My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0450.000 2016-2018
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2016-2018
>
COM 0450.000 2016-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 9:15:43 AM
Creation date
9/19/2017 11:44:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2016-2018
Communication
0450
Point
000
Author
Bonnie S. Nims, Legislative Auditor
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
FC: Filed - 10/3/17.
Document Relationships
AGE FC 2017/10/03 (2016-2018)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2016-2018\Finance Committee (FC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Caretaker 1) were selected since the positions were open -competitive recruitments on a <br />continuous basis for three years resulting in a large and ever changing referred list. The fourth <br />class of work (Scale Attendant) was selected because the SRC did not follow uniform written <br />procedures. Recruitments in 2017 were not reviewed due to a hiring freeze enacted by current <br />Administration. The hiring freeze was in effect until departments updated their procedures. <br />We reviewed updated interview and selection policies and procedures implemented by DEM, <br />DPW, Finance, and P&R in December 2016 and January 2017. <br />We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government <br />auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain <br />sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions <br />based on our audit objectives. We believe the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis <br />for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. Our conclusions on the <br />effectiveness of these controls are detailed within this report. <br />We thank the Department of Human Resources, Recruitment and Examination Division staff, <br />and all other departments that provided us information, assistance, and cooperation during this <br />audit. Management generally agreed with the comments and recommendations in this report. <br />Their complete response to this audit can be found on page 20: Department's Comments. <br />Commendations & Noteworthy Accomplishments <br />We are pleased to report that the new Office of the Mayor and the Department of Human <br />Resources (DHR) has taken a proactive role in strengthening certain controls we identified as <br />weaknesses during the course of the audit. Additionally, we appreciate the cooperation <br />exhibited by DHR and the departments and their willingness to implement many of our <br />recommendations. For instance, DHR has asserted they have: <br />• communicated to all the departments, that the Office of the Mayor and DHR will not be <br />involve in the hiring selection process and eliminated the Staffing Review Committee <br />(SRC); <br />• established a template for interview and selection procedures to include a more uniform <br />and transparent process; <br />• closed all open -competitive recruitments on a continuous basis that were not "difficult -to - <br />fill"; <br />• assisted departments with conducting skill set criteria evaluation; and <br />• provided mandatory training (e.g., interview, skill set development evaluation, etc.) to <br />those responsible for hiring. <br />In addition, DEM consistently followed policies and procedures in their interviewing and <br />selection processes throughout the audit period. <br />Commendations & Noteworthy Accomplishments 8 1 P a g e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.