My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0024.020 2012-2014
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2012-2014
>
COM 0024.020 2012-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2014 10:37:13 AM
Creation date
6/3/2014 10:29:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2012-2014
Communication
0024
Point
020
Author
Margaret Wille, Council Member
Communications - Referred To
FC
Document Relationships
AGE FC 2014/06/17 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Finance Committee (FC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 29, 2014 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> one additional method of property valuation—the income approach. That Task Force <br /> recommendation is now before the Council in the form of bill to accordingly amend the County <br /> Code. <br /> The Task Force's current track is to focus first on agriculture related issues, then residential- <br /> homeowners issues, then commercial and other significant categories. We would prefer to bring <br /> any related bills or resolutions to the Council in bundles of related legislation, rather than piece <br /> meal. <br /> With respect to the real property tax programs that provide relief for agricultural activities on <br /> agriculturally zoned land, the Task Force has focused on how to handle the Dedicated (Code § <br /> 19-60) and Non-Dedicated (Code § 19-57) Agricultural use programs. The Department reported <br /> that the Dedicated Agricultural use program is working well (under 1000 participants; loss in tax <br /> revenue is approximately 2.6 million). On the other hand, the Department reported that the Non- <br /> dedicated Agricultural use program, as currently structured, is relatively lax and allows for abuse <br /> (10,666 participants; loss in tax revenue is approximately 28.3 million). The Task Force is <br /> looking at various options to revise this program and allow time for those within the program to <br /> bring their agricultural operations into alignment with the program criteria. <br /> The Task Force has informally adopted a Statement of Task Force Goals, but has not yet been <br /> formally approved. A copy of that Statement of Goals will be provided to the Council. <br /> In summary this Task Force aims to address the most problematic issues in order to bring <br /> recommendations to the Council before the end of this Council term. As a Co-Chair, I conclude <br /> by saying the obvious, that if we are able to eliminate abuses and establish more effective <br /> enforcement mechanisms, we hopefully, in the not so distant future, have the option of proposing <br /> reduced tax rates in light of having addressed the most prominent loopholes in the County's <br /> current real property tax program. <br /> Resp ctfull 1 su•mitted, <br /> Margaret Wille, Co-Chair <br /> Real Property Tax Stakeholders' Task Force <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.