My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
REP FC 083 2018/02/20 (2016-2018)
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Reports
>
2016-2018
>
Finance Committee (FC)
>
REP FC 083 2018/02/20 (2016-2018)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:14:11 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 3:43:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reports
Reports - Type
REP
Reports - Council Term
2016-2018
Report
083
Committee
FC
Meeting date
2018-02-20
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2018/03/14 2016-2018
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2016-2018\Council
BIL 098 Draft 02 2016-2018
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2016-2018
COM 0712.000 2016-2018
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2016-2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FC-83 Page 2 February 20, 2018 <br /> Council Member Aaron Chung stated his concern was that there are no checks and balances. The Salary <br /> Commission is the final arbiters and what they think is fair is final. Mr. Chung noted that the Salary <br /> Commission does things incrementally and feels generally people do not have a problem with raises; <br /> however, when it is up to 40 percent and the bargaining units are fighting for small increments, it's hard <br /> to explain that to the public. <br /> Committee Chair Maile David thanked Ms. Lee Loy for bringing this item forward and stated she would <br /> like to hear from the Salary Commission because any amendments Ms. Lee Loy entertains will make <br /> sense after giving the Salary Commission the opportunity to speak about the process. <br /> Ms. Lee Loy postponed Bill 98 to February 20, 2018, Finance Committee meeting in Kona, and placed <br /> on the agenda when the Salary Commission would be able to present its comments and input, with <br /> discussion on this bill to follow. <br /> February 20, 2018 <br /> Ms. Lee Loy stated if the Salary Commission is a body with authority to institute raises and impact the <br /> County's Operating Budget, they should be held to a higher standard,just like the Council. Ms. Lee Loy <br /> feels that the Council needs to give the electorate the ability to engage because they are the ones who <br /> pay the bills and, therefore, should have a seat at the table. <br /> Mr. Richards commented that there is no question as to the level of work of the Salary Commission in <br /> reviewing salaries and also the level of professionalism as to what is being evaluated. <br /> Council Member Eileen O'Hara stated she appreciates the work the Salary Commission is doing but <br /> feels there is a lack of transparency. Ms. O'Hara commented that it's important that the public be given <br /> notice, and a notice published in newspapers as well so that the public is made aware of the process and <br /> have knowledge of that before the actual meetings. If the electorate decides, Ms. O'Hara feels the <br /> County Charter should be amended to allow for additional public process. <br /> Council Chair Valerie T. Poindexter commented that the public should be able to "chime"in, and further <br /> added that with this amendment, the public would not be part of the decision making, however, leaving <br /> it up to the voters to decide if they would want this or not. Ms. Poindexter also stated that the Salary <br /> Commission had put a lot of thought and hard work into their decisions, and she even inquired with the <br /> Finance Department as to how it would impact the budget and if there was money for the pay <br /> adjustments. Ms. Poindexter does not want to give the public false hope, stating that if this amendment <br /> is put in place, the public would be giving input but will not be involved in the decision. <br /> Council Member Jennifer Ruggles asked Ms. Lee Loy whether the Commission held public hearings in <br /> the past. Ms. Lee Loy responded that the Salary Commission operates the same as any other board or <br /> commission. Ms. Lee Loy noted that in this situation, the discussion took place but the,proposal itself <br /> was distributed at the meeting. She stated that some of the decisions made were on the day the proposal <br /> was given and the reason behind the amendment relating to the Salary Commission. <br /> Mr. Chung commented that he is in support of this amendment. The current Charter provision <br /> was borne out of the desire to de-politicize the system. He noticed he was in favor of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.