My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BIL 240 Draft 01 1996 1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Bills
>
1996-1998
>
BIL 240 Draft 01 1996 1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2021 10:29:38 AM
Creation date
9/25/2015 1:16:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
BIL
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
1996-1998
Bill/Resolution
240
Draft
01
Introducer
Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd, Council Member
Referred To
PC
Action 1
PC: Amends to Draft 2 - 05/15/1998
Document Relationships
COM 0830.000 1996-1998
(Message)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N. Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria <br />for imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included <br />herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees <br />Ordinance. <br />0. Comply with all other applicable laws, rules, regulations and requirements of <br />affected agencies for approval of the proposed development within the subject <br />property. <br />P. An annual progress report shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to <br />each anniversary date of the approval of this change of zone. The report shall <br />address in detail the status of the development and the compliance with the <br />conditions of approval. This condition shall remain in effect until all of the <br />conditions of approval have been complied with and the Director acknowledges <br />that further reports are not required. <br />Q. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the <br />ordinance may be granted by the Director upon the following circumstances: <br />The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been <br />foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or <br />assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. <br />2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan <br />or Zoning Code. <br />3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original <br />reasons for the granting of the change of zone. <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.