My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RES 272 Draft 02 2012-2014
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Resolutions
>
2012-2014
>
RES 272 Draft 02 2012-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2014 10:11:00 AM
Creation date
2/10/2014 1:10:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
RES
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2012-2014
Bill/Resolution
272
Draft
02
Introducer
Margaret Wille, Council Member
Referred To
GREDC
Action 1
GREDC-6: Recommends adoption of Res. 272-14, as amended to Draft 2 - 02/04/2014.
Action 2
Council: Adopts Res. 272-14, Draft 2 & GREDC-6 - 02/19/14
Status
Adopted
Date To Mayor or Adoption Date
2/19/2014
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
2/19/2014
Ayes
8-Eoff;Ford;Kanuha;Kern;Onishi;Poindexter;Wille;Yoshimoto
Noes
1-Ilagan
Absent
0
Excused
0
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2014/02/19 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Council
COM 0604.003 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2012-2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit A <br /> •B • NO. <br /> ____ <br /> A BILL FOR AN ACT <br /> RELATING TO THE COUNTIES' AUTHORITY ON AGRICULTURE <br /> BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII: <br /> 1 SECTION 1 . The primary objective of the Hawaii Right to <br /> 2 Farm Act was to protect and promote agricultural lands by <br /> 3 preventing nuisance lawsuits arising due to encroaching <br /> 4 development . On the other hand, each county has an interest in <br /> 5 preventing the establishment of agricultural technologies that <br /> 6 are adverse to what are generally accepted agricultural <br /> 7 practices within that county. In particular, this amendment <br /> 8 makes clear that each county, through its elected county <br /> 9 council, has the right to regulate the cultivation of <br /> 10 genetically engineered crops . <br /> 11 <br /> 12 The counties are aware that the cultivation of genetically <br /> 13 engineered crops in one location can contaminate neighboring <br /> 14 non-genetically engineered crops . In light of the substantial <br /> 15 controversy surrounding the cultivation of genetically <br /> 16 engineered crops and the differential in the likelihood of <br /> 17 cross-pollination depending upon the type of crop being <br /> 18 cultivated, county-level oversight concerning the open-air <br /> 19 cultivation of genetically engineered crops is appropriate to <br /> 20 minimize potential risks and adverse impacts . <br /> 21 <br /> 22 The counties foremost obligation is to protect the health <br /> 23 and safety of its population and are aware that standard medical <br /> 24 facilities in our outer-island counties are not equipped with <br /> 25 toxicology laboratories for either sufficient or sophisticated <br /> 26 testing of illnesses and harms that may result from genetically <br /> 27 engineered organisms or their associated pesticides . <br /> 28 <br /> 29 The counties are also aware that in 2013 the multinational <br /> 30 agrochemical corporations lead an effort to gut the jurisdiction <br /> 31 of the counties, such that they would no longer have any <br /> 32 authority over matters concerning the health and wellbeing of <br /> 33 their residents . (See 2013 Senate Bill No. 727 . ) In addition, <br /> 34 the multinational agrochemical corporations advocated to further <br /> 35 erode the ability of either the State or the counties to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.