Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 562 Draft 01 2016-2018 5IOFN, COUNTY OF HAWAII i*_ �.','�%'�..- . • STATE OF HAWAII ;.P1..•..4.,;.;-.--01A:0 r ei:.1'1..PV RESOLUTION NO. 562 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AMENDING THE 2015-2019 COUNTY OF HAWAII CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND 2018 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR THE COUNTY OF HAWAII COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT, HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAMS, AND NATIONAL HOUSING TRUST FUND AND AUTHORIZING. THE MAYOR OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII TO EXECUTE AND SUBMIT THE AMENDED CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND ALL OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, the County of Hawaii is.a direct recipient of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program funds from the.United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and WHEREAS, the County is a State recipient of HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program funds and has included its proposed goals and priorities for the HOME funds for informational purposes; and WHEREAS, the County is a State recipient of Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Program funds and has included its proposed goals and priorities for the HTF funds for informational purposes; and WHEREAS, it required by HUD that the County submit a Consolidated/Action Plan, in accordance with Subpart C of 24 CFR Part 91, which include housing and homeless needs assessments, housing market analysis, five- year goals and priorities, project monitoring procedures; and WHEREAS, the Consolidated Plan is a five-year (2015-2019) plan that indicates the County's goals and priorities for the use of CDBG, HOME and HTF funds for housing, homeless, special needs and community development; and WHEREAS, the Annual Action Plan is a yearly plan that includes the actual projects and activities that will be carried out with the County's CDBG funds; and WHEREAS, it is required by HUD that before the County of Hawaii receives its annual CDBG allocation, the.County shall submit its Annual.Action Plan as required by the Consolidated Plan; and WHEREAS, the CDBG projects and activities must meet the priorities and objectives as described in the Consolidated Plan; and WHEREAS, it is required by HUD that the County of Hawaii submit certifications assuring conformance to related rules, regulations and laws of the CDBG Program; and WHEREAS, a timely submission of the Consolidated/Action Plan for CDBG, HOME and HTF funds, in accordance with appropriate federal regulations, is necessary; and WHEREAS, the Office of Housing and Community Development is providing the following exhibits for reference: Exhibit A — 2018 Action Plan Project List Exhibit B — 2018 Citizen Participation Process and CDBG Action Plan Schedule Exhibit C — Request for Proposal Process Exhibit D — Project Recommendation and Rating Sheet Exhibit E — 2018 Amended Consolidated Plan and Action Plan ; and WHEREAS, Hawaii Revised Statutes, Section 46-7, requires that County departments obtain the consent of the Council to enter into agreements with the federal or state governments respecting action to be taken pursuant to any of the powers granted by law to furnish, expend, and receive any funds or other assistance in connection with projects being or to be undertaken pursuant to those powers; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY-THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII, in accordance with section 46-7, Hawaii Revised Statutes, that the Mayor of the County of Hawai`i is authorized to execute; on behalf of the County, an agreement and related documents with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and the State Hawai'i Housing Finance and Development Corporation for the 2018 CDBG, HOME and HTF funds. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Amended 2015-2019 Consolidated and 2018 Annual Action Plan is hereby approved and adopted and the Mayor of the County of Hawai'i or, in his absence, the Acting Mayor or authorized representative is hereby authorized to executeand submit the Amended 2015-2019 Consolidated and 2018 Annual Action Plan and all other related documents and agreements necessary to process the CDBG, HOME and HTF Programs to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and State of Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County shall utilize the CDBG, HOME and HTF funds in accordance with program rules.and.regulations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor or his authorized representative is designated to act as the representative of the County. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the County Clerk shall transmit a copy of this resolution to the Office of the Mayor and the Office of Housing and Community Development. Dated at Kona Hawai`ii, this 25th day of April , 2018. INTRODUCED BY: 41111111101111w'PAW/4,/ / COUNCIL MEM-ITER • NTY OF HA ' All COUNTY COUNCIL ROLL CALL VOTE County of Hawai`i AYES NOES ABS EX Hilo, Hawai`i CHUNG X DAVID x I hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION was by EOFF X the vote indicated to the right hereof adopted by the COUNCIL of the KANUHA X County of Hawaii on April 25, 2018 . LEE LOY X O'HARA X ATTEST: POINDEXTER X RICHARDSX • • 6f...1"/\Q RUGGLES 'X �� 9 0 0 0 Reference: C-851/FC-103 COUNTY CLERK CHAIRPERSON&PRESIDING OFFICER RESOLUTION NO. 562 Exhibit A 2018 Action Plan Project List COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM The County of Hawai ' i estimates receiving $2, 428 , 055 . 00 for its 2018 CDBG allocation. In addition, the County anticipates receiving $100, 000 . 00 of program income from the Residential. Repair Program (RRP) for .a total of $2, 528, 055 . 00 . This amount is an approximation and the County will proportionally adjust its proposed project.. funding levels by increasing or decreasing the actual project amountsto the actual funds received. To meet the County' s five (5) year 2015-2019 CP, Priorities and Objectives, the following projects will be included in the 2018 AP. 2018 CDBG Projects Amount Paradise Park Fire Station - Wildland 4X4 Brush Truck $ 270, 000.00 Kulaimano Elderly Renovations $ 850, 000.00 Hale Maluhia Men' s Shelter - Roof & ADA Improvements $ 151, 742. 00 Kiheipua Family Shelter - Roof and Kitchen Renovations $ 137, 753. 00 Boys and Girls Club .— Gym and Paving. Improvements $ 571, 560.00 Boys and Girls Club - Van Acquisition $ 47, 000.00 Administration, Planning & Fair Housing $ 500, 000.00 Total $2, 528, 055. 00 The CDBG project amount for all projects may change to accommodate the actual amount of grant funds or program income received or if there are any cancelled project (s) or reprogramming of CDBG funds . In its efforts to expedite and timely implement its .projects, the. Public is advised that the County of Hawaii may utilize County funds for the Kulaimano Elderly Renovation project to incur pre-award cost under the CDBG program that will not exceed 25% of current CDBG allocation. This is in accordance with the CDBG regulations 24 CFR 570 . 200 (h) (1) , Reimbursement for pre-award costs . HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) PROGRAM The State of Hawai 'i is required to submit its 2015-2019 CP and AP to HUD for the 20.18 HOME program. The County of Hawai ' i 2261hbmi anticipates it will receive approximately $2, 375, 000 . 00 for the 2018 HOME Program. In addition, the County anticipates receiving $50, 000 . 00 of program income for a total of $2, 425, 000 .00 . To prepare for the 2018 HOME program, the County requested project proposals and will submit the following projects to the State of Hawai' i HHFDC for approval. 2018 HOME Projects Amount Kaloko Heights Affordable Housing $ 1, 400, 000 . 00 Tenant Base Rental Assistance Program $ 900, 000 . 00 OHCD Administration $ 125, 000 . 00 Total$ 2, 425, 000 . 00 The amount for the all HOME projects may change to accommodate the actual allocation of HOME Project funds, program income received or if there areany cancelled or reprogramming of HOME funds . The Administration amount will change to the actual allocation of Administration funds received from the State. In its efforts to expedite and timely implement its projects, the Public is advised that the County of Hawaii may utilize County funds to incur pre-award costs under the HOME Program that will not exceed 25% of the current HOME allocation amount . This is in accordance with the HOME regulations 24 CFR 92 . 212 (c) , Pre- award Costs, Project Costs . HOUSING TRUST FUNDS (HTF) PROGRAM The State of Hawai ' i is required to submit its 2015-2019 CP and AP to HUD for the 2018 HTF program. The County of Hawai ' i anticipates it will receive approximately $1, 425, 000 . 00 for the 2018 HTF Program. To prepare for the 2018 HTF program, the County requested project proposals and will submit the following projects to the State of Hawai' i HHFDC for approval . . 2261 hbmi • 2018 HTF Projects Amount Kaloko Heights Affordable Housing $ 1, 350, 000 . 00 OHCD Administration $ 75, 000 . 00 Total$ 1, 425, 000 . 00 The amount for . the HTF .project may change to accommodate the actual allocation of HTF Project funds, program income received or if .there are any cancelled or reprogramming of HTF funds . The Administration amount will change_ to the actual allocation of Administration funds received from the State . • 2261hbmi Exhibit B 2018 Consolidated/Action Plan Schedule DATE TASK Public hearings to hear the Housing & Community Development needs and explain the CDBG/HOME/HTF proposal procedures and Consolidated/Action Plan process. 10/09/17 Pahala•: •. . : Pahala Community Center,, 10:00 a.m. 10/09/17 Pahoa: Pahoa Community Center, 2:30 p.m. 10/11/17 .Kona: West Hawaii Civic Center, 10: 00 a.m. 10/11/17 Honokaa:. Honokaa Gym/MPR Room, 3: 00 p.m. 10/13/17 Hilo: Existing Housing Conference Room, 10: 00 a.m. 10/16/17 CDBG/HOME/HTF project proposals available. 01/11/18 CDBG/HOME/HTF project proposals due to the OHCD. 01/12-29/18 OHCD to review, rank, and select CDBG/HOME/HTF projects for the County' s Action Plan to HUD. 01/30-02/06/18 OHCD todraft the County's proposed 2018 Action Plan. 02/13/18 Public notice appears in newspapers, announcing the availability of the proposed 2018 Action Plan for public review and comment. 02/14/18 to Comment period for the County's 03/16/18 Action Plan (30 days required) . 03/20/18 Deadline tosubmit documents for. Finance meeting. 04/10/18 Finance meeting to approve Action Plan. 04/17/18 Deadline to submit documents for Hawai'i County Council 04/25/18 , ' Council meeting to authorize Mayor to sign and submit County's 2015-20.19 Consolidated/Action Plan to HUD. 05/03/18 Obtain Mayor's signature. 05/04/18 Public Notice appears in newspapers summarizing the final 2018 Action Plan. 05/08/18 Mail 2018 Action Plan to HUD. 05/15/18 . . 2018 Action Plan due. 2262hbmi Exhibit C - Request for Proposal Process The County distributes its CDBG/HOME/HTF allocations through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process.. This competitive process is intended to ensure that the projects funded by the County are consistent with the County's Consolidated Plan (CP) priorities and objectives, are eligible for CDBG/HOME/HTF funds., and can be implemented in a timely manner. In order to rate and rank the projects, the OHCD has developed the County project selection system. The system is intended to ensure that the projects submitted to HUD are eligible for funds and can be implemented in a timely manner. The project must also be consistent with the priorities and objectives in the CP. Three raters review each project proposal. Projects that meet the threshold requirements are rated. The scores are totaled and the projects are ranked in order of the points awarded. The project proposals that do not meet the threshold requirements are deemed not eligible and not rated. Based on the ratings, the OHCD contacts each applicant to determine whether the project can be completed withthe amount of fundsthat is recommended. The final recommendation is made by the OHCD and provided to the Mayor for concurrence and to the Finance Committee and Council for approval. 2263hbmi Exhibit D-Project Recommendation and Rating 2018 HOME PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATION 2018 HOME ALLOCATION: $ 2,375,000.00 2018 Anticipated Program Income: $ 50,000.00 TOTAL: $ 2,425,000.00 FUNDED :. Project Name: Requested Funded District Organization Points Kaloko Heights Affordable Housing Project $ 2,300,000.00 $ 1,400,000.00 8 iwaiiIsland Community Development Cc -2565. Tenant Base Rental.Assistance Program(TBRA) $: 1,500,000.00 $ 900,000.00 All OHCD-Existing Housing Division 2395 OHCD-Administration $ 125,000.00 $ 125,000.00 N/A OHCD N/A Total $ 3,925,000.00 $ 2,425,000.00 NOT FUNDED Project Name Requested Funded District Organization Points Nani 0 Puna $ 1,475,000.00 $ - 5 AHED Foundation 2350 Kaiaulu 0 Waikoloa $ 2,300,000.00 $ - 9 Ikaika Ohana 2175 West Kawili Street Senior Project $ 1,000,000.00 $ - 3 Hui Kauhale Inc. 2095 Home Is Key $ 906,000.00 $ - _ 5 Habitat for.Humanity West Hawaii 1225 Total $. 5,681,000.00 Exhibit D-Project Recommendation and Rating 2018 CDBG PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATION 2018 CDBG ALLOCATION: $2,428,055.00 ANTICIPATED PROGRAM INCOME: $100,000:00_ TOTAL: $2,528,055.00 FUNDED Project Name Requested ' Funded District Organization Points 00 000 $270,000.00 270, . Paradise Park Fire Station-Wildland 4X4 Brush Truck $ 4 Fire Department 2243.75 Kulaimano Elderly Renovations $850;000.00 $850,000.00 1 OHCD-Development 1896.25 Hale Maluhia(Men&Elderly) Shelter-Roof/ADA Improver $151,742.00 $151,742.00 3 _Hope Services 1585.00 Kihiepua(Family) Shelter-Roof and Certified Kitchen. Improvements $137,753.00_ $137,753.00 3 ,Hope Services 1585.00 Boys and Girls Club-Gym and Paving Improvement: $571,560.00 $571,560.00,: 3 Boys and Girls Club 1566.25 Boys and Girls Club-4 Van Acquisition $189,200.00 $47,000.00 3 _Boys and Girls Club 1507.50 OHCD-Administration, Planning and Fair Housing $500,000:00 $500,000.00 . N/A OHCD N/A Total $2,670,255.00 $2,528,055.00 NOT FUNDED Project Name Requested Funded District Organization Points None Total $0.00 Exhibit D - Project Recommendation and Rating 2018 HTF PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATION 2018 HTF Allocation $ 1,425,000.00 2018..Anticipated Program Income TOTAL: $ 1,425,000.00 FUNDED Project Name Requested Funded District : Organization Points Kaloko Heights Affordable Housing $1,350,000.00 $ 1,350,000.:00. 8 Hawaii Island Community Development Corp. 2365 OHCD-Administration $75,000.00 $ . 75,000.00 N/A OHCD N/A Total $1,425,000.00 $ 1,425,000.00 NOT FUNDED Project Name Requested Funded District Organization . Points Nani 0 Puna $ 1,425,000.00, $ - 5 AHED Foundation 2200 West Kawili Street Senior Project $ 716,820.00 $ 3 Hui Kauhale Inc. ` 2070 Kaiaulu 0 Waikoloa $ 1,425,000.00 $ -. 9 Ikaika Ohana 1925 Total $ 3,566,820.00 3/19/2018 Exhibit "E" STEWART MAEDA •oY qF JON HENRICKS County Clerk � �t���j�: Deputy County Clerk w tr c' .rrMof:•'.. County of Hawai`i Office of the County Clerk 25 Aupuni Street,Suite 1402 • Hilo,Hawai`i 96720 (808)961-8255 • Fax (808)961-8912 Resolution 562-18 The 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and the 2018 Action Plan of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan, both of which are referenced in Resolution 562-18 as Exhibit E, are not made a part of the duplicate copies of this document, due to their size, but are available for viewing in the Office of the County Clerk and in the Council Records section of the County's home page. Serving the Interests of the People of Our Island Hawai`i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. Consolidated Plan 2015-2019 County of Hawai' i Harry Kim Mayor Prepared by: County of Hawai' i Office of Housing and Community Development 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 VITT Phone: (808) 961-8379 Fax: (808) 961-8685 Email: ohcdcdbg@hawaiicounty.gov Cover and Signature Page Amended Consolidated Plan 2015-2019 Name of Grant Recipient: County of Hawaii Contact Person/Title: Neil S. G otoku Housing Administrator Phone: 8081961-8379 Fax: 8081961-8685 E-mail: ohcdcdbgAhawaiicounty.gov The Amended Consolidated Plan covers a five-year period starting July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2019, and complies with Subpart C of 24 CFR part 91. The County of Hawaii certifies that it will operate its Community Development Block Grant Program, HOME Investment Partnerships Programs and National Housing Trust Fund in accordance with this plan and applicable federal and state laws and regulations. Harry Kim Date Mayor, County of Hawaii Recommend Approval: Approved as to Form and Legality: Neil S. Gyotoku Deputy Corporation Counsel Housing Administrator County of Hawai' i Office of Housing and Community Development TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary....................................................................................................1 ES-05................................................................................................................................... 1 TheProcess......................................................................................................................... 7 PR -05 Lead & Responsible Agencies................................................................................... 7 PR -10 Consultation............................................................................................................. 9 PR -15 Citizen Participation............................................................................................... 12 Housing Needs Assessment.............................................................................................. 18 NA -05 Overview................................................................................................................ 18 NA -10 Housing Needs Assessment................................................................................... 23 NA -15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems .......................................... 30 NA -20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems .............................. 33 NA -25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens .................................... 37 NA -30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion....................................................... 38 NA -35 Public Housing...................................................................................................... 39 NA -40 Homeless Needs Assessment................................................................................ 44 NA -45 Non -Homeless Special Needs Assessment............................................................ 50 NA -50 Non -Housing Community Development Needs .................................................... 54 Housing Market Analysis.................................................................................................. 56 MA -05 Overview............................................................................................................... 56 MA -10 Number of Housing Units..................................................................................... 58 MA -15 Cost of Housing..................................................................................................... 60 MA -20 Condition of Housing............................................................................................ 63 MA -25 Public and Assisted Housing................................................................................. 67 MA -30 Homeless Facilities................................................................................................ 70 MA -35 Special Needs Facilities and Services.................................................................... 74 MA -40 Barriers to Affordable Housing............................................................................. 78 MA -45 Non -Housing Community Development Assets ................................................... 79 MA -50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion................................................................. 87 2015-2019 Strategic Plan.................................................................................................. 89 SP -05 Overview................................................................................................................. 89 SP -10 Geographic Priorities.............................................................................................. 92 SP -25 Priority Needs......................................................................................................... 94 SP -30 Influence of Market Conditions............................................................................ 106 SP -35 Anticipated Resources.......................................................................................... 107 SP -40 Institutional Delivery Structure............................................................................ 112 SP -45 Goals..................................................................................................................... 116 SP -50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement..................................................... 123 SP -55 Barriers to Affordable Housing............................................................................. 124 SP -60 Homelessness Strategy......................................................................................... 127 SP -65 Lead Based Paint Hazards..................................................................................... 129 SP -70 Anti -Poverty Strategy......................................................................................... 130 SP -80 Monitoring........................................................................................................... 131 2015 Action Plan.................................................................................................................. AP -15 Expected Resources .......... .......................... .......................... I ....... ..................... 133 AP -20 Annual Goals and Objectives............................................................................... 139 AP -35 Projects................................................................................................................ 143 AP -38 Project Summary.................................................................................... .......... 144 AP -50 Geographic Distribution....................................................................................... 153 AP -55 Affordable Housing.......................................................................__ ................ 154 AP -60 Public Housing..................................................................................................... 155 AP -65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities...................................................... 156 AP -75 Barriers to Affordable Housing................................................ ..... ....................... 159 AP -85 Other Actions...................................................................................................... 161 AP -90 Program Specific Requirements ........................................... ....... .................... ..... 164 Appendix A: Maps and Charts........................................................................................ 172 Appendix B: Needs Consultations and Comments, Public Notices and Approvals........ 185 Appendix C: Monitoring Plan. ..................................................................................... 201 Appendix D: Citizenship Participation Plan ........ ___ ......... :............................................ 203 Appendix E: 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing .......................................... 224 Appendix F: Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan............... .............. ............................. 278 The purpose of this Substantial Amendment to the County of Hawaii Consolidated Plan 2015-2019 is to include HUD's new National Housing Trust Fund Program (HTF). Hawaii Housing Finance Development Corporation (HHFDC) is a designated State HTF Grantee. Hawaii County is a designated HTF Sub - Grantee. Executive Summary ES -OS Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction The County of Hawai'i is required to submit a Consolidated Plan (CP) to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in order to receive its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The purpose of the County's CP is to ensure that jurisdictions receiving direct federal assistance utilize and develop a plan for its housing and related needs of extremely -low, very low-, low-, and moderate -income families in a way that improves the availability and affordability of decent, safe and sanitary housing within a suitable living environment. The County's CP has three major sections: Housing & Special Needs Housing; Homeless; and Community Development. The County's CP provides goals, priorities, needs, and data used to develop the plan for how the County intends to administer the HUD CDBG Program. The State of Hawai'i's CP provides background, direction, and a plan for how the State intends to administer HUD's Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) to assist in meeting the housing needs of Hawai'i's citizens. In PY2018, the County of Hawaii will be a designated State HTF Sub -grantee for HUD's new National Housing Trust Fund (HTF), to provide affordable rental housing units serving households with incomes at or below 30% of the area median income. The County's Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) reviewed the 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing and noted that the following impediments were completed: • Develop video to increase awareness of Fair Housing violations. • Develop Fair Housing Information on County Website • Conduct studies to determine progress in removing barriers. Although these impediments were completed, the OHCD would still like to include them in the Analysis of Impediments (Al) because we will still be updating the video for Marshallese, llocano and Spanish speaking families, updating the Al and monitoring the County website. The 2011 Al (Appendix E) is applicable for the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY OMS Control No 2506-0117 {exp, 06/30/7018; 2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview The following summary consolidates the goals and priorities and gives an overview of the County's plans. They are summarized as follows: GOALS The County of Hawaii is utilizing the HUD "Logic Model" to develop its 2015 through 2019 CP. The model outlines the CDBG, HOME, and HTE activities the County will COMPLETE between 2015 and 2019. These include: Housing Goals • Provide Tenant -Based Rent Assistance to 100 households, • Construct 2 new affordable rental units for extremely low, low and moderate income households, • Construct 30 affordable rental units for low income elderly persons, • Rehabilitate 36 affordable rental units for low income disabled and/or elderly persons. • Provide 25 homebuyer education and counseling sessions (one per year), • Construct 38 affordable for -sale housing units, • Provide loans/grants for home rehabilitation to 50 homeowners, • Provide effective program administration & conduct an update to the Housing Study. Fair Housing Goals • Conduct 3 fair housing training sessions for persons of Non/Limited-English proficiency, • Develop 1 video to increase awareness, • Increase participation by 20 landlords in training sessions, • Create and link fair housing plan to the County's web site — target 500 hits on the website, • Participate in 15 State-wide meetings and coordinate events, • Conduct 10 fair housing seminars island -wide, • Provide technical support and disseminate information, • Attend 10 training sessions on fair housing, • Conduct an Analysis of impediments Study, • Attend 3 Pair Housing training sessions. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 2 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Homeless Goals + Acquire 32 micro-housing units for a shelter in West Hawai'i, • Infrastructure improvements for a shelter in West Hawaii, • Rehabilitate one shelter for victims of domestic violence, • Conduct 5 point -in -time counts to determine number of homeless persons (current data will get higher points in funding application with HUD). Community Development Goals • Provide infrastructure or other activities that will provide access to affordable housing and public facilities(2 activities), • Provide 1 new public safety facility (fire/police/environmental), • Remove architectural barriers at 4 facilities, • Improve 5 public facilities, • Provide 1 transportation services, • Provide job training for 10 persons, • Provide effective CDBG program management. Objectives and Outcome Pg. 2 PRIORITIES The County has established the following priorities based upon community input and data available from various studies and plan. The housing needs were expressed by the community, homeless providers and many faith -based organizations as the most important need for persons earning <80% of median income. The need for public facilities to provide healthcare, child/youth care and programs for the seniors was also expressed. In addition, public health and safety and activities to meet legal obligations or federal mandates are also a concern. Activities such as fire, police, and environmental protection are essential to meet public health and safety. In addition, the County must comply with federal mandates (ADA) in order to continue to receive federal funds. All other activities are considered medium priority. The County's CP priorities will be used to allocate CDBG, HOME and/or HTF funds in accordance with project eligibility requirements and program rules. (Higher points will be awarded to project proposals that address high priority activities in accordance with the County's Request for Project Proposal System.) The County's CP priorities will also be used to determine if projects applying for other HUD funds (Super NOFA) are consistent with the County's CP. For the County's CP, high and medium priorities will be considered as consistent with the County's CP. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 3 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/201B) The following are the County's CP Priorities_ High Priorities • Housing - Housing for households earning less than 80% of median income [i.e. rental, homeownership, special needs, homeless and activities which will produce new housing (i.e. water, streets, environmental activities, planning, etc,)] • Public Health and Safety - Activities that protect the health and safety of the residents in Hawai County. (i.e. fire, police, environment, etc.) • Federal Mandates - Activities to meet legal obligations or federal mandates. (i.e. ADA) • Public Facilities - Child care, youth, and/or senior centers; facilities for the disabled; homeless facilities; health facilities; neighborhood facilities; and/or parks & recreation facilities. Medium Priorities • Infrastructure (other than housing related) - Water/sewer/street improvements; solid waste disposal; and/or flood drainage improvements. • Public Services - Senior, disabled, youth, childcare, transportation, substance abuser employment, health, lead hazards, crime, etc. • Economic Development - Activities which create jobs for low and moderate income persons. Low Priorities • Non -Public Facilities - Parking facilities and nonresidential historic preservation. • Non -Infrastructure - Sidewalks. The County's CP also contains housing, special needs, and homeless data, census data, needs, and inventory. This was used to produce the 2015-2019 goals and priorities. 3. Evaluation of past performance Each year, The County of Hawaii reports its progress in meeting the five-year and annual goals in the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). The County of Hawaii has consistently satisfied program mandates and expended funds in a timely manner. Furthermore, the County of Hawaii has successfully targeted funds to benefit low and moderate income persons and communities throughout the island. A copy of the CAPER is available in the County of Hawaii Office of Housing & Community Development. 4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The County is required to have a Citizen Participation Plan in its CP (see Appendix D). This plan describes and outlines the County's plan to encourage and inform all citizens, especially persons of very low and Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 4 OMB Control No 2506.0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) moderate income including minorities, non-English speaking and persons of Limited English Proficiency (LEP), as well as persons with mobility, visual or hearing impediments, to participate in the development of the County's CP, along with any amendments to the CP, and the County's performance report. The citizen participation process as outlined in the Citizen Participation Plan includes public hearings, consultation meetings, 30 -day review and comment period on the County's draft CP, Hawaii County Housing Agency/Finance Committee Meetings/County Council Meeting and a public notice announcing the availability of the County's final CP. Public Hearings: The County began its 2015-2019 Citizen Participation Process in October of 2013. The County utilized its annual public hearings in Pahala, Pahoa, Keaau, Kailua-Kona, Honokaa, and Hilo to present an overview of the Consolidated Plan process and encouraged citizens to offer input concerning housing, homeless, special needs and community development needs. In addition, the past use of funds and accomplishments were discussed and available for comments. The County informed participants of the County's draft CP priorities and if there were any concerns or comments. In October 2017, the County conducted Public Hearings in Pahala, Pahoa, Kailua-Kona, Honokaa, and Hilo to inform the public about the 2018 CDSG and HOME application process and to introduce the new National Housing Trust Fund Program (HTF). Members of the public were provided with information on CDSG, HOME and the HTF Programs. On February 16, 2018, the County published a Notice of Public Comment seeking input of the draft Substantial Amendment to its 5 year Consolidated Plan. No comment to the 2015-2019 Amended Consolidated Plan were received. Copies of the draft Substantial Amendment were made available for review at the Housing Agency and online at the County's website at http://www.hawaiicounty.gov/office-of-housing/ The Final Substantial Amendment is available for review online at the County's website at http://www.hawailcounty.gov/office-of-housing/ Public and Private Agencies Consultation Meetings: in 2014, the County again held consultation meetings during its annual public hearings to hear the concerns or comments to the County's draft priorities for its 2015-2019 CP. An overview of the draft priorities and goals were presented. The participants were asked to provide input on the county's draft priorities and goals established as a result of community input at public hearings. Overall, there were 46 participants: 25 in Hilo District, and 21 in Kona District, representing not -far -profit service providers, housing services providers, developers, and county and state agencies. In addition to these consultations, the OHCD also informed each Council Member representing all districts in the County of Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 5 oM8 Control No 2,506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Hawaii of the CP process and inquired if they had any projects that would meet the draft priorities within their district. In addition and in its efforts to get additional feedback from as many community members as possible, the County mailed need surveys to public service providers and other government agencies. The County did a follow up response inquiry and was able to get 37 responses from 100 mail outs. S. Summary of public comments There were no public comments received during the public comment period. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them If public comments are received during the public comment period and are not accepted by the County of Hawaii, the comments will be summarized here along wi tip the County's reasons for not accepting them. 7. Summary The CP is a comprehensive planning document which identifies the housing and community development needs and priorities for the County of Hawaii for the next five years. It sets forth the County's strategies and objectives in addressing these needs and provides a framework for the Annual Action plan, which details the specific projects and activities the county will undertake in each of the five years to carry out the CP. Consolidated Pian HAWAII COUNTY OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp.06/30/2018) 0 The Process PR -05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b) 1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. Agency Role Name Department/Agency Lead Agency HAWAII COUNTY, HI CDBG Administrator HAWA11 COUNTY, HI Office of Housing & Community Development HOME Administrator HAWAII COUNTY, HI Office of Housing & Community Development HTF Administrator HAWAII COUNTY, HI Office of Housing & Community Development Table 1— Responsible Agencies Narrative The County of Hawai'i's Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) manages and administers the use of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program funds for the County. As the lead agency and direct recipient of CDBG funds, the OHCD is responsible to complete the planning and submission process for the County's CP. The State of Hawaii is the recipient of the HOME, ESG, HOPWA, and HTF funds and is therefore, required to submit a CP to HUD before it can receive these program funds. The County is not required to address the State's programs in its CP, but will reference and include portions of the State's CP as it relates to the County's housing -related and homeless needs. Although the County of Hawaii is not a direct recipient of HOME funds, it does receive HOME funds from the State of Hawaii, every three years. Thus the County's OHCD manages and administers the use of HOME program funds for the County. In PY 2018, the County of Hawaii will be a designated State HTF Subgrantee to develop and preserve affordable rental housing serving households with incomes at or below 30°Y of the area median income. The County of Hawaii will receive HTF funds from the State of Hawaii every three years. The County's OHCD manages and administers the use of HTF program funds for the County. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 7 DMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information County of Hawaii Office of Housing & Community Development Alison T. Mukai 50 Wailuku Drive Halo, Hawaii 96720 Phone Number: (808)961-8379 Fax: (808)961-8685 Email: ohcdcdbg@hawaiicounty.gav Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 8 OMB Control No: 2506 0117 (exp 06/30/2018) PR -10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(1) 1. Introduction The County began its 2015-2019 Citizen Participation Process in October of 2013. The County utilized its annual public hearings in Pahala, Pahoa, Keaau, Kailua-Kona, Honokaa, and Hilo to present an overview of the Consolidated Plan process and encouraged citizens to offer input concerning housing, homeless, special needs and community development needs. In addition, the past use of funds and accomplishments were discussed and available for comments. The County informed participants of the County's draft CP priorities and if there were any concerns or comments. In October 2017, the County conducted Public Hearings in Pahala, Pahoa, Kailua-Kona, Honokaa, and Hilo to inform the public about the 2018 CDBG and HOME application process and to introduce the new National Housing Trust Fund Program (HTF). Members of the public were provided with information on CDBG, HOME and the HTF Programs. On February 16, 2018, the County published a Notice of Public Comment seeking input of the draft Substantial Amendment to its 5 year Consolidated Plan. Copies of the draft Substantial Amendment were made available for review at the Housing Agency and online at the County's website at http://www.hawaiicounty.gov/office-of-housing/ Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies In 2014, the County again held consultation meetings during its annual public hearings to hear the concerns or comments to the County's draft priorities for its 2015-2019 CP. An overview of the draft priorities and goals were presented. The participants were asked to provide input on the county's draft priorities and goals established as a result of community input at public hearings. Overall, there were 46 participants, 25 in Hilo District, and 21 in Kona District, representing not-for-profit service providers, housing services providers, developers, and county and state agencies. In addition to these consultations, the OHCD also informed each Council Member representing all districts in the County of Hawaii of the CP process and inquired if they had any projects that would meet the draft priorities within their district. In addition and in its efforts to get additional feedback from as many community members as possible, the County mailed need surveys to public service providers and other government agencies. The County did a follow-up response inquiry and was able to get 37 responses from 100 mail outs. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 9 OMB Control No 2506-0117 )exp 0613012018) Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness The State of Hawaii is the primary agency that provides homeless funds to homeless service providers. the County actively participates in the Bridging the Gap (Neighbor island counties) and Statewide (consisting of the State and Bridging the Gap) Continuum of Care. These groups focus on approaches to ending homelessness. The County is also a component of the interagency Council on Homelessness - a conglomerate of Government and service providers that seek solutions to address statewide chronic homelessness through mainstream re -programming. Participation in the Continuum also allows the County to acquire other HUD funds for activities that address homeless needs within the County. The County will continue to participate in all levels of collaboration in a proactive in all levels of collaboration in a proactive effort to address the needs of its homeless community. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS The County of Hawaii is not a recipient of Emergency Solution Grant Funds. The State of Hawaii allocates these funds to eligible homeless providers. 2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 10 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table 2 — Agencies, groups, organizations who particip 35 Agency/Group/Organization p Agency/Group/Organization Type What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Boys and Girls Club of the Big island Services -Children Educational & Youth Services Contacted through mail survey and attended public hearing. This organization provides educational and youth services. Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The County utilized a mail list from its previous Consolidated Plans and is constantly updated through participation, meetings, trainings, etc... to contact as many providers and government agencies to ensure proper consultation. The County does not preclude or exclude any public or private agencies participation. Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization T Naw do the goals of your Strategic Paan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of Care Bridging the Gap The State is writing the goals to the State's Strategic Plan, please refer to the State's Consolidated Plan Table 3 — Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(1)} The County conducts its Consolidated Plan citizen participation public hearings with the State of Hawaii - Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation along with its annual Action Plan. The County and State conducts two meetings annually in the East and West side of the islands. The County also informs and invites its units of local government agencies to participate in these public meetings. Narrative (optional): Consolidated Plan OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) HAWAII COUNTY 11 PR -15 Citizen Participation 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal -setting The County began its 2015-2019 Citizen Participation Process in October of 2013. The County utilized its annual public hearings in Pahala, Pahoa, Keaau, Kailua-Kana, Honokaa, and Hilo to present an overview of the Consolidated Plan process and encouraged citizens to offer input concerning housing, homeless, special needs and community development needs. In 2014, the County again informed its citizens of the County's draft CP priorities and encouraged citizens for their input. Citizen Participation was also achieved through a Community Need Assessment Survey which was mailed out to local State and County Agencies along with non-profit organization service providers. The following schedule and task was utilized to inform and encourage citizens of the Consolidated Plan and its process. DATE TASK September 2013 . Informed and invited Administration, County Departments and Council Members on the start of the 2015.2019 Consolidated Plan (CP) process and solicit comments or possible projects to meet objectives with the current and future CP, May 2014 Community Need Surveys mailed to State and County Agencies and nor) profit service providers. October 2014 - Public Notices published and Island wide Public Hearings/Meetings were held to discuss draft CP priorities along with 2015 2019 Consolidated Plan Process & Annual Action Plan_ March 2015 - Graft CP and published public notice announcing the CP availability for public review and comment. April 2015 - Draft CP Submitted to Hawaii County Housing Agency and Hawaii Council Meetings for review and approval. Public Notice informs citizen of the meetings and comments. In October 2017, the County conducted Public Hearings in Pahala, Pahoa, Kailua-Kona, Honokaa, and Hilo to inform the public about the 2018 CDBG and HOME application process and to introduce the new National Housing Trust Fund Program (HTF). Members of the public were provided with information on CDBG, HOME and the HTF Programs. On February 16, 2018, the County published a Notice of Public Comment seeking input of the draft Substantial Amendment to its 5 year Consolidated Plan. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 12 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Copies of the draft Substantial Amendment were made available for review at the Housing Agency and online at the County's website at http://www.hawaiicounty.gov/office-of-housing/ Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 13 OMB Control No 2506-0117 {exp 0613012018} = 2 a m � � rR i E m G k u � 0 |k Ln cu � � . � k ? : o � \ k & 0 0 m o W_ § - § - % § o c . a 1 m_ 4)© 0 2 2 E e di _'0 2 u 7 £ E: :� k A 2 2 / m — �' i \ ( Ln 2 u ' , m a k\ ° % I a .. .$ k\ a x_ 2§ • 2 2§ 2 £ � f 2 ' t r , 2 GJ 0 � 3 o - - E E k \ o `e § � § CL , k Ln E \ z .- ai & ' \ % § $ S t O# ° 3� m ■ & o 2 S 2 � � rR i E m G k u � 0 Ln % � . � k ? : o � \ k & Q m o W_ § - § - o c . a 1 m_ 4)© 0 r-© 2aj di _'0 2 7 £ E: :� 4-,W 2 m — �' i > 2 0 o CL k j k\ cn k\ J 2 2 �u 2}\ o `e § =� 3 E ® 2 L \ t = § ° m ■ S � a 2 m m t£ 2/ k m E m 3 m -W � 2 % �� 'C'U'E a- g E |2 2 S � � rR i E m G k u � 0 � [ c / 2 CL . ■ �k VE -o a .§ $ §,\ Min % U £ E m 0 22E 2 E 0 CL ES 2 |k � .o 2 �M E c .Ln 3E . E 0 . u cu c % 2 � t E tn 0 . / � � 0 0 � � � o � 0 EA 0)' ` ' � / © o e ' u B 4 ED CU to C3 / E ƒ_ k § / e f& k k c 0 © - uƒ§ E. E C \ m - ? . Q . &A M / $' $/ w 0 7 2 2 m 2 o = OL I_® o- E 41 - �cu � \ k w x 0 c/ c§ [ k k 0 k .e Q= m-0 M M � u sCL tA $ � . � k u Ln cu � Ln k 2 � 2 Ln : § CL aiM k k u \ \ 0 Ln Ln2 u co 2 0 | M 131 , U k / .0 m u -0 lu . U \ E f u,; m �_ - m » o E§ Q 0 E i 2 . u / 1�: § J / 5 3 o u C§ 2 R CL 2 � k u Ln cu � Ln k 2 � 2 Ln : § CL aiM k k u \ \ 0 Ln Ln2 u co 2 0 � �2 -J � CL m tn 41 '0 k \ CL % k k E I�2 E IE 0 k 2 cc k 0 2 E f 3 E E 0 � � 2 I0 & t� E Ln k CL§ 5 a .� .0 tw .� ( � � 0 0 10 (■ �2 �O t tA 2 = 2 7 f o m $ e � 2 0 % E E/ k k k k CL & 2 a g CL \ % i ; 0 2@ = 7 E a 0. o W§ fm a Co o 3 c o � 2§ 0 COL 0( mo aci k \/§ CL 2 � W u r u 0 0 o m_» E § z 2 E E r- c CU / 0 0 Ln � fig" 2 D 0 � $ _ § 0 � o g / LA k3 2 0 2 a = 0 f u u 7 \ §Ln® � a g _ f 3 t � 2 6 E k 2 2 7 0 o 5 2 � �u a( � § 2 aE � � d 2 % E 2 % m f e CL m / ti2 n S ƒ/ E f 2 2 = 2 7 f o m $ e � 2 0 % E E/ k k k k CL & 2 a g CL \ % i ; 0 2@ = 7 E a 0. o W§ fm a Co o 3 c o � 2§ 0 COL 0( mo aci k \/§ CL 2 � W u r u 0 0 o m_» E § z 2 E E r- c CU / 0 0 Ln � fig" 2 D 0 � $ _ § 0 � � m c / CL m f ■ � E � _ 'K CL §�$ 41 o �0 r- / .E m E �m � \ % 2 m c E CD E E S k 0 �. 2 raE Ln k / a LM w m . m \ 0 C / § — E �: 2 a E/ t° B ib/ CL= a 2 E£ E ' % _ 2 � E R K [ # E m r c c e& 7 e a o 5 c k S 2 E ƒ w 2 r 2£. 5 Q� _ »» o c' - 0 M I 7 . / 2& 2 U CL m% 2 E§ 6 k . . .�� . .. .«C m �Lm U k 5 ® k a & c k k / o k// q§' aj § ° m 2 7 CL 2 2\ 2 2 m 2 / g§ 7 2 e o 2 `� § r LLrUf 2 § \ � = � ° ° E 2 � 4 Aa 2 2 0 2 §: 2 § 8§ a a 3 m R 5 §-o\ Eu c m 7 / M 41= 2£CCm $ S E 2 k%§ 7 m% 2 cu k < 2 k o 0. 0 k ■ z � k � f6n S i � � 0 LA0 u \ C ci § rl§ ) 3 cc 2 0 Needs Assessment NA -05 Overview Needs Assessment Overview The Hawaii Housing Model was developed to provide forecasts. Initiated in 1992, the Model was expanded each time the Study was updated. It exists today as a supply and demand model of HawaiTs housing market. It treats each County as an independent housing market that can be summed to describe housing activity for the entire State. For those who are interested, the most recent version of the Hawaii Housing Model is further described in the Technical Report. HOUSING DEMAND The Hawai' i Housing Model summarizes demand in terms of units sold each year and produces separate estimates for single-family and multi -family units. For past years, demand is based heavily on the unit sales reported by county boards of realtors and subsequently reported by DBEDT. Sales forecasts for future years are based on past performance of the housing market and several other factors including population growth, household formation, household income, and expected interest rates. Important parameters set for the statewide forecasts shown here are as follows: a population growth rate of 1.0 percent per annum, household size dropping by .01 points per decade, household income growth rate of about 2.6 percent per annum, and interest rates beginning at 4.0 percent in 2011 and rising to 6.25 percent by 2030. Modeled Demand Data for demand estimates for the State housing market from 1980 through 2030 for single-family and multi -family unit sales indicate that in years before 2011, the sales figures were based on resales reported by boards of realtors. In the last two studies, estimates for new unit sales and sales prices have become available. Post -2010 new unit counts reflect the assumptions noted above and the history of the housing market since 1980. NA -05 P2 As noted earlier, the Hawaii housing market has been cyclical over the last 35 years. Very generally, we have had three major market expansions followed by periods of post- expansion adjustment. The cyclical nature of sales is definitely a feature of our housing market and there is no indication that the underlying factors responsible for those cycles will change significantly in the future. The model, therefore, forecasts continuation of that pattern. It produces another housing run-up beginning later in this decade. We note that the quality and quantity of housing -related data has improved notably since Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 18 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp 06/3012018) 1992. The model and its forecasts benefit from the improvement and reflect improvement in detail through the years. The forecast suggests continued slow growth in Hawai'i's housing market in the short term. It predicts slow sales between 2011 and 2017. We do not expect any further decreases in sales. Obviously, changes in model assumptions would alter results. Increasing employment, for instance, would push up household incomes, shortening the current adjustment period and increasing the volume of the next run-up. Increasing interest rates would have the opposite effect. HOUSING SUPPLY The Hawaii Housing Model measures supply in terms of housing units added each year with separate estimates for single-family and multi -family units. For past years, added units are the difference between housing unit counts for two adjacent years. Forecasts of added units are based on past performance of the housing market, population growth household formation, household income, and expected interest rates. The assumptions applied for the supply forecast are the same as those noted above for the demand forecast. NA -05 P3 OThe market cycles are apparent in the supply forecast just as they are in the demand estimates. The forecast just as they are in the demand estimates. The forecast follows a similar pattern of rapid growth and longer adjustment periods during which housing prices fall slightly and production is reduced significantly. The forecast suggests continued slow growth in Hawai'i's housing market. Specifically, it predicts slow sales between 2011 and 2017. Further decreases in sales are not expected. With the standard caveat that reliability of forecast estimates decreases in later years. Again, changing assumptions would alter the forecast. Increasing population growth, decreasing unemployment and low interest rates all work toward increasing demand and therefore the need for more housing units. Slower growth in any of those assumptions would decrease the need for new units. NEEDED UNITS The ultimate objective of the modeling exercise was to estimate the number of new housing units needed in Hawai'i in the near future. As in the past, we accomplished this in two steps: (1) estimate the total number of units required in the Hawaii Housing Model; (2) estimate the types of units needed (by market level and units per structure) based on the Housing Demand Survey. In 2011, we added a further step intended to estimate the numbers of elderly and family housing units needed in each county. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 19 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 {exp 06r'W-'2018' Total New Units Needed Based on the model, the total number of housing units that will change hands in the period between 2012 and 2016 is approximately 60,000 to 75,000 units. This is the number of units that would be required to meet the needs of everyone who wanted to move. Most of those would be resales and not require any construction. The number of new units that would have to be built during that five-year period to meet new demand generated by changing demographic and economic conditions might be as high as 50,000. Some of those units will be produced by Hawai'i's housing industry (public and private). Some will not. Units that are not built represent the shortage of units needed to fill total demand for housing units. The shortage results from market inefficiencies (lack of information or coordination, lag times, etc.), regulations that dampen supply, and economic realities (difficulties of producing units below market prices, etc.). This shortage has come to be known as "needed units" and is defined as the difference between total demand and expected supply. identified in the Housing Demand Survey, the median household income for the State was $58,700. The median was slightly higher for the City and County of Honolulu ($59,076) and approximately equal for the County of Maui ($58,424). Both Kauai and Hawaii Counties had medpan household incomes well below the statewide median ($49,730 and $49,696, respectively). NA -05 P4 Types of Units Needed The Hawaii Housing Model 2011 was used to develop the total number of needed units by county and for the State as a whole. The distribution of needed units by tenure, type, and market level was developed from Housing Demand Survey data. The analysis employs the assumption that needed units are distributed according to the effective and qualified demand estimates from the survey. Effective demand means that only Hawaii residents who are planning to move to a unit in the State of Hawaii in the next five years were included in the analysis. The analysis did include people who are currently doubled -up for economic reasons. The estimates are based on qualified demand in the sense that their housing choices have been adjusted to reflect their current economic situations. if a survey respondent expressed a desire to move from a rented unit to an owned unit, but did not have the financial resources to support that move, we added that case to the list of rental units needed rather than the ownership unit needed. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 20 OMB Control No 25060117 (exp 06/30/2018) The process of estimating needed units is crucial to housing planning because it identifies housing units other than those that will be produced by the local market under normal conditions. Not surprisingly, in a very high-priced housing market like Hawai'i's the number of needed units is relatively high — as many as 3,500 to 6,000 units per year in recent decades. Needed units are concentrated in market levels below 180 percent of AMI. This finding suggests that the market is more effective in producing high-end units than low-end units. Inefficiencies are exacerbated in periods of rapid market expansion when fewer low-end units are built. More middle - market and low-end units are built during periods of market adjustment. Needed units are also concentrated in the rental market rather than the ownership market. Again, the current housing market produces units for sale more efficiently than units for rent. The detail produced in this analysis will be useful in a variety of housing planning efforts in the next five years. It is relevant, reliable, and utilitarian. One conclusion of the 2011 modeling exercise supports major conclusions of every housing study and blue-ribbon housing task force conducted in Hawaii for the last twenty years — what we need is more affordable rental housing. Finally, we need to explain how each of four housing types -- market level units, affordable units, special needs housing, and units for those impacted by homelessness — are treated in the Hawaii Housing Model. NA -05 P5 Market Level Units: Units needed for households with incomes above 80 percent of AMI are referred to in the housing model as "market level" housing units. It is assumed that most of those will be produced by the private sector. The model does not assume that market level housing units will be produced on schedule as they are needed. Hawai'i's housing market is marked by high prices and restricted supply. By any method of reckoning, there will be a need for units at nearly every market level for a long time to come. Affordable Units: Rental housing units intended for households with incomes below 80 percent of AMI have, for the most part, been assisted by the public sector. Failure to produce sufficient units for low- and moderate -income households will cause pent-up demand in these market segments. Affordable housing includes two types of public sector -generated housing units. The first is public housing, which includes units developed and maintained in perpetuity by the public sector. it is "affordable" in the sense that it is available to qualified persons at below market prices. The second is government -assisted housing, which is usually produced in partnership with private sector or non-profit affordable housing developers. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 21 CIMS Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Government assistance extends beyond funding. Public sector programs and partnerships often involve government contributions in the form of financing, permitting, planning and zoning variances, land and many other forms of assistance. In some cases, affordable housing requires post -production services including property management and services required by residents with special needs. Public sector agencies often help pay for or subsidize those services Special Needs Housing Units: Subpopulations such as persons with special needs and their impact on housing planning are discussed later in this report. NA -05 P6 Homeless Housing Needs: By definition, homeless persons are not included in the Hawai' i Housing MDdel. The model is built on data on households or housing units- For the first time in 2011, the Housing Demand Survey did make provision for including homeless persons. By incorporating cell phone interviews rather than relying solely on landline phone numbers associated with a housing unit, the 2011 Housing Demand Survey was able to solicit information from a very small number of homeless persons. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 22 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Ele NA -10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c) Summary of Housing Needs Demographics Base Year: 2000 Most Recent Year: 2011 % Change Population 148,677 182,997 23% Households 52,945 64,270 21% Median Income $39,805.00 $53,591.00 35% Table S - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics Data source: 2000 Census (Base Year), 2007 2011 ACS M t R t Y Number of Households Table Table 6 - Total Households Table Data 2007 2011 CHAS Source: Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 23 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 0-30% HAMFI >30-50% HAMFI >50-80% HAMFI >80-100% HAMFI >100% HAMFI Total Households 9,507 7,499 10,149 7,128 30,005 Small Family Households 2,334 2,238 3,847 2,772 15,465 Large Family Households 664 475 1,038 1,099 3,270 Household contains at least one person 62-74 years of age 1,905 1,656 2,482 1,766 7,189 Household contains at least one person age 75 or older 1,267 1,800 1,580 644 2,808 Households with one or more children 6 years old or younger 1,454 1,189 1,481 1,306 3,056 Table 6 - Total Households Table Data 2007 2011 CHAS Source: Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 23 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Housing Needs Summary Tables 1. Housing Problems (Households with one of the listed needs) Renter Owner 0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total 0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Substandard Housing - Lacking complete ! plumbing or kitchen facilities 687 107 132 111 1,037 325 104 31.6 115 860 Severely Overcrowded - s With >1.51 people per room (and complete j kitchen and ' plumbing) 118 281 145 122 666 94 83I 96 96 369 Overcrowded - With 1.01-1.5 people per room (and none of the above problems) 267 391 161 249 1,068 261 85 351 233 930 Housing cost burden greater than 50% of income (and none of the above problems) 2,618 1,1221 403 189 4,332 1,620 1,283 1,502 614 1 5,019 Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 24 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06/3012018) Table 7 — Housing Problems Table Data 2007.2011 CHAS Source: 2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: Lacks kitchen or complete plumbingr severe overcrowding, severe cost burden) Renter Owner 0-30% >30- >so- >so- Total 0-30% >30- >so- >so- Total AMI Soya I AM] 50% 80% 100% 80% AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI Housing cost more of four burden greater Y° housing than 3W) of I problems 3,686 1,905 income (and 673 7,123 2,323 1,555 2,296 1,044 7,218 F Having none of none of the four housing above problems 1,445 1,620 problems) 504 971 1,430 446 3,351 264 432 1,049 1,216 2,961 Zero/negative negative Income (and income, but none of the none of the above other housing problems) 560 0 0 0 560 393 0 0 0 393 Table 7 — Housing Problems Table Data 2007.2011 CHAS Source: 2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: Lacks kitchen or complete plumbingr severe overcrowding, severe cost burden) Table 8 — Housing Problems 2 Data 2007-2011CHAS Source - Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 25 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/3012018) Renter Owner 0-30% >30- >50- >so- Total 0-30% 1 >30- >so- >80- Total AMI Soya I 80% 100% AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Having 1 or more of four Y° housing I problems 3,686 1,905 859 673 7,123 2,323 1,555 2,296 1,044 7,218 F Having none of four housing problems 1,445 1,620 2,721 1,902 7,688 1,089 2,424 4,278 3,498 11,289 Household has negative income, but none of the other housing problems 560 0 1 0 0 1 560 1 393 1 0 0 0 393 Table 8 — Housing Problems 2 Data 2007-2011CHAS Source - Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 25 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/3012018) 3. Cost Burden > 30% Data 2007.2011 CHAS source: 4. Cost Burden > 50% Renter Owner 0-30% 1 >30 -SO% AMI AMI >50-80% AN Total 0-309'0 AMI >30-50% >50-$O% AMI AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Small Related 1,134 1,247 888 3,269 684 483 1,225 2,392 Large Related 370 190 176 736 110 100 364 574 Elderly 802 531 364 1,697 772 871 896 2,539 Other 1,273 689 559 2,521 677 355 363 11395 Total need by income 3,579 2,657 1,987 8,223 Table 9 — Cost Burden > 2,243 1,809 2,848 6,900 4,716 30% Data 2007.2011 CHAS source: 4. Cost Burden > 50% Table 10 — Cost Burden > 50% Data 2007-2011 CHAS Source: 5. Crowding (More than one person per room) Renter 0-30% >30-50% >so- Total AMI AMI 80% AMI Owner 0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Small Related 983 589 225 1,797 569 407 723 1,699 Large Related 347 53 49 449 72 57 189 318 Elderly 474 258 41 773 568 600 532 1,700 Other 1,199 438 138 1,775 581 248 170 999 Total need by income 3,003 1,338 453 4,794 1,790 1,312 1,614 4,716 Table 10 — Cost Burden > 50% Data 2007-2011 CHAS Source: 5. Crowding (More than one person per room) Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 26 OM9 Control No 2506.0117 (exp, 06/30/2018) Renter Owner 0- >30- >so- >so- Total 0- >30- >50- >80- Total 30% 50% 80% 100% 30% 50% 80% 100% AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Single family households 380 651 250 317 1,598 249 127 322 139 837 Multiple, unrelated family households 39 53 18 68 178 132 35 209 190 566 Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 26 OM9 Control No 2506.0117 (exp, 06/30/2018) Data 2007-2011 CHAS Source: 0- 30% AMI Households with Children Present 0 Data Source Comments - Table 11— Crowding Information —1/2 Renter Owner 0- >30- >50- >so- Total 0- >30- >50- >80- Total 30% 30% 50% 80% 100% I AMI 30% 50% 80% 100% AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI Other, non -family households 235 0 60 0 295 0 1 34 10 1 4 48 Total need by 654 704 328 385 2,071 381 196 541 333 1,451 income Data 2007-2011 CHAS Source: 0- 30% AMI Households with Children Present 0 Data Source Comments - Table 11— Crowding Information —1/2 Renter Owner >30- >so- Total 0- >30- >so- Total 50% 80% 30% 50% 80% AMI I AMI AMI AMI AMI 01 01 01 0.l 01 Q 1 0 Table 12 — Crowding Information — 2/2 Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance. The County of Hawaii does not collect data of the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance. Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking. There are 6,074 families on the County of Hawaii's Section 8 wait list and 901 families or 14.8% of the families on the wait list are disabled_ No distinctions of the type of disability is noted on the Section 8 wait list. What are the most common housing problems? HUD has identified four housing problems which are (1) overcrowding, (2) lacks complete kitchen, (3) lacks complete plumbing, or (4) cost burden. Overcrowding means that there is more than one person per room living in a housing unit When households spend too much of their incomes on housing, they are considered to be "cost burdened" or "severely cost burdened." HUD has determined that households should spend no more than 30%of their incomes on housing. Households that pay more than 30% of their incomes on housing are considered cost burdened; households that pay more than 50% of their incomes are considered to be severely cost burdened. Cost burdened households will find Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY CIMB Control No 250E 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 27 it difficult to meet all household needs; severely cost burdened households maybe in danger of becoming homeless. As indicated by Table 9 "Cost Burden > 30%" and Table 10 "Cost Burden > 50%" the most common housing problem concerned households that were cost burdened. Out of the 64,270 households that reported housing problems, 15,123 households or 24% reported being cost burdened at greater than 30% of income. Another 9,510 households or 15% reported being cost burdened at greater than 50% of income. Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems? In the cost burden table greater than 30%, 38% of the small households in the 30-50% AMI category is cost burdened. In the severely cost burdened (cost burden > 500) category the highest level of need among renters is in the "other" category which is predominately single people. There were 55% of the households in the 0-30% AMI category paying more than 509 of their monthly income towards housing costs. Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re -housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance Individuals and families with children with an imminent risk of residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered typically have a combination of financial factors present in their lives. Of these financial factors, unemployment and the inability to pay rent/mortgage are the two most common factors that contribute to a family becoming at risk for homelessness. Other factors include high child care costs, medical costs and lack of transportation- Also, households that pay more than 50% of their monthly income for rent or mortgage are more prone to become homeless. An individual or family at risk of becoming homeless may require additional assistance with domestic violence, mental health issues, chemical dependency, prior episodes of homelessness or difficulty accessing services. Some of the needs, to consider, for low-income individuals and families close to homelessness are: • Subsidies and rental assistance to improve access to stable and affordable housing- • Affordable and accessible child care. • Improved public transportation. • Increased Department of Social Services allowances for persons at risk of homelessness- • Educating school teachers about referral services and social service processes to assist students at risk. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 28 OMB control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at -risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at -risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates: Persons at risk of homelessness are defined as individuals or families who would become homeless in less than three months if they suddenly lost their primary source of income. According to the Hawaii Housing Policy Study 2011, about 24% of all households in the State of Hawaii reported being at risk of homelessness. The HUD CHAS 2007-2011 data indicate that renters that pay more than 50% of their income to housing and are in the 0-30% AMI group number 3,003 or 63% of the families that are severely cost burdened and are at -risk of becoming homeless. In the owner households there are 1,790 families or 38% of the total families that are at -risk of becoming homeless. Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness The lack of affordable housing units for those people who earn very low incomes is linked with increased risk of becoming homeless. The typical measure of housing affordability is whether tenants are paying more than 30% of their gross income to rent or mortgage. The inability to rent or mortgage is one of the top reasons for people to become homeless. Unemployment and domestic violence also rank high on the reasons that people become homeless. Discussion Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 29 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) NA -15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems -- 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction An analysis of the 2007-2011 CHAS data confirms that members of the County of Hawaii's minority racial/ethnic groups are represented among low-income populations, reporting housing problems. The definition of disproportionately greater need is persons or racial or ethnic minority groups that experience housing problems at a 109! or more of the income group as a whole. 0%-30% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 6,395 1,980 585 White 2,660 935 330 Black/ African American 40 0 0 Asian 1,030 620 105 American Indian, Alaska Native 40 4 0 Pacific Islander 725 85 40 Hispanic 765 155 19 Table 13 - Disproportionally Greater Need 0 - 30% AMI Data 2007 2011 C HA5 Source: *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3_ More than one person per room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30% 30%-50% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more Has none of the Household has of four housing four housing no/negative h problems problems income, but none of the other 2,725 housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 3,830 0 White 1,640 950 0 Black / African American 20 0 0 Asian 620 1,070 0 Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 30 OMB control No' 2506.0117 (exp. 06130/2018) X Housing Problems Has one or more 7 Has none of the Household has of four housing four housing no/negative problems problems income, but none of the other housing problems American Indian, Alaska Native 15 10 0 Pacific Islander 455 185 0 Hispanic 490 245 0 Table 14 - Disproportionally Greater Need 30 - 50% AMI Data 2007-2011 -HA' Source "The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30a 50%-80% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Jurisdiction as a whole Has one or more Has none of the of four housing four housing problems problems 5,020 5,325 Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems 0 White 2,155 1,760 0 Black / African American 60 20 0 Asian 965 1,750 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 29 10 0 Pacific Islander 465 580 0 Hispanic 425 360 0 Table 15 - Disproportionally Greater Need 50 - 80% AMI Data 20072011 CHAS Source: *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30% 80%-3.00% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Jurisdiction as a whole Consolidated Plan OMB Control No.. 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Has one or more of four housing problems 3,110 HAWAII COUNTY Has none of the Household has four housing no/negative problems income, but none of the other housing problems 3,57D 0 31 Housing Problems Has one or more Has none of the Household has of four housing four housing no/negative problems problems income, but none I of the other .,.., _n._,r._... �. housing problems White 1,125 1,365 0 Black/ African American 60 0 0 Asian 750 1,075 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 10 0 Pacific Islander 155 300 0 Hispanic 210 230 0 Table 16 - Disproportionally Greater Need 80 -100% AMI Data 2007 2011CHAS Source: *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4 -Cost Burden greater than 30% Discussion Asians, Pacific Islanders and Hispanic people are more likely to experience housing problems than other minority groups. 12.3% of Asians in the 0-30% AMI category has one or more of four hOLOSing problems, 8.7% of Pacific Islanders and 9.1% of Hispanic people experience housing problems. There were no racial or ethnic groups that were disproportionately representative of this group - The percentage of people in the 30-50% AM[ category that suffer one of more of four housing problems is slightly less than the people in the 0-30% AMI category. However, Asians at 9.4%+ Pacific Islanders at 6.9% and Hispanics at 7.5% are more likely to experience housing problems. There were no racial or ethnic groups that were disproportionately representative of this group. In the 50-80% AMI category, Asians have a greater likelihood of experiencing housing problems compared to other minority groups. The 2007-s011 CHAS data table shows that 9.3% of Asians experience at least one or more housing problems- There were no racial or ethnic groups that were disproportionately representative of this group. The number of people that have housing problems, in the 80-100% AMI category, dropped 38% from the 50.80% category. However, the Asian population, at 11.2%, is still the highest ethnic group that suffer housing problems- There were no racial or ethnic groups that were disproportionately representative of this group. Consolidated Plan OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) HAWAII COUNTY 32 NA -20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems — 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction Severe housing problems include overcrowded households (with more than 1.5 persons per room not including bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half -room) and households with cost burdens of more than 50 percent of income. The 2007-2011 CHAS data shows the County of Hawaii, as a whole, has a total of 25,280 households at 80% or less AMI for all races that have a least one or more of the four housing problems. HUD defines disproportionately greater need as persons of racial or ethnic minority groups that have problems at a rate of 10% or more of the income group as a whole. There are no racial or ethnic groups that show a disproportionately severe housing problem need. 0%-30% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems 585 330 Jurisdiction as a whole 5,610 2,765 White 2,420 1,175 Black / African American 25 15 0 Asian 780 875 105 American Indian, Alaska Native 40 4 0 Pacific Islander 680 130 40 Hispanic 715 210 19 Table 17 — Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI Data 2007 2011 CHAS Source: *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4.Cost Burden over 50% Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 33 OMB Control No 2506-0117lexp 06/30/2019) 30%-50% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problems* Jurisdiction as a whole Has one or more of four housing problems 2,670 Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems 0 3,885 White 1,230 1,360 0 Black / African American 20 0 0 Asian 345 1,340 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 10 15 0 Pacific Islander 350 290 0 Hispanic 270 470 0 Table 18 — Severe Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI Data 2007-2011 CHAS Source: *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2 Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4.Cost Burden over 50% 50%-80% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 2,860 7,490 0 White 1,210 2,705 0 Black/ African American 60 20 0 Asian 500 2,215 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 4 35 0 Pacific Islander 285 770 0 Hispanic 190 595 0 Table 19 -- Severe Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI Data 7007-2011 CHAS Source - *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2- Lacks complete plumbing facilpties, 3. More than 1-5 persons per room, 4.Cost Burden over 50% Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 34 OMB Control No 2506-0117 {exp. 06/30/2018) D 80%-100% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problems Jurisdiction as a whole Has one or more Has none of the of four housing four housing problems problems 1,665 5,015 Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems 0 White 455 _....................... 2,035 0 Black/ African American 0 60 0 Asian 440 1,390 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 10 0 Pacific Islander 90 365 0 Hispanic 1 135 300 0 Table 20 — Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100°Y AMI Data 2007-2011 CHAS Source: *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4.Cost Burden over 50% Discussion Asians, at 9.3% of all residents with 0-30`f' AMI, have a greater likelihood of experiencing severe housing problems than other minority groups. The 2007-2011 CHAS data table shows the next minority groups that have the possibility of experiencing severe housing problems would be Hispanics at 8.5% and Pacific Islanders at 8.1%o. There were no racial or ethnic groups that were disproportionately representative of this group. The number of people in the 30-50% AMI category reduced 52.34<_ from 5,610 to 2,670. The Asians and Pacific Islanders, at 5-3'.,6, were still the minority groups that were more at risk to experience severe housing problems. There were no racial or ethnic groups that were disproportionately representative of this group. The total number of people in the 50-80% AMI that has one or more of four housing problems was similar to the 30-50Tt AMI category. However, the percentage of Asians that may experience severe housing problems dropped to 4.81A and the percentage of Pacific Islanders was reduced to 2.8%. There were no racial or ethnic groups that were disproportionately representative of this group. The jurisdiction as a whole has a total of 1,665 people with incomes 80-100%AMI who have experienced 1 or more housing problems which was a reduction of 41.7% from the 50-80;4 AMI category. The Asian group was the minority group that still had a greater likelihood of experiencing Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 35 OMB Control No. 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30'20181 severe housing problems. There were no racial or ethnic groups that were disproportionately representative of this group. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 36 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) NA -25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens — 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction: The disproportionately greater need of racial or ethnic groups is based on the level of cost burden defined as monthly housing costs (including utilities) exceeding 30% of monthly income. As noted in the 2007-2011 CHAS data table, Hawaii County as a whole has a total of 21,320 households that have a cost burden (30-50% 10,455) or severe cost burden ( more than 50% 10,865). HUD defines disproportionately greater need as persons of racial or ethnic minority groups that have problems at a rate of 10% or more of the income group as a whole. Housing Cost Burden Housing Cost Burden <-30% 30-50% >50% No / negative income (not computed) Jurisdiction as a whole 41,220 10,455 10,865 680 White 16,195 4,645 5,360 370 Black / African American 75 80 i 65 0 Asian 12,220 2,245 1,770 115 American Indian, Alaska Native 120 50 39 0 Pacific Islander 3,415 815 1,020 60 Hispanic 3,160 990 850 25 Table 21— Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI Data 2007-2011 CHAS Source. Discussion: Asians have a greater likelihood of experiencing housing cost burden than other minority residents. The 2007-2011 CHAS data table shows that 10.5% of Asians pay between 30-50% of their monthly income to housing costs and 8.1 8 are severely cost burden and pay more than 50;•6 of their monthly income to housing costs. The other minority groups that are at risk of experiencing housing cost burden are Pacific Islanders (3.80/j) and Hispanics (4.6%). These minority groups are also in danger of experiencing severe cost burden (more than 50 ,,, of monthly income to housing costs). There are no racial or ethnic groups that show a disproportionately housing cost burden need. Consolidated Pian HAWAII COUNTY 37 OMS Control No 2506 0117 (exp, 06/30/2018) NA -30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion — 91.205(b)(2) Are there any Income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole? There are no racial or ethnic groups that show a disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole. However, in the County of Hawaii, Asians have a greater likelihood to experience housing problems than any other minority group. Pacific Islanders and Hispanics are other minority groups that are more likely to experience housing problems. If they have needs not identified above, what are those needs? There are no racial or ethnic groups that show a disproportionately greater need. Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community? Those racial or ethnic groups that may have a greater likelihood to experience housing problems are located throughout the island of Hawaii. However, according to the 2010 Census data, there are a few low/moderate income (0 80% AMI) census tracts that may have a large population Of Asians, Pacific Islanders and Hispanics. these would be census tracts 202.02, 203, 205, 210.05, 210.10, 211.01 and 212.02. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 38 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) NA -35 Public Housing — 91.2O5(b) Introduction All of the public housing projects on the Big Island and throughout the State are the responsibility of the State Hawaii Public Housing Authority (HPHA). The HPHA manages 85 projects consisting of 6,196 units of public housing. The Big Island has 20 public housing projects, throughout the island, totaling 715 units. Currently, the occupancy rate statewide is 98%. The State Section 8 waitlist is so large that it has been closed since 2006. The County's Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) manages the County's Section 8 program. As of December 31, 2014, there were 1,723 households being assisted with Section 8 Choice Vouchers, 153 project -based vouchers, 39 tenant -based rental assistance and 22 Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Vouchers. The current waitlist has 6,074 households and it is made up of 4,616 extremely low income, 1,154 very low income and 304 low income households. The approximately wait period is more than 5 years. Affordable housing is the greatest need throughout the County of Hawaii as evidence by the County's Section 8 Choice Voucher list of 6,074 households with a wait period of over 5 years. The need of affordable housing units is critical for the residents of the County but the lack of developers willing to develop affordable housing units is a barrier. The lack of developable land is not an issue on the Big Island as there is an vast amount of land available, however the lack of infrastructure and water maybe a barrier in developing affordable housing. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 39 OMB Control No. 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 0) w D i Y 0 F d CL H E tw 0 CL J2 no _ 3 O 3 CL N N G7 .0 F c a C F m E 0 x no V 3 Z C m L m }. m E m C R m N C 0 E m •+ N Qf B m H T d 'o c 0 Z m v 3 U Y) Y C 13 G1 OC O Ln LM �L cu m L m s u O O O O a O o, R L v1 d D t }, C E u 3 O > = R i g, m - t O u m %- u m ? 3 " 0 a a � 0 0. fi u CL d c CD ;I b LD 7 V} m L Y w C. 3 P as CL 0 LA D cn G1 -a n m L ` 3 w O -4 T rw n=i n �� � c =CL ui u � aj CL W m o M 0. t/1 d C: _ C. lO F 00 EL W � u 0 O lD N O m ~ O W CL` > W to u = muOi O 3 p, O - m O -o ro o s N W O Ql cr u r O V) R 41 h N i� m .0 W 4J u CL ai lU IA m W I IA L Q✓ rn rn N tD v W t T G U 1 r 0 5 Ln 41C m 7 pu O 0 O Q Q O xe d CL H E tw 0 CL J2 no _ 3 O 3 CL N N G7 .0 F c a C F m E 0 x no V 3 Z C m L m }. m E m C R m N C 0 E m •+ N Qf B m H T d 'o c 0 Z m v 3 U Y) Y C 13 G1 OC O Ln LM �L cu m L m s u e m 0 O O O O a O L }, C E L R i u m 0 0. 7 QI D CL ` 3 w O -4 T rw �� � c =CL aj CL W t/1 d C: _ 00 lD N O m 00 W n W muOi - m ri N W O Ql O u N V) 41 h N m .0 W CL lU N W I IA L Q✓ rn rn N tD W T G 1 r E m pu O O O Q Q O C L � o O O O O O O O d! a; O O O O C:s o m u y L d V Y r_ m Q. 0] Ql C CI L M N Ln T wl O Q1 u Ln Y3 O 'a R L _ O 3 L OJ Ln LL = O LA u .O m ro ro rtE0 w O =O r4 'D O ¢ ¢ ¢' ft ft ^ va e m 0 Eo 00 rf " N r� Q N � a o tu J2 CL` u 0° c N 7 � 0. O C G O D C G G M � Y � Lni rn � a� "' N r -I n m L m LA 'c 0 s u 7 Q j C 0 0 0 O O G C! :0-2 E "Cf d 0 m t E u m � Q' mo c C " jM. a R uW y m 0 0 N O Ln CL c Ln to y a `a i CL U � a =_ Ca Q C) ° r" 0 o v C CU b%A c m w m H 00 rf " N r� Q N � a o tu J2 CL` u 0° c N 7 � 0. O 000�0� OOO�OC C m [a � Y � Lni rn � u "' N r -I n Z 0 u Q m Q 010101 o O "Cf d I'm C � 000�0� OOO�OC CL 'C co 07 0 � o 'a M O o CA d a L5 N N O z a C 0 u m C m [a Y u "' a u Q m L "Cf d C � u c C R > y a `a U Z Ca Q Q 4 0 CL 'C co 07 0 � o 'a M O o CA d a L5 N N O z a C 0 u m � o c 2 > c o 0 § E ■ 2 % C � C2 _ t -Ln @ > CL 0 Z 4n , q 2 k 0 E K CL m § = E = & E tw E § co q E 2 s CL$ . $ i .0 c2 �2 EFA � / Z fA m 2 -0 a: $ U G c z 7 §m0 - R k _ e 2 u ƒ 2 / > ; 2 / M \ 7 m cu u- a —5 L �_ w o k @ `� o o -� CU gr r4 w wtu a /cr CA k E . E g k \ / c cu 2 2 0 ca k � m 3 m _ 272 / 2 f vp C3 { A $ u \ 2 7 ¢ _ L k2 k k 2 f z r4 CA w a ) M CL En § km 2 C . o m 2 0 G LLA § Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units: There is a definite need for accessible units for public housing tenants and applicants on the waitlist. According to the 2011 Hawaii Housing Planning Survey, there were approximately 130,500 people in the State of Hawaii with a form of disability. This represents approximately 10.6 percent of the State of Hawaii's non -institutionalized population. Persons with disabilities require special housing considerations not only to accommodate physical limitations, but also as a result of their financial challenges. Hawaii's residents with disabilities are more likely than residents without disabilities to have incomes below the poverty line. According to the HHPS 2011 Housing Demand Survey, Statewide, about 19 percent of households with at least one person with a disability currently live in public housing. An additional 1,774 households with a member with a disability are on the waitlist for public housing units, accounting for 17 percent of the close to 9,000 households on the public housing waitlist. Households with persons with disabilities on public housing waitlists may also be on the waitlist for Section 8 housing vouchers. About one-fourth of Hawaii residents with disabilities (21%) receive Section 8 assistance. Nearly 3,000 of the over 17,000 families waiting for Section 8 rental assistance have members with disabilities (17%). In the County of Hawaii 901(15%) households with at least one person with a disability are on the County's Section 8 waitlist. Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders Although the process may be in place to address the individual's choice of residential setting, limited resources are available to support their choices; like initial deposits and monthly rent payments. limited housing inventory for Section 8 voucher holders, low cost rentals, rent subsidies, and the high cost of living in Hawaii make it challenging for low-income families to obtain housing and live independently. How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at large In many ways these needs are similar to the housing needs of the population at large. The population at large also faces the high cost of living in Hawaii, limited housing inventory and low cost rentals. However, the low-income families face the challenge of having less and less disposable income at a time when housing costs are rising. Discussion Narrative included in previous sections. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 43 CM8 Control No. 2506-0117 (exp. 05;110/2-318) NA -40 Homeless Needs Assessment — 91.205(c) Introduction: An ongoing challenge for the County of Hawai'i, and the State of Hawai'i, involves the issue of Homelessness. A large part of the homeless issue is not having affordable housing available, unaffordable rental prices, and low employment opportunities. When you combine these issues with the lack of behavioral health providers and substance addiction counseling programs, many in need fall in the gaps. Through the efforts of the County of Hawaii Mayor's office and the development of the West Hawai'i Chronic Homeless Intervention and Rehabilitation Project (CHIRP) and the East Hawai'i Coalition on Homelessness, the service providers that target the homeless have been able to better coordinate the services they provide while minimizing duplication of efforts. Statistics from the Homeless Service Utilization 2014 report shows that Hawaii County had the highest proportion of chronically homeless clients at 34%. The City and County of Honolulu had the lowest proportion of chronically homeless clients at 20%. Statewide and in all counties, a larger number and/or pro -portion of adults were identified as chronically homeless in FY 2014 than in FY 2013. In the 2014 "State of Homelessness in America" report, Hawaii ranked highest among the 50 states for homeless people per capita. A recent state-sponsored tally found there were more than 4,700 homeless on Oahu, with at least 2r200 an neighboring islands — figures that most advocates agree underreport the true total. Housing costs in Hawaii • Hawai'i's rents exceed the national average by 50%, with about 75% of households in poverty spending more than half of their income on rent. • Hawai'i's housing costs are the highest among the states, while Honolulu is the most expensive metropolitan area for housing. • A minimum wage worker would have to work 177 hours per week, 52 weeks per year, to afford a two bedroom apartment at market rent. The "housing wage" — what a worker would need to earn hourly to afford a two bedroom apartment at fair market rent—is $32.14. Meanwhile, the average hourly wage for a renter is $13.56, while minimum wage is just $7.25. • Inability to pay rent and eviction are frequently cited as events leading to homelessness. Even for those who are working or ready to move into permanent housing, there are few affordable options, causing them to languish in shelters or transitional housing. • Hawai'i has the highest rate of "doubling up" in the country, where multiple generations live in one unit. Hawaii residents at middle income levels have trouble finding affordable housing or purchasing homes, but low-income families face a severe affordability crisis. The Hawai'i County Office of Housing and Community Development's (OHCD) work focuses on affordable rental housing for those in greatest need. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 44 OMB Control No 25060117 Jexp 06/301"2018] to H w o 0 O # C H Ln Ln 1* q 0 0 0 0 0 O 4 m r y c y m E '' am m o t LU at: IA w v kD N Ln 0 0 0 0 0 d L, n ru y. a0+ +4d E E m O d il •O L CUn n O O O O O 0 N n di 07 d U u ty ba 0 0o N n rn M tp 01* c y y, n N Ln W W CL ER tyit X O W L dr -i r4 t v T--4 r- M N T-4 O O 0 L V -q m r- 0 o c cu r i a m r O E C C 0 � s aci = to °° rnn N n n o o a �E a ° LU X s ♦+ Q D O � ¢� C 3 3 3 M p vi 'O %n 'C Lr 'C ii to 2 a 4J OJ i CL tA E 0 V a M G 0 0 0 c ~ c r c�- C C L CC L C u •� u G i O u w C HO aN' O CL) um CL Mas u a Q u u>> a LA W) cu cj Q t0 L t m a 0 m N c G Y t� N QN d t1 dLn O Ln x � t31 c E tL o 'J t3 .� aj 3 to Ln U O C vi LA q* G z n O U a x C m tl M 0 to c O U 2 0 c E cu 2 V ■ z tn vi E 0 x � � �2 $ $ 0 0 0 0 k■ k Lno £ - u © CL - © Z 2 dl 0 . Lu % 7 g o 0 0 0 0 e � n �. _ ■ & E k M . _ = 12w § § ©¥ 7 0:3! � c o 0 0 0 5 c o r� r, e 2 2 w ■ E � 0 � � # �2 m o r- m m o# Q3 r- � �' r- to tn t k ■ § . CL E� I' x o © ( . . ... ./ . � U& g o 0 �_ r. 0 e m ¥ 0 r a�t ® E - \ �tw k E- m ƒ r q/ rl/ o � a 2 W - Ln m . E r - Lu / Ln « o o / - c k k § a Ln& o 0 o $ Ln n t wl wl E E 2 >_ o 0 c � 0 a I 0 I \ I CLtn � 0 U 0 / 0 2 5 E @ 41 m t2 ƒ & ƒ d C J / d $ \ ƒ � 2 g 2 =3 0 k R « _ m ai� 0 Ln0 L) For persons in rural areas who are homeless or at risk of homelessness, describe the nature and extent of unsheltered and sheltered homelessness with the jurisdiction: One of the characteristics of the homeless population within the rural area are that 79 of the homeless are unemployed and 88% are non -veterans. Besides the White population the next highest race that are homeless is the Native Hawaiians/Pacific islanders. The estimated number of persons experiencing homelessness on a given night is approximately 2,300 Sheltered and unsheltered is 1,759. The estimated total number of persons experiencing homelessness each year is approximately 4,059 If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," and "number of days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth): The estimated number of persons becoming homeless each year are Persons in Househalds with Adult(s) and Children is 1,064; Persons in Households with only Children is 287; and Persons in Households with Only Adults is 777. The estimated number of persons exiting homelessness each year are Persons in Households with Adult(s) and Children is 1,716; Persons in Households with Only Children is 464; and Persons in Households with only Adults is 1,252. The estimated number of days persons experience homelessness are Persons in Households with Adult(s) and Children is 45; Persons in 0 Households with Only Children is 45; and Persons in Households with Only Adults is 52. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 47 OMB Control No 2506.0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Nature and Extent of Homelessness: (Optional) Race: E Sheltered: Unsheltered (optional) White Black or African American 70 4 0 0 Asian American Indian or Alaska Native 6 .. 4 0 D Pacific Islander 34 0 Ethnicity: Hispanic Sheltered: 15 Unsheltered (optional) 0 Not Hispanic 103 0 Data Source Comments: Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for families with children and the families of veterans. Safe shelter and housing for families is a strong concern for the County of Hawaii_ By being proactive and continuing to hold this as a top concern, the County finds it important that by assisting families with children through such programs as Rapid Rehousing, or Section S Rental Assistance vouchers, stability and safety wil I be a common standard as they grow into adults. A group known as the West Hawai'i Chronic Homeless Intervention and Rehabilitation Project (CHIRP) is comprised of Hawaii County Departmental representatives and nonprofit service providers charged with addressing homelessness on the island. Established as a directive by Mayor Kenoi, this collaborative effort of community stakeholders meets monthly to strategize on the needs of the homeless and to leverage limited resources that assist in addressing the needs. A member of this group represents the Veteran population on the West side of the island and provides insight on their efforts involving homeless Veterans. Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group. Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders continue to show the highest vulnerability to homelessness, second to the White population. It is also known that a high percentage of Native Hawaiians are chronic homeless clients, who also comprise a high percentage of chronic homeless families. The Hawai'i County Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD), Existing Housing Division, had received a grant from the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) to assist Native Hawaiians to purchase affordable homes. This effort is the first collaboration with OHCD and OMA in assisting Native Hawaiians to become home- owners of affordable housing units. Statistically, Native Hawaiians continue to have the highest Consolidated Plan OMB Control Na: 2506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) HAWAII COUNTY 48 incarceration percentages in the State of Hawaii, along with high rates of substance addiction, behavioral health problems, obesity, heart disease, Cancer, and diabetes. By providing shelter and permanent housing, Native Hawaiian families can receive the services which would help to provide a more stable home environment, which could positively affect the social and health challenges Native Hawaiian families face. Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness. Statewide and across counties, single -person households were the most common among types of households in all homeless programs. In general, family households with children under the age of 18 outnumbered family households without children. The average household size for the Shelter Program was 1.8 persons, the same as that of the Rapid Rehousing Program. The Outreach Program served smaller households, with an average size of 1.2 persons. Discussion: The definition of rural homelessness is the homeless population located in the rural areas of the Big Island. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 49 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) NA -45 Non -Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b,d) Introduction: This section will discuss the characteristics and needs of the non -homeless special needs population in the State of Hawaii and the County of Hawaii. Data for this section will be mainly from the 2011 Hawaii Housing Planning Study. Included in the special needs populations are: • Elderly and Frail Elderly • Exiting Offenders • Persons with Alcohol and Other Drug Addictions • Persons with Disabilities • Persons Diagnosed with HIV or AIDS • Persons with Severe Mental Illness • Victims of Domestic Violence • Emancipated Foster Youth Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community: The elderly population, age 62 or older, in Hawaii is increasing and is expected to account for more than one-quarter of Hawaii's population by 2030. There are 22,752 households that include one or more frail elderly persons, those persons with physical or ability to independently perform activities of daily living. For another special needs population, ex -offenders, housing is often their most immediate concern. Some exiting offenders will return to their pre -imprisonment residence upon their release, most will be in need of affordable rental housing options_ In 2004, an estimated 78,896 statewide were in need of alcohol and/or drug treatment, an increase of approximately 10 percent between 1998 and 2004. Approximately five percent of these individuals (3,759) are adolescents in grades 6 through 12 who are in need of treatment for alcohol or drug use, or both. Persons with some form of disability make up approximately 130,500 people in the state of Hawaii, roughly 10.6 percent of the State of Hawaii's non -institutionalized population. They require special housing considerations not only to accommodate physical limitations, but also as a result of their financial challenges. Hawaii's residents with disabilities often have incomes below the poverty line. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 50 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06130/2018) The Department of Health, Developmental Disabilities Division reported that 3,292 Hawaii residents with developmental disabilities were being served. Adult individuals with Developmental Disabilities/Mental Retardation (DD/MR) live in various residential settings, most live with their family and 195 live in settings other than with family. There were 14 individuals who wanted to live independently in their own home (with or without supports), but would require a rental subsidy to help pay for rent. These individuals lived with their family, relative, in an Adult Residential Care Home (ARCH) or Adult Foster Home (AFH), or were homeless, but remained in their current living situation due to limited resources to assist them to live independently. According to the annual HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report issued by the Hawaii State Department of Health at the end of 2010, the cumulative number of individuals diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in Hawaii is 4,209. Of those, 55 percent (2,318 persons) are confirmed living. Nearly 32,000 of Hawaii's residents live with severe mental illness. Of those, about 11,000 are receiving services from the State Department of Health's Adult Mental Health Division (AMHD). While many mentally ill individuals receive treatment from private physicians, it is highly likely that a large number of Hawaii residents with severe mental illness are not receiving treatment or support. Roughly 1 in 4 women will experience domestic violence at some point during her lifetime. With females accounting for half of Hawaii's population of 1.36 million, that is close to 170,000 women subjected to domestic violence. It is estimated that 150 youth per year leave the foster care system through emancipation at age 18, and an additional 50 youth leave the system at age 16 for other reasons. Upon exiting the foster care system, some youth remain with their foster parents or return to living with their immediate or extended family. However, transition into tenuous living arrangements, often in substandard and/or overcrowded conditions. National studies suggest that approximately 30 percent of former foster youth will experience homelessness shortly after leaving foster care. What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations and how are these needs determined? The elderly and frail elderly have needs for specific housing unit amenities such as ramps, railings, grab bars and emergency call systems. These kinds of quality of life modifications in their homes are needed as well as to be in close proximity to retail and medical establishments and have access to public transportation. Alternative housing options for exiting offenders such as halfway house programs is critical as ex - offenders are found to commit fewer and less severe offenses during a one-year outcome analysis than those who did not participate. Participants were also more successful at finding and holding a job, being self-supporting, and participating in self-improvement programs. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 51 OMB Control No 25060117 (exp. 06/30/20181 Providers working with alcohol and other drug addictions have indicated that there is a need for more clean and sober housing during the recovery period. The most pressing need is for clean and sober houses for women with children, followed by a similar housing option for single women. Households with at least one person with a disability currently live in public housing. Many households with a member with a disability are on the waitlists for public housing units and for Section 8 housing vouchers. About a fourth of Hawaii residents with disabilities (21%) receive Section 8 assistance. Another obstacle is the limited resources are available to support their choices, like initial deposits and monthly rent payments. Limited resources for Section 8 vouchers, low cost rentals, and rent subsidies, and the high cost of living in Hawai'i make it challenging for individuals with DD/MR to obtain housing and live independently. Studies show that Hawaii residents with HIV were in need of Housing assistance, nearly 2,000 housing units. Lack of affordable housing is a critical problem facing a growing number of people living with AIDS and other illnesses caused by HIV. They often lose their jobs due to discrimination or because of the fatigue and periodic hospitalization caused by HIV-related illness. Their incomes are often drained by the costs of health care. As result of their lack of stable housing is the lack ongoing HIV care and often rely on more costly care from emergency and acute care facilities, poorer health outcomes and shorter lives. Hawai'i's mentally ill population face specific challenges related to finding adequate housing. This includes insufficient funding to provide Section 8 housing vouchers, rules barring persons with a history of drug abuse from public housing and difficulty in finding appropriate housing for persons with Severe Persistent Mental Illness (SPMI). These individuals also face limited employment opportunities. They are less likely to become and remain gainfully employed. Persons with SPMI have extremely low incomes and are in need of housing assistance. Victims and survivors of domestic violence often encounter difficulties finding housing, as their situation contributes to poor employment, credit or rental histories- They lack access to safe, adequate, and affordable housing which would allow for independence and permanently end the cycle of violence. Many victims are forced to stay with or return to their abusive partners due to a lack of available shelter or affordable housing, many have reported staying in an abusive relationship because they had nowhere e Ise to go. Most of the 150 youth exiting the foster care system each year need assistance to find or maintain permanent housing. A number of service providers emphasized the need to create affordable housing for former foster youth and/or improve access to Section 8 housing. The need for more "youth -friendly" independent living programs and group homes that serve the particular needs of foster youth has also been emphasized. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 52 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their families within the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area: According to the annual HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report issued by the Hawaii State Department of Health at the end of 2010, the cumulative number of individuals diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in Hawaii is 4,209. Of those, 55 percent (2,318 persons) are confirmed living. The 2008 Hawaii AIDS clinical Research Program (HACRP) Statewide HIV/AIDS Medical Care Needs Assessment indicates that there are 2,700 confirmed people with HIV living in Hawaii. The HACRP survey found that 74 percent of the 2,700 confirmed Hawaii residents with HIV were I need of housing assistance (63% long term and 11% short term). This finding indicates a need for nearly 2,000 housing units. According to the National Coalition for the Homeless, lack of affordable housing is a critical problem facing a growing number of people living with AIDS and other illnesses caused by HIV. People with HIV/AIDS may lose their jobs due to discrimination or because of the fatigue and periodic hospitalization caused by HIV-related illness. They may also find their incomes drained by the costs of health care. Persons living with HIV/AIDS who do not have stable housing may lack ongoing HIV care and often rely on more costly care from emergency and acute care facilities. They have poorer health outcomes and shorter lives. Stable housing for those people can reduce emergency visits by 35 percent and hospitalizations by 57 percent. Housing assistance leads to savings in avoidable health services that more than offset the costs of housing interventions. Discussion: Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 53 OMB Control No- 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) NA -50 Non -Housing Community Development Needs -- 91.215 (f) Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Facilities: The need for Public Facilities was identified thru the Community Needs Survey and through public hearings though out the County. In addition, County departments submit annual request for the need to utilize CDBG funds for various County Facilities such as Neighborhood Community Centers, Recreational Park Facilities and Fire Equipment. How were these needs determined? Based on the survey responses as well as public input, the County has identified Public Facilities as a High Priority for the use of CDBG funds. The Coonty will allocate CDBG funds in accordance with CDBG program and project eligibility requirements to projects that address a high priority meet the needs but not limited to Neighborhood Facilities, Pa,-k/Recreational Facilities, Health Facilities, Youth Centers, Homeless Facilities, Child Care Centers and Senior Centers. Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Improvements: The need for Public Improvements was identified thru the Community Needs Survey and through public hearings though out the County, The County of Hawaii is the largest Island in the State of Hawaii as well as the youngest. Based on the Census, the County has the largest growth in population but lacks infrastructure especially in the many rural areas. Improving infrastructure to provide the basic necessities to all its citizens is important. How were these needs determined? Based on the survey responses as well as public input, the County has identified Public Improvements as a High Priority for the use of CDBG funds. The County will allocate CDBG funds in accordance with CDBG program and project eligibility requirements to projects that address a high priority meet the needs but not limited Public Improvement activities such as Water/Sewer Improvement, Solid Waste Disposal, Flood Drain Improvements, Infrastructure for Economic Development and Removal of Architectural Barriers. Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Services: The need for Public Services was identified thru the Community Needs Survey and through public hearings though out the County. Non-profit service providers expressed a high need for public services to the elderly, mentally health services, substance abuse services and basic health services especially in rural areas throughout the County. Consolidated Plan HAWAll COUNTY 54 OMiB Control No. 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) How were these needs determined? Based on the survey responses as well as public input, the County has identified Public Services as a High Priority for the use of CDBG funds. The County will allocate CDBG funds in accordance with CDBG program and project eligibility requirements to projects that address a high priority meet the needs but not limited Handicap Services, Transportation Services, Substance Abuse Services, Employment Services, Health Services, Senior Services and Child Care Services. Consolidated Pian HAWAII COUNTY SS OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Housing Market Analysis MA -05 Overview Housing Market Analysis Overview. The following data was obtained through the 2011 Hawaii Housing Planning Study and the 2010 U.S. Census data. Population: Between 1990 and 2000, the County of Hawaii's population grew at a rate of 2.0 percent per year. In the first six years of the present decade, the county growth rate was 2.1 percent per year. Hawaii County was the only one of Hawaii's counties that had higher growth rates in 2000-2006 than in the nineties. The population growth rate climbed to 2.3 percent per year between 2006 and 2010 — tied with Maui for the highest in the State over the last four years. According to the 2010 U.S. Census the population in Hawaii County in 2010 was 185,079. Housing Stock: The total number of housing units in Hawaii County at the beginning of 2011 was about 83,325 units. Since 1990, the average annual growth rate for total units has been higher than the population growth rate. Hawaii housing stock grew by 2.5 percent between 1990 and 2000. Between 2000 and 2006, the growth rose to 2.9 percent per year. In the past four years, the annual growth rate was down slightly at 2.7 percent. Between 1990 and 2006, the housing stock used by Hawaii County households dropped from 86.0 to 78.9 percent. As is true for the other counties, the percentage of the total housing stock on the Big Island that is available to local residents soared to 93.0 percent. Households: The number of households, or occupied housing units, in Hawaii is a strong indicator of housing stock available to Hawaii residents. The total number of households on the Big Island grew 6 percent in the past four years, to 67,096 total households in 2010 The average household size also increased during that same time period, from 2.68 to 2.76 persons per household. Home Ownership: Housing stock growth from 1990 to 2006 fueled increasing home ownership rates across the State. The percent of occupied units that were owner occupied rose from 61 percent in 1990 to 67 percent in 2006. The growth rate was slow at first, rising three points between 1900 and 2000, one point between 2000 and 2003, and then another point in the last three years. Since 2006, that trend has leveled off. In 2011, 66 percent of the County's units were owner occupied. Out -of -State Ownership: In 2011, 12 percent of Hawaii County's single-family housing units and 49 percent of the condominium units were owned by persons from outside of the State. Housing Prices: The most salient characteristic of Hawaii's housing market in the last four years has been a slow decline in the prices. Home resale prices statewide fell in Hawaii from 1990 through 1990, and then rose at an increasing rate from 1998 through 2005. In 2006, sales prices continued to rise, but Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 56 QMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06?30/201$) at a slower pace. In 2006, the median sales prices in the County of Hawaii peaked at $421,250 for SFD and $426,500 for condominium units. Since then, the median price has fallen to $218,900 for SFD and $231,800 for condominiums. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 57 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) MA -10 Number of Housing Units — 91.210(a)&(b)(2) Introduction According to the 2007-2011 American Community Survey (ACS) data table, Hawaii County had a total of 81,221 housing units, of which 64,166 (79%) were single-family dwellings. The most common bedroom Size for owner -occupied housing units is three bedrooms at 75" , and renters at 46%. All residential properties by number of units Property Type Number % 1 -unit detached structure 1 -unit, attached structure 62,328 1,838 77% 2% 2-4 units 4,122 5% 5-19 units 7,268 9% 20 or more units 5,296 7% Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc 369 0% Total 81,221 100% Table 28 --Residential Properties by Unit Number Data Source: 2007-2011 ACS Unit Size by Tenure Table 29 -- Unit Size by Tenure Data Source= 2007-2011 ACS Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs. The Hawaii Public Housing Authority (HPHA) is the sole statewide public housing agency for the State of Hawaii. The HPHA Federal and State Low Income Public Housing programs combine make available housing units for over 6,100 families or more than 20,000 individuals. The HPHA manages 20 public housing projects on the Big Island, totaling 715 units. Not less than 40% of Federal family public housing units are restricted to "Extremely Law Income" families earning 30% AMI or less. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 5S OMS Control No 2506 0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Owners Renters Number % Number % No bedroom 655 2% 1,782 8% 1 bedroom 2,086 5% 3,420 16% 2 bedrooms 7,880 19% 6,619 30% 3 or more bedrooms 31,713 j 75% 10,115 1 46% Total 42,334 1 101% 21,936 1 100% Table 29 -- Unit Size by Tenure Data Source= 2007-2011 ACS Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs. The Hawaii Public Housing Authority (HPHA) is the sole statewide public housing agency for the State of Hawaii. The HPHA Federal and State Low Income Public Housing programs combine make available housing units for over 6,100 families or more than 20,000 individuals. The HPHA manages 20 public housing projects on the Big Island, totaling 715 units. Not less than 40% of Federal family public housing units are restricted to "Extremely Law Income" families earning 30% AMI or less. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 5S OMS Control No 2506 0117 (exp 06/30/2018) The "Extremely Low Income" families are not actually targeted but they are the group that make the least amount of money and are more in need of housing assistance. On the County of Hawaii Section 8 waitlist of 6,074 households, 76% (4,616 households) are "Extremely Low Income" households. 1154 households (19%) are "Very Low Income" households earning 30-50% AMI. Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts. Hawaii County has a shortage of affordable rental housing inventory throughout the island and it is anticipated that additional housing inventory will be lost with the current lava flow that is affecting the Pahoa area. The County has issued a moratorium in executing new Section 8 lease agreements in the lower Puna area because of the danger of the lava flow. Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population? No, there is a definite shortage of affordable housing units for the low, very -low and extremely -low income families in the County of Hawaii. According to the 2011 Hawaii Housing Planning Study for the period between 2012 and 2016, a total of 2,279 housing units are needed to meet the needs of the 80% AMI and below families in the County of Hawaii. Out of the total 2,279 housing units, 1,492 (65.5%) are needed by the "Extremely Low Income" households. Describe the need for specific types of housing: Households in the market for affordable homeownership opportunities and owner -occupied homes with three or more bedrooms have many opportunities as 75 percent of the total number of owner -occupied units are 3 or more bedrooms. The greatest housing need for the County of Hawaii residents are affordable rental units for low-income, very -low income and extremely -low income households. There are always a need for special needs housing, homeless housing and elderly housing. Discussion Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 59 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) MA -15 Housing Market Analysis. Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) Introduction The cost of housing in Hawaii is one of the highest in the nation. In other high—priced markets, prices tall, incomes rise, and affordability is recovered. In Hawaii, prices remain relatively high and it takes longer for incomes to catch up and restore affordability to the market. Nationwide, high priced real estate markets lost more than 50 percent of their boom -years gain by the end of 2009. In Hawaii, prices have been steadier than that. According to the 2011 Hawaii Housing Planning Study, the median sales price for a single. -family dwelling for the State was $513,300. The cost of housing is most affordable in Hawaii County. In 2011, the median sales price for a single-family dwelling was $224,500, in Maui and Kauai County it was $415,000 and in the City and County of Honolulu it was $570,000_ The median monthly rent amount for the State, in 2011, was $1,431. Hawaii County was the lowest in the State with a median monthly rent amount of $861. Cost of Housing Fable 30 -- Cost of Housing Data Source: 2000 Census (Base Year). 2007 2011 ACS (Mast Recent Year) Rent Paid Base Year: 2000 Most Recent Year: 2011 % Change Median Home Value 155,400 342,100 120% Median Contract Rent 553 865 56% Fable 30 -- Cost of Housing Data Source: 2000 Census (Base Year). 2007 2011 ACS (Mast Recent Year) Rent Paid Number % Less than $500 6,451 29.4% $500-999 7,910 36.1% $1,000-1,499 $1,500-1,999 4,782 1,936 21.8% 8.8% $2,000 or more Total 857 21,936 3.9% 100.00/0 Table 31- Rent Paid Data source: 2007-2011 ACS Housing Affordability r % Units affordable to Households earning Renter Owner 30% HAMFI 1,979 No Data 50% HAMFI 4,631 1,196 Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 60 OMB Control No, 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) % Units affordable to Households earning 80% HAMFI 100% HAMFI Tota! Data Source: 2007-2011 HA. Monthly Rent Renter 11,179 No Data 17,789 Table 32 -- Housing Affordability Owner 3,547 6,858 11,601 Monthly Rent ($) Efficiency (no bedroom) Fair Market Rent 0 High HOME Rent 0 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 0 4 Bedroom 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low HOME Rent 0 0 0 0 0 Table 33 — Monthly Rent Data Source Comments is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels? According to the 2011 Hawaii Housing Planning Study, the total number of housing units that will change hands in the period between 2012 and 2016 is approximately 60,000 to 75,000 units. This is the number of units that would be required to meet the needs of everyone who wanted to move. Most of those would be resales and not require any construction. The number of new units that would have to be built during that five-year period to meet new demand generated by changing demographic and economic conditions might be as high as 50,000. Units that are not built represent the shortage of units needed to fill total demand for housing units. This shortage has come to be known as `needed units" and is defined as the difference between total demand and expected supply. The total number of housing units needed, for the period 2012-2016, by the State is 28,137. The County of Hawaii needs a total number of housing units of 3,514 (12.51,5) if the State total. Out of the 3,514 housing units needed, 1,492 (42.5%) is needed by the households earning 30% AMI or less. 402 (11.4%) of households earning between 30-50% AMI need housing. The percentage of households needing housing is reduced as they earn more income. So there should be sufficient housing for households at the higher income levels, but insufficient housing for the lower income households. Consolidated Plan QM9 Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) HAWAII COUNTY 61 How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents? According to the 2011 Hawaii Housing Planning Study, the median sales price for a single-family dwelling for the State was $513,300. The cost of housing is most affordable in Hawaii County. In 2011, the median sales price for a single-family dwelling was $224,500, in Maui and Kauai County it was $415,000 and in the City and County of Honolulu it was $570,000. The median monthly rent amount for the State, in 2011, was $1,431. Hawaii County was the lowest in the State with a median monthly rent amount of $861. As home values and/or rents increase housing will become fess affordable for the residents of Hawaii County especially the very -low and extremely -low income households. How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing? Fair Market rent and the High HOME rent at $950 is slightly higher than the median monthly rent amount of $861. The Low HOME rent at $826 is slightly lower than the median monthly rent amount of $861. HOME rents are by their nature more affordable but are still at a level that HOME units are attractive to developers and affordable to tenants with a mnderate level of HOME subsidy. Discussion Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 62 OM9 Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) MA -20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing — 91.210(a) Introduction The age and condition of the County's housing stock are important variables in assessing the overall characteristics of a local housing market. This section will review important data about the County's housing stock. The older housing stock, particularly older rental housing often has code and deferred maintenance issues that can impact the longevity of the housing structure which in turn impacts the housing supply in terms of accessibility and affordability. According to the 2011 Hawaii Housing Planning Study, there are housing units in Hawaii that are in need of refurbishing. Compared with other States, However, the condition of Hawaii's housing stock is not a serious problem. Across the State, the median year built for our housing stock in 2009 was 1978 and the median age of all housing units was 32 years. Median unit age of all housing units was 32 years. Median unit age differs little across the state: 35 years for the City and County of Honolulu, 25 for Maui County, 28 for Hawaii County and about 27 for Kauai County. The national figure was 34 years. The condition of Hawaii's housing units as measured by the Census is relatively good. However, Census figures only identify units without suitable plumbing and kitchen facilities. Statewide less than one percent of our units have incomplete plumbing facilities and only 1.6 percent had incomplete kitchen facilities in 2009. The figures differed very little across the counties. Those figures get steadily better over time, and describe a housing stock in good condition. Housing units have been getting smaller over time, but some say they are better constructed as building codes get stronger. Our smaller housing units are also more crowded than in other places. Nationally, the average Census crowding rate was 3.2 percent in 2009. ACS reported that 8.5 percent of Hawaii housing units were crowded by the Census definition of more than one person per room. For the counties, the figures were 8.7 percent in Oahu, 7.6 percent in Hawaii County, 9.0 percent in Maui County and 7.9 percent on Kauai. Definitions HUD has identified four housing problems, which are 1) lack a complete kitchen facilities, 2) lack a complete plumbing facilities, 3) overcrowding or 4) cost burden. Overcrowding is defined by HUD as 1.01 to 1.50 persons per room while severe overcrowding is 1.51 or more persons per room. When households spend too much of their incomes on housing, they are considered to be "cost burden" or "severely cost burden". HUD has determined that households should spend no more than 30% of their income for housing. Households that pay more than 30% of their incomes on housing are considered cost burdened; households that pay more than 50% of their incomes are considered to be severely cost burdened. Cost burdened households will find it difficult to meet all household needs; severely cost burdened households may be in danger of becoming homeless. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 53 OMS Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Definitions The County's definition of "substandard condition" is housing units that are in poor condition, structurally unsound and is uninhabitable. The definition of "substandard condition but suitable for rehabilitation" is housing units that are in poor condition but it is structurally sound and financially feasible to rehabilitate. Condition of Units Condition of Units Owner -Occupied Renter -Occupied .............. Renter -Occupied % Number % Number % 6,448 With one selected Condition 15,312 1980-1999 36% 10,304 47% With two selected Conditions 1,241 34% 9% 3% 1,738 8% With three selected Conditions 158 1000/0 0% 1 128 1% With four selected Conditions 12 0% 0 0% No selected Conditions 25,611 61% 9,766 45% Tota! 42,334 1000/0 21,936 101 Table 34 - Condition of Units Data Source- 2007-2011 ACS Year Unit Built Year Unit Built Owner -Occupied Renter -Occupied Number % Number % 2000 or later 6,448 15% 3,042 14% 1980-1999 17,924 42% 7,845 36% 1950-1979 14,279 34% 9% 8,243 38% 2,806 13% Before 1950 3,683 Tota! 42,334 1000/0 21,936 101 Table 35 — Year Unit Built Data Source: 2007.2011 CHAS Risk of Lead -Based Paint Hazard Risk of Lead -Based Paint Hazard Owner -Occupied Renter -Occupied Number % Number % Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 17,962 42% 11,049 50% Housing Units build before 1980 with children present 2,967 7% 2,510 11% Table 36 — Risk of Lead -Based Paint Data Source: 2007-2011 ACS (Total Units) 2007-2011 CHAS (Units with Childrer present) Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 64 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp_ 06/3012018) Vacant Units Table 37 - Vacant Units Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation Currently, the County of Hawaii has a Residential Emergency Repair Program (RERP) for homeowners. The RERP is a low interest loan program that benefits very low, low and moderate income homeowners in the County of Hawaii to repair the dwelling that they occupy as their primary residence. Loans are available from $2,500 to $25,000 at 3% simple interest and payment is deferred for 15 years. Eligible disabled and/or elderly homeowners may qualify for 30% off the principal balance of the loan as a grant. All recipients must have clear title to their property. The loan is secured through a Mortgage and Promissory Note, which is recorded at the State of Hawaii Bureau of Conveyances. The program is administered by Existing Housing Division of the Office of Housing and Community Development. Between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014, approximately 127 RERP applications were sent out. Of these 127 applications, 40 were submitted and processed 19 were denied or cancelled, 10 have been obligated with a Mortgage and Note 6 are with contractor's packets and the remaining 5 are in process. The RERP has averaged at least 10 homes completion a year. Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low or Moderate Income Families with LBP Hazards Although lead based paint was banned for use in residential structures after 1978, may older homes still contain lead hazards. Lead is the most dangerous to young children (age 6 or younger) as exposure in early years may cause long term health and developmental difficulties. The Risk of Lead -Based Paint Hazard table shows there are a total of 5,477 households, in the County of Hawaii, with children who live in houses built before 1980. Although not a comprehensive collection of data, the Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response Office, State of Hawaii Department of Health, received tests results submitted electronically by the Hawaii Clinical Laboratories, from 2007-2015. The data represented the number and location of children 6 years or younger with an elevated blood lead levels of greater than or equal to 10 ug/dl. The total count of children with elevated blood lead levels, for the State, was 149 children. Honolulu had the Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY OMB Control No. 2506-0117 (exp 06130/2018) 65 Suitable for Rehabilitation Not Suitable for Rehabilitation Total Vacant Units 0 0 0 Abandoned Vacant Units 0 0 ❑ REO Properties 0 0 0 Abandoned REQ Properties 0 0 0 Table 37 - Vacant Units Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation Currently, the County of Hawaii has a Residential Emergency Repair Program (RERP) for homeowners. The RERP is a low interest loan program that benefits very low, low and moderate income homeowners in the County of Hawaii to repair the dwelling that they occupy as their primary residence. Loans are available from $2,500 to $25,000 at 3% simple interest and payment is deferred for 15 years. Eligible disabled and/or elderly homeowners may qualify for 30% off the principal balance of the loan as a grant. All recipients must have clear title to their property. The loan is secured through a Mortgage and Promissory Note, which is recorded at the State of Hawaii Bureau of Conveyances. The program is administered by Existing Housing Division of the Office of Housing and Community Development. Between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014, approximately 127 RERP applications were sent out. Of these 127 applications, 40 were submitted and processed 19 were denied or cancelled, 10 have been obligated with a Mortgage and Note 6 are with contractor's packets and the remaining 5 are in process. The RERP has averaged at least 10 homes completion a year. Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low or Moderate Income Families with LBP Hazards Although lead based paint was banned for use in residential structures after 1978, may older homes still contain lead hazards. Lead is the most dangerous to young children (age 6 or younger) as exposure in early years may cause long term health and developmental difficulties. The Risk of Lead -Based Paint Hazard table shows there are a total of 5,477 households, in the County of Hawaii, with children who live in houses built before 1980. Although not a comprehensive collection of data, the Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response Office, State of Hawaii Department of Health, received tests results submitted electronically by the Hawaii Clinical Laboratories, from 2007-2015. The data represented the number and location of children 6 years or younger with an elevated blood lead levels of greater than or equal to 10 ug/dl. The total count of children with elevated blood lead levels, for the State, was 149 children. Honolulu had the Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY OMB Control No. 2506-0117 (exp 06130/2018) 65 highest percentage (72.5°,�,) of children with an elevated lead levels, The County of Hawaii was second in the State with a total of 24 (16.1%) children with an elevated blood lead level. 50 percent (12) of the children were from Hilo. Discussion Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 66 oMeControl No 2506 0117 (exp 06/30/2018) OMA -25 Public and Assisted Housing — 91.210(b) Introduction All of the public housing projects on the Big Island and throughout the State are the responsibility of the State Hawaii Public Housing Authority (HPHA). The HPHA manages 85 projects consisting of 6,196 units of public housing. The Big Island has 20 public housing projects, throughout the island, totaling 715 units. Currently, the occupancy rate statewide is 989'x. The State Section 8 waitlist is so large that it has been closed since 2006. The County's Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) manages the County's Section 8 program. As of December 31, 2014, there were 1,723 households being assisted with Section 8 Choice Vouchers, 153 project -based vouchers, 39 tenant -based rental assistance and 22 Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Vouchers. The current waitlist has 6,074 households and it is made up of 4,616 extremely low income, 1,154 very low income and 304 low income households. The approximately wait period is more than 5 years. Affordable housing is the greatest need throughout the County of Hawaii as evidence by the County's Section 8 Choice Voucher list of 6,074 households with a wait period of over 5 years. The need of affordable housing units is critical for the residents of the County but the lack of developers willing to develop affordable housing units is a barrier. The lack of developable land is not an issue on the Big Island as there is an vast amount of land available, however the lack of infrastructure and water maybe a barrier in developing affordable housing. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY OMB Control No 2506-0117(exp 06/30/2018) 67 i O a d m " L C � I t } E r Q U. O I !A i d u 3 �32 =m ,c m 5 CL = L a W m e co M n ri L O 'a+ M t m y O Ln E ~ t7 b ti 11 ba O Ln a I Z A � � C n W � � w m a T L a a } E U- m E z wy ►. p L H c � �Im Q a � h oil C. O' m V N c 'ro O �n ? � C � 7 a LU > Z ai a y C .f] u mU ro m 0 m 0 *t; m 1. xt H C CL O d L .N O u_ .O O CL 0 fl. O. 7 tn m t N �L u to Q} al %A a 4� 0 rq M M .Ti aJ i 4-1 m L N 4- m tin cu m c a LD co a � C C m vt 0 a N t Ln :3 a w 0 D y Z w C L m Ln Ln r4 7 0 m a m Ln c N C tin S N 3 0 a 0 c 0 -a r- 0 its u r a ar L i3 (U a) a, C 00 G c m cu 0 n. Y N 'C m 0 o c 0 m � n N 0 0 IA N c Z 6 C V m Public Housing Condition Public Housing Development I Average Inspection Scare Table 39 - Public Housing Condition Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in the jurisdiction: In 2012, the State legislature passed and the governor signed into law Act 159, which provided the HPHA with a temporary exemption from civil service recruitment requirements, which allowed for the prompt hiring of exempt trade workers into teams, to complement the existing workforce and for the contracting of repair work for vacant public housing units statewide. In order to expedite the waitlist and reach the 98% statewide average occupancy goal, vacant units needed to be repaired quickly. This skilled crew of men and women, including carpenters, plumbers, electricians, and laborers, went to work renovating vacant units with the speed and skill necessary to produce quality units. This Special Teams have brought the level of unit occupancy up from 80% to 9&:.,0, and reduced the turnaround time of over 267 days down time to an average of less than seven days. Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low - and moderate -income families residing in public housing: The public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low and moderate -income families residing in public housing is to provide a decent, safe and healthy housing unit. The first priority would be to do the necessary repairs to improve the condition of the units. Another improvement would be to make more units accessible for disabled people. An improvement for health reasons would be the elimination of all large capacity cesspools and converting them to a septic system or connecting to the sewer system. The HPHA is also working to repair or replace all major building systems (boilers, generators, booster pumps, exhaust fans, etc.) in its aged housing inventory as well as placing those systems under maintenance contracts to ensure optimum working order and efficiency. The HPHA is looking to improve the security at their public housing properties by installing security cameras, improving exterior lighting and installing fencing around the perimeter. To help do all these improvements, as of June 30, 2014, the HPHA had budgeted $255,660,205 and had a total of 45 new contracts totaling $102,783,109. For the fiscal year 2014, the HPHA had completed 27 projects totaling $9,266,233. Discussion: Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 69 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) u ! 0 O O O 3O C N O s V4 w rn IA o I 0 vs x ar fA u H > L y Qi E V1 0 a x = o m Ln 'G cu M Ln d J LO �_ O m m LL. tic W C Ln °J � o � x 41 C o m L a ul � � N 0 O E c c 0 a 0 N Q rl FN z 0 u Q Q 2 ro a N ro 0 N c u° m 0 ! O O O O 3O C Ol o = L > 7 y 0 7 ML CU n m M Ln J 2 L � C 41 L a u M 00 O lD O a 7 m J Qw 2 66 A = ~' 9 7 i D = u 0 0 0 0 0 13H Qi t m W = d U C 7 Vol O c a � V1 } y 0 y N rn N H ry M n La ul .--. 41 L 41 `n m z E u o c a m � Y u 1 Ln 0 C ate+ N ro 7 VI 0 in m O 7 � a O a a } t L E -a 3 3 o Ln Ln m - Q. t d r u N 0 Q T C 0 t9 t y f0 0 t T u O T u m > > 0 O E c c 0 a 0 N Q rl FN z 0 u Q Q 2 ro a N ro 0 N c u° m 0 Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are used to complement services targeted to homeless persons The scope and magnitude of homelessness in the State of Hawaii have forced government officials to develop new paradigms of providing quality shelter and complimentary services to this vulnerable population. Programs have been developed to help prevent homelessness through financial counseling, employment training, and rental subsidies. Homelessness causes and results from serious health care issues, including addiction, psychological disorders, HIV/AIDS, and a host of order ailments that require long-term, consistent care. Homelessness inhibits this care, as housing instability often detracts from regular medical attention, access to treatment, and recuperation. This inability to treat medical problems can aggravate these problems, making them both more dangerous and more costly. The two federal funded Community Health Centers on the island have also provided care for this needy population. Hawai'i, specifically the Kona Airport, has seen a dramatic rise in homelessness which is associated with the direct flights from the continental U.S. People who are homeless spend more time in jail or prison, which is tremendously costly to the state and locality. Often, time served is a result of laws specifically targeting the homeless population, including regulations against loitering, sleeping in cars, and begging. According to a University of Texas two-year survey of homeless individuals, each person cost the taxpayers $14,480 per year, primarily for Oovernight jail. A typical cost of a prison bed in a state or federal prison is $20,000 per year. Part of the West Hawaii CHIRP and the East Hawaii Coalition on Homelessness has representatives from the Hawai'i County Prosecutor's Office. The value of this involvement is that a sub -group of staff involved in the judiciary system can now assist and work with other County entities, such as the Hawaii Fire Department's Emergency Medical Services division to identify the high -users of emergency, medical, and judicial services. As a homeless individual prepares for re-entry into society after serving time due to minor infractions and bench warrants, the Prosecutor's office helps to coordinate homeless service provides to be present at the Court house to provide seamless care with re-entry into the community. Homeless individuals are assessed to determine if personal identification is needed, nutritional services are accessible, and a host of other services matched to the immediate needs of the individual. Emergency shelter is a costly alternative to permanent housing. While it is sometimes necessary for short-term crises, too often it serves as long-term housing. The cost of an emergency shelter bed funded by HUD's Emergency Shelter Grants program is approximately $8,067 more than the average annual cost of a federal housing subsidy (Section 8 Housing Certificate). A recent HUD study found that the cost of providing emergency shelter to families is generally as much or more than the cost of placing them in transitional or permanent housing. On the island there currently exist four emergency shelters with the capacity of 100 beds. Three of the shelters are for adult individuals, and the remaining shelter provides shelter for families with children. Studies have shown that providing people experiencing chronic Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY OMB Control No 2506.0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 71 homelessness with permanent supportive housing saves taxpayers money. Permanent supportive housing refers to permanent housing coupled with supportive services. List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP -40 Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA -35 Special Needs Facilities and Services, describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations. Child & Family Services, West Hawaii Domestic Abuse Shelter and Hale 'Ohana, and HOPE Services Hawai'i's Friendly Place and Kihei Pua Emergency Shelter, provide emergency shelter to domestic violence victims and their children_ Child and Family Services, HOPE Service Hawaii and Beyond Shelter, provide transitional shelter care to women and their children, as well as for families. In addition, HOPE Service Hawaii has two homes, Wilder House and Kuleana House. which provide transitional housing for adult individuals and their children. HOPE Resource Center, provides transitional shelter for recently incarcerated men re-entering society. Hawai'i Island Home for Fecovery Transitional Housing, provides transitional housing for adult individuals by providing safe, decent, cleanr and sober housing to meet the basic needs of an individual for up to two years. Services such as Access Capabilities, Alahou Clean and Sober Housing, Big Island Catholic Charities Hawaii provide services for individuals and families affected by substance abuse and addiction and interpersonal violence. Alahou Clean and Sober Housing provide the only long term housing facility on the Big Island for individuals with a dual diagnosis of addiction combined with mental illness. Catholic Charities Hawaii provides alternative education, community based residential, comprehensive counseling and support services, crisis mobile outreach, developing options to violence program, domestic violence advocacy, domestic violence batterer services, domestic violence emergency shelter, domestic violence survivor services, employment services for refugees, and enhanced healthy start. Family centers include Neighborhood Place of Wailuku, Hale Ho'omalu & Nana's douse on Kauai, Hilo & O'ahu Family Centers. They provide family strengthening services, head start, healthy start early identification, healthy start -home visiting, immigrant resource center, independent living program for residential services (Hawai'i Island), 'Ohana care, parent line/home reach, positive youth development, REACH (Responsiveness, Encouragement and Assistance through Counseling and Help), senior groups (health maintenance), sex abuse treatment services, specialized substance abuse treatment -E Ala Hou, teen pregnancy prevention program, therapeutic crisis home, transitional family home/respite home, transitional housing, and Voluntary Case Management (VCM). Other services include: Habitat for Humanity -eliminates substandard housing locally and worldwide through constructing, rehabilitating, and preserving homes; Hawaii Sober Living -provides treatment for drug and alcohol addiction, behavioral addictions including sex, pornography, food and gambling addiction, and co-occurring mental health conditions including depression, anxiety, PTSD and bipolar disorder; Hawaii Island HIV/AIDS Foundation- provides island -wide coordination of services to all persons affected by HIV/AIDS; Lokahi Treatment Centers- provides substance abuse treatment & prevention programs, anger management programs for adults, adolescents & children, domestic Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 72 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) violence intervention classes, mental health evaluations & counseling, co-occurring disorder treatment program, psychiatric evaluation s, family therapy sessions, women's trauma group, individual counseling, and medication management; Neighborhood Place of Puna provides child abuse and neglect prevention. Steadfast Housing and Development Corporation administers housing and employment options throughout the state of Hawaii to adults with serious and persistent mental illnesses. THE CHOW Project serves individuals, families and communities adversely affected by drug use, especially people who inject drugs. CHOW works to reduce drug-related harms. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 73 OMB Control No, 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) MA -35 Special Needs Facilities and Services — 91.21O(d) Introduction Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, public housing residents and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify, and describe their supportive housing needs In 2011, the Housing Demand Survey evaluated the need for specific housing unit amenities among the elderly and frail elderly. The survey found that approximately 38 percent of elderly residents needed housing unit amenities such as ramps, railings, grab bars and emergency call systems. Not only do the frail elderly need these kinds of quality of life modifications in their homes, they also need to be in close proximity to retail establishments and medical facilities with convenient access to public transportation. The importance of alternative housing options for exiting offenders is underscored by the results of several recent studies. Offenders participating in halfway house programs were found to commit fewer and less severe offenses during a one-year outcome analysis (at a statistically significant level) than those who did not participate. Participants also performed better on a range of other outcome measures, such as finding and holding a job, being self-supporting, and participating in self- improvement programs. According to providers, there is a need for more clean and sober housing during the recovery period. The most pressing need is for clean and sober houses for women with children, followed by a similar housing option for single women. According to the HHPS 2011 Housing Demand Survey, Statewide, about 19 percent of households with at least one person with a disability currently live in public housing. An additional 1,774 households with a member with a disability are on the waitlist for public housing units, accounting for 17 percent of the close to 9,000 households on the public housing waitlist. MA -35 pg. 2 Households with persons with disabilities on public housing waitlists may also be on the waitlist for Section 8 housing vouchers. About one-fourth of Hawaii residents with disabilities (21%) receive Section 8 assistance. Nearly 3,000 of the over 17,000 families waiting for Section 8 rental assistance have members with disabilities (17%). Although the process may be in place to address the individual's choice of residential setting, limited resources are available to support their choices, like initial deposits and monthly rent Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 74 OM9 Control No: 25060117 {exp. 06/30/20181 payments. Limited resources for Section 8 vouchers, low cost rentals, and rent subsidies, and the high cost of living in Hawaii make it challenging for individuals with DD/MR to obtain housing and live independently. The Hawaii AIDS Clinical Research Program (HACRP) survey found that 74 percent of the 2,700 confirmed Hawaii residents with HIV were in need of Housing assistance (63% long term and 11% short term). This finding indicates a need for nearly 2,000 housing units. According to the National Coalition for the Homeless, lack of affordable housing is a critical problem facing a growing number of people living with AIDS and other illnesses caused by HIV. People with HIV/AIDS may lose their jobs due to discrimination or because of the fatigue and periodic hospitalization caused by HIV-related illness. They may also find their incomes drained by the costs of health care. MA -35 pg 3 Persons living with HIV/AIDS who do not have stable housing may lack ongoing HIV care and often rely on more costly care from emergency and acute care facilities. They have poorer health outcomes and shorter lives. Stable housing for those people can reduce emergency visits by 35 percent and hospitalizations by 57 percent. Housing assistance leads to savings in avoidable health services that more than offset the costs of housing interventions. Many victims of domestic violence are forced to stay with or return to their abusive partners due to a lack of available shelter or affordable housing. One study found that 46 percent of homeless women reported staying in an abusive relationship because they had nowhere else to go. Victims and survivors of domestic violence often encounter difficulties finding housing, as their history of abuse may have caused poor employment, credit or rental histories. These individuals need access to safe, adequate, and affordable housing in order to achieve independence and permanently end the cycle of violence. Most of the 150 youth exiting the foster care system each year need assistance to find or maintain permanent housing. While connections to housing resources have improved, more could be done to support foster youth planning for transition and finding affordable housing. A number of service providers emphasized the need to create affordable housing for former foster youth and/or improve access to Section 8 housing. The need for more "youth -friendly" independent living programs and group homes that serve the particular needs of foster youth has also been emphasized. Some potentially viable residential alternatives would need to make simple changes to their policies in order to allow youth to work late hours or attend evening courses, for example. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY OMB control No 2506-0117(exp 06/30/2018) 75 Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing Service providers and advocates who work closely with HawaiTs mentally ill population note four types of challenges related to finding adequate housing for members of this group. 1. Insufficient funding to provide Section 8 housing vouchers needed is historically a challenge, and was exacerbated when the economic crisis led to severe budget cuts. 2. Because there are rules barring persons with a history of drug abuse from public housing, and substance abuse is extremely common among persons with Severe Persistent Mental Illness (SPMI), finding appropriate housing for persons with SPMI is difficult. 3. Employment opportunities for mentally ill individuals are often very limited so the likelihood of them becoming and remaining gainfully employed is not high. 4. A lack of blended housing that provides both shelter and supportive services makes it difficult to place SPMI patients in suitable housing. According to the Community Housing Plan 2008-2012 published by the State Department of Health's Adult Mental Health Division (AMHD), approximately 9,600 of the persons with severe and persistent mental illness have extremely low incomes and are in need of housing assistance. Of these, approximately 30 percent (2,880) are living in stabilized housing. Another 2,094 mentally ill persons currently receive AMHD subsidized housing. Although the need for affordable housing among the remaining 4,626 will be addressed by AMHD's anticipated production of 1,670 by 2012, nearly 3,000 Hawaii residents with SPMI will still need housing. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 76 OMB Control No 2506 1117 (exp 06/30/2018) Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. 91.315(e) Housing for households earning less than 80% AMI is a high priority for the County of Hawaii. Housing could include rental, homeownership, special needs, homeless and activities which will produce new housing (i.e. water, streets, environmental activities, planning, etc.). Public Facilities is another high priority for the County. This includes child care, youth, and/or senior centers, facilities for the disabled, homeless facilities, health facilities, neighborhood facilities, and/or parks & recreation facilities. Through the 2015 CDBG and HOME program allocation the County plans to undertake the following activities: 1. Hilo Adult Day Center — Foundation and Site Improvements an adult day care center for physically and mentally challenged adults. Most of the participants are elderly or frail elderly. 2. Kona Domestic Abuse Shelter— Renovations to a women domestic abuse shelter in Kona. 3. Hale Ulu Hoi I & II Apartments — Renovate 36 apartments for mentally and physically challenged adults. 4. Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood 2 — Construct 30 units for the elderly. For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. (91.220(2)) N/A Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 77 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018, MA -40 Barriers to Affordable Housing — 91.210(e) Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment The County of Hawai'i's strategy to remove barriers to affordable housing is: Foster and maintain affordable housing. The County will continue to facilitate the development of at least one affordable and one special needs housing project. The County will continue to provide technical assistance to for-profit and not-for-profit developers to expedite the development process. Fees, charges, exactions. The COLinty will amend its Housing Policy to maintain a reasonable fee structure and encourage developers to provide affordable units. Land use regulations. The County of Hawaii will amend its County subdivision and zoning codes and recommend the elimination or modification of onerous codes. Building codes. The County of Hawaii will continue to review County building codes and recommend the elimination or modification of onerous codes that do not affect health and safety of residents. Growth limitations. The County of Hawaii will revise and update the County General Plan as mandated by our Charter. The County wolf continue to use the General Plan, as amended, to direct growth. Return on investment. Please refer to the State's CP. The County imposes mandated buy back provisions_ The County may impose shared equity conditions. Lack for resources. The County will continue to support and provide technical support to not-for-profit organizations with applications for and to eilcourage funding agencies to approve start up and capacity bu4cling gr{rots "Mini Davis -Bacon", Tax Policy, and Land Use Controls. Please refer to the State's CP for the State's strategy to remove the following barriers to affordable housing. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 78 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) E* w C r -f O 1-1 Ln d O r -I ry e --I r -I r- N 114 cm _ 3 � N Q3 N d N a N 0 L I a� L Gl c ma ryy ro Q a � Lu a _ �r Y i E V to m L N •� 0! E �n N n CL LG 0 Ln O >. 00 LPI -;:t ; mrl Y 7 C a) O Z O a H V 0 a •� o a 2 ii m I n CL cu R 72 w C O u N C r -f O 1-1 O d O r -I ry O r -I r- ; C _ 3 � N d N L I vV L ml c ma ryy Q a u Lu ;z _ E m L N �n N n LD LG N M Ln Ln G 00 LPI -;:t ; mrl Y }O } O a L W r -I 00 C r• N d rn O rn 0 Lo m '" a N a r -I 00 Lf1 Crt G1 �Ict n r-1 ri n M C M r -I n n N M m N 1* r w � a ei N N W n N r -i r -i r -i oo ri ri --: � E i W O O O 00 rl N Ln Ln N ri m w ri -;r Ln 00 m N m ;r r -I n N o0 to a r-1 m r•I DD N r -I N N G1 r -I ri Ln ` E 0 Z u 0 Ln tu Ln o G ° °m C ai X m W o CD Qj �u E N GI iII c u L a c ra U C m �I J� wdi C f0 CU cu Ci u Y C & m e tm C as in LIT q^ C m, I n CL cu R 72 w C O u N C _ L. L I vV L ml c ma ryy Q a u Lu ;z _ I n CL cu R 72 w C O u N Labor Force Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 92,086 Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 83,640 Unemployment Rate Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 - 9.17 24.66 Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 5.81 Table 42 - Labor Force Data Source: 2007-2011 ACS Occupations by Sector Number of People Management, business and financial 15,793 Farming, fisheries and forestry occupations 3,484 Service 9,866 Sales and office 21,297 Construction, extraction, maintenance and 25% repair 10,611 Production, transportation and material Total moving 3,941 Table 43 — Occupations by Sector Data Source: 2007.2011 ACS Travel Time Travel Time Number Percentage < 30 Minutes 48,466 65% 30-59 Minutes 18,763 25% 60 or More Minutes 7,273 10% Total 74,502 100% Table 44 - Travel Time Data Sourcer 2007-2011 ACS Education: Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older) Educational Attainment Less than high school graduate In Labor Force Civilian Employed I Unemployed 3,767 1 734 Not in Labor Force 2,461 Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 80 COMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Educational Attainment In Labor Force Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor Force High school graduate (includes equivalency) 20,462 2,459 8,380 Some college or Associate's degree 26,495 1,602 7,303 Bachelor's degree or higher 19,297 981 5,296 Table 45 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status Data Source: 2007.2011 ACS Educational Attainment by Age Table 46 - Educational Attainment by Age Data Source: 2007-2011 ACS Educational Attainment - Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Educational Attainment Age 18-24 yrs 25-34 yrs 35-44 yrs 45-65 yrs 65+ yrs Less than 9th grade 98 395 301 1,070 2,339 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 2,304 1,297 1,057 2,842 2,185 High school graduate, GED, or alternative 6,131 8,614 7,236 15,480 8,558 Some college, no degree 5,233 5,328 5,028 13,252 4,352 Associate's degree 704 2,173 2,758 7,019 1,838 Bachelor's degree 952 3,380 3,675 10,850 4,107 Graduate or professional degree 18 752 1,392 5,561 2,796 Table 46 - Educational Attainment by Age Data Source: 2007-2011 ACS Educational Attainment - Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Less than high school graduate 20,013 High school graduate (includes equivalency) 26,953 Some college or Associate's degree 31,057 Bachelor's degree 41,636 Graduate or professional degree 51,294 Table 47 - Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Data Source: 2007 2011 ACS Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction? The Hawaii County Workforce Development Board, using data from county, state and federal sources, concluded that seven industry sectors; [1] Hospitality/ Visitor; [2] Healthcare; [3] Construction; [4] Consolidated Plan OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. of/30.'2418} HAWAII COUNTY 81 Education Systems; [5] Innovation Industries; [6] Astronomy and; [2] New Agriculture had the greatest impact on the County's economy and workforce needs. Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community: Hospitality/Visitor Industry: Although once struggling to find qualified workers to fill vacancies coupled with low unemployment, the industry has faced a downturn in the market directly correlating to the effects of the national economy. Air lift is on the rise but is not recovered. Hilo international airport currently has a mainland route; the last one was ceased in 2008. Although not mentioned in the last plan version, ecotourism is an area that is expected to emerge as a demand business as the economy improves. The cruise ship industry has had the greatest impact over the last two years with the highest gains in visitor counts. However our econornic downturn has impacted the tourism industry more than most, several cruise ships have modified routes and no longer sail to our ports. Health Care industry: With our steadily increasing aging population, there has been and will continue to be a heightened demand for elder care, certified nurse assistants, home health nurses, and home health aides. The escalating health care costs have been a key driver in the proliferation of domestic elder care. The introduction of mobile health and dental care for rural areas has also created opportunities for outreach health workers to serve an otherwise underserved population. Preventative health care has been the genre over the past decade. With its popularity, together with our aging baby boomers, we will continue to see growing demands in: wellness and fitness centers, homeopathic and nutritional care, rehabilitative services, etc. Construction Industry: The housing cycle peaked two years ago and is on the decline with an excessive inventory of middle to high end single family houses on the market. Building permit issuance has dramatically decreased. During the downturn, even skilled trades people have been impacted. As always the problem for the industry will be well-trained, skilled workers who will continue to be in demand. Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create. Due to the economic downturn services were altered, more frequent orientations and group activities, including job clubs were developed. Also, the online job listing and recruitment software, HireNet was utilized more for automated self-service. More emphasis on leveraging resources and collaboration Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 82 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) with other partners was seen in the one-stop and with other community partners. Additionally, co - enrollment strategies are being encouraged, when allowed. The lune 27, 2014 lava flow poses a threat to the Puna economy. Precautionary steps are being taken. How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction? Basic Skills: Deficiencies in basic education has become increasingly evident in many new labor market entrants as well as current employees. Employer input via our existing school -to -work initiatives island wide has validated these deficiencies. In order to compete in this demand driven global economy, a sound comprehension of basic language skills; reading, writing, computations, listening and speaking are principal prerequisites. Deemed as a key building block to a self-sufficient lifestyle, basic skills acquisition will be a high priority for our LWIB. Technology Skills: Due to rapid developments in technology, our workforce must possess moderate to high levels of computer application skills and information technology expertise. Across all industries and occupations, a minimal level of computer application skills and literacy is needed. Being adept in software applications will greatly enhance employability levels of our Big Island job seekers, employers and current workers. Occupational -Specific Skills: Our workforce will be required to have some skills and aptitude in their chosen occupation. Although not entirely necessary for entry-level positions, these skill prerequisites will ensure greater job retention and work quality as employers strive to compete in a global economy. It is the specific intention of our LWIB to introduce occupationally specific skills in a contextual learning environment. Whenever possible, academic learning will directly relate to the specific occupational skills. Interpersonal Skills: With the constant focus for customer satisfaction and customer service, employees must possess a high level of interpersonal skills to effectively deal with co-workers and customers alike. The ability to work in teams is essential to completing multi -tasks demanded by today's businesses. Specific desirable traits that directly complement effective interpersonal skills include, but not limited to: being punctual; showing initiative; being empathetic toward cultural differences; accepting responsibility; demonstrating good time management and having the ability to communicate in oral and written form. Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan. Although there are multiple challenges, with excellent partnerships between the community school for Adults, community college and the one-stop system, the local area is best equipped to meet the skill and Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 83 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) educational challenges. Long developed partnerships with the credit and non-credit programs have shaped many in demand educational programs. Technology and IT infrastructure make it more possible to work across geographical barriers. Private programs are available as well. Leveraging of resources, seeking additional funding and seeking of collaborations from the program to the client level is an ongoing challenge but our local area is best equipped to meet it for our county. Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)? No If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth. Our local area works closely with entities such as the Hawaii Economic Development Board (HIEDB), County Research and Development Division, Hawaii County Economic Opportunity Council (HCEOC), Maui Economic Opportunity (MEO) and Hawaii Island Workforce and Economic Development Ohana (HIWEDO). We participate in common planning and have goal alignment. Additionally, our members include multiple business owners who are members of various employer and development agencies, Chambers of Commerce, Industrial Associations, and Human Resources Associations. All board members and members of the public, including the partners above have input in our planning as well as regular meetings. The local area has sent representatives to National, Statewide and Local sector strategy sessions, including Statewide skills panels for healthcare, agriculture and software development, National Association of Workforce boards and local chamber events, Rotary meetings, KIAA, business forums and others. As a result of these meetings, networks are strengthened and sector as well as individual business strategies are optimized. Particular instances where collaborations lowered costs and increased efficiency include an entrepreneurial fair held at the Hawai'i Community College in 2012 which B1WC co-sponsored. Not only did the consortium defer cost of outreach by pooling resources such as printing, graphics, Public Service Announcements etc., but the consortium also organized and facilitated planning meetings and pulled in additional resources and expertise in project conceptualization, feasibility analysis and organizational development. As a result of the BIWC partnership, Hawaii Community College was able to execute a well -attended and resourced entrepreneurial fair, while incurring minimal cost. Additionally, the astronomy strategy began with a report on jobs which projected job availability and education required. This was then used to identify on island educational opportunities. As a result, several degree tracts are being developed on island. Discussion Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 84 OM Contra) No 2506.0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Workforce and Infrastructure Pg. 2 Education Systems: Over the past several years, the University of Hawaii at Hilo and the Hawai'i Community College have made great strides in attracting local residents, intra -state residents, and out- of-state students to their campuses. The University system and Hawaii Community College are acquiring funding for modernization, expansion of facilities and increased vocational programs. The additions of Pharmacy, Engineering and Physical Therapy programs as well as several modern buildings are recently completed or in progress. With expansion will come more employment opportunities in the clerical, professional, technical and innovation sectors, along with the need for teachers to educate and train for these sectors. The Department of Education continues to search for a full pool of qualified teachers necessary to meet all requirements, such as No Child Left Behind reporting. These regulations have adversely affected the ability to tutor our students effectively. Without addressing this area, our labor force will not attain the skills necessary to pursue occupations in industries. Innovation Industries: Clean industry is the wave of the future for Hawaii Island. The geographic isolation of Hawaii County to the rest of the State and world has prompted employers to rely heavily on high tech connectivity. From basic office conversion to personal computers and operational software programs to conducting business via the internet, businesses will continue to seek business solutions via this technology. Transcending all occupations and industries, transacting business with and through computer technology will be the way of doing business. Workforce and Infrastructure Pg. 3 High technology has revolutionized the agricultural, health, science, business service, and visitor industries in our County. Further, entrepreneurial opportunities will be readily available for the enterprising individuals seeking niche markets. Astronomy: Hawaii Island is world renowned as THE place for astronomy. The most sophisticated high- powered telescopes in the world and international presence have attracted renowned technicians and scientists from around the globe. In partnership with the industry and the university system, a coordinated workforce development initiative needs to support the infrastructure of this community. New Agriculture: Since the demise of large plantation farming, new agriculture has blossomed with new niche market high end products. With such diversity expanding including the world renowned Kona coffee, hearts of palm, hydroponic heirloom tomatoes being sold to market and top restaurants around the nation. The science that this new agriculture demands requires a new approach for job recruitment, including higher skill requirements at entry level and willingness to train on the job. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 85 0 M Control No. 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Horticultural specialties, tropical fruits, nuts, fresh cut flowers and ornamentals have had an increasing presence in our County. With improved marketing strategies via cooperatives and joint ventures, many have expanded their markets nationally and internationally. Increasingly, nursery laborers need to possess a variety of skills that will complement the technological changes in this industry. Aquaculture has also continued to experience growth with numerous small businesses successfully raising kahala, algae, shrimp, lobsters, crabs, abalone, and oysters. Production levels are almost at maximum levels. Skills and Education Pg. 2 Multi-lingual Skill: As a hub to the Pacific Rim, Hawaii represents a clearinghouse of business transactions for many cultures and languages. As a major visitor destination, many of our employees will be interacting directly with our European and Asian visitors. For many occupations in the hospitality industry, being bilingual is a requirement. As more of our employers perform international business transactions, the ability to speak more than one language will become increasingly invaluable. Entrepreneurial Skills: Many aspiring entrepreneurs have started numerous small business ventures, filling a variety of niche markets. In addition to the necessary occupational skills needed for their ventures, these entrepreneurs need skills in marketing, business planning, accounting, management, information systems, etc. Job Readiness and Retention Skills: Data from surveys and questionnaires have indicated that many new entrants to the labor market lack essential job readiness skills. Further, welfare work requirements have vaulted many unskilled individuals into the job market. Developing employment preparation skills prior to employment is necessary to ensure entered employment rates and retention with this population. These skills include, but are not limited to: understanding personal strengths and weaknesses, interview preparation, resume -writing, knowing job trends and understanding employer expectations. Challenges include: • Limited, declining funding to meet all county -wide need, large geographic area with limited population and limited training courses. • Most severe unemployment and poverty rates to meet the needs of this geographically diverse, high need population. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY $5 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) MA -50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") Areas of housing problem concentrations include households that expend more than 30% of their income on housing related costs. The most critical housing problem in Hawaii County is the extent to which the extremely -low, very -low and low-income residents are cost burdened. The other housing problems are houses that lack complete plumbing facilities. The two areas that have a concentration of households with multiple housing problems are the Puna and Ka'u area. The Puna area is the area that has the most affordable rental units in the County of Hawaii and this attracts the extremely -low, very - low and low-income residents. Even though the Puna area has affordable rents, many of the extremely - low and very -low income residents are still 30°% or more of their adjusted monthly income for housing costs. The Puna area also has many houses that lack complete plumbing facilities because they are unpermitted houses. The definition of "concentration" is the clustering of a specific or definitive characteristic. Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low-income families are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") The Puna area is where there is a concentration of minorities or low-income families. The minority groups like Pacific Islanders and Hispanics and low-income families are attracted to the area because of the affordable rents. The definition of "concentration" is the clustering of a specific or definitive characteristic. What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods? The characteristics of the market in these areas are many of the neighborhoods have older housing stock, many of the census tracts in the areas are low -moderate income areas, affordable rents and a concentration of minority and low-income households. Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods? The State and County owns property, in the Puna area, that could be used for housing development. However, because the majority of the Puna area is in Lava Hazard Zone 1 and 2, HUD does not allow new housing developments in these zones. Lava Hazard Zone 1 and 2 are the most hazard zone for a lava flow as evidence in the currently lava flow that is headed toward Pahoa town. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 87 OMB Control No 2506.0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas? Unless the United States Geological Service (USGS) updates the current Lava Hazard Zones it would be difficult to develop housing in the Puna area. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY as OMB Control No 25060117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Strategic Pian SP -05 Overview Strategic Plan Overview Geographic Priorities The County of Hawaii does not allocate investments geographically. The County utilizes a Request for Proposal (RFP) process to allocate the CDBG, HOME and HTF funds. However, preference for the HTF program will be given to applicants who will develop affordable rental housing in areas located near to employment, schools, shopping, medical services and public transportation to support self- sufficiency. Priority, Needs One of the priority needs for the County of Hawaii is affordable housing for extremely -low, very -low, low and moderate income households. This can be in the form of new construction of rental housing projects or for -sale housing, rehabilitation of existing affordable rental units and rental assistance through the Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program. The priority needs requirements are listed Oin SP -25 Priority Needs. Influence of Market Conditions Many of the extremely -low and very -low income households, in the County, experience a high level of cost burden. This market characteristic has influence the County's decision to use funds for rental assistance. Also, because of the lack of affordable housing in the County, the age of housing stock and the slowdown in the new construction housing market, the County has put an emphasis on production of new housing units, rehabilitation of old units and the acquisition of existing units. This requirement is fulfilled on SP -30 influence of Market Conditions. Anticipated Resources The County of Hawaii has been estimating receiving approximately $2,500,000 of CDBG funds every year for the past few years. Even though the federal budget has fluctuated our actual CDBG allocation has been close to that amount. The State Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC) allocates the HOME funds on a rotation basis for the three neighbor -island counties. The Counties receives the full amount of the State's HOME allocation every three years. The County of Hawaii will receive the full HOME allocation in 2015 and the next time the County will receive any HOME funds will be in 2018. This requirement is fulfilled on SP -35 Anticipated Resources. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 89 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06130/2018) In PY2018, the County of Hawaii will be a designated State HTF Subgrantee for HUD's new National Housing Trust Fund program (HTF). The State HHFDC allocates the HTF funds on a three year rotation basis for the three neighbor -island counties. The County of Hawaii will receive the HTF allocation in 2018. The next time the County will receive any HTF funds will be in 2021. Institutional Delivery Structure The County recognizes there is a homeless problem and has taken a proactive approach to address this problem. In support of efforts to end homelessness the County has contributed as a component of the Community Alliance Partners (CAP) - the planning group on homelessness in Hawaii County. The County also participates in the Continuum of Care (CoQ meetings with the other counties and the State, This requirement is fulfilled on SP -40 Institutional Delivery Structure. SP -05 Overview Pg. 2 Goals There are a number of goals that the County of Hawaii has established to address the priorities of the County. Affordable housing is a high priority that the County has established and intends to initiate and/or complete during the five year Consolidated Plan. The complete list of goals and proposed accomplishments the County hopes to achieve over the course of the Strategic Plan is shown on SP -45 Goals. Public Housing The State's Hawaii Public Housing Authority manages the public housing projects throughout the State_ Please refer to the State's Consolidated Plan for specific information. Barriers to Affordable Housing See MA -40 Barriers to Affordable Housing and SP -55 Barriers to Affordable Housing. Homelessness Strategy See SP -60 Homelessness Strategy. Lead-based Paint Hazards Hawaii County has two programs that consider the hazards of lead based paint poisoning. One, the Residential Emergency Repair Program (RERP), requires that lead based paint risk assessments be conducted for homes built before 1978. If a dwelling is determined to have lead, mitigation measures are taken to address the lead that is present. When the lead based paint concerns are corrected, the Consolidated Pian HAWAII COUNTY 90 OMS Control No 2506.0117 (exp. 06/30#2018) unit becomes available for lead free safe occupancy, thereby, increasing access to housing without LBP hazards. The other is the County's Section 8 Rental Assistance Payments Program which prohibits rental subsidy for any unit that is built before 1978 if there is a family member under the age of 6 and the unit contains peeling paint. This requirement is fulfilled on 5P-65 lead-based Paint Hazards. Anti -Poverty Strategy The County of Hawaii plans to continue administering the Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA) that targets the extremely -low and very -low income households. This would limit the households from paying more than 30% of their income to housing costs. A program the County would like to start is the National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) that targets the extremely -low and very -low income households. This requirement is fulfilled on SP -70 Anti -Poverty Strategy. Monitoring For its CDBG and HOME projects the County's Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) prefers to conduct an ongoing monitoring process instead of the usual monitoring and auditing of projects during the middle or at the completion of the project. This system enables the OHCD to work with the recipients through every step of the project implementation. The process ensures compliance prior to executing any actions, instead of reviewing files after the fact. This requirement is fulfilled on SP -80 Monitoring. Beginning in PY2018, the OHCD will include HTF in its ongoing monitoring process. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 91 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) SP -10 Geographic Priorities -- 91.215 (a)(1) Geographic Area Table 48 - Geographic Priority Areas 1 Area Name: County of Hawaii Area Type: Other Target Area Description: HUD Approval Date: % of Low/ Mod: Revital Type: Other Revital Description: Identify the neighborhood boundaries for this target area. Include specific housing and commercial characteristics of this target area. island Wide low - moderate areas Island Wide low - moderate areas How did your consultation and citizen participation process help you to identify this neighborhood as a target area? Identify the needs in this target area. What are the opportunities for improvement in this target area? Are there barriers to improvement in this target area? General Allocation Priorities Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA) The County of Hawaii does not allocate investments geographically. The County utilizes a Request for Proposal (RFP) process to allocate the CDBG, HOME and HTF funds. However, preference for the HTF program will be given to applicants who will develop affordable rental housing in areas located near to employment, schools, shopping, medical services and public transportation to support self- sufficiency. A deadline is given for all project proposals to be submitted to the County of Hawaii. Project proposals submitted must comply with the program criteria; meet eligibility requirements, program objectives, and be consistent with the County's priorities and objectives as contained in the County's Consolidated Plan. The project proposals are reviewed, ranked and selected for the County's annual Action Plan. The Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 92 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2016] County's proposed Action Plan, listing the proposed CDBG/HOME/HTF projects is drafted and a public notice is published in the local newspapers, announcing the availability of the proposed Action Plan for public review and comment. The general public has thirty days to comment on the County's proposed Action Plan. After the thirty day comment period expires, a public mgeting held by the Hawaii County Housing Agency (HCHA) or the Finance Committee is scheduled for the purpose of approving projects submitted in the annual Action Plan to be funded by CDBG/HOME/HTF program. following the action of the HCHA or Finance Committee, a public meeting of the Hawaii County Council will be held to authorize the Mayor to sign and submit the County's Action Plan to HUD. These public meetings are open to the public and interested persons can submit their comments in person or in writing. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 93 OMB Control No, 2506.0117 (exp 06/30/2018) SP -25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2) Priority Needs Table 49 -• Priority Needs sum f i T Priority Need I � Name Priority Level Population Geographic Areas Affected Consolidated Plan Housing High Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Rural Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally III Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Unaccompanied Youth Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Island Wide low -moderate areas OMB Control No 2506.0117 (exp 06/30/2018) HAWAII COUNTY 94 Associated Homeless - Construction Goals Homeless Rehabilitation Housing - Affordable Rental Units Housing Elderly/Special Needs Rental Units Housing - Homebuyer Housing Rehabilitat on Housing - TBRA Housing education and counseling for homebuyers Description Housing for households earning less than 80% of median income (i.e. rental, homeownership, special needs, homeless and activities which will produce new housing i.e. water, roadways, environmental activities, planning, etc.) Basis for Affordable housing in the County of Hawaii is a high priority because there is a Relative great demand but there is a lack of supply for housing. Priority Z 1 Priority Need I Public Health and Safety Name Priority Level j High Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 95 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 96 ohne control No, 2506-0117 {exp. 06/30/i018i Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Rural Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally Ill Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Unaccompanied Youth Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Nonhousing Community Development Geographic Island Wide low -moderate areas Areas Affected Associated Public Health and Safety Goals Description Activities that protect the health and safety of the residents in Hawaii County. (i.e. fire, police, environmental management, etc.) Basis for The public health and safety need is high because the Island of Hawaii is so huge Relative that it lacks public safety and solid waste facilities throughout the island. Priority 3 Priority Need Federal Mandates Name Priority Level I High Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 96 ohne control No, 2506-0117 {exp. 06/30/i018i Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Non -dousing Community Development Geographic Island Wide low -moderate areas Areas Affected Associated --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fair Housing - FH Training for Non-English Speaking Goals Fair Housing - Landlord Training Fair Housing - Meetings Fair Housing - Seminars Fair Housing - Training Fair Housing - Video Fair Housing - Website Description Activities to meet legal obligations or federal mandates (i.e. ADA) Basis for The Federal government issued a mandate that the County of Hawaii had to Relative remove all architectural barriers and follow the ADA laws and make the County's Priority facilities accessible to disabled people. 4 Priority Need Public Facilities Name Priority Level j High Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY OMB Control No 2506-0117 {exp 06/30/2018) 97 Population Geographic Areas Affected Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Rural Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally III Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Unaccompanied Youth Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Non housing Community Development Island Wide low -moderate areas Associated I Public Facilities - Improvements Goals Public Facility - ROAB Description Improve and/or repair public facilities (i.e. child care, youth, and/or senior centers, facilities for the disabled, homeless facilities, health facilities, neighborhood facilities, and/or parks & recreation facilities. Throughout the County of Hawaii there is a shortage of child care, youth and/or Basis for Relative senior centers, facilities for the disabled, homeless facilities, health facilities, Priority neighborhood facilities, and/or parks & recreation facilities. it was brought up in our public meetings that there is a great need for health facilities in the rural areas, especially in the Puna area, as residents would have to drive to Hilo if there is a medical emergency. Consolidated Plan 0MB Control No 2506-0117 (exp_ 06/30/2018) HAWAII COUNTY 98 1*1 5 Priority Need l Infrastructure Name Priority Level I High Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Rural Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally III Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Unaccompanied Youth Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families victims of Domestic Violence Non -housing Community Development Geographic Island Wide low -moderate areas Areas Affected Associated I Infrastructure - Construction Goals 1 Description Infrastructure projects in support of development of affordable housing. Examples of infrastructure projects may include water/sewer/street improvements, solid waste disposal, and/or flood drainage improvements. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 99 OMB control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 100 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Basis for Due to the large land mass on the Big Island, there is a definite need for Relative infrastructure improvements before affordable housing can be developed, Priority especially in the rural areas. Water is the key to all housing development, if there is no water you can't do a housing development. 6 Priority Need Public Services Name Priority Level High Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Rural Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally III Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Unaccompanied Youth Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Non -housing Community Development Geographic Island Wide low -moderate areas Areas Affected Associated Public Service -Transportation Goals Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 100 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 7 Description Provide services to senior's, disabled, youth, childcare, transportation, substance abuse, employment, health, lead hazards, crime, etc. Basis for Two of the greatest needs for seniors and extremely -low, very -low and low - Relative i income households are transportation and childcare. Transportation services Priority I would improve if government agencies or non-profit organizations can acquire vehicles to transport seniors and low-income households to their appointments. If affordable childcare services could be offered to low-income households, this would allow the low-income person to go to work or find a job. Priority Need Economic Development Name Priority Level I High Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Rural Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally III Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Unaccompanied Youth Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Non -housing Community Development Geographic Island Wide low -moderate areas Areas Affected �. ____ _.- a_ I --- ------- Consolidated Plan OMB Control Na 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) HAWAII COUNTY 101 Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 102 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Associated Economic Development -Job Training Goals Description Activities which would create training and jobs for low and moderate income persons. Basis for In order to boost the economy individual's need to be employed and contributing Relative part of their income back into the economy. In order for low and moderate Priority income person's to be employed they must be properly trained. Activities in this area would fulfill the need to provide job training for low and moderate income persons. $ Priority Need Non -Public Facilities Name Priority Level Low Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIWAIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Non -housing Community Development island Wide low -moderate areas iI Geographic Areas Affected Associated infrastructure - Construction Goals Description This would involve construction or renovations of parking facilities non- residential historic preservation requirements. Basis for The County normally does not fund any low priority projects because high priority Relative projects are funded first and the amount of CDBG funds requested is more than Priority the CDBG allocation that the County receives. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 102 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 9 Priority Need Name Priority Level r Population Non -Infrastructure Low Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Rural Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally III Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Unaccompanied Youth Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Non -housing Community Development Geographic Island Wide low -moderate areas Areas Affected Associated I Infrastructure - Construction Goals Description I Activity in this area would be construction of sidewalks. Consolidated Plan OMB Control No 2506.0117 (exp, 06/30/2018) HAWAII COUNTY 103 Basis for Relative Priority Although there are a lot of subdivisions throughout the County of Hawaii that do not have sidewalks, it is still considered a low priority. This is because by constructing sidewalks there is no benefit to the low and moderate income person in regards to housing, public facility or public service. Normally low priority projects are not funded because high priority projects are funded first and the amount of CDBG funds requested is more than the actual CDBG allocation to the County. Narrative (Optional) Funding Priorities and Guidelines • High priorities are those activities that will be considered for funding with CDBG/HOME/HTF Funding during the five-year consolidated plan period of 2015 through 2019 prior to low priority projects. • Low priorities are those activities that will be considered for funding with CDBG/HOME/HTF funding during the five-year consolidated plan period of 2015 through 2019 following the consideration of high priorities. County of Hawaii Funding Priorities for 2015-2019 Housing • Provide rental assistance through the Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program for extremely -low, very -low and low-income households, • Fund activities that expand the supply of rental and affordable for -sale housing for extremely - low and lower income households. • Fund activities to rehabilitate homes of low to moderate income homeowners that address health and safety reasons. • Fund activities that provide homebuyer education and counseling for potential low to moderate income homebuyers. • Construct a new elderly rental housing project. Homeless • Construct a homeless shelter in West Hawaii. • Rehabilitate a victims of domestic violence shelter. Public Health and Safety • Construct a fire/police and/or a solid waste facility. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 104 OFederal Mandates • Remove architectural barriers at various County facilities. Public Facilities • Improve and/or repair public facilities in deteriorated neighborhoods or neighborhoods that lack public facilities. Infrastructure • Construct infrastructure projects to enable access to affordable housing and public facilities. Public Services • Acquire vehicles to provide additional transportation services to the elderly and low income households. Economic Development • Fund activities that provide job training to low and moderate income persons and help them gain employment. Fair Housing • Conduct fair housing training for non• English speaking and limited English proficiency families. • Create a video which will increase awareness of avenues for reporting fair housing violations. • Conduct fair housing training for new landlords to increase awareness of fair housing laws. Conduct fair housing training island -wide to increase awareness of fair housing in the communities. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 105 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp 06/30/2018) SP -30 Influence of Market Conditions — 91.215 (b) Influence of Market Conditions Affordable Market Characteristics that will influence Housing Type the use of funds available for housing type Tenant Based There is a high level of cost burden for extremely -low and very -low income Rental Assistance households; and there is an extremely long wait list for the County's Section 8 (TBRA) Voucher Program. There is over 6,000 households on the wait list with a wait period of over five years. There is a high level of cost burden for extremely -low and very -low income TBRA for Non- Homeless Special households; also the extremely -low income households paying more than 30% Needs of AMI is more at -risk of becoming homeless than households paying less than 30% of AMI. New Unit The lack of affordable housing in the County; the age of the housing stock; the Production high demand for affordable housing and long wait list for the County's Section 8 Voucher Program are market characteristics that will influence the use of funds for new unit production. The aging of the housing stock In the County is a market condition that may Rehabilitation influence the use of funds for rehabilitation. The County has a Residential Emergency Repair Program (RERP), funded by CDBG funds, that allows owner - occupants to rehabilitate their homes for health and safety reasons. Beginning in 2018, the County has the National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) that can provide assistance to rehabilitate existing affordable rental housing units. Acquisition, Because of a slowdown in the new construction housing market, the County has including placed a high priority on projects to acquire lots to construct self-help housing preservation by non-profit organizations like Habitat for Humanity. Table 50 — Influence of Market Conditions Consolidated Plan CM8Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) HAWAII COUNTY 106 N u a .o C_ 01 o LA L to lu CL +� u C p O oco C o 0 .+ N L Q N u H c 7 r -I Y .0 Cm .r Gui Q1 G a C u u t. Ln G O d 0 rn m r� Ln 0 v rq N 14 N C) I 0 ry Ln u L c 0 c W c u ai po u E E .2 � V Ln m C h CL .� C t, u 7 0 cc cr -0 C O D d Q a 3 CL Ln M C Z L it CL w Li A p m c a a — ro c o c Q. E ro o � LUcr 0 o L ro Q! . RuCU Ol .0 % L ro o 0 a' a w cr M C oE ro a c o4► dL C a a (u u a .o C_ 01 o LA L to lu CL +� }- a C p LU O oco C o 0 .+ Co L Q u m ro u u H c 7 is L 0 O. Y .0 Cm .r Gui } G a C u u Ln G O d 0 rn 0 v a`° rn r-; co in N a 0 t,0 N rn Ln H N XC L fl 1 a m ja n LU O N 3 �+ C ro y: Ln v a`° a ry Ln c c c u po u E E .2 OroC Ln en C O C C u 7 0 u cr -0 C O } Ou Q a w Li Ln L6 CL n G 9 r a m 2 0 L fl 1 a m ja n G 9 r a m 2 0 w al �; a c = LL, l%l U ` a0+ vs al `�' al Y a 2 L^ to 0 O o a �- c w s, C m 3 O Y �° o a`l LL S r V 41 i C N a1 O p sem+ .� 3 LA Q _ 'o z al o «. 0 u O .r L u m C o a� Y L - 0 0= u _ c M C u_ 0 ai 6 O C(U rts O U +� al O N •� �, V Q al s 1L- U N �' Q ai L u a w a on o ami S al u 1O ea U 'M M l7 o O C L u vi 7 _, •- c 4. L a� 0 3 c 3 m m al +_ C Q _0 OJ '� al y V C m O M= m o R u ' I N ii L �° i o - 3 '� a) ro C = 4-1 L V _ a S o j M ao u° _ o O s p; u C oa ro (U '�• � "- a o o � .° ! C c Y u 3 oa ,i &A a, o c Y 'a c al L •� o d Z LJJ •7 a! C "a •C u "to.a •C M t w ci w ? O C 2 2 OL (U •� O W y o p a m H4-1 al Y c al 3 'ro O r N LlJ L +�' O til 3 a�' j C C to C al •� 4? a7 aJ a 2 }' N .s+ S 2 •r O al.L. Q- 7 ,= ro a1 al C al 0 al aj L O R Q u 4� w 2 ,r N I^ S t� U ro i �= ro O V w c a v r4 _ o .+ a m c a Ln o r4 G NI W Q Q N N GG O 0 CD O O mo n 0 N O � fV al N MO M a ra � ' 3 V1 a Q a` W 0 o E T E rn Q as o {^ ai �0u u W X C Ql O W O O 3 �+ c u +A tN O n r - Q c oc r - Q N u u a o -moo u U 1.1� �! Q. O ro `LU m CL 2 O S c 'a a a Q ti L- 0 0 C 0O m0 Q 'tl 42 O a�+ 40l + +`. a .N E �. - Y LA C a o o o o a 0 3 m o Q i rn S L S 2 L tU 2 +_ ��j Z u o ff 2 u u a o -moo u U 1.1� �! Q. O ro `LU m CL 2 O S c 'a a a Q ti f3 g z O `a a z C R d .o cu 0 LA C 0 Q J ? r i L o ILc r LL F u a a �- C o = te O l7 ILL- 0o LL y N U -a c 3 a Y (D Q u = a +� 0p ri a u m = m u a R= a c C ,n Y R C m o a u s a> r .a a o 0 m Q Y `o ,0 LiC 3 a aaii CL `o ? 'o V m u c 'L° u° a a t° C= W `� o CL '- 00 c 0 LA cu LLI ` p Q G C m C Q y 'O aj L4 C u vi iL+ y= to m u C z C 3 a t a L m F o C o -Ca b f0 LL -F a +-1 C 00 '^ o u tA c n O o = R — O u C C a C 7. J L• �' a l7 �' a a a y LA a C awl m C 3 V a p C 3 a �t C C C a 0 'O tp z� I- Ln o s r •. a L 3 m m a, >_ o— u ,r m un O L a a m o m o LL O x Ln L c. L o er Q O 0 0 O O +' 7 C L cu 0 10 N a 0 c d Nt ,baa ac o o r- o amo0 o m o o m n o 0 Q M N N tin ri 00 Ql e -I LCI ei F' lqr La Ln r -I N O tin 16 SV Ln LCI L; Q O O Q O O O O CL, d � � L Q a c E 0 0 0 o a o 0 Cl eo a m o o c n, u <u C O w O ol O r -I O M Cat Lu o O M r- O C u Vb.to O I- N d 0 Q 0 CD ri a) I C o rl N a— � LLD Ln O LLnn� a L til, C O u O tw C .N o0 C w G L w C N tA L arA '= + + te.. 4-,M Ian L a L a o .-1 0 � x O Q 2 L u 0aj i O i a 1 V ` 1 u .a+ 41 aa+ A., 1 u ` 1 La 7 o C A a 'C .0 +a+ � � 7 a M o tn 0. Q Ia CL Q Q Q d 0. ro N ISA E tio �p 04 C = H L aJ L a L s L a L s L a CL x F LL J O O O O O O J c O a a � u � � � C a o - M v� CL E m µ'aaa o u � c G� G io a Lr a u a `u CLo H W Ln Ln Ia � � ,n = O ` a Ol u +n c ej a a' a a E y C u' 7 O m l.1 c O a a � u � � � C a o - M v� CL E m µ'aaa o ii o 0.2 o „i � N Vi io a Lr a u a a 3 H F Ln Ln � � a O Q a Ol u i a. >H ej G a' a 'O E y o u' m -aa o ii o 0.2 c „i � N Vi io r u, a a c ti a 4 L a y � y O u v 3 O C m �n 2 O CO I CJ aL p m a N m a d x V n 0 ka 0 in N O 2 0 c V Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied The CDBG funds in 2015 are about 40% of the total cost of the projected CDBG projects in 2015. So, the 40% of CDBG funds leverage 60';•) of additional resources, which includes State, County, owner's contribution and private foundation grants. The HOME funds are 20� of the total cost of the projected HOME projects in 2015_ This means the HOME funds are leveraged 5 to 1 by additional resources, like State, County, owner's contribution and private bank loans or foundation grants. The HOME projects match are usually from LIHTC or State general excise tax exemptions and owner's contribution. The self- help housing projects match is from State general excise tax exemptions and "sweat equity" by the homebuyers. If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan County owned land has been used in the past, and will be used in the future, to develop affordable housing projects for the low and moderate income households throughout the County of Hawaii. Usually, a long-term lease (55 years) is executed with the non-profit organization for nominal annual lease amount. It is stated in the lease that the non-profit organization must keep the project affordable to low and moderate income households for the duration of the lease. The County of Hawaii's Kamakoa Nui Community Housing project located at Waikoloa, South Kohala is an experimental/demonstration housing project designed to meet the needs of low -and moderate income persons. The County has currently cleared, grubbed and installed infrastructure for the sale of one and two story Bungalow and Single Family Traditional homes. A total of 91, fee simple residential units will be sold during this phase. In addition, the County has provided 16 lots to two non-profit housing entities for mutual self-help housing projects. These units will target households earning below 80% of the County's median family income. Discussion Narrative included in previous sections. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY onna control No 2506.0117 (exp. 06/30/20281 1X1 SP -40 Institutional Delivery Structure — 91.215(k) Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its consolidated plan including private industry, non-profit organizations, and public institutions. Responsible Entity ... Responsible Entity Type ._ Role Geographic Area Served HAWAII COUNTY Government Economic Other Development Homelessness Non -homeless special needs Ownership Rental public facilities public services..:.. __._.. Table 52 - Institutional Delivery Structure Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System One of the main strengths of the current institutional delivery system is the experience of the staff to administer the CDBG program. The staff person who administers the CDBG program has over 25 years of experience. This experience allows the County to deliver a wide range of services available to support low to moderate income County residents. A second strength of the current institutional delivery system is the overall willingness of participants from the private, public and not-for-profit sectors to work together to identify new and dynamic ways to meet the needs of the County of Hawaii residents. The major obstacle of meeting the unmet homeless needs is the lack of financial resources. The County hopes to leverage other sources of funds and to seek other new resources to meet the needs In addition, community acceptance of shelters and facilities for the homeless is an obstacle. The "not in my back yard" (NIMBY) attitude is a major factor in finding suitable sites that meet the homeless needs. Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services Homelessness Prevention Services Counseling/Advocacy Legal Assistance Mortgage Assistance Rental Assistance Utilities Assistance Consolidated Plan OMB Control No: 25060117 (exp. 06f30/2018) Available in the Targeted to Community Homeless Homelessness Prevention Services X I X X X X X X X HAWAII COUNTY Targeted to People with HIV X X Q 112 Street Outreach Services Law Enforcement Mobile Clinics X X X Other Street Outreach Services X X Supportive Services Alcohol & Drug Abuse Child Care X X X X Education X X Employment and Employment Training X X Healthcare X X X HIV/AIDS X X Life Skills X X X Mental Health Counseling X X X Transportation X X Other Table 53 - Homeless Prevention Services Summary " Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) A County representative is part of the Community Alliance Partners (CAP), an organization embodied by representatives from various facets of the community that focuses on long term solutions to serve and house the homeless in Hawaii County. Although CAP works to establish and support programs and services at the local level, CAP also participates in Bridging the Gap to assist in long term planning and resource development in an effort to end homelessness statewide. Through the efforts of the County of Hawaii Mayor's office and the development of the West Hawaii Chronic Homeless Intervention and Rehabilitation Project (CHIRP) and the East Hawaii Coalition on Homelessness, the service providers that target the homeless have been able to better coordinate the services they provide while minimizing duplication of efforts. The County actively participates in the Bridging the Gap (consisting of the neighbor island counties) and Statewide (consisting of the State and Bridging the Gap) Continuum of Care. These groups focus on approaches to ending homelessness. The County is also a component of the Interagency Council on Homelessness —a conglomerate of Government and service providers that seek solutions to address statewide chronic homelessness through mainstream re -programming. The County will continue to participate in all levels of collaboration in a proactive effort to address the needs of its homeless community. Participation in the Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 113 OMB Control No 2506.0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Continuum also allows the County to acquire other HUD funds for activities that address homeless needs within the County. Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above Through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Programs the County has assisted not-for-profit organization construct or renovate housing for the special needs homeless population. Also, through the CDBG and HOME program, the County, has or will assist not-for-profit organizations provide services for the elderly, frail elderly and disabled special needs population. Some of the special needs and homeless projects recently completed are: • West Hawaii Emergency Shelter— Construction of an emergency shelter, in West Hawaii, consisting of 31 beds for overnight stay for the homeless. 2015 CDBG funds will be used to convert the kitchen to a certified kitchen, so food can be prepared and feed the homeless. • Na Kahua Hale O Ulu Winir Housing Project — 96 two-bedroom apartments constructed in West Hawaii, completed in December, 2014, consisting of 24 transitional units and 72 affordable rental units for low income families. • Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood, Phase I Housing Project — Construction of 60 one - bedroom rental apartments for low income seniors in Hilo. 2015 HOME funds will be used for Phase II to construct 30 units. Services available to the senior residents will be primarily provided by various service providers currently operating in the Hilo area. Some of the special needs and homeless projects that will be starting in 2015 are: • Hilo Adult Day Care Center— A new facility needs to be built because the Hilo Adult Day Care Center (HADCC) is located in a building that has been declared uninsurable by the Hawaii County inspectors. The Hilo based care center provides services for elders and/or physically and mentally challenged adults. The HADCC will be located on the same site as the Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood project, so once the HADCC is completed they will work with the County's Nutrition Program and provide lunch meals, as well as Meals on Wheels to the entire senior housing project. 2015 CDBG funds have been awarded for the foundation and site improvements. Vertical construction of the facility should begin in 2016. West Hawaii Homeless Micro Housing Units —2015 CDBG funds will be used for site improvements for 32 micro housing units. 2015 HOME funds will be used to acquire and install 8 shipping containers converted to 32 units. These units will be used as permanent housing for the chronic homeless. • Kona Domestic Abuse Shelter -2015 CDBG funds will be used to renovate the kitchen, offices, replace playground equipment and railings at the domestic abuse shelter. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 114 OMB Control No: 2506.0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Hale Ulu Hoi I and it Apartments — 2016 HOME funds will be used to renovate 36 apartments kitchen and bathroom, upgrade the laundry facility, utility upgrade, resurface the parking lot, landscape improvements and installation of solar energy. Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs The County recognizes there is a homeless problem and has taken a proactive approach to address this problem accordingly. In support of efforts to end homelessness the County has contributed as a component of the Community Alliance Partners (CAP) -- the planning group on homelessness in Hawai'i County. According to the Homeless Big Island Strategic Plan, the mission of the Continuum of Care (CoC) is "...to assist individuals and families who become homeless or are at -risk of becoming, to regain their housing stability and a greater quality of life." The CoC hopes that "...collaborative working relationships with homeless providers, State and County officials, consumers, and faith -based organizations result in effective referrals, better care and innovative partnerships." Strategies to address homelessness, as indicated in the Sig Island Strategic Plan, focus on the following: • Increase availability for emergency, transitional, permanent, rental and for -sale housing. • Strengthen homeless prevention through financial assistance (rent, deposit, childcare, etc.), vocational and educational training, outreach and housing retention services, and community O awareness. • Reduce barriers to housing by collaborating with private and government agencies, by providing training on working with homeless, and by creating supportive services to assure tenant marketability. • Enhance supportive services by increasing service availability (legal, rehabilitative, health treatment, skills training, transportation, etc.). • Improve methods of data collection to secure other funding sources and research other regions for advantageous practices. • Establish collaborative partnerships with state and local government to increase community awareness. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 115 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) W Ln ri JN r4 cn I E E to N m /(O V Ln I CL LA r_ a Y m E 0 r.. i m E E Lq IU 0 c� ►: z O u Q x Q N m 0 CL w 0 0 Ln N O z a O U m 4- +, 'c r.+ .a'• M a r_ °c° Q ao co cc c C m C' tn 3 ,C 0 3 7 C •in C .N m 41 c0 N E a co = co a -a O T o z T N -0 Q u U 0 L O p s °' c ,an' c c&A c ' �, c 3 u 3 = m m = a� = 0 = = 0 —,-OW Ln o c°a vi x ° O ;� z° m z w� p V e S e s N to O N x N O N� +L- Ln O co O w O H m .q of N LD d' Ln p N = M 2 D: Ln �UJ O 4 O CO V O a ++ O W O N w a r, o i c o N �- m -Z c o o m c,0 m oL� oo�L'ooa; r, m oo�r-oo G x� x o M Ln i w Ln -0(7 Ln 2 U m2 0 a LD Ln C m LD LD C 1^ 1, N v O Vl LL. C U'F LL T V Hw N a7 i MO co ma On w w z a c c c c c a 0 0 0 0 0 0 T T T z z x U_ CL C M O 0 O O O O To - - - - - 0 3 a 3 3 3 3 3 w a a a a a O m O m O m O m O m a m u z u x u x u= u= u x T Ln n°a w w w E w W v ai CLO m z -0 w -0 an to tj'a C 'm -a c Y _ m c a C-0 C O OO C d O 7 O 7 O 3 Q a z a i a i ¢ m z° z° LCL n .a °�' aq ti Q O a' O O O yr"j N N i Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln R ri ri O r -I O ri O ei O ri o Ln >'O N N N N N N C L () Ln 0! z O O E m m z m o L U Ln a0 Ln L 0 Q !- cu !- a C) y T ar 0 to c= c a= c p to c O 7 = m CD O a aJ O'D w O C O O O N x x c z w c T m c T T oC al O M H O e-1 N M Ln $O ►: z O u Q x Q N m 0 CL w 0 0 Ln N O z a O U 101 r - r -I r -I ►* z D 0 u a S G ra CL � H y N fD 'a m Ln o C a acu u r ri 0 N N O z O c 0 u m L, a a y a c 0° a d v C 6.M N N U ,�,� CO C i_+ p C1 G M M C N a 'N O a� > C Q dl Y i_+ 0 +n � Q1 C aLn C y� U •�+ U ,r ftl L N •N Q S ON N L a s 4J _ N a L a s 'm _Ln = a u +_� A�' "Q C C G N v c +cu L- o 0 O Z ai N o .� u m 0 a �, U o m N Ip OD m Gd L LL L Q CO Q.1 L U- o m d] L m a a 4+ a Ln Ln a+ a N O s et 7 `� p Q S ate.+ 0 O m p Ln y 0 S tri Y to f� d = J Z N O r l O d a C +L+ i N 0 r -I u` O O Ci O n C N L!} cc L1i c O C3 O m 0 CO 0 c 0 n O L.L. O a 0 Ou 00 �v n t 0 � 'C 'cr N m N t!)- 'CC N O N r -I C i!F ih V1 ih tfF 1-1 V} ih W C m IJf tu c N u N 'C u r — a &n u u y « U U a on to 3 ` 2 L L Li vat z C c V N a u m Ln u u u a _ 3 m _ ._ = z z a a a _ _ Ii rco ai u = O O O f3. O O O O a +� M LJ F� d 3 a 3 3 3 3 3 3 o m Q m Q m o m o m Q m o m u= u r u r u a u s u 2 u z 00 4.+ GO 41 4141 hQ y qA y E j 'C E 'C m '� E N N 7 C r 7 o C a a- o s CL o a a o Q- c� �, a, = E a E° r E°= E° S E o E E c E� C E� c E a E E>w E 0 o a 0 a o Q a o 0 a Q o a o S Z z u Z u z u z u z u 0 v _} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lj N N N N N N N ` LLn Lfi Lli Ln Ln Ln Ln m ri ri r -I r -I r 4 } O O 0 O O Or4 O N rq C14 t0 a a � , m ? to N • C z O Q a r' _ = u} Li Li a In aN N .V u 2 :� a N E c E t `L° c � m .0 a n c 0 0 o a o a ,� m -0 a E E S u S a u a Ln CL 12 a t - L V � O N 0 � � W G1 rM r�•1 H r - r -I r -I ►* z D 0 u a S G ra CL � H y N fD 'a m Ln o C a acu u r ri 0 N N O z O c 0 u m Q M ro u C GJ E 0 D L L lU L L L Q% QJ i L Ol L Cl L Y ti1 cu cu OJ G1 0 � 0 0 CJ +L+ �$ YD 4-C)t0 0-1 O M 11o o rq 4-C O N o Ln o Ln T'+ a C r+ D rn mo Ca C o C C 0 tLo Ln 0 � Ln i!? 3 m m m m LL m m m ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n ❑ o u u u u u u u � Y c m CA a uE d ` E c' Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Z'p CO Q fL6 M LLU M R M fLU fG f9 M (� M fO LII a c a (U c aj c aj c a r- a c (U c Cu c "OM 'O m -am 'a m "am 'am 'am U U. Ll- U- U- Ll LLQ Ll - _u C O O O O O O. O O O a d 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 D o M O M O m O ra p M O m O m O M U U= U U 2 U Y U Y Y u Y U Y CO ++ L10 Y ++ 00 Y I O C u w •C ?,' Gl .0 a - GJ ,_ Cu ,C ��, OJ .0 ate+ a) .0 cu ,_ � w m c E 7 E E= C E M c E M c E c E 0 c E= c E A o :3 °- o C' o M C- o CL o M C' o M Q' o Q' a a' x E° _ E a E° z E° 0@ E° z E° z E° s E � E� E� c E a, a c E n c E @ n a E @ a a E E N a O p a O O a O O W O O G] O O til O O 0 O O W O O w Z u Z u Z u Z u Z u Z u Z u Z u t OZ G1 O7 Q1 Q1 G1 G1 O1 M P'I P'4 r-4 T-1 11 P'4 P'I T-1 w W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L+ tlin LnLn Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln aro+ d Ln } 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 rq rq N N N N N N O N z c to ro no d LL o C 7 •= 4+ 1 z Y I ,L I I I 1 �" L G7 c QJ C c ~ C c c c ro E M'v, v, In v1 Ln L!L In Q CO O to 7 O ' OJ 7 00 7 i- 7 pp 5.07 O C O G O O p O = O a O O C c a a= C y 2 = a = M z m 2 z •C 7 ' L L L L L L L ' J LL] ❑ �-- LL LLL W LL LL L.L. Ll Ln 6L L W 'a o H D et I Ln IND j W M D r# Ga ro E E Ln z LM ro o O u t� Ln 3 N Q ,r m M � 2 CL in D � � � e IA � $ LA 0 2 , k' ) 7 §§ k c 'u 0 ai o ° k ° m § £ o % 0c \ EJS § 2 2 to2 e $ ƒ ' 2e 2 3 0 § g a cu E 3:. 0 m m 2 § 2 2 # LA a)° E uo / 2 % k u CLO § 0 = o E 0 < k 7 W) 0 \ \ LA L / Ln co 2 ® $73 m 5 $ o 7 \ 0 & Ln \ m k % R / @ 0 / = � Ln 2 20 C Ln c w 7 \ 0 § 2 q \ (a $ o R 2 . _ 2 0 k k -E 0 7 0= \ i 2 7� \ 0 § � m -0 m / ƒ o : 2 � 0 � 2 E 7 \ 0 cu t o k a m 12 m 2 o 7 c 0 0 \ 2 2 7 = 0 § § - 0 k � E 2 i 3 2 0 § / § 12 0) u E 0 \ 2 LA° 7 aj k G 2 ° E o L- k 0 = a = u = u = a = u z = u e E z c ° ■ E z z c ° e § z c 2 e § z � @ ■ c © ■ § z c ° e § m � ■ 0 0 2 o M t 0 a o a t 0 a o 2LLn, o, 2 o M o lin a a o 2 m 0 'R o m o li e v v W to o 0 0 O 0 0 o ID w 0 w 0 o � e IA � 0 N N i z D O a a 2 co c C rQ+l 14 w 0 d x d n .ti 0 a N O Z a r or y k" 0 a c a Gi vai Q ro G C C 0 .«° co o a Q. a E c _ m a Ln Ln a, E O _ � u c a O u Ln a 'E°O 4 O LA u > o y cn a C O fYaO s� ro L a w p N c O U a u N ro � "- c ' Q ro �, L a L f0 O Ln a u u a ro C a o i a O Q o L "„ C O U a u ro "- c y°-' vf°r -p C ro u Cl) u L O a. U _ m O Ln G aO -a a L a L O - = u w a ro 3 v O v7 L m u O = a � : � C O U m Q cc u �i u _ .fl O a cn u ro a a Y ro E .J cn a �•' — a 4-' _ U ;A p ` ro � _ m � m � y �, L u � 0 5 ° E a z y C a E Q. E u u% u _ G O a. r° 3 z O ��' U a Y }'cu oa O y Ln a ,=. — u 7 Q O °; m L O L- a a ` O 4- � � C O U _ ro �' ro i F- a uu L cn u _ a O a : s s a E O c } a a Y p +- CO Y ro n y -aa a 0 �, 'n a u ; a L � u Q C_ ro H O °' E 0 O 41 > n u E o c p u w c m O E cu 4 O Ln LA L ro 3 L u -C LM o Lnc Q a E C a a• a 0 3 °° C E Q a '6 p a. pa m a N __ a) C '-;-' c ° z O m = L- a ° _ _ ro LL u = O C- W C w -p E - C ro nn ro cu °- Ln LA 00 C w C °c L c as c m CU c L 7 C O ro t n L u c a ro � C O O O U L a E m z 0 O •L a E m z 0 O a •L m E m z = O 4. •L a E m z 0 O a. •L a E m z 0 O a. •L a E m z c O a. •—y a E m z 0 O 1 •` a E m z D Q. •L f6 O t0 Yf O a f0 O f0 N O a fG O fG Yf O a l9 O 10 ILII O a fG O IL lun O a t0 O t9 VW, O a f0 O f0 H O a c9 O SO tun O O t7 C7 t7 0 0 l9 0 0 0 l7 0 l7 C7 0 0 C7 0 l7 0 0 0 0 a 0 N N i z D O a a 2 co c C rQ+l 14 w 0 d x d n .ti 0 a N O Z a r or y m \ cc _ 2 § LA � \ u / § Ln k a 2 0 � 2 E w k 7 L / � § � $ 7 @ Kto 0 ° Ln 0 CL 7a 2 R 2 j 2 k tw 2 4 j I § / k u d E \ � £JT E LL tn (v L 2CL : E w w \ 9 t CL 0 L 2 k E � \ 2 k E / § w E % cu ƒ 0 m co L. on & w % c f k o/ / \ 2� ¥ L b 0 / 7 k f Cl. 0 2 o» c 7 2 f m \ m-@ U m ƒ o % 2 L- Et 0 &If C e 2 c (Um \ $'§ � $ Q E; a 0 E M a e c § e 0 � f LnE m 2 � \ � LL £ cu uLArcl 5 k \ � V \ $ � - m f E k k §\ u ' k toQj f \ f m. 7 — 9 U to § e ■ E zm c ? 4w ■ E Z EL c § 4-1 e § S z c ° 4-1 S ■ § 2 c 8 ■ E 2 c © ■ § z c 0 4.0 S 0 R o e 2F o 0 4 IR o R o 2 o 4 o 41 2 o 2 o■ 2 o o m Q 10 0 W w O (D O D 0 0 o 0 Q a 0 W 0 r4 T4 r wl rq \ cc _ 2 § LA � \ u / § Ln k a 2 0 Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate -income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2) Tenant Based Rental Assistance - The County estimates to assist 50 extremely -low income households for the five year ConPlan period. Rental New Construction: The County estimates constructing 2 new affordable rental units and 30 new elderly rental units for the five year ConPlan period, Of these units, 90% (27) of these units is planned to be occupied by households earning 50% and below AMI. The remaining 5 units will be occupied by low- income households. Homeownership: The County estimates 38 homeownership/for-sale affordable homes will be constructed and sold in the five year ConPlan period. Of these units, 75%, (28) of these units is planned to be occupied by low-income households and the remaining 10 units will be occupied by moderate - income households. Homeowner Rehabilitation: The County estimates 50 owner -occupied homes will be rehabilitated in the five year ConPlan period. Of these units, 331.'0 (16) of these units is planned for households earning 50% of below AMI and the remaining 34 (67f4) units is planned for households earning between 51%- 60% AM I. Rental Rehabilitation: The County estimates 36 affordable rental units for special needs households will be rehabilitated in the five year ConPlan period- 33 of these units is planned to be occupied by households earning 30% AMI or less, the remaining 3 units will be occupied by households earning 31%- 50% AM I. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 122 CIMS Control No: 2506-0117(exp .06/30/2018) SP -50 Public Housing Accessibility and involvement — 91.215(c) Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement) The State Hawaii Public Housing Authority manages the public housing throughout the State of Hawaii. Please refer to the State's Consolidated Plan. Activities to Increase Resident Involvements The State Hawaii Public Housing Authority manages the public housing throughout the State of Hawaii. Please refer to the State's Consolidated Plan. Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part 902? N/A Plan to remove the `troubled' designation The State Hawaii Public Housing Authority manages the public housing throughout the State of Hawaii. Please refer to the State's Consolidated Plan. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 123 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) SP -55 Barriers to affordable housing— 91.215(h) Barriers to Affordable Housing The County of HawaiTs strategy to remove barriers to affordable housing is: Foster and maintain affordable housing. The County will continue to facilitate the development of at least one affordable and one special needs housing project. The County will continue to provide technical assistance to for-profit and not-for-profit developers to expedite the development process. Fees, charges, exactions. The County will amend its Housing Policy to maintain a reasonable fee structure and encourage developers to provide affordable units. Land use regulations. The County of Hawai'i will amend its County subdivision and zoning codes and recommend the elimination or modification of onerous codes. Building codes. The County of Hawaii will continue to review County building codes and recommend the elimination or modification of onerous codes that do not affect health and safety of residents. Growth limitations. The County of Hawaii will revise and update the County General Plan as mandated by our Charter. The County will continue to use the General Plan, as amended, to direct growth. Return on investment. Please refer to the State's CP. The County imposes mandated buy back provisions. The County may impose shared equity conditions. Lack for resources. The County will continue to support and provide technical support to not -far -profit organizations with applications for and to encourage funding agencies to approve start up and capacity building grants. "Mini Davis -Bacon". Tax Policy, and Land Use Controls. Please refer to the State's CP for the State's strategy to remove the following barriers to affordable housing - Strategy to Remove or Ameliorate the Barriers to Affordable Housing The County is undertaking the following efforts to reduce and/or remove affordable housing barriers among vario4Is housing stakeholders. Foster and Maintain Affordable Housing The County will: • Administer the Residential Emergency Repair Program- • Coordinate landlord forums and promote benefits of its rental assistance program. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 124 CMB Control No- 2506-0117 Jexp 06/30/2018) • Work with the Real Property Tax Division to inform landlords about the Affordable Rental Housing Program. • Educate the community (including non-English or Limited English Proficiency) on tenant/landlord roles and responsibilities under the Fair Housing Act. • Represent homeless needs to State agencies to encourage mainstream resourcing to address homelessness. • Administer Fair Housing training to participant's island wide. • Educate communities and solicit support through various stakeholder venues about needed housing programs. • Support authorized pre-emptions, pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes 46-15.1 to assist in expediting development of affordable housing projects. • Design/maintain a website to increase housing and program information accessibility. • Revise Hawaii County Code, Chapter 11, to promote development of affordable housing. • Provide policy recommendations to the Hawaii County Council and the State Legislature to preserve affordable housing development viability and funding opportunities. • Provide resource information at community development planning meetings that are representative of at -risk population housing needs. Fees, Charges, Exactions O * The County will implement Hawaii County Code, Chapter 11 (Housing) to increase inventory in affordable for -sale housing units and lots, rental units, developable land and fees dedicated to affordable housing development. Land Use Regulations • The County will continue to amend and/or streamline its entitlement codes and/or processes. Remove barriers Building Codes • The County will continue to amend and/or streamline its entitlement codes and/or processes. Growth Limitations • The County will utilize its General Plan to monitor its performance and make amendments needed to direct growth. Return on Investment • Refer to the State's CP. The County imposes buyback and shared equity provisions. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 125 OMB Control No. 2506-0117 (exp 06.'30;'20181 Lack for Resources The County will: • Establish the Homebuyer Education and Counseling Services program to prepare eligible families for homeownership. 0 Collaborate with community stakeholders to secure County, State and Federal funds for the development of Na Kahua Hale O Ulu Wini (formally known as the Kaloko Housing Program), which will increase transitional and permanent rental housing inventory and services for homeless families in West Hawaii. + Provide technical assistance in accessing SuperNOFA, ESG, HOPWA and other federal funds for housing programs/services- "Mini Davis -Bacon", Tax Policy and Land Use Controls Refer to the State's CP for the State's strategy to remove barriers to affordable housing. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 125 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) SP -60 Homelessness Strategy — 91.215(d) Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs The State Homeless Outreach Program provides comprehensive geographic coverage of the state's four counties taking basic services out to the homeless on the beaches, in parks, and in the downtown streets where the homeless congregate. The program partially funds the "Care -a -Van" programs in partnership with the State Department of Health in the counties of Hawaii (two vans), Maui (one van), and Kauai (one van). Each of the vans is equipped with basic medical, food, and other emergency supplies and is staffed by a nurse and outreach case worker. The program seeks out the unsheltered homeless, provides them with basic intake, assessment, medical and social services; refers the clients to appropriate agencies; and otherwise assists the homeless in moving toward a more stable living environment. Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons The State Homeless Shelter Stipend Program funds emergency and transitional shelters with the intent to achieve geographic accessibility throughout the state. Homeless emergency and transitional shelters are available in all counties, but most of the shelters are full and maintain waiting lists for future vacancies. Additionally, transitional housing for the homeless with special needs is in short supply. Therefore, out of necessity, most of the state's emergency and transitional housing programs provide a broad spectrum of services to address the multiple needs of homeless clients, including substance abuse services, mental health services, life skills training, educational services, job training, and family support. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again. Hawaii's emergency and transitional shelters provide a secure environment where individuals and families can stabilize their lives, address their needs and bolster their economic stability. The State's homeless programs provide funds to shelter providers wherein more than 2000 individuals annually successfully transition into permanent housing. The program requires that each shelter address the homeless individual's or family's immediate basic needs, health and social needs, and successful transition to permanent housing. Toward this end, all shelters provide basic services, such as meals, shelter, and a clothing bank. Also, each shelter performs an intake and assessment on each client that identifies the areas that the client needs to address (e.g., health, education, substance abuse problems, employment skills, etc.). These areas of need are then incorporated into a social development case plan Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 127 with goals, activities and a timeline for completion, in which the client agrees to participate. The shelters also provide referrals and on-site classes or other services to assist clients in the implementation of case plans. The State public housing authority provides a preference for homeless persons on their wait list for public housing and Section -8. Additionally, the County of Hawaii provides homeowners who rent out a room to maintain their homeowner tax exemption. Additionally, the County of Hawaii has adopted a preference to homeless persons for their tenant based rental assistance program. Help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families who are likely to become homeless after being discharged from a publicly funded institution or system of care, or who are receiving assistance from public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education or youth needs The State Department of Health, Adult Mental Health Division (AMHD) has risen from the stigma of being under a Court Ordered Consent Degree to a model for best practices in evolving more readily available and appropriate services for their clients with serious and persistent mental illness. The change is most evident in relation to the homeless mentally ill who comprise a significant portion of the State's chronically homeless population. AMHD has initiated a remarkable permanent supportive housing program for their clients, augmented further by HUD's Mainstream Section -8 vouchers. However, the State has had to respond to the severe economic downturn with cuts in State funding for programs that threaten the stability of many supportive housing programs. Programs are being examined for cost effectiveness and maximum achievement of outcome objectives. The State will continue to apply for Continuum of Care competitive grants on behalf of the rural counties to enhance the production of permanent and supportive housing as well as to continue effective programs that help the homeless to attain economic self-sufficiency. The federal Shelter Plus Care program and the State Department of Health's Bridge Subsidy have been key tools to providing permanent supportive housing for the homeless mentally ill. Additionally, the State will apply for any federal "collaboration" grant opportunities through the partnerships that exist within the Hawaii Interagency Council on Homelessness. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 128 OMS Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) SP -65 Lead based paint Hazards -- 91.215(i) Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards Hawaii County has two programs that consider the hazards of lead based paint poisoning. One, the Residential Emergency Repair Program (RERP), requires that lead based paint risk assessments be conducted for homes built before 1978. if a dwelling is determined to have lead, mitigative measures are taken to address the lead that is present. When the lead based paint concerns are corrected, the unit becomes available for lead free safe occupancy, thereby, increasing access to housing without LBP hazards. The other is the County's Section 8 Rental Assistance Payments Program which prohibits rental subsidy for any unit that is built before 1978 if there is a family member under the age of 6 and the unit contains peeling paint. How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards? The actions taken to correct lead based paint concerns directly reduces the extent of lead poisoning and hazards because the unit becomes lead free safe for occupancy. By prohibiting the approval of rental subsidy, units will not by occupied by Section 8 participants. As a result, families, especially those with members under the age of 6, the most vulnerable and susceptible population, are not put at risk to the hazards of lead poisoning. How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures? The County's RERP includes in its program rules the requirement that any dwelling subject to loan approval and built before 1978, be tested by a State certified Risk Assessor. If lead-based paint is detected, then the lead based paint hazard must be mitigated. Section 8 Rental Assistance Payments Program requires strict compliance with Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) regulations concerning lead based paint hazards to protect the health of children. Housing Quality Standards (HQ5) inspections are conducted prior to approval of any rental assistance. Thus, ensuring the health and safety of tenant families from lead based paint hazards. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 129 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp 06/30/2018) SP -70 Anti -Poverty Strategy — 91.215(j) Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty -Level Families According to the 2010 Census, 18.3% of the people in Hawaii County are below the poverty level. This is above the State's poverty level of 11.2% and this is mainly due to the high unemployment rate in the County. The County plans to continue administering the Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA) that targets the extremely -low and very -low income households. This would limit the households from paying more than 301,1.3 of their income to housing costs. Another program the County would like to administer is the National Housing Trust Fund (NHTF) that targets the extremely -low and very -low income households. The National Housing Trust Fund can be used to acquire, construct or rehabilitate rental housing and rent to extremely -low and very -low income households. In rural areas the NHTF law considers households with income below poverty line as very -low income. By administering the NHTF it will help the County reduce the number of poverty -level families. In addition, the County is administering the Department of Labor's Workforce Investment Act (WIA) program which require a one-stop shop. The one-stop concept allows a client to access various services from a central location, which includes self-sufficiency and financial literacy programs. The mandatory partners in the one-stop shop are: WIA programs, Native American programs, migrant and seasonal farm worker programs, veteran employment program, adult education, welfare -to -work, senior community service employment program), vocational rehabilitation services for the blind programs, Hawaii Community College and HUD employment and training programs. The County will continue to ensure compliance with Section 3 requirements by working with contractors on projects utilizing CDBG/HOME/HTF funds to provide job training, employment and contract opportunities to low and very -low income residents. How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan? The County's Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) will continue working with and partnering with non-profit organizations, government agencies and Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO) to develop affordable housing for extremely -low, very -low, low and moderate income households throughout the County. The OHCD will continue to fund the County's TBRA program to assist extremely -low and very -low income households with rental assistance. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 130 OMB Control No: 2505-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) SP -80 Monitoring — 91.230 Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements Upon approval of the CABG, HOME and HTF program funds, the County of Hawaii meets with each recipient. During this meeting, the County explains the contents of the agreement and all of the requirements for the specific project. The County has developed various checklists (bid, construction, labor standards, acquisition, etc.) that are distributed to each recipient. The checklist indicates the process and the documentation requirements. The checklist also requires that the County approve agreements, documents, notice, etc. prior to its use or execution. This ensures that the documents meet the federal requirements of the program. Recipients are required to submit all executed and completed documents to the County for its files. Recipients are also subject to audits and monitoring visits by auditors and HUD. This is an ongoing process. The County works with the recipient through every step of the project. Training and technical assistance is done immediately if errors or non-compliance are found. For projects involved with facility rehabilitation or construction, the County conducts site visits to verify work progress, to conduct labor interviews, and verify project progress payments. In addition, the agreement executed between the County and recipient requires the recipient to submit monthly status reports to the County. This ongoing monitoring process is preferred to the usual monitoring and audit of projects during the middle or at the completion of the project. This system enables the County to work with the recipients through every step of the project implementation. The process ensures compliance prior to executing any actions, instead of reviewing files after the fact. For the HOME Investment Partnerships Program and the National Housing Trust Program (HTF), the County is responsible for monitoring the County of Hawaii's HOME and HTF Projects. The County provides technical assistance and monitoring during project development and implementation, as well as during the appropriate period of affordability. The County conducts annual site inspections on the HOME and HTF projects as well as review of tenant's files to verify income eligibility and income verification, compliance with HOME and HTF lease requirements, if applicable, and other tenant related aspects of the program such as compliance with allowable rent schedules. In all instances, a written report is issued detailing the results of the monitoring visit and any corrective actions necessary. A written response detailing corrective actions Otaken by the sub -recipient is required within 30 days of issuance of the report. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 131 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) The County will continue to actively encourage participation by minority and women -owned businesses who may be procuring goods and services and ensure sub -recipient contract opportunities are incorporated into bid solicitations, requests for proposals and sub -recipient contracts. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 132 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06,130/2018) COUNTY OF HAWAI I 2015 ACTION PLAN OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN (2015 - 2019) N LU u L O Ln 41 M a .Q Tj c am �. C M W(Uo -a u '6 a a N CL a m 2 L m Z f9 E E- ry u d u a C rp U 7` L mtm +. u w N m m p U C C = E v > a ` j p C. rl ate+ 0 aui > v m W r C C u a C U s m m c 4 O -C c CL E d LU ac o 0 �!1 rl H R y } mN u } L LO ine N m Eb E p Q p to in .� II a 0 u a` c Lo N G1 N N d X w o N OLm 4^ Ln a U � a L.i a-. A to 3 C N QJ V D C u a E o an cu Ln N_ d •� CC N •vf N C p > > -0 CL w s a� a u VV N R A H C 13L co 0 0 10 k. a E CL O u _.......... .. _......... G r m 0 c O CL LLJ M LA V 2 '1 . vi G7 - y O 'j - -0 3 O- O ? ❑o ate+ C ,L.. Y = 0 — Y m O d LL 3 LA -a S - r 3 L 4cl)- LO O C O '� O = t i VI p u= m L _ = m L c o m 41 U C U_ � 7 CU m O .� m O d 'm to V O L O ro N u a, ° ' a c �° M 3 i m m m 3 �" u a� c m u m �' c L u L N a o m= 0 m 0 3 c o 'rn m r m a, � o a ro Q ra }' m L ,a � W �= U acu rC C ro ` m U ,n ii O L .0 -p m 3 'ra ,n io O = _ +- L tia U _ U L 'U C to � R7 'a+ N `~ N O O CLI O C ,r = O 3 to O- Ln V O O Y 'a c -0 Ln wate. = `� L O 3 LnG E " cu CJ ? r i a L V O 3 D - c n o uj v c a= v m e, ao '^ c '0 7, w +� o w > c a� c m W °' c p °' o R o r= oe Z 2 N F r -MaUOL ra m o u 1 t o 'O + 0 41cu a _m O u c O m O t tin l co a Q' CU O N Q O a N N 0) RL O O n� ❑ n n m Ln O N u1 C* N Im. w L o 0 c a` D a, x t� :3 9 L H � L a U U 01 U L L IV I. � LA Q o o c c c C a m o in o C u w LL O EL r- O O r Im. w L o 0 c a` D a, x t� :3 9 O G fO C a LL r 4, •� DJ C1 "� aj 00 F+ ar 1 0 Ls.l Q� C ❑ m_� o u o � ami `� m 6. ,Q- ? G - m Cr] p cu L}' W p � O O a T O u • i+ G .� ro d N O O Z VLL d u C Y L u 'n � -a dJ 3' tm c = C L LLI p L ti0 ❑ Qj Ln 0 a 0L- — 3 o ° r } cuo a ro = 0 O 0 c N s 0 r a= ,Y LL s ,� .� a c i u a s 2: a - = Gd 7 v�ni m w p C C 6. •� C L4- LL fC s E O. cu Y +-+ O Gl ai Y N D C D z Ln vi u �. w- L p. to vl Zto O ti n 0 b Gni C •a J cu U 0 c '~ Lu i7 U P = y a Z a C' L —_ :6 C Y O u O a, M = 3 O as y .� m O r ate+ Ln 0, ❑ a m u tv7 O CL 3 O 0 LL O O S a G N O Q O O O r a a G C L13 O O N u u 0 I CL o E V Wa$� c �; a 0 r- 0 00i o 0 O O M fl- O O m C r 00' Iz r4 N +^� M W Ln O L!1 L go c -I f1 r'1 LCI Ltl a . L 0 d Q Q Q z A d f° y O "m u o oin — Q z a` .. a 'o E" o a o 0 0 0 0 = Q 26 w o in -C O u a a �i a c O to O Q O O1 i0 o O O Om On O 0 CA fY0{n O' 1� rl Gt OO 1 r4 Q O Ln � c -i N G L M LNn Ln r .-+ ui Lri c � o a O d K C N C C 'u, 4-1 O r4 a Ln 4, ,-n 7 7 C! y O +S+ O u a p S oLn p s o o a rL aGJ U +IA u U a+ a Y m Y U L- L O UL. �+ r M 0 +°J 7 7 �_ •U N LL O. a p. Y of a O_ O. C a �,a to p E as � 2 '^ N U r C) OJ w Cl N O Q = L Y O 0 0 0 O m �J i 0 a w 9 z M O U Q Q c d � H oj N f9 � O m tA O o c a O al U n 0 LO 0 %n N a ;fl Ll Ln c a a y Lk- y i Gi +m+ O = L - a LL LL O = Cu! EL _ = v w w 7 0 E - -r- L U a o -- a?i U ro a 3 a L� m u U Ia `o a -n o CU _ •� a a M L m=� ro � O a N c M o. i y z fL m = aJ — oo v 2 ra oE:3 . c to L o tn r - cu Cu M atA. c E cu ro- L CU 3 m :3G m �— ai tw ea (j o d �- = c c u Y = OJ, aM a �^ u c c LL o a m A .� _-0 m O U L C O as c m -0 `° o u a = C r O m w O CL a w Ln Larnx, a' w a: o 0 0 o Ln o.►> o Ln m 'n L a � i ` O.. O a, N a u r � � ` � 7 O C 'n Q a` c a E a o l o E m o Q tw ° r ao• _ u CL CDa W O O LPI Mo Q lit a ° m Ln a � LA 3 O m �n = Q7 N D O r z O u_ in u u LO LL O — o !7 p — E L L L d7 cli ai O L t CL Y 0 Y 0 a w 9 z M O U Q Q c d � H oj N f9 � O m tA O o c a O al U n 0 LO 0 %n N Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied The CDBG funds in 2015 are about 40% of the total cost of the projected CDBG projects in 2015. So, the 40% of CDBG funds leverage 60% of additional resources, which includes State, County, owner's contribution and private foundation grants. The HOME funds are 20% of the total cost of the projected HOME projects in 2015. This means the HOME funds are leveraged 5 to 1 by additional resources, like State, County, owner's contribution and private bank loans or foundation grants. The HOME projects match are usually from LIHTC or State general excise tax exemptions and owner's contribution. The self- help housing projects match is from State general excise tax exemptions and "sweat equity" by the homebuyers. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 137 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan County owned land has been used in the past, and will be used in the future, to develop affordable housing projects for the low and moderate income households throughout the County of Hawaii. Usually, a long-term lease (55 years) is executed with the non-profit organization for nominal annual lease amount. It is stated in the lease that the non-profit organization must keep the project affordable to low and moderate income households for the duration of the lease. The County of Hawaii's Kama koa Nui. Community Housing project located at Waikoloa, South Kohala is an experimental/demonstration housing project designed to meet the needs of low -and moderate income persons. The County has currently cleared, grubbed and installed infrastructure for the sale of one and two story Bungalow and Sir3gle Fami ly Traditional homes. A total of 91, fee simple residential units will be sold during this phase. In addition, the County has provided 16 lots to two non-profit housing entities for mutual self-help housing projects. These units will target households earning below 80% of the County's median family income - Discussion Narrative included in previous sections. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 138 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Eo c 4•+ A E G L m E E V! 2 0 0 p M z Z3 0 u Q Q 2 m O co u 0 a -0 tl Ln+. Ln C VI a L m LA Ln O C r- 7 r0 = n Ln o r p N m Ea c C 0 = c O L ` O �, O O L Q O Ln L a O au ca y Q L rL x a -a �+ (U d Ln0J C L + a an b O ,cu, p O ° 3 '" �+ °v '� c0 O A °' L aaj w v v a 5L: c °7 oj cum E 7 E y Ln nl r0 en A L ++ }• O O Q L Q C1 O aL a rC LM 0 O z z x v, x x 0 r cc Q l7 n a a o 0 o m m r� O p Ln p O N C Ty VF ih IA ih -L4 'hl rJ l7 cG C7 0 ►+� 0 0 u D D u u u u = u inm 'G N IA Cl tA (U 7 LA C iB Cr •y' U U •� a .0J •N U N .N a 0 a m a O Q = m 0 a a, O = a LL a. L x ZLL= a_ x an = u Q C m 0 O O O O O Lmti – – – – – - L Y L -i yJ ,00a = 3 � 3 = 3� 3� 3 = 3 : 3 aj O m Q ra O M O m Q m O m Q ro u z u x u z u x u x u= u x an to +. C OD r C m Cu Z_- °J Cu �C-, ,?_ E E as a� ,?_ E _a 7 C 7 C � •n 7 C A = E a v c _ E° o .c c E>w c E� `O , E 0� c E� O= o o¢ z= ¢ z° ua za ua x0 z u o a z LU ,r ON p O O O p p Ln Ln Ln in Ln Ln Ln R r! } O O O O D O O N N N N N N N tn R rp CC Lam+ O 0 < m z a0+ Q — 01 L N ' ++ 's+ 4� i– ra v m E ' �` CAi of °+ C�i ' aj tw on cD Ln`' ° °' °' L LA C - -0 CL E E == v LA O C = z=�_� a z vRi L V � a � '" O Ln �a n p M z Z3 0 u Q Q 2 m O s. LO rrn p tw r O r* 1 - a . u M �+ of 7 i C al C O ate+ u =1U = ,n - L0 Q d C C (IJ C d E s "' i -n Lo o m uLU L m C O C O r Q DJ GJ C cu ++ Ln of 6. +_' &A oC T x O Ln an �O ..0 V 6 C"UC 0 M L1 O n" 0 0 a p C fl 'Y O S O 'o O O N x er) 1- L!'I Cs w J mN Ln 0-0 C � fr1 rrl LC M -:tN C In.ri Q tr} LTi C u� {j tii LL C U.O c v O p O S 2 V x 13 a N 00 CU a r c c Z y an v, yr o a o x z T u_ L O O a� p _ _ - b O U 2 v 2 ULn x N Ln a) 10 m y a E z Ln m O ra t n, u = -acu . `o E ¢ z Ln x � � � ca tL V o 0 0 N N N ` �.. LP{ LPI LP1 m ri r-1 r -I 1 O O O N N N 41 Ln C f6 r6 Q z a Q At o O- Ln OJ , C Ln 4 + t�CLn R l) N m 4+ `a w Ln 4- S W z T T U a oLn D a� r -I O Ty H z D O a Q 0 2 2 0 N _ 0 CL .L u K ai 0 O u' ai c v c aJ c 0i c 0 c r C �iQ E o " 0 o E o E o m U E 0 N c m m +, 'a N m 4+ m CL 4+ �. u 4+ L r > c Q Z o. Z .e. m w Li m S Z A L N N ON i' un a 10 N cu`n fti O 19 fG iyn cu E f9 N �9 m al E Cl f0 N o A a 0 v m E o a, � E o E O o o m o o a, o a a o o m o 0 C aim l9 O W l7 C l7 C9 0 L C7 O C l7 C U' w e Y i oj m Q �+ a al +r m C] a v u p > m Z N m C E 3 C a o L ° = ° m 3 cE °' cli m 0 m L- u N 3 C m c a a rL t:! cu 41Y as 4- 7 rA o d C ro V a 0 L w c_ aN+ U Y N E Qj 3 0 c OL y C m m u a its > c 3 _ o a rya oa = 0 m m c O! 7 C C * u " Q = O +' N u 7 vi a L No = '� m C C O L C O r ou u a ¢> 0 a = m L G N Q O " GD y m Y 0 a CIC C C r]o doOa CL to C co -a cu c c C 'i• C1= 'N F � ++ m 7 �+ L Q L Q = Ln '*- Ur OO c VI Q O C1 Q- 4- C1 c- c o Q Y= m 0 a a •+ m aCl L a�j N ... a v, i m ai a v ai m U c w a 'V s }, a al v r 'CL u�, Gi i.+ _ m _ 'u i ,n a+ 3 E = m = m 4- r_rco Q u Q = 3 Q c 3 4A m U ^, .0 Y = F Y c o Ln a' Y c o c c o= m m (D _, Y c c 0 aLL >0 unu mrn o c o ua ci C -a C a a t Q t E Q a L O a. L X n 0 iui C 3 0 L h m n. F = F Y 1-- z F a CL F = }- ai c v c aJ c 0i c 0 c al C E o " E o E o E o E o E 0 c m m +, m +r m 4+ m 4+ m 4+ m.C. r Z ,a Z o. Z .e. Z a Z S Z A f0 10 N l9 fti N 19 fG iyn fa f9 N �9 m N fa f0 N i A y 0 o m o o a, o o w o o m o o a, o o a o o m Q 0 C l7 l9 O W l7 C l7 C9 0 w C7 O w l7 D U' w e .-I 1 N I M I q* I u1 1 to I n r-4 Irr r-1 G r ig YI z 0 U Q Q C R a cc CL) L N R "p m 0 0 N c ci X o a u .. 0 �a Ln 0 N no c 0 L N al aJ I O m u W O a L QJ aJ N Q) al a� L y N N v N � ro G t � u Y 3 a,Ln �. a, CL w Z MD m 4- .u cu O a! G1. �+O- A L R 'Q LA � — C O U i = i &A c o c aCJ 7 � 7 G O O O d c m c a c G O E 0 r zR. �L Z Q. �L z Q. %- _ R R N R R @ R X c� c� o cry C7 a � C7 n O 00 Q1 rl ig YI z 0 U Q Q C R a cc CL) L N R "p m 0 0 N c ci X o a u .. 0 �a Ln 0 N Projects AP -35 Projects — 91.220(d) Introduction For the 2015 CDBG and HOME allocation there were a total of 8 CDBG and 6 HOME projects that were selected. It consisted of 9 housing projects, 4 public facility projects and 1 health and safety project. The 9 housing projects ranged from self-help housing, owner -occupied rehabilitation, construction of elderly rental units, renovation of elderly and disabled apartments, micro -housing units for the chronic homeless to tenant based rental assistance. The 4 public facilities were made up of foundation and site work for the construction of an adult day care facility, construction of a certified kitchen in an emergency shelter, renovation of a domestic abuse shelter and planning and site work for a micro -housing project for the chronic homeless. The 1 health and safety project was to acquire a Wildland Brush Truck for the Pahoa Fire Station. The County completed a Substantial Amendment to its 2015 Action Plan on March 18, 2016 for its 2015 CDBG and HOME Funds. This amendment included the project cancellation of Habitat for Humanity Workforce Housing - Land Acquisition and Construction, Kamakoa Nui Mutual Self -Help Housing Land Acquisition and the West Hawaii Micro -Unit Housing Planning, Site improvements and Construction. The funding for these projects were reprogrammed to the Hilo Drag Strip Accessibility Compliance Project, Residential Emergency Repair Program, Kona Domestic Abuse Shelter Renovations, Hilo Adult Day Center Construction Project, Mohouli Heights Senior Housing and Tenant -Based Rental Assistance. Projects # Project Name 1 Hale Ulu Hoi I& II Apartment R h b t i n& p r f x t R Facilities 3 Mohouli Heights Senor N ghborh d Ph I A r ble Rentals For Seniors 4 Tenant Based Renta Assistance 7 Hilo Adult Day Care Cent r Sute Impr ,w;e.. nts & C n t t n 8 West Hawai Emergency Sh Iter - C rtifi d Ktt h C n tr t o 10 BHC15 - Pahoa Fire Station W Idl nd Brush Tru k A q t n 13 BHC15 - Kona Domestic Abu Sh t Sh t r R n v 14 BHC15 - Residential Emergen y Repa r Program 15 CDBG Administration, Planning and Fa,r Houzing 16 OHCD Administration 17 Kumakua Mututal Self Help Housing Phas II- Construction of Affordable Homes Table 57 — Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 143 OMS Contra'. No 25C6-4117 (exp. 06;'30/2718} 7• Lr m E 0 u GJ '0 L a W M CL C E 0 4- C m E in m �O 3- 0. a [C1 G v a Ln a� v z tw G C a a c 0 �7 0 M 0 �' c o W cj Q L 2 ro c O m uz. O c Q -a 'a .6 O! C 41 a1 sn 0 CL L z L a a A a 0 O1 cu N 'D mL. ro m w CL a h° i7 I Z tw G C a a c 0 �7 0 M 0 �' c o W cj Q L 2 ro c O m uz. O c Q a c 0 cu y GJ L m u G m LA Ln m R C a c u d Ln -a r C a1 16 0 a c 0 cu y GJ L m u G m LA Ln m R C a c u d Ln ri c ro CL QJ 72 O N Q O V cc N m 0 c x ai n 0 LD 0 N O z 0 0 u tL 2 0 -a v L Q- 0 0 w CL 3 N c as � u •E 4.0 a c a H M a w ate. m .a a ri c ro CL QJ 72 O N Q O V cc N m 0 c x ai n 0 LD 0 N O z 0 0 u tL 2 0 Ln 9 Z 0 u a ° r� i 0 ocn 4-1 3 Ln E -2 Lm u aio o� E a E L aNi °' E u oo °- ° o w $ m s m 0 ° ° E ° a° Ea ro m a n o ;«_ ,n O -�{ c C Ln L WCD laP! LS a�j [} VI N a •�+ cO c 0 C= .3 u ,n z :3 N u c Q a NV1 cu in m u Ln C m X Ln C Ou +' N E u ° C Mcu L ~ cc O E"O Ln M 4 ra E OL m a 3 D ,m o U Q c a +' c o aui o-0 o -° M :3 a ,., o a .. •3 ._ Q •a0 oGi 3 a E L o o. Y o m -0 c u u -a = c YF+ C Ln M C .0 m y C a fC Y ° a � a F• � ° ql L Q E c 'aC--� p '_ O A m Q p t C Ln of .G C 6! N 06 GJ p °p p u 4 (1) °u a 'w y a a cu Y n e w o -CL L M° E " °0. a u C a R -0 ° u Q W .� 7 a > L o a- s� . i m Ln E E a _ m N LLn 0 Q > N L a JC ` O rl' u u a L c.1 a •'r 3 y w Q "r o o '`' en n c y� v C �° r ro m a a a m Q ni rn � - L H an w in 4_P�_n Q _n c _ ` m CLO nA C w U :R G W :� 3 C t� L C C C 0 ID E ° 4- c ° ° 2 0 0 m3 a 2 cu u u 2 T z = 2 2 3: .0 .an •� Q. ° .a M t a a z �w E .� CL a m ro d �, t Ln E W i C w t E cu E m ° $. ` Q -p C eo �' C a � w d "O Z a M a o r `� -*" � .� z a a N+' to C d •u �, fC G, O N � m ro a '� E a °' '7 c •� tw w 'a O cu = N u _ �' L C �' um ` D C�1 a H C9 Z Iii. D F- W ate+ .a M -4 d }- (D Z FrT In Ln 9 Z 0 u a ° r� i 0 Q _ a -o rGo G L CL V CU 0 .0 Q. = N L c a ,, a E E a NCL c 3 W - 41 m C ,a u N a n 0 f6 u J H 1+ a" -a a C C m C. c 0 u u w YL E m L tw O v u O O 7 = ej O u O L L l3 'n GO = O O W) V = '.6 O 2 ,n (U C O Ol } 7 L O LCL W cu cu 1 F L CL c .- u c a cu L L � ! V r m Y � d0 � a ,n o V! C G E O ,Ya u > o L L CL _ E u 1 1 to = Y U U [fl Lm u_ 03 03 .a C O v b a N H L N 'O a a Z n Ln N r-1 eh i� m A u LD v 7u c m CL v -u 'a a tw LL. O H LD v 7u 1 z O u Q Q 2 m ti 0 m O Q V n N 0 N to c Ln � � a C — _ L C N r4Q E 3 a m 3: c a L KA 'U u m m Q, ro rn G w •_ L .0 W 0 4-T Lj Q ate+ 4+ ra LCL CA L 4-• C '- L CL J d Q, {� L N7 {n 1 d Q Q Yaj v CO E C a� � a cu G = a C+'i-+ O = Na � a U y M v IA m I aj u O 0 C N O E N L O v U L OJC N a m bc m a Lnu L C_ .G C 0 rn '� -a m 3 t Q7 D U Q, m to Y r9 'd CL C C a "G Q, a+ +kn Q, -a Q, +(U� L � `- u N +r � C 5 QJ E 47 C.j.d C7 L —Cu Qa CL u y Oa r m t; rn a N E a a+ Q) u Q] � �Q, R C C u O m ,n a,L. •� Q3, Ln LAQ, L) QCJ G :3F t rL ur-,+r E Q, L QJ Z QJ t .cu Q di 111 L Q, m W E--. _ C 4 o "- E L ro 3 1 a`n,aj a a o _ r "` cu wm .a LF) VI oj 7 QC, C ma m R N t P1 C C E •u > a fl. Y A LL LL Q, j 4� i7 0 ;_ 4� U u l� L7 �A a •U m c. -es m a -0 .a CO Co W n. -0 QJ m R _ O L o c d a o c 7 .f L Q. a Y h .0 M = L n. p c ns QJ }, .0- ; d N C ns Q, d Q, u Q, L L Q, - 4+ E u N E c o u m m Q. c y t 4' E ° as 4J L tA Iu 41 w E .y c eo a u oa E Q, w '� o W R LU Z m + 0. H W Z Ii a W M lA z O u Q Q 2 m ti 0 m O Q V n N 0 N 4 ■ § g u 3 R � ƒ E E R R 2 k Ln Ln E 2 § 3 E r u � 2 2 2 2 § k 0 S 2 'R cu 2 t . > 0 £ ° o \ Ln tjo ƒ % ° ° cu 5 / 7 0 u E k \ » / a CU k c r.L -0 2 m -0§ 3 � / b ƒ -M 2 L I W 0 k k k cu k m � � a u � ¥ � k CL \0 M C # � § IA = Ln w LA 2 ƒLIO w § CL z cus ■� N2 k \ & |cu CL � § � k § \ k .z < _ $ uLA Z.« 2 t CL § k % 2 Ln c _IAJ lu 9" 73 Ln ' @ k - @ • © c • 0. E ' % u e J a (D 2ti- 9 w z- 2 u J >- c J \ § : u / k CL r— CU L < �2cu t E / ƒ 2 2 Ln / 2 k cu n ƒ Ln S \ 2 Ln q e O J ƒ c t E 5 § m 4A E\ E o o E - E a 0 2 § 2 0 r J/ 2 on m2; 0LM g $ E t rA - / U E k CU I 3 m� k f 2 R 9 � � E g � 0 � \0 M # � § IA w LA 2 w § CL / cus ■� k \ & |cu CL � § � k § .z < _ $ uLA Z.« 2 t CL 40 Ira % 2 Ln c _IAJ lu 9" Ln ' @ ° - @ • © c • 0. E ' ■ e J a (D 2ti- 9 w z- 2 u J R 9 � � E g � 0 C m 4 a m ° c ° U C a C Ul L- _ Q u m a m Cl Ln u :Y nci n Y - «� a t 3 ,a„ a a c m o cu 0~ E Y 'n a y C a p p a i ra a *' qa O c m a0- m E c a a c E E a L -m +� m c E m p ie IV c a.to u cu D -c •3 c m L f° `O C m a E a vi �e E C - a _ > cu w m CL Fes- }' � p u c -r C '3 — 'u ++ p m O a m 11 = Cr4 m o 0 -p L > o � •o v o f9 _ a c u. m c M' c. '1!1 -0 a a C L C E ,� aE c E •- a� (NC a Ln � c �, c p 4 °' a o o o> s tn m a c E Ln N v R G d E 7 C a 7? -u 'O 41 .0 LJ a -p p a M a O a Q �° Y E 4+ o ' L (-U m E . Q m E aEQ -j O .� p o p m E air u '^ a c o ip u u p L �' a ++ m LL O a s n �' E m t7 C `«-• u_ a X a 4- m C L- tn CL a M N a 90 m aai . v, u C d +�, +s+ C '� G m a as O p m U j L m C Lin CL O m O w 4 5 m C a p 7 *� C N C C sn m 'C a m� u ~ m a _ 4- N m L Ln c } O a L O U C — C a m b a to CU 'r m m -c U E Ln N Mo a m� LLJ O v +J a �' p p m a _ �_ m -0 m m a ti4 to x u, e u M u c a ppq O c L Ln o �° C, a 'G m -= W p s D a c N g E u a Ln •m u �+ p L O U C C "G fU iJE a a K co e�•4 C L 1 3 N p 7 C "C � 'p a C V7 a: p m Lcl) L to mo M Vl- u a Q. .r +r o sn c c 3 m u m m A C c a E 'o r- � u a � UU m S nU CL U U Q m ° -p m U u �c ro z° _0 w L 3 a. aj O M CL O -0 Et �n lu IA H i 0 Ul 41 s E IA N EminCL i a �. o I w w z a a ° m a = u m Z LL G w� a m 'a 4 Z F� Cpl U- 00 C m 4 a m ° c ° U L, � o c a CU � ~ EL Y N G a 'E 0 cu mo w rn"- Q c ao 0 _ a C_ - m G m U T O m 0 u c o c t io +, u E o r CJ U G c _ y M tn Ln u Q a 0 aLA s c a a a L 0 H EE ami aj u N p to a L b O Oo c c uj - -o atic CLI a 3 C m E to a L- C C. E E vi an O to c o +� a Ln rn CL r qXl O w C CULm a 7 C m p tt—I UNJ u, m .0 0 a L Ntw Na •N +-' C O r,II cu s rfl LL G CC LL 0 Z '° C o fU m A 'o u ro v- p o A Cm c E C a C N 0 a O Y aj O C IC E -4 Q1 4f U > 7 C 7 ti C fO C- L " 0 0 O Q L L O W .°J v?+ .` p ra a m a o 0 Ln n ra 3 m v 0 'a 8. , � Q r-IY 1A. -a + a Z - .0 - .y LA m �' C d c .6 Q C rn ra .� Ur ai = E L OV !�O C LL LL U m C O L C o m u a -p C C E "C 'C m O m O C o •U 0 7 u a a m m u u u a a fru •� 0 a+r o C -0 E sa .�' +r L CL Gl 0 j CL YI N m 'G C w L -W L v } w L us- N CU _ E E o d a a cc c �- L L a .L a.+ w SL w E Q W jr M 4! C V N -0 O I G! A ? `a Q L z H L� m � a H U M C) O O d O m 0 u C O Ln x-, s G fG CU R p u GO O ry M O x tV 0 Lo O UllN 0 0 e 0 u m k f § E k 0 cu E ƒCL / 4 -- LU / � E ? &aj _ � � m / E 7 0 k % 4 2 7 0 c \ © \ 2 > § k / u / / u k f i / ai CL U / CL z 2 I Ln f CL R 7R Ln / ® k 7 1 2 \ ? q \ 41 2 I u _ f % 7 CL . E � u — >- 2 ƒg / \ m / 7 2 ƒ % \ \ q S :3§ I I 3: ej k \ 7 Q 7 ' §\ \ \ S E E £ \\ s z 2 3 S 3CL s k 2 cu2 -0k F §r � � a @ c t M a ■ _ E ° © $ - w C� o f -0 c C - ■ t ' ■ 2 3 f E cu \ k k § ' k � 2 m t § . §■ 2 \ E = ■ e 2 m c E o A 2 k u � _ tD z _ a 0. CL c . § . m _ 2 w 2r 2 m _Oj a a k G § 0 a m N LML '4 a a a+ CJ Z O a O 14 N 1J'} f� C O O 3 d �Q r`r cr- "} a w � m O = LL. C 3 W C O 0 -a m in CL s s a E " y 3 s C QJ y cu= sc �. Eo Qa w rn •' a, m E m m C W .0 m rl4 LrI C AP -50 Geographic Distribution — 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed The County does not allocate funds based on geographic areas. The CDBG and HOME funds are allocated through a request for proposal (RFP) process which rank and rates project for program eligibility, need and meeting the County's priorities and objectives of the Consolidated Plan. Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of Funds County of Hawaii 100] Table 58 - Geographic Distribution Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically Not applicable as the County does not allocate funds based on geographic areas. Discussion Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 153 OMS Control No 2506.0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Affordable Housing AP -55 Affordable Housing — 91.220(g) Introduction One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Su Homeless Non -Homeless ecial-Needs Total Table 59 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Thro Rental Assistance L The Production of New Units I Rehab of Existing Units I Acquisition of FxistinQ Hnitr I 'total Table 60 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type Discussion For the 2015 CDBG and HOME allocation there were a total of 8 CDBG and 6 HOME projects that were selected. It consisted of 9 housing projects, 4 public facility projects and I health and safety project, The 9 housing projects ranged from self-help housing, owner -occupied rehabilitation, construction of elderly rental units, renovation of elderly and disabled apartments, micro -housing units for the chronic homeless to tenant based rental assistance. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 154 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) AP -60 Public Housing — 91.220(h) Introduction Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing The State Hawaii Public Housing Authority manages the public housing throughout the State of Hawaii. Please refer to the State's Consolidated Plan. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership The State Hawaii Public Housing Authority manages the public housing throughout the State of Hawaii. Please refer to the State's Consolidated Plan. If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance The State Hawaii Public Housing Authority manages the public housing throughout the State of Hawaii. Please refer to the State's Consolidated Plan. Discussion Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 155 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 05130/2018) AP -65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i) Introduction The County's Consolidated Plan includes the HUD's "Performance Measures Model." The Model sets Objectives, Outcomes, Activities, Indicators, and Output for the next five years. Please see the attached Homeless Performance Measures Model Chart for the County's Homeless objectives. Chronic Homelessness is a priority of this administration and through the administration's efforts the West Hawai`i Chronic Homelessness Intervention and Rehabilitation Project (CHIRP) and the East Hawaii Homeless Coalition was established_ These new forums now bring the various County Departments to the table to develop collaborations between local government, nonprofit, and service providers. The County plans to acquire and install 32 micro -housing units, in West Hawaii, to provide long- term transitional housing for the chronic homeless. The County's Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) will be communicating with vendors who will be retrofitting and delivering 40'x 8' shipping containers that will be converted into 4 micro -housing units. In addition to providing shelter, the OHCD will be working with the various service providers and West Hawaii Chronic Homelessness Intervention and Rehabilitation Project (CHIRP) participants to provide the management of the site in addition to coordinating the needed health care services for these clients. The County arso plans to work with the Child and Family Service to renovate the Kona Domestic Abuse Shelter. The project proposes to enlarge and remodel the kitchen, create an interior private office space, replace flooring, replace the playground equipment to include a safety fall surface and repair wood railings. Incidents of domestic violence have increased substantially in the past three years. There has been a corresponding increase in the number of community members seeking services at the Kona Domestic Violence Shelter. With the increased usage at the shelter, the facility requires more frequent maintenance, a larger kitchen to accommodate the victim's needs, and private space for the staff to meet with victims. The long-term goal, for the shelter, is to prepare the victim for self-sufficiency and independence. Once the victims of domestiE violence and their children are safe, transitioning them to permanent safe housing and providing and linking them to various services to accomplish this becomes the main focus. In Fiscal Year 2014 the Shelter served 97 unduplicated families comprised of 95 women, 2 men and 68 children. Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs Hope Services Hawaii, Inc. provides outreach services to assist the homeless persons. They actually drive to the beaches or areas that the unsheltered homeless stay to deliver hygiene products and advise them of the support services that are available to them. Hope Services Hawaii, Inc. also advises the homeless persons to come in so that the can discuss their case management and provide them with Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 156 COMB Control No.. 2506.0117 (exp (16/30/2018) shelter. Hope Services Hawaii, Inc. also provides meals for the homeless and transportation to appointments. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons The County has a plan to address the emergency shelter, transitional housing and permanent housing needs of homeless persons in West Hawaii. Recently, the County completed the West Hawaii Emergency Shelter in Kailua-Kona, Hawaii. The shelter has 31 rooms available for homeless persons every night and it is filled to capacity every night. In December, 2014 the County completed construction of 24 transitional housing units and 72 permanent housing units in the Na Kahua Hale 0 Ulu Wini project in Kailua-Kona, Hawaii. The County plans to acquire and install 32 micro -housing units, in West Hawaii, to provide long- term transitional housing for the chronic homeless. The County's Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) will be communicating with vendors who will be retrofitting and delivering 40' x 8' shipping containers that will be converted into 4 micro -housing units. In addition to providing shelter, the OHCD will be working with the various service providers and West Hawaii Chronic Homelessness Intervention and Rehabilitation Project (CHIRP) participants to provide the management of the site in addition to coordinating the needed health care services for these clients. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again The County's plan is to transition homeless persons from the West Hawaii Emergency Shelter to the Ulu Wini transitional housing and then to the permanent rental units in Ulu Wini or other permanent housing units in West Hawaii. The rental units provide Section 8 project -based vouchers which will assist with rental subsidies, which is another program the Office of Housing and Community Development administers. The goal is to prevent these individuals and families from becoming homeless again by providing them with case management, counseling and employment and life skills training. This allows for personal growth, family stability and job opportunities. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving 4") assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 157 0MB Control No 2506 0117 (exp 06/30/2018) employment, education, or youth needs The County does not have a formal policy for individuals being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care. These individuals would normally fall under the State's jurisdiction and we as a County would follow the State's policy. However, under the County's Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program, preference is given to applicants who are homeless, victims of domestic violence, aged -out foster care youths and families living in a transitional housing program. Discussion In respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs, the County is partially funding, Phase II, of an elderly rental project, that is being developed by Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC), with HOME funds. The Mohouli Neighborhood Heights Senior Housing Project will be a 120 unit elderly rental project located in Hilo, Hawaii. Phase I of the project consisting of 60 units, began in April, 2012 and was completed in March, 2014. Phase II of the project will consist of 30 units and is scheduled to begin in January, 2016 and completion in January, 2017. The County is providing nutritional and transportation services to the residents. Hawaii Island Adult Care, Inc. {HIAC) is working with HICDC to relocate their program on-site of the project. The HIAC would provide an adult day care program to the residents, as well as to other seniors in the community. The HIAC program would further the health of the seniors by keeping them engaged, physically and mentally involved, and in the presence of trained personnel that can respond to their need 1. The HIAC provides an adult day care program where elders attend for the day, they have dignity, spend time with peers in activities of interest and are a part of the community. In the past, the County has provided CDBG funds for the planning, design, site and infrastructure improvements for the HIAC project. In 207,5, CDBG funds will be provided for foundation acrd site improvements. Vertical construction of the facility is scheduled to start in January, 2016 and completion in December, 2016. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 158 QMB Contro No 2506 0117 (exp 06/30/2018) AP -75 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.220(j) Introduction: The major obstacles of producing affordable housing are the lack of financial resources, scarcity of developable land and the lack of infrastructure. The County has identified the following barriers to continue to address in its quest to provide affordable housing. The following barriers are fees, charges, exactions, land use regulations, building codes, growth limitations and lack of resources. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment The County will undertake the following to reduce and/or remove affordable housing barriers. *Coordinate landlord forums and promote benefits of its rental assistance program. *Work with the Real Property Tax Division to inform landlords about the Affordable Rental Housing Program. *Educate the community (Non-English or Limited English Proficiency) on tenant/landlord roles and responsibilities under the Fair Housing Ac. *Represent homeless needs to State agencies to encourage mainstream resourcing to address homelessness. *Administer Fair Housing training to participants island wide. *Educate and provide communities and solicit support through various stakeholder venues about needed housing programs. *Support authorized pre-emptions, pursuant to Hawaii Revise Statutes 46-15 to assist in expediting development of affordable housing projects. *Continue to maintain a housing website to increase housing and program information. *Continue to revise Hawaii County Code, Chapter 11 to promote development of affordable housing. *Provide legislature recommendations to preserve affordable housing development and funding opportunities. *Provide resource information at community development planning meetings that are representative of Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 159 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) at -risk population housing needs. *Continue to amend and/or streamline the General plan land use regulations and process. *Continue to support applications for and to encourage funding agencies to approve start up and capacity building grants. *Continue to review and update the County building code and recommended the elimination or modification of onerous codes that do not affect health and safety. Discussion: The bottom line is that it is very expensive to build homes affordable for very low and low-income families in Hawaii. The strengths of the affordable housing delivery system in the County is derived from the many different entities striving toward one common goal; to provide for more affordable housing in Hawaii. State, Federal and County agencies, private non -profits, private social service providers, private lenders and private for-profit developers are doing their part to respond to the urgency of the housing situation in Hawaii. New programs are continually being established to form tax incentives, low-interest interim financing, bond financing, rental subsidies and other creative development techniques to provide affordable housing, Despite all of these efforts the availability of affordable housing will not be developed unless massive amounts of funding is available. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 160 oMB Control No: 2506-01171exp 06/30/2018) AP -85 Other Actions — 91.220(k) Introduction: Listed below are the actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs, foster and maintain affordable housing, reduce lead-based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty -level families, develop institutional structure, and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs One of the obstacles to meeting underserved needs is the production of affordable housing. The major obstacles are the lack of financial resources and the lack of infrastructure. The County hopes to leverage other sources of funds (i.e. USDA, State, County and private) by providing federal funds to subsidize the cost of housing. Another obstacle is the cost burden that the extremely -low and very -low income households have to endure for housing in the County. The County hopes to continue funding the Tenant Based Rental Assistance program (TBRA) with HOME funds to assist these extremely -low and very -low income households with rental assistance so that they pay less than 30% of their income to housing costs. Another obstacle is the lack of rental units, throughout the County, for extremely -low and very - low income households. The County plans to work with management agencies and educate landlords about the Section 8 Voucher program and the TBRA program. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing The County of Hawaii plans to foster and maintain affordable housing for County residents by investing CDBG and HOME funds in multiple housing projects during the 2015 Program Year. High priority affordable housing program strategies will include Rental Rehabilitation, New Construction of Rental Units for Special Needs people, Homeowner Repair, Acquisition of affordable units for the chronic homeless, Construction of for -sale affordable houses, renovation to a domestic abuse shelter, kitchen renovations to an emergency shelter and foundation and site improvements for a special needs facility. Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards Hawaii County has two programs that consider the hazards of lead based paint poisoning. One, the Residential Emergency Repair Program (RERP), requires that lead based paint risk assessments be conducted for homes built before 1978. If a dwelling is determined to have lead, mitigation measures are taken to address the lead that is present. When the lead based paint concerns are corrected, the unit becomes available for lead free safe occupancy, thereby, increasing access to housing without LBP hazards. Through the RERP, the County expects to test approximately 10 homes during 2015. The other is the County's Section 8 Rental Assistance Payments Program which prohibits rental subsidy for any unit that is built before 1978 if there is a family member under the age of 6 and the unit contains Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 161 OMB Central No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) peeling paint. Other actions/plans to be undertaken to reduce lead-based paint hazards include: • Distribute pamphlets to applicants of the RERP notifying them of potential lead-based paint hazards; and • Conduct Clearance testing on homes that was found to have lead under the RERP. Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty -level families According to the 2010 Census, 18.3% of the people in Hawaii County are below the poverty level. This is above the State's poverty level of 11.2% and this is mainly due to the high unemployment rate in the County- The County plans to continue administering the Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA) that targets the extremely -low and very -low income households. This would limit the households from paying more than 30% of their income to housing costs. Another program the County would like to administer is the National Housing Trust Fund (NHTF) that targets the extremely -low and very -low income households. The National Housing Trust Fund can be used to acquire, construct or rehabilitate rental housing and rent to extremely -low and very -low income households. In rural areas the NHTF law considers households with income below poverty line as very -low income. By administering the NHTF it will help the County reduce the number of poverty -level families. In addition, the County is administering the Department of Labor's Workforce Investment Act (WIA) program which require a one-stop shop. The one-stop concept allows a client to access various services from a central location, which includes self-sufficiency and financial literary programs. The mandatory partners in the one-stop shop are: WIA programs, Native American programs, migrant and seasonal farm worker programs, veteran employment program, adult education, welfare -to -work, senior community service employment programs, vocational rehabilitation services for the blind programs, Hawaii Community College and HUD employment and training programs. Actions planned to develop institutional structure The County will continue to participate in: CDBG/HOME Quarterly Coordinator's Meetings which coordinates state-wide activities and performance measures; the State-wide Continuum of Care group which meets every other month to collaborate on homeless issues; the Inter -Agency Council on Homelessness which meets every other month to enable better access to mainstream programs and to end chronic homelessness; HOME State Recipient Group which meets periodically to coordinate HOME program and projects; quarterly meeting with Fair Housing Officers from the State and other counties and State-wide Housing Directors which meets monthly to collaborate on housing issues. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 162 0MB Control No 250c 01171exp 06/30/2018) Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies The County will do the following to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. • Expand an email list to notify interested citizens and organizations of upcoming events. • Include video conferencing in its c-htizen participation activities. Discussion: Consolidated Pian HAWAII COUNTY 163 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Program Specific Requirements AP -90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(1)(1,2,4) Introduction: Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Protects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan D 5. The amount of income from float -funded activities 0 Total Program Income: 0' Other CDBG Requirements 1. The amount of urgent need activities 0 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100.00% Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 164 OMBtontrol Ma 2506 0117lexp. 06/30/2018) HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(2) 1. A description of other forms of investment being used beyond those identified in Section 92.205 is as follows: The County of Hawaii does not use any other forms of investment except those listed in Section 92.205. 2. A description of the guidelines that will be used for resale or recapture of HOME funds when used for homebuyer activities as required in 92.254, is as follows: On Homebuyer activities the County of Hawaii will recapture the total amount of HOME funds expended for a project when the recipient fails to comply with the terms of its agreement with the County, or refuses to accept conditions imposed by the County, HHFDC, or HUD; when the recipient sells or otherwise transfers any real or personal property purchased or constructed with the HOME funds within the applicable period of affordability,. and when the recipient ceases to use the property constructed, rehabilitated and/or renovated with HOME funds for the applicable period of affordability, following the issuance of final payment for the project by the County. 3. A description of the gu'4elines for resale or recapture that ensures the affordability of units acquired with HOME funds? See 24 CFR 92.254(a)(4) are as follows: The County of Hawaii adheres to the recapture provisions and recoups the entire amount of the HOME investment from the homebuyer, if the house does not continue to be the principal residence of the homebuyer's family for the entire period of affordability_ 4. Plans for using HOME funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated with HOME funds along with a description of the refinancing guidelines required that will be used under 24 CFR 92.206(b), are as follows: The County of Hawaii has never used HOME funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated with HOME funds and has no intention of using HOME funds for this purpose in the future. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 165 OMB Control No 2506.0117 {exp 06/30/2318} Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Reference 24 CFR 91,220(1){5} 1. Distribution of Funds a. Describe the eligibility requirements for recipients of HTF funds (as defined in 24 CFR § 93.2). Please refer to Section V - "Eligible Recipients" of the attached HTF Allocation Plan. b. Describe the jurisdiction's application requirements for eligible recipients to apply for HTF funds. Please refer to Section VII - "Application and Award Process" of the attached HTF Allocation Plan. Describe the selection criteria that the jurisdiction will use to select applications submitted by eligible recipients - Please refer to Section VIII - "Selection Criteria" of the attached HTF Allocation Plan - d. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on geographic distribution, which is a description of the geographic areas of the State (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) in which it will direct assistance during the ensuing program year. The County of Hawaii does not allocate investments geographically- The County utilized a Request for Proposal (RFP) process to allocate HTF funds. However, preference will be given to applicants who will develop affordable rental housing in areas located near to employment, schools, shopping, medical facilities and public transportation to support self-sufficiency. e. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on the applicant's ability to obligate HTF funds and undertake eligible activities in a timely manner. Please refer to Section VI(I - "Selection Criteria" of the attached HTF Allocation Plan. f. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on the extent to which rents for units in the rental project are affordable to extremely low-income families. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 166 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Please refer to Section IV - "Eligible Activities and Expenses" of the attached HTF Allocation Pian. g. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on the financial feasibility of the project beyond the required 30 -year period. Please refer to Section Vill - "Selection Criteria" of the attached HTF Allocation Plan. h. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on the merits of the application in meeting the priority housing needs of the jurisdiction (such as housing that is accessible to transit or employment centers, housing that includes green building and sustainable development features, or housing that serves special needs populations). Please refer to Section VIII - "Selection Criteria" of the attached MTF Allocation Plan. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on the location of existing affordable housing. Preference for the HTF program will be given to applicants who will develop rental housing in areas located near employment, schools, shopping, medical services and public transportation to support self- sufficiency. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on the extent to which the application makes use of non-federal funding sources. Please refer to Section VIII - "Selection Criteria" of the attached HTF Allocation Plan. 2. Does the jurisdiction's application require the applicant to include a description of the eligible activities to be conducted with HTF funds? Yes 3. Does the jurisdiction's application require that each eligible recipient certify that housing units assisted with HTF funds will comply with HTF requirements? Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 167 OMB Control No. 2506.0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Yes 4_ Performance Goals and Benchmarks. The jurisdiction has met the requirement to provide for performance goals, consistent with the jurisdiction's goals established under 24 CFR 91.215(b)(2), by including HTF in its housing goals in the housing table on the SP -45 Goals and AP -20 Annual Goals and Objectives screens. Y P. 5 5. Rehabilitation Standards. The jurisdiction must establish rehabilitation standards for all HTF-assisted housing rehabilitation activities that set forth the requirements that the housing must meet upon project completion. The jurisdiction's description of its standards must be in sufficient detail to determine the required rehabilitation work including methods and materials. The standards may refer to applicable codes or they may establish requirements that exceed the minimum requirements of the codes. The jurisdiction must attach its rehabilitation standards below. If the jurisdiction will not use HTF funds for the rehabilitation of housing, enter "N/A", In addition, the rehabilitation standards must address each of the following,. health and safety; major systems; lead-based paint; accessibility; drsaster mitigation (where relevant); state and local codes, ordinances, and zoning requirements; Uniform Physical Condition Standards, and Capital Needs Assessments (if applicable). N/A. The County will not utilize HTF for rehabilitation. 6. Resale or Recapture Guidelines. Below, the jurisdiction must enter (or attach) a description of the guidelines that will be used for resale or recapture of HTF funds when used to assist first-time homebuyers. If the jurisdiction will not use HTF funds to assist first-time homebuyers, enter "N/A" N/A_ The County will not utilize HTF for homeownership activities. 7. HTF Affordable Homeownership Limits. If the jurisdiction intends to use HTF funds for homebuyer assistance and does not use the HTF affordable homeownership limits for the area provided by HUD, it must determine 95 percent of the median area purchase price and set forth the information in accordance with §93.305. If the jurisdiction will not use HTF funds to assist first-time homebuyers, enter "N/A" N/A_ The County will not utilize HTF for homeownership activities. Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 16S OMB Control No: 2506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Limited Beneficiaries or Preferences. Describe how the jurisdiction will limit the beneficiaries or give preferences to a particular segment of the extremely low- or very low-income population to serve unmet needs identified in its consolidated plan or annual action plan. If the jurisdiction will not limit the beneficiaries or give preferences to a particular segment of the extremely low- or very low-income population, enter "N/A." Any limitation or preference must not violate nondiscrimination requirements in § 93.350, and the jurisdiction must not limit or give preferences to students. The jurisdiction may permit rental housing owners to limit tenants or give a preference in accordance with § 93.303 only if such limitation or preference is described in the action plan. N/A 9. Refinancing of Existing Debt. Enter or attach the jurisdiction's refinancing guidelines below. The guidelines describe the conditions under which the jurisdiction will refinance existing rental housing project debt. The jurisdiction's refinancing guidelines must, at minimum, demonstrate that rehabilitation is the primary eligible activity and ensure that this requirement is met by establishing a minimum level of rehabilitation per unit or a required ratio between rehabilitation and refinancing. If the jurisdiction will not refinance existing debt, enter "N/A." N/A. The County will not utilize HTF for the refinancing of existing debt. Discussion: Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 169 OMB Contra! No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Attachments Consolidated Plan HAWAII COUNTY 177 OM8 Control No 2506 0117 (exp, 06/30/2018) Appendix A: Maps and Charts 2015-19 CP Forel -is) w( > uoauAu3 ;imn!7 a!gni!nS F U (03) ,iijunpoddp ua33 > - - 5 C(H(j) SulsnoH auaaa(I ? r x x x x x Ll (£) X3jjjgvumjsnS Y (Z) A)II)qupaojjV -_ x x x x x L � 0 012 cc C n �'�^ryry�gII21 ZO 12 ciys '— C �_ C C C, Mr� = 0.0 o N O G v p ;1.0 V Yet Q L s pp C, — vi O h :3 c°i G .. � X C C r^i v h d C v OZI6IOZ o _ o o h 611$IOZ N _ o o 0 2 SY/LYOZ o h x o L119IOZ N 9I,"SIOZ H 3 F R at� v��uc�waU�rDu �r�au u L=6cr y F y •1 T ty7 m SCS `o h L 'J 7 L ✓ o 3 C a a 3u c c c 9> r U— w c = y d 4=f ' _ G u s V p C c, c y.5. nnom_� C P 21 e ^� C 4 G O 9 M G. 1� /C� L G V Ci L C 'Ei !O� V y L_ C4 CY 1°� V= b L. W z E _ � a a � � a a sq_a �° a c L. a=71a er c n a a u o ram zo a v a e N € �° en cs o 0 3 fl�y� a C> o.2 r- e CL a n s o c_ z n m aPoJ ['g0 _ x L ° z ('[s) W > uoal.�u3 3ul%!-I alg41!n5 x x x x x >C E-� (03) A3!unjaoddo uoa3 W Cr O (Ha) 8uisnOH )uaaaQ (F) f1!j!gcu!nasnS x x x x x OU (Z) Sa!!!gcPanild F (!) (!!!!q!ssaaaV x x r c o ami `o "' > E Ln O �� p 0-4 L O z w � C a 0 C> ✓✓ y ✓ �_ i y _ •� O > V.vs = u U v y ~ O o CS '� y rr' r�••' u 10 _ o O Cl ✓ E O LS -i U r q GC37 tn en . Q .0 c3 r- .0 OZ?610Z r, N 61 r 8I OZ O g M C.,, 8ULIOZ _ , , c1, LI19IOZ O o r, ell 9IfSIOZ ,_ o c M r.� Z u c a c a a E n= b c� ^p e� 'O 'm CJ n E u r q E q o p uU.DU 0if5u c ���u _ 0�DU G u U. 0 LLDu 102 Ln 0 0 q ..4 �•+ ~ G C 0 O L s. r C O C S3. eLC V HH `� n��°o to > ='�� on [s > �a�.Sa�u a� .�' sus r� •� fY r V '7 ,Gw G y CO r< y p u � u O .�. u•+ v 'D C U CA to W C ac-o.v R C v C G. .� p2- CJ .U�+ .ter y u > cs > e� C 0 a, p 'd o > _ ai a o a � a� u G c �, n rs x U _ o > n o a A��5a�a�nv4.a>oUt:: Em a.w vy`U y U y V y J N L y y n G O 'p rs � E3 c7 � n •� q .O 7 y' C=9 .7 T n .�+ a T V T 4 .. �. W 4 2p y E w C y E pro C Z. co c E Lco � � E on C F a'L E F co E� 0 00 u E'er 0 tw E o oq p cq E� o an o c c u c u c u c u= u a s u c u u z u s u s u -j � n ri _.1 apoo rso w w w w w Id � 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ / $ $ $ $ $ % § \ m % � •f \ 12 t 2 n7A _=2 - o o = - c o - _ o �k -�-0\ —M )3 \/j\d�d § ? � k�\ X23\ \1 Li 8 / 2 § _ § § � §) kk k; % 0§ � 20 �� / § Os) _J3am-Ialq mn 2 qmAl,n o do s3 a C) (II(I' m H)U m3o k k 2 2 u(z Ajj § q!V $ S � G � ¢ § z@ 2 /§ �( 2 0 \ \ �� (U CL k \ k § / \ U -/ otr)R 0 %IO 61*1nz 8 %IO _ o L! 9Z IO g3lo F / a / ± / � � ] 9 2 S O \U. 0WE 3 \L'! U \ \ k \ 7�% ac c V k 2 k 4 § 2 2 / UM= m > _ Q 2 & W k k� �k u6m uƒ § 2 a § $ 2 ƒ C� CL O a - _ E ri $ E o$ c: k oaf 0 \ k \ 5- w u N Ns) � uo tt -.u3 Sul:►ti alqulln5 X X X X Z F V �l (03) Allunpoddo uo33 X Z CQ (HQ) duisnOH IuaaaQ X (£) SlrlrquuiulsnS 2 X X X O (z) �4mgcpaojld x Z O ([} �1l1lglssaaa� X X Z ccY rii � r. � 7 ` 2 Q O y o n = U V FQ fes= C t u u res Z U t=s N E --= U s M 13 E c) LL 3 E X UW , 3 U n C= y c U r3 c C�i r» O 8 v O H E es 3 7, WM gi. E oo W N Q3 C3 v7 .3 Ci OZ/6IOZ 61/81OZ `^ 0 0 0 8I/LIOZ tn O O N O O LI/9IOZr 0 0 0 0 9I/510z 0 0 0 q n= E c E a E ca e v E E o e o C7LE:5U a= o 0:-, fj o a G o c O c C UIfU 0m.Z)U o e o ut_U 0 3 e o u[s.'�U o c o uLLZ)u E O c Ej H O y U c U� q c u 4. O O s U '' M p y E v t04 U v �^ C 0.i i °� .?r? n O v� .D O E u C C q I U U O •q 2,`•°' 6l ` U a ` u R M q 0 'O 0. u 'O b Q ov>, �U� c�i.eu'^a_�=-°'vim0 .o�o� C C'~ E E 7 c 'E ea b 4' c 47 3 p O rU7 Qi i a U oc� U c` v1s0 ccsuac�c°-coL3� �' n U O. 4 Q o0 u o f a s= r I A � W •= c C •� O •`ci o I 7tj u O A 6o ` � •g E' :� C O Cq a d 6J — — N — OpoZ) rsoZ C- Ll- M. w u N 04 W a as H 0 u a H Ola ala 010 0l0 0q0 010 0l0 0l0 010 010 610 010 0l0 010 0l0 0\0 010 ala 010 0l0 0'P ow 0l o a1 c 01 o 0l 0 01 0 01 0 010 cl0 010 010 010 ,d O Ln O co r- ;zr r -I Ln m co m m r— H N r— Ln Ln r-1 w uo m C— d' N d N L!) m N rF l9 m N M N M Lo Lf) r-4 r-1 N�,o m m Lf) tD r- w O m ,o l9 O O m-qr O O O Q' ,o m m l0 ` d lD lfl m m N N m N cr LI) Ln qr rr Ln Ln Ln m m m M m M N N m N Q H 0 a o'P U rd FI N r -I N m Ln O r-1 ro r -I 1p N N (N r- dl e -f N N N H N (,,) WLf) ko 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 r -i r -i r"I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O f� f� 00 00 O O O O O O ra ri N d' L!) Ln U-) Liz to k-0 r- i� 61 N r-1 N N N N N N O O O O N H r -i r -i r-1 r-1 r -I r-1 r- N ri H H VH r -I r -i r i r -i r N e --i N N W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N i'. ill U i W O(2% a o a e o e *o a tie a'• ;o a� �^ e• o a o \ e e M ["� V' tri N — u ; r! N 00 M Q\ Q M m M O O N C4 — O— — Q Q Ci O V M N h qtr N 00 N tiQ oa v r' W O(2% O CN= O< � w w C- 1 7 M � 1 N o %C co to O M r, �c = O � — — rn h er M m 1� a, 00 r' o — — PSI N Ci oc N h qtr N 00 N tiQ oa a s L) � c ti iv z ? V C C 3 ; N Q rO M- y .7 V. (7jV Q 7 0IL r O N E fd j. a QI el �� �V N 0 Z U ~ V y r1 = O k� O u e d m ry r 7 ic M ate. a 9 E 00 r m Z O � 9 � oCc,� u J ila iQN �fu J � I I V '�a�'7o ♦ S" ti t 's iv -2 T7 �Il 1 � ✓ � ti 1 � O mn \ \ \ C)Lit 4 t3 • a ui a z ZG�i 'i rs nJ Ymz� 7y Q 4 n Q Civ N 2 VI O r� s U) 4c R -y0 a Q Q r! @ 0 47; IAM tN s ui c a o E Z IL x a gal V a .6cr 0 4'a a W Q 20 $4n4 aG � ani o rr bQ s G • �• 0 a N n ri a P F4 s sG r o W �cCtmU. `off' 3:. s �erss 2°9cgi Appendix B Needs Consultations and Comments, Public Notices, and Approvals 2010-14 CP Final . f Needs Consultations and Comments: Feedback from the surveys distributed and input on needs from the public hearings are summarized below: Housing: • Affordable rental housing • Affordable for -sale housing • Affordable housing for persons with special needs • Affordable and appropriate housing for persons with mental illness • Affordable housing for persons with developmental and physical disabilities • Elderly housing • Service worker housing (West Hawai'i) • Self -Help housing • Home -financing options for low-income families • Rehabilitation loans Homeless: • Emergency shelter (West Hawaii) • Transitional housing for victims of domestic violence • Transitional housing for families Self-esteem and life planning training Parent education programs • Decrease in housing barriers • Appropriate support services to retain housing • Homeless prevention (rental deposit, rental assistance) • Improved methods of data collection • Partnerships established to end homelessness Community Development: • Vocational job training • Homebuyer counseling • Employment development centers • Community centers • Senior centers • Youth centers • Public safety facilities • Rural healthcare facilities • Fire stations, equipment and rescue; emergency medical coverage • Enhanced solid waste management facilities • Development of new park sites • Enhancement of existing park sites • Removal of Architectural Barriers • Infrastructure to adhere to County building code • Off-site infrastructure r01113EINJI Mil • On-site infrastructure • Funding for soft costs Transportation vehicles • Neighborhood center for educational purposes 2010-14 CP Final PUBLIC NOTICE ON PUBLIC MEETINGS and REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS for COUNTY OF HAWAII 2014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM and 2015-2019 CONSOLIDATED PLAN (CP) The County of Hawaii Office of Housing & Community Development (OHCD) is currently planning for its 2014 Consolidated/Action Plan process for the aforementioned program. In addition, the County of Hawaii will begin preparing for its 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan Program Year with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The purpose of the CP is to ensure that jurisdictions receiving federal U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) assistance plan for the housing and related needs of low- and moderate - income families in a way that improves the availability and affordability of decent, safe, and sanitary housing in a suitable living environment. The County's CP describes the needs, priorities, and funding plans. The CP covers a five (5) year period and is required to be submitted to HUD in order for the County to receive its annual CDBG grant and the State to receive its annual HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Grant, Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) and Housing for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) Grant. As required by federal regulations, the County will hold a series of public hearings and has selected the following locations and times in an effort to encourage comments and views from persons of very low and moderate income. PAHALA PUBLIC HEARING Date: October 14, 2013 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Pahala Community Center KONA PUBLIC HEARING Date: October 15, 2013 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: West Hawaii Civic Center Mayors Conference Room, 2nd Floor 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy. HILO PUBLIC HEARING Date: October 18, 2013 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: 1990 Kino'ole Street Existing Housing Conference Room 2010-14 CP Final I , J PAHOA PUBLIC HEARING October 14, 2013 2:00 p.m. Pahoa Community Center HONOKA'A PUBLIC HEARING October 15, 2013 3:00 p.m. Honoka'a Gym/MPR Room The purpose of the public bearings is to hear views and comments from citizens on housing and community development needs and the past performance of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD's) CDBG Program. Input will assist the County in establishing the priorities and goals for the 2015-2019 grants secured by the HUD. The County encourages its citizens, especially persons of low and moderate income, minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with disabilities, to attend the public hearings and share their comments and views. Persons requiring special needs (i.e., sign language or bilingual interpreters) may call the OHCD at V TT 961-8379 at least seven (7) days prior to the hearings so arrangements may be made to accommodate them. Citizens who are unable to attend these hearings may submit or fax (8081"961- 8685) testimony pertaining to their housing and community development needs by October 18, 2013 to Stephen J. Arnett, Housing Administrator, Office of Housing and Community Development, 50 Wailuku Drive, Hilo, Hawaii 96720. After the public hearing, OHCD staff will be available to discuss the procedures and guidelines for applying for the County's 2014 CDBG program. OHCD staff will provide technical assistance to groups agencies requesting assistance in developing proposals, 2014 CDBG PROJECT PROPOSAL FORMS The County's five-year 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan (CP) describes the County's housing and community development needs, funding plans, priorities and objectives, and includes the County's Annual Action Plan for the use of CDBG Program funds. The County of Hawaii is, therefore, seeking eligible applicants to submit project proposals to be included in its 2014 Annual Action Plan ter HUD. The County expects to receive approximately $2,500,000 for its CDBG Program. In order to receive federal funding all applicants will be required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and be actively registered with current information in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) prior to applying for CDBG funding. The applicant will have to submit proof that they have a DUNS number and are actively registered in the CCR system with their project proposal packet. Project proposals submitted to the OHCD must comply with the program criteria, meet eligibility requirements, program objectives, and be consistent with the County's priorities and objectives as contained in the County's 2010-2014 CP. All original project proposals and two (2) copies must be received by 4:30 p.m. on January 09, 2014, by the OHCD, 50 Wailuku Drive, Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456 or OHCD Kona Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740. The proposal forms and federal guidelines covering the eligible activities will be available at the public hearings and at the following locations beginning October 18, 2013, Monday through 2010-14 CP Final 1 Friday, 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., except on holidays. Proposal forms will also be mailed, upon request, after October IS 2013. OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Hilo Armory 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Phone: 961-8379 OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT West Hawai' i Civic Center 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy. Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Phone: 323-4305 In addition, copies of the County's current CP; Citizen Participation Plan and past performance of CDBG funds are also available at the Office of Housing and Community Development, 50 Wailuku Drive, Hilo, Hawai' i. A brief description of the CDBG Program is as follows: Community Development Block Grant Program: Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-383) created the CDBG Program, which became effective January 1, 1974. Under the CDBG Program, a community is able to develop a flexible, locally designed comprehensive community development strategy in order to address the program's primary objective: "...development of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and suitable living environments and expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate income." Under the CDBG program, grants or loan assistance may be used by eligible public agencies, private non-profit organizations, and Community Based Development Organizations (CBDO), (non-profit organization) for the following activities provided that these activities either 1) principally benefit low and moderate income families, 2) aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight, or 3) meet other community development needs having a particular urgency. Range of Eligible Activities for the use of CDBG Program Funds: * Acquisition of real * Disposition of real property. property. * Clearance, demolition and * Acquisition, construction, removal of buildings and reconstruction, improvements. rehabilitation or * Interim assistance to immedi- installation of public ately arrest deterioration and facilities. alleviate emergency conditions. * Provision of public * Urban renewal completion, services, provided it is * Relocation payments. a new service or a * Loss of rental income incurred quantifiable increase in in holding housing units for a service now being displacees. provided and does not * Removal of material and archi- 2010-14 CP Final 1 111 exceed 15°o of the County's allocation. Payment of the non-federal share in connection with other federal programs undertaken as part of the development program. Assist privately owned utilities. Code enforcement in deteriorated areas expected, together with public improvements and services, to arrest the area's decline. HOME Program: tectural barriers restricting mobility of elderly and disabled persons. * Historic preservation. * Assistance to sub -recipients to carry out activities listed. * Renovation of closed school buildings. * Micro enterprise assistance. * Planning activities. * Rehabilitation of privately owned building and low income public housing. The HOME Program was created under Title II (the HOME Investment Partnership Act) of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990. The purpose of the HOME Program is to expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing for very low and low-income persons. Under the HOME Program, equity investments, interest-bearing and non-interest bearing loans or advances, deferred payment loans, grants, may be used by eligible public agencies, private non-profit organizations, developers, owners, community housing development organizations or other private organizations are eligible to utilize HOME funds for the following activities. Range of Eligible Activities for the use of HOME Program Funds-. ' Development hard costs defined as the actual cost of constructing or rehabilitating housing. * Acquisition costs. * Related soft costs defined as other reasonable and necessary costs incurred and associated with the financing or development (or both) of new construction, rehabilitation or acquisition of housing assisted with HOME funds. * Relocation costs. * Cost related to tenant -based rental assistance. Applicants applying for HOME funding are required to match for every $1.00 of federal HOME funds expended for the project with at least $.25 of eligible matching funds. The State of Hawai'i is required to submit its 2014 Action Plan to HUD for the HOME program. The HOME program funds will be allocated on a three year rotation basis beginning with Hawai'i County followed by Kauai County and Maui County. Hawaii County anticipates receiving its next allocation of HOME program funds in 2015. The designated County will receive the entire allocation of HOME funding, less 2.5% of the allowable administrative funding which will be retained by the State's Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC) to cover program administrative 2010-14 CP Final expenses (approximately $75,000). The designated County anticipates it will receive approximately $2,925,000.00 for the HOME Program. OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTY OF HAWAI' I By: Stephen J. Arnett Housing Administrator William P. Kenoi, Mayor County of Hawaii (Hawai'i Tribune -Herald: Oct. 7, 2013) (West Hawai'i Today: Oct. 7, 2013) 2010-14 CP Final i COUNTY OF HAWAII CONSOLIDATED PLAN NEEDS SURVEY FOR HOUSING, HOMELESSNESS, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PART I. ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION 1) Organization Name; _ Address: Phone: Fax: Person completing this form: T 2) Is your organization incorporated: Yes ❑ 3) Is your organization a: (Check all that apply) ❑ 501(c)(3) Non -Profit ❑ ❑ Trade or Professional Organization ❑ ❑ Other (Please Specify): 4) ❑ Hawai`i Resident E-mail: Date: _ No ❑ Government Advocacy Group 5) What is your organization's geographic area? (choose one) ❑ Hawai`i ❑ Statewide ❑ Specific Communities, Please specify: 6) What is your organization's primar purpose or function? (Choose one) ❑ Other, Please specify: 7) What is your organization'srip -mart ❑ Service; provider ❑ Neighborhood association Homeowners ❑ Advocacy group ❑ Trade association ❑ Homeless shelter provider ❑ ❑ Non-profit housing developer ❑ Homeless service provider ❑ ❑ For-profit housing developer ❑ For-profit business ❑ Veterans ❑ Other, Please specify: 7) What is your organization'srip -mart constituency? (Check all that apply) ❑ Neighborhood residents ❑ Homeowners ❑ HomeIess persons ❑ Elderly population ❑ Persons with disabilities ❑ Low-income persons (- 80°0 of MFI) ❑ Persons with AIDS ❑ Very low income persons (• 500o of MFI) ❑ Mobility impaired ❑ Veterans ❑ Chronically mentally ill ❑ Renters ❑ Developmentally disabled ❑ Public Housing residents ❑ Other, please specify: 2010-14 CP Final ::. 1 QPART II. GENERAL PRIORITIES Based on the constituency your organization serves; please indicate what you believe is the relative priority for each broad type of housing, homelessness, and community development need by checking the appropriate box_ LIM Indicate whether that category of need is, in your opinion, 1) Highest Relative Need compared to all the others, 2) Above Average Relative Need compared to others, 3) about Average Relative Need compared to all others, 4) Below Average Need compared to all others, or 5) the Lowest Relative Need compared to all others. Also, if you have any data or additional information which supports your ranking which you would like us to consider, please enclose it with your response to this survey. Needs Category (1) Housing Rental Housing Homeowner Housing (2) Special Needs Housing (Non- Homeless) Elderly Persons with AIDS Persons with Disabilities Highest Above Average BelowLowest Relative Average Relative Average Relative Need Need Need Need Need FM 11:1 11:1 (3) Homelessness Homeless Individuals ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Homeless Families ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (4) Community Development Economic Development ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Public Facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Infrastructure ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Public Services ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Neighborhood Planning ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2010-14 CP Final :15 PART III. SPECIFIC PRIORITIES In this section. the County is looking for more detailed input regarding specific needs and priorities as they relam to the general categories identified in Part 11 of this survey_ If you feel that you or your organization is unable or unqualified to give an informed opinion on the relative needs within any oI' these more specific categories, just check off the box at the top of the survey table marked "Unable to Judge Relative Needs". Based on the constituency your organization serves, please indicate what you believe is the relative priority for each specific need by checking the appropriate box. Indicate whether that type of need is, in your opinion, 1) Highest Relative Need compared to all others, 2) Above Average Relative Need compared to all others, 3) about Average Relative Need compared to all others, 4) Below Average Need compared to all others, or 5) the Lowest Relative Need compared to all others. Rental Housing Needs by Household Type ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Renter Housing by Household Type Highest Above T Average Below Lowest Average Relative Need ❑ Relative Average Relative Average Relative Extremely low income Need Need Need Need Need Non -Elderly 1 -person households ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Small Families (2-4 persons) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Large Families (5+persons) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Elderly (1 or 2 person households) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other renters (e.g. unrented 2-f ❑ Upper income ❑ ❑ ❑ person households) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Rental Housing Needs by Income Level ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Renter Housing by Annual Household Income Highest Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need ❑ Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need Extremely low income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Very low income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Low income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Moderate income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Middle income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Upper income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ZDIO-14 CP Final 1, 6 EO Homeowner Housing Needs by Household Type ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Homeowner Housing By Type Highest Above Average Below Lowest Relative Average Relative Average Relative Need Need Need Need Need First-time Homebuyers (all) ❑ Above Average ❑ Lowest ❑ Relative ❑ Average ❑ Elderly Homeowners ❑ ❑ Need ❑ Extremely low income ❑ ❑ ❑ Families (2---- related persons) ❑ Very low income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Non -Elderly (1 -person household) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Moderate income ❑ ❑ ❑ Other homeowners (unrelated 2+ ❑ Middle income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ person households) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Veterans ❑ ❑ Homeowner Housing Needs by Income Level n Unable to Judge Relative Needs Homeowner Housing By Annual Highest Above Average Below Lowest Household Income Relative Average Relative Average Relative Frail Elderly Need Need Need Need Need Extremely low income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Very low income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Low income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Moderate income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Middle income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Upper income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Special Needs Housing (Non -Homeless) n Unable to Judge Relative Needs Special Needs Housing By Sub- Highest Population Type Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Lowest Average Relative Need Need Elderly (all) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I❑ Frail Elderly ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Developmentally Disable ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Physically Disable ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Chronic Substance Abuse ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Seriously Mentally Ill ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Dually Diagnosed (Substance ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Abuse & Mentally Ill) Veterans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Persons with HIV AIDS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Youth (< 18 yrs. Old) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Victims of Domestic Violence ❑ 1 ❑ A ❑ ❑ ❑ 2010-14 CP Final 117 Homeless Needs by Population and Sub -Population ❑ Unable to Jude Relative Needs Homeless Population and Sub -Population Type Highest Relative i Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need (1) General Population Individuals ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Families with Children ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (2) Specific Sub -Populations ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Elderly (all) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Frail Elderly ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Developmentally Disabled ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Physically Disabled ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Chronic Substance Abuse ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Seriously Mentally 111 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Dually Diagnosed (Substance ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Abuse & Mentally Ill) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Veterans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Persons with HIV/AIDS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Youth (<18 yrs. Old) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Victims of Domestic Violence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Unmet Needs of the Homeless by Type of Need Unable to Judge Relative Needs Type of Unmet Homeless Needs Highest Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need (1) Shelter & Housing Emergency Shelter ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Transitional Housing ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Permanent Housing ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (2) Supportive Services Job Training ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Case Management ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Childcare ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Substance Abuse Treatment ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Mental Health Care ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Housing Search & Placement ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Life Skills Training ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2010-94 CP Final 118 M QCommunity Development Needs: Economic Development ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Economic Development Highest Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need _ Commercial:` Industrial Acquisition ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Rehabilitation/New Construction ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Direct Financial Assistance ❑ ❑ ❑ [❑ ❑ (Business Loans) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Brownfield's Remediation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (Clean up of Contaminated Sites) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Micro -Enterprise Assistance ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Business Technical Assistance ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Community Development Needs: Public Facilities ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Public Facilities Neighborhood Facilities Highest Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need Water/Sewer Improvements ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Parks/Recreational Facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Health Facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Parking Facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Youth Centers ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Child Care Centers ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Senior Centers ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Historic Preservation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (Non -Residential Buildings) Community Development Needs: Infrastructure ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Infrastructure Highest Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need Water/Sewer Improvements ❑ ❑ Solid Waste Disposal ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Flood Drain Improvements ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Infrastructure for Econ. Development ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Street Improvements ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sidewalk Improvements ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Removal of Architectural Barriers ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2010-14 CP Final 119 Community Development Needs: Public Services ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Public Services Highest Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need Handicapped Services Relative ❑ Relative Transportation Services ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Substance Abuse Services ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Employment Services ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Health Services ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Mental Health Services ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Crime Awareness ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Legal Services ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Youth Services ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Child Care Services ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Senior Services I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Community Development Needs: Neighborhood Planning ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Neighborhood Planning Highest Above Average Below Lowest Relative Average Relative Average Relative Need Need Need Need Need Neighborhood Planning Fair Housing Activities CHDO/(Community Development Corporation) Operating Assistance ❑ ❑ ❑ 1:1 ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Return Survey to: Office of Housing & Community Development 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Or email to: ohcdcdbg@co.hawaii.hi.us 2010-14 CP Final Appendix C Monitoring Plan This section describes the standards and procedures by which the County uses to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of its CP. The intent is to ensure the long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including the comprehensive planning requirements. Upon approval of the CDBG and HOME program funds, the County of Hawai'i meets with each recipient. During this meeting, the County explains the contents of the agreement and all of the requirements for the specific project. The County has developed various checklists (bid, construction, labor standards, acquisition, etc.) that are distributed to each recipient. The checklist indicates the process and the documentation requirements. The checklist also requires that the County approve agreements, documents, notices, etc. prior to its use or execution. This ensures that the documents meet the federal requirements of the program. Recipients are required to submit all executed and completed documents to the County for its files. Recipients are also subject to audits and monitoring visits by auditors and HUD. This is an ongoing process. The County works with the recipient through every step of the project. Training and technical assistance is done immediately if errors or non-compliance are found. For projects involved with facility rehabilitation or construction, the County conducts site visits to verify work progress, to conduct labor interviews, and verify project progress payments. In addition, the agreement executed between the County and recipient requires the recipient to submit monthly status reports to the County. This ongoing monitoring process is preferred to the usual monitoring and audit of projects during the middle or at the completion of the project. This system enables the County to work with the recipients through every step of the project implementation. The process ensures compliance prior to executing any actions, instead of reviewing files after the fact. For the HOME Investment Partnership Program, the County is responsible for monitoring the County of Hawaii HOME Projects. The County provides technical assistance and monitoring during project development and implementation, as well as during the appropriate period of affordability. The County maintains documentation of its project monitoring for review by the State during their monitoring of the County's HOME Program. Appendix D Citizen Participation Plan QCITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN A Plan for Citizen Input and Involvement in the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnership, National Housing Trust Programs with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the State of Hawaii Housing and Finance and Development Corporation County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Telephone: (808) 961-8379 Approved: January 13, 1995 Amended: May 6, 1998 Amended: December 15, 2009 Amended: May 15, 2015 Amended: 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS I�iWVIT81-911 worilkl [I. ENCOURAGEMENT OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION A. Public Notices B. Public Hearings,'Meetings C. Public Comment Period Ill. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IV. PUBLIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION V. COMPLAINTS OR GRIEVANCES VL SCHEDULE VII. CRITERIA FOR AMENDMENT TO CONSOLIDATED PLAN EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 - Public Notice regarding the Public Hearing Exhibit 2 Public Notice regarding the Availability of the Draft Consolidated 'Action Plan Exhibit 3 Public Notice announcing the Availability of the final Consolidated. Action Plan Exhibit 4 Public Notice regarding the availability of the Draft Consolidated Annual Performance Assessment Report Exhibit 5 Application Schedule of the Consolidated/Action Plan Exhibit 6 Public Notice regarding program Amendments 1. INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) administers the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, established by Congress through the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. The County of Hawaii is a direct recipient of CDBG funds from HUD. The purpose of the CDBG Program is to provide decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expand economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. The County has received CDBG funds from 1976 to the present. In order for the County to receive its annual CDBG grant and in an effort to coordinate and condense the planning and application aspects of the CDBG Program, HUD in 1995 replaced the past CDBG application process with a single plan submission called the Consolidated Pian. The County's Consolidated Plan also serves as an information resource for the State of Hawai'i's Consolidated Plan submission and application for funding under HUD's HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) and National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) programs. The Consolidated Plan is a single plan which will describe the County's needs, priorities, funding plans, proposed projects and certify compliance with CDBG Program requirements. The Consolidated Plan covers a five (5) year period. In addition, the County's Consolidated Plan also includes the County's HOME and HTF Projects for information purposes. In addition, Section 104 (a) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, requires that the County certify and now adopt as part of the Consolidated Plan process a detailed citizen participation plan which shall contain the following: 1. Provides for and encourages citizens participation in the development of the Consolidated Plan, any substantial amendments to the Plan and past performances report of CDBG HOME HTF activities, with particular emphasis on participation by persons of extremely -low, low and moderate income, residents of slum and blighted areas, low and moderate income neighborhoods, minorities and non- English Speaking persons and persons with disabilities in which CDBG HOME'HTF funds are proposed to be used; 2. Encourages the consultation with public housing authorities with emphasis for participation of residents of the public and to assist housing developments in developing and implementing the Consolidated Plan as well as to obtain views on housing and community development needs and non -housing development needs; 3. Provides citizens, units of local government and other interested parties on the amount of funds available, range of eligible activities, plans to minimize displacement and the amount of CDBG HOME HTF funds that will benefit very low and moderate income persons; 4. Provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to public meetings, information, and availability of the Consolidated/Action Plan, substantial amendments and performance records relating to the grantee's proposed use of funds and actual use of the funds; 5. Provides for technical assistance to groups, representative of persons of extremely -low, Iow and moderate income that requests such assistance in developing proposals and questions related to housing and community development needs, proposed activities, and program performance; 6. Provides public notices for public hearings to obtain citizens' views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the Consolidated Action Plan process, including at least the development of needs, priorities, goals and the review of proposed activities, and the review of program performance. Hearings shall be held after adequate notice and times and locations convenient to potential or actual beneficiaries and with accommodations for the disabled; 7, Provides for a timely written answer to written complaints and grievances, within fifteen (15) working days, where practicable, 8. Identifies how the needs of non-English speaking residents will be met in the case of public hearings where a significant number of non-English speaking residents can be reasonably expected to participate. a. Person with special needs may request reasonable accommodations to participate in hearings (e.g., large print, taped materials, sign language, interpreter, or translator for non-English speaking participants, at least seven (7) days prior to the public hearings). This Citizen Participation Plan describes how the County will comply with the above requirements to keep the public informed ofCDBG,HOME:'HTF programs, projects, and activities and provide the opportunity for public input. All citizens, including the elderly, minorities, persons with disabilities, persons of low and moderate income, and members of the business community, civic groups, community associations, public agencies, and ethnic -cultural groups, are encouraged to give input to the CDBG/HOMEiHTF Programs. II. ENCOURAGEMENT OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Citizens will be encouraged to be involved in all stages of the Cons olidatedlAction Plan Process. Citizens may submit their views and priorities by calling, faxing, and writing or speaking directly to staff of the Office of Housing and Community Development at: 1) public hearings, 2) public meetings, 3) during public comment periods, and or 4) at any time during the year. Citizens will be informed of such opportunities for input through public notices. A. Public Notices Public notices will appear in newspaper(s) of general circulation and the County website to: 1) Announce the location & purpose of the public hearings, amount of federal assistance, range of activities that may be undertaken with CDBG HOME HTF funds, including the estimated amount that will benefit persons of extremely -low, low- and moderate income and availability of CDBG HOME HTF proposals to the public; 2) Announce the participation in the development of the Consolidated Action Plan and any substantial amendments to the Consolidated Action Plan; 3) Announce the availability of the Citizen Participation Plan for public review and comment; 4) Announce the availability of the draft ConsolidatedAction Plan for public review and comment; 5) Announce the meeting of the County Housing Agency Finance Committee; 6) Announce the meeting of the Hawai'i County Council; 7) Announce the availability of the final Consolidated. Action Plan; and 8) Announce the availability of the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report. Public hearing notices will also state that the OHCD will provide bilingual opportunities to persons or groups who speak and or read a primary language other than English upon request by the person or group. In addition, the OHCD will provide services of an interpreter for the hearing impaired, large print and taped materials upon request by the person or group. The public hearings will be held at a location that is accessible to persons with disabilities and at a time and location convenient to potential and actual beneficiaries. The public hearings may be conducted via video conferencing. Citizen or groups are requested to call at least a week prior to the hearing so arrangements can be made. B. Public Hearings/Meetings Public hearing(s) will be held to hear citizens' housing and community development needs, comments on the progress of past CDBG HOME!HTF projects, Consolidated: Action Plan and Citizen Participation Plan, and to explain the Consolidated Action Plan Process. A public meeting will be held by the Hawai'i County Housing Agency (HCHA) and or Finance Committee (FC) for the purpose of approving and submitting the Consolidated."°Action Plan for which the Office of Housing and Community Development is recommending CDB&HOME!'HTF funding through its annual Action Plan. Following the action of the HCHA. FC, a public meeting of the Hawai'i County Council will be held to authorize the Mayor to sign and submit the County's Consolidated Plan andior its Action Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). These public meetings shall be held in Hilo at the Hawaii County Council room, unless otherwise announced. A public notice will be published and meeting agendas will be posted at the Hawaii County Council room at least seven (7) days prior to the public meetings. These public meetings are open to the public. Interested persons will have an opportunity to submit data, views or arguments in writing as well as provide oral testimony on the proposed CDBG HOME HTF activities. Any comments or views expressed at the public meeting will be considered for relevance and incorporated or attached into the Consolidated Action Plan, and'or Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). C. Public Comment Period In addition to the opportunity to present comments at public hearings and public meetings, citizens will have the opportunity to comment on: l) the draft Citizen Participation Plan, Consolidated Plan an&or Action Plan prior to its submittal to the HCHA`FC and County Council, and 2) the proposed CAPER Reports prior to its submittal to HUD. Public comment periods shall not be less than 30 days for the draft Consolidated Plan and any substantial amendment to the Consolidated Plan: not less than one week for the final Consolidated Plan, Citizen Participation Plan; and 15 days for CAPER Reports. II1. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Technical assistance will be provided by the staff of the Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) to any groups of persons requesting assistance in developing CDBG'HOME HTF project proposals. OHCD staff will also be availably: to answer questions and to provide assistance during the public hearings and -'or meetings. IV. PUBLIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION In order to provide opportunities for citizens, public agencies and other interested parties to participate in the Consolidated. Action Plan Process, the County will publish public notices to notify all interested parties on the various stages of the Consolidated Action Plan. In addition, a summary of the draft Consolidated/Action Plan will also be published and available for comment. CDBG HOME HTF proposal forms and Federal guidelines covering eligible activities will be available at the public hearings and at the following locations Monday through Friday, 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., except holidays. Office of Housing and Community Development (Hilo Armory) 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456 Phone: 961-8379 Office of Housing and Community Development (West Hawaii Civic Center) 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy Kailua-Kona, Hawai' i 96740 Phone: 323-4305 The draft/proposed and final Consolidated Plan as well as the Action Plans will also be available on the County of Hawaii Housing Website for review. V. COMPLAINTS OR GRIEVANCES Citizens may submit complaints or grievances regarding the Consolidated Action Plan process by writing to the Office of Housing and Community Development. The Office will make every reasonable attempt to provide a written response to any written complaint or grievance within 15 working days of its receipt. All comments andeor opinions received will be considered for relevance when preparing the final Consolidated/Action Plan, any amendments to the Plan, or performance reports. A summary of comments will be attached to the final Consolidated. Action Plan, amendments to the Plan, or performance reports. VI. SCHEDULE Exhibit 5 is a sample schedule for the Consolidated Action Plan which reflects the foregoing provisions. VII. CRITERIA FOR AMENDMENT TO CONSOLIDATED PLAN The County will determine the necessity to amend its approved Consolidated/Action Plan whenever it is presented with the following decisions: Makes a change in its allocation priorities or changes its method of distribution of funds; 2. Carries out a new activity not previously described in the approved Action Plan; or 3. Changes the purpose, scope, location, or beneficiaries of an activity. The County will determine whether a change or amendment is substantial in nature as it relates to changes in purpose, scope, location, or beneficiaries of an activity. The County's basis for a substantial change will hinder on whether 4he activity continues to assist the original beneficiaries. Should the County determine that an amendment is substantial in nature, then a public notice will be published for thirty (30) days to receive comments on the substantial amendment before the amendment is implemented. Subsequently, if an amendment is not substantial in nature then a public notice will be published for a two (2) week comment period to inform citizens of the County's amendment(s) to the plan. In situations where there is a surplus of CDBGEOME/HTF funds which will be transferred to existing approved project(s) to offset project deficits, the County will not publish a public notice to announce these transfer of funds. In cases of emergencies andror in situations as declared by the Mayor, or in his absence his authorized representative, to be of particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate hazard or threat to the health and welfare of the public which is a direct result from flooding, tidal wave (tsunami), earthquake, or other natural causes, the County will utilize its unencumbered CDBG funds for eligible CDBG. HOME/HTF activities as determined by the OHCD, to alleviate these threatening conditions. Due to the immediate urgency of tliese situations, the County will at a later date publish a public notice to inform its citizens of the actual expenditure of these CDBG funds. In all case scenarios above, the County will submit a matrix description of its amendment(s) to HUD on its proposed changes. EXHIBIT I "SAMPLE" PUBLIC NOTICE ON PUBLIC MEETINGS And REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For COUNTY OF HAWAI'I's COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG), HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (HOME) AND NATIONAL HOUSING TRUST (HTF) PROGRAMS The County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) will hold a series of public hearings on the aforementioned programs. As required by federal regulations, the County has selected the locations and times in an effort to encourage comments and views from persons of very low- and moderate -income. The following selected locations have been identified in the current U.S. Census as low- and moderate income areas: PUNA PUBLIC HEARING HILO PUBLIC HEARING Date. Monday, Month, Day, Year Time: _ _ a.m./p.m. Place: Pahoa Neighborhood Center HAMAKUA PUBLIC HEARING Date: Thursday, Month, Time: _ _ a.m./p.m. Place: Honoka'a Gym Wednesday, Month, Day, Year Time: _ _ a.m./p.m. 1990 Kinoole Street Existing Housing Conference Room KONA PUBLIC HEARING Day, Year Wednesday, Month, Day, Year Time: ___a.m./p.m. Pahala Community Center The purpose of the public hearings is to hear views and comments from citizens on housing and community development needs and the past performance of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) and National Housing Trust Program funds (HTF). In addition, the OHCD will entertain comments with respect to the currently approved Consolidated Plan (CP), Citizens Participation Pian, and suggestions or possible projects that comply and meet with the priorities and strategies in the CP section of its Consolidated Plan process. The County encourages its citizens, especially persons of extremely -low, low and moderate income, minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with disabilities, to attend the public hearing and share their comments and views. Persons requiring special needs (i.e., sign language, bilingual interpreters, large print and taped material) may call the OHCD at V/TT 961-8379 at least 7 days prior to the hearings so arrangements may be made to accommodate them. Citizens who will be unable to attend these hearings may submit written testimony or fax testimony pertaining to their housing and community development needs, or comments to the Consolidated Plan by (Day, Month, Year), to Housing Administrator, Office of Housing and Community Development C(OHCD), 50 Wailuku Drive, Hilo, Hawaii 96720, After the public hearing, the OHCD staff will be available to discuss the procedures and guidelines for applying for the County's (Year) CDBG, HOME and HTF programs. The OHCD staff will provide technical assistance to groups re7uesting assistance in developing proposals. CDBG/HOME/HTF PROJECT PROPOSALS FORMS The CP describes the County's housing and community development needs, funding plans and strategies and the County's Annual action plan for the CDBG, HOME and HTE Program funds. The County of Hawaii is, therefore, seeking project proposals for its (Year) Annual Action plan for its CP *.o submit to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The County expects to receive approximately ($ Amount) for its CDBG Program, ($ Amount) for the HOME Program and ($ Amount) for the HTF program. Project proposals submitted to the OHCD must comply with the program criteria, meet eligibility requirements, program objectives, and be consistent with the County's Priorities and strategies as contained in the County's current Consolidated Plan. An original project proposal and two (2) copies must be received by 4:30.2.m. on Day, Month, Year, by the OHCD, 50 Wailuku Drive, Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456. The proposal forms and federal guidelines covering the eligible activities will be available at the public hearings and at the following locations beginning (Month, Day, Year), Monday through Friday, 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., except on holidays. Proposal forms will also be mailed, upon request, after (Month, Day, Year). OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) (Hilo Armory) 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456 Phone. 961--6379 OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Phone: 329-4305 In addition, copies of the County's current Consolidated/Action Plan, Citizen Participation Plan and past performance of CDBG, HOME and HTF funds are also available at the both locations. The following is a brief summary to the Citizen Participation Plan, CDBG, HOME and HTE programs. Citizen Participation Plan: The County is proposing to amend its currently approved Citizen Participation Plan which describes and outlines the County's plan to encourage and inform all its citizens, especially persons of very low and low income, including minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with mobility, visual or hearing impairments, to participate in the development cf the County's Consolidated Plan. The amendment includes the HOME Investment Partnerships and National Housing Trust programs, stipulates the County's requirements on the use of federal funds during an emergency situation and corrects and clarifies other clerical and technical aspects of the Citizen Participation Plan. The proposed amendments are required and necessary to comply with the federal program rules and regulations. The Hawaii County Housing Agency and or Finance Committee and Hawaii County Council will be acting on the amended Citizen Participation Plan during the approval of the County's Action Plan for its (year) Consolidated Plan. Community Development Block Grant Program: Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93- 383) created the CDBG Program, which became effective January 1, 1974. Under the CDBG Program, a community is able to develop a flexible, locally designed comprehensive community development strategy in order to address the program's primary objective: . . development of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and suitable living environments and expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate income." In general, grant or loan assistance under the CDBG Program may be used for the following activities provided that these activities either 1) principally benefit low- and moderate -income families, 2) aid in the prevention of elimination of slums and blight, or 3) meet other community development needs having a particular urgency. Range of Eligible Activities for * Acquisition on real property. • Acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or installation of public facilities. * Provision of public services provided it is a new service or a quantifiable increase in a service now being provided and does not exceed 15g of the County's allocation, * Payment of the non-federal share in connection with other federal programs undertaken as part of the development program. * Assist privately owned utilities. * Code enforcement in deteriorated areas, together with public improvements and services, to arrest the area's decline. * Rehabilitation of privately owned buildings and low- income public housing. the use of CDBG Program funds: * Disposition of real property. * Clearance, demolition and removal of building and improvements. * Interim assistance to deterioration and alleviate emergency conditions. * Urban renewal completion. * Relocation payments. * Loss of rental income incurred in holding housing units for displacees. * Removal of material and architectural barriers restricting mobility of elderly and disabled persons. * Historic preservation.. * Assistance to sub - recipients to carry out activities listed. * Renovation of closed school buildings. * Micro enterprise Assistance. * Planning activities. HOME Program: The HOME Program was created under Title II (the HOME Investment Partnerships Act) of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990. The purpose of the HOF.i, program is to expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing for very low and low income persons. Range of Eligible Activities for the use of HOME Program funds: • Development hard costs defined as the actual cost of constructing or rehabilitating housing, • Acquisition costs, • Related soft costs defined as other reasonable and necessary costs incurred and associated with the financing, or development (or both) C( new construction, rehabilitation or acquisition of housing assisted with HOME funds. • Relocation costs. • Costs related to tenant -based rental assistance. Applicants applying for HOME funding are required to match for every $1.00 of federal HOME funds expended for the project with at least $.25 of eligible matching funds. National Housing Trust Fund: The National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Program is a new federally funded program which was created by Section 1131 of Title I of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. This program is intended to be a locally designed and administered program to increase and preserve the supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing, with primary attention to rental housing for extremely low-income households, including homeless families. The State of Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC) anticipates receiving approximately $3,000,000 in HTF in 2016. The alloc-dti.on is divided amongst the City and County of Honolulu and Counties and rotated annually between the neighbor island counties. Hawaii County is next in the rotation to receive the HTF program funds in 2016 of approximately $1,425,000. The County is targeting these funds solely for rental housing activities serving households with incomes at or below 30� of the area median income. HTF funds can be used for the new construction or acquisition and/or rehabilitation of rental housing units affordable to extremely low income families and some operating costs for rental projects. For additional program information, please view the OHCD website at www.hawaii.gov/office-of-housing/ OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTY OF HAWAI I by: Housing Administrator Mayor County of Hawai i (Hawaii Tribune -Herald: (Month, Day, Year and Month, Day, Year) (West Hawaii Today: (Month, Day, Year and Month, Day, Year) EXHIBIT 2 "SAMPLE„ PUBLIC NOTICE COUNTY OF HAWAII CONSOLIDATED/ACTION PLAN FOR THE COUNTY'S CONSOLIDATED PLAN - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) , HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) AND NATIONAL HOUSING TRUST (HTF) PROGRAMS The Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) has developed and published its proposed Cunsolidated/Action Plan for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) (Year) CDBG, HOME and HTF Programs and is providing affected citizens an opportunity to examine its contents and tc, submit comments on the proposed (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM The County of Hawaii has been informed by HUD that the County's total (Year) CDBG allocation is ($ Amount). The County plans to utilize these funds for the following projects: CDBG Projects Amount Acquisition/Construction $ Renovation & Restoration $ Planning & Administration $ Total $ Based on the proposed (Year) CDBG projects, the OHCD estimates that _ percent or ($ Amount) in CDBG grant funds will benefit low and moderate income persons in accordance with CDBG regulations. The CDBG Project amount for the County of Hawaii's (Project) may change to accommodate the actual amount of grant funds or program income received or if there are any cancelled project(s) or reprogramming of CDBG funds. HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) PROGRAM The State of Hawaii is required to submit its (Year) Action Plan to HUD for the (Year) HOME Program. It is anticipated that the State will continue to rotate the HOME funds among the three neighbor island counties. The County of Hawaii anticipates that it will receive approximately ($ Amount) for its (Year) HOME Program. To prepare for the (Year) Home Program, the County requested project proposals and will summit the following projects to the State's Housing Finance and Development Corporation for approval: HOME Projects Amount County of Hawai-i's HOME Rental Assistance $ County of Havaai'i's HOME Rental Assistance S Administration 110!''E Administration S Total $ The HOME project amount for the County of Hawai'i's HOME Project(s) may change to accomrodate the actual amount of grant funds or program income received or if there are any cancelled project(s) or reprogramming of HOME funds. NATIONAL HOUSING TRUST FUND (HTE) PROGRAM The State of Hawaii is required to submit its (Year) Action Plan to HUD for the (Year) HTF Program. It is anticipated that the State will continue to divide the HTF funds among the three neighbor .island counties. The County of Hawaii anticipates that it will receive approximately ($ Amount) for its (Year) HTF Program. To prepare for the (Year) HTE Program, the County requested project proposals and will submit the following projects to the State's Housing Finance and Development Corporation for approval: HTF Projects Amount County of Hawai'i's HTS' PROJECT $ County of Hawai'i's HTF PROJECT $ HTF Administration $ Total $ The HI'F project amount for the County of Hawai'i's HTF Project(s) may change to accommodate the actual amount of grant funds or program income received or if there are any cancelled project(s) or reprogramming of HTF funds. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD The proposed (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan will be available for public review and comment from (Month, Day, Year), to (Month, Day, Year), at the following locations, Monday through Friday, 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., except on holidays: OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMWINITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) (Hilo Armory) 5.0 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456 Phone! 961--8379 OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVE-OPMENT (OHCD) 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Phone: 329-4305 Persons, particularly those who are extremely -low, low and moderate income, j are encouraged to submit their comments regarding the activity or activities �f that are being proposed in their area. As required by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, a Plan to Minimize Displacement will also be available for public review at the above OHCD locations. The OHCD will consider any comments and views expressed by citizens on the proposed (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan and may modify the Plan, if deemed appropriate. Citizens who wish to comment on the proposed plan must submit their comments in writing to the OHCD by (Month, Day, Year), in order for the Hawaii County Housing Agency and Hawaii County Council to consider them in their review of the final (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan. The Hawaii County Housing Agency/Finance Committee and Hawaii County Council will be meeting on (Month, Day, Year), and (Month, Day, Year), respectively. Mayor County of Hawai.'i (Hawai'i Tribune -Herald: (West Haviai'i Today. Office of Housing and Community Development - County of Hawa i i By:Housing Administrator (Month, Day, Year) (Month, Day, Year) EXHIBIT 3 "SAMPLE" PUBLIC NOTICE COUNTY OF HAWAI I (Year) CONSOLIDATED/ACTION PLAN FOR THE COUNTY'S CONSOLIDATED PLAN PROGRAM YEAR FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) , HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) AND NATIONAL HOUSING TRUST PROGRAMS The Hawaii County Council has approved the County of Hawaii (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan for the County's (Year) Consolidated Plan program year with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and have authorized the Mayor to execute and submit the (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan to HUD for the CDBG, HOME and HTF programs. The County of Hawai i plans to utilize its (Year) CDBG, HOME and HTF funds for the following projects: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM The County of Hawaii has been informed by HUD Char_ the County's total (Year) CDBG/HOME/HTF allocation is ($ Amount). The Coun!�y plans to utilize these funds for the following projects: CDBG/HOME/HTF Projects Amount CDBG/HOME/HTF Project $ CDBG/HOME/HTF Project $ Planning & Administration $ Total $ The CDBG/HOME/HTF project amounts for the project(s) may change to accommodate the actual amount of grant funds or program income received or if there are any cancelled project(s) or reprogramming of CDBG/HOME/HTF funds. Based on the proposed (Year) CDBG projects, the OHCD estimates that 100% percent of ($ Amount) in CDBG grant funds will benefit low and moderate income persons in accordance with CDBG regulations. The HOME/HTF Project amount for the project(s) may change to accommodate the actual amount of grant funds or program income received or if there are any cancelled project(s) or reprogramming of HOME funds. As required by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, the (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan will be available for public review from (Month, Day) to (Month, Day, Year), at the follcwing locations, Monday through Friday, 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., except on holidays. OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) DEVELOPEMTN (OHCD) (Hilo Armory) 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway 50 Wailuku Drive Kailua-Kana, Hawaii 96740 Hilo, Hawai'i 96720-2456 Phone: 329-4305 Phone: 961-8379 The OHCD will mail and or electronically submit the final (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan to HUD, Honolulu Area Office, on May (Day, year), to meet HUD's submittal deadline of May (Day, year). Office of Housing and Community Development - County of Hawai'i By: Housing Administrator Mayor County of Hawai'i (Hawai'i Tribune Herald: (Month, Day, Year) (West Hawaii Today: (Month, Day, Year) EXHIBIT 4 "SAMPLE" PUBLIC NOTICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) SMALL CITIES PROGRAM CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) The County of Hawaii, through its Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD), has developed its proposed CAPER for its (Year -Year) CDBG/HOME/HTF programs. The purpose of the report is to provide the U.S. Department of Hoasing and Urban Development (HUD) with information on the financial and physical development status of each CDBG-assisted activity within the County. In accordance with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, the proposed report will be available for pubic review and comment from (Month, Day, Year), at the following locations: OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) (Hilo Armory) 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456 Phone: 961-8379 OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) 74--5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway Kailua-Kona, Hawai'i 96740 Phone; 329-4305 Copies of the draft CAPER may also be obtained by calling the OHCD at (808) 961-8379 or (808) 323-4300. The OHCD will consider any written comments and views expressed by citizens on the draft CAPER and may modify the reports, if it is deemed appropriate, Citizens who wish to comment on the draft CAPER must submit their vomments in writing to the OHCD, 50 Wailuku Drive, Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456, or fax your comments 808/961-8685 by 4:30 p.m. on (Month, Day, Year). OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTY OF HAWAI I BY: HOUSING ADMINISTRATOR MAYOR COUNTY OF HAWAII (Hawai'i Tribune Herald: (Month, Day, Year) (West Hawaii Today: (Month, Day, Year) EXHIBIT 5 %I SAMPLE, fr CONSOLIDATED/ACTION PLAN AND CDBG/HOME/HTF APPLICATION SCHEDULE DATE TASK (Month, Day, Year) Public hearing to hear the Housing & Community Development needs and explain the application procedures, and Consolidated/Action Plan process. (Month, Day, Year) Hilo- 1990 Kinoole St. (Time, a.m./p.m.) Kona: Mayors Office (Time, a.m./p.m.) Honoka'a: Honoka'a Gym, (Time, a.m./p.m.) Pahoa: Neighborhood Center, (Time, a.m./p.m.) (Month, Day, Year) CDBG/HOME/HTF Project proposals due to the OHCD. (Month, Day, Year) OHCD to review, rank, and select CDBG/HOME/HTF Projects for the County's Consolidated/Action Plan to HUD. (Month, Day, Year) OHCD to draft the County's proposed Consolidated/Action Plan. (Month, Day, Year) Public notice appears in newspapers and County website, announcing the availability of the proposed Consolidated/Action Plan for public review and comment. (Month, Day, Year) Comment period for the County's proposed Consolidated/Action Plan (30 days required). (Month, Day, Year) Deadline to submit documents for Hawaii County Housing Agency/Finance Committee meeting. (Month, Day, Year) Housing Agency/Finance Committee meeting to approve projects. (Month, Day, Year) Deadline to submit documents for Hawaii County Council meeting. (Month, Day, Year) Council meeting to authorize Mayor to sign and submit the County's Consolidated/Action Plan to HUD. (Month, Day, Year) Obtain Mayor's signature. (Month, Day, Year) Public Notice appears in newspapers and County website summarizing the final Consolidated/Action Plan. (Month, Day, Year) Consolidated/Action Plan due. EXHIBIT 6 "SAMPLE" PUBLIC NOTICE PROGRAM AMENDMENT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SMALL CITIES PROGRAMS The Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) has developed and published its draft amendments to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) and National Housing Trust (HTF) programs, to afford affected citizens an opportunity to examine its contents, and to submit comments on the draft amendments. AMENDMENT TO (Consolidated Program Year) Consolidated/Action Plan In accordance with the County's approved Citizen Participation Plan, projects determined to substantially change in purpose, scope, location and beneficiaries shall be listed and describe here. Should the amendment be substantial in nature, then this notice will be published for thirty (30) days to receive public comments. Subsequently, if an amendment is not substantial in nature then a public notice will be published for a two (2) week comment period to inform citizens of the County's amendment(s) to the plan. The draft amendments will be available for public review and comment from (Month, Day, Year) to (Month, Day, Year) at the following locations, Monday through Friday, 7.45 a.m, to 4::30 p.m., except on holidays. OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUN-TTY OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) (Hilo Armory) 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway 50 Wailuku Drive Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456 Phone: 329-4305 Phone: 961-8379 The OHCD will consider any comments and views expressed by citizens on the draft amendments, and may modify the amendments, if it deems appropriate. Citizens who wish to comment on the draft amendments must submit their comments in writing to the OHCD, or FAX your comments to 808/961-8685, by (Month, Day, Year). OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - COUNTY OF HAWAI I Mayor County of Hawai i (Hawai'i Tribune Herald: (Month, Day, Year) (West Hawaii Today: (Month, Day, Year) Appendix E: 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing O 2011 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE COUNTY OF HAWAII Final: March 2012 Prepared by Belt Collins Hawaii LLC Prepared for Office of Housing and Community Development County of Hawaili HIGHLIGHTS This report brings together information about the availability of housing in Hawai'i County for persons or groups who are identified in state and federal laws as "protected classes." In Hawaii, it is illegal to discriminate against any person because of religion, color, race, ancestry'national origin, age, familial status, marital status, disability, HIV infection, sex or sexual orientation. The major findings of the study can be summarized as responding to the following questions: Is housing discrimination present on Hawai'i island? If so, what groups are affected? In tit -hat situations does discrimination affect them? Housing discrimination still occurs. The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission reports, on average, 80 housing complaints filed annually statewide. That figure is modest when compared to the 192,656 renter households statewide (22,825 on Hawai'i island) in 2010. The largest set of complaints involves people with a disability. Complaints involving persons with disabilities often involve "reasonable accommodation" - changes needed so that the person can enjoy use of the housing unit as much as others do. Housing and social service professionals report that discrimination occurs more often, and may affect Micronesians more often than others but Micronesian immigrants are very unlikely to complain about mistreatment. Many property managers for low-income housing are aware of fair housing laws, and careful to follow them. Others in the private sector who rent housing may not be so well informed or scrupulous, Fair housing issues may arise in mortgage practices, if borrowers are steered to less favorable loans on the basis of race, language or disability. The extent of this practice in Hawai'i County has not yet been determined. Is fair housing choice being significantly limited on Hativai'i island by factors other than or in addition to discrimination? Demand for secure, affordable housing is strong. The limited supply and the cost to build and maintain housing already makes rents high in comparison to U.S. Mainland areas. Incomes are lower, on average, in Hawaii County than statewide, and the share of the population below the poverty level (14.41�u) is higher than the statewide share. Recently, median rental prices have declined. The supply of housing vouchers for low-income families have not grown along with the population, and the supply of housing built for low-income tenants grows slowly. The County continues to maintain a waitlist for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program, There is no firm evidence that economic pressures lead to Fair Housing abuse. However, when the supply of housing managed by professionals is full, vulnerable persons and families seeking BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC page i County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 housing increasingly depend on landlords whose knowledge of the law is limited. Currently, an estimated 24,825 households in Hawaii County earn 50 percent of the County median household income or less; while only 2,555 units are listed in the inventory of managed affordable housing units. An additional 1,000 Section 8 vouchers are distributed by the county, but the wait list for Section 8 vouchers include more than 6,000 families. The large majority of low- and moderate - income households find housing elsewhere, and most probably deal with Iandlords with limited knowledge of Fair Housing. Do actions of the County of Hativai 'i work to create or remove impediments to fair housing choice? The County's Fair Housing staff works to remove impediments by educating housing professionals and the public at large at seminars and training sessions throughout the island. Presentations are made using interpreters to groups with limited English proficiency. The recent development and release of a video, available on a compact disk or through the Office of Housing and Community Development website, extends the educational efforts. The County staff provides information on Fair Housing to the general public and in response to requests on a daily basis. Changes in building codes and the proposed imposition of impact fees are likely to increase the cost of housing construction. However, the County Council can limit the cost of new workforce housing projects by granting qualified exemptions from fees and requirements. Is the County acting on the recommendations in earlier reports? Yes, recommendations in earlier reports have been put into practice. The County is spreading information about Fair Housing through its website, via video, and through daily assistance to tenants and landlords. Collaboration with Federal, State and County staff has helped to share knowledge of emerging Fair Housing issues. Are additional measures needed to counter barriers to fair housing choice? Continuing work to educate landlords and persons who suffer housing discrimination about rights and responsibilities is appropriate. Due to changes in the housing market and the shift to Internet advertising of housing for rent or sale, additional actions are recommended: • Review and respond systematically to Internet rental advertisements, in order to reach "Mom and Pop" landlords. (OHCD and Legal Aid Society of Hawaii both review these. The recommendation is to do so continuously and to respond to advertisements by alerting lessors to Fair Housing training and laws.) Reach out to community associations to spread knowledge of Fair Housing regulations. (These are increasingly involved in the rental market after foreclosures.) BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page ii County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Provide a help line with interpreters available at set times: Professionals in the housing industry recognize that advice and consultation on Fair Housing issues by the County staff help them understand the regulations and avoid violations. This effort can be enhanced if a separate help or advice telephone line is made available and publicized. If a help line is publicized in several languages and interpretation services are available in Spanish, Marshallese, and other languages, it will be possible to estimate and address the need for assistance in language -isolated groups_. To cover the cost of such a service, a statewide pilot project is suggested. Consider providing counseling and legal support for victims of predatory lending when it violates Fair Housing laws: The issue of fair housing in mortgage practices may warrant further attention. Housing counseling is available through the Hawaii HomeOwnership Center. While no complaints against lenders have been filed under lair Housing rules, there is prima facie evidence that predatory lending may disproportionately affect minority groups. In other states, counseling services are supplemented by education and legal advice, funded by HUD, for victims of predatory lending. A similar program in Hawaii may be effective. The latter two recommendations are for co-ordinated action throughout Hawa'i'i. The County of Hawaii would likely be an advocate for, not the primary funder of, these programs. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page iii County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to fair Housing Choice March 2012 CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS................................................................................................................................. i IINTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background...................................................................................................................... 1 I.2 Scope of the Study............................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Approach.......................................................................................................................... l 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS..................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Population and Housing Trends....................................................................................... 4 2.2 Housing Foreclosures....................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Economic and Technological Trends............................................................................... 9 2.4 Incidence of Protected Classes: Persons........................................................................ 11 2.5 Incidence of Protected Classes: Households.................................................................. 15 3 HOUSING TRENDS............................................................................................................. 18 3.1 Housing Availability...................................................................................................... 18 3.2 Cost of Housing for Sale or Rent................................................................................... 19 3.3 Housing Demand............................................................................................................ 25 4 COMPLAINTS AND TESTING.......................................................................................... 27 5 COUNTY POLICY ISSUES................................................................................................. 30 5.1 HaNvai`i County Policies and Programs......................................................................... 30 5.2 Ongoing Actions to Address Impediments.................................................................... 32 6 INTERVIEWS AND SURVEYS......................................................................................... 35 7 RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................39 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................. 41 APPENDIX: QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES TO E -SURVEY .............................................. 42 BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page iv County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 FIGURES Figure 2-1. ANNUALIZED RATE OF INCREASE, POPULATION, HOUSING AND Table 2-2: AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS, 1990-2010--- .............. - .. . .... ..................... 5 HOUSEHOLDS, HAWAII COUNTY, 1980 TO 2010 ....................... ................. 5 Figure 2-2: TOTAL WEEKS UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMED, HAWAII ISLAND Table 2-5: RACE AND LATINO'HISPANIC STATUS, 2010 ............................................. UNEMPLOYMENT OFFICES............................................................................ 10 Figure 3-1: MULTIPLE LISTINGS SERVICE ANNUAL SALES VOLUME AND Table 2-7: SELECTED INDICATORS FROM THE BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR MEDIAN PRICES, HAWAII COUNTY, 1997-2010 ......................................... 20 Figure 3-2: MEDIAN CONTRACT AND FAIR MARKET RENTS, AND AVERAGE Table 2-8: REPORTED AIDS CASES, 2006-2010............................................................... ASKING RENT, 20042011 ................................. ,............. ............................... 21 Figure 3-3: MONTHLY PAYMENT AFFORDABLE FOR HOUSEHOLDS PLANNING TO Table 2-10: RENT OR BUY HOUSING, 2011....................................................................... 24 Figure 3-4: VOLUME OF HOUSING SALES, BY PRICE RANGE, HAWAII COUNTY, 18 Table 3-2-. 2010 AND 2011.................................................................................................. 24 TABLES Tabie 2-1. POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1980 -2010 ....................................................... 4 Table 2-2: AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS, 1990-2010--- .............. - .. . .... ..................... 5 Table 2-3: AGE DISTRIBL;TION, 2010.... ............................................................................. 6 Table 2-4: EMPLOYMENT AND POVERTY, 2006-2010.. ...... .............. ............... ...... 7 Table 2-5: RACE AND LATINO'HISPANIC STATUS, 2010 ............................................. 12 Table 2-6: LINGUISTIC ISOLATION, 2006-2010.............................................................. 13 Table 2-7: SELECTED INDICATORS FROM THE BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM, 2010 ........................................... I ... ........... ........... . 14 Table 2-8: REPORTED AIDS CASES, 2006-2010............................................................... 15 Table 2-9: HOUSEHOLDS BY RACE OF HOUSEHOLDER, 2010 ................................... 16 Table 2-10: HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION, 2010................................................................ 17 Table 3-1; HOUSING OCCUPANCY AND TENURE, 2010 .............................................. 18 Table 3-2-. AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS, 1990 TO 2010 ............................................... 19 Table 3-4: DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME AND HOUSING BURDEN, 2006-2010.......................................................................................... 22 Table 3-5: NEEDED HOUSING BY HUD INCOME CLASSIFICATION, 2012 TO 2016 26 Table 4-1: SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS, HAWAII CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION COMPLAINTS, FY 2002-2011............................................................................ 28 Table 5-1: IMPEDIMENTS AND RESPONSES, PER 2007 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS ... .... ............ ................................................... .................................... .... ...... ........._ 33 Table 5-2: FAIR HOUSING PERFORMANCE MEASURES ............................................. 34 Table 6-1: PARTICIPANTS IN THE 2012 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS STUDY...... 36 BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 5 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ACS American Community Survey (of the United States Census) CDBG Community Development Block Grant COFA Compact of Free Association between the United States of America and the independent states that had been part of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (Belau, the Federated States of Micronesia, Republic of the Marshall Islands). Nationals of these states may enter and stay in the United States much as residents of other U.S. states or possessions do. In Hawaii, immigrants from these Micronesian areas may be identified as COFA migrants. DBEDT Hawaii State Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism ESG Emergency Shelter Grant IICRC Hawaii Civil Rights Commission I-iHFDC Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation, an agency of the State of Hawaii HPHA Hawaii Public Housing Authority HRS Hawaii Revised Statutes HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development LASH Legal Aid Society of Hawaii OHCD Office of Housing and Community Development, County of Hawaii Section 8 Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program: Federal low-income housing voucher program for renters, administered by local agencies. In Hawaii County, the Existing Housing Division of OHCD is responsible for the Section 8 program. A different program allocates "HUD Section 8" vouchers to housing projects. U.S. United States BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Page 6 March 2012 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background In the State oi`Hawai`i, it is illegal to discriminate against any person because of religion, color, race, ancestry/national origin, age, familial status, marital status, disability, HIV infection, sex or sexual orientation. Both federal and state laws specify classes of people protected from discrimination. This report deals with access to housing. It is produced in response to the requirement, by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), that housing agencies receiving certain funds from HUD certify that they are actively working to affirmatively further fair housing. Affirmatively furthering fair housing is defined as conducting an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, identifying and implementing actions to overcome impediments, and developing ways to monitor those actions. 1.2 Scope of the Study The analysis of impediments deal with impediments to fair housing choice in the public and private sectors. It involves.- 1. nvolves: 1. A comprehensive review of local laws, regulations, administrative policies, procedures and practices, 2. An assessment of how those laws, regulations, policies, procedures and practices affect the location, availability, and accessibility of housing, and 3_ An assessment of conditions affecting fair housing choice. 1.3 Approach 1.3.1 Major Questions for the Analysis Is housing discrimination present on Hawaii Island? If so, what groups are affected? In what venues or situations does discrimination affect them? Is fair housing choice being significantly limited on l iawai`i island by factors other than or in addition to discrimination? BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 1 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 - Do actions of the County of Hawaii work to create or remove impediments to fair housing choice? Is the County acting on the recommendations in earlier reports? - Are additional measures needed to counter barriers to fair housing choice? 1.3.2 Organization of the Report This report includes eight major sections: • The summary provides a narrative account of fair housing choice in Hawaii County, bringing together data discussed in more detail in later sections; • This introduction deals with the scope and organization of the report; • Chapter 2 deals with population and housing trends, with a focus on the incidence of the protected classes; • Chapter 3 considers demand and supply, moving from counts of housing units and households to estimates of current and likely future need; Chapter 4 describes the incidence and content of claims of housing discrimination, and the testing done to learn whether such discrimination is extensive; Chapter 5 describes housing policy and government practices affecting housing choice in Hawaii County; Chapter 6 brings together information from interviews and surveys for this report, including local experts' views of current conditions and suggestions for policy initiatives; and • Chapter 7 identifies recommendations for County action. 1.3.3. Sources of Information This report relies on information from public sources, notably the U.S. Census Bureau, on studies and reports prepared for the County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) along with associated housing agencies in Hawaii, and on information provided by stakeholders for this report. (Stakeholders include OHCD staff, other housing agencies, and County agencies concerned with housing availability, real estate professionals, and advocates for members of protected classes. See Table 6-1.) BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC page 2 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 OHCD and associated agencies have sponsored extensive data collection and analysis, notably the Hawaii Housing Policy Study conducted by SMS Research & Marketing Services, Inc. in 1992, 1997, 2003, 2006 and 2011. (The 2011 study is entitled Hawaii Housing Planning Study, 011.) OHCD has sponsored Analysis 91'Impediments to Fair Housing Choice reports in the past, most recently for 2007 (published in 2008). The State of Hawaii sponsored a similar study in 2010, covering the four counties of Hawaii. This report draws on information from earlier studies as needed. Earlier studies included a survey on awareness of fair housing law, attitudes toward discriminatory housing practices, and experience of housing discrimination. No new survey was conducted for the present report, in part because past work provides a solid basis to guide policy development for the next few years. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 3 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Population and Housing Trends Hawaii County has seen continuing population growth over the last few decades. Housing development has increased rapidly. Some of that housing is for use by non-residents. The number of households - the housing actually occupied by residents has not increased as quickly as the overall housing stock. Table 2-1 shows State and County Census data since 1980, and Figure 2-1 shows the annual average rates of change per decade for population, housing units, and households. Table 2.1: POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1980-2010 SOURCE, [?.S. Census as rcpertL d in DSFDT data books. When units available for island residents are counted (including units vacant for rent or sale, but excluding units held for recreational or seasonal use, for migrant workers, and other vacant units), the share of Hawaii County units vacant and available for residents have climbed from 4.0 percent to 6.6 percent of the available stock by 2010 (as shown in Table 2-2). BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 4 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County Population 1980 964,961 92,053 1990 1,108, 229 120,317 2000 1,211,537 148,677 2010 1,360,301 185,079 Housing Stock 1980 332,213 33,954 1990 389,810 48,253 2000 460,542 62,674 2010 519,508 82,324 Households 1980 294,052 29,237 1990 356,267 41,461 2000 403,240 52,985 2010 455,338 67,096 SOURCE, [?.S. Census as rcpertL d in DSFDT data books. When units available for island residents are counted (including units vacant for rent or sale, but excluding units held for recreational or seasonal use, for migrant workers, and other vacant units), the share of Hawaii County units vacant and available for residents have climbed from 4.0 percent to 6.6 percent of the available stock by 2010 (as shown in Table 2-2). BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 4 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Figure 2-1: ANNUALIZED RATE OF INCREASE, POPULATION, HOUSING AND HOUSEHOLDS, HAWAYI COUNTY,1980 TO 2010 4 0% 3 5% `mow 3 0% 2.0% 198D to 1390 —Population 1990 to 2000 -- - Housing Stock Table 2-2: AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS, 1990-2010 2000 to 2010 —!— Households NOTE: See SMS 2011 Table IA -4 for listings of vacancies and for intercensal data from the American Community Survey. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 5 County of Hawaii 2012 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County Available Units 1990 367,282 43,210 2000 426,276 55,745 2010 475,792 71,819 Unoccupied Available Units 1990 11,015 1,749 2000 23,036 2,760 2010 20,454 4,723 Unoccupied Units, % of Available Units 1990 3.0% 4.0% 2000 5.4% 5.0% 2010 4.3% 6.6% NOTE: See SMS 2011 Table IA -4 for listings of vacancies and for intercensal data from the American Community Survey. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 5 County of Hawaii 2012 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 In 2010, the decennial U.S. Census counted 185,079 persons in Hawaii County. Of these, 181,435 lived in households, and 3,644 in group quarters.' Compared to the State as a whole, Hawaii County had a somewhat older population, on average. Table 2-3 shows the age distribution for the County and State populations. The cohorts aged 50 to 69 form a larger share of the County population than of the State as a whole. Hawai `i County's people tend to be poorer than residents of the rest of the state. Table 2-4 shows that this difference involves labor force participation, unemployment, and incomes. Table 2-3: AGE DISTRIBUTION, 2010 SOURCE: 2010 Census. Posted at http:l/hawaii.gov dbedt/info census Census 2010 demographic. 2010 U.S. Census data are posted by the Census Bureau through American FactFinder. Currently, these data are on "American FactFinder2" (}jt ':: fa�jiinder?.census.goN faces nav Lsf pages indzr,,xhtm1). That site will likely be renamed when the original version is retired. In addition, the Hawaii State Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (DBEDT) posts tables of Census data (at hup: lia%%aii.vox_dbedt info Cen;U,. Ccn411ti'2010). Much of the information discussed here comes from the 20I0 SF -I Demographic Profile for Hawaii County prepared by the Census Bureau. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 6 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County Total population 1,360,301 185,079 Under 5 years 87,407 6.4% 11,845 6.4% 5 to 9 years 83,361 6.1% 11,478 6.2% 10 to 14 years 81,539 6.0% 11,521 6.2% 15 to 19 years 85,994 6.3% 12,089 6.5% 20 to 24 years 95,829 7.0% 10,833 5.9% 25 to 29 years 97,302 7.2% 11,290 6.1% 30 to 34 years 88,031 6.5% 10,935 5.9% 35 to 39 years 86,756 6.4% 10,485 5.7% 40 to 44 years 89,617 6.6% 10,897 5.9% 45 to 49 years 95,787 7.0% 12,657 6.8% 50 to 54 years 97,978 7.2% 14,866 8.0% 55 to 59 years 93,340 6.9% 15,807 8.5% 60 to 64 years 82,222 6.0% 13,542 7.3% 65 to 69 years 59,170 4.3% 9,178 5.0% 70 to 74 years 41,353 3.0% 5,830 3.2% 75 to 79 years 34,675 2.5% 4,571 2.5% 80 to 84 years 29,702 2.2% 3,652 2.0% 85 years and over 30,238 2.2% 3,603 1.9% Median age (years) 38.6 40.9 SOURCE: 2010 Census. Posted at http:l/hawaii.gov dbedt/info census Census 2010 demographic. 2010 U.S. Census data are posted by the Census Bureau through American FactFinder. Currently, these data are on "American FactFinder2" (}jt ':: fa�jiinder?.census.goN faces nav Lsf pages indzr,,xhtm1). That site will likely be renamed when the original version is retired. In addition, the Hawaii State Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (DBEDT) posts tables of Census data (at hup: lia%%aii.vox_dbedt info Cen;U,. Ccn411ti'2010). Much of the information discussed here comes from the 20I0 SF -I Demographic Profile for Hawaii County prepared by the Census Bureau. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 6 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 2-4: EMPLOYMENT AND POVERTY, 2006-2010 SOURCE; American Community Survey (ACS) for ?006-2010, in profiles posted at 17�t1; lii%%aii_gw. dbedi iilo-census acs ACS2010 ACS2010 5 fear acti_hi 2010 profile; 5 ter "timate_ BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 7 County of Hawa'i'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii County of Hawali EMPLOYMENT Population 16 years and over 1,068,287 143,857 In labor force 714,067 93,190 Civilian labor force 674,469 92,979 Employed 636,454 85,780 Unemployed 38,015 7,199 Armed Forces 39,598 211 Not in labor force 354,220 33.2% 50,667 35.2% Civilian labor force 674,469 92,979 Percent Unemployed 5.6% 7.7% HOUSEHOLD INCOME Households 442,267 64,382 Median household income (dollars) $66,420 $54,996 Sources of household income Earnings 364,878 50,028 Social Security Retirement 135,465 21,125 income Supplemental Social 96,566 13,171 Security Cash public 15,099 3,138 assistance 14,798 2,825 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance (Food 32,544 7,403 Stamps) SHARE OF POPULATION BELOW POVERTY LEVEL, PREVIOUS YEAR All people 9.6% 14.4% Under 18 years 12.3% 19.1% Related children under 18 years 11.8% 18.5% Related children under 5 years 13.5% 22.3% Related children 5 to 17 years 11.1% 17.1% 18 years and over 8.8% 13.0% M to 64 years 9.1% 13.8% 65 years and over 7.5% 9.4% SOURCE; American Community Survey (ACS) for ?006-2010, in profiles posted at 17�t1; lii%%aii_gw. dbedi iilo-census acs ACS2010 ACS2010 5 fear acti_hi 2010 profile; 5 ter "timate_ BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 7 County of Hawa'i'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 2.2 Housing Foreclosures The recession of 2008 was triggered by problems in housing markets that resulted in a spike in foreclosures throughout the United States. Lending practices in Hawaii have largely been conservative, so the incidence of foreclosures has been lower than the U.S. average, and far lower than in California or Nevada. With the foreclosure boom has come an increase in procedurally flawed foreclosures, jeopardizing homeowners. In 2011, the Hawaii legislature passed Act 48, aimed at protecting homeowners from rushed non judicial foreclosure actions. In response, the Federal Home Mortgage Fannie Mae directed all loan servicers to pursue only judicial foreclosures, avoiding procedures established under the new law. The matter is under discussion in the current legislative session. When credit was easily available in the form of sub -prime mortgages, home prices nationwide rose. During the recession, lenders' credit standards tightened greatly, making it hard for many to qualify for mortgages or refinancing. Both extremely loose and tight credit markets can lead to hardship for households wanting to buy homes, especially for first-time buyers. The failure of many lenders to establish procedures to deal with high default rates, to communicate with borrowers, and to work out new arrangements has created a climate of uncertainty of benefit to none of the parties involved. As of February 2012, some 413 properties in Hawaii County were listed by foreclosure.com.2 A smaller listing showed foreclosued homes at prices ranging from $70,000 to $700,000.3 These clustered in North Kona (18 cases), Puna (17) and South Kohala (13). These properties range from homes in residential neighborhoods to resort condos and luxury homes. Information is gathered on complaints about mortgage adjustment scams by HUD and associated groups. This information is forwarded to the Federal Trade Commission. The database does not demonstrate that Fair Housing violations have occurred, but it provides evidence that (a) Hawaii County families are more likely than others in the state to be the targets of predatory loan -related practices, and (b) the scams affect minority communities disproportionately. As of February 2012, the database listed 111 complaints from Hawaii, of which 44 (40%) were from Hawaii County.4 The Hawaii County victims' race or ethnicity was identified as: Hispanic: 6 complaints (14%) • Asian: 10 complaints (23%) .. These sales include bank -owned properties, but may short sales by homeowners. In the current legal and economic situation, it is unclear whether many more properties are at risk of foreclosure. 3 Posted at Mi'p.. _"-%v.x%.adrhi,cpm foreclosures, lta%%an. as of January 27, 2012. 4 Pasted at litip. complaint.pr«entloans.catti;.org, intake-se,,rk-h atinr, as of February 22, 2012. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 8 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 • Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander: 15 complaints (34%) White: 12 complaints (27-10 • Prefer not to say: 1 complaint (2110). 2.3 Economic and Technological Trends In recent decades, Hawaii County experienced the closing of sugar plantations and growth of a resort economy along the west coast. In addition to tourism, astronomy and diversified agriculture are major contributors to the island economy. Development of resorts, followed by construction of luxury home subdivisions, condominium and timeshare projects, has supported both a locale construction workforce and interisland movement of construction workers and specialized trades. Recent events have changed the situation considerably- From 2008 to 2009; the construction job count dropped by about 30 percent in Hawaii County. Annual turnover among the unemployed has long been a feature of the Fast Hawaii economy (as shown by the ups and downs for Hilo unemployment claims in Figure 2-2). The recession pushed unemployment claims from West Hawai `i higher than from the other side of the island. Total employment has increased since the recession in the City and County of Honolulu, but not in Hawaii and other Neighbor Island counties. Paul Brewbaker, Assessing Aspects of Hawaii's Economy in 2011 for the 2012 Outlook Presentation to Hawai'i Senate Committee on Ways and Means and House Committee on Finance, January 2012. Accessed January 26, 2012 atIILLn- %%%%uxapitol.hanaii,ao% totimon%.lq'la 1{�LJJJ1(,ua I IN-%% AM (}1-09 12 L_.conornistti_ '.20BreN%,bak-er ;,CjLI . _ — BELTCOLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 9 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Figure 2-2: TOTAL WEEKS UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMED, HAWA171SLAND UNEMPLOYMENT OFFICES 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 A° 61 A'1, '0) On Ah ire OA 5§'a`� ys yy � yg' �� ,��' yQ ,�' tip' 'r yai tir .5i 1� Hilo —Kona SOURCE: DSEDT website, Iitip; hawaii;goy'dbedt/info:economic.data reyorts�unem�rlow�ment, as of January 2012 While the state outlook is for a slow increase in employment over the next few years, new jobs and a decline in unemployment may come much later to Hawaii County than to Honolulu. In this situation, many families may have difficulty paying for housing. Two major trends have affected Hawaii housing markets in recent years. These are likely to continue to affect the availability of housing and procedures to obtain homes for rent or sale. First, changes in lending practices have greatly limited capital for real estate investment. Tighter lending has greatly reduced the pace of new development, and hence limited growth of the housing stock. For individual borrowers, mortgage loans and refinances have become much harder to obtain. The share of homeowners falling behind on mortgages and association payments increased with the 2008 recession. The implications for foreclosures and Hawaii foreclosure law are beyond the scope of this report. One consequence should be noted: condominium associations are increasingly involved in foreclosures and in renting units in order to recoup lost payments and keep their projects maintained. Secondly, housing information is now Internet -based. For the rental market, this means that advertisements are found on Craigslist, not in local newspapers. Since these advertisements are free, individual landlords who may have earlier relied on word of mouth or personal contacts to find renters now use the same advertising medium as Realtors. Craigslist depends on its readers to police advertising, so listings are not vetted to make sure they conform to Fair Housing Law before they appear. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 10 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Another consequence of Intemet-based information is that applicant's credit history and criminal records can be checked quickly. It is now standard practice for real estate firms to demand that applicants pay up to S30 for these checks before an application is considered; often before the applicant can see the unit. As a consequence, applicants with poor credit or criminal histories may avoid these listings, and apply only to Iess demanding landlords. The likely result is that the firms with expertise in handling Fair Housing issues will see fewer low-income applicants, and deal with fewer cases involving complex Fair Housing concerns. With increased Internet access, borrowers have more information about available mortgages or other loans. Lenders from other states are actively competing for clients along with local financial institutions and brokers_ As noted above, mortgage adjustment bureaus and other parties who offer to resolve credit or foreclosure problems can now operate in Hawaii using television advertising_ websites, c -mail and telephone communication. 2.4 Incidence of Protected Classes: Persons While race, color, ethnicity and ancestry' national origin are important for fair housing choice, these are not easily counted in any definitive way_ Race is a cultural characteristic discrimination occurs when race is perceii-ed, not when it is a biological fact. Over time, the U.S. Census Bureau has changed from assigning race to persons by rule, to allow respondents to identify their own race, to allowing them to identify themselves as in more than one race category. These procedures respond to complex, shifting views of race in the United States but do not show how perceptions of race affect social life. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 11 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 QD Table 2-5, RACE AND LATINCIMISPANIC STATUS, 2010 SOURCE: 2010 Census. Posted at http: hawaii.gov dbedt/info census. Census 2010 demographic. The broad "race" categories used by the Federal government do not capture many of the distinctions recognized in Hawaii (e.g., among Native Hawaiians, Samoans, and Marshallese, BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 12 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County Total population 1,360,301 1001Y0 185,079 100% One Race 1,039,672 76% 130,544 71% White 336,599 25% 62,348 34% Black or African American 21,424 2% 1,020 1% American Indian and Alaska Native 4,164 01Y0 869 1% Asian 525,078 39% 41,050 22% Asian Indian 2,201 0% 175 0% Chinese 54,955 4% 1,661 1% Filipino 197,497 15% 15,834 9% Japanese 185,502 14% 18,086 10% Korean 24,203 2% 1,005 1% Vietnamese 9,779 1% 317 0% Other Asian 50,941 4% 3,972 2% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 135,422 10% 22,389 12% Native Hawaiian 80,337 6% 15,812 9% Guamanian or Chamorro 2,700 0% 187 0% Samoan Other Pacific 18,287 1% 576 01ya Islander Some Other Race 34,098 3% 5,814 3% Two or More Races 16,985 1% 2,868 2% 320,629 24% 54,535 30% Race alone or in combination with one or more other races: White Black or African American 564,323 42% 101,344 55% American Indian and Alaska Native 38,820 3% 2,975 2% Asian 33,470 3% 7,210 4% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 780,968 57% 82,944 45% Some Other Race 355,816 26% 62,487 34% 34,199 3% 5,450 3% Racial Identifications/Total Population 133% 142% HISPANIC OR LATINO Total population Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 1,360,301 100•/ 185,079 100`;, 120,842 9% 21,383 123'3 SOURCE: 2010 Census. Posted at http: hawaii.gov dbedt/info census. Census 2010 demographic. The broad "race" categories used by the Federal government do not capture many of the distinctions recognized in Hawaii (e.g., among Native Hawaiians, Samoans, and Marshallese, BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 12 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 all included in the "Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander" group by the Census). The table shows the Census data in two ways: (a) a detailed account of ancestry for persons who only claim one "race," and (b) an account of all "race" claims. Neither approach captures local understandings, since these "races" combine recognized ethnicities (such as the many varieties of "Asian" shown in the table, and many residents see themselves as descended from several ethnicities, not just one or two "races." The risk of housing discrimination increases when people lack the language skills needed to negotiate and to learn about their rights in the dominant language used for contracts and other legal matters. Data from the American Community Survey (ACS) indicate that about 7% of the Hawaii County population has difficulty with English (Table 2-6)_ 6 Table 2-6: LINGUISTIC ISOLATION, 2006-2010 SOURCE: American Community Survey (ACS) for 2006-2010, in profiles posted at Leat+: himala 200 dbedt.inflo census acs ACS2010 ACS2010_5_Year acs Ili 2010motiles 5 yr estittaate. The State and the U.S. Census no longer collect counts of religion. The Atlas of Hatit-ai 'i reported 51 % of the population as "unaffiliated," and 351'. o as affiliated with Judeo-Christian faiths, 7% with Buddhism, and 7% with Cather religions..'Major religious organizations include the Roman Catholic Church and the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter -Day Saints. Unlike the decennial census, the ACS is a sample survey_ Within each census tract, different subareas are sampled every year in five (so the sample is drawn from all parts of each trace over a five-year period. Single -year results are published for counties and states; the five-year data is more reliable, as based on a larger sample, but not identified with a single point in time_ R, Lamb, "Religion." Atlas of Hawti 'i edited by S. and J. Juvik. P edition. Honolulu, HI, 1998. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 13 County of Hawal`i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii County of Hawaii Population 5 years and over 1,247,010 168,941 English only 929,303 74.5% 136,693 80.9% Language other than English 317,707 25,5% 32,248 19.1% Speak English tress than "wry weal" 144,943 11.6% 11,198 6.6% Spanish 25,285 2.0% 4,857 2.9% Speak English less than "very well," 6,930 0.6% 1,416 0.8% Other Indo-European languages 18.211 1.5% 2,952 1.7% Speak English less than "very well" 3,488 0,3% 385 0.2% Asian and Pacific Islander languages 272,452 21.8% 24,241 14.3% Speak English less than "very well" 134,214 10.8% 9:365 5-5% Other languages 1,759 0.1% 198 0.1% Speak English less than "very well" 311 0.0% 32 0.0% SOURCE: American Community Survey (ACS) for 2006-2010, in profiles posted at Leat+: himala 200 dbedt.inflo census acs ACS2010 ACS2010_5_Year acs Ili 2010motiles 5 yr estittaate. The State and the U.S. Census no longer collect counts of religion. The Atlas of Hatit-ai 'i reported 51 % of the population as "unaffiliated," and 351'. o as affiliated with Judeo-Christian faiths, 7% with Buddhism, and 7% with Cather religions..'Major religious organizations include the Roman Catholic Church and the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter -Day Saints. Unlike the decennial census, the ACS is a sample survey_ Within each census tract, different subareas are sampled every year in five (so the sample is drawn from all parts of each trace over a five-year period. Single -year results are published for counties and states; the five-year data is more reliable, as based on a larger sample, but not identified with a single point in time_ R, Lamb, "Religion." Atlas of Hawti 'i edited by S. and J. Juvik. P edition. Honolulu, HI, 1998. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 13 County of Hawal`i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Reliable counts or estimates of the distribution of sexual orientation in Hawai'i are not available. A survey designed by the Centers for Disease Control helps to identify the incidence of disabilities for which persons may need reasonable accommodations. It also included questions related to HIV risk, as shown in Table 2-7 below. A significant number of persons in Hawai'i County appear to have health limitations, but most of these do not need special equipment. Table 2-7: SELECTED INDICATORS FROM THE BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM, 2010 NOTES: Survey conducted with over 4,000 adults -- over 1,000 in Hawaii County -- by telephone. (l) Question: Are you limited in any way because of health problems'? (2) Question: Do you have any health problem that requires you to use special equipment? (3) The survey asks whether any of several "high HIV risk situations" apply. SOURCE: Hawaii State Department of Health, Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System results for 2010, posted at ht�t haw_aii.j9yiItealtIV tat isticsilihs brNsfindex.html Based in part on ACS data, SMS reports that Hawai'i County had in 2009 some 22,000 residents with disabilities. Of these many are employed, but the share of the disabled with employment is lower in Hawai'i County than in the other counties. However, the share below the poverty level is higher than in the other counties (SMS 2011, Table 25). Table 2-7 suggests that the incidence of HIV is slightly lower in Hawai'i County than in other parts of the state. This finding is in line with reports of AIDS cases by county, which show a lower reported incidence in Hawai'i County than elsewhere. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 14 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Share of respondents who -- Report Health Must Rely on Special Report High Limitation (1) Equipment (2) HIV Risk (3) State of Hawaii 16.2% 6.0% 3.7% Hawaii County 20.7% 6.9% 3.4% Honolulu County 15.3% 6.0% 3.8% Kauai County 18.5% 5.4% 3.7% Maui County 15.2% 5.9% 3.9% NOTES: Survey conducted with over 4,000 adults -- over 1,000 in Hawaii County -- by telephone. (l) Question: Are you limited in any way because of health problems'? (2) Question: Do you have any health problem that requires you to use special equipment? (3) The survey asks whether any of several "high HIV risk situations" apply. SOURCE: Hawaii State Department of Health, Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System results for 2010, posted at ht�t haw_aii.j9yiItealtIV tat isticsilihs brNsfindex.html Based in part on ACS data, SMS reports that Hawai'i County had in 2009 some 22,000 residents with disabilities. Of these many are employed, but the share of the disabled with employment is lower in Hawai'i County than in the other counties. However, the share below the poverty level is higher than in the other counties (SMS 2011, Table 25). Table 2-7 suggests that the incidence of HIV is slightly lower in Hawai'i County than in other parts of the state. This finding is in line with reports of AIDS cases by county, which show a lower reported incidence in Hawai'i County than elsewhere. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 14 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 2-8: REPORTED AIDS CASES, 2006-2010 SOURCE; Hawaii State Department of Health. HIVIfIIDSSertto-,r`lltinceAnnunl Report. Posted at I,ril, Lmaii.so% lied IIII heaIth%-Itfc,�t%Ies std aids;data-,,tatititics 2010,Vdt Honolulu, 2011, 2.5 Incidence of Protected CIasses. Households Statistics about persons fail to indicate how often families or households are vulnerable to discrimination. Data from the Census provide additional indications of the diversity of households in Hawaii County. Table 2-9 shows householders' racial identification; Table 2-10 deals with household composition. BELL' COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 15 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Rate of Reported AIDS, 2006 through 2010 per 100,000 persons State of Hawaii 7.2 Hawaii County 5.0 Honolulu County 7.8 Kauai County 7.2 Maui County 6-5 SOURCE; Hawaii State Department of Health. HIVIfIIDSSertto-,r`lltinceAnnunl Report. Posted at I,ril, Lmaii.so% lied IIII heaIth%-Itfc,�t%Ies std aids;data-,,tatititics 2010,Vdt Honolulu, 2011, 2.5 Incidence of Protected CIasses. Households Statistics about persons fail to indicate how often families or households are vulnerable to discrimination. Data from the Census provide additional indications of the diversity of households in Hawaii County. Table 2-9 shows householders' racial identification; Table 2-10 deals with household composition. BELL' COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 15 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 2-9: HOUSEHOLDS BY RACE OF HOUSEHOLDER, 2010 SOURCE: U.S. Census, 2010 Census posted at "iv%v census., -To%. As of 2010, Hawaii County's population was 50.2% male and 49.8% female. Families with a single female head accounted for 12% of households, while ones with a single male head accounted for 6%. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 16 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County Households 455,338 67,096 Owner occupied: 262,682 57.7% 44,271 66.0% By race of Householder White alone Black 79,139 20,453 alone 1,945 182 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 570 174 Asian alone 125,599 12,099 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacificlslanderalone 15,169 3,289 Some Other Race alone 1,603 366 Two or More Races 38,657 7,708 Renter occupied: 192,656 42.3% 22,825 34.0% By race of Householder White alone Black 71,573 9,501 alone 6,187 208 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 1,050 183 Asian alone 56,480 3,798 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacificlslanderalone 18,352 2,825 Some Other Race alone 3,839 516 Two or More Races 35,175 5,794 Share of Owningor Renting Households, Own Rent Own Rent By race of Householder White alone Black alone American Indian 30.1°% 37.2% 46.2% 41.6% and Alaska Native alone Asian alone 0.7% 3.2% 0.4% 0.9% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 0.2% 0.5% 0.4% 0.8% Some Other Race alone 47.8% 29.3% 27.3% 16.6% Two or More Races 5.8% 9.5% 7.4% 12.4% 0.6% 2.0% 0.8% 2.3°% 14.7% 18.3% 17.4°% 25.4°% SOURCE: U.S. Census, 2010 Census posted at "iv%v census., -To%. As of 2010, Hawaii County's population was 50.2% male and 49.8% female. Families with a single female head accounted for 12% of households, while ones with a single male head accounted for 6%. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 16 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 2-10: HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION, 2010 SOURCE: U.S. Census, 2010 Census posted. at %%x% .cen�uti.go�. The five-year ACS summary for 2005 to 2009 presented data for households on language use (similar to the count of persons in Table 2-6), showing about 1,850 households in Hawaii County as linguistically isolated. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 17 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County Total households 455,338 100.0% 67,096 100.0% Family households (families) 313,907 68.9% 44,407 66.2% With own children under 18 years 126,155 27.7% 17,296 25.8% Husband -wife family 230,076 50.5% 31,834 47.4% With own children under 18 years 91,610 20.1% 11,141 16.6% Male householder, no wife present 26,590 5.8% 4,315 6.4% With own children under 18 years 10,737 2.4% 2,101 3.1% Female householder, no husband present 57,241 12.6% 8,258 12.3% with own children under 18 years 23,808 5.2% 4,054 6.0% Nonfamily households 141,431 31.1% 22,689 33.8% Householder living alone 106,175 23.3% 16,843 25.14 Male 51,465 11.3% 8,593 12.8% 65 years and over 12,371 2.7% 2,197 3.3% Female 54,710 12.0% 8,250 12.3% 65 years and over 24,603 5.4% 3,690 5.5% Households with individuals under 18 years 156,045 34.3% 21,340 31.8% Households with persons 65 years and over 137,815 30.34 19,541 29.1% Average household size 2.89 2.70 Average family size 3.42 3.22 SOURCE: U.S. Census, 2010 Census posted. at %%x% .cen�uti.go�. The five-year ACS summary for 2005 to 2009 presented data for households on language use (similar to the count of persons in Table 2-6), showing about 1,850 households in Hawaii County as linguistically isolated. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 17 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 191 3 HOUSING TRENDS 3.1 Housing Availability At first glance, Hawaii Island appears to have a surplus of housing, with 18%" of the housing stock vacant. The vacancy rate is largely due to the presence of vacation units (including both vacation rentals and second homes). Table 3-2 shows the count of "available units" for the resident population over time. The count excludes units held for seasonal or vacation use, for migrant workers, and for other reasons, but still includes vacant units held for sale or rent. (This approach still overestimates available supply, since it does not separate out units held vacant for short-term use, not long-term rentals.) Table 3-1: HOUSING OCCUPANCY AND TENURE, 2010 SOURCE: US Census, 2010 Census posted at «<ti ��.centiuTru�. BELT COLLI NS HAWAII LLC Page 18 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County HOUSING OCCUPANCY Total housing units 519,508 100.0% 82,324 100.0% Occupied housing units 455,338 87.6% 67,096 81.5% Vacant housing units 64,170 12.4% 15,228 18.5% For rent 16,441 3.2% 2,995 3.6% Rented, not occupied 954 0.2% 101 0.1% For sale only 4,277 0.8% 1,338 1.6% Sold, not occupied 1,151 0.2% 289 0.4% For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 30,079 5.8% 7,135 8.7% All other vacant 11,258 2.2% 3,370 4.1% Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) 1.6% 2.9% Rental vacancy rate (percent) 7.8% 11.6% HOUSING TENURE Occupied housing units Owner -occupied 455,338 67,096 housing units 262,682 57.7% 44,271 66.0? Population in owner -occupied units 793,160 119,236 Average household size of owner -occupied units 3.02 2.69 Renter -occupied housing units Population in 192,656 42.3% 22,825 34.090 renter -occupied units Average household 524,261 62,199 size of renter -occupied units 2.72 2.73 SOURCE: US Census, 2010 Census posted at «<ti ��.centiuTru�. BELT COLLI NS HAWAII LLC Page 18 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 3-2: AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS, 1990 TO 2010 Currently, the share of available units that are unoccupied is larger in Hawaii County than in the state as a whole, and larger than in past decades. Additions to the housing stock on Hawaii Island averaged 1,965 units per year from 2000 to 2010; Table 3-2 shows that the average increase in available units was 1,607 units per year_ 3.2 Cost of Housing for Sale or Rent Average housing prices in Hawaii County are low, both for sale or rent, compared to statewide averages. Prices increased over recent decades, but have moved downwards since 2008, Figure 3-1 snows annual median sales prices and volumes over fourteen years. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 19 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County Available Units 1990 367,282 43,210 2000 426,276 55,745 2010 47S,792 71,819 Unoccupied Available Units 1990 11,015 1,749 2000 23,036 2,760 2010 20,454 4,723 Unoccupied Units, %of Available Units 1990 3.0% 4.0% 2000 5.4% 5.0% 2010 4.3% 6,6% Currently, the share of available units that are unoccupied is larger in Hawaii County than in the state as a whole, and larger than in past decades. Additions to the housing stock on Hawaii Island averaged 1,965 units per year from 2000 to 2010; Table 3-2 shows that the average increase in available units was 1,607 units per year_ 3.2 Cost of Housing for Sale or Rent Average housing prices in Hawaii County are low, both for sale or rent, compared to statewide averages. Prices increased over recent decades, but have moved downwards since 2008, Figure 3-1 snows annual median sales prices and volumes over fourteen years. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 19 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Figure 3-1: MULTIPLE LISTINGS SERVICE ANNUAL SALES VOLUME AND MEDIAN PRICES, HAWAII COUNTY, 1997-2010 4,000 '. 3,500 i 3,000 I i 2,500 f 2,000_.__ 1,500 - -_-- 1,000 Soo F� $450,000 $400,000 $ 350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 0 - I -r- -._ W 1111111 W w $0 i 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISFSales Condo Sales -Median SF Price Median Condo Price } NOTE: Multiple L.ititings Service (ML.S) sales inc! _-,_..___..___-_.__._._ __._.__.r ___.._-,e_.._ .__a__ __,_,__._-_., , ude the bulk ofsales by real estate professionals, but the count of sales may omit sales by owners. SOURCE: State of Hawaii Data Book 2010, Tables 21-34 and 21-35. Trends in rental volume and prices are not so clearcut. There is no standard inventory of transactions. Fair Market Rents are established by survey conducted for HUD. ACS data provide additional survey -based estimates. Hawaii Information Service compiled average asking prices from samples of advertisements. In earlier years, these were from classified newspaper advertisements; currently, most rental ads are on Craigslist. Advertised rents have declined since 2008. It may be that the transition to Internet advertising has affected the range of units advertised, and, as a result, average prices. Alternatively, it may be that the advertised rents BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 20 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 reflect market changes that affect new contracts first, and affect existing rentals to a lesser extent and later in time. Figure 3-2 shows Hawaii County annual rental prices. Figure 3-2: MEDIAN CONTRACTAND FAIR MARKET RENTS, AND AVERAGE ASKING RENT, 2004-2011 $1,600 $1,400 $ 1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 Fair Market Rents -•--� Advertised Asking Rents 2008 2009 -- 2010 2010 2011 — Contract Rent SOURC F. SMS Research & Marketing SL!rti ices, Inc. Hdivai'i llouning Planning Study, 011. Rcnial Housing Report, Table A-7. Surveys by the U.S. Census establish the number of housing units being held for occupancy by renters or owners. Table 3-1 showed the most current information on available units. The cost of renting or owning a home relative to income is no longer an issue for the decennial census. Instead, the ACS includes questions about income and housing costs. Table 3-3 shows recent costs and the share of households with high housing costs relative to their income. While costs are lower in Hawaii County than in Honolulu and Maui, the share of households paying high housing costs is much the same in Hawaii County as statewide. (See Table 3-4.) The ACS results indicate that about 31 percent of Hawaii County households pay high housing costs. Responses to the Housing Policy Study survey indicate that the share of households with high shelter -to -income ratios has been increasing since 1992 (SMS 2011, Table A-9). High housing cost burdens are more common among renters than among owners, and among households who have spent a year or less in their current unit (SMS 2011, Table A- 10). The SMS study shows similar patters from all four counties. however, only in Hawaii County has the decline in rental prices cantinucd through 2011. _. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 21 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 When housing costs are high relative to income, families not only have less disposable income for other expenses, but also may be unable to qualify for loans or refinancing, since mortgage requirements are stricter than they were a few years ago. The housing cost burden indicates a major hurdle in both achieving and maintaining home -ownership. Table 3-4: DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME AND HOUSING BURDEN, 2006-2010 NUI E: Share of renting households computed for those households for which rental information was available. SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5 -Year Estimates, 2006-2410. Downloaded from DBEDT site (jj�tp. Itawaii.vo%. dbedt. into census.`acti, ACS2030. ACS20.10_5 Year acs hi 2010 profiles 5 w estimate). BELT COLLIN5 HAWAII LLC Page 22 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii County of Hawaii Occupied housing units 442,267 64,382 Owner -occupied 262,419 42,591 Average household size 3.07 2.73 Renter -occupied 179,848 21,791 Average household size 2.71 2.74 MORTGAGE STATUS Owner -occupied units 262,419 42,591 Housing units with a mortgage 180,639 26,773 Housing units without a mortgage 81,780 15,818 SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS Housing units with a mortgage Median (dollars) $2,225 $1,691 Housing units without a mortgage Median (dollars) $2,225 $322 Renter -occupied units Median Gross Rent $1,260 $1,009 HOUSING COST BURDEN Households paying 35% or more of income for housing (% of reporting households) Housing units with a mortgage 68,598 38.1% 10,616 39.9% Housing units without a mortgage 7,205 8.9% 1,297 8.3% Renters 73,616 45.3% 8,045 42.7% NUI E: Share of renting households computed for those households for which rental information was available. SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5 -Year Estimates, 2006-2410. Downloaded from DBEDT site (jj�tp. Itawaii.vo%. dbedt. into census.`acti, ACS2030. ACS20.10_5 Year acs hi 2010 profiles 5 w estimate). BELT COLLIN5 HAWAII LLC Page 22 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Would-be buyers and renters vary significantly in their ability to pay for new units. The median "affordable" price for renters in Hawaii County is less than $1, 100; for buyers it is about $1,700.9 (See Figure 3-3.) Based on the 2011 SMS survey, the median rental price for a multi -family unit in Hawaii County ($861 per month) is affordable for about 61 °-o of households planning to rent. For single family units, the median monthly rent is $1,218, and less than 30% of those who plan to rent can afford that amount for housing. For would-be buyers, nearly 90% can afford the median monthly mortgage payments for condos, and 71 percent can afford the median monthly payment for single family units, assuming a 20% down payment. However, about a third of this sub -sample have an adequate down payment in hand for a condominium, and only 14% of the group can cover the down payment for the median -price single family home. 10 The median sales price for tl}e two years combined was $249,000. Monthly payments for a $250,000 sale could amount to about $1,275 (assuming a five percent down payment and a mortgage rate of five percent for 30 years). Again, the data suggest that many units are available at rates that residents can afford, so long as their credit and savings meet lenders' criteria_ A study conducted by SMS Research for the Land Use Research Foundation in 2005 provided a measure of comparative housing availability, at least for for -sale units_11 Information on housing sales in each county over a period of 20 years was analyzed in relation to the County -level "affordable' housing price for each sale year. Data from Oahu and Hawaii showed fairly flat trends: for example, homes that were originally affordable to Big Island families earning from 100% to 120° o of the median income were resold at about 1201-o of the current affordable price in later years. Similar data from Maui and Kauai showed a very different pattern, with homes increasing in value i.e., decreasing in affordability over time. The large subdivisions in Puna and Ka' u with little or no infrastructure have provided land at relatively low cost for those who want to buy or build homes on ar limited budget. Also, the pace of housing production has probably limited price increases. In this survey, respondents' statements about the amount they can pay define "affordability." The financial qualification analysis deals with "effective demand buyers," a subset of those who plan to move who are likely to rent or buy in the next few years. See Tables 10 a through 10d of the SMS report. SMS Research & Marketing Services, Inc. Affordable Housing Polic-. and Hawaii's For -Sale Housing tb1arkets. Posted at hup:._t�N��ti.lurlmru cines SNIS?.pol: In the 2005 study, "affordability" is the ability to pay monthly mortgage and utility costs at prevailing rates with no more than 30% of 1, household income BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 23 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Figure 3-3: MONTHLY PAYMENTAFFORDABLEFOR HOUSEHOLDS PLANNING TO RENT OR BUY HOUSING, 2011 10,0.__.0 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 More than $3,000 $2,000 to $3000 $1,700 to $1,999 El $1,400 to $1,699 El$1,100 to $1,399 $800 to $1,099 $500 to $799 $200 to $499 Less thin $200 PI an to (tent PI an to Buy SOURCE: SMS Research & Marketing Services, Inc. Hinvai't Housing PlunningShidy, 2011, Tables A -15a and b. Figure 3-4: VOLUME OF HOUSING SALES, BY PRICE RANGE, HAWAVI COUNTY, 2010 AND 2011 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2010 2011 Over $1,000,000 ❑ $1,000,000 $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 0 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 NOTES: Sales of parcels with one or more dwelling (excluding partial and multi -parcel transactions, and sales less than $20,000.). Price categories are for incremental sales less than the amount shown yet (e.g., sales less than $200,000 but more than $100,000, and so forth). Sales are for 2,809 properties in 2010 (of which 777 are condos) and 2,282 in 2011 (of which 751 are condos). The volume of sales is larger than the number of properties because of multiple transactions for the same property. Downloaded from Hawaii Information Service, January 18. 2012. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 24 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 3.3 Housing Demand OHCD and the other housing agencies of Hawaii have supported a modeling process (conducted by SMS and Hawaii Information Service) that identifies both resident demand for housing in the coming years ("effective demand") and the need for new units given resident demand and the existing housing supply. The 2011 housing demand survey indicated that 42 percent of Hawaii County households were interested in moving to a new home at some time, and 26 percent an estimated 17,412 households had formed plans to move within the state. Inter -county movement can affect demand. Based on respondents' preferred location of their next housing unit, a total of 17,821 households might expect to seek homes in Hawaii County. 13 Over the years in which the Housing Policy Study has been conducted, effective demand has fallen in all counties. Factors contributing to the trend may include demographics and housing prices. As the population has aged, more and more households reached what they saw as their lasting home. As housing prices have increased, and as the economy has posed increasing challenges for many in Hawaii, many see few acceptable alternatives. Of the Hawaii respondents who expect to move out of state, the share who name housing costs as their reason has increased from 12 percent in 1997 to 30 percent in 2011 . 14 Many of those who expect to move will find new homes in the existing housing stock. Nonetheless, the number of households is likely to increase due to demographics long term population growth and a trend towards smaller household sizes. The resident population of the County is expected to grow at an annual rate of about 1.7 percent, an increase of about 20,000 residents every five years- 15 As the population ages, demand for housing suited to households with senior members -- whether housing for multigenerational families, senior housing, or assisted living facilities - becomes more important. The most recent Housing Policy Study estimates need for 3,454 additional units for resident households in Hawaii County from 2012 through 2016 about 700 per year. Table 3-5 shows the estimated need by HUD income classification. The total figure is well below the increase in housing stock in the last decade, which averaged over 1,600 units per year. However, developers and public agencies are not likely to supply new housing for all income levels, much less to offer units for sale for all income levels. t � When responses from the survey are weighted to model the statewide population, a total of 15,611 households are identified with expressed preferences for locations in Hawaii County. Only 87.6°1, of respondents named a particular location, the above count allocates the "no preference stated" group in proportion to the share of the total choosing a location within Hawaii County. 1 4 This paragraph combines analytic points from the 2003 and 2011 SMS Housing Policy Study reports. is DBEDT (2009), 3035 Papulation and Economic Projections, Table A-3. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC page 25 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 3-5: NEEDED HOUSING BY HUD INCOME CLASSIFICATION, 2012 TO 2016 Households by Income Level Owner -Occupied SF MF Rented SF MF Total Less than 30% of AMI 225 18 231 539 1,013 30% to 50% 172 12 145 164 493 50% to 80% 277 9 32 259 577 809/0 to 120% 179 45 12 103 339 120% to 140% 192 9 24 12 237 140% to 180% 236 - 29 51 316 180% or more 387 - 52 1001 539 1,668 93 525 1,228 Total 3,514 SOURCE: SMS 2011: Table 11. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 26 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 4 COMPLAINTS AND TESTING Victims of discrimination can register their grievance and seek redress; government agencies and legal assistance providers have procedures to register, assess, and respond to complaints. OHCD publicizes fair housing rules and procedures for making complaints at its office and on its website. The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission works in co-operation with HUD and other agencies to address discrimination. It provides annual data on the incidence of complaints (a) by county and (b) by type (e.g., housing) and basis (e.g., race, familial status, disability). Housing complaints constitute five to ten percent of complaints annually employment-related issues account for the majority of complaints. Complaints from Hawaii County normally account for 10 to 15 percent of all complaints. (See Table 4-1.) Hawaii County cases accounted for 12% of housing complaints from 2006 through 2009.1" Some trends are clear in the data: Disability is the most common basis for complaints, and accounts for nearly 40 percent of all housing complaints; Taken together, race, ancestry /national origin, and color account for about 27% of housing complaints over the ten year period; and No housing complaints associated with HIV status have been registered. O Far more people experience incidents of discrimination than register formal complaints about them. (In the most recent SMS statewide survey, 18 percent of respondents said they had experienced housing discrimination ) The Legal Aid Society of Hawaii (LASH) receives complaints and provides advice on housing discrimination services. In the period 2009 to November 2011, the following bases for complaints were identified in about 50 cases from Hawaii County: Disability: 42 (74%' of bases identified); Race: 7 (12%); Sex: 6 (11 %); and Familial status: 2 (4%)." 'r' SKIS `010, Table 3. 17 Persona] communication, Leba T. Kaufmann, Fair Housing Staff Attorney, LASH, November 30, 2011. BELT COLLINIS HAWAII LLC page 27 County of Hawai"i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 ►i n �-1 io Rr N Ln M n - —i Ln N t� } O O Ljf N H n M q O , 4 14 n14 r-1 b Lo � rq } LL r-1 00 "r� Ln N m G1 M r- N 0 O r4 } LL �y co rY Ln G1 LM m `r5 -4 Q C N N n ag pp�� N O } LL O n �-t CNrl M ti Lf} T r,, 00 00 oto LD W O qp N O } LL M tp -T Q M N Ln .5 m Ln N C } LL Ln 1 CD 00 n Ln N r1 r-1 Ln %D ry 1M rk 7 QQC to N O } LL lD r'1 H L!1 N L!'{ r-1 �} 4 Ln Ln N r -I t Ln O } LL LD gr ry m v ry r1 m N S r4 � N } LL N Ln N -w n N C N n m g `^M N g LL LL ' r r m n r4m Ln N gt° N O } 41. u C9 u _ 'ao +' O m 7 Ln ate+ R z m C O 0.F C O G. � T +yip a+ CL E ~ Li W O . � ra f6 C � m tw�000 . g C C '� cOi ate+ x X A m ¢ ¢ U a� c Ln Ln y 6A i 3 Co H S ►i LASH also conducts fair housing testing for discriminatory practices. Such testing typically involves having two applicants inquire about housing. However, many Hawai'i real estate firms typically demand that applicants fill out detailed information and pay for credit checks before they can see housing units. This practice makes shopping by multiple applicants costly. LASH has also been monitoring advertisements. In the past year, LASH documented 109 advertisements that stated illegal preferences: 92 stated a preference against families with children; 13 stated a preference against persons with disabilities; and 2 stated a preference based on sex. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 29 County of Hawai'i 2021 Analysis of impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 S COUNTY POLICY ISSUES Hawaii County addresses fair housing choice in part through education and training. It helps those who believe they are victims of housing discrimination to challenge unfair situations. An expansive view of fair housing choice would involve supporting a wide range of policies or programs to oppose housing discrimination and forces that encourage it. On this view, fair housing choice is made possible by: • A housing supply adequate to provide for the population and to limit market effects that could have discriminatory consequences; • Maintenance of units so that the supply will continue and residents can expect that units will be available and habitable over time; • Equal access to units for sale or rent; • Recognition that protected classes are assured equal access to units, on the part of all involved in renting and selling housing; and • Means to challenge and remove impediments to equal access. In this chapter, Hawaii County policies and responses to impediments are recognized. 5.1 Hawa!7 County Policies and Programs Hawaii County directly affects the provision of housing in several ways, above all: The zoning code (Hawaii County Code [HCC] Chapter 25) identifies lands on which housing can be built, and the minimum size of lots. Other land use and building codes -- subdivision, building, plumbing and electrical (HCC Chapters 5. 4, 17, 23) -- set standards to be followed in building construction and renovation. The County's affordable housing requirement (HCC Chapter 11), imposed on any rezoning to permit new construction involving five or more houses or hotel/resort development, or industrial development, demands that developers earn credits by setting aside lots or building homes affordable to middle- or low-income households. Such homes are subject to a ten-year limitation on resale at market rates. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 30 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Impact fees may be levied on new construction to offset the cost to the county of providing infrastructure_ Such fees are imposed on a "fair share" basis by the county. but an impact fee schedule has been debated for several years. • Real property taxes are levied on property throughout the County, based on assessed value. Rates for owner -occupants are lower than for other residential property. (As of 2012, the difference between owner -occupant rates and rates for other types of property was smaller in Hawaii County than in Maui County. In the City and County of Honolulu, the distinction between owner -occupant and other residential uses is no longer emphasized, but the difference between residential rates and commercial, industrial and resort rates is greater than in Hawaii County.) The Office of Housing and Community Development is responsible for additional programs: The "Section S" voucher program that assures and supports rent payments for eligible low-income families in approved housing units; o Programs to encourage home ownership among low-income families, including low-interest loans towards down payments and closing costs for first-time Homebuyers; o Loans for home repairs for low-income owner -occupants; o Oversight of housing owned by the County (Kulaimano E1derIy Housing Project); a Investment of moneys collected through the aCfordable housing program 18 in new housing construction; and o Housing development and:°or investment in entities developing housing. The County has sponsored and participated in the project to develop workforce housing at Kamakoa, in Waikoloa, and is developing transitional housing at Kaloko, in North Kona, The County Council can exempt workforce housing projects from a wide range of fees and requirements under HRS 201 H, thereby reducing the cost to build new homes for low- and moderate -income families. Changes in any of the above policies and programs could have complex effects on the availability and cost of housing. As noted earlier, Hawaii County, unlike other counties in Hawaii, has large agricultural subdivisions with limited infrastructure_ Land where homes can be built is far more available than elsewhere in Hawaii but often far from work and school sites. Commuting between rural residential areas and job centers can strain or exceed the capacity of the connecting roadways. In response to this problem, the affordable housing requirement states that affordable housing will be built within fifteen miles of a project. k Until 2011, developers could �+ p pay "in lieu" fees intitead of building nrw housing or conveying improved land For affordable housinu. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 31 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Policy initiatives recently discussed in Hawaii County include: Revisions to the building code: An update to the building code to conform to the International Building Code has been considered and approved by Council. It has been challenged as increasing construction costs and as ruling out the use of "alternative" materials (e.g., bamboo). Development and imposition of impact fee schedules: Impact fees on new development have been considered by the Hawaii County Council and the State Department of Education. The County fees most recently proposed ranged from about $5,000 to $7,000 for single family homes, depending on their size. The Council filed, i.e., did not pass, the proposal in 2011.19 County authorities also opposed the Department of Education fees proposed for West Hawaii as an undue imposition on homeowners in a time of economic hardship. Reliance on shared equity arrangements or a community land trust to help keep housing for sale at "affordable" prices over many years: A community land trust was initially proposed for the Kamakoa Nui workforce housing project. The County has since assumed ownership of the project, and will have resale and shared equity restrictions. Implementation of any of these initiatives could affect the cost, and hence the availability, of new housing. 5.2 Ongoing Actions to Address Impediments The 2007 Analysis of Impediments focused on three impediments and included action plans to address these, as shown in Table 5-1. These action plans were reformulated as a series of performance measures, shown in Table 5-2. The tables show that OHCD has considered the findings of the 2007 Analysis oflmpediments and has incorporated them in a detailed and specific work plan. That plan has been implemented in more sophisticated ways than originally proposed (e.g., use of a video available as a DVD or for download from the County website). 19 J. Armstrong, "Impact Fees Fail to Pass." Hilo Tribune Herald, September 22, 2011; Council vote is in http: records.co.hawaii,hi.us.WeblmU 0 doc 759680/Pa eel aspx BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 32 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 5-1: IMPEDIMENTS AND RESPONSES, PER 2007 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS 1 Applicants are unaware of rights and resources Action plan: a. Develop information packets in languages other than English Measure: goal is to develop one new packet per year. b_ Continue training for landlords, especially smaller ones Measure: develop and implement plan by 2009 to reach smaller landlords c. Increase public awareness of consequences of failure to comply with fair housing laws Measure: Issue five press releases by 2005 about the consequences of infraction of fair housing laws d. Incorporate fair housing informaiton in school curricula Measure: Working with HCDCH, approach DOE with a proposal for collaboration by 2009 e. Promote fai r housing awareness among recent immigrants Measure: develop proposal fortraining session by end of 2009, and approach officials at Immigration and Naturalization Service f. Increase advocacy groups' awareness of fair housing Measure: conduct five presentations before the end of 2009; advocacy groups' directors report increased awareness of fair housiing laws. 2 Fair housing policies lack standardization Action plan: Fair housing office will begin to identify policies and procedures that are contradictory or lack standardization. Measure: By 2009, County will identify approaches to identify policies and procedures for which additional efforts are needed, and will investigate the cost of addressing these problems - 3 Limited supply of affordable housing units Action plan: Fair Housing Office can advocate for more affordable rental units, especially for mentally and physically disabled, families with children, and ones with dogs to assist them in day to day living. Measure: Increased appreciation by County officials of need SUUKC E: SMS 2008. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 33 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 C. - LA ls.l Ln LLk W u z a 0 cr LLJ a C7 z Mn 0 cc R N N a m H W_ U c J Y c Q 0 U � x Z O � O O u U � J cn m z OA Iil C cr u ro D o a N 3:0 — o LU a LA C N LA a Q O Q7 'O W o ma¢" to Ufa ti4 a O c ro¢ c o rco •- c c 00 c tw c ro ri E c a w E-1 E m m tw tw E c o ro ro c c o o c c c c u o a o U ro 0 u N° 0 0 0 0 H al N r•+ wra C r -I M Lncu C N X O u u � a Q� N p N Ln rii N C .tw N Ln UF ei E ri c N X C .tw M O T u ai Q a u {� N Q rn r-1 r-! LL GG N L1! Q1 M Ln ri N Q Z Nto .1 C ao C LC C Q i N O p J 'O E C C • O Y C A a 4] aj H an 1] aJ Q Nn aj C C +�+ v C w ro a C u ro Co L en � � 0! C � w 0 N 'L U •� � d M U = C � C_ LU �► ro E LA o C v u ° .to E E cu o c o _ c ru z �, c -a z" `" - v L u . o c fC L ug oo L a LA O na H '0 •C o q 3m ,N L1 LM O v O w O u L Ln q0 G1 C—W cup V- C 4-- 2= S C U C •C •� O U L 7 LL b i Q o GJ 01 Q 0 I'+ 3 c a Ln •' C _ •� � L } (U C N C •ti VI a u = Z o�u m O ou°� <uo� T L li ri N M lczr Ln lD 1- co M LL W_ U J Y Q 0 U � x Z O � w O u U � J cn m W_ 6 INTERVIEWS AND SURVEYS Earlier Analysis of Impediments reports included results of surveys of the general public and summaries of housing experts' views. The surveys concerned respondents' experience oi- discrimination and awareness of fair housing issues.'() Respondents showed considerable uncertainty in the population concerning the specifics of the laws. Discussions with Realtors and property managers, who address fair housing issues often, reinforce the point. These experts are occasionally uncertain about the law. They find that housing applicants, owners of rental housing, and officers of condominium associations are often uncertain or mistaken about Fair Housing rights and responsibilities. This point was underlined by responses from participants to an e -survey, tabulated in Appendix A.21 Table 6-1 lists the housing stakeholders interviewed in the course of the Analysis of Impediments research. They provided information and perspective on current economic and social conditions, on public knowledge of Fair Housing issues, on common procedures for renting and managing housing, and on ways to address housing problems. Common themes in the interviews were: Knowledge of Fail° Housing Regulations • Property managers and Realtors active in the rental market are largely knowledgeable about the law, procedures for responding to tenant concerns and requests, and the consequences of violation of Fair Housing rules. • Experts expected most tenants, applicants, property owners, condominium association heads and many resident managers not to understand the details of Fair Housing law. Even experts mentioned points at which they or their associates were uncertain about the regulations. Some experts noted that OHCD staff provided helpful advice and were very responsive to their inquiries. Uncertainty or misunderstanding of the law is most common with regard to reasonable accommodation for the disabled. Problems may involve tenants' requests for animal companions, for separate rooms for the disabled or for health aides, and for reserved parking. Some landlords and property managers have reportedly allowed exceptions to occupancy rules -- the number of tenants in a unit for Native Hawaiian tenants but not others. 'Q Resulrs from 2003 and 2007 for Hawaii County are summarized in SMS 2008. 21 The survey was sent to a small group of housing stakeholders. It should not be taken as indicating the %iews of any larger population. The survey was sent to persons listed in Table 6-1 and to a tew additional stakeholders with whom Belt Collins Hawaii had had limited telephone contact. The survey respondents could then include persons not listed in Table 6-1. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 35 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 6-1: PARTICIPANTS IN THE 2012 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS STUDY Name Organization Melva Albone Hawaiian Dream Properties Daryn S. Arai Planning Dept., County of Hawaii Earl Arakaki OHCD Existing Housing Division Waquita L. Armour Legal Aid Society of Hawaii Steven Arnett OHCD Administrator Rose Y. Bautista County of Hawaii Office of the Mayor Nancy S. Cabral Day-Lum Rentals & Management, Inc. Neal Erickson Dept of Public Works, County of Hawaii Louis Erteschik Hawaii Disability Rights Center Brandon Gonzalez Dept of Public Works, County of Hawaii Diane "D.D." Grace Hawaii HomeOwnership Center Sharon L. Hirota OHCD Existing Housing Division Keith H. Kato Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Leba T. Kaufmann Legal Aid Society of Hawaii Mary M. Love Mary M. Love Realtor Jeremy McComber OHCD Community Development Division Sharon Madsen Pacific Horizons Properties Kyle McNamara Legal Aid Society of Hawaii Kiriko Oishi Hawaii Public Housing Authority Larissa Ranz L6kahi Apartments Alan S. Rudo OHCD Community Development Division Kevin K. Tanaka Bob Tanaka, Inc. Realtors Garrett tlejo OHCD Existing Housing Division Elaine Watai Jack Hall Housing NOTE: Organizations are listed to indicate the range of persons interviewed. No claim is made that participants and their organizations support the findings and recommendations of this study. Micronesians are thought to be often denied housing because they are expected not to be responsible tenants. This population is seen as unwilling to complain or challenge discrimination. However, Micronesians may well have large households and be willing to shelter kin, to the point that they exceed occupancy restrictions. Landlords' decisions not to rent to Micronesian families may not be based on discrimination. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC page 36 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Reasonable Accommodation for the Disabled • Stakeholders report little difficulty allowing or providing physical accommodation to disabilities e.g., the installation of ramps or grab bars. Stakeholders believe nearly everyone recognizes the rights of the blind to have service animals. The broad issue of assistance animals is more complex; tenants may believe they have a right to have pets, when the right is to have an animal that helps persons with disabilities enjoy their homes. Realtors and managers commonly ask for a doctor's letter stating that the animal is needed as part of the tenant's therapy. A far trickier issue arises in the case of medical marijuana. Growing and consuming marijuana may be recognized by state and county personnel as therapy when prescribed by a medical doctor. Marijuana is illegal under federal law, and so cannot be considered a form of reasonable accommodation under federal statutes. Stakeholders have tried to address this problem by including clauses in lease agreements banning the production of marijuana. • Reasonable accommodation for one tenant may involve suspending rules which others follow. This is hard for managers and other tenants to accept. MaYs to Address Fair Housing Issues Discussed in Interi,iews Encourage mediation and compromise: Realtors and managers who had been involved with Fair Housing complaints emphasized that dealings with complainants and with Fair Housing regulators involved a great deal of time, effort and anxiety. They wished these cases could have been resolved infonnally, However, they found that the parties involved in these cases were so angry or stubborn that they would not agree to mediation or compromise. Train County staff and managers of low-income housing projects regularly: Resident managers of low-income housing and government employees dealing with Section 8 housing may need regular training in Fair Housing rules, since these regulations are complex and their interpretation changes over time. • Continue education for real estate professionals: Several stakeholders found Fair Housing training to be helpful. They appreciated OHCD's work to get the training recognized as part of continuing education for real estate professionals. Additional Suggestions • Increase the supply of housing for residents: The obvious way to reduce all housing problems is to increase the supply of units that resident families can afford, e.g., through new construction or by increasing the number of Section 8 vouchers available in the County. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 37 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 0 - Train and certify rental applicants: HOPE Services (formerly known as the Office of Social Ministry of the Roman Catholic Diocese) has run classes for the homeless and certified participants as trained to be responsible tenants. Such certification can help applicants with poor credit or criminal records be considered for units. Develop a centralized database of contact information for applicants on waitlists: Homeless and other low-income housing applicants may be placed on waitlists for subsidized housing, then not be found months later when a unit becomes available. Both rental managers and applicants could be helped if they could list and update their contact information with a central registry. Help immigrants with paperwork: COFA migrants may lack documentation (e.g., birth certificates) demanded for lease applications. They would benefit from increased support from the state or their national consuls. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 38 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 7 RECOMMENDATIONS The current Comprehensive Plan states Fair Housing goals for the fiscal years 2010 through 2014, calling for the training and coordination activities shown in Table 5-2. As noted earlier, OHCD has implemented plans for developing educational materials, conducting training sessions, and cooperating with other Fair Housing stakeholders. OHCD has further provided technical or informal assistance in response to queries on Fair Housing and what callers view as unfair landlord -tenant relationships. Research for this study indicates that the County has been working effectively towards the Fair Housing goals. Many see continuing efforts to educate small landlords and non-English speakers as warranted. While OHCD has made substantial progress, these efforts should continue, since knowledge of Fair Housing rules, rights and responsibilities remains limited. In the course of research for this report, Belt Collins Hawaii developed three additional recommendations. These are responsive to information about the changing environment for housing transactions_ 1. Rental advertising has migrated to CraigsIist and other Internet venues, where advertisements are free and widely accessible. Internet providers do not automatically edit for Fair Housing compliance, so advertisements that violate the law may be posted. On the other hand, this situation provides an opportunity to make contact with lessors who are uninformed about them- responsibilities. Monitor and respond to Internet advertising to improve outreach to "Mom and Pop" landlords. LASH monitors such advertising to spot ads that violate Fair Housing rules. At times, the County staff reviews current advertisements_ If resources permit, the County could review ads regularly and reply to them by e-mail, informing advertisers of Fair Housing law and inviting them to attend training activities given by the County. Such responses can be standardized. This recommendation would be useful if it results in increased participation by "Mom and Pop" landlords in the County's training activities. It will be important to ask participants how they heard of the training, and to assess the monitoring and response to advertisements on the basis of whether they lead to increased participation and calls to OHCD. 2. With the economic downturn, condominium associations have become increasingly involved in the rental market after foreclosures. Such associations need to recapture lost income but also seek tenants as good neighbors, not just renters. Conduct mail outreach to condominium associations, inviting them to send participants to Fair Housing training. Again, the objective is to provide education to BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC page 3 9 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 persons and groups involved in housing transactions who may now be uninformed. A listing of contacts for condominium associations is available through the State Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (h!tp:_ hawaii,..oy dcca/real condo e&aoaocontact0708.1dt). Again, the usefulness of this effort can be judged on the basis of whether they lead to increased participation in trainings and to calls to OHCD. 3. Provide a help line with interpreters available at set times: Professionals in the housing industry recognize that advice and consultation on Fair Housing issues by the County staff help them understand the regulations and avoid violations. This effort can be enhanced if a help or advice telephone line is made available and publicized. If a help line is publicized in several Ianguages and interpretation services are available in Spanish, Marshallese, and other languages, it will be possible to estimate and address the need for assistance in language -isolated groups.. To cover the cost of such a service, a statewide pilot project is suggested. �'. The information on Ioan modification scams in Section 2.2 suggests that the impact of such activities is not distributed proportionately among ethnic groups in Hawaii: complaints are unusually frequent from Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders. The incidence of complaints from Hawaii County is also surprisingly higher than for other counties. However, it appears that Realtors, OHCD and others are not aware of Fair Housing "�. violations involving mortgage loans. This may be due to the high duality of mortgage procedures in Hawaii. Alternatively, it may be due to a lack of complaints and inattention to the activities of national and Internet mortgage operations. In some other states, Fair Lending has been recognized as a Fair Housing issue. For example, HUD has funded a Fair Housing/Fair Housing advice line in Idaho manned by Idaho Legal Aid Services, Inc. with both English- and Spanish-speaking advisors. (Funds come from a Fair Housing Initiatives Program grant from HUD.) In earlier years, this line addressed problems for Native Americans and familial status issues. Currently, it deals often with predatory lending to Limited English Proficiency refugee and immigrant families, and to the disabled, who have been steered to inappropriate loan products at high cost. The Idaho program has been accompanied by publicity and outreach efforts in languages other than English. It has generated considerable participation at training sessions. (Personal communication, Zoe Ann Olson. February 22, 2012). Accordingly, it seems appropriate for OHCD to bring the issue to the attention of HUD and other Fair Housing stakeholders in Hawaii and to propose that a Fair Lending assistance line project be piloted in Hawaii. Such a program could extend statewide. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 40 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 REFERENCES Armstrong_ J. "Impact Fees Fail to Pass." Hilo Tribune -Herald, September 22, 2011. Brewbaker, P Assessing Aspects ofHawaii's Economic in 2011 for the 2012 Outlook. Presentation to Hawaii Senate Committee on Ways and Means and House Committee on Finance, January 2012. Accessed January 26, 2012 at http:� www.cafritol.haw_aii.4ov. session2012 testimony:, Info Testimony FIN-WAM 01- 09-12 Economists %2013rewbaker .ndf Hawaii State Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (DBEDT) Population and Economic Projections fbr the State of Hawaii to 2035_ Posted at httn: ha�va i.cov: dbedt/info'economic°data reports. ,2035_Lon gRangeSerics,`. 2009. State of Hawaii Data Book 1010. Posted at httn: hawaii.gov/dbedt'info,cccmomicAatabook.'. Honolulu, Hl, 2011. Hawaii State Department of Health HIVIAIDS Surveillance Annual Report. Posted at http:._hawaii.4ov licalti'Itcalthy- lifc,;tyleslstd-aids,data-statistics:,2010.ndf: Honolulu, HI, 2011. Juvik, S. and J., eds. Allas of Hawaii. 3" Edition. Honolulu, HI, 1998. SMS Research & Marketing Services, Inc. Affordable Housing Policy and Hawaii's For -Sale Housing Markets. Posted at littt?_ www.lurf.org'docs SMS2.ndf Honolulu, HI, 2005. County ofHawai'i: 2007Analysis of Impediments. Honolulu, HI. 2008. Fair Housing Analysis of Impediments Report for the State of Hawai 'i, 2010. Honolulu, HI, 2010. Hawai'i Housing Planning Study, 2011. Honolulu, HI, 2011. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 41 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to fair Housing Choice March 2012 APPENDIX: QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES TO E -SURVEY The initial sample for this survey was very small (24 persons) and non-random. Quantified findings only indicate the range of views encountered by Belt Collins Hawaii, and cannot be generalized to a larger population. Do you think fair housing laws are followed by people on Hawaii Island? Not at Know of Response Response Rating Percent Count All the time 0.0% 0 Most of the time 0.0% 0 Often 14.3% 1 Sometimes, but violations also occur 42.9% 3 Sometimes, but violations are also common 28.6% 2 Rarely 14.3% 1 Never 0.0% 0 Q2. How well do people understand which groups are "protected classes" for housing?" "Rating average" is a calculation, treating the first column as 1, the second as 2, and so forth. An average of 3 aligns with the third response ("Know most of the groups.") BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 42 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Not at Know of Know of Know all Rating All some most of the Average groups, the protected not r_oucsra oups others Realtors and Realtor associates who handle 0 2 2 2 3 rentals regularly Other Realtors and Realtor associates 0 3 2 1 2.67 Resident property managers 0 4 2 0 2.33 Owners of rental units 1 4 1 0 2 Owners selling housing without a Realtor 2 4 0 0 1.67 Mortgage brokers and bankers 0 3 3 0 2.5 Condo associations 0 5 1 0 2.17 Tenants 2 3 0 0 1.6 Applicants for rental housing 3 3 0 0 1.5 County housing personnel 0 3 2 1 2.67 Neighbors 5 1 0 0 1.17 "Rating average" is a calculation, treating the first column as 1, the second as 2, and so forth. An average of 3 aligns with the third response ("Know most of the groups.") BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 42 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Q3. Haus well do people understand the rules about "reasonable accommodation"?" Realtors and Realtor associates who handle rentals regularly Other Realtors and Realtor associates Resident property managers Owners of rental units Owners selling housing without a Realtor Mortgage brokers and bankers Condo associations Tenants Applicants for rental housing County housing personnel Neighbors Not at A little Fairly Well and Rating All well, but know how Average still to uncertain implement the rules 0 4 1 1 2.5 1 4 1 0 2 1 4 0 1 2.17 3 3 0 0 1.5 3 3 0 0 1.5 0 5 1 0 2.17 2 3 1 0 1.83 1 4 0 0 1.8 1 5 0 0 1.83 0 4 1 1 2.5 4 2 0 0 1.33 Q4. What group of people is likely to go against the spirit or the letter of fair housing laws? Realtors and Realtor associates who handle rentals regularly Other Realtors and Realtor associates Resident property managers Owners of rental units Owners selling housing without a Realtor Mortgage brokers and bankers Condo associations Tenants Applicants for rental housing County housing personnel Neighbors No one % Response Count 16.7% 1 16.7% 1 66.7% 4 83.3% 5 33.3% 2 0.0% 0 50,0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16.7% 1 33.3% 2 0.0% 0 BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 43 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Q5. In what situations do fair housing law problems arise? % Response Count When people call to find out about rentals 50.0% 3 When prospective tenants fill out application 50.0% 3 forms 33.3% 2 Steering within a project or community When applications are reviewed, and tenants are 66.7% 4 chosen Service animals When tenants don't get along with others in a 83.3% 5 project or neighborhood 66.7% 4 as steps, grab bars When tenant behavior affects the quality of life in 66.7% 4 a building or neighborhood Annual (or 6 months) lease reviews 16.7% 1 Sale transactions 0.0% 0 None 0.0% 0 Comments Almost all Resident Property managers have a tendency to dislike and discriminate against COFA Migrants. They are both afraid that they will not follow rules, and they are likely to prefer not to rent to those with a bad reputation even if the reputation is not true or at least not true for all members of the discriminated group, like COFA Migrants When people show up with their kids Reasonable accommodation requests, change in households, new child Q6. What Fair Housing issues are misunderstood or misstated often? % Response Count Race, National origin, or Calor as protected class 16.7% 1 Sexual orientation as protected class 16.7% 1 HIV status 33.3% 2 Familial status 66.7% 4 Age 33.3% 2 Steering within a project or community 66.7% 4 Dealing with both occupancy (number of people 66.7% 4 in a unit) and familial status Service animals 83.3% 5 Other assistance animals 83.3% 5 Reasonable accommodation to disabilities such 66.7% 4 as steps, grab bars Other reasonable accommodation 50.0% 3 BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 44 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 07. What should the County stress in its education activities to help clear this up? Comments I have found that when the County has informational classes about who is allowed to visit or make short stays with renters, they at least know what laws they are supposed to follow. They don't always follow the rules. The culture they come from may not allow them much ability to follow the law. Reasonable accommodation requests, assistance animals as reasonable accommodations, familial status Q8. We've heard some suggestions about removing impediments to fair housing. We'd like to know your reaction to these: Comments Building more housing won't help until the people are educated. Running stings woUld work only if the violators had to attend classes so they understand what they did and know it is wrong. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 45 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Needed Good Not a Bad idea, Really to idea, but good and it bad assure may idea -- may idea" fair need doesn't create housing work address problems choice the issue Provide seminars for owners and associations 4 2 0 0 0 Educate the general public about rights and 3 3 0 0 0 responsibilities Educate the general public about the cost and 3 3 0 0 0 other consequences of violations Conduct more tests" or "sting" operations to catch 2 2 2 0 0 violators Resolve complaints non -judicially 0 6 0 0 0 Build more housing 1 3 2 0 ❑ Comments Building more housing won't help until the people are educated. Running stings woUld work only if the violators had to attend classes so they understand what they did and know it is wrong. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 45 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Q9. How do you think the County can help improve fair housing access? Comments Give out more certificates for Section 8, but make the certificate holder take fair housing class, as well as the rentals owner or manager. Most people get good and bad ideas from watching television. Cable TV is an option, but not everyone has cable. PBS over broadcast stations would reach more people, but the program would have to be made very carefully to be fair and balanced. Any one hour program would have to have two parts -- Renters & those who do the renting. Each has a story, and each breaks their respective rules. Are the rules correct, are they fair, do they work, and most of all are they the best way to help those who are financially challenged succeed Reach more of the small landlords and private owners, publicize the results of settlements, Regular training for housing providers; more fair housing law enforcement. Provide more affordable accessible housing. Incentives to landlords to provide more affordable accessible housing. Enforcing design and construction requirements for new housing. Educating housing providers on reasonable accommodation requests and common fair housing violations. Q10. Please add any other comment you want to share. Comments My own experience is that most private resident managers and private families or individuals are less rigid than the public housing programs. They don't have to answer to their boss for the most part. The result is that these people both provide more humanity to renters, and they also get abused by renters. In any case, education concerning their actions does not very often make much change happen. Private people get away with abuse and also get abused. County housing projects can cause terrible problems by following the rules, and Fair Housing agents, who are supposed to insure that the right things happen, have no real "policing" authority for the building managers and rental agents abusing the families and individuals who break rules. On the other hand, most renters are afraid, and when confronted with the threat of eviction, they usually just give up. Angry people from both sides will dig in rarely, but the facts about renter mistakes or breaking the rules almost always cause loss of their apartments or homes. The net result is that it is common for the renters to be abused, and rare indeed that a bad Realtor or Building manager is punished in any substantive way. I would rather see more humanity for the people who are at risk, but the $ is king in this situation. Realtor and Building managers have lawyers, and renters almost never do. Mahalo BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 46 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Appendix F: County of Hawau Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan O COUNTY OF HAWAII HOUSING TRUST FUND PROGRAM ALLOCATION PLAN I. INTRODUCTION The National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) program was created under Title 1 of the Housing and Recovery act of 2008, Section 1131 (Public Law 110-289) and is administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The regulations which govern the HTF are contained in 24 CFR Part 93, Housing Trust Fund. The purpose of the HTF is to provide grants to State governments to increase and preserve the supply of decent, safe and sanitary affordable housing for primarily extremely low-income (30% AMI) households. II. STATE ALLOCATION PLAN The Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC) is a designated HTF Grantee for the state of Hawaii. HHFDC's HTF Allocation Plan has received approval from HUD to allow HHFDC to allocate its HTF funds to the counties (Sub - Grantees) for rental activities. HHFDC's Allocation Plan requires HTF projects to be selected and awarded through an application issued by the counties. The County of Hawaii (County) is a designated HTF Sub -grantee. III. DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS The County will receive an allocation of $1,425,000 in PY 2018 HTF Funds. The allocation includes $1,350,000 in program funds, and $75,000 for administrative and planning expenses. The County's Consolidated Plan identifies a substantial need for new affordable rental housing. Consequently, the County will invest PY 2018 HTF funds for rental housing activities. The County expects to implement rental projects through a third -party Recipient (e.g. owner; developer) that meets the eligibility requirements described herein. The annual distribution is described below: a. The County will retain $75,000 of the HTF annual allocation for allowable administrative and planning expenses. b. The balance of the HTF annual allocation will be provided to Recipient(s) selected through the County's HTF Application. c. The HTF Program requires the commitment of funds within 24 months of HUD's execution of the HTF Grant Agreement. In order to meet this requirement, the County must commit funds by the commitment date established in the Sub- grantee Agreement. IV. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES AND EXPENSES Rental Housing -- The County will focus HTF funds on providing affordable rental housing to 30% AMI households. HTF funds may be used for the production, preservation, and rehabilitation of affordable rental housing through the acquisition, new construction, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of non -luxury housing with suitable amenities. All rehabilitation projects must meet applicable HTF rehabilitation standards and the requirements of 24 CFR 93.301(b). However, inasmuch as the County intends to expend PY 2018 HTF only for the new construction of rental housing. Eligible HTF activities and expenses include the following; • Real Property Acquisition; • Site Improvements; • Development hard costs (new construction; rehabilitation); • Related soft costs, • Demolition; • Conversion; • Financing Costs; • Relocation Assistance; • Operating cost assistance for rental housing; and • Reasonable administrative and planning costs for the HTF program administration. The County does not intend to use HTF funds for the refinancing of existing debt. V. ELIGIBLE RECIPIENTS An organization, agency or other entity (including a public housing agency, or a for-profit entity, or a nonprofit entity) is eligible to apply for HTF assistance as an owner or developer to carry out an HTF-assisted project. An HTF Recipient must: a. Make assurances to the County that it will comply with the requirements of the HTF program during the entire period that begins upon the selection of the recipient to receive HTF funds, and ending upon the conclusion of all HTF- funded activities; b Demonstrate the ability and financial capacity to undertake, comply and manage the eligible activity; c. Demonstrate its familiarity with the requirements of other Federal, State or local housing programs that may be used in conjunction with HTF funds to ensure compliance with all applicable requirements and regulations of such programs; and d. Have demonstrated experience and capacity to conduct an eligible HTF activity as evidenced by its ability to own, construct, or rehabilitate, and manage an affordable multi -family rental housing development. VI CONSOLIDATED PLAN PRIORITY OA 5 -Year Consolidated Plan (2015-2019) has been adopted by the County of Hawaii to address the County's needs, priorities and strategic plan. The County has amended the PY 2018 Annual Action Plan to include this HTF Allocation Plan and selected project(s) for PY 2018 HTF funding. VII APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS Applications for the HTF are issued, accepted, reviewed and selected by the County for funding consideration, subject to the availability of funds. Applications are reviewed for eligibility and rated using the selection criteria. Each application must describe the eligible activity, in accordance with 24 CFR 93.200, to be conducted with HTF funds and contain a certification by each eligible recipient that housing units assisted with HTF will comply with the HTF requirements. In addition, applicants must provide performance goals and benchmarks that the County will use to monitor efforts to accomplish the rental housing objectives. Rental housing projects may provide tenant preferences in accordance with 24 CFR 93.303, as provided for in the County's consolidated plan. Any limitation or preference must not violate nondiscrimination requirement in 24 CFR 93.350. Minimum Thresholds: Applicants must meet all of the following Minimum Threshold requirements to receive consideration for an allocation or award of HTF. Failure to meet any Minimum Threshold shall result in the immediate rejection of the application. 1. Market Assessment — A market assessment of the housing needs of extremely low income individuals to be served by the project must be submitted as a part of the application. The assessment should review the neighborhood and other relevant market data to determine that there is a current demand for the type and number of housing units being developed. 2. Site Control — Evidence of site control shall be submitted with the application for HTF funds. Site control shall be substantiated by providing evidence in the form of an executed lease or sales option agreement, fee simple deed, executed land lease, or any other documentation acceptable to the County. Evidence of site control must be provided for all proposed sites. 3. Capital Needs Assessment (For projects acquiring an existing property) -- To ensure that the proposed rehabilitation of the project is adequate and that the property will have a useful life that exceeds the affordability period, a Capital Needs Assessment of the property by a competent third party shall be submitted with the application. A Capital Needs Assessment is a qualified professional's opinion of a property's current physical condition. It identifies deferred maintenance, physical needs and deficiencies, and material building code violations that affect the property's use, structural and mechanical integrity, and future physical and financial needs. A Capital Needs Assessment shall identify any work that must be completed immediately to address health and safety issues, violation of Federal and State law, violation of local code, or any work necessary to ensure that the building can continue to operate as affordable housing. 4. Pro forma Criteria: a. Debt Service Ratio (DSR) for Projects with hard debt service requirements: 1. Project is required to evidence a DSR of no less than 1.15x. on all hard debt service requirements for the first 15 years. b. Debt Service Ratio for Projects with no hard debt service requirements: 1. Project is required to evidence a positive Net Operating Income throughout the 30 -year pro forma period_ c. Hard Debt Service Requirement: 1. Defined as scheduled regular and periodic principal and/or interest payments of project loan obligations made for its direct benefit, as evidences by a note and loan agreement. 2. Applicants are required to support all hard debt service loans and terms with executed lenders' commitment letters, letters of interest, or term sheets. Underwriting Criteria and Requirements: Applicants are required to use the following parameters and assumptions in the preparation of the project pro forma: L Annual Income Inflation Rate of 2% for the first 15 years and Annual Expense Inflation Rate of 3% for the first 15 years, or term of the first mortgage, whichever is greater. ii. Annual Income Inflation Rate of 2% and Annual Expenses Inflation Rate of 2% for the remaining term of affordability_ iii_ Vacancy Rate of no less than 5%. iv. Annual Replacement Reserve Allocation of no less than $300 per unit per year. 5. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment — All proposed multifamily 0 (more than four housing units) HTF projects require a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. For acquisition/rehabilitation projects, the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment should address lead based paint and asbestos. 6. Developer Fee — For new construction, the maximum developer fee is 15% of total development costs or $3,750,000 (whichever is less). For acquisition/rehabilitation, the maximum developer fee is 10% of the acquisition costs and 15% of the rehabilitation costs, or $3,750,000 (whichever is less). Vlll SELECTION CRITERIA The following selection criteria shall be used in the evaluation of HTF Applications: 1. Extent and Seriousness of the Identified Needs (Max. 100 pts.) — The project demonstrates that the needs and priorities of the community will be met. The project will provide affordable housing to extremely low income persons. 2. Consolidated Plan Priorities (Max. 100 pts.) — The extent to which the project proposes accomplishments that will meet the rental housing objectives for both the HHFDC and the County. The HTF is primarily a production program meant to add units to the supply of affordable housing for extremely low-income households. Merits of the application in meeting the priority housing needs of the County where the project is located such as accessible to transit or employment centers, housing that includes green building and sustainable development features or housing that serves special needs populations; 3. Need for HTF Funds (Max 100 pts.) — The applicant demonstrates the need for HTF funding. All sources of funding are secured and or committed to complete the project. No other source of funds can replace HTF resources. 4. Results to be Achieved (Max 100 pts.) — The project would resolve the problem. All other actions needed to support the project have been committed and are clearly demonstrated. The project proposes accomplishments that will meet the rental housing objectives for both the HHFDC and the County. The HTF is primarily a production program meant to add units to the supply of affordable housing for extremely -low income households. Merits of the application in meeting the priority housing needs to the County where the project is located, such as, accessible to public transportation, employment centers, housing that includes green building and sustainable development features or housing that serves special needs population, will be given. 5. Budget and Funding (Max 100 pts.) — Project pro forma to cover a minimum 30 year HTF affordability period and include rents that are affordable to extremely low-income households. Priority to be given for projects with extended affordability periods and project based rental assistance. Firm financial commitments from other funding sources (non-federal funding sources) are secured to evaluate project timeliness to expend HTF funds. 6. Site Selection Standards Information (Max. 100 pts.) — The applicant demonstrates site control. Site control shall be substantiated by providing evidence in the form of an executed lease or sales option agreement, fee simple deed, executed land lease, or any other documentation acceptable to the County. Evidence of site control must be provided for all proposed sites. There are no delinquencies against the proposed project. The proposed project has appropriate zoning or zoning exemptions. The project has secured firm commitments for utilities, to include but not limited to, electrical, water, sewer/waste water etc. 7. Environmental Concerns — (Max. 100 pts.) — An Environmental Assessment has been completed and does not indicate any environmental concerns. 8. Additional Actions Needed — (Max. 50 pts_) — The project fully resolves the identified problem. No further action will be needed in order to complete the project. 9. Compliance with Federal Overlay Statutes (50 pts.) — Federal Overlay Statutes are applicable to all projects selected for funding. Possible problems are considered in the review. Examples of Federal Overlay Statutes include Equal Employment Opportunity, Environmental Reviews etc. The applicant submitted all required documentation to support compliance with Federal Overlay Statues. 10. Project Management (Max. 100 pts.) — The applicant clearly documents the necessary qualifications and experience to obligate HTF dollars and undertake the funded activity in a timely manner. Staff demonstrates extensive training and experience relative to their functions. Applicant has excellent previous experience and capacity for managing grant funds. 11. Past Performance (Max. 100 pts.) —The applicant demonstrates a proven record of experience with comparable projects and has experience in developing and managing projects of similar type and scope. The applicant also demonstrates experience with other comparable projects. Successful Recipient(s) will receive a Notice of Award, which will state that the County's intent to award HTF funds is subject to approval by the approving authorities of the County, HHFDC and HUD, IX MAXIMUM PER-UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY LIMITS Each year, HHFDC must establish maximum limitations on the total amount of HTF funds that may be invested per-unit for development of non -luxury rental housing projects. The HOME Program Maximum Per -Unit Subsidy Limits have been adopted for the HTF program. The development costs of affordable rental housing across the state are generally higher in comparison with the HOME subsidy limits. However, due to the limited funding, the HTF projects will require leveraging with other significant sources of funds. The HOME subsidy limit provides a reasonable maximum to develop a greater number of HTF assisted units throughout the state. The following table reflects the maximum per unit subsidy limits by bedroom size for 0 housing assisted with HTF within the State of Hawaii, for PY 2018. Bedrooms PY 2018 HTF Maximum Per -Unit Subsidy Limit 0 $ 141,088 1 $ 161,738 2 $ 196,672 3 $ 254,431 4+ $ 279,285 X REHABILITATION STANDARDS The County of Hawaii has elected to utilize HTF for the development of new rental housing projects rather than rehabilitation projects. Therefore, Rehabilitation Standards are not relevant to the County's 2018 HTF Allocation. X m COUNTY OF HAWAII 2 018 ACTION PLAN OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN (2015 - 2019) Q�Q'QAµENro,m.+DGS SF 424 &a The SF 424 is part of the CPMP Annual Action Plan. SF 424 form "Q@qM D��LOQ fields are included in this document. Grantee information is linked from the 1 CPMP.xIs document of the CPMP tool. Complete the fillable fields (blue cells) in the table below. The other items are pre -filled with values from the Grantee Information Worksheet. ite Submitted IacanHldentEfier Type of Submission ate Received by state Pate Identifier kpplication re-application ate Received by HUD ederal Identifier Z Construcb&n a Construction Non Construction I Non Construction -X Pplicant Information _ aunty of Hawai' i oil59999 HAWAII STATE PROGRAM _ ) Wailuku Drive 9-463-6073 A. Dyer Identification Number .ocal Government: County ue of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbcrs; Desrriptive s) (cities, Counties, localities etc.); Estimated Funding IG Project Titles Paradise Park Wildland Brush Truck jisition, Kulaimano Elderly Renovations, Hale Maluhia 's Shelter improvements, IGheipua Family Shelter •ovements, Boys and Girls Club Improvements, Boys Girls Club Van Acquisition, Administration, Planning & Amount 52,528,055.00 otal Funds Leveraged for CDBG-based Proiect(s) of Housing & Comm of Management i Cou Other Type if necessary: Other Type a ption nt U.S. Department a jsinl} and Urban Developmen nt Project(s); Areas Affected by HUD Grantrs) Leverageddescnbe _ Additional State Funds Leveraged Grantee Funds Leveraged ther (Describe) '�'�. 4.239 Proiect Ttles Kaloko Heights Affordable Housing, Base Rental Assistance Program, Administration, 8& Fair Housing :Grant Amount $2.375.000.00 ISAdditlohal HUD es Affected by HOME Projects) SF 424 Page 1 Version 2.0 dditional Federal Funds Leveraged Additional State Funds Leveraged ocally Leveraged Funds Grantee Funds Leveragednticipated Program Income er(Describe) al Funds Leveraged For HOME -based Projects) It tional Housing Trust Fund 4.275 HTF F Project Titles cription of Areas Affected by HTF Projects HTF GrantAmount $1,425,000.00 dditional HUD Grant(s)-Leveraged rescribe Additional Federal Funds Leveraged Addiltional State Funds Leveraged Locally Leveraged Funds —rV Grantee Funds Leveraged Anticipated Program income ther(Descn total rands Leveraged for HTF Praject(s) ergency Shelter Grants Program 14.231 ESG .SG Project Titles 5escdption of Areas Affected by ESG Project(s) .. ESG Grant Amount dditional HUD-Grant(s) Leveraged esc0be Additional Federal Funds Leveraged SAdditional State Funds Leveraged Locally Leveraged Funds Grantee Funds Leveraged Anticipated Program Income Other (Describe) otal Funds Leveraged for ESG-based Project(s) Congressional Districts of: Is application subject to review by state Executive Order _ App(cant Districts Pf ect Districis 12372 Process? Is the applicant delinquent on any federal debt? If Yes This application was made available to the "Yes" please include an additional document state EO 12372 recess for review on DATE explaining the situation. N No Pr ram is not covered b EO 12372 El Yes ®No ❑ NIA Program has not been selected by the state for review SF 424 Page 2 Version 2.0 Executive Summary AP -OS Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction The County of Hawaii is required to summit a Consolidated Plan (CP) to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in order to receive its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The purpose of the County's CP is to ensure that jurisdictions receiving direct federal assistance utilize and develop a plan for its housing and related needs of very low -,low-, and moderate -income families in a way that improves the availability and affordability of decent, safe and sanitary housing within a suitable living environment. The County's CP has three major sections: Housing & Special Needs Housing; Homeless; and Community Development. The County's CP provides goals, priorities, needs, and data used to develop the plan for how the County intends to administer the HUD CDBG Program. The State of Hawai'i's CP provides background, direction, and a plan for how the State intends to administer HUD's Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME), National Housing Trust Fund (HTF), Emergency Solution Grant (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) to assist in meeting the housing needs of Hawai'i's citizens. HOME and HTF funds are allocated between the three neighbor -island counties on a three year rotation. The County's Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) reviewed the 2016 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing and noted the following impediments were listed: • Not allowing Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). • Disallowance of multiple kitchens in house design. • "Not in My Backyard" opposition to special needs group housing. 2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan This could be a restatement of items or a table listed elsewhere in the plan or a reference to another location. It may also contain any essential items from the housing and homeless needs assessment, the housing market analysis or the strategic plan. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM The County of Hawaii anticipates that the County's 2018 CDBG allocation will be $2,500,000.00. In addition, the County anticipates receiving $28,055.00 of program income from the Residential Repair Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No. 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) Program (RRP) for a total of $2,528,055.00. To meet the County's five year 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan, Priorities and Objectives, the following projects will be included in the 2018 Action Plan. 2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan, Part 2 2018 CDBG Proiects Paradise Park Fire Station - Wildland 4X4 Brush Truck - $270,000.00, Kulaimano Elderly Renovations - $850,000,00, Hale Maluhia Men's Shelter Roof & ADA Improvements - $151,742.00, Kiheipua Family Shelter -Roof & Kitchen Renovations - $137,753.00, Boys and Girls Club -Gym and Paving Improvements $571,560.00, Boys and Girls Club -Van Acquisition - $47,000.00, Administration, Planning and Fair Housing - $500,000.00. Total: $2,528,055.00 The CDBG project amount for all projects may change to accommodate the actual amount of grant funds or program income received or if there are any cancelled project(s) or reprogramming of CDBG funds. In its efforts to expedite and timely implement its projects, the Public is advised that the County of Hawaii may utilize County funds for the Kulaimano Elderly Renovations project to incur pre -award cost under the CDBG program that will not exceed 250 of current CDBG allocation. This is in accordance with the CDBG regulations 24 CFR 570.200 (h) (1), Reimbursement for pre -award costs. HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) PROGRAM Kaloko Heights Affordable Housing - $1,400,000.00, Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA) - $850,000.00, OHCD Administration - $125,000.00. Total: $2,375,000.00. Should the County of Hawaii receive any program income it will be applied to the Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program. If there are any cancelled or reprogramming of HOME funds it may be applied to any eligible HOME project. NATIONAL HOUSING TRUST FUND (HTF) Kaloko Heights Affordable Housing - $1,350,000.00, OHCD Administration - $75,000.00. Total: $1,425,000.00. The 2018 CDBG projects meet the Objectives and Outcomes which are identified in the County's 2015- 2019 Consolidated Plan. The housing projects meet the affordable housing objective by creating new affordable housing and/or sustaining existing housing through renovations and repairs. The public facility projects meet the suitable living environment objective by renovating and rehabilitating the Hale Maluhia Men's Shelter, Kiheipua Family Shelter and the Boys and Girls Club, Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/20181 2 3. Evaluation of past performance This is an evaluation of past performance that helped lead the grantee to choose its goals or projects. Each year, The County of Hawaii reports its progress in meeting the five-year and annual goals in the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). The County of Hawaii has consistently satisfied program mandates and expended funds in a t melt' manner. Furthermore, the County of Hawaii has successfully targeted funds to benefit low and moderate income persons and communities throughout the island. A copy of the CAPER is available in the County of Hawaii Office of Housing & Community Development (OHCD) and on the County's website at http://www.hawaiicounty.gov/office- of-housing/. The report states that the County has accomplished the following during the period of July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017: HOUS'NG AND SPECIAL NEEDS: Provided fit new households with Tenant Based Rental Assistance Began construction of 30 rental units at the Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood Phase II project Completed 8 Self -Help homes of the Kumakua Phase 2B project in Hawi, Hawaii Rehabilitated 13 homes for the Residential Repair Program (RRP) IR•mR*13 Completed Point in Time Count Completed 23 Micro Housing Rental units for the homeless in Kailua-Kona, Hawaii. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Completed the acquisition of the Pahoa Fire Station - Wildland Fire Brush Truck Annual Action Plan 2018 OMS Control No. 25060117 {exp 06/30/2018) ILI FAIR HOUSING_ Conducted 36 Fair Housing training sessions for property managers/homeless programs and for the general public - 5 new landlords attended trainings and a total of 112 people attended Conducted 3 Fair Housing training sessions for the staff 126 calls/inquiries were received and given assistance 1,000 inquiries on the County's Fair Housing website 4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process Summary from citizen participation section of plan - The County is required to have a Citizen Participation Plan in its CP (see Appendix D). This plan describes and outlines the County's plan to encourage and inform all citizens, especially persons of extremely -low, very -low and moderate income including minorities, non,English speaking and persons of Limited English Proficiency (LEP), as well as persons with mobility, visual or hearing impediments, to participate in the development of the County's CP, along with any amendments to the CP, and the County's performance report. The citizen participation process as outlined in the Citizen Participation Plan includes public hearings, consultation meetings, 30 -day review and comment period on the County's draft CPr County's draft Annual Action Plan (AP), Hawaii County Housing Agency/Finance Committee Meetings/County Council Meetings and a public notice announcing the availability of the County's final CP and AP.. Public Hearings. The County began its 2018 Annual Action Plan Citizen Participation Process in October of 2017. The County held its annual public hearings in Pahala, Pahoa, Kailua,Kona, Honokaa, and Hilo to present an overview of the Consolidated Plan process, to encourage citizens to offer input concerning housing, homeless, special needs and community development needs and to discuss the past use of funds and accomplishments. In addition, the members of the public were provided with information about the 2018 CDBG and HOME application process and were introduced to the new National Housing Trust Fund Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Congo' Nc 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 4 Program (HTF). The County informed participants of the County's CP priorities and provided an opportunity for participants to provide their concerns or comments. The draft 2018 Action Plan was available for public review and comment from February 16, 2018 through March 19, 2018. Public and Private Agencies Consultation Meetings: As stated above, in October 2017, the County conducted Public Hearings island -wide to inform the public about the 2018 CDBG, HOME application process and to introduce the new National Housing Trust Fund Program (HTF). Members of the public were provided with information on CDBG, HOME and the HTF programs. An overview of the draft priorities and goals were also presented. The participants were asked to provide input on the county's draft priorities and goals established as a result of community input at the various public hearings. In addition to these consultations, the OHCD also informed each Council Member representing all districts in the County of Hawaii of the CP process and inquired if they had any projects that would meet the draft priorities within their district. 5. Summary of public comments This could be a brief narrative summary or reference an attached document from the Citizen Participation section of the Con Plan. Public comments on the draft 2018 Action Plan will be received throughout the 30 -day Public Comment Period. The draft 2018 Action Plan was available for public view and comments from February 16, 2018 through March 19, 2018. No comments to the 2018 Annual Action Plan were received. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them If public comments are received during the public comment period and are not accepted by the County of Hawaii, the comments will be summarized here along with the County's reasons for not accepting them. 7. Summary The CP is a comprehensive planning document which identifies the housing and community development needs and priorities for the County of Hawai'i for the next five years. It sets forth the County's strategies and objectives in addressing these needs and provides a framework for the Annual Action Plan, which details the specific projects and activities the county will undertake in each of the five years to carry out the CP. Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control Na: 2506-0117 jexp. 06130/2018) 5 L _a a +� O in L nn c O C m ,� O 3 0o a +=ra — '^s ay a ° m �. c a a a .v+ ° o _ 0 E E E _❑ a s m O o a o ° u O a4-1 cE O 7 7 E D Z C u t a a v u° � o .5 c a? � E �+ � = d C O V .Ln C C c 4- en U m �:: t E m d m E O E 7 E 4- C lL }" W of = ,r L -O 13E E E In t� E C a •° m L O u O u O u O a❑ m N cz oz 06 0 to 00 E O +1 41 .0 3 c 4 - E ' VI •LA '&n a+ C a L m m O x Z 2 C .a cr 7 p LJ 2 O VI CL '" z CL 0 0 0 �' u LL H ` m� a w CL D O O v, ► a ,� u a c m .a 9n CLO w LU m M LnO M m C m u V O 'O H c m a oo Q E c a c ro L CL _ 2 w c p on ,n +n vi O 7 u A 0 M 7 ,f_, vi tm +' z c o +' m ¢ w 40 _ a. c m a c H OO L LA a C N d 0 i� NLU W .a L CL Ln (U C c E 2 m m E 'E z z z M❑ = p O L O 'a � -- t D O o a� o �uu Y Ln 41s U a, "-0 L tC4 Y y Li -o a Q1 C a w o 4 .E _ a m m I m Q p V ,n ui O U! u m c m C = S= .._ C u ° D 00 Ll L a � C m CL N H u a O a •n to E m o a c ° ° u _ CJ Ola w y in b4 o Ln tn m O Q a c O ° ° a Ln o c o U Y 4. c N in ina, n c 'o LM .- M c O � d o m? H o y CL a u L O❑ U c u al u} m u O i 0 0 m �• u mLn fA Z i+ C N b0 L O O +. �` L l7 C N E N Ln Q t U ¢ L ° m 00 M 0�. a c z �n m o m o °- o a, c CA L ,� E :c N O. = m m Q u m M c E v p c 41 `� �; 0l t a J Q a E ¢ �, -a > c E a Y CL L L Lid V ¢ m O D E y dJ n U by ❑ O ILL- i V N p to } a O O u s s a 7 u a u m 4 a in ❑. z *O a v1 ¢ ai L E CL a au v d a C 7 E E O u no c .0; a 0 CI u 0 :m 3 s 0 c a u a n M 00 r�-I uo rn 0 w o� Z a c 0 t a.. Ln co lA co ri an co 0 cc X m LLLLI r - AP -10 Consultation — 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(1) 1. Introduction The County began its 2018 Annual Action Plan Citizen Participation Process in October of 2017. The County held its annual public hearings in Pahala, Pahoa, Kailua-Kana, Honokaa, and Hilo to present an overview of the Consolidated Plan process, to encourage citizens to offer input concerning housing, homeless, special needs and community development needs, and to discuss the past use of funds and accomplishments. In addition, the members of the public were provided with information about the 2018 CDBG and HOME application process and were introduced to the new National Housing Trust Fund Program (HTF). The County informed participants of the County's Cf' priorities and provided an opportunity for participants to provide their concerns or comments. The draft 2018 Annual Action Plan was available for public review and comment from February 15, 2018 through March 19, 2018. The OHCD also informed County agencies and each Council Member representing all districts in the County of Hawaii of the CP process and inquired if they had any projects that would meet the draft priorities within their district. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(1)) Beginning in 2014, the County held consultation meetings during its annual public hearings to hear the concerns or comments to the County's draft priorities for its 2015-2019 CP. An overview of the draft priorities and goals were presented. The participants were asked to provide input on the county's draft priorities and goals established as a result of community input at public hearings. Overall, there were 46 participants: 25 in Hilo District, and 21 in Kona District, representing not-for-profit service providers, housing services providers, developers, and county and state agencies. In addition to these consultations, the OHCD also informed each Council Member representing all districts in the County of Hawaii of the CP process and provided them with the opportunity to inform the County of any projects that would meet the draft priorities within their district. In its efforts to get additional feedback from as many community members as possible, the County mailed need surveys to public service providers and other government agencies. The County did a follow-up response inquiry and was able to get 37 responses from 100 mail outs. In October 2017, the County conducted Public Hearings island -wide to inform the public about the 2018 CDBG, HOME application process and to introduce the new National Housing Trust Fund Program (HTF)_ Members of the public were provided with informatlon on CDBG, HOME and the HTF programs. An overview of the draft priorities and goals were also presented and reviewed. The participants were asked to provide input on the county's draft priorities and goals established as a result Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2606 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) of community input at the various public hearings. In addition to these consultations, the OHCD also informed each Council Member representing all districts in the County of Hawaii of the CP process and provided them with an opportunity to inform the County of any projects that would meet the draft priorities within their district. Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness. The State of Hawaii is the primary agency that provides homeless funds to homeless service providers. The County actively participates in the Bridging the Gap (Neighbor island counties) and Statewide (consisting of the State and Bridging the Gap) Continuum of Care. These groups focus on approaches to ending homelessness. The County is also a component of the Interagency Council on Homelessness - a conglomerate of Government and service providers that seek solutions to address statewide chronic homelessness through mainstream re -programming. Participation in the Continuum also allows the County to acquire other HUD funds for activities that address homeless needs within the County. The County will continue to participate in all levels of collaboration in a proactive effort to address the needs to its homeless community. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the operation and administration of HMIS The County of Hawaii is not a recipient of Emergency Solution Grant Funds. The State of Hawaii allocates these funds to eligible homeless providers. 2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdiction's consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities Annual Action Plan 2018 OMS Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 05/30/2018) 9 C Y 14 N to o Q 7 a u C 4! a N C O N CU LM CL Ln a) G %. aJ O GJ E Z O tn O u u u .> m Ln Lm t.0 01 CL JJ 10 ro m Q a 0 u u C w to to O Z m W OJ u tr1 A� d R .r C O V .n a w Ln N R N 3 R H: m t Y O uu a IA r t C fE d a a a a 0 c 0 u l7 w -0 q u C- 0 0 u Q. Q al aJ � � W 3 i �ro i Y � 0 fa L u O � 3 7 N CA ao u u to O C O u w O c L O w m c O Q m L ai O L Q 'O C b d LA N c V O N (U CL u d do a G m w I i 0! a O 4- a r CU :3 4/ a U CL !j C � � O O a Li O O N c utj o C .2 -a is CL N a, u C aJ to R R CL O Ee Lel M1• O G f9cu Q r U a u m L di a o Cu L CLU en tLa Lu a CL 41 C y � _ a 3 u Q 'CIO a 5 0, � r m' C a u . cn eo a a L In , y L 0 r IN � L m O O qn C ?� a m � L d O y � EO L s 3 o a U , � m 3 Ln a O cu CO x F- LA c O m P4 , a to m U l7 01 a C c 1 � P 1 m I C fa a a L O u ap o m 7 Z C O U m C LA i E - 'm +ri m C = f° o M o = a o a r+r «° a Ln t m aO ++ to C 3 N LU a ma E a t � Q u m tn 0 a d C s m +� C +n C O tw Y C a 4J m E u L •y 0 CL 3 CL a in 0 N 4. Z u an u :3 a M 0 m 4 to C qj m O rytl r y C y N a Q -a E C C C ate+ � < o aO Mc U u a 0 m o d C ate.+ m L n 0 N o u U r a C LA C m LM °, E 0 C m � CU >. U C G a m 0 C }L- i% u al C O a:+ m M m CL C QI u C aJ -a 0 O d m E W L 0 w LU H N V U O CL c 0 Q. L.. m IL C m N u O N ri OO C aj N O to a m u m CL E .0 .r: LnC n3 H ar u O L O CL C GJ N t0 a Ln t, 0 N v - O O u O u d CL c 0 !2 .E m a c N u c _m _ 0 u Q co r -I G N Ln C m au aj _T C m 0 u a s m = cE u c d a CLI _ C Y m Ln Q u u m c 'C a+ Ln a u Q _ M ++ C E cu o Q,0 o o c, o c M u a c m s= m c L_ _a 'Q -d a a ¢ Q m u c o .d _ E •E -ate 0 co 0 rn L O Y u O m m Y Q 3 D. .} Q N 4 L7 n tA c E a, - a = a a+ N O c ra O V p V Q " rn W d = .0 C m e a J + •` +z �` L o 0 ro b c $ o L m o L O 0 rn c ro d t.M a 0 0 aj C mtj U + — CL U 0 c ro aj `� — rho _ 0 d 'nij C W i 1A'Q ycu tv d U O r° o° E ° E a c CU u ^ ul u 3 L a CU O ` O v L m co u 3 u QJ CL n c LA 0 n a7 O O U f° C u `6 n U � o0 W, (D m Q w a L C m Co .a i 0 oN 0 7 c Ln 3 d y m C Y = N Y C y aJ aJ 00 a) '° r%jo D0 CL u E u m o U w ai CL 0 4-L y ra al d a] u Q 0= m E L = O ❑ Q1 L a d ro L' W O = 7' C al E u7 O_ ani Ea c a 0 0 Z 0 ai o 0 u a 0° a C '' o u m c u y a_ > m ai E C Q> E L C V c E � w m 'O O r aJ m O 6. a C c •� C • E m y c '-' c m 0 cCD E O aj ai o sn w d 3= aE -0 E •n c CL f E N °i N Q Q m O IA ci o i •u :3ai O Qi c a 7 O u O7 c N a_+ Ln Vi N Q C 0 { I m Y = Y c .0 L n al Q Q m a C L i a} Y p E p, U ajO L- m = u rn C m ,n CU +� rma C 17 0 .O 0 'r -o 0 aCl 0 _ ono u n ro E a 0 E CL 0 N' �' > p aJ �' y L aQw z b 2 CL Q. c C L E `� m m N— a, d. `o M M .0 o 7 m o v1 v, LLMm c° °.-,° c L ai L n y� 0 a❑ Y 0 Ln a u a O Z ^I 0 ? a7 vui rl 0 C m = m O E rn L m C m y+ s m C Q H N In 0. L o u '� ❑ != 'p CU q1 IL he E O C m u rd al E Z ma m L 2 O a1 L o ,`?, CU Iu E° � a w e t w 3 w ai c Q o. 0. o c L� c. ❑ Q CL .°c �° F_ In 0 x LL H 0 C 7 U- :3 m C Ln O 2 m O m z ani N r•1 El 2 0 n� u •a Z u _ a ro 0 L CL m C }m } Q� .j a� L L 0 �u C 3 0 u :m 3 m c m a a, E E 0 u N 0 u :m 3 0 a, E _ N CL u m ai c aj E m C rt CL Q ro 6- 0 a 00 O N 0. a m 0 LS a J V a CL m N C Q1 E m Ln aJ C C- , GJ M ti u u L '0 R Q r E 12 L D! V O t Q Ln aJ N m .0 3 �- O tv C U tip •� O} @ v...11 Q] m" C � t OL uj C r «, oCCL C a'' i Cl) C Vf a y 0 w w o_ f° a M L Y cn O -O U O ate+ 'y �-C L Q' j cuCL C C O i CL i O } 7 G! O .S N d Q_ y -C Ou ria y p aj U dJ vi t �^u C O en O +� N a th V 4+ p aJ ai ''' (L)y m V al to +�+ .N Ln C tm ro a+ a) LA aliQ � %. cu •U ul 7 Y •O aJ �"� Ln C ? C r6 0 LA j +� +� 'C ra O p 0- E ,r E 7- ro N E .� C m p_ -a O aJ V C O vi j W rn a7 ,� C aA Y " X o 'i 7 _ W- > V C vpi a a+ V , U w 4`I } > a"' i aJ d m-0 'G O �p aJ a) N LA p a0! Z 7 O C W C C 'i : 2 w L ", C O U U O 'C m m a- o c 'm a1 u 3 ry E m u 2L 0 0 N O O CL n W O l0 O N O 2 a' m 4.1 O C a) s. cu f 3 W C a1 C EB O C. U a) aJ N m .0 3 �- O tv C U tip •� O} @ v...11 Q] m" C � t OL uj C r «, oCCL C a'' i Cl) C Vf a y 0 w w o_ f° a M L Y cn O -O U O ate+ 'y �-C L Q' j cuCL C C O i CL i O } 7 G! O .S N d Q_ y -C Ou ria y p aj U dJ vi t �^u C O en O +� N a th V 4+ p aJ ai ''' (L)y m V al to +�+ .N Ln C tm ro a+ a) LA aliQ � %. cu •U ul 7 Y •O aJ �"� Ln C ? C r6 0 LA j +� +� 'C ra O p 0- E ,r E 7- ro N E .� C m p_ -a O aJ V C O vi j W rn a7 ,� C aA Y " X o 'i 7 _ W- > V C vpi a a+ V , U w 4`I } > a"' i aJ d m-0 'G O �p aJ a) N LA p a0! Z 7 O C W C C 'i : 2 w L ", C O U U O 'C m m a- o c 'm a1 u 3 ry E m u 2L 0 0 N O O CL n W O l0 O N O 2 a' m �2 2 CL m .� 'E 2 c u E �0 L E 'E � I 7 Li �E c �Ln E �� o u � t 0 0 � m 5 0 2 § 0 m E k 3 u k � / § U CL -j = CN \ c 2 k rq rqr [ El 2 0 U k k k 3 - \ 5 c W \ � � .\ g o U§ƒ/ 3 0 3 R c |\ � o 2 � 2 C CU 2 CL / 0 / a ' c m � k\\ E E) 2 cu .�k R E m 0 C $� 2 ],o / I § c 0 _ § k § 5 , / 3 _ r- 2 I! w 3 o 2 CL a CL 0 2 § 0 m E k 3 u k � / § U CL -j = CN \ c 2 k rq rqr [ El 2 0 LA c 4- (D m 0 u 4- 0 d C Q L- u a) m C m C. 0 m aj D N •� a-1 3 Ec r E O N N H f0 C ' 'us 3 V � L 0 3 u w O cc m i x C =O CLO Lu C 3 0 a c r Ln Gl A C (O c C O Ln N a.i m E x CL CL m LA N v u a C O u cu r m IA IA O CL 0 O. 4�- m a, c o inm C � Ln O .0 c m CL m u c a C m CL c LO u ¢ N c c m u CA C T7 .(U GJ N LA m N >. m p O++ yt.+ C, a ;° 0 ' = C u C t 47 Cm `~ 5 a C O C m w m u •� A � != � ate' f0 a+ C cu C 3 m 7 a 4J ° u ° u Li 3 m C y o O v> o Waal oCD Ln Ln O FQ N Ln L N � � V V y is L 0 y E a ori o o CL cco N m O CL LU p d 3 m � O' Q G N a N Ln C LA u C C W - O Zm c � u '� E E Q bG E d to rn y •.3 C .= O C u p u C O lu � O fl. a¢mLu a a w Ln a o C � cu N W � a ho coa C m CL c LO u ¢ N c c CL E Lu > � 2MA ru LU F ƒ ® C I7U m R % 22 ° � § ° J 2 . m K £ m 0 c m c e o y a m Q Q m a § u k\§ S 4E 2 m 0 2 2 2§ x 2 0 2 c § c k LL k� o k c tO c 3� 2 u / c § E®' / k k q 0 E 2 ƒ ƒ cU / ƒ % \CL = $ § a / o 0% Etn R§ E e E 7 U k» \ k 2 B 2 m \ U 5 e� S (M § S 0 $ 2 � k c $ $3�CL LM C u ' • c _ a � Ln E§%§toj 3 « < 2 E m r % t {� / S o Q a 0_ a � _ R � § m � © M o \ � 2 Cr � 2 ECD igg_ CL E Lu a 0 2MA m 22 m K � t cCL c c § § / 2 0 = $ § a Etn E 2 s 2 k» k k/ � S 2 S 0 LM a � E t / o Q a � � k \ k 2 § ■ j u ca a 0 c r. V m 0 a A z N M C 0 d In M N M L Ln CL u a :0 A °ca O 3 N C �. CL = H 1 ; 4� m ,� c N ql0 3 _ = 341 M OO m Z in C Q ', 7 .0 A '� t� Cul '0 ►3 �fvfII N 0 +r S }'a u u 0 m C u CL c. c C m ro C Ou u R a L =o C o a m s N a C �, m 0 3 W= w c c O t c mo m ° w a. 3 v1 ; m o m m- W -a o i -a O 0 a L - 4- w L a +, _ w U Ln C N O u Q C C C (� ? j41 FLL- j ,, C = LL 7 C X 3 m +s+ LO 0 v3- 2 u O o O C Ln N r -i cu 73 0 o I- o �• 0 Lr o N r CL �-t I Qr O O � 7 0 d w M :: 0 0 r. x L� Lr, a o O h O N crI C ? ? c 3 a m o m c j ato N C ,, _ L _ C Cn +° ^ +J M a 5 c c 3 c Q i i u z m M Ln CL u a A L O 3 N C i CL = H 1 0 3 0 L 0 C 0 Q. u N a .a m e>4 C u us w .a C 3 w v Q 'O c m a m w c 7 •i Q. a u 0 N a if appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan None. Discussion Annual Action Plan 201$ OMS Control No 2506.0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 19 An W V O C m _tA O tD C EO O N m 0 P: L �CLI L (Li o M C O Ln0 t/1 ma Ln E m L 3 °° � +. 'r .� c [ N O Q C i O Iv J cu W> _ E ro s m m d c a u — L m -0 of 0 C ,� C 00 C O a+ U ISA 0 7 0 vNi 4J 0 ;t+ Q1 C •7 y = O L Q Ln i Qi ate+ aL+ y� (A U 2 GJ LU C u o 'u ° o `^ Q c 'a o Y '^ O L in 41 � L L 0a � L O CO:, u = cu E O O QJ N y C W M O E� E o n, y QJ a "a al L Q U a 2 r z m 0 as E Ln m p o O c Ln c m 00 ❑ 0 N 0 C th u m t/ti m LL l7 C7 m pq u u •C U in IN/1 CA CJ Od N N d0 y U. N .0 u U r+ N 7 LLN 7 "O U a O O z a m� m z LL i u CL C M O O _ O _ O O �0Q:3 :33 =1 m u 2 Y u z 2 U u u L w C up OC •7 Q7 E •� Q7 t(U E a? E 4J C C CL O C O C- m 00 W h4 u = E °z E ° M .c CU E E> o f `o a O o m O a w X 0 0 tt= O z u❑ z u o a m x Q= °� � � � c 1-4 CU0 0 0 0 0 r4 r4 ` L Ln Lit Ln Ln to ra N} O O O O O N fV N N N di E °-' Ln Y Y c O :r = c tiCl 41 o 0 •f6 C Ln b 7 L U 7 L7- j cn : t r. 00 LA v > O r OJ N Ln = E E 4--C C a. - w u a. _= 2 eY m -a a �^ a :Ln] r4 N M O N m 0 EO C14 q k § co ¥ M k r4 m ■ r_ < � cu ELn c LA � � � 7 k U L -k ° m 2 ° k e e � ' m m 0 o Z » tn k § 0 i u\ ° k E § k c u c S wl 3 § o a$ /\ § k k j" 2\ 2 u$ I/ U 2 a § G 2 £ � 2 k � @ 2 o / & j ■ a 7: r 3 .. # 0 k \ £ k \ k k k 2<� 2$ / z 2 2 k kk r- k � o/ ■ o a 0 b o a \ 5 Uj� & g Lr) E g q° 2 00 in R in % S � � b cau / � 2 %§ u£ « DO c - _ c _ c _ c u § k 2 k 0 0 =\ C xEn x _ z IL V) M_ 0 0 0 % 0 [!cu Z� �� �: = �� k k k m k m k m k m u z u z u= Q= utn= E s�� Ln tu r ' e w _ E ° Ln k LAE 0 cc 6 E E 2$ k o= c E$ o§ c E & E E 2 k R<$ k% ¢ z 2 Z 0 3 u c� � � V q >' N rq r4 � N N Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln N rqk ry \N _ 2 E 5 « m M ' c I c • u° c z . 2 m ' ° m / E a - $ cu M k vi Z ai k/ Ln- o§ k 2 CL L X: ui Z =<_ = u C e 0- VI o � � n ■ cri C14 q k § co ¥ M k r4 m ■ r_ < � LE C 0 C! v C aC E aJ .o E o c r + r Z a z fl. u O 7. M 41 m .� U' l7 ❑ C7 C7 ❑ s L Z .ai tS1 (tl u u IWA M a H t9 R tljn f9 ea w O N � a O O a C O aJ O O a♦ C7 Q o i7 C7 ❑ w L 0 u � w Q O O L � � � L O C L L m J+ C to @ L L a tA um � � C a E LM G y m ¢7 QJ E p uaci ra o a ai Ln L a o C a. L . c -a ❑ l7 Y ro a N p v7 U C a N M � CO M L _ O ` s 3 _ O to c Y a O L j E u01 L C a C a to i d U u Ln E o m 3CLaj L a m = H > cu T m LU Ln a M cn o to Y C r aJ E L a * ra 1!1 y _ O i.+ en 0 O O Er - O �' C t er L QCL a C = a E LL C H 7 anal cin C a pp Cl) '�/L L 'N .0 d a a � z E z- a a. � H a z C! C aC E aJ .o E o r + r Z a z fl. u O u 41 m U' l7 ❑ C7 C7 ❑ r1 1 fV a CJ aJ c a r C O O 41 m Z a Z Z s L Z .ai tS1 (tl IWA M l4 H t9 R tljn fL ea w O G a O O a O O aJ O O a♦ C7 Q o i7 C7 ❑ w u 0 u w Q M I gr I LA I LO N 2 0 ■ °§ J c w E c e 2 u \ k k k u \ u k � k LU w CL 2 \ ra IIAJ 0 k 2 � = W 3 W ƒ E (U 'D z 2 . ' 2 LU a E § m » § E a) > . t . ƒ be / k k /aj .2 k S � 9 7 e c� g x E 0 \ k -o -0. C E o o = � L o k ai E aj 7 / u u E \ k u 2 2 tAkk 2 > W 4) CL R D a 2 « c E k k E ® 2 J k % E 3 2Lnk > LA 2 E u % 2 i z 7 Q f 3 A& j 2 k Ln k CL bo 2 k k f 2 � f � « k — § 3 >- $ / 2 a 2 6 2 w < \ m 7j 7\` E k 3 Q u :3 u u a ' •-2 �. ai c x / f i/ s S ■ °§ J c w E c e E u \ k k k u \ u k k Z w 0 ra IIAJ k k k W W % � k / w E _ § > k § k CL j:� � § / � � 0 / Cr 0 Ln � 0 u K 5 % C Lnm u $ — \ � CL k } Ln 0 w CO S \ \ CL Ln .0 k cu IL m rN k °§ J ; E 9 u \ k k k u \ u k a w 0 � m rN k Projects AP -35 Projects — 91-220(d) Introduction For the 2018 CDBG allocation there are a total of 6 CDBG projects that were selected. It consists of 1 housing project, 4 public facility projects and 1 public service project. The 1 housing project consists of rehabilitation improvements to a senior rental housing facility. The 4 public facilities projects involves the rehabilitation and/or renovation of 2 homeless shelters and 1 youth facility and the acquisition of a Wildland Brush Truck. The public service project involves the acquisition of a vehicle to provide transportation services to the extremely -low, low and moderate income youths within the co-inty. Projects i# Project Name 1 Paradise Park Fire Station Wildland Brush Truck Acquisition 2 Kulaimano Elderly Renovations 3 Hale Maluhia Men's Shelter - Roof and ADA Improvement 4 Kiheipua Family Shelter- Roof and Kitchen Renovations 5 Boys and Girls Club - Gym and Paving Improvements 6 Boys and Girls Club - Van Acquisition 7 CDBG Administration, Planning and Fair Housing 8 Kaloko Heights Affordable Housing (HTF) 9 HTF Administration Table 7 - Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs Refer to Section SP -25, Priority Needs, of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan. Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 24 Ln rlj al c L 'r M E E 1 I Project Name Paradise Park Fire Station Wildland Brush Truck Acquisition Target Area County of Hawaii Goals Supported Public Facilities - Improvements Needs Addressed Public Facilities Funding CDBG: $270,000 Description The County Fire Department will use CDBG funds to acquire a new Wildland Brush Truck to provide fire protection to Hawaiian Paradise Park, Orchidland and Makuu. This activity is eligible under 24 CFR 570.201(c) Public Facilities and Improvements. 6/30/2019 The Wildland Brush truck will service the Census Tract 210.05, which qualifies under the National Objective 24 CFR 570.208(a)(1) low and moderate income area benefit activity with a 59.70% low and moderate designation. 15-1575 Paradise Drive, Keaau, HI 96749. Target Date Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Planned Activities Acquisition of new Wildland Brush Truck 2 Project Name Kulaimano Elderly Renovations Target Area County of Hawaii Goals Supported Housing - Elderly/Special Needs Rental Units Needs Addressed Housing Funding Description Target Date Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description CDBG: $850,000 The Office of Housing and Community Development, Development Division, will utilize CDBG funds to renovate the Kulaimano Elderly Housing Project. Renovation activities will be determined by the Needs Assessment currently being conducted for the site. This activity is eligible under 24 CFR 570.202(b)(2) Eligible Rehabilitation and Preservation. 6/30/2019 This project will benefit 49 low and moderate income senior residents and 1 Resident Manager at the Kulaimano Elderly Housing project. This meets the CDBG program National Objective 24 CFR 570.208 (a)(3) Housing Activities. 28-2947 Kumula Street. Pepeekeo, HI 96783 Census Track 201 Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 26 Planned Activities Pending possible county funds and based on the conducted Needs Assessment, the OHCD, Development Division, will utilize county funds under 24 CFR 570.200 (h)(1) Preaward to conduct renovation activities at the project site. 3 Project Name Hale Maluhia Men's Shelter - Roof and ADA Improvement Target Area Goals Supported Public Facilities - Improvements Needs Addressed Public Facilities Funding CDBG: $151,742 Description The Nonprofit, HOPE Services Hawaii Inc., will utilize CDBG funds to design and rehabilitate the roof and ADA accessibility improvements to comply with Fair Housing and ADA. This activity is eligible under 24 CFR 570.201(c) Public Facilities and Improvements. Target Date 6/30/2019 Estimate the number The renovations to Hale Maluh,a Men's Shelter will benefit 150 single and type of families homeless and elderly men within the County of Hawaii. This meets the that will benefit from CDBG Program National Objective 24 CFR 570.208 (a)(2)(i)(A) Low and the proposed activities I moderate income Limited Clientele. Location Description 110 Ululani Street Hilo, HI 96720 Planned Activities This project includes the d=s gn and/or replacement of a 30 year old roof and accessib lity improvements for Fair Housing and ADA compliance. 4 Project Name Kiheipua Fall y Shelter - Roof a rd Kitchen Renovations Target Area County of Hawaii Goals Supported Public Facilities • Improvements Needs Addressed Public Facilities Funding CDBG: $137,753 Description The Non-profit, HOPE Services Hawaii Inc., will utilize CDBG funds to design and replace the roof at 3 on-s'te buildings and to renovate a current kitchen to meet Department of Health Certified Kitchen requirements to feed homeless famil es at the shelter. This activity is eligible under 24 CFR 570.201(c) Public Facilities and Improvements. Target Date 6/30/2019 Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 27 Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 8 Estimate the number These renovations will benefit 200 homeless families. This meets the and type of families CDBG Program National Objective 24 CFR 570.208 (a)(2)(i)(A) Low and that will benefit from Moderate Income Limited Clientele. the proposed activities Location Description 115 KapioIani Street Hilo, Hl 96720 Planned Activities This project involves the design to replace the roof at 3 on-site buildings and to renovate the current kitchen to meet the Department of Health Certified Kitchen requirements. 5 Project Name Boys and Girls Club - Gym and Paving Improvements Target Area County of Hawaii Goals Supported Public Facilities - Improvements Needs Addressed Public Facilities Funding CDBG: $571,560 Description 6 The Non-profit, Boys and Girls Club of the Big Island will utilize CDBG funds to design and renovate the Gym. CDBG will also be used to re- pave the existing driveway and parking area. This activity is eligible under 24 CFR 570.201(c) Public Facilities and Improvements. 6/30/2019 Target Date The Boys and Girls Club facility is located on 100 Kamakahonu Street in Estimate the number and type of families Hilo and serves a youth population in predominately Census Tracts 203, that will benefit from 204 and 205. These Census Tracts qualifies under 24 CFR 57.208 (a)(1) the proposed activities Low and Moderate Income Area Benefit Activity with 55.62% low and moderate income designation. Location Description 100 Kamakahonu Street Hilo, HI 96720 Planned Activities This project involves the design and renovation to an existing gym, which will include but not limited to, roof replacement, refinishing of gym floor, fire and safety code compliance, ADA renovations and re- paving improvements to the existing driveway and parking areas. Boys and Girls Club - Van Acquisition 6 Project Name Target Area County of Hawaii Goals Supported Public Service - Transportation Needs Addressed Public Services Funding CDBG: $47,000 Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 8 Description The Non-profit, Boys & Girls Club of the Big Island will utilize CDBG funds to acquire a 15 passenger van to provide transportation services to low and moderate youth. This project is eligible under 24 CFR 570.201(e) Public Services. Target Date 6/30/2014 Estimate the number The Boys and Girls Club facility is located on 100 Kamakahonua Street in and type of families Hilo and serves a youth population in predominately Census Tracts 203, that will benefit from 204 and 205. These Census Tracts qualifies under 24 CFR 570.208 (a)(1) the proposed activities Low and Moderate Income Area Benefit Activity with a 55.62% low and moderate income designation. Location Description 100 Kamakahonua Street Hilo, HI 96720 Planned Activities This activity involves the acquisition of one (1) fifteen (15) passenger van eligible under 24 CFR 570.201(e) Public Services. 7 Project Name CDBG Administration, Planning and Fair Housing Target Area County of Hawaii f. Goals Supported Needs Addressed Funding CDBG: $500,000 Description CDBG funds will be used to administer and coordinate the County's CDBG and Fair Housing programs to ensure effective and timely project implementation in accordance with all applicable HUD rules and regulations. CDBG funds will also be used to fund present and future planning documents in accordance with Federal rules. The National Objective is 24 CFR 570.206. Target Date 6/30/2019 " Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, HI 96720 Planned Activities Planning and administration. $Project Name Kaloko Heights Affordable Housing (HTF) Target Area County of Hawaii Goals Supported Housing - Affordable Rental Units Annual Action Plan 2018 OMS Control No 250640117 (exp 06/30/2018) 29 Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp_ 06/30/2018) 30 Needs Addressed Housing Funding HOME: $1,400,000 Housing Trust Fund: $1,350,000 owner contribution: $40,884,826 Description The Non-profit, Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC), will utilize National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) to develop an 80 - unit multi -family affordable housing rental complex. This activity meets the State's priority to utilize HTF for new construction of rental housing. Target Date 2/28/2021 Estimate the number This activity will provide 80 units to the extremely low, low and and type of families moderate income families. that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description 73-4577 Nina Lani Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 (TMK: 3-7-3-009-032) Census Tract: 215.07 Planned Activities This project involves the design and development for the construction of a 80 unit multi -family affordable housing rental complex. HTF Administration 9 Project Name Target Area County of Hawaii Goals Supported Needs Addressed Funding Housing Trust Fund: $75,000 Description HTF funds will be used to administer and coordinate the County's HTF program to ensure effective and timely project implementation in accordance with all applicable HTF rules and regulations. Target Date 12/31/2021 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, HI 96720 Planned Activities Planning and administration Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp_ 06/30/2018) 30 AP -50 Geographic Distribution — 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed The County does not allocate funds based on geographic areas. The CDBG, HOME and HTF funds are allocated through a request for proposal (RFP) process which rank and rates project for program eligibility, need and meeting the County's priorities and objectives of the Consolidated Plan. Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of funds County of Hawaii F 100 Table 8 - Geographic Distribution - Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically Not applicable as the County does not allocate funds based on geographic areas. However, preference for the HTF program will be given to applicants who will develop affordable rental housing in areas located near employment, schools, shopping, medical services and public transportation to support self sufficiency. Discussion Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Contra$ No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 31 Affordable Housing AP -55 Affordable Housing — 91.220(g) Introduction _ One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless _ 180 Non -Homeless 40 Special -Needs 66 Total 286 Table 9 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through I Rental Assistance 20 The Production of New Units 72 Rehab of Existing Units 194 q Acquisition of Existing Units 0 Total 286 Table 10 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type Discussion For the 2018 CDBG allocation there are a total of 6 CDBG projects that were selected. It consists of 1 housing project, 4 public facility projects and 1 public service project. The 1 housing project consists of rehabilitation improvements to a senior rental housing facility. The 4 public facilities projects involves the rehabilitation and/or renovation of 2 homeless shelters and 1 youth facility and the acquisition of a Wildland Brush Truck. The public service project involves the acquisition of a vehicle to provide transportation services to the to low and income youths within the county_ Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 {exp. 06/30/201al 32 AP -60 Public Housing — 91.220(h) Introduction Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing The State Hawaii Public Housing Authority manages the public housing throughout the State of Hawaii. Please refer to the State's Consolidated Plan. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership The State Hawaii Public Housing Authority manages the public housing throughout the State �f Hawaii. Please refer to the State's Consolidated Paan. If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance The State Hawaii Public Housing Authority managcs the public housing throughout the State Uf Hawaii. Please refer to the State's Consolidated Plan. ODiscussion Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506.0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 33 AP -65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i) Introduction The County's Consolidated Plan includes the HUD's "Performance Measures Model." The Model sets Objectives, Outcomes, Activities, Indicators, and Output for the next five years. Please see the attached Homeless Performance Measures Model Chart for the County's Homeless objectives. Chronic Homelessness is a priority of this administration and through the administration's efforts the West Hawaii Chronic Homelessness Intervention and Rehabilitation Project (CHIRP) and the East Hawaii Homeless Coalition was established. These new forums now bring the various County Departments to the table to develop collaborat;ons between local government, nonprofit, and service providers. The County completed construction of 23 micro -housing units in West Hawaii, in November, 2016. These units will provide long-term permanent supportive housing for the chronic homeless. In addition to providing shelter, the OHCD is working with various service providers to provide the management of the site in addition to coordinating the needed health care services for these clients. The County is currently working with the Child and Family Services to renovate the Kona Domestic Abuse Shelter. The project proposes to enlarge and remodel the kitchen, create an interior private office space, replace flooring, replace the playground equipment to include a safety fall surface and repair wood railings. Incidents of domestic violence have increased substantially in the past three years. There has been a corresponding increase in the number of community members seeking services at the Kona Domestic Violence Shelter. With the increased usage at the shelter, the facility requires more frequent maintenance, a larger kitchen to accommodate the victim's needs, and private space for the staff to meet with victims. The long-term goal, for the shelter, is to prepare the victim for self-- sufficiency and independence. Once the victims of domestic violence and their children are safe, transitioning them to permanent safe housing and providing and linking them to various services to accomplish these goals becomes the main focus. 1n 2017 the Shelter served 69 unduplicated families comprised of 69 women, and 63 children. The County plans to allocate a total of $289,495.00 of their 2018 CDBG allocation for the rehabilitation/renovation of 2 homeless shelters. The rehabilitation/renovation includes the roof replacement and ADA improvements to the Hale Maluhia Men's Shelter and the roof replacement and kitchen renovations to the Kiheipua Family Shelter. Also in 2018, HTF funds will be utilized, in part, to construct an 80 multi -family affordable housing rental complex to provide housing to the extremely -low, low and moderate income families. Five percent (5%) of the units constructed in this complex will be set aside for eligible families who, 1. are experiencing homelessness; 2- are at -risk of becoming homeless; or 3. transitioning out of an emergency shelter or Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 34 transitional housing program as certified by a federal or state funded homeless service provider. Oescribe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs Hope Services Hawaii, Inc. provides outreach services to assist the homeless persons. They actually drive to the beaches or areas that the unsheltered homeless stay to deliver hygiene products and advise them of the support services that are available to them. Hope Services Hawaii, Inc. also provides case management to homeless persons and works toward placing homeless persons into shelters until permanent housing becomes available. Hope Services Hawaii, Inc. also provides meals for the homeless and transportation to appointments. In 2017, HOPE Services Hawaii Inc., utilized CDBG funds to acquire 2 mobile vehicles to provide outreach to the homeless persons island -wide. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons The County has a plan to address the emergency shelter, transitional housing and permanent housing needs of homeless persons in West Hawaii. Recently, the County completed the West Hawaii Emergency Shelter in Kailua-Kona, Hawaii. The shelter has 31 rooms available for homeless persons. The rooms are filled to capacity every night. The County completed construction of 23 micro-hour;ng units, in West Hawaii, to provide long- term permanent supportive housing for the chronic homeless. The County's Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) retrofitted and delivered 40' x 8' shipping containers that were converted into 4 micro -housing units each. in addition to providing shelter, the OHCD is working with the various service providers and West Hawaii Chronic Homelessness intervention and Rehabilitation Project (CHIRP) participants to provide the management of the site in addition to coordinating the needed health care services for these clients. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB control No 2506.0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 35 recently homeless from becoming homeless again The County's plan is to transition homeless persons from the West Hawaii Emergency Shelter to the Ulu Wini transitional housing and then to the permanent rentai units in Ulu Wini or other permanent housing units in West Hawaii. The rental units at Ulu Wini provides Section 8 project -based vouchers which will assist with rental subsidies, which is another program administered by the Office of Housing and Community Development. The goal is to prevent these individuals and families from becoming homeless again by providing them with case management, counseling, employment and life skills training. This allows for personal growth, family stability, job opportunities and self-sufficiency. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are. being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address mousing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs. The County does not have a formal policy for individuals being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care. These individuals would normally fall under the State's jurisdiction and we as a County would follow the State's policy. However, under the County's Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program, preference is given to applicants who are homeless, victams of domest!c violence, age& out foster care youths and families living in a transitional housi11g program. Discussion In respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs, the County has partially funded, Phase II, of the Mohouli Neighborhood Heights Senior elderly rental housing project, developed by Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC), with HOME funds_ This project consists of 120 elderly rental housing units located in Hilo, Hawaii, Phase I of the project consisting of 60 units, began in April, 2012 and was completed in March, 2014. Phase II of the project consists of 30 units and began construction in January, 2017. The construction of this project was completed in October 2017. Tenant occupancy started in November 2017. The County is providing nutritional and transportation services to the residents. Hawaii Island Adult Care, Inc. (HIAC) is working with HICDC to relocate their program to the same site as the Mohouli Neighborhood Heights Senior Housing project, Once completed, the HJAC will provide an adult day care program to the residents of the Mohouli Neighborhood Heights Senior Housing project, as well as to other seniors in the community. The HIAC program will further the health of the seniors by keeping them engaged, physically and mentally involved, and in the presence of trained personnel that Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 0613012018) 36 can respond to their needs. The HIAC provides an adult day care program where elders attend for the day, spend time with peers in activities of interest and are a part of the community. In the past, the County has provided CDBG funds for the planning, design, site and infrastructure improvements for the HIAC project. In 2015, CDBG funds were provided for foundation and site improvements. 2016 and 2017 CDBG funds were provided to supplement the vertical construction of the facility. Construction to the project began in February, 2017 and is anticipated to be completed by July, 2018. Other projects that will be funded with 2018 CDBG funds are the renovations to the Kulaimano Elderly Housing facility, and gym renovations and paving improvements to the Boys & Girls Club of the Big Island. Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No. 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 37 AP -75 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.22O(j) Introduction: The major obstacles of producing affordable housing are the lack of financial resources, scarcity of developable land and the lack of infrastructure_ The County has identified the following barriers and to continue to address them in its quest to provide affordable housing. The following barriers are fees, charges, exactions, land use regulations, building codes, growth limitations and lack of resources Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment The County will undertake the following to reduce and/or remove affordable housing barriers. * Continue to publicize and conduct fair housing workshops and seminars *Ensure the topics of affordable housing and fair housing choice are fully addressed within the Wrong Door Network and all ADRCs (Aging and Disability Resource Centers). *Publicize and promote the existence of, and assistance through, the housing "doors" in the No Wrong Door Network. 0 *Collaborate with relevant organizations to advocate for the addition or upgrading of accessibility requirements in major neighborhood and housilig development projects. *Collaborate with relevant organizations to advocate for a visit ability requirements for all new housing construction (with the exception of ADUs and Ohana units). *Collaborate with relevant organizations to advocate for increased funding to help lower income homeowners cover the costs of modifications and renovations to make their home more accessible. *Collaborate with relevant organizations to advocate for actions to ensure the paraprofessional caretaking workforce is sufficient to meet growing needs for long-term services and supports (LTSS) and Home and Community-based Services (HCBS). *Collaborate with public and private providers of services to people with the most severe disabilities to support their access to appropriate housing. *Coordinate landlord forums and promote benefits of its rental assistance program. *Represent homeless needs to State agencies to encourage mainstream resourcing to address Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506.0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 38 homelessness. *Administer Fair Housing training to participants island -wide. *Support authorized exemption, pursuant to Hawaii Revise Statutes 46-15 to assist in expediting the development of affordable housing projects. *Continue to maintain a housing website to increase housing and program information. *Continue to revise Hawaii County Code, Chapter 11 to promote development of affordable housing. *Provide legislature recommendations to preserve affordable housing development and funding opportunities. *Provide resource information at community development planning meetings that are representative of at -risk population housing needs. *Continue to amend and/or streamline the General plan land use regulations and process. *Continue to support applications for and to encourage funding agencies to approve start up and capacity building grants. *Continue to review and update the County building code and recommend the elimination or modification of onerous codes that do not affect health and safety. Discussion: The bottom line is that it is very expensive to build affordable homes for the extremely -low, very low, and low-income families in Hawai'i and without requirements for accessibility the choice for people with disabilities continues to worsen. The strengths of the affordable housing delivery system in the County is derived from the many different entities striving toward one common goal; to provide for more affordable housing in Hawai'i. This will require a similar effort to provide accessible affordable housing. State, Federal and County agencies, private non -profits, private social service providers, private lenders and private for-profit developers are doing their part to respond to the urgency of the housing situation in Hawaii. New programs are continually being established to form tax incentives, low-interest interim financing, bond financing, rental subsidies and other creative development techniques to provide accessible affordable housing. Despite all of these efforts, the availability of affordable housing will not be developed unless massive funding is available. Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No: 2506.0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 39 AP -85 Other Actions — 91.220(k) Introduction: One of the conditions to receiving Community Planning and Development (CPO) funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD) such as the Community Development Bock Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) programs and the National Housing Trust Program (HTF), is that grantees, such as the County of Hawaii, are required to affirmatively Further the purposes of the Fair Housing Act. To help identify imped.'ments to fair housing choice, grantees conduct an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (Al) that analyzes existing conditions affecting fair housing, identifies impediments to fair housing, and proposes an action plan outlining steps to reduce the impediments. Generally, the Al is updated every five years to coincide with the Consolidated Plan HUD recently implemented its new Assessment Of Fair Housing (AFH) Tool, intended to replace the AI; the anticipated implementation of the AFH is for the next five-year Consolidated Plan period of PY2020-2024. In the interim, the State Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC), in collaboration with other state and county agencies and with HUD guidance, elected to conduct an Al focused on the state's most prevalent fair housing complaint_ In Hawaii, disability issues are the most common basis for fair housing complaints. On behalf of the collaborative group, HHFDC contracted with the University of Hawaii's Center on Disability Studies to conduct an Al focused on impediments facing peop`e with disabilities. The Al was completed in November, 2016. The Al identified substantial imped;ments to fair housing choice facing people with disabilities in Hawaii as 1) a lack of knowledge on the part of people with disabilities, the general public, landlords and property manai;ers about legal requirements and available resources to support people with disabilities; 2) people with disabilities have tremendous difficulties obtaining affordable housing that is accessible; 3) personnel lack attitude, skills and knowledge to serve and support people with disabilities in the housing, social service, med)cal, caretaking, and related fields; and 4) service systems are not well -coordinated to support people with disabilities, especially those with serious cognitive disabilities, to obtain and retain suitable housing. The Al also proposed action steps for the next five years that may help to address the issues. The 2016 Al may be viewed at the County of Hawaii's website: http,.//records.ca_.hawa ii.h i.us/weblink/.aspx?dbid=l&id=85183&i2agDocViewe=l&cr=1 Listed below are the actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs, foster and maintain affordable housing, reduce lead-based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty -level families, develop institutional structure, and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs One of the obstacles to meeting underserved needs is the production of affordable housing. The major obstacles are the lack of financial resources and the lack of infrastructure_ The County hopes to leverage Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06;`30/2018; 40 other sources of funds (i.e. USDA, State, County and private) by providing federal funds to subsidize the cost of housing. Another obstacle is the cost burden that the extremely -low and very -low income households have to endure for housing in the County. The County hopes to continue funding the Tenant Based Rental Assistance program (TBRA) with HOME funds to assist these extremely -low and very -low income households with rental assistance so that they pay less than 30% of their income to housing costs. Additionally, beginning in 2018 the County hopes to receive funds from the National Housing Trust Fund Program (HTF). This program will provide funding for the development of affordable rental housing units to serve extremely -low income households. Another obstacle is the lack of rental units throughout the County for extremely -low and very -low income households. The County plans to work with management agencies and educate landlords about the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program and the TBRA program. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing The County of Hawaii plans to foster and maintain affordable housing for County residents by investing CDBG funds in renovating an elderly housing project during the 2018 Program Year. High priority affordable housing program strategies will include the renovation and rehabilitation of 2 homeless shelters, Hale Mahulia Men's Shelter and Kiheipua Family Sheltor, as well as gym renovations and paving improvements at the Boys and Girls Club. Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards Hawaii County has two programs that consider the hazards of lead based paint poisoning. One, the Residential Repair Program (RRP), requires that lead based paint risk assessments be conducted for homes bu' It before 1978. If a dwelling is determined to have lead, mitigation measures are taken to address the lead that is present. When the lead based paint concerns are corrected, the unit becomes available for lead free safe occupancy, thereby, increasing a. --cess to housing without LBP hazards. Through the RRP, the County expects to test approximately 10 homes during 2018. The other is the County's Section 8 Rental Assistance Payments Program which prohibits rental subsidy for any unit that is built before 1978 if there is a family member under the age of 7 and the unit contains peeling paint. Other actions/plans to be undertaken to reduce lead-based paint hazards include: D,stribute pamphlets to applicants of the RRP notifying them of potential lead-based paint Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 41 hazards; and • Conduct Clearance testing on homes that were found to have lead under the RRP. Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty -level families According to the 2010 Census, 18.3010 of the people in Hawaii County are below the poverty level. This is above the State's poverty level of 11.2% and this is mainly due to the high unemployment rate in the County. The County plans to continue administering the Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA) that targets the extremely -low income households. This would limit the households from paying more than 30% of their income to housing costs. Another program the County would like to administer is the National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) that targets the extremely -low households. The National Housing Trust Fund can be used to acquire, construct or rehabilitate rental hour;ng and rent to extremely -low income households. In rural areas the HTF law considers households with income below poverty line as very -low income. By administering the HTF it will help the County reduce the number of poverty -level families. In addition, the County is administering the Department of Labor's Workforce Innovation Opportunity Act (WIOA) program which requires a one-stop shop. The one-stop concept allows a client to access various services from a central location, which includes self-sufficiency and financial literacy programs. The mandatory partners in the one-stop shop are: WIOA programs, Native American programs, migrant and seasonal farm worker programs, veteran employment program, adult education, welfare -to -work, senior community service employment programs, vocational rehabilitation services for the blind programs, Hawaii Community College and HUD employment and training programs Actions planned to develop institutional structure The County will continue to participate in: County & State Quarterly Coordinator's Meetings which coordinates state-wide activities and performance measures; the State-wide Continuum of Care group which meets every other month to collaborate on homeless issues; the Inter -Agency Council on Homelessness which meets every other month to enable better access to mainstream programs and to end chronic homelessness; HOME State Recipient Group which meets periodically to coordinate HOME program and projects; quarterly meeting with Fair Housing Officers from the State and other counties and State-wide Housing Directors which meets monthly to collaborate on housing issues. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies The County will do the following to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp. 06130/ W18) 42 service agencies: • Expand an email list to notify interested citizens and organizations of upcoming events. • Include video conferencing in its citizen participation activities. Discussion: Annual Action Plan 2418 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 43 Program Specific Requirements AP -90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(1)(1,2,4) Introduction: Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out, 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0 5 The amount of income from float -funded activities 0 Total Program Income: 0 Other CDBG Requirements 1. The amount of urgent need activities 0 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100.00°' Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No. 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 44 HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(2) 1. A description of other forms of investment being used beyond those identified in Section 92.205 is as follows: The County of Hawaii does not use any other forms of investment except those listed in Section 92.205. 2. A description of the guidelines that will be used for resale or recapture of HOME funds when used for homebuyer activities as required in 92.254, is as follows: On Homebuyer activities the County of Hawaii will recapture the total amount of HOME funds expended for a project when the recipient fails to comply with the terms of its agreement with the County, or refuses to accept conditions imposed by the County, HHFDC, or HUD; when the recipient sells or otherwise transfers any real or personal property purchased or constructed with the HOME funds within the applicable period of affordability; and when the recipient ceases to occupy the property constructed, rehabilitated and/or renovated with HOME funds for the applicable period of affordability. 3. A description of the guidelines for resale or recapture that ensures the affordability of units acquired with HOME funds? See 24 CFR 92.254(a)(4) are as follows: The County of Hawaii adheres to the recapture provisions and recoups the entire amount of the HOME investment from the homebuyer, if the house does not continue to be the principal residence of the homebuyer's family for the entire period of affordability. 4. Plans for using HOME funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated with HOME funds along with a description of the refinancing guidelines required that will be used under 24 CFR 92.206(b), are as follows: The County of Hawaii has never used HOME funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated with HOME funds and has no intention of using HOME funds for this purpose in the future. Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 45 Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(5) 1. Distribution of Funds a. Describe the eligibility requirements for recipients of HTF funds (as defined in 24 CFR § 93.2), Please refer to Section V. - "Eligible Recipients" of the attached HTF Allocation Plan. b. Describe the jurisdiction's application requirements for eligible recipients to apply for HTF funds. Piease refer to Section VII. - "Application and Award Process" of the attached MTF Allocation Plan - c. Describe the selection criteria that the jurisdiction will use to select applications submitted by eligible recipients. Please refer to Section VIII. - "Selection Criteria" of the attached HTF Allocation Plan. d. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on geographic distribution, which is a description of the geographic areas of the State (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) in which it will direct assistance during the ensuing program year. The County of Hawaii does not allocate investments geographically. The County utilized a Request for Proposal (RFP) process to allocate HTF funds. However, preference will be given to applicants who will develop affordable rental housing in areas located near to employment, schools, shopping, medical facilities, etc. to support self-sufficiency. e. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority forfunding based on the applicant's ability to obligate HTF funds and undertake eligible activities in a timely manner. Please refer to Section VIII - "Selection Criteria" of the attached HTF Allocation Plan. Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No. 2506-0117 [exp. 06/30/2018) 46 f. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on the extent to which rents for units in the rental project are affordable to extremely low-income families. Please refer to Section IV. - "Eligible Activities and Expenses" of the attached HTF Allocation Plan. g. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on the financial feasibility of the project beyond the required 30 -year period. Please refer to Section Vlll — "Selection Criteria" of the attached HTF Allocation Plan. h. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on the merits of the application in meeting the priority housing needs of the jurisdiction (such as housing that is accessible to transit or employment centers, housing that includes green building and sustainable development features, or housing that serves special needs populations) Please refer to Section Vlll • "Selection Criteria" of the attached HTF Allocation Plan. i. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on the location of existing affordable housing. Preference for the HTF program will be given to applicants who will develop rental housing in areas located near employment, schools, shopping, medical services and public transportation to support self- sufficiency. j. Describe the jurisdiction's required priority for funding based on the extent to which the application makes use of non-federal funding sources. Please refer to Section VIII - "Selection Criteria" of the attached HTF Allocation Pian, 2. Does the jurisdiction's application require the applicant to include a description of the eligible activities to be conducted with HTF funds? Yes 3. Does the jurisdiction's application require that each eligible recipient certify that housing units assisted with HTF funds will comply with HTF requirements? Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 47 Yes 4. Performance Goals and Benchmarks. The jurisdiction has met the requirement to provide for performance goals, consistent with the jurisdiction's goals established under 24 CFR 91.215(b)(2), by including HTF is its housing goals in the housing table on the SP -45 Goals and AP -20 Annual Goals and Objectives screens. Yes 5. Rehabilitation Standards. The jurisdiction must establish rehabilitation standards for all HTF-assisted housing rehabilitation activities that set forth the requirements that the housing must meet upon project completion. The jurisdiction's description of its standards must be in sufficient detail to determine the required rehabilitation work including methods and materials_ The standards may refer to applicable codes or they may establish requirements that exceed the minimum requirements of the codes. The jurisdiction must attach its rehabilitation standards below. of the jurisdiction will not use HTF funds for the rehabilitation of housing, enter "N/A". In addition, the rehabilitation standards must address each of the following:. health and safety; major systems; lead-based paint; accessibility; disaster mitigation (where relevant); state and local codes, ordinances, and zoning requirements; Uniform Physical Condition Standards; and Capital Needs Assessments (if applicable). SCJ/A_ The Courity will not utilize HTF for rehabilitation 6. Resale or Recapture Guidelines. Below, the jurisdiction must enter (or attach) a description of the guidelines that will be used for resale or recapture of HTF funds when used to assist first-time homebuyers. if the jurisdiction will not use HTF funds to assrst first-time homebuyers„ enter "N/A". N/A_ The County will not utilize HTF for homeownership activities. 7. HTF Affordable Homeownership Limits. If the jurisdiction intends to use HTF funds for homebuyer assistance and does not use the HTF affordable homeownership limits for the area provided by HUD, it must determine 95 percent of the median area purchase price and set forth the information in accordance with §93.305. If the jurisdiction will not use HTF funds to assist first time homebuyers, enter "N/A" Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506 0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 48 N/A. The County will not utilize HTF for homeownership activities. 8. Limited Beneficiaries or Preferences. Describe how the jurisdiction will limit the beneficiaries or give preferences to a particular segment of the extremely low- or very low-income population to serve unmet needs identified in its consolidated plan or annual action plan. If the jurisdiction will not limit the beneficiaries or give preferences to a particular segment of the extremely low- or very low-income population, enter "N/A." Any limitation or preference must not violate nondiscrimination requirements in § 93.350, and the jurisdiction must not limit or give preferences to students. The jurisdiction may permit rental housing owners to limit tenants or give a preference in accordance with § 93.303 only if such limitation or preference is described in the action plan. N/A. 9. Refinancing of Existing Debt. Enter or attach the jurisdiction's refinancing guidelines below. The guidelines describe the conditions under which the jurisdiction will refinance existing rental housing project debt. The jurisdiction's refinancing guidelines must, at minimum, demonstrate that rehabilitation is the primary eligible activity and ensure that this requirement is met by establishing a minimum level of rehabilitation per unit or a required ratio between rehabilitation and refinancing. If the jurisdiction will not refinance existing debt, enter "N/A." N/A. The County will not utilize HTF for the refinancing of existing debt. Discussion: Annual Action Plan 2018 OMB Control No 2506-0117 (exp 06/30/2018) 49 Attachments Annual Action Plan 2018 DMB Control No: 25060117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 50 Appendix A: leaps and Charts 2615-19 CP Final (,Is) matug gum alquipS (03) Allunuoddq u033 W z O(HQ)'SuisnoH;um(j ?, x x x x x W (£) 4pIgeutvjsnS Z i u(Z) ,G!ngnP-IOJJV x x 0 ([) Ralllgsssaaa� x x x �.y y L �•-• L y p �' � L C T e_ co p F� �~yj j •p C rj r� �NJ C F O C�� � � C W^ �I 9 �p i �_ y _ in t C `n e9 y C J 3 _T =1 r y �rcz E. 91,3 -9 V n N O m 7: p N 9- A a u G U Or� OZ/61OZ rV v 61/81OZ a ~ Si/LIOZ _ O LI/9Toz ry o v, h 2 n Z _ 91/SIOZ N �_ z o 'u u > J I u C ' F 7 C 3 c F F 1 Q- U'Z)U Ut°.�U UL�C7 C7L�U {� U. UL�V C7L�U T V 1 U � syr• � eye 'O � � � a L O y �r1 G �7 rJ > G C 3 C D y C z �• y L = ray �. a a a :� a y e u •� en C e p n �' So n e a .� N jai+ f'i •C O 7q Q •� t �� c s, = c N a � o �� n n y � a v �+ � � ,C aJJ a o o neo 7E g= o �' uF 3 _Q4 U E' M !2A ^ = i Q F � J W u q C G c s=ue a e'4=° C o c y p z o •• O C F O O p p •ava C t = a [3 7 O ma to t4 ` No y tA C u {, apoa rao x N z o N 0 "S 0 ¢ N a Ns) uo ii.sug Numu7 alqullns X X >C X X X X —4 E" W (03) gj!un)jodd0 uoaa O 0 (HQ) 2ulsnOH auaaaQ W .� (£) 4!=!quuiujsng yG X X X X Z U (Z) gilpqupjo jV E� � (I) flitigissaaat+ X X > cm v.u > L^ W G► crL+ 'n O — — O `� J y tr i � •� C.3 :!7 °> .L? — C�.i y O f,• 'a U i C G C O 6J fv� >. .� 41 Ot— e Ln� W y �» ��� o o a n t3 CZ C z u y O C ' pq = c a roil v` O ¢7 C y Ci u p rte. 3 7 7 Q,N C C U O rO U F u — rJ p cs N C GA = n n G «�.+ I OZ.r6IOZ C = Z M N 61110Z o a a M N 8T/L[OZ _ _ 2 a — M N Li/91OZ o r, 'a 91/9I0Z — o N 2 CL O C74L�U C7? cU V L• CU C7ts-.�U C� Lt�U C7Li.DU C� O di y 13 to ° Li. O rt Er k,O [ C C LL res v CeGSU>aa� 0 ,C C:6 v, '°c . ra S y 2 eo to ° rn = C ° Cm F wC ° c«? 12aOC 0 0 au w Mo n° .w ° a0 y CJ y G y V 14 rte.• O U p CJ a G C v v j zcm C y C � G v1 •C � C� C� C U0 e to u c o to u c c to u c c oo u e s to u e 0 u O s.. a `o `o u u u �u7 — N jr,. ew1 Q rr1 .fr i� apoo fgo w r=iLL. r=i F, c=c. I I § O � f 2 2 $ 2 I 2 I f 2 I 2 � § \_ §#� a o� j § k•�� VLO M� 2 � ƒ $'E 2 r3� - &I - o 0 0 . - o o - _ o *2 *� p2 2§k Zai 2/k ]772\§§ Gju Q�»uo =u - § 8 2� 1.- / §22 ] k.S3��� S%2� § �§ k E .■ ® § % £ § / \ � § O � {�s7 uo-j!.%u3 su!.%!i a!qul!ns cz F W (Og) Al!unpodd0 uo33 Z (EIQ) Zuisnog;uaaaa x x (£) Aptgauivjsng x O(Z) �GIP.grp-iojjV Z O ([) �s!1!q!ssaaad x 2 E� w o /yam 0 wL p O � Q; .r v C C V v Z o c to zy a.+ a y rn O " E o v E U •�>'av, c .G OZ:-6IOZ o 0 61TIOZ o 0 O 'GiOZ _ o U.9[OZ o 9I%S[OZ o 461 O U 0[i u Q liDU aiia H O U_ H E., u a �. 0 O 'd G, v7 q F+ Fts Q o y v a o c u U wx 0w >; u A J W O G O ? y u z 13Go W C Lj r tj a y U N a O 7 - apo rao apo:) = x (is) i uoat,%u3 Suet^; alqujmg X >C ?< >C Z U W- (Og) SpunpoddO uoa3 x ti d C (Ha) 3utsnoH;ua3aQ 5C u(Z) A4!pgepao.{3d x (T) •Ci!l!gtssaaat+ X X •L" Yiy U � � O cr — v c R 0t _ _ c3 r d Y u? e •-- _ \O �i r� 3 O G Q n, •� p �' n O e�� rVs � ca �Nrl v c, fV r�ZU A O u u in u t� V, Z y v C c > p .R � m U cz° + N L tr zLI, C. v s rr ? W C r.Os C y a cL R 3 v� c o •p I vs u C C ry aCi� _ h=o OZ/6IOZ o o 61/8I0Z_ Ui 0 0 — o 8I/LiOZ o Li/91OZ o 0 0 0 0 9I/9IOZ 0 0 0 [� -a C7c��UC7u'.�UVu'.Z�u0 :Du C�7riD :5uu �U v a E o c o C Y p o, «C a� a o . E � c 3 y, p .RL. ED v 61 u ra U C Q O 6J w c.R_ V Ls L u 'o U o c E ` u tJ y snO E 'E D -o M = 3° a 0 U 0 U 0 di � p v c a U a u un s a 'd o L w o. ° o o C w r Cl .__ GL Q W L= Ut y Jp C O vR,`a o �u En 3 j o I apoz) rao z c a A LU — I i 610 010 010 060 0l0 alo ol0 o10 0l0 010 o10 oW oW o\o olo olo olo dO 6l0 050 010 ol0 010 610 ado o1a o%P o1O aio o1Q o10 010 010 O Lo O oo r- T r --i u7 O1 o0 m M I— r --i N I— u'! Lo r -i �x LIT M I— 11 N Q' N Ln Ol N r -i l0 Irl QZ (,4 m N m Lo Lr) r -H r -i N m a) u-) to I� ,s O ON l0 lD O O O Q' O O O 4 14 C)1 r4 kD cr I LO to ev to M M N N M N -' Lr) U7 C' -:zr LY) ul LO m M m Qw N m m m N N rr") N Q' rl I I I I r -I N r -i N m 0 O r< m r1 to N N N d" [- m r -i l" N Q' N N I N M 'gr Ln"o 0 0 0 0 00 r -I r -4r -i 0 0 0 r..i O O O O 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 r r- co CC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 r -i r-4 " �r u-) Ln Ln Lo *10 to 1- r- r--1 Ol N r -I N N N N N N O O O O N rl r -i r-! r -i rl r� r1 r -I N r -I r -i ri r -i r -i r -j r -i r -i r -I N r --i N N I i I I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N e a 0 e ci a a a - a aP o V'1 rh N 00 M (:1 O — O O N O -4 u a w = Q D\ O 01 w C.% r- o0 � � q O M C 00 O r" 00 � D\ 'seq— CIF N N 00 z z z ul cc . %.i M U 4 rS r3 O u a w oc Q r•� tp 4 N � CC — "4 i � � q z z z ul cc . U M U 4 rS r3 O D Q t'S eCC � O O v D a a v eCs ce_s a C~] 3 122 Q G cz = ¢ e c rs U ... V V Edd q 3 z o m¢ ¢¢ `o o r¢¢ oc Q r•� tp 4 N � CC — "4 i IR a fill ° rs r° a 0 nl v a 4Lart o u +I6O i J Q ?i i fA Y J "{f ff y N 0gn 42 /A do O _ a IA us t3 V u rff, L h T IL U Y 4 a ��.... L r. \ H � S p � 5 4 r ry� coo h Ut �1 a i' 175 a z o 4 pl r fy QqF yy �t3ra f1�11 T Q YG"�fVM glVf, " z Ll 2 N N Y! CDU o a a o N Qi E y r H N � Q = 3 N W O Z J A m s gD 0 N W) �Q 3N� pj T gp 3NN 7 0 �Eiki V t? w SG��i Imo N �NN � 5 k < R W j / 0 ( Q k� 0 \ L � cn \ Q § 0 L f 2/ E E kU. $ � k 02 k R ] § % aC13 _ D E 'B R 2 Q \ § Z2 22 /\ CL ❑ \ 2 f LL — — �) 7 C0 ! I L) 'm Z §§< )/ (k !2 0 MSR 12 0 ) k !G Q � w. S) 22 ,b s D 2; !§ ® �b �§ �k ! ° � !§ C k§_ � Ja 0� ° CR $� |§ LU 0 �§ z m a Appendix P : Needs Consultations and Comments, Public Notices, and Approvals 2015 19 i h final Needs Consultations and Comments: 0 Feedback from the surveys distributed and input on needs from the public hearings are summarized below: Housing: • Affordable rental housing • Affordable for -sale housing • Affordable housing for persons with special needs • Affordable and appropriate housing for persons with mental illness • Affordable housing for persons with developmental and physical disabilities • Elderly housing • Service worker housing (West Hawaii) • Self -Help housing • Home -financing options for low-income families • Rehabilitation loans Homeless: • Emergency shelter (West Hawaii) • Transitional housing for victims of domestic violence • Transitional housing for families Self-esteem and life planning training Parent education programs O• Decrease in housing barriers • Appropriate support services to retain homing • Homeless prevention (rental deposit, rental assistance) • Improved methods of data collection • Partnerships established to end homelessness Community Development: • Vocational job training • Homebuyer counseling • Employment development centers • Community centers • Senior centers • Youth centers • Public safety facilities • Rural healthcare facilities • Fire stations, equipment and rescue: emergency medical coverage • Enhanced solid waste management facilities • Development of new park sites • Enhancement of existing park sites • Removal of Architectural Barriers • Infrastructure to adhere to County building code • Off-site infrastructure 2015-19 CP Final • On-site infrastructure • Funding for soft costs • Transportation vehicles • Neighborhood center for educational purposes 2015-19 CP Final PUBLIC NOTICE ON PUBLIC MEETINGS and REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS for COUNTY OF HAWAII 2014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM and 2015-2019 CONSOLIDATED PLAN (CP) The County of Hawaii Office of Housing & Community Development (OHCD) is currently planning for its 2014 Consolidated/Action Plan process for the aforementioned program. In addition, the County of Hawaii will begin preparing for its 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan Program Year with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The purpose of the CP is to ensure that jurisdictions receiving federal U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) assistance plan for the housing and related needs of low- and moderate -income families in a way that improves the availability and affordability of decent, safe, and sanitary housing in a suitable living environment. The County's CP describes the needs, priorities, and funding plans. The CP covers a five (5) year period and is required to be submitted to HUD in order for the County to receive its annual CDBG grant and the State to receive its annual HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Grant, Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) and Housing for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) Grant. As required by federal regulations, the County will hold a series of public hearings and has selected the following locations and times in an effort to encourage comments and views from persons of very low and moderate income. PAHALA PUBLIC HEARING Date: October 14, 2013 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Pahala Community Center KONA PUBLIC HEARING Date: October I5, 2013 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: West Hawaii Civic Center Mayors Conference Room, 2nd Floor 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy. HILO PUBLIC HEARING Date: October 18, 2013 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: 1990 Kino'ole Street Existing Housing Conference Room 201549 CP Final PAHOA PUBLIC HEARING October 14, 2013 2:00 p.m. Pahoa Community Center HONOKA'A PUBLIC HEARING October 15, 2013 3:00 p.m. Honoka'a Gym/MPR Room The purpose of the public hearings is to hear views and comments from citizens on housing and community development needs and the past performance of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD's) CDBG Program. Input will assist the County in establishing the priorities and goals for the 2015-20I9 grants secured by the HUD. The County encourages its citizens, especially persons of low and moderate income, minorities and non-hnglislt speaking persons, as well as persons with disabilities, to attend the public hearings and share their comments and views. Persons requiring special needs (i.e., sign language or bilingual interpreters) may call the OHCD at VITT 961-8379 at least seven (7) days prior to the hearings so arrangements may be made to accommodate them. Citizens who are unable to attend these hearings may submit or fax (808 961-8685) testimony pertaining to their housing and community development needs by October 18, 2013 to Stephen J. Arnett, Housing Administrator_ Office of Housing and Community Development, 50 Wailuku Drive, Hilo, Hawaii 96720. After the public hearing, OHCD staff will be available to discuss the procedures and guidelines for applying for the County's 2014 CDBG program. OHCD staff will provide technical assistance to groups agencies requesting assistance in developing proposals_ 2014 CDBG PROJECT PROPOSAL FORMS The County's five-year 2010-2014 Consolidated PIan (CP) describes the County's housing and community development needs, funding plans. priorities and objectives, and includes the County's Annual Action Plan for the use of CDBG Program funds. The County of Hawai' i is, therefore, seeking eligible applicants to submit project proposals to be included in its 2014 Annual Action Plan to HUD. The County expects to receive approximately $2,500,000 for its CDBG Program. In order to receive federal funding all applicants will be required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and be actively registered with current information in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) prior to applying for CDBG funding. The applicant will have to submit proof that they have a DUNS number and are actively registered in the CCR system with their project proposal packet. Project proposals submitted to the OHCD must comply with the program criteria. meet eligibility requirements, program objectives, and be consistent with the County's priorities and objectives as contained in the County's 2CI10-2014 CP_ All original project proposals and two (2) copies must be received by 4:30 a.m. on January, 09, 2014, by the OHCD, 50 Wailuku Drive, Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456 or OHCD Kona Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740. The proposal forms and federal guidelines covering the eligible activities will be available at the public hearings and at the following locations beginning October 18 2013, Monday 2015 -19 CP Final through Friday, 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., except on holidays. Proposal forms will also be mailed, upon request, after October 18, 2013. OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Hilo Armory 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Phone: 961-8379 OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT West Hawaii Civic Center 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy. Kailua-Kana, Hawaii 96740 Phone: 323-4305 In addition, copies of the County's current CP; Citizen Participation Plan and past performance of CDBG funds are also available at the Office of Housing and Community Development, 50 Wailuku Drive, Hilo, Hawaii. A brief description of the CDBG Program is as follows: Community Development Block Grant Prop -ram: Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-383) created the CDBG Program, which became effective January 1, 1974. Under the CDBG Program, a community is able to develop a flexible, locally designed comprehensive community development strategy in order to address the program's primary objective: "...development of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and suitable living environments and expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate income." Under the CDBG program, grants or loan assistance may be used by eligible public agencies, private non-profit organizations, and Community Based Development Organizations (CBDO), (non-profit organization) for the following activities provided that these activities either 1) principally benefit low and moderate income families, 2) aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight, or 3) meet other community development needs having a particular urgency. Range of Eligible Activities for the use of CDBG Program Funds: * Acquisition of real property. * Acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or installation of public facilities. * Provision of public services, provided it is a new service or a quantifiable increase in a service now being provided and does not 2015-14 CP Final * Disposition of real property. * Clearance, demolition and removal of buildings and improvements. * Interim assistance to immedi- ately arrest deterioration and alleviate emergency conditions. * Urban renewal completion. * Relocation payments. * Loss of rental income incurred in holding housing units for displacees. * Removal of material and archi- exceed 15p o of the County's allocation. Payment of the non-federal share in connection with other federal programs undertaken as part of the development program. * Assist privately owned utilities. Code enforcement in deteriorated areas expected, together with public improvements and services, to arrest the area's decline. HOME Program: tectural barriers restricting mobility of elderly and disabled persons. * Historic preservation. * Assistance to sub -recipients to carry out activities listed. * Renovation of closed school buildings. * Micro enterprise assistance. * Planning activities. * Rehabilitation of privately owned building and low income public housing. The HOME Program was created under Title 11 (the HOME Investment Partnership Act) of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990. The purpose of the HOME Program is to expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary and ailbrdabl� housing for very low and low-income persons. Under the HOME Program, equity investments, interest-bearing and non-interest bearing loans or advances, deferred payment loans, grants. may be used by eligible public agencies, private non-profit organizations, developers, owners, community housing development organizations or other private organizations are eligible to utilize HOME funds for the following activities. Range of Eligible Activities for the use of HOME Program f=unds: * Development hard costs defined as the actual cost of constructing or rehabilitating housing. * Acquisition costs. * Related soft costs defined as other reasonable and necessary costs incurred and associated with the financing or development (or both) of new construction, rehabilitation or acquisition of housing assisted with HOME funds. Relocation costs. Cost related to tenant -based rental assistance_ Applicants applying for HOME funding are required to match for every $1.00 of federal HOME funds expended for the project with at least $.25 of eligible matching funds. The State of Hawai'i is required to submit its 2014 Action Plan to HUD for the HOME program_ The HOME program funds will be allocated on a three year rotation basis beginning with Hawaii County followed by Kauai County and Maui County. Hawaii County anticipates receiving its next allocation of HOME program funds in 2015, The designated County will 2015-19 CP Final receive the entire allocation of HOME funding, less 2.5'o of the allowable administrative funding which will be retained by the State's Hawai' i Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC) to cover program administrative expenses (approximately $75,000). The designated County anticipates it will receive approximately $2,925,000.00 for the HOME Program. OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTY OF HAWAII By: Stephen J. Arnett Housing Administrator William P. Kenoi, Mayor County of Hawai' i (Hawai' i Tribune -Herald: Oct. 7, 2013) (West Hawai'i Today: Oct. 7, 2013) 2015-19 CP Final COUNTY OF HAWAII CONSOLIDATED PLAN NEEDS SURVEY FOR HOUSING, HOMELESSNESS, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2015 19 CP Final PART I. ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION 1) Organization Name: Address: Phone: Fax: E-mail. Person completing this form: Date.- 2) ate:2) Is your organization incorporated: Yes ❑ No ❑ 3) Is your organization a: (Check all that apply) ❑ 501(c)(3) Non -Profit ❑ Government ❑ Trade or Professional Organization ❑ Advocacy Group ❑ Other (Please Specify): 4) ❑ HawaN Resident 5) What is your organization's geographic area? (choose one) ❑ Hawai` i ❑ Statewide ❑ Specific Communities, Please specify: 6) What is your organization'sriP �marX purpose or function? (Choose one) ❑ Services provider ❑ Neighborhood association ❑ Advocacy group ❑ Trade association ❑ Homeless shelter provider ❑ Non-profit housing developer ❑ Homeless service provider ❑ For-profit housing developer ❑ For-profit business ❑ Mobility impaired ❑ Other, Please specify: . ..... 7) What is your organization'srp imary constituency? (Check all that apply) ❑ Neighborhood residents ❑ Homeowners ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Elderly population ❑ Persons with disabilities ❑ Low-income persons (, .80° o of MFI) ❑ Persons with AIDS ❑ Very low income persons (<501-0' of MFI) ❑ Mobility impaired ❑ Veterans ❑ Chronically mentally ill ❑ Renters ❑ Developmentally disabled ❑ Public Housing residents ❑ Other, please specify: 2015-19 CP Final PART H. GENERAL PRIORITIES Based on the constituency your organization serves; please indicate what you believe is the relative priority for each broad type of housing, homelessness, and community development need by checking the appropriate box. Indicate whether that category of need is, in your opinion, 1) Highest Relative Need compared to all the others, 2) Above Average Relative Need compared to others, 3) about Average Relative Need compared to all others, 4) Below Average Need compared to all others, or 5) the Lowest Relative Need compared to all others. Also, if you have any data or additional information which supports your ranking which you would like us to consider, please enclose it with your response to this survey. Needs Category Highest Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need (1) Housing Rental Housing ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Homeowner Housing ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (2) Special Needs Housing (Non- Homeless) Elderly ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Persons with AIDS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Persons with Disabilities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (3) Homelessness Homeless Individuals ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Homeless Families ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ [❑ (4) Community Development Economic Development ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Public Facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ [❑ Infrastructure ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Public Services ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Neighborhood Planning ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2415-19 CP Final PART III. SPECIFIC PRIORITIES In this section, the County is looking for more detailed input regarding specific needs and priorities as they relate to the general categories identified in Part I1 of this survey. If you feel that you or your organization is unable or unqualified to give an informed opinion on the relative needs within any of these more specific categories, just check off the box at the top of the survey table marked "Unable to Judge Relative Needs". Based on the constituency your organization serves, please indicate what you believe is the relative priority for each specific need by checking the appropriate box. Indicate whether that type of need is, in your opinion, 1) Highest Relative Need compared to all others, 2) Above Average Relative Need compared to all others, 3) about Average Relative Need compared to all others. 4) Below Average Need compared to all others, or 5) the Lowest Relative Need compared to all others. Rental Housing Needs by Household Type ❑ Unable to Jud a Relative Need Renter Housing by Household Type Highest Above Average Below Lowest Household Income Relative Average Relative Average Relative Need Need Need Need Need Non -Elderly 1 -person households Li 11 Small Families (2-4 persons) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Large Families (5+persons) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Elderly (1 or 2 per -n households) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other renter (e g unrented 2+ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ per on hou ehold) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Rental Housing Needs by Income Level ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Renter Housing by Annual Highest Above Average Below Lowest Household Income Relative Average Relative Average Relative Need Need Need Need Need Extremely low income Very low income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Low income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Moderate income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Middle income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Upper income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2015-19 CP Final Homeowner Housing Needs by Household Type ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Homeowner Housing By Type Highest _ Above Average Below Lowest Average Relative Average Relative Average Relative Need Need Need Need Need Need First-time Homebuyers (all) Elderly Homeowners ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Families (2fi related persons) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Non -Elderly (1 -person household) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other homeowners (unrelated 2+ ❑ [❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ person households) ❑ Upper income [] ❑ ❑ Homeowner Housing Needs by Income Level ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Homeowner Housing By Annual Highest Above Average Below Lowest Household Income Relative Average Relative Average Relative Need Need Need Need Need Extremely low income ❑ ❑ Developmentally Disable ❑ ❑ Very low income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Low income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Moderate income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Middle income ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Upper income [] ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Special Needs Housing (Non -Homeless) ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Special Needs Housing By Sub- Population Type Highest Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need Elderly (all) Lj Frail Elderly ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Developmentally Disable ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Physically Disable ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Chronic Substance Abuse ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Seriously Mentally Ill ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Dually Diagnosed (Substance ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Abuse & Mentally Ill) Veterans ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Persons with HIV/AIDS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Youth (<18 yrs. Old) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Victims of Domestic Violence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2015-19 CP Final Homeless Needs by Population and Sub -Population Unable to Jud a Relative Needs Homeless Population and Sub -Population Type (1) General Population Individuals Families with Children (2) Specific Sub -Population Elderly (all) Frail Elderly Developmentally Disable Physically Disabled Chronic Substance Abuse Seriously Mentally Ill Dually Diagnosed (Subst Abuse & Mentally 111) Veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Youth (<18 yrs. Old) Victims of Domestic Viol d Highest Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need (1) Shelter & Housing El 1:1 El E3 E]El Emergency Shelter ❑ El 1:1 El Els Transitional Housing E] El El 11 El Permanent Housing 1:1 11 El El El (2) Supportive Services E]❑ 1:1 E] ❑ Job Training 1:3 E] 11 El 1111 Case Management ❑ El El ❑ ❑ Childcare ❑ 1:1 11 E] E]ance Substance Abuse Treatment ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Mental Health Care ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Housing Search & Placement ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Life Skills Training ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Unmet Needs of the Homeless by Type of Need ❑ Unable to Jud a Relative Needs Type of Unmet Homeless Needs Highest Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need (1) Shelter & Housing Emergency Shelter ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Transitional Housing ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Permanent Housing ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (2) Supportive Services Job Training ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Case Management ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Childcare ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Substance Abuse Treatment ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Mental Health Care ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Housing Search & Placement Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Life Skills Training ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2015-19 CP Final Community Development Needs: Economic Development n Unable to Judse Relative Needs Economic Development Highest Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need Commercial/industrial Acquisition ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Rehabilitation,New Construction ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Direct Financial Assistance ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (Business Loans) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Brownfield's Remediation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a (Clean up of Contaminated Sites) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Micro -Enterprise Assistance ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Business Technical Assistance ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Community Development Needs: Public Facilities n Unable to Judae Relative Needs Public Facilities Highest Relative Need Above Average Need Average Relative Need Below Average Need Lowest Relative Need Neighborhood Facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Parks/Rccreational Facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Health Facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Parking Facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Youth Centers ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Child Care Centers ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Senior Centers ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Historic Preservation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (Non -Residential Buildings) Community Development Needs: Infrastructure ❑ Unable to Judge Relative Needs Infrastructure Water/Sewer Improvements Solid Waste Disposal Flood Drain Improvements Infrastructure for Econ. Development Street Improvements Sidewalk Improvements Removal of Architectural Barriers 2015-19 CP Final Highest Above Average Below Lowest Relative Average I Relative Average I Relative Need i Need Need I Need Need El ❑ o ❑ ❑ El 11 El El El N Community Development Needs: Public Services Unable to Jud a Relative Needs _ Public Services Highest Above Average Relative Average Relative Need Need Need Handicapped Services Transportation Services Substance Abuse Services Employment Services Health Services Mental Health Services Crime Awareness Legal Services Youth Services Child Care Services Senior Services Below Lowest Average Relative Need Need ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Community Development Needs: neighborhood Planning Unable to Jud e Relative Needs Neighborhood Planning Highest Above Average Below Lowest Relative Average Relative Average Relative Need Need Need Need Need Neighborhood Planning ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Fair Housing Activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ CHDO/(Community Development Corporation) Operating Assistance ❑ ❑ ❑ ID ❑ Return Survey to: Office of Housing & Community Development 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Or email to: ohcdcdbg@co.hawaii.hi.us 2015-14 CP Final Appendix C: Monitoring flan 11MU4av mil This section describes the standards and procedures by which the County uses to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of its CP. The intent is to ensure the long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including the comprehensive planning requirements. Upon approval of the CDBG and HOME program funds, the County of Hawai' i meets with each recipient. During this meeting, the County explains the contents of the agreement and all of the requirements for the specific project. The County has developed various checklists (bid, construction, labor standards, acquisition, etc.) that are distributed to each recipient. The checklist indicates the process and the documentation requirements. The checklist also requires that the County approve agreements, documents, notices, etc. prior to its use or execution. This ensures that the documents meet the federal requirements of the program. Recipients are required to submit all executed and completed documents to the County for its files. Recipients are also subject to audits and monitoring visits by auditors and HUD. This is an ongoing process. The County works with the recipient through every step of the project. Training and technical assistance is done immediately if errors or non-compliance are found. For projects involved with facility rehabilitation or construction, the County conducts site visits to verify work progress, to conduct labor interviews, and verify project progress payments. In addition, the agreement executed between the County and recipient requires the recipient to submit monthly status reports to the County. This ongoing monitoring process is preferred to the usual monitoring and audit of projects during the middle or at the completion of the project. This system enables the County to work with the recipients through every step of the project implementation. The process ensures compliance prior to executing any actions, instead of reviewing files after the fact. For the HOME Investment Partnership Program, the County is responsible for monitoring the County ofHawai'i HOME Projects. The County provides technical assistance and monitoring during project development and implementation, as well as during the appropriate period of affordability. The County maintains documentation of its project monitoring for review by the State during their monitoring of the County's HOME Program. 2015-19 CP Final Appendix D: Citizen Participation Plan CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN A flan for Citizen Input and Involvement in the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnership, National Housing Trust Programs with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the State of Hawaii Housing and Finance and Development Corporation County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Telephone: (808) 961-8379 Approved: January 13, 1995 Amended: May 6, 1998 Amended: December 15, 2009 Amended: May 15, 2015 Amended: 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION Ir. ENCOURAGEMENT OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION A. Public Notices B. Public Hearings/Meetings C. Public Comment Period Ill. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IV. PUBLIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION V. COMPLAINTS OR GRIEVANCES VI. SCHEDULE VII. CRITERIA FOR AMENDMENT TO CONSOLIDATED PLAN EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 - Public Notice regarding the Public Hearing Exhibit 2 -- Public Notice regarding the Availability of the Draft Consolidated/Action Plan Exhibit 3 - Public Notice announcing the Availability of the final Consolidated!Action Plan Exhibit 4 -- Public Notice regarding the availability of the Draft Consolidated Annual. Performance Assessment Report Exhibit 5 - Application Schedule of the Consolidated/Action Plan Exhibit 6 -- Public Notice regarding program Amendments 1. INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) administers the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, established by Congress through the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. The County of Hawaii is a direct recipient of CDBG funds from HUD. The purpose of the CDBG Program is to provide decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expand economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. The County has received CDBG funds from 1976 to the present. In order for the County to receive its annual CDBG grant and in an effort to coordinate and condense the planning and application aspects of the CDBG Program, HUD in 1995 replaced the past CDBG application process with a single plan submission called the Consolidated Plan. The County's Consolidated Plan also serves as an information resource for the State of Hawai`i's Consolidated Plan submission and application for funding under HUD's HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) and National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) programs. The Consolidated Plan is a single plan which will describe the County's needs, priorities, funding plans, proposed projects and certify compliance with CDBG Program requirements. The Consolidated Plan covers a five (5) year period. In addition, the County's Consolidated Plan also includes the County's HOME and HTF Projects for information purposes. In addition, Section 104 (a) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, requires that the County certify and now adopt as part of the Consolidated Plan process a detailed citizen participation plan which shall contain the following: 1. Provides for and encourages citizens participation in the development of the Consolidated Plan, any substantial amendments to the Plan and past performances report of CDBG/HOME/HTF activities, with particular emphasis on participation by persons of extremely -low, low and moderate income, residents of slum and blighted areas, low and moderate income neighborhoods, minorities and non- English Speaking persons and persons with disabilities in which CDBG/HOME/HTF funds are proposed to be used; 2. Encourages the consultation with public housing authorities with emphasis for participation of residents of the public and to assist housing developments in developing and implementing the Consolidated Plan as well as to obtain views on housing and community development needs and non -housing development needs; 3. Provides citizens, units of local government and other interested parties on the amount of funds available, range of eligible activities, plans to minimize displacement and the amount of CDBG/HOME/HTF funds that will benefit very low and moderate income persons; 4. Provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to public meetings, information, and availability of the Consolidated/Action Plan, substantial amendments and performance records relating to the grantee's proposed use of funds and actual use of the funds; 5, Provides for technical assistance to groups, representative of persons of extremely -low, low and moderate income that requests such assistance in developing proposals and questions related to housing and community development needs, proposed activities, and program performance; 6. Provides public notices for public hearings to obtain citizens' views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the Consolidated/Action Plan process, including at least the development of needs, priorities, goals and the review of proposed activities, and the review of program performance. Hearings shall be held after adequate notice and times and locations convenient to potential or actual beneficiaries and with accommodations for the disabled; 7. Provides for a timely written answer to written complaints and grievances, within fifteen (15) working days, where practicable; Identifies how the needs of non-English speaking residents will be met in the case of public hearings where a significant number of non-English speaking residents can be reasonably expected to participate. a. Person with special needs may request reasonable accommodations to participate in hearings (e.g., large print, taped materials, sign language, interpreter, or translator for non-English speaking participants, at least seven (7) days prior to the public hearings). This Citizen Participation Plan describes how the County will comply with the above requirements to keep the public informed of CDBG/HOME/HTF programs, projects, and activities and provide the opportunity for public input. All citizens, including the elderly, minorities, persons with disabilities, persons of low and moderate income, and members of the business community, civic groups, community associations, public agencies, and ethnic -cultural groups, are encouraged to give input to the CDBG/HOME/HTF Programs_ II. ENCOURAGEMENT OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Citizens will be encouraged to be involved in all stages of the Consolidated/Action Plan Process. Citizens may submit their views and priorities by calling, faxing, and writing or speaking directly to staff of the Office of Housing and Community Development at: 1) public hearings, 2) public meetings, 3) during public comment periods, and/or 4) at any time during the year, Citizens will be informed of such opportunities for input through public notices. A. Public Notices Public notices will appear to newspaper(s) of general circulation and the County website to: 1) Announce the location & purpose of the public hearings, amount of federal assistance, range of activities that may be undertaken with CDBG/HOME/HTF funds, including the estimated amount that will benefit persons of extremely -low, low- and moderate income and availability of CDBG/HOME/HTF proposals to the public; 2) Announce the participation in the development of the Consolidated. Action Plan and any substantial amendments to the Consolidated'Action Plan; 3) Announce the availability of the Citizen Participation Plan for public review and comment; 4) Announce the availability of the draft Consolidated!Action Plan for public review and comment; 5) Announce the meeting of the County Housing Agency:Finance Committee; 6) Announce the meeting of the Hawai'i County Council; 7) Announce the availability of the final Consolidated.,'Action Plan; and 8) Announce the availability of the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report. Public hearing notices will also state that the OHCD will provide bilingual opportunities to persons or groups who speak and, or read a primary language other than English upon request by the person or group. In addition, the OHCD will provide services of an interpreter for the hearing impaired, large print and taped materials upon request by the person or group. The public hearings will be held at a location that is accessible to persons with disabilities and at a time and location convenient to potential and actual beneficiaries. The public hearings may be conducted via video conferencing. Citizen or groups are requested to call at least a week prior to the hearing so arrangements can be made. B. Public Hearines/Meetines Public hearing(s) will be held to hear citizens' housing and community development needs, comments on the progress of past CDBG HOME111HTF projects, Consolidated"'Action Plan and Citizen Participation Plan, and to explain the Consolidated/Action Plan Process. A public meeting will be held by the Hawai'i County Housing Agency (HCHA) and or Finance Committee (FC) for the purpose of approving and submitting the Consolidated/Action Plan for which the Office of Housing and Community Development is recommending CDBG-1HOME,`HTF funding through its annual Action Plan. Following the action of the HCHA/FC, a public meeting of the Hawai'i County Council will be held to authorize the Mayor to sign and submit the County's Consolidated Plan and/or its Action Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). These public meetings shall be held in Hilo at the Hawaii County Council room, unless otherwise announced. A public notice will be published and meeting agendas will be posted at the Hawaii County Council room at least seven (7) days prior to the public meetings. These public meetings are open to the public. Interested persons will have an opportunity to submit data, views or arguments in writing as well as provide oral testimony on the proposed CDBG''HOME,`HTF activities. Any comments or views expressed at the public meeting will be considered for relevance and incorporated or attached into the Consolidated Action Plan, and -'or Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). C. Public Comment Period In addition to the opportunity to present comments at public hearings and public meetings, citizens will have the opportunity to comment on: 1) the draft Citizen Participation Plan, Consolidated Plan and/or Action Plan prior to its submittal to the HCHA/FC and County Council, and 2) the proposed CAPER Reports prior to its submittal to HUD_ Public comment periods shall not be less than 30 days for the draft Consolidated Plan and any substantial amendment to the Consolidated Plan; not less than one week for the final Consolidated Plan, Citizen Participation Plan; and 15 days for CAPER Reports. III. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Technical assistance will be provided by the staff of the Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) to any groups of persons requesting assistance in developing CDBG/HOME`HTF project proposals. OHCD staff will also be available to answer questions and to provide assistance during the public hearings andror meetings. IV. PUBLIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION In order to provide opportunities for citizens, public agencies and other interested parties to participate in the Consolidated/Action Plan Process, the County will publish public notices to notify all interested parties on the various stages of the Consolidated Action Plan. In addition, a summary of the draft ConsolidatediAction Plan will also be published and available for comment. CDBG/HOME`HTF proposal forms and Federal guidelines covering eligible activities will be available at the public hearings and at the following locations Monday through Friday, 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., except holidays. Office of Housing and Community Development (Hilo Armory) 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawai' i 96720-2456 Phone. 961-8379 Office of Housing and Community Development (West Hawaii Civic Center) 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy Kailua-Kona, Hawai' i 96740 Phone: 323-4305 The draft/proposed and final Consolidated Plan as well as the Action Plans will also be available on the County of Hawaii Housing WebSite for review. V. COMPLAINTS OR GRIEVANCES Citizens may submit complaints or grievances regarding the Consolidated:'Action Plan process by writing to the Office of Housing and Community Development. The Office will make every reasonable attempt to provide a written response to any written complaint or grievance within 15 working days of its receipt. All comments and/or opinions received will be considered for relevance when preparing the final Consolidated/Action Plan, any amendments to the Plan, or performance reports. A summary of comments will be attached to the final Consolidate&Action Plan, amendments to the Plan, or performance reports. VI. SCHEDULE Exhibit 5 is a sample schedule for the Consolidated/Action Plan which reflects the foregoing provisions. VII. CRITERIA FOR AMENDMENT TO CONSOLIDATED PLAN The County will determine the necessity to amend its approved Consolidated:'Action Plan whenever it is presented with the following decisions: 1. Makes a change in its allocation priorities or changes its method of distribution of funds; 2. Carries out a new activity not previously described in the approved Action Plan; or Changes the purpose, scope, location, or beneficiaries of an activity. The County will determine whether a change or amendment is substantial in nature as it relates to changes in purpose, scope, location, or beneficiaries of an activity. The County's basis for a substantial change will hinder on whether the activity continues to assist the original beneficiaries. Should the County determine that an amendment is substantial in nature, then a public notice will be published for thirty (30) days to receive comments on the substantial amendment before the amendment is implemented. Subsequently, if an amendment is not substantial in nature then a public notice will be published for a two (2) week comment period to inform citizens of the County's amendment(s) to the plan. In situations where there is a surplus of CDBG'HOMEiHTF funds which will be transferred to existing approved project(s) to offset project deficits, the County will not publish a public notice to announce these transfer of funds. In cases of emergencies and'or in situations as declared by the Mayor, or in his absence his authorized representative, to be of particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate hazard or threat to the health and welfare of the public which is a direct result from flooding, tidal wave (tsunami), earthquake, or other natural causes, the County will utilize its unencumbered CDBG funds for eligible CDBGiHOME/HTF activities as determined by the OHCD, to alleviate these threatening conditions. Due to the immediate urgency of these situations, the County will at a later date publish a public notice to inform its citizens of the actual expenditure of these CDBG funds. In all case scenarios above, the County will submit a matrix description of its amendment(s) to HUD on its proposed changes. EXHIBIT 1 "SAMPLE,• PUBLIC NOTICE ON PUBLIC MEETINGS And REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For COUNTY OF HAWAI'I's COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG), HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (HOME) AND NATIONAL HOUSING TRUST (HTF) PROGRAMS The County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) will hold a series of public hearings on the aforementioned programs. As required by federal regulations, the County has selected the locations and times in an effort to encourage comments and views from persons of very low- and moderate -income. The following selected locations have been identified in the current U -S. Census as low- and moderate income areas: PUNA PUBLIC HEARING HILO PUBLIC HEARING Date: Monday, Month, Day, Time: _ _ a.m./p.m. Place: Pahoa Neighborhood HAMAKUA PUBLIC HEARING Year Wednesday, Month, Day, Year Time: _ _ a.m./p.m. Center 1990 Kinoole Street Existing Housing Conference Room KONA PUBLIC HEARING Date: Thursday, Month, Day, Year Wednesday, Month, Day, Year Time: _ _ a.m./p.m. Time: _ _ a.m./p.m. Place: Honoka,a Gym Pahala Community Center The purpose of the public hearings is to hear views and comments from citizens on housing and community development needs and the past performance of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) and National Housing Trust Program funds (HTF). In addition, the OHCD will entertain comments with respect to the currently approved Consolidated Plan (CP), Citizens Participation Plan, and suggestions or possible projects that comply and meet with the priorities and strategies in the CP section of its Consolidated Plan process. The County encourages its citizens, especially persons of extremely -low, low and moderate income, minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with disabilities, to attend the public hearing and share their comments and views. Persons requiring special needs (i.e., sign language, bilingual interpreters, large print and taped material) may call the OHCD at V/TT 961-8379 at least 7 days prior to the hearings so arrangements may be made to accommodate them. Citizens who will be unable to attend these hearings may submit written testimony or fax testimony pertaining to their housing and community development needs, or comments to the Consolidated Plan by (Day, Month, Year), to Housing Administrator, Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD), 50 Wailuku Drive, Hilo, Hawaii 96720, After the public hearing, the OHCD staff will be available to discuss the procedures and guidelines for applying for the County's (Year) CDBG, HOME and HTF programs. The OHCD staff will provide technical assistance to groups requesting assistance in developing proposals. CDBG/HOME/HTF PROJECT PROPOSALS FORMS The CP describes the County's housing and community development needs, funding plans and strategies and the County's Annual action plan for the CDBG, HOME and HTF Program funds. The County of Hawai'i is, therefore, seeking project proposals for its (Year) Annual Action plan for its CP to submit to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The County expects to receive approximately ($ Amount) for its CDBG Program, ($ Amount) for the HOME Program and ($ Amount) for the HTF program. Project proposals submitted to the OHCD must comply with the program criteria, meet eligibility requirements, program objectives, and be consistent with the County's Priorities and strategies as contained in the County's current Consolidated Plan. An original project proposal and two (2) copies must be received by 4:30 p.m. on Day, Month, Year, by the OHCD, 50 Wailuku Drive, Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456. The proposal forms and federal guidelines covering the eligible activities will be available at the public hearings and at the following locations beginning (Month, Day, Year), Monday through Friday, 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., except on holidays. Proposal forms will also be mailed, upon request, after (Month, Day, Year). OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) (Hilo Armory) 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456 Phone; 961-8379 OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway Kailua-Kana, Hawaii 96740 Phone: 329-4305 In addition, copies of the County's current Consolidated/Action Plan, Citizen Participation Plan and past performance of CDBG, HOME and HTF funds are also available at the both locations. The following is a brief summary to the Citizen Participation Plan, CDBG, HOME and HTF programs. Citizen Participation Plan: The County is proposing to amend its currently approved Citizen Participation Plan which describes and outlines the County's plan to encourage and inform all its citizens, especially persons of very low and low income, including minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with mobility, visual or hearing impairments, to participate in the development of the County's Consolidated Plan. The amendment includes the HOME Investment Partnerships and National Housing Trust programs, stipulates the County's requirements on the use of federal funds during an emergency situation and corrects and clarifies other clerical and technical aspects of the Citizen Participation Plan. The proposed amendments are required and necessary to comply with the federal program rules and regulations. The Hawaii County Housing Agency and or Finance Committee and Hawaii County Council will be acting on the amended Citizen Participation Plan during the approval of the County's Action Plan for its (year) Consolidated Plan. Community Development Block Grant Program: Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93- 383) created the CDBG Program, which became effective January 1, 1974. Under the CDBG Program, a community is able to develop a flexible, locally designed comprehensive community development strategy in order to address the program's primary objective: ". . . development of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and suitable living environments and expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate income." In general, grant or loan assistance under the CDBG Program may be used for the following activities provided that these activities either 1) principally benefit low- and moderate -income families, 2) aid in the prevention of elimination of slums and blight, or 3) meet other community development needs having a particular urgency. Range of Eligible Activities for * Acquisition on real property. * Acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or installation of public facilities. * Provision of public services provided it is a new service or a quantifiable increase in a service now being provided and does not exceed 15% of the County's allocation. * Payment of the non-federal share in connection with other federal programs undertaken as part of the development program. * Assist privately owned utilities. * Code enforcement in deteriorated areas, together with public improvements and services, to arrest the area's decline. * Rehabilitation of privately owned buildings and low- income public housing. the use of CDBG Program funds: * Disposition of real property. * Clearance, demolition and removal of building and improvements. * Interim assistance to deterioration and alleviate emergency conditions. * Urban renewal completion. * Relocation payments. * Loss of rental income incurred in holding housing units for displacees. * Removal of material and architectural barriers restricting mobility of elderly and disabled persons. * Historic preservation. * Assistance to sub - recipients to carry out activities listed. * Renovation of closed school buildings. * Micro enterprise Assistance. * Planning activities. HOME Program: The HOME Program was created under Title II (the HOME Investment Partnerships Act) of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990. The purpose of the HOME program is to expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing for very low and low income persons. Range of Eligible Activities for !:he use of HOME Program funds: • Development hard costs defined as the actual cost of constructing Cr rehabilitating housing. • Acquisition costs. • Related soft costs defined as other reasonable and necessary costs incurred and associated with the financing, or development (or both) of new construction, rehabilitation or acquisition of housing assisted with HOME funds. • Relocation costs. • Costs related to tenant -based rental assistance. Applicants applying for HOME funding are required to match for every $1.00 of federal HOME funds expended for the project with at least $.25 of eligible matching funds. National Housing Trust Fund: The National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Program is a new federally funded program which was created by Section 1131 of Title I of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. This program is intended to be a locally designed and administered program to increase and preserve the supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing, with primary attention to rental housing for extremely low-income households, including homeless families. The State of Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC) anticipates receiving approximately $3,000,000 in HTF in 2018. The allocation is divided amongst the City and County of Honolulu and Counties and rotated annually between the neighbor island counties. Hawaii County is next in the rotation to receive the HTF program funds in 2018 of approximately $1,425,000. The County is targeting these funds solely for rental housing activities serving households with incomes at or below 30% of the area median income. HTE funds can be used for the new construction or acquisition and/or rehabilitation of rental housing units affordable to extremely low income families and some operating costs for rental projects. For additional program information, please view the OHCD website at www.hawaii.gov/office-of-housing/ OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTY OF HAWAII by: Housing Administrator Mayor County of Hawai i (Hawaii Tribune -Herald: (Month, Day, Year and Month, Day, Year) (West Hawai'i Today- (Month, Day, Year and Month, Day, Year) EXHIBIT 2 "SAMPLE" PUBLIC NOTICE COUNTY OF HAWAII CONSOLIDATED/ACTION PLAN FOR THE COUNTY'S CONSOLIDATED PLAN — COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG), HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) AND NATIONAL HOUSING TRUST (HTF) PROGRAMS The Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) has developed ana published its proposed Consolidated/Action Plan for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) (Year) CDBG, HOME and HTE Programs and is providing affected citizens an opportunity to examine its contents and to submit comments on the proposed (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM The County of Hawaii has been informed by HUD that the County's total (Year) CDBG allocati:n is ($ Amount). The C,cunty plans to utilize these funds for the following projec s : CDBG Projects Acquisition/Construction Renovation & Restoration Planning & Administration Amount Total $ Based on the proposed (Year) CDBG projects, the OHCD estimates that percent or ($ Amount) in CDBG grant funds will benefit low and moderate income persons in accordance with CDBG regulations. The CDBG Project amount for the County of Hawaii's (Project) may change to accommodate the actual amount of grant funds or program inc...me received or if there are any cancelled project(s) or reprogramming of CDBG funds. HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) PROGRAM The State of Hawaii is required to submit its (Year) Action Plan to HUD for the (Year) HOME Program. It is anticipated that the State will continue to rotate the HOME funds among the three neighbor island counties. The County of Hawaii anticipates that it will receive approximately ($ Amount) for its (Year) HOME Program. To prepare for the (Year) Home Program, the County requested project proposals and will submit the following projects to the State's Hcusing Finance and Development Corporation for approval; HOME Projects Amount County of Hawaii's HOME Rental Assistance $ County of Hawai'i's HOME Rental Assistance $ Administration HOME Administration $ Total $ The HOME project amount for the County of Hawai'i's HOME Project(s) may change to accommodate the actual amount of grant funds or program income received or if there are any cancelled project(s) or reprogramming of HOME funds. NATIONAL HOUSING TRUST FMW (HTF) PROGRAM The State of Hawaii is required to submit its (Year) Action Plan to HUD for the (Year) HTF Program. It is anticipated that the State will continue to divide the HTF funds among the three neighbor island counties. The County of Hawaii anticipates that it will receive approximately ($ Amount) for its (Year) HTF Program. To prepare for the (Year) HTF Program, and will submit the following projects Development Corporation for approval: HTF Projects County of Hawai is HTF PROJECT County of Hawai'i's HTF PROJECT HTF Administration Total the County requested project proposals to the State's Housing Finance and �� Amount The HTE project amount for the County of Hawai'i's HTE Project(s) may change to accommodate the actual amount of grant funds or program income received or if there are any cancelled project(s) or reprogramming of HTF funds. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD The proposed (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan will be available for public review and comment from (Month, Day, Year), to (Month, Day, Year), at the following locations, Monday through Friday, 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., except on holidays: OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) (Hilo Armory) 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456 Phone; 961-6379 OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Phone: 329-4305 Persons, particularly these who are extremely -low, low and moderate income, are encouraged to submit their comments regarding the activity or activities that are being prcposed in their area. As required by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, a Plan to Minimize Displacement will also be available for public review at the above OHCD locations. The OHCD will consider any comments and views expressed by citizens on the proposed (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan and may modify the Plan, if deemed appropriate. Citizens who wish tc comment on the proposed plan must submit their comments in writing to the OHCD by (Month, Day, Year), in order for the Hawaii County Housing Agency and Hawa-'i County Council to consider them in their review of the final (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan. The Hawaii County Housing Agency/Finance Committee and Hawaii County Council will be meeting on (Month, Day, Year), and (Month, Day, Year), respectively. Office of Housing and Community Development - County of Hawai i By:Housing Administrator Mayor County of Hawai i (Hawai'i Tribune -Herald: (Month, bay, Year) (West Hawaii Today: (Month, Day, Year) n EXHIBIT 3 "SAMPLE re PUBLIC NOTICE COUNTY OF HAWAI I (Year) CONSOLIDATED/ACTION PLAN FOR THE COUNTY'S CONSOLIDATED PLAN PROGRAM YEAR FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) , HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) AND NATIONAL HOUSING TRUST PROGRAMS The Hawaii County Council has approved the Coun_y cf Hawaii (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan for the County's (Year) Consolidated Plan program year with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and have authorized the Mayor to execute and submit the (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan to HUD for the CDBG, HOME and HTF programs. The County of Hawaii plans to utilize its (Year) CDBG, HOME and HTF funds for the following projects: COWRWITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM The County of Hawaii has been informed by HUD that the County's total (Year) CDBG/HOME/HTE allocation is ($ Amount). The County plans to utilize these funds for the following projects: CDBG/HOME/HTF Projects Amount CDBG/HOME/HTF Project $ CDBG/HOME/HTF Pro,ect $ Planning & Administration $ Total $ The CDBG/HOME/HTE project amounts for the project(s) may change to accommodate the actual amount of grant funds or program income received or if there are any cancelled project(s) or reprogramming of CDBG/HOME/HTE funds. Based on the proposed (Year) CDBG projects, the OHCD estimates that 100%_ percent of ($ Amount) in CDBG grant funds will benefit low and moderate income persons in accordance with CDBG regulations. The HOME/HTF Project amount for the project(s) may change to accommodate the actual amount of grant funds or program income received or if there are any cancelled project(s) or reprogramming of HOME funds. As required by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, the (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan will be available for public review from (Month, Day) to (Month, Day, Year), at the following locations, Monday through Friday, 7:45 a.m. to 4.30 p.m., except on holidays. OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) (Hilo Armory) 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456 Phone: 961-8379 OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMTN (OHCD) 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Phone; 329-4305 The OHCD will mail and or electronically submit the final (Year) Consolidated/Action Plan to HUD, Honolulu Area Office, on L,y,. (Day, year),_.. meet HUD's submittal deadline of May (Day, year). Office of Housing and Community Development - County of Hawai i By; Housing Administrator Mayor County of Hawai i (Hawai'i Tribune Heralds (Month, Day, Year) (West Hawaii Today: (Month, Day, Year) LN EXHIBIT 4 "SAMPLE" PUBLIC NOTICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) SMALL CITIES PROGRAM CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) The County of Hawai'i, through its Off`_ce of Housing and Community Development (OHCD), has developed its proposed CAPER for its (Year -Year) CDBG/HOME/HTF programs. The purpose of the report is to provide the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) with information on the financial and physical development status of each CDBG-assisted activity within the County. In accordance with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, the proposed report will be available for public review and comment from (Month, Day, Year), at the following locations; OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) (Hilo Armory) 50 W'ailuku Drive Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456 Phone: 961-8379 OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Phone: 329-4305 Copies of the draf'; CAPER may also be obtained by calling the OHCD at (808) 961-8379 or (808) 323-4300. The OHCD will consider any written comments and views expressed by citizens on the draft CAPER and may modify the reports, if it is deemed appropriate. Citizens who wish to comment on the draft CAPER must submit their comments in writing to the OHCD, 50 Wailuku Drive, Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456, or fax your comments 808/961-8685 by 4:30 p.m. on (Month, Day, Year). OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTY OF HKvIAV I BY: HOUSING ADMINISTRATOR MAYOR COUNTY OF HAWAI' I (Hawai'i Tribune Herald: (Month, Day, Year) (West Hawaii Today: (Month, Day, Year) EXHIBIT 5 "SAMPLE'► CONSOLIDATED/ACTION PLAN AND CDBG/HOME/HTF APPLICATION SCHEDULE DATE TASK (Month, Day, Year) Public hearing to hear the Housing & Community Development needs and explain the application procedures, and Consolidated/Action Plan process. (Month, Day, Year) Hilo: 1990 Kinoole 5t. (Time, a.m./p.m.) Kona: Mayors Office (Time, a.m./p.m.) Honoka'a: Honoka'a Gym, (Time, a.m./p.m.) Pahoa: Neighborhood Center, (Time, a.m./p.m.) (Month, Day, Year) CDBG/HOME/HTF Project proposals due to the OHCD. (Month, Day, Year) OHCD to review, rank, and select CDBG/HOME/HTF Projects for the County's Consolidated/Action Plan to HUD. (Month, Day, Year) OHCD to draft the County's proposed Consolidated/Action Plan. (Month, Day, Year) Public notice appears in newspapers and County website, announcing the availability of the proposed Consolidated/Action Plan for public review and comment. (Month, Day, Year) Comment period for the County's proposed Consolidated/Action Plan (30 days required). (Month, Day, Year) Deadline to submit documents for Hawaii County Housing Agency/Finance Committee meeting. (Month, Day, Year) Housing Agency/Finance Committee meeting to approve projects. (Month, Day, Year) Deadline to submit documents for Hawaii County Council meeting. (Month, Day, Year) Council meeting to authorize Mayor to sign and submit the County's Consolidated/Action Plan to HUD. (Month, Day, Year) Obtain Mayor's signature. (Month, Day, Year) Public Notice appears in newspapers and County website summarizing the final Consolidated/Action Plan. (Month, Day, Year) Consolidated/Action Plan due. EXHIBIT 6 "SAMPLE" PUBLIC NOTICE PROGRAM AMENDMENT TO COMdUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SMALL CITIES PROGRAMS :'he Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) has developed and published its draft amendments to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) and National Housing Trust (HTF) programs, to afford affected citizens an opportunity to examine its contents, and to submit comments on '�he draft amendments. AMENDMENT TO (Consolidated Program Year) Consolidated/Action Plan In accordance with the County's approved Citizen Participation Plan, projects determined to substantially change in purpose, scope, location and beneficiaries shall be listed and describe here. Should the amendment be substantial in nature, then this notice will be published for thirty (30) days to receive public comments. Subsequently, if an amendment is not substantial in nature then a public notice will be published for a two (2) week comment period to inform citizens of the County's amendment(s) to the plan. The draft amendments will be available for public review and comment from (Month, Day, Year) to (Month, Day, Year) at the following locations, Monday through Friday, 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., except on holidays. OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) DEVELOPMENT (OHCD) (Hilo Armory) 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway 50 Wailuku Drive Kailua-Kona, Hawai'i 96740 Hilo, Hawaii 96720-2456 Phone: 329-4305 Phone: 961--6379 The OHCD will consider any comments and views expressed by citizens on the draft amendments, and may modify the amendments, if it deems appropriate. Citizens who wish to comment on the draft amendments must submit their comments in writing to the OHCD, or FAX your comments to 808/961-8685, by (Month, Day, Year). OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - COUNTY OF HAWAI'I Mayor County of Hawai'i (Hawai'i Tribune Herald: (Month, Day, Year) (West Hawaii Today: (Month, Day, Year) Appendix : 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing O 2011 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE 01 COUNTY OF HAWAII Final: March 2012 Prepared by Belt Collins Hawaii LLC Prepared for Office of Housing and Community Development County of Hawaii HIGHLIGHTS This report brings together information about the availability of housing in Hawaii County for persons or groups who are identified in state and federal laws as "protected classes." In Hawai-i, it is illegal to discriminate against any person because of religion_ color, race, ancestry °national. origin, age, familial status, marital status, disability, HIV infection, sex or sexual orientation. The major findings of the study can be summarized as responding to the following questions: Is housing discrimination present on Hmrai 'i island? If so, what groups are affected? In tithat situations does discrimination affect them? Housing discrimination still occurs. The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission reports. on average, 80 housing complaints filed annually statewide. That figure is modest when compared to the 192,656 renter households statewide (22,825 on Hawaii island) in 2010. The largest set of complaints involves people with a disability. Complaints involving persons with disabilities often involve "reasonable accommodation" - changes needed so that the person can enjoy use of the housing unit as much as others do. Housing and social service professionals report that discrimination occurs more often, and may affect Micronesians more often than others -- but Micronesian immigrants are very unlikely to complain about mistreatment. Many property managers for low-income housing are aware of fair housing laws, and careful to follow them. Others in the private sector who rent housing may not be so well informed or scrupulous. Fair housing issues may arise in mortgage practices, if borrowers are steered to less favorable loans on the basis of race, language or disability. The extent of Lhis practice in Hawaii County has not yet been determined. Is fair housing choice being si nificantly limited on Hatirai'i island by facto) s other than or in addition to discrimination? Demand for secure, affordable housing is strong_ The limited supply and the cost to build and maintain housing already makes rents high in comparison to U.S. Mainland areas. Incomes are lower, on average, in Hawaii County than statewide, and the share ofthe population below the poverty level (14.4%) is higher than the statewide share. Recently, median rental prices hay :e declined. The supply of housing vouchers for low-income families have not grown along with the population, and the supply of housing built for low-income tenants grows slowly. The County continues to maintain a waitlist for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program, There is no firm evidence that economic pressures lead to Fair Housing abase. However, when the supply of housing managed by professionals is full, vulnerable persons and families seeking BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page i County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 housing increasingly depend on landlords whose knowledge of the law is limited. Currently, an estimated 24,825 households in Hawaii County earn 50 percent of the County median household income or less; while only 2,555 units are listed in the inventory of managed affordable housing units. An additional 1,000 Section 8 vouchers are distributed by the county, but the wait list for Section 8 vouchers include more than 6,000 families. The large majority of low- and moderate - income households find housing elsewhere, and most probably deal with landlords with limited knowledge of Fair Housing. Do actions of the County of Hawaii work to create or remo►•e impediments to fair housing choice? The County's Fair Housing staff works to remove impediments by educating housing professionals and the public at large at seminars and training sessions throughout the island. Presentations are made using interpreters to groups with limited English proficiency. The recent development and release of a video, available on a compact disk or through the Office of Housing and Community Development website, extends the educational efforts. The County staff provides information on Fair Housing to the general public and in response to requests on a daily basis. Changes in building codes and the proposed imposition of impact fees are likely to increase the cost of housing construction. However, the County Council can limit the cost of new workforce housing projects by granting qualified exemptions from fees and requirements. Is the County acting on the reconunendations in earlier reports? Yes. recommendations in earlier reports have been put into practice. The County is spreading information about Fair Housing through its website, via video, and through daily assistance to tenants and landlords. Collaboration with Federal, State and County staff has helped to share knowledge of emerging Fair Housing issues. Are additional measures needed to counter barriers to fair housing choice? Continuing work to educate landlords and persons who suffer housing discrimination about rights and responsibilities is appropriate. Due to changes in the housing market and the shift to Internet advertising of housing for rent or sale, additional actions are recommended: Review and respond systematically to Internet rental advertisements, in order to reach "Mom and Pop" landlords. (OHCD and Legal Aid Society of Hawai` i both review these. The recommendation is to do so continuously and to respond to advertisements by alerting lessors to Fair Housing training and laws.) • Reach out to community associations to spread knowledge of Fair Housing regulations. (These are increasingly involved in the rental market after foreclosures.) BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC page ii County of Hawaii 2021 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Provide a help line with interpreters available at set times: Professionals in the housing industry recognize that advice and consultation on Fair Housing issues by the County staff help them understand the regulations and avoid violations. This effort can be enhanced if a separate help or advice telephone line is made available and publicized. If a help 1 ine is publicized in several languages and interpretation services are available in Spanish, Marshallese, and other languages, it will be possible to estimate and address the need for assistance in language -isolated groups.. To cover the cost of such a service, a statewide pilot project is suggested. Consider providing counseling and legal support for victims of predatory lending when it violates Fair Housing laws: The issue of fair housing in mortgage practices may warrant further attention. Housing counseling is available through the Hawaii HomeOwnership Center. While no complaints against lenders have been filed under Fair Housing rules, there is prima facie evidence that predatory tending may disproportionately affect minority groups. In other states. counseling services are supplemented by education and legal advice, funded by HUD, for victims of predatory lending_ A similar program in Hawaii may be effective. The latter two recommendations are for co-ordinated action throughout Hawaii. The County of Hawaii would likely be an advocate for, not the primary funder of, these programs. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page iii County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 CONTENTS TENT lIGHLIGHTS............................................................................................................................ i 1 INTRODTv;CTION......................................................,......................... ....,,...., ,,..,,....,...... 1 1.1 ................................................. .... ..................................... 1 1.2 Scope of the Study' ..... .... ......................................................................................... l 1.3 Approach..—........ ... ......................................................................................... ....... 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................... 4 2_1 Population and Housing Trends.................................................................. .......... ...... 4 2.2 Housing Foreclosures ................................................................................................8 2.3 L.conomic and Tecluiological Trends........ . ................................................................. 4 2.4 Incidence of Protected Classes: Persons...................................................................... 1 I 2.5 incidc,rice of Proteacd Classes: ado sehofds.................................. ........................... „ IS 3 110USING TRENDS..,..., ........... ............................................................................ I 3.1 Housing Avaiiabil tv ....... ......... ........................................................................... 18 3.2 Cost oI'll ousing for Sale or Rent ...................................................... ..................... I$ 3.3 Housing Demand....................................................................... ............................... 25 4 CONIPLAI QTS AND TESTING ................ ........... I ............................................................ 27 5 COI;NTY POLIC4'ISSN]FS................................................................... ......................... 30 5.1 1lawai`i County Policies and Prourains ............... ..................................................... 30 5.2 Ongoing Actions to Address Impe;dunertts ................................................................. 32 b INTERVIEWS AND SURVEYS .............................................................. ............. ......35 7 RE S............................................................................................. 3 REFERENCE.. .. ...... .............................................................................................. ..... ...41 APPENDIX QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES TO E -SURVEY .......................................—... 42 BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page iv County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 FIGURES Figure 2-1; ANNUALIZED RATE OF INCREASE, POPULATION, HOUSING AND TABLES Table 2-1: HOUSEHOLDS, HAWAI`l COUNTY, 1980 TO 2010 ............. ........... -.............. 5 Figure 2-2: TOTAL WEEKS UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMED, HAWAI1 ISLAND 5 Table 2-3: UNEMPLOYMENT OFFICES............................................................................ 10 Figure 3-1: MULTIPLE LISTINGS SERVICE ANNUAL SALES VOLUME AND - 7 Table 2-5: MEDIAN PRICES. HAWAII COUNTY, 1997-2010 ......................................... 20 Figure 3-2. MEDIAN CONTRACT AND FAIR MARKET RENTS, AND AVERAGE 13 Table 2-7: ASKING RENT, 2004-2011................................................................................. 21 Figure 3-3: MONTHLY PAYMENT AFFORDABLE FOR HOUSEHOLDS PLANNING TO 14 RENT OR BUY HOUSING, 2011....................................................................... 24 Figure 3-4: VOLUME OF HOUSING SALES, BY PRICE RANGE, HAWAII COUNTY, HOUSEHOLDS BY RACE OF HOUSEHOLDER, 2010. .... ...._....................... 16 2010 AND 2011 .......... __ ............. ___ .... ............. -.............. ............................... 24 TABLES Table 2-1: POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1980 -2010 ....................................................... 4 Table 2-2: AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS, 1990-2010 .... .......... __............................ .. _.. 5 Table 2-3: AGE DISTRIBUTION, 2010..............................................................................— 6 Table 2-4: EMPLOYMENT AND POVERTY, 2006-2010 ......................................... .... .... - 7 Table 2-5: RACE AND LATINO HISPANIC STATUS, 2010.... ... 12 Table 2-6: LINGUISTIC ISOLATION, 2006-2010.............................................................. 13 Table 2-7: SELECTED INDICATORS FROM THE BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM, 2010 ................ .......................... I .......... ....... ..... ..... 14 Table 2-8: REPORTED AIDS CASES. 2006-2010 ....... ........ ..... -... .............. ...................... .. 15 Table 2-9: HOUSEHOLDS BY RACE OF HOUSEHOLDER, 2010. .... ...._....................... 16 I -able 2-10: HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION, 2010.... .... -...................................................... 17 Table 3-1: HOUSING OCCUPANCY AND TENURE, 2010 .................................. .......... - 18 Table 3-2: AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS, 1990 TO 2010 ............................... .............. 19 Table 3-4: DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME AND HOUSING BURDEN, 2006-2010........................................................................-...........— 22 Table 3-5: NEEDED HOUSING BY HUD INCOME CLASSIFICATION, 2012 TO 2016 26 Table 4-1: SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS, HAWAII CIVIL. RIGHTS COMMISSION COMPLAINTS, FY 2002-2011 ..................... ..................................... .................. 28 Table 5-1: IMPEDIMENTS AND RESPONSES, PER 2007 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS .................................._...._........_............_.......I..... I .............................................. .. 33 Table 5-2: FAIR HOUSING PERFORMANCE MEASURES ............................................. 34 Table 6-1: PARTICIPANTS IN THE 2012 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS STUDY...... 36 BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page v County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 0 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ACS American Community Survey (of the United States Census) CDBG Community Development Block Grant COFA Compact of Free Association between the United States of America and the independent states that had been part of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (Belau, the Federated States of Micronesia, Republic of the Marshall Islands). Nationals of these states may enter and stay in the United States much as residents of other U.S. states or possessions do. In Hawai` i, immigrants from these Micronesian areas may be identified as COFA migrants. DBEDT Hawai` i State Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism ESG Emergency Shelter Grant HCRC Hawaii Civil Rights Commission HHFDC Hawai` i Housing Finance and Development Corporation, an agency of the State of Hawaii HPHA Hawai` i Public Housing Authority HRS Hawaii Revised Statutes HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development LASH Legal Aid Society of Hawaii OHCD Office of Housing and Community Development, County of Hawai` i Section 8 Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program: Federal low-income housing voucher program for renters, administered by local agencies. In Hawai` i County, the Existing Housing Division of OHCD is responsible for the Section 8 program. A different program allocates "HUD Section 8" vouchers to housing projects. U.S. United States BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page vi County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background In the State of Hawaii, it is illegal to discriminate against any person because of religion, color, race, ancestry�national origin, age, familial status, marital status: disability, HIV infection, sex or sexual orientation. Both federal and state laws specify classes of people protected from discrimination. This report deals with access to housing. It is produced in response to the requirement, by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), that housing agencies receiving certain funds from HUD certify that they are actively working to affirmatively further fair housing. Affirmatively furthering fair housing is defined as conducting an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, identifying and implementing actions to overcome impediments, and developing ways to monitor those actions. 1.2 Scope of the Study The analysis of impediments deal with impediments to fair housing choice in the public and private sectors. It involves: I _ A comprehensive review of local laws, regulations, administrative policies, procedures and practices; 2. An assessment of how those laws, regulations, policies, procedures and practices affect the location, availability, and accessibility of housing; and 3. An assessment of conditions affecting fair housing choice. 1.3 Approach 1.3,1 Major Questions for the Analysis • Is housing discrimination present on Hawaii Island? If so, what groups are affected? In what venues or situations does discrimination affect them? Is fair housing choice being significantly limited on Hawaii island by factors other than or in addition to discrimination? BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page I County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Do actions of the County of Hawaii work to create or remove impediments to fair housing choice? • is the County acting on the recommendations in earlier reports? • Are additional measures needed to counter barriers to fair housing choice? 1.3.2 Organization of the Report This report includes eight major sections: The sununary provides a narrative account of fair housing choice in Hawaii County, bringing together data discussed in more detail in later sections; • This introduction deals with the scope and organization of the report; • Chapter 2 deals with population and housing trends, with a focus on the incidence of the protected classes; • Chapter 3 considers demand and supply, moving from counts of housing units and households to estimates of current and likely future need; • Chapter 4 describes the incidence and content of claims of housing discrimination, and the testing done to learn whether such discrimination is extensive; Chapter 5 describes housing policy and government practices affecting housing choice in Hawaii County; • Chapter 6 brings together information from interviews and surveys for this report, including local experts' views of current conditions and suggestions for policy initiatives; and Chapter 7 identifies recommendations for County action. 1.3.3. Sources of Information This report relies on information from public sources, notably the U.S. Census Bureau, on studies and reports prepared for the County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) along with associated housing agencies in Hawaii, and on information provided by stakeholders for this report. (Stakeholders include OHCD staff, other housing agencies, and County agencies concerned with housing availability, real estate professionals, and advocates for members of protected classes. See Table 6-1.) BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 2 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 OHCD and associated agencies have sponsored extensive data collection and analysis, notably the Hawnri Housing Police Study conducted by SMS Research & Marketing Services, Inc. in 1992, 1997, 2003, 2006 and 2011. (The 2011 study is entitled Hawai 'i Housing Planning Slucly, 2011.) OHCD has sponsored Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice reports in the past, most recently for 2007 (published in 2008). The State of Hawaii sponsored a similar study in 2010, covering the four counties of Hawaii. This report draws on information from earlier studies as needed. Earlier studies included a survey on awareness of fair housing law, attitudes toward discriminatory housing practices, and experience of housing discrimination. No new survey was conducted for the present report, in part because past work provides a solid basis to guide policy development for the next few years. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 3 County of Hawaii 2012 Analysis of lmpedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Population and Housing Trends Hawai'i County has seen continuing population growth over the last few decades. Housing development has increased rapidly. Some of that housing is for use by non- residents. The number of households the housing actually occupied by residents --- has not increased as quickly as the overall housing stock. Table 2-1 shows State and County Census data since 1980, and Figure 2-1 shows the annual average rates of change per decade for population, housing units, and households. Table 2-1: POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1980-2010 SOURCE- U.S. Census as reported in DBEDT data books_ When units available for island residents are counted (including units vacant for rent or sale, but excluding units held for recreational or seasonal use, for migrant workers, and other vacant units), the share of Hawai'i County units vacant and available for residents have climbed from 4.0 percent to 6.6 percent of the available stock by 2010 (as shown in Table 2-2). BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 4 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawai'i County Population 1980 964,961 92,053 1990 1,108, 229 120,317 2000 1,211,537 148,677 2010 1,360,301 185,079 Housing Stock 1980 332,213 33,954 1990 389,810 48,253 2000 460,542 62,674 2010 519,508 82,324 Households 1980 294,052 29,237 1990 356,267 41,461 2000 403,240 52,985 2010 455,338 67,096 SOURCE- U.S. Census as reported in DBEDT data books_ When units available for island residents are counted (including units vacant for rent or sale, but excluding units held for recreational or seasonal use, for migrant workers, and other vacant units), the share of Hawai'i County units vacant and available for residents have climbed from 4.0 percent to 6.6 percent of the available stock by 2010 (as shown in Table 2-2). BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 4 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Figure 2-1: ANNUALIZED RATE OF INCREASE, POPULATION, HOUSING AND HOUSEHOLDS, HAINAN COUNTY,1980 TO 2010 4.0% - 3.5% - 3.0%- 2.5% - 2.0% 1.5% - 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% - 1980 to 1990 1990 to 2000 2000 to 2010 -Population Hous ng Stock --- Households Table 2-2: AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS, 1990-2010 NOTE: See SMS 2011 Table IA -4 for listings of vacancies and for intercensal data from rhe American Community Survey. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 5 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County Available Units 1990 367,282 43,210 2000 426,276 55,745 2010 475,792 71,819 Unoccupied Available Units 1990 11,()15 1,749 2000 23,036 2,760 2010 20,454 4,723 Unoccupied Units, % of Available Units 1990 3.0% 4.0% 2000 5.4910 5.0% 2010 4.3% 6.6% NOTE: See SMS 2011 Table IA -4 for listings of vacancies and for intercensal data from rhe American Community Survey. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 5 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 In 2010, the decennial U.S. Census counted 185,079 persons in Hawaii County. Of these, 181,435 lived in households, and 3,644 in group quarters.' Compared to the State as a whole, Hawaii County had a somewhat older population, on average. Table 2-3 shows the age distribution for the County and State populations. The cohorts aged 50 to 69 form a larger share of the County population than of the State as a whole. Hawaii County's people tend to be poorer than residents of the rest of the state. Table 2-4 shows that this difference involves labor force participation, unemployment, and incomes. Table 2-3: AGE DISTRIBUTION, 2010 SOURCE: 2010 Census. Posted at http: Ihawan.gov dbedt/mfo census Census 2010 demographic. 2010 U.S. Census data are posted by the Census Bureau through American FactFunder. Currently, these data are on "American FactFinder2" (http.. factfinder2.census.gov faces nav Isf/pages index.xhtml). That site will likely be renamed when the original version is retired In addition, the Hawaii State Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (DBEDT) posts tables of Census data (at http: /hawaii,p Abedtlinf6censu.4 Census 2010) Much of the information discussed here comes from the 2010 SF -1 Demographic Profile for Hawsii County prepared by the Census Bureau. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 6 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawai'i County Total population 1,360,301 185,079 Under 5 years 87,407 6.4% 11,845 6.4% 5 to 9 years 83,361 6.1% 11,478 6.2% 10 to 14 years 81,539 6.0% 11,521 6.2% 15 to 19 years 85,994 6.3% 12,089 6.5% 20 to 24 years 95,829 7.0% 10,833 5.9% 25 to 29 years 97,302 7.2% 11,290 6.1% 30 to 34 years 88,031 6.5% 10,935 5.9% 35 to 39 years 86,756 6.4% 10,485 5.7% 40 to 44 years 89,617 6.6% 10,897 5.9% 45 to 49 years 95,787 7.0% 12,657 6.8% 50 to 54 years 97,978 7.2% 14,866 8.0% 55 to 59 years 93,340 6.9%, 15,807 8.5% 60 to 64 years 82,222 6.0% 13,542 7.3% 65 to 69 years 59,170 4.3% 9,178 5.0% 70 to 74 years 41,353 3.0% 5,830 3.2% 75 to 79 years 34,675 2.5% 4,571 2.5% 80 to 84 years 29,702 2.2%, 3,652 2.0% 85 years and over 30,238 2.2% 3,603 1.9% Median age (years) 38.6 40.9 SOURCE: 2010 Census. Posted at http: Ihawan.gov dbedt/mfo census Census 2010 demographic. 2010 U.S. Census data are posted by the Census Bureau through American FactFunder. Currently, these data are on "American FactFinder2" (http.. factfinder2.census.gov faces nav Isf/pages index.xhtml). That site will likely be renamed when the original version is retired In addition, the Hawaii State Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (DBEDT) posts tables of Census data (at http: /hawaii,p Abedtlinf6censu.4 Census 2010) Much of the information discussed here comes from the 2010 SF -1 Demographic Profile for Hawsii County prepared by the Census Bureau. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 6 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 2-4- EMPLOYMENT AND POVERTY, 2006-2010 SOURCE; American Community Survey (ACS) for 2006-2010, in profiles posted at httn; lia%vaii,ttov/dbedt/in#a/census,,acs:AC'S20IOi-ACS20.10 5 Year acs hi 2010 profiles 5 yr estimate. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 7 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii County of Hawaii EMPLOYMENT Population 16 years and over 1,068,287 143,857 In labor force 714,067 93,190 Civilian labor force 674,469 92,979 Employed 636,454 85,780 Unemployed 38,015 7,199 Armed Forces 39,598 211 Not in labor force 354,220 33.2% 50,667 35.2% Civilian labor force 674,469 92,979 Percent Unemployed 5.6% 7.750 HOUSEHOLD INCOME Households 442,267 64,382 Median household income (dollars) $66,420 $54,996 Sources of household income Earnings 364,878 50,028 Social Security Retirement 135,465 21,125 income Supplemental Social 96,566 13,171 Security Cash public 15,099 3,138 assistance 14,798 2,825 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance (Food 32,544 7,403 Stamps) SHARE OF POPULATION BELOW POVERTY LEVEL, PREVIOUS YEAR All people 9.6% 14.4% Under 18 years 12.3% 19.1% Related children under 18 years 11.8% 18.5% Related children under 5 years 13.5% 22.3% Related children 5 to 17 years 11.1% 17.1% 18 years and over 8.8% 13.0% 18 to 64 years 9.1% 13.8% 65 years and over 7.5% 9.4% SOURCE; American Community Survey (ACS) for 2006-2010, in profiles posted at httn; lia%vaii,ttov/dbedt/in#a/census,,acs:AC'S20IOi-ACS20.10 5 Year acs hi 2010 profiles 5 yr estimate. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 7 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 2.2 Housing Foreclosures The recession of 2008 was triggered by problems in housing markets that resulted in a spike in foreclosures throughout the United States. Lending practices in Hawai'i have largely been conservative, so the incidence of foreclosures has been lower than the U.S. average, and far lower than in California or Nevada. With the foreclosure boom has come an increase in procedurally flawed foreclosures, jeopardizing homeowners. In 2011, the Hawaii legislature passed Act 48, aimed at protecting homeowners from rushed non -judicial foreclosure actions. In response, the Federal Home Mortgage Fannie Mae directed all loan servicers to pursue only judicial foreclosures, avoiding procedures established under the new law. The matter is under discussion in the current legislative session. When credit was easily available in the form of sub -prime mortgages, home prices nationwide rose. During the recession, lenders' credit standards tightened greatly, making it hard for many to qualify for mortgages or refinancing. Both extremely loose and tight credit markets can lead to hardship for households wanting to buy homes, especially for first-time buyers. The failure of many lenders to establish procedures to deal with high default rates, to communicate with borrowers, and to work out new arrangements has created a climate of uncertainty of benefit to none of the parties involved. As of February 2012, some 413 properties in Hawaii County were listed by foreclosure.com.2 A smaller listing showed foreclosued homes at prices ranging from $70,000 to $700,000.3 These clustered in North Kona (18 cases), Puna (17) and South Kohala (13). These properties range from homes in residential neighborhoods to resort condos and luxury homes. Information is gathered on complaints about mortgage adjustment scams by HUD and associated groups. This information is forwarded to the Federal Trade Commission. The database does not demonstrate that Fair Housing violations have occurred, but it provides evidence that (a) Hawai'i County families are more likely than others in the state to be the targets of predatory loan -related practices. and (b) the scams affect minority communities disproportionately. As of February 2012, the database listed 111 complaints from Hawai'i, of which 44 (40%) were from Hawai' i County.4 The Hawai'i County victims' race or ethnicity was identified as: Hispanic: 6 complaints (14%) Asian: 10 complaints (23%) '- These sales include bank -owned properties, but may short sales by homeowners, to the current legal and economic situation, it is unclear whether many more properties are at risk of foreclosure. 3 Posted at httu: www.adrhi.com_foreclosures hawaii as of January 27, 2012. 4 Posted at http:_. complaint.t)reyentloanscams.orz/intake-search.aspxas of February 22, 2012, BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 8 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander: 15 complaints (34,10) White: 12 complaints (27%) - Prefer not to say: 1 complaint (2%). 2.3 Economic and Technological Trends In recent decades, Hawaii County experienced the closing of sugar plantations and growth of resort economy along the west coast. In addition to tourism, astronomy and diversified agriculture are major contributors to the island economy. Development of resorts, followed by construction of luxury home subdivisions, condominium and timeshare projects, has supported both a Iocal construction workforce and interisland movement of construction workers and specialized trades. Recent events have changed the situation considerably. From 2008 to 2009, the construction job count dropped by about 30 percent in Hawaii County. Annual turnover among the unemployed has long been a feature of the East Hawaii economy (as shown by the ups and downs for Hilo unemployment claims in Figure 2- 2). The recession pushed unemployment claims from West Hawaii higher than from the other side of the island. Total employment has increased since the recession in the City and County of I Ionolulu, but not in Hawaii and other Neighbor Island counties.5 Paul Brewbaker, Assessing Aspects of Hawaii's Economy in 1011 fol- the 2012 Outlook. Presentation to Hawai` i Senate Committee on Ways and Means and House Committee on Finance, January 2012. Accessed January 26, 2012 at htta` www.capitol.hawaii-izay session20l2 testimony Info Testimony_FIN-WAM 0 1 -09- 12 Economists %2013rewbaker .ydf BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 9 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Figure 2-2: TOTAL WEEKS UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMED, HAWAVI ISLAND UNEMPLOYMENT OFFICES 3,000 00 " 0 Mite* Kona SOURCE: DBEDT website, htty: /hawaii.aov_dbedt/info economic data reports/unemployment, as of January 2012. While the state outlook is for a slow increase in employment over the next few years, new jobs and a decline in unemployment may come much later to Hawaii County than to Honolulu. In this situation, many families may have difficulty paying for housing. Two major trends have affected Hawaii housing markets in recent years. These are likely to continue to affect the availability of housing and procedures to obtain homes for rent or sale. First, changes in lending practices have greatly limited capital for real estate investment. Tighter lending has greatly reduced the pace of new development, and hence limited growth of the housing stock. For individual borrowers, mortgage loans and refinances have become much harder to obtain. The share of homeowners falling behind on mortgages and association payments increased with the 2008 recession. The implications for foreclosures and Hawaii foreclosure law are beyond the scope of this report. One consequence should be noted: condominium associations are increasingly involved in foreclosures and in renting units in order to recoup lost payments and keep their projects maintained. Secondly, housing information is now Internet -based. For the rental market, this means that advertisements are found on Craigslist, not in local newspapers. Since these advertisements are free, individual landlords who may have earlier relied on word of mouth or personal contacts to find renters now use the same advertising medium as Realtors. Craigslist depends on its readers to police advertising, so listings are not vetted to make sure they conform to Fair Housing Law before they appear. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 10 Another consequence of Internet -based information is that applicant's credit history and criminal records can be checked quickly. It is now standard practice for real estate firms to demand that applicants pay up to $30 for these checks before an application is considered; often before the applicant can see the unit. As a consequence, applicants with poor credit or criminal histories may avoid these listings, and apply only to less demanding landlords- The likely result is that the firms with expertise in handling Fair Housing issues will see fewer low-income applicants, and deal with fewer cases involving complex Fair Housing concerns. With increased Internet access, borrowers have more information about available mortgages or other loans. Lenders from other states are actively competing for clients along with local financial institutions and brokers. As noted above, mortgage adjustment bureaus and other parties who offer to resolve credit or foreclosure problems can now operate in Hawaii usin�L, television advertising, websites, e-mail and telephone communication, 2.4 Incidence of Protected Classes: Persons While race, color, ethnicity and ancestry'national origin are important for fair housing choice, these are not easily counted in any definitive way. Race is a cultural characteristic --- discrimination occurs when race is perceived, not when it is a biological fact. Over time, the U.S. Census Bureau has changed from assigning race to persons by rule, to allow respondents to identify their own race, to allowing them to identify themselves as in more than one race category. These procedures respond to complex, shifting views cif race in the i 1nited States but do not show how perceptions of race affect social life. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 11 Table 2-5: RACE AND LATINO/HISPANIC STATUS, 2010 SOURCE: 2010 Census. Posted at http./liawaii.gov/dbedt/info/census/Census_2010 demographic. The broad "race" categories used by the Federal government do not capture many of the distinctions recognized in Hawaii (e.g., among Native Hawaiians, Samoans, and Marshallese, BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 12 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County Total population 1,360,301 100% 185,079 1001A One Race 1,039,672 76% 130,544 71% White 336,599 25% 62,348 34% Black or African American 21,424 2% 1,020 1% American Indian and Alaska Native 4,164 0°/0 869 1% Asian 525,078 39% 41,050 22% Asian Indian 2,201 0% 175 0% Chinese 54,955 4% 1,661 1% Filipino 197,497 15% 15,834 9% Japanese 185,502 14% 18,086 10% Korean 24,203 2% 1,005 1% Vietnamese 9,779 1% 317 0°/G Other Asian 50,941 4% 3,972 2% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 135,422 10% 22,389 12% Native Hawaiian 80,337 6°A 15,812 9% Guamanian or Chamorro 2,700 0'/0 187 0% Samoan Other Pacific 18,287 1% 576 0% Islander Some Other Race 34,098 3% 5,814 3% Two or More Races 16,985 1% 2,868 2% 320,629 24% 54,535 30% Race alone or in combination with one or more other races: White Black or African American 564,323 42% 101,344 55% American Indian and Alaska Native 38,820 3% 2,975 2% Asian 33,470 3% 7,210 40/a Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 780,968 57% 82,944 45% Some Other Race 355,816 26% 62,487 34% 34,199 3% 5,450 3% Racial Identifications/Total Population 133% 142% HISPANIC OR LATINO Total population Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 1,360,301 100% 185,079 100% 120,842 90/0 21,383 12% SOURCE: 2010 Census. Posted at http./liawaii.gov/dbedt/info/census/Census_2010 demographic. The broad "race" categories used by the Federal government do not capture many of the distinctions recognized in Hawaii (e.g., among Native Hawaiians, Samoans, and Marshallese, BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 12 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 all included in the "Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander" group by the Census). The table shows the Census data in two ways: (a) a detailed account of ancestry for persons who only claim one "race," and (b) an account of all "race" claims. Neither approach captures local understandings, since these "races" combine recognized ethnicities (such as the many varieties of --Asian" shown in the table, and many residents see themselves as descended from several ethnic ities, not just one or two ''races_" The risk of housing discrimination increases when people lack the language skills needed to negotiate and to learn about their rights in the dominant language used for contracts and other legal matters. Data from the American Community Survey (ACS) indicate that about 7 a of the I lawai` i County population has difficulty with English (Table 2-6).6 Table 2-6. LINGUISTIC ISOLATION, 2006-2010 SOURCE: American Community Survey (ACS) for 2006-2010, to profiles posted at Isttti:flhawaii.eov'dbedt.info.'census"acs ACS2010 ACS2010 5 Year acs hi 2010 profiles 5 yr estimate. The State and the U.S. Census no longer collect counts of religion. The Atlas of Hativai'i reported 51% of the population as "unaffiliated," and 35% as affiliated with Judeo-Christian faiths, 7% with Buddhism, and 7° o with other religions .7 Major religious organizations include the Raman Catholic Church and the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter -Day Saints. " Unlike the decennial census, the ACS is a sample survey. Within each census tract, different subareas are sampled every year in five (so the sample is drawn from all parts of each tract over a five-year period. Single -year re,,4ults are published for counties and states; the five-year data is more reliable, as based on a lamer sample; but not identified with a single point in time, R Lamb, "Religion," Atlas of Hawaii. edited by S. and J. Juvik. 3'a edition. Honolulu, Hl, 1998. BELT COLLINS HAWAfI LLC Page 13 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii County of Hawaii Population 5 years and o\,er 1,247,010 168,941 English only 929,303 74.5% 136,693 80.9% Language other than English 317,707 25.5% 32,248 19.1° Speak English less than "fiery well" 144,943 11.6% 11,198 6.64 Spanish 25,285 2.0% 4,857 2,9% Speak English less than "very well' 6,930 0.6% 1,416 0,8% Other Indo-European languages 18,211 1.5% 2,952 1.7% Speak English less than '%ery well" 3,488 03% 385 0.2% Asian and Pacific Islander languages 272,452 21.8% 24,241 14.3% Speak English less than "eery well" 134,214 10.8% 9,365 5.5% Other languages 1,759 0.10 198 0,1% Speak English less than "very well" 311 0.0% 32 0.0% SOURCE: American Community Survey (ACS) for 2006-2010, to profiles posted at Isttti:flhawaii.eov'dbedt.info.'census"acs ACS2010 ACS2010 5 Year acs hi 2010 profiles 5 yr estimate. The State and the U.S. Census no longer collect counts of religion. The Atlas of Hativai'i reported 51% of the population as "unaffiliated," and 35% as affiliated with Judeo-Christian faiths, 7% with Buddhism, and 7° o with other religions .7 Major religious organizations include the Raman Catholic Church and the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter -Day Saints. " Unlike the decennial census, the ACS is a sample survey. Within each census tract, different subareas are sampled every year in five (so the sample is drawn from all parts of each tract over a five-year period. Single -year re,,4ults are published for counties and states; the five-year data is more reliable, as based on a lamer sample; but not identified with a single point in time, R Lamb, "Religion," Atlas of Hawaii. edited by S. and J. Juvik. 3'a edition. Honolulu, Hl, 1998. BELT COLLINS HAWAfI LLC Page 13 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Reliable counts or estimates of the distribution of sexual orientation in Hawai` i are not available. A survey designed by the Centers for Disease Control helps to identify the incidence of disabilities for which persons may need reasonable accommodations. It also included questions related to HIV risk, as shown in Table 2-7 below. A significant number of persons in Hawai'i County appear to have health limitations, but most of these do not need special equipment. Table 2-7: SELECTED INDICATORS FROM THE BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM, 2010 NOTES: Survey conducted with over 4,000 adults -- over 1,000 in Hawaii County by telephone, (1) Question: Are you limited in any way because of health problem59 (2) Question: Do you have any health problem that requires you to use special equipment? (3) The survey asks whether any of several "high HIV risk situations" apply. SOURCE: Hawaii State Department of Health, Behavior Risk Factrr Surveillance System results for 2010, posted at ht!p.: await. Dov health stati,tics.'hh 6r{ss igdex.html Based in part on ACS data, SMS reports that Hawai` i County had in 2009 some 22,000 residents with disabilities. Of these many are employed, but the share of the disabled with employment is lower in Hawai` i County than in the other counties. However, the share below the poverty level is higher than in the other counties (SMS 2011, Table 25). Table 2-7 suggests that the incidence of HIV is slightly lower in Hawaii County than in other parts of the state. This finding is in line with reports of AIDS cases by county, which show a lower reported incidence in Hawaii County than elsewhere. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 14 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Share of respondents who -- Report Health Must Rely on Special Report High Limitation (1) Equipment (2) HIV Risk (3) State of Hawaii 16.2% 6.0% 3.7% Hawaii County 20.7% 6.9V 3.4% Honolulu County 15.3% 6.0% 3.8% Kauai County 18.5% 5.4% 3.7% Maui County 15.2% 5.9% 3.9% NOTES: Survey conducted with over 4,000 adults -- over 1,000 in Hawaii County by telephone, (1) Question: Are you limited in any way because of health problem59 (2) Question: Do you have any health problem that requires you to use special equipment? (3) The survey asks whether any of several "high HIV risk situations" apply. SOURCE: Hawaii State Department of Health, Behavior Risk Factrr Surveillance System results for 2010, posted at ht!p.: await. Dov health stati,tics.'hh 6r{ss igdex.html Based in part on ACS data, SMS reports that Hawai` i County had in 2009 some 22,000 residents with disabilities. Of these many are employed, but the share of the disabled with employment is lower in Hawai` i County than in the other counties. However, the share below the poverty level is higher than in the other counties (SMS 2011, Table 25). Table 2-7 suggests that the incidence of HIV is slightly lower in Hawaii County than in other parts of the state. This finding is in line with reports of AIDS cases by county, which show a lower reported incidence in Hawaii County than elsewhere. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 14 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 2-8: REPORTED AIDS CASES, 2006-2010 SOURCE- Hawaii State Department of Health_ HIVAIDSStaveillancc Annual Report. Posted at htW lhawaii.eow, health/healthy-lifertyleslstd-aidsldata-statistics.2010.pdf. Honolulu, 2011. 2.5 Incidence of Protected Classes: Households Statistics about persons fail to indicate how often families or households are vulnerable to discrimination. Data from the ('emus provide additional indications of the diversity of households in Hawai` i County. Table 2-9 shows householders' racial identification; Table 2-10 deals with household composition. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 15 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Rate of Reported AIDS, 2006 through 2010 er 100,000 persons State of Hawaii 7.2 Hawaii County 5.0 Honolulu County 7.8 Kauai County 7.2 Maui County 6.5 SOURCE- Hawaii State Department of Health_ HIVAIDSStaveillancc Annual Report. Posted at htW lhawaii.eow, health/healthy-lifertyleslstd-aidsldata-statistics.2010.pdf. Honolulu, 2011. 2.5 Incidence of Protected Classes: Households Statistics about persons fail to indicate how often families or households are vulnerable to discrimination. Data from the ('emus provide additional indications of the diversity of households in Hawai` i County. Table 2-9 shows householders' racial identification; Table 2-10 deals with household composition. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 15 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 2-9: HOUSEHOLDS BY RACE OF HOUSEHOLDER, 2010 SOURCE: U.S. Census, 2010 Census posted at www.census..gov. As of 2010, Hawaii County's population was 50.21•o male and 49.8% female. Families with a single female head accounted for 12% of households, while ones with a single male head accounted for 6%. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 16 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County Households 455,338 67,096 Owner occupied: 262,682 57.7% 44,271 66.09% By race of Householder White alone Black 79,139 20,453 alone 1,945 182 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 570 174 Asian alone 125,599 12,099 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 15,169 3,289 Some Other Race alone 1,603 366 Two or More Races 38,657 7,708 Renter occupied: 192,656 42.3% 22,825 34.0% By race of Householder White alone Black 71,573 9,501 alone 6,187 208 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 1,050 183 Asian alone 56,480 3,798 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanderalone 18,352 2,825 Some Other Race alone 31839 516 Two or More Races 35,175 5,794 Share of Owning or Renting Households, Own Rent Own Rent By race of Householder White alone Black alone American Indian 30.1% 37.2% 46.2% 41.6% and Alaska Native alone Asian alone 0.7% 3.2% 0.4% 0.9% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 02% 0.5% 0.4% 0.8% Some Other Race alone 47.8% 29.3% 27.3% 16.6% Two or More Races 5 8V 9.5% 7.41% 12.4% 0.6% 2.0% 0.8% 2.3% 147% 18.3% 17.4% 25.4% SOURCE: U.S. Census, 2010 Census posted at www.census..gov. As of 2010, Hawaii County's population was 50.21•o male and 49.8% female. Families with a single female head accounted for 12% of households, while ones with a single male head accounted for 6%. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 16 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 2-10: HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION, 2010 SOURC!-. U ';. Census, 2010 Cen,.us posted aL tivww.census eov. The five-year ACS summary for 2005 to 2009 presented data for households on language use (similar to the count of persons in Table 2-6), showing about 1,850 households its llawai`i County as linguistically isolated. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 17 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County Total households 455,338 100.0°/ 67,096 100.0•/ Family households (families) 313,907 68.9% 44,407 66.2% With own children under 18 years 126,155 27.7% 17,296 25.8% Husband -wife family 230,076 50.5% 31,834 47.4% With own children under 18years 91,610 20.10/a 11,141 16.6% Male householder, no wife present 26,590 5.80/0 4,315 6.4% With own children under 18 years 10,737 2.40/a 2,101 3.1% Female householder, no husband present 57,241 12.6% 8,258 12.3% With own children under 18 years 23,808 5.2% 4,054 6.00/a Nonfamily households 141,431 31.1% 22,689 33.8% Householder living alone 106,175 23.3% 16,843 25.1% Male 51,465 11.3% 8,593 12.8% 65 years and over 12,371 2.7% 2,197 3.3% Female 54,710 12. W/o 8,250 12.30,0 65 years and over 24,603 5.4% 3,690 5.5°,1 Households with individuals under 18 years 156,045 34.3% 21,340 31.8% Households with persons 65 years and over 137,815 30.3% 19,541 29.1% Average household size 2.89 2.70 Average family size 3.42 3.22 SOURC!-. U ';. Census, 2010 Cen,.us posted aL tivww.census eov. The five-year ACS summary for 2005 to 2009 presented data for households on language use (similar to the count of persons in Table 2-6), showing about 1,850 households its llawai`i County as linguistically isolated. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 17 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 3 HOUSING TRENDS 3.1 Housing Availability At first glance, Hawaii Island appears to have a surplus of housing, with 18% of the housing stock vacant. The vacancy rate is largely due to the presence of vacation units (including both vacation rentals and second homes). Table 3-2 shows the count of "available units" for the resident population over time. The count excludes units held for seasonal or vacation use, for migrant workers, and for other reasons, but still includes vacant units held for sale or rent. (This approach still overestimates available supply, since it does not separate out units held vacant for short-term use, not long-ternn rentals.) Table 3-1: HOUSING OCCUPANCY AND TENURE, 2010 SOURCE: US Census, 2010 Census posted at www.census.eov. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 18 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County HOUSING OCCUPANCY Total housing units 519,508 100.0% 82,324 100.0% Occupied housing units 455,338 87.6% 67,096 81.5% Vacant housing units 64,170 12.4% 15,228 18.5% Far rent 16,441 12% 2,995 3.6% Rented, not occupied 954 01% 101 0.1% For sale only 4,277 0.8% 1,338 1.6% Sold, not occupied 11151 0.2% 289 0.4% For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 30,079 5.8% 7,135 8X'D All other vacant 11,268 2.2% 3,370 4.111�a Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) 1.6% 2.9% Rental vacancy rate (percent) 7.8% 11.6% HOUSING TENURE Occupied housing units Owner -occupied 455,338 67,096 housing units 262,682 57.7% 44,271 66ffo' Population in owner -occupied units 793,160 119,236 Average household size of owner -occupied units 3.02 2.69 Renter -occupied housing units Population in 192,656 42.3% 22,825 34.0'1 renter -occupied units Average household 524,261 62,199 size of renter -occupied units 2.72 2.73 SOURCE: US Census, 2010 Census posted at www.census.eov. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 18 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 3-2: AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS, 1990 TO 2010 Currently, the share of available units that are unoccupied is larger in Hawaii County than in the state as a whole, and larger than in past decades. Additions to the housing stock on Hawaii Island averaged 1,965 units per year from 2000 to 2010; Table 3-2 shows that the average increase in available units was 1,607 units per year. 3.2 Cost of Housing for Sale or Rent Average housing prices in Hawaii County are low, both for sale or rent, compared to statewide averages. Prices increased over recent decades, but have moved downwards since 2008. Figure 3-1 shows annual median sales prices and volumes over fourteen years. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 19 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii Hawaii County Available Units 1990 367,282 43,210 2000 426,276 55,745 2010 475,792 71,819 Unoccupied Available Units 1990 11,015 1,749 2000 23,036 2,760 2010 20,454 4,723 Unoccupied Units, % of Available Units 1990 3.090 4.0% 2000 5.4% 5.0% 2010 4.3% 6.6% Currently, the share of available units that are unoccupied is larger in Hawaii County than in the state as a whole, and larger than in past decades. Additions to the housing stock on Hawaii Island averaged 1,965 units per year from 2000 to 2010; Table 3-2 shows that the average increase in available units was 1,607 units per year. 3.2 Cost of Housing for Sale or Rent Average housing prices in Hawaii County are low, both for sale or rent, compared to statewide averages. Prices increased over recent decades, but have moved downwards since 2008. Figure 3-1 shows annual median sales prices and volumes over fourteen years. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 19 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 O Figure 3-1: MULTIPLE LISTINGS SERVICE ANNUAL SALES VOLUME AND MEDIAN PRICES, HAINAVI COUNTY, 1997-2010 4,000 I 3,500 I 3,000 i i 2,500 I 2,000 I I 1,500 1,000 I t S00 i l 1 0 $ 450,000 $350,000 • $300,000 E$250,000 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 SF Sales -Median SF Price • 99, Median Condo Price NOTE- Multiple Listings Service (MLS) sales include the bulk of sales by real estate professionals, but the count of sales may omit sales by owners. SOURCE' State of Hawaii Data Book 2010, Tables 21-34 and 21-35. Trends in rental volume and prices are not so clearcut. There is no standard inventory of transactions. Fair Market Rents are established by survey conducted for HUD. ACS data provide additional survey -based estimates. Hawaii Information Service compiled average asking prices from samples of advertisements. In earlier years, these were from classified newspaper advertisements; currently, most rental ads are on Craigslist. Advertised rents have declined since 2008. It may be that the transition to Internet advertising has affected the range of units advertised, and, as a result, average prices. Alternatively, it may be that the advertised rents BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 20 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 reflect market changes that affect new contracts first. and affect existing rentals to a lesser extent and later in time.$ Figure 3-2 shows Hawaii County annual rental prices. Figure 3-2. MEDIAN CONTRACTAND FAIR MARKET RENTS, AND AVERAGE ASKING RENT, 2004-2011 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 i E $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 ;Wiio�- sposo mom� mono "%ft �Awarw~� 2004 2005 2006 2007 Fair Market Rents Advertised Asking Rents — oft `mow - 2008 2009 2010 2011 Contract Rent SOURCE: SMS Rc�earch & Marketing Services, Inc. Hawaii Housing Planning Sir«1.v, 2011. Rental Hou.siny Report, Table A-7. Surveys by the U.S. Census establish the number of housing units being held for occupancy by renter,, or owners. Table 3-1 showed the most current information on available units. The cost of renting or owning a home relative to income is no longer an issue for the decennial census. Instead, the ACS includes questions about income and housing costs. Table 3-3 shows recent costs and the share of households with high housing costs relative to their income. While costs are lower in Hawaii County than in Honolulu and Maui, the share of households paying high housing costs is much the same in Hawaii County as statewide. (See Table 3-4.) The ACS results indicate that about 31 percent of Hawaii County households pay high housing costs. Responses to the Housing Policy Study survey indicate that the share of households with high shelter -to -income ratios has been increasing since 1992 (SMS 2011, Table A-9). High housing cost burdens are more common among renters than among owners, and among households who have spent a year or less in their current unit (SMS 2011, Table A-10). ° The SMS study shows similar patters from all tour counties. However, only in Flawai`i Cuunty has the decline in rental jLrices continued throu •h 2011_ BELT COLLI NS HAWAII LLC Page 21 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 When housing costs are high relative to income, families not only have less disposable income for other expenses, but also may be unable to qualify for loans or refinancing, since mortgage requirements are stricter than they were a few years ago. The housing cost burden indicates a major hurdle in both achieving and maintaining home- ownership. Table 3-4: DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME AND HOUSING BURDEN, 2006-2010 NOTE: Share of renting households computed for those households for which rental information was available. SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5 -Year Estimates, 2006-2010. Downloaded from DBEDT site (httn: /hawaii.gov dbedtlinfo census -acs ACS2010 ACS2010 5 Year acs hi 2010 profiles _5_31 estimate) - BELT COLLINS stimate)_BELTCOLLINS HAWAII LLC page 22 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housina Choice March 2012 State of Hawaii County of Hawaii Occupied housing units 442,267 64,382 Owner -occupied 262,419 42,591 Average household size 3.07 2.73 Renter -occupied 179,848 21,791 Average household size 2.71 2.74 MORTGAGE STATUS Owner -occupied units 262,419 42,591 Housing units with a mortgage 180,639 26,773 Housing units without a mortgage 81,780 15,818 SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS Housing units with a mortgage Median (dollars) $2,225 $1,691 Housing units without a mortgage Median (dollars) $2,225 $322 Renter -occupied units Median Gross Rent $1,260 $1,009 HOUSING COST BURDEN Households paying 35c5 or more of income for housing (°C of reporting households) Housing units with a mortgage 68,598 38.1% 10,616 3991- 99°-blousing Housingunits without a mortgage 7,205 8.9170 1,297 8.3°: Re me rs 73,616 45.3% 8,045 42.7"o NOTE: Share of renting households computed for those households for which rental information was available. SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 5 -Year Estimates, 2006-2010. Downloaded from DBEDT site (httn: /hawaii.gov dbedtlinfo census -acs ACS2010 ACS2010 5 Year acs hi 2010 profiles _5_31 estimate) - BELT COLLINS stimate)_BELTCOLLINS HAWAII LLC page 22 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housina Choice March 2012 Would-be buyers and renters vary significantly in their ability to pay for new units. The median "affordable" price for renters iri Hawaii County is less than $1,100; for buyers it is about $1,700.9 (See Figure 3-3.) Based on the 2011 SMS survey, the median rental price for a multi -family unit in Hawaii County ($861 per month) is affordable for about 61°a of households planning to rent. For single family units, the median monthly rent is $1,218, and less than 300.0 of those who plan to rent can afford that amount for housing. For would-be buyers, nearly 901 a can afford the median monthly mortgage payments for condos, and 71 percent can afford the median monthly payment for single family units, assuming a 200.0 down payment. However, about a third of this sub -sample have an adequate down payment in hand for a condominium, and only 140 o of the group can cover the down payment for the median -price single family home. 10 The [Median sales price for the two years combined was $249,000. Monthly payments for a 5250,000 sale could amount to about $1,275 (assuming a five percent down payment and a mortgage rate of five percent for 30 years). Again, the data suggest that many units are available at rates that residents can afford. so long as their credit and savings meet lenders' criteria. A study conducted by SMS Research for the Land Use Research Foundation in 2005 provided a measure of comparative l,oLLsing availability, at least for for -sale units." Information on housing sales in each county over a period of 20 years was analyzed in relation to the County -level "affordable" housing price for each sale year.- Data from Oahu and Hawaii showed fairly flat trends: for example, homes that were originally affordable to Big Island families earning from I00ao to 120ao of the median income were resold at about 120°•0 of the current affordable price in later years. Similar data from Maui and Kauai showed a very different pattern, with homes increasing in value i.e_, decreasing in affordability over time_ The large subdivisions in Puna and Ka`u with little or no infrastructure have provided land at relatively low cost for those who want to buy or build homes on a limited budget. Also, the pace of housing production has probably limited price increases. ' In this survey, respondents' statements about the amount they can pay define "affordability." 10 The financial qualification analysis deals with "effective demand buyers," a subset of those who plan to move who are likely to rent or buy in the next few years. See Tables 10 a through 10d of the SMS report. 11 L SMS Research & Marketing Services, Inc. Affordable Housing Policy and Hawaii's For -Serle Housing klarkels. Posted at httR;!iwww.lurfore docslSMS2.pdf. t'- In the 2005 study, "affordability" is the ability to pay monthly mortgage and utility costs at prevailing rates with no more than 30% of cross household income. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 23 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Figure 3-3: MONTHLY PAYMENTAFFORDABLE FOR HOUSEHOLDS PLANNING TO RENT OR BUY HOUSING, 2011 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 ■ More than $3,000 $2,000 to $3000 $1,700 to $1,999 13$1,400 to $1,699 ■ $1,100 to $1,399 $800 to $1,099 $500 to $799 ii $200 to $499 Less than $200 Plan to Rent Plan to Buy SOURCE: SMS Research & Marketing Services, Inc. Haimi'i Housing Planning Study, 2011, Tables A -15a and b. Figure 3-4: VOLUME OF HOUSING SALES, BY PRICE RANGE, HAWAII COUNTY, 2010 AND 2011 3,500 Over $1,000,000 3,000 ❑ $1,000,000 2,500 $ 900,000 t $800,000 2,000 .. $ 700,000 1,500 %$600,000 13$500,000 1,000 H $400,000 } $ 300,000 500 /$200,000 0 0$100,000 2010 2011 NOTES: Sales of parcels with one or more dwelling (excluding partial and multi -parcel transactions, and sales less than $20,000.). Price categories are for incremental sales less than the amount shown yet (e.g., sales less than $200,000 but more than $100,000, and so forth). Sales are for 2,809 properties u3 2010 (of which 777 are condos) and 2,282 in 2011 (of which 751 are condos). The volume of sales is larger than the number of properties because of multiple transactions for the same property. Downloaded from Hawaii Information Service, January 18. 2012, BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 24 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 3.3 Housing Demand OHCD and the other housing agencies of Hawaii have supported a modeling process (conducted by SMS and Hawaii Information Service) that identifies both resident demand for housing in the coming years ("effective demand") and the need for new units given resident demand and the existing housing supply. The 2011 housing demand survey indicated that 42 percent of Hawaii County households were interested in moving to a new home at some time, and 26 percent — an estimated 17,412 households .,- had formed plans to move within the state. Inter -county movement can affect demand. Based on respondents' preferred Iocation of their next housing unit, a total of 17,821 households might expect to seek homes in Hawaii County. 13 Over the years in which the Housing Policy Study has been conducted, effective demand has fallen in all counties. Factors contributing to the trend may include demographics and housing prices. As the population has aged, more and more households reached what they saw as their lasting home. As housing prices have increased, and as the economy has posed increasing challenges for many in Hawaii, many see few acceptable alternatives. Of the Hawaii respondents who expect to move out of state, the share who name housing costs as their reason has increased from 12 percent in 1997 to 30 percent in 2011.14 Many of those who expect to move will find new homes in the existing housing stock. Nonetheless, the number of households is likely to increase due to demographics -- long term population growth and a trend towards smaller household sizes. The resident population of the County is expected to grow at an annual rate of about 1.7 percent, an increase of about 20,000 residents every five years,'5 As the population ages, demand for housing suited to households with senior members — whether housing for multigenerational families, senior housing, or assisted living facilities — becomes more important. The most recent Housing Policy Study estimates need for 3,454 additional units for resident households in Hawai'i County from 2012 through 2016 - about 700 per year. Table 3-5 shows the estimated need by HUD income classification. The total figure is well below the increase in housing stock in the last decade, which averaged over 1,600 units per year. However, developers and public agencies are not likely to supply new housing for all income levels, much less to offer units for sale for all income levels. I' When responses from the survey are weighted to model the statewide population, a total of 15,611 households are identified with expressed preferences for locations in Hawai'i County. Only 87.6% of respondents named a particular location, the above count allocates the "no preference stated" group in proportion to the share of the total choosing a location within Hawaii County. 14 This paragraph combines analytic points from the 2003 and 2011 SMS Housing Policy Study reports. 15 DBEDT (2009), ?035 Population and Economic Projections. Table A-3. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 25 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 3-5: NEEDED HOUSING BY HUD INCOME CLASSIFICATION, 2012 TO 2016 Households by Income Level Owner -Occupied SF MF Rented SF MF Total Less than 301/o of AMI 225 18 231 539 1,013 30% to 50% 172 12 145 164 493 50% to 80% 277 9 32 259 577 80% to 120% 179 45 12 103 339 120% to 140% 192 9 24 12 237 140% to 180% 236 - 29 51 316 180% or more 387 - 52 100 539 1,668 93 525 1,228 Total 3,514 SOURCE: SMS 2011. Table 11. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 26 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 G�DKI]M Ch1 IU RM altll *1111010 Victims of discrimination can register their grievance and seek redress; government agencies and legal assistance providers have procedures to register, assess, and respond to complaints. OHCD publicizes fair housing rules and procedures for making complaints at its office and on its website. The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission works in co-operation with HUD and other agencies to address discrimination. It provides annual data on the incidence of complaints (a) by county and (b) by type (e.g., housing) and basis (e.g_, race, familial status, disability). Housing complaints constitute five to tern percent of complaints annually — employment-related issues account for the majority of complaints. Complaints from Hawaii County normally account for 10 to 15 percent of all complaints. (See Table 4-1.) Hawaii County cases accounted for 120.0 of housing complaints from 2006 through 2009.16 Some trends are clear in the data: • Disability is the most common basis for complaints, and accounts for nearly 40 percent of all housing complaints; Waken together, race, ancestry national origin, and color account for about 27% of housing complaints over the ten year period; and • No housing complaints associated with HIV status have been registered. Far more people experience incidents of discrimination than register formal complaints about them. (In the most recent SMS statewide survey, 18 percent of respondents said they had experienced housing discrimination.) The Legal Aid Society of Hawaii (LASH) receives complaints and provides advice on housing discrimination services. In the period 2009 to November 2011, the following bases for complaints were identified in about 50 cases from Hawaii. County: • Disability: 42 (7410 of bases identified); • Race: 7 (12%); • Sex: 6 (11 %); and Familial status: 2 (4°-0)_17 16 SMS 2010, Table 3. 1' Personal communication, Leba T. Kaufmann, Fair Housing Staff Attorney, LASI1, November 30, 2011. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 27 County of Hawaii 2021 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 r-1 t -I Q N N O a N Ski H z g CL. O u Z O H u7 C� G O u Li'l J_ V a 3 a x MI LtJ b a a a u W b J W N d m r Q Q 2 V) Z J J 0 LU m ►� n r �•-I Ln r- Q -I %D -q- N } c 111 ;r � cn a C6 N cn 0a m M N O �I N}} rk iL q cn 00ri4D M LnN M OO Ly ,i :I- LA. LL. oo •" 'I rn m r4 O tar ^� 00 rn Ln r -L pppp N O U- U- rq Izl� LA NLM O ca N a% co Ln LPL to O }N 6L H Ln LPI rY —4 Ln N Ln O } LL A O lND Y LLN ' 1-1 co Ln M og N N LL N �I n n en LO CD N O }N LL (u(� �J C +' O 3 � -a o ti _ m j Ln Z m L c aCi H O C V E ,? O - Lp E m m u L o 0 C aj °u 3 c Lri ar •�, tw c o �^ m +a m m as m m _ a ¢ u LL. cc w Ln M m 12x° Q Q 2 V) Z J J 0 LU m ►� LASH also conducts fair housing testing for discriminatory practices. Such testing typically involves having two applicants inquire about housing. However, many Hawai'i real estate firms typically demand that applicants fill out detailed information and pay for credit checks before they can see housing units. This practice makes shopping by multiple applicants costly. LASH has also been monitoring advertisements. In the past year, LASH documented 109 advertisements that stated illegal preferences: • 92 stated a preference against families with children; • 13 stated a preference against persons with disabilities; and 2 stated a preference based on sex. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 29 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice March 2012 S COUNTY POLICY ISSUES Hawaii County addresses fair housing choice in part through education and training. It helps those who believe they are victims of housing discrimination to challenge unfair situations. An expansive view of fair housing choice would involve supporting a wide range of policies or programs to oppose housing discrimination and forces that encourage it. On this view, fair housing choice is made possible by: • A housing supply adequate to provide for the population and to limit market effects that could have discriminatory consequences; • Maintenance of units so that the supply will continue and residents can expect that units will be available and habitable over time; • Equal access to units for sale or rent; • Recognition that protected classes are assured equal access to units, on the part of all involved in renting and selling housing; and • Means to challenge and remove impediments to equal access. In this chapter, Hawaii County policies and responses to impediments are recognized. 5.1 Hawaii County Policies and Programs Hawaii County directly affects the provision of housing in several ways, above all: • The zoning code (Hawaii County Code [HCC] Chapter 25) identifies lands on which housing can be built, and the minimum size of lots. Other land use and building codes - subdivision, building, plumbing and electrical (HCC Chapters 5. 9, 17.23) -- set standards to be followed in building construction and renovation. The County's affordable housing requirement (HCC Chapter 11), imposed on any rezoning to permit new construction involving five or more houses or hotel/resort development, or industrial development, demands that developers earn credits by setting aside lots or building homes affordable to middle- or low-income households. Such homes are subject to a ten-year limitation on resale at market rates. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 30 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Impact fees may be levied on new construction to offset the cost to the county of providing infrastructure. Such fees are imposed on a "fair share" basis by the county, but an impact fee schedule has been debated for several years. Real property taxes are levied on property throughout the County, based on assessed value. Rates for owner -occupants are lower than for other residential property. (As of 2012, the difference between owner -occupant rates and rates for other types of property was smaller in Hawaii County than in Maui County. In the City and County of Honolulu, the distinction between owner -occupant and other residential uses is no longer emphasized, but the difference between residential rates and commercial, industrial and resort rates is greater than in Hawaii County.) • The Office of Housing and Community Development is responsible for additional programs: The "Section 8" voucher program that assures and supports rent payments for eligible low-income families in approved housing units; Programs to encourage home ownership among low-income families, including low-interest loans towards down payments and closing costs for first-time homebuyers; o Loans for home repairs for low-income owner -occupants; Oversight of housing owned by the County (Kulaimano Elderly Housing Project); o Investment of moneys collected through the affordable housing program 18 in new housing construction; and Housing development and'or investment in entities developing housing. The; County has sponsored and participated in the project to develop workforce housing at Kamakoa, in Waikoloa. and is developing transitional housing at Kaloko, in North Kona. • The County Council can exempt workforce housing projects from a wide range of fees and requirements under HRS 201H, thereby reducing the cost to build new homes for Iow- and moderate -income families. Changes in any of the above policies and programs could have complex effects on the availability and cost of housing. As noted earlier, Hawaii County, unlike other counties in Hawaii, has large agricultural subdivisions with limited infrastructure. Land where homes can be built is far more available than elsewhere in Hawaii but often far from work and school sites. Commuting between rural residential areas and job centers can strain or exceed the capacity of the connecting roadways. In response to this problem, the affordable housing requirement states that affordable housing will be built within fifteen miles of a project. 'a Until 2011, developers could pay "in lieu" fees instead of building new housing or conveying improved land for affordable Knusing.�_-_._._-- BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 31 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 0 Policy initiatives recently discussed in Hawai' i County include: • Revisions to the building code: An update to the building code to conform to the International Building Code has been considered and approved by Council. It has been challenged as increasing construction costs and as ruling out the use of "alternative" materials (e.g., bamboo). Development and imposition of impact fee schedules: Impact fees on new development have been considered by the Hawai' i County Council and the State Department of Education. The County fees most recently proposed ranged from about $5,000 to $7,000 for single family homes, depending on their size. The Council filed, i.e., did not pass, the proposal in 2011.19 County authorities also opposed the Department of Education fees proposed for West Hawai' i as an undue imposition on homeowners in a time of economic hardship. Reliance on shared equity arrangements or a community land trust to help keep housing for sale at "affordable" prices over many years: A community land trust was initially proposed for the Kamakoa Nui workforce housing project. The County has since assumed ownership of the project, and will have resale and shared equity restrictions. Implementation of any of these initiatives could affect the cost, and hence the availability, of new housing. 5.2 Ongoing Actions to Address Impediments The 2007 Analysis of Impediments focused on three impediments and included action plans to address these, as shown in Table 5-1. These action plans were reformulated as a series of performance measures, shown in Table 5-2. The tables show that OHCD has considered the findings of the 2007 Analysis of Impediments and has incorporated them in a detailed and specific work plan. That plan has been implemented in more sophisticated ways than originally proposed (e.g., use of a video available as a DVD or for download from the County website). 1' J. Armstrong, "Impact Fees Fail to Pass." Hilo Tribune -Herald, September 22, 2011; Council vote is in http records,co.hawaii.hi.us/Weblink&0 doc 7596801Pagel.asox BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 32 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 5-1: IMPEDIMENTS AND RESPONSES, PER 2007 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS 1 Applicants are unaware of rights and resources Action plan: a. Develop information packets in languages otherthan English Measure- goal is to develop one new packet per year. b. Continue trainingfor landlords, especially smaller ones Measure: develop and implement plan by 2009 to reach smaller landlords c. Increase public awareness of consequences of failure to comply with fair housing laws Measure: Issue five press releases by 2005 about the consequences of infraction of fair housing laws d. Incorporate fair housing informaiton in school curricula Measure: Working with HCDCH, approach DOE with a proposal for collaboration by 2009 e, Promote fair housing awareness among recent immigrants Measure; develop proposal for training session by end of 2009, and approach officials at Immigration and Naturalization Service f. Increase advocacygroups' awareness of fair housing Measure: conduct five presentations before the end of 2009; advocacy groups' directors report increased awareness of fair housiing laws. 2 Fair housing policies lack standardization Action plan: Fair housing office will begin to identify policies and procedures that are contradictory or lack standardization. Measure: By 2009, County will identify approaches to identify policies and procedures for which additional efforts are needed, and will investigate the cost of addressing these problems. 3 Limited supply of affordable housing units Action plan: Fair Housing Office can advocate for more affordable rental units, especially for mentally and physically disabled, families with children, and ones with dogs to assist them in day to day living. Measure: Increased appreciation by County officials of need SOURCE: SMS 2008, BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 33 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 W a ua LU u Z a O L6 o: I'l G. Z O C: R N LAi H V- N M o a0 N 0- u ti r e u .o a c t u Z Ga .V"s O J c Cd O r I— C On Z Lt 0 ca o In 'a LL CL E M- 0 Ln U z u — a o a u 3 o = M o Q N cQ +•' C A, ¢ C Y C GO a GO GO GO GO Da a G C fG r C O C C C C = -L CL CL tw E C -O GO C GO GOO Go GOO E 0 a 0 u 4 0 u N 0 0 0 0 u u(31° c N x O u � Q Q� N � l!1 L!1 S N 4 1.11 e••i , N C_ •� p�QpQ N C O O 1p LA C 41 d n00 N n i•1 L S E d N O y ? a id¢ a Q n m ,� LL N t1'1 m Cm Ln a C4 Z a Go Y C L to m LL C J O '++Y in O O 'C C -o E c ru c = m N o N v Go N a a C mvi Ln -0 twai y to a C C C n GQ u �, L a cum CL 3 O a tw n Go r`o m E O .0 e� .... ' tA 0 £ c O c O C tA Z O •� y_ L C 0 N 01 •� C� O a C GO L m L �O CA �O � o ra3 0 m LL .0 CU tw o u n C ai o ,a a C T a o 2 c L C m u c= ' a Y u o .E E a R o c •� Y 7 Q L LL L LL w Q 4.1 V$ i vl O R= E O u `tW C C a j C r z S a c o a c 0 U w O C a u a= Q u A 2 r+ N m a Ln %o n Go LL V- N M o a0 N 0- u ti r u .o a t u Z Ga .V"s O J c Cd O r I— C On Lt 0 u° In CL E M- 0 Ln U z — a a Z .V"s O J Z Cd O r I— C On m u° 6 INTERVIEWS AND SURVEYS Earlier Analysis of Impediments reports included results of surveys of the general public and summaries of housing experts' views. The surveys concerned respondents' experience of discrimination and awareness of fair housing issues. 20 Respondents showed considerable uncertainty in the population concerning the specifics of the laws. Discussions with Realtors and property managers, who address fair housing issues often, reinforce the point. These experts are occasionally uncertain about the law. They find that housing applicants, owners of rental housing, and officers of condominium associations are often uncertain or mistaken about Fair Housing rights and responsibilities. This point was underlined by responses from participants to an e -survey, tabulated in Appendix A.2 1 Table 6-1 lists the housing stakeholders interviewed in the course of the Analyyis of Impediments research. They provided information and perspective on current economic and social conditions, on public knowledge of Fair Housing issues, on common procedures for renting and managing housing, and on ways to address housing problems. Common themes in the interviews were: Knowledge of Fair Housing Regulations • Property managers and Realtors active in the rental market are largely knowledgeable about the Iaw, procedures for responding to tenant concerns and requests, and the consequences ofviolation of Fair Housing rules. Experts expected most tenants, applicants, property owners, condominium associatioll heads and many resident managers not to understand the details of Fair Housing law. Even experts mentioned points at which they or their associates were uncertain about the regulations. Some experts noted that OHCD staff provided helpful advice and were very responsive to their inquiries • Uncertainty or misunderstanding of the law is most common with regard to reasonable accommodation for the disabled. Problems may involve tenants' requests for animal companions, for separate rooms for the disabled or for health aides, and for reserved parking. • Some landlords and property managers have reportedly allowed exceptions to occupancy rules - the number of tenants in a unit — for Native Hawai` ian tenants but not others. Results from 2003 and 2007 for Hawaii County are summarized in SMS 2008. -� The survey was sent to a small group of housing stakeholders. It should not be taken as indicating the views of any larger population. The survey was sent to persons listed in Table 6-1 and to a few additional stakeholders with whom Belt Collins Hawaii lied had limLted telephone contact The survey respondents could then include persons not listed in Table 6-1. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 35 County of Hawaii Z01I Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Table 6-1: PARTICIPANTS IN THE 2012 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS STUDY Name Organization Melva Albone Hawaiian Dream Properties Daryn S. Arai Planning Dept., County of Hawaii Earl Arakaki OHCD Existing Housing Division Waquita L. Armour Legal Aid Society of Hawaii Steven Arnett OHCD Administrator Rose Y. Bautista County of Hawaii Office of the Mayor Nancy S. Cabral Day -tum Rentals & Management, Inc. Neal Erickson Dept of Public Works, County of Hawaii Louis Erteschik Hawaii Disability Rights Center Brandon Gonzalez Dept of Public Works, County of Hawaii Diane "D.O." Grace Hawaii HomeOwnership Center Sharon L. Hirota OHCD Existing Housing Division Keith H. Kato Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Leba T. Kaufmann Legal Aid Society of Hawaii Mary M. Love Mary M. Love Realtor Jeremy McComber OHCD Community Development Division Sharon Madsen Pacific Horizons Properties Kyle McNamara Legal Aid Society of Hawaii Kiriko Oishi Hawaii Public Housing Authority Larissa Ranz L6kahi Apartments Alan S. Ruda OHCD Community Development Division Kevin K. Tanaka Bob Tanaka, Inc. Realtors Garrett Uejo OHCD Existing Housing Division Elaine Watai Jack Hall Housing NOTE: Organizations are listed to indicate the range of persons interviewed. No claim is made that participants and their organizations support the fmdmgs and recommendations of this study. Micronesians are thought to be often denied housing because they are expected not to be responsible tenants. This population is seen as unwilling to complain or challenge discrimination. However, Micronesians may well have large households and be willing to shelter loin, to the point that they exceed occupancy restrictions. Landlords' decisions not to rent to Micronesian families may not be based on discrimination. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Page 36 March 2012 Reasonable Accommodation for the Disabled • Stakeholders report little difficulty allowing or providing physical accommodation to disabilities — e.g., the installation of ramps or grab bars. Stakeholders believe nearly everyone recognizes the rights of the blind to have service animals. The broad issue of assistance animals is more complex; tenants may believe they have a right to have pets, when the right is to have an animal that helps persons with disabilities enjoy their homes. Realtors and managers commonly ask for a doctor's letter stating that the animal is needed as part of the tenant's therapy. A far trickier issue arises in the case of medical marijuana. Growing and consuming marijuana may be recognized by state and county personnel as therapy when prescribed by a medical doctor_ Marijuana is illegal under federal law, and so cannot be considered a form of reasonable accommodation under federal statutes. Stakeholders have tried to address this problem by including clauses in lease agreements banning the production of marijuana. • Reasonable accommodation for one tenant may involve suspending rules which others follow. This is hard for managers and other tenants to accept. lVays to Address Fair Housing Issues Discussed in Inter-vievts Encourage mediation and compromise: Realtors and managers who had been involved with Fair Housing complaints emphasized that dealings with complainants and with Fair Housing regulators involved a great deal of time, effort and anxiety. They wished these cases could have been resolved informally. However, they found that the parties involved in these cases were -,o angry or stubborn that they would not agree to mediation or compromise. Train County staff and managers of low-income housing projects regularly. Resident managers of low-income housing and government employees dealiFIg with Section 8 housing may need regular training in Fair Housing rules, since these regulations are complex and their interpretation changes over time. Continue education for real estate professionals: Several stakeholders found Fair Housing training to be helpful. They appreciated OHCD's work to get the training recognized as part of continuing education for real estate professionals. Additional Suggestions Increase the supply of housing for residents- The obvious way to reduce all housing problems is to increase the supply of units that resident families can afford, e_g., through new construction or by increasing the number of Section 8 vouchers available in the County. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 37 County of HawaN 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 • Train and certify rental applicants: HOPE Services (formerly known as the Office of Social Ministry of the Roman Catholic Diocese) has run classes for the homeless and certified participants as trained to be responsible tenants. Such certification can help applicants with poor credit or criminal records be considered for units. Develop a centralized database of contact information for applicants on waitlists: Homeless and other low-income housing applicants may be placed on waitlists for subsidized housing, then not be found months Iater when a unit becomes available. Both rental managers and applicants could be helped if they could list and update their contact information with a central registry. Help immigrants with paperwork: COFA migrants may lack documentation (e.g., birth certificates) demanded for lease applications. They would benefit from increased support from the state or their national consuls. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 38 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 7 RECOMMENDATIONS The current Comprehensive Plan states Fair Housing goals for the fiscal years 2010 through 2014, calling for the training and coordination activities shown in Table 5-2. As noted earlier, OHCD has implemented plans for developing educational materials, conducting training sessions, and cooperating with other Fair Housing stakeholders. OHCD has further provided technical or informal assistance in response to queries on Fair Housing and what callers view as unfair landlord -tenant relationships. Research for this study indicates that the County has been working effectively towards the Fair Housing goals. Many see continuing efforts to educate small landlords and non-English speakers as warranted. While OHCD has made substantial progress, these efforts should continue, since knowledge of Fair Housing rules, rights and responsibilities remains limited. In the course of research for this report, Belt Collins Hawaii developed three additional recommendations. These are responsive to information about the changing environment for housing transactions. 1. Rental advertising has migrated to Craigslist and other Internet venues, where advertisements are free and widely accessible. Internet providers do not automatically edit for Fair Housing compliance, so advertisements that violate the law may be posted. On the other hand, this situation provides an opportunity to make contact with lessors who are uninformed about their responsibilities. Monitor and respond to Internet advertising to improve outreach to "Mom and Pop" landlords. LASH monitors such advertising to spot ads that violate Fair Housing rules. At times, the County staff reviews current advertisements. If resources permit, the County could review ads regularly and reply to them by e-mail, informing advertisers of Fair Housing law and inviting them to attend training activities given by the County. Such responses can be standardized_ This recommendation would be useful if it results in increased participation by `'Mom and Pop" landlords in the County's training activities_ It will be important to ask participants how they heard of the training, and to assess the monitoring and response to advertisements on the basis of whether they lead to increased participation and calls to OHCD. 2. With the economic downturn, condominium associations have become increasingly involved in the rental market after foreclosures. Such associations need to recapture lost income but also seek tenants as good neighbors, not just renters. Conduct mail outreach to condominium associations, inviting them to send participants to Fair Housing training. Again, the objective is to provide education to BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 39 County of Hawaii 2012 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 persons and groups involved in housing transactions who may now be uninformed. A listing of contacts for condominium associations is available through the State Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (http: /hawaii.gov dcca/real/condo_ed aoaocontact07O8.12dfl. Again, the usefulness of this effort can be judged on the basis of whether they lead to increased participation in trainings and to calls to OHCD. 3. Provide a help line with interpreters available at set times: Professionals in the housing industry recognize that advice and consultation on Fair Housing issues by the County staff help them understand the regulations and avoid violations. This effort can be enhanced if a help or advice telephone line is made available and publicized. If a help line is publicized in several languages and interpretation services are available in Spanish, Marshallese, and other languages, it will be possible to estimate and address the need for assistance in language -isolated groups.. To cover the cost of such a service, a statewide pilot project is suggested. 4. The information on loan modification scams in Section 2.2 suggests that the impact of such activities is not distributed proportionately among ethnic groups in Hawai'i: complaints are unusually frequent from Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders. The incidence of complaints from Hawai'i County is also surprisingly higher than for other counties. However, it appears that Realtors, OHCD and others are not aware of Fair Housing Oviolations involving mortgage loans. This may be due to the high quality of mortgage procedures in Hawai'i. Alternatively, it may be due to a lack of complaints and inattention to the activities of national and Internet mortgage operations. In some other states, Fair Lending has been recognized as a Fair Housing issue. For example, HUD has funded a Fair Housing/Fair Housing advice line in Idaho manned by Idaho Legal Aid Services, Inc. with both English- and Spanish-speaking advisors. (Funds come from a Fair Housing Initiatives Program grant from HUD.) In earlier years, this line addressed problems for Native Americans and familial status issues. Currently, it deals often with predatory lending to Limited English Proficiency refugee and immigrant families, and to the disabled, who have been steered to inappropriate loan products at high cost. The Idaho program has been accompanied by publicity and outreach efforts in languages other than English. It has generated considerable participation at training sessions. (Personal communication, Zoe Ann Olson. February 22, 2012). Accordingly, it seems appropriate for OHCD to bring the issue to the attention of HUD and other Fair Housing stakeholders in Hawai'i and to propose that a Fair Lending assistance line project be piloted in Hawai'i. Such a program could extend statewide. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 40 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 REFERENCES Armstrong, J. `'Impact Fees Fail to Pass." Hilo Tribune -Herald, September 22, 2011. Brewbaker, P. Assessing Aspects of Hawaii 's Economic in 2011 for the 1011 Outlook. Presentation to Hawai'i Senate Committee on Ways and Means and House Committee on Finance, January 2012. Accessed January 26, 2012 at http:.`,'www.capitol.hawaii.goy!session20l2'testimony;;lnfo_T_estimony FIN WAM 01- 09-12_Economists_° 620Brewbakerlpdf Hawaii State Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (DBEDT) Population and Economic Projections for the State of Hawaii to 2035. Posted at fittp: 'hawaii.gov'dbedt°'info economic/data reports'2035LongRangeSeries/. 2009. State of Hawaii Data Book 2010. Posted at http: /hawaii.govAbedt'info economic databook/. Honolulu, H1, 2011. Ha%vai`i State Department of Health HIVIAIDS Surveillance Annual Report. Posted at http:1hawaii.gov.-`heafth/fiealthy- lifestyles/std-aids data-statistics12010.pdE Honolulu, HI, 2011. Juvik, S. and J., eds. Atlas of Hati nii, 3'a Edition. Honolulu, Hl, 1998. SMS Research & Marketing Services, Inc. Affordable Flousing Policy and Hawaii 's For -Sale Housing Markets. Posted at httn: 'www.lurforgldocs/SMS2.pdf Honolulu, HI, 2005. County of Hawaii 2007 Analysis of Impediments. Honolulu, HI. 2008. Fair Housing Analysis of Impediments Report for the State of Hawaii, 2010. Honolulu, HI, 2010. Hawai 'i Housing Planning Study, 2011. Honolulu, HI, 2011. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 41 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 0 APPENDIX: QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES TO E -SURVEY The initial sample for this survey was very small (24 persons) and non-random. Quantified findings only indicate the range of views encountered by Belt Collins Hawaii, and cannot be generalized to a larger population. Do you think fair housing laws are followed by people on Hawaii Island? Not at Know of Response Response Rating Percent Count All the time 0.0% 0 Most of the time 0.0% 0 Often 14.3% 1 Sometimes, but violations also occur 42.9% 3 Sometimes, but violations are also common 28.6% 2 Rarely 14.3% 1 Never 0.0% 0 Q2. How well do people understand which groups are "protected classes" for housing?" "Rating average" is a calculation, treating the first column as 1, the second as 2, and so forth. An average of 3 aligns with the third response ("Know most of the groups.") BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 42 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Not at Know of Know of Know all Rating All some most of the Average groups, the protected notry oupsrg oups others Realtors and Realtor associates who handle 0 2 2 2 3 rentals regularly Other Realtors and Realtor associates 0 3 2 1 2.67 Resident property managers 0 4 2 0 2.33 Owners of rental units 1 4 1 0 2 Owners selling housing without a Realtor 2 4 0 0 1.67 Mortgage brokers and bankers 0 3 3 0 2.5 Condo associations 0 5 1 0 2.17 Tenants 2 3 0 0 1.6 Applicants for rental housing 3 3 0 0 1.5 County housing personnel 0 3 2 1 2.67 Neighbors 5 1 0 0 1.17 "Rating average" is a calculation, treating the first column as 1, the second as 2, and so forth. An average of 3 aligns with the third response ("Know most of the groups.") BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 42 County of Hawai'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Q3. How well do people understand the rules about "reasonable accommodation"?" BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 43 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Not at A little Fairly Well and Rating All well, but know how Average still to uncertain implement the rules Realtors and Realtor associates who handle 0 4 1 1 2.5 rentals regularly Other Realtors and Realtor associates 1 4 1 0 2 Resident property managers 1 4 0 1 2.17 Owners of rental units 3 3 0 0 1.5 Owners selling housing without a Realtor 3 3 0 0 1.5 Mortgage brokers and bankers 0 5 1 0 2.17 Condo associations 2 3 1 0 1.83 Tenants 1 4 0 0 1.8 Applicants for rental housing 1 5 0 0 1.83 County housing personnel 0 4 1 1 2.5 Neighbors 4 2 0 0 1.33 04. What group of people is likely to go against the spirit or the letter of fair housing laws? % Response Count Realtors and Realtor associates who handle 16.7% 1 rentals regularly Other Realtors and Realtor associates 16.7% 1 Resident property managers 66.7% 4 Owners of rental units 83.3% 5 Owners selling housing without a Realtor 33.3% 2 Mortgage brokers and bankers 0.0% 0 Condo associations 50,0% 3 Tenants 0.0% 0 Applicants for rental housing 0.0% 0 County housing personnel 16.7% 1 Neighbors 33.3% 2 No one 0.0% 0 BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 43 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 45. In what situations do fair housing law problems arise? % Response Count When people call to find out about rentals 50.0% 3 When prospective tenants fill out application 50.0% 3 forms 16.7% 1 When applications are reviewed, and tenants are 66.7% 4 chosen 66.7% 4 When tenants don't get along with others in a 83.3% 5 project or neighborhood 66.7% 4 When tenant behavior affects the quality of life in 66.7% 4 a building or neighborhood Annual (or 6 months) lease reviews 16.7% 1 Sale transactions 0.0% 0 None 0.0% 0 Comments Almost all Resident Property managers have a tendency to dislike and discriminate against COFA Migrants. They are both afraid that they will not follow rules, and they are likely to prefer not to rent to those with a bad reputation even if the reputation is not true or at least not true for all members of the discriminated group, like COFA Migrants When people show up with their kids Reasonable accommodation requests, change in households, new child Q6. What Fair Housing issues are misunderstood or misstated often? BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 44 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 % Response Count Race, National origin, or Color as protected class 16.7% 1 Sexual orientation as protected class 16.7% 1 HIV status 33.3% 2 Familial status 66.7% 4 Age 33.3% 2 Steering within a project or community 66.7% 4 Dealing with both occupancy (number of people 66.7% 4 in a unit) and familial status Service animals 83.3% 5 Other assistance animals 83.3% 5 Reasonable accommodation to disabilities such 66.7% 4 as steps, grab bars Other reasonable accommodation 50.0% 3 BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 44 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Q7. What should the County stress in its education activities to help clear this up? Comments I have found that when the County has informational classes about who is allowed to visit or make short stays with renters, they at least know what laws they are supposed to fotlow. They don't always follow the rules. The culture they come from may not allow them much ability to follow the law. Reasonable accommodation requests, assistance animals as reasonable accommodations, familial status Q8. We've heard some suggestions about removing impediments to fair housing. We'd like to know your reaction to these; Comments Building more housing won't help until the people are educated. Running stings would work only if the violators had to attend classes so they understand what they did and know it is wrong. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 45 County of Hawa'i'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 Needed Good Not a Bad idea, Really to idea, but good and it bad assure may idea -- may idea! fair need doesn't create housing work address problems choice the issue Provide seminars for owners and associations 4 2 0 0 0 Educate the general public about rights and 3 3 0 0 0 responsibilities Educate the general public about the cost and 3 3 0 0 0 other consequences of violations Conduct more tests" or "sting" operations to catch 2 2 2 0 0 violators Resolve complaints non -judicially 0 6 0 0 0 Build more housing 1 3 2 0 0 Comments Building more housing won't help until the people are educated. Running stings would work only if the violators had to attend classes so they understand what they did and know it is wrong. BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 45 County of Hawa'i'i 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice March 2012 09. How do you think the County can help improve fair housing access? Comments Give out more certificates for Section 8, but make the certificate holder take fair housing class, as well as the rentals owner or manager. Most people get good and bad ideas from watching television. Cable TV is an option, but not everyone has cable. PBS over broadcast stations would reach more people, but the program would have to be made very carefully to be fair and balanced. Any one hour program would have to have two parts -- Renters & those who do the renting. Each has a story, and each breaks their respective rules. Are the rules correct, are they fair, do they work, and most of all are they the best way to help those who are financially challenged succeed Reach more of the small landlords and private owners, publicize the results of settlements, Regular training for housing providers; more fair housing law enforcement. Provide more affordable accessible housing. Incentives to landlords to provide more affordable accessible housing. Enforcing design and construction requirements for new housing. Educating housing providers on reasonable accommodation requests and common fair housing violations. Q10. Please add any other comment you want to share. Comments My own experience is that most private resident managers and private families or individuals are less rigid than the public housing programs. They don't have to answer to their boss for the most part. The result is that these people both provide more humanity to renters, and they also get abused by renters. In any case, education concerning their actions does not very often make much change happen. Private people get away with abuse and also get abused. County housing projects can cause terrible problems by following the rules, and Fair Housing agents, who are supposed to insure that the right things happen, have no real "policing" authority for the building managers and rental agents abusing the families and individuals who break rules. On the other hand, most renters are afraid, and when confronted with the threat of eviction, they usually just give up. Angry people from both sides will dig in rarely, but the facts about renter mistakes or breaking the rules almost always cause loss of their apartments or homes. The net result is that it is common for the renters to be abused, and rare indeed that a bad Realtor or Building manager is punished in any substantive way. would rather see more humanity for the people who are at risk, but the $ is king in this situation. Realtor and Building managers have lawyers, and renters almost never do. Mahalo BELT COLLINS HAWAII LLC Page 46 County of Hawaii 2011 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Mousing Choice March 2012 Appendix F: County of Hawaii Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan COUNTY OF HAWAII HOUSING TRUST FUND PROGRAM ALLOCATION PLAN I. INTRODUCTION The National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) program was created under Title 1 of the Housing and Recovery act of 2008, Section 1131 (Public Law 110-289) and is administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The regulations which govern the HTF are contained in 24 CFR Part 93, Housing Trust Fund. The purpose of the HTF is to provide grants to State governments to increase and preserve the supply of decent, safe and sanitary affordable housing for primarily extremely low-income (30% AMI) households. Il. STATE ALLOCATION PLAN The Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC) is a designated HTF Grantee for the state of Hawaii. HHFDC's HTF Allocation Plan has received approval from HUD to allow HHFDC to allocate its HTF funds to the counties (Sub - Grantees) for rental activities. HHFDC's Allocation Plan requires HTF projects to be selected and awarded through an application issued by the counties. The County of Hawaii (County) is a designated HTF Sub -grantee. III. DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS The County will receive an allocation of $1,425,000 in PY 2018 HTF Funds. The allocation includes $1,350,000 in program funds, and $75,000 for administrative and planning expenses. The County's Consolidated Plan identifies a substantial need for new affordable rental housing. Consequently, the County will invest PY 2018 HTF funds for rental housing activities. The County expects to implement rental projects through a third -party Recipient (e.g. owner; developer) that meets the eligibility requirements described herein. The annual distribution is described below: a. The County will retain $75,000 of the HTF annual allocation for allowable administrative and planning expenses. b. The balance of the HTF annual allocation will be provided to Recipient(s) selected through the County's HTF Application. c. The HTF Program requires the commitment of funds within 24 months of HUD's execution of the HTF Grant Agreement. In order to meet this requirement, the County must commit funds by the commitment date established in the Sub- grantee Agreement. IV. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES AND EXPENSES Rental Housing — The County will focus HTF funds on providing affordable rental housing to 30% AMI households. HTF funds may be used for the production, preservation, and rehabilitation of affordable rental housing through the acquisition, new construction, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of non -luxury housing with suitable amenities. All rehabilitation projects must meet applicable HTF rehabilitation standards and the requirements of 24 CFR 93.301(b). However, inasmuch as the County intends to expend PY 2018 HTF only for the new construction of rental housing. Eligible HTF activities and expenses include the following: • Real Property Acquisition; • Site Improvements; • Development hard costs (new construction; rehabilitation); • Related soft costs; • Demolition; • Conversion; • Financing Costs; • Relocation Assistance; • Operating cost assistance for rental housing; and • Reasonable administrative and planning costs for the HTF program administration. The County does not intend to use HTF funds for the refinancing of existing debt. V. ELIGIBLE RECIPIENTS An organization, agency or other entity (including a public housing agency, or a for-profit entity, or a nonprofit entity) is eligible to apply for HTF assistance as an owner or developer to carry out an HTF-assisted project. An HTF Recipient must: a. Make assurances to the County that it will comply with the requirements of the HTF program during the entire period that begins upon the selection of the recipient to receive HTF funds. and ending upon the conclusion of all HTF- funded activities; b. Demonstrate the ability and financial capacity to undertake, comply and manage the eligible activity; c. Demonstrate its familiarity with the requirements of other Federal, State or local housing programs that may be used in conjunction with HTF funds to ensure compliance with all applicable requirements and regulations of such programs; and d. Have demonstrated experience and capacity to conduct an eligible HTF activity as evidenced by its ability to own, construct, or rehabilitate, and manage an affordable multi -family rental housing development. VI CONSOLIDATED PLAN PRIORITY 0 A 5 -Year Consolidated Plan (2015-2019) has been adopted by the County of Hawaii to address the County's needs, priorities and strategic plan. The County has amended the PY 2018 Annual Action Plan to include this HTF Allocation Plan and selected project(s) for PY 2018 HTF funding. VII APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS Applications for the HTF are issued, accepted, reviewed and selected by the County for funding consideration, subject to the availability of funds. Applications are reviewed for eligibility and rated using the selection criteria. Each application must describe the eligible activity, in accordance with 24 CFR 93.200, to be conducted with HTF funds and contain a certification by each eligible recipient that housing units assisted with HTF will comply with the HTF requirements. In addition, applicants must provide performance goals and benchmarks that the County will use to monitor efforts to accomplish the rental housing objectives. Rental housing projects may provide tenant preferences in accordance with 24 CFR 93.303, as provided for in the County's consolidated plan. Any limitation or preference must not violate nondiscrimination requirement in 24 CFR 93.350. Minimum Thresholds: Applicants must meet all of the following Minimum Threshold requirements to receive consideration for an allocation or award of HTF. Failure to meet any Minimum Threshold shall result in the immediate rejection of the application. 1. Market Assessment — A market assessment of the housing needs of extremely low income individuals to be served by the project must be submitted as a part of the application. The assessment should review the neighborhood and other relevant market data to determine that there is a current demand for the type and number of housing units being developed. 2. Site Control -- Evidence of site control shall be submitted with the application for HTF funds. Site control shall be substantiated by providing evidence in the form of an executed lease or sales option agreement, fee simple deed, executed land lease, or any other documentation acceptable to the County. Evidence of site control must be provided for all proposed sites. 3. Capital Needs Assessment (For projects acquiring an existing property) — To ensure that the proposed rehabilitation of the project is adequate and that the property will have a useful life that exceeds the affordability period, a Capital Needs Assessment of the property by a competent third party shall be submitted with the application. A Capital Needs Assessment is a qualified professional's opinion of a property's current physical condition. It identifies deferred maintenance, physical needs and deficiencies, and material building code violations that affect the property's use, structural and mechanical integrity, and future physical and financial needs. A Capital Needs Assessment shall identify any work that must be completed immediately to address health and safety issues, violation of Federal and State law, violation of local code, or any work necessary to ensure that the building can continue to operate as affordable housing. 4. Pro forma Criteria: a. Debt Service Ratio (DSR) for Projects with hard debt service requirements: 1. Project is required to evidence a DSR of no less than 1.15x on all hard debt service requirements for the first 15 years. b. Debt Service Ratio for Projects with no hard debt service requirements: 1. Project is required to evidence a positive Net Operating Income throughout the 30 -year pro forma period. c, Hard Debt Service Requirement: 1. Defined as scheduled regular and periodic principal and/or interest payments of project loan obligations made for its direct benefit, as evidences by a note and loan agreement. 2. Applicants are required to support all hard debt service loans and terms with executed lenders' commitment letters, letters of interest, or term streets. d. Underwriting Criteria and Requirements: 1. Applicants are required to use the following parameters and assumptions in the preparation of the project pro forma: i. Annual Income Inflation Rate of 2% for the first 15 years and Annual Expense Inflation Rate of 3% for the first 15 years, or term of the first mortgage, whichever is greater. ii. Annual Income Inflation Rate of 2% and Annual Expenses Inflation Rate of 2% for the remaining term of affordability. iii. Vacancy Rate of no less than 5%. iv. Annual Replacement Reserve Allocation of no less than $300 per unit per year. 5. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment — All proposed multifamily (more than four housing units) HTF projects require a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. For acquisition/rehabilitation projects, the Phase Environmental Site Assessment should address lead based paint and asbestos. 6. Developer Fee — For new construction, the maximum developer fee is 15% of total development costs or $3,750,000 (whichever is less). For acquisition/rehabilitation, the maximum developer fee is 10% of the acquisition costs and 15% of the rehabilitation costs, or $3,750,000 (whichever is less). VIII SELECTION CRITERIA The following selection criteria shall be used in the evaluation of HTF Applications: 1. Extent and Seriousness of the Identified Needs (Max. 100 pts.) — The project demonstrates that the needs and priorities of the community will be met. The project will provide affordable housing to extremely low income persons. 2. Consolidated Plan Priorities (Max. 100 pts.) —The extent to which the project proposes accomplishments that will meet the rental housing objectives for both the HHFDC and the County. The HTF is primarily a production program meant to add units to the supply of affordable housing for extremely low-income households. Merits of the application in meeting the priority housing needs of the County where the project is located such as accessible to transit or employment centers, housing that includes green building and sustainable development features or housing that serves special needs populations; 3. Need for HTF Funds (Max 100 pts.) — The applicant demonstrates the need for HTF funding. All sources of funding are secured and or committed to complete the project. No other source of funds can replace HTF resources. 4. Results to be Achieved (Max 100 pts.) — The project would resolve the problem. All other actions needed to support the project have been committed and are clearly demonstrated. The project proposes accomplishments that will meet the rental housing objectives for both the HHFDC and the County. The HTF is primarily a production program meant to add units to the supply of affordable housing for extremely -low income households. Merits of the application in meeting the priority housing needs to the County where the project is located, such as, accessible to public transportation, employment centers, housing that includes green building and sustainable development features or housing that serves special needs population, will be given. 5. Budget and Funding (Max 100 pts.) — Project pro forma to cover a minimum 30 year HTF affordability period and include rents that are affordable to extremely low-income households. Priority to be given for projects with extended affordability periods and project based rental assistance. Firm financial commitments from other funding sources (non-federal funding sources) are secured to evaluate project timeliness to expend HTF funds. 6. Site Selection Standards Information (Max. 100 pts.) -The applicant demonstrates site control. Site control shall be substantiated by providing evidence in the form of an executed lease or sales option agreement, fee simple deed. executed land lease, or any other documentation acceptable to the County. Evidence of site control must be provided for all proposed sites. There are no delinquencies against the proposed project. The proposed project has appropriate zoning or zoning exemptions. The project has secured firm commitments for utilities, to include but not limited to, electrical, water, sewer/waste water etc. 7. Environmental Concerns -(Max. 100 pts.) --An Environmental Assessment has been completed and does not indicate any environmental concerns. 8. Additional Actions Needed - (Max. 50 pts.) - The project fully resolves the identified problem. No further action will be needed in order to complete the project - 9. Compliance with Federal Overlay Statutes (50 pts.) - Federal Overlay Statutes are applicable to all projects selected for funding. Possible problems are considered in the review. Examples of Federal Overlay Statutes include Equal Employment Opportunity, Environmental Reviews etc. The applicant submitted all required documentation to support compliance with Federal Overlay Statues. 10. Project Management (Max. 100 pts.) - The applicant clearly documents the necessary qualifications and experience to obligate HTF dollars and undertake the funded activity in a timely manner. Staff demonstrates extensive training and experience relative to their functions. Applicant has excellent previous experience and capacity for managing grant funds. 11. Past Performance (Max. 100 pts.) - The applicant demonstrates a proven record of experience with comparable projects and has experience in developing and managing projects of similar type and scope. The applicant also demonstrates experience with other comparable projects. Successful Recipient(s) will receive a Notice of Award, which will state that the County's intent to award HTF funds is subject to approval by the approving authorities of the County, HHFDC and HUD, 1X MAXIMUM PER-UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY LIMITS Each year, HHFDC must establish maximum limitations on the total amount of HTF funds that may be invested per-unit for development of non -luxury rental housing projects. The HOME Program Maximum Per -Unit Subsidy Limits have been adopted for the HTF program. The development costs of affordable rental housing across the state are generally higher in comparison with the HOME subsidy limits. However, due to the limited funding, the HTF projects will require leveraging with other significant sources of funds. The HOME subsidy limit provides a reasonable maximum to develop a greater number of HTF assisted units throughout the state. The following table reflects the maximum per unit subsidy limits by bedroom size for housing assisted with HTF within the State of Hawaii, for PY 2018. Bedroom: 0 1 2 4+ PY 2018 HTF Maximum Per -Unit Subsidy Limit X REHABILITATION STANDARDS $ 141,088 $ 161,738 $ 196,672 $ 254,431 $ 279,285 The County of Hawaii has elected to utilize HTF for the development of new rental housing projects rather than rehabilitation projects. Therefore, Rehabilitation Standards are not relevant to the County's 2018 HTF Allocation. Q�QriroFyoG,n 1 1j CPMP Non -State Grantee �Qq�4oQ Certifications M cep Many elements of this document may be completed electronically, however a signature must be manually applied and the document must be submitted in paper form to the Field Office. EJ This certification does not apply. E This certification is applicable. NON -STATE GOVERNMENT CERTIFICATIONS In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the consolidated plan regulations, the jurisdiction certifies that: Affirmatively Further Fair Housing -- The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing, which means it will conduct an analysis of impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting that analysis and actions in this regard. Anti -displacement and Relocation Plan -- It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and implementing regulations at 49 GFR 24; and it has in effect and is following a residential antidisplacement and relocation assistance plan required under section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, In connection with any activity assisted with funding under the CDBG or HOME programs. Drug Free Workplace -- It will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by: 1. Publishing a statement notifying emp�oyees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited In the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; 2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to Inform employees about - a. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; b. The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; c. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and d. The penalties that may be Imposed upon emp'oyees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; 3. Making It a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1; 4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will - a. Abide by the terms of the statement; and b. Notify the employer In writing or his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; 5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise rete:ving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant; 6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted - a. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and Including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or b. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; 7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 1 Version 1,3 County of Hawai' i Anti -Lobbying -- To the best of the jurisdiction's knowledge and belief: 0 B. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for Influencing or attempting to Influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; 9. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for Influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its Instructions; and 10. It will require that the language of paragraph 1 and 2 of this anti -lobbying certification be Included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Authority of 3urisdiction -- The consolidated plan Is authorized'under State and local law (as applicab e) and the jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which It is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations. Consistency with plan -- The housing activities to be undertaken with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds are consistent with the strategic plan. Section 3 -- It will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1468, and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 135. Signature/Authorized Official Harry Kim Name Mayor, County of Hawai' i Title 25 Au uni Street Room 215 Address Hilo, Hawai' i, 96720 City/State/Zip 808/961-8211 Telephone Number Date CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 2 Version 1.3 County of Hawai' i ❑ This certification does not apply. ® This certification is applicable. Specific CDBG Certifications The Entitlement Community certifies that: Citizen Participation -- It is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR 91.105. Community Development Plan -- Its consolidated housing and community development plan identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and long-term community development objectives that provide decent housing, expand economic opportunities primarily for persons of low and moderate income. (See CFR 24 570.2 and CFR 24 part 570) Fallowing a Plan -- It is following a current consolidated plan (or Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) that has been approved by HUD. Use of Funds -- It has complied with the following criteria: 11. Maximum Feasible Priority - With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG funds, it certifies that It has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also Include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available); 12. overall Benefit - The aggregate use of CDBG funds including section 108 guaranteed loans during program year(s) 2018, 2019, 2020 (a period specified by the grantee consisting of one, two, or three specific consecutive program years), shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons during the designated period; 13. Special Assessments - It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate Income, Including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with CDBG funds) financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public Improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds, Including Section 108, unless CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of public Improvements financed from other revenue sources. In this case, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public Improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. Also, in the case of properties owned and occupied by moderate -income (not low-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against the property for public Improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment. Excessive Force -- It has adopted and is enforcing: 14. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and 15. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction; CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 3 Version 1.3 County of Hawai ` i Compliance With Anti -discrimination laws -- The grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 USC 3601-3619), and Imp'ementmg regulat;ons. Lead -Based Paint -- Its activities concerning lead-based paint will comply with the requirements of part 35, subparts A, B, 3, K and R, of title 24; Compliance with Laws -- It will c_mply with applizable laws. Signature/Authorized Official Harry Kim __ Name Mayor, County of Hawai' i Title 25 Au uni Street Room 215 Address L„Hilo, Hawai' i, 96724 City/State/Zip L 808/961-8211 Telephone Number Date CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 4 Version 1.3 County of Hawai' i This certification does not apply. [] This certification is applicable. OPTIONAL CERTIFICATION CDBG Submit the following certification only when one or more of the activities in the action plan are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency as specified in 24 CFR 570.208(c); The grantee hereby certifies that the Annual Plan includes one or more specifically Identified CDBG-assisted activities, which are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditons pose a serous and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community and other financial resources are not available to meet such needs. Signature/Authorized Official Address 1 City/State/Zip Telephone Number Date CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 5 Version 1.3 County of Hawai' i This certification does not apply. [] This certification is applicable. Specific HOME Certifications The HOME participating jurisdiction certifies that: Tenant Based Rental Assistance -- if the participating jurisdiction intends to provide tenant -based rental assistance: The use of HOME Funds for tenant -based rental assistance is an essential element of the participating jurisdiction's consolidated plan for expanding the supply, affordability, and availability of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing. Eligible Activities and Costs -- it is using and will use HOME funds for eligible activities and costs, as described in 24 GFR § 92.205 through 92.209 and that it Is not using and will not use HOME Funds For prohibited activities, as described In § 92.214. Appropriate Financial Assistance -- before committing any funds to a project, it will evaluate the project in accordance with the guidelines that it adopts for this purpose and will not Invest any more HOME funds in combination with other Federal assistance than is necessary to provide affordable housing; Signature/Authorized Official [. Name Title _ Add ress 1 71 City/State/Zip Telephone Number I =:1 Date CPMP Non -State Grantee Certiifcations 6 Version 1.3 County of Hawai ` i ® This certification does not apply. ElThis certification is applicable. HOPWA Certifications The HOPWA grantee certifies that: Activities -- Activities Funded under the program will meet urgent needs that are not being met by available public and private sources. Building -- Any building or structure assisted under that program shall be operated for the purpose specified in the plan: 1. For at feast 10 years in the case of assistance involving new construction, substantial rehabilitation, or acquisition of a facility, 2. For at least 3 years in the case of assistance involving non -substantial rehabilitation or repair of a building or structure. Signature/Authorized official Name Title Address City/State/Zip Telephone Number CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 7 Date Version 1.3 County of Hawai' i This certification does not apply. ❑ This certification is applicable. ESG Certifications I, , Chief Executive Officer of Error! Not a valid link., certify that the local government will ensure the provision of the matching supplemental funds required by the regulation at 24 CFR 576.51. I have attached to this certification a description of the sources and amounts of such supplemental funds. I further certify that the local government will comply with: 1. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.53 concerning the continued use of buildings for which Emergency Shelter Grants are used for rehabilitation or conversion of buildings for use as emergency shelters for the homeless; or when funds are used solely for operating costs or essential services. 2. The building standards requirement of 24 CFR 576.55. 3. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.56, concerning assurances on services and other assistance to the homeless. 4. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.57, other appropriate provisions of 24 CFR Part 576, and other applicable federal laws concerning nondiscrimination and equal opportunity. 5. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.59(b) concerning the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. 6. The requirement of 24 CFR 576.59 concerning minimizing the displacement of persons as a result of a project assisted with these funds. 7. The requirements of 24 CFR Part 24 concerning the Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988. B. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.56(a) and 576.65(b) that grantees develop and implement procedures to ensure the confidentiality of records pertaining to any individual provided family violence prevention or treatment services under any project assisted with ESG funds and that the address or location of any family violence shelter project will not be made public, except with written authorization of the person or persons responsible for the operation of such shelter. 9. The requirement that recipients involve themselves, to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, homeless individuals and families in policymaking, renovating, maintaining, and operating facilities assisted under the ESG program, and in providing services for occupants of these facilities as provided by 24 CFR 76.56. 10.The requirements of 24 CFR 576.57(e) dealing with the provisions of, and regulations and procedures applicable with respect to the environmental review responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and related CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 8 Version 1.3 County of Hawai' i authorities as specified in 24 CFR Part 58. 11. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.21(a)(4) providing that the funding of homeless prevention activities for families that have received eviction notices or notices of termination of utility services will meet the requirements that: (A) the inability of the family to make the required payments must be the result of a sudden reduction in income; (B) the assistance must be necessary to avoid eviction of the family or termination of the services to the family; (C) there must be a reasonable prospect that the family will be able to resume payments within a reasonable period of time; and (D) the assistance must not supplant funding for preexisting homeless prevention activities from any other source. 12.The new requirement of the McKinney-Vento Act (42 USC 11362) to develop and implement, to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, policies and protocols for the discharge of persons from publicly funded institutions or systems of care (such as health care facilities, foster care or other youth facilities, or correction programs and institutions) in order to prevent such discharge from immediately resulting in homelessness for such persons. I further understand that state and local governments are primarily responsible for the care of these individuals, and that ESG funds are not to be used to assist such persons in place of state and local resources. 13. HUD's standards for participation in a local Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) and the collection and reporting of client -level information. I further certify that the submission of a completed and approved Consolidated Plan with its certifications, which act as the application for an Emergency Shelter Grant, is authorized under state and/or local law, and that the local government possesses legal authority to carry out grant activities in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Signature/Authorized Official Name Title Address City/State/Zip Telephone Number I Date CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 9 Version 1.3 County of Hawai' i ❑ This certification does not apply. ® This certification is applicable. APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATIONS Instructions Concerning Lobbying and Drug -Free Workplace Requirements Lobbying Certification This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transactio� was made or entered -nto. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction Imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who falls to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Drug -Free Workplace Certification 1. By signing and/or submitting this application or grant agreement, the grantee is providing the certification. 2. The certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance Is placed when the agency awards the grant. If it is later determined that the grantee knowingly rendered a false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements of the Drug -Free Workplace Act, HUD, In addition to any other remedies available to the Federal Government, may take action authorized under the Drug -Free Workplace Act. 3. Workplaces under grants, for grantees other than individuals, need not be Identified on the certification. If known, they may be identified in the grant application. if the grantee does not Identify the workplaces at the time of application, or upon award, If there is no application, the grantee must keep the Identity of the workplace(s) on file in its office and make the information available for Federal inspection. Failure to identify all known workplaces constitutes a violation of the grantee's drug-free workplace requirements. 4. Workplace Identifications must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the grant takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (e.g., all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio stations). 5. If the workplace identified to the agency changes during the performance of the grant, the grantee shall Inform tate agency of the change(s), If it prevlously identified the workplaces in question (see paragraph three). 6. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant: Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code) Check if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here. The certification with regard to the drug-free workplace is required by 24 CFR part 21. Place Name Street city County State Zi Office of Housing & Comm Dev 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo Hawai' I HI 96720 Definitions of terms In the Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment common rule and Drug -Free Workplace common rule apply to this certification. Grantees' attention is called, in particular, to the following definitions from these rules: "Controlled substance" means a controlled substance in Schedules I through V of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and as further defined by regulation (21 CFR 1308.11 through 1308.15); "Conviction" means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes; "Criminal drug statute" means a Federal or non -Federal criminal statute involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, use, or possession of any CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 10 Version 1.3 County of Hawai' i controlled substance; "Employee" means the employee of a grantee directly engaged in the Q performance of work under a grant, including: a. All "direct charge" employees; b. all "indirect charge" employees unless their impact or involvement is Insignificant to the performance of the grant; and c. temporary personnel and consultants who are directly engaged in the performance of work under the grant and who are on the grantee's payroll. This definition does not include workers not on the payroll of the grantee (e.g., volunteers, even if used to meet a matching requirement; consultants or Independent contractors not on the grantee's payroll; or employees of subrecipients or subcontractors in covered workplaces). Note that by signing these certifications, certain documents must completed, In use, and on File for verification. These documents Include: 1. Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing 2. Citizen Participation Plan 3. Anti -displacement and Relocation Plan Signature/Authorized Official Harry Kim Name Mayor, County of Hawai' i Title 25 Aupun! Street Room 215 Address Hilo Hawai' i 96720 City/State/Zip 8Q8/961-8211 Telephone Number Date CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 11 Version 1.3