The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOM 0351.001 2016-2018Karen Eoff Chair & Presiding Officer EILEEN O 'HARA Vice Chair AARON S. Y. CHUNG MAILE MEDEIROS DAVID DRU MAMO KANUHA SUSAN L. K. LEE LOY VALERIE T. POINDEXTER HERBERT M. "TIM" RICHARDS, III JENNIFER RUGGLES HAWAII COUNTY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ON PLANNING County of Hawai `i West Hawai `i Civic Center, Bldg. A 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy. Kailua-Kona, Hawai'i 96740 DATE: August 14, r-ri TO: Valerie T. Poindexter, Council Chair And Members of the Hawaii County Council FROM: Karen Eoff, Council Member LAff Council District 8 , .- o� RE: Transmits Powerpoint Material Regarding Bill 52, the Ka`u Community Development Plan, from the Planning Department Attached please find powerpoint material that has been provided by the Planning Department to be presented by Ron Whitmore, regarding Bill 52 on the August 15, 2017, Planning Committee agenda. Thank you. KE/wpb Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (42 pages) Serving the Interests of the People of Our Island Hawai 'i County Is an Equal Opportunity Provider And Employer ftn7ft No. �L Ref. To. Ref. ®ate I°.5 An Overview of the Dratt Ka'U Communitv eve o m e nt P-lan (CDP y --For the County Council, August 15, 2017 Today's Presentation 1. Hawaii County's Community Planning 2. Ka"U CDP Community Planning Process & Products 3. Hot Topics �k 'u Community Development plan Context: Evolution of CoH Community Planning •General Plan: 1971J. 198911 2005 ■ Limited, ad hoc community planning ■ Limited community engagement • 2005 General Plan: Chapter 15 ■ CDPs were a response to a call for a meaningful public role in planning COUNTY OF HAWAII GENERAL PLAN `u Community Development Plan Purpose & Scope of the Ka"Q CDP A Forum for Community Input on: Protecting Natural &Cultural Resources Strengthening Infrastructure & Services Including public facilities, transportation, drainage, and recreation Building a Resilient local Economy Directing land Use zoning, growth, development, and design Specific Regional Actions that implement goals of General Plan . ` -„ .. 4.vup�neshnr Kohals :'rka�u amakm - I➢i (I' Naft 0110 p� R�dmF�rhin kl Spuffi Hilo l North Kom K 40 ma 'u Community Development plan Puna l 16 F1.. I��IIa1ti n& } Kau YI•dl� iy P,�Ila?5 Representative & Credible Steering Committee 0 Ocean View — Patti Barry, Bob DaMate, Loren Heck Kama'oa, Wai'ohinu — Leina'ala Enos Na'alehu — Eldridge Naboa Honu'apo, Ka'alaiki — Michele Galimba Punalu'u — Ron Ebert Mala — Simon Torres Jr, Marino Ramones Non -Voting Committee Member — John Cross The role of the advisory Steering Committee is to: ■ Help County tailor process to Ka'u. ■ Promote process to maximize community participation. ■ Monitor uevelopment of the CDP to ensure Ka'u's best interest. 'u Community Development plan Community Planning 101 ■ What is "the community"? ■ Balance three critical perspectives: ■ Local knowledge, in all its diversity — keep it grounded ■ Local planner and developer knowledge — keep it practical ■ "Best practices" — use the "planner's toolbox" ■ Stay anchored in an open process ■ Community is more than meetings ■ Focus on objective analysis ■ There's an element of truth in every perspective, so everyone wears a learner's hat `u Community Development Plan We're Here to Celebrate ■ Credible Process: participatory, collaborative, strategic, systematic, and transparent ■ Thorough Vetting: community, Steering Committee (x2), agencies ■ Continue the Work: Community Objectives, fact -based analysis, rationale 'u Community Development plan Today's Presentation 1. Hawaii County's Community Planning 2. Ka"U CDP Community Planning Process & Products 3. Hot Topics �k 'u Community Development plan Ka"D CDP Process & Timeline The planning process started Identify with... Vision Learn , bout Ka'u Create CDP 2008 2009 S pteniber -J I (OjMUl ITY ° COMMI Give Values s and Vision Input via Talk Story $essiions R Surveys STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POIM Adopt Values and Vision Statements; Identify Corn munit, Issues and PHDritiel Oirtobtr 161 November } I STEERING COMMITTEE M EETI `, KEY D'Et:6 POINT Adopt Co-, Objec Nes STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POINT Affirm Community Pro [v 2014-2013 2074 PLANNING TEA Ident dy Alternative Wategies to Achieye Ccmmunity Objecti4°e5 PLANNING TEAM Identify Preliminary CDP Strategies trr-.1 Surom.,i Gi}IVIFW1 %A KITTY Review of Draft CDP STEE ING COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POINT Affirm CIS Strategies for Community Review STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Review of Prediminary Strategies 'u Community Development Plan Adopt CDP Tek 2016 STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POINT Recornrnend STEERING Approval of CDP COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POINT Review Community Input COMMUNITY Lead CwwnunKrbmkd Actions COMMUNITY Comment at County Hearings Identify Vision 2008 C0 1UNi Give VaiU4Fs 4ndl Vk1a" IriPUF wca Tiik story sessions r, Sways STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Adopt Values grid Vision Statements, Ic#entlfy Community issues and Priarlties LA `u Community Development Plan Identify Vision Values & Vision based on input from 1,200 Ka'u residents (14% of population, demographically representative of total population) .e "Our sense of'ohana — family is real ingrained 3 44 "Preserve our coastline as well as our natural resou rces:' "We want to see wide open spaces that provide opportunities to hunt and fish." in our people." -- V ' `Ohana t' "We have a simple way of life, a place for solitude where valued family traditions are still practiced." "We have a close knit community — people, - helping people." `Aina, M. atural Resources I "Our rural lifestyle." i ntry, Ru O, Lifestyle resilient, and sustainable economy. 0 Protect and provide reasonable access to natural and recreational resources, including the rnauka forests, the coastline{ open spaces, and park facilities and programs. Strengthen families, communities, and the diversity of local cultures ADOPTED_ by Ka`u CDP Steering Committee 'u Community Development plan Ka"D CDP Process & Timeline The next step in the planning process... ldenti� % �10 or Vision Darn about a`i�reat SDP 2008 ;009 2010-1013 2014 5eF tember - October November MEET] G MEETING KEY D€CIIDN PRINT KEY DECISION POINT • 1(}15 Spring+ Summer i ♦ M + COMMUNITY Review of Draft CDP STEER] ISG COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POINT Affirm CDP Strategies for Community Review KEY DECISION STEERING Adopt Vj COJMUNITY COMMUNITY STEERING PLANNING TEAM eats; iveValues SUMMITS I COMMITTEE ldentiiyAlternative MEETING and Vision MEETING SN tegits to Input via Talk �trdt4gl@S Achieve Community 3101y Sessions I KEY DECISION Objectims & 5u rveys POINT Comwamiq PLAN ING I TEAM I Idem iN . STEER G STEERING Preliminary COW EE COMMITTEECDP Strategies MEET] G MEETING KEY D€CIIDN PRINT KEY DECISION POINT • 1(}15 Spring+ Summer i ♦ M + COMMUNITY Review of Draft CDP STEER] ISG COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POINT Affirm CDP Strategies for Community Review `u Community Development Plan Adopt CDP Take Action Fall!Winter STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION STEERING Adopt Vj sand Affirm CommuntyProfile Recommend Vision St eats; COMMITTEE Identifyl rnunity MEETING , a t 7V1 Priorities Review of Preliminary Review �trdt4gl@S `u Community Development Plan Adopt CDP Take Action Fall!Winter STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING 2016 COP N4UNITY Lead Communitttowd Actions COMMUNITY Co rnrnent at County Hearings KEY DECISION POINT Recommend STEERING ApprovalQfCDP COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DI_CISION PDINT Review Community Input 2016 COP N4UNITY Lead Communitttowd Actions COMMUNITY Co rnrnent at County Hearings Darn about Ka'u 2009 p tr mbar - 4ct obw Narem4rr � I COMMUNITY STEERING SUMMITS COMMITTEE MEETING TREY DECISION INT Aricept [.arnm€onity {ib��ctives [ING STEERING ITTEE 'COMMITTEE INCMEETING 151014POINT HEY DECIiI N POINT apace% and Affirm Community Profile rztem entf: [oMmtiniiy id Prlaritlet a 0 Learn a About P- Ka"O Ka`u Community Development Plan Community Objectives based on Values & Vision and input from Community Summits. ! els I I -� �� i �I.ommunityManage & Conserve "Preserve native Natural Resources forests and Fbjectives coastline." "Access to coastline for "A balance between responsible surfing, progress and keeping°;;; fishin nd gathering. country country:' - ' "A safe community for our families:' i. -ie Preserve & "Jobs that allow our T best and brightest to Strengthen sa stay." C- - pop- Resilien E"More restaurantsa-ra .� ,- serving local products Sustainable {: to increase jobs and local revenue:' Local Economy Ka"D CDP Process & Timeline The third step in the planning Identify two"' Vision learn about l `u 2048 2009 2A]0-2013 Stlp:er-,ber October Novernl1w 4 # (OKIMUNITY1 COMMUNITY Gi%.*vaiues = SUMMITS and Vis[on Inpurt via Talk EF Survfys I STEEFJN COMMITTEE MEETING process... STEERING PLANNING TEAM COMMITTEE identify Alternative Strategies to MEMING , Community KI Kk {{��Cqq.,,l�lea-e Obiect i we � POINT Ac# t C Create CDP 2014 20 S Falb S ringISurnmor Up ammo 11.1 s PLANNING Object�es STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POINT KED' DEL Adopt Values and Affirm Carmmun rf,� P- t Vision Statements, Identity Community Issues and Priarities Co hwtll Rev of Ora CDP STET ING COMMITTEE . MEETING T LJAIVI Identify I KEY DECISION Preliminary Affirm CDP CDP Strategies Strategies for ICommunity Re STEER L�G ([1'.1 `,r1 I TT f E ,41 E E T I' -I rye -%% of Prelim inar. Strate9ies 'u Community Development Plan ITY Adopt CDP Take Action 20] 6 F falMinter STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POl NT Recommend STEERING Approvalof CDP COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POINT Review Community Input COMMUNITY Lead Actions COMMUNITY Comment at Cwnty Hearings Comte CDP � 2010-2013 2014 2015 Feil # # # PLANNING TEAM 7 Ideritbfy Alteriiative COh+tM Uh Strategies to R. view of Ad leve Community praN C[ ObjecOm SHE INC CCiMMffTEE PLANIIIJINCA MEETING TEAM KEY U€CiSION POINT Preliminary Affirm CDP CGP itratr Ins Strategles for C+;1mmUtelty Revlew STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Revlew ai Prefthmly 51ra1a9io-& Create CDP CDP Building Blocks Driven by Community Input �l �Jl�rl L 'U Community Development Plan Types of Policy &Action Strategies in Draft CDP Land Use Policies— Official land Advocacy —Federal, state, use policy guidance (Policy and private actions that Intent &Policy 4�111111111111111 MWAw. help advance CDP Controls) County Actions Official County policies mplementation. mmunity-Based, Collaborative Action — to guide future County priorities Community led initiatives with and initiatives. support from range of agencies and organizations. K1u Community Development pment Pl n When Adopted & Implemented the CDP Will .. . 3 - Direct Future Conservation & Become a County Policy Document; Guide Federal & State Agencies; and Guide Community -Based Action to ... Settlement Patterns 6- Build a Resilient, Sustainable Local Economy 4 - Protect &� _. - , Enhance Natural & Cultural Resources s 0 5 - Strengthen Infrastructure, Facilities, & Services oil 1; f a'O Community Development Plan Ka"D CDP Process & Timeline Identify .6"VW Vision Learn about taro in 2008 2009 September October November COIJAIUNITY COMMUNITY STEERING Civil Valuc SUMMITS COMMITTEL a nd Vision COMMITTEE MEETING Input via Talk KEIT DECISION POINT KEY DECISION POINT Story Sessions Affirm Community Profile KEY DECISION & Surveys Identify Community )DINT Issues and Priorities rept Community ObjKtives STEERING STEERINC COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEETING MEETI'dG KEIT DECISION POINT KEY DECISION POINT Adopt Values and Affirm Community Profile Vision Statements; Strati Identify Community Comm Issues and Priorities Community Review 2010-2013 4 PLANNING TEAM ItlEr�� if}�Iter��ativ� Strategiesto Ac11ieve Community obilective5 Create CDP 2014 2015 Fall Spring£' Wmrre> PLANNING TEAM Identify Preliminary CDP Strategies COMMUNITY Review of D raft COP STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Reviewof Prelin nary Strategies 'u Community Development Plan STE II Co ITTEI ME N KEY KCWON 11 hv . Car runity In p Adopt CDP Take Action 2016 Fall STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING COMMUNITY KEY DECISION Lead POINT Actions Recommend A oval of CDP COMMUNITY Comment at County Hearings STEER G COW EE M EETI G KEY DE SIGN POINT Affirrmn Strati for Comm ' Review STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Reviewof Prelin nary Strategies 'u Community Development Plan STE II Co ITTEI ME N KEY KCWON 11 hv . Car runity In p Adopt CDP Take Action 2016 Fall STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING COMMUNITY KEY DECISION Lead POINT Actions Recommend A oval of CDP COMMUNITY Comment at County Hearings Community Review of Draft CDP Review CDP Download copy or review at libraries, community centers, or County Planning Office. Submit feedback online or by email, fax, or mail. CDP Steering Committee Review of community feedback and make final decision on revision recommendations. Speak -Outs Focused Discussions Participate in in-depth discussions on specific topics that will be held with the CDP Submit feedback in person at informal, drop-in listening sessions to be held in Na`alehu, Ocean View, Pahala, and Discovery Harbour. 'u Community Development plan Planning Team. Ka"D CDP Process & Timeline Identify .6"VW Vision Learn about Ka'o in 2008 2009 September October November COIJAIUNITY COMMUNITY STEERING Civil Valuc SUMMITS Cf MMITTEL a nd Vision MEETING Input via Talk Story Sessions KEY DECISION & Surveys )DINT rept Community ObjKtives STEERING STEERING COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEETING MEETING KEIT DECISION POINT KEY DECISION POINT Adopt Values and Affirm Community Profile Vislon StatemQnts; Identify Community Issues and Priorities Steering Committee Recommendation Create CDP 2010-2013 2014 4 6 PLANNING TEAM Iden! ify Alterffiative Ssrategiesto Ac11ieve Coram unity obilective5 PLANNING TEAM Identify Preliminary CDR Strategies em S finvSumrner ♦ 4 # 6 GVIV11"UN! Review of Draft CDP STEEI�IN�G COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POINT Affirm CDP Strategies for Commursity Review STEERING COMMITTEE MERK Reviewof Preliminary Strategies 'u Community Development Plan FelflllYiat STEERING CO WITTIE MEETI NIG KEY DECISION POINT RK end EERING "val of CDP )MMITTEE FETING DECISION NT Comm unity Input 2016 COMMUNITY Lead Actions COM19 W ITy Comrne� Cou o Orientation to Communication 351 ■ Planning Director's Recommendation ■ Background ■ CDP Program ■ Plan Elements ■ Planning Process ■ CDP Implementation ■ Exhibits ■ Exhibit 1: Ka`u CDP ■ Exhibit 2: Strategy Rationale ■ Exhibit 3: Comment Summary ■ Remaining Exhibits: Comment ■ Minutes of the Windward Planning Commission `u Community Development Plan Agency Review Agency Review: January 25 — March 4, 2016 Co u my i State ■ Federal ■ Private Organizations OF 9 59 5 ,9 `u Community Development Plan Agency Comments Non -substantive: typos, style, updates Lack of understanding: CDP strategies, GP -CDP relationship, rationale Substantive Support Differences in interpretation or opinion ■ Discovery Harbour ■ Implementation 'u Community Development plan Recommendations from the Planning Director & Windward Planning Commission ■ Bottom Line: recommend adoption of the Ka"u- CDP, including non -substantive revisions ■ Agency recommendations ■ Organizational improvements ■ Clarification 'u Community Development plan Ka"O CDP Process & Timeline Identify & aeyond Vision Learn about Ka`u 2008 Sep { COIJMUNITY Give Values and Vision Input via Talk Story Sessions & Surveys '.009 tem ber October w j , COMMUNITY SUMMITS STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING November ! STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POINT Adopt Community Objectives STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING KEY DECISION POINT KEY DECISION POINT Adopt Values and Affirm Community Profile Vision Statements; Identify Community Issues and Priorities Create CDP 2010-2413 2014 i PLANNING TEAM Identify Alternative Strategies to Achieve Community Objectives PLAN ING TEAM Identify Preliminary CDP Strategies Adopt CDP Take Action 2015 Fall Spring/Summer Fall/Winter Strategies for Community Review STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Review of Preliminary Strategies Ka'u Community Development plan KEY DECISION POINT Review Community Input 2016 P. i COMMUNITY Lead Community-based Actions COMMUNITY Comment at County Hearings ST RING COMMUNITY CC MITTEE Review of Draft CDP MI TING STEE ING KE) DECISION COMMITTEE PO T MEETING Ret mmend 5EERING App oval of CDP KEY DECISION POINT COMMITTEE Affirm CDP MEETING Strategies for Community Review STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Review of Preliminary Strategies Ka'u Community Development plan KEY DECISION POINT Review Community Input 2016 P. i COMMUNITY Lead Community-based Actions COMMUNITY Comment at County Hearings Today's Presentation 1. Hawaii County's Community Planning 2. Ka"U CDP Community Planning Process & Products 3. Hot Topics �k 'u Community Development plan In v or Recent Public Input Land Use Scope of CDPs ■ "forum for community input into managing growth" ■ "direct physical development" ■ "designate and coordinate detailed development patterns" "may contain detailed land use and zoning guide maps 11 "the Steering Committee may recommend amendments [to the General plan]....If there is a direct conflict between the CDP and the General Plan, the General Plan shall be controlling." Iia'u Community Development p n Ka"Ei CDP Land Use Policy Controls that Don't Simply Re-inforce Existing Policy Use Policy Mai, including Urban Growth Boundaries (Policies 7, 8, 9, 39) ■ Shoreline Setback (Policy 28) ■ Scenic Impact Analysis & Mitigation in Rezones and Special & Use Permits (Policies 56, 57, 58) Importantly, the Ka'u- CDP does NOT amend the General Plan or County Code — it includes follow-up actions to do that. 'u Community Development plan Planning Director Recommendations ■ Refine language in Sections 1.1.1, 1.1.3, 2.111 2.2, and 2.4 to clarify the purpose of CDPs relative to General Plan ■ Refine language in Policies 7, 39, and 93 per the above ■ Change "shall" to "should" in Policy 13 ■ Change "shall" to "should" in Policy 94 'u Community Development plan Planning Director Recommendations 'Ike aku, 'ike mai, kbkua aku kokua mai; pe15 iho la ka nohona 'ohnna. Recognize others, be recognized, help others, be helped; such is a family relationship. Mart/ Kavrena P0kul, 'CD lelo no'eau 2.1 Purpose Community Development Plans (CDPs) are introduced in Char)ter 15 of the Hawaii County General Plan. The purpose of Ceanty ef Hawaii'm CDPs} is to implement the broad goals within the General Pian on a regional basis and to translate the broad General Plan statements to specific actions. CDPs are the forum for community input into managing growth and coordinating the delivery of government services to the community. CDPs designate detailed development patterns and direct physical development and public improvements by detailing land use policies and infrastructure priorities. 2.2 Relationship to the General Plan NaFi. In the case of direct conflicts between a CDP and the General Plan, the General Plan pFev shall be controlling. In order to bring the Ka'u CDP and the General Plan into alignment, the CDP recommends specific amendments to the General Plan as a follow-up to the CDP (see Policy 15 on page 40, Policy 16 on page 40, and Policy 101 on page 73). I `u Community Development Plan Planning Director Recommendations 3.4 Land Use Policy Policy i With the adoption of the Ka'u CDP, Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 on pages 41 through 46 are adopted as the official Land Use Policy Map for the Ka'u CDP planning area. The land use category definitions are identical to those used in the General Plan LUPAG map (and included in the Glossary). Future land use decisions in the Ka'u CDP planning area shall be consistent with the Land Use Policy Map boundaries, designations , and policies herein, unless the CDP and the General Plan are in direct conflict. palliev Dote: Policy 15 and Policy 16 on page 40 are follow-up County Actions to amend the General Plan to conform with the official KaTj CDP Land Use Policy Map. 3.5 County Action Policy 15 Amend the General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide and, as needed, State Land Use boundaries, to conform with the official Ka'u CDP Land Use Policy Map. 'u Community Development plan Shoreline Structural Setback: Majestic Kali `u Community Development Plan Shoreline Structural Setback (Policy 28) Exhibit 2: pages 34-36 "Limit development on the shoreline" is one of the highest priorities for the Ka`u community: subsistence, recreation, culture, ecosystems, views Economic benefits and costs: structures near the shoreline provide little economic benefit, but they impact one of the community's greatest economic assets One of complimentary strategies: SLU Conservation, LUPAG Conservation &Open, SMA Setback is most effective because it's about siting. `u Community Development Plan Shoreline Structural Setback: Majestic Kali `u Community Development Plan Shoreline Structural Setback (Policy 28) Exhibit 2: pages 34-36 ■ Counties can establish setbacks by rule or ordinance at distances greater than 40 feet. ■ Planning Department Rule 11-5 establishes the minimum shoreline setback at 40 feet, but the County has no protocol for establishing shoreline setbacks. ■ Because of the unique conditions in different coastal areas, a strong case can be made for adapting setbacks to local conditions. 'u Community Development plan w Coastal Phows Shoreline Resour�� 41� Natural Beauty Site _ Hawksbill Nesting Area 0 Anch iali ne Pond Shoreline Public Access r r , __ �� r ■ ■ Public Access 4 _ ;ti. - �,�:,� _ ■ ■ gess with Resarxrovns 1003 r# 1 4 ■ ■ Azaess is Controversial �x"u r �•� f: ■ ■ Access K" Established - 3950NOO1 ■ ■ Unknown } Rd LAN e Ala Ka halm Corridor ? X 4001009 . MENPublic. L[rcatlfln CaMmned, t=6laGilsdl�d _man UMme's. •� ..� �' s � .y I ` �;}:�S °E3t7115t1Z4 ,. Fr,.a:Pi, _tan Cq'TtITIIeC. AD=-S1 4cr., Esta etl + .6. *r t # `. ��■■ Pr-rale, -fin Not on lrmc-d. P[ 5 Nal E=bl�,,'red K J # Th1K boundaries. a `� �6 Fish Pcnds -•. E � `..•_` .- • P . Y"''J7 -__ - - - _._.. :.; a:... � Tsunarrri Evac Zone aFIRM-A ' as Special ManagementArea .7 � ••,�; �ry��I,•.' - ,,,,.�,� � 5W Feet Inland 1,000 Feet I nland { ,.•�,. 1,320 Feet Inland 'w : 2,000 Feel Inland Ka'alu'aiu Bay Mate Land Use Agricultural Conservation Rural `u Community Development Plan Urban Impact of Policy 28 Exhibit 2: pages 34-36 ■ When: proposed development on lots that are at least partially within the Special Management Area (SMA) in Ka'u 1,320 feet (1/4 -mile) ■ Distance of coastal resources from the shoreline in Ka'u ■ %-mile standard used by planners to assess the "walkable" distance to sites of interest ■ Community wants it much deeper — up to 1.5 miles ■ Applicant's Option: make a case for a different setback as part of SMA review ■ Effect: doesn't affect permitted uses 'u Community Development plan We're Here to Celebrate 4. ■ Credible Process: participatory, collaborative, strategic, systematic, and transparent ■ Thorough Vetting: community, Steering Committee (x2),, agencies ■ Continue the Work: Community Objectives, fact -based analysis, rationale ■ So ... debate and improvement are welcome 'u Community Development plan 0- 27- 41� ,_ �` .-- a :`� �;" _ . t�j� � c$ �:�: � �'4. r • _ . � _ -