|
4
<br /> ' 274 LAND AND POWER IN HAWAII • 8 /Hawaii:Subdividing Lava Fields 275
<br /> In 1975,after the subdividing boom had come and gone,97.5%of all lots principally the efforts of then-County Planning Director Suefuji in rewrit-
<br /> in Puna in subdivisions of 100 or more lots were still vacant. By the end of ing the county subdivision ordinance that choked off the creation of new
<br /> 1983,a quarter-century after the start of the boom,no more than about 5% speculative developments.
<br /> of lots held residences.43 The new ordinance shifted approval of subdivisions away from the
<br /> So whatever the Big Island boom was about, it really was not about actu- County Planning and Traffic Commission to the Planning Director.Where
<br /> ally providing homes. it had been a simple matter for the Commission to grant variances from the
<br /> It was not even about developing subdivisions fully. After all those years, road paving requirements, it was now made mandatory for the director to
<br /> many subdivisions still did not have adequate roads and functioning utilities. require paving, and it was made very difficult for the commission to over-
<br /> 1 Perhaps,in an ironic sense,it was best that the subdivisions never did fill ride him.Where water lines had not been required if a subdivision was more
<br /> up beyond radically low levels, because what would have happened if they than 1,500 feet from a county line, now water lines were mandatory wher-
<br /> became even so much as 25% full in, say, 30 years? What would the costs ever the subdivision might be. The director enforced this provision, and
<br /> have been to the county and the state governments to provide normal.public here again variances were made extremely difficult. The new ordinance
<br /> services to these home owners, living so far from existing population cen- also forced subdivisions to conform to county zoning and the county general
<br /> ters and not even close to each other? plan.If county land use maps did not show a certain area for residential use,
<br /> So appalling was this fiscal prospect that consultants to the Land Use then a residential-type subdivision there would be disallowed.
<br /> Commission wrote in 1963 that"when the provision and maintenance of Suefuji's ordinance was eventually adopted by the County Board of Su-
<br /> public facilities and services are requested and demanded by property own- pervisors in December 1966.48
<br /> ers in these subdivisions . . . both the solvency of the investment and the The era of ever-expanding Big Island speculative subdivisions,with sub-
<br /> government are threatened."94 standard roads,without water or electricity,below a volcano,in the middle
<br /> This view was supported by University of Hawaii Land Study Bureau of a lava field,without houses,had come to an end.
<br /> researchers,who wrote two years later:"The people of the county can only
<br /> hope that these and subsequent developments in the area do not have suf-
<br /> ficient construction activity to necessitate the provision of normal urban
<br /> services,for the costs of their installation and operation would be a fantastic
<br /> burden for the county to assume."45 In the mid-1980s,those boom-time subdivisions were a kind of spectacle
<br /> In the late 1960s Big Island Planning Director Raymond Suefuji said the Big Island possessed, along with active volcanic craters, snowcapped
<br /> that it would actually be cheaper for the County to buy up all those scores of volcanic peaks, papaya trees growing in lava,and the simple vastness of the
<br /> thousands of vacant lots to forestall any more house-building than it would island compared to the rest of the state. If they wanted to, tourists on their
<br /> be to face the financial disaster of having to service a significant percentage way from Hilo to Volcano National Park could wander along rutted roads
<br /> of them some day.46 laid out in perfect grid patterns regardless of the landscape, looking at di-
<br /> lapidated street signs in semi-wilderness, aware of the strangeness of being
<br /> * * * in a lava field,and seeing,every once in a great while,a house.
<br /> The few tourists who actually did venture into a Puna subdivision,particu-
<br /> larly those farthest from the county seat of Hilo, might also encounter some-
<br /> For nine years, 1958-1966, Hawaii County routinely approved specula- thing else: a close,sometimes hostile scrutiny from people living there.
<br /> tive subdivisions. And development of subdivisions approved during that Beginning in the mid-1970s and continuing into the 1980s, many Big
<br /> period continued into the 1970s.Reform was a long,hard-fought process.It Island speculative subdivisions came to have as their major economic use
<br /> took a rising tide of alarm over how to finance services if people should ever something no one could have foreseen at the time of their creation: the
<br /> come in large numbers to live on their lots; a threat from the County Plan- criminal activity of growing marijuana.
<br /> ning Commission to void a large subdivision because the developer for Marijuana being an illegal crop,its total value never turned up in the state's
<br /> years had refused to meet his road-building schedule; weeds growing in economic data book. Still, by all sorts of accounts,it had come to be very big
<br /> many roads because maintenance arrangements did not function; embar- I business in Puna and other districts of the Big Island,as in the state at large.
<br /> rassment over sales injunctions issued in California; and a federal land Most estimates of the early 1980s ranked marijuana as the Islands'third larg-
<br /> fraud prosecution involving the owners of one Big Island project.97 It was est revenue producer,behind only tourism and military spending—but as big
<br />
|