My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BIL 311 Draft 01 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Bills
>
1996-1998
>
BIL 311 Draft 01 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2017 11:02:19 AM
Creation date
9/23/2015 4:01:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
BIL
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
1996-1998
Bill/Resolution
311
Draft
01
Introducer
Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd, Council Member
Referred To
PC
Action 1
PC: Defer Bill 311 (to next PC meeting) - 10/20/98
Action 2
PC: Amends Bill 311 to Draft 2 - 11/5/98
Action 3
Council: Held over due to tie vote - 11/18/1998
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
11/18/1999
Ayes
4-Leithead-Todd, Ray, Santangelo, Smith
Noes
4-Arakaki, Chung, Tyler, Yagong
Absent
1-Reynolds
Excused
0
Document Relationships
COM 1013.000 1996-1998
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
K. Upon compliance with applicable conditions of approval, prior to the <br />establishment of any new use or the opening of the proposed development, the <br />applicant shall submit a final status report, in writing, to the Planning Director. <br />L. Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fee Ordinance setting forth criteria <br />for imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included <br />herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fee <br />Ordinance. <br />M. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the <br />ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following <br />circumstances: <br />1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been <br />foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicants, successors or <br />assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. <br />2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan <br />or Zoning Code. <br />3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original <br />reasons for the granting of the change of zone. <br />4. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period <br />originally granted for performance (i.e., a condition to be performed <br />within one year may be extended for up to one additional year). <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.