My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0656.000 2016-2018
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2016-2018
>
COM 0656.000 2016-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 4:36:40 PM
Creation date
12/20/2017 3:59:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2016-2018
Communication
0656
Point
000
Author
Harry Kim, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2018/01/24 2016-2018
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2016-2018\Council
AGE COUNCIL 2018/02/07 2016-2018
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2016-2018\Council
AGE PC 2018/01/03 (2016-2018)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2016-2018\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 088 Draft 01 2016-2018
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2016-2018
REP PC 043 2018/01/03 (2016-2018)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2016-2018\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
seem like it is a lot of record through the Planning Department even though we don't have a <br /> number to say that it was a legitimate subdivision. <br /> HENKEL: Okay, I'm a little more understanding now. I mean, I was wondering if there's such <br /> a place as Orchid Isle Subdivision. That's up near Volcano, I think, right? Orchid Isle <br /> Subdivision. <br /> GAGORIK: It's further, yeah, going up— <br /> HENKEL: —And they've been paying taxes. There is some development even though it's <br /> probably substandard. <br /> GAGORIK: Yeah, right. <br /> HENKEL: Like the other 1960's subdivisions. And they have a road maintenance corporation <br /> probably? <br /> GAGORIK: Probably, most likely they'll have a road maintenance. And in the last maybe six <br /> months or so, we've had multiple requests from individuals where they will ask uscan you <br /> determine if this is a lot of record, and when we go through all our files, we don't have any <br /> legitimate subdivision and we see that these individuals have-it's been owned by multiple <br /> people, there was a building permit taken out on this, they've been paying taxes all these years, <br /> and we actually had to say no, you're not a lot of record! And, it hurts us, too, as a planning <br /> department, but we have to follow the law, and that's why we wanted to add these conditions so <br /> that it would recognize those lots that are under these circumstances. <br /> CLARKSON: Well, what is a lot of record then? I mean, obviously, the Tax Department <br /> thought they were a lot. The Building Department thought they were a lot. The State thinks that <br /> they're a lot, the Bureau of Conveyances. What, what do they—so, the only difference between <br /> a lot and a lot of record is one that has a number assigned by the Planning Department? <br /> GAGORIK:. And, there are other situations that are explained in this section of the Code also. <br /> Prior to the Subdivision Code becoming approved as through ordinance, there was a Traffic <br /> Commission way back in the forties that was under the Department of Public Works, and they <br /> approved subdivisions. So, there are some records with that, that we can go back to, but we <br /> don't have a complete record which is why we included that section to recognize that there may <br /> be some lots that were created before the Subdivision Code. But people have to come to us with <br /> background information to support their request that it would be a lot of record, and they usually <br /> have some deeds and things of that sort to recognize that the property had existed. <br /> CLARKSON: One more question. Then, why, why is it bad if you can sell it, you're getting <br /> taxed on it and all that other stuff, why do people need it to be a lot of record? Why do they <br /> want that title added to their property? <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.