Laserfiche WebLink
+ Taketa, Iwata, Hara & Associates, LLC <br /> Certified Public Accountants & Consultants <br /> E 101 Aupuni Street, Suite 139 <br /> Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4260 <br /> INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT ON APPLYING AGREED-UPON <br /> PROCEDURES <br /> Lane Shibata <br /> Acting Legislative Auditor <br /> Office of the Legislative Auditor <br /> County of Hawai'i <br /> 1266 Kamehameha Avenue, Suite A-8 <br /> Hilo, HI 96720 <br /> Dear Mr. Shibata: <br /> We performed the procedures enumerated below, which were agreed to by the County of Hawaii (COH) <br /> solely to assist COH's Management in evaluating COH's accounting procedures used to record <br /> expenditures of the County of Hawai'i Elections Division. This agreed-upon procedures engagement was <br /> conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified <br /> Public Accountants. The sufficiency of these procedures is solely the responsibility of the parties <br /> specified in this report. Consequently, we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the <br /> procedures described below either for the purpose for which this report has been requested or for any <br /> other purpose. <br /> Our procedures and findings were as follows: <br /> 1. COH Elections Division Salaries and Wages: <br /> a. We agreed all COH Elections Division salaries and wages transactions related to the <br /> 2012 election cycle to authorized timesheets and identified reasons noted on the <br /> employee timesheets for overtime hours. There were 1,569 overtime transactions that <br /> totaled $70,879. The overtime schedule is attached to this report as Exhibit A, Our <br /> findings and recommendations are as follows: <br /> i. Condition: There were five timesheets with date discrepancies between the <br /> overtime description support and the Eden payroll report (See Exhibit A: Agree <br /> Overtime Exception a). <br /> Recommendation: Keypunched dates should be verified against timesheet <br /> dates. <br /> ii. Condition: There was a timesheet that indicated 7.5 hours of overtime. <br /> However, the employee was paid 6.0 hours of overtime. The difference of 1.5 <br /> hours was paid to the employee in a subsequent pay period (See Exhibit A: <br /> Agree Overtime Exception b). <br /> Recommendation: Keypunched hours should be verified against timesheet <br /> hours. <br /> iii. Condition: The original authorized timesheet was not available for an <br /> employee's final pay period. However, the files contained an unsigned <br /> photocopy of the timesheet. (See Exhibit A: Agree Overtime Exception c). <br />