Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0939.000 2012-2014 • c� - '_'''''' Walter K.M.Lau " , 6b�i Managing Director William P.Kenoi ,,46-•;;"' .? :• Mayor =--" Randall M.Kurohara • . .• ,. `�. Deputy Managing Director tOfMt- County of Hawaii Office of the Mayor 25 Aupuni Street,Suite 2603 • Hilo,Hawaii 96720 • (808)961-8211 • Fax(808)961-6553 KONA: 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy.,Bldg.C • Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 (808)323-4444 • Fax(808)323-4440 CI _ Cn June 18, 2014 =7_ a --1- N z o. a-< ;,C) J Yoshimoto, Council Chair f and Members of the County Council , v� County of Hawai`i '0 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Chairman Yoshimoto and Members: SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 12-000036) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone(REZ 12-000160) Request: A-1 a to CV-40 Applicant: Dr. William C. Foulk Tax Map Key: 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 As required by Chapter 7, Sec. 6-7.5 (a), Hawai`i County Charter, transmitted herewith for the County Council's consideration and action are the Windward Planning Commission's letter and enclosures regarding the above-referenced request. Sincerely, lb William P. Kenoi Mayor Enclosures cc: Planning Department <rb% k\ ''D.6-1 -4-eakc. Comm. No. q 39 Ref. To: Jti cC Ref. Date 2 7 ZU14 County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. .r!Of M►'� County of Hawaii WINDWARD PLANNING COMMISSION Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 • Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)961-8288 • Fax(808)961-8742 JUN 1 8 2014 J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Chairman Yoshimoto and Council Members: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 12-000036) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone(REZ 12-000160) Request: A-la to CV-40 Applicant: Dr. William C. Foulk Tax Map Key: 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 The Windward Planning Commission, at its duly held public hearing on June 5, 2014, voted to recommend for your approval the proposed legislative bills to change the State Land Use district from the Agricultural to Urban District and a Change of Zone from Agricultural-1-acre(A-la)to a Village Commercial—40,000 square foot (CV-40) zoning district for 4.143 acres of land. The properties are located in the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates Subdivision on the north(mauka) side of the Hawai`i Belt Road, west of Lehua Lane at Kahuku, Ka`u, Hawai`i. The Commission concurs with the following Planning Director's reasons for recommending favorable consideration of the request: State Land Use Boundary Amendment In the 1960's, the County approved the subdivision of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos. Hawaiian Ocean View Estates consists of about 11,000 lots, and Hawaiian Ranchos consists of about 1,200 lots. The population of these areas is growing rapidly. In the 2000 census, the Hawaiian Ocean View Census Designated Place had a population of 2178. It had more than doubled since 1990. Rapid growth continues Hawai`i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 2 in the area. In 2005-2006,building permits for 435 new homes were issued in this general area. This is more than the number of building permits for new homes issued in the districts of North Hilo, Hamakua, North Kohala, and South Kona combined in that time period. The Planning Director favors the development of a commercial area in close proximity to these established subdivisions to serve the rapidly increasing population. This will give residents an opportunity to shop closer to their homes, and provide a location for service-oriented businesses, like offices for doctors, tax preparers, hairdressers, and the whole host of commercial needs generated by a large residential population. The closest town with commercial areas is Na`alehu. A number of commercial enterprises have been approved on both sides of fronting these subdivisions Highway 11, most of which were approved by Special Permits. All of the land in the area is in the State Land Use Agricultural District except for one property to the east that was approved for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban. The closest area in the Urban District is in Wai`ohinu. Previously, the General Plan was a constraint as it did not show an urban center in HOVE and Ranchos Subdivisions in the LUPAG map. As a result, the Special Permit became the vehicle to establish the commercial core fronting HOVE and Ranchos Subdivisions. It is generally not proper to utilize Special Permits to gradually establish a town center, permit by permit. The Special Permit is a procedure meant to handle unusual situations that arise in the Agricultural District. It creates some flexibility in the Agricultural District by allowing consideration of urban-type uses on Agricultural lands. But urban areas, like a commercial center, should be in the State Land Use Urban District and be properly zoned by the County. The 2005 General Plan established an urban center in this area, centered around the existing Special Permit areas, and put it on the LUPAG map. This boundary amendment is consistent with the General Plan amendments. The approval of the reclassification from the State Land Use Agricultural to the Urban District for approximately 3 acres will not be violative of Section 205-2, Chapter 205, Hawaii Revised Statutes, nor will it be inconsistent with the Land Use Commission Rules, the County General Plan and the Hawaii State Plan. The applicant is also requesting a concurrent Change of Zone from A-la to CV-40 to develop a commercial project with 54,300 square feet of professional and retail space. Under the Land Use Commission Rules, one of the standards for considering an area for urban J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 3 reclassification states that"It shall include lands in appropriate locations for new urban concentrations and shall give consideration to areas of urban growth as shown on the state and county general plans." The properties conform to this standard as it is situated in the area designated for urban expansion in the General Plan. Additionally, there are three large commercial and/or light industrial projects previously approved by Special Permits, which are within 1,500 feet of this project. Lastly, the project site is situated in the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates subdivision and across from the Hawaiian Ranchos subdivision. The reclassification action conforms to the goals, objectives and/or policies articulated in the Hawaii State Plan including the objective to "encourage an increase in economic activities and employment opportunities on the neighbor islands consistent with community needs and desires." The reclassification action also conforms to the following goals, policies and standards of the Land Use and Economic General Plan Elements and the General Plan LUPAG Map: The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide(LUPAG) Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical relationship among the various land uses. The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the County. The proposed request conforms to the LUPAG Map, which designates the properties as Urban Expansion Area, which allows for a mix of high density, medium density, low density, industrial, industrial-commercial and/or open designations in areas where new settlements may be desirable,but where the specific settlement pattern and mix of uses have not yet been determined. The reclassification request would further the County's goals of providing an economic environment that allows new or existing businesses to expand and diversify the County's economic base, and also increase choice of occupations. The proposed use would be consistent with the following goals, policies and standards of the Economic, Land Use and Commercial Elements of the General Plan. Economic Element: • Provide residents with opportunities to improve their quality of life through economic development that enhances the County's natural and social environments. J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 4 • Economic development and improvement shall be in balance with the physical, social and cultural environments of the island of Hawai`i. • Strive for diversity and stability in its economic system. • Provide an economic environment that allows new, expanded, or improved economic opportunities that are compatible with the County's cultural, natural and social environment. • Strive for an economic climate that provides its residents an opportunity for choice of occupation. • Strive for diversification of the economy by strengthening existing industries and attracting new endeavors. The applicant will be providing residents who live in the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos subdivisions and surrounding subdivisions more opportunities for commercial services and employment, which will be located closer to their residence than traveling to Kona or Hilo for these services. Land Use Element • Designate and allocate land uses in appropriate proportions and mix and in keeping with the social, cultural, and physical environments of the County. • Zone urban- and rural-types of uses in areas with ease of access to community services and employment centers and with adequate public utilities and facilities. • Allocate appropriate requested zoning in accordance with the existing or projected needs of neighborhood, community,region and County. • Encourage the development and maintenance of communities meeting the needs of its residents in balance with the physical and social environment. • Zoning requests shall be reviewed with respect to General Plan designation, district goals, regional plans, State Land Use District, compatibility with adjacent zoned uses, availability of public services and utilities, access and public need. J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 5 Commercial Element: • Provide for commercial developments that maximize convenience to users. • Urban renewal, rehabilitation, and/or redevelopment programs shall be undertaken in cooperation with communities, businesses and governmental agencies. • Distribution of commercial areas shall meet the demands of neighborhood, community and regional needs. • The development of commercial facilities should be designed to fit into the locale with minimal intrusion while providing the desired services. Appropriate infrastructure and design concerns shall be incorporated into the review of such developments. The Urban classification conforms to the standard that the development is within reasonable proximity to centers of trading and employment except where the development would generate new centers of trading and employment. The properties are in close proximity of three commercial centers, previously established by Special Permits, which provide employment to residents in the area, and conforms with the Land Use Commission Rules which encourages urban developments in close proximity to existing developments and in close proximity to existing services and facilities. Additionally, the proposed development would create a new center of trading and employment in this area. All utilities are or will be made available to the project site. Access to the properties will be from Lehua Lane, which is a two-lane,private road that has a 20-foot wide asphalt pavement within a 40-foot right-of-way. Lehua Lane is accessed directly from the Hawai`i Belt Road. Water requirements necessary for sanitation and firefighting will be provided by adequate storage facilities on-site. The applicant is proposing to construct five(5) large water tanks and have an on-site water reservoir to meet these requirements. The Department of Water Supply (DWS) states that there are no DWS facilities in the area. The nearest water system facility is located in Wai`ohinu, approximately 10 miles east of the subject properties. There is a water system within HOVE that accommodates both public and private water users daily from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., which is located on a J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 6 County owned property on Lehua Lane near the subject properties. There are six (6) public water spigots and a private standpipe facility that provides services to ten(10) private customers for water hauling and/or delivery services. The system is serviced by a well and 300,000-gallon water tank, which is located on a County owned property on Paradise Circle Makai. No metered water services will be allowed unless a second well is constructed to provide the required redundancy for a public water system. Solid waste will be handled through a commercial hauler. The applicant is proposing to construct a sewage treatment system for the proposed commercial center. Utilities, including telephone and electrical services, are available to the site. The closest police and fire station is located in Na`alehu, approximately twelve(12) miles from the properties. Police and fire substations are available in the immediate area. While the property is within the State Land Use Agricultural and County's Agricultural (A-1 a) zoned district,it is not currently being used for active agricultural purposes. The project site is currently vacant and has been previously bulldozed. The property is unclassified by the State Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawai`i (ALISH) Map and the Land Study Bureau's Overall Master Productivity Rating is "E" or"Very Poor". Thus, the reclassification of this 4-acre area from the Agricultural to the Urban designation will not be detrimental to the reduction of this area from the agricultural land inventory in the County. An Urban classification would complement the existing and future land use patterns of the surrounding properties in view of the nearby commercial/light industrial projects and the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos subdivisions. The Urban classification conforms to the standard to include lands with satisfactory topography, drainage, and reasonably free from the danger of any flood,tsunami, unstable soil condition, and other adverse environmental effects. The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) designates the properties as Zone"X", areas outside the 500-year flood plain. The properties are located approximately 6 miles mauka of the shoreline. All project generated runoff will be disposed of on-site. Based on the above, the approval of the State Land Use Boundary Amendment from the Agricultural to the Urban District complements the State Land Use District Regulations and County General Plan and is supportive of the Hawai`i State Plan. J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 7 Change of Zone The applicant is requesting a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from the Agricultural to the Urban District and a Change of Zone from an Agricultural-1-acre (A-1a) to a Village Commercial 40,000 square foot (CV-40)zoned district for 4.143 acres of land. The applicant is proposing to develop a 54,000-square foot commercial center with an additional 12, 500 feet of an open landscaped area to be used for periodic craft fairs, thespian events and public gatherings. The project will be constructed utilizing LEED certified design standards. The project tentatively includes: • Two (2) three-story structures, each approximately 27,150 square feet in size, which includes anchor tenants, along with day care, tourist driven retail establishments, and an Acute Care Facility on the ground floor. Medical and professional offices would occupy the upper levels. The completed project will include a total of 54,300 square feet of uses with a total of 139 employees. • 230 parking stalls including handicap and loading stalls on permeable paved surfaces • Private water system, which will require the amount of water supply to be consistent with public health and safety needs such as sanitation and fire-fighting, which will consist of about 300,000 gallons of storage. Potable water will have to be trucked in from another area. • Sewage treatment plant • Landscaping The construction cost is estimated at approximately 9.5 million dollars. The applicant will begin site improvements and break ground for structures within 12 months after approvals of permits. In the 1960's, the County approved the subdivision of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos. Hawaiian Ocean View Estates consists of about 11,000 lots, and Hawaiian Ranchos consists of about 1,200 lots. The population of these areas is growing rapidly. In the 2000 census, the Hawaiian Ocean View Census Designated Place had a population of 2178. It had more than doubled since 1990. Rapid growth continues in the area. J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 8 The County Planning Depar truent favors the development of a commercial area within the area fronting these subdivisions to serve this rapidly increasing population. This will give people an opportunity to shop closer to their homes, and provide a location for service-oriented businesses, like offices for doctors, tax preparers, hairdressers, and the whole host of commercial needs generated by a large residential population. The closest town with commercial areas is Na`alehu, about 12 miles away by road. A number of commercial enterprises have been approved near Highway 11, on both sides of the highway. To date, all of these have been approved by Special Permit within the State Land Use Agricultural District except for one Change of Zone(MCX-3a) that is located at the intersection of Hawai`i Boulevard and the highway in close proximity to the subject application. All of the land in the area is within the State Land Use Agricultural District except for the above mentioned rezoned property, which is in the State Land Use Urban District. It is not the correct use of the State Land Use Law to use Special Permits to gradually establish a town center, permit by permit. The Special Permit is a procedure meant to handle unusual situations that arise in the Agricultural District. It creates some flexibility in the Agricultural District, which is otherwise subject to rather limited uses under the state law. But urban areas, like a commercial center, should be situated within the State Land Use Urban District and be properly zoned by the county. The 2005 General Plan established an urban center in this area, centered around the existing Special Permit areas, and put it on the LUPAG map. This change of zone is consistent with the General Plan amendments. In the past, the trend in the area of the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos Subdivisions has been to issue Special Permits for urban types uses in appropriate locations. These established uses include,but are not limited to, a general store, gas station, post office, hardware store,restaurants, and other types of commercial and industrial uses on both sides of the Hawai`i Belt Road (Highway 11) within these two subdivisions. Additionally, there have been several Special Permits approved in the vicinity of the proposed request. These include Special Permit No. 1115, which allowed the establishment of a 18,900-square foot market, a two-story 5,760-square foot building for commercial office and retail space to include prospective tenants such as a real estate office, financial institution, restaurant, video rental, personal services, tourist shop and other use, and a gas station. This proposed development is located on the corner of Lotus Blossom Lane and Hawai`i Belt Road in Hawaiian Ocean View Estates, approximately 400 feet east of the subject property. Special Permit No. 637 was approved to allow the J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 9 establishment of a new hardware store, postal facility and commercial building on approximately 2 acres of land (Ocean View Town Center), which is along the highway within Hawaiian Ocean View Estates, approximately 1,000 feet east of the location of the subject property. Lastly, Special Permit No. 653 was approved to allow a variety of commercial and industrial uses, including an open storage facility, a farmer's market and all uses permitted within the Industrial-Commercial Mixed Use(MCX) zoned district (Pohue Plaza), which is along the highway within Hawaiian Ranchos, approximately 1,300 feet east of the subject property. In 2007, the Hawai`i County Council adopted Ordinance No. 07-99, which amended Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Article 2, Division 4, Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2005 Edition, as amended)by adding a new section relating to concurrency conditions. The council added requirements relating to traffic impacts and water supply relative to the approval of rezonings. To determine whether road conditions are adequate in an area, the ordinance requires some rezoning applications be accompanied by a traffic impact analysis report(TIAR). The ordinance also requires evidence that water is available for the new rezonings. If these requirements are not met, then the rezoning should not be approved or should not take effect unless improvements to traffic and water occur before the occupancy of the project. In Ordinance 07-99, the council addressed the issue of water in rural areas where there is no reasonable prospect of a public water system,but where the county may wish to allow some commercial and possibly light industrial rezonings to serve the growing rural population, such as the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos area. The Council added Section 25-2-46(n), which states "to facilitate the development of village centers in rural areas that are not currently served by a public water system, the council may waive the water supply requirements for rezonings for commercial or light industrial uses in areas that do not currently have a public water system, and where the department of water supply has no plans to build a public water system, and which are(1) designated as an "urban or rural center" or"industrial area" on Table 14-5 of the General Plan and(2) designated for urban use on the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map of the General Plan; provided that conditions of zoning shall require water supply consistent with public health and safety needs such as sanitation and firefighting." The water supply necessary for sanitation and firefighting, in these circumstances, can be handled by requiring adequate storage facilities through conditions of the rezoning. As required by Section 25-2-46(n), the proposed request is designated as a"urban or rural center" and "industrial area" on Table 14-5 of the General Plan and is designated for urban use on the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map of the General Plan (urban expansion area/rural). • J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 10 The proposed Change of Zone from an Agricultural (A-la) to a Village Commercial 40,000 square foot(CV-40)zoned district will conform to, among others, the following goals, policies and standards of the Land Use and Economic General Plan Elements and the General Plan LUPAG Map: In order to consider an area for any type of zoning designation, the applicable goals, policies and standards of the General Plan must be adequately addressed. It is only through such a comprehensive policy analysis approach that evaluations and decisions can be made to better time and stage developments to achieve growth determined by the General Plan and related planning documents. The implication of these evaluations and decisions must be also considered as they may have an impact on similar areas in the County. In a previous General Plan amendment, the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map was amended for the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos Subdivisions area. Hawaiian Ocean View Estates was amended from Extensive Agriculture and Orchards to Rural to recognize its residential-agricultural character. A portion of Hawaiian Ranchos and Hawaiian Ocean View Estates was amended along the highway from Extensive Agriculture to Urban Expansion Area to allow additional lands to accommodate future industrial, commercial, and higher density residential uses to service these large subdivisions. The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide(LUPAG) Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical relationship among the various land uses. The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the County. The proposed request conforms to the LUPAG Map, which designates the property as Urban Expansion Area, which allows for a mix of high density, medium density, low density, industrial, industrial-commercial and/or open designations in areas where new settlements may be desirable,but where the specific settlement pattern and mix of uses have not yet been determined. The proposed change of zone request from A-la to CV- 40 would further the County's goals of providing an economic environment which allows new or existing businesses to expand and diversify the County's economic base, and also increase choice of occupations. The proposed use would be consistent with the following goals, policies and standards of the Economic, Land Use and Commercial Elements of the General Plan: J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 11 Economic Element: • Provide residents with opportunities to improve their quality of life through economic development that enhances the County's natural and social environments. • Economic development and improvement shall be in balance with the physical, social and cultural environments of the island of Hawai`i. • Strive for diversity and stability in its economic system. • Provide an economic environment that allows new, expanded, or improved economic opportunities that are compatible with the County's cultural, natural and social environment. • Strive for an economic climate that provides its residents an opportunity for choice of occupation. • Strive for diversification of the economy by strengthening existing industries and attracting new endeavors. The applicant will be providing residents who live in the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos subdivisions and surrounding subdivisions more opportunities for commercial services and employment, which will be located closer to their residence than traveling to Kona or Hilo for these services. Land Use Element • Designate and allocate land uses in appropriate proportions and mix and in keeping with the social, cultural, and physical environments of the County. • Zone urban- and rural-types of uses in areas with ease of access to community services and employment centers and with adequate public utilities and facilities. • Allocate appropriate requested zoning in accordance with the existing or projected needs of neighborhood, community, region and County. • Encourage the development and maintenance of communities meeting the needs of its residents in balance with the physical and social environment. J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 12 • Zoning requests shall be reviewed with respect to General Plan designation, district goals, regional plans, State Land Use District, compatibility with adjacent zoned uses, availability of public services and utilities, access and public need. Commercial Element: • Provide for commercial developments that maximize convenience to users. • Urban renewal, rehabilitation, and/or redevelopment programs shall be undertaken in cooperation with communities, businesses and governmental agencies. • Distribution of commercial areas shall meet the demands of neighborhood, community and regional needs. • The development of commercial facilities should be designed to fit into the locale with minimal intrusion while providing the desired services. Appropriate infrastructure and design concerns shall be incorporated into the review of such developments. The proposed request is also consistent with the following courses of action for commercial development in the Ka`u District: • Centralization of commercial activity in the communities of Pahala,Na`alehu and Ocean View and the area of the Volcanoes National Park shall be encouraged. • Do not allow strip or spot commercial development on the highway outside of the designated urban areas. The change of zone from an A-la to a CV-40 zoned district will not result in a substantial adverse impact upon the surrounding area, community or region. The properties are located on the mauka side of the Hawai`i Belt Road between Lehua Lane and the Hawai`i Belt Road. The properties total 4.143 acres in size within the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates Subdivision and are generally rectangular in shape. They are currently vacant of any structures or uses. Surrounding properties within the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates Subdivision are approximately one acre in size and zoned Agricultural (A-la)by the County. Lands makai of Hawaii Belt Road within the Hawaiian Ranchos Subdivision are approximately three acres in size and zoned Agricultural (A-3a). Both subdivisions consist primarily of J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 13 scattered residential uses and vacant lands. The nearest dwelling is located across Lehua Lane on the corner of Lehua Lane and Keaka Parkway. The project is reasonably well situated within the urban core for this area. There are three large commercial and/or light industrial projects that have been approved through the Special Permit process within 1,500 feet of this project. This is the central location for residents to travel for these services within this area of Ka`u. Continued development of commercial services in this area should continue to alleviate overall traffic congestion because many employees and residents who live in this area currently commute to places as far away as Kona and Hilo for work and services. All utilities are or will be made available to the project site. Access to the property will be from Lehua Lane, which is a two-lane, private road that has a 20-foot wide asphalt pavement within a 40-foot right-of-way. Lehua Lane is accessed directly from the Hawaii Belt Road. A condition of approval will be added restricting access to the property directly from the Hawaii Belt Road. Based on the requirements of Ordinance 07-99, the applicant has been required to submit a traffic report for the project, which was conducted by Phillip Rowell and Associates. The assessment concluded that 1) the proposed project will generate 69 inbound trips and 18 outbound trips during the morning peak hour and 50 inbound trips and 100 outbound trips during the afternoon peak hour. 2) The level-of-service analysis that all intersections and lane groups will operate at a Level-of-Service A or B, which are the highest levels-of-service. This implies very good operating conditions with minimal delays. Widening to provide additional lanes will not improve the levels-of-service because they are already high. Accordingly, no mitigation is required or recommended. 3) Lehua Lane should be widened to provide two 12-foot lanes, one in each direction, between Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) and Keaka Parkway. 4) The project's civil engineer should confirm that adequate site distances are provided along Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) at the study intersections. Any deficiencies shall be mitigated. 5) The project's civil engineer should determine the viability of providing a separate left turn lane along Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) at Lehua Lane. 6) At the intersection of Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) at Lehua Lane, adequate turning radii should be provided for trucks and other service vehicles to and from the project. The Department of Transportation (DOT) stated that the recommendations within the report should be implemented, which are described above. Additionally, DOT is inclined to require a left-turn lane into Lehua Lane from Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) despite the lack of warrant, yet they deferred to the judgment of the Highways Division- J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 14 Hawai`i District Engineer on this matter and details relating to it. The DOT Highways Division-Hawai`i District Engineer Salvador C. Panem subsequently approved the plans submitted for this project, which did not include a left turn lane from Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) onto Lehua Lane. The HOVE Road Maintenance Corporation (RMC) requested that the developer of Lehua Court rebuild Lehua Lane to County specifications from Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) to Keaka Parkway, which will allow HOVE RMC to dedicate that portion of Lehua Lane to the County. This option would financially jeopardize the project as the applicant would be required to put in County standard paving and curb, gutter and sidewalks along both sides of Lehua Lane from the highway to Keaka Parkway. In a typical commercial rezoning application located within an urban area, a condition of approval may be added requiring the applicant to improve their property frontage with curb, gutter and sidewalks, but not the frontage of other properties. Based on the recommendations of the traffic report and the DOT, the Planning Director is recommending that a condition of approval be added requiring the applicant to improve the pavement width from 20 feet to 24-feet wide(12-foot paved lanes)on Lehua Lane from the Hawai`i Belt Highway to its intersection with Keaka Parkway. Additionally, a condition of approval will be added requiring the applicant to pay for any increase of the road maintenance fee for a commercial business upon the subject properties to the HOVE Community Association and/or the HOVE Road Maintenance Corporation. Additionally,based on Ordinance 07-99, the applicant is required to meet water requirements necessary for sanitation and firefighting by providing adequate storage facilities on-site. The applicant is proposing to construct five(5) large water tanks and have an on-site water reservoir to meet these requirements. Within the Fire Suppression Plan, it appears that there will be over 300,000 gallons stored onsite within the storage tanks and the pond. Additionally, the applicant will be hiring a private water hauling company to truck in potable water for up to 150,000 gallons. A condition of approval will be added allowing the storage and delivery of water on-site meeting with the approval of the Department of Health for sanitation purposes and meeting with the approval of the Fire Department's fire-flow requirements. The Department of Water Supply(DWS) states that there are no DWS facilities in the area. The nearest water system facility is located in Wai`ohinu, approximately 10 miles east of the subject properties. There is a water system within HOVE that accommodates both public and private water users daily from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 15 which is located on a County owned property on Lehua Lane near the subject properties. There are six (6)public water spigots and a private standpipe facility that provides services to ten (10) private customers for water hauling and/or delivery services. The system is serviced by a well and 300,000-gallon water tank, which is located on a County owned property on Paradise Circle Makai. No metered water services will be allowed unless a second well is constructed to provide the required redundancy for a public water system. In the future with improvements, this system may become available to residents in the area, including the applicant. A proposed condition will require that residential uses district including single- family, double-family or multi-family residential uses,boarding facilities, rooming or lodging houses, hotels and lodges be served by a potable water system meeting with the approval of the Department of Water Supply. Normally, CV zoning would allow up to 35 residential units per acre. While the Planning Director supports commercial uses serviced by on-site water storage sufficient for the fire flow purposes, the Department will not support residential uses in the absence of a County-approved water system. A similar CV rezoning in Volcano, Ordinance 03-06, also prohibited residential uses for the same reasons. The applicant is proposing to construct a sewage treatment system for wastewater, which will meet the requirements of the Department of Health. Utilities, including telephone and electrical services, are available to the site. The closest police and fire station is located in Na`alehu, approximately twelve (12) miles from the property. Police and fire substations are available in the immediate area. The property has no severe geological or topographical problems which cannot be properly rectified or which would render the land unusable. The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) designates the property as Zone"X", areas outside the 500- year flood plain. The property is located approximately 6 miles mauka of the shoreline. All project generated runoff will be disposed of on-site. The request is not contrary to Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statues, relating to Coastal Zone Management. The property is not located in the Special Management Area. The site is located mauka of the Hawai`i Belt Road, is not an oceanfront property, and will not be impacted by coastal hazard and beach erosion. There is no record of a designated public access that traverses the property. No valued cultural, historical or natural resources exist on the property and there is no evidence of any J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 16 traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the site. Thus, it is not anticipated that the proposed request will have any adverse impact on cultural or historical resources in the area. The request will not have a significant adverse impact to traditional and customary Hawaiian Rights. In view of the Hawai`i State Supreme Court's"PASH" and"Ka Pa'akai 0 Ka'Aina"decisions, the issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights must be addressed in terms of the cultural, historical, and natural resources and the associated traditional and customary practices of the site: Investigation of valued resources: No formal archaeological reconnaissance survey, oral history of kamaaina accounts of the area, historical survey of documentary records was submitted with the applications. The applicant did submit a botanical survey and fauna survey of the properties. The valuable cultural,historical, and natural resources found in the permit area: As the property was grubbed in the past, an archaeological inventory survey of the site was not conducted. In a letter to the applicant dated June 14, 2006 from the Department of Land and Natural Resources-Historic Preservation Division, DLNR-SHPD stated that they believe no historic properties will be affected by this undertaking because residential development/urbanization has altered the land and that the subject parcel is identified by Sato et. Al 1973 as Aa lava flows, and the aerial photos contained in that document show development in the late 1960's. Their staff is familiar with the area and the parcel, and has not noted any historic properties on the parcel. Therefore, DLNR-SHPD concluded that a"no historic properties determination" is appropriate for this parcel. Possible adverse effect or impairment of valued resources: Established standards and controls to manage potential negative effects should effectively limit and mitigate foreseeable long-term impacts. The property does not abut the shoreline, therefore Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights is not an issue. Feasible actions to protect native Hawaiian rights. To the extent to which traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights are exercised, the proposed action will not affect traditional Hawaiian rights and no action is necessary to protect these rights. A condition of approval will be included to require the applicant to notify the DLNR-SHPD should any unidentified sites or remains be encountered, and proceed only upon an archaeological clearance from the DLNR-SHPD. J Yoshimoto, Council Chair and Members of the County Council Page 17 Based on the above findings, the change of zone from Agricultural-1 acre (A-1a) to Village Commercial 40,000 square foot(CV-40) would result in an appropriate land use pattern and further benefit the general public. For your favorable consideration, enclosed are the draft bills to amend the State Land Use Boundary Maps for the County of Hawai`i and Section 25-8-28 (Ka`u District Zone Map), Article 8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) are provided. We are enclosing copies of the staff Background, Planning Director's Recommendation Reports, and the Powerpoint presentation for your information. Sincerely, \/ 5E' Myles Miyasato, Chairman Pro-tem Windward Planning Commission L.Foulkslu 12-036rez 12-0160wpc2 Enclosures cc: Lehua Court LLC/Ohia Properties Department of Public Works Depai tinent of Water Supply Department of Land &Natural Resources-HPD DOT-Highways, Honolulu State Land Use Commission William Brilhante, Esq., Corporation Counsel Planning Department- Kona BFouIkSLUREZ..jwd 05-23-14 COUNTY OF HAWAI`I PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT DR. WILLIAM C. FOULK STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT (SLU 12-000036) CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 12-000160) DR. WILLIAM C. FOULK has submitted applications for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from the Agricultural to the Urban District and a Change of Zone from an Agricultural 1-acre(A-la)to a Village Commercial 40,000-square foot (CV-40) zoning district for 4.143 acres of land. The properties are located in the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates Subdivision on the north(mauka) side of the Hawaii Belt Road, west of Lehua Lane at Kahuku, Ka`u, Hawaii, TMK: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041 and 042. PROPOSED ACTION 1. Request: The applicant is requesting the following: • State Land Use Boundary Amendment from the Agricultural to the Urban District for 4.143 acres; and a • Change of Zone from A-la to CV-40 for 4.142 acres. The applicant is proposing to develop a 54,000-square foot commercial center with an additional 12,500 feet of an open landscaped area to be used for periodic craft fairs, thespian events and public gatherings. The project will be constructed utilizing LEED certified design standards. The project tentatively includes: • Two (2)three-story structures, each approximately 27,150 square feet in size, which includes anchor tenants, along with day care, tourist driven retail establishments, and an Acute Care Facility on the ground floor. Medical and professional offices would occupy the upper levels. A list of business uses including the amount of square feet for each use and the amount of employees for each use is attached within the application. It includes a total of 54,300 square feet of uses with a total of 139 employees. • 230 parking stalls including handicap and loading stalls on permeable paved surfaces. Re: Comm. 939/Bills 267 & 268 • Private water system that supports the public health and safety needs of the project such as sanitation and fire-fighting. • Sewage treatment plant. • Landscaping. (Planning Department Exhibit 1 —Change of Zone and State Land Use Boundary Applications) 2. Village Commercial Zoning District: According to the Zoning Code, the purpose of the Village Commercial zoning district is to provide a broad range or variety of commercial and light industrial uses that are necessary to serve the population in rural areas where the supplementary support of the general business uses and activities of a central commercial district is not readily available. Requirements for establishing a land use in the CV district, including a list of the variety of permitted land uses, are shown in Section 25-5-120 to 128 of the Zoning Code. (Planning Department Exhibit 2— Zoning Code Requirements for Village Commercial Districts) 3. Cost: The cost of the development is estimated to be approximately$9.5 million. 4. Project timetable: The applicant will begin site improvements and break ground for structures within 12 months after approvals of permits. 5. Landowner: The landowner of the properties is Lehua Court, LLC (William Stockton and Stephen Sahines). The landowner has authorized the applicant to submit the proposed requests. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 6. State Land Use Designation: Agricultural. 7. GP LUPAG Map: Urban Expansion Area. Planning Director Chris Yuen determined that the Urban Expansion Area GP LUPAG designation in the Hawaiian Ranchos Subdivision goes across the highway to include properties along the highway in the Hawaiian Ocean View Subdivision, which includes the subject properties. 8. County Zoning: Agricultural (A-1a). 9. Ordinance No. 07-99: On June 25, 2007, the Hawaii County Council adopted Ordinance No. 07-99, which amended Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Article 2, Division 4, Hawaii County Code 1983 (2005 Edition, as amended) by adding a new section related to concurrency conditions. The council found that because of road congestion in Hawai`i -2- County, it is necessary to assess the traffic impacts of major developments, and if they will add traffic to roads that are now congested, or will foreseeably be congested in the future, that the rezoning should not take effect unless improvements to the traffic situation occur before the occupancy of the project. At the same time, the council recognizes that the lack of affordable housing near employment centers is one of the factors that creates traffic problems,by forcing workers to commute long distances, and does not want to inhibit the supply of affordable housing. In addition there are situations where commercial or light industrial rezoning may be desirable to reduce traffic. For example, thousands of homes are being built in rural subdivisions approved in the 1950's and 1960's,mostly in Puna and Ka`u. These generally have no areas zoned for commercial and light industrial uses, and development of these necessary services has not kept pace with the movement of population to these areas. The council also found that it is desirable to have standard expectations for water supply for new rezonings. In some rural areas,however, there is no reasonable prospect of a public water system,but the County may wish to allow some commercial and possibly light industrial rezoning to serve the growing rural population. In these circumstances, the water supply necessary for sanitation and firefighting can be handled by requiring adequate storage facilities. 10. Special Management Area (SMA): The Special Management Area is a part of the Coastal Zone Management Program and regulated by the County. The properties are approximately 6 miles from the nearest coastline and are not located within the Special Management Area. OTHER SIMILAR USES IN THE AREA 11. Change of Zone Ordinance No. 11-000011: On February 23, 2011, the County Council approved Change of Zone Ordinance No. 11-000011 to change the zoning district from A-la to MCX-3a for TMK:9-2-082:002,which is 3.183 acres in size. The State Land Use Boundary was also changed from Agricultural to Urban. The applicant proposed to develop three (3) mini storage structures totaling 7,800 square feet in size. This was the first property to be rezoned in Hawaiian Ocean View Estates as a result of the on-site water storage allowance within Ordinance No. 07-99, as referenced above. 12. Special Permit No. 1115: On August 14, 2001, the Planning Commission approved Special Permit No. 1115 to Michael Bell to allow the establishment of a gas station,mini -3- mart, restroom, self-storage facility and related improvements on 1.88 acres of land. The applicant sold the property to Burt Kamagaki in September 2004. As the proposed uses were never constructed, the new applicant/landowner requested a modification to the approved uses on the property to a) delete the proposed self-storage facility;b) convert the proposed 3,000-square foot mini mart into a 15,600-square foot market; c) construct a two-story 5,760-square foot building for commercial office and retail space to include prospective tenants such as a real estate office, financial institution,restaurant, video rental, personal services, tourist shop and other uses; and d) retain the proposed gas station. The amendment was approved by the Planning Commission on June 17, 2005 subject to Condition No. 6, which limited the square footage of the proposed market to 15,600 square feet. Lastly, on December 6, 2006 the Planning Commission approved an amendment to Condition No. 6 to increase the size of the market from 15,600 square feet to 18,900 square feet, which included no more than 3,000 square feet for a mezzanine and 300 square feet for a mechanical room. This property is located on TMK: 9-2-093:047, which is in close proximity to the properties associated with this application. 13. Special Permit No. 637: On January 15, 1987, the Planning Commission approved Special Permit No. 637 to Quentin Arbo to allow the establishment of a new hardware store, postal facility and commercial building on approximately 2 acres of land. This is the site of the Ocean View Town Center, which is in close proximity of the subject properties. 14. Special Permit No. 653: On December 8, 1987, the Planning Commission approved Special Permit No. 653 to allow the continuation of existing commercial/industrial uses (convenience store, small postal facility, service station,real estate office,hardware store and concrete batching plant) and approved new commercial and industrial-related uses (post office, supermarket, gift shop, laundromat,barbershop,beauty salon, insurance, legal, medical and veterinarian offices, TV/radio appliance shop, including repairs, restaurant/drive-inn, general dry goods store, warehouse, woodcraft workshop and mechanical repair shop) on 14.75 acres of land. On November 1, 2002, the Planning Commission approved an amendment to allow a variety of commercial and industrial uses, including an open storage facility, a farmer's market and all uses permitted within -4- the Industrial-Commercial Mixed Use(MCX) zoned district. This is the site of Pohue Plaza, which is in close proximity of the subject properties. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA 15. Subject Properties: The properties are located on the mauka side of the Hawai`i Belt Road between Lehua Lane, Keaka Parkway and the Hawai`i Belt Road. The properties are approximately 4.143 acres in size and consist of 4 separate parcels within the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates Subdivision. The properties are generally rectangular in shape. They are currently vacant of any structures or uses. 16. Surrounding Zoning/Land Uses: Surrounding properties within the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates Subdivision are approximately one acre in size and zoned Agricultural (A-la)by the County. Lands makai of Hawai`i Belt Road within the Hawaiian Ranchos Subdivision are approximately three acres in size and zoned Agricultural (A-3a). Both subdivisions primarily consist of scattered residential and agricultural uses, and vacant lands. The nearest dwelling is located across Lehua Lane on the corner of Lehua Lane and Keaka Parkway. 17. ALISH: Unclassified. 18. Land Study Bureau's Detailed Land Classification System: "E"or"Very Poor". 19. U.S. Soil Survey: Lava Flows,A`a(rLV). This lava has almost no soil covering and is rough and broken. This lava is bare of vegetation except for a few small ohia trees, lantana and similar herbaceous, drought-resistant plants. 20. FIRM: Zone "X", area determined to be outside the 500-year flood plain. 21. Flora/Fauna Resources: The applicant submitted a botanical survey and a fauna survey of the properties. The botanical survey lists several alien species observed on-site. Dominant species are Paspalum grasses and Leucaena glauca. No rare or endangered species were noted. The fauna survey stated that the observations and known sightings are comprised almost entirely of introduced species of birds and mammals. It is possible that two endemic Hawaiian creatures classified as endangered by the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service may enter or fly over the project site. These are the Hawaiian Hawk (I`o), and the Hawaiian Bat. 22. Archaeological/Historical/Cultural Resources: In a letter dated June 14, 2006 from the Department of Land and Natural Resources-Historic Preservation Division, -5- DLNR-SHPD stated that they believe no historic properties will be affected by this undertaking because residential development/urbanization has altered the land. Additionally, the subject parcels are identified by Sato et. al 1973 as `a`a lava flows and the aerial photos contained in that document show development in the late 1960's. DLNR Staff has indicated that they are familiar with the area and the parcels, and has not noted any historic properties on the parcels. Therefore, DLNR-SHPD concluded that a no historic properties determination is appropriate for this project. 23. Public Access: There is no record of a designated public access to the shoreline or mountain areas that traverses the properties. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 24. Access: Although the project site borders the Hawai`i Belt Road, access to the properties will be from Lehua Lane, which is a two-lane,private road that has a 20-foot wide asphalt pavement within a 40-foot right-of-way. Lehua Lane is accessed directly from the Hawai`i Belt Road. 25. Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR): A Traffic Impact Assessment Report of the project was conducted by Phillip Rowell and Associates. The assessment concluded that 1) the proposed project will generate 69 inbound trips and 18 outbound trips during the morning peak hour and 50 inbound trips and 100 outbound trips during the afternoon peak hour. 2) The level-of-service analysis that all intersections and lane groups will operate at a Level-of-Service A or B,which are the highest levels-of-service. This implies very good operating conditions with minimal delays. Widening to provide additional lanes will not improve the levels-of-service because they are already high. Accordingly, no mitigation is required or recommended. 3) Lehua Lane should be widened to provide two 12-foot lanes, one in each direction,between Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) and Keaka Parkway. 4) The project's civil engineer should confirm that adequate site distances are provided along Highwayl l (Hawai`i Belt Road) at the study intersections. Any deficiencies shall be mitigated. 5) The project's civil engineer should determine the viability of providing a separate left turn lane along Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) at Lehua Lane. 6) At the intersection of SR 11 at Lehua Lane, adequate turning radii should be provided for trucks and other service vehicles to and from the project. The Department of Transportation (DOT) submitted comments in a -6- letter dated October 25, 2010. They stated that the recommendations within the report should be implemented, which are described above. Additionally, DOT is inclined to require a left-turn lane into Lehua Lane from Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) despite the lack of warrant, yet they will defer to the judgment of the Highways Division-Hawai`i District Engineer on this matter and details relating to it. In a letter dated March 23, 2012, the Highways Division-Hawai`i District Engineer Salvador C. Panem approved the plans submitted for this project, which did not include a left turn lane from Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) onto Lehua Lane. Lastly, the HOVE Road Maintenance Corporation(RMC) submitted a comment letter dated April 25, 2014 requesting that the developer of Lehua Court rebuild Lehua Lane to County specifications from Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road)to Keaka Parkway, thus allowing HOVE RMC to dedicate that portion of Lehua Lane to the County. 26. Water: According to the applicant, a new private water system will be provided to meet the requirements and recommendations of the County of Hawai`i Fire Department and the State Department of Health for water. The applicant is proposing to construct five(5) large water tanks and have an on-site water reservoir to meet these requirements. Within the Fire Suppression Plan submitted within Planning Department Exhibit 13, it appears that there will be over 300,000 gallons stored onsite within the storage tanks and pond. Additionally, the applicant will be hiring a private water hauling company to truck in potable water for up to 150,000 gallons. The Department of Water Supply(DWS) states that there are no DWS facilities in the area. The nearest water system facility is located in Wai`ohinu, approximately 10 miles east of the subject properties. There is a water system within HOVE that accommodates both public and private water users daily from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., which is located on a County owned property on Lehua Lane near the subject properties. There are six (6)public water spigots and a private standpipe facility that provides services to ten(10)private customers for water hauling and/or delivery services. The system is serviced by a well and 300,000-gallon water tank, which is located on a County owned property on Paradise Circle Makai. No metered water services will be allowed unless a second well is constructed to provide the required redundancy for a public water system. -7- 27. Wastewater: The applicant is proposing to put in a sewage treatment plant to service the proposed neighborhood commercial center improvements. 28. Essential Utilities and Services: Utilities, including telephone and electrical services, are available to the site. The closest police and fire station is located in Na`alehu, approximately twelve (12)miles from the properties. AGENCY AND ORGANIZATION COMMENTS 29. Department of Water Supply: (Planning Department Exhibit 3—November 27,2012 Memo) 30. Department of Environmental Management: (Planning Department Exhibit 4— November 5, 2012 Memo) 31. Police Department: (Planning Department Exhibit 5—November 14,2012 Memo) 32. Fire Department: (Planning Department Exhibit 6—November 9, 2012 Memo) 33. Department of Land and Natural Resources-Land Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 7—November 27, 2012 Letter) 34. Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 8—November 14,2012 Letter 35. Department of Health: (Planning Department Exhibit 9—November 7, 16,26 & 29, 2012 Memos) 36. Department of Transportation: (Planning Department Exhibit 10— October 25, 2010 and March 23,2012 Letters) 37. HOVE Road Maintenance Corporation: (Planning Department Exhibit 11 — April 25, 2014 Letter) AGENCIES -NO RESPONSE 38. Department of Public Works, State Land Use Commission, Office of Planning and HOVE Community Association. APPLICANT'S SUBMITTAL 39. The applicant has submitted the following additional information: • Submittal with information about community contacts regarding the proposed project, including a letter dated October 16, 2012 from Kirk and Sherry Mattos, who are the nearest neighbors to the project site: (Planning Department Exhibit 12—Community Contact and Mattos Letters) -8- • Submittal from Peter J.K. Dahlberg, P.E. with information of how the project will meet the water requirement for the Department of Health and the Fire Department: (Planning Department Exhibit 13—Letter dated March 11, 2014 from Peter Dahlberg, P.E. with Attachment Letters) PUBLIC COMMENTS 40. As of the date of this writing, the Planning Department has not received any written comments or objections from the general public or adjacent landowners on the subject applications. -9- LEHUA COURT, LLC. ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT LEHUA COURT, Lic., RE-ZONE TMK: 9—2—093: 039, 040, 041, 042 KAPUA, DISTRICT OF KA'U PREPARED BY: DR. WILLIAM C. FOULK PARTHENON GROUP, INC. AIA 75-5656 KUAKINI HIGHWAY SUITE 301 KAILUA KONA, HAWAII 96740 Planning Dept. Exhibit, 1 . CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Type or legibly print the requested information) IAPPLICANT: APPLICANTS SIGNATURE: DATE: g ' 12_ • ADDRESS: 1,9ee? " kJ F-1l41/4-? 1 LIST APPLICANT'S INTEREST IF NOT OWNER_ LIST PRINClP AL(S)INCLUDING NAMES OF MAIN OFFICERS: PITIONE:(Bus.) ' s==14-ASJ. (Res-) (Fax) LANDOWNER(S): Lelt Vet. C44.. T {_Le_ LANDOWNER SIGNATURE(S); /VW DATE: q— J LANDOWNER(S) ADDRESS: P -2--7 I . 1‘iliar bk:Vv4 et 7457-2-713 REQUEST: I 4/a.— TO kE-sisting zoninu) (Pt opo-:ed Zoning) TAX MAP KEY: 9 2 1 40,_--h 4z STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: SIZE OF PROPERTY OR AFFECTED AREA(S)TO BE REZONED: IIAGENT: , ADDRESS: TELEPHONE:(Dus.) (Res.) (Fax) Please indicate to whom original correspondence and copies should.be sent. ORIGINAL. ifl COPIES: C)I-A.1),,,102.c STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (15 ACRES OR LESS) COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Type or legibly print the requested information) PETITIONER: /w' � � C �.t J PETITIONER'S SIGNATURE: ASA DATE: •- •-- (z ADDRESS: r'Ii� ° �� 14_1_44444 U' LI I� • (� � 1-11 6-14.1c PETITIONER'S INTEREST IF NOT OWNER: '....111m C TELEPHONE:(Bus.) 4 en44 ,e7. (Res.) (Fax) 1 LANDOWNER(S): L/4.. et9(./ir L L e., LANDOWNER SIGNATURE(S): RAO 'f7/0A DATE: q- 6-- 2-o I -2- (May be by letter) ADDRESS: f!' Y"+x TAX MAP KEY: 9 e Z - ; } 4 42 STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ZONING: ,j •, SIZE OF PROPERTY: 44. 142 CURRENT STATE LAND USE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION: J ' ciJI4)J REQUESTED STATE LAND USE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION: AGENT: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE:(Bus:) (Res.) (Fax) Please indicate to whom original correspondence and copies should be sent. ORIGINAL: $..11" COPIES: 1 JL .C5 (See Instructions on Reverse Side) .• PLANNING DEPARTMENT j County of Hawaii ATTACHMENT L _ N 1)A C Q U R T' L L 4.5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy. - , Commercial, RM, Resort, & Industrial Kaitua-Kona, HI 96740 RECEIVED OCT 2 4 2012 PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF HAWAII _._I APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE 1 . if your request is approved, do you intend to subdivide the subject land in accordance with the approved change I of zone? A Al 1 If yes, please answer the rest of question I and then to I question 3. a. How many acres of the requested area do you intend to subdivide? • b. Into what lot sizes? • _.. c. if your request is approved, approximately how long after the date of approval do you expect to submit your subdivision plans to the Planning Department for preliminary approval? If you intend to subdivide, please submit a preliminary I schematic subdivision plan together with your change of . 1 zone application form. . ) 2. If you nave no firm plans of subdividing the subject area, do you intend to: a. Sell or lease the land to someone who has firm plans? kIl 1 b. Sell or lease the land to someone who has tentative 1 plans? +0 O i c. Sell or lease the land to someone who has no plans? ' K C d. Keep it? is C' e. other (please state) ____________ ____ i ' / r i � ' Have you performed any study which discusses the \ environmental impacts your request would nave on the surrounding area and/or the County? 1 / If so, please el8borate on your findings in the space 7 provided below. 11 '� � � �� �� �� ���~�^. �/��'� �� ��-�� ���� H �~ �� TO h� u l�� • ~ . _ rl 71 F k.1 |:- � _] rr . . 6. Are there any buildings on the subject area? � ]�7 /���� - ' If so, what kind? r � Wbat du yoo iuteod to do *itb tbuao buildiuga if yooz zeguest ia appzoved? ., 7. Is the subject land currently being used for any /10 _/ agricultural activity? ' if so, please list the kinds of products grown on and _] bow many square feet or acres of land per product? <-' . . • , -�- --'-__— --__- . .. __'_- ___-' -- For those checked "yes, " please elaborate what type or kinds of improvements and/or assistance are needed. 11. Have you performed any historic sites study and/or survey of the subject area? If so, what were the results? Please, also, submit a copy of the study together with this change of zone l] supplement. c ATI A fi4M Signature: (A./ 4/,41 Address: ,R O&,e- / � 27 / �/v4� 64 � �c Chi 744" Telephone: gob ( p `7 2.5q Date: , l 72-... 1 _J 1 • I _5_ 6338A/50A - _ ..__.__. . P. D. 5/84 LEHUA COURT, LLC. A.) SUBJECT REQUEST 1. Details of the Proposed Development a. Project Description A 54,000 SF neighborhood commercial center is proposed, with an additional 12,500 of open landscape area to be used for periodic craft fairs, thespian events, and public gatherings. The neighborhood center will have three levels of commercial space, with anchor tenants on the ground floor [a lumber company has shown interest for example], along with day care and tourist driven retail and an Acute Care Facility. Medical and professional offices would occupy the upper levels. An E-commute charter high school is an ideal use for upper level space as well. The campus of commercial buildings would be of a LEED certified design. Permeable paving, high-albedo roofing, wind generated power,water collection and a site water feature that would store energy and act as a viable wetlands —designed and installed under the supervision of the James Audobon Society — are all part of the project. Recycling and sustainability would be demonstrated for the community and other developers to get a `hands-on' experience. Large portions of the land would remain open and endemic plantings are proposed in landscaped areas. Research on endemic plant migrations due to global warming can be carried out on site by UH Hilo biologists who will be consulted in the landscape patterning and layout. b. Statement of Objectives and Reason for the Request The objective is to provide additional professional and retail space to accommodate continuing and future growth in this district. Facilities will also service the more than I million visitors who pass through on their way to visit Volcano National Park each year. The reason for the request is to attain proper zoning to allow this objective to be met. c. Number of acres/square feet The four lots combined total 4.142 acres; 180,415 SF d. Proposed Floor Area of Proposed Building Envelope 54,000 SF enclosed space distributed over two three story buildings is proposed, with an additional 12,500 SF of landscaped area that may be used for various functions. e. Timeframe and Cost The proposed development timetable is to begin site improvements within 12 months, and to break ground for structures before winter of 2013. Estimated cost of all improvements is nine million five hundred thousand dollars ($9,500,000). f. Membership size/number of employees and clientele Visitors to the center should tally in the hundreds per day, depending on the unit mix. The highest visitor mix was used for traffic study purposes. Over 50 employees will likely be on site daily. TMK: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 1 LEHUA COURT, LLC. g. Parking Arrangement Parking is distributed through 3 general areas on the combined parcel. 230 parking stalls are proposed in a conforming ratio of handicap,compact and full-size stalls.Loading zones are also provided in conformance with County requirements. h. Traffic Impacts Traffic will be distributed between local trips and already existing visitor trips. Local trips will lessen Mamalahoa traffic to Kailua Kona facilities. Traffic service levels will remain close to the same(see attached Traffic Study). i. Other Related Information DNA j. Proposed On-site and Off-site Infrastructure A sewage treatment plant will be constructed on-site, as will water features and water tanks to hold water for the project need and required fire suppression. Wind and solar power will augment Helco supplied electricity. Permeable paving will help filter run-off, and additional drainage will be stored for irrigation of landscaping and other gray water uses. Off-site improvements will be limited to Lehua Lane fronting the project, and the Lehua Lane/Mamalahoa intersection where improvements required by the State of Hawaii DOT will be made. B.) CONFORMANCE WITH STATE/COUNTY PLANS 2. State Land Use Designation While the property is within the State Land Use Agricultural and County's Agricultural (A-1 a) zoned district, it is not currently being used for active agricultural purposes. The project site is currently vacant and has been previously bulldozed. The property is unclassified by the State Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii(ALISH)Map and the Land Study Bureau's Overall Master Productivity Rating is "E" or "Very Poor". Thus, the reclassification of this 4-acre area from the Agricultural to the Urban designation will not be detrimental to the reduction of this area from the agricultural land inventory in the County. An Urban classification would complement the existing and future land use patterns of the surrounding properties in view of the nearby commercial light industrial projects and the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos subdivisions. The Urban classification conforms to the standard to include lands with satisfactory topography, drainage, and reasonably free from the danger of any flood, tsunami, unstable soil condition, and other adverse environmental effects. The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIR..\l) designates the properties as Zone "X", areas outside the 500-year flood plain. The properties are located approximately 6 miles mauka of the shoreline.All project generated run off will be disposed of on-site. 3. How the proposed use is not contrary to Chapter 205A,Coastal Zone Management(existing public access,scenic or open space resources,coastal view planes,and coastal ecosystems): TMK: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 2 LEHUA COURT, LLC. The request is not contrary to Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statues, relating to Coastal Zone Management.The properties are not located in the Special Management Area. The site is located mauka of the Hawaii Belt Road, is not an oceanfront property, and will not be impacted by coastal hazard and beach erosion. There is no record of a designated public access that traverses the properties. No valued cultural,historical or natural resources exist on the properties and there is no evidence of any traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the site. Thus, it is not anticipated that the proposed request will have any adverse impact on cultural or historical resources in the area. 4. Applicable Goals Policies and Objectives of the General Plan& 5. General Plan Designation(LUPAG Map) The reclassification action also conforms to the following goals, policies and standards of the Land Use and Economic General Plan Elements and the General' Plan LUPAG Map: The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical relationship among the various land uses. The LUP AG Map establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the County. The proposed request conforms to the LUP AG Map, which designates the properties as Urban Expansion Area,which allows for a mix of high density, medium density, low density, industrial, industrial-commercial and/or open designations in areas where new settlements may be desirable,but where the specific settlement pattern and mix of uses have not yet been determined. The reclassification request would further the County's goals of providing an economic environment that allows new or existing businesses to expand and diversify the County's economic base, and also increase choice of occupations. The proposed use would be consistent with the following goals, policies and standards of the Economic, Land Use and Commercial Elements of the General Plan. Economic Element: • Provide residents with opportunities to improve their quality of life through economic development' that enhances the County's natural and social environments. • Economic development and improvement shall be in balance with the physical, social and cultural environments of the island of Hawaii. • Strive for diversity and stability in its economic system. • Provide an economic environment that allows new, expanded, or improved economic opportunities that are compatible with the County's cultural, natural and social environment. • Strive for an economic climate that provides its residents an opportunity for choice of occupation. • Strive for diversification of the economy by strengthening existing industries and attracting new endeavors. The applicant will be providing residents who live in the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos subdivisions and surrounding subdivisions more opportunities for commercial services and employment,which will be located closer to their residence than traveling to Kona or Hilo for these services. Land Use Element: TMK: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 3 LEHUA COURT, LLC. • Designate and allocate land uses in appropriate proportions and mix and in keeping with the social,cultural, and physical environments of the County. • Zone urban-and rural-types of uses in areas with ease of access to community services and employment centers and with adequate public utilities and facilities. • Allocate appropriate requested zoning in accordance with the existing or projected needs of neighborhood,community,region and County. • Encourage the development and maintenance of communities meeting the needs of its residents in balance with the physical and social environment. • Zoning requests shall be reviewed with respect to General Plan designation, district goals, regional plans, State Land Use District, compatibility with adjacent zoned uses,availability of public services and utilities, access and public need. Commercial Element: • Provide for commercial developments that maximize convenience to users. • Urban renewal,rehabilitation,and/or redevelopment programs shall be undertaken in cooperation with communities,businesses and governmental agencies. • Distribution of commercial areas shall meet the demands of neighborhood, community and regional needs. • The development of commercial facilities should be designed to fit into the locale with minimal intrusion while providing the desired services. Appropriate infrastructure and design concerns shall be incorporated into the review of such developments. 6. Zoning While the property is within the County's Agricultural (A-1 a) zoned district, it is not currently being used for active agricultural purposes. The project site is currently vacant and has been previously bulldozed. The property is unclassified by the State Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH) Map and the Land Study Bureau's Overall Master Productivity Rating is "E" or "Very Poor". Thus, the reclassification of this 3-acre area from the Agricultural to the Urban designation will not be detrimental to the reduction of this area from the agricultural land inventory in the County. Rezoning this parcel to CV-40 would complement the existing and future land use patterns of the surrounding properties in view of the nearby commercial light industrial projects and the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos subdivisions and would conform to the zoning types suggested by an Urban designation. 7. Community Development Plan The Ka'u District CPD is currently in process and has not been approved in a final form. The construction of this project will be within the spirit of known drafts of that plan, and ultimate conformance to the CDP will have to be determined at the Plan Approval stage. 8. Special Management Area The proposed project is not located in a Special Management Area. C.) PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROPERTY AND THE SURROUNDING AREA Physical Characteristics/Environmental Setting: TMK: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 4 LEHUA COURT, LLC. 9. Description of subject property,location,climate,topography,slope,soils(including size, shape,existing structures): The neighborhood commercial center improvements are proposed for a vacant site located just across the Mamalahoa Highway from Hawaiian Ranchos Subdivision; bounded by Lehua Lane,Keaka Parkway, the Mamalahoa Highway and 1 acre agricultural lots (Figure 1.0). The combined site totals 4.142 acres; 180,415 SF of slightly sloping land with both ocean and mountain views. The slopes of Mauna Loa are visible to the east. The northern boundary of the parcel runs along Keaka Parkway. To the southeast and west are existing agricultural lots. An easement for access also adjoins the southern boundary. The neighborhood commercial center improvements do not adjoin notable archaeological features. The Ka'u area is known for its mild climate. Rainfall averages less than 30 inches annually in this area on the flank of Mauna Loa. Average temperatures range in the mid-seventies, with daytime highs mitigated by light onshore winds. Nighttime and early mornings enjoy cooling catabatic winds dropping from the higher slopes of Mauna Loa. The site topography is slightly sloping from Lehua Lane to Highway 11. Average grade is 1 to 2%beginning at a point about 2,092 feet above sea level. There is a prominent lava depression on the lot adjoining the highway, about 12 feet below the surrounding grade. The highest point on site is 2,100 feet MSL. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service Survey (1973) classified the soil as Kapua —A'a complex. Pahoehoe lava is the substrate,with up to 30% of the site occupied by lava outcrops. The character of this soil is a well-drained, thin organic soil layer over Pahoehoe lava bedrock. This soil combination is unsuitable for agriculture and extremely limited for all(agrarian)uses. 10. Lava Hazard Zone Lava Hazard Zone 2. 11. Distance from Coastline Approximately 6 miles. 12. Agricultural Lands of Importance in the State of Hawaii(ALISH)designation The property is unclassified by the State Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii(ALISH)Map. 13. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Services Soil Service Report soil type • The U.S. Soil Conservation Service Survey(1973) classified the soil as Kapua—A'a complex. Pahoehoe lava is the substrate, with up to 30% of the site occupied by lava outcrops. The character of this soil is a well-drained, thin organic soil layer over Pahoehoe lava bedrock. This soil combination is unsuitable for agriculture and extremely limited for all (agrarian)uses. 14. Land Study Bureau soil rating The Land Study Bureau's Overall Master Productivity Rating is"E" or"Very Poor". 15. Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)designation ry= TMK: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 5 LEHUA COURT, LLC. The project site is within the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (F.I.R.M.) Zone `X'; the proposed site is not within the 100-year tsunami inundation zone or the coastal high hazard area. There is no history of flood or tsunami drainage on this site in territorial times. 16. Existing drainage ways or improvements There is no storm drainage system in this area. Drainage from the existing improvements will be significantly altered within the boundary of the property. The balance of the site currently percolates into the ground; this feature will be retained with the progressive use of permeable concrete paving and natural aerobic water treatment systems within the parking areas. No portion of this site is within a drainage tributary;no portions of the area are within flood or impact(surf)zones. There are no unusual erosion or flood problems. 17. Air/noise/water quality 1 Air Quality: Construction activities typically generate visible smoke and odors from diesel engines and moving equipment. These effects are temporary and will cease at the end of construction. Site work can generate fugitive dust; the nature of these improvements will require significant site preparation. The State of Hawaii requires that all activities comply with Chapter 43, Air Pollution Control Regulations of The Department of Health. As well as complying with these standards, all work will also comply with any County and Federal air quality restrictions, including EPA volatile organic compound(VOC) emission regulations. Following construction and upon occupancy, long-term air quality will be affected by the automobile emissions of clients and patrons. This additional pollution is expected to be relatively minor and will not exceed allowable state and federal standards. Noise: This project will generate noise of varying levels and duration during all phases of the grading and construction. Noise levels will depend on the equipment or construction activity, with different intensities expected for foundation, fmish work and landscaping. Construction equipment will be conventional, as will construction means and methods. The most noise will likely occur during grading and concrete mixing for foundations; this work is expected to last up to 60 days. It is likely that subsurface conditions will require the use of pneumatic equipment for some areas and tasks. The use of explosives is not expected. Excessive noise from construction can be relieved somewhat by the proper maintenance of mixing equipment and regular servicing of mufflers and exhaust systems. Restrictions on operating hours for noise emitting equipment and devices will be maintained. All construction will occur during daylight hours and on normal workdays, thereby reducing disturbing noise and vibrations to passing vehicles, residents and pedestrians. A noise permit will be obtained from the State Department of Health if required and all noise reduction requirements and regulations will be complied with. Water Quality: Construction activities and methods are not expected to generate disturbances to quality nor the balance of the offshore waters ecosystem; these proposed neighborhood commercial center improvements do not adjoin the shoreline, so no measures will be required to prevent alterations to the existing shoreline or the 40' shoreline setback area. TMK: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 6 :4 LEHUA COURT, LLC. Historic Resources: 18. Existing archaeological,cultural or historic sites on National Register or Hawaii Register: None; see attached letters of no effect from the State of Hawaii. Natural Resources: 19. Existing floral/faunal resources See Attached Flora and Fauna Surveys 20. Scenic or Coastal Resources The low lying nature of the site in reference to the surrounding highway and house lots above prevent the development from blocking ocean or mountain views form the public way. Valued Cultural Resources: 21. Identify any traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights that are exercised in the area; the extent in which the proposed development will affect these rights; and feasible action to be taken to protect native Hawaiian rights if they exist. The request will not have a significant adverse impact to traditional and customary Hawaiian Rights. In view of the recent Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH" and "Ka Pa 'akai 0 Ka 'Aina" decisions,the issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights must be addressed in terms of the cultural, historical, and natural resources and the associated traditional and customary practices of the site: Investigation of valued resources: No formal archaeological reconnaissance survey, oral history of kamaaina accounts of the area, historical survey of documentary records are being submitted with the application.A botanical survey and fauna survey of the properties are attached. The valuable cultural, historical, and natural resources found in the permit area: As the properties were grubbed in the past, an archaeological inventory survey of the site was not conducted. In a letter to the applicant dated June 14,2006 from the Department of Land and Natural Resources- Historic Preservation Division, DLNR-SHPD stated that they believe no historic properties will be affected by this undertaking because residential development/urbanization has altered the land and that the subject parcel is identified by Sato et. Al 1973 as Aa lava flows, and the aerial photos contained in that document show development in the late 1960's. Our staff is familiar with the area and the parcel, and has not noted any historic properties on the parcel. Therefore, DLNR-SHPD concluded that a "no historic properties determination" is appropriate for this parcel. Possible adverse effect or impairment of valued resources: Established standards and controls to manage potential negative effects should effectively limit and mitigate foreseeable long-term impacts. The properties do not abut the shoreline,therefore Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights is not an issue. Feasible actions to protect native Hawaiian rights: To the extent to which traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights are exercised,the proposed action will not affect traditional Hawaiian rights and no action is necessary to protect these rights., A condition of approval will be included to TM K: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 LEHUA COURT, LLC. require the applicant to notify the DLNR-SHPD should any unidentified sites or remains be encountered,and proceed only upon an archaeological clearance from the DLNR-SHPD. Public Access: 22. Existing public access to and along the shoreline or to mountain areas and knowledge of public access being used: DNA Social-Economic Characteristics: 23. Social settlement pattern for the area: Hawaiian Ocean View estates is an agricultural area of a scale which can support an urban services node of moderate size. This project abuts the existing Urban designated area,and is intended as a logical next extension of that area as required to support the settlement pattern for the area. 24. Economic resources of the area: 1 The proposed development will provide an economic environment that allows new, expanded, or improved economic opportunities that are compatible with the County's cultural, natural and social environment. The Ka'u District is and will remain largely agricultural in nature; this regional center will assist in supporting the needs of farms and workers of this area. The proposed rezone would help protect and encourage the intensive and extensive utilization of the County's important agricultural lands. 25. Land values: Land values in the area are depressed relative to 2007;however,even taking this into account, the long term trend reflects an increase in value of approximately 100%every five years for the last three decades. It is anticipated that this trend will continue as populations migrate toward the less expensive ag parcels in this area. Surrounding lands: 26. Land use& 27. Zoning: To date, this area of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos Subdivisions has used Special Permits for urban type uses in appropriate locations. These uses include a general store, gas station, post office,hardware store, restaurants, and other types of commercial and industrial uses ;< on both sides of the Hawaii Belt Road (Highway 11) within these two subdivisions. There are several Special Permits approved in the vicinity of the proposed request. These include Special Permit No. 1115, which allowed the establishment of a 18,900-square foot market, a two-story 5,760-square foot building for commercial office and retail space to include prospective tenants such as a real estate office, financial institution, restaurant, video rental, personal services, tourist shop and other use, and a gas station. This proposed development is located on the corner of Lotus Blossom Lane and Hawaii Belt Road in Hawaiian Ocean View Estates, approximately 400 feet east of the location of the subject Herat properties. Special Permit No. 637 was approved to allow the establishment of a new hardware store, postal facility and commercial building on approximately 2 acres of land (Ocean View Town Center), which is along the highway within Hawaiian Ocean View Estates, approximately 1,000 feet east of the TMK: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 8L,; LEHUA COURT, LLC. location of the subject properties. Lastly, Special Permit No. 653 was approved to allow a variety of commercial and industrial uses, including an open storage facility, a farmer's market and all uses 4 permitted within the Industrial-Commercial Mixed Use (MCX) zoned district (Pohue Plaza), which is along the highway within Hawaiian Ranchos, approximately 1,300 feet east of the location of the subject properties. D.) PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES il28. Description of access: (paved or unpaved; private or county, right-of-way and pavement width. If private road,submit evidence of legal access rights): Access to the site is via Lehua Lane, a private, improved roadway. Paving width is 24 feet currently, and will be widened as required by the traffic study to accommodate turn in and turn out lanes. The estimated additional trips generated by the center according to the TZAR would be between 87 [a.m.] and 150 [p.m.]. Level-of-Service D is generally considered to be the minimum acceptable peak hour level-of- service for urban intersections. Since the proposed project is in a rural area, a higher level-of-service would be acceptable. The level-of-service analysis concluded that at intersections and lane groups will operate at Level-of-Service A or B, which are the highest levels-of-service. This implies very good operating conditions with minimal delays. Widening to provide additional lanes will not improve the levels-of-service because the levels-of service are already high. Accordingly, no mitigation is required i or recommended. No additional County of Hawaii resources are required. 29. Availability of water: A new private system will be provided to supply improvements and will meet the requirements and recommendations of the County of Hawaii Fire Department along with the State department of Health and other agencies as apply. No additional County of Hawaii resources required. 30. Sewage disposal: A sewage treatment plant is proposed for the site.No additional County or State resources will be required. 31. Solid waste: Solid waste will be sorted for recycle and the remainder disposed of according to an approved solid waste plan submitted at Plan Approval. 32. Police and Fire Protection The Kapua region of Ka'u is adequately serviced by public agencies and facilities. The Ka'u District Police Headquarters is a robust facility located approximately 12 miles away. There is also a &' police substation in Captain Cook. A fire station is located off of Mamalahoa Highway, approximately 12 miles from the project site The Ka'u station also co-ordinates ocean rescue, air-evac and paramedic service. Fire service appears to be adequate for emergencies. Structures will be fire sprinkled using water from onsite reservoirs. TMK: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 9 1 LEHUA COURT, LLC. 33. Schools: Public school attendance will not be affected. Pre-school and day care facilities are a projected part of the tenant mix, adding additional flexibility for local parents, better education opportunities to toddlers and reducing long distance traffic loads along the inter-regional byways. 34. Parks Along the Kona and Ka'u coasts of the Big Island are numerous recreational facilities,including: • Kahaluu Beach Park—4.23 acres • Old Airport State Recreation Area— 103.7 acres • Keolonahihi State Historical Park— 12.0 acres • Kekaha Kai State Park— 1,642.0 acres • Kaloko-Honokahau National Historical Park— 1,178.0 acres • Disappearing Sands Beach—2.35 acres • Pahoehoe Beach Park—0.66 acres • Higashihara Park—tennis and ball fields • Whittington State Park—ocean recreation • Volcano National Park—outdoor recreation—225,000 acres • Kipuka Puaulu—self-guiding nature trail— 100 acres • Manuka State Park—outdoor recreation— 13 acres Numerous other parks, recreation and educational projects are planned in West Hawaii and Ka'u Regions.No additional County or State resources will be required. 35. Other utilities and services(telephone/electricity): The existing transmission facilities in Ka'u are adequate to service the proposed neighborhood commercial center improvements. This project also intends to demonstrate the viability of low profile vertical axis wind turbines, carefully shielded from sight, to substantially reduce impact on local transmission facilities.No additional utility demands are anticipated. The existing telephone and cable service is adequate to service this neighborhood commercial center and other development in this area. E.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ANALYISIS 36. Relationship between local short term uses of environment and maintenance and enhancement of long term productivity& 37.Mitigating measures proposed to avoid, minimize, rectify or reduce impact: Land Form Alterations:Minor land form alterations are expected. �s€ Flora and Fauna: No known rare or endangered vegetation or fauna have been found to exist on this parcel. Impacts on flora and fauna are not considered significant. The generally overgrown appearance w,? of the site will be improved as new intensive landscaping is planted and maintained in the required landscape areas. Construction activities will displace the fauna currently onsite to adjoining areas. Upon completion of construction, displaced fauna (birds in particular) are expected to re-establish TMK: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 10 LEHUA COURT, LLC. onsite in similar numbers. Landscaping is intended to be low maintenance and of endemic planting wherever possible. Archaeological and Historic Sites: As noted previously, there are no significant archaeological features on this site. The strict guidelines of the DLNR will be followed during excavation and construction in case anything should be found during those processes.. At this time however there is no reason to expect remains of historical importance to be found. See attached letter of no effect from the DLNR. Disruption To Traffic Flow: Traffic is not expected to be disrupted by the relatively small scale of the construction. Long-Term Increase In Vehicular Traffic: There is no expected long term negative impact on traffic in the area. A net reduction in inter-regional traffic flow is expected as a natural result of this proposed rezone. Water Quality: Construction activities and methods are not expected to generate disturbances to quality nor the balance of the offshore waters ecosystem; these proposed neighborhood commercial center improvements do not adjoin the shoreline, so no measures will be required to prevent alterations to the existing shoreline or the 40' shoreline setback area. Visual/Aesthetics: At present,the project region is developed and will remain substantially the same in appearance. The overall visual and aesthetic effect of this project as it relates to the special management area objectives is considered to be minimal as the overall design is low-rise in nature and set into the terrain respecting view corridors and proposed future residential and agrarian development in the region. Social-Economic Impacts: The construction phase of this project will introduce capital into the local economy. Capital in the form of wages paid to local laborers, craftsmen and artisans involved in construction. As well, local materials and finish items supplied by local retailers will be a part of the near term capital influx. 38. Alternatives to the proposed development No Action. The no action alternative would be to retain the property in its current condition. This alternative is inconsistent with government policies for the district, an under-utilization of the property, and would not increase real property and other revenues for the county, state and federal governments. 39. Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of natural resources that would be involved if proposed action implemented: These neighborhood commercial center improvements will further commit the land from its present state of use. These neighborhood commercial center improvements will contribute to the transformation of the rural face of this area to a more urban like character. It will help concentrate urban development in a controlled, centralized area and it will help avoid isolated and uncontrolled developments in other locations. Archaeological features and/or remains will not be affected. TMK: 9-2-093; 039, 040, 049, 042 4 i�. LEHUA COURT, LLC. These neighborhood commercial center improvements will permanently alter the land and commit it for an extended period of time. Energy sources used for construction and transportation of construction materials for buildings and other improvements will be committed. Upon completion of the work, the residents will continue to consume water, fuel and electrical power as part of daily habitation and transportation needs. Water will additionally be used for irrigation and cleaning purposes, and will be used in a similar fashion to the present. I 1 TM K: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 12 LEHUA COURT BUSINESS MIX Square Feet Employees Square Feet Employees Medical Retail Health Clinic 1600 6 Farmer's Mark 6500 20 (10-20 Vendors) Doctor 1100 3 Gift 4500 7 Dentist 1200 3 Photography 800 2 Chiropractor 1200 3 Clothing 1000 3 Vet 1000 2 Misc. 1900 10 14700 42 Pharmacy 1200 3 7300 20 Food and Beverage Professional Restaurant 2500 20 Bank 2000 6 Coffee 1000 6 Real Estate/ 1000 6 Property Mgt. 500 Bakery 1200 4 Title/Escrow 1000 3 Takeout 800 4 5500 34 Mortgage 1000 3 Postal Center 1400 4 Residential Attorney 600 1 Apartments 9000 Pre-school 1500 4 Architect 2000 2 Management Accountant/tax 1000 3 12000 32 Business Office 500 Maintenance/ 1500 3 Warehouse Restrooms 1000 3000 3 Community/Phys Ed. YMCA 1000 3 Curves 1000 2 Veterans Center 500 2 Chamber of 300 1 Commerce Sq. Ft. Employees 2800 8 Totals 54300 139 LEHUA COURT, LLC. APPENDIX I BOTANICAL SURVEY TM K: 9--2—093: 040, 041, 042 APRIL 2012 Status Apocynaceae: Catharanthus roseus— Periwinkle Alien ICucubitaceae: Coccinea cordifolia— Ivy gourd Alien Euphorbiaceae: Breynia nivosa — Snowbush Alien Gramineae: Paspalum sp. — Paspalum grass Alien Malvaceae: Sida fallax— Ilim Indigenous Mimosoideae: Pithecellobium dulce— Opiuma Alien Palmae: Cocos nucifera —Coconut palm Polynesian Verbenaceae: Lantana camara — Lantana Alien Dominant species are Paspalum grasses and Leucaena glauca. No rare or endangered species noted. Appendix LEHUA COURT, LLC. APPENDIX II FAUNA SURVEY TMK: 9 —2—093: 040, 041, 042 APRIL 2012 The observations and known sightings are composed almost entirely of introduced species of birds and mammals. It is also possible that two endemic Hawaiian creatures classified as endangered by the U. S. Fish & 1 Wildlife Service may enter or fly over the project site. These are the Hawaiian Hawk or lo, and the Hawaiian Bat. 1 The site of the Draft environmental Assessment is primarily covered with lowland vegetation of introduced plants. The mauka area of the property is vacant land. The dominant lowland vegetation on and around the site is composed of introduced plants. The dominant tree is the kiawe (Prosopis pallida). The vegetation under story is made up of shrubs including haole koa (Leucaena glauca) and Christmasberry (Schinus terebinthifolius). Along the south side of the subject property adjacent to the Mamalahoa Highway is a temporary residence with coconut palms and other planted (exotic) landscaping. Birds that would be expected to nest in the trees on the proposed site especially the kiawes are the spotted and zebra dove, mynah, house finch, Java sparrow, warbling silverbill, ricebird, red cardinal and yellow-billed cardinal. The Pacific Golden Plover in this area would make use of lawn areas for feeding. Appendix LEHUA COURT, LLC. Fauna List Birds that may be found, though rarely, or that may fly over the proposed project site are: Native Birds Common Name Hawaiian Name Scientific Name Hawaiian Hawk lo Buteo solitarius Hawaiian Owl Pueo Asio flammeus sandwichensis Pacific Golden Plover Kolea Pluvialis fulva Ruddy Turnstone Akekeke Arenara interpres Introduced Birds Common Name Scientific Name Barn Owl Tyto alba Black Francolin Francolinus francolinus Gray Francolin Francolinus pondicerianus Ring-Necked Pheasant Phasianus colchicus Spotted Dove Streptopelia chinensis Zebra Dove Geopelia striata Japanese White-Eye Zosterops japonicus Common Mynah Acridotheres tristis House Sparrow Passer domesticus House Finch Carpodacus mexicanus Saffron Finch Sicalis flaveola Java Sparrow Padda oryzivora Warbling Silverbill Lonchura malabarica Spotted Munia (Ricebird) Lonchura punctulata Appendix LEHUA COURT, LLC. Yellow-Fronted Canary Serinus mozambicus Lavender Waxbill Estrilda caerulescens Red Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Yeloow-Billed Cardinal Paroaria capitata Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis Mammals The Hawaiian Bat, the State's only native land mammal, is widely distributed on the Island of Hawaii. It could possibly inhabit or fly over the subject site from time to time. I Other mammals that could be present are all introduced by humans. It is probable that the following list of mammals could be found at the subject site: Native Mammals Common Name Scientific Name Hawaiian Bats Lasiurus cinereus semotus Introduced Mammals Common Name Scientific Name Mongoose Herpestes auropunctatus Roof Rat Rattus rattus House Mouse Mus musculus Cat Felix catus Dog Canis familiaris Pig Sus scrofa Appendix s N- 5 • 1110_ i•a, • it 1 • O A ', / O , .t • P f O 1 4 .r f �vr r.ii) ��,� 4+ S 11 I -4 e 4. I \14) . »° '� C _ at ' VC e. 0 '° • § , ,''e,.! .rip 6'N ' 0. •,41 (-A r : , ..„... ,,,,,, „,.... ,, ..„ D yP ` A .9 A SS , i. t t tY �. C� i` .�,, Q � 4 ►►� � 'q. `,`, .wiz --� O O fit a' d% 7. (C12 '...4, .. '0 o a t .� i , 3 1, 4411,1k1 . NC) SO.II...I 1,,,A....V+af WY," lirtor �l1 , 4-- ' e O'' 0 ,." :M1 ti C O O w CO bei o li J 1. k Y f ! #E t e L; o . 0 .. ..s 4x44+'_ ► .:..•..... 43 1-1 61 1 II 31 '1 A 11 II I 1 h - if • I if . - - 2 - 2 i 1 1 1 i I f 1 . t.--1 , 1 = I 1. 0" \ •----- 1 I 1 PSI' : 1 I i 1 1 II ' 4-1"q 4"4.. i■":.-- I 1 11 I PA I I. I 0,- %;1,,... wViAtirkr;IV- , 4„. ...,,,, `- • i■ 4 N:1* , 0 „Mts 4, . \ ,,.. .o ,_. 7•40••e•■•• \'',7 . 0 g I '114, T24T4 V t,' I 4 4t'..i4454% ' •.nk.••••1 ,,, I. • '4443.1. Ali, AfrAtt..■-•, le V '11 ‘., N . % I \ it 0 ,.... . , I EL Mil• s,, \ \ ......4., •Millli...'/N ... ....A._,,, -...-- -,.• , opX 4e.Y4. L;aa,a` . ak a; 1.111..s. .M■ 'zi-.40.ilmi :.1.1.•• \ Iiiii. ."';'.21 • ..r- "4 AN ' 11IF.,■''' 1.4k■Z,\ • \ II_ .,., ,A:Los , • , ... ... A..ire . k.. !,. 01 iir --,'• •.--,,st,,,Fio. ,,,,,, : r,,11, 0. ,'Ito All. A ' -0 i■-.),•*4..„:, It, ,.A. :pj,.: .,--4,4,., 1 ,l', 'fr,,,,:f, 4:-:' p '- ! al ,R., - V:— '' '!:411-CO ' :'Z i '7•.'1,'-' 1 I 1 ., INNI ;.,71. ',Al sr,a, It: • '. -.. . - I, iil r IS i',,,4.1 %.'"1 In .- , , '''''.9 • t , ti., '0'7' t.....' .--' i.* 'r-....nr 1 1 '.• : •' 01 ''.. !,44 .I •`*%,".,.•:;”" 2 =AIN:14i moo eVitc .,..11n90.10 faV, .11.111r II 1 e II 2 0'' A g r•- —1- , ,....._ 1,..,-.- ..,. - _,...... 114 -4 t:tailtililaille-.- ..g: '1';Ti V .2 IN- ,...,:. fr.- / I pi- t (- I-_-- ' w- 'Iiii,''.2...''111F,l'i •'1,1'P uts.4-7, •.i. 1,,,,,,- , - ...2- -.,.. ,:,, —. I • 4j..:.,1;,-, __,°3,..,t,°°,Ale 0■L.,..1t, -; "TAIllfrilliti4;0111a0.111PW i . ';:4•4110,1:-AliffrAaltt. ' 1.1":. ", ,....1,..- I 1 '1. g•:•1 igl .-....f. 411;;," — 1 cd I I m Mimi , i, 0 ILIIIH_ Le, 1 1_ 61.-i''.--Zilni la = ZiNi4!Zt;1104• 444, ,-,4'1■-4 ,-6',,Z.,7111, I i Lli L I t-,(ktv tilLi;_r^-',_ AV.11 i4i-11:::.,V '''':14Y.' : 1 1 i 1 I 1 4 LINDA t.INl:t.l: i✓•'�'••'^y"t�: S II.tl1A'r1 1 a .(�4 19tty y .AV.I.N.I.�:T.1KAY.111.'t 1.w m∎I∎1•IC .;m:Km Ill 1+12 II.1WMI b.< • M I•'11M1nMe�'(1V WAt1 II AL..:iryl:V•I;:A18'It.'IT Ii ,� IWOF.RTK.MAMMA ' I a ,,' 3 IIII'I IY1RI111-IIIR-I-WII k : '.Y li DEAN NARANO ' 60:00.. � T^ Ixrllrr ntRI1 a R vor �vrn9 :1 x,A1 .,INIAtx'wslRlRlls 1 !\\ B ratIAASIIVAVRIA1%IM M{{ IIPRN.111<Ip/tNt'tY.VGtt 1,04.MIS>114.AY WAlfR RFSY.PRIV a1.W,101 MINT > -t STATE OE HAWAII +<x+.InYArKZ+AIMell,*stu1.::.Ils ,�,._,� I.Y.VIIVATYCT.INARRfin1Rt'fe f7.4+411ti.1WT ire oJNtNI� DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES nwl:STRY wu max h141.MR'PRFSRRVAtNI.V RAIRI1bAWR LSI VSA.VII VRi-11nID1KS1•R1 STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION �Tn55 P PKS 601 KAMOKILA BOULEVARD,ROOM 555 i KAPOLEI.HAWAII 96707 I June 14,2006 i Lehua Court LOG NO: 2006.1934 c/o Steve Sahines DOC NO:06061T39 73-1157 Oluolu St. Archaeology Kaitua-Kona,HI 96740 Dear Mr. Sahines: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review- : I Request for No Historic Properties Affected Kahuku Ahupua'a,Ka'u District,Island of Hawaii TMKS:(3)9-2-093;040,041.042 Thank you for your request for a determination that no historic properties will be affected by development . - 1 on the parcels named above. We believe that no historic properties will be affected by this undertaking because: :.I ❑ ® a) intensive cultivation has altered the land b)residential development/urbanization has altered the land ❑ c) prt vious grubbing/grading has altered the land - .1 ❑ d) an acceptable archaeological assessment or inventory survey found no historic properties • ❑ e)this project has gone through the historic review process,and mitigation has been completed ® fj other. The subject parcel is identified by Sato et. al 1973 as 'a'a lava flows, and the aerial photos contained in jhat document show development in the late 1960's. Our staffs are 1 familiar with the area and the parcel, and have not noted any historic properties cm the parcel. Therefore, we conclude that a no historic properties determination is appropriate for this project. 1 i In the event of lava tube breakthroughs or that historic resources, including human skeletal remains,are identified during the construction activities,all work needs to cease in the immediate vicinity of the find, l the find needs to be protected from additional disturbance, and the State Historic Preservation Division, Hawai'i Section,needs to be contacted immediately at(808)327-3691. Aloha, ./ M� Janie Chinen,Administrator <' ---S't to Historic Preservation Division JT LI NEIL ABERCROMBIE s F,.m-,":� GLENN M.OKIMOTO GOVERNOR } • sk� y '' DIRECTOR J 9b;,':'Y t Deputy Dhectora i JADE.T.BUTAY p�: p:.•' FORD N.FUCHIGAMI RANDY GRUNE JADINE URASAKI STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN REPLY REFER TO: HIGHWAYS DIVISION HAWAII DISTRICT HWY-H 12-2.0064 50 MAKAAt,A STREET HILO,HAWAII 96720 TELEPHONE:(808)933.8866 • FAX:(808)933-8869 March 23, 2012 Peter J.K. Dahlberg, P,E., LI,C 74-4920 Kiwi Street Kailua-Kona, Hawai'i 96740-9669 Dear Mr. Dahlberg: SUBJECT: Proposed Lehua Court and Ohia Center, Lehua Lane and Connection with Hawaii Belt Road Improvements, Project No. FAP 11EF-01-93M Ocean View, Kau, Hawaii We reviewed your plans and they are approved as submitted. Please submit a copy of this letter with three sets of the final plan and obtain a permit to perform work upon state highways before starting any work within the highway right-of-way. When filling out the permit, please refer to the above approval letter number HWY-H 12-2.0064 of March 23,2012. Construction must start within one year of this date. If it does not, the plans shall be resubmitted for review and approval. Should you have any questions, please call Mr. Robert Taira at telephone number 933-8866. Very truly yours, i SALVADOR C. PANEM Hawai'i District Engineer Phillip Rowell and Associates 47-273'D'Hui Iwa Street Kaneohe,Hawaii 96744 Phone:(808)239-8206 FAX:(808)239-4175 Email:prowell@hawaiiantel.net DRAFT REPORT January 29, 2019 Lehua Court, LLC 73-1157 Oluolu Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Attn: Mr. William Stockton Re: Traffic Impact Assessment Report Proposed Lehua Court and Ohia Center Oceanview, Island of Hawaii TMK: 9-2-93:39, 40,41 and 42 Dear Mr. Stockton: Phillip Rowell and Associates have prepared the following Traffic Impact Assessment Report for the proposed Lehua Court and Ohia Center. The report is presented in the following format: A. Project Location and Description B. Purpose and Objective of Study C. Methodology D. Description of Existing Streets and Intersection Controls E. Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes F. Level-of-Service Concept G. Existing Levels-of-Service H. 2015 Background Traffic Projections I. Project Trip Generation J. 2015 Background Plus Project Traffic Projections K. Impact Analysis of 2015 Conditions L. Mitigation M. Other Issues N. Summary and Conclusions A. Project Location and Description The proposed project is located along the north side of SR 11 between Lehua Lane and Lotus Blossom Lane in the Ocean View area of the Island of Hawaii. The approximate location on the island is shown on Attachment A. This traffic impact study assesses the impacts of two projects. The first project is Lehua Court, which will consist of 20,000 square feet of retail space and 40,000 square feet of office space. The second project is Ohia Center which will consist of 16,800 square feet of retail space. Access to and egress from the project will be via a new driveway along the south side of Lehua Lane between SR 11 and Keaka Parkway. See Attachment B for a diagram of location of the project and the approximate location of the driveway. Lehua Court, LLC January 29, 2019 Page 2 B. Purpose and Objective of Study 1. Quantify and describe the traffic related characteristics of the proposed project. 2. Identify potential deficiencies adjacent to the project that will impact traffic operations in the vicinity of the proposed project. C. Methodology 1. Define the Study Area The intersections to be analyzed were determined based upon our experience with other projects in the vicinity and discussions with the Hawaii District office of the State of Hawaii Department of Transportation. Accordingly, the study area includes the following intersections: I • SR 11 at Prince Kuhio Boulevard • SR 11 at Lotus Blossom Lane • SR 11 at Lehua Lane • SR 11 at Orchid Parkway • Keaka Parkway at Lotus Blossom Lane • Lehua Lane at Keaka Parkway • Project Driveway at Lehua Lane 2. Analyze Existing Traffic Conditions Existing traffic volumes at the study intersections were estimated from manual traffic counts performed during December 2009. The intersection configurations and right-of-way controls were determined from a field reconnaissance of the area. Existing traffic operating conditions of the study intersection were determined using the methodology described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual(HCM) '. 3. Estimate Horizon Year Background Traffic Projections Background traffic conditions are defined as future traffic conditions without the proposed project. Typically, the horizon year is approximately five(5)years after completion of the project. It was assumed that the project will be completed in two years,or 2015. Accordingly,2015 was used as the horizon year for this traffic study. 4. Estimate Project-Related Traffic Characteristics The number of peak-hour trips that the proposed project will generate was estimated using standard trip generation procedures outlined in the Trip Generation Handbook' and data provided in Trip Generation'. These trips were then distributed and assigned based on the available approach and departure routes and trip distribution data from other recently completed traffic studies in the area. 5. Analyze Project-Related Traffic Conditions The project-related traffic was then superimposed on 2015 background traffic volumes at the study intersections and driveways. The HCM methodology was used again to conduct a level-of-service analysis 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers,Highway Capacity Manual„Washington,D.C.,2000 2 Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook, Washington,D.C., 1998 3 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation,Washington,D.C.,2003 Lehua Court, LLC January 29, 2019 Page 3 for background plus project conditions. The purpose of this analysis was to identify potential operational deficiencies in the vicinity of the proposed project. D. Description of Existing Streets and Intersection Controls In the vicinity of the project,SR 11 is a two-lane,two-way State highway with an east-west orientation. There are no separate left turn lanes at the intersections in the area and there are no acceleration or deceleration lanes. The posted speed limit along SR 11 reduces from 55 to 45 miles per hour between Orchid Parkway and Lehua Lane. Lehua Lane, Keaka Parkway and Lotus Blossom Lane are two-lane, two-way local collector streets. All intersections are STOP sign controlled and all intersection approaches are one-lane. A diagram of existing conditions is provided as Attachment C. E. Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Existing peak hour traffic volumes are summarized in Attachment D. The Traffic Count Summary Worksheets are provided as Attachment E. F. Level-of-Service Concept "Level-of-service" is a term which denotes any of an infinite number of combinations of traffic operating conditions that may occur on a given lane or roadway when it is subjected to various traffic volumes. Level-of- service(LOS)is a qualitative measure of the effect of a number of factors which include space,speed,travel time,traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver,safety,driving comfort and convenience. There are six levels-of-service, A through F, which relate to the driving conditions from best to worst, respectively. The characteristics of traffic operations for each level-of-service are summarized in Table 1. In general,LOS A represents free-flow conditions with no congestion. LOS F,on the other hand,represents severe congestion with stop-and-go conditions. Level-of-service D is typically considered acceptable for peak hour conditions in urban areas. Corresponding to each level-of-service shown in the table is a volume/capacity ratio. This is the ratio of either existing or projected traffic volumes to the capacity of the intersection. Capacity is defined as the maximum number of vehicles that can be accommodated by the roadway during a specified period of time.The capacity of a particular roadway is dependent upon its physical characteristics such as the number of lanes, the operational characteristics of the roadway(one-way,two-way, turn prohibitions, bus stops,etc.),the type of traffic using the roadway(trucks, buses, etc.)and turning movements. Lehua Court, LLC January 29, 2019 Page 4 Table 1 Level-of-Service Definitions for Signalized Intersections(') Volume-to-Capacity Stopped Delay Level of Service Interpretation Ratio(2) (Seconds) A,B Uncongested operations;all vehicles clear in a single 0.000-0.700 <20.0 cycle. C Light congestion; occasional backups on critical 0.701-0.800 20.1-35.0 approaches D Congestion on critical approaches but intersection 0.801-0.900 35.1-55.0 functional. Vehicles must wait through more than one cycle during short periods. No long standing lines formed. E Severe congestion with some standing lines on critical 0.901-1.000 55.1-80.0 approaches. Blockage of intersection may occur if signal does not provide protected turning movements. F Total breakdown with stop-and-go operation >1.001 >80.0 Notes: (1) Source:Highway Capacity Manual,2000. (2) This is the ratio of the calculated critical volume to Level-of-Service E Capacity. Like signalized intersections, the operating conditions of intersections controlled by stop signs can be classified by a level-of-service from A to F. However, the method for determining level-of-service for unsignalized intersections is based on the use of gaps in traffic on the major street by vehicles crossing or turning through that stream. Specifically,the capacity of the controlled legs of an intersection is based on two factors: 1)the distribution of gaps in the major street traffic stream,and 2)driver judgement in selecting gaps through which to execute a desired maneuver. The criteria for level-of-service at an unsignalized intersection is therefore based on delay of each turning movement. Table 2 summarizes the definitions for level-of-service and the corresponding delay. A subsequent calculation to determine an overall LOS was made, and these results are presented in tables to summarize traffic conditions using parameters similar to those used for signalized intersections. Table 2 Level-of-Service Definitions for Unsignalized lntersectionstl) Level-of-Service Expected Delay to Minor Street Traffic Delay(Seconds) A Little or no delay <10.0 B Short traffic delays 10.1 to 15.0 C Average traffic delays 15.1 to 25.0 D Long traffic delays 25.1 to 35.0 E Very long traffic delays 35.1 to 50.0 F See note(2)below >50.1 Notes: (1) Source: Highway Capacity Manual,2000. (2) When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane,extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvement of the intersection. I G. Existin g Levels-of-Service The existing levels-of-service were estimated using the methodology described in the Highway Capacity Manual. The results of the level-of-service analysis of existing conditions are summarized in Table 3. All movements operate at Level-of-Service A or B. I Lehua Court, LLC January 29, 2019 Page 5 Table 3 Existing Levels-of-Service .. .. . ..... .. . AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection and Movement Delay' LOS 2 Delay LOS SR 11 at Prince Kuhio Boulevard Westbound Left 7.6 A 4.2 A Northbound Left 10.7 B 13.1 B Northbound Right 9.1 A 9.8 A SR 11 at Lotus Blossom Lane Eastbound Left 7.7 A 2.3 A Southbound Left&Right 9.5 A 10.4 B SR 11 at Lehua Lane Eastbound Left&Thru 0.6 A 0.8 A Southbound Left&Right._ 9.3 A 9.4 A SR 11 at Orchid Parkway Eastbound Left&Thru 0.1 A 0.5 A Southbound Left&Right. 8.8 A 10.0 A 1 Keaka Parkway at Lotus Blossom Lane Westbound Left&Thru 3.4 A 3.8 A Northbound Left&Right 9.3 A 9.6 A Keaka Parkway at Lehua Lane I Southeast-bound Left,Thru&Right 0.0 A 0.0 A Northwest bound Left,Thru&Right 0.0 A 0.5 A Northeast bound Left,Thru&Right 9.1 A 9.3 A Southwest-bound Left,Thru&Right 9.3 A 9.3 A NOTES: (1) Delay in seconds per vehicle. (2) LOS denotes Level-of-Service calculated using the operations method described in Highway Capacity Manual. Level-of-Service is based on delay. (3) See Attachment F for Level-of-Service Worksheets. H. 2015 Background Traffic Projections Background traffic projections are defined as future background traffic conditions without the proposed project. Future traffic growth consists of two components. The first is ambient background growth that is a result of regional growth and cannot be attributed to a specific project. This background growth rate will also compensate for any small development projects that are not identified as a related project. The second component is estimated traffic that will be generated by other development projects in the vicinity of the proposed project. Background Growth The TIAR for the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates Commercial Center used an average annual growth rate of 6.4% per year based on historical traffic data contained in State of Hawaii Department of Transportation's Traffic Summaries!' This growth rate was used to be consistent with other traffic projections for the study intersections. The growth factor for background traffic between 2009 and 2015 was calculated to be 1.45 using the following formula: F= (1 +On where F= Growth Factor i =Average annual growth rate, or 0.064 n = Growth period, or 6 years 4 M&E Pacific,Inc.,Hawaiian Ocean View Estates Commercial Center Traffic Impact Analysis Report,March 2007,p 4. Lehua Court, LLC January 29, 2019 Page 6 This growth factor was applied to the eastbound and westbound traffic movements along SR 11. The estimated background growth between 2009 and 2015 are shown in Attachment G. Related Projects The second component in estimating future background traffic volumes is traffic resulting from other proposed projects in the vicinity. Related projects are defined as those projects that are likely to be constructed within or adjacent to the study project and would significantly impact traffic in the study area. Related projects may be development projects or roadway improvements. The only related project in the area is the HOVE Commercial Center which will be locate between Keaka Parkway and SR 11 and between Lotus Blossom Lane and Lehua Court. The TIAR for this project was obtained and the traffic assignments for the project taken directly from the report. This project has been build but was unoccupied at the time of the counts in December 2009. As part of the HOVE project, SR 11 between Lotus Blossom Lane was modified to provide separate left turn lanes at Lotus Blossom Lane and at Prince Kuhio Boulevard. This improvement was completed before the traffic counts were performed. The traffic assignments for the related project are summarized as Attachment H. 2015 background traffic projections were calculated by expanding existing traffic volumes by the appropriate growth rates and then superimposing traffic generated by related projects. The resulting 2015 background peak hour traffic projections are shown as Attachment I. I. Project Trip Generation Future traffic volumes generated by the project were estimated using the procedures described in the Trip Generation Handbooks and data provided in Trip Generations. This method used trip generation rates to estimate the number of trips that the project will generate during the peak hours of the project and along the adjacent street. The following assumptions were used for the trip generation analysis: 1. Lehua Court will have 20,000 gross square feet of retail and 40,000 gross square feet of office space. 2. For the retail floor area, trip generation rates for specialty retail uses were used to estimate the number of peak hour trips that the project will generate. Trip rates for specialty retail uses are based on the leaseable floor area. It was assumed that 90%of the gross floor area is leaseable. Therefore, the trip generation calculations were based on 18,000 leaseable square feet. 3. For the office uses, trip generation rates for general office buildings were used. These rates are based on the gross floor area. 5 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Handbook,Washington,D.C.,1998,p.7-12 9 P 6 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 7'Edition, Washington,D.C.,2003 t ILehua Court, LLC January 29, 2019 Page 7 4. Ohia Center will have a 16,800 gross square feet of floor area. Trip generation rates for specialty I retail were also used to estimate the peak hour trips that the project will generate. The trip generation calculations were based on 90%of the gross floor area, of 15,120 leaseable square feet. 5. There are no pass-by trips associated with specialty retail or office uses. Other traffic studies in the area estimated pass-by trips using data for shopping centers. Therefore,the traffic projections in this report will be conservative. The results of the trip generation analysis are summarized in Table 4. ITable 4 Results of Trip Generation Analysis I Lehua Court Ohia Center Office Specialty Retail Time Period (LU Code 814) (LU Code 710) Total (LU Code 814) Total I Project and Direction Rate&% TGLSF Trips Rate&% TGSF I Trips Rate&% TGLSF I Trips Trips AM Total 0.75 18.0 14 1.55 40.0 62 76 0.75 15.12 11 87 Peak In 48% 7 88% 55 62 61% 7 69 Hour Out 52% 7 12% 7 14 39% 4 18 PM Total 2.71 49 1.49 60 109 2.71 41 150 Peak In 44% 22 17% 10 32 44% 18 50 Hour Out 56% 27 83% 50 77 56% 23 100 Notes; (1) TGSF=Thousand gross square feet of floor area. (2) TGLSF=Thousand gross leaseable square feet of floor area. TGLSF was estimated to be 90%of TGSF. J. 2015 Background Plus Project Projections I Background plus project traffic conditions are defined as 2015 background traffic conditions plus project generated traffic. The project generated traffic was distributed and assigned based on trip distribution data used in the HOVE TIAR. The project trip assignments are shown in Attachment J. I 2015 background plus project traffic projections were estimated by superimposing the peak hourly traffic generated by the proposed project on the 2015 background (without project) peak hour traffic projections. This assumes that the peak hourly trips generated by the project coincide with the peak hour of the adjacent I street. This represents a worse-case condition. The resulting 2015 background plus project peak hour traffic projections are shown in Attachment K. The Traffic Projection Worksheets are provided as Attachment L. K. Impact Analysis of 2015 Conditions The impacts of the project were assessed by performing a level-of-service analysis of the study intersections and the project's driveway along Lehua Lane. The level-of-service analysis was performed using the following assumptions: 4 1. An assessment of the need for an eastbound left turn lane for traffic turning left into the project at Lehua Lane was performed using the guidelines described in Evaluating Intersection Improvements'. This assessment determined that a separate left turn lane was needed for eastbound to northbound I7 Transportation Research Board,NCHRP Report 457,Evaluating Intersection Improvements,2001,p. 21 &22. oy Lehua Court, LLC January 29, 2019 Page 8 left turns at Lehua Lane. Therefore, it was assumed that an eastbound left turn lane will not be provided at the intersection, 2. All intersections lane configurations and right-of-way controls are the same as existing. The results of the level-of-service analysis of 2015 conditions are summarized in Table 5. Shown in the table are the delays and levels-of-service of each controlled movement. As shown,all movements will operate at Level-of-Service B, or better. This implies high levels-of-service and minimal delays to traffic using these intersections. It should also be noted that the Level-of-Service of all movements are the same without and with project generated traffic. This means that the levels-of-service do not decrease as a result of project generated traffic. Table 5 2015 Levels-of-Service AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Without Project With Project Without Project With Project Intersection and Movement _ Delay' LOS 2 Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS SR 11 at Prince Kuhio Boulevard Westbound Left 7.6 A 7.7 A 3.9 A 8.5 A Northbound Left 11.2 B 11.4 B 15.9 B 17.8 B Northbound Right 9.1 A _ 9.3 A 10.7 B 10.9 B SR 11 at Lotus Blossom Lane Eastbound Left 7.8 A 7.9 A 8.1 A 8.3 A Southbound Left&Right_ 10.1 A 10.3 B I 12.7 B 13.5 B SR 11 at Lehua Lane Eastbound Left&Thru I 0.5 A 1.8 A 0.6 A 1.2 A Southbound Left&Right. 9.6 A 9.9 A I 9.9 A 12.1 B SR 11 at Orchid Parkway Eastbound Left&Thru I 0.1 A 0.1 A 0.4 A 0.4 A Southbound Left&Right. 9.0 A _ 9.1 A _ 10.5 B I 10.9 B Keaka Parkway at Lotus Blossom Lane Westbound Left&Thru 3.4 A 3.1 A 3.8 A I 2.8 A Northbound Left&Right_ 9.3 A 9.3 A 9.6 A 9.8 A Keaka Parkway at Lehua Lane Southeast-bound Left,Thru&Right 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A 0 A Northwest-bound Left,Thru&Right 0.0 A 1.2 A 0.5 A 1.5 A Northeast bound Left,Thru&Right 9.1 A 9.2 A 9.3 A 9.7 A Southwest-bound Left,Thru&Right 9.3 A 9.6 A e 9.3 A 9.8 A Lehua Lane at Project Driveway Northwest-bound Left&Thru 6.7 A I 4.6 A Northeast-bound Left&Right 9.5 A 9.7 A NOTES: (1) Delay in seconds per vehicle. (2) LOS denotes Level-of-Service calculated using the operations method described in Highway Capacity Manual. Level-of-Service is based on delay. (3) See Attachments M and N for Level-of-Service Worksheets. I 4 Lehua Court, LLC January 29, 2019 Page 9 L. Mitigation Level-of-Service D is generally considered to be the minimum acceptable peak hour level-of-service for urban intersections.8 Since the proposed project is in a rural area, a higher level-of-service would be acceptable. The level-of-service analysis concluded that at intersections and lane groups will operate at Level-of-Service A or B, which are the highest levels-of-service. This implies very good operating conditions with minimal delays. Widening to provide additional lanes will not improve the levels-of-service because the levels-of- service are already high. Accordingly, no mitigation is required or recommended. M. Other Traffic Issues Left Turn Lane Assessment An assessment of the need for a separate left turn lane for traffic turning left from SR 11 into the project at Lehua Lane was performed using guidelines published by the Transportation Resource Board'. The assessment determined that a separate left turn lane is not warranted for both morning and afternoon peak hour conditions. See Attachment O. Accordingly,based on the findings of an accepted standard,a separate left turn lane is not recommended. State of Hawaii Department of Transportation has indicated that they may require a separate left turn lane regardless of the results of the left turn lane needs assessments. This may require modification of the project plan to encourage southbound traffic to turn left at Lotus Blossom Lane rather at Lehua Lane,therefore using the new left turn lane recently installed. Modifications that would encourage traffic to us Lotus Blossom include the following: 1. Widening Keaka Parkway between Lotus Blossom Land and Lehua Court and Lehua Court between SR 11 and Keaka Parkway, 2. Restriction, or prohibition, of left turns from SR 11 to Lehua Lane, 3. Redesign of the project's site plan to relocate the driveway from Lehua Lane to Keaka Parkway, and 4. Redesign of the SR 11/Lehua Lane intersection to discourage left turns. Regional Traffic Impacts Customers and employees of the two study project will live and work in the Ocean View area. The traffic impacts will be limited to the Ocean View area. a Institute of Traffic Engineers Transportation Impact Analyses for Site Development,A Recommended Practice, Washington,D.C.,2006,p 60. Transportation Resource Board,NCHRP Report 457,Evaluating Intersection Improvements:An Engineering Study Guide,2001,Washington,D.C.p21-22 ietx bb's:>g Lehua Court, LLC January 29, 2019 Page 10 N. Summary and Conclusions The conclusions of the traffic impact assessment are: 1. The proposed project will generate 69 inbound trips and 18 outbound trips during the morning peak hour and 50 inbound trips and 100 outbound trips during the afternoon peak hour. 2. The level-of-service analysis concluded that all intersections and lane groups will operate at Level-of- Service A or B,which are the highest levels-of-service. This implies very good operating conditions with minimal delays. Widening to provide additional lanes will not improve the levels-of-service because the levels-of-service are already high. Accordingly, no mitigation is required or recommended. 3. Lehua Lane should be widened to provide two 12-foot lanes,one in each direction, between SR 11 and Keaka Parkway. 4. The project's civil engineer should confirm that adequate sight distances are provided along SR 11 at the study intersections. Any deficiencies shall be mitigated. 5. The project's civil engineer should determine the viability of providing a separate left turn lane along SR 11 at Lehua Lane. 6. At the intersection of SR 11 at Lehua Lane,adequate turning radii should be provided for trucks and other service vehicles to and from the project. Respectfully submitted, PHILLIP ROWELL AND ASSOCIATES t6,94 -41 Phillip J. Rowell, P.E. Principal List of Attachments Attachment A Project Location Map Attachment B Preliminary Site Plans Attachment C Diagram of Existing Conditions Attachment D Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Attachment E Traffic Count Reduction Worksheets Attachment F Level-of-Service Worksheets for Existing Conditions Attachment G Estimated Background Growth between 2009 and 2015 Attachment H Related Projects'Trip Assignments Attachment I 2015 Background Peak Hour Traffic Projections Attachment J Project Traffic Assignments Attachment K 2015 Background Plus Project Peak Hour Traffic Projections Attachment L Traffic Projection Worksheets Attachment M Level-of-Service Worksheets for 2015 Background Conditions Attachment N Level-of-Service Worksheets for 2015 Background Plus Project Conditions Attachment 0 Assessment for the Need for a Separate Left Turn Lane from SR 11 to Lehua Lane . , . I , I NORTH KOH - - DISTRICT. SOU TH NOT TO SCALE .. ,.i.i; -, --..'KOHALA , ,..s,„ .-' . DISTRICT- , HAMAKUA DISTRICjoRrH Hit_ , , .., DISTRICT ,-- MAUNA KEA . C.' HILO BAY , : NORTH KONI D ISTRI-CT S.t I HILO-1--- ...,.‹;KAILUA-KONA - SOUTH HILO DISTRIC1 '.... KEAAU I ,., . . - •_ . . . /' 1,'`,.. '''` :'■ ' ,' . . ,' ./ 11: PAHOA- )51,''' I SOUTH ii'::,' ,,, ..,.. , ;., . PUNA DISTRICT . KC)NA DfS'I RIOT , , '. HOKUMA POINT KAU DisTRICT ."."---1 '''t,,i ,, ,f,, ',,,, Wti, = Ft ! ,11'' ... HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK I PALIMA POINT ., . . , 0 . . - .:: LEGEND I SOUTH POINT 0 PROJECT LOCATION Attachment A PROJECT LOCATION MAP I I io•-..5 I I I 1 I I I I I Attachment B IPreliminary Site Plans I . I I I I I „, C,.• .ri, ;%',.. 1 ,1 1 I PI , I 1 1 i 11' fil i'I. 1„ r I i 1 I \ \. \ \. .• -, , ./ \ ,... \ • , .- % \\\--.._7-\ . t i I k * I 1 * g i a.' W I '' \ ...., / i' 4 . k ill I ii IC i 3, - il i , -1 to II l' 1 i., I 1 t • ; I I nil ; II ; I . / b //411111W . SI ' ."f' 4'\ \ Z A Z-1*,,I'llir-A."'LN \ a .,„ e i E I ik' 11 A 1 i r a I; t ; a I” 1.7 i _44.kV' '''.1*.'*-V. \ - I ' *'''' ' ''''"4.' \ (16 N ''. ' I .1 ! I ..4-;,:Lif■ra vr-.4,' \ 4., \ i 1 1.:‘,:,4?-• \"rs, \-. 1 I I . . , : .4; i• -4. .\\>, . t - - t. if , • ; Ale:40k . 'VW* \ I, / 5 E i,, I. Ii :I I . * * • 0 44 ' a 0 k 0) . 'f.%,••...,. \ . a• • .., \ .1: : ■,. • L0,10 ,, 46'.''• \ 5 ' " IP ....." 4:0 ._. t,t-.': . \ I 4 ii, 3. . n, , • I- -I; •, . r •i te,4. • ■ 4, • . ' \ • V. "II \ ■ e. I• I, „.• IF -- •• ,. .: . 1 • . d • 1 „ .' V. " pie.. Ira e !- IL. " ‘rt- - ,fr IE2 \ • \.. \ •. \.. . PI n 1 g A N .2 . . , 1 • I.1 _ , . ---- .., • iSzo2 1 •!. j —r . .F,. 4. 1.... - . ..... ,. 1: „ \ . . .. . ,... \ - \ .. ., , I 2 ' Aimix..,;,.. .,-10.i.,..;; - aw co 4 ii,-.'1!* ., p II: - \.. \ • . \ \ .4 - .1 -; - IT1 .,. 1 -= i a- 2 \ 1 r 11 oiii.r.v.iff...mir.,:s Zit: - . • 0 i ,I" , " "1,.. 4 • _ _ _ •___ _ : ..... : 1 —1 ,I 111111111111 .,„.... ,:„,, ,14,, .,e" - L _ Itylgirs.— 5.7....,,nriC„ 4r' .-14. ..:41•4.,1.1, ___.....), k ......__._..- 1 ....,,,y, HAWAII BELT ROAD „,,„ 1 .... _____w________ ...,... .••••• _4 ,., 1 I 1 . ' -'', g.i ' if i tell ''..=‘ II% !It i ‘--: f.` ? iiii -,. hl 1 .; Z ' 4 c. new retail centers: „ Lehua Court/Ohia Center tmk:9-2-93:39,40,41,42 parth fill! environ atom en 11 - V.iurketta, i r . er eA 2. kaliadad , . , A 4 NO' I. ll I I I 1 I I I I I Attachment C Diagram of Existing Conditions I I I I I I I I I rt 0 ,) 1 z 4 AVMNbdd a1H0210 ` ______ z °t h I 2 z Ile w I a W •ch 03 D I Al 0 --'' � t 0 1 --ii„ s `°2 LL d O o���+ '\lei C _O oJ� re E , co f) < i JP � �e w o Q G < Cl)0 co co O m O c 0 g °" Z �.,) 1 R` L L L9—� W �� lq L a(o t co� II co o k_ 179 ,l L p- ZE oaen311108 I � OIHf1N 30%Id tl( t I o co co . c.>,_cs, I ,_ 0 Z c:::,, .) 1 J z AVMNI dd 01}-10210 Z 04---,1 co co cn kiiii0 ° Z w I- CO I m 2 N D 41 0 I rb� s � YO U— d 0 IX 64 .///o'. c1l cc z .9, cD _ o ���JP� I- D a z w 5 w 0 F 0 C j F.;CO CO O o 0 J CO (V D c\J 1- o C7 J -;CO (,.. ------r CO tz 1 �, 59 L-} T) 1 W 1 ( S NY1 N I /////1 0 O) ` 99 ,,i, zI- oavn3inos OIHnH 30NRId I 1 cc aoo INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY IINTERSRCTION: SR 11+Prance Kuhio` TIME 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM JURISDICTION DATE 12-15-09,rue. 'ROJECT,TITLE: PROJECT NO PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 1PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIO 7:15 AM to 7:30 AM ■ SR 11 PHF= 0.80 I M o o Prince Kuhio PHF=0.80 co I 32 1 L 0 93 — .— TOTAL 0 0 4-- 0 I 287 64 i r 0 96 —+ —. 0 1 1 r 1 1 I 0 PHF=N/A _ 0o v o v o i SR 11 ; PHF= 0.90 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.97 Prince Kuhio SR 11 SR 11 RUNNING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound COUNTS Left_ Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Period End A B C Dp O 0 G H I 0 K L TOTAL 6 7.00 AM 12 0 31 0 0 0 29 30 0 0 12 9 123 7:15 AM 18 0 40 0 0 0 43 38 0 0 18 17 174 I 7:30 AM 27 0 53 0 0 0 54 53 0 0 30 31 248 7:45 AM 32 0 69 0 0 0 76 61 0 0 46 36 320 8:00 AM 45 0 86 0 0 0 92 70 0 0 57 42 392 8:15 AM 50 0 104 0 0 0 103 86 0 0 68 50 461 8:30 AM 65 0 114 0 0 0 118 102 0 0 77 56 532 PERIOD COUNTS Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL I 6:45 AM 6 0 16 0 0 0 ii 13 0 0 3 3 52 7:00 AM 6 0 15 0 0 0 18 17 0 0 9 6 71 7:15 AM 6 0 9 0 0 0 14 8 0 0 6 8 51 7:30 AM 9 0 13 0 0 0 11 15 0 0 12 14 74 7:45 AM 5 0 16 0 0 0 22 8 0 0 16 5 72 8:00 AM 13 0 17 0 0 0 16 9 0 0 II 6 72 8:15 AM 5 0 18 0 0 0 II 16 0 0 11 8 69 I 8:30 AM 15 0 10 0 0 0 15 16 0 0 9 6 71 HOURLY TOTALS Beeinnine At A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 6:30 AM 27 0 53 0 0 0 54 53 0 0 30 31 248 6:45 AM 26 0 53 0 0 0 65 48 0 0 43 33 268 7:00 AM 33 0 55 0 0 0 63 40 0 0 45 33 269 7:15 AM 32 0 64 0 0 0 60 48 0 0 50 33 287 7:30 AM 38 0 61 0 0 0 64 49 0 0 47 25 284 I INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY INTERSECTION SR 11+Prince Kuhio TIME 3:36 PM to 5:30 PM JURISDICTION DATE 12-15-09,Tue. PROJETTITLE.. PROJECT NO: ' PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIO 4:00 PM to 4:15 PM SR I I PHF= 0.68 O 't ° d 00 s.0 1 Prince Kuhio PHF=0.94 72 ...1 L 0 204 •-- •— 0 TOTAL 0 —► *— 0 618 166 -1 i 0 238 --• 0 1 1 I 0 1 1 PHF=N/A I SR 11 ` PHF= 0.92 N INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.93 Prince Kuhio SR 11 SR 11 ,-- RUNNING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound COUNTS Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thnx Right Left Thru Right Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 3:45 PM 16 0 46 0 0 0 29 22 0 0 15 18 146 4:00 PM 36 0 77 0 0 0 50 38 0 0 43 58 302 I; 4:15 PM 50 0 126 0 0 0 78 63 0 0 64 87 468 4:30 PM 72 0 166 0 0 0 102 92 0 0 84 102 618 4:45 PM 79 0 188 0 0 0 129 110 0 0 105 113 724 5:00 PM 84 0 208 0 0 0 152 130 0 0 129 131 834 5:15 PM 98 0 229 0 0 0 171 147 0 0 149 139 933 5:30 PM 107 0 254 0 0 0 195 162 0 0 180 160 1058 PERIOD I COUNTS Period End A B C D E F G II I J IC L TOTAL 3:45 PM 16 0 46 0 0 0 29 22 0 0 15 18 146 4:00 PM 20 0 31 0 0 0 21 16 0 0 28 40 156 4:15 PM 14 0 49 0 0 0 28 25 0 0 21 29 166 4:30 PM 22 0 40 0 0 0 24 29 0 0 20 15 150 1. 4:45 PM 7 0 22 0 0 0 27 18 0 0 21 11 106 5:00 PM 5 0 20 0 0 0 23 20 0 0 24 18 110 5:15 PM 14 0 21 0 0 0 19 17 0 0 20 8 99 5:30 PM 9 0 25 0 0 0 24 15 0 0 31 21 125 HOURLY TOTALS Beginning At A B C D E F G H I = J K L TOTAL 3:30 PM 72 0 166 0 0 0 102 92 0 0 84 102 618 3:45 PM 63 0 142 0 0 0 100 88 0 0 90 95 578 4:00 PM 48 0 131 0 0 0 102 92 0 0 86 73 532 4:15 PM 48 0 103 0 0 0 93 84 0 0 85 52 465 4:30 PM 35 0 88 0 0 0 93 70 0 0 96 58 440 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY IN'T'ERSECTION SR 11+Lotus Blossom Ln TIME 6:30 AM, =_ W to 5:30'AM JURISDIC'T'ION: DATE 12-15-09,Tile Pj2O,IECT;TITLE: PROJECT NO: ;. PEAK HOUR PERTOD• 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIO 7:30 AM to 7:45 AM SR 1 I PHF= 0.84 0 PHF=N/A ° ^ 0 L 67 0 TOTAL 74 0 —+ •— 0 298 0 1 F 7 0 --" —" 117 I Lotus Blossom Ln. + 1 PHF=0.88 oo c 0 0 0 .n v I SR 1 I " PHF= 0.63 INTERSECTION s PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.90 Lotus Blossum Ln. SR 11 SR 11 RUNNING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound COUNTS Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left. Thru Right Left Thru Right Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 6:45 AM 0 0 0 3 0 12 0 12 20 9 10 0 66 7:00 AM 0 0 0 5 0 27 0 32 40 24 19 0 147 7:15 AM 0 0 0 7 0 40 0 41 80 30 28 0 226 7:30 AM 0 0 0 8 0 50 0 57 80 40 43 0 278 7:45 AM 0 0 0 9 0 70 0 67 100 52 63 0 361 8:00 AM 0 0 0 11 0 89 0 73 120 65 78 0 436 8:15 AM 0 0 0 15 0 102 0 87 120 78 94 0 496 8:30 AM 0 0 0 15 0 117 0 103 150 87 104 0 576 PERIOD COUNTS Period End A B C D E F G H I r J K L TOTAL 6:45 AM 0 0 0 3 0 12 0 12 20 9 10 0 66 7:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 15 0 20 20 IS 9 0 81 7:15 AM 0 0 0 2 0 13 0 9 40 6 9 0 79 7:30 AM 0 0 0 I 0 10 0 16 0 10 15 0 52 7:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 20 0 10 20 12 20 0 83 8:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 19 0 6 20 13 15 0 75 8:15 AM 0 0 0 4 0 13 0 14 0 13 16 0 60 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 16 30 9 10 0 80 HOURLY TOTALS Beeinnine At A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 6:30 AM 0 0 0 8 0 50 0 57 80 40 43 0 278 6:45 AM 0 0 0 6 0 58 0 55 80 43 53 0 295 7:00 AM 0 0 0 6 0 62 0 41 80 41 59 0 289 7:15 AM 0 0 0 8 0 62 0 46 40 48 66 0 270 7:30 AM 0 0 0 7 0 67 0 46 70 47 61 0 298 I INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY INTERSECTION; SR 11+Lotus Blossom Ln TIME: , •3 3o PM' to , 5:30 PM JURISDICTION DATE: 12-15-09;Tue PROJECT TITLE. . PROJECT NO:" PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIO 3:30 PM to 3:45 PM SR 11 PHF= 0.89 o o N — 0 r 1 L PHF=N/A J 0 •1 L 30 0 •-- 37 TOTAL 0 +— 0 478 0 -j r 7 0 —► 100 Lotus Blossom Ln. 1 I PHF=0.77 O b N r I SR 11 t PHF= 0.84 N INTERSECTION I PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.93 Lotus Blossom Ln. SR 11 SR 11 RUNNING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound COUNTS ' Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left T_hiu Right . Left Thru l ht Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 3:45 PM 0 0 0 4 0 7 0 44 13 11 50 0 129 4:00 PM 0 0 0 4 0 16 0 72 19 32 88 0 231 4:15 PM 0 0 0 4 0 21 0 120 23 52 138 0 358 4:30 PM 0 0 0 7 0 30 0 164 27 73 177 0 478 4:45 PM 0 0 0 8 0 41 0 198 30 85 208 0 570 5:00 PM 0 0 0 9 0 49 0 233 31 95 242 0 659 5:15 PM 0 0 0 11 0 55 0 263 33 107 271 0 740 5:30 PM 0 0 0 12 0 65 0 292 34 120 314 0 837 PERIOD I COUNTS Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 3:45 PM 0 0 0 4 0 7 0 44 13 11 50 0 129 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 28 6 21 38 0 102 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 48 4 20 50 0 127 4:30 PM 0 0 0 3 0 9 0 44 4 21 39 0 120 4:45 PM 0 0 0 I 0 11 0 34 3 12 31 0 92 5:00 PM 0 0 0 I 0 8 0 35 1 10 34 0 89 5:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 6 0 30 2 12 29 0 81 5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 10 0 29 I 13 43 0 97 HOURLY TOTALS Beginning At A B C D E F G H I J K �L TOTAL 3:30 PM 0 0 0 7 0 30 0 164 27 73 177 0 478 '`` 3:45 PM 0 0 0 4 0 34 0 154 17 74 158 0 441 4:00 PM 0 0 0 5 0 33 0 161 12 63 154 0 428 4:15 PM 0 0 0 7 0 34 0 143 10 55 133 0 382 4:30 PM 0 0 0 5 0 35 0 128 7 47 137 0 359 I I INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY INTERSECTION:. SR 11+Lehua TIME 6:30 AM •' to 8:30 AM I JURISDICTION DATE: 1216=0$Wed . PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT NO:' PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIO 8:15 AM to 8:30 AM SR 11 PHF= 0.76 I o 0 co 1 L. PHF=N/A as 0J L 1 5 0 4..... l o TOTAL 0 --► 4-- 0 174 1 0 i F 5 0 --' 10 1 I f r Lehua ♦ 1 PHF=0.63 op O CO v t� ,r,o0 t ISR 11 1 PHF= 0.82 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.91 Lehua SR 11 SR 11 RUNNING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound COUNTS Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 6:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 18 0 0 11 0 30 7:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 38 0 I 32 0 76 7:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 55 0 5 46 0 115 I 7:30 AM 0 0 0 2 0 11 0 67 0 5 58 0 143 7:45 AM 0 0 0 2 0 12 0 87 0 7 74 0 182 8:00 AM 0 0 0 3 0 13 0 111 2 8 92 0 229 8:15 AM 0 0 0 5 0 15 0 129 4 9 107 0 269 I 8:30 AM 0 0 0 7 0 16 0 148 4 11 131 0 317 PERIOD COUNTS I Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 6:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 18 0 0 I I 0 30 7:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 20 0 1 21 0 46 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 17 0 4 14 0 39 7:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 12 0 0 12 0 28 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 20 0 2 16 0 39 8:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 24 2 1 18 0 47 8:15 AM 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 18 2 1 15 0 40 8:30 AM 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 19 0 2 24 0 48 HOURLY TOTALS Beginning At A B —C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 6:30 AM 0 0 0 2 0 11 0 67 0 5 58 0 143 6:45 AM 0 0 0 2 0 11 0 69 0 7 63 0 152 7:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 9 0 73 2 7 60 0 153 7:15 AM 0 0 0 4 0 7 0 74 4 4 61 0 154 7:30 AM 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 81 4 6 73 0 174 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY iNTE1$ECr ON: 'sit 11+Lehua TIME 3:30 PM" - to 5:30 PM Ji1RISDICTION ` "DATE 121609 Wed PROJECT TITLE , ; PROJECT NO: (PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 3:45 PM to 4:45 PM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIO 3:45 PM to 4:00 PM SR 11 PHF= 0.84 o 0 PHF=N/A 0 J L 5 0 •-- 4--- 6 TOTAL 0 -� •■• 0 297 0 ""l r 1 0 --► 18 I ~I I r 1 I Lehua PHF=0.38 M N G Cs1 M t I SR 11 i PHF= 0.81 IINTERSECTION PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.95 Lehua SR 11 SR 11 RUNNING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound COUNTS Left Thru Right Left Thru Rat Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 35 2 0 31 0 71 4:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 60 2 5 75 0 149 4:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 98 3 8 108 0 225 4:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 128 5 11 143 0 295 4:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 158 5 15 181 0 368 5:00 PM 0 0 0 4 0 10 0 182 5 21 220 0 442 5:15 PM 0 0 0 4 0 10 0 200 5 23 256 0 498 5:30 PM 0 0 0 4 0 15 0 219 5 24 278 0 545 PERIOD I _ COUNTS Period End A B C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 35 2 0 31 0 71 4:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 25 0 5 44 0 78 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 38 1 3 33 0 76 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 2 3 35 0 70 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 30 0 4 38 0 73 5:00 PM 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 24 0 6 39 0 74 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I8 0 2 36 0 56 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 19 0 I 22 0 47 HOURLY TOTALS Beginning At A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 3:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 128 5 11 143 0 295 3:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 123 3 15 150 0 297 4:00 PM 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 122 3 16 145 0 293 4:15 PM 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 102 2 15 148 0 273 4:30 PM 0 0 0 3 0 8 0 91 0 13 135 0 250 I INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY INTERSECTIONF SR 11+'Orchid Pkwy TIME 630'AM" to 8:30;1111 JURISDICTION - DATE 12-1'/209,Thu 'PROJECT TITLE:. PROJECT NO: PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 1 I PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIO 7:45 AM to 8:00 AM SRI 1 PHF= 0.75 o N n 0 1 I-. }} -PHF=N/A I I I 0 J L I 0 TOTAL I 0 •-- 0 165 1 0 ---1 1---- 0 0 -.• —• 3 Orchid Pkwy ` 1 PHF=0.25 1 O N r c't 00 1 I SR I I 1 PHF= 0.80 N INTERSECTION . PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.90 — Orchid Pkwy SR.11 SR 11 RUNNING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound COUNTS Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thu Right Left Thru Right Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL I 6:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 11 0 29 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 33 0 71 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 54 0 0 47 0 102 I 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 65 0 0 60 0 127 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 85 0 1 75 0 163 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 111 1 1 94 0 209 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 130 I I 1 1 1 0 246 I 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 149 2 I 137 0 292 PERIOD COUNTS I Period End A B C D E F G H I J K k TOTAL 6:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 11 0 29 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 22 0 42 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 16 0 0 14 0 31 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 II 0 0 13 0 25 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 1 15 0 36 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1 0 19 0 46 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 19 0 0 17 0 37 I 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 1 0 26 0 46 HOURLY TOTALS _ Beginning At A B C D E F W G H I J K L TOTAL 6:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 65 0 0 60 0 127 6:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 67 0 1 64 0 134 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 73 1 1 61 0 138 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 76 1 1 64 0 144 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 84 2 1 77 0 165 - ------ --- r ..I xs INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY INTERSECTION. SR it+Orchid.Pkwy TIME: 3 30 PM- to` 5:30 PM JURISDICTION ± DATE - 12-16-09;Wed PROJECT TITLE: ; ' PROJECT NO: PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIO 3:45 PM to 4:00 PM SR 1 I PHF= 0.80 o _" co ^ 0 PHF=N/A 0 J L 7 0 10 TOTAL 0 -- 0 283 0 r 3 0 11 I «-I Orchid Pkwy + I PHF=0.83 rn rn 0 N M SR 11 t PHF= 0.87 INTERSECTION i PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.97 Orchid Pkwy __. SR 11 SR 11 RUNNING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound COUNTS Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right _ Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 3:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 36 1 1 30 0 70 4:00 PM 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 60 2 3 73 0 143 4:15 PM 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 97 2 6 103 0 215 4:30 PM 0 0 0 3 0 7 0 126 3 8 136 0 283 4:45 PM 0 0 0 3 0 8 0 155 3 12 170 0 351 5:00 PM 0 0 0 4 0 8 0 179 4 14 210 0 419 5:15 PM 0 0 0 5 0 8 0 197 4 16 244 0 474 5:30 PM 0 0 0 5 0 8 0 216 5 18 264 0 516 PERIOD I COUNTS s _ Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 3:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 36 1 1 30 0 70 4:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 24 1 2 43 0 73 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 37 0 3 30 0 72 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 29 1 2 33 0 68 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 29 0 4 34 0 68 5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 24 I 2 40 0 68 5:15 PM 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 18 0 2 34 0 55 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 1 2 20 0 42 a; HOURLY TOTALS Be¢innine At A B� C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL ,; 3:30 PM 0 0 0 3 0 7 0 126 3 8 136 0 283 3:45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 7 0 119 2 11 140 0 281 4:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 119 2 11 137 0 276 4:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 100 2 10 141 0 259 1 4:30 PM 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 90 2 10 128 0 233 1 r K X INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY INTERSECTION: Lotus Blossom Ln +Keaka Pkwy. TIME: 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM JURISDICTION: DATE: 12-1640,Wed PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT NO: PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 7:30 AM to R.30 AM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIO 8:15 AM to 8:30 AM Lotus Blossom Ln. PHF= 0.90 'a c° o Lotus Blossom Ln. PHF=0.81 r wl 41 J L 0 71 •--. 0 TOTAL 0 --• •— 0 153 11 i r 0 52 0 I CD~I 1 r 0 • 1 PHF=N/A N N ON CD N N Keaka Pkwy I PHF= 0.61 N INTERSECTION i PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.89 Lotus Blossom,Ln. Keaka Pkwy Lotus Blossom Ln. RUNNING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound COUNTS Left Tin-it, Ri:ht Left Thru Ri:ht Left Thru Ri:ht Left Thru Ri:ht Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 6:45 AM 7 0 I 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 10 23 7;00 AM 13 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 3 22 44 7:15 AM 18 0 3 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 30 63 7:30 AM 22 0 3 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 6 36 79 7:45 AM 31 0 5 0 0 0 7 8 0 0 9 51 ill 8:00 AM 40 0 8 0 0 0 9 11 0 0 14 65 147 8:15 AM 49 0 12 0 0 0 12 17 0 0 17 82 189 8:30 AM 63 0 14 0 0 0 15 19 0 0 24 97 232 PERIOD COUNTS 1 Period End A B C D B F G H I J K L TOTAL 6:45 AM 7 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 10 23 7:00 AM 6 0 0 0 0 0 I ) 0 0 1 12 21 7:15 AM 5 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 I 8 19 7:30 AM 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 2 6 16 7:45 AM 9 0 2 0 0 0 2 I 0 0 3 15 32 8:00 AM 9 0 3 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 5 14 36 8:15 AM 9 0 4 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 3 17 42 8:30 AM 14 0 2 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 7 15 43 HOURLY TOTALS Beginning At A B C D E F G H I J IC L TOTAL 6:30 AM 22 0 3 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 6 36 79 6:45 AM 24 0 4 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 7 41 88 7:00 AM 27 0 7 0 0 0 7 8 0 0 11 43 103 i 7:15 AM 31 0 9 0 0 0 8 13 0 0 13 52 126 7:30 AM 41 0 11 0 0 0 10 12 0 0 18 61 153 I INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY INTE'RSEGTION° Lotus Blossom Ln +Keaka Pkwy. ' TIME 3'30 P11,1 to` 5.30 PM JURISDICTION ' DATE: 12-1609,Wed PROJECT:TITLE PROJECT NO PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIO 3:30 PM to 3:45 PM Lotus Blossom Ln. PHF= 0.82 r V7 N C n a. Lotus Blossom Ln. 1 L PHF=0.77 I 65 -- L 0 68 •-- •— 0 TOTAL 0 '— 0 192 24 F 0 89 —► 0 I 1 1 fl 0 • 1 PHF=N/A d' z< 7 N I Keaka Pkwy 1 PHF= 0.64 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.83 ' Lotus Blossom Ln. Keaka Pkwy Lotus Blossom Ln. RUNNING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound COUNTS Left Thni Right Left Thru .. Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 3:45 PM 19 0 10 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 7 16 58 4:00 PM 32 0 12 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 10 27 93 4:15 PM 53 0 19 0 0 0 10 13 0 0 14 41 150 4:30 PM 65 0 24 0 0 0 14 14 0 0 21 54 192 4:45 PM 78 0 29 0 0 0 15 16 0 0 26 64 228 5:00 PM 87 0 32 0 0 0 17 18 0 0 31 73 258 5:15 PM 93 0 37 0 0 0 21 21 0 0 41 83 296 5:30 PM 109 0 40 0 0 0 25 23 0 0 49 96 342 PERIOD I COUNTS Period End A B C D E F G II I J K L TOTAL 3:45 PM 19 0 10 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 7 16 58 4:00 PM 13 0 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 11 35 4:15 PM 21 0 7 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 4 14 57 4:30 PM 12 0 5 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 7 13 42 4:45 PM 13 0 5 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 5 10 36 5:00 PM 9 0 3 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 5 9 30 5:15 PM 6 0 5 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 10 10 38 5:30 PM 16 0 3 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 8 13 46 HOURLY TOTALS Beeinnine At A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 3:30 PM 65 0 24 0 0 0 14 14 0 0 21 54 192 3:45 PM 59 0 19 0 0 0 12 13 0 0 19 48 170 4:00 PM 55 0 20 0 0 0 11 12 0 0 21 46 165 4:15 PM 40 0 18 0 0 0 11 8 0 0 27 42 146 4:30 PM 44 0 16 0 0 0 11 9 0 0 28 42 150 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY INTERSECTION. . ICeaka+Lehoa TIME: 6:30 AM , to 8:30"AM r JURISDICTION. ` DATE:. 12-17-09,-Thu PROJECT_TITLE: PROJECT.NO: PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIO 8:15 AM to 8:30 AM Lehua PHF= 0.75 — 0 N Keaka 1 L PHF=0.70 N 1 j 17 ._.l L 0 22 •-- 6 TOTAL 11 —► 5 69 3 i F I 31 —• ---► 11 ~I 1 r Keaka 1 1 PHF=0.38 o ,no Lehua t PHF= 0.31 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.82 Keaka ��� Keaka T Lehua Lehua RUNNING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound COUNTS Left Thru Right, Left Thru Rht - Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 6:45 AM 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 8 7:00 AM 2 2 0 0 3 0 0 I 0 0 3 2 13 7:15 AM 4 3 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 3 4 21 7:30 AM 6 3 0 0 6 1 0 2 0 0 7 8 33 7:45 AM 10 3 0 0 6 1 0 3 0 0 9 12 44 8:00 AM 13 8 I 0 7 1 0 3 0 0 12 16 61 8:15 AM 17 Il 1 0 11 1 0 3 0 0 14 23 81 8:30 AM 23 14 3 1 11 1 0 7 0 0 17 25 102 PERIOD COUNTS Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 6:45 AM 1 2 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 8 7:00 AM I 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 5 7:15 AM 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 8 7:30 AM 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 4 12 7:45 AM 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 2 4 11 8:00 AM 3 5 t 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 17 8:15 AM 4 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 20 t( 8:30 AM 6 3 2 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 2 21 mss; HOURLY TOTALS W J Beginning At A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL u 6:30 AM 6 3 0 0 6 1 0 2 0 0 7 8 33 6:45 AM 9 1 0 0 5 1 0 3 0 0 7 10 36 7:00 AM 11 6 1 0 4 1 0 2 0 0 9 14 48 7:15 AM 13 8 1 0 6 1 0 1 0 0 11 19 60 7:30 AM 17 11 3 1 5 0 0 5 0 0 10 17 69 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT O MENT SUMMARY INTERSECTION: Keaka-1=1;14a: TIME , 3 30 PM to' 5:30 PM JURISDICTION DATE 12474 Thu PROJECT TITLE , , : PROJECT NO PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIO 5:00 PM to 5:15 PM Lehua PHF= 0.65 N O _ I N tt Keaka «J I 1 L PHF=0.83 25 J L 1 24 12 TOTAL 17 4-- 9 97 1 - r 2 43 17 1 Keaka I 1 PHF=0.60 I it Lehua j PHF= 0.80 INTERSECTION 1 PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.76 Keaka Keaka Lehua Lehua RUNNING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound COUNTS Left Thru Right Left _Thru Rig t _ Left Thru Right Left ___Thru _ Right _ Period End A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 3:45 PM 7 2 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 5 19 4:00 PM 16 10 1 0 3 0 1 6 0 0 3 7 47 4:15 PM 17 17 1 0 6 0 I 10 0 0 4 9 65 4:30 PM 22 24 1 0 9 0 2 11 0 0 8 13 90 4:45 PM 30 25 2 0 12 0 2 16 0 0 11 15 113 5:00 PM 34 29 2 0 12 1 2 21 0 0 12 17 130 5:15 PM 42 34 2 2 15 1 2 25 0 0 16 23 162 5:30 PM 49 40 2 2 15 2 2 28 0 0 19 27 186 PERIOD COUNTS Period End A B C D E F G II I J K L TOTAL 3:45 PM 7 2 I 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 5 19 4:00 PM 9 8 0 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 2 2 28 4:15 PM 1 7 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 1 2 18 4:30 PM 5 7 0 0 3 0 1 I 0 0 4 4 25 4:45 PM 8 1 1 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 3 2 23 5:00 PM 4 4 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 1 2 17 5:15 PM 8 5 0 2 3 0 0 4 0 0 4 6 32 5:30 PM 7 6 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 4 24 HOURLY TOTALS Be¢innin2 At A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL 3:30 PM 22 24 1 0 9 0 2 11 0 0 8 13 90 3:45 PM 23 23 1 0 11 0 2 14 0 0 10 10 94 4:00 PM 18 19 I 0 9 1 1 15 0 0 9 10 83 4:15 PM 25 17 1 2 9 1 1 15 0 0 12 14 97 4:30 PM 27 ]6 1 2 6 2 0 ]7 0 0 11 14 96 y I I I I I 1 ' Attachment F Level-of-Service Worksheets for Existing Conditions 1 I 1 I I I HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SR 11 & PRINCE KUHIO BLVD 1/29/2010 _ —► 1- 4N / Lane Configurations + r ) 4, II r -- Sign Control '" Free` Free'. Stop> ,. _ Grade 0% 0% 0% Volumee(treh/h) ;;" 80 33. : 60 48 32 64 - Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 Hourly flow rata(vph) 100 41 67 ' 53 : 40 80 . Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage, Right turn flare(veh) Median-,`type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 141 287 100 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 141 287 100 tC,single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 95 94 92 cM=capacity(veh/h) ' 1442 671 956 I 100 41 67 Volume Left 0. 0 67 50'. 40" 80 Volume Right 0 41 0 0 0 80 cSH 1700 1700 1442 1700 671 956 Volume to Capacity 0.06 . 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.08 Queue Length(ft) 0 0 4 0 5 7 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 10.7 9.1 Lane LOS A B A Approach Delay,(s) 0.0 4.2 9.6 Approach LOS A Average Delay 4.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 S"k HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case1 am Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR :dd 5k� r�Y w HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SR 11 & LOTUS BLOSSOM LANE 1/29/2010 Lane Configurations li 4' t SigntControl 7 : Free Free..;: Stop f_° Grade 0% -, 0% 0% Volume(veh h); fi.:'; 47 70.1,- 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.63 0.63 0.88 0.88 Hourly,flow•rate(vph) 56 73 73 111 8 76 - Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage , Right turn flare (veh) 1 Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 184 313 129 vC1,stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 184 313 129 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 96 99 92 cM capacity(veh/h) 1391 652 921 Volume Total',!' '56 73: 184 84`" Volume Left 56 0 0 8 Volume Right 0 0 111 76 cSH 1391 1700 1700 887 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.04 `0.11 0.09 Queue Length (ft) 3 0 0 8 Control Delay(s) 7.7 0.0 0.0 9.5 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 3.3 0.0 9.5 Approach LOS A Average Delay y 3.1 intersection Capacity Utilization. 20.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case1am Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR { A HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SR 11 & LEHUA LANE 1/29/2010 tT• 4/y Lane Configurations 4 i V Sigrj Oontrol, . '4 . 1 Free i Free; Stop '° Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h)-1 6 73 81 4,': # i 5 Peak Hour Factor 0176 0.76 0.82 0.82 0.63 0.63 Hourly flow"rate(vph) . 8 196 99 5` 58 8 ' Pedestrians Lane Width:(ft), ' -- Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type ' None Median storage veh) Upstream Signal.(ft) pX, platoon unblocked ve,conflicting volume: 104 213 101 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vG2,Stage'"?conf vol , _ vCu, unblocked vol 104 213 101 tC,single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 99 99 cM°capacity,(veh/h) 1488 771 ; 954 Volume Total 104 104 16 . Volume Left 8 0 8 Volume Right 0 5 ` 8 cSH 1488 1700 853 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.06 0.02 _ Queue Length(ft) 0 0 1 Control Delay(s) 0.6 0.0 9.3 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.6 0.0 9.3 Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.9 Intersection Capacity;Utilization 18.8%; ICU Level of;Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Caselam Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SR 11 & ORCHID PARKWAY 1/29/2010 Lane Configurations 4 - Sign Control- Fee Free . ,Stop - Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h}. 1 . 77 - 84. 2 ; ... 0 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.80 0.80 0.25 0.25 Hourlyfiow fate_(vph) ;1.. . '1,03 : 105 2 0 4," Pedestrians Lane Width (ft)', Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None - Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft)=: pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 108 212 106 vC1,stage 1 conf vol vC2,'stage'2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 108 212 106 tC,sin gle(s) 4.1 ' 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1483 776 948 Volume Total" 104 108 4 Volume Left 1 0 0 Volume Right 0 2 4 cSH 1483 1700 948 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.06 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.1 0.0 8.8 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s)' 0.1 0.0 8.8 Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 SS++ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Caselam Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: KEAKA PARKWAY & LOTUS BLOSSOM LANE 1/29/2010 -�' .*— 4\ / Lane Configurations 4 'V Sign Control Free ri Free Grade 0% 0% 0% VOligne,(Ve,h/h)1 =18 - 60 10 12 4T 19 _ Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.61 0.61 0 81 0.81 Hourly,flo rate(vph) 20 67; 16 20_: 51= 14 - P v,edestrians LaneiWidth_'(ft) , Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage - Right turn flare (veh) Median type; None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC;conflicting volume 87 106 53 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 87 106 53 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s)4 2.2 3.5,?. 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 94 99 cM-capacity(veh/h): 1509 882 1014 Volume Total 87 36. . 64 • Volume Left 0 16 51 Volume Right 67 0 14 cSH 1700 1509 907 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.01 0.07 Queue Length (ft) 0 1 6 Control Delay(s) 0.0. 3.4 9.3 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay.(s) 0.0 3.4 9.3 Approach LOS A Average Delay 3.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 17.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Caselam Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: LEHUA LANE & KEAKA PARKWAY 1/29/2010 Lane Configurations 4, 4 4 4 Sign Control;` T t , _ Free.-, ;Free - Stop` Stop Grade 0% . 007 0% 0% Volurne,(yeh/h) 0 10.. 17 . 0' ' .5 0 17 11 3 1 ' 5, 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.38 0.38 0.38 Hourf flo c rate(vph) 0 13 ' 23 0 : 16 0 24.i 16 4 3 4 13 , " 0 Pedestrians Lane 1/idth(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Perc',ent Blockage , Right turn flare (veh) 1 Median type',- None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 16 36 47 41 25 53 52 16 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,`stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 16 36 47 41 25 53 52 16 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 '6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 97 98 100 100 98 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1601 1575 942 851 1052 . 929 839 1063 Volume Tbtal' 36 16. 44 16 Volume Left 0 0 24 3 Volume Right 23 0 4 0 cSH 1601 1575 917 853 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.02 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 4 1 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.1 9.3 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.1 9.3 Approach LOS A A Average Delay 4.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case1am Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SR 11 & PRINCE KUHIO BLVD 1/29/2010 —►. „`# c 1— 4\ p Lane Configurations r m I 1 r Sign Control Free -, Free:; I Sto Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 84 102 ,` 102 92 I 72: 166 T 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.68 0.68 0.92 0.92 0.94 0.94 Hourly flour rate,(vph) ; 124,'`; 150- 111,; 100 ? 77 177; Pedestrians Lane Width;(ft) i -- Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage; Right turn flare (veh) Median typo . None Median storage veh) Upstream,signal(ft). . pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 274 ' 445 124 • vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 274 445 124 tC,single:(s)' 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC,2 stage (s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 91 85 81 cM capacity(veh/h) 1290 521 927 Volume Total `' 124 150- -111, 100 77; 177 1-' Volume Left 0 0 111 0 77 0 Volume Right 0 150 0 0 0 177 cSH 1700 1700 1290 1700 521 927 Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.15 0.19' Queue Length (ft) 0 0 7 0 13 18 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 13.1 9.8 Lane LOS A B A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 4.2 10.8 Approach LOS B Average Delay 4.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Caselpm Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR e ran"a HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SR 11 & LOTUS BLOSSOM LANE 1/29/2010 Lane Configurations 1 4 t V Sign:Control = Free Free Stop. Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume!(veh/h) _ ; 73 177 164 27 7- 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.84 0.84 0.77 0.77 Hourly;flow rate(vph) 82 199 195 32 9 39 Pedestrians Lane Width{ft)` Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) 1 Median type None Median storage veh) Ups,#ream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 227 574 211 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,:stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 227 574 211 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 94 98 95 cM'capacity(veh/h) 1341 451 829 Volume Total ' '82 199 ' 227_ 48 Volume Left 82 0 0 9 Volume Right 0 0 32 39 cSH 1341 1700 1700 715 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.12 0.13 0.07 Queue Length (ft) 5 0 0 5 Control Delay(s) 7.9 0.0 0.0 10.4 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay(s) 2.3 0.0 10.4 Approach LOS B Average Delay 2.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 �tw HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case1pm ., Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR AI Y. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SR 11 & LEHUA LANE 1/29/2010 Lane Configurations 4 SignControl. : Free Free. '. ;Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (vehth) . 15 150 123 3 ;. 1 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.81 0.81 0.38 0.38 Hourlyflow`rate(vph) 18 179 >'. 152 ' .4 3 13 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) ' Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 156 368 154 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 156 368 154 tC:single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC,2 stage (s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free% 99 100 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 1425 624 892 Volume Total 196 156 " , 16:` Volume Left 18 0 3 Volume Right 0 4 13 cSH 1425 1700 833 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.09 0.02 Queue Length(ft) 1 0 1 Control Delay(s) 0.8 0.0 9.4 Lane LOS A A Approach.Delay(s) 0.8 0.0 9.4 Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.7% ICU Level of Service_ A Analysis Period (min) 15 u#ra; HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case1 pm Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SR 11 & ORCHID PARKWAY 1/29/2010 Lane Configurations 4 i4 V Sign'Control' . Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% .. Volume(veh/h) 8 136 126 3 11 10 Peak-Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.87 0.87 0.83 0.83 Hourly flow rate (vph) '10 170 145 ;' 3 13 _.: -12 - , Pedestrians Lane.Width (ft): Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 148 337 147 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 148 337 147 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free% 99 98 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 1433 654 900 Volume Total'! 180 148 25 Volume Left 10 0 13 Volume Right 0 3 12 cSH 1433 1700 752 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.09 0.03 Queue Length(ft) 1 0 3 Control Delay(s) 0.5 0.0 10.0 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.5 0.0 10.0 Approach LOS A Average Delay 1.0 9 Y Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case1pm Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: KEAKA PARKWAY & LOTUS BLOSSOM LANE 1/29/2010 _ Lane Configurations 1. 4 Sign Control` Free = Free;; Stop; Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 21 54 14' 14 65 24! Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.64' 0.64 0.77 6.77 Hourly flow rate (vph) 26. 66` 22 22 84 31 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage turn flare(veh) Median type None. Median storage veh) Upstream signal!(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 91 124 59 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 91 124 59 tC,single(s): 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 90 97 cM capacity(veh/h) 1503 858 1007 , Volume Total 91 44 11'6 Volume Left 0 22 84 Volume Right 66 0 31 cSH 1700 1503 894 Volume to Capacity 0.05. 0.01 0.13 Queue Length (ft) 0 1 11 Control Delay(s) 0.0 3.8 9.6 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 : 3.8 9.6 Approach LOS A Average Delay 5.1 Intersection Capacity.Utilization 19.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Caselpm Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: LEHUA LANE & KEAKA PARKWAY 1/29/2010 Lane Configurations , Signs Control _i . -, Free- Free Stop _ Stop` Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) :. 0 12 14 1 15 0- 25 17 1 2 9 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.60 0.60 0.60 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 ;;`18 22 1 19 0 30 20 1` 3 15 2 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage. Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 19 40 60 50 29 62 61 19 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 19 40 60 50 29 62 61 19 tC, single(s) 4,1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s). 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 97 98 100 100 98 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1598 1570 921 840 1046 914 829 1060 Volume Total 40 20 52 20 Volume Left 0 1 30 3 Volume Right 22 0 1 2 cSH 1598 1570 890 858 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.02 Queue Length(ft) 0 0 5 2 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.5 9.3 9.3 Lane LOS A A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.5 9.3 9.3 Approach LOS A A Average Delay 5.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.3% ICU Level of Service A . Analysis Period (min) 15 us 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case1 pm Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR Ii N M 1 1 AVMNabd aIHMIO ,+ AVMN JVd OIHaaO *-J z o LO z r O N Q Ile 6 Z 0 z Q W 7 N M 0) ° 1 0 N S ♦ �# ♦ Z I I W ���P a ���JP v f- W CO W re O N s z Y _ Y E O w 'c it fl CO 0 co co 1- Q 1--- o" Q 0 Z W W Z Ill Z W D o o c O IX m o co Y in co 0 2 u,N (+.j W l W a as Q < it t W Y N a I u^^ W k. N U) CO "Jr aadna1noe aadna1noa OIHnJi 3ONIad OIHnJi 3ONIad ik it it mss= N o V a�'p v 'Jr Lo 1 AVM3121Vd aIHOao } AVM>121Vd°MONO v.I t I I cc 1 +- i I x F ce 0 Z w Ct to Ct 1 1 I — J JP��� P �� t CO 0 I Z Q if R aw a o 1-- Q W °` O o w z o g w CC m CL °w co CO QA O y CV 0 N V J ./A) 44) 1 Ct ce Y Q Q 0. —'4 t. Y `-v Y 1D V r in 1 2 ck i°'— <I.> a2iVn31f108 L �-- 0" a2iVA311108 OIHfI>1 30NRId 0IH11>1301■1I21d t(7 I r 10 A V CO N V qt M 1=- N<- 0 Z z AVMNadd 4IHOaO O S le Z W 7 I O H U W s� � t U 1 ,y s `°c, LIB_ '14db Q a a Ct �6:4 I'll° a' \-, ti'��, No E _ .��� �,s, co co w .r ��JP 1-- Q Q. W r C z Li, .G m F Q O m m m Z o m GI O 7 o CC J COC 0 i Q t (` N CO,- / ry m`O lk— 69 1 c F;a. � �£ aadn3�noa 0IH115I 3ONIad t ( CO M �h„A{i � J \ Z i � \� z AVM?RtVd 01H01O 0 z 01.-----4 cot_ co kg° O Z w 0 I LI a. o s� L I 14 --t?„. col LL db I— Z .9c4 E _ 01r Ft < CU ti� 0 Q Z CC o <a ^CL m Q u' Z 0 m m O O G-53 o CC `n 1 bz Q or—_ 99 E 1.9—1f t CO SS. _04 N up N r 1 ( N v N to CO 01 r- Jr /,-- ZL 02iVn3111O8 OIHf1N 3ONRid I nn vrn 1�2 iii I IT- r z 1 J 1 AVM) Vd QIHOIO z IleW m K F- I CO r LLI 2 z b____A 0 1 CO ry ` --.4 N �i�tb Q ICJ b27 - IX •))r,\. f o %y I- I zi � 0 r w,4 �� U a W a. W a lir c 0 I Q w N A a i----- -- ,..1.: N I ?ogo�' J 2 0 m vc, �Y �, L awn3�noe bL OIHf1N gat I v .)..., ,, ,,, . . x ° 0 ,,,_Z 1 z AVMN Vd alHONO Z N f'" 0 Z W 0 1 ix F- o Z 2 Z CD 017---44 (n in b S a l' E U .° cn .c w �� V "7 JP� W . O �4' 0 Q a I W a 0 I Q w 1 91 a CL a r->f U")LO cow i∎ 5o 00 1 N N �;3d LoL O3011121d CMV 3011121d 1 0 t co 0 F N o .) 1 • z z AVM)ladd aiHOao 2 0--A 1i r V) kg° O o H z W U I W LL CL .) 1 g �y Z6- 4 T ct 1 '1'4. I t N Cr 0 I b-3. *:77-`1. a /'' os�� AN �Jsod..13 C o,, I-- JPS U �� Z 0 Q W W 0 Ct M F- co co 0- o U) m D co J CO CO EL m 0 �� l Z s` r =O 1 � ,b bt CC I Y 1: ry. 0 CO Nt0 1^/I T'''' Cb CO O pr— Le 02:vn311109 on-frm 30NIad CO a3t �pF ig ?J. CO HM z Al a AVMN Vd OIHObO z_ t I. --� I \ z 01.----1 tOo N CO F. Z ac O lie '2 W 0 CL w 0 Et a. U � I c., w An `L O 4i4/0 4 d / � M N I a ''S'<0 OO,�A 1-//73'\'\ � '� N 4 j 4 co �� W & Q w Z a W 0 J i- 0 � Q/0 co . O Cl)co J VJ m 1 J o ° Q. L • 7/7•Ch MI 4, c. sZ o - S9 EZ--'' I OOC , l9 �' . N n. C) 1 � . N U/ CO N '^ L / O L L8l N 1 , ZL oavn3- oa on-mm 30NIad Lo cr, I I I I I I I I I Attachment L I Traffic Projection Worksheets I I I I I I I 0 TRAFFIC PROJECTION WORKSHEET Intersection 1 SR 11 at Prince Kuhio Blvd 2009 to 2015 I Background Related Projects' 2015 Background 2015 Background Approach& Existing(2009) Growth Trips Traffic Project Trips Plus Project Movement AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM _ North Rt 0 0 0 0 Th 0 0 0 0 Lt 0 0 0 0 East Rt 0 0 0 0 Th 48 92 25 35 14 8 87 135 4 20 91 155 Lt 60 102 5 14 65 116 3 20 68 136 South Rt 64 166 5 11 69 177 14 10 83 187 Th 0 0 0 0 Lt 32 72 -1 0 31 72 31 72 West Rt 33 102 -1 -5 32 97 32 97 Th 50 84 25 40 5 23 80 147 14 10 94 157 Lt 0 0 0 0 Total 287 618 50 75 27 51 364 744 35 60 399 804 TRAFFIC PROJECTION WORKSHEET Intersection 2 SR 11 at Lotus blossom Lane 2009 to 2015 Background Related Projects' 2015 Background 2015 Background Approach& Existing(2009) Growth Trips Traffic Project Trips Plus Project Movement AM PM AM PM AM _ PM AM PM AM PM AM PM North Rt 67 30 31 31 98 61 98 61 Th 0 0 0 0 Lt 7 7 7 16 14 23 14 23 East Rt 70 27 16 24 86 51 86 51 Th 46 164 _ 25 35 -12 -9 59 190 _ 7 40 66 230 Lt 0 0 0 0 South Rt 0 0 0 0 Th _ 0 0 0 0 Lt 0 0 0 0 West Rt _ 0 0 0 0 Th 61 177 25 40 -3 -5 83 212 21 15 104 227 Lt 47 73 12 39 59 112 7 5 66 117 Total 298 478 50 75 51 96 399 649 35 60 434 709 A u I TRAFFIC PROJECTION WORKSHEET Intersection 3 SR 11 at Lehua Lane I 2009 to 2015 1 Background Related Projects' 2015 Background 2015 Background Approach& Existing(2009) Growth Trips Traffic Project Trips Plus Project Movement AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM North Rt 5 5 5 5 7 40 12 45 Th 0 0 0 0 Lt 5 1 5 1 4 20 9 21 East Rt 4 3 4 3 13 10 17 13 Th 81 123 25 35 4 15 110 173 110 173 Lt 0 0 0 0 t' South Rt 0 0 0 0 Tt, 0 0 0 0 Lt � 0 0 0 0 West Rt 0 0 0 0 Th 73 150 25 40 4 11 102 201 102 201 Lt 6 15 6 15 21 15 27 30 Total 174 297 50 75 8 26 _ 232 398 _ 45 85 277 483 TRAFFIC PROJECTION WORKSHEET Intersection 4 SR 11 at Orchid Parkway 2009 to 2015 Background Related Projects' 2015 Background 2015 Background Approach& Existing(2009) Growth Trips Traffic Project Trips Plus Project Movement AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM North Rt 1 10 1 10 1 10 Th 0 0 0 0 Lt 0 11 0 11 0 11 East Rt 2 3 2 3 2 3 Th 84 126 25 35 4 15 113 176 13 10 126 186 Lt 0 0 0 0 South Rt 0 0 0 0 Th 0 0 0 0 Lt _ 0 0 0 0 West Rt 0 0 0 0 Th 77 136 25 40 4 _ 11 106 187 4 20 110 207 Lt _ 1 8 1 8 1 8 Total 165 294 50 75 8 _ 26 223 395 17 30 _ 240 425 4�va ij S}ti Y iv I I TRAFFIC PROJECTION WORKSHEET Intersection 5 Keaka Parkway at Lotus Blossom Lane 2009 to 2015 I Background Related Projects' 2015 Background 2015 Background Approach& Existing(2009) Growth Trips Traffic Project Trips Plus Project Movement AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM North Rt 0 0 0 0 Th 0 0 0 0 Lt 0 0 0 0 East Rt 0 0 0 0 I Th 12 14 12 14 2 10 14 24 Lt 10 14 10 14 10 14 South Rt 11 24 11 24 7 5 18 29 Th 0 0 0 0 I Lt 41 65 41 65 41 65 West Rt 61 54 61 54 61 54 Th 18 21 18 21 7 5 25 26 I Lt 0 0 0 0 Total 153 192 0 0 0 0 153 192 16 20 169 212 TRAFFIC PROJECTION WORKSHEET I Intersection 6 Keaka Parkway at Lehua Lane 2009 to 2015 I Background Related Projects' 2015 Background 2015 Background Approach& Existing(2009) Growth Trips Traffic Project Trips Plus Project Movement AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM North Rt 10 14 10 14 10 14 Th 10 12 10 12 14 10 24 22 Lt 0 0 0 0 0 0 East Rt 0 1 0 1 0 1 Th 5 9 5 9 5 9 I It 1 2 1 2 7 5 8 7 South Rt 0 0 0 0 2 10 2 10 Th 5 15 5 15 3 20 8 35 I Lt 0 1 0 1 2 10 2 11 West Rt 3 1 3 1 14 10 17 11 Th 11 17 11 17 11 17 Lt 17 25 17 25 17 25 ITotal _ 62 97 0 0 0 0 62 97 42 _ 65 104 162 I I I I J°7? TRAFFIC PROJECTION WORKSHEET Intersection 7 Lehua Lane at Project Driveway I 2009 to 2015 Background Related Projects' 2015 Background 2015 Background Approach& Existing(2009) Growth Trips Traffic Project Trips Plus Project Movement AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM North Rt 0 0 35 25 35 25 Th 14 15 14 15 14 15 Lt 0 0 0 0 East Rt 0 0 0 0 Th 0 0 _ 0 0 Lt 0 0 0 0 South Rt 0 0 0 0 Th 5 16 5 16 5 16 Lt 0 0 34 25 34 25 West Rt 0 0 11 60 11 60 Th 0 0 0 0 Lt 0 0 7 40 7 40 Total 19 31 0 0 _ 0 0 19 31 87 150 106 181 I I I Sus- I I I I I I I I I I Attachment M 1 Level-of-Service Worksheets for 2015 Background Conditions I I I I I I HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SR 11 & PRINCE KUHIO BLVD 1/29/2010 --► c '— 4\ P Lane Configurations + it vi t vi r S1:61.Con tol sv ; Free . Free`; Stop' , Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 80,' 32 65 87 31 69 Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 Hourly flow rate.(vph) 100- 40 , 722''' 97, 39 -. 86 - Pedestrians Lane Wdtl (ft). Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type ,;- None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 140 341 100 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 140 341 100 tC,single (s) ' 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 95 94 91 cM capacity(veh/h)' 1443 622 956 Volume Total - 100 ' 40" 72.; ' 97 39';" > 86 Volume Left 0 0 72 0 39 0 Volume Right 0 40 0 0 0 86 . cSH 1700 1700 1443 1700 622 956 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.09 Queue Length(ft) 0 0 4 0 5 7 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 11.2 9.1 Lane LOS A B A Approach Delay(s)` 0.0 3.3 9.8 Approach LOS A Average Delay 4.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case2am Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SR 11 & LOTUS BLOSSOM LANE 1/29/2010 f Lane Configurations ) + t; 1 Sign,Control _ - Free 'Free : Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h)' . 59 83 59 86 14 98 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.63 0.63 0.88 0.88 Hourly now rate(vph) : 70 ' 99 94 137 16 111 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 1 Median type` = None Median storage veh) Upstream,signal (ft) ' , tpX, platoon unblocked vC;conflicting volume 230 401 162 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2_conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 230 401 162 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF,(s) 2.2 3.5, 3.3 p0 queue free % 95 97 87 cM capacity(veh/h)_: 1338 573 883 ' Volume Total 70 99 230 127 Volume Left 70 0 0 16 Volume Right 0 0 137 111 cSH 1338 1700 1700 827 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.06 0.14 0.15 Queue Length (ft) 4 0 0 14 Control,Delay(s) 7.8 0.0 0.0 10.1 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay(s) 3.3 0.0 10.1 Approach LOS B Average Delay 3.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization '- 28.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case2am Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SR 11 & LEHUA LANE 1/29/2010 Lane Configurations 4 V Sign Control = Free_ Free Stop 3.::. ' ' .:.` Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) ; 6: 102 110 4' 5 'f Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.82 0.82 0.63 0.63 Hourly,flow rate (vph) 8 134 134;7 5_ :-'.8 , Pedestrians Lane Width'(ft), Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal?(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 139 287 137 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage"2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 139 287 137 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5. 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 99 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 1444 700`' 912 Volume Total 142 139` „ 16 Volume Left 8 0 8 Volume Right 0 5 8 cSH 1444 1700 792 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.08. 0.02 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 2 Control Delay(s) 0.5 0.0 9.6 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.5 0.0 9.6 Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization. 20.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case2am Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TZAR ' HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SR 11 & ORCHID PARKWAY 1/29/2010 Lane Configurations 4 I, V Sigri±C9ntrol,_` 1 Free Free , Stop ,.. . _ Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(yen/h), : 1 106 113 ,` 2,.- 0"" 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.80 6.80 0.25 0.25 Ht ut ly,tloW:rate (vph). 1 141 141 2 0 , 4 ` Pedestrians Lane-yWidth(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 1 Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal,(ft)' pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume . 144 286 142 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol _ _ vCu, unblocked vol 144 286 142 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF (s) ' 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free% 100 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1439 703 . 905 Volume-Total 1'43 144 4 Volume Left 1 0 0 Volume Right 0 2 4 cSH 1439 1700 905 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.08 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.1 0.0 9.0 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.1 0.0 9.0 Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case2am Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: KEAKA PARKWAY & LOTUS BLOSSOM LANE 1/29/2010 —.• c 4\ p Lane Configurations i, 4 V Sigf,Control _h :Free -r Free a Stop;. Grade 0% 0% 0% VoI,ume(veh/hi; ;r 18 61 10 - 12 41r-- 11: Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.61 0.61 0.81 0.81 Hourly flow.rate(vph); , 20-i-_ 68> 16 ,F 20, 51 ; 14 = '=- Pedestrians Lane Width'.(ft) ": Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage' Right turn flare(veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 88 106 54 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 ,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 88 106 54 tC,single(s) . 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF;(s) , 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 94 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 1508 882 1013 Volume Tota(, + ' 88 36 64 Volume Left 0 16 51 Volume Right,. 68 0 14 cSH 1700 1508 907 Volume to.Capacity 0.05= 0.01 0.07 Queue Length(ft) 0 1 6 Control Delay(s) 0.0 3.4 9.3 Lane LOS A A Approach-Delay(s) 0.0 3.4 9.3 Approach LOS A Average Delay 3.8 Intersection:Capacity Utilization 17.9% ICU Level of Service A ', Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case2am Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR 0 ?:m3' HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: LEHUA LANE & KEAKA PARKWAY 1/29/2010 ` Ni, ) _ \ r 'I / fk % lt.. Lane Configurations 4 , 43 , its Sigii Control , - R, Free ;;Free!= Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% . 0% 0% Volume(yeh/h), , ; 0 10 10 0 _T 5 0,' 17: 11,' .3 '1 5 ; 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.38 0.38 0.38 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 13 13 0 16" ' 24 16 " . 4 '°3 _-13 , 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) I Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 16 27 43 36 20 48 43 16 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 16 27 43 36 20 48 43 16 tC, single(s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s). 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free% 100 100 97 98 100 100 98 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1601 1587 949 856 '; 1058 935 849 1063 Volume Total' 27 16 44 16 Volume Left 0 0 24 3 Volume Right 13 0 4 0 cSH 1601 1587 923 862 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.02 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 4 1 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.1 9.3 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.1 9.3 Approach LOS A A Average Delay 5.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case2am Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SR 11 & PRINCE KUHIO BLVD 1/29/2010 --* "''.* f� l_ 4\ /'` Lane Configurations SigCootrol Free .„ ` = Free Stop` „„,-,=. _ Grade 0% 0%° 0% Volume(veh/h), .;; _ 147 97:1,116. ; 135 •72 4 .177 .. Peak Hour Factor 0.68 0.68 0-.92 0 92 0.94 0.94 Figorliti flow rate.(vph)-. 216, ; 143 126 1,47`' 77 188:,: , Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) PerOnt Blockage` Right turn flare(veh) Median type:' None Median storage veh) Upstream-signal(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 359 615 216 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 359 615 216 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 89 81 77 cM capacity(veh/h) 1200 :- 407 ; 824 Volurne Total " 216 148 '126:? '147 77 188` Volume Left 0 0 126 0 77 0 Volume Right 0 143 0 : 0 0 188 cSH 1700 1700 1200 1700 407 824 Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.08 0.11 0.09, 0.19 0.23 Queue Length(ft) 0 0 9 0 17 22 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 15.9 10.7 Lane LOS A C B Approach Delay.(s) 0.0 3.9 12.2': Approach LOS B Average Delay 4.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.2% ' ICU Level:of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case2pm Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR i 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SR 11 & LOTUS BLOSSOM LANE 1/29/2010 Lane Configurations C 'ol: » Sig , � E•' T Free - Free:; - - �Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h)r , 112 212 ;194. : 51 ' 231 _ 617° Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.84 0.84 0.77 0.77 Hourly flow.rate.,(vpt )_ 126 238 226 61, 301,- 79 Pedestrians Lkane.Width(ft) { Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage ;; - - Right turn flare (veh) I Median type;,' :'`.None _ Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked I vC,conflicting volume 287 746 257 .. vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage.2 conf vol - vCu, unblocked vol 287 746 257 tC, single(s) 4.1 , ; 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) � � 2.2 3.5 33 ,° p0 queue free % 90 91 90 cM capacity(veh/h) 1275 ';343: 782 r Volume Total 126 238 287 109 Volume Left 126 0 0 30 Volume Right 0 0 61 79 cSH 1275 1700 1700 579 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.14 0.17 0.19 Queue Length (ft) 8 0 0 17 Control Delay(s) 8.1 0.0 0.0 12.7 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay(s) 2.8 0.0 12.7 Approach LOS B Average Delay 3.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.3% ICU Level of Service £ A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case2pm Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SR 11 & LEHUA LANE 1/29/2010 Lane Configurations 4 t' V Sign Control - Free < Free Stop;, { , Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) ' 15 201 173 ,,,3',. 1` .5 . - Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.81 0.81 0.38 0.38 Hourly flow;rate'(vph) 18 ' 239 214 4_, 3 , -13 ;_` Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) - Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent,Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 217 490 215 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,,stage 2 conf vol. vCu, unblocked vol 217 490 215 tC,:single(s). 4.1 6.4 6.2_ tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 100 98 c■ capacity(veh/h) 13.52 530 824 Volume Total 257 ' 217 16 Volume Left 18 0 3 Volume Right 0 4 13 cSH 1352 1700 755 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.13 0.02 Queue Length (ft) 1 0 2 Control Delay(s) 0.6 0.0 9.9 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.6 - 0.0 9.9 Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case2pm Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SR 11 & ORCHID PARKWAY 1/29/2010 -4,. "/- 44.. \I. 4/ Lane Configurations 4 tb ` Sign.Control .' Free i'Free ', i;$top Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) a. . 81 187 ;?°176 3 10= :11 Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.87 0.87 0.83 0.83 Hourly flow rate(vph) 10 234 °202 '.: 3 12 13 Pedestrians Cane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage _ Right turn flare (veh) 1 Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft);, pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 206 458 204. vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,;stage.2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 206 458 204 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) ,. 1 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free% 99 98 98 cM capacityi(veh/h) 1366 557 837 Volume Total 244. 206 ';25 Volume Left 10 0 12 Volume Right 0 3 13 cSH 1366 1700 675 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.12 0.04 Queue Length (ft) 1 0 3 Control Delay(s) 0.4 0.0 10.5 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay(s) 0.4 0.0 ` 10.5 Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.3% ' ICU Level of Service A asp Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case2pm Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: KEAKA PARKWAY & LOTUS BLOSSOM LANE 1/29/2010 — c 4-- 1\ 1* Lane Configurations ti 4 v Sign Control 4:. Free Free= Stop- Grade 0% 0% 0% Yolume(veh/h) 21 54 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.64 0.64 0.77 0.77 Hourly flow;rate(vph)' =26 66 22, 22 84, Pedestrians Lane,Widtn (ft) , , Walking Speed (ft/s) c,ejt Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC;:conflicting volume 91 124 59 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 91 124 59 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF.(s). 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 90 97 cM capacity(veh/h) 1503 858 1007 Volume Total 91' • 44 116' Volume Left 0 22 84 Volume Right 66' 0 31 cSH 1700 1503 894 Volume,to Capacity 0.05 ` 0.01 0.13 Queue Length (ft) 0 1 11 Controt Delay(s) 0.0 3.8 9.6 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay'(s) . 0.0 3.8 9.6 Approach LOS A Average Delay 5.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 n.N HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case2pm Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR r ant HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: LEHUA LANE & KEAKA PARKWAY 1/29/2010 \ ,- 1\ l* 'I ,% '4 fj % 1 -' Lane Configurations 4) ,) 4 SigifControl': Free FrQ-701;= : -- ' Stop ` , Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume.(veh/h) 0 `:12 14 1 X15 0 25 . . .,17 1 :.2; 9 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.80 o.60 0.80 0.83 0.83 0.83 0 60 0.60 0.60 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 = 18 22 1 ;= 19 r' .. 0 30 20 1 ' 3 15 2 Pedestrians Lane Width (fE)' Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent;Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 1 Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 19 40 60 50 29 62 61 19 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, sfage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 19 40 60 50 29 62 61 19 tC, single(s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 97 98 100 100 98 100 cM capacity,(veh/h) 1598 1570 921 840 1046: 914 829 1060 Volume Total 40 20 52 20 Volume Left 0 1 30 3 Volume Right 22 0 1 2 cSH 1598 1570 890 858 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.02 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 5 2 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.5 9.3 9.3 Lane LOS A A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.5 9.3 9.3 Approach LOS A A Average Delay 5.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case2pm Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR 1 1 1 1 1 I Attachment N Level-of-Service Worksheets for 2015 Background Plus Project Conditions 1 1 1 I I I I I 0 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SR 11 & PRINCE KUHIO BLVD 1/28/2010 --� -Ni f I-- p Lane Configurations if r vi it vi r Sign Control" Free Free',1- .Stop: _ Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h); -'94 32 . 68 ! 91 31' 83 Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 Hourly flow rate(vph) 118 - 40 ' 76 101 ' - 39 104. - ' Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) percent Blockage. Right turn flare(veh) 1 Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,,conflicting volume " 158 370 118 vC1, stage 1 conf vol v,C2,-stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 158 370 118 tC,single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF (s) . 2.2 3.5 3,3. p0 queue free% 95 94 89 cM capacity(veh/h) 1422 597 934 Volume:Total 118 40 76 101 39 104 Volume Left 0 0 76 0 39 0 Volume Right 0 40 0 0 0 104 cSH 1700 1700 1422 1700 597 934 Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.11 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 4 0 5 9 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 11.4 9.3 Lane LOS A B A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 - 3.3 9.9 Approach LOS A Average Delay 4.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3am Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SR 11 & LOTUS BLOSSOM LANE 1/28/2010 Lane Configurations + V side)Control Free`. Frye Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 66 104 r 66_ 86, 14 98 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.63 0.63 0.88 0.88 Hourly flow?rate(vph)} 79 124 105. 137 16 111 Lane Width(ft) , { Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage_:;, Right turn flare (veh) Median type . None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) 749 ; pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 241 454 173 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf voi. vCu, unblocked vol 241 454 173 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 94 97 87 cM capacity(veh/h) 1325 530 870 Volume Total. 79 "` 124' 24 I 127 Volume Left 79 0 0 16 Volume Right 0 0 137 - 111 cSH 1325 1700 1700 806 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.07 0.14 0.16- Queue Length (ft) 5 0 0 14 Control Delay(s) 7.9 0.0 , 0.0 10.3 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay(s) 3.1 0.0 10.3, Approach LOS B Average Delay 3.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3am Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SR 11 & LEHUA LANE 1/28/2010 Lane Configurations 4 T lyi Sign'tControl; 2 - , " Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h)" 27 102 110 17 ` 9 ' :12- Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.82 0.82 0.63 0.63 Hourly flow`rate:(vph) 1. 36 = 134 134 21 14 19 ``- Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) . Walking Speed (ft's) Percent Blockage , Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,,'conflicting volume 155: 350 145 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 155 350 145 tC,single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s)' 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 98 98 98 cM capacity,(veh/h) 1425 631 903 Volume Total 170 155 33 Volume Left 36 0 14 Volume Right 0 21 19 cSH 1425 1700 762 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.09 0.04 Queue Length (ft) 2 0 3 Control Delay(s) 1.8 0.0 9.9 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 1.8 0.0 9.9 Approach LOS A Average Delay 1.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3am Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SR 11 & ORCHID PARKWAY 1/28/2010 Lane Configurations 4 T9 Si°; Control' Free Free"_ Stop: °� Grade 0% J 0%° 0% 1 110 1 126 2'- 0. " Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.80 0.80 0.25 0.25 Hourly flow rate.(yph) '.', 1 .' 147 158 27 0 `.' 4 . 4,_' Pedestrians Lane.)(IWidth,(ft) - _ 5. Walking Speed (ft/. ft/s) Percept Blockage r Right turn flare(veh) Median„type t None Median storage veh) Upstreeth,signal.(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,`,cohflicting volume 160 308 159 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage-2 conf vol _ vCu, unblocked vol 160 308 159 tC, single (s) 4.1 . , 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s), . . 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 cM'capacity'(Veh/h) 1419 683 887 Volume T"tal . 148 160,, .. ..4 . , Volume Left 1 0 0 Volume Right 0 2 4 cSH 1419 1700 887 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.09 ; 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.1 0.0 9.1 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.1 0.0 9.1' Approach LOS A Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 o. . ■ HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3am Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TZAR 1. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: KEAKA PARKWAY & LOTUS BLOSSOM LANE 1/28/2010 Lane Configurations '+ 4 'I Sign.Control• Free Free Stops - Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh%h) 25 61 10 - 11. 41 18. Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.61 0.61 0.81 0.81 Hourly flawrate(vph) 28 68' _ 16 23 51' 22:: Pedestrians LaneWidth (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type;'. None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 96 117 62 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage.2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 96 117 62 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 94 98 cM capacity(veh/h), 1498 869 1003 Volume Total 96 39 73 Volume Left 0 16 51 Volume Right 68 0 22 cSH 1700 1498 906 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.01 0.08 Queue Length(ft) 0 1 7 Control Delay(s) 0.0 3.1 9.3 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 3.1 9.3 Approach LOS A Average Delay 3.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3am Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: LEHUA LANE & KEAKA PARKWAY 1/28/2010 - %At \ 4 1\ tr , '-'11, ,(, ►( *-. Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4. 4, Sign Control Free, , Free? ., Stop , . t£ Stop ' Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume,(yeh/h). ` ` - ;•0 1:24.; i'10'` ,2' 8 2, 17_ 11 .._17 -, 2 5 , ' : 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.38 0.38 0.38 Hourly flow,.rate,(vph) 3 0 32:'` '13 6; : : 26 - 61 24 161=-. 24 =`5 13 _0 Pedestrians Lane Width.,(ft) - Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage; Right turn flare (veh) Median . p e typ None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) 292,, pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 32 : 45 87 84 39 113 87 29 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage'2.conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 32 45 87 84 39 113 87 29 tC,single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 I. tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) . ' 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3, 3.5 4.0 , 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 97 98 98 99 98 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1580 1563 884 803 1033 829 800 1046 Volume'Total ' ' _` 45' ' 39 64' '18' Volume Left 0 6 24 5 Volume Right 13 6 24 0 cSH 1580 1563 911 808 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.02 Queue Length(ft) 0 0 6 2 Control Delay(s) 0.0 1.2 9.2 9.6 Lane LOS A A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 1.2 9.2 ;: 9.6 Approach LOS A A Average Delay 4.9 intersection Capacity Utilization 13.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 NAY HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3am Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR -„, HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis k 7: LEHUA LANE & PROJECT D/W 1/28/2010 Lane Configurations t, 4 V Sign control Free: Free ' Stop ' ' - Grade 0% 0% 0% Volumc_(veh/h) 14 34 _ Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.63 0.31 0.31 0.50 0.50 Hourly,flow'rate(vph) , 22 54 110 16 = 14 22 Pedestrians Lane:Width(#t) ,' Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage . `. Right turn flare (veh) Median type. None Median storage veh) Upstream.signal (ft); 715 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 76 285 49 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2;.stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 76 285 49 tC,single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s). 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 93 98 98 cMcapacity(veh/h) 1523 655 1019 Volume Total 76 126 36 - Volume Left 0 110 14 Volume Right 54 0 22 cSH 1700 1523 838 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.07 0.04 Queue Length (ft) 0 6 3 Control Delay(s) 0.0 6.7 9.5 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0' 6.7 9.5 Approach LOS A Average Delay 5.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.8% ICU Level of Service A t Analysis Period (min) 15 14 tRa }} HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity ty Anal Analysis Case3am 1. Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: SR 11 & PRINCE KUHIO BLVD 1/28/2010 —. Ni' c 11-- I N p Lane Configurations + r ) + AI r 80iipantrol - Free Free:,;Stop; r, ; Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 157 ,> 97 136; 155: 72 187 Peak Hour Factor 0.68 0.68 0.92 0.92 0.94 0.94 Hourlly flow rate(vph) 231 143 148 `: _168 • 77` : 199 _ Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) - - Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage: Right turn flare (veh) Median type : None Median storage veh) Upstream,signal(ft). pX, platoon unblocked VC;<conflicting volume 374 695 231' vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol ; . vCu, unblocked vol 374 695 231 tC'single',(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF;:.(s) 2.2 ' 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 88 79 75 cM capacity(veh/h) 1185 357 808 Volume Total ' 231 143 148 ' 168 77' 199 Volume Left 0 0 148 0 77 0 Volume Right 0 143 0 0 0 199 cSH 1700 1700 1185 1700 357 808 Volume to Capacity 0.14 0.08 0.12 0.10 0.21 0.25 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 11 0 20 24 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 8.5 0.0 17.8 10.9 Lane LOS A C B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 4.0 12.8 Approach LOS B Average Delay 5.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.8% ' ICU Level of Service " A Analysis Period (min) 15 mw HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3pm Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SR 11 & LOTUS BLOSSOM LANE 1/28/2010 Lane Configurations li t 1, rYr Sign Control; Free Free -% ., Stop . _ Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(yeti/h) 117 227•.. ;.230 = 51 23 61,• Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.84 0.84 0.77 0.77 Hourly flowr'ate(vph) f 131; . 255 274 61 30 79.'' Pedestrians Lane Width.;(ft), Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage:; Right turn flare(veh) 1 Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) 749 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 335 822 304 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,'stage-2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 335 822 304 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 89 90 89 cM capacity(veh/h) 1225 307 ;736 Volume Total 131,.` 255 335 109 Volume Left 131 0 0 30 Volume Right 0 0 61 79 cSH 1225 1700 1700 532 Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.15 0.20 0.21 Queue Length (ft) 9 0 0 19 Control Delay(s) 8.3 0.0 0.0 13.5 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay(s) 2.8 0.0 13.5 Approach LOS B Average Delay 3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3pm Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SR 11 & LEHUA LANE 1/28/2010 Lane Configurations 4 T. ' '' SignrC,ontrQl ; ;`Free Free; ` ; Stop fir Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(,veh/ti) 30 .,_20111 173 _ .:413 21'= _ 45, Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 -0.81 0.81 0.38 0.38 Hourly flow`rate(vph),. 36 -= 239 214 16 55 118 Pedestrians Lane,Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent,Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None' Median storage veh) Upstream signal;(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,'conflicting volume 230 532 222 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage'2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 230 532 222 tC,single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s) , , 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free% 97 89 86 cM capacityt(veh/h). 1338 494 818 Volume To alr. t 275 230 174 Volume Left 36 0 55 Volume Right 0:, 16 118 cSH 1338 1700 677 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.14 0.26 Queue Length(ft) 2 0 25 Control Delay(s) 1.2 0.0 12.1 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay(s) 1.2 0.0 12.1 Approach LOS B Average Delay 3.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.1% ICU Level of Service' A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3pm Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR i HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SR 11 & ORCHID PARKWAY 1/28/2010 Lane Configurations 4 t 'v Sign Control Free Free -Stogy 1- ; , Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 8 207 186. '' 3 11 . 10 - Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.87 0.87 0.83 0.83 - 10 259 '214., 3 13= _ 12 Hourly flow rate.(yph) _-: " i Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) ; Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage, Right turn flare(veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC; conflicting volume 217 494 216 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 217 494 216 tC, single(s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s)` 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 98 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 1352 530 824' Volume Total? ' 269 217 25 Volume Left 10 0 13 Volume Right : 0 3 12 cSH 1352 1700 639 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.13 0.04 Queue Length(ft) 1 0 3 Control Delay(s) 0.4 0.0 10.9 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay(s) 0.4 0.0 10.9 Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.7 Intersection.Capacity Utilization 27.4% ICU Level of Service; A ., Analysis Period (min) 15 ti '''''t HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3pm Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TIAR I HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: KEAKA PARKWAY & LOTUS BLOSSOM LANE 1/28/2010 —► c 4-- 4 p Lane Configurations T, 4 V Sign Control r ,.Freed 3 Freed Shop r t s ! { •. Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h)` ,' 26 .. 54i;-,, 14 24=, 3 65' 29< Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.64 0.64 0.77 0.77 Hourly flow'rate;(vph) 323 66 f: 22 38 84 38 , Pedestrians Lane Width(ft)° , - Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage: Right turn flare(veh) Median __ type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal•,(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 98 ' 146 65 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 98 146 65 tC, single (s) 4,1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 90 96 cM capacity(veh/h) 1496 834 1000. Volume Total ' 08_ , 59 122 ,, Volume Left 0 22 84 Volume Right 66 0 38 cSH 1700 1496 879 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.01 0.14 Queue Length (ft) 0 1 12 Control Delay(s) 0.0 2.8 9.8 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 2.8 9.8 Approach LOS A Average Delay 4.9 Intersection Ca aci Utilization 20.7% ICU Level of Service A 0 Analysis Period(min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3pm Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR 0 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: LEHUA LANE & KEAKA PARKWAY 1/28/2010 4 "f _ \ f , , te r k. _ Lane Configurations 4, ,x , ._ :..... .... 4. Si n,Control : Free Free Stop Stop= Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) , 0 22 14 11.- 35 10 25 17' 11 :. 7 9 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.60 0.60 0.60 Hourly flow rate(vph)_- 0 34 22 14. 44 12 ! 30 20 13: 12 15 2 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median,type' None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 292 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 56 55 131 128 45 146 133 50 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 56 55 131 128 45 146 133 50 tC,single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s), 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 99 96 97 99 99 98 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1548 1550 821 755 1025 790 751 1018 Volume Total ` . 55 70 64 28 - Volume Left 0 14 30 12 Volume.Right 22 12 13 2 cSH 1548 1550 832 779 Volume to Capacity 0.00 ' 0.01 0.08 0.04 Queue Length (ft) 0 1 6 3 Control Delay(s) 0.0 1.5 9.7 9.8 Lane LOS A A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 1.5 9.7 9.8 Approach LOS A A Average Delay 4.6 Intersection,Capacity Utilization 20.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3pm Phillip Rowell&Associates Lehua Court TIAR HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: LEHUA LANE & PROJECT D/W 1/28/2010 i Lane Configurations ') 4 jeTE Sign Control Free. Free Sto Grade 0% 0% 0% VoIurn eh/h) 15 - 25 , . _25> 16- 40r 6Q', �. : Peak Hour Factor 0.38 0.38 0.80 0.80 0.65 0.65 Hourlyy)low rate(vph) . 39 : 66 31 20 62: 92 Pedestrians Lane Wdth-(ft) 4. Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream.`signal(ft) 715 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting Volume 105 155 72 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2.conf.vol vCu, unblocked vol 105 155 72 tC,single(s): 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC,2 stage (s) tF(s)' 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 98 92 91 cM capacity (veh/h) 1486 819 990 Vblhme Total 105 51 154'' ,c: Volume Left 0 31 62 Volume Right 66 0 92 cSH 1700 1486 914 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.02 0.17 Queue Length (ft) 0 2 15 Control Delay(s) 0.0 4.6 9.7 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 4.6 9.7 Approach LOS A Average Delay 5.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Case3pm Phillip Rowell &Associates Lehua Court TZAR , r I I I 1 1 Attachment 0 Assessment for the Need for a Separate Left Turn Lane from SR 11 to Lehua Lane I I F"F4�4 fl . �fi fl I 800 _ LEFT-TURN_ _..___.__ _. TREATMENT 2 600 _._. __ _.. ____ _._.__ WARRANTED__-_-.. s cn 500;— LEFT-IT-URN- ,per L! TREATMENT job °4, NOT <> 0 I WARRANTED .. . . 1•. z 300'._.. ._ , .__a.° O PM PEAK HOUR �o I Doo 11 200 ° O I 100 , , , MIDDAY PEAK HOUR —: 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 ADVANCING VOLUME, veh/h Source: NCHRP Report 457 Evaluating Intersection Improvements:An Engineering Study Guide 2001,page 22 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour VA=129 VA=231 V°= 127 V°=186 LT=21% LT= 13% 1 I Attachment 0 GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING THE NEED FOR A MAJOR ROAD LEFT-TURN BAY AT A TWO-WAY STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION TWO-LANE ROAD - 60 km/hr (40 mph) #17860 PROPOSED CHANGE OF ZONING DESIGNATION FROM A-la TO CV-40 PROPOSED CHANGE OF ZONING DESIGNATION FROM A-la TO CV-40 LOTS 6, 7 , 8 AND 9 OF BLOCK 157 OF HAWAIIAN OCEAN VIEW ESTATES (FILE PLAN 787) Land situated on the Northeasterly side of Hawaii Belt Road and on the Southwesterly side of Lehua Lane at Kahuku, Ka'u, Island and County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii. Being the whole of: Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9 of Block 157 of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates (File Plan 787); and Being a portion of: Grant 2791 to C. C. Harris. hk,ti Beginning at the Easternmost corner of this parcel of land, being also the Northernmost corner of Lot 10 of Block 157 of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates(File Plan 787) and being a point on the Southwesterly side of Lehua Lane, the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station "PUU 0 KAMAOA" being 1,976.65 feet North and 4,186.36 feet West and running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: 1. 19° 35' 374.80 feet along Lot 10 of Block 157 of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates (File Plan 787) and along the remainder of Grant 2791 to C. C. Harris to a point; 2. 109° 34' 52" 325.00 feet along the Northeasterly side of Hawaii Belt Road to a point; 3. 199° 35' 606.84 feet along Lot 5 of Block 157 of Hawaiian Fk Ocean View Estates (File Plan 787) feet to a point; #17860 Page 1 of 2 WES THOMAS ASSOCIATES -Land Surveyors- 75-5749 Kalawa Street, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740-1817 #17860 PROPOSED CHANGE OF ZONING DESIGNATION FROM A-la TO CV-40 4. 251° 01' 30" 89.52 feet along the Southeasterly side of Keaka Parkway to a point; Thence, following along the Southwesterly intersection of Keaka Parkway and Lehua Lane on a curve to the right with a radius of 20.00 feet, the chord azimuth and distance being: 5. 296° 01' 30" 28.28 feet to a point; 6. 341 ° 01' 30" 364.02 feet along the Southwesterly side of Lehua Lane to the point of beginning and containing an area of 4.143 Acres. T. Y4 719 WES THOMAS ASSOCIATES 4 LICENSED -Fc. C.) PROF cSSIONAL LAND *. SURVEYOR No.4331 P' Chrystal Thomas Yamasaki 614 WAIl,V Licensed Professional Land Surveyor State of Hawaii Certificate No. LS-4331 75-5749 Kalawa Street Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740-1817 TMK: 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041 and 042 (3rd Division) April 4, 2012 A4A 5$k.. #17860 Page 2 of 2 WES THOMAS ASSOCIATES —Land Surveyors— 75-5749 Kalawa Street, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740-1817 I I Immil Ism /11=11M6.•••■ I I I r ..../ KEAKA PARKWAY `,.. 296'01'30" 28.28 - 251'01:30" 89.52 L . R=20.00 A'S V' ill PARKWAY _ 11 I 4 4..... -4, st, krbt CP 4 cv (z) NI: co in Li Z .r 4,4, // 1111 VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1 INCH .. 1,000 FEET / l'" 6" e 1 ccZ cl.,, - kJ A—la ZONING cf _. .- .4 . to irS Lot 5 ,o e' ■-zt-- o 63 NI I —V0 •.> 0,,. >, 0 X\ 1,976.65 Ft. North 04,: ■t‘.51 (o.„. ,..o 4,186.36 Ft. West Ref. "PUU 0 KAMA0A"6. Oti -0 c- 4,z, 0 oc -J ... ""./ i-i co ,<.. • "00 rx.,7*. -57--...9-4./ e Ate\b" J 1 4, aN, /t. '14.• .... oc, ..>% 5=2› t.14:.3 -.:ci, <ss> A—1 a ZONING „.„,... ..z.4' LICENSED v vt..STh 0 PROFESSIONAL — N REZONING EXHIBIT. ie ■ft, LAND SURVEYOR__y; o.1-331 iY e.P.. • MAP SHOWING 11, LOTS 6, 7, 8 AND 9 411410:' OF BLOCK 157 OF HAWAIIAN OCEAN VIEW ESTATES (FILE PLAN 787) This mop was prepared by me or under my direct supervision. i"- / Being Portions of Grant 2791 to C. C. Harris atinsri THOMAS YAMASAKI fir At Kahuku, Ka'u Island and County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii Licensed Professional Land Su - or State of Hawaii Certificate Number LS-4331 PROJECT NO.: 17860 TAX MAP KEY: 9-2-093:039,040,041 AND 042 (3RD DIVISION) DATE: APRIL 6, 2012 April 07, 2012 p:\17500-17999\17860Vgn\17860z dgn 110* WES THOMAS ASSOCIATES -- Land Surveyors -- 75-5749 Kalawa Street Kailuo-Kona, Hawaii 96740-1817 TEL (808) 329-2353 FAX (808) 329-5334 EMAIL surveys@wtahowaii.com • _ _ I 1 1,... = _. ._ dam. 7-1 I 1 _LI r _ KEAKA PARKWAY 296'01'30" 28.28 251'01'30" 89.52 R=20.00 _ eoNelliffa PARKWAY - L - A g 4 SUBJEC " *1 -PARCEL - e z el I 'Po cv lb Ct kelt< cP in Lu VICINITY MAP 4,- SCALE: 7 INCH •■• 7.000 FEET cs / (0e, A-la ZONING V -> 1'.`) '\t (f.S4 1:7-11\,c, • .7 I Lot 5 V ....) oe, 6, in 0,. .. "lc ''1 :("•1/4 1,976.65 Ft. North O,.. Ck '\ 4e.. .9 4,186.36 Ft. West Ref. "PUU 0 KAMAOA 1:3 7 ....-y ,. i I 0 44, C t% • '5'...v*„. 4,1\t‘. I 10■00 q , `PO N -) I" k(S41 Lot 10 ,s.„*., oz..21. <ss> A—la ZONING Aca\ fill 0 `-%.S. 'Z' LICENSED 7 -z- 0 PROFESSIONAL - LAND • * SURVEYOR * 1 REZONING EXHIBIT 4.0 No.4331 MAP SHOWING LOTS 6, 7, 8 AND 9 OF BLOCK 157 OF HAWAIIAN OCEAN VIEW ESTATES (FILE PLAN 787) This map was prepared by me or under my direct supervision. 11 / , 9,1„,,,,,,,,A, Being Portions of Grant 2791 to C. C. Harris A...../...,, / ......,...,---_.."„,,c„,........1.,..2 CHRYST L THOMAS YAMASAKI Er Licensed Professional Land Su -,or At Kahuku, Ka'u State of Hawaii Certificate Number LS-4331 Ii 61. Island and County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii PROJECT NO.: 17860 TAX MAP KEY: 9-2-093:039,040,041 AND 042 (3RD DIVISION) DATE: APRIL 6, 2012 April 07, 2012 p:\17500-1799917860Vgn\17860z dgn Ille WES THOMAS ASSOCIATES -- Land Surveyors -- 75-5749 Kalawa Street .'.i Kailuo-Kono, Hawaii 96740-1817 TEL (808) 329-2353 FAX(808) 329-5334 EMAIL surveys@wtahowailcom 1! - J co ,0Tto 1! • /Vt_VI J U O O N 7 Q i O N L L, a O_ 1,•••O O O ! iii,- y i 4 y IA ' dt a t </z _,,,_,, _,,,_ -,..••=- --,2,'..-"•'''.-'''',''', .7„ . '.' : - : ,--7; • '.- . ra _ F; �14 - 11 . -i I■■■ a... !■■iC �!!!■■ '!!!■1111 !■■11■■ `• ,!11!!11■ l■2111■■ I!■112!■t■ if 'r i Jt■ ■11■■■ j1l111i11/11■ (: ce!■■11■/l■ !!CN■■■11!■ 111!/11►'\1111■ il11111112\\!2 I !!■■t■■■■m !■■■!■/!l■■■ 4 a) ,-,.,;:::—.,-.;. -. - ;. : --, .,! 2 0..,1--..:...-.--..--....r, . -•' - .'c. .--s t .. .uf - A /1111■ 11!!111■!■,i■.\■i:11■■/!11t 11■■■m■■■ii■11■! !mill■/!■1111 /211/■!!m!! ■11lm!!t■11!■■2!tYi ■t ! ■!4, l ms--..!!!■■!!11r\ ■■■■11■■!J■! !■■1■■■■ !■■■■11i •L'■■!11 ■■ ■■ ■lt11■■ id!11!!!11■1111■■f■■110t■!1111!■■■!ml11 !■11■ ■0 d C!m■m ms1111/t! i/ii. 1 ll +►/1111l11l.... 11■■R ` Ilit 1111111111/!■■■; � �' ` f �1y.s : t !!■!11.11 �■■0 ■ ■1-:-::".=.':=-: •::';',-;-,- /■ ■!itlllli\11sm■4 � Ilt11!!i■,!■■1111■!■!\■o P n iml1111■ l■/1111■■■c _ /■■! 1111!■■■ ■■!! ii 1■■■■ ■ m■ ■ iiii s ■■■■msiiii„•- ; _ -riimaiiii ■■i lim.' , ii i■■■!!■■■■■isms N py i ■!■11r\C�■■■■!!■■■■■■i11■■ ■! m■■■ ■!■■L, /111111.19111111.1111111k' 1■■ !/■■■i. r /!■■ ■ ■■■ 1i 10 ■■■mum ul uJ A...�,,..P:,-.7:2::,,E.:::--,_.. z `- a li■11mm iam■■111 ■■■CRs\■■. - z F mi■■■i1111 nill■ ims■s► CS' ,- +r; Y .,� ` � alma ■■i■m■ .■ 11 ! ism� , � , im■■■ ■■11mim ■■■■■ g■s11■t " k� t ,e ,-i ,lm...■i■■m!■m m■0■■0■■ i■1■X es? . a s : ' ii■■m■m:\■m■!m■■■■i■■!1■■■4 " ' = ue. s- - Is■t■■n■■mfr 1..■■11i11!■■s■■/.- $ -, ta , ` �, !ml!■■■■■■■■ti►i: 11 ■■t- . .ri� vf�v +� I■im■iti■11i1111 11 . .■■# 4 5 � , �� ij• `/.110 ■/■■ ■■• 4 s } � ■ t111111m .t ac 6,-1 2 ■s■■■■�� O�. a R •>�Yw § k 1. 12/2008 William P.Kenoi 1Jv% Nancy E. Crawford Mayor ' �'' Finance Director• • =_ Deanna S. Sako M•+•-0%_; Deputy Director �Tt oP M�' County of Hawaii DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE-REAL PROPERTY TAX Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street,Suite No.4 • Hilo,Hawai'i 96720-4224 • Fax(808)961-8415 Appraisers(808)961-8354 • Clerical(808)961-8201 • Collections(808)961-8282 West Hawai`i Civic Center • 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy. • Bldg.D,2nd Flr. • Kailua Kona,Hawaii 96740 Fax(808)327-3538 • Appraisers(808)323-4881 • Clerical(808)323-4880 www.hawaiipropertytax.com REAL PROPERTY TAX CLEARANCE 1 April 3, 2012 1 TM K(s): (3)9-2-093-039-0000 This is to certify that the real property taxes due to the County of Hawaii on the parcel(s) listed above have been paid up to and including June 30, 2012. This clearance was requested on behalf of Ohia Commerical Property LLC and is issued for this/these parcel(s) only. By , Cherisse Hurley- Clerk REAL PROPERTY TAX DIVISION g,P Hawai`i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer : v. 12/2008 William P.Kenoi :dt•,� '�''.+.; Nancy E.Crawford Mayor '+: �"'� ��'/• Finance Director ,3.,, .• Deanna S. Sako • ..or w►`- Deputy Director County of Hawaii DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE-REAL PROPERTY TAX Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street,Suite No.4 • Hilo,Hawaii 96720-4224 • Fax(808)961-8415 Appraisers(808)961-8354 • Clerical(808)961-8201 • Collections(808)961-8282 West Hawaii Civic Center • 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy. • Bldg.D,2nd Flr. • Kailua Kona,Hawai`i 96740 Fax(808)327-3538 • Appraisers(808)323-4881 • Clerical(808)323-4880 www.hawaiipropertytax.corn REAL PROPERTY TAX CLEARANCE April 3, 2012 TMK(s): (3)9-2-093-040-0000 9-2-093-041-0000 9-2-093-042-0000 This is to certify that the real property taxes due to the County of Hawaii on the parcel(s) listed above have been paid up to and including June 30, 2012. This clearance was requested on behalf of Lehua Court LLC and is issued for this/these parcel(s) only. By Cherisse Hurley- erk REAL PROPERTY Iv DIVISION Hawai`i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer PETER T.YOUNG '� O F yq_ CHAIRPERSON t r..........w LINDA LINGLE �P r' �g,§9 "'•` BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES GOVERNOR OF HAWAD �) !y • N.�, COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ,, ViNa-t„,,. 4. t- ROBERT K.MASUDA e�t-� :'•.�� DEPUTY DIRECTOR LAND ,Rod and N i ' i _.tyi 10 OE a �� - �' DEAN NAKANO F�C`�`� 9 ;Lqi .YS it ACTING DEPUTY DIRECTOR-WATER r ,/� m,. .-4 ,, -_Q�°j•' AQUATIC RESOURCES BOATING AND OCEAN RECREATION --... �—.� � COMMISSION ON BUREAU RESOURCE M*IAC—EMENT STATE OF HAWAII CONSERVATION ON TRIER RESRCSTENPORCE \--i?. CONSERVATION AND RESOURCES ENFORCEMENT \_ ENGINEERING ST4 teofHa40 DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES FORESTRY NDW�, r sFwTwE KAHOOLAWE ISLAND RESERVE COMMISSION STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION LAND 60I KAMOKILA BOULEVARD,ROOM 555 STATE KAPOLEI,HAWAII 96707 June 14,2006 Quality Windows LOG NO: 2006.1934 c/o Steve Sahines DOC NO: 0606JT40 73-1157 Oluolu St. Archaeology Kailua-Kona,HI 96740 Dear Mr. Sahines: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review— Request for No Historic Properties Affected Kahuku Ahupua`a,Ka`u District,Island of Hawaii TMKs: (3)9-2-093:039 Thank you for your request for a determination that no historic properties will be affected by development on the parcels named above. We believe that no historic properties will be affected by this undertaking because: ❑ a) intensive cultivation has altered the land ® b) residential development/urbanization has altered the land ❑ c) previous grubbing/grading has altered the land ❑ d) an acceptable archaeological assessment or inventory survey found no historic properties ❑ e)this project has gone through the historic review process,and mitigation has been completed ® f) other: The subject parcel is identified by Sato et. al 1973 as `a`a lava flows, and the aerial photos contained in that document show development in the late 1960's. Our staff is familiar with the area and the parcel, and has not noted any historic properties on the parcel. Therefore, we conclude that a no historic properties determination is appropriate for this project. In the event of lava tube breakthroughs or that historic resources, including human skeletal remains, are identified during the construction activities, all work needs to cease in the immediate vicinity of the find, the find needs to be protected from additional disturbance, and the State Historic Preservation Division, Hawaii Section,needs to be contacted immediately at(808)327-3691. Aloha, , i / 0 .. nie Chinen, Administrator ate Historic Preservation Division JT r'�-p F ;;4.--- PETER T.YOUNG LINDA OROFHA E ,'Pi/ �?.,F tip BOARD OF LAND AND CHAIRPERSON BOARD GOVERNOR OF HAWAII /0)i I,. • -; COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT t t ` ROBERT K.MASUDA I ll 00 aT+d and 4, I 1 �*_ DEPUTY DIRECTOR•LAND J DEAN NAKANO C���°�� •1'y�- S. .00 Q ACING DEPUTY DIRECTOR-WATER AQUATIC rr Ef �. �m��,, BOATING AND OCEAN RECREATION r ` BUREAU OF CONVEYANCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT STATE OF HAWAII CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDS 7E t CONSERVATION AND RESOURCES ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES FORESTRY°ANNDD WII DLo-E SrdtE Of Ham HISTORIC PRESERVATION KAHOOLAWE ISLAND RESERVE COMMISSION STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION LAND 601 KAMOKILA BOULEVARD,ROOM 555 STATE PARKS KAPOLEI,HAWAII 96707 June 14,2006 Lehua Court LOG NO: 2006.1934 do Steve Sahines DOC NO: 0606JT39 73-1157 Oluolu St. Archaeology Kaiiva-Kona, HI 96740 IDear Mr. Sahines: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review— Request for No Historic Properties Affected Kahuku Ahupua`a,Ka`u District,Island of Hawaii TMKs: (3)9-2-093:040,041,042 Thank you for your request for a determination that no historic properties will be affected by development on the parcels named above. We believe that no historic properties will be affected by this undertaking because: ❑ a) intensive cultivation has altered the land ® b) residential development/urbanization has altered the land ❑ c)previous grubbing/grading has altered the land El c) an acceptable archaeological assessment or inventory survey found no historic properties ❑ e)this project has gone through the historic review process,and mitigation has been completed ® f) other: The subject parcel is identified by Sato et. al 1973 as `a`a lava flows, and the aerial photos contained in that document show development in the late 1960's. Our staffs are familiar with the area and the parcel, and have not noted any historic properties on the parcel. Therefore, we conclude that a no historic properties determination is appropriate for this project. In the event of lava tube breakthroughs or that historic resources, including human skeletal remains, are identified during the construction activities, all work needs to cease in the immediate vicinity of the find, the find needs to be protected from additional disturbance, and the State Historic Preservation Division, Hawai`i Section,needs to be contacted immediately at(808)327-3691. Aloha, 11 X i - anie Chinen,Administrator . ate Historic Preservation Division JT September 14, 2006 Ocean View Chamber of Commerce Ken Wicks, President George B. Wallace, Secretary P.O. Box 6710 Ocean View, HI 96737 To whom it may concern: I am writing on behalf of the Ocean View Chamber of Commerce to express our enthusiastic support for the efforts of Ohia Commercial Properties TMK#3-9-2-93:39 and Lehua Court TMK# 3-9-2-93:40,41,and 42 for their proposed project. This development will give the area the ability to grow employment with local business and reduce traffic to Kona. It will be a benefit to the community by providing needed retail and professional space and will aid in the development of a broader economic base for the District of Ka'u. This kind of development for this area will provide much needed local jobs. The board also specifically directed me to send you this letter in support of our position. Ocean View is now a rapidly growing community of 6,000—we expect the community to continue to grow at a rapid clip,with our population reaching up to 40,000 within 10 years. We would like to see economic development that creates jobs closer to home than Kona to cut down on the growing volume of the workday commute. There will always be some resistance to building anything anywhere that brings changes. Change is not bad if it also brings what a community needs to provide for the future of its children. It is time to stand up to the always present vocal negative minority and have the courage to do what is right for Ka'u,now and in the future. Therefore the Ocean View Chamber of Commerce adds its active,enthusiastic support,and asks that you do what is in your power to facilitate this timely effort to greatly improve our greater community. Sincerely, •eo'g B. !• lace, Secretary Ocean View Chamber of Commerce I i Patti BARRYR (PB) The Land Office,LLC P.O.Box 510,Na`aiehu,HI.96772 Cell: (808)937 3124 Fax:(866)831-1023 HOMES LAND ACREAGE CONDOS . e-mail: .barry e- ohabroadband.com I I February 16,2012 Bill Stockton P.O.Box 1712 Kailua,Kona,HI 96745 RE: Lehua Court in Ocean View,HI 96737 Dear Bill, , I just want you to know how much we need your development in Ocean View. As a Realtor and part owner of The Land Office,LLC,I am constantly receiving inquiries for either retail or professional space in the Ocean View area and there simply is nothing available. A number one priority would be a GYM which many of us would like to participate in along with many other uses. that_ c7Patti Barry,R(PB) , i Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center Hilo, Hawaii 4/17/12 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. I believe this development will be of great benefit to the local community through an increase in jobs, business opportunities, services and convenience for local residents. This will save on driving, fuel, pollution and safety. I also believe this will enhance the value of my property and improve the local economy. Sincerely, Richard Murphy rmurphsurfPgmail.com k.a Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Panahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Pla7i Such a development will upgrade the area, businesses,jobs,shopping PS and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials. At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, Sri �j�Lcf;J 4 ( 1�Z Print Name Date vr�f t4 ®6e u._cc _ 9-2-093-029 Email or Other Address fa z;v Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, ; 'r I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs, shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents tot stay clove to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate- traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, i/1 / I�yl r b.0 r efedas L 2-1• ,5 i SA 7-- Print Name Date I 9-2-084-066,067, 068,069 Email or Other Address" I I 3�a! Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 t4 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail 4r(; Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities. Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, lAjt 11/41/1"<-1? ?e—S./‘W. Print Name Date v 1474. 9-2-084 04 Email or Other Address veop treae---)--Pv w GLer 6 .ff�esr e.-1 DA 71- '714 e -e 6f--fi cr 0-Y 4g -A17- A -17-07-e I f 8yf iet/44 Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza.Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to"meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. 1 Thank You, 1 "I)\+,/1 N KAY N ��. Print Name Date Ce?clIC 1 •C1C'Vn 9-2-084-049 Email or Other Address �1k 5wy6. Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs, shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials. At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, 'DeAf3C6( 7,(rGyAr Print Name Date d-z_agP (9oI CX� �4t-6 k 9-2-093-035 Email or O i i er Address �.y Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area, create businesses,jobs, shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials. At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. ` The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the i overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. I Thank You, 1 (i., liet.A1/9-1-14-- .-7 , j �AvbEW ,\iaoc5 oyVi6/1;. Print Name Date 641r- I c2Sb e�{,c it oo, �.):i, 9-2-093-004,005 Email or Other Address I I , I ,tr Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, 1 am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs, shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. IThank You, KC►vtklac eu Til act an - 14-12 Print Name Date 9-2-093-037 Email or Other Address `k 3; 1� . Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Panahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. 1 Thank You, 1 RENATO BERGONIA 4/16/12 Print Name Date 9-2-084-042 Email or Other Address 1 .+j1v. Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a develo p ment will upgrade the area,a,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, A4 4 /7-41 Print Name Date 7/P ANC? NCB is c -b n i. -0, B,4g j C4 9 7( 9-2-084-020 --Emeii-Fnn ether Address 31^ I 1 Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs, shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. I The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. I Thank You, I , C2,61i ee.14 Z.oc?.v vie r 4 -- /7- ...', -0 �- Print Name Date I 9-2-093-001 Email or Other Address I I I fir.- 4a t Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You 7-77, ,j 1Lr vc 61-/ c,c/rfAl .40 Print Name Date 712( 4x2)�/4� Z' /Ii s 4 9-2-084-002 Email or Other Ad ess //7 //?,37 (8 4+N G;tiy $�1�. Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Paiinhi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities. Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials. At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. I Thank You, 4.1 f '.�. . •, 1)cic,, I a;(4s, l3q.r a L. t._ i it 172 Print Name Date• i f F'-r ��, r,'' r C?"14 2-084-064.065 E I s_' or Other Address • • 4�y Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will u pgr ade the area,create businesses,j obs,sho pping and service opportunities. Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, Print Name Date y 1)0 CE P- 9-2-084-043 Email or Other Address €)GMA-1 L° Qom e A M?ayy: �yhz $"rf 5'I Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs, shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials. At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. I The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. I Thank You, I I Print Name ate J I regi v 1 hr I L(�C •C I.Cii 9-2-093:020 k E l or Other Address I I I I Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs, shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, .4dr Al • P t ame Date IOW • dG 9-2-093-036 Email or/i ��?�a 0 ess "zQ: El Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pa ahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 4^.�d Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs, shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate . traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, i V is i�jkf°L. Print Name J Date 9-2-084-023, 024 Email or Other Address - Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Panahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 IDear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities. Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close I to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. I The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. IThank You, I <_ I ©,e 1 a_ 1 ►mac b PrintOam Date 9-2-084-018 Email or Other Address I I k Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities. Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials. At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, /2p J, I , . Gary itivi �rcc1 s=1S= 1,2 Print Name Date // Gw1t '37IdAot•Cow Pir Coif (Qc ed�V�ewe 1s4;. 9-2-185:046 Email or Other Address 6. 31 Y:yC: Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, t 1 I am sending this letter to voice my ' pport for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza.Such a development will upgrade the area,pm ggr ea,create businesses,jobs, shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. (l 4)f5 6-C 2/7--` t,t/ _ (-' kV) jt i' The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economicrowth of the Ka'u area. .,_`' �L mil[- r` t , Thank You, _ '- J/ // ecL-k-_zt.•�-%_ - ;�4'`'-' /'j7/�.e i -1,7-.2 `'e! r � 4 �c c G'l t f/C'� � -—--J Print Name/ / .., Date ��` ,�_ 9-2-08t-0_05, 006 - Email or Other Address ' .J if ,' ry e.� Ji ,.._� �l t ;fC'�t_-..- t� `"te,/'_t- /' ��/�C-� l-'�� 4 . ,� fr, ;J t j f yi'-.z.1, / _/ •'c�ti�t-?4",, / (/.! ---r- '/i- /--:.-(-- -'_f' /LC-'"PLC--{/.6 'i S t, r �t ' //r-e.'"-_1.-4-(4.f/ / r/ C r,Z r s r t/ y` -"� � i`=j f�f +/ r 6 ... J. 4,6, / ff_ '',,_ ✓Af-^?; ., , t-1" 1/` --"l.{' Li LLLL " ,li f f y , , ,---1---/A,--y-----Ai ? i- , — tic /�l 0 S j ff ` / Q " / r 2 of �/!/C�i_ 1'' lj w-i'rZf[ ? a SlZti' G7Lsi V-1:1-7/.11 -7 Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials. At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Playa will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, i o ft ft to4- Q L9 . Print Name Date oLI Uf 1 lVQv (0in 9-2-185-043 Email or Other Ass Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza.Such a development will upgrade the area, create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, 1 ,R uN INGl`A frt.1/9Mtc1Tgt15`- 04/2.1//2 Print Nam Date habra * PVG ( OV)1 9-2-185-044 Email or Other Address Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials. At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Playa will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. I Thank You, I teA0 i,ovri r2,3A-0/.2--Print Name/ D r f I I .7.6--- -4-er44'r t. -i71 9-2-093-031 m �ail or Other Address I I I I Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities. Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the 1 overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, Print Name Date COX 1 Kor•1A o) OJ oo . C,==.0A. 9-2-084-039 Email or Othe Address kF? Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Panabi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You I C-c 6a e_- t vin v� vim- 5-0/ Print Name Date ?10 , bx / 7 S5 /-t-; . 474 757)9-2-189:096 Email or Other Address 'T 1�c Ala -�- S ��`a r l'. • { Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs, shopping and service opportunities. Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. Thank You, Print Name Date 9-2-093:044 Email or Other Address y�4 {.5 Hawaii County Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Sirs, 4 I am sending this letter to voice my support for the Lehua Court Professional and Retail Plaza. Such a development will upgrade the area,create businesses,jobs,shopping and service opportunities.Having new services in our area will allow residents to stay close to home for their professional and shopping essentials.At the same time it will alleviate traffic and driving requirements to meet those needs. The Lehua Court Plaza will enhance the value of my property and spur resurgence of the overall economic growth of the Ka'u area. t Thank You, 1 -6(2p,"-6my Print Name Date 9-2-084-009.010 Email or Other Address LEHUA COURT LLC, ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION 1000` MAILING LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Charles Munoz Linda Lovelight se 396 Curie Dr. PO Box 377276 San Jose, Ca. 95123 Ocean View, HI 96737 9-2-093-026 9-2-093-032 Michael Hayes Marjorie Joyce Trust 147 Ohana Street PO Box 405 Kailua, HI 96743 Newport, WA 99156 9-2-093-027 9-2-093-034 IStephen Keller Trust Debra Zager 6274 Lauhola Place PMB 277 92-1329 Prince Kuhio Blvd. Honolulu, HI 96825 Captain Cook, HI 96704 9-2-093-028 9-2-093-035 Scott Biglow Alice Almarinez PO Box 826 4016 Rocky Point gort Angeles, WA 98362 Antioch, CA 94509 9-2-093-029 9-2-093-036 Anthony Bee Katandai Madan 510 Kuakini Street Apt 5 985 Alaea Street #A Honolulu, HI 96817 Makawao, HI 96768 9-2-093-030 9-2-093-037 'Valentine Saturino C een Zoerner 22049 Saratogo Place 5123 Mecca Ave. Hanford, CA 93230 Tarzana, CA 91356 9-2-093-031 9-2-093-001 April Newman Kym Dyal 13-3402 Luana Street PO Box 6015 •ahoa, HI 96778 Ocean View, HI 96737 •-2-093-032 9-2-093-002,003 I I Hayden Jones Chun Yim 2644 W Meadowview Lane 555 N. Vulcan Ave. Anaheim, CA 92804 Encinitas, Ca. 92024 9-2-093-004,005 9-2-093:016 Sidney Rose Norene Gerstner PO Box 10185 9022 Windflower Lane Fullerton, CA 92635 Annandale Va. 22003 9-2-093-006, 007 9-2-093:017 Denis Shigemura David Kaulia Sr. P.O. Box 7216 74-207 Ililoa Street I Ocean View, Hawaii 96737-7216 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 9-2-093:008, 013 9-2-093:018 1 County of Hawaii Phyllis Laymon 25 Aupuni Street P.O. Box 6482 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Ocean View, Hawaii 96737-6482 9-2-093-009,010,011 9-2-093:019 Kirk Mattos John Ulbrich P.O. Box 72 2401 S. Third Ave. Honaunau, Hawaii 96726-0072 Arcadia Ca. 91006 9-2-093:012 9-2-093:020 Anson Echevary David Mandeville 41 W. Kaui Street P.O. Box 7063 PMB 157 Kahului, Hawaii 96732 Ocean View, Hawaii 96737 9-2-093:014 9-2-093:021 Walter Andrade Jr. Wilbert Barber 74-4932 E. Mamalahoa Hwy. 427 C Manono Street Holualoa, Hawaii 96725 Kailua, Hawaii 96734 9-2-093:015 9-2-093:038 Lehua Court LLC Yoneda Tamara P 0 Box 2713 1904 Terrance Drive Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96745 Sacramento, CA 95825 9-2-093:039,040,041,042 9-2-185-003 Melitta Hodson John Comerford 177-360 Nohealani Street P.O. Box 780 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Honaunau, Hawaii 96726-0780 19-2-093:043 9-2-185:004 Keiko Makahanaloa Horst Braun 94-571 Honowai Street 140 Palmas Norte Waipahu, Hawaii 96797 Fallbrook, CA 92028 9-2-093:044 9-2-185-043 IIArgyle Westfall Angela Braun Trust 1658 Liholiho Street Apt. 402 PO Box 6007 Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Ocean View, HI 96737 19-2-093:045 9-2-185-044 Lotus Blossoms Partners LLC Reginald Hawkins PO Box 46 P.O. Box 1442 Ocean View, Hawaii 96737-6709 Kealakekua, Hawaii 96750-1442 9-2-093:046, 047 9-2-185:045 CKahuku Congregational Church Gary Kneeland P.O. Box 6709 P.O. Box 6334 Ocean View, Hawaii 96737-6709 Ocean View, Hawaii 96737-6334 9-2-185:001 9-2-185:046 Ronald Wilson Oceanview Partners LLC P.O. Box 252 307 Lewers Street Ste. 600 onaunau, Hawaii 96726-0252 Honolulu HI 96815 -2-185:002 9-2-185-047,048,049 Earl Kemmer Richard Cortese PO Box 7222 654 Alexander St ,Ocean View, HI 96737 Glendale, Ca. 91203 9-2-185-005 9-2-084-008 a effery Anderson Bradley Garness D O Box 6962 P.O. Box 382 scean View, HI 96737 Willow, Ak. 99688-0382 9-2-084-009,010 1 William R Routin Keith Primeau PO Box 799 1845 Charmeran Ave. Honaunau, Hawaii 96726 San Jose, Ca. 95124 9-2-084-001 9-2-084-011 John McGowan Robert Morse 14 Old Two Holes Road P.O. Box 235239 East Hampton, NY 11937 Encinitas, Ca. 92023 9-2-084-002 9-2-084-012 K David Itamura Richard Ho 1741 Nalulu PI 1859 Alaweo Street 1 Honolulu, Hawaii 96821 Honolulu, Hawaii 96821 9-2-084-003, 007 9-2-084-013 1 Gordon Grace Owen Vickers 87-2636 Mamalahoa Hwy 4721 West Ave. #L-10 Captain Cook, Hawaii 96704 Quartz Hill, Ca. 93536 9-2-084-004 9-2-084-014 Margo M Montry Betsy Kagawa PO Box 522 1163 S Beretania St Pahala, Hi. 96777 Honolulu, HI 96814 9-2-084-005, 006 9-2-084-015 Maria T Sheppard Edward Atrisain PO Box 6847 1935 Davis Ave Ocean View, Hawaii 96737 Concord, Ca. 94518 9-2-084-016 9 2-084 033 Chris R McDonnell Raleigh H Luitjens PO Box 6898 PO Box 6427 Ocean View, Hawaii 96737 Ocean View, Hawaii 96737 9-2-084-017 9-2-084-034 Gregory D Piercy Wray-Al-Properties LLC 2427 NE 10th Ave 3681 Winery Rd Portland, Or 97212 Pahrump, Nv. 89048 9-2-084-018 9-2-084-035 i4 I I Elizabeth Hardy Rebecca Dejohn ma PO Box 2239 88-1605 Moana Dr Kealakekua, Hawaii 96750 Captain Cook, Hawaii 96704 1 9-2-084-019 9-2-084-036 ▪ Romana Cabebe Vicky McNamara 1710 Ano Nuevo Dr PO Box 1663 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Soap Lake, WA 98851 9-2-084-020 9-2-084:037 ▪ Froylan Magana Alton Kaleohano II PO Box 2139 20662 Road A3 NW Kealakekua, Hawaii 96750 Soap Lake, WA 98851 19-2-084-023, 024 9-2-084-038 Sandra G Lutz Ronald Elphick 113770 Cobble Hill Rd RR1 6420 Bohemian Hwy. ▪Cobble Hill, Bc, Canada Ocidental, Ca. 95465 9-2-084-025 Ocidental, Ca. 95465 Charles Roy Elizabeth Young 2045 Crown View Street TRS PO Box 92 ▪Henderson, Nv. 89052 Naalehu, Hawaii. 96772 119-2-084-040 9-2-084-047 Glen Hasimoto Richard C Murphy P. O. Box 1773 PO Box 24 111Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96745-1773 Davenport, Ca. 95017 ▪9-2-084-041 9-2-084-048 Renato Bergonia Edwin B Kayton 74-5029 Kealakaa Street PO Box 6198 IKaa-K0na, Hawaii 96740 Ocean View, Hi 96737 9-2-084-042 9-2-084-049 Jane Kay Charmagne Gushiken 1878 Heritage Way 1101 N Rainbow Blvd Apt 7 Iyountville, Ca. 94599 Las Vegas, Nv. 89108 9-2-084-043 9-2-084-050 I William Pestinger James R Overton 1215 S Kihei Road #0-107 18226 Westside Rd Kihei, Hawaii 96753 Lakeview, OR 97630 9-2-084-044 9-2-084-057 Alex Wilcox Kirkwood K Keoho 6718 County Road 49 1101 N Rainbow Blvd Apt 7 Burlington, Co 80807 Las Vegas, Nv. 89108 9-2-084-045 9-2-084-058 Lotus Blossom Partners LLC John Neil Manton PO Box 46 12418 Kozy Rest Lane Kealakekua, Hawaii 96750-0046 Jacksonville, Fl. 32258 9-2-084-046 9-2-084-060 I Robert ] Muller Christopher Stillson 915 N Tamarack 8681 Hwy. 193 Green Valley, Az. 85614 Kelsey, Ca. 95667 9-2-084-061 9-2-189:095 Barbara Gilles Wayne Brumaghim PO Box 6873 P.O. Box 1755 Ocean View, Hi 96737 Kealakekua, Hawaii 96750-1755 9-2-084-064, 065 9-2-189:096 Don D Crawford Title Guarentee Escrow Service 2109 Fuentes PO Box 1678 Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 Honolulu, Hawaii 96806-1678 9-2-084-066, 067, 068, 069 9-2-189:097 Margit Hertig Stephen B Schulte E 7637 Miller Fall Road HC 1 Box 5265 Derwood, Md. 20855 Keaau, Hawaii 96749 9-2-189:053 9-2-189-093 Richard Choy Regina Desasito P.O. Box 1166 6127 Fillmore St Captain Cook, Hawaii 96704-1166 Hollywood, Fl 33024 9-2-189:054 9-2-189-094 § 25-5-120 HAWAI`I COUNTY CODE Division 12. CV,Village Commercial Districts. Section 25-5-120. Purpose and applicability. The CV (village commercial) district provides for a broad range or variety of commercial and light industrial uses that are necessary to serve the population in rural areas where the supplementary support of the general business uses and activities of a central commercial district is not readily available. (1996, Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2;ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-121. Designation of CV districts. Each CV (village commercial) district shall be designated by the symbol "CV" followed by a number which indicates the minimum land area, in number of thousands of square feet,required for each building site. (1996, Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2;ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-122. Permitted uses. (a) The following uses shall be permitted in the CV district: (1) Adult day care homes. (2) Amusement and recreation facilities, indoor. (3) Art galleries,museums. (4) Automobile sales and rentals. (5) Automobile service stations. (6) Bars. (7) Bed and breakfast establishments, as permitted under section 25-4-7. (8) Boarding facilities, rooming, or lodging houses, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (9) Business services. (10) Cemeteries and mausoleums,as permitted under chapter 6,article 1 of this Code. (11) Churches,temples and synagogues. (12) Commercial parking lots and garages. (13) Community buildings, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (14) Convenience stores. (15) Crematoriums, funeral homes, funeral services, and mortuaries. (16) Crop production. (17) Day care centers. (18) Dwellings, double-family or duplex, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (19) Dwellings, multiple-family, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (20) Dwellings, single-family. (21) Family child care homes. (22) Farmers markets. When the vending activity in a farmers market involves more than just the sale of local fresh and/or raw produce, plant life, fish and local homegrown and homemade products for more than two days a week,the director, at the time of plan approval, shall restrict the hours of use, maintenance and operations and may require improvements as determined appropriate to ensure its compatibility with the existing character of the surrounding area. (23) Financial institutions. (24) Group living facilities. (25) Home occupations, as permitted under section 25-4-13. Planning Dept. SUPP. 14 (7-2012) 25-74 Exhibit 2 ZONING § 25-5-122 (26) Hospitals, sanitariums, old age,convalescent,nursing and rest homes and other similar uses. (27) Hotels,when the design and use conform to the character of the area, as approved by the director. (28) Laboratories,medical and research. (29) Lodges. (30) Manufacturing,processing and packaging light and general, except for concrete or asphalt products, where the products are distributed to retail establishments located in the immediate community, as approved by the director. (31) Medical clinics. (32) Meeting facilities. (33) Model homes,as permitted under section 25-4-8. (34) Neighborhood parks, playgrounds, tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar neighborhood recreational areas and uses. (35) Offices. (36) Personal services. (37) Photography studios. (38) Public uses and structures, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (39) Publishing plants for newspapers, books and magazines, printing shops, cartographing, and duplicating processes such as blueprinting or photostating shops, which are designed to primarily serve the local area. (40) Repair establishments, major, when there are not more than five employees, as approved by the director. (41) Repair establishments,minor. (42) Restaurants. (43) Retail establishments. (44) Schools. (45) Telecommunication antennas, as permitted under section 25-4-12. (46) Temporary real estate offices, as permitted under section 25-4-8. (47) Theaters. (48) Utility substations,as permitted under section 25-4-11. (b) In addition to those uses permitted under subsection(a)above,the following uses may be permitted in the CV district, provided that a use permit is issued for each use: (1) Golf courses and related golf course uses, including golf driving ranges, golf maintenance buildings and golf club houses. (2) Major outdoor amusement and recreation facilities. (3) Yacht harbors and boating facilities. (c) Residential uses in connection with the operation of any permitted uses shall be permitted in the CV district. (d) Buildings and uses similar to the permitted uses listed in subsection (a) above shall be permitted in the CV district, as approved by the director. (e) Buildings and uses normally considered accessory to the uses permitted in this section shall also be permitted in the CV district. (1996,Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2;ratified April 6, 1999; Am 2012, Ord.No. 12-28, sec. 14.) Section 25-5-123. Height limit. The height limit in the CV district shall be thirty feet. (1996, Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2;ratified April 6, 1999.) 25-75 SUPP. 14 (7-2012) § 25-5-124 1-1AWAI`I COUNTY CODE Section 25-5-124. Minimum building site area. The minimum building site area in the CV district shall be seven thousand five hundred square feet. (1996, Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2;ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-125. Minimum building site average width. Each building site in the CV district shall have a minimum building site average width of sixty feet. (1996, Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-126. Minimum yards. The minimum yards in the CV district shall be as follows: (1) Front or rear yards,fifteen feet; and (2) Side yards, none, except where the adjoining building site is in an RS, RD, RM or RCX district. Where the side yard adjoins the side yard of a building site in an RS, RD,RM or RCX district,there shall be a side yard which conforms to the side yard requirements for dwelling use of the adjoining district. (1996, Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2;ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-127. Landscaping of yards. (a) All front yards in the CV district shall be landscaped, except for necessary access drives and walkways, and except for the construction of one single-family dwelling and accessory buildings per lot. (b) Where any required side or rear yard in the CV district adjoins a building site in an RS, RD, RM or RCX district, the side or rear yard shall be landscaped with a screening hedge not less than forty-two inches in height, within five feet of the property line, except for necessary drives and walkways, and except for the construction of one single-family dwelling and accessory buildings per lot. (1996, Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2;ratified April 6, 1999;Am. 2005,Ord.No. 05-155, sec. 14.) Section 25-5-128. Other regulations. (a) Plan approval shall be required for all new structures and additions to existing structures in the CV district, except for construction of one single-family dwelling and any accessory buildings per lot. (b) Exceptions to the regulations for the CV district regarding heights, building site areas, building site average widths and yards,may be approved by the director within a planned unit development. (1996,Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2;ratified April 6, 1999; Am. 2005,Ord.No. 05-155,sec. 15.) Division 13.MCX,Industrial-Commercial Mixed Districts. Section 25-5-130. Purpose and applicability. The purpose of the MCX(industrial-commercial mixed use)district is to allow mixing of some industrial uses with commercial uses. The intent of this district is to provide for areas of diversified businesses and employment opportunities by permitting a broad range of uses, without exposing nonindustrial uses to unsafe and unhealthy environments. This district is intended to promote and maintain a viable mix of light industrial and commercial uses. (1996,Ord.No. 96-160, sec. 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-131. Designation of MCX districts. Each MCX (industrial-commercial mixed use) district shall be designated by the symbol "MCX" followed by a number which indicates the minimum land area, in number of thousands of square feet, required for each building site. (1996,Ord. No. 96-160,sec. 2;ratified April 6, 1999.) SUPP. 1 (1-2006) 25-76 01.WA7fR '_ 19 49? n`. '' DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY •• COUNTY OF HAWAII yTyOFNAWp\\ ,p" 3 4 5 KEKUANAO`A STREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAII 96720.2 TELEPHONE (808) 961-8050 • FAX (808) 961-8657 November 27,2012 'y ;.t TO: Ms. BJ Leithead Todd,Director Planning Department FROM: Quirino Antonio,Jr.,Manager—Chief Engineer SUBJECT: STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION(SLU 12-000036) APPLICANT—DR.WILLIAM C. FOULK REQUEST:A-lA TO CV-40 CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 12-000160) TAX MAP KEY 9-2-093:039-040 We have reviewed the subject applications and have the following comments. Please be informed that there are no Department of Water Supply facilities in the area. As the applicant has indicated a private water system, the Department recommends that the applicant consult with the State of Hawai`i, Department of Land and Natural Resources,Commission on Water Resource Management as well as the State of Hawai`i, Department of Health for their requirements, and the Fire Department for any fire protection requirements. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070, extension 256. Sincer, y yo rs, iill Quirino • ,tonio,Jr., P.E. Manag- -4 hief Engineer RQ:dfg Planning Dept. copy— Dr. William C. Foulk A_ Lehua Court LLC EXhlblt ., 0 S 2"iix`6 7 . . .`."rated Cho lli1 1 ° re.icrrus 9Z . ur . _ Na 1`I t _ine , . . `3' r�r•:-qtr .-.a.:. :.r .z . - JMf OPp William P.Kenoi *i ` ' '�i• Dora Beck,P.E. Mayor d 1 =-�s•t_ Acting Director William T.Takaba 4�r os N�,ri��_ Managing Director • County of Hawai i DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 25 Aupuni Street • Hilo,Hawaii 96720 (808)961-8083 • Fax(808)961-8086 http://co.hawaii.hi.us/directory/dir envmng.htm MEMORANDUM Date : November 5, 2012 To : BJ LEITHEAD TODD,Planning Director From: DORA BECK,P.E.,Acting Director, Subject: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 12-000036) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application (REZ 12-000160) Request: A-1 a to CV-40 Applicant: Dr. William C. Foulk TMK: 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 The Wastewater Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following recommendations (please note Solid Waste Division comments will be submitted separately): DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: WASTEWATER COMMENTS: (Contact Wastewater Division for details.) (X) No comments ( ) Require connection of existing and/or proposed structures to the public sewer in accordance with Section 21-5 of the Hawai'i County Code. ( )Require Council Resolution to approve sewer extension in accordance with Section 21-26.1 of the Hawaii County Code. Complete Sewer Extension Application. ( ) Require extension of the sewer system to service the proposed subdivision in accordance with Section 23-85 of the Hawai'i County Code. +: ( ) Check or line out as applicable: required by Department 0 pp [ ] If re uired b the Director of the of m Environmental Management("Director of DEM"), [ ] applicant shall conduct a sewer study in 0 accordance with the then applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. Applicant shall provide such sewer line or other facility CC improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require, which the sewer study may indicate •C •••1 are advisable for mitigation of impacts of the proposed project. Contact Wastewater Division Chief C ;_ for details. ( ) Other: iy County of Hawai`i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. i' 8 2 3 9 3 William P.Kenoi : .:,��.''�: �;/j, :+ Dora Beck,P.E. - Mayor Acting Director William T.Takaba t `° df►r• "°. �• ��OF N� , Managing Director CUMIN of Past`t DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 25 Aupuni Street • Hilo,Hawai'i 96720 (808)961-8083 Fax(808)961-8086 http://co.hawaii.hi.us/directory/dir envmng.htm MEMORANDUM Date : November 5, 2012 To BJ LEITHEAD TODD, Planning Director From: DORA BECK,P.E., Acting Director Subject: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 12-000036) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application(REZ 12-000160) Request: A-1a to CV-40 Applicant: Dr.William C. Foulk TMK: 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 The Solid Waste Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following recommendations (Please note Wastewater Division's comments will submitted separately): DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: ( ) Wastewater Division had no comment as this area is not a sewered and there are no immediate plans for sewering of the area. ( ) Other SOLID WASTE COMMENTS: (Contact Solid Waste Division for details.) ( ) No comments ( ) Commercial operations, State and Federal agencies,religious entities and non-profit organizations may not use transfer stations for disposal. ( ) Aggregates and any other construction/demolition waste should be responsibly reused to its fullest extent. ( ) Ample and equal room should be provided for rubbish and recycling. ( ) Green waste may be transported to the green waste sites located at the Kailua and Hilo transfer stations, or other suitable diversion programs. ( ) Construction and demolition waste is prohibited at all County Transfer Stations. ( ) Submit Solid Waste Management Plan in accordance with attached guidelines. ( ) Existing Solid Waste Management Plan is to be followed. Provide update to the department on current status. ( ) Other: 982394 County of Hawai`i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. '� r JMZY'9s............... • • • William P.Kenoi ; 1);r, p; 'T cP''�' Harry S.Kubojiri a • Mayor Police Chief '} {s raF t d ° ' °' j' 05 .1 7.1i; r''-'' Paul K.Ferreira Deputy Police Chief County of Hawai`i POLICE DEPARTMENT 349 Kapi'olani Street • Hilo,Hawaii 96720-3998 (808)935-3311 • Fax(808)961-2389 November 14, 2012 TO : BJ LEITH : ' TODD, PLANNING DIRECTOR OUNTY S F AWAI'I PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM : : L H. K` ALOHA JR., ASSISTANT CHIEF, AREA II OPERATIONS SUBJECT : STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT (SLU 12-000036) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application (REZ 12-000160) Request: A-la to CV-40 Applicant: Dr. William C. Foulk Tax Map Key: 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 The above-referenced application has been reviewed, and we have no comments or objections to offer at this time. Should you have any questions, please contact Captain Andrew Burian, Commander of the Ka'u District, at (808) 939-2520. AB RS120677 Planning Dept. ExhibitSIE...._ eArt,INT7'"r 062243 i "Hawai`i County is an Equal Opportunity Pnwider and Employer" --- _,. 1 . . . 0 0 XII!���1 William P.}K 101.`": ;^a r,° -,--,7,1T ., c `' Darren J. Rosario Mayor �%r..�I' Fire Chief . } 1A--: Renwick J. Victorino ,,�-a -,--, r r. t . r•,c5 Deputy Fire a,kef QCouutp of atuat`t HAWAI'I FIRE DEPARTMENT 25 Aupuni Street • Room 2501• Hilo,Hawaii 96720 (808)932-2900 • Fax(808)932-2928 November 9,2012 TO: BJ LEITHEAD TODD,PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: DARREN J. ROSARIO,FIRE CHIEF SUBJECT: STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT(SLU 12-000036) REQUEST: AGRICULTURAL TO URBAN CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION(REZ 12-000160) REQUEST: A-la to CV-40 APPLICANT: DR. WILLIAM FOULK TAX MAP KEY: 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 The Hawai'i Fire Departmentt has no objections, we have included water and access requirements for any structures built on site. NFPA 1,UNIFORM FIRE CODE,2006 EDITION Note: NFPA 1, Hawai'i State Fire Code with County amendments. County amendments are identified with a preceding "C--," of the reference code. Chapter 18 Fire Department Access and Water Supply 18.1 General. Fire department access and water supplies shall comply with this chapter. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature, or where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy,or where access for fire apparatus is unduly difficult, or .,. areas where there is an inadequate.fire flow,or inadequate fire hydrant spacing, and the AHJ may m require additional safeguards including,but not limited to, additional fire appliance units, more p than one type of appliance, or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved. C •.- �E S 18.1.1 Plans. 2_• 18.1.1.1 Fire Apparatus Access. Plans for fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the CL Vxj fire department for review and approval prior to construction. 18.1.1.2 Fire Hydrant Systems. Plans and specifications for fire hydrant systems shall be;=rte submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. J AWaA 14 ` Hawai'i Qnunly is an Equal Opportunity Pramider and Employer. 82' � '` ro 8 BJ Leithead Todd November 9,2012 Page 2 C--18.1.1.2.1 Fire Hydrant use and Restrictions.No unauthorized person shall use or operate any Fire hydrant unless such person first secures permission or a permit from the owner or representative of the department, or company that owns or governs that water supply or system. Exception: Fire Department personnel conducting firefighting operations, hydrant testing,and/or maintenance, and the flushing and acceptance of hydrants witnessed by Fire Prevention Bureau personnel. 18.2 Fire Department Access. 18.2.1 Fire department access and fire department access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Section 18.2. 18.2.2* Access to Structures or Areas. 18.2.2.1 Access Box(es).The AHJ shall have the authority to require an access box(es)to be installed in an accessible location where access to or within a structure or area is difficult because of security. 18.2.2.2 Access to Gated Subdivisions or Developments.The AHJ shall have the authority to require fire department access be provided to gated subdivisions or developments through the use of an approved device or system. 18.2.2.3 Access Maintenance.The owner or occupant of a structure or area,with required fire department access as specified in 18.2.2.1 or 18.2.2.2, shall notify the AHJ when the access is modified in a manner that could prevent fire department access. 18.2.3 Fire Department Access Roads. 18.2.3.1 Required Access. 18.2.3.1.1 Approved fire department access roads shall be provided for every facility,building, or portion of a building hereafter constructed or relocated. 18.2.3.1.2 Fire Department access roads shall consist of roadways, fire lanes, parking lots lanes, or a combination thereof. 18.2.3.1.3* When not more than two one-and two-family dwellings or private garages, carports, sheds, agricultural buildings, and detached buildings or structures 400ft (37 m2) or less are present, the requirements of 18.2.3.1 through 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be modified by the AHJ. BJ Leithead Todd November 9, 2012 Page 3 18.2.3.1.4 When fire department access roads cannot be installed due to location on property, topography, waterways, nonnegotiable grades, or other similar conditions, the AHJ shall be authorized to require additional fire protection features. 18.2.3.2 Access to Building. 18.2.3.2.1 A fire department access road shall extend to within in 50 ft (15 m) of at least one exterior door that can be opened from the outside and that provided access to the interior of the building. 18.2.3.2.1.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13, NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R, the distance in 18.2.3.2.2 shall be permitted to be increased to 300 feet. 18.2.3.2.2 Fire department access roads shall be provided such that any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located not more than 150 ft (46 m) from fire department access roads as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. 18.2.3.2.2.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13, NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R, the distance in 18.2.3.2.2 shall be permitted to be increased to 450 ft (137 m). 18.2.3.3 Multiple Access Roads. More than one fire department access road shall be provided when it is determined by the AHJ that access by a single road could be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, or other factors that could limit access. 18.2.3.4 Specifications. 18.2.3.4.1 Dimensions. C- 18.2.3.4.1.1 FDAR shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20ft with an approved turn around area if the FDAR exceeds 150 feet. Exception: FDAR for one and two family dwellings shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 15 feet, with an area of not less than 20 feet wide within 150 feet of the structure being protected. An approved turn around area shall be provided if the FDAR exceeds 250 feet. C- 18.2.3.4.1.2 FDAR shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less then 13ft 6 in. C- 18.2.3.4.1.2.1 Vertical clearances may be increased or reduced by the AHJ, provided such increase or reduction does not impair access by the fire apparatus, and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating such approved changes. BJ Leithead Todd November 9, 2012 Page 4 18.2.3.4.1.2.2 Vertical clearances shall be increased when vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to accommodate fire apparatus. C— 18.2.3.4.2 Surface. Fire department access roads and bridges shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads (25 Tons) of the fire apparatus. Such FDAR and shall be comprised of an all-weather driving surface. 18.2.3.4.3 Turning Radius. C— 18.2.3.4.3.1 Fire department access roads shall have a minimum inside turning radius of 30 feet, and a minimum outside turning radius of 60 feet. 18.2.3.4.3.2 Turns in fire department access road shall maintain the minimum road width. 18.2.3.4.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 ft (46 m) in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the fire apparatus to turn around. 18.2.3.4.5 Bridges. 18.2.3.4.5.1 When a bridge is required to be used as part of a fire department access road, it shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with county requirements. 18.2.3.4.5.2 The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 18.2.3.4.5.3 Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges where required by the AHJ. 18.2.3.4.6 Grade. CC 18.2.3.4.6.1 The maximum gradient of a Fire department access road shall not exceed 12 percent for unpaved surfaces and 15 percent for paved surfaces. In areas of the FDAR where a Fire apparatus would connect to a Fire hydrant or Fire Department Connection, the maximum gradient of such area(s) shall not exceed 10 percent. 18.2.3.4.6.2*The angle of approach and departure for any means of fire department access road shall not exceed 1 ft drop in 20 ft (0.3 m drop in 6 m)or the design limitations of the fire apparatus of the fire department, and shall be subject to approval by the AHJ. BJ Leithead Todd November 9, 2012 Page 5 18.2.3.4.6.3 Fire department access roads connecting to roadways shall be provided with curb cuts extending at least 2 ft (0.61 m)beyond each edge of the fire lane. 18.2.3.4.7 Traffic Calming Devices. The design and use of traffic calming devices shall be approved the AHJ. 18.2.3.5 Marking of Fire Apparatus Access Road. 18.2.3.5.1 Where required by the AHJ, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained to identify fire department access roads or to prohibit the obstruction thereof of both. 18.2.3.5.2 A marked fire apparatus access road shall also be known as a fire lane. 18.2.4* Obstruction and Control of Fire Department Access Road. 18.2.4.1 General. 18.2.4.1.1 The required width of a fire department access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including by the parking of vehicles. 18.2.4.1.2 Minimum required widths and clearances established under 18.2.3.4 shall be maintained at all times. 18.2.4.1.3* Facilities and structures shall be maintained in a manner that does not impair or impede accessibility for fire department operations. 18.2.4.1.4 Entrances to fire departments access roads that have been closed with gates and barriers in accordance with 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be obstructed by parked vehicles. 18.2.4.2 Closure of Accessways. 18.2.4.2.1 The AHJ shall be authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across roads, trails, or other accessways not including public streets, alleys, or highways. 18.2.4.2.2 Where required, gates and barricades shall be secured in an approved manner. J BJ Leithead Todd November 9,2012 Page 6 18.2.4.2.3 Roads, trails, and other accessways that have been closed and obstructed in the manner prescribed by 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be trespassed upon or used unless authorized by the owner and the AHJ. 18.2.4.2.4 Public officers acting within their scope of duty shall be permitted to access restricted property identified in 18.2.4.2.1. 18.2.4.2.5 Locks, gates, doors, barricades, chains, enclosures, signs, tags, or seals that have been installed by the fire department or by its order or under its control shall not be removed, unlocked, destroyed, tampered with, or otherwise vandalized in any manner. 18.3 Water Supplies and Fire Hydrants 18.3.1* A water supply approved by the county, capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are hereafter constructed, or moved into or within the county. When any portion of the facility or building is in excess of 150 feet (45 720 mm) from a water supply on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on- site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided when required by the AHJ. For on-site fire hydrant requirements see section 18.3.3. EXCEPTIONS: 1. When facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system the provisions of section 18.3.1 may be modified by the AHJ. 2. When water supply requirements cannot be installed due to topography or other conditions, the AHJ may require additional fire protection as specified in section 18.3.2 as amended in the code. 3. When there are not more than two dwellings, or two private garage, carports, sheds and agricultural. Occupanicies, the requirements of section 18.3.1 may be modified by AHJ. 18.3.2*Where no adequate or reliable water distribution system exists, approved reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, fire department tanker shuttles, or other approved systems capable of providing the required fire flow shall be permitted. 18.3.3* The location, number and type of fire hydrants connected to a water supply capable of delivering the required fire flow shall be provided on a fire apparatus access road on the site of the premises or both, in accordance with the appropriate county water requirements. 18.3.4 Fire Hydrants and connections to other approved water supplies shall be accessible to the fire department. BJ Leithead Todd November 9,2012 Page 7 18.3.5 Private water supply systems shall be tested and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25 or county requirements as determined by the AHJ. 18.3.6 Where required by the AHJ, fire hydrants subject to vehicular damage shall be protected unless located within a public right of way. 18.3.7 The AHJ shall be notified whenever any fire hydrant is placed out of service or returned to service. Owners of private property required to have hydrants shall maintain hydrant records of approval, testing, and maintenance, in accordance with the respective county water requirements. Records shall be made available for review by the AHJ upon request. C� 18.3.8 Minimum water supply for buildings that do not meet the minimum County water standards: Buildings up to 2000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 3,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings 2001- 3000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 6,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, 3001- 6000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 12,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, greater than 6000 square feet, shall meet the minimum County water and fire flow requirements. Multiple story buildings shall multiply the square feet by the amount of stories when determining the minimum water supply. Commercial buildings requiring a minimum fire flow of 2000gpm per the Department of Water standards shall double the minimum water supply reserved for firefighting. Fire Department Connections (FDC) to alternative water supplies shall comply with 18.3.8 (1)-(6) of this code. NOTE: In that water catchment systems are being used as a means of water supply for firefighting, such systems shall meet the following requirements: (1) In that a single water tank is used for both domestic and firefighting water, the water for domestic use shall not be capable of being drawn from the water reserved for firefighting; BJ Leithead Todd November 9, 2012 Page 8 (2) Minimum pipe diameter sizes from the water supply to the Fire Department Connection(FDC) shall be as follows: (a) 4" for C900 PVC pipe; (b) 4" for C906 PE pipe; (c) 3" for ductile Iron; (d) 3' for galvanized steel. (3) The Fire Department Connection(FDC) shall: (a)be made of galvanized steel; (b)have a gated valve with 2-1/2 inch, National Standard Thread male fitting and cap; (c)be located between 8 ft and 16 ft from the Fire department access. The location shall be approved by the AHJ; (d) not be located less than 24 inches, and no higher than 36 inches from finish grade, as measured from the center of the FDC orifice; (e)be secure and capable of withstanding drafting operations. Engineered stamped plans may be required; (f)not be located more than 150 feet of the most remote part, but not less than 20 feet, of the structure being protected; (g) also comply with section 13.1.3 and 18.2.3.4.6.1 of this code; (4) Commercial buildings requiring a fire flow of 2000gpm shall be provided with a second FDC. Each FDC shall be independent of each other, with each FDC being capable of flowing 500gpm by engineered design standards. The second FDC shall be located in an area approved by the AHJ with the idea of multiple Fire apparatus' conducting drafting operations at once, in mind. (5) Inspection and maintenance shall be in accordance to NFPA 25. (6) The owner or lessee of the property shall be responsible for maintaining the water level, quality, and appurtenances of the system. EXCEPTIONS TO SECTION 18.3.8: (1) Agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and shade houses with no combustible or equipment storage. (2) Buildings less than 800 square feet in size that meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements. (3) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and detached garages 800 to 2000 square feet in size, and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements, the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 1000 feet. (4) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, and storage sheds BJ Leithead Todd November 9, 2012 Page 9 greater than 2000square feet,but less than 3000 square feet and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements, the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 500 feet. (5) For buildings with an approved automatic sprinkler system, the minimum water supply required may be modified. If there are any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Fire Prevention Bureau at (808) 932-2911. 42- — DARREN J. ROSARIO Fire Chief KT/lc y 1 • • e OV NHL ABIRRCROMBIR • . , WILLIAM J.Ai,/ . GOVPRNOR OP HAWAII a LA,JR liU1NMA!MM iMMk!r rH!MD AM,HAH KM w:w*IIN I:% !1 k i n II Y 101IM ION 1WAIINMI'.vNka I MANM.IMINI d and 44 `` ems STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES L� `'- LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 state of via4 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 November 27,2012 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attention: Mr. Jeff Darrow via email: yarrow rrco.hawaii.hi.us 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Mr.Darrow: SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 12-000036), and Change of Zone Application (REZ 12-000160), Dr. William C. Foulk, Applicant, North Kona,Hawaii; TMK: (3) 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Department of Land and Natural Resources' (DLNR) Land Division distributed or made available a copy of your report pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR Divisions for their review and comments. At this time, enclosed are comments from (i) the Engineering Division and (ii) the Hawaii District Land on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call Kevin Moore at 587-0426. Thank you. Sincerely, 9 t. ussell Y. Tsuji Plannin D p Land Administrator Exhibit Enclosure(s) SCA N.I I: . I Vtt 0524 9 . 1 •• • • 4 NEIL ABERCROMBIE WILLIAM J.AILA,JR GOVERNOR OF HAWAII - CHABUIRSON A I' BOARD CO►WRS OFLANWATER D N6A0lp(ENANAOp7. W7 I *.1. . y ' STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LA LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES I.t—- - — LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 S�eotHXA1" HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 November 7, 2012 MEMORANDUM TO: DLNR Agencies: _Div. of Aquatic Resources _Div. of Boating&Ocean Recreation h.), X Engineering Division ry _Div. of Forestry& Wildlife =? Div. of State Parks _Commission on Water Resource Management o Office of Conservation&Coastal Lands J(7 !? X Land Division—Hawaii Districts X Historic Preservation —'rn cn �� FROM: ussell Y. Tsuji, Land Admin. st for SUBJECT:Mtate Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 12-000036), and Change of Zone Application(REZ 12-000160) LOCATION: North Kona, Hawaii; TMK: (3) 9-2-093:039, 040, 041,042 APPLICANT: Dr. William C. Foulk Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above referenced application. A complete copy of the subject applications and environmental report is available at the Land Division office in Honolulu. We would appreciate your comments on this document. Please submit any comments by November 26, 2012. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. if you have any questions about this request,please contact Kevin Moore at 587-0426. Thank you. Attachments ( ) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. (fit ) Comments are attached. /1 Signed: Print Nam fr Date: �`�f cc: Central Files S .) • • DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LM/KevinMoore Ref.: ChangeZoneSLUBoundaryAmendment Hawaii.589 COMMENTS () We confirm that the project site,according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM),is located in Flood Zone (X) Please take note that the project site,according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM),is located in an area of Minimal Tsunami Inundation.The National Flood Insurance Program does not have any regulations for developments within the Minimal Tsunami Inundation areas. () Please note that the correct Flood Zone Designation for the project site according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)is () Please note that the project must comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP)presented in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations(44CFR), whenever development within a Special Flood Hazard Area is undertaken. If there are any questions,please contact the State NFIP Coordinator,Ms.Carol Tyau-Beam,of the Department of Land and Natural Resources,Engineering Division at(808)587-0267. Please be advised that 44CFR indicates the minimum standards set forth by the NFIP. Your Community's local flood ordinance may prove to be more restrictive and thus take precedence over the minimum NFIP standards. If there are questions regarding the local flood ordinances, please contact the applicable County NFIP Coordinators below: () Mr.Mario Siu Li at(808)768-8098 or Ms.Ardis Shaw-Kim at(808)768-8296 of the City and County of Honolulu,Department of Planning and Permitting. () Mr.Frank DeMarco at(808)961-8042 of the County of Hawaii,Department of Public Works. () Mr.Francis Cerizo at(808)270-7771 of the County of Maui,Department of Planning. () Ms.Wynne Ushigome at(808)241-4890 of the County of Kauai,Department of Public Works. () The applicant should include water demands and infrastructure required to meet project needs. Please note that projects within State lands requiring water service from the Honolulu Board of Water Supply system will be required to pay a resource development charge,in addition to Water Facilities Charges for transmission and daily storage. () The applicant should provide the water demands and calculations to the Engineering Division so it can be included in the State Water Projects Plan Update. () Additional comments : () Other: Should you have any questions,please call Ms. Suzie S.Agraan of the Planning Branch at 587-0258. Signed: '` f' T CH Ci,CHI ENGINEER IyF Date : ". 'p ; f. • NEIL ABERCROMBIE a ~• WILLIAM.1.AILA,JR. GOVERNOR OF HAWAII CIIANlFA40N BOARDOf NW ANUNN/ RLSOUOCec ll r ' lE6.SIONON WA GM RESOURCE MANAGEMI3NI pod and ``w t017 NOV -8 P 2. 55 STATE OF HAWAII - Ortonii DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION RECEIVED POST OFFICE BOX 621 I_AND DIVISION stale ofHa+rti6 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 1IL HAWAII November 7,2012 MEMORANDUM TO: DLNR Agencies: Div. of Aquatic Resources _Div. of Boating& Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division _Div. of Forestry&Wildlife _Div. of State Parks Commission on Water Resource Management _Office of Conservation&Coastal Lands Land Division- Hawaii District X Historic Preservation FROM: ussell Y. Tsuji,Land Admin. for SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 12-000036), and Change of Zone Application(REZ 12-000160) LOCATION: North Kona, Hawaii; TMK: (3) 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 APPLICANT: Dr. William C. Foulk Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above referenced application. A complete copy of the subject applications and environmental report is available at the Land Division office in Honolulu. We would appreciate your comments on this document. Please submit any comments by November 26,2012. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact Kevin Moore at 587-0426. Thank you. Attachments ( ) We have no objections. {,4 We have no comments. ( ) Comments are att ;; ed. Sign Print Name: , 40, C. ; i j Date: cc: Central Files 624 5 9 ter" I t .:�'+ ., •y 3^k r�^ - WILLIAM J.AILA,JR. t)i•i 7 �.G I r P"T 'R. O F y"— CIWRPERSON NEIL ABERCROMBIE •f•.•••"••••••........4( ; BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES GOVERNOR OF HAWAII tt 14 n 5959 COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ESTHER KIA'AINA = YM 4 :t FIRST DEPUTY 1 '7 riV f f±1 7: t I�' ��1� •�'� WILLIAM M.TAM `.�.�,t � DEPUTY DIRECTOR-N'ATER '• .• rt£f'i AQUATIC RESOURCES w 'U BOATING AND OCEAN RECREATION ���rr ....� '_y _ � BUREAU OF CONVEYANCES T�' COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT -'"�- 4 �7 `I7 7 l CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDS ... '-�. .:._ STATE OF HA�'Y Al CONSERVATION RESOURCES SENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES HISTORRY AND RVATIOE Of tial'1'I RAHOOLAIWE ISLAND RESERVE COMMISSION STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION unv 601 KAMOKILA BOULEVARD,ROOM 555 STATE PARKS KAPOLEI,HAWAII 96707 November 14,2012 Jeff Darrow LOG NO:2012.3159 County of Hawaii Planning Department DOC NO: 1211MV12 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 Archaeology Hilo,HI 96720 SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review- State of Hawaii State land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 12-000160) Change of Zone Application(REZ 12-000160)from A-la to CV-40 for Lehua Court LLC In Hawaiian Ocean View Estates Kahuku Ahupua`a,Ka`u District,Island of Hawaii TMK(3)9-2-093:039 through:042 Thank you for the opportunity to review this application that was received by our office on November 2,2012. We apologize for the delayed review and thank you for your patience. According to the application,Lehua Court LLC. is seeking the subject zoning and land use boundary changes in order to construct a 54,000 square foot neighborhood commercial center. A review of our records indicates that there are no known archaeological sites within the subject parcel. Our records also indicate that no archaeological survey has been conducted on the property. However,aerial photographs indicate that the project area has been previously graded,and it is unlikely that any archaeological sites remain intact in this parcel. Finally,a previous SHPD review of this project area(SHPD correspondence LOG NO 2006.1934, DOC NO 0606JT39 and DOC NO 0606JT40) indicted that no historic properties were located in the project area and no historic properties would be affected. Therefore SHPD believes that no historic properties will be affected by this project In the event that historic resources, including human skeletal remains, structural remains, sand deposits, midden deposits, or lava tubes are identified during construction activities, please cease work in the immediate vicinity of the find, protect the fmd from additional disturbance, and contact the State Historic Preservation Division at(808) 933-7653. Please contact Mike Vitousek at (808) 652-1510 or Michael.Vitousek(4hawaii.gov for any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Aloha, Planning pt. Michael Vitousek, Exhibit Lead Archaeologist Hawaii Island Section Historic Preservation Division Orr + 5 NEIL ABERCROMBIE ';- L ETTA J.FUDDY,A.C.S.W.,M.P.H. GOVERNOR 1859 Director of Health / ri cf ,.1. 8 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH P.O.BOX 916 HILO,HAWAII 96721-0916 MEMORANDUM DATE: November 7, 2012 TO: Bobby Jean Leithead Todd Planning Director, County of Hawaii FROM: Newton Inouye District Environmental Health Program Chief SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 12-000036) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application (REZ 12-000160) Request: A-la to CV-40 Applicant: Dr. William C. Foulk Tax Map Key: 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 The submittals for the subject development have been transmitted to our Environmental Management programs for their coordinated review and comments. Upon receipt of their reply, their comments will be forwarded to your office. WORD:SLU 12-000036.my Planning ept. Exhibit SCANNED NEIL ABERCROMBIE i, ;( `4 ; LORETTA J.FUDDY,A.C.S.W.,M.P.H. GOVERNOR OF HAWAII L J DIRECTOR OF HEALTH STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH In reply,please refer to: P.0.BOX 3378 File: HONOLULU,HI 96801-3378 12-213 SLU 12.000036 DATE: November 16, 2012 TO: Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd Planning Director, County of Hawaii FROM: Laura McIntyre_...- , , , Environmental' fanning 0 ce Manager SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 12-000036) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application(REZ 12-000160) Request: A-la to CV-40 Applicant: Dr. William C. Foulk Tax Map Key: (3) 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 The Department of Health(DOH), Environmental Planning Office(EPO), acknowledges receipt of your letter, dated October 31, 2012. Thank you for allowing us to review and comment on the subject document. The document was routed to the various branches of the Environmental Health Administration. We have no comments at this time, but reserve the right to future comments. We strongly recommend that you review all of the Standard Comments on our website: www.hawaii.gov/health/environmental/env-planning/landuse/landuse.html. Any comments specifically applicable to this application should be adhered to. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)provides a wealth of information on their website including strategies to help protect our natural environment and build sustainable communities at: http://water.epa.gov/infrastructure/sustain/. The DOH encourages State and county planning departments, developers,planners, engineers and other interested parties to apply these strategies and environment principles whenever they plan or review new developments or redevelopments projects. We also ask you to share this information with others to increase community awareness on healthy, sustainable community design. If there are any questions about these comments please contact me. Laura Leialoha Phillips McIntyre, AICP Environmental Planning Office Manager Environmental Health Administration Department of Heath ma . ..� �Ac 919 Ala Moana Blvd., Ste. 312 f N Honolulu, Hawaii 96814 Phone: 586-4337 O 8 2 2' 9 laura.mcintvregdoh.hawaii.gov ew 1,10 NEIL ABERCROMBIE r.t GOVERNOR OF HAWAII r,. 3 1 it', ° LORETTA J.FUDDY,A.C.S.W.,M.P.H. ,`�t DIRECTOR OF HEALTH C: 1:O STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH In reply,please refer to: P.0.BOX 3378 File: HONOLULU,HI 96801-3378 LUD-3 9 2 093 039 etc-ID1132 SLUBA Ag to Urban-Faulk November 26, 2012 Ms. Bobby Jean Leithead Todd, Planning Director Planning Department, County of Hawaii Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi Street Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Leithead Todd: Subject: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 12-000036) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application (REZS 1-000160) Request: A-la to CV-40 Applicant: Dr. William C. Foulk TMK (3) 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to review the above subject project which requests comments on the State Land Use Boundary Amendment for the subject property. The subject project is located in the critical wastewater disposal area (CWDA) as determined by the Hawaii Advisory Wastewater Advisory Committee. We do not have records of any wastewater systems information on file and it is our understanding that the area is currently not serviced by the County sewer service system. We have no objections regarding the change of zone request as long as wastewater generated from future developments on the subject properties shall be handled by wastewater systems that comply with our Chapter 11-62, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Should you have any questions, please contact the Planning & Design Section of our branch at phone (808) 586-4294 or fax to (808) 586-4300. Sincerely, SINA PRUDER, P.E., ACTING CHIEF NNEV / NE Wastewater Branch LM:mt : O 4 r:& 1 c: DOH-Environmental Planning Office(12-213Ms.Laura McIntyre DOH-WWB's Kona Staff, Mr.Dane Hiromasa 46 �F N9 9' Ny61L ABERCRONI�IE, }: LORETTA J.FUDDY,A.C.S.W.,M.P.H. COVERNOROFHAWNI DIRECTOR OF HEALTH •4/ '`• E�j STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH In reply,please refer to SAFE DRINKING WATER BRANCH File: SDWB 919 ALA MOANA BLVD.,ROOM 308 LehuaCourtl.doc HONOLULU,HI 96814-4920 November 29, 2012 Ms. BJ Leithead Todd County of Hawaii, Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Leithead Todd: SUBJECT: STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT (SLU 12-000036) REQUEST: AGRICULTURAL TO URBAN, CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 1-000160), REQUEST: A-1A TO CV-40 APPLICANT: DR. WILLIAM C. FOULK TMK: (3) 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 The Safe Drinking Water Branch (SDWB) has reviewed the subject document and has the following comments: 1. The description of the project does not clearly identify the source of drinking water for the project. Please clearly identify the source of drinking water. 2. This project qualifies as a public water system. Federal and state regulations define a public water system as a system that serves 25 or more individuals at least 60 days per year or has at least 15 service connections. All public water system owners and operators are required to comply with Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR), Title 11, Chapter 20, "Rules Relating to Public Water Systems." 3. All new public water systems are required to demonstrate and meet minimum capacity requirements prior to their establishment. This requirement involves demonstration that the system will have satisfactory technical, managerial and financial capacity to enable the system to comply with safe drinking water standards and requirements in accordance with HAR Section 11-20-29.5, "Capacity demonstration and evaluation." 4. Projects that propose development of new sources of drinking water serving or proposed to serve a public water system must comply with the terms of HAR Section 11-20-29, "Use of new sources of raw water for public water systems." This section requires that all new public water system sources be approved by the Director of Health prior to its use. Such approval is based primarily upon the submission of a satisfactory engineering report which addresses the Esi-74 N requirements set in .HAR Section 11-20-.29. I 513:3 Ms. BJ Leithead Todd November 29, 2012 Page 2 5. The engineering report must identify all potential sources of contamination and evaluate alternative control measures which could be implemented to reduce or eliminate the potential for contamination, including treatment of the water source. In addition, water quality analyses for all regulated contaminants, performed by a laboratory certified by the State Laboratories Division of the State of Hawaii, must be submitted as part of the report to demonstrate compliance with all drinking water standards. Additional parameters may be required by the Director for this submittal or additional tests required upon his or her review of the information submitted. 6. All sources of public water systems must undergo a source water assessment which will delineate a source water protection area. This process is preliminary to the creation of a source water protection plan for that source and activities which will take place to protect the source of drinking water. 7. Projects proposing to develop new public water systems or proposing substantial modifications to existing public water systems must receive approval by the Director of Health prior to construction of the proposed system or modification in accordance with HAR Section 11-20-30, "New and modified public water systems." These projects include treatment, storage and distribution systems of public water systems. The approval authority for projects owned and operated by a County Board or Department of Water or Water Supply has been delegated to them. 8. All public water systems must be operated by certified distribution system and water treatment plant operators as defined by Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 25, "Rules Relating to Certification of Public Water System Operators." 9. All projects which propose the use of dual water systems or the use of a non- potable water system in proximity to an existing drinking water system to meet irrigation or other needs must be carefully designed and operated to prevent the cross-connection of these systems and prevent the possibility of backflow of water from the non-potable system to the drinking water system. The two systems must be clearly labeled and physically separated by air gaps or reduced pressure principle backflow prevention devices to avoid contaminating the drinking water supply. In addition backflow devices must be tested periodically to assure their proper operation. Further, all non-potable spigots and irrigated areas should be clearly labeled with warning signs to prevent the inadvertent consumption on non-potable water. Compliance with Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 21, "Cross-Connection and Backflow Control" is also required. Ms. BJ Leithead Todd November 29, 2012 Page 3 10. All projects which propose the establishment of a potentially contaminating activity (as identified in the Hawai'i Source Water Assessment Plan) within the source water protection area of an existing source of water for a public water supply should address this potential and activities that will be implemented to prevent or reduce the potential for contamination of the drinking water source. 11. Section 17 on Air/Noise/Water Quality does not address any potential impacts to groundwater or local surface waters. 12. For further information concerning the application of capacity, new source approval, operator certification, source water assessment, backflow/cross- connection prevention or other public water system programs, please contact the Safe Drinking Water Branch at (808) 586-4258. If there are any questions, please call Ms. Jennifer Nikaido at (808) 586-4258. Sincerely, Ciw JOANNA L. SETO, P.E., CHIEF Safe Drinking Water Branch JN:slm c: Ms. Theresa McGeehan-Takiue, East Hawaii EHS via e-mail EPO • ,,,,,,,, <,.i.....»....4... 4y, 'fir.+:125a s%t:i NEI.ABERC�I IV 1 tI , ,, I £ `', �} LORETTA J.FUDDY,A.C.S.W.,M.P.H. GOVERNOR OF HAWAII LF 4 is �iT 1 lla, ��� it DIRECTOR OF HEALTH Z413 JUL STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH In reply,please refer to: SAFE DRINKING WATER BRANCH File: SDWB 919 ALA MOANA BLVD.,ROOM 308 Leithead ToddOl.Doc HONOLULU,HI 96814-4920 July 12, 2013 Ms. BJ Leithead Todd County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Leithead Todd: SUBJECT: NOVEMBER 29, 2012 INITIAL COMMENT LETTER FROM SAFE DRINKING WATER BRANCH ON STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT (SLU 12-000036) REQUEST: AGRICULTURAL TO URBAN, CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 1-000160), REQUEST: A-1A TO CV-40 APPLICANT: DR. WILLIAM C. FOULK TMK: (3) 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 The Safe Drinking Water Branch (SDWB) acknowledges information, provided via email in May and July of this year, from Mr. Peter J.K. Dahlberg, P.E., for the applicant that clarifies the project's intended operations and status. Based on this information, the proposed project does not meet the definition of a public water system under our jurisdiction. Therefore, the SDWB has no further comments. If there are any questions, please call Mr. Michael Miyahira, SDWB Engineering Section Supervisor, at 808-586-4258. Sincerely, J• 11111F1 '+NA L. SETO, P.E., CHIEF Safe Drinking Water Branch MM:cb c: Ms. Theresa McGeehan-Takiue, East Hawaii EHS [via email only] SCANNED JUL 1 8 2013 By: ' 86433 r _ • .o a Nq 195D • w p 4t t CPART ENT NEILABERCROMBIE 1 ;' f .. qtt s i{ GOVERNOR OF HAWAII .�^ ! f 4; ti.; ,+; LORETTA DIRECTOR FUDDY,A.C.S.W.,M.P.H. DIRECTOR OF HEALTH 2Z13 L'.;1 14 RfI 2: 00 STATE OF HAWAII (I- - Gq 1151 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH In reply,please refer to EMDICWB P.O.BOX 3378 HONOLULU,HI 96801-3378 03032PJF.13 March 11, 2013 Ms. BJ Leithead Todd Director Planning Department County of Hawaii 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Dear Ms. Leithead Todd: SUBJECT: Comments on State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 12-000036) Kapua, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii The Department of Health (DOH), Clean Water Branch (CWB), acknowledges receipt of your letter, dated October 31, 2012, requesting comments on your project. The DOH-CWB has reviewed the subject document and offers these comments. Please note that our review is based solely on the information provided in the subject document and its compliance with the Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR), Chapters 11-54 and 11-55. You may be responsible for fulfilling additional requirements related to our program. We recommend that you also read our standard comments on our website at: http://www.hawaii.qov/health/environmental/env-planning/landuse/CWB-standardcomment.pdf. 1. Any project and its potential impacts to State waters must meet the following criteria: a. Anti-degradation policy (HAR, Section 11-54-1.1), which requires that the existing uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses of the receiving State water be maintained and protected. b. Designated uses (HAR, Section 11-54-3), as determined by the classification of the receiving State waters. c. Water quality criteria (HAR, Sections 11-54-4 through 11-54-8). 2. You may be required to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for discharges of wastewater, including storm water runoff, into State surface waters (HAR, Chapter 11-55). An application for an NPDES individual permit must be submitted at least 180 calendar days before the commencem discharge. To request NPDES permit coverage, you must sub t vija• MAR 1 i . 1 ; ■ • Ms. BJ Leithead Todd 03032PJF.13 March 11, 2013 Page 2 NPDES Form through the e-Permitting Portal and the hard copy certification statement with $1,000 filing fee. Please open the e-Permitting Portal website at: https://eha-cloud.doh.hawaii.qov/epermitNiew/home.aspx. You will be asked to do a one-time registration to obtain your login and password. After you register, click on the Application Finder tool and locate the "CWB Individual NPDES Form." Follow the instructions to complete and submit this form. 3. If your project involves work in, over, or under waters of the United States, it is highly recommended that you contact the Army Corp of Engineers, Regulatory Branch (Tel: 438-9258) regarding their permitting requirements. Pursuant to Federal Water Pollution Control Act [commonly known as the "Clean Water Act" (CWA)], Paragraph 401(a)(1), a Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) is required for "[a]ny applicant for Federal license or permit to conduct any activity including, but not limited to, the construction or operation of facilities, which may result in any discharge into the navigable waters..." (emphasis added). The term "discharge" is defined in CWA, Subsections 502(16), 502(12), and 502(6); Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 122.2; and HAR, Chapter 11-54. 4. Please note that all discharges related to the project construction or operation activities, whether or not NPDES permit coverage and/or Section 401 WQC are required, must comply with the State's Water Quality Standards. Non-compliance with water quality requirements contained in HAR, Chapter 11-54, and/or permitting requirements, specified in HAR, Chapter 11-55, may be subject to penalties of $25,000 per day per violation. If you have any questions, please visit our website at: http://www.hawaii.gov/health/environmental/water/cleanwater/index.html, or contact the Engineering Section, CWB, at (808) 586-4309. Sincerely, ALEC WONG, P.E., CHIEF Clean Water Branch JF:np c: DOH-EPO #12-213 [via e-mail only] LINDA UNCLE �t 0.�'� MICHAEL D.FORMBY GOVERNOR "'11 p74. INTERIM DIRECTOR g Deputy Directors + `.► FRANCIS PAUL KEENO JIRO A.SUMADA STATE OF HAWAII IN REPLY REFER TO: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HWY_PS 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET 2.6961 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813-5097 October 25,2010 Mr. William Stockton Lehua Court,LLC 73-1157 Oluolu Street Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 Dear Mr. Stockton: Subject: Traffic Impact Assessment Report,Proposed Lehua Court and Ohia Center, Oceanview,Kau, Hawaii, TMK: (3)9-2-093: 40,41,42 The subject project consists of 2 adjacent projects of retail and office space sharing a common driveway on Lehua Lane in Hawaii Oceanview Estates(HOVE). Lehua Court consists of 2 structures with a combined 20,000 square feet of retail space and 40,000 square feet of office space and Ohia Center consists of 2 structures with a combined 16,800 square feet of retail space. Lehua Lane continues North into HOVE and South towards Hawaii Belt Road(Route 11) to a stop-controlled intersection. We have the following comments: 1. The recommendations in the report's conclusion should be implemented. This will include but not be limited to widening of Lehua Lane's travel lanes, confirmation of sight distance at the Lehua Lane and Hawaii Belt Road intersection and ensuring adequate turning radii for the largest anticipated vehicle that may access the project. 2. We are inclined to require a left-turn lane into Lehua Lane, despite the lack of a warrant, because of the developing commercial activities in that particular area. In this regard, street lighting of the intersection would also be required. We recommend that the shoulder of Lehua Lane within the State right-of-way be brought to State standards. We will defer to the judgment of the Highways Division Hawaii District Engineer on this matter and details related to it. 3. Plans for construction within the State right-of-way must be submitted to the Hawaii District Engineer for review and approval. Very truly yours /' Planning Dept. (1 MIC `+ L D. 'ORMBY Interi I Dir- •r of Transportation Exhibit GLENN M.OKIMOTO NEIL ABERCROMBIE c °6a. +, ti . DIRECTOR GOVERNOR '- - ` (-* { ' t1A Deputy Directors ''t` ` O; Directors JADE.T.BUTAY a�ei FORD N.FUCHIGAMI �'�' RANDY GRUNE JADINE URASAKI STATE OF HAWAII IN REPLY REFER TO: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAYS DIVISION HAWAII DISTRICT HWY-H 12-2.0064 50 MAKAALA STREET HILO,HAWAII 96720 TELEPHONE:(808)933-8866 • FAX:(808)933-8889 March 23, 2012 Peter J.K. Dahlberg, P.E., LLC 74-4920 Kiwi Street Kailua-Kona, Hawai'i 96740-9669 Dear Mr. Dahlberg: SUBJECT: Proposed Lehua Court and Ohia Center, Lehua Lane and Connection with Hawaii Belt Road Improvements, Project No. FAP 11EF-01-93M Ocean View, Kau, Hawaii We reviewed your plans and they are approved as submitted. Please submit a copy of this letter with three sets of the final plan and obtain a permit to perform work upon state highways before starting any work within the highway right-of-way. When filling out the permit, please refer to the above approval letter number HWY-H 12-2.0064 of March 23,2012. Construction must start within one year of this date. If it does not, the plans shall be resubmitted for review and approval. Should you have any questions, please call Mr. Robert Taira at telephone number 933-8866. Very truly yours, • l i SALVADOR C. PANEM Hawai'i District Engineer PLAP4tr.1=. r DEr f4T UENT rtf i N - NM MAY 12 PH '2: 14 ",, *: .. ROAD MAINTENANCE CORPORATION April 25, 2014 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attn:Duane Kanuha 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Aloha Mr. Kanuha, This letter is in regards to the application to the LUC from Lehua Court LLC: Lehua Lane widening and right of way permit. HOVE Road Maintenance Corporation is unaware of any correspondence from the County Planning Commission regarding this project.As you know Hawaiian Ocean View Estate's roads are private roadways maintained by our corporation and funded by property owners. The Board of Directors feels it is in the best interest of the Corporation and its members to request the Planning Commission have the developer of Lehua Court rebuild Lehua Lane to County specifications from HWY 11 to Keaka Parkway, thus allowing HOVE RMC to dedicate that portion of Lehua Lane to the county. Site project is TMK(3)—9-2-093:040;041; 042 Respectfully submitted, „......._e„........,\64,--- Laura Foster, COO HOVE RMC gm @hoveroad.com C !% 1s2c; PO Box 6227 • Ocean View, HI 96737 " Phone (808)929-9910 •Fax(808)929-9623•ToIl Free: 1-866-241-7294 Email: office@hoveroad.com • Website: http://www,hoveroad.com Planning Dept. Exhibit /f LEHUA COURT LLC P.O. BOX 2713 KAILUA-KONA, HAWAII 96745 COMMUNITY CONTACT FOR REZONE APPLICATION Prior to Lehua Court last application in 2007, we attended at least 9 events with the Kau community: • Wai Puna meeting with Mayor Kim, Hove Community Center. • Chamber of Commerce meeting, Hove Community Center. • Kau Economic Development meeting,Naalehu. • Mayor Kim,general meeting, Pahala. • Mayor Kenoi, Water meeting, Hove Community Center. Discussed project with Hunter Bishop. • General meeting with Project presentation to assembly, Hove Community Center. • Dept of Water meeting, upcoming well details. Hove Community Center. • Numerous Chamber of Commerce meetings with several Project discussions and presentations. Contribute to CC Scholarship Fund • Gov. Abercrombie Kau Inauguration Celebration spoke of project with Governor, Senator Bob Herkes, other attendees. At all times leading up to our application, we received support from all the meetings we attended where we discussed or presented. One presentation led to a letter of support from the Ocean View Chamber of Commerce. In 2007,the rezone application was subject to public hearings where community concerns were not to be found. This was after many meetings, individual contact, and mailings for the hearings. We have received community support through out this process. 2012 Campaign: Since the early this year, we have meet with many community members who are involved with Kau concerns. Most already have an understanding,and all support the Lehua Court concept. • June, meet with HOVE Road Maintenance Board of Directors and give presentation with positive response. We also discussed collaboration for the highway mitigation. • Department of Water Information Meeting, Hove Community Center. • Onsite meeting with Bolton construction project manager. Gave them permission to use our property to store materials needed for water line construction. Discussed our project. • Meeting with Evie and Jimmy Gonzales at her Kau Trading Post El Pachuco Mexican Restaurant. Gave her progress report of our project. • Danny Freeman, Kau Trading Post owner. Planning Dept. Exhibit /a • Kamagaki Lease tenants, discussed project with business owners with positive response. • HOVE Cave Society. • Sherry and Kirk Mattos. Planned with them to install an electric gate to provide a safe driveway access to their property. We did a walkthrough of our properties with Kirk, identifying property lines and driveway access to the LC project. Review LC project highway mitigation,road widening and radius adjustment,to discover impact on the Mattos property. The Mattos were pleased that they would not be impacted. See Mattos letter of recommendation. • Bob Zeller, community facilitator • Mike Dubois, community facilitator • While inspecting the working water fill station we discussed our project water haulers there, with positive responses we also discussed our needs for water. At the time they expressed concerns of the low water levels and speed of filling their trucks. • Dick Hershberger, Kau Community Plan • Greg and Gail Smith, farmers • South Island Reality, Meghan O'Brian, Rick Shively. • We are working with Kau Chamber of Commerce to get on their upcoming meeting agenda to give a presentation of the Lehua Court project. We continue to support their scholarship program. • We have supported the Kau Calendar since 2008 and are in contact to be placed on an agenda to present our project. In April we sent out a letter to the 1000' surrounding property owners announcing and seeking comment of the Lehua Court project. From the parties who received the mailing, we were returned 27 supporting responses and only one with some concerns. In conclusion,through our contacts and presentations this year, we are impressed with the amount of community involvement programs, and the many events of the Kau area. SHERRY AND KIRK MATTOS POST OFFICE BOX 72 HONAUNAU, HI 96726 640-1297 (SHER) 938-7670 (KIRK) October 16, 2012 Hawaii County Planning Commission 101Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Re: Zone Change and State Land Use Boundary Amendment for: Lehua Court LLC TMKs (3)9-2-093:039, 040, 041 and 042 To whom it may concern, This is a letter to express the feelings we had with the proposed developing of the property across from our residence on Lehua Lane in Hawaiian Ocean View Estates. After meeting with Steve Sahines and Bill Stockton, owners of the project, we are pleased and satisfied with the answers to our concerns. We are looking forward to the Lehua Court project bringing new employment opportunities for the residents of HOVE, and the business's planned will hopefully assist the community with their needs close to home. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter. Kirk and I are in favor and will support the approval for the zone change request. Si e ly, Sherry Matt i s Kirk Mattos PETER J.K. DAHLBERG, P.E., LLC CIVIL ENGINEER (PE-11345 C, HAWAII) or 74-4920 Kiwi STREET, KAILUA-KONA, HI 96740-9669 [P] (808)895-6173[F](808)331-2071 [E]pdahlbern hawaii.rr.com March 11, 2014 County of Hawaii, Planning Department (Attn. Jeff Darrow, 808-961-8158) 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, HI 96720 SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 12-000036) REQUEST: Agricultural to Urban, Change of Zone Application (REZ 1-000160) A-1 A to CV-40 APPLICANT: Dr. William C. Foulk TMK: (3) 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 In response to your request for continuance memorandum dated January 25, 2013, please reference the below list and associated attachments. 1. State of Hawaii Department of Health (DOH) standards/DOH-Safe Drinking Water Branch (DOH-SDWB) standards for a public water system: Attachment 1 contains a memorandum dated July 12, 2013 from DOH-SDWB. As can be referenced in that memo "the proposed project does not meet the definition of a public water system." Information provided to DOH-SDWB essential to this determination was that water supply would not be sub-metered (sold to tenants). The applicant and his client propose to provide potable water to tenants as identified by Attachments 3 and 6 and shall be responsible for said supply, demand, constructed improvements and repairs necessary to ensure continuous supply for the proposed development and fire protection. 2. County of Hawaii Fire Department (CoH-FD)standards: Attachment 2 contains a transmittal from my office and an accompanying fire suppression plan (Attachment 3) showing the proposed tankage, fire reservoir, and firefighting appurtenances in accordance with NFPA 1142. Attachment 4 is a memorandum from the CoH-FD providing acceptance of presented plan. It should be noted, and as can be seen on Attachment 3, that an existing fire hydrant is in close proximity to the proposed development. 3. Number and capacity of storage tanks: The client proposes to provide 5 individual storage tanks for potable water as shown on Attachment 3. The sizes of these tanks are to be 18'-6" diameter by 10'-9" with a volume of 21,000 gallons (each). Attachment 5 contains the envisioned business mix (anticipated tenancy) for the proposed development (Lehua Court). The mix identifies approximately 139 employees, has a floor plan showing 9 individual apartments with a bedroom equivalent of 12. Customers per day will vary, but for this exercise will be 0907 ? 2 Planning Dept. Exhibit 3 approximated at 300. Given these variables and assigning presumed demands of: (a) 20 gallons/day employee (b) 200 gallons/day bedroom, and (c) 10 gallons/day customer, the following calculation estimates daily potable demand: (139*20) + (12*200) + (300*10) = 2780 + 2400 + 3000 = 8,180 gallons/day The presumed demands are based on DOH, Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) title 11, Chapter 62, Wastewater Systems, Appendix A, Table 1. Sanitary waste will be disposed of via multiple Individual Wastewater Systems (IWS, septic type) if allowed by DOH, or potentially via a centralized wastewater treatment plant custom designed for the above design flow and mixed uses. Both will be regulated by DOH and submitted for design approval during the building permit phase of development. 4. Potable water source: Attachment 6 contains a proposal from a water hauler who has secured a meter agreement with the County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply (DWS) specific to the Ocean View water fill station. Said meter is located across the street (Lehua Lane) from the proposed development. The fill station (where the meter is located) was dedicated July 5th, 2012. The publicly funded project provides a basic drinking water system (approved by DOH- SDWB) complete with a well, storage tank, and transmission pipeline to the fill station. The client will require an initial delivery of 105,000 gallons to fill potable tanks and 220,000 gallons to fill the fire reservoir. Terms and prices of such delivery can be referenced in attachment 6. Lehua Court has demonstrated its ability to provide the basic parameters necessary for its proposed development, in conceptual form. Please schedule the Planning Commission hearings with regards to the subject applications at your earliest convenience or contact me with any requests for clarification and/or additional information required. Sincerely, 1,0t,'Wola--CP- DANAllhlk4 Peter J.K. Dahlberg, PE-11345C Manager, Peter J.K. Dahlberg, PE, LLC Attachments: 1. DOH-SDWB memo (1 page, 8.5" x 11") 2. Engineer's Transmittal (1 page) 3. Conceptual Fire Suppression and Site Plan (1 sheet, 24" x 36") 4. CoH-FD memo (1 page) 5. Lehua Court Business Mix (1 page) 6. Haul Proposal (1 page) NELABERCROMBE -- ;<: LOREITA RIDOY.A.CS.W.,Y.P.H. tioY9sioa0Fi1111Mt .. , .. OhICTOROFfEATH STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH In Is*.please mak SAFE DRINKING WATER BRANCH Filw 919 ALA MOANA BLVD.,ROOM 308 whew T 1.Doo HONOLULU.HI 988144920 July 12, 2013 Ms. BJ Leithead Todd County of Hawaii.Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo., Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Leithead Todd: SUBJECT: NOVEMBER 29, 2012 INITIAL COMMENT LETTER FROM SAFE DRINKING WATER BRANCH ON STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT (SLU 12-000036) REQUEST: AGRICULTURAL TO URBAN, CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 1-000160), REQUEST: A-1A TO CV-40 APPLICANT: DR.WILLIAM C. FOULK TMK: (3) 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 The Safe Drinking Water Branch (SDWB)acknowledges information, provided via email in May and July of this year, from Mr. Peter J.K. Dahlberg, P.E.; for the applicant that clarifies the project's intended operations and status. Based on this information,the proposed project does not meet the definition of a public water system under our jurisdiction. Therefore,the SDWB has no further comments. If there are any questions, please call Mr. Michael Miyahira, SDWB Engineering Section Supervisor, at 808-586-4258. Sincerely, JOANNA L. SETO, PE.,`"CHIEF Safe Drinking Water Branch - MM:cb c: Ms. Theresa McGeehan-Takiue, East Hawaii EHS [via email only] 090-712 f JUL 1 5 ^^._ PETER J.K. DAHLBERG, P.E., LLC -;*CIVIL ENGINEER(PE-11345 C, HAWAII) 74-4920 KIWI STREET,KAILUA-KONA,HI 96740 [P](808)895-6173[F] (808)331-2071 [E]pdahlbera hawaii.rr.com TRANSMITTAL SHEET 2 October 2013 Planning Department West Hawaii Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokaloloe Hwy Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 808-323-4770 State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 12-000036) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application (REZ 12-000160) Request: A-1 a to CV-40 Applicant: Dr. William C. Foulk Subject: Fire Protection Water Supply Calculation Tax Map Key : 9-2-093: 039, 040, 041, 042 This memo is to address the Fire Department's standard for fire protection regarding the above mentioned project. NFPA 1142 (2012 ed.) "Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting", was used to calculate the minimum fire protection water supply for the structures. A 250,000 gallon pond is proposed to provide 1.5x the minimum required fire protection water supply to service the two 27,150sf buildings. The attached calculations were made based on the following assumptions. (i) The separation between the two buildings is greater than 50'; (ii) The type construction is type 3A per the 2006 International Building Code (iii) The occupancy hazard classification for the mixed use building is "mercantile" The proposed pond will service individual standpipes designed and located in accordance w/the COH FD water and access requirements. Should there be any further questions please feel free to contact our office. iBe t7 r egards, Peter J.K. Dahlberg, PE Attached: 090 '71 2 1. Site Plan (1 sheet, 24"x36") with Water Supply Calculations 0.44P"' - C I I ' ---,=77:=:=D 1 ,,,,-,6 rl m rq„ J ,j;. L� �, 1 i} fix`I(,. _ I r�r'ri i T h " .ac v Ti 111 .0 I I ( it PI 7} 1 Pl 1 1 !.1 1 IA I,1 S! ! l 1 11i - I.�' II`IH 1Iu ;u`I�Ii1liiIII ..L m Y' .:; LAMING LAMWG 1 \ \/ 1 ►.1.1 rt +, a -_ _ �9 \ 1:1 ►1►1 I 1 � IX 8g M�4 \ I `// .111 /1 _ : ga --^ , f 1§ . !:' 1 I !2" ++ 'El F ir \\-" ,,,,50 A ..4g IR ill< a0 ,S CI � `` \--6": ® � � 1 I AI t � is di : P; _d `y !N 1 Sig 11.7:::::::=1:::.. ><H -- \4 44 II gli CI fa 16.i 1 .A e. e. ....s. s -se. ■ a....e.e....s.g. )Rg j !Al il 1 ,q 1 1 1 1 1 , \ s ., , ; 2M i' I 1 / 11 1 1 il 111 .: \ 'x ' ...,,, „ ''V‘ $111ggiR1511111 P1111: Q IX gAla g€ ; 5PE : o7. o t w '4g € Oill 1 "1 8 r.'i g 8 -- i I If A 11 ili 1 ! i i g m a i :9� FIRE SUPRESSION PLAN '° ei �F e e If;' ya€ LEHUA LANE i r r0 r m �� R I ? TMK: (3)9-2-93: 39,40,41,42 Its E P 9 N $ a , LEHUA COURT ‘�,�OI °z g 11 11 COUNTY AND ISLAND OF HAWAII �► J \ 2 HAWAII FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HILO:25 Aupuni St.Suite 2501,Hilo,HI 96720 (808)932-2911 KONA:74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy,Bldg E.Kailua Kona,HI 96740.(808)323-4760 Peter J.K.Dahlberg, P.E., LLC 74-4920 Kiwi St Kailua Kona,HI 96740 Re: Fire Suppression Plans for Lehua Court Dear Mr. Dahlberg, This letter is a follow up to our discussion and the plans submitted to meet fire department needs at the proposed development of Lehua Court in Hawaiian Ocean View. I have reviewed the plans as submitted for their compliance with NFPA 1 142 and find them to meet the intent of the code as presently drawn. To this end the Hawaii Fire Department currently has no issues that would prevent the change of zone application from A-la to CV-40. Once zone change has been approved, and prior to issuance of building permit, further plans and specification will have to be submitted for final fire department plan approval. These plans shall include details on stand pipes,water storage, and topography in relation to fire department needs. Should there be any further questions or comments please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, X R Captain Kazuo Todd Fire Prevention Bureau Hawaii Fire Department (808)640-3728 090712 LEHUA COURT BUSINESS MIX Square Feet Employees Medical Square Feet Employees Retail Health Clinic 1600 6 Farmer's Mark 6500 20 Doctor 1100 3 (10-20 Vendors) Gift 4500 7 Dentist 1200 3 Photography 800 2 Chiropractor 1200 3 Clothing 1000 3 Vet 1000 2 Misc. 1900 10 Pharmacy 1200 3 14700 42 7300 20 Professional Food and Beverage Bank 2000 Restaurant 2500 20 6 Real Estate/ 1000 6 Coffee 1000 6 Property Mgt. 500 Bakery 1200 4 Title/Escrow 1000 3 Takeout 800 4 Mortgage 1000 3 5500 34 Postal Center 1400 4 Attorney 600 Residential 1 Apartments 9000 Pre-school 1500 4 Architect 2000 2 Management Accountant/tax 1000 3 12000 32 Business Office 500 Maintenance/ 1500 3 Warehouse Restrooms 1000 Community/Phys Ed. 3000 3 YMCA 1000 3 Curves 1000 2 Veterans Center 500 2 Chamber of 300 1 Commerce 2800 8 Sq. Ft. Employees Totals 54300 139 S IONA & SONS, LLC PO 130X 486 XT..4L AKE1C1191, 3-ET 96750 (1808)217-0823 OR (808)557-8062 ELIV# 46-1732369 DECEMB w 15,2013 PROPOSAL FOR MANTA ENTERPRISES TO BILL STOCKTON AND STEVE SAHINES, S IONA&SONS, LLC IS A LOCALLY OWNED COMPANY OP ' • TING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ISLAND. CURRENTLY WE HAVE A WI'TER METER IN THE OCEANVIEW AREA ACROSS OF THE PROPOSED SIT FOR LEHUA COURT PROPERTY. OUR COMPANY HAS A WATER TANK 'A A MAX CAPACITY OF 7,500 GALS AND WE ALSO HAVE ACCESS TO ANOTHER WATER TANK THAT HAS A MAX CAPACITY OF 4,200 &•. . BY HAVING MULTIPLE WATER TANKS WE WILL BE ABLE TO DELIVER ALMOST 12,000 GALS IN AN HOUR. S IONA AND SONS, LLC WILL PROVIDE WATER DELIVERY S VICES TO MANTA ENTERPRISES TO FILL A 150,000 GALLON TANK AT PROPOSED LEHUA COURT PROPERTY. OUR SERVICES WILL ALSO INCLUDE DAILY DELIVERY OF 7,500 GALS OF WATER TO LOCATI AND AS NEEDED BY OWNERS. THE FEES ARE AS FOLLOWS AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE PROPER NOTIFICATION TO OWNERS. 4,200 GALS $130 6,000 GALS $150 7,500 GALS $165 AFTER EVERY 10 LOADS THE NEXT LOAD OF 6,000 GALS WILL BE ' TO CUSTOMER. MAHALO FOR YOUR : jiINESS, 6 ;11,07 10 ki S $ ' 'YANN IONA (0 090 ' 12 PETER J.K. DAHLBERG, P.E., LLC i ,7;ENT N74:01,441# CIVIL ENGINEER(PE-11345 C, HAWAII) [P] (808)895-6173[F](808)331-2071 [E]pdahlberq at hawaii.rr.com 2 [ W.R 914' • Y -0 TRANSMITTAL SHEET 21 March 2014 `? To: County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 (Attn: Jeff Darrow) Hilo, HI 96720 FOR YOUR REVIEW& COORDINATION Phone: (808) 961-8158 State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 12-000036) Re: REQUEST: Agricultural to Urban, Change of Zone Application (REZ 1-000160) A-1A to CV-40 APPLICANT: Dr. William C. Foulk TMK: (3) 9-2-093:039, 040, 041, 042 Pages/Sheets: 10 Please see attached. Please contact me with any questions or additional information required. Mahalo, Peter J.K. Dahlberg, PE Attached: excerpted email from DOH-SDWB with regards to a certified hauler, alluded to as a requirement. It is in fact not a requirement, given SDWB determination that the proposed development is not a Public Water System (PWS) regulated by SDWB. Additional Attachments: see cover letter, dated 11 March 2014 SCANNED MAR 2 7 2014 Page 1 of4 Peter Dahlberg From: N1oGeahan-Takiue. Thenmsm [Theneoo.K8oGeehan-Tokjua@doh.howaiigov] Sent: Monday, March 17. 2O1411:17AM To: pdoh|berg@hawoiirr.conn Subject: FW: Inquiry Re: Regulated Public Water Systems in Hawaii Hi Peter, Thank you for the communication last week. lam forwarding an email from Mr. Michael Miyahira of the SDWB stating his understanding of your past communication and information provided to him regarding a change of zone application for the parcel ,with his understanding of the p ject not to be operated as a public water system (pws) and therefore not required to have a certified hauler to haul water to his tank. Please contact me at: 933-0407, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Theresa McGeehan-Takiue, EHS Safe Drinking Water Branch, East Hawaii 1582 Kamehameha Ave. Hilo, HI 96720 Phone: (808)933-0407 Enoai|:thereoa.nnogeehan-takiue@doh.havxaii.gov From: Miyahira, Michael M Sent: Fridav, March 14, 2014 1:02 PM To: Hamano, Melvin 3 Subject: RE: Inqui Re: Regulated Public Water Systems in Hawaii He is not a PWS per my understanding and therefore is not required to have a certified hauler haul water to his tank. From: McGeehan-Takiue,Theresa Sent: Thursday March 13, 2014 4:27 PM To: Hamano, Melvin 3; Miyahira, Michael M Subject: FW: Inquiry Re: Regulated Public Water Systems in Hawaii FYI From: Peter Dahlberg [mailto:pdahlberg(ahawaii.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:04 PM To: 'Manta Enterprise' Cc: McGeehan-Takiue,Theresa; 'Darrow, Jeff Subject: RE: Inquiry Re: Regulated Public Water Systems in Hawaii 0 9 0 7 1 2 Hi Theresa, please see attached. As can be referenced, we have already gone through this exercise. Water is to be hauled from an approved public water source(the Ocean View well/filling station)across the street(Lehua Lane) to the proposed development. 3/7l/7014 ae ` s efil STh ON NOIl3f1 11SN00 """"""16`3NM'3J0 i`i 1 e' ; Y g F� Lin)WOK,MO-•6-()�nl 9 ' a .R .A_ `— yfe °ailr ' t ns viva 1O3f 0jd ° 4.p 1 a ft ai` u 1- B MEW AVM io 1■eni OWONIx3OLM 3M'1MH31 $ e1 a !`t °�. spg N011b00� 311S »1 ianoo vnHan OW.i a U' ley i , f ! 1s !; 7i tEE 59� 3 i.i.oninr.o i!1e °I 11)0 a •Sd•4' 41 ''I' (1' ,_ i _ I '4. e ''',7,,,,,,,4- 8‘1, 1 ; A. g 1 - , 0 i im 015-i= - s« g s_ MI'R .a,$ �`�r, � p Q _ e P2 s 3@ .,_�S azYa Og E" I w ' € '4 g s 4 g aii(I !.......'•' 4,1,_ ,-, 4111 _ PI (t)! w 8 g NN f• qa S I g! e�€552.61 v a JVb ig €3 f "� g d$a 6asi $ 1 2g ° 9bg ga 0 s6 -g L ," .I f L>' 1 leg ss°e 1 8 Lg6 i x 'lff gal 1" E o � a g,°1 1i° g ' ; a g 1s eg rot: g` .g g1 1AI s O f 1 Rib 16 s I s - ia° c1e ! ; f ; e` e $ g ° 5n 8 LL :' 8 ! i 9iaa .4 1 '6 1ea9 g 4m 0 n5- 111`. E n1:g g dr g °.f 9 gm 3i aP p pa =1 ��,. W f § !l_ i#i a - 2 -lad of !i pa ' !I ! € iI c6 - 5�i !4 . a Sg al zo g ! ^60 € Pii Inl l �` %5p 11Fa$-li 1 m L"" a N` f f a �• 1 I i°U 1 1idi iP 111 _$f, i{ JII s d 11151 gF E.. Id' n 1 g g " lm I g f € s aag i lag$e 9111 ! a g?3fig$iggs_iff , $!! ! l r, ko of gi f <a wy kg w t I k ; gig !I 0�1 n �• � 3�:{333s.�i$ " k3iEs>s3asYiss$d ° �' €E g o1 a$ g i' : 1. " k 1a 1 R 1:`x�a R 4°xs NI fi. f5 .gc fi. f! ill m leg f. .i a[k sSen .-. P € °1 ° kkf i g $ :i if {w pE if9Qy E 1 gen "ra It e1 a; ke a Qg " 3 r°.i' b'�g "E e gi IM 9.w 5 all °a 1yk 1 w iii ■ 6° kJ iili: 1g sp`pd€ as ■ I f1lf 1 }f a s d z- g[E E #' - WI gf ' 1 1.1 i f 16 f k f ° 1 6 gq fa i F gg 61e F i o w s i1 f[15' gnf 1d �{ f1 1° F de °° 0 .g f € a1 i4gn#� % 8 a i 3 n1 c kff f 1 Eg y � !� .a _ i_ Ix! f $ i E f'gq 49 $gr! a.fF �f f� f s f ! g k �i 11i f gild ih c n pyy Q a s 9 1a t o 1! i �3 g Ei B n 1`" o f �� ! faf SS gif k$ a i q ieg 3& g- a !` f 1 1 '{ 4., f- E!1 !:s gg1 f i1" 7,F g Eg f ! °`F 1 �+ n of k ! ie is a 1 g1�iEf f!! [-' $ de 1fl € � !�^a 1 g. •'� a°- �f y @ 3 4 f 1i it H I� !g; e E . q ■ w i g IDIIi i fiY a n . /n "!ff v i - s FR - i}f i g° f UII age a i w a3 k i!i{i f. L�93 � i�� �8i g¢_1� s ��igi�e � �� lit�iY f e'}k�e�p ■ k°i a <a !€ .i !1I,1 f 14i g e $!f g Ii °g 11 i € 1° r : g A °Le i s Lr s -g 1 14z °gd ra! g d o ! 4 F f.i g pa 4 . 1 i ri f d . ' yo 4° y f 3 s iggf x F 1e > a 9of R# 1KnY9 �' 1s^ f! ° !#."3 gi fg. o f •1:�, f°I I` 5 f 11f #139 1 s • 3;9 a n iII f111 0 1 igf e I °z% ;al a Eg. a'1 6 If 1s Fk � f 1.� f @c �" f .- E � ! g 7 fn 4 z o r f 1 59� 1 i d !II° a s- ;Ili • aa: !ia 1i i ill f"q f- f,il fit 9.a i ill 0 !f1 .l € .i" ai fig fip A g 1f f f'I 1 f1 ill ° i e n�1 k i i ki k° k°n f Q 1�1€"1 w 1i : k. BR "s°aw.i 1' ! w ¢jn k # 11111-Nil;i���n Q � ekE-g 1!eG kg 5�< f11e �._ f° � f i' fiG o f 1 @ s y f �! y @ � $f°e p a am � i °� z 3s �i ° EES � 1 4 ■Ir• g �� k f Will'1�1 k €f f o "k9i yyg1 1 II' q ygf di s g• #11' @.6 i ! gig pi gR°f i f 11 $ . i" Q B o,3i .1 i 1a!pi mY- ig°. $i aEE �g 5f � �'c F ° mid; q�Q�}1 B Qy fy�-a°e 1 #'�� c� OW 8isf �fif +yg:mE�f d ��'� � f f- � �c7 lip! . ��' Y5� °C� g:Sit f! ; .61 it 4 ,Iiii ,ii f? tie°—, la O1 f l .. t31i.a1g1 @1E z At f1YG all hi fit i ,Ili 91a ii xi z.;,.„ 5 of 1: $.. Ilia Li z o °qa °—oL- i Aa y °fiil 2A2g kii m 9i " i 101 e9 L i B f e f 1 b 3! Qg k IS g •i R` Fy i: [e .1 a 1 1 E f ff fig ii f c [ g� 8 9. 6 En f f° f g ! E g y hi s e 11 i 1111111 11 8 6 f§ g iY g1f I It 1y 4 gi3gf ! si 1I g ^ . a 1g 4-- ! B g !9 f1 Uri..:'i g it gR 1 1 A l i 1 3 y 6gk 1r - e F 1f f .f Ef f! # g a. n i 8f S fg #°�f E d"e i ri g i i f fi gg ff1 m@ 1 .:E>.. 11 ' 1 f6fI f g gg a 9'i i ig i f i . !w 1 n is l f I1f yr: ! ai !n f ii° I! !!.a 8 g1 of 1 !f i q g ji h 1 ib !! I!IiI §g Q i Ea tgi #E C1 [1 i �.,1 '+'f 1Y `g I° f g° 1 -- d 9a `i x 3f °e Si 9. 1 !. c ..F -f & 1 i ! E qG 1 as o f EL f :g IpI; - ! g Fe g .6 `_1 ! 1 a is 1 1`E f 1g 6 ai A °f Lf - f` y! g ` �1 1-g 1� n i €i s 11 g s 1e it 9 9 € y ' 3 5 ian LC, " P i i f f°a ! 1 f f y" f ! II 1 a- ! c i. 1 y! ,s i : f Y �° d 1< L h n f1 !4 I., gfi1 -f dg 1 a 11 f 01 g.a Bg ill 1 " 1s a f gay 1 g I. If thilit1.111f 1' gi 11 ill 'r gk f1 i i f if D i gg 1 1 d 13'1 i'i,' f 1 ig s a`E a E1 y f 11 y i WI 1 i if n !Q # e1f g IN! 1 1 1k me g 1f 1 m 1 d f .l 2•I 11 1111 ! ii 5 f fi i 1w igE, 1 r 1e 3 -- i ff1 eit g B�' 41 ¢¢ f f 1-' IF3 1 11 s8 g5 !w €.-§i !. ,it r !ill E y 'y i° m O 'F f y� 4 i ! f fE 9 9. 111''' eff 3Ff f aE d- to Efi i ! 5°'_ e ! 1i 2 �!� � '�� g f` ai" kSL f € �� �' ii g6 f. � ! 3. , � 1� @ L g� 1 m!� �f e � s �� f o to f ii a i. S i f < 1. P 1 Rag. / 1 Iii lie Qf f f ! . E it i! 11$1 R.r r @k •is 1 ! 69E f h e i Ig f5 1s gi 4a!'.a . •aa i a 1 g 1 R e !1 III *agg g 6 !g 1 s z i1a f= ;1 1 S fif i,11 1 1 1e/ 4/ S 1. s 0 II= . I . . r!?.31 EI B 1pf . qt fs4 f 1e 4 1. a I o '£€ ki f -f' Q ' y g 1 Qi9 f 1 $ 1 S. s e° Yf f 1g! 41"1 ki ff m 'g ir,' 1 qe .'y 1d 14. "ae 9 i !f§ 1 i4 If ff 12 1< w ii'.° f1 1 Eq. Ilig i g ggs is '' fga5fhiga gfii W es1 14!1n fE '3f < ail ae 9 11 g1 9. C s` ° 9g 9 ef. Ms 8 i la m r a ;� 8 -c @ i Irw flVM'M31AXY300 p "�� o g 6 z 1 11Fi 3XVItlIW33 LIVPZE ill - s: N g !$ R _ '�'� NV 7d f.��../ (` ZXl'lo0'OX)'EEO-Z-6-(fI WLL p 4 g§ �$ !q u li ''a@ Eli: _ 1Y Y;', NV1d dVYO CN V 31IJ llWtl3d AVM 10 DIM OW ONIN301M3NV1 MX31 i 7 11/ `ni + Yi saaf_ g YYl 3 ill lanoo VnH31 r�t $? # `. 2a .L g Itl S/0 2E'[22L29 V11: 21411 IVtl N 3 r. \\\ _ s ,f. gym\ "'A. t / a `l g m -ir Y o duo °0 L \ Nz \\� ., d Y F LLo tt o '� ��\\ xp .o.zcso a \ S 2E 12�L29 YlE N ml ~N ~N as �� a �� a z J z a a : wb W W Y '0 \\\\ z „I L2.1 g "�\ � 3T/l15 k y \.\ �b�'l .EEnt Il 5/0 2. 3 H zr[z.LZS Yu 3X11 A/II C\\ Y(Y Q £ 9�6� \ o1u 3 a '�SU i S€S \ J O iiiii ^�� �4: N I\\ !, ' F}w N >W a Fq z � gym to � �� N Z �N CV woou a o% z iv c a za Y o \\ �'', o �a �a F zo.- F N or' z, 0_ x °. l\ N;3r w�b� v � \ v W� 3-'�- z yu '4:a �. aJZ �J m $: '` z xd z ' �,.r \' ', ran J .-.z w ; J um� .yk ��' �a his. _ 2 Q \\ \.. 2 Q Z W W W . O W Z,� •4 2 G� a _J ;- `\• I " .. o vi 7 r rl > _ :Yde wm z K �I; o ALl aN Na 3 aw ~ a� VJ�yyy \�j \ N u� 9� z> 3 3�J O E O ! ^B O\\ �aa �° s z zaro W® \I: \ ® O OO O OO Y a 0 \ _ ,Y1 P —_,/ —J / s� j-.-- C , / a°' . \\ / / l l "� l 4. - h / / / a a. \PN� '" / a ' \.-,\\''' / - v§ `ml a / ' // _e col ' psl a / a (,off - s 9 / w I / m. / N / / O / / / / W 1 ligi (Z d0 l 30Vd) WMY Wel vm6•M'3)[) y E u N) s t 3 C60-Z•6-C)Mni �i iiil �B =i u 3 pS Zq'iq'Oq�R0-L-6-IC)Hni F i �/ Y 1•1e - I 5.i NV-Id 10d1N00 OLd3Vd1 ntl3d AYM iO Lf tlOM MIN304M 3nY YM3t 9 1"1 q asi 1°1 i. ! oliianoo VnH3l /DI ry e U ti s 159 1111 .,,.... ill 00+909 V'15 '71Y M ' 4 I,I 3 tk . . .`: Li N 1 ` � y I Is a ..,,k g o u N h • f E. 8 • V ii o e q 1 ill 1; ®x?'g o 4 / a i f !s°Ig t 1 f;1; w a F e ig 1. t^f7 i i ` 424d 5 o , 0 a i t D#DD)' ; cf � I � ` ®x'" $ pypy3a � N0tY �,1 1 _ uxi X E d g g {IY f1 a •c" 3 i z a� g P, g IA I 1 }c Ar ! N, e I a l i g ¢i ! 11!:11111 EC1111110 .I' © e ¢E$ � oh iii It 11g6 R Vim„ S Lo, y i �77 yEy !? 1;, III !Hi 111111111111111111 Y 1 h �F9 3 7I vE v O N v coo ,I 2 b g y Y Z C3 N ao •-•1 a tits p5p5s n t �. tlg a 6 O g '1 U z r _. I; g 67 !i „e i _ „� 1 nt 4� O ! 0I 6 ! m - 8 .4 7 S 3 o 1 1 g Eig $ e! &i .1" a 8th gl ! di sus kit ° 3 8" 1 at gg e 3 !£1 o E. ' • + a� III 4 y 5 o �r 51: A �4: ill 11111111 o13N SI d 1.411 2 C S ii 1 ! !lb w w � Z ro j 26:.' ¢ pS Si Z g e � 's ui �wz: 7S4 , p el 1 g !I bo IS; III li t Z 1 !♦1 O N e' #P R 6 " 111 �I Gp a "i - li : 'i _ . w ash - 3 1 pp —` ? a ,"0 1 1- L NN r4 z it61r aJ 3 i f 2e1 i R•E k I • $TWA ao n h _ i y !II 'A 1 ,i 'i ° ® 00+c,9 b'1S R '7'W x ii H Z z �"W x g1kil / nv J` mmvN'nv>t'mav,mr3oo !ill R g ee ee •� 4 ■ \Z �0 Z �JV U/ 3M',vnH31[r9Pi6 •6 ,,j- ! 1 2 2° Lam_ De 210'410'OIO.C6U-i-6-lU MN i t�7 � 7•'e !, R g i i 4 Vs NV�d �O�J1N00 ����d�l unraAVm o woieaR ownaw�mvnHn €t °� e LL 1; ill j i ,..o on ianoo vnH3 IN e U Wig a . ill r ii° Tr c v s \ 17 ce!F ': Z OO+SF9 'x'15 $ '7'fY An t O < �o W 4 ii' I- 0,Th, V e. ' ' z .���� \ K '•'i.:io I y - w a %-'-Ti a N o - r g u) a ! m N 8� o a • O a Vin= w ,•�� Z lig :.- • �,, W 5 g ` 1 o �4 W f I IW •• L•('e J f1 • 6 0 i gl Q e€� �SGAIE - t ---P-3 2 b�1 °W o R Imp; t °5 Pe ,141 IL) % ." ai i! gb ¢aW .E Ra. BEN • d w m € .: a § m@ 'o tr7 gw§ 7 w ga Via$ a n O gw2 Nog' s:t b t w5 M w IOU' a r 8-54 Al rdi'' tea'=g; 0 o :4 �rt s ��e wc� gas gz� E � ° 0 ME 2 °.5i0 oa g 2M n w ie a a°l fig o a: l• 1 aq CC o © 0 0 I 0 0 0 S. 'on --1 51` Y o W e d i 1 d '1 : 3 x �d B•N 11' Nrt ; P 110 3M P I N b ` i i P i s E O a � 1 • mod; P A • a r a a i'r g s i I a l € c ;1 g i 'a^ ace I ' 9 p aG a i�slslsl�is��ANEA °g i �� 9 i ¢ axe 8i I s e No ® pV I 4••g e 9� gg : its g 1 and dl 01 a Eq Eh 4441.1 I`g it pp 1 z Ei'X d F [11 a j`' B w ' a . : LE c ya 3 BBg w i k g 3 1 ii, 1 I 111 I 1 IJo 1, §l i g dili��:§`sli§ i q 1 = .0°111g! 900+699 '1S '7'W e lq , - „ geii h_i:ig; €iii gagilm 55 RFoullcSLU..jwd 05-23-14 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION WILLIAM C. FOULK STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (SLU 12-000036) Upon careful review of the request, the Planning Director is recommending that a favorable recommendation for the State Land Use Boundary Amendment be forwarded to the County Council. Since this recommendation is made without the benefit of public testimony, the Director reserves the right to modify and/or alter this position based upon additional information presented at the public hearing. The favorable recommendation is based on the following general comments and specific findings: In the 1960's, the County approved the subdivision of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos. Hawaiian Ocean View Estates consists of about 11,000 lots, and Hawaiian Ranchos consists of about 1,200 lots. The population of these areas is growing rapidly. In the 2000 census, the Hawaiian Ocean View Census Designated Place had a population of 2178. It had more than doubled since 1990. Rapid growth continues in the area. In 2005-2006,building permits for 435 new homes were issued in this general area. This is more than the number of building permits for new homes issued in the districts of North Hilo, Hamakua,North Kohala, and South Kona combined in that time period. The Planning Director favors the development of a commercial area in close proximity to these established subdivisions to serve the rapidly increasing population. This will give residents an opportunity to shop closer to their homes, and provide a location for service-oriented businesses, like offices for doctors, tax preparers, hairdressers, and the whole host of commercial needs generated by a large residential population. The closest town with commercial areas is Na`alehu. A number of commercial enterprises have been approved on both sides of fronting these subdivisions Highway 11, most of which were approved by Special Permits. All of the land in the area is in the State Land Use Agricultural District except for one property to the east that was approved for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from -1- Re: Comm. 939/Bill 267 Agricultural to Urban. The closest area in the Urban District is in Wai`ohinu. Previously, the General Plan was a constraint as it did not show an urban center in HOVE and Ranchos Subdivisions in the LUPAG map. As a result, the Special Permit became the vehicle to establish the commercial core fronting HOVE and Ranchos Subdivisions. It is generally not proper to utilize Special Permits to gradually establish a town center, permit by permit. The Special Permit is a procedure meant to handle unusual situations that arise in the Agricultural District. It creates some flexibility in the Agricultural District by allowing consideration of urban-type uses on Agricultural lands. But urban areas, like a commercial center, should be in the State Land Use Urban District and be properly zoned by the County. The 2005 General Plan established an urban center in this area, centered around the existing Special Permit areas, and put it on the LUPAG map. This boundary amendment is consistent with the General Plan amendments. The approval of the reclassification from the State Land Use Agricultural to the Urban District for approximately 3 acres will not be violative of Section 205-2, Chapter 205, Hawaii Revised Statutes,nor will it be inconsistent with the Land Use Commission Rules,the County General Plan and the Hawaii State Plan. The applicant is also requesting a concurrent Change of Zone from A-1 a to CV-40 to develop a commercial project with 54,300 square feet of professional and retail space. Under the Land Use Commission Rules, one of the standards for considering an area for urban reclassification states that"It shall include lands in appropriate locations for new urban concentrations and shall give consideration to areas of urban growth as shown on the state and county general plans." The properties conform to this standard as it is situated in the area designated for urban expansion in the General Plan. Additionally, there are three large commercial and/or light industrial projects previously approved by Special Permits,which are within 1,500 feet of this project. Lastly, the project site is situated in the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates subdivision and across from the Hawaiian Ranchos subdivision. The reclassification action conforms to the goals, objectives and/or policies articulated in the Hawaii State Plan including the objective to "encourage an -2- increase in economic activities and employment opportunities on the neighbor islands consistent with community needs and desires." The reclassification action also conforms to the following goals, policies and standards of the Land Use and Economic General Plan Elements and the General Plan LUPAG Map: The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical relationship among the various land uses. The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the County. The proposed request conforms to the LUPAG Map, which designates the properties as Urban Expansion Area, which allows for a mix of high density,medium density, low density, industrial, industrial-commercial and/or open designations in areas where new settlements may be desirable,but where the specific settlement pattern and mix of uses have not yet been determined. The reclassification request would further the County's goals of providing an economic environment that allows new or existing businesses to expand and diversify the County's economic base, and also increase choice of occupations. The proposed use would be consistent with the following goals,policies and standards of the Economic, Land Use and Commercial Elements of the General Plan. Economic Element: • Provide residents with opportunities to improve their quality of life through economic development that enhances the County's natural and social environments. • Economic development and improvement shall be in balance with the physical, social and cultural environments of the island of Hawai`i. • Strive for diversity and stability in its economic system. • Provide an economic environment that allows new, expanded, or improved economic opportunities that are compatible with the County's cultural, natural and social environment. -3- • Strive for an economic climate that provides its residents an opportunity for choice of occupation. • Strive for diversification of the economy by strengthening existing industries and attracting new endeavors. The applicant will be providing residents who live in the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos subdivisions and surrounding subdivisions more opportunities for commercial services and employment, which will be located closer to their residence than traveling to Kona or Hilo for these services. Land Use Element • Designate and allocate land uses in appropriate proportions and mix and in keeping with the social, cultural, and physical environments of the County. • Zone urban- and rural-types of uses in areas with ease of access to community services and employment centers and with adequate public utilities and facilities. • Allocate appropriate requested zoning in accordance with the existing or projected needs of neighborhood, community,region and County. • Encourage the development and maintenance of communities meeting the needs of its residents in balance with the physical and social environment. • Zoning requests shall be reviewed with respect to General Plan designation, district goals,regional plans, State Land Use District, compatibility with adjacent zoned uses, availability of public services and utilities, access and public need. Commercial Element: • Provide for commercial developments that maximize convenience to users. • Urban renewal,rehabilitation, and/or redevelopment programs shall be undertaken in cooperation with communities,businesses and governmental agencies. • Distribution of commercial areas shall meet the demands of neighborhood, community and regional needs. • The development of commercial facilities should be designed to fit into the locale with minimal intrusion while providing the desired services. Appropriate -4- infrastructure and design concerns shall be incorporated into the review of such developments. The Urban classification conforms to the standard that the development is within reasonable proximity to centers of trading and employment except where the development would generate new centers of trading and employment. The properties are in close proximity of three commercial centers, previously established by Special Permits,which provide employment to residents in the area, and conforms with the Land Use Commission Rules which encourages urban developments in close proximity to existing developments and in close proximity to existing services and facilities. Additionally, the proposed development would create a new center of trading and employment in this area. All utilities are or will be made available to the project site. Access to the properties will be from Lehua Lane, which is a two-lane, private road that has a 20-foot wide asphalt pavement within a 40-foot right-of-way. Lehua Lane is accessed directly from the Hawai`i Belt Road. Water requirements necessary for sanitation and firefighting will be provided by adequate storage facilities on-site. The applicant is proposing to construct five(5)large water tanks and have an on-site water reservoir to meet these requirements. The Department of Water Supply(DWS) states that there are no DWS facilities in the area. The nearest water system facility is located in Wai`ohinu, approximately 10 miles east of the subject properties. There is a water system within HOVE that accommodates both public and private water users daily from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.,which is located on a County owned property on Lehua Lane near the subject properties. There are six(6) public water spigots and a private standpipe facility that provides services to ten(10) private customers for water hauling and/or delivery services. The system is serviced by a well and 300,000-gallon water tank, which is located on a County owned property on Paradise Circle Makai. No metered water services will be allowed unless a second well is constructed to provide the required redundancy for a public water system. Solid waste will be handled through a commercial hauler. The applicant is proposing to construct a sewage treatment system for the proposed commercial center. Utilities, including telephone and electrical services, are available to the site. The closest -5- police and fire station is located in Na`alehu, approximately twelve(12)miles from the properties. Police and fire substations are available in the immediate area. While the property is within the State Land Use Agricultural and County's Agricultural (A-1a) zoned district, it is not currently being used for active agricultural purposes. The project site is currently vacant and has been previously bulldozed. The property is unclassified by the State Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawai`i (ALISH)Map and the Land Study Bureau's Overall Master Productivity Rating is "E" or"Very Poor". Thus, the reclassification of this 4-acre area from the Agricultural to the Urban designation will not be detrimental to the reduction of this area from the agricultural land inventory in the County. An Urban classification would complement the existing and future land use patterns of the surrounding properties in view of the nearby commercial/light industrial projects and the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos subdivisions. The Urban classification conforms to the standard to include lands with satisfactory topography, drainage, and reasonably free from the danger of any flood,tsunami, unstable soil condition,and other adverse environmental effects. The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) designates the properties as Zone"X", areas outside the 500-year flood plain. The properties are located approximately 6 miles mauka of the shoreline. All project generated runoff will be disposed of on-site. Based on the above, the approval of the State Land Use Boundary Amendment from the Agricultural to the Urban District complements the State Land Use District Regulations and County General Plan and is supportive of the Hawai`i State Plan. The accompanying draft bill to amend the State Land Use Boundaries Map is provided for your favorable consideration. -6- COUNTY OF HAWAII *E ` % ��a: STATE OF HAWAII BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. , (PLA4A/m/6 � AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STATE LAND USE BOUNDARIES MAPS FOR THE COUNTY OF HAWAII BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM THE AGRICULTURAL TO THE URBAN DISTRICT AT KAMA`OA,KA`U, HAWAII (TMK: 9-2-093:039, 040, 041 &042). BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. The State Land Use Boundaries Maps for the County of Hawai`i are amended to change the district classification of property described hereinafter as follows: The district classification of the following area situated at Kama`oa,Ka`u, Hawai`i, shall be Urban: Beginning at the Easternmost corner of this parcel of land,being also the Northernmost corner of Lot 10 of Block 157 of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates (File Plan 787) and being a point on the Southwesterly side of Lehua Lane,the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station"PUU 0 KAMAOA"being 1,976.65 feet North and 4,186.36 feet West and running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: 1. 19° 35' 374.80 feet along Lot 10 of Block 157 of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates(File Plan 787) and along the remainder of Grant 2791 to C. C. Harris to a point; 2. 109° 34' 52" 325.00 feet along the Northeasterly side of Hawai`i Belt Road to a point; 3. 199° 35' 606.84 feet along Lot 5 of Block 157 of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates (File Plan 787) feet to a point; 4. 251° 01' 30" 89.52 feet along the Southeasterly side of Keaka Parkway to a point; Thence, following along the Southwesterly intersection of Keaka Parkway and Lehua Lane on a curve to the right with a radius of 20.00 feet, the chord azimuth and distance being: 5. 296° 01' 30" 28.28 feet to a point; 6. 341° 01' 30" 364.02 feet along the Southwesterly side of Lehua Lane to the point of beginning and containing an area of 4.143 Acres. All as shown on the map attached hereto,marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other parts of this ordinance. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAII Hilo,Hawai`i Date of Introduction: Date of 1st Reading: Date of 2nd Reading: Effective Date: -2- KEP L- jai / J / ! r / / Z TMKs:(3)9.2-093:039,040,041&042 / ! ! G AGRICULTURAL TO URBAN 4.143 ACRES TOTAL / / /, / / / / / 1 ! / / J ! / Mq,y / A44y0q / H(.V SURROUNDING VICINITY IS r! STATE LAND USE AGRICULTURAL I Feet 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 AMENDMENT TO THE STATE LAND USE BOUNDARIES MAPS AMENDING THE STATE LAND USE BOUNDARIES MAP FOR THE COUNTY OF HAWAII, BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM THE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO THE URBAN DISTRICT AT KAMA'OA, KA'U, HAWAII MAP PREPARED BY: COUNTY OF HAWAII, PLANNING DEPARTMENT TMK•(3)9-2-093:039,040,041&042 DATE:May 28,2014 EXHIBIT"A" Dr William C.Foulk Map:12-188 • RFouIkREZ..jwd 05-23-14 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION WILLIAM C. FOULK CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 12-000160) Upon careful review of the request, the Planning Director recommends that a favorable recommendation of the request for a Change of Zone be forwarded to the County Council. Since this recommendation is made without the benefit of public testimony, the Director reserves the right to modify and/or alter this position based upon additional information presented at the public hearing. This favorable recommendation is based on the following findings: The applicant is requesting a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from the Agricultural to the Urban District and a Change of Zone from an Agricultural 1-acre(A- 1 a) to a Village Commercial 40,000 square foot(CV-40) zoned district for 4.142 acres of land. The applicant is proposing to develop a 54,000-square foot commercial center with an additional 12, 500 feet of an open landscaped area to be used for periodic craft fairs, thespian events and public gatherings. The project will be constructed utilizing LEED certified design standards. The project tentatively includes: • Two (2) three-story structures, each approximately 27,150 square feet in size, which includes anchor tenants, along with day care,tourist driven retail establishments, and an Acute Care Facility on the ground floor. Medical and professional offices would occupy the upper levels. The completed project will include a total of 54,300 square feet of uses with a total of 139 employees. • 230 parking stalls including handicap and loading stalls on permeable paved surfaces • Private water system, which will require the amount of water supply to be consistent with public health and safety needs such as sanitation and fire-fighting, which will consist of about 300,000 gallons of storage. Potable water will have to be trucked in from another area. • Sewage treatment plant • Landscaping Re: Couuu. 939/Bill 268 The construction cost is estimated at approximately 9.5 million dollars. The applicant will begin site improvements and break ground for structures within 12 months after approvals of permits. In the 1960's, the County approved the subdivision of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos. Hawaiian Ocean View Estates consists of about 11,000 lots, and Hawaiian Ranchos consists of about 1,200 lots. The population of these areas is growing rapidly. In the 2000 census, the Hawaiian Ocean View Census Designated Place had a population of 2178. It had more than doubled since 1990. Rapid growth continues in the area. The County Planning Department favors the development of a commercial area within the area fronting these subdivisions to serve this rapidly increasing population. This will give people an opportunity to shop closer to their homes, and provide a location for service-oriented businesses, like offices for doctors, tax preparers,hairdressers, and the whole host of commercial needs generated by a large residential population. The closest town with commercial areas is Na`alehu, about 12 miles away by road. A number of commercial enterprises have been approved near Highway 11, on both sides of the highway. To date, all of these have been approved by Special Permit within the State Land Use Agricultural District except for one Change of Zone (MCX-3a) that is located at the intersection of Hawai`i Boulevard and the highway in close proximity to the subject application. All of the land in the area is within the State Land Use Agricultural District except for the above mentioned rezoned property, which is in the State Land Use Urban District. It is not the correct use of the State Land Use Law to use Special Permits to gradually establish a town center,permit by permit. The Special Permit is a procedure meant to handle unusual situations that arise in the Agricultural District. It creates some flexibility in the Agricultural District, which is otherwise subject to rather limited uses under the state law. But urban areas, like a commercial center, should be situated within the State Land Use Urban District and be properly zoned by the county. 2 The 2005 General Plan established an urban center in this area, centered around the existing Special Permit areas, and put it on the LUPAG map. This change of zone is consistent with the General Plan amendments. In the past, the trend in the area of the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos Subdivisions has been to issue Special Permits for urban types uses in appropriate locations. These established uses include,but are not limited to, a general store, gas station, post office,hardware store, restaurants, and other types of commercial and industrial uses on both sides of the Hawai`i Belt Road(Highway 11) within these two subdivisions. Additionally, there have been several Special Permits approved in the vicinity of the proposed request. These include Special Permit No. 1115, which allowed the establishment of a 18,900-square foot market, a two-story 5,760-square foot building for commercial office and retail space to include prospective tenants such as a real estate office, financial institution, restaurant, video rental,personal services, tourist shop and other use, and a gas station. This proposed development is located on the corner of Lotus Blossom Lane and Hawai`i Belt Road in Hawaiian Ocean View Estates, approximately 400 feet east of the subject property. Special Permit No. 637 was approved to allow the establishment of a new hardware store,postal facility and commercial building on approximately 2 acres of land(Ocean View Town Center), which is along the highway • within Hawaiian Ocean View Estates, approximately 1,000 feet east of the location of the subject property. Lastly, Special Permit No. 653 was approved to allow a variety of commercial and industrial uses,including an open storage facility, a farmer's market and all uses permitted within the Industrial-Commercial Mixed Use(MCX)zoned district (Pohue Plaza), which is along the highway within Hawaiian Ranchos, approximately 1,300 feet east of the subject property. In 2007, the Hawai`i County Council adopted Ordinance No. 07-99,which amended Chapter 25 (Zoning Code),Article 2, Division 4, Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2005 Edition, as amended)by adding a new section relating to concurrency conditions. The council added requirements relating to traffic impacts and water supply relative to the approval of rezonings. To determine whether road conditions are adequate in an area, the ordinance requires some rezoning applications be accompanied by a traffic impact 3 analysis report(TIAR). The ordinance also requires evidence that water is available for the new rezonings. If these requirements are not met, then the rezoning should not be approved or should not take effect unless improvements to traffic and water occur before the occupancy of the project. In Ordinance 07-99, the council addressed the issue of water in rural areas where there is no reasonable prospect of a public water system, but where the county may wish to allow some commercial and possibly light industrial rezonings to serve the growing rural population, such as the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos area. The Council added Section 25-2-46(n), which states"to facilitate the development of village centers in rural areas that are not currently served by a public water system, the council may waive the water supply requirements for rezonings for commercial or light industrial uses in areas that do not currently have a public water system, and where the department of water supply has no plans to build a public water system, and which are(1) designated as an"urban or rural center"or"industrial area" on Table 14-5 of the General Plan and (2) designated for urban use on the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map of the General Plan;provided that conditions of zoning shall require water supply consistent with public health and safety needs such as sanitation and firefighting." The water supply necessary for sanitation and firefighting, in these circumstances, can be handled by requiring adequate storage facilities through conditions of the rezoning. As required by Section 25-2-46(n), the proposed request is designated as a"urban or rural center" and "industrial area"on Table 14-5 of the General Plan and is designated for urban use on the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map of the General Plan(urban expansion area/rural). The proposed Change of Zone from an Agricultural (A-la) to a Village Commercial 40,000 square foot(CV-40)zoned district will conform to, among others,the following goals,policies and standards of the Land Use and Economic General Plan Elements and the General Plan LUPAG Map: In order to consider an area for any type of zoning designation, the applicable goals, policies and standards of the General Plan must be adequately addressed. It is only through such a comprehensive policy analysis approach that evaluations and decisions can be made to better time and 4 stage developments to achieve growth determined by the General Plan and related planning documents. The implication of these evaluations and decisions must be also considered as they may have an impact on similar areas in the County. In a previous General Plan amendment, the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map was amended for the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos Subdivisions area. Hawaiian Ocean View Estates was amended from Extensive Agriculture and Orchards to Rural to recognize its residential-agricultural character. A portion of Hawaiian Ranchos and Hawaiian Ocean View Estates was amended along the highway from Extensive Agriculture to Urban Expansion Area to allow additional lands to accommodate future industrial, commercial, and higher density residential uses to service these large subdivisions. The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide(LUPAG) Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical relationship among the various land uses. The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the County. The proposed request conforms to the LUPAG Map,which designates the property as Urban Expansion Area,which allows for a mix of high density,medium density, low density, industrial, industrial-commercial and/or open designations in areas where new settlements may be desirable,but where the specific settlement pattern and mix of uses have not yet been determined. The proposed change of zone request from A-1 a to CV- 40 would further the County's goals of providing an economic environment which allows new or existing businesses to expand and diversify the County's economic base, and also increase choice of occupations. The proposed use would be consistent with the following goals,policies and standards of the Economic, Land Use and Commercial Elements of the General Plan: Economic Element: • Provide residents with opportunities to improve their quality of life through economic development that enhances the County's natural and social environments. 5 • Economic development and improvement shall be in balance with the physical, social and cultural environments of the island of Hawai`i. • Strive for diversity and stability in its economic system. • Provide an economic environment that allows new, expanded, or improved economic opportunities that are compatible with the County's cultural,natural and social environment. • Strive for an economic climate that provides its residents an opportunity for choice of occupation. • Strive for diversification of the economy by strengthening existing industries and attracting new endeavors. The applicant will be providing residents who live in the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates and Hawaiian Ranchos subdivisions and surrounding subdivisions more opportunities for commercial services and employment, which will be located closer to their residence than traveling to Kona or Hilo for these services. Land Use Element • Designate and allocate land uses in appropriate proportions and mix and in keeping with the social, cultural, and physical environments of the County. • Zone urban- and rural-types of uses in areas with ease of access to community services and employment centers and with adequate public utilities and facilities. • Allocate appropriate requested zoning in accordance with the existing or projected needs of neighborhood, community,region and County. • Encourage the development and maintenance of communities meeting the needs of its residents in balance with the physical and social environment. • Zoning requests shall be reviewed with respect to General Plan designation, district goals, regional plans, State Land Use District, compatibility with adjacent zoned uses, availability of public services and utilities, access and public need. Commercial Element: • Provide for commercial developments that maximize convenience to users. 6 • Urban renewal, rehabilitation, and/or redevelopment programs shall be undertaken in cooperation with communities,businesses and governmental agencies. • Distribution of commercial areas shall meet the demands of neighborhood, community and regional needs. • The development of commercial facilities should be designed to fit into the locale with minimal intrusion while providing the desired services. Appropriate infrastructure and design concerns shall be incorporated into the review of such developments. The proposed request is also consistent with the following courses of action for commercial development in the Ka`u District: • Centralization of commercial activity in the communities of Pahala,Na`alehu and Ocean View and the area of the Volcanoes National Park shall be encouraged. • Do not allow strip or spot commercial development on the highway outside of the designated urban areas. The change of zone from an A-la to a CV-40 zoned district will not result in a substantial adverse impact upon the surrounding area, community or region. The properties are located on the mauka side of the Hawai`i Belt Road between Lehua Lane and the Hawai`i Belt Road. The properties total 4.142 acres in size within the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates Subdivision and are generally rectangular in shape. They are currently vacant of any structures or uses. Surrounding properties within the Hawaiian Ocean View Estates Subdivision are approximately one acre in size and zoned Agricultural (A-1 a)by the County. Lands makai of Hawai`i Belt Road within the Hawaiian Ranchos Subdivision are approximately three acres in size and zoned Agricultural (A-3a). Both subdivisions consist primarily of scattered residential uses and vacant lands. The nearest dwelling is located across Lehua Lane on the corner of Lehua Lane and Keaka Parkway. The project is reasonably well situated within the urban core for this area. There are three large commercial and/or light industrial projects that have been approved through the Special Permit process within 1,500 feet of this project. This is the central location for residents to travel for these services within this area of Ka`u. Continued 7 development of commercial services in this area should continue to alleviate overall traffic congestion because many employees and residents who live in this area currently commute to places as far away as Kona and Hilo for work and services. All utilities are or will be made available to the project site. Access to the property will be from Lehua Lane, which is a two-lane,private road that has a 20-foot wide asphalt pavement within a 40-foot right-of-way. Lehua Lane is accessed directly from the Hawaii Belt Road. A condition of approval will be added restricting access to the property directly from the Hawaii Belt Road. Based on the requirements of Ordinance 07-99, the applicant has been required to submit a traffic report for the project, which was conducted by Phillip Rowell and Associates. The assessment concluded that 1) the proposed project will generate 69 inbound trips and 18 outbound trips during the morning peak hour and 50 inbound trips and 100 outbound trips during the afternoon peak hour. 2) The level-of-service analysis that all intersections and lane groups will operate at a Level-of-Service A or B, which are the highest levels-of-service. This implies very good operating conditions with minimal delays. Widening to provide additional lanes will not improve the levels-of-service because they are already high. Accordingly, no mitigation is required or recommended. 3) Lehua Lane should be widened to provide two 12-foot lanes, one in each direction, between Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) and Keaka Parkway. 4) The project's civil engineer should confirm that adequate site distances are provided along Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) at the study intersections. Any deficiencies shall be mitigated. 5) The project's civil engineer should determine the viability of providing a separate left turn lane along Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) at Lehua Lane. 6) At the intersection of Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) at Lehua Lane, adequate turning radii should be provided for trucks and other service vehicles to and from the project. The Department of Transportation(DOT) stated that the recommendations within the report should be implemented, which are described above. Additionally, DOT is inclined to require a left-turn lane into Lehua Lane from Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) despite the lack of warrant, yet they deferred to the judgment of the Highways Division-Hawaii District Engineer on this matter and details relating to it. The DOT 8 Highways Division-Hawai`i District Engineer Salvador C. Panem subsequently approved the plans submitted for this project, which did not include a left turn lane from Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road) onto Lehua Lane. The HOVE Road Maintenance Corporation(RMC)requested that the developer of Lehua Court rebuild Lehua Lane to County specifications from Highway 11 (Hawai`i Belt Road)to Keaka Parkway, which will allow HOVE RMC to dedicate that portion of Lehua Lane to the County. This option would financially jeopardize the project as the applicant would be required to put in County standard paving and curb, gutter and sidewalks along both sides of Lehua Lane from the highway to Keaka Parkway. In a typical commercial rezoning application located within an urban area, a condition of approval may be added requiring the applicant to improve their property frontage with curb, gutter and sidewalks, but not the frontage of other properties. Based on the recommendations of the traffic report and the DOT, the Planning Director is recommending that a condition of approval be added requiring the applicant to improve the pavement width from 20 feet to 24-feet wide(12-foot paved lanes) on Lehua Lane from the Hawaii Belt Highway to its intersection with Keaka Parkway. Additionally, a condition of approval will be added requiring the applicant to pay for any increase of the road maintenance fee for a commercial business upon the subject properties to the HOVE Community Association and/or the HOVE Road Maintenance Corporation. Additionally,based on Ordinance 07-99,the applicant is required to meet water requirements necessary for sanitation and firefighting by providing adequate storage facilities on-site. The applicant is proposing to construct five(5) large water tanks and have an on-site water reservoir to meet these requirements. Within the Fire Suppression Plan,it appears that there will be over 300,000 gallons stored onsite within the storage tanks and the pond. Additionally, the applicant will be hiring a private water hauling company to truck in potable water for up to 150,000 gallons. A condition of approval will be added allowing the storage and delivery of water on-site meeting with the approval of the Department of Health for sanitation purposes and meeting with the approval of the Fire Department's fire-flow requirements. 9 The Department of Water Supply(DWS) states that there are no DWS facilities in the area. The nearest water system facility is located in Wai`ohinu, approximately 10 miles east of the subject properties. There is a water system within HOVE that accommodates both public and private water users daily from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., which is located on a County owned property on Lehua Lane near the subject properties. There are six (6)public water spigots and a private standpipe facility that provides services to ten(10)private customers for water hauling and/or delivery services. The system is serviced by a well and 300,000-gallon water tank, which is located on a County owned property on Paradise Circle Makai. No metered water services will be allowed unless a second well is constructed to provide the required redundancy for a public water system. In the future with improvements, this system may become available to residents in the area, including the applicant. A proposed condition will require that residential uses district including single- family, double-family or multi-family residential uses, boarding facilities,rooming or lodging houses,hotels and lodges be served by a potable water system meeting with the approval of the Department of Water Supply. Normally, CV zoning would allow up to 35 residential units per acre. While the Planning Director supports commercial uses serviced by on-site water storage sufficient for the fire flow purposes,the Department will not support residential uses in the absence of a County-approved water system. A similar CV rezoning in Volcano, Ordinance 03-06, also prohibited residential uses for the same reasons. The applicant is proposing to construct a sewage treatment system for wastewater, which will meet the requirements of the Department of Health. Utilities,including telephone and electrical services, are available to the site. The closest police and fire station is located in Na`alehu, approximately twelve(12)miles from the property. Police and fire substations are available in the immediate area. The property has no severe geological or topographical problems which cannot be properly rectified or which would render the land unusable. The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) designates the property as Zone"X", areas outside the 500- 10 year flood plain. The property is located approximately 6 miles mauka of the shoreline. All project generated runoff will be disposed of on-site. The request is not contrary to Chapter 205A,Hawaii Revised Statues, relating to Coastal Zone Management. The property is not located in the Special Management Area. The site is located mauka of the Hawai`i Belt Road, is not an oceanfront property, and will not be impacted by coastal hazard and beach erosion. There is no record of a designated public access that traverses the property. No valued cultural,historical or natural resources exist on the property and there is no evidence of any traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the site. Thus, it is not anticipated that the proposed request will have any adverse impact on cultural or historical resources in the area. The request will not have a significant adverse impact to traditional and customary Hawaiian Rights. In view of the Hawai`i State Supreme Court's "PASH" and"Ka Pa'akai 0 Ka'Aina"decisions, the issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights must be addressed in terms of the cultural,historical, and natural resources and the associated traditional and customary practices of the site: Investigation of valued resources: No formal archaeological reconnaissance survey, oral history of kamaaina accounts of the area,historical survey of documentary records was submitted with the applications. The applicant did submit a botanical survey and fauna survey of the properties. The valuable cultural,historical, and natural resources found in the permit area: As the property was grubbed in the past, an archaeological inventory survey of the site was not conducted. In a letter to the applicant dated June 14, 2006 from the Department of Land and Natural Resources-Historic Preservation Division, DLNR-SHPD stated that they believe no historic properties will be affected by this undertaking because residential development/urbanization has altered the land and that the subject parcel is identified by Sato et. Al 1973 as Aa lava flows, and the aerial photos contained in that document show development in the late 1960's. Their staff is familiar with the area and the parcel, and has not noted any historic properties on the parcel. Therefore, DLNR-SHPD concluded that a"no historic properties determination"is appropriate for this parcel. 11 Possible adverse effect or impairment of valued resources: Established standards and controls to manage potential negative effects should effectively limit and mitigate foreseeable long-term impacts. The property does not abut the shoreline, therefore Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights is not an issue. Feasible actions to protect native Hawaiian rights. To the extent to which traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights are exercised, the proposed action will not affect traditional Hawaiian rights and no action is necessary to protect these rights. A condition of approval will be included to require the applicant to notify the DLNR-SHPD should any unidentified sites or remains be encountered, and proceed only upon an archaeological clearance from the DLNR-SHPD. Based on the above findings, the change of zone from Agricultural-1 acre (A- la) to Village Commercial 40,000 square foot(CV-40)would result in an appropriate land use pattern and further benefit the general public. The accompanying draft bill to amend Section 25-8-28 (Ka`u District Zone Map), Article 8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) is provided for your favorable consideration. The proposed conditions of approval are attached to the draft bill. 12 COUNTY OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. ( j4J/,(//,44f b Dge AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-28 (KA`U DISTRICT ZONE MAP), ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2005 EDITION), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL—ONE ACRE(A-1 a) TO VILLAGE COMMERCIAL—40,000 SQUARE FEET (CV-40) AT KAHUKU, KA`U, HAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY 9-2- 093:039, 040, 041 & 042. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. Section 25-8-28, Article 8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) of the Hawaii County Code 1983 (2005 Edition), is amended to change the district classification of property described hereinafter as follows: The district classification of the following area situated at Kahuku,Ka`u,Hawai`i, shall be Village Commercial—40,000 square feet(CV-40): Beginning at the Easternmost corner of this parcel of land,being also the Northernmost corner of Lot 10 of Block 157 of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates (File Plan 787) and being a point on the Southwesterly side of Lehua Lane,the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station"PUU 0 KAMAOA"being 1,976.65 feet North and 4,186.36 feet West and running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: 1. 19° 35' 374.80 feet along Lot 10 of Block 157 of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates(File Plan 787)and along the remainder of Grant 2791 to C. C. Harris to a point; 2. 109° 34' 52" 325.00 feet along the Northeasterly side of Hawai`i Belt Road to a point; -1- 3. 199° 35' 606.84 feet along Lot 5 of Block 157 of Hawaiian Ocean View Estates (File Plan 787) feet to a point; 4. 251° 01' 30" 89.52 feet along the Southeasterly side of Keaka Parkway to a point; Thence, following along the Southwesterly intersection of Keaka Parkway and Lehua Lane on a curve to the right with a radius of 20.00 feet, the chord azimuth and distance being: 5. 296° 01' 30" 28.28 feet to a point; 6. 341° 01' 30" 364.02 feet along the Southwesterly side of Lehua Lane to the point of beginning and containing an area of 4.143 Acres. All as shown on the map attached hereto,marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 25-2-44, Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2005 Edition), the County Council finds the following conditions are: Necessary to prevent circumstances which may be adverse to the public health, safety and welfare; or (1) Reasonably conceived to fulfill needs directly emanating from the land use proposed with respect to: (A) Protection of the public from the potentially deleterious effects of the proposed use,or (B) Fulfillment of the need for public service demands created by the proposed use. -2- SEE ATTACHED CONDITIONS SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other parts of this ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAI`I , Hawai`i Date of Introduction: Date of 1st Reading: Date of 2nd Reading: Effective Date: -3- KEPKPP‘k\I\I ' / LOTS 6,7,8&9 / / AGRICULTURAL TO ILLAGE-ONE ACRE IAL-1 a) TO VILLAGE COMMERCIAL- / 40,000 SQFT(CV-40) 4.143 ACRES TOTAL f 1 ' <ms / 1 G / I 2 Lot 6 /Lot 7 I Lot 8 I/ Lot 9 1,976.65'N 14311.11;W / KAMA'OA" / / / �ry / / I Q w I I O / cr I / d,A' / 4 I ci / 0S? / Q I I / 0? / I I / / I / Mq/yg h / I O .NwY ALL PARCELS MAUKA OF MAMALAHOA HWY ARE DISTRICT ZONE A-la ALL PARCELS MAKAI OF MAMALAHOA HWY ARE DISTRICT ZONE A-3a Feet 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-28 (KA'U DISTRICT ZONE MAP)ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAI'I COUNTY CODE 1983 (2005 EDITION), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL - 1 ACRE (A-1 a) TO VILLAGE COMMERCIAL- 40,000 SQFT (CV-40), AT KAHUKU, KA'U, HAWAII MAP PREPARED BY: COUNTY OF HAWAII, PLANNING DEPARTMENT TMKS:(3)9-2-093:039,040,041 &042 DATE:May 28,2014 EXHIBIT"A" Dr William C. C1330 CFouIkREZ..jwd/dsa 05-23-14 WILLIAM C.FOULK CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 12-000160) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. The applicant, its successors or assigns, shall be responsible for complying with all of the stated conditions of approval. B. Tax Map Keys 9-2-93: 39, 40, 41 and 42 shall be consolidated within one(1) year from the effective date of this ordinance. C. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any commercial use on the subject project site, the applicant shall construct and maintain an onsite water storage and delivery system that will provide adequate water service to all uses established upon the subject project site, meeting with the requirements of the Department of Health and the Fire Department for sanitation and firefighting purposes, respectively. D. Construction of the proposed development shall be completed within five(5) years from the effective date this ordinance. Prior to construction, the applicant, successors or assigns shall secure Final Plan Approval for the proposed development from the Planning Director in accordance with Section 25-2-70, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Hawaii County Code. Plans shall identify all existing and/or proposed structures,paved driveway access and paved parking stalls associated with the proposed development. Landscaping shall also be indicated on the plans for the purpose of mitigating any adverse noise or visual impacts to adjacent properties in accordance with the requirements of Planning Department's Rule No. 17 (Landscaping Requirements) standards for CV zones adjoining a RS zone. E. Single-family, double-family and multiple-family residential uses,boarding facilities,rooming or lodging houses, hotels, lodges and other types of visitor accommodations shall be directly serviced by a potable water system meeting with the requirements of the Department of Water Supply. F. Direct access to and from the Hawai`i Belt Highway shall be prohibited. Access to the subject project site shall be restricted to Lehua Lane, which shall be improved with a minimum non-dedicable pavement width of 24 feet along its entire length from its intersection with the Hawai`i Belt Highway to and including its intersection with Keaka Parkway. G. The applicant shall construct all recommended improvements to the Hawai`i Belt Highway at its intersection with Lehua Lane as may be required by the State Department of Transportation prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any portion of the proposed development. H. Any increase in road maintenance fees to accommodate uses generated by the proposed development that is assessed by the HOVE Community Association or the HOVE Road Maintenance Corporation shall be the responsibility of the applicant, its successors or assigns. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site and shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of a construction permit. Any recommended drainage improvements, if required, shall be constructed meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to receipt of a Certificate of Occupancy. J. All earthwork activity shall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, of the Hawaii County Code. K. Wastewater disposal shall meet the specifications and requirements of the Department of Health. L. Should any remains of historic sites, such as rock walls, terraces,platforms, marine shell concentrations or human burials be encountered, work in the immediate area shall cease and the Department of Land and Natural Resources- Historic Preservation Division(DLNR-HPD) shall be immediately notified. Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearance from the DLNR-HPD when it finds that sufficient mitigative measures have been taken. M. To ensure that the Goals and Policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan are implemented, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 11, Article 1, Hawaii County Code relating to Affordable Housing Policy. This 2 requirement shall be approved by the Administrator of the Office of Housing and Community Development prior to final plan approval for any new residential structures. N. If the applicant, its successors, or assigns develops a water system meeting the requirements of the Department of Water Supply sufficient to support the development of residential units on the subject project site, the applicant shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the properties with respect to parks and recreation, fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution shall become due and payable prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval. The fair share contribution for each lot shall be based on the actual number of residential units developed. The fair share contribution in a form of cash, land, facilities or any combination thereof shall be determined by the County Council. The fair share contribution may be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective date of this ordinance,based on the percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index (HCPI). The fair share contribution shall have a maximum combined value of$8,542.61 per multiple family residential unit($13,312.70 per single family residential unit). The total amount shall be determined with the actual number of units according to the calculation and payment provisions set forth in this condition. The fair share contribution per multiple family residential unit(single family residential units) shall be allocated as follows: 1. $4,213.83 per multiple family residential unit($6,419.62 per single family residential unit)to the County to support park and recreational improvements and facilities; 2. $133.18 per multiple family residential unit($309.68 per single family residential unit)to the County to support police facilities; 3. $409.67 per multiple family residential unit($611.66 per single family residential unit) to the County to support fire facilities; 4. $182.59 per multiple family residential unit($267.79 per single family residential unit) to the County to support solid waste facilities; and 3 5. $3,603.34 per multiple family residential unit($5,703.94 per single family residential unit)to the County to support road and traffic improvements. In lieu of paying the fair share contribution, the applicant may contribute land and/or construct improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation, fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads within the region impacted by the proposed development, subject to the review and recommendation of the Planning Director,upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the County Council. O. Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance. P. The applicant shall comply with all applicable County, State and Federal laws, rules, regulations and requirements. Q. An annual progress report shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the anniversary date of enactment of the ordinance. The report shall include,but not be limited to, the status of the development and to what extent the conditions of approval are being complied with. This condition shall remain in effect until all of the conditions of approval have been complied with and the Planning Director acknowledges that further reports are not required. R. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: 1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant(s), its successors or assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. 2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. 3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of the change of zone. 4 4. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance(i.e., a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for up to one additional year). 5. If the applicant(s) should require an additional extension of time, the Planning Director shall submit the applicant's request to the Planning Commission and County Council for appropriate action. S. Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Planning Director may initiate rezoning of the subject area to its original or more appropriate designation. 5 • co NJ NJ re) 0 L.) Fin" .15 LLJ z• Ctr 0 CL 111111111111k CO 'NU =NJ LLI M ‘,0 CD 0 LI- CD z0 00 < I (11 ,1 eNi Jj • ern 11-1 Z T-I rsj '11 LLI 31 CC N "11.011110 NINON %ma. / i . . f, , a. r -?•, -1 4 ...' , '''..- '--' -,..: '641 .1....- ',‘t ,,,,,..._;,1,......_ s l7 C ` f� . _ .. :r ,� ,, a ,rr sr " j f ✓ r ;tit t c U • • • r, ., )_ - Qr ✓ /} t s T { ". ,• -1 .. .,,. of J a J l .. .. .,, •,... SP 5J 5, s.• sJ '.f ra■-• 1 ,, : . . .. / .., a 0 ,- \ ) \ \ ) 1 . \ ,. ^^ ! \ CO 2. c . 0 ,„ 7, 1"°�` (20;; '''..' • I \,..........„.„,„, \ , ,..,-„,--..--:-,r.'-',17':'.''','I.I:''''''t:''AC.';'-'Wq14,r,''■'',.'''''',II.4.1 6.74 I NO 6..41.4 I,44.4.40 I.44 ','":''': ' 'L'' '... ''' ''' ••...•1.....•• ok• . 'lir , \ ■.nipli,4,.■S.1,..•, ..c,X '4.:21 .:44::it:4:40.1:4:7:: i '' '*\‘'''' .'''''''''4..•.......%1'.... ,."'\'''' ' ' '''1,,,414•••••41",•"..4• , , , .A• ‘ ,,,:,:,'.:•,00 1.. ••••••••*••• i444410 ....;., '' '',"c•'''''+'''''., ' e••••••••••••• - ,,,••••,...••• ••••• .,,,, c,-- ••,•,•,•,,,•,„••••••••••, ,..7,1,14.0,..,•,•,,,...4.,.., ---.........4.4.4 11. , ".•44,4**••••••.... loi ..........••••." . . •••.••••••••••• ••••.;•••••••••••• ,.,• 4*.AV.•••4*•••••• 1 Ili,,„: .• , ,,,,,,•,•,...., ,,- , ••••1 A.***4.**********, '''' 47** 4.401W11■44"440"1"1" ,i •40'4`••••••4••••••A% A.. 4••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••!..•• ':'A ..•••••••••••14.• *ASV*** -A.,4*•4•••••••••••••4•••••..• VA, *4 ••••••••••;* 440** PA. 4 44,•••••:••••••• 4*.VA, •• • ••••‘• ••• '••• fr***** * ****4-******4•V *St. ••••••• +•:•••••1 ••'• *!•••• • ••••••••• •4,,•• ***.:4,*,„ 44. .AV 44.44.4..*.• **•••••••4*.t.• .••••4*•W•••••44.••• •••*•••••••••44 Pe!.4V4V4,. •V'4 4.• t••••••••4••••• ••■••,4 .4****V•V••••:',..4•••••••••••0 *:••• *# •••*V.%***********V• 4•404,.•••••••••••4••••••S•444,4•••••••4 *•••••&•••• ••••••••••••■• ••••••••** •••••••,:••*M4 *V VASS:•••V• 444•4•4•4•V•to fr** ••••••:•••••••■••Noit ,•,••••041.•+:.•••••••••■••••■••••••••••••,•••••., , 4.0 4,.4,4,4,4,4 i•••••••••••••:,, •••••••••444%*.• 4 ••• •••••••••• ••••••••'•• .".4. **••• •••••44*4 •••- 4.•"*.••Z`.4•41...44,/•44„ •••• • •• • *41 ••i••*.. c ..41 *4 4,* *1.4 .•A • VA.* ** , •■■.‘,. .• ••4!..■•••• • 44't•• OM. 'jr•*.•• ••••• •• i 44.4* •. •.,•4', •. Iiiirele' •••••••••••••••••4••••4•••• ,044•••...•,.IV 4 4•••.••.••4 • ' • • .44 tit•S A cc; , ,.•••••••••S•i•1..4.•444, ••••• 4+4■,,...0.44 , ,,, ...._.... .,_,..„„.... .,. ....,,..„,,,,, ... . , „ ,. . ...... .,...... ._..,. ..., „. .,..„. .... ... . +. ....4 • ...-. . • .....4.,........ 2., ... , , , , ti, , 4 ' '''1, .,.;'' ''4 . 4, ' ,•.•••,.• .4.. .4, • • , •• • g,,,e•4 • • • II'.•••• 4, ,,•• .• • .,,,. , . . . . . ••••V••••••••••••••••4,•••• ••••••1■••••••••••••N14,0•••••• **Vs* .•+*••-•,•,•...V•••••••."4"4••••••••• : ••••••■■•••••••••••2•••4,.••••••••,--"St • ••• 40 4** VA•4•••••44••••••• 4, 4%,'4 o 4 44•• '4 •0•44.44.4.4•••••••••.+0.V. V4s4.. .44...1, -r, . . ..**•••+ 4 0.4".,•*••••••• ••••••4*Vie,••••• .••••••••••4:••••••*44•••••••••• 44.•■•••••••*•••••••*•••••• 17 ., . , „- .. , . , . .......• ........••••••••••• Lied . ... , . . ...,,.. ....,. . ,„.,.., ... . ,,, ,. _,.. ..._ „................„................•.„.••••••• .•• ;..•••.••• ••••.0..4•4•••••••••••• s 4•44.11.41444.4 +44. 4,0,r414,44.414, 44+4+ 414.4* • +4P4-4,14 -****, !**********444•441•444*****•V*V****:**1:444. '1, -,... , 4 0•4:`.••,••••••..Ihe••••••*441*V•0 r••••••••• •-- .., . .. . . ..4',•4"...:... •4144 • ***,••44444 44P • V4144 C LK, ' - ''4444,04•44••••••••.•';.••••••••••4. •••••4•4•••••••••••••••••••04V V+.******••••• ••••••••&••••••••••44••••••• 4••••••:***•:••••••+.4•414•464:•••••••:•:4 44•:••••••••••••••••:••••+.4 , ,.4•1;* ••••• ** •••••••4•••44.4•AV.••••••••••••••• ••■•••• . •••• 44“•4.••04,4•••••■• : * •••••■••■•• •••.9-•*".•-.1•••4••••• owl•e a m 0' ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••:-..•••••••••••*••••:•••:•••- ••••••••••••••••••••••••*•••• !••••••••••••••••4•444*.••••••••44•4•44.•4•4;• 1111MMIR, •••••••••••4`••••.4.•••••••••ai''') .•••••••••••••• 4144,4, 4144•11,..4 ■••••••••••••4,4 **IP... •••••Csd: 0.1.••••••••••••4 .4*********** cm. 4.4*****V44•44 44•V•4***********4...4*:*V...***** "t ,•-••••••••••••••• •••••••••*•••••■••• .•••.•••••4•40 04*4411 I 0,./04•••4 1 1,1 1.•i:•444 4 04,1 I 1 1 0••••••,,. 4 1•••••••••'•••••••••&"•':`•••••••••••••••■ ••••••••••••••••*••■ •••••••••• ••••••••••••'4•••4/•••••••■`••••••' '444.1.444.0.•••••••••••V4 4.404••••••••••••*44`44.■•••••" 4.4441'.4.•*••••••••••4 44••••■.I•440.•••••••••••••••.•7".4+0 •••••••••••••••••0••••••••••'•• I a M O C IMO•I NB +.+44•••+41V1 01‘.44••••• •••••14‘•••••••••••••••+••••••••0 . . ,.„ „. ,... .. 41 0.••••+41 V",.44.4 04,•••••••,+,,■+••••••+•••4 • ' . ?. ' ' '.' 0••••• 1•••t.•40%•4 i.0 4 1+,4..4,0.44**,4...4 4. , ,*••••• •••• /■• o . " ••••4••.•44.•••••••%**Of••••*••••••••4444e 4. ' '''' '' 7' 'L'-''1+.44.4*:••••..44.4 4.4 4.:•.:4'44.4:4:•••4:1 4..4:4:44.•:••••:•••••■..• um 41 4 mo 4 4 "4.. .$1:444:41:*if 41 4.:••.....•sit•::4+34;4:1:44 it•e f:.•:•••+4:•.44+;4;::i.4.4,......t 4 t..4.41: co ' '.,..,„ .. s......"44 4,.0 ••4.•••.••••..•••••• .4, •. a. +V•‘,4, i!••• • ••••••••••-*AV, oto •"•••*N. " •••••,•efrik•I* ** ••••••••••4••••• 411 .4' AO I V0 IV••••4 41 W4?•••"I'M OPV•V•V******* '4•4 44,4•••:•••********V***47•V4V4 4 4.4+44.••••••••• 4,-) u, ,, _ u, ,..k,..... ..... ,.......„..•.• ...... ,., .„:„........,......... ....... ....,... „. .. .. s.„..t.*4• V•V4 4.4.***"A."414*•*•■•• . **II,* •■••44••••4••••••••• • 1* . •4*•.•• •V4*V4••4,• ••-•••• •- 4414,•*•• . ,'.. '4**4.•••i* ••••1.4•4••4 • C • )7- • '' •• • ••••••4••‘'4•4•••••••••••••••• •••••••••••• . . .s. ••••••••••,&••••• • , , •••,..,., .44.,•,•,•, ,, 444, 144,,,.44.v•44•4•44.4.•. 4.o. 4.•9.• ••..?Al.■■ ■• .4•4•ji•.I 4.,/,,,,j, •,h,•&&& V.,;,,:r&V&&Iv&irav+Nr.coraw \••110.••,ir6•f••417 .•Sr.44 I 4511 I,+.■•lir t.7.4 I 4'3'7■10,1 0'V. '40*•••••• C lo) .-'' AV•V•V+4 MA.V••• + . •••••••• 44****'"- •+....f•V•V•V '.,,''''' 44 444 444•4•444•44Mh. •••41*i******VA •14'N:1414.4, •••■••••••••••• 4,- 8 0.4•4) .4 m p*Ave* ......t.t••sit./4.444.v..,4,;•„••,,,,,,,v,...ii , 4•040i,*,•-.4-**...„-.4.4,6•4,-4‘.,-.44„.1,-.iv.' ,p+.•rivi..--r4.-•-•-.4.4,-•,-..-44,- , • ••44. , 04*. • ••••••••4••4••••••••**':et . •AA Vo'4/4•••••••••44,'444■••••••••4•4•••••••*•444•V••••A'AN!••'•"'44.P. - ..• •;: ,o4 r• 40 0 A v..,....-- •.4,,•i,,.•41 14•••.••••••44.4,••••••1 I t..1 6410.•••••44.•44404.4 14•••••••••• •••■.'1 1/4" •••••••••■••1■/,.. (1119 ...- Ara'\ “r•••••4`4'1,4" •.4 • qr 4,4 •..,4 #4, 4 im+ ..A........s....t 0"........4.4s.....,..•••- --. * +.;49 . !. • •• .-.4•-•Is • •••••• • ••■••••*4 -, . .--'"-- A ',(-- 14 beS.•t""•4,...•4•4:44••••;+X•••■•••*************A*11,,,••••••4.6.4•4 P.,•,;•..4.°4 L.Q.....•:411•,44.4•7 - \ 41• L'• •••••#•-• .*4- VW***4.741-Vir•vir'4" g■•"•-•-•'."•"• '_.,..eg 1 I*••••••V.4&...440...••V•t•V•V_4**:■P.a,'s./0•41.4 o....!•t•V•1!4;t•t•t• AO 4 ot■e•t•.•V•t•t•..•t•fr A ..k 0 sue, . }4 , 1%iio4iirAillIlIllIllIl%Nr - .. ,,..,,,, ,.4.,,,,,,k -.;:,;(... ,,, r ,, Y .t 4''''' 4 C op • . ii , Q .r tii -o Cv . a) a) U U I C D _o ct3 O 0 E U m ° +_) CU a 0 p crj d- O •— _0 Z0 w" m p _- 4 L-r) co -J 0 i co tap Cll d' 0 CZ 00 L. c . tt,,; p p RI 4,t- (1) ±-2 -0 > .4.--:, • .-, 1 > (l) Q) D 4U U > CU 0- V; E 7.-- U -0 " (75 C C) U CO a)n 0 0 +-; v) •,, 4—) , +-.) +-) = � U OA „CU C M vi (U C r-1 C (U - -4J —6 ZS (13 -�--+ cn L- SI. C _Q <C p .- C C c3 1.1 • � 0 75 E c).- " ' L_. U c m ,- p 4- CU CO 'F", 4— 476' -O coil cr) 4-1 (L) tr) E c.t3 CU (t) D 0 c •...._ U 4-) p U O U cn co a 03 L-, 4- U O G) to 73 x U•on� p .— p CD O J + z 4 - L C • -0 _ CD u 03 ago c3 - p Cv a) Cz L.- Z3 CO a) = , � .- CU i ...0 V) taL) C -C N p c� -C Cv F. Q <C co U E-- 0 4- 0A I— U • . . . V) 13 no -C C U 0 ) O u D co C 0_ v > •�= — a3• .... 4. 03 = ca c - > ._c (-) til U- 0 0- MIIIIMIIIIIIIIID U — •i.7) U V) = IIIIIIIIIIIMII CO c13 a (1)� -C -J o leZ v; •`—' ° v o C 0- � fa: _ 1 to U to O Ni U — Ca D •— >. c 03 7 � Q) C C co C6 C6 a) �' Co Cf__ -0 .•.-' CU C ril--- L. 4— 0 W 0.) -.%'- 03 v) v) C CD L Clo cD Ca O Qu O d; t t0• . CU C _C 0- co E 0 _c ._ w 4.-J -41,-, 4..) a 0 4-1 Ln -C (4- 4--j -'--/ E -' w ^ � O r1 c1 CD v o Cl > � W N cu cfn sO U en C •L. C (1) c6 F— N +.J CU t O N O Co 9- cn H • • • • • i if a, q a I 51 / I ti {i F - k•E Q ci } i . ; ; if- 11 ,�� 4` ' h: I i , !1 i Ili! Ab. :$,........ .,..... .„„ ..,, ' 111111111F 11* --44416.444 ‘'..: it 0 � "� i «« � T ,v \ 4.f:. .�° � \ ..i - Y1• J. _• -':.'1' , 444 d 1111. p4.E'r,".9t.."-..-4v .1110 . ..,:i '•111- .".. I.::.,"4-4.4,,, 40.-4,- • 1c II 1 lc I.'. i 'f.113 milmmrE0.11.1.0 n 6. '4 Pri-cv-` 1 �. �� �'�-• Y^tea, i it • ;w OP = :=: 4 = cr..41i a ss _ v L _• it 14• 11 - �J — - it �lr,, .o-.fZ 1 .0-.YZ •F. :fie- - - Q _ �. • �, � ..... ti. w ar,11��t•y 1110 41--s7► 4a ti>j�y _ 4liIk 1 J 3[. '�Yr i . +/41;1 • Iw -`1/''' � 3 , q r w''�lir R .r,..� �l 1111 •z�� i'a ar YJt _ � .1 � ` ti ay ,... yr• '�1.."-A� IF ��• • 0-141:i-.-iIT-•lf �∎=:.;114;* I ` '{� _� {�-1 • w �Ir t I- B _i a ' .1 _ �-'' •: !a oa e n z 7 E 3 E C c.) 4"3 °'.i, '_' J'_-`. _z 3* C •/_\ __.--r ,4. =.,, „� -'-,;, ,. - -5.".!..44.. "1:.7" .—.._.__� s /*�. t i 1 -7. ` t s I 'k . f I.1 rfilli7 # .. t � 1 I f 1 {d „'::f: } ortl NNIIIISNSIlk ., , . 4, N. c,, : ' ,..or r Nik :t Q) ,,� a + � _ :i,VSZ-3x ��4 fiFP �z h k Y ++ypypYY J x '..�+ * f a j P h F „.4r a-4 r rr �k x t tYk t i F r$� ik F1. aryl ° ,y r N P YP�dM 4 „ &.d,� • AA t'4',.:k ' \ J „ ry ,_ i \ \ I.\ Ft o w o �.R - �. Cl. -� r a) .,�^ N. r ' IOW 0 L— ,t I ..m n, lit Ie f 1 , Il. ;, p, —i if :r 1 n x. ti- t q. r i � Ui I u.i , ** S a T 0,\ ‘;'. ...-:, .. j7 9 Li ±, FL� 4 »1.awe ?,yy A i. i y O 'x ,' r e s " .F w t F y w � ...... .,...... i 0 ' ..,..,„:.„.....,:_....... : ,.:.„.............,. .._ ..,,_. ,,, .„.,,,...:) .,, ,„...,,,,,L...,,,,,,..,4„.,,,,,,.,,,...,..., , ...c .,,,,,..,:„....,...:....,. ..,. ..,..„„:„......„:„..„, .„ . • .. .,;-;- ' ' .. ■ Yr 4 7 • • \\\:7;.: 0 L 4% +r she • A,• _ ,, r, 1. j.. rR• w i.'�y r r '� I a �,. x litit it Ve r k a E.‘ ki < y + _ --`q th v F t I ` T k c • ,& '• t, ;,� ," . ( 0 y e 4 .,,;;;:n....•=4„.,.::: , . L T--; 4a ® s.a" , et' k 4 4. ,.Y :, n; • AK- j 4 .) C a) f 0.- E .4. C c 75 .2 c Lois 0 Q) 0 • -0 L.) (13 c < ai CD 73 a) E " C 0 S.... m N • ..... c E CU -0 CD tk E Q) 0 0 (13 la) c • —c E a) a) ...c C 0 _a m D U 0 -0 CT (1) > c (13 CD ....J LL CU 4--; (la 4--J (i)