My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0330.000 2014-2016
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2014-2016
>
COM 0330.000 2014-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2019 12:29:13 PM
Creation date
5/21/2015 8:48:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2014-2016
Communication
0330
Point
000
Author
William P. Kenoi, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
PC-23: Forwards Bill 60 to Council with a negative recommendation - 07/01/2015
Document Relationships
BIL 060 Draft 01 2014-2016
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2014-2016
REP PC 023 2015/07/01 (2014-2016)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2014-2016\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dru Kanuha, Council Chair <br />and Members of the County Council <br />Page 6 <br />would be applicable to them. For example, in this area in the general vicinity of <br />Mountain View, there are over 1,000 basically contiguous acres zoned A -20a consisting <br />of 25 to 50 -acre lots that could potentially come in for a similar change of zone if private <br />water catchment systems were allowed to meet minimum water requirements for a change <br />of zone. Also consider that this compromise of the concurrency standards can easily be <br />translated to urban areas as well, subjugating the legislative intent of the County's <br />concurrency requirements to have standard expectations for water supply for new <br />rezomngs. <br />The proposed change of zone from an Agricultural 20 -Acre (A -20a) to an <br />Agricultural 5 -Acre (A -5a) zoning district does not conform to the goals, objectives <br />and actions of the Puna Community Development Plan. Another negative factor <br />supporting this unfavorable recommendation is that the request is not consistent with the <br />goals, objectives and actions of the Puna Community Development Plan. <br />Regional and/or Community Development Plans are intended to implement the <br />broad goals within the General Plan on a regional basis. They serve to designate and <br />coordinate detailed development patterns and infrastructure needs throughout the County. <br />The plans detail land use policies and infrastructure priorities, transportation, recreation <br />and other major land use policies within each area, and must be developed with <br />participation by the affected communities and adopted by ordinance by the County <br />Council. <br />The Puna Community Development Plan was adopted by the Hawaii County <br />Council, Ordinance 08 116, on September 10, 2008 and was amended: November 4, 2010 <br />by Ordinance No. 10-104; June 8, 2011 by Ordinance Nos. 11-51, 11-52, & 11-53; and <br />December 6, 2011 by Ordinance No. 11-117 & 11-118. <br />The Planning Department received a memo from the Puna Community <br />Development Plan Action Committee. The memo stated: <br />"We find the change of zone request to be consistent with the Puna Community <br />Plan Section 3.2 on Agriculture and Economic Development. <br />• Many areas formerly in sugar cane production and highly suitable <br />for diversified crops are not available for small farming <br />operations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.