My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
REP PC 076 2014/08/20 (2012-2014)
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Reports
>
2012-2014
>
Planning Committee (PC)
>
REP PC 076 2014/08/20 (2012-2014)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2017 12:50:43 PM
Creation date
8/27/2014 1:38:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reports
Reports - Type
REP
Reports - Council Term
2012-2014
Report
76
Committee
PC
Meeting date
2014-08-20
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2014/09/05 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2012-2014\Council
BIL 278 Draft 01 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2012-2014
COM 0978.000 2012-2014
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2012-2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PC -76 Page 2 August 20, 2014 <br />the necessary requirements would need to be in compliance should <br />the rezoning be approved. <br />Committee members held two rounds of discussion. Mr. Onishi <br />requested representatives from the Planning Department, Planning <br />Program Manager Daryn Arai and Deputy Planning Director <br />Bobby Command, and the Department from Public Works, <br />Director Warren Lee, to come before your Committee and explain <br />to the public on the happenings with this particular process. All <br />representatives explained the application process through their <br />respective department, which basically concluded that the <br />application was handled by what the applicant had submitted. <br />Committee members expressed strong concern of the intended use <br />of the structure while viewing three photographs, submitted by the <br />Hilo testifier, which appears to be in violation of what was <br />permitted. Confirmed by the Planning Department representatives, <br />complaints were received, investigations were conducted <br />accordingly, and with recent findings, a citation will be issued to <br />the applicant. After a lengthy discussion, a motion was made by <br />Committee Member Wille, to postpone this item to the call of the <br />Chair; however, this motion had failed with six noes. <br />Your Committee agreed to move forward with respects to both the <br />Planning Department and the Department of Public Works, that <br />corrective actions will be initiated by the next Council meeting. <br />Should there be no corrective action to report by the next Council <br />meeting, a motion to postpone may be made at that time. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Positive; passage of Bill No. 278 at first reading. <br />For the record, Committee Member Kanuha voted "kanalua," then "aye." <br />ZK/nm <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />COMMITTEE ON PLANNING <br />DO KERN, CHAIRPERSON <br />PC REPORT NO. 76 <br />ADOPTED: <br />AYES NOES ABS EX <br />EOFF <br />X <br />FORD <br />X <br />ILAGAN <br />X <br />KANUHA <br />X <br />KERN <br />X <br />ONISHI <br />X <br />POINDEXTER <br />X <br />WILLE <br />X <br />YOSHIMOTO <br />X <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />COMMITTEE ON PLANNING <br />DO KERN, CHAIRPERSON <br />PC REPORT NO. 76 <br />ADOPTED: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.