses through the Project Area,but since the Project consists entirely of subsurface improvements,there would be no effect on overland flood patterns. The Environmental Report verified these findings through consultations with the U.S.Fish&Wildlife Service, State Historic Preservation Office,and the Army Corps of Engineers. Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 2 September14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report . „ . : - . . ',..•,,, .7'. ' '''''.„-• -,-.' -,,,..-:----,`•%. 7, ' ' .,,, ', ,',,,. . ,' . - - . '- - .•-• -•,... , , _ . ,, . - . .. •:11,N'"'-''- ." . • „ _ ,' - : _ _ . __,..,.,_- • • :- '_;._-- ' It-:-. ''''''''' ' .ra. ...-.7',..'"'?"'-'.,' • -,'-..- - ' '• . ! 7::':',',7‘,:r '. - ' :1 ' '-'• .1''''''' ''. '''' ' . , ... . 1, _Keetake -t- --- .,..* ' -7.. ... ' .,........* '' t , ..-.''''''"-,. ,i -' '1,!}.2,:r,,,,, .,P4'., ' ', . .. ': ,'.. ,,':..•.' ' . ,...^ '' ' '''''''''';',:::.''.:■: ,,,,?'if...';'7"::4;1(Ar-'4 '.- " ' ',,:',4,\'°.','1::'- ' : . a ' - r, - • ,... , . •'., , 0 = 1 .; . '''._'-, ..-,--'"';','::::.,..-•'`''' -----7- ''..;-: ,,:r-,,, , s, ' 4 ikif.:7117,,,... ::: '-,,,,,, ,. . -'.; ••*;-,, ,,,,, , ........ -..,- I. l': •_-_•,, ' - .0, .. ti ..., r.'. :.... _, - -7.1 14:4 0, •,- LEGEND * Wastewater Treatment Plant LONO KONA SEWER PROJECT - North Kona Sewerage System I:3 Project Area Illip 0 3750 7,500 .:/t,,,,t. ;.e\,••,,..i.. Feet Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 3 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT 0 Preliminary Engineering Report Figure 2.Area of Potential Effect Am Sono Kona Sewer Im • rovement District . sy..F4'..Ill -,,,... a, I I I PI I 1°°I 1 PI"Ii.g,..,\,iii .oel 0 1 I 1: '''‘ .4 4 4 4 I 4 I I I li N $` s. yu /� Iii .►'' =- 'ilk\\ 10\ 1111111 1M Will I, j \\I.\.64. ' ',,, tali lik--"NikillIk. illkllkligl . r11 ..rt11-1���. m Legend a Existing Sewer Manhole 1 —Existing Sewer Main s • New Sewer Manhole New Sewer Easement,10-1t wide ri__E-1_1 i Feet New Sewer Main 0 170 340 680 Vacant ID Parcels-Put teniinl SYagnsk: Construction staging expected to occur on E22/vacant ID Parcels-Rasiridal Staging fvea one or more vacant ID parcels,at the contractors discretion Developed 0 Parcels Me Affected Rights of Way Lono Kona Sewer improvement District PER 4 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Prelimnary Engineering Report 2.4 Growth Areas and Population Trends .t Regional Population/Income Data The Project Area is located within census tract 216.01 and Kailua Census Designated Place (CDP). The 2000 population for the Kailua CDP is 9,870. Relative to the entire County,the Kailua CDP has a comparable median age of 36.5, less seniors over age 65,slightly larger household size, and diverse ethnicity. Ethnicity Number Hispanic or Latino 1007 American Indian/Alaska Native 45 Asian 1804 Black or African American 45 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 1299 White 3815 Multiple 2672 Other 190 Total 9870 The median household income for the State nonmetropolitan areas,County,census tract,and CDP are as follows: Geographic Area Median Household Income (MHI)(Census 2000) Statewide,nonmetropolitan areas $51,765 80%of Statewide, nonmetropolitan areas $41,412 Statewide Poverty Income $26,510 County of Hawaii $39,805 Census Tract 216.01 $40,765 Kailua Census Designated Place $40,874 2.4.2 Project Area Population and Wastewater Generation The population within the Project Area was estimated using the wastewater generation assumptions as follows: Single-family dwelling: 4 capita/unit Duplex: 4 capita/unit Apartment: 2.8 capita/unit Based on these assumptions,the Project Area's existing population is approximately 1,100. The projected population if built out to the entitled zoning is 2,470 persons. The projected average wastewater generation for this maximum population is 138,110 gpd (see Appendix A for wastewater generation calculations). Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 5 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D-Preliminary Engineering Report 3 Existing Facilities 3.1 Region and Project Area Existing Wastewater Facilities 3.1.1 Kailua-Kona Sewer System The planning area for the County's Kailua-Kona Sewer System includes a northern zone, extending approximately 8 miles from Keahole Point to Kailua Bay, and a southern zone extending approximately 4 miles from Kailua Bay to Kahaluu Bay (R.M.Towill Corporation,April 1981). The existing collection system services a portion of this northern and southern zone planning area, extending from Kealakehe to Laaloa (see Figure 3). The County completed the first sewer system serving Kailua-Kona in 1965 with a treatment plant capacity of 0.3 mgd. A 1968 wastewater master plan recommended separate wastewater systems for the northern and southern zone, and the treatment plant was expanded to 1.0 mgd based on the plan. A 1981 supplement to the areawide plan recommended that the most cost-effective system is one central treatment plant serving both zones. The plan also recommended relocating the existing treatment plant from an industrial area that received complaints from neighbors to the current location of the treatment plant on State land near Honokohau Harbor, referred to as the Kealakehe Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). Figure 3,Kailua-Kona Sewer System System Network - Kailua-Kona , is,`. INDEX MAP e 4` , 4--) , \ 1401616A.WWT,IN 11? --------"----ii-N„. Al LEGEND • v..=,w....n: • .WptstYro 1-.0., .6<[MP5 varct M. COUNTY OF HAWAII SEWER NETWORK .f Z" ,„ . o KAM-0.1(ONA,HAWAII The Kealakehe WWTP was built as a 5.3 mgd secondary treatment lagoon system with the intent that the primary means of effluent disposal would be reuse as irrigation water. Due to economic and legal complications,the Kealakehe Golf Course which was the major user of the reclaimed water,was never built. R-2 quality effluent has been available for reuse since the WWTP started operations in 1993, but has been disposed in a temporary sump where it seeps into the ground (Brown &Caldwell, February 1999). Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 6 September 14, 2012 EXHIBIT 0:Preliminary Engineering Report The County has plans to upgrade the treatment facilities to meet R-1 reclaimed water standards and to expand the distribution system for this higher quality reclaimed water to a potentially greater number of users. 3.1.2 Project Area Existing Wastewater Facilities Within the Project Area,the existing method of wastewater disposal is by onsite methods—i.e.,cesspools or septic systems. 3.2 History The Lono Kona subdivision was created in 1962,prior to the first section of the Kailua-Kona Sewer System installed by the County in 1965. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)regulations required all large capacity cesspools to be replaced by an alternative wastewater system by April 5,2005. EPA started issuing violation notices to property owners within the Project Area in 2010. 3.3 Condition of Facilities The condition of the sewer lines to which the Project will connect are in good condition. The Kealakehe Treatment Plant has adequate capacity to handle the sewage from the Project Area. Some septic tanks in the Project Area are known to have odor problems. There are no known performance problems associated with the existing cesspools in the Project Area, notwithstanding their potential contamination of the groundwater and nearshore waters. 3.4 Financial Status of Any Existing Facilities The County collects sewer service charges to fund operation and maintenance expenses,fixed costs(e.g., debt service,construction costs),and equipment replacement. The sewer charge revenues and expenditures are accounted for in a separate sewer fund established pursuant to Hawaii County Code section 21-34. Past audits have not raised any concerns with the sewer fund. The audited financial statement for fiscal year ending June 30,2011 is in Appendix B. 4 Need for the Project 4.1 Health, Sanitation, and Security The untreated cesspool leachates have a high potential to contaminate groundwater,especially in the highly permeable lava rock substrate of the area. Since the Project Area is within the Critical Wastewater Disposal Zone established by the Department of Health for areas near the shoreline,there is a high probability for the contaminated groundwater to seep into the nearshore coastal waters.To stem further water quality degradation,the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)banned large capacity cesspools pursuant to the Underground Injection Control provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act.1 Several property owners within the Project Area have received violation notices from EPA. The purpose of the Project is to prevent further water quality degradation from cesspools in the most cost-effective means and comply with EPA requirements. 1 EPA defines a cesspool to be a"large-capacity cesspool"as follows:Residential multiple-dwelling,community,or regional systems(e.g.,townhouse complexes or apartment buildings)that dispose of sanitary waste,or Non- residential cesspools that have the capacity to serve 20 or more persons per day(e.g.,rest areas or churches)if the cesspools receive solely sanitary waste. Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report 4.2 System O&M The Project is not intended to rectify any operation or maintenance problems of the Kailua-Kona Sewer System. 4.3 Growth The Project is intended to address existing wastewater disposal deficiencies. The driving need for the Project is public health and not to enable future growth. The Project Area is 86%built out(based on the number of lots)with 16 vacant parcels. Future development of these vacant parcels could proceed even without the Project using onsite septic or treatment plant systems. 5 Alternatives Considered 5.1 Alternative 1: No Action / Maintain Status Quo 5.1.1 Description No action consists of no sewer improvements and continued reliance on onsite wastewater disposal methods consisting of an Individual Wastewater System(IWS)or package plant wastewater treatment. State law stipulates each IWS system is limited to 1,000 gallons per day,and requires 10,000 square feet of usable land. The majority of the proper-ties are less than 10,000 square feet,and would therefore, not be able to replace their nonconforming cesspool with an onsite septic system. 5.1.2 Design Criteria None(no new system to design). 5.1.3 Map None. 5.1.4 Environmental Impacts Without the Project,those who received EPA violation notices would immediately have to install an approved wastewater system—i.e.,either a septic system or private wastewater treatment plant. The cost for a septic system or a private treatment plant is greater than the Project costs to the property owner. EPA would impose a time limit for compliance,and penalties for noncompliance. For property owners with cesspools that do not meet the definition of a "large capacity cesspool",the cesspools can legally remain. However,the potential to contaminate the groundwater and nearshore waters would persist. 5.1.5 Land Requirements None. 5.1.6 Construction Problems None(no construction). 5.1.7 Cost Estimates Those landowners with large-capacity cesspools would need to expend approximately$40,000 to construct an IWS for disposal of 1,000 gallons per day of sewage. Multiple IWS may be installed provided adequate usable land is available. Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 8 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report 5.1.8 Advantages/Disadvantages Advantages of Alternative 1: The landowners would not have to pay Improvement District assessments or monthly sewer charges. There would be no construction impacts that would have been caused by the construction of the sewer system. Disadvantages of Alternative 1: Landowners who received EPA large-capacity cesspool violation notices would have to immediately comply and/or face penalties. Cesspools for single-family residences would continue to potentially contaminate the groundwater and near shore coastal waters. 5.2 Alternative 2: Gravity Sewer System 5.2.1 Description Construct a gravity sewer collection system within the existing road rights of way and easements through private properties. The sewer system consists of 8-inch and 10-inch sewer mains with sewer manholes and sewer laterals extending up to each individual property identified in the improvement district. The collection system ultimately connects to the County's trunk sewer in Hualalai Road. The sewer is located at sufficient depth to allow the majority of individual properties to connect entirely by gravity. Five properties are significantly lower in elevation than the fronting roadways and will be required to install,operate,and maintain their own sewage pump to connect to the gravity system. 5.2.2 Design Criteria Design of the sewer system will follow the"Design Standards of the Department of Wastewater Management,"City and County of Honolulu,July 1993. 5.2.3 Map See Alternative 2 preliminary design in Appendix C. 5.2.4 Environmental Impacts No long term significant impacts are anticipated. There will be mitigable short-term impacts in terms of noise and dust during construction. 5.2.5 Land Requirements The majority of the system is located in existing public rights of ways. Easements through 5 private properties are required. These parcels are located at the downstream end of the sewer collection system and must be crossed to gain access to the County sewer in Hualalai Road. 5.2.6 Construction Problems Construction is anticipated to be routine for the Kona area. Typical construction challenges faced include trench excavation through hard basalt and the potential of uncovering lava tubes/underground cavities. Excavation in hard basalt is commonly accomplished using heavy equipment and hoe ram; production rates are slow and costly. The risk of uncovering a lava tube increases with the depth of excavation. Once uncovered,the standard practice is to collapse the unstable sections of the lava tube, and backfill with engineered material to fill the void. Lava tubes vary in size from inches in diameter,to tens of feet,and can extend laterally for hundreds of feet. Construction projects within 5 miles of the improvement district have uncovered lava tubes large enough to drive a school bus through. Lono Kona Sewer improvement District PER 9 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D.Preliminary Engineering Report 5.2.7 Cost Estimates The opinion of probable construction cost for Alternate 2 is$5,500,000,excluding the cost of easement acquisition. An allowance is included for stabilizing and backfilling lava tubes. See Appendix C for a detailed breakdown.Advantages/Disadvantages Advantages of Alternative 2: Alternative 2 provides an all gravity public sewer serving the majority of properties in the improvement district. The sewer line depths are at or near the minimum required,thereby minimizing the risk exposure to uncovering lava tubes. Disadvantages of Alternative 2: The gravity sewer is unable to serve all properties in the improvement district without the need for sewage pumps. Approximately five properties are lower than the sewer main and will require installation of a sewage pump to connect to the County sewer system. Alternative 2 also impacts private landowners with the creation of sewer easements through vacant parcels. 5.3 Alternative 3: No Easements 5.3.1 Description To eliminate the easements required for the all gravity system in Alternative 2,two sewage pumping stations(SPS)are required within the improvement district. These SPSs are located on lower ends of Lamaokeola Street and Alahou Street. The gravity collection system within the public right of way remains largely similar to the Alternative 2 layout. Two sewer force mains will connect each SPS to the gravity main in Kalani Street. An additional reach of gravity sewer along Kalani Street between Kuakini Highway and Alahou Street is required. The system will connect to the County trunk sewer at the intersection of Kalani Street and Kuakini Highway. 5.3.2 Design Criteria Design of the sewer system will follow the"Design Standards of the Department of Wastewater Management,"City and County of Honolulu,July 1993. 5.3.3 Map See Alternative 3 schematic layout in Appendix D. 5.3.4 Environmental Impacts The electrical requirements to operate the pump stations result in a larger ecological footprint for the alternative compared to the all-gravity alternative. The air and ambient noise quality for the adjacent residential units will be impacted by the day to day operation of the pumping station. Sewage pumps and electric generators are sources of noise. Odors may be noticed as the SPS does not operate continuously. Sewage will collect and sit in the SPS wet well until pumped to the Kalani Street sewer. 5.3.5 Land Requirements Land acquisition would be necessary for 2 treatment plants totaling approximately 0.4 acres. 2012 tax assessment values for these properties total$310,100. 5.3.6 Construction Problems The anticipated construction problems are similar to those stated in section 5.2.6. Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 10 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report 5.3.7 Cost Estimates The opinion of probable construction cost for Alternate 3 is$8,500,000,excluding the cost of acquisition of private properties. An allowance is included for stabilizing and backfilling lava tubes. See Appendix D for a detailed breakdown. 5.3.8 Advantages/Disadvantages Advantages of Alternative 3: Alternative 3 will not require creation of easements across private property.An advantage from the standpoint of the commercial landowners,the elimination of the gravity sewers in easements would relieve the adjacent commercial properties from connecting to the County system,and instead allow those parcels to continue to rely upon their legal septic system. Disadvantages of Alternative 3: The construction and operational costs would be the highest of all alternatives. This alternative also has the largest ecological footprint due to the energy requirements to operate the pump stations. The SPS will become an ongoing operation and maintenance expense to the County. This option requires the acquisition of 2 private properties. Though currently vacant,the maximum potential of these properties will not be fully realized. Because the adjacent commercial owners do not have to connect,a disadvantage from the standpoint of the improvement district participants is the number of properties potentially serviced by the sewer improvement is reduced thereby increasing the share of the remaining participants. 5.4 Alternative 4: No Private Sewage Pumps 5.4.1 Description This all-gravity system would have the same layout as Alternative 2, but the invert for portions of the system would be lowered so that the lowest properties would not have to install sewage pumps. 5.4.2 Design Criteria Design of the sewer system will follow the"Design Standards of the Department of Wastewater Management," City and County of Honolulu,July 1993. 5.4.3 Map The schematic layout would be identical to Alternative 2 but with a different profile. 5.4.4 Environmental Impacts Deeper trenches would be required resulting in greater expenditure of energy and increased potential to breach lava tubes. There would likely be increased duration of construction noise. 5.4.5 Land Requirements The land requirements are similar to those stated in section 5.2.5. 5.4.6 Construction Problems The anticipated construction problems are similar to those stated in section 5.2.6. The increased depth of trench excavation magnifies the risk of uncovering a lava tube. Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 11 September14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report 5.4.7 Cost Estimates The opinion of probable construction cost for Alternate 4 is$6,000,000,excluding the cost of easement acquisition. An increased allowance is included for stabilizing and backfilling lava tubes, traffic control, and trench excavation. See Appendix E for a detailed breakdown. 5.4.8 Advantages/Disadvantages Advantages of Alternative 4: The 5 landowners who would have had to install sewage pumps in Alternative 2 would be relieved from that financial and operational burden. Disadvantages of Alternative 4: The total costs increase for all users. Impacts during construction increase due to deeper trenching. 6 Selection of an Alternative If the landowners reject the Improvement District,the no-action(Alternative 1)will be the only alternative by default. Of the three sewer alternatives,Alternative 2 has the lowest present worth cost and, hence, the recommended alternative. The present worth factors the initial capital costs,operation and maintenance costs, replacement costs,and salvage value (if any)over the life cycle of the sewer system (see Appendix F for detailed present worth calculation). Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Gravity Sewer No Easements No Private Sewage System Pumps (Recommended) (Pump Stations) (Lower Invert) Life Cycle(Years) Sewer Lines,Manholes,Laterals,Etc. 50 50 50 Sewer Pump Stations,Generators,Etc. 15 Initial Capital Cost $5,500,000 $8,500,000 $6,000,000 Replacement Cost,Every 15 Years $2,400,000 Salvage Value $0 $0 $0 Annual Operation&Maintenance Costs Sewer Lines,Manholes,Laterals,Etc. $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 Sewer Pump Stations,Generators,Etc. $6,150 Annual Cost Escalation(Constant$Analysis) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% "Real"Discount Rate for Present Worth 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% Present Worth $5,947,000 $13,090,000 $6,437,000 7 Proposed Project (Recommended Alternative) 7.1 Project Design 7.1.1 Collection System Layout The Recommended Alternative("Project")consists of approximately 5,640 linear feet of 8-inch sewer pipe, 360 linear feet of 10-inch sewer pipe,34 sewer manholes,sewer laterals to 110 parcels,and restoration of roadway pavements. Eight-inch sewer lines would be installed on Alahou Street, Lamaokeola Street,Alakai Street,Alanoe Place,Kalani Street Ala Onaona Street,and in some private properties. The 10-inch portion Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 12 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report would be installed in Hualalai Road and connect to an existing 30-inch line in Kuakini Highway(see Alternative 2 layout in Appendix C). The Project requires acquisition of land for sewer line easements. These easements are 10' wide located in the zoning setback portions of the affected properties where structures would not be allowed. The total land area required for the easements is approximately 0.26 acres. The estimated land cost based on tax assessed values is$200,000, conservatively assuming fee simple values. 7.1.2 Pumping Stations The Project does not require pump stations. 7.1.3 Treatment The Project will not have any treatment components but will be part of the County's Kailua-Kona Sewer System that conveys the sewage to the Kealakehe Wastewater Treatment Plant. 7.2 Total Project Cost Estimate The total project cost—including design,construction,financing,and land costs—is$6.4 million,detailed as follows: Construction Costs Mobilization $ 846,000 Demolition $ 1,500 Sewer System $ 1,920,800 Paving Restoration $ 1,440,000 Backfill of Lava Tubes $ 250,000 Hualalai Road Tie-In $ 50,000 Easement Costs $ 200,000 Subtotal $ 4,708,300 Contingency(20%) $ 941,700 Total Construction Cost $ 5,650,000 Other Costs Feasibility Study $ 185,300 Design $ 285,000 Reserve Fund (Not Required) 1 $ - Legal Fees $ 75,000 ID Formation $ 50,000 Misc(3%of Construction Cost) $ 169,500 Total Other Costs $ 764,800 Total Development Cost $ 6,414,800 This total project cost translates to the user as an Improvement District assessment. The assessment is calculated by dividing the total project costs by the total single family equivalent(SFE)to determine the cost per SFE. The number of SFEs per parcel is based on land use and is proportional to the estimated Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 13 September14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report wastewater generation. At a total cost of$6.4 million divided by the total SFEs at 248,the cost per SFE is $25,828. The Improvement District assessment enables the user to spread the payment over 35 years. At an assumed interest rate of$3.75%per annum,the monthly cost per SFE would be$121. In addition to the monthly assessment cost,the user would also have to pay a monthly sewer charge. For residential uses, the monthly sewer charge is currently$27 per month. Therefore,for a single family dwelling,the total monthly cost would be$148($121+$27). The total monthly cost for the range of land uses in the Project Area is as follows: Average Average Monthly Total per per Sewer Monthly Year Month Charge 1 Charge (A) (B) (A +B) Total Annual Cost $362,900 Total SFEs 248 Cost per SFE $1,461 Average Annual/Monthly Cost per Land Use Single Family Unit $1,458 $121 $27 $148 Duplex Unit $1,021 $85 $27 $112 Apartment Unit $1,021 $85 $27 $112 Commercial TMKs 7-5-004:036 &7-5-004:047 $4,703 $392 $39 $431 TMK 7-5-004:048 $6,573 $548 $39 $587 TMK 7-5-004:049 $7,140 $595 $39 $634 Other TMK 7-5-003:022 $20,434 $1,703 $2,140 $3,843 TMK 7-5-003:025 $9,066 $756 $281 $1,037 1 Existing monthly sewer charges for Commercial and Other uses are based on average daily water consumption of 17,700 gallons for TMK 7-5-003:022,2,400 gallons for TMK 7-5-003:025,and 400 gallons per commercial parcel for TMK 7-5-003:036 and 7-5-003:47 through 7-5-003:049. Source: Goodwin Consulting Group,Inc. The total project cost allocated by land use would be as follows(see Figure 4 for a land use map): Land Use Total Assessment lit.,14,, �� . " a m me . - � Single Family $1,136,432 18% Duplex $1,898,357 30% Apartments $2,531,143 39% Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 14 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report C :Land Use Total Assessment %of Total Commercial $326,255 5% . Other____ $522,613 8% Total Assessment $6,414,800 100% Source: Goodwin Consulting Group,Inc. Figure 4.Existing Land Use tk rti a I � "� .u\ z . { Cd 1. � = a f ' 1 � j o- b ' i h1 S •fir' H.ta ' , 404 .-,,-,., . ...-: 4. . , : .!ff yh'kai" 7 ..• ,11.4:1:11:t i.#• r a I � A f ` _; . ' tip' ki ' kr"�''`a ' s 5�3 • ... •' ''' '.:Itt:40,:ti:-.:i-,: ioitn:_:,..:,.,' :it,'-g±:-:' , 8 ?' '' Use ': ,,.i ` -1 �t•' 1 Single-Family• ✓ Apartment � --'— - \ ---° _ J Commercial ..,;i--, ----'.._— ' 1 Other The assessment covers the user's capital cost for the sewer system. Other capital costs that the user would have to pay on their own include the cost to connect to the lateral and close their existing onsite system. lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 15 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT 0:Preliminary Engineering Report 7.3 Annual Operating Budget This section analyzes the income and expenses related to the operation of the recommended system. 73.1 Income The sources of income include an improvement district assessment and sewer charges. The improvement district assessment will pay the debt service to finance the design,construction, and improvement district establishment and administration. The Improvement District assessment will be set by ordinance pursuant to Hawaii County Code chapter 12. The sewer charges flow directly into a special Sewer Fund to finance the operation and maintenance of the County sewer system (see Appendix G for the Sewer Fund budget). Hawaii County Code chapter 21 sets forth the legal basis for the sewer charges and Sewer Fund. The sewer charges pursuant to section 21-36.1 are as follows: WASTEWATER SERVICE CHARGE RATE USER CATEGORY Effective Date* 7/01/97 2101/98 7/01/00 7/01.02 A. Single Unit Residential: $ 2.5.00 $ 26.00 $ 27.00 1. Monthly charge per unit B. Multi-Unit Residential: 1. Monthly base rate charge per unit 25.00 26.00 27.00 C. Nonresidential: 1. Monthly base rate charge per unit 20.00 20.00 21.00 2 2.00 2. Monthly usage charge per 1.000 gallons(after the first 8.000 gallons)per unit 3.55 3.55 3.80 4.05 D. Private Haulers Discharge Fee: 1. Discharge fee per 500 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 gallons or fraction thereof 2. Minimum charge per load 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 E. Gang Cesspools: 1. Monthly charge per unit 15.00 15.00 07/0103 07,01;05 07/01/07 F. Recycled Water: 1. Distribution charge per 1.000 1.00 1.20 1.20 gallons or fraction thereof lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 16 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report The total monthly and annual income from the combined sources is summed in the table below. Monthly Income Source Rate EDUs Income Notes Improvement District Assessment 121.50 248.0 30,132.00 Sewer Charges Residential 27.00 215.5 5,818.50 NonResidential Commercial 12.6 117.00 Assumes 400 gpd for four commercial parcels Assumes 17,700 gpd for one parcel and 2.400 gpd Other 20.2 2,421.00 for the other TOTAL MONTHLY 38,488.50 TOTAL ANNUAL 461,862.00 7.3.2 Operation and Maintenance Costs Since the recommended system is a gravity system,there are no short-lived assets. The O&M costs attributable to the Lono Kona gravity sewer system are distinguished from the system costs allocated to Lono Kona for conveyance,treatment,and disposal in the following table: item Lono Kona Cost System Costs TOTAL Labor(including fringes) 13,412 29,883 43,295 Electricity 19,610 19,610 Other Utilities 549 549 Chemicals 544 544 Maintenance& Repair 1,498 1,729 3,227 Vehicles-Oper, Maint, & Repair 381 774 1,155 General &Administrative 2,709 9,407 12,116 TOTAL ANNUAL 18,000 62,496 80,496 TOTAL MONTHLY 1,500 5,208 6,708 EDUs 248 248 248 Cost/EDU/month 6 21 27 Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 17 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D. Preliminary Engineering Report 7.3.3 Debt Service The RD loan would be secured by a General Obligation bond ("G.O. Bond")and not an Improvement District bond. Since a G.O.Bond is backed by the County to cover the debt service on the GO bond,and the County will simply get reimbursed through the Improvement District for the debt service it pays, a debt service reserve is not necessary. For previous similar RD Loans for water improvement districts in this County,no debt service reserve was required. Construction Costs Mobilization $846,000 Demolition $1,500 Sewer System $1,920,800 Paving Restoration $1,440,000 Backfill of Lava Tubes $250,000 Hualalai Road Tie-In $50,000 Easement Costs $200,000 Subtotal $4,708,300 Contingency(20%) $941,700 Total Construction Cost $5,650,000 Other Costs Feasibility Study $185,300 Design $285,000 Reserve Fund (Not Required) $0 Legal Fees $75,000 ID Formation $50,000 Misc(3%of Construction Cost) $169,500 Total Other Costs $764,800 Total Development Costs $6,414,800 Loan Required $6,414,800 Interest 3.75% Amortization Term 35 Annual Debt Service 332,100 Annual Administration $30,000 Total Annual Cost $362,100 EDUs 248 Cost/EDU $ 1,460.08 Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 18 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report 7.3.4 Net Income (or Deficit) Based on the preceding Income and Costs presented,the Project would have a positive cashflow. Income Monthly Amount Improvement District Assessment 30,132.00 Sewer Charges 8,356.50 Subtotal-Income 38,488.50 Costs O&M 6,708.00 Debt Service 27,675.00 Admin/Reserve 2,500.00 Subtotal-Costs 36,883.00 Net Income(Deficit) 1,605.50 8 Conclusions and Recommendations The Project Area currently disposes wastewater primarily by onsite cesspools with a few septic systems. Since the Project Area is within the Critical Wastewater Disposal Zone established by the Department of Health for areas near the shoreline,there is a high probability that the untreated cesspool leachates seep into the groundwater and nearshore coastal waters. Several property owners within the Project Area have received large-capacity cesspool violation notices from EPA. Without the Project,the landowners would have to replace the large-capacity cesspools with septic systems or private treatment plants. Because of the higher density zoning of the Project Area,many of the lots do not have the size to accommodate the required onsite system. For the parcels that can accommodate an onsite system,the cost for the onsite systems coupled with the need to pay lump sum or find private financing makes this onsite alternative not as cost-effective as the Project. Upon reviewing alternative sewer designs,the Project is the recommended alternative since it has the lowest capital and operational costs. The Project is an all-gravity system. This alternative will require acquisition of easements,and five lots lower than the road will have to install private sewage pumps. While lowering the line(Alternative 4)eliminates the need for private sewage pumping,it comes at a 9% premium over the recommended alternative to the benefit of only 5 properties(2 of which are vacant). The capital cost for the Project would be financed through an Improvement District that enables the users to pay for the Project cost amortized over 35 years. The Project Area is one of the few pockets of affordable housing within the vicinity of the Kailua Village core. Funding provided by the USDA loan and grant program could further reduce the monthly cost to keep this area affordable. Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 19 September 14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report Works Cited Brown&Caldwell.(February 1999).Kealakehe Wastewater Treatment Plant:Effluent Reuse Master Plan. Prepared for the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works. PBR Hawaii&Associates, Inc. (2012).Environmental Report:Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District. Prepared for the County of Hawaii Department of Environmental Management. R.M.Towill Corporation.(April 1981).Kailua-Kona Sewerage System,Phase IV(Northern Zone). Prepared for the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works. U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service.(October 2003). Bulletin 1780-3:Preliminary Engineering Report-Wastewater Facilities. Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District PER 20 September14,2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report Appendix A: Wastewater Generation Calculation EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report (This page intentionally left blank) EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report PROJECT: Lono Kona Sewer PER JOB NO: 2012.33.0300 CLIENT: PBR/DEM DATE 20-Mar-12 SUBJECT: Wastewater Generation-Design Basis BY: JC BELT C O L L I N S FILE: M:\Lono Kona120I 2330300 PER\Design\Calculations\[Wastewater Generation.xls)ByTMK Average Dwelling Capita per Wastewater TMK Service Area Zone Area(ac) Area(sf) Units acre or unit Capita Flow(gpd) 375003022 B A-5a 7.06 307359 n/a n/a4 497 4485 375003025 B A-5a 2/1 117917 n/a n/a4 158 1990 375003026 A RS-7.5 1.11 48395 6 4 24 1920 375004035 D RM-1 3.80 165441 165 2.8 462 36960 375004036 E CV-7.5 0.19 8385 n/a n/a4 106 530 375004047 E CV-7.5 0.28 12188 Na n/a4 48 240 375004048 E CV-7.5 0.34 14928 n/a n/a4 33 465 375004049 E CV-7.5 0.50 21750 n/a 40 19 1520 375004050 E CV-7.5 0/0 8869 n/a 40 8 640 375004051 E CV-7.5 0/9 12728 n/a 40 11 880 375022053 F RM-1 0.52 22499 22 2.8 62 4960 375022056 F RM-1 0.19 8372 8 2.8 23 1840 375022059 F RM-1 0.19 8311 8 2.8 23 1840 375022060 F RM-1 0.37 16061 16 2.8 45 3600 375022062 F RM-1 0.17 7501 7 2.8 20 1600 375022063 F RM-1 0.17 7501 7 2.8 20 1600 375022064 F RM-1 0.17 7501 7 2.8 20 1600 375022071 D RM-1 0.17 7501 7 2.8 20 1600 375022076 C RM-1 0.39 16919 16 2.8 45 3600 375022078 C RD-3.75 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022079 C RD-3.75 0.20 8834 2 4 8 640 375022080 C RD-3.75 0.21 9104 2 4 8 640 375022081 C RD-3.75 0.18 7658 2 4 8 640 375022082 C RD-3.75 0.20 8599 2 4 8 640 375022083 C RD-3.75 0.18 7758 2 4 8 640 375022084 C RD-3.75 0.22 9540 2 4 8 640 375022085 C RD-3.75 0.17 7610 2 4 8 640 375022086 C RD-3/5 0.18 7950 2 4 8 640 375022087 C RD-3.75 0.18 7701 2 4 8 640 375022088 C RD-3.75 0.18 7701 2 4 8 640 375022089 C RD-3.75 0.18 7967 2 4 8 640 375022090 C RD-3.75 0.19 8072 2 4 8 640 375022091 D RD-3.75 0.17 7527 2 4 8 640 375022092 0 RD-3.75 0.17 7553 2 4 8 640 375022093 0 RD-3.75 0.18 7893 2 4 8 640 EXHIBIT D.Preliminary Engineering Report PROJECT: Lono Kona Sewer PER JOB NO: 201233.0300 CLIENT: PBR!DEM DATE 20-Mar-12 SUBJECT: Wastewater Generation-Design Basis BY: JC BELT C O L L I N S FILE: M:\Lono Kona120 1 23 30300 PER\Design\Calculationsl[Wastewater Generation.xls]ByTMK S 3 375022094 D RD-3.75 0.18 7810 2 4 8 640 375022095 D RD-3.75 0.18 7941 2 4 8 640 375022096 D RD-3.75 0.19 8150 2 4 8 640 375022097 D RD-315 0.18 7989 2 4 8 640 375022098 D RD-3/5 0.19 8320 2 4 8 640 375022099 D RD-3.75 0.19 8455 2 4 8 640 375022100 D RD-3.75 0.19 8438 2 4 8 640 375022101 0 RD-3.75 0.19 8481 2 4 8 640 375022102 0 RD-315 0.19 8381 2 4 8 640 375022103 B RD-3.75 0.19 8337 2 4 8 640 375022104 B RD-3.75 0.19 8364 2 4 8 640 375022105 C RD-175 0.20 8668 2 4 8 640 375022106 C RD-3.75 0.23 9940 2 4 8 640 375022107 C RD-3.75 0.20 8577 2 4 8 640 375022108 C RD-3.75 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022109 C RD-3.75 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022110 C RD-175 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022111 C RD-3.75 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022112 C RD-3.75 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022113 C RD-3.75 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022114 C RM-1 010 8634 8 2.8 23 1840 375022115 B RM-1 0.18 7950 7 2.8 20 1600 375022116 B RD-3.75 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022117 B RD-3.75 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022118 B RD-175 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022119 B RD-3.75 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022120 B RD-3.75 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022121 B RD-3.75 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022122 B RD-3/5 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022123 B RD-3.75 0.18 7680 2 4 8 640 375022124 D RD-3.75 0.19 8329 2 4 8 640 375022125 B RD-3.75 0.20 8573 2 4 8 640 375022126 B RD-3.75 0.18 7884 2 4 8 640 375022127 B RD-3.75 0.23 10001 2 4 8 640 375022129 A RD-3.75 0.17 7566 2 4 8 640 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report PROJECT: Lana Kona Sewer PER JOB NO: 2012.33.0300 CLIENT: PBR/DEM DATE 20-Mar-12 SUBJECT: Wastewater Generation-Design Basis BY: JC BELT COLLINS` FILE: M:\Lono Kona12012330300 PER\Design\Calculationsl[Wastewater Generation.xls]ByTMK Average Dwelling Capita per Wastewater MK Service Area Zone Area(ac) Area(sf) Units acre or unit Capita Flow(gpd) 375022130 A RD-3.75 0.18 7653 2 4 8 640 375022131 A RD-3.75 0.18 7919 2 4 8 640 375022132 B RD-3.75 0.19 8115 2 4 8 640 375022133 B RD-375 0.18 7854 2 4 8 640 375022134 B RD-3.75 0.18 7789 2 4 8 640 375022135 B RD-375 0.18 7823 2 4 8 640 375022136 B RD-3.75 0.18 7854 2 4 8 640 375022137 B RD-375 0.18 7758 2 4 8 640 375022138 B RD-3.75 0.18 7767 2 4 8 640 375022139 B RD-3.75 0.18 7775 2 4 8 640 375022140 B RD-3.75 0.18 7775 2 4 8 640 375022141 B RD-3.75 0.19 8137 2 4 8 640 375022142 B RM-1 020 8830 8 2.8 23 1840 p 375022143 A RM-1 022 9644 9 2.8 26 2080 375022144 A RD-3.75 0.21 9209 2 4 8 640 375022145 A RD-3.75 0.18 7775 2 4 8 640 375022146 A RD-3.75 0.18 7775 2 4 8 640 375022147 A RD-3.75 0.18 7767 2 4 8 640 375022148 A RD-3.75 0.18 7758 2 4 8 640 375022149 A RD-3.75 0.18 7854 2 4 8 640 375022150 A RD-3.75 0.18 7823 2 4 8 640 375022151 A RD-3.75 0.18 7789 2 4 8 640 375022152 A RD-3.75 0.18 7854 2 4 8 640 375022153 A RD-3.75 0.18 7928 2 4 8 640 375022154 A RD-3.75 0.22 9405 2 4 8 640 375022155 A RD-3.75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022156 A RD-375 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022157 A RD-3.75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022158 A RD-3.75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022159 A RD-3.75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022160 A RD-3_75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022161 A RD-375 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022162 A RD-3.75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022163 A RD-3.75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022164 A RD-3.75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report PROJECT: Lono Kona Sewer PER JOB NO: 2012.33.0300 CLIENT: PBR/DEM DATE 20-Mar-I2 SUBJECT: Wastewater Generation-Design Basis BY: JC BELT C O L L l N S FILE: M:\Lono Kona\2012330300 PER\Design\Calculations\[Wastewater Generation.xls]ByTMK Average Dwelling capita per Wastewater Area(sf) Units acre or unit Capita Flow(gpd) 375022165 A RD-3.75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022166 A RD-3.75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022167 A RD-3.75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022168 A RD-3.75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022169 A RD-3.75 0.17 7501 2 4 8 640 375022170 A RM-1 0.18 7841 7 2.8 20 1600 375022171 F RM-1 0.18 7889 7 2.8 20 1600 138110 112 <—#Parcels 2472 <--#Capita Design Parameters 1 Sewers laid above the ground water table Dry Ill 5 gpcd Wet I/I 1250 gad 2 Average per capita design flow=80 gpd 3 Equivalent Populations by zoning A-5a Agricultural,5 aclunit,assume 25 capita/ac RS-7.5 Single Family Residential,7,500 sf/unit,4 capita/unit RD-3.75 Double Family Residential,3,750 sf/unit,4 capita/unit RM-1 Multiple Family Residential, 1,000 sf/unit,2.8 capita/unit(rounded up) CV-T5 Village Commercial,7,500 sf/bldg=Neighborhood Business,40 capita/ac 0 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report 0 3 3 3 3 g o CO N O Q 0 0 0 c C c c 1= w w M m v t w w Yto t ; z ;m m �+ m mg o 3 fi 6 O o b+ 5+ ,° VP N N N V N to to ea CO A lo m CO CO 03 3 3 3 m v 3 d m CO 0 N d 91 no m m 2 no �9 @ Z ro m 2 2 2 L° m w 0) CO m m m m m A d m to m m m 0 -ra a a n a m a am no m 00 00 00 00 n 0 1 ,r. o 1 0 r m m b � n 'Cfi 1n 01 N On N In r d 0 e-1 N V U qV u v a a a a a a s 00 eaw m m m m m m m no ea U N X c .Q O N u' 1 u'1 N ON O A p L a) c CC l7 q� 2 CO a a a a s a a m m CO c_ CO CO m V V u V u V V u u u u Ir W C N oa co O MI m 2 O p�I V I .i CC 771 Cyr 1-1 O CO CCO ti .11 N 3 00 N ? N II N > 11 0 ya QO N '.2 N c + C N C 'O C 10 Y O W 9J N N X Q w o N Z. O Ip 7 a.L a 3 '> {� tA v 2 4 N N t m L . O m N GO 6. O p >O - O c M - j 71 o m N CO 8 0 O 0 d l') eO 0 L N 4/ L V) L O ?� CC V C(�O, O(f)�) V CO c O .c 8 c y O 0 c N O w Y Q d c V' L N C1 10 LO , . • O 00 u c ,Q 00 ri oti 0 .� Co a > f 3 0 0 u o c C ^y > Q C L tC Q @ C •� - v 0. °' o m Y m 2 t W b. F- U L ?+ p m y U A Q W m ' E £ " W v) Y oc e al en N in m z o o O V z m 8 8 8 On a, O, O N A A n h A u R n j[ Y ii F _a Nd c 2 2 2 2 2- 0- 0-J m 0 W a (This page intentionally left blank) EXHIBIT U:Preliminary Engineering Report Appendix B : County of Hawaii Department of Environmental Management Financial Statement EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report (This page intentionally left blank) EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report Position 3 FORM APPROVED OMB No.0575-0015 form RD 442-3 Name county of Hawaii (Sewer Fund) (Rev.3-97) Address 25 Aupuni Street, Room 2103 BALANCE SHEET Hilo, ai 96720 Prelim Close 12-31-2011 06-30-2011 ASSETS Month Day Year Month Day Year CURRENT ASSETS Current Year Prior Year $5,190,024.00 Refer to CAFR I.Cash on hand in Banks .. 2.Time deposits and short-term investments 3.Accounts receivable $1,514,690,00 4.Less:Allowance for doubtful accounts _ ( $931,332.00 ) ( ) 5.inventories 6.Prepayments 7. ................................ 8. 9. Total Current Assets(Add 1 through 8) $5.773,382.00 $0.00 FIXED ASSETS 10.Land 11.Buildings 12.Furniture and equipment ..................................................................................................... 13. ) 14. Less:Accumulated depreciation . ( )( 15.Net Total Fixed Assets(Add 10 through 14 .....-. $0.00 $0.00 OTHER ASSETS 16. -- 17. 18. Total Assets(Add 9, 15, 16 and I?) $5,773,382.00 $0.004 LIABILITIES AND EQUITIES CURRENT LIABILIITES, 19.Accounts payable ••--.... 20.Notes payable ..............................................._......................................................... ............. . 2L Current portion of USDA note 22.Customer deposits ........ $66,888.00 23.Taxes payable 24.Interest payable . 25.Due to Other Funde ., .. $143,696.00 $956,061.00 26,Deferred Revenue 27. Total Current Liabilities(Add 19 through 24) $788,645,00 $0.00 LONG-TERM LIABILITIES 28.Notes payable USDA 29. . 30., _...._....., 31. Total Long-Term Liabilities(Add 28 through 30) $0.00 $0.00 32, Total Liabilities(Add 27 and 31) 5766,645.00 $0.00 LOUITY $1,205,703.00 33.4teteineedternings.....gncum brances..__..._,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„._.,...._-.--------------..-.-.-...-.-. . 34.4,4embevAipjs Fund Balance $3,801,334.00 35. Total Equity(Add tines 33 and 34) $5,006,737.00 $0.00 36. Total Liabilities and Equity(Add lines 32 and 35) $5,773,382.00 50.00 ApK priate gnatu� ) CERTIFIED CORRECT Date k / 1 ilr tlillf 4rcwohng in the Paperwork Redaction Art of 1993,no person!ant"cataract looegn d In a enilectian nfunvrmam,n,rnlr.a i;dnpiens a,uhd OMB control nwnhrr.The raid OMB cameral mnrherfin this r..f,mn,mm r I,ac,o...n O570.03!J.The ewer ensnared to crnnplere this o,6rmanon is enameled to average 1 hour per rrapnnte,rnchnhng she rnneAn.ro nenins Itmtltrmn,aean:f ans eaanng dam Ann..Y, gr henng and rnarntemng the data needeot and eaniprenng.rnd reviewing the calk ene n ofinfnntmion. RD 442-3(Rev.3-97) EXHIBIT Di Preliminary Engineering Report COUNTY OF HAWAII Nonmajor Governmental Funds Combining Balance Sheet June 30,2011 Nit Special Revenue Funds Solid Parking Highway Sewer Waste Cemetery Meter Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Assets Cash and cash equivalents $13,248,630 $ 5,548,541 $ 8,363,666 $84,659 $173,679 Investments - - - - - Imprest fund - 400 250 - - Receivables: Due from other governments 80,278 4,254 618,798 - - Due from other governmental funds 971,155 8,993 11,346 - - Due from other nongovernmental funds - 1,350 - - - Trade,net of allowance for doubtful accounts - 1,056,941 1,499,534 - - Other 81 - 494,347 - - 1,051,514 1,071,538 2,624,025 - - Total assets $14,300,144 $ 6,620,479 $10,987,941 $84,659 $173,6' Liabilities and Fund Balances Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 725,251 $ 289,786 $ 2,176,942 $ - $ - Due to other governmental funds 277,547 10,883 30,046 - - Deferred revenue - 1,056,941 1,511,532 - - Other - 69,529 229 - - Total liabilities 1,002,798 1,427,139 3,718,749 - - Fund balances: Restricted for: Debt service - - - - - Highways, streets and abandoned vehicles 13,297,346 - - - - Committed to: Sanitation - 5,193,340 7,269,192 - - Highways,streets and abandoned vehicles - - - - 173,679 Rental assistance and subsidy - - - - - Cemetery - - 84,659 - Golf course - - - - - Lower Puna area - - - - - Parks and recreational facilities - _ - , - - - Total fund balances 13,297,346 5,193,340 7,269,192 _ 84,659 173,679 Total liabilities and fund balances $14,300,144 $ 6,620,479 $10,987,941 $84,659 $173,679 EXHIBIT 0:Preliminary Engineering Report -90- Appendix C: Recommended Alternative—Preliminary Design and Opinion of Probable Cost C EXHIBIT 13.Preliminary Engineering Report (This page intentionally left blank) EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report Fri, 1i 1AnI 2012 k\lszw Kano\2 0 1 2 939300 FED\CA0\Shceb\C.01—P1—A 0000 TO 5+00.dw9 }Q 1 V l 1 It 1 9MM M71 �r 0+30 � �� a 96.90 1'r ,- 111 I 4 ; k x P 1 0 SW A.10 rrg rt ERJ,INE o 9+27 I j r �*.�"'J j 91.Q t, floie r .. t iY l a t / R. r T� SZN� ]..' E .. / s t I y t: 4 11 hr IX W l ' r o 11,,l 4' ii'e3 ., ,;. - / rr P m , 1 1 ;2011 Mitt r g t Ori b5 O 0 8MM A-9 �" ' �' 1 w+20 I -1 �ta 8.^'-_---3EWEf LNdEp $�.w� 79.99 / .,',"F / $ '2”.i it Q ■ E Fps' ll> 5�,�,_ . oily . 1/ A; XI / r r aZ r jrn ' 1 Z / k m />� D it uI ttsaMV,. } /�/ j 4 WAN MB ^v �...' 210 n dtAai f ~ s39a euz� ,._`S.u, SEWER tNE R I, Ga m N m 53 O ■ ' , ! r SE d MATCH LINE SEE SHT G Z S G'�k' d ii: e'iTi:Ii iN-8 loll 'c. A-° s 5/i% A 2 t Q ° ab 3 >mi �o k 13 4 0 # -IU F. 0 (4 E' ° 2 Ir. r- •p fii 1 C4 yrn0 � R 0 =4M T gi3 v a 11 II UJ t o-J �$$ > 1. r a U z 8 r m a71 Y w R 7 Q O •'3i $ a: g ii u) QZ O W a 0 6 tg al 2 ---I i° Q 5 < - o1W � WWi i - ¢yyFil ^47 i Vsi i ;< jg # =p yy0�& Sr �aW� r I o — S o c8 S `�'' + r, __ o St 3'J o &� ,. I -' Z IRS 3�S 3Nil H�l�JW r S �:L�1 3S < .; Ha1b�W V Iu 1 °uS 0 o p1.Y y* Q1 6 43 $ R ■ N. 0.. '-'9 `i 7. ! �1�Lp $ ft ', I „y , i- -. 88 96+9 3nrti b3M3S —�- 1 ehr HW6 r 1S�IH31trl1i � I TMK76112 .°�iQ �! l �e t h 6 � �. 1 y �� �. j o • Z 1 ,. I iii I Z fr ill e cr ICL Td I INK S-01Z:it7 d n" � 6 ai OOUL a. - `� ,,.++— tl+r.6 F5.ar54 SRS INa BY MS 0 b3M3g '+` a' + !S IfJ T p 1 r++M 72:�aa �� I1 ' - i ,, 'ice 0 Iii r • 1 1 ' ,t 1 p o f 1 1 of xi y IL 1 / �`1 1 c N. x � 1 § 1 ` rt II 1Y'1 q &t` 11 < -jam'j / sir ii' 1 — / «I6• =Z.. `� ALA ONA r 1 �r 3111Tboi3S� i 43 < I a ?t $1 xt xi ieeia - It ,I 99.0 `r� �` ( WV MIS C O 1.S S 8 S g S G 6vq 00 re 01 00+4 Y-dd-rl0-0\° 4S\OVA0 00£OCt,1 0100 y oua7\V i+lo£SC-itOL 6Pyl ll'�_ i ■., — LI i 11 ...,_, 8 . . . z w + 0 0 Ow 8 '°I11). 4 ) a -, 13 owo I% 1 X ,a III z 0 to .c.— . 2 . cuiiIi > 6 •,-8 4 E co / 0 o 0 8 g 2 x J < tg5 e 5 * T; ge 2w . . 46, . +, tatE ph • :ES'i 8 to r- 8 0 q 8 al P 8 + 0 ..-- 0 0 0+ C-0 1 S 33S 3NI HalVIN , 1 t I ■ I I I 8 , + fil 10 , t 2 t t I ga 1 ...r i o . . z . ... . ma iril4 i•-• 5d§ i ILfet 4-V UPS LIU 0 0 ...— i.4 .....i f - - ''''''-'7.". ""•••••...„,„........_ b , ' 1:C - , ■ W y! # ... 1 f • 6 a w . J W • LL Z 0 --I rt 40 Ct ■ Cl- 8 f s 11 $ t i , + „, ' 1 $ / v .,„, i 01 , f e . Z .111111111■Nrat: WOO 7 < I 9 V HMIS ZE09 :i91111111111111 .11 jai* ' ' - 9•V HOYS • 1 1 '''''' ,,,,r . 8 41)ft/A al t . if,v.-- .1: ---------------- , ..4 ., ea6 ' ?Nig .•••••■.: g _,...„----- -) _-------- , 0 , 7.E. ... ....... 1 ‘ --, - ,sevt sw c-' -3 IHS 3 S 3Nn H vv ......_------ --- 09 r' 0 r- 8 E g 8 a t:2 co 6.. 00,1 01 013.1-13■-,j-Z 0-0\1....I.S\SND,„h3d ian CCU,QV,.04 0101 k.. -Z I0 .04 i,I .+A a T 8 _ + a— B o rn ¢ '... V X Z c 8 m a- J :m : � p X00 - uw11 0 p ' 2 a J i 01 Y 1 2 Q III e=gz ii°�.6 OOa= 3 M7F€ y4o. .. 0. g!i W$ °n 8 8 $ 8 8 ° I i 1 09'tE HVIS JS1X x , 0.1 '.,, , . < a ..I. .."- .,.!: '''-' ,"."- V',i W Q v = � w Z W 7■ J WIC Z �' Y3.91 J " u t-V HMS MM GL 7 v , ii n iii W W CO F 9rz _..1 St e9•u LL 1. i z-v Hws 0 L',....1 r t kf Z J / jp 1�f fl "�•' - - . .. ,, ' NI SS} {110 Al 31 O 2 1921 IP- g � C-V HWS t�° r- , � G't`r Z-31HS 33S 3M1 H3J.W1 A i ,a o 8 8 $ 8 g ° O*P'o03 01 Cq+SU'r.-dd—i0-�\'ax1S\4•03\b3d 0000,000,00 V.b0°"°l\N _.9S=t—ZtOZ Roil tt 1,A -- B i 1 f5t113 Et = 0 § g Lu 9 o W .1.(. X Z co I i- t']I y 1 ..ut i k 6 fi u,LLI 0, i 8 w § /1 0 41C x ,,, 5., a 0- t.,-, I 1,,,-, A .— . tg t 1 -- 0 2 ez i § g t 2 z a w &a' P - lg!,6, gV. at— i 4 1,E,1,§ e +0 . +`r 125E 1n6 r * 0 o o 0 o a ta •s- , ..- + ,.. .- a .,- ,,.. 1 , 0 o a+ 0 , •„ . Il 9-0 INS 33S 3NI1 HOIVIA,1 0 I..: --------',.. 1 , ri , X-06 ,,504 I /1 etl $ ,i. 1 _ - r-----Li 00-e01, 93/1 ' I s/t' " # I f 0-9 HIVS la i i ■ i , i, 8 , , , , II A 1 ... I 4!1 .: ' $ 1 ; W XI i CO , ti d o / 1 Z ,/ t A6 g , I , 1 i (..) (inc, cc I „t ,.., H 1 , 00. V 1 , 00+9 9CO / 9-9 HINH ■ m W 9 ' / 24 '2 .,' 1 W (1) 8 ' / Z 9 , i i -_-_-1 , -j en L,di / , ,. ",,, ,- , g 1 t, 1 NA z..., i\Ai i _ . ,- r Lu $ . i # tp,4r,0 , ....... , r LL i 1 0 - . / CC i 'f--' It 2 / 0LZ I. 00+1, V _________114___---- , -9 ii 9MIS , --- IS jV)iV1V 1, / ■ , 4 8 ' / . X . / t , .-' N a .4`i 8 r,,1 .?„.•- 1 1°56 i . .. 7/ / , cri .f ..' / ' s 1 1 1 . . I A ' i' fs.6 Y 44 / ,, , r 0 N 1 q 1 - 1 , i I/ 09•01,1. 00+0 C) A 2-8 HP1S I e , 0 •.! X '''',,,, .4, 1 .$ i .,..,. 4,01)V311 tf' q : ,, , 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 S3 0 04 F- . 6op co-9 0J.oo-,c a-d-kc-0\ \ *lt,ncrIZZ,C01,‘;;.:,:n.":7; ... -,„. _ g -,•- . f v In A— ii i 11 ri.11Z6 •,., a 2 A 6 I 0 ft N. 1z w 4. 0 o w < a. m co g i o- nu a < t, 0 C t 0 j ji,' , m 3 Lu -- I . % 4r1i 0-2 . 2 cr 6 co co i t:, wiu a to i 8 6 g g 2 cc J 6. .g. . ..„ z S A I — i -2E * lb, • +"' g28L r'2.h I, i'cld, 8 8 c:, ,-- 8 8 ? 88 N. •-- 0 T 0 , \ \ ,■ \ \ g ) 0 81 \ , ,''' ■12 Se .. . 1-1!HMIS / / . `4 Ii ' ) ec t ' ., 44 \ .....*:74,,,, SIS....."'. t f, ...".. ,........, 1,!, i , -''' , / / 4 f, ' 1' ; / w.- -4‘ : . 4,, q F.: , I t4 / I 5 0 '' / 4 0 , ' / „, r ti CO a ,' / w , W I/ , — ; / 0470+Z I. ,. w yty ■ W § , 2 Cs7 l 4 CO I. 8 i , i,. < , ..) _i $, 1 —J Li , C) a. F''' i/I Gozzlif.ii W 11 j Z-8 HIMS ' -- ---- ' _ '1 1.% 1 p' .":•-7,-...-- ---',,,,•\ / ...- / 01 e ' Ne , , // — .,, , „, i S 1 1 <r ,11 / 4.3/. i ' 41/ r / • , / 8 1 ,` i/ 8 , / "c+, / ,... / 1..„,, . . . 1 ; R *6 i /I 0.7. 1 , / 6-8HZIS ,0 , .4 - .3 , , i T / / r, I - , , ri V - , 1 i/ 131 , ; i ■ r ae 1 ;. , I I / I •.1 2 -4 r I 0 , i,-0 4.14s atg, 14n kOIVIN 1 v • 0 + 1+-3 J.HS aas 3Nn HOD/A 0.., , ...L., IS Y103>itAINY'l -1,_ -*‘--6n------- +. t• z- .,..g.4 3 ' 0 0 8 8 R 8 2 g 8 It Emtp*,*Cu.004*p-ee-50-5\.....15\000\ae 00cC4s:Z.OZ\P.,1,,,e1S,Y -ZlOZ.1.1 tt g A— L3 i _1 €.5. c) U Z g f5 _, O. 73 g w E W o 2 > s ii Q H W - u, rn 0 8a 2 a g Y = i� D E. 01 § ti Q ,y;`'WiW u N €IA Via= s gel �`i igt: �a€ yoJ� +r ?§D 6 8 8 8 O^ 8 8 °O + 0 t_ i - 1 1 1 .� a ,� ! _.�, pg o co 8 . -.�..- -.- —V 3NIl 3NV3S.'o*-+•o-!$e""-.� V "i .s{lOHtl 1 e y o,— e v q r PF.Sit _L F -I es) pO ins pe' 73 VSFe + // R 1 W'fir,: w // 5 .,+ 0 x /// �'e// g ,� 0 .. ,k),-.„ n w _ � / Z eg s _ / Z i fNY(15-022OB0 a [� �+ - ld 3ONV1V . .. tree $ 3 _ j O4HS w + Py .. '1-0316 a3M3S if,. 1,-0 HISS (� in ,7-s�azog �,. -- *••�\\ .7 w � = a .��► 1.- Li- 0 7 , / j a) //15 ° N:_ '° T 535�:, y"S!1 / _ j (NI) tinoi '7 1 - se 3' tp. / I Duet 9 roe S ce / / zo HPIS a R g / i ,, / 8 0 8 8 o 0, g 83 a ■ v q R zol a :_F060 Die % ti.'£' _ 1ks .r/ ;1 1� n Sr, B4l / +8?d r�'S' / INS tin o)l' ,: 1 I 1 4" i' 4yc ``5„44 Oc'set e g n Let /�/ 6 J HMS t6C 'X 1 20 a zr ecl d e +yqh - 64'1 , CSILl y - yeti �' /1/ 1-0 NYS Y- yy3 / 8 / cv TM 4 � M v ., % s ors It � o �'" l5'�7G� n . � je . ." 4 ` oo t"- , ' , ,, ti S,, 8 sr ei r°3 ° $ 8 °m 10— fiMP'OM1L3 0±00+e,-ad-90-3\sYcc s\ic/\b3d cc0000iL•ozVcc,I,101\VI, y^;0 s—zwz con a 4q -^r 3 a d W t p �� U II =x N Q m a.2-1 0 o� s ii $ z w 1 11 11 aN I —i g i W 4. 46g5 c ' I;41 R:gs 'II= `$3g Is [ 1' i Y oa d ` , .. is nomv iv I r? `----- ' try4 •r, 5 1N1 01101 — , ens OWES 1f YY , 8.11111,03 i ,, � i E6— U / rE w N Z f • Ff � � rb / 0 aa1 ! w y, �� aa. a z i m J 14 TWiN 7-5-022.020 N 5 W J a t Wee id 3onv_�r� 4, r 4 N .�A '11 oats ii e5 G3NfI g ,.is 5 01 , � .7- 2: ' be Una CD 0 -eer ;30-1411r a LT,44 4 �/ me II 01.99 scot Ce `? w Y k - / 8LH s �� tFA // Z-3 MIS a m d, r` _ s 74t F / / n y t iF \ % ,vgt T / # Xi4 1 D oet gib t tw �1 // ta0 Lino) / IXNti .. / C':1 NYi6 < fy / ri q' t t s ,.•eft // +a Yri .y£c .. / + 1 >r 1,9¢f- Otr6tb A, rt f , �' , 1� � as 4, ... ■ b i / Nb `-..—^._--._. 't&'rC r no q ^ 1y... _ - L°IFS i,.. 25 --'- R' .r'" yt � M 0 0 O Qt CO �Rr0.3 01 o o 0-dd-v80-o\3.'1s\W O'\3d OOVX Zion L4...11L ..64.t.-ZtOZ ton 11..0 gg `a °-1 In U L. C) 0 W Q J & 1 p., 8 S < G ZIrH W E a off $ 0 0 < W1r co<1 0 hhu2 o R z Q . L r41 9 PQQ S " W r $w N = : E=o Yef j ig 0 O— 00) co O O^ C00 tn d0' M O O + co 0 0 + CO O O + h O O + (0 ■ M` ^ M 4 ' y � CJ, iii / 1$ iy_� '?T p�yh�7 / ! h" p ` A w J Lt 0 w • z , 4041.46 b (NO Ilnol . „� _ CY9C Cave O i , L"a PINS 7 NY F' � ,... ...„ ,e1 R 1 J _ N N — W O J %' N S A% 1a lava ^ r ,'v.1 J ` �' + t� arcs t 2-131416 Ut0 a_ " ` /I , � XI f � 4 , �L E seas NO HMS 0 e. ., t O O I p OQ OCO On Otp d0 an I bMP'0.3 01 00+0 10—ad—t0-0\s.+Js\0 'b..3J 0000c t00\c0I++%\N ..20 13—Zt OZ Rr+4 H 'I,d ./- 1 i icr- 2 i Pr li _ 9 Nr I gl 1.1.1e x in w T b 13 > 1 E 0 W i.....- I1" .". re Z W 4 < 1 z . g iii; 1 ne g i 50<1 0 o_r3 . . n H 2 x t ! 610 6 .... 0 0 0 re/ 0 0 '41 0 -t• 0 0 0 CO P U3 0 Ce 0 CII ..- 0 0 + CO 0 0 + N 8 + (0 1 ol *.IS -.. & I 1 1 it) 0 3 + I ... in 7- A. ; i v ' I i■ t— I 0 frt ili.ihs1 44 : ' ka P —1 0 el- r‘ 4 N A. •,..‘x g' ,•":. MI 4 ••• ."'",s, ..4 f .7.9 S n 0 (1) b A $ AF Z fi.' ;.• 1 W9e Seat 0 ° 4-1 m „ I x, a. c--- — z-a roKS I $ % / le 3aivr70'1 1*.-"---1l 41111111` ..: i.k .ft, ....,., a * a444 ,,,,`•-....__,_ 6—S: A. 10 g ; 0 ' .Z. `14' '' 1 w a . .... z I ' 2,r,,_—, 4-- _, cs, _ , , , ce v, * , , w . .,.: ..- , . ii ---,, g . w - , 0011 (i) i 25 r 1 og„ a ,_,,,Hns z:i al ...i 0 a Ei d 81 _ 0 EL + 0 9'-' I ii .0 0 0 Ce , .... 0_ • , # L 1 i I sc+11 z-i•oims II .11 ab Xi 0 * ' W11 0 , , II Si•O r + 0 1 ''''. / (.13 MKS ., 0 0 0 r- 0 0 In I 0 * 0 tn 0 <0 0 N 03 0 0 0 S\ '43d:rgCf'C OZ,nil ■•••• 0.1. 0-dd-VL T — a t o° Alga Y _ a o xZIa- 15 _, aim S Lo, g i < G p tr.FO 0-8 ° z I< <oWW is a$f lgo a e, fair... . qqo F NSW .s _,11W * 16E .1 • „,s I co N .t o N O O 0 0 t0 S I in •- k v Y ' r 6-0 INS 33S 3NI1 H3iWW S r 8-0 1,149,33S 3NIl -101V141 + o i - tdL4 — 0.• ; • iu /� / c U� • k 0 t1131 "P f A / / R II4i:', „ - a. A� r i. n Ak; ;Yit 9R:ru,' -fit t¢ W /// e ,gni ezt, = J R14 g N i of _ $ ,r„", 4 9Lti i (I) 8 / r A Q @Zt.-'9LL to '4--... i w/ J 1 A t] $ v-.... - kFi A / I Z O I 41 W wy 3 r W d // ' ..i '. �f^J, 0 g TY J c// —I 0 t>t ' r 8� a 13 / LL O I o , / ,� 9°>, " 4 / Cl. 9 r / A O a ,z51 37 A "`+- j ill (�S�YL 01 0 a,� ° Q1 3tt }V, 05.1r ,.• t.,.1r-' 941 / gym, 0b1/2, - I / ce . R .? A oar ._ if / r / ' / X Y r. /p ► L9 S ■ I SKIMS N 11 1 o r ��I Q Y4, .. Y 0 to tl" M O cs, O o O + 6•p'Grd+, CLL OO+t O—•,d—BO—\s.a5s\QC,I\k£3d ODCOCIZ:OZ\cuoy'.V 1\:N wn{.pg—ZtOt:tf1 IL !,A • V a * X— i 11 I~ES i CS a p0 (o sdS E = S■ te.— 5111 § 8 v LL. 0 — x4 Z co i5 a. =I S �]1I ! a < t, in xQN o-0 C E a osi to g ow l,a 4 1 o E 8 § $ o i z d z Q LI ? .g. N. r :10 NAW 7 w W 4 6 b 3 ; 3` lg s ,P yo„J.w t k=,3Ea Cwb O o rn too °n ttoo to as o I r-) N 0 0 1 N N i O I N ■ 0 I 0 N 1 1 o – r TS 1 a x W q J ■ +1 W 9 i o rry 1 i0 I i W F oe I „ Y� W Z q sr sr____„___________ Q o - Hu J J a�Ni�a s Ate, IX r e+�krs ilV f T I Cl) le ,' r ' r- tL g at el k ,o o z Z a 8 d , r d g ''4- c'a z s, � , a v a- 1 0 O I 1 r r or+rt 44 01-0 INS 3 3N 11401tIW F - $-�J 1HS 33S 3NIl Ha1VIN a $ty., r 8 a Y x 1 a O O O O Oa O Otl tO 0 ' a M 6MP'0KI 01 00+Y:0-od-60-0\?o 1s\ova\bad 000-Xtr:OL\cu+51 c.cl\K y,01.0 4-Z 10£.01 i i 4,A • Q O 3 il w U z to >5 � � 8 b� g G oWOO t/) >.: __.1 1 �J�oW W %. € R a W t— k al i 1 'FOFB 3 iti 8z1 zu jou',:ii,`-''.•.- i UJ!.i' &g§aL -wh 4. eg3$ .4 ; 0 to N tr [��] N q p I La O 5111" it F 1{ ; ti - r.,_• 905 �y�y3yr K C ss IV ! • 44-0i S3.�. �" N!'�H�1bW 14'31HS 33S 3NIl H�lt/W o >Zf "'555 li r3 Z LLI / i° PE — 1 J y� ce 00.9 T to I W 6-3 urn p uJ i 5 y , t CO 0 I i °t i Z / / ep� 5ft •r', �! a �/ to / S 1 ► p I,. III x b / 1 id t. I t 11.1 a .., q/ • Z O m re / �' I` N: U, wg IS�o� oewv as / cn aI I - -I o i LL el o N ti Ct s(� a. _... , 7�W / Oi'66t ti`�... u+ II $ # 5Ci 1.3 NM ._ .4gt tit / o 2 N , � F3 ggt 1 °9' - �/ t. .... 89f �i / /// C 1- il ii r. ttc 09.0 49 1 WS ., j ° 0 p 0 o to +- tpfi Y M N o kr r r r r- .- w r 6*P'GCi+'G1 6]+0 3-ad-9t-Jti' th1Cr£C''.''f FN o:a1\:w ■ a 11.1 t too Z i g z ° I W :- v Q 0 Ili CCZi- $m a. J t mJJ b < G CI Cr W es w I- Q w i—o 0A a? 2 t g °o z as Raw p�J �r q§g wh e i PROJECT: Lono Kona Sewer PER JOB 1 2012.33.0300 CLIENT: PBR/DEM DAT 30-Jul-12 SUBJECT: Opinion of Probable Cost-Alternative 2 BY: JC BELT O L L I`J S FILE M;1Lono Kona12012330300 PER\Design\Cost Estimatesl[opc-per.xis]PER-preferred Item Estimated No. Quantity Description Unit Price Total CONSTRUCTION MOBILIZATION 1 Lump Sum,Project survey Lump Sum $ 33,000 $ 33,000 2 Lump Sum,Mobilization/Demobilization Lump Sum $ 293,000 $ 293,000 3 Lump Sum,Erosion Control Lump Sum $ 250,000 $ 250,000 4 Lump Sum,Traffic Control Lump Sum $ 270,000 $ 270,000 TOTAL FOR MOBILZATION $ 846,000 DEMOLITION 1 0.50 Acres,Clearing and grubbing,within the limits Per Acres $ 3,000 $ 1,500 TOTAL FOR DEMOLITION $ 1,500 SEWER SYSTEM 2 5,640 Lin.Ft.,8-inch PVC SDR-26 sewer pipe and fittings,in place complete. Per Lin.Ft. $ 30 $ 169,200 3 360 Lin.Ft.,10-inch PVC SDR-26 sewer pipe and Per Lin.Ft. $ 35 $ 12,600 4 3,700 Cu.Yds.,trench excavation and backfill. Per Cu.Yd. $ 200 $ 740,000 5 1 Each,Connect to existing sewer stub,in place complete. Each $ 2,000 $ 2,000 6 29 Each,sewer manholes 5.0'to 9.5'deep,in place complete. Each $ 12,000 $ 348,000 7 4 Each,lined shallow drop sewer manholes 10.0'to 14.99'deep,in place complete. Each $ 16,000 $ 64,000 8 1 Each,lined drop sewer manholes 15.00'to 20.00'deep,in place complete. Each $ 35,000 $ 35,000 9 110 Each,sewer lateral connection,in place complete. Each $ 5,000 $ 550,000 10 Lump Sum,Hualalai Road Tie-in,in place Each $ 50,000 $ 50,000 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report PROJECT: Lono Kona Sewer PER JOB 120I 233.0300 CLIENT: PBR I DEM DAT 30-jul-12 SUBJECT: Opinion of Probable Cost-Alternative 2 BY: JC BELT C O L L I`I S FILE MALono Kona12012330300 PER\Design\Cost Estimates\[opc-per.xlsJPER-preferred 1.5lrydl6n Item Estimated No. Quantity Description Unit Price Total TOTAL FOR SEWER SYSTEM $ 1,970,800 MISCELLANEOUS 1 12,000 Sq.Yd.Asphalt concrete pavement and base course, Mix 3,in place complete. Per Sq.Yd. $ 120 $ 1,440,000 2 Lump Sum.Allowance for backfill of lava tubes Lump Sum $ 250,000 $ 250,000 TOTAL FOR MISCELLANEOUS $ 1,690,000 Subtotal $ 4,508,300 20%Contingency $ 901,660 Total $ 5,409,960 Total Construction Cost Say $ 5,500,000 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report Appendix D : Alternative 3 (No Easements)—Schematic Layout and Opinion of Probable Cost EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report (This page intentionally left blank) EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report Lono Kona Sewer Im • rovement District ° 0, ♦ . , 4...1111. • . a • • �acfia Stitee . ' 0'3' .3 0 • lop4 . N Q e� �•@-- OW .. .P- . 57,„ �o , G roz. v 0 Y,,,_ ,,, ,..x. * .4 . / , ka,a,t.,:, # 1 1,, , 1 -\, , ' , , ,,,, c,-- IllIl'a4411 ‘‘,. ......0-01-- \„7:',„,,, ,s.,, \ I.. . , , iiii!. ...,.. IL VIIIIIII Atli %%III,„,Il , Alternative 3 - No easements Legend N 0 Existing Sewer Manhole 4E :....:.m..,.-,Existing Sewer Main • New Sewer Manhole s New Sewer Main �,. ri_r-I___I ® New Sewage Pump Station Feet New Sewer Force Main 0 170 340 680 I New Sewage Pump Station Construction staging expected to occur on fJ Vacant ID Parcels-Potential Staging Area ®Vacant ID Parcels-Restricted Staging Area one or more vacant ID parcels, at theErxi900314WWN5Ineenng Report -I :awe, Developed ID Parcels Affected Rights of Way PROJECT: Lono Kona Sewer PER JOB 1 2012.33.0300 CLIENT: PER/DEM DAT 30-Jul-12 SUBJECT: Opinion of Probable Cost-Alternative 3 BY: JC B ELT COLLINS FILE: M:\Lono Kona12012330300 PER\Design\Cost Estimates\[opc-per.xls]PER-SPS Option Item Estimated No. Quantity Description Unit Price Total CONSTRUCTION MOBILIZATION I Lump Sum,Project survey Lump Sum $ 53,000 $ 53,000 2 Lump Sum,Mobilization/Demobilization Lump Sum $ 470,000 $ 470,000 3 Lump Sum,Erosion Control Lump Sum $ 250,000 $ 250,000 4 Lump Sum,Traffic Control Lump Sum $ 405,000 $ 405,000 TOTAL FOR MOBILZATION $ 1,178,000 DEMOLITION 1 0.40 Acres,Clearing and grubbing,within the limits of grading,including removal and disposal of vegetation and tree stumps and roots. Per Acres $ 5,000 $ 2,000 TOTAL FOR DEMOLITION $ 2,000 SEWER SYSTEM 1 4,440 Lin.Ft.,8-inch PVC SDR-26 sewer pipe and fittings,in place complete. Per Lin.Ft. $ 30 $ 133,200 2 580 Lin.Ft.,10-inch PVC SDR-26 sewer pipe and fittings,in place complete. Per Lin.Ft. $ 35 $ 20,300 3 1,450 Lin.Ft.,6-inch force main,in place complete. Per Lin.Ft. $ 100 $ 145,000 3 1 Lump Sum,Appurtenances for force main,in place complete. Lump Sum $ 50,000 $ 50,000 4 4,200 Cu.Yds.,trench excavation and backfill. Per Cu.Yd. $ 200 $ 840,000 5 24 Each,sewer manholes 5.51'to 9.5'deep,in place complete. Each $ 12,000 $ 288,000 6 4 Each,lined shallow drop sewer manholes 10.0'to 14.99'deep,in place complete. Each $ 16,000 $ 64,000 EXHIBIT D_Preliminary Engineering Report PROJECT: Lono Kona Sewer PER JOB t 2012.33.0300 CLIENT: PBR/DEM DAT 30-Jul-I 2 SUBJECT: Opinion of Probable Cost-Alternative 3 BY: JC B E LT r O l_L I`I S FILE: M:\Lono Kona\2012330300 PERIDesign\Cost Estimatesl[opc-perxls]PER-SPS Option Item Estimated No. Quantity Description Unit Price Total 7 1 Each,lined sewer manholes 15.00'to 20.00' deep,in place complete. Each $ 35,000 $ 35,000 8 110 Each,sewer lateral connection,in place complete. Each $ 5,000 $ 550,000 9 Lump Sum,Hualalai Road Tie-in,in place complete. Lump Sum $ 50,000 $ 50,000 10 Lump Sum,Sewer pump stations,in place complete at 2 locations. Lump Sum $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 11 Lump Sum,Sewer pump station ancillary equipment including generator and monitoring equipment,in place complete at 2 locations_ Lump Sum $ 500,000 $ 500,000 TOTAL FOR SEWER SYSTEM $ 4,175,500 MISCELLANEOUS 1 12,000 Sq.Yd.Asphalt concrete pavement and base course, Mix 3,in place complete. Per Sq.Yd. $ 120 $ 1,440,000 2 Lump Sum.Allowance for backfill of lava tubes Lump Sum $ 250,000 $ 250,000 TOTAL FOR MISCELLANEOUS $ 1,690,000 Subtotal $ 7,045,500 20%Contingency $ 1,409,100 Total $ 8,454,600 Total Construction Cost Say $ 8,500,000 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report (This page intentionally left blank) EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report Appendix E : Alternative 4 (No Private Sewage Pumps)—Opinion of Probable Cost EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report (This page intentionally left blank) EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report Alternative 4 preliminary plans are included in Appendix C PROJECT: Lono Kona Sewer PER JOB 12012.33.0300 CLIENT: PBR/DEM DAT 30311-12 SUBJECT: Opinion of Probable Cost-Alternative 4 BY: JC BELT C O L L I J S FILE M:\Lono Kona\2012330300 PER1Desigh1Cost Estimates\[opc-per.xls]PER-nopumpak Item Estimated No. Quantity Description Unit Price Total CONSTRUCTION MOBILIZATION 1 Lump Sum,Project survey Lump Sum $ 37,000 $ 37,000 2 Lump Sum,Mobilization/Demobilization Lump Sum $ 322,000 $ 322,000 3 Lump Sum,Erosion Control Lump Sum $ 250,000 $ 250,000 4 Lump Sum,Traffic Control Lump Sum $ 315,000 $ 315,000 TOTAL FOR MOBILZATION $ 924,000 DEMOLITION 1 0.50 Acres,Clearing and grubbing,within the limits of grading,including removal and disposal of vegetation and tree stumps and roots. Per Acres $ 3,000 $ 1,500 TOTAL FOR DEMOLITION $ 1,500 SEWER SYSTEM 2 5,640 Lin.Ft.,8-inch PVC SDR-26 sewer pipe and fittings,in place complete. Per Lin.Ft. $ 30 $ 169,200 3 360 Lin.Ft.,10-inch PVC SDR-26 sewer pipe and fittings,in place complete. Per Lin.Ft. $ 35 $ 12,600 4 4,000 Cu.Yds.,trench excavation and backfill. Per Cu.Yd. $ 225 $ 900,000 5 1 Each,Connect to existing sewer stub,in place complete. Each $ 2,000 $ 2,000 6 24 Each,sewer manholes 4.0'to 9.49'deep,in place complete. Each $ 12,000 $ 288,000 7 1 Each,sewer manholes 9.5'to 14.99'deep,in place complete. Each $ 15,000 $ 15,000 8 2 Each,sewer manholes 15.0'to 20.0'deep,in place complete. Each $ 20,000 $ 40,000 9 3 Each,lined shallow drop sewer manholes 10.0'to 14.99'deep,in place complete. EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report PROJECT: Lono Kona Sewer PER JOB 12012.33.0300 CLIENT: PBR!DEM DAT 30-Jul-12 SUBJECT: Opinion of Probable Cost-Alternative 4 BY: JC BELTr.G I_ FILE M:tLono Kona 12012330300 PER1DesignlCost Estimates l[opc-perxis]PER-nopumpalt Item Estimated No Quantity Description Unit Price Total Each $ 16,000 $ 48,000 10 4 Each,lined sewer manholes 15.00'to 25.00' deep,in place complete. Each $ 35,000 $ 140,000 11 110 Each,sewer lateral connection,in place complete. Each $ 5,000 $ 550,000 12 6 Each,sewer riser connection,in place complete. Each $ 10,000 $ 60,000 13 Lump Sum,Hualalai Road Tie-in,in place complete. Each $ 50,000 $ 50,000 TOTAL FOR SEWER SYSTEM $ 2,274,800 MISCELLANEOUS 1 12,000 Sq.Yd.Asphalt concrete pavement and base course, Mix 3,in place complete. Per Sq.Yd_ $ 120 $ 1,440,000 2 Lump Sum.Allowance for backfill of lava tubes Lump Sum $ 300,000 $ 300,000 TOTAL FOR MISCELLANEOUS $ 1,740,000 Subtotal $ 4,940,300 20%Contingency $ 988,060 Total $ 5,928,360 Total Construction Cost Say $ 6,000,000 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report Appendix F: Present Worth Analysis EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report (This page intentionally left blank) EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report 2 kto \a 0 _ k �/ 0 0 @ @ \ % 2 0 6 o R q o E $ © 0 co « 2 0 w < 7 � T-. 2 - $ o 0 0 2 E , 0 0 0 2 a a k $ 3 2 S k 0 2 2 % C / 2 � E _\ & < za. 0 k 49 0i. R I 7 f co c 3 10 i i E $ CSI ¢• 2 C } co i 0 0 a @ is.- 0 a , E 0 0 0 9 0 0 4 R - u) § © I)tri / a w / $ ƒW uJ E — e O 0 % 0 k 1 3 # w 2 & k \ O 0 La a 49 ■ a ¢ ■ � 0o 5 Ii \ a ; co a E cr m co # B § k § a c . ao 7 ,0 0 w 21t ii f _ $ � 0 k» ■ � � § a« & t _M CO k tu fi- $ E �_ , w 11'I§ a i to 2 - � k E fa) % j \ $ ) L. k a = ° ® z 0 . 0 d 3 c c e 2 an k \ CC \ I 4) $ < < 2 Table 2 County of Hawaii Lono Kona Proposed Sewer Project Preliminary Engineering Report Present Worth Analysis Cash Flow and Present Worth Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Gravity Sewer System No Easements No Private Sewage Pumps (Recommended) (Pump Stations) (Lower Invert) Capital, Annual Capital, Annual Capital, Annual Replcmt, O&M Cash Replcmt, O&M Cash Replcmt, O&M Cash Year &Salvage Costs Flow &Salvage Costs Flow &Salvage Costs Flow O $5,500,000 $5,500,000 $8,500,000 $8,500,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 1 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 2 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 3 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 4 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 5 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 6 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 7 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 B $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 9 518,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 518,000 10 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 11 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 12 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 13 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 14 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 15 $18,000 $18,000 $2,400,000 $24,150 $2,424,150 $18,000 $18,000 16 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 17 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 18 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 19 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 20 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 21 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 22 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 23 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 24 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 25 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 26 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 27 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 28 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 29 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 30 $18,000 518,000 $2,400,000 $24,150 $2,424,150 $18,000 $18,000 31 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 32 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 33 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 34 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 35 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 36 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 37 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 38 $18,000 $18,000 524,150 524,150 $18,000 $18,000 39 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 40 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 41 518,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 42 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 43 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 44 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 45 $18,000 $18,000 $2,400,000 $24,150 $2,424,150 $18,000 $18,000 46 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 47 518,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 48 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 49 $18,000 $18,000 $24,150 $24,150 $18,000 $18,000 50 $0 518,000 518,000 $0 $24,150 $24,150 $0 $18,000 $18,000 Total $5,500,000 $900,000 $6,400,000 $15,700,000 $1,207,500 $16,907,500 $6,000,000 $900,000 $6,900,000 Present Worth $5,947,000 $13,090,000 $6,437,000 Source: Goodwin Consulting Group,Inc. 0526/2012 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report Appendix G: Annual Operating Budget EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report (This page intentionally left blank) EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report Estimated COUNTY OF HAWAII Page 31 05/03/12 Fund 030 Sewer Fund Year 2012-13 Revenues FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 Base.EI Account Description Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate 3300 Intergovernmental Revenue 3301 Federal Grants +++ Federal Grants 0,00 0 0 0 0 3303 Federal Grants +++ Federal Grants 0.00 0 0 0 0 3305 State Grants 3305.73 2006 Earthquake Asst 959.09 0 0 0 0 +++ State Grants 959.09 0 0 0 0 3308 Federal Grants 3308.75 FEMA 2011 Tsunami Disaster 4,254.48 0 0 0 0 +++ Federal Grants 4,254.48 0 0 0 0 **** Intergovernmental Revenue 5,213.57 0 0 0 0 3400 Charges for Services 3401 General Government 3401.72 Wastewtr Div Svc Fees 71,032.14 105,600 152,000 100,000 100,000 +++ General Government 71,032.14 105,600 152,000 100,000 100,000 3406 Sewers 3406.01 Hilo Sewer Charges 2,930,393.88 2,914,600 2,894,953 2,894,953 2,894,953 3406.02 Papaikou Sewer Charges 146,043.59 148,380 147,346 147,346 147,346 3406.03 Kulaimano Sewer Charges 199,500.06 207,225 205,066 205,066 205,066 3406.04 Kapehu Sewer Charges 8,974.06 9,072 10,470 10,470 10,470 3406.05 Honokaa Sewer Charges 0.00 290,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3406.06 Kona Sewer Charges 2,978,664.89 2,943,900 3,078,722 3,078,722 3,078,722 3406.07 Naalehu Sewer Charges 23,212.56 27,000 28,469 28,469 28,469 3406.08 Pahala Sewer Charges 15,987.83 18,180 19,193 19,193 19,193 3406.21 Hilo Sewer Discharge Fee 103,344.50 130,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 3406.26 Kona Sewer Discharge Fee 93,825.50 127,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 +++ Sewers 6,499,946.87 6,815,357 6,814,219 6,814,219 6,814,219 **** Charges for Services 6,570,979.01 6,920,957 6,966,219 6,914,219 6,914,219 3600 Miscellaneous Revenue 3604 Disp Of Fixed Assets +++ Disp Of Fixed Assets 0.00 0 0 0 0 3609 Reimbursemts&Transfers 3609.10 Fund Bal From Prey Year 0.00 545,263 530,874 0 0 3609.11 Transfer From Gen Fund 0.00 0 0 2,954,482 3,734,601 3609.12 Fd Bal Res For Repl Fund 0.00 1,619,198 1,824,056 0 0 +++ Reimbursemts&Transfers 0.00 2,164,461 2,354,930 2,954,482 3,734,601 3611 Sundry&Misc +++ Sundry&Misc 0.00 0 0 0 0 **** Miscellaneous Revenue 0.00 2,164,461 2,354,930 2,954,482 3,734,601 Sewer Fund 6,576,192.58 9,085,418 9,321,149 9,868,701 10,648,820 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report COUNTY OF HAWAII Page 32 05/03/12 Estimated Fund 030 Sewer Fund Year 2012-13 Expenditures FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 Base,El Account Description Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate 5631 Wastewater 5631.01 Wastewater S&W 2,567,858.54 2,933,646 2,900,523 2,906,962 2,906,962 5631.02 Wastewater OCE 3,317,636.24 3,668,289 4,133,641 4,133,641 4,133,641 5631.21 Wastewater Eqpt 43,139.21 10,000 55,500 172,000 223,000 5631.31 Operator Inv Facility 11,550.00 15,000 17,575 17,575 17,575 Total Wastewater 5,940,183.99 6,626,935 7,107,239 7,230,178 7,281,178 5912 Miscellaneous Total Miscellaneous 0.00 0 0 0 0 +++Dept 631 Wastewater 5,940,183.99 6,626,935 7,107,239 7,230,178 7,281,178 5801 Trans To Other Funds Total Trans To Other Funds 0.00 0 0 0 0 5802 Fringe Reimb Total Fringe Reimb 0.00 0 0 0 0 +++Dept 801 Interdepartment 0.00 0 0 0 0 5902 Employee Benefits&FICA 5902.15 Health Benefits 256,907.40 315,537 340,610 340,610 340,610 5902.17 Retirement Benefits 379,548.17 442,837 449,581 465,114 479,649 5902.20 FICA Employer Share 182,957.46 225,847 221,890 222,383 222,383 Total Employee Benefits&FICA 819,413.03 984,221 1,012,081 1,028,107 1,042,642 +++Dept 901 Pensions&Contribs 819,413.03 984,221 1,012,081 1,028,107 1,042,642 5911 Miscellaneous 5911.49 Prov-Compensation Adj-S 0.00 (52,709) 0 0 0 5911.86 Workers Comp 22,734.63 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Total Miscellaneous 22,734.63 (17,709) 35,000 35,000 35,000 5912 Miscellaneous 5912.93 Replacement Reserve Acct 390,497.81 1,600,000 1,166,829 1,575,416 2,290,000 Total Miscellaneous 390,497.81 1,600,000 1,166,829 1,575,416 2,290,000 5913 Miscellaneous 5913.03 Prov for Payroll Lag Adj 0.00 (108,029) 0 0 0 Total Miscellaneous 0.00 (108,029) 0 0 0 +++Dept 911 Miscellaneous 413,232.44 4,474,262 1,201,829 1,610,416 2,325,000 Sewer Fund 7,172,829.46 9,085,418 9,321,149 9,868,701 10,648,820 EXHIBIT D:Preliminary Engineering Report EXHIBIT E: Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost PROJECT: Lono Kona Sewer PER JOB 12012.33.0300 CLIENT: PBR I DEM DAT 30-Jul-12 SUBJECT: Opinion of Probable Cost-Alternative 2 BY: JC B E LTC O L L INS FILE: M:1Lono Konat2012330300 PER\Design\Cost Estimatest[opc-perxts]PER-preferred Item Estimated No. Quantity Description Unit Price Total CONSTRUCTION MOBILIZATION 1 Lump Sum,Project survey Lump Sum $ 33,000 $ 33,000 2 Lump Sum,Mobilization/Demobilization Lump Sum $ 293,000 $ 293,000 3 Lump Sum,Erosion Control Lump Sum $ 250,000 $ 250,000 4 Lump Sum,Traffic Control Lump Sum $ 270,000 $ 270,000 TOTAL FOR MOBILZATION $ 846,000 DEMOLITION 1 0.50 Acres,Clearing and grubbing,within the limits Per Acres $ 3,000 $ 1,500 TOTAL FOR DEMOLITION $ 1,500 SEWER SYSTEM 2 5,640 Lin.Ft.,8-inch PVC SDR-26 sewer pipe and fittings,in place complete. Per Lin.Ft $ 30 $ 169,200 3 360 Lin.Ft.,10-inch PVC SDR-26 sewer pipe and Per Lin.Ft $ 35 $ 12,600 4 3,700 Cu.Yds.,trench excavation and backfill. Per Cu.Yd. $ 200 $ 740,000 5 1 Each,Connect to existing sewer stub,in place complete. Each $ 2,000 $ 2,000 6 29 Each,sewer manholes 5.0'to 9.5'deep,in place complete. Each $ 12,000 $ 348,000 7 4 Each,lined shallow drop sewer manholes 10.0'to 14.99'deep,in place complete. Each $ 16,000 $ 64,000 8 1 Each,lined drop sewer manholes 15.00'to 20.00'deep,in place complete. Each $ 35,000 $ 35,000 9 110 Each,sewer lateral connection,in place complete. Each $ 5,000 $ 550,000 10 Lump Sum,Hualalai Road Tie-in,in place Each $ 50,000 $ 50,000 PROJECT: Lono Kona Sewer PER JOB 12011334300 CLIENT: PBR/DEM DAT 30-Jul-12 SUBJECT: Opinion of Probable Cost-Alternative 2 BY: JC BELT COL L H S FILE: M:\Lono Kona120 1 2 3 30 300 PERIDesign1Cost Esdmates\[opc-per.xlsJPER-preferred Item Estimated No. Quantity Description Unit Price Total TOTAL FOR SEWER SYSTEM $ 1,970,800 MISCELLANEOUS 1 12,000 Sq.Yd.Asphalt concrete pavement and base course, Mix 3,in place complete_ Per Sq.Yd. $ 120 $ 1,440,000 2 Lump Sum.Allowance for backfill of lava tubes Lump Sum $ 250,000 $ 250,000 TOTAL FOR MISCELLANEOUS $ 1,690,000 Subtotal $ 4,508,300 20%Contingency $ 901,660 Total $ 5,409,960 Total Construction Cost Say $ 5,500,000 Exhibit F Lono Kona Proposed Sewer Improvement District Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District Proposed Assessment Roll Estimated Fixed Annual TMK/CPR Situs Address Property Owner Contact Address SFEs Assessment Assessment r 7-5.403-022-0001 230 KALANI ST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS 50 E N TEMPLE ST 22ND FL SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84150-3620 8.5 $83,989.06 $4,600.94 2 7-5-003-022-0002 75-232 KALANI ST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS 50 E N TEMPLE ST 22ND FL SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84150-3620 5.5 $54,313.58 $2,975.32 2 7-5-003-025-0000 75-223 KALANI ST THE SALVATION ARMY PO BOX 1358 KAILUA,KONA 967454358 6.2 $61,365.05 $3,361.60 7-5-003-026-0000 75-3215 A ALA ONAONA ST THE SALVATION ARMY PO BOX 620 HONOLULU,HI 96809-0620 6.0 $59,206.48 $3,243.34 7-5-004-036-0000 75-167 HUALALAI RD L-T VENTURES LLC 76-6167 ALII DR KAILUA,KONA,HI 96740 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 7-5-004-047-0000 75-165 HUALALAI RD HWN REHABILITATION SERVICES 75-165 HUALALAI RD KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-3722 3.2 $31,834.57 $1,743.90 7-5-004-048-0000 75-169 HUALALAI RD KONA PROFESSIONAL BUILDING LLC 3179 KOAPAKA ST 2ND FLR HONOLULU,HI 96819-5199 4.5 $44,489.34 $2,437.14 7-5-004-049-0000 75-167 HUALALAI RD YOUNG,ROBERT P TRUST 3591 AVE CORONADO,CA 92118-1135 4.9 $48,323.68 $2,647.18 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0001 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5737 KALAWA ST 83 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-1830 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0002 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5737 KALAWA ST#3 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-1830 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0003 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0004 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0005 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0006 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU EEC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0007 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0008 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0009 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0010 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0011 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU EEC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0012 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0013 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0014 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $5,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0015 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0016 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 7-5-022-053-0017 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0018 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 7-5-022-053-0019 75-5708 ALAHOU ST AtAHOU CLEAN&SOBER 75-5708 ALAHOU ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 7-5-022-053-0020 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 7-5-022-053-0021 75-5708 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 NAGEL,BRUCE RAYMOND 7-5-022-056-0000 75-5718 ALAHOU ST NAGEL,BEVERLY ANNE KIMOTO 44-104 MIKIOLA DR KANEOHE,HI 96744-2436 4.9 $48,351.96 $2,648.72 NIU PIA LAND COMPANY LTD THEODORE,ERNEST E TRST AGASID,RAYNETTE K TRST 900 FORT ST MALL,STE 1640 HONOLULU,HI 96813-3719 7-5-022-059-0000 75-5726 ALAHOU ST STONE,JEANETTE KUULANI TRST 47-514 IPULEPO WAY KANEOHE,HI 96744-5623 5.6 $55,259.38 $3,027.12 7-5-022-060-0000 75-5730 ALAHOU ST ALAHOU ASSOCIATES LLC 7360 ATOLL AVE NORTH HOLLYWOOD,CA 91605 11.2 $110,518.76 $6,054.24 CRABBE,NOLAN LEE KEUINOHOPONO 7-5-022-062-0000 75-5738 ALAHOU ST AIU,ANDREW K 99-902 MOANALUA RD UNIT 1-A-4 AIEA,HI 96701 4.9 $48,351.96 $2,648.72 KANEKO,OSAMU NAHA-SHI OKINAWA 900-0022 7-5-022-063-0000 75-5742 ALAHOU ST KANEKO,NAOKO 1-4-38 HIGAWA JAPAN 4.9 $48,351.96 $2,548.72 7-5-022-064-0000 75-5746 ALAHOU ST RUDOY,RAUL CTRST 316 KEALAHOU ST HONOLULU,HI 96825-2854 4.9 $48,351.96 $2,648.72 7-5-022-069-0000 75-5762 ALAHOU ST MACDONALDS PROPERTIES LLC 1245 S KUMUWAINA PL HILO,HI 96720 5.6 $55,259.38 $3,027.12 IANIAKEA FOUNDATION 7-5-022-071-0000 75-5770 ALAHOU ST ARRINGTON,CLIFTON 765 KUMUKAHI PL HONOLULU,HI 96825 1.0 $9,867.74 $540.56 AU,GORDON S K TR 7-5-022-076-0001 75-180 ALAKAI ST AU,LANA L TR 2715 LILIHA ST HONOLULU,HI 96817 0.7 $5,907.42 $378.38 AU,GORDON S K TR 7-5-022-076-0002 75-180 ALAKAI ST AU,LANA L TR 2715 LILIHA ST HONOLULU,HI 96817 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 7-5-022-076-0003 75-180 ALAKAI ST ROWE,DUANE ARTHUR PO BOX 812 LIHUE,HI 96766-0812 0.7 $6,907.42 $373.38 7-5-022-076-0004 75-180 ALAKAI ST CALLAN,TIMOTHY M 75-180 ALAKAI ST#104 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $37838 CUNNINGHAM,FUMIKO 7-5-022-076-0005 75-180 ALAKAI ST CUNNINGHAM,SHELLY JASON 75-176 ALAKAI ST#105 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 FLEMING,SHARAIN HERRICK,110 W 75-180 ALAKAI ST#106 KAILUA-KONA HI 96740 7-5-022-076-0006 75-180 ALAKAI ST HERRICK,DONNA R 2747 PEARTREE LN SAN JOSE,CA 95121 0.7 $5,907.42 $378.38 AU,GORDON S K TR 7-5-022-076-0007 75-180 ALAKAI ST AU,LANA LTR 2715 LILIHA ST HONOLULU,HI 96817-1366 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 7-5-022-076-0008 75 480 ALAKAI ST PALOLO CHINESE HOME INC 2715 LILIHA ST �, HONOLULU,HI 968174366 0.7 $6,907.42 $37838 MORES,HERBERT! 7-5-022-076-0009 75-180 ALAKAI ST MORES,LAI NGOR CHOW PO BOX 4578 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96745-4578 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 7-5-022-076-0010 75-180 ALAKAI ST LEOPOLDINO,ROBERT C 73-1139 HAMO �, _.,„KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 KNIPPERS,JOHN 7-5-022-076-0011 75-180 ALAKAI ST KNIPPERS,CAROLYN 8440 E 111TH ST SOUTH BIXBY,OK 74008 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 Exhibit F Lono Kona Proposed Sewer Improvement District Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District Proposed Assessment Roll Estimated Fixed Annual TMK/CPR Situs Address Property Owner Contact Address SFE5 Assessment Assessment; JEFFREY,SCOTT.' 435 NEPTUNE AVE APT 11H BROOKLYN,NY 11224-4592 7-5-022-076-0012 75-180 ALAKAI ST JEFFREY,LINDA L 77-6470 LEILANI ST KAILUA-KONA 96740 0.7 $6,907.42 $37838 HAALILIO,WILLIAM P 7-5-022-078-0000 75-5742 ALANOE PL HAALILIO,HARRIET U 1681 HOOLEHUA ST PEARL CITY,HI 96782-1731 1.4 $13,814.84 $756.78 7-5-022-079-0000 75-5744 ALANOE PL CHUNG,EDWARD K III TR 2251 MOHALA WAY HONOLULU,HI 96822 1.0 $9,86734 $540.56 TAKUSHI,SHARON T 7-5-022-080-0000 75-5746 ALANOE PL TAKUSHI,JASON Y 909 ALA NANALA ST APT 401 HONOLULU,HI 96818-2916 1.4 $13,814.84 $756.78 7-5-022-081-0000 75-5748 ALANDE PL MENTAL HEALTH KOKUA 1221 KAPIOLANI BLVD STE 345 HONOLULU,HI 96814 1.0 $9,86734 $54056 r, 7-5-022-082-0000 75-5750 ALANOE PL BIG ISLAND RESIDENTIAL INC 1221 KAPIOLANI BLVD STE 345 HONOLULU,HI 96814 1.4 $13,814.84 $756.78 7-5-022-083-0000 75-5751 ALANOE PL PATRICK,FAMILY TR 21657 PACIFIC COAST HWY MALIBU,CA 90265 1.0 $9,867.74 $540.56 HARRIS,JOE F TRST HARRIS,MARGARET A TRUST 7-5-022-084-0000 75-5747 ALANOE PL HARRIS,GRANT 0 1717 ALA WAI BLVD 51706 HONOLULU,HI 96815 1.0 $9,867.74 $540.56 7-5-022-085-0000 75-5743 ALANOE PL GASPAR,EDWIN 73-111.1 KAIMINANI DR KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.4 $13,814.84 $756.7811 7-5-022-086-0000 75-5739 ALANDE PL MCCASKILL,FAMILY TR 1600 ALA MOANA BLVD APT 2708 HONOLULU,HI 96815-1406 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-087-0000 75-190 ALAKAI ST KESHAP,MAY 8121 VAN NUYS BLVD STE 308 PANORAMA CITY,CA 91402-5124 1.0 $9,86735 $540.56' SIMPSON,MICHAEL LEE 7-5-022-088-0000 75-192 ALAKAI ST SIMPSON,MELISSA F OTT 75-192 ALAKAI ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-1837 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 MANNING,JEROME O I 7-5-022-089-0000 75-196 ALAKAI ST MANNING,MARIE S 690 CHELSEA DR SANFORD,NC 27331 1A $13,814.85 $75638:' MANNING,JEROME O 7-5-022-090-0000 75-198 ALAKAI ST MANNING,MARIE S 690 CHELSEA DR SANFORD,NC 27331 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-091-0000 75-5742 LAMAOKEOLA ST HARAGUCHI,ALVIN M P 0 BOX 5116 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96745-5116 1.0 $9,86735 $54056'-!. 7-5-022-092-0000 75-5748 LAMAOKEOLA ST CARMICHAEL,PAUL TR 75-5748 LAMAOKEOLA ST KAILUA-KDNA,HI 96740 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-093-0000 75-5752 LAMAOKEOLA ST HARAGUCHI,ALVIN P 0 BOX 5116 L KAILUA-KONA,HI 96745-5116 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-094-0000 75-5756 LAMAOKEOLA ST HIND DRIVE PROPERTIES LLC 73-4840 KANALANI ST RD KAILUA-KDNA,HI 96740 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 PETERSON,GREGORY 7-5-022-095-0000 75-5757 LAMAOKEOLA ST PETERSON,JULITA 73-1130 ALA KAPUA ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-9575 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-096-0000 75-5753 LAMAOKEOLA ST CASPELL,TRUST 63 A ELM DR HILO,HI 96720 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 CIRIAKO,RAYMOND EDWIN 7-5-022-097-0000 75-5749 LAMAOKEOLA ST PURDOM,LISA JEAN P 0 BOX 2361 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96745-2361 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 YOSHIMI,EVELYN TRST 1767 BLUESTONE LN MONTEREY PARK,CA 91755-5821 7-5-022-098-0000 75-5745 LAMAOKEOLA ST FUJIOKA,ROY/NANCY TRST 2529 HEPWORTH DR DAVIS,CA 95618-7671 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-099-0000 75-5741 LAMAOKEOLA ST AHUNA,HATTIE K TRUST 3047 WOODLAWN DR HONOLULU,HI 96822 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 KITCHEN,ROBERT T 7-5-022-100-0000 75-5737 LAMAOKEOLA ST KITCHEN,VICTORIA M 75-5737 LAMAOKEOLA ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-1585 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-101-0000 75-5733 LAMAOKEOLA ST FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSN 3900 WISCONSIN AVE WASHINGTON,DC 20016 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-102-0000 75-5729 LAMAOKEOLA ST WINETT,DAVID L 986 BROOKSIDE DR EUGENE,OR 97405 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 PHAM,HANK 7-5-022-103-0000 75-208 KALANI ST DO,THUY-HUANG T 74-5450 MOKALA BLVD#E-101 KAILUA-KONG,HI 96745 2.1 $20,722.27 $1,135.16 7-5-022-104-0000 75-5725 LAMAOKEOLA ST LAMAOKEOLA LLC 75-5737 KALAWA ST 3A KAILUA-KDNA,HI 96740 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 ' 7-5-022-105-0000 75-5734 LAMAOKEOLA ST DECKER,RICHARD A/AMY L TR 73-4570 MAMALOHOA HWY - KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 7-5-022-106-0000 75-197 ALAKAI ST TTEE 3815 S WEST TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84115-4412 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 z, POIRE,GORDON H K 7-5-022-107-0000 75493 ALAKAI ST STEVENS-POIRE,SCOTT i 75-193 ALAKAI ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.0 $9,867.75 $54156 7-5-022-108-0000 75-191 ALAKAI ST COFFEY,ELMER L 75-191 ALAKAI ST KAILUA-KDNA,HI 96740 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-109-0000 75-187 ALAKAI ST KONA KOKUA HOUSING INC 1221 KAPIOLANI BLVD STE345" HONOLULU,HI 96814 1.0 $9,86735 $540.56: RUPLEY,MYUNG SOOK HWANG 7-5-022-110-0001 75-185 ALAKAI ST RUPLEY,ROSS 75-185 A ALAKAI ST KAILUA-KDNA,HI 96740 0.3 $3,391.86 $185.80 2 7-5-022410-0002 75-185 ALAKAI ST LAWRENCE,WILLIAM J 75-185 B ALAKAI ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 967411 03 $6,475.88 $354.74 2 7-5-022-111-0000 75-183 ALAKAI ST UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS 75-5851 KUAKINI HWY KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-112-0000 75-181 ALAKAI ST UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS 75-5851 KUAKINI HWY KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-113-0000 75-177 ALAKAI ST UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS 75-5851 KUAKINI HWY KAILUA-KDNA,HI 96740 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-114-0000 75-5731 ALAHOU ST HSBC BANK USA N A TTEE 4828 LOOP CENTRAL DR HOUSTON,TX 77081 ` '5 $34,537.12 $1,891_94 7-5-022-115-0000 75-176 KALANI ST DUNN,L A/GOODMAN,1 L TR PO BOX 625 NAALEHU,HI 96772-0625 6.3 $62,166.81 $3,405.50 7-5-022-116-0000 75-178 KALANI ST UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS 75-5851 KUAKINI HWY KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 WILSON,MICHAEL A TRST JOHNSON,KEISIULING SIN LOO CHA1 7-5-022-117-0000 75-182 KALANI ST TRST 82-6275 PUUHONUA RD CAPTAIN COOK,HI 96704 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 OKANO,DAVID MASATO TR 7-5-022-118-0000 75-184 KALANI ST OKANO,CAROLEE MAKIE TR 83 MAIKAI ST HILO,HI 96720 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 OKAND,DAVID MASATO TR 7-5-022-119-0000 75-186 KALANI ST OKANO,CAROLEE MAKIE TR 83 MAIKAI ST HILO,HI 96720 2.8 $27,629.69 $1,513.56 7-5-022-120-0000 75-188 KALANI ST MORI,SCOTT ALLEN 91-2064 KAIOLI ST APT 4104 EWA BEACH,HI 96706-6095 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 SARADPON,EMMA M CALMA,ISIDRO A BALLESTEROS,DUSTIN 7-5-022-121-0000 75-190 KALANI ST BALLESTEROS,STELLA M 75-194 KALANI ST KAILUA-KDNA,HI 96740-1838 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-122-0000 75-194 KALANI ST SARADPON,EMMA 75-194 KALANI ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-1838 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56, LAO,MARIA ESTELA POLYANNA S 7-5-022-123-0000 75-196 KALANI ST LAO,MA ESTELA SINDICO 201 EL BONITO WAY MILLBRAE,CA 94030 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-124.0000 75-5730 LAMAOKEOLA ST BURGESS,AMELIA L KTR PO BOX 597 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96745-0597 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-125-0000 75-5726 LAMAOKEOLA ST WALSH,MARY C TTEE 10241 THURSTON GROVES BLVD SEMINOLE,FL 33778-3825 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022426-0000 75-5717 LAMAOKEOLA ST CORSAIR,ROBERT 75410 ALA ONA ONA KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-1808 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-127-0000 75-209 KALANI ST DEMBLEWSKI,KENNETH E SR P 0 BOX 35605 MONTE SERENO,CA 95030-0605 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-129-0000 75414 ALA ONAONA ST PATRICK,FAMILY TR - 21657 PACIFIC COAST HWY MALIBU,CA 90265-5208 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-130-0000 75-210 ALA ONAONA ST CORSAIR,ROBERT 75-210 ALA DNA ONA KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-1808 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 II 7-5-022-131-0000 75-5711 LAMAOKEOLA ST URBAN,TANTE TJR 75-5711 LAMAOKEOLA ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-1816 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 TRANSFIGU RACI O N,ANDRES 7-5-022-132-0000 75-5718 LAMAOKEOLA ST TRANSFIGURACION,MARIA 75-5718 LAMAOKEOLA KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.0 $9,867.75 $540,56 T _ Exhibit F Lono Kona Proposed Sewer Improvement District Lono Kona Sewer Improvement District Proposed Assessment Roll Estimated Fixed Annual TMK/CPR Situs Address Property Owner Contact Address SFEs Assessment Assessment' GALANTO,NESTOR 7-5-022-133-0001 75-199 KALANI ST GALANTO,ELIZABETH 75-202 ALA ONAONA ST#A KAILUA-KONA,HI 95740-1812 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 SAGUN,ERANO B SAGUN,NIDA A 7-5-022-133-0002 75-199 KALANI ST SAGUN,ERANO A JR 75-199 KALANI ST UNIT B KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-1899 0.7 $6,907.42 $378.38 7-5-022-134-0000 75-195 KALANI ST TREDWAY,CAROL E 75-5503 MAMALAHOA HWY HOLUALOA,HI 96725 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56,== ARMSTRONG,ROBERT H 7-5-022-135-0000 75-193 KALANI ST ARMSTRONG,KELLY R 80 SAND ISL ACCESS RD#209 HONOLULU,HI 96819 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-136-0000 75-189 KALANI ST MABUNI,MELVIN Y TR 75-183 KALANI ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 LO $9,867.75 $540.56'' 7-5-022-137-0000 75-187 KALANI ST TEH,CHERYL 75-187 KALANI ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 TAKAUYE,JAMES K TRUST 7-5-022-138-0000 75-185 KALANI ST TAKAUYE,EMI TRUST PO BOX 610 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-0610 1.0 $9,86735 $540.56 7-5-022-139-0000 75-183 KALANI ST MABUNI,MELVIN Y TR 75-183 KALANI ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 MERO,VALENTINE 7-5-022-140-0000 75-181 KALANI ST KAWAHINEKAMEALOHA JR 75-181 KALANI ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-1840 1.0 $9,86735 $540.56 7-5-022-141-0000 75-177 KALANI ST BUTLER,LADONNA ANNE TRST PO BOX 833 PAHALA,HI 96777-0833 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-142-0000 75-175 KALANI ST JAZMIN,FAMILY TRST 348 EL TOYONAL ORINDA,CA 94563 5.6 $55,259.38 $3,027.121111 7-5-022-143-0000 75-176 ALA ONAONA ST JAZMIN,FAMILY TRST 348 EL TOYONAL ORIN DA,CA 94563 6.3 $62,166.81 $3,405.50 7-5-022-144-0000 75-180 ALA ONAONA ST UDANI,FREDITAS GUILLERMO P 0 BOX 4427 HILO,HI 96720 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 CAROLINE K 7-5-022-145-0000 75-182 ALA ONAONA ST SMITH RHINE K 75-182 ALA ONAONA ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-146-0000 75-184 ALA ONAONA ST PATEY,ROBERT WILLIAM 62 KEOKEA LOOP HILO,HI 96720-4927 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 JOSEPH C JR PERS IN TR TYLER, 7-5-022-147-0000 75-188 ALA ONAONA ST THELMA W PERS INCME TR P 0 BOX 2636 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96745-2636 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 J 7-5-022-148-0000 75-190 ALA ONAONA ST HANSON,JEFFREY A P 0 BOX 1400 HONOLULU,HI 96816 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-149-0000 75-192 ALA ONAONA ST PANG,FAMILY TR 3158 HARDING AVE HONOLULU,HI 96816 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-150-0000 75-196 ALA ONAONA ST KAIMALINO TRST 73-4430 PAIAHA ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-9314 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78- IGAYA,RAMON N 7-5-022-151-0000 75-198 ALA ONAONA ST IGAYA,REVEENA K 75-248 MALULANI DR KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-2080 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 GALANTO,NESTOR 7-5-022-152-0000 75-202 ALA ONAONA ST GALANTO,ELIZABETH 75-202 ALA ONAONA ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78'': OCHMANN,FRANK J JR 7-5-022-153-0000 75-5712 LAMAOKEOLA ST OCHMANN,VIRGINIA L 75-5712 LAMAOKEOLA ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-154-0000 75-215 ALA ONAONAST WONG,DAMIEN P 75-5699ALII DR KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-3112 1.4 $13;814.85 $756.78" ARNOLD,DOUGLAS G 7-5-022-155-0000 75-211 ALA ONAONA ST ARNOLD,BARBARA L STAHLY 75-209 ALA ONAONA ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 ARNOLD,DOUGLAS G 7-5-022-156-0000 75-209 ALA ONAONA ST STAHLY,BARBARA L 75-209 ALA ONAONA ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.4 $13,814.85 $75538- 7-5-022-157-0000 75-207 ALA ONAONA ST ALAONAONA RENTALS LLC 2489 PALI HWY APT C HONOLULU,HI 96817-1462 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 7-5-022-158-0000 75-205 ALA ONAONA ST BAJADA,STEVEN 75-205 ALA ONAONA ST APT1 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-3805 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78'+. 7-5-022-159-0000 75-203 ALA ONAONA ST TEAUPA,SALOTE TTEE 74-5045 HUA'ALA ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-160-0001 75-201 A ALA ONAONA ST AVERY,JESSE V PO BOX 3280 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96745-3280 0.5 $4,933.87 $270.28 z 7-5-022-160-0002 75-201 ALA ONAONA ST HSBC BANK USA NA TTEE 4828 LOOP CENTRAL DR HOUSTON,TX 77081 0.5 $4,933.87 $270.28 2 7-5-022-161-0000 75-197 ALA ONAONA ST ALLENDE,RICHARD 73-4678 HINALANI ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 7-5-022-162-0000 75-195 ALA ONAONA ST RANCOURT,STEVE 75-195 ALA ONAONA ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 2.1 $20,722.27 $1,135.15 JADRAQUE,EUGENIO JADRAQUE,CARMELITA PADILLO,RAUL C PO BOX 5131 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96745 =. 7-5-022-163-0000 75-193 ALA ONAONA ST PADILLO,ERA L PO BOX 1701 .-'.-• KAILUA-KONA,HI 96745 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.55 BAXTER,WARNER D 7-5-022-164-0000 75-191 ALA ONAONA ST BAXTER,THELMA S 75-333 ALOHA KONA DR KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-1970 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 HAMILTON,ROBERT G 7-5-022-165-0000 75-189 ALA ONAONAST HAMILTON LINDA G 82-5972WAKIDA OR CAPTAIN COOK,HI 96704 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.781 HARAGUCHI,ALVIN HARAGUCHI,LORRAINE 7-5-022-166-0000 75-185 ALA ONAONA ST HARAGUCHI,ALVIN M PO BOX 5116 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96745-5116 1.0 $9,867.75 $540.56 NOVOLODSKIY,YURIY V 7-5-022-167-0000 75-183 ALA ONAONAST NOVOLODSKAYA,NADEZHDA I 75-183 ALA ONAONA ST KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740-3809 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 AKERS,GERALD TR 7-5-022-168-0000 75-181 ALA ONAONA ST AKERS,KAREN TR P 0 BOX 4552 KAILUA-KONA,HI 96745-4552 1.4 $13,814.85 $756.78 MARK,GARY TRST 7-5-022-169-0000 75-179 ALA ONAONA ST MARK VIVIAN TRST 219 KULEANA LOOP HILO,HI 96720 1.0 $9,867.75 $54056 7-5-022-170-0000 75-177 ALA ONAONA ST JAZMIN,FAMILY TR 348 EL TOYONAL ORINDA,CA 94563 5.3 $51,805.67 $2,837.92 7-5-022-171-0000 NA JAZMIN,FAMILY TR 348 EL TOYONAL ORINDA,CA 94563 5.3 $51,805.67 $2,837.92 Total SFE 247.0 $2,437,000.00 $133,499.00 Assessment units 145.0 1 Includes annual debt service payments and County administration costs. The assessments that were determined for a Condo Master parcel are allocated to each TMK/CPR(Condominium Property Regime)based on acreage_ Sources:County of Hawaii,Belt Collins;Goodwin Consulting Group,lnc. Exhibit G: Lono Kona Sewer ID Easements Map //i,, f // / $ , t `.:u,,. ///. i -7-5-22:173 it 7-5-04:035 7-5-05:069 a ��'! 0-- —7-5-05.0 48 ---7-5-05:049 7-5-04:001 • �7-5-05:047 Legend • New Sewer Manhole V / Vacant parcels New Sewer Easement 10-ft wide �a. Single-Family --- New Sewer Line Duplex 0 250 500 1.000 ID Boundary Apartment I I I 1 I ► I Feet Commercial Other