My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0092.036 2016-2018
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2016-2018
>
COM 0092.036 2016-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2017 9:04:36 AM
Creation date
6/27/2017 1:03:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2016-2018
Communication
0092
Point
036
Author
Joyce Alberta Folena
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Document Relationships
BIL 012 Draft 01 2016-2018
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2016-2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
276 LAND AND POWER IN HAWAII 8 /Hawaii:Subdividing Lava Fields 277 <br /> as sugar and pineapple combined.Newsweek in October 1982 wrote that the 1. In 1978 a Big Island realtor placed a general advertisement in a drug cul- <br /> Hawaii marijuana business"by most estimates..".now tops half a billion dol- ture magazine called High Times.Noting that two and three-acre lots in Puna <br /> lars annually." In 1982 sugar was worth $352 million and pineapple $206 could be had for as low as$1,500,the advertisement said:"Yes,Hawaii's Gold <br /> million.In October 1984 the state attorney general estimated that the annual Rush is not only in its smoke,but also in its land.On the Big Island[Hawaii], <br /> marijuana crop value was$3 billion,about the highest estimate so far.If accu- which has gained international fame for its sacred herbs, fantastic land val- <br /> rate this would probably make marijuana Hawaii's number two industry in ues are still available, but for how long?" "Think," the ad prodded, "what <br /> annual revenues.99 land prices will do when legalization occurs." <br /> The Big Island,with all those remote places for growers to hide their oper- With the discreet buyer in mind,the ad also said that sellers would finance <br /> ations,was the state's marijuana capital. Extrapolating from the amount of "with no questions asked," and there would be"total confidentiality on your <br /> marijuana seized by law enforcement officers county by county,in 1982–1983 purchase."52 <br /> the Big Island accounted for about two-thirds of the state's crop.Moreover,by Among the consequences of the ad were telephoned death threats to the <br /> one reliable estimate, marijuana by the early 1980s had become the Big Is- realtor.In an interview for this book,he said he assumed the calls came from <br /> land's single largest industry. Hawaii Business in 1982 estimated the value of marijuana growers who did not want more people in Puna. <br /> the Big Island's 1981 crop at$300–$500 million,as against revenues for Big <br /> Island tourism in 1981 of$180 million and $160 million for lawful agricul- <br /> ture.5° <br /> If the Big Island was Hawaii's marijuana headquarters, then the specula- <br /> tive subdivisions of Puna were the center of the center. Extrapolating from <br /> Big Island police estimates on the percentage of the Big Island crop grown in <br /> Puna, and from amounts of marijuana seized county by county, Puna in <br /> 1982–1983 accounted for about 40% of the total state crops' According to <br /> police most of this was grown by people living in the subdivisions. <br /> The creation of speculative Puna subdivisions required dirt-cheap land in <br /> large parcels,to attract amateur first-time buyers on a mass scale.This in turn <br /> meant the subdivisions were relatively cheap residential areas to move to, a <br /> fact of importance to prospective marijuana growers who were often young <br /> mainlanders with relatively little capital. In fact, moving in might even be <br /> free. So little did the average Puna absentee owner care about his lot, aside <br /> from its appreciation value, that there were occasional squatters—people <br /> who just appeared on a lot and lived there without benefit of the law. <br /> As noted, speculative subdivisions commonly existed only in places far <br /> from other people and jobs, on land usually valueless for other purposes; <br /> waste land or even hazardous. In other words, places where ordinary people <br /> would not really want to live and where indeed few built homes. <br /> All this was desirable to marijuana growers.They needed to be as nearly <br /> invisible as possible, they liked to have very few other people in the vicinity, <br /> and they needed to know by sight everyone else who had business being in a <br /> certain place. And they liked to be able to shift around if they had to. Puna <br /> had the remote spaces for this.With an area as big as Oahu,Puna in 1980 had • <br /> a population only 1.5%of Oahu's. <br /> Athough beginning in the late 1970s there was police pressure on mari- <br /> juana growers,mostly in the form of crop seizures but with occasional arrests, <br /> the main response into the mid-1980s was simply to move the principal culti- <br /> vation areas away from growers' dwellings and deeper into Puna's empty <br /> spaces; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.