My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1000.000 2014-2016
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2014-2016
>
COM 1000.000 2014-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2016 12:04:28 PM
Creation date
8/18/2016 12:07:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2014-2016
Communication
1000
Point
000
Author
William P. Kenoi, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
BIL 231 Draft 01 2014-2016
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2014-2016
REP PC 074 2016/09/07 (2014-2016)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2014-2016\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w <br /> • <br /> • <br /> d. Proposed lots and area of proposed easements and setbacks: With the S <br /> proposed zoning approval, the applicant propose to subdivide the existing lot into two <br /> parcels that would each be approximately 10.61 acres in size, as indicated in the S <br /> Conceptual Subdivision Plan shown in Figure 3. It is expected that the lots will • <br /> have similar conditions as those placed on recently rezoned properties in the Kaloko • <br /> • <br /> Mauka subdivision. These conditions have included a 100-foot wide "forest reserve i <br /> easement" along the existing public street frontage of the subject property, exclusive <br /> • <br /> of access points permitted by the Department of Public Works; a 30-foot"forest • <br /> reserve easement" along all lot lines not covered by the 100-foot easement;and a • <br /> 100-foot wide structural setback in lieu of the required 30-foot setback along the • <br /> property's public street frontage to provide an additional buffer. Additionally, • <br /> restrictive covenant(s)would be included in the deeds of the proposed agricultural • <br /> • <br /> lots, which shall specify the easements and setbacks for each lots. The restrictive • <br /> covenant(s)shall also specify that no less than eighty percent(80%)of the entire lot • <br /> area shall be retained in forest, including the area comprising the forest reserve • <br /> easements described, and further prohibit the construction of a second dwelling on • <br /> each lot. Further, a copy of the proposed covenant(s) is to be recited in an instrument 40 <br /> executed by the applicants and the County and recorded with the Bureau of • <br /> i <br /> Conveyances prior to the issuance of Final Subdivision Approval. a <br /> • <br /> e. Time frame: The application for the subdivision would be filed immediately ' <br /> following zoning approval and is expected to take 6-8 months to receive final • <br /> subdivision approval. • <br /> • <br /> f Parking arrangement: Parking at the existing residences is currently <br /> • <br /> accommodated at each site, as required by the Zoning Code. It is anticipated that <br /> • <br /> there will be only one residential unit on each lot, as per the restriction that would • <br /> be imposed as a condition of the zoning approval. • <br /> • <br /> g. Traffic Impacts: In that the property has two existing residences and water • <br /> • <br /> service to each of the homes, the proposed rezoning would not affect any increase <br /> • <br /> in density or create any additional traffic impacts as a result of the proposed action. • <br /> • <br /> S <br /> 4 • <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.