My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
REP FC 019 2017/05/16 (2016-2018)
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Reports
>
2016-2018
>
Finance Committee (FC)
>
REP FC 019 2017/05/16 (2016-2018)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 8:58:07 AM
Creation date
5/23/2017 8:45:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reports
Reports - Type
REP
Reports - Council Term
2016-2018
Report
019
Committee
FC
Meeting date
2017-05-16
Document Relationships
BIL 032 Draft 01 2016-2018
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2016-2018
COM 0274.000 2016-2018
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2016-2018
ORD 2017-048 2016-2018
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Ordinances\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FC-19 Page 2 May 16, 2017 <br /> Council Members expressed concerns over the number of loads that would be hauled over <br /> Saddle Road to Kona, once the South Hilo Landfill is full. They also expressed concerns over <br /> the dangerous conditions of the travel route and expressed that this was not a popular solution on <br /> the west side. Mr. Goodale estimated 8 loads per day depending on the composting programs. <br /> As far as the travel, Solid Waste looks at post accident conditions, how drivers are trained, how <br /> heavy the loads are, and equipment. Basic safety is always a concern. <br /> Council Member Valerie Poindexter posed the question of how Mr. Tomei came up with the <br /> $20,000,000 figure. Deanna Sako, Deputy Finance Director, responded that they went with the <br /> best estimates from the department knowing that Solid Waste is in the beginning stages. They <br /> want to ensure that the $20,000,000 does not go to another County and a requirement to apply <br /> for the loan is having an ordinance in place. This is only one piece of the puzzle. They still <br /> need to get the design, appropriations and other items done. They would like to get on the list <br /> and have the money held for the County in order to receive the low interest. Mr. Goodale stated <br /> that in order to move forward with the State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan Program, they need <br /> concurrence from the Council and stated he believes it is one of the most economical ways for <br /> the County to get the project done. <br /> Council Member Susan Lee Loy stated it would help the Council to have historical data, <br /> specifically the cost for the closing of the Kona landfill, they can tack on years and growth and <br /> possibly get a better grip on a number that they can compare this project to. Mr. Goodale will <br /> provide the data to council, as far as costs for the Kona landfill, prior to the next meeting. <br /> Ms. Lee Loy asked about the monitoring devices and if it was a separate cost item. Mr. Goodale <br /> explained that the monitoring is part of the construction of the cap and would fall under <br /> operations and maintenance of their annual budget. Currently, they do ground water monitoring <br /> continually and also have landfill gas monitoring probes that are monitored for landfill gas <br /> migration. Upon monitoring, they may also need to install landfill gas vents. There are runoff <br /> channels and controls for storm runoff that needs to be monitored and maintained, and things <br /> that would have to be monitored, maintained, and evaluated regularly. <br /> Council Members expressed approval of moving it forward to Council but would like to see the <br /> historical data from the Kona landfill prior to proceeding. <br /> Pursuant to the County Procedures Manual for Participation in the Hawai`i State Revolving Fund <br /> Loan Program, prepared by the Wastewater Branch of the Hawai`i Department of Health in April <br /> 1994, part of the loan application process requires a "resolution or ordinance passed by the <br /> County Council which authorizes the SRF loan application and identifies the dedicated source(s) <br /> of revenue(i.e., general obligation bonds) which will fund the project and repayment of the loan <br /> with interest." The Council's authorization of the issuance of general obligation bonds will serve <br /> as a pledge of its general obligation authority as security for repayment of the loan and interest. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.