My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0642.003 2012-2014
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2012-2014
>
COM 0642.003 2012-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2014 8:55:22 AM
Creation date
6/30/2014 8:54:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2012-2014
Communication
0642
Point
003
Author
William P. Kenoi, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2014/07/17 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Dwellings, single-family. <br /> • Family child care homes. <br /> • Group living facilities. <br /> • Home occupations,as permitted under section 25-4-13. <br /> • Hospitals, sanitariums, old age, convalescent, nursing and rest homes and other similar uses. <br /> • Hotels, when the design and use conform to the character of the area, as approved by the <br /> director. <br /> • Lodges. <br /> • Neighborhood parks, playgrounds, tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar neighborhood <br /> recreational areas and uses. <br /> • Schools. <br /> The department is concerned about defining permitted uses by simple reference to other <br /> zoning districts since it may confuse people attempting to interpret the Zoning Code and what is <br /> or is not permitted. If there is a desire to consider a type of use as permitted within a particular <br /> zoning district,then the most effective approach is to simply identify that use as specifically <br /> permitted within that zoning district,rather than by reference. We cannot support Bill No. 192 <br /> for this reason alone. <br /> Furthermore, we have concerns regarding Bill No. 192 and its proposed amendment to <br /> Section 25-5-138 (c), which states that,"Conflicts regarding CV district uses permitted under <br /> section 25-5-132 (b) shall be resolved in favor of the stricter regulations." The potential conflicts <br /> in uses are not defined, and it is not clear which"stricter regulations"would be applied to resolve <br /> the conflict. <br /> However,on a more substantive level,we believe we can find support to allow various <br /> types of residential uses and activities that promote the congregation of people within the MCX <br /> zoning district. While many industrial types of uses permitted within the limited industrial(ML) <br /> zoning district is also permitted within the Industrial-Commercial Mix(MCX)zoning district,it <br /> does exclude some of the more noxious types of activities, such as lumber yards,junk yards,and <br /> truck and freight terminals. Therefore,the MCX zoning district has excluded those uses <br /> generally considered unsafe and hazardous and relegated these uses to the Limited Industrial <br /> (ML)and General Industrial (MG)zoning districts. The intent of this district is to provide for <br /> areas of diversified businesses and employment opportunities by permitting a broad range of uses, <br /> without exposing nonindustrial uses to unsafe and unhealthy environments(emphasis <br /> added). The intent of this district is also to provide for areas for a viable mix of diversified <br /> commercial and light industrial businesses and employment opportunities by permitting a broad <br /> range of uses. The viability of a mixed use commercial and industrial zone can be supported by <br /> an integrated residential component as seen in many areas, such as the revitalized Kaka`ako <br /> district on O`ahu. <br /> -3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.