Laserfiche WebLink
PC-64 Page 2 July 10, 2018 <br /> CDPs to move development from where we don't want it, to where we do want it, and to <br /> encourage growth in areas. She further stated that parties must be willing to participate and <br /> willing to sell their development rights. <br /> Ms. Lee Loy inquired regarding Policy 27 of the CDP that refers to special permits. Ms. Gloor <br /> explained that this policy calls for clarity on potential impacts to be evaluated in the process, and <br /> said that this is done on a case by case basis, as appropriate, because it is not always clear <br /> through the application process, what a mitigating condition is and what an applicant may be <br /> offering. She stated that this is for more transparency, clarifying the process, and not changing <br /> the criteria itself. <br /> Ms. Lee Loy inquired about areas of encouraged growth and asked if there has been an analysis <br /> of the growth areas where we can use 201H projects as a leveraged opportunity. Ms. Gloor <br /> responded that there was an analysis of each of the urban areas for projected growth expected, <br /> not specific to 201H, but could fit into that. Ms. Gloor said it certainly addressed infill in the <br /> existing urban areas, and further explained that there was adequate room for infill within existing <br /> towns. <br /> Ms. Lee Loy inquired regarding Policy 118 of the CDP regarding apiaries. Ms. Gloor stated that <br /> this is asking to re-evaluate the Zoning Code relating to livestock production where there is <br /> currently a minimum distance of 1,000 feet from any public street or other zoning. Ms. Gloor <br /> explained that this distance is sometimes difficult for some to be 1,000 feet from public streets. <br /> Council Member Chung commented that he is impressed with the readability of the CDP. <br /> Mr. Chung inquired regarding the maps in Pepeekeo and `O`okala and wanted to know what <br /> the industrial uses are there. Ms. Gloor responded that in the General Plan it exists as industrial. <br /> She further explained that in `O`okala it originally went all the way to the coast, but shrunk back <br /> because it was not in use, which is in line with what the CDP recommends for industrial. <br /> Mr. Chung expressed concerns voiced by Mr. Shropshire and Mr. Carvalho regarding this being <br /> a wish list or advisory. Mr. Chung stated that he is unclear as to whether the maps are <br /> regulatory, if it creates a down zoning, and whether it would change vested rights. Ms. Gloor <br /> responded that the CDP does not change zoning with its entitlements. She then referred to the <br /> Land Use Guide Maps in Policy 1, where it says future land use decisions shall be consistent <br /> with the Land Use Guide Map, unless the CDP and General Plan are in direct conflict, in which <br /> case the General Plan shall be controlling. She further explained that the CDP does not change <br /> zoning, and it does not automatically change the General Plan map designation for Hakalau. <br /> Ms. Morrison added that the General Plan is the long-term plan for the County, and that the CDP <br /> makes recommendations to the General Plan. <br /> Council Chair Valerie Poindexter commented that in `O`okala, during breakout sessions, part of <br /> the discussion was about what the group would like to see. She said they wanted their area to <br /> remain as an industrial use. They liked the plantation community where they were built around <br /> PC-Report No. 64 <br />