My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BIL 311 Draft 03 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Bills
>
1996-1998
>
BIL 311 Draft 03 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2017 3:36:02 PM
Creation date
9/23/2015 3:56:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
BIL
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
1996-1998
Bill/Resolution
311
Draft
03
Introducer
Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd, Council Member
Referred To
COUNCIL
Action 1
PC-165: Recommends passage of Bill 311, Draft 3, on first reading. - 11/05/98
Action 2
Council: Held over due to tie vote - 11/18/98
Action 3
Council: Close File - 11/2/2000 (Note: Main motion at the next reading was to close file per request from the applicant. No further motions were made to approve.)
Document Relationships
COM 1013.002 1996-1998
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
REP PC 165 11/05/1998 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\1996-1998\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
information that identifies the specific approved fair share and/or in lieu <br />contributions, as allocated, and further implementation requirements <br />M. Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fee Ordinance setting forth criteria <br />for imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included <br />herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fee <br />Ordinance. <br />N. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the <br />ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following <br />circumstances: <br />1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been <br />foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicants, successors or <br />assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. <br />2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan <br />or Zoning Code. <br />3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original <br />reasons for the granting of the change of zone. <br />4. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period <br />originally granted for performance (i.e., a condition to be performed <br />within one year may be extended for up to one additional year). <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.