Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0094.000 2018-2020 --04114M N,..' .+, Wil Okabe 414-. Managing Director lF��>% Harry Kim •c q ;i Mayor j''�£=_ • -- — Barbara J.Kossow 0.•"4 � • A6p OF.H►' Deputy Managing Director &MTN rTignai`i @Ma of#k' Alavor 25 Aupuni Street,Suite 2603 • Hilo,Hawaii 96720 • (808)961-8211 • Fax(808)961-6553 KONA: 74-5044 Me Keohokalole Hwy.,Bldg.C • Kailua-Kona,Hawai`i 96740 (808)323-4444 • Fax(808)323-4440 CZto (a QIP cam. • January 30, 2019 C:3.., a ter- Aaron S. Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Chair Chung and Members: SUBJECT: Change of Zone Application (REZ 18-000231) Request: RS-10 to CG-20 Applicant: Bank of Hawaii Tax Map Key: 2-2-024:003 As required by Chapter 7, Sec. 6-7.5 (a), Hawai`i County Charter, transmitted herewith for the County Council's consideration and action are the Windward Planning Commission's letter and enclosures regarding the above-referenced requests. Sincerely, • WIL OKABE Managing Director MTransCouncilBankofHawaiiREZ 18-231 Enclosures cc: Planning Department < 9,4 Comm. No. 44 Ref. To: PC, County of Hawai`i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. Ref. date JAN 3 1 2019 1i Harry Kim `�JN`�of.... �,,6i�:' Joseph Clarkson, Chair Mayor ++W.:-•J.��j.',t, Thomas Raffipiy,Vice Chair •-_ --,- _` Gilbert Aguinaldo •:•::. y�.M w;•• Donn Dela Cruz 'TE oF'..•'�' Donald Ikeda John Replogle County of Hawaii WINDWARD PLANNING COMMISSION Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 • Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)961-8288 • Fax(808)961-8742 JAN 30 2019 Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i 25 Aupuni Street Hilo,HI 96720 Dear Chair Chung and Council Members: SUBJECT: Change of Zone Application (REZ 18-000231) Request: RS-10 to CG-20 Applicant: Bank of Hawaii Tax Map Key: 2-2-024:003 The Windward Planning Commission, at its duly held public hearing on January 3, 2019, recommended for your approval the proposed legislative bill for a Change of Zone from Single-Family Residential- 10,000 square feet(RS-10)to a General Commercial-20,000 square feet(CG-20)zoning district. The property is located at 1339 Kino`ole Street, at the northeast corner of its intersection with West Lanikaula Street, Waiakea Houselots, South Hilo, Hawaii. 1 At its meeting on January 3, 2019,the Windward Planning Commission voted to forward a favorable recommendation to the County Council for Change of Zone Application REZ 18-000231, with changes to Condition B (Complete Construction), which clarified the type, location and height of a privacy fence/wall intended to mitigate adverse noise and visual impact to surrounding property owners. In addition, the Commission agreed to add a new Condition C (Consolidation), which requires the consolidation of three(3) lots of record within the subject parcel prior to obtaining Final Plan Approval. Adding this condition re-lettered all of the subsequent conditions. Finally,the Commission voted to replace Condition H(West Lanikaula Street Access),which originally limited access from West Lanikaula Street to right-in/right-out movements,to a condition suggested by the applicant to Hawai`i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i Page 2 provide the applicant and DPW a one-year timeframe from the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy to determine if there are impacts on the West Lanikaula Street and Kino`ole Street intersection from full- turn movements at the West Lanikaula Street access. If DPW determines that there is an impact,the applicant will be required to modify the turning movements at the West Lanikaula Street access, at their cost, within 6-months of DPW's determination. The Ordinance conditions attached to this letter reflect the Windward Planning Commission changes discussed above. The following is the original Planning Director's Recommendation to the Planning Commission which may or may not be consistent with the ordinance conditions attached. The applicant is requesting a Change the zoning district from Single-Family Residential— 10,000 square feet(RS-10)to General Commercial—20,000 square feet (CG-20)zoning district for 40,282-square feet of land in order to develop a new, single-story, 7,500 square-foot office building to house banking functions at this site. The height of the structure is not expected to exceed forty-five(45)feet,the maximum allowable by the Zoning Code. While higher than normal for a single-story building,this added height is designed to provide for the option to accommodate a mezzanine within the structure to accommodate office and related uses. Additionally,the applicant is proposing a drive-through ATM along the northern boundary of the subject property. This new structure would provide the bank the option to either relocate some of its operations or to provide another branch in proximity to the University of Hawai`i at Hilo and this area of the community. The applicant is proposing a 36- stall parking lot(including two handicapped stalls)to accommodate customer and employee parking. This on-site parking and landscaping would be provided as required by the Zoning Code. In order to consider an area for any type of zoning designation,the applicable goals, policies and standards of the General Plan must be adequately addressed. It is only through such a comprehensive policy analysis approach that evaluations and decisions can be made to better time and stage developments to achieve growth determined by the General Plan and related planning documents. The implications of these evaluations and decisions must also be considered as they may have an impact on similar areas in the County. The change of zone request from an RS-10 to a CG-20 zoning district conforms to applicable goals, policies and standards of the General Plan. The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG)Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical relationship among the various land uses. The request to change the zoning to a CG-20 district conforms to the LUPAG Map, which designates the property and the surrounding area as High Density Urban. Such designation allows general commercial, multiple family residential and related services Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i Page 3 (multiple family residential-up to 87 units per acre). In addition to being consistent with the LUPAG Map,the request would also support the following goals and policies of the General Plan Land Use element: • Provide for commercial developments that maximize convenience to its users. • Provide commercial developments that complement the overall pattern of transportation and land usage within the island's regions, communities, and neighborhoods. • Commercial facilities shall be developed in areas adequately served by necessary services, such as water, utilities, sewers, and transportation systems. • Commercial development shall maintain or improve the quality of the present environment through the consideration of visual, access, landscaping, and other design elements in their development. • Preference shall be given to commercial lands with a reasonably level topography. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of the Kino`ole Street/West Lanikaula intersection. The property is rectangular in shape with about 220 feet of frontage along West Lanikaula Street and 160 feet of frontage along Kino`ole Street. The topography is fairly level. According to tax records there are four(4)single-family dwellings on the site, three (3) of which were constructed in 1946, while the other, in 1928. These dwellings will be removed and/or relocated for possible housing use, if deemed appropriate and salvageable, by the contractor. • The property is surrounded by a mix of commercial and residential uses. There is an office building directly across of and kitty corner of the subject site on property zoned Neighborhood Commercial(CN-20). There is also a small commercial complex zoned General Commercial (CG-10) on the corner of Lanikaula and Kilauea Avenue, less than 200 feet east of the subject parcel. The University of Hawai`i at Hilo campus begins approximately 500 feet to the west at Ululani Street. There are also some scattered single-family residences north of the subject site along Kino`ole Street and an apartment complex fronting West Lanikaula Street, zoned Multiple-Family Residential(RM-4). Despite the transitioning nature of the neighborhood from residential to commercial zoning and the proposed zoning's consistency with the General Plan,there are still several residentially-zoned lots in close proximity to the subject property. The applicant received a Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i Page 4 letter of opposition from the owner of parcel 2-2-024:031, which is situated directly adjacent to the north of the subject property. The owner objected to the noise and air pollution caused by cars accessing the bank parking lot and drive up bank teller service. Additionally,the lot owner is in the process of selling the lot with the expectation of the buyer that he was purchasing a lot in a quiet, residential neighborhood. In response, the applicant proposed the installation of privacy fencing and landscaping along the shared boundary to mitigate noise and visual impacts. The preceding will be added as a condition of approval. The subject parcel consists of three(3)separate lots of record (Lot 17, Lot 18 and Grant 9646). The applicant plans to construct the proposed bank office building and related improvements across these lot lines. As such, the Director finds it prudent to require consolidation of the three(3) lots into one(1). The preceding will be added as a condition of approval. The applicant will provide basic infrastructure needed to support commercial uses such as County potable water, connection to the County sewer system, sidewalk improvements along West Lanikaula and Kino`ole Streets, and electrical service. Thus,the applicant's request is consistent with surrounding land uses and zoning and the goals, policies and standards of the General Plan. All essential utilities and services are available to the site. Proposed access to the subject parcel is via two (2) full-movement driveways from West Lanikaula Street and Kino`ole Street positioned as far from the intersection as possible. Both West Lanikaula Street and Kino`ole Street are two-lane, paved County roadways with curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements fronting the subject parcel, all within a 60-foot wide right-of-way. Additionally, there is a signalized intersection, complete with dedicated left-turn lanes fronting the subject site. Based on the proposed zoning, the Department of Public Works (DPW)recommends that the applicant provide improvements to the subject property's entire Kino`ole and West Lanikaula Streets frontage consisting of a"full width" concrete sidewalk of ten(10) foot width meeting the requirement of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the approval of DPW. DPW further recommends that the applicant install streetlights and traffic control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works. The applicant shall be responsible for the design, purchase, and installation of such devices. Finally, DPW requires driveway connections shall also conform to Chapter 22, County Streets, of the Hawai`i County Code. The proposed bank use is anticipated to generate approximately 31 entering and 22 exiting new trips in the A.M. peak hour and 82 entering and 82 exiting new trips in the P.M. peak hour. Based on the preceeding and in accordance with the Zoning Code's concurrency Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i Page 5 requimrent,the applicant prepared a Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR). The TIAR studied and evaluated the project's traffic impact at three(3) intersections: West Lanikaula and Kino`ole Streets; West Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Avenue; and East Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway. The TIAR found that with or without the proposed project and based on a five(5)and ten(10)year projection(2023 and 2028),the overall intersection Level of Service (LOS)would continue to be"C" at the Kino`ole Street/West Lanikaula Street intersection, and LOS C and D, at the Kilauea Avenue/West Lanikaula Street intersection. The LOS, however, for westbound movements on West Lanikaula Street at Kilauea Avenue(the through and right turn lane)would move from"D"to "E"during the PM peak hours. At the Mamalahoa Highway,the LOS would continue to be unchanged at"F." DPW-Traffic Division recommended restricting driveway access on West Lanikaula Street to right in/right out movements. In response,the applicant's traffic engineer provided analysis indicating that incidence of left hand turns into the property from West Lanikaula Street and associated traffic queuing would be minimal, and therefore restricting movements at that driveway would be an excessive/unnecessary treatment. Despite this analysis, DPW-Traffic Division reiterated their concerns about vehicle queuing to the intersection, citing observations of higher congestion along that roadway at certain times (PM peak hours and lunchtime), which may not be captured by assumptions based in part on national data found in the Trip Generation Handbook. Therefore, DPW-Traffic Division upheld their original recommendation restricting driveway access from West Lanikaula Street to right in/right out movements. The Planning Director generally defers to DPW-Traffic Division's expertise on traffic related issues on county roadways, therefore, the restriction of driveway access from West Lanikaula Street to right in/right out movements will be added as a condition of approval. The project site has no severe geological or topographical problems which cannot be properly rectified, or which would render the land unusable. The property is located in flood zone"X"which is an area determined by FEMA to be outside the 500-year flood plain. County water is available from an existing from an existing 8-inch waterline within Kino`ole Street and Lanikaula Street which front the subject parcel. The 8-inch waterline is capable of providing the required pressure of 2,000 gallons per minute of water flow for fire protection for commercial zoning. The Department of Water Supply(DWS)will determine the appropriate water commitment deposit, prevailing facilities charge, and appropriate service lateral meter size required once the applicant provides estimated maximum daily water usage calculations for the proposed commercial land use. The DWS also recommends a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly be installed. The preceding will be added as conditions of approval. Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i Page 6 The subject property is accessible to the County sewer. The Department of Environmental Management(DEM)has indicated that any existing or new structure is required to connect to the public sewer in accordance with Section 21-5 (Sewers)of the County Code. In addition, DEM requires the applicant conduct a sewer study in accordance with the then applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. Finally,the applicant shall provide such sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require, which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation of impacts of the proposed project. The preceding will be added as conditions of approval. There are no municipal waste collection services in the County. According to the application, solid waste will be handled by commercial haulers who will dispose of the refuse at the county landfill in Hilo and eventually to the West Hawai`i Sanitary Landfill. Electrical and telephone services are available to the property. Police and fire services and medical services are available nearby in Hilo. Lastly,this recommendation is made with the understanding that the applicant remains responsible for complying with all other applicable governmental requirements in connection with the proposed use, prior to its commencement or establishment upon the subject properties. Additional governmental requirements may include the issuance of building permits, the installation of approved wastewater disposal systems, compliance with the Fire Code, installation of improvements required by the American with Disabilities Act(ADA), among many others. Compliance with all applicable governmental requirements is a condition of this approval; failure to comply with such requirements will be considered a violation that may result in enforcement action by the Planning Department and/or the affected agencies. • Based on the above findings, the request to rezone the property from a Single-Family Residential- 10,000 square feet(RS-10)to General Commercial-20,000 square feet(CG-20) zoned district would result in an appropriate land use pattern that would further benefit the general public. The accompanying draft bill to amend Section 25-8-33 (City of Hilo Zone Map), Article 8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) of the Hawai`i County Code, is provided for your favorable consideration. Please note the proposed conditions of approval attached to the draft bill. Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i Page 7 We are enclosing copies of the staff Background, Planning Director's Recommendation,the Power point presentation and a draft transcript of the hearing for your information. Sincerely, Joseph BB.Digitally Clarkssigned by Joseph on Clarkson Date::31 2019.01.30'00' 14:03 -10 Joseph Clarkson, Chairman Windward Planning Commission LBan kofHawaiiREZ 18-231 wpc2 Enclosures cc: Mr. Sidney Fuke,Planning Consultant Bank of Hawai`i Department of Public Works Department of Water Supply Department of Land&Natural Resources-HPD Amy Self, Esq., Corporation Counsel BBank0fHawaiiREZ.crk.12.19.18 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT BANK OF HAWAII CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 18-000231) BANK OF HAWAII has submitted an application for a Change of Zone from a Single- Family Residential-10,000 square feet (RS-10)to a General Commercial-20,000 square feet (CG-20) zoning district for approximately 40,282-square feet of land. The subject property is located at 1339 Kino`ole Street, at the northeast corner of its intersection with West Lanikaula Street, Waiakea Houselots, South Hilo, Hawai`i, TMK: 2-2-024:003. PROPOSED ACTION 1. Applicant's Request: Change the zoning district from Single-Family Residential— 10,000 square feet (RS-10) to General Commercial—20,000 square feet (CG-20) zoning district for 40,282-square feet of land. According to the Zoning Code,the General Commercial district applies to an area suitable for commercial uses and services on a broad basis to serve as the central shopping or principal downtown area for a city or a region. No CG district shall be established until there is a demonstrated need for such action and no two CG districts shall be established in such relationship to each other that they cannot act as one center and yet are too close together to serve two distinct regions. Requirements for establishing a land use in the CG district, including a list of the variety of permitted land uses, are shown in Section 25-5-110 to 118 of the Zoning Code. (Planning Department Exhibit 1 —Zoning Code Requirements for General Commercial Districts) 2. Proposed Development: The applicant requests the change of zoning to CG-20 in order to develop a new, single-story, 7,500 square-foot office building to house banking functions at this site. The height of the structure is not expected to exceed forty-five (45) feet, the maximum allowable by the Zoning Code. While higher than normal for a single- story building, this added height is designed to provide for the option to accommodate a -1- mezzanine within the structure to accommodate office and related uses. Additionally, the applicant is proposing a drive-through ATM along the northern boundary of the subject property. This new structure would provide the bank the option to either relocate some of its operations or to provide another branch in proximity to the University of Hawaii at Hilo and this area of the community. The applicant is proposing a 36-stall parking lot (including two handicapped stalls) to accommodate customer and employee parking. This on-site parking and landscaping will be provided as required by the Zoning Code. (P.D. Exhibit 2 - Change of Zone Application dated September 17, 2018) 3. Project Timetable and Cost: The Applicant intends to finalize the construction plans and begin construction within the next year. The anticipated opening would be 2020. The applicant estimates the cost of this project at $2.5 million. 4. Landowners: 1339 Kinoole Street, LLC. The applicant has executed a purchase contract for the subject property with the current owner. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 5. State Land Use District: Urban. 6. General Plan LUPAG Map Designation: High Density Urban, which allows general commercial, multiple family residential and related services (multiply family residential- up to 87 units per acre). 7. County Zoning: Single-Family Residential-10,000 square feet(RS-10). 8. Hilo Community Development Plan: The Hilo CDP, adopted by Resolution No. 1 on May 21, 1975, identifies the area as RS-10 zoning for single-family residential development. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA 9. Subject Property: The property is rectangular in shape with about 220 feet of frontage along West Lanikaula Street and 160 feet of frontage along Kino`ole Street. The topography is fairly level. According to tax records there are four(4) single-family dwellings on the site, three (3) of which were constructed in 1946, while the other, in -2- 1928. These dwellings will be removed and/or relocated for possible housing use, if deemed appropriate and salvageable,by the contractor. 10. Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning: The property is surrounded by a mix of commercial and residential uses. There is an office building directly across of and kitty corner of the subject site on property zoned Neighborhood Commercial (CN-20). There is also a small commercial complex zoned General Commercial (CG-10) on the corner of Lanikaula and Kilauea Avenue, less than 200 feet east of the subject parcel. The University of Hawaii at Hilo campus begins approximately 500 feet to the west at Ululani Street. There are also some scattered single-family residences north of the subject site along Kino`ole Street and an apartment complex fronting West Lanikaula Street, zoned Multiple-Family Residential (RM-4). 11. Flood Zone: Zone X, an area determined by FEMA to be outside the 500-year flood plain. 12. Flora/Fauna Resources: No professional floral or faunal survey was conducted of the property due to the long-time residential use of the property and the urban character of the surrounding area. It is unlikely that rare or endangered floral or faunal resources are likely to be found within or proximate to the site. According to the Department of Land and Natural Resources-Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW), the State and Federally listed Hawaiian hoary bat has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project area and may roost in trees. DOFAW made recommendations to mitigate impact on this species. Additionally, DOFAW recommended shielding of lights and limiting nighttime work requiring lights to minimize impacts on endangered sea birds passing through the area. Finally, DOFAW recommended using native plants for landscaping purposes. 13. Archaeological/Cultural/Historical Resources: No professional archaeological and cultural study was conducted of the property because it has been developed since the 1920's with a residence. There are no known historic sites on the property as listed on the State or National Register of Historic Places. In a letter dated August 30, 2018, the State Historic Preservation Division(SHPD) determined that no historic properties would be -3- affected by the proposed rezoning since the project area has been full impacted by urban development. 14. Public Access: There is no public access to the mountains or the shoreline that traverses the property. 15. Traffic: According to the applicant, the proposed bank use is anticipated to generate approximately 31 entering and 22 exiting new trips in the A.M. peak hour and 82 entering and 82 exiting new trips in the P.M. peak hour. Based on the preceeding and in accordance with the Zoning Code's concurrency requirement, the applicant prepared a Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR) included with the application as Exhibit B of their application. The TIAR studied and evaluated the project's traffic impact at three (3) intersections: West Lanikaula Street and Kino`ole Street; West Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Avenue; and East Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway(Kanoelehua Avenue). The TIAR found that with or without the proposed project and based on a five (5) and ten(10) year projection (2023 and 2028), the overall intersection Level of Service (LOS) would continue to be"C" at the Kino`ole Street/West Lanikaula Street intersection, and LOS C and D, at the Kilauea Avenue/West Lanikaula Street intersection. The LOS, however, for westbound movements on West Lanikaula Street at Kilauea Avenue (the through and right turn lane) would move from"D"to "E" during the PM peak hours. At the Mamalahoa Highway, the LOS would continue to be unchanged at "F."As stated below, DPW-Traffic Division recommended restricting driveway access on West Lanikaula Street to right in/right out movements. In response, the applicant's traffic engineer provided analysis indicating that incidence of left-hand turns into the property and traffic queuing would be minimal, and therefore restricting movements at that driveway would be an excessive/unnecessary treatment. Despite this analysis, DPW- Traffic Division reiterated their concerns about vehicle queuing to the intersection, citing Traffic Division observations of higher congestion along that roadway at certain times (PM peak hours and lunchtime), which may not be captured by assumptions based in part on national data found in the Trip Generation Handbook. Therefore, DPW-Traffic -4- Division upheld their original recommendation restricting driveway access on West Lanikaula Street to right in/right out movements. UTILITIES AND SERVICES 16. Access: The subject parcel is currently accessed via three (3) driveways to existing dwellings from West Lanikaula Street and one (1) driveway to an existing dwelling from Kino`ole Street. Both West Lanikaula Street and Kino`ole Street are two-lane, paved County roadways with curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements fronting the subject parcel, all within a 60-foot wide right-of-way. Additionally, there is a signalized intersection, complete with dedicated left turn lanes fronting the subject site. The applicant is proposing two (2) full-movement accesses, one from Kino`ole Street Street and the other from West Lanikaula Street positioned furthest from the intersection. There will also be a drive through ATM, with ingress from West Lanikaula Street and egress at Kino`ole Street. Based on the proposed zoning, the Department of Public Works (DPW) recommends that the applicant provide improvements to the subject property's entire Kino`ole and West Lanikaula Streets frontage consisting of a"full width" concrete sidewalk of ten(10) foot width meeting the requirement of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the approval of the Department of Public Works. The driveway connections shall also conform to Chapter 22, County Streets, of the Hawai`i County Code. Additionally, based on concerns with cars trying to turn left into the West Lanikaula Street driveway, especially considering the proximity of the driveway to the intersection in a heavy traffic area, DPW-Traffic Division recommends restricting access on West Lanikaula Street to right in/right out movements to prevent queuing to the intersection. Finally, DPW recommends that the applicant install streetlights and traffic control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works. The applicant shall be responsible for the design,purchase, and installation of such devices. 17. Water: County water is available from an existing 8-inch waterline within Kino`ole Street and Lanikaula Street which front the subject parcel. The 8-inch waterline is -5- capable of providing the required pressure of 2,000 gallons per minute of water flow for fire protection for commercial zoning. The Department of Water Supply(DWS) will determine the appropriate water commitment deposit, prevailing facilities charge, and appropriate service lateral meter size required once the applicant provides estimated maximum daily water usage calculations for the proposed commercial land use. The DWS also recommends a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly be installed. 18. Wastewater: The subject property is accessible to the County sewer. The Department of Environmental Management (DEM)has indicated that any existing or new structure is required to connect to the public sewer in accordance with Section 21-5 (Sewers) of the County Code. In addition, DEM requires the applicant conduct a sewer study in accordance with the then applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. Finally, the applicant shall provide such sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require, which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation of impacts of the proposed project. 19. Solid Waste: There are no municipal waste collection services in the County. According to the application, solid waste will be handled by commercial haulers who will dispose of the refuse at the county landfill in Hilo and eventually to the West Hawai`i Sanitary Landfill. 20. Utilities and Services: All essential utilities and services are available to the property. Police, fire and medical services are available nearby in Hilo. AGENCY COMMENTS PROVIDED 21. Department of Public Works-Engineering Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 3 -November 5, 2018 memo.) 22. Department of Public Works-Traffic Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 4- November 2,2018 email.) -6- 23. Department of Water Supply: (Planning Department Exhibit 5 - October 17,2018 memo.), 24. Department of Environmental Management-Wastewater Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 6- October 11, 2018 memo.) 25. Fire Department: Planning Department Exhibit 7-November 7, 2018 memo.) 26. State Department of Health: (Planning Department Exhibit 8 - October 12, 2018 memo.) 27. State Department of Transportation-Airports Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 9 -November 2, 2018 memo.) 28. State Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 10 -November 30, 2018 memo.) 29. State Department of Land and Natural Resources - Engineering Division and the Division of Forestry and Wildlife: (Planning Department Exhibit 11 -October 1, 2018 memo. AGENCIES -NO COMMENTS OR OBJECTIONS 30. Department of Environmental Management- Solid Waste Division, Police Department. AGENCIES -NO RESPONSE 31. Department of Public Works- Building Division. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO AGENCIES' COMMENTS 32. Planning Department Exhibit 12: Letter from Sidney Fuke dated December 12, 2018 responding to Fire Department, Department of Water Supply, Department of Environmental Management,Department of Public Works, State Department of Health, State Department of Transportation-Airports Division, and State Historic Preservation Division comments. 33. Planning Department Exhibit 13: Letter from Sidney Fuke dated December 19, 2018 responding to Department of Public Works-Traffic Division comments. -7- 34. Planning Department Exhibit 14: Email from Sidney Fuke dated December 20, 2018 responding to Department of Land and Natural Resources Engineering, Land Divisions and the Division of Forestry and Wildlife. PUBLIC COMMENTS/APPLCANT'S RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 35. Planning Department Exhibit 15: Email from Martin McGinn with objections to the proposed change of zone. This exhibit also includes a response email from Sidney Fuke dated October 22, 2018. -8- § 25-5-108 HAWAII COUNTY CODE (c) Exceptions to the regulations for the CN district regarding heights, building site areas, building site average widths and yards, may be approved by the commission within a planned unit development. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2005, ord 05-155, sec 11; am 2015, ord 15-33, sec 4.) Division 11. CG, General Commercial Districts.' Section 25-5-110. Purpose and applicability. (a) The CG (general commercial) district applies to an area suitable for commercial I uses and services on a broad basis to serve as the central shopping or principal downtown area for a city or a region. (b) No CG district shall be established until there is a demonstrated need for such action and no two CG districts shall be established in such relationship to each other that they cannot act as one center and yet are too close together to serve two distinct regions. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-111. Designation of CG districts. Each CG (general commercial) district shall be designated by the symbol"CG" followed by a number which indicates the minimum land area, in thousands of square feet, required for each building site. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-112. Permitted uses. (a) The following uses shall be permitted uses in the CG district: (1) Adult day care homes. (2) Amusement and recreation facilities, indoor. (3) Art galleries, museums. (4) Art studios. (5) Automobile service stations. (6) Automobile sales and rentals. (7) Bars, nightclubs and cabarets. (8) Bed and breakfast establishments, as permitted under section 25-4-7. (9) Boarding facilities, rooming, or lodging houses, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (10) Broadcasting stations. (11) Business services. (12) Car washing, provided that if it is mechanized, sound attenuated structures or sound attenuated walls shall be erected and maintained on the property lines. (13) Catering establishments. (14) Cemeteries and mausoleums, as permitted under chapter 6, article 1 of this Code. 25-104 Planhing Dept. Exhibit ZONING § 25-5-112 (15) Churches, temples and synagogues. (16) Cleaning plants using only nonflammable hydrocarbons in a sealed unit as the cleansing agent. (17) Commercial parking lots and garages. (18) Community buildings, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (19) Convenience stores. (20) Crematoriums, funeral homes, funeral services, and mortuaries. (21) Crop production. (22) Day care centers. (23) Display rooms for products sold elsewhere. (24) Dwellings, double-family or duplex, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (25) Dwellings, multiple-family, provided that the maximum density shall be one . thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (26) Dwellings, single-family. (27) Equipment sales and rental yards, and other yards where retail products are displayed in the open. (28) Family child care homes. (29) Farmers markets. When the vending activity in a farmers market involves more than just the sale of local fresh and/or raw produce, plant life, fish and local homegrown and homemade products for more than two days a week, the director, at the time of plan approval, shall restrict the hours of use, maintenance and operations and may require improvements as determined appropriate to ensure its compatibility with the existing character of the surrounding area. (30) Financial institutions. (31) Group living facilities. (32) Home occupations, as permitted under section 25-4-13. (33) Hospitals, sanitariums, old age, convalescent, nursing and rest homes and other similar uses. (34) Hotels. (35) Ice storage and dispensing facilities. (36) Laboratories, medical and research. (37) Laundries. (38) Light manufacturing, processing and packaging, where the only retail sales outlet for products produced is on the premises where produced. (39) Medical clinics. (40) Meeting facilities. (41) Model homes, as permitted under section 25-4-8. (42) Neighborhood parks, playgrounds, tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar neighborhood recreational areas and uses. (43) Offices. 25-105 § 25-5-112 HAWAI`I COUNTY CODE (44) Personal services. (45) Photography studios. (46) Public uses and structures, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (47) Printing shops, cartographing and duplicating processes such as blueprinting or photostating shops. (48) Repair establishments, minor. (49) Restaurants. (50) Retail establishments. (51) Schools. (52) Telecommunication antennas, as permitted under section 25-4-12. (53) Theaters. (54) Time share units. (55) Utility substations; as permitted under section 25-4-11. (56) Veterinary establishments. (b) In addition to those uses permitted under subsection (a) above, the following uses may be permitted in the CG district, provided that a use permit is issued for each use: (1) Golf courses and related golf course uses, including golf driving ranges, golf maintenance buildings and golf club houses, provided that the property is within the state land use urban or rural district. Golf courses and golf driving ranges shall not be permitted within the state land use agricultural district unless approved by the County before July 1, 2005. (2) Major outdoor amusement and recreation facilities. (3) Yacht harbors and boating facilities. (c) Residential uses in connection with the operation of any permitted use shall be permitted in the CG district. (d) Buildings and uses normally considered accessory to the uses permitted in this section shall also be permitted in the CG district. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2012, ord 12-28, sec 13; am 2014, ord 14-86, sec 11.) Section 25-5-113. Height limit. (a) The height limit in the CG district shall be forty-five feet, except in those areas designated in subsection (b) below. (b) The height limit in the City of Hilo shall be one hundred twenty feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2002, ord 02-88, sec 2.) Section 25-5-114. Minimum building site area. The minimum building site area in the CG district shall be seven thousand five hundred square feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) 25-106 •4 ZONING § 25-5-115 Section 25-5-115. Minimum building site average width. Each building site in the CG district shall have a minimum building site average • width of sixty feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-116. Minimum yards. The minimum yards in the CG district shall be as follows: (1) Front or rear yards, fifteen feet; and (2) Side yards, none, except where the adjoining building site is in an RS, RD, RM or RCX district. Where the side yard adjoins the side yard of a building site in an RS, RD, RM or RCX district, there shall be a side yard which conforms to the side yard requirements for dwelling use of the adjoining district. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-117. Landscaping of yards. (a) All front yards in the CG district shall be landscaped, except for necessary access drives and walkways, and except for the construction of one single-family dwelling and accessory buildings per lot. (b) Where any required side or rear yard in the CG district adjoins a building site in an RS, RD, RM or RCX district, the side or rear yard shall be landscaped with a screening hedge not less than forty-two inches in height, within five feet of the property line, except for necessary drives and walkways, and except for the construction of one single-family dwelling and accessory buildings per lot. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2005, ord 05-155, sec 12.) Section 25-5-118. Other regulations. (a) Plan approval shall be required for all new structures and additions to existing structures in the CG district, except for construction of one single-family dwelling and any accessory buildings per lot. (b) Exceptions to the regulations for the CG district regarding heights, building site areas, building site average widths and yards, may be approved by the commission within a planned unit development. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2005, ord 05-155, sec 13; am 2015, ord 15-33, sec 4.) Division 12. CV,Village Commercial Districts. Section 25-5-120. Purpose and applicability. The CV(village commercial) district provides for a broad range or variety of commercial and light industrial uses that are necessary to serve the population in rural areas where the supplementary support of the general business uses and activities of a central commercial district is not readily available. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) 25-107 APPLICATION FOR COUNTY ZONING (RS4OTOCG20) APPLICANT BANK OF HAWAII Waiakea, South Hilo Hilo, Hawaii TMK: (3) 2®2024: 003 Prepared For: Bank of Hawaii Prepared By: Sidney M. Fuke, Planning Consultant September 2018 Planning Dept 12 0 5 4 ,3 Exhibit M1B SEP 1 7 P I '34 PLAN mENT COUNI 1-1AvolANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Type or legibly print the requested information) APPLICANT:_, Bank of Hawaii Michael Ta lor EVE APPLICANTS SIGNATURE: DATE; 9 2'1 k ADDREss: . 4 ji,X. LIST APPLICANTS INTEREST IF NOT OWNER:j3tx.r4SIN. O CA-Ct LIST PRINCIPAL(S)INCLUDING NAMES OF MAIN OFFICERS:,OA \IV PHONE:(Bus (Res.) (Fax) LANDOWNER(S); 1339 Ki tle S LLC -LANDOWNER SIGNATURE(S); • g • 4 DATE: IV ' by leiter) LANDOWNER(S)ADDRESS: c/t 1632 So h KStreet. Suite 100 Honolu HI 96826-2065 REQUEST: Rs- 0 TO CG-20 Existing zoning) (Proposed Zoning) TAX MAP KEY: 2-2-024:003 STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY; 1339 Kinoole Street SIZE OF PROPERTY OR AFFECTED AREA(S)TO BE REZONED:___ 40,282„.atiale„feet AGENT: M.Fuke,Plattniltmt ADDRESS: 100 Pauabi StreAluite/121-jk, TELEPHONE:(Bus.) 969-1522 (Res.) (Fax) Please indicate to whom original correspondence and copies should be sent ORIGINAL; Si4jçy Fake COPIESL Michael Yani THIS CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE FOLLOWING: 1. A filing fee of five hundred dollars($500)plus twenty-five dollars($25)per lot or unit proposed _ CO by the amendment. (Checks shall be made payable to the County Director of Finance) 2. An original and twenty(20)copies of this completed application and the appropriate Departmental Zoning Questionnaire. ATTACHMENT Commercial, RM, Resort, & Industrial PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF HAWAII APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE 1 , if your request is approved, do you intend to subdivide the subject land in accordance with the approved change • of zone? No If ip4, please answer the rest of question I and then to question 3. a. How many acres of the requested area do you intend to subdivide? N/A b. Into what lot sizes? C. if your request is approved, approximately how long after the date of approval do you expect to submit your subdivision plans to the Planning Department for preliminary approval? NPA • If you intend to subdivide, please submit a preliminary schematic subdivision plan together with your change of zone application form, 2. If you nave no firm plans of-subdividing the subject area, do you intend to: a. Sell or lease the land to someone who has firm plans? No b. Sell or lease the land to someone who has tentative plans? No c. Sell or lease the land to someone who has no plans? Na Keep it? Yes e. other (please state) f, If you intend to do either a, b, or c, please elaborate on the kind of plans the other party has. Please, also, include in your answer approximately how soon after approval of your rezoning do you expect to transfer the subject land to another party. 3, What specific building plans do you have for the subject land? Include in your answer the following: type of building (apartment, office, launderette, etc.); financing arrangement; timetable for construction; and any other information which you feel might help us in evaluating your request. Construct a new office building to be used as a bank 4. Have you performed any study which would demonstrate a need for your proposed building and/or development? No if so, please elaborate on your findings in the space provided below. -• Have you performed any study which discusses the - environmental impacts your request would nave on the surrounding area and/or the County? Yes If so, please elaborate on your findings in the space provided below. • Please refer io accompanying planninanand environmental report 6. Are there any buildings on the subject area? Yes If so, what kind? Four single-family residences What do you intend to do with those buildings if your request is approved? Demolish or relocate them Is the subject land currently being used for any agricultural activity? No if so, please list the kinds of products grown on and how many square feet or acres of land per product? B, To your knowledge, has there been any flooding and/or drainer prcblem on the eject area? P_o If so, ply describe the prOblem, 9. Do you think that the roads leading to the subject area needs improvement? If so, what kind? Is the road adequate for the prqposed traffic volume or load? yes =1. What sort of governmental assistance and/or improvements do you feel will be needed in the subject area when developed? yes a. Schools x b, Roads c . Sewer d, Drainage e. Police Protection .. f. Fire Protection x g, Recreational Facilities h. Recreational Facilities For those checked "yes," please elaborate what type or kinds of improvements and/or assistance are needed. 11, Have you performed any historic sites study and/or survey of the subject area? :If so, what were the results? Please, also, submit a copy of the study together with this change of zone supplement. No,inasmuch as the site has been and continues to'be used residentially for over 70 years Bankait, Michael Taylor, EVP Signature: ► .��" Address: P.A. Box 2900, Honolulu, HI 96846 ... IY'IIYI'rlY✓W Y�'' VY""41 . Telephone: (808) 694-8925 Date: August 31,2018 6338A/50A P. D. 5/84 COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT COUNTY REZONING REQUEST - RS-10 to CG-20 BANK OF HAWAII WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII TAX MAP KEY: (3) 2-2-024: 003 INTRODUCTION Bank of Hawaii ("Applicant") is requesting the rezoning of a parcel of land consisting of 40,282 square feet from Single-Family Residential (RS- 10) to General-Commercial (CG-20) in the City of Hilo, Hawaii. The subject site is situated on the northeastern corner of Lanikaula and Kinoole Streets at Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawai'i, TMK: (3) 2-2-024: 003. If successful, the Applicant plans to construct a 7,500+/- square foot office building for a bank. II. PROJECT LOCATION As noted earlier, the subject site consists of 40,282 square feet and is identified by TMK: 2-2-024: 003. The site is located on the northeastern corner of Lanikaula and Kinoole Streets. (Figures 1 & 2) In this area and within five hundred (500) feet of the subject site, there is an office building directly across of and kitty corner of the subject site. There is also a small commercial complex on the corner of Lanikaula and Kilauea Avenue, less than two hundred (200) feet away. There is also a labor union's hall fronting Lanikaula Street, approximately three hundred (300) feet west of the subject site. The University of Hawaii at Hilo campus begins approximately five hundred (500) feet to the west at Ululani Street. There are also some scattered single-family residences north of the subject site along Kinoole Street and an apartment complex fronting Lanikaula Street. Most of the zoning corresponds to this mixture of land uses. There are four (4) single-family dwellings on the site. According to the County of Hawai'i Real Property Tax records, three (3) of the dwellings were constructed in 1946, while the other, in 1928. These dwellings will be removed and/or relocated for possible housing use, if deemed appropriate and salvageable, by the contractor. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Project Concept and Components The Applicant wishes to develop a new office building to house its 1 . �' ,' fes' { • � 7• ' i a f • \ k a ''.%e _ ...",,../...."''' "h'T N' • w � _ .• 7n..',..,` :,,. x`,,�,,•'.• '' ,_ =` _ 1 'I r ` . �l "tfj �t �+� �. E E I-17-1 l` \ ç4 F�Yt 9 d "r .r '� ,:.S. ys r� .f +'� ,,%-*' ��� i .. t r ._�....,_.:. • tt",,...t e • tt .'`/_'r- }`_4 - a,�• ''1-o • 3- l' �`! - F,._,� _ . s ... o P .1. t .��1. 7{ : e .d 1 1.• , . t f Oil , 37 e> ` r��^ �fi'—.,� ,,�,.3.... :,........._,J_Lit, ._ ;-% , . _,,,,X".'. {u .,C f 5 \ ^.. Mei ; i '_ 'E -,. • S } '-3-:-''''s `'s'F "# !r '�--'`'. i ^ J.rte 1.. -?\ �1 T" '':J"F . r _-._ KE .a i VA-ST _T'-c :"%," ',f '` %�,.°• ' .,,_,,,••..i.,;-• ...)..e ?y.,. .-7, �y4-•:.5,-;..A.-';-.74'- . i- �...:.a }t'i't '.---t-.. k 1 '_ 4 ye a , ;�jr , i • 1. ' Y may` q rr\-I\0\ 1s L / vr,,,,:rN.---.., 3).--- 't.� y } �"-`_ E i. „...,., •. , ...„,„:„.,... ..,,,„.,.,.„1/4,...„-„,_.\.„.�� y .� k , ✓'� , ` ``l 4 77 , LEIVA$41-ST / �F 75---\\'..‘••••••••%•:-\\".��}`� L �4 lL r , V' 00-• lr •:.i'^f--S ' ..r . E -r j�'!' „5.,�._ c ..1,--YyY,. -,�'' ., Y• .s. ,,..`., -A....`". ,./-rv. 4y.d. .F° e_....k l l•q ,; 5N� ^�A� if xk '9 P` .;.* .J�0,-. !� rte„ i. F I i t,� ��y,���r3,1'.:5.'•-:1--1t'ri ';'" - 1 I l +Sy"w,,�C ! s l IFI t I I a Y. 1' ~ti V Y i:� �'`'`` }' ,•• r= '.,,„..,,,,k,...,,,,,," .T ,/moi 4 y 4°� E ; 1 E +i I. 'es,;'`"`..; ,r-`';` ° I '; :, ' i."2'"` ` r---- �'S 0:',./.;'(.. -'4.�,,, r`--.3 ;,r` e f-'r'• r-` '�,�,?d f ,,,,.. 1. . f %. �_ fE / ate•..r ``� .Y ,, > 'R k, \ , .. t S—. I 1 \.‘•• \ \\.,' ',,,,''',.‘Ep>.4; .,..;\\ ,W,,,.., \t':.'''''';-j,E,A, E' `� l� 4 ,:f r r' • E w 4 t f - -II 4 , % 1 s xY i. ✓yrs l' ' .f F I gy i * TS ' r• { 3 r' 1 '1 0 1 t ,E 1.-: l -.{ ._ '� 2 E Y iii i '$"-:..... L44.-7, r �'+' j?'4 n YQ k"r'�.+' �$' J-,j`., y- f —7-171T.• 3�E i _x.5--4 j_� FY 3' • I^ '. � - = _-" .,..d ,._ ,�", ''.�'�. te : ._.,- *Hawaii County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible.No warranties,expressed or implied,are provided for the data herein,its use or interpretation.The assessment information is from the last certified taxroll.All data is subject to change before the next certified taxroll.The'parcels'layer is intended to be used for visual purposes only and should not be used for boundary interpretations or other spatial analysis beyond the limitations or the data. The'parcels'data layer does not contain metes and bounds described accuracy therefore,please use caution when vicwtny lli s Jdld.Ov.tidyiny Li as Idybi milt(..)i.iii Haid idyls iitdi[tidy nut Leve ust..i liiis Idyci ab d udsc mdy nut piuduc,c ptci is-e icsults. GPS did imagerydata will not overlay exactly. Date printed: 09/05/18:18:16:15 Figure I z z 24 / 1 PLAT E3 I fC.; I APS:, SEP 7 19 L ONO Sr S[',24 IB45 5 .o OE!3333 i3;5 ...... .Rahn H/3Y,/n tb'3nAr3 I mi (J�Q c6/ry L�c6y O �O�^i'G� Y,[.o _ we e�, ,er �'indr in:7 r 44 V'U ••;� ^; 2-h/J C3 /.na L. 4e�Y.M,,,A Y6 it r•,�rnY,-7/6 ei c. ..%c MNe.// r..><aew.a.-+'' Y ' �[• /s4aJf */r ,; 212.5,n;o(+ :R - d,r.,.e _�,' /4910# /rzaa G,3. y 511.:;1 2 io]; o:� OC. 9147 £ .a p ; eL: 9191 4 2 22 .. /IT.-i 19� 'waw ex'^ _ R ______., �j �i _. __!OVA: 1 I I�]B 0 r•;,n Y 6. J..bd:F.a'...../. a (.] q,le6i y3mada•;'F G•,e, 92 91g a5 q Y' h N c,P, 9279 = t .X ,:.e. 9/42 y /99 o0.d Pan.{ r3,/i2 M' 0..•. 99,999.9 -,51 ..Y,. I u • __ -- .a...-. r..•..,..n...r.air 3,w^�eor.• .14 ;.ems . /y 0 : ��^ ,000` qe •:✓, 1h • 2h..'e Milsuwi. /..,i oma./y..e. h0 es 0° °4.�9 7aaas I" a.e.:m a 2176// yy `, 1, •/9.9eei, 0 y AC 00..0 A.Cvmsyegey}rvlRa,e,i lI. .�„ I �TI w✓e''''.� '4 e.P. 9206 y 'h` 3e = /C' /o,oeo]5 \ ,sy 27 .. ren .. n�iw•a-.1. 12 .. e1.ri.n P m/.3 i 62, 997.9 : "••.s K 3 m�N.keba a u/ 0 �ro srd 0/iYe/a"%it 20,/60 e . +n"+n '0 _•a a+zae¢ 2 �� L T.skle-7c :'t ` IAego{ ...Win sM. .w.-✓/7 \ ,i tr v y4.o 1. /29496 \ 6 4 BLOCK or o i ; �,• 0 BLOCK 223 (r974o¢) 93,r V g a,amoa ze ,� '�' 1]N` %^-B AA�� krn..d em..m0.-,.w;/.o.-/e 0' ® ®; Jm.i Ke.l.hs•/ 0 1 kci/ �i.:•:' 'l /9 cos V N 20./64 f a �' vel.... s.,..1..., u1y/a.me.em+.r..V y Y f. ¢ can9 d p V gb :c•: s �R. 4R 9699 [44 G.P. 9/41 ` Q /�s>/Sof. jN .,r•u.uo ae9499 O:+t[ n11 Q 151.ifi0 V _• •_ .. .. .• - JAuukilBuii tVIli' p .».. 3333.. Q W.yn.M.K.>%[t., f../ ,f-Aln y , ]Y11[y,. h M.ry K.ka....fv,-0.rv. �,,, ©- e0° �I Sandra Y.- 1 1,611.'./!:��- M....N.f....L w.M.,4.,e.• J 02. 999/ BEC�,OoIY f .If%]01116 a 4 , >7 8 _— j L, �+f.P21131B 1; r-- /9Joef saam./ m./0mM . N N'_' I A0'fJS fbYlY R+2-[c772d $ n /m. 31 ' r _ LY 1]111, IB GR. 009 P• .....a .... I __�� 1 • NN e.NAsr�.b 00L 0 OA 9046 O.Q. 9/72 I rMnr ry%C.i,•f-n„a/a.. 1' 6� 9/OA 1 ]71.6..6 f _1:77rEf9,a.sof — 1511_--',1 le;{2 i ' C1 �,; I n, ••• 1 r QK.Yauo a 4r1,/.,.-,4/.; aa7.7f ! 'Y9' t 6w 1 7�ae/fi I1I • 8.�GP. 2/7/ iv' r 17 3333, be./ .,$ .1& /7..m I q4 7.,.4.9.4.- ,,.'r i1r,•']- 1'• .]t L.1iY//rAULA 57 ,,� J\ I 1 1 !-9 y/_ n.e//.d....Ws:31.10, Y Ft , LAT OS ` -4G �M ` ' <9 SION `rte' THZOI RDSE CIVI LAT 2 2 24 '!'3‘ E.)' 4ADJ'A NC111:1_'!' CONTAINING:'.PARCELS WA/IKEA/So.H/LO,HA//A///Wa/akca H/Js.2c Ce,-/e.S.(firs.,-1./778,) 5'[-IBJGCT%'(J CHANGE Scale:I in: 50 ft PAIMEO_ banking functions at this site. In so doing, it would give the bank the option to either relocate some of its operations or to provide another branch that would be proximate to the University and this area of the community. The visibility and accessibility of this area make this site quite attractive for office use. At the same time, because of some of the surrounding residences, the proposed office or bank use would be more benign and less noxious than a retail or light industrial activity. If the request is approved, the Applicant would construct a single- story office building, consisting of approximately 7,500 square feet. The height of the structure is not expected to exceed forty-five (45) feet, the maximum allowable by the Zoning Code. While higher than normal for a single-story building, this added height is designed to provide for the option to accommodate a mezzanine within the structure to accommodate office and related uses. (Figure 4) As proposed, there would be a minimum of thirty six (36) parking stalls, including two (2) handicapped stalls, provided on-site. This would be more than the Zoning Code's parking requirement of twenty five (25) stalls for a 7,500+/- square foot building, as it would provide some accommodation for employee parking. (Figure 3) The Zoning Code requires a minimum setback of fifteen (15) feet from the front OR rear yard; and none forthe side yard, except where it adjoins a residential zone, in which case the residential zone setbacks must be used. In this case, the adjoining properties are zoned RS-10, and the setbacks are ten (10) feet. As proposed, the building would be setback no less than twenty (20) feet from Lanikaula Street and no less than thirty five (35) feet from Kinoole Street. Along the sides, the setbacks would be in excess of forty (40) feet. As such, the setbacks would be consistent with the Code. There would be two (2) full-movement accesses, one from Kinoole Street and the other from Lanikaula Street. They would be positioned furthest from the intersection. There will also be a drive- through ATM, with ingress from Lanikaula Street and egress at Kinoole Street Landscaping consistent with Planning Department Rule Na. 17 would be installed around the perimeter of the subject site. • 0055 EX.";'-1-- Owl I I 0= PROPOSED OIiAIE I I .(r b 1 405 YMD PROPOSED SWALE -NRB NIS 1 INN:T W11H 1 SETBAIX:10'-0' -LonINO STALL NNIEUVERING SPACE SHALLOW OflYWELL 6 - 3( I,�. 0o1YfT T^" ,::J, I..:' Jf*is �.1. I ';'I. \I�I Eyl_.r•a:+-xnIats5r. �k,...uP 9.^:. g ' — 0 67.42 _4\\I. ` .. p I Y" .33 , .■. ®/ R4.25' , I I I R100 �Y I B,.IB' \ 4I \ — I 4 L 8.17• I 10.]]' I 1 I _ • I LLOW OgYAAE�LI (Q_ II— YARD 15 STALLS O B'?ADE I 0y .1198 I SETBACK:10'-0' — 36 35 '4 33 32 1 30 29 28 27 .26 25 24 23 22 \ w firall OWE ,, • 1y 1-�I ��\�\,., .. :L1 k.:ls. }1 •r 1 1 7 �~I WRD CUTS 1'INA EFT' `]1J.- A 1 / I1,1--S41-141-1/2' I I� IWI-I/4'- O I I - � f� T:'� �� • `pROPosEIFo 1-Va. I e.ao• — J � U1�8_.,•, WAIEfl UIEBAL .. ?1 m 15 0 _ 6 r 13.5'MIN 15.45'INN I ,��_PROPOSED SWME >: 3 I 400 5 14 I W I o I BANK OF HAWAII 4 '� 4 1�r �I BUILDING 1o.D6 rz n Iris 1 7.500 SF q -1 -m FF=47')ASSUMED) HANDICAP 3 11210.00'(TYP)I;131 VAN 1111 I 5 5510- m 1 A2 P7,1 11 18,00•(lYP I PROPOSED ORATE INLET M. W17N SHALLOW OflYNEL. RI -I I MNP. \, RI q A SS-`\\l\\\ �( • FRONT YARD I \ g 9r�U -,',1 1 FGFND• -4)---—I SMACK:1s•_0• :Isl. �k �_ _w�._ I HArOm 14 ROW OIRECRON jialsikPROPOSED SWALE- STALL 4 1 dj g 1 qS 9 I • )I —_-_- PflOPEfltt NNE Ipb 1____44 - -1—a�_ _ SWAIE Q PNDPDSED GRATE 1�` I--� - _- '� _— -- �S:DD 1 _ 1 �.,„,,,,,H„ .v.INLET YA1H `II ® • li' 0 I0' 20' " SHALLOW ORYNELL • - I -� 2D.aD• • • i SCALD d II \ - •I_. Ip.._............__....w. `=� -- EgPR9T NOm FIRE HYD—RANT— . YO AST — SUET\ —.- -- ENSf --- -- EMT--- u Dui _ OWI' OW CB—� �O1b..-- ;,...v;'-•-•-;7`o`P� --":r--I�':r'"_..s , Z. _' __ ,,;-..,_......<g �r=-�W--.._... G� --,z-Ea_-521,^=-_' /-. -PROPOSED SWALE LANIKAULA STREET - 51'5 ._ _ s10------------- FRONT YARD � --510-__—.___—.___—___— ....... MUM:15'-0' __ __ .�..._.... - m.. �-�_»-•,•,-^,„.„.............. NI Sry�.; � »........-- I ez. PROPOSED FIRE ��/ % a...�,.- WATER UNNE s U1 y-�• j CIVIL SITE ASSESSMENT FOR PREPAREGBY: -""--�--�� -- TTT - BANK OF HAWAII PROPERTY — — DA1E JuLY401E IEI e _ -----WB— __r'•IaG S?]f°JA1��IN4.114t66 I I I I r-- HEIGHT LIMIT:45'-0" II ...,,,,.......,s...<:_, }FfTOACKf .$TO fAC l; I BANK OF HAWAII I� I 7,500 SF I I �:�..::P.:,, i_...".i.:..::_.,L...:i,i}t..::.(:.I`fv:E;jiix';�c....�;�:. I I t�i"�f L I' t digli €t € l I :iP A �} Fi 1 �ir�..( :t lY .. 1€ `�P ,• I Lir }ISL€ 1 , s € d L it l! d..,-r ll r L :1:e[ii Lt €I t rS �; I lr:, r t s( ,i 1 -A... t I t. :;t i i 4. , li LI tl I _ 1 I}`i} € it( r4iF 1 I i3 Al "\ , rt tr V L'i L * i ! (, k• .1.,.. i.f ......Yr L.A.FIu.::.. .....Ix. .i...l... .t.l ..:.... A .......:r. .s. ..:.. Ptah. .... ::A .. ...t..0 ..}.ttai' Y:. ,f_. .jrt.4 .s..f......lt_y.:.. OFRONT ELEVATION— LANIKAULA STREET SCALE: I:30 I I I I HEIGHT LIMIT:45'.0" TBAcif I I I BANK OF HAWAII I 7,500 SF I II I I r s.t..A.v.V,,,IIri(4,1ing:Il!ei iI,'Jf, -..r nE,€131 l2 Rt il;s (L€ I mttli IP wki�Ct12 E;'[ L ly.[tlll .Ilyil.l i I!G 1 }I't�l .i r�(1 dpi ( P S� Vt 1},�� dt t�ilL,�( 1lti I1Id1 L 1 trot 71�IL ill tt0 I I STI) ( i i I J ( I t i u 1 # # i I �t t t I ii ai t #rel{!t Y �1i11'i:€It tt it I i r t1t f€7r r P, i hitt I;c,.r j €, I.�i_rr�'- `•.1�;;;�`.:'::i��'e?�=I7�:_1 �s.� i e,:,Y.. 1:.�4�r::. ...r :4_...-t.. ...........n. ...< :...1,.4rr.<._..:._ ...r.. .rr-sat.�. .t i, r' _v..�r'I OSIDE ELEVATION—KINOOLE STREET SCALE:1:30 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10' 20' 50' • 11131111MINIBSEW •••••- BANK OF HAWAII HILO, HAWAII 1[111111111) CHI It should be emphasized that the proposed structure and parking location are preliminary and may be adjusted to accommodate the spatial requirements of the potential building and County's design review and related construction requirements. B. Project Timetable and Cost Should the request be approved, the Applicant intends to finalize the construction plans and begin construction within the next year. The anticipated opening would be 2020. The estimated cost of this project is $2.5 million. IV. INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS A. State Land Use The subject property is designated Urban. As such, no State Land Use Commission action is required. The County of Hawaii can process the rezoning request. B. County General Plan The most recent revisions to the General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide ("LUPAG") map (February 2005) amended the Medium Density Urban designation to High Density Urban. Relative to this designation, the General Plan allows consideration for "General commercial, multiple-family residential and related services (residential- up to 87 units per acre." The requested County zoning and planned uses would be consistent with the uses envisioned within the High Density designation. As such, no General Plan amendment would be required to effectuate this project. C. Hilo Community Development Plan The Community Development Plan ("CDP") attempts to further define the General Plan and serves as a guide for decision-makers. It was adopted by the Planning Commission in 1975, over 25 years ago. Although reviewed by the County Council, the CDP was never adopted. The CDP's Land Use Concept map identifies a RS-10 designation for this area. This designation suggests residential uses at an average of nearly 4 units per acre. 3 Notwithstanding this inconsistency, however, it is acknowledged that the growth of Hilo, including the expansion of the University of Hawai'i at Hilo, and its outlying areas like Puna, have made most of the planning assumptions of the CDP obsolete. An updated CDP would be timely. Absent the availability of a relevant intermediary planning document, one must rely only on the General Plan LUPAG map and policies. In the end, the General Plan is more critical, as the County Charter requires all zone changes to be consistent with it. D. County Zoning The County zoning of the subject site is Single-family Residential (RS-10). If the General-Commercial (CG-20) request were approved, the site would be converted into an office building to be . used as a bank. Should that occur, all land use and development codes such as parking, landscaping, fire, ADA, and the like would be complied with. It should be noted that a property less than one hundred (100) feet to the north fronting Kinoole Street was recently rezoned into the Commercial-General (CG-20) district. Another property, also fronting Kinoole Street and directly opposite of the block, is zoned Neighborhood-Commercial (CN-10) and is used as an office. G. Other Permitting Considerations The site is not located within the County Special Management Area (SMA). As such, no SMA Use Permit would be required. However, other construction-related permits would still be required. These would be of the "ministerial" variety, such as Plan Approval, building permit, driveway permit, and health clearances. V. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS A. General Description The 40,282 square foot site is generally rectangular in shape. It has a width of 168+/-feet and a depth of 235+/- feet. There are four (4) relatively older single-family dwellings on the site that will be removed and/or relocated for possible housing use, if deemed appropriate and salvageable, by the contractor. 4 i - B. Climate, Soil and Topography According to the State Commission on Water Resource Management, the nearest rain gauge in this area is the Hilo Airport. The rainfall data of this gauge notes that over the past 37 years, the annual median rainfall for thisarea was 131.1 inches. The wetter months tend to occur between October through April. The average• daily temperature ranges from a minimum of 61 degrees to a maximum of 79 degrees Fahrenheit. Wind patterns are generally tradewinds (easterly) during the day and westerly or mountain winds during the evenings. The site is fairly level. There are no perceptible topographic or geologic constraints. It sits at approximately the 75-foot elevation level. Being within a heavily urbanized area, the Land Study Bureau Overall Master Productivity Rating does not have any classification for this site. Likewise, the site is not classified under the Agriculture Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH) classification system. Thus, the State's classification system does not recognize this site as being agriculturally important. The U. S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, however, has designated the soil type in this are to be of the Keaukaha extremely rocky muck (rKFD) series, 6 to 20 percent slopes. This soil type consists of well-drained, think (less than 1 foot) organic soils overlying pahoehoe lava bedrock. Runoff is medium, erosion hazard slight, and shrink-swell potential high. These soils are usually moist, but when dried, they have high shrinkage but low swelling potential. This soil type is widespread throughout downtown Hilo. C. Natural Hazards 1. Drainage The US Corps of Engineers' Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) designates the area of the proposed development to be in Zone X (areas outside of 500-year flood). There are no drainage ways through the site. Accordingly, the site has not and should not be subject to flooding. As there will be an added level of impervious surface resulting from the proposed parking area, there may be an issue relating to potential increased run-off. In that event, 5 drywells, permanent BMPs or similar type of accommodations will be implemented, subject to the review and approval of the Department of Public Works. The depth of these drywells - if needed -will be sufficient to avoid potentially high groundwater table. 2. Tsunami Hazard The site is situated over a mile from the ocean and outside of the Civil Defense's Tsunami Evacuation Zone. 3. Volcanic and Earthquake Hazards The United States Geological Survey (USGS) classifies the entire City of Hilo as being within Lava Flow Hazard Zone 3, on a scale of ascending risk, 9 to 1. There is very little that can be done`to mitigate this situation and reflects an ongoing threat to all residents and businesses. The entire island of Hawaii falls within Earthquake Zone 4, according to the County Building Code. As such, the Applicant understands and accepts that there will be added structural requirements to address this seismic hazard during the building permit and construction processes. B. Fauna Resources Although there was no professional survey conducted of the faunal resources of the site, the Applicant does not believe that rare or endangered faunal resources are likely to be found within or proximate to the subject site. The site is not only within an urban environment, but it is fully developed and used residentially for well over seventy (70) years. As such, introduced bird species (such as dove, Japanese White- eye, house finch, myna) are common in this area. Domestic animals such as cats and dogs, and other animals like rats and mongoose are also common. These are all common and not endangered. As such, it is unlikely that the development of the subject property would cause any adverse faunal impacts. E. Flora Resources No commissioned flora survey was conducted of the site due in 6 large measure to its past and current residential use. There is a lawn and other non-native plant species on the site, such as ti-leaf and other non-native ornamental plants. F. Historic/Cultural/Archaeological Resources For the same reason noted above, no commissioned archaeological inventory survey and cultural assessment study were conducted of the subject site. The historical residential use of the site reduces the prospect of finding any archaeological remains. Nonetheless, during the course of developing this project, should any anticipated archaeological features or sites be uncovered, work in the affected area will immediately cease and the applicant will notify the Planning Department. G. Valued Cultural Resources In view of the recent Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH" and "Ka Pa'akai 0 Ka'Aina"decisions, the issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights must be addressed. Specifically, there must be a discussion of the cultural, historical, and natural resources and associated traditional and customary practices of this site. In this situation, the subject site is not adjacent and/or proximate to the shoreline. As such, fishing and/or coastal access is not an issue. It is not known whether the subject or immediate surrounding area was ever used for the gathering of plants by native Hawaiians. However, as the site has been used residentially for over seventy (70) years and landscaped with a lawn and other introduced species, it would appear very unlikely that the site would serve such purpose today and/or in the recent past. There are also no known archaeological features on the subject property. Based on the above, it does not appear that the project would have any potential adverse impact relating to the cultural and historical resources of this area. H. Water and Coastal Resources The subject site is located over a mile from the coastline. As such, coastal impacts resulting from discharge of drainage systems from the site should not be significant. Being a non-coastal property, no coastal access will be affected. According to a civil engineering report prepared for this project by Akinaka and Associates, Ltd., dated July 23, 2018 (Exhibit A), the proposed development is expected to connect to an existing 8-inch sewer lateral along Lanikaua Street. As such, the method of wastewater disposal should further reduce potential adverse groundwater or nearshore water impacts resulting from this project. Further as noted earlier, prior to the installation or use of any drywells on the site to address on-site drainage concerns, if applicable, the appropriate UIC permit from the State will be taken. At that time, impacts to water and coastal resources will be carefully examined. Noise, Air Quality, and Dust Impacts The existing background ambient noise level is associated with the wind, foliage, birds, and the like. This is relatively low, averaging less than 45 Ldn. Traffic along Kinoole Street and Lanikaula Street, however, heavily influence manmade noise in this area. Both of these streets are significant cross-town streets. Kinoole Street is a 2-lane road that • runs in a north/south direction. Lanikaula Street is also a 2-lane road that runs in an east/west direction. As such, although this project will introduce additional vehicular traffic to this area, it is not anticipated to contribute significantly more to the long-term ambient noise level. Thus, any traffic increase should result in a noise increase of equal to or less than 55 Ldn, which is within acceptable levels within an urban environment. The short-term noise impacts will be associated with the construction of the project. These will be temporary. Further, all applicable State rules governing construction noise abatement will be observed. The Applicant also intends to not allow noise- generating construction activity to occur on Sundays and early morning and late evening hours. The proposed development should not generate any direct air quality impacts. During the short-term, there may be some fugitive dust associated with the construction of the project. However, 8 compliance with the State Department of Health's regulations governing dust control should help mitigate this potential impact. From a long-term perspective, the project itself is not expected to have uses that generate adverse air pollutants. The only discernible air quality impact would be associated with vehicular traffic to and from the site. While the added traffic will have an impact to the ambient air quality, the impact should not be significant. This is due in part to the higher EPA standards for automobile air emissions and the prevailing tradewinds. All of the required parking area within the project site will be paved with an all-weather, dust free surface. Landscaping will also be required as part of the Plan Approval requirement. As such, with the exception of minimal construction dust in the beginning, long term dust generated by the project should be insignificant. J. Scenic and Visual Considerations In the Natural Beauty element of the General Plan, there are sites or areas listed as scenic resources. The subject site is not listed as a scenic site. However, Mauna Kea and Mauna Loa are listed as scenic resources. The proposed development would not have any visual impacts on either of those mountains. The location of the site is such that there will be no interruptions to these views from either Lanikaula Street or Kinoole Street. Further, the structure will be within the 45- foot height limit allowed within the CG zone, which is ten (10) feet more than the allowable limit of thirty five (35) feet in the Single- Family Residential zone. Thus, there should not be significant visual impacts from any public area or street resulting from this project. VI. SOCIAL AND RELATED CONSIDERATIONS A. Surrounding Land Uses The land uses in the immediate area are a mixture of commercial and residential in nature. Within five hundred feet (500) feet of the subject site, in addition to some single-family residential uses, there are offices, medically-related facility, union office, shopping complex, and a multiple-family residential complex. As such, while the requested use would generally be consistent with the evolving commercial activities in this area, the proposed use could still generate some impact to the residences. To mitigate 9 these impacts, design and construction factors such as the placement of the structure, parking areas, lighting, landscaping, and the like will be taken into account. B. Economic Impacts The requested zoning would have some measure of economic impact, as it would provide short-term employment opportunities for those in the construction and related industries. Whether a new branch or consolidated operation, because of internal movements, the project is anticipated to create a few, if any, direct new jobs. The subject property is located proximate to commercial areas, including Downtown Hilo, Kaiko'o Mall, Hilo Shopping Center, and the University. The proposed commercial office use can thus be supportive of those areas. A commercial rezoning would also increase the tax revenues to the County. However, there could be some real property tax consequences for the adjacent residential properties. As the assessed valuation of the subject property rises due to the higher commercial use, there could be some fallout to neighboring properties. Nonetheless, homeowners intent on keeping their property for residential uses could avail themselves to some tax provision that "freezes" valuation of their property for a certain period of time. C. Agricultural Impacts The site is and has not been used for agricultural activities. The site has not been used for commercial agricultural purposes for well over seventy(70) years. Further, the surrounding areas are also heavily urbanized. Even the State ALISH's mapping system does not classify this site. Accordingly, the potential commercial agricultural value of the site - aside from limited domestic purposes - is minute, if at all. VII. INFRASTRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS A. Road Accesses to the project would be from both Kinoole Street and Lanikaula Street. These County streets serve as cross-town roads in both the north/south and east/west directions. In this area, both 10 streets are essentially undivided with two (2) lanes within a 60-foot wide right-of-way. However, fronting the subject site, there is a signalized intersection, complete with dedicated left turn lanes. Currently, there are three (3) driveways from Lanikaula Street and one (1) from Kinoole Street. There are also curb, gutter, and sidewalk section fronting the subject site. No on-street parking is allowed on either street. Inasmuch as the existing rights-of-way are sixty (60) feet, the Applicant does not believe that additional rights-of-way strip is needed. However, the Applicant understands and accepts that a curb, gutter, sidewalk section fronting the property may also have to be improved within the existing road rights-of-way as condition of the zone change. The proposed bank is anticipated "to generate approximately 31 entering and 22 exiting new trips in the AM peak hour and 82 entering and 82 exiting new trips in the PM peak hour." Hence, in accordance with the concurrency requirement, a Traffic Impact Analysis Report ("TIAR") was prepared by SSFM International, dated July 27, 2018, and found in its entirety in Exhibit B. The TIAR studied and evaluated the project's traffic impact at three (3) intersections - Lanikaula and Kinoole Streets; Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Avenue; and Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway. The existing Level of Service ("LOS") condition at the Kinoole Street and Kilauea Avenue intersections during the AM/PM peak weekday hours was pegged at LOS C. At the Mamalahoa Highway, even with only its right-turn movements from Lanikaula Street, the LOS was determined to be F, "due to the high southbound volumes and 256 eastbound right turners in the PM peak hours." Based on that premise, with or without the project, and based on a five (5) and ten (10) year project (2023 and 2028), the overall intersection LOS would continue to be "C" at the Kinoole Street/Lanikaula Street intersection, and LOS C and D, respectively, at the Kilauea Avenue/Lanikaula Street intersection. The LOS, however, for westbound movements on Lanikaula Street at Kilauea Avenue (the through and right turn lane) would move from "D" to "E" during the PM peak hours. At the Mamalahoa Highway, the LOS would continue to be unchanged at "F". 11 In sum, the TIAR concluded that the LOS, with or without the project, for the years 2023 and 2028 would continue at "C" or "D" at both intersections during the AM/PM peak hours. For the year 2038, the Lanikaula Street/Kilauea Avenue intersection is expected to function at LOS D, "but is expected to have LOS E in the PM peak hour. By removing the green arrow phase for the westbound left runners, additional green time can be reallocated to other movements and raise the overall intersection LOS to D." Given the TIAR, there appears to be no need for restrictive ingress or egress movements or no off-site improvements required. Further, there are additional considerations in that regard. For one, there is adequate sight distance at both streets to render reasonably safe egress and ingress movements. If needed, as is the current practice, a traffic security monitor could be retained to facilitate movements to and from the site. Further, the driveway to the drive-through ATM is at a considerable distance, allowing sufficient space for auto queuing. B. Water According to the engineer's report (Exhibit A), there is an 8-inch County water line fronting Kinoole Street. The report projected an average maximum daily demand of 4,185 gallons or the equivalent of eleven (11) units of water, based on 400 gallons/unit. C. Wastewater As noted earlier, the project will connect to an existing 8-inch County line fronting Lanikaula Street. The connection will be done in accordance with the requirements of the County Department of Environmental Management. D. Solid Waste Solid waste will be handled b commercial haulers who will dispose Y p se of the refuse at the county landfill in Hilo and eventually at Pu'uanahulu, North Kona. Typically, the waste generation of a project of this nature (office) should be comparable to the water demand of ten (10) to eleven (11) residences. Although the Applicant does not believe one is needed, if required, a Solid Waste Management Plan can be prepared to help address ways to accommodate and reduce the project's waste. • 12 E. Other Government Services As this area is already part of the City of Hilo urban area, it is ' already being serviced. No extension of government services would be required, and existing facilities should be sufficient to accommodate the limited demand expected from this project At least three (3) County Fire Stations and Emergency Medical Services are located within a 5-minute response area. As this project is a commercial one, it should have little or no direct impacts to schools, parks, and other related facilities. Nonetheless, there are parks and schools within a 2-mile radius of the subject site. The Hilo Hospital is located, approximately three (3) miles from the site. This hospital is one of five licensed hospitals on the island. F. Other Utilities All other utilities such as telephone and electrical services are available to the site. VIII. IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS A. Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of Environment and Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity The short-term use of the site would probably continue to be rentals. However, given the area of transition and significant traffic along Kinoole Street and Lanikaula Street, residential use may eventually notbe that desirable. Further, this project should not result in any significantly adverse short or long-term impacts that cannot be properly mitigated. There will be direct and indirect economic benefits - albeit small - resulting from the construction and implementation of this project. Relatedly, the project will generate increased tax revenues that can supplement the State and County's fiscal resources. Because of its location, this project will provide a service that can be made reasonably accessible to the region and immediate neighborhoods. The required infrastructure - if needed - will be implemented by the Applicant to mitigate potential impacts of this project. 13 Finally, the design and scale of the project will be quasi-residential in nature. As such, in spite of its commercial use, a residential ambiance could still be captured and further enhanced by landscaping. B. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources The subject site is already disturbed. As such, the commitment of natural or other resources (such as archaeological) would not appear to be an issue. The likelihood of finding archaeological features on the site is remote, due to the past development of the site. Further, any unanticipated finds will be properly mitigated upon consultation with appropriate government agencies. C. Mitigative Measures The Applicant intends to provide any required off and on-site infrastructure in conjunction with the development of this project. These may include drainage, wastewater, andwater improvements. The Applicant will provide the driveway accesses from both Kinoole Street and Lanikaula Street and, if required, improving the existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk sections fronting the site. Likewise, the Applicant, if required, is prepared to make on-site drainage improvements to accommodate the planned parking area as well as the necessary wastewater system. All of these will be done in conjunction with the permitting and permit implementation phases of this project. Although the potential for unearthing archaeological features on the site is remote, if any inadvertent discoveries are made during any phase of this project, the Planning Department will be notified. Work will resume only upon receipt of proper clearances from said agency. Additional landscaping will also be incorporated within the project site, as well as along the boundaries adjacent to the neighboring residences to the north and east. The landscaping would be consistent with the Planning Department's landscaping rules. D. Alternatives to the Proposed Project 1. No Project Under the status quo alternative, the site would continue to be used for housing. 14 Under this scenario, the site would not be fully utilized in a manner consistent with the General Plan High Density designation and for a use that services the community, especially the University community. 2. Development Based on Existing RS-10 Zoning Under this alternative, the land could be subdivided into four (4) lots. An additional dwelling through the "Ohana" concept could conceivably be constructed, resulting in a total density of eight (8) homes on the site. However, the site's proximity to commercial uses and the heavily traveled Kinoole Street and Lanikaula Street would eventually make it less desirable for more intensive residential uses. Further, there could be more traffic conflicts. 3. Alternative Residential Densities The site could be developed into a higher residential density, such as a multiple-family residential project. However, as noted above, having residential uses adjacent to major streets, particularly from a noise and dust perspective, may not be a desirable use. 4. Evaluation of Alternatives Leaving the property in its current four (4) rental state would not maximize the use of the land in accordance with the General Plan. There would also be diminished tax revenues and fewer services to the public. While alternative residential densities are possible, the proximity of commercial uses and major roadways would probably not make such a project feasible. At the same time, the project'simpact to the area's social and physical infrastructure would not appear to be pronounced, particularly in light of the quasi-residential scale and design of the building. Further, additional mitigative measures such as landscaping, lighting, and so forth will be taken to address any possible impact associated with the proposed use. 15 In that regard, the project in totality would be consistent with the land use objectives sought to be accomplished by the County General Plan LUPAG map. In view of the aforementioned, it would appear that none of the alternatives would be more prudent and beneficial than the requested CG-20 zoning alternative. IX. REGULATORY ANALYSIS A. General Plan LUPAG Map The General Plan provides for the long-range comprehensive development of the island of Hawaii. It provides direction for balanced growth in the County. The LUPAG map designates the site High Density Urban, a designation that allows the requested CG-20 zoning. Accordingly, this request would not be inconsistent with the LUPAG map. General Plan Policies The requested zoning would be consistent with the goals, policies, and standards of the Economic and Land Use Elements of the General Plan. Specifically, the more pertinent ones follow: 1. Economic Element Goals ® Provide residents with opportunities to improve their quality of life. ® Economic development and improvement shall be in balance with the physical and social environments of the island of Hawaii. ® The County of Hawaii shall strive for diversity and stability in its economic system. e The County shall provide an economic environment which allows new, expanded, or improved economic opportunities that are compatible with the County's natural and social environment. 16 Policies • The County shall provide an economic environment which allows new, expanded, or improved economic opportunities that are compatible with the County's natural and social environment. • The County shall strive for an economic climate which provides its residents an opportunity for choice of occupation. • The County shall strive for diversification of its economy by strengthening existing industries and attracting new endeavors. • The County shall encourage the development of a visitor industry which is consistent with the social, physical, and economic goals of the residents of the County. Discussion The request would provide opportunities for an office building (bank) to establish itself in an area that is serviced by a good transportation system and in an area (such as the University) that is currently underserved. Relatedly, all required infrastructure is there or, if not and/or needed, will be provided by the Applicant without taxing government's servicing ability. Further, the area is located proximate to commercial and business areas, making the site accessible to these uses. At the same time, because of the type of use (office), the requested project should be consistent with the land use pattern in this area, while making it convenient for the region and surrounding neighborhoods. • 2. Land Use Element (Commercial) Goals • Provide for commercial developments that maximize convenience to its users. 17 ® Provide commercial developments that complement the overall pattern of transportation and land usage within the island's regions, communities, and neighborhoods. Policies • Commercial facilities shall be developed in areas adequately served by necessary services, such as water, utilities, sewers, and transportation systems. Should such services not be available, the development of more intensive uses should be in concert with a localized program of public and private capital improvements to meet the expected increased needs. ® Distribution of commercial areas shall be such as to best meet the demands of neighborhood, community and regional needs. • The development of commercial facilities should be designed to fit into the locale with minimum intrusion while providing the desired services. Appropriate infrastructure and design controls shall be incorporated into the review of such developments. Standards • Commercial developments shall be located in areas adequately served by transportation, utilities, and amenities. Commercial developments shall provide for adequate internal circulation amongst commercial facilities in the area. • Off-street parking and loading facilities shall be provided. • Commercial development shall maintain or improve the quality of the present environment through the consideration of visual, access, landscaping, and other design elements in their development. • Preference shall be given to commercial lands with a reasonably level topography. Discussion As the City of Hilo and its surrounding area continue to grow, there will be a need for more office space such as a financial 18 institution at locations that provide convenience for its users. In this case, there are a number of businesses in this area plus the University that would greatly benefit by having a bank or similar type of use at this location. Further, from a visual and infrastructure perspective, the proposed project would not overwhelm the surrounding area. The subject site also fulfills other policies and standards articulated in the General Plan. The site is already serviced by adequate infrastructure, and where there are not, will be extended and/or provided by the Applicant. The County water line is already available to the subject site. Police and fire protective services are available within a 5- minute response time. As such, this project should not require addition public services to be provided. The site does not have any on-site development constraints. The land is relatively level and is designated "X" on the FIRM map. Further, because office use is not noxious, potential pollution concerns would be minimal, if at all. Being used as residentially for a number of years, the prospect of the site serving as a habitat for rare or endangered plant or animal life appear remote. There is also little evidence that the site would have any archaeological feature. Because of the type of use (office), landscaping, and off-site road improvements, the request would be generally compatible with the growing mix of commercial uses in this area and could mitigate potential visual and noise impact to the few nearby residences. Finally, the standards for an office building will be fulfilled. These include the acreage, setbacks, uses, parking, etc. C. Hilo Community Development Plan As noted earlier, the Hilo CDP was adopted in 1975 by the Planning Commission to serve as a guide to the General Plan. Although the site is designated RS-10,,many changes have occurred over the past 25 years, making many of the planning assumptions obsolete. 19 De Zoning If the request is approved, the existing dwellings would be demolished or relocated, if salvageable, to other sites. All of the requirements relative to height, setback, landscaping, and parking, and the like would be complied with. No variances from the Code are anticipated. 20 EXHIBIT A CIVIL BASIS FOR PLANNING FOR BANK OF HAWAII PROPERTY TMK: (3) 2-2-024: 003 HILO, HAWAI'I Prepared by Akinaka and Associates, Ltd. July 23, 2018 AKINAKA & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Consulting Civil Engineers Civil Basis of Planning for Bank of Hawaii Property TMK: (3) 2-2-024:003 Hilo, Hawaii, Hawaii Date: July 23, 2018 I. Assumptions a. Property has water and sewer entitlements and can be serviced by the County's Water and Wastewater system (adequate capacity). Improvements to offsite system will not be required. b. Zoning requirement based on commercial use (CG-1). c. Property will not have significant traffic impacts. If required,improvements to surrounding roadways will be minimal. II. Parking Lot a. Parking stall size: 8'-6'x 18' long(minimum) b. Minimum parking aisle width=24' (for perpendicular stalls) c. Minimum number of parking stalls:25 stalls(1 per 300 SF floor area) d. ADA stalls:minimum of 2,with 1 being van accessible. Handicap stalls and ramp to comply with ADA requirements. ADA walkway to be provided from stalls to building entrance. e. Minimum turning radius(inside/outside): 15 ft/25 ft(passenger cars) f. Loading stalls for commercial development: 1 stall, 12'side x 50'long with 43' long maneuvering space g. Minimum walkway width:3'with passing space h. Stalls for electric vehicles stalls or ADA electric vehicles are not required. i. Landscaping: i. 1 tree per every 12 parking stalls=minimum of 4 trees ii. Lots adjoining residential lots require screening of the parking lot and loading stalls with walls,continuous screening hedges or earth berms a minimum of 42- inches in height. Ill. Water a. Water service will be provided by the existing 8-inch waterline along Kinoole Street to minimize crossings with existing utilities. b. A Backflow preventer will be required. c. County meter and backflow preventer will be located within the yard frontage. d. The waterline to service the building will be located within the paved access aisle to minimize disturbance to parking. e. Calculation of Water Demand: Commercial Use ' 3000 gal/acre(based on 2002 Water System Standards as amended) Site is approximately 0.93 acres Average Daily Demand: 3,000 x 0.93=2,790 gal/day Alakea Corporate Tower . 1100 Alakea Street,Suite 1800 . Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Phone: (808) 836-1900 . Fax: (808)836-8852 AKINAKA & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Consulting Civil Engineers Max Day Demand: 1.5 x ave day=1.5 x 2,790=4,185 gal/day Minimum Required=5/8" meter with 1-inch lateral DWS will most likely require a minimum 1-inch meter with 1-1/2-inch lateral due to commercial use IV. Fire Protection a. Only a portion of the building can be serviced by the existing fire hydrant along Kinoole Street.Additional fire protection measures will be required. i. Additional street/public fire hydrant place along Lanikaula Street(as shown on site plan) 1. Requires discussion with County of Hawaii, Department of Water Supply &Fire Department for approval ii. Onsite fire protection (i.e.fire hydrant,standpipe, or fire sprinkler system,etc.) 1. Fire hydrant will be placed at convenient location for fire department hookup&minimize disturbance to vehicles.Valves to be placed in aisle, not in parking stalls. 2. Fire hydrant protection extends 150 feet from the hydrant. 3. Fire hydrant should be placed at least 40 feet away from the building it's protecting(NFPA 24). 4. Clear space around hydrant=36 inches. 5. A separate water lateral with detector check valve will be required for fire service. 6. Fire Access a. Minimum turning radius=30 ft/60 ft(inside/outside) b. Minimum width=20 ft V. Wastewater a. Wastewater service will be provided by the existing 8-inch sewer lateral along Lanikaula Street. b. Building connection location required for civil to run line from end of lateral to service building use. VI. Drainage(See Exhibit A) a. Site will be graded to sheet flow across the parking area and away from the building. b. Flows will be directed to maintain existing drainage patterns. c. Development flows generated onsite in excess of the pre-development run-off to remain onsite. d. County of Hawaii does not have water quality requirements. e. Flows will be collected by swales and conveyed into the landscaping for infiltration up to maximum calculated capacity. f. Flows in excess of landscape capacity will be captured in a drain system resulting in shallow drywell construction on-site Alakea Corporate Tower . 1100 Alakea Street, Suite 1800 . Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Phone: (808) 836-1900 . Fax: (808)836-8852 AKINAKA & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Consulting Civil Engineers i. Operational permitting and maintenance of drywell will be the responsbility of the Bank of Hawaii g. Flush curbs and curb cuts adjacent to landscaped areas can be used to allow for infiltration of runoff. h. Roof drain: identify locations,assume overland flow with splash blocks i. Roof runoff will also be collected through parking lot for use in bio swales/landscaping and drywell collection VII. Estimated Civil Site Work-Opinion of Probable Cost(Planning Stage Estimate) See Exhibit B a. Costs are based on best available information at the time of estimate b. Costs are not based on construction plans and therefore include a 20%contingency /- c. Costs are for ballpark estimating only d. Costs only include line items related to civil design site work,exterior of proposed building improvements VIII.References a. County of Hawaii, Hawaii County Code Chapter 25 Zoning,dated 2017. b. County of Hawaii, Hawaii County Code Chapter 26 Fire,dated 2018. c. County of Water Supply, Department of Water Supply,Water System Standards,dated 2002. d. Department of Public Works,Standard Details for Public Works Construction,dated September 1984. e. National Fire Protection Association,NFPA 24:Standard for the Installation of Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances,dated 2013. Alakea Corporate Tower . 1100 Alakea Street,Suite 1800 . Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Phone: (808) 836-1900 . Fax: (808)836-8852 r I I -CRD aMs PROPCSEO LATE I I (t'o I- - --_ BWC IVd ---- IL�GIIG ST/l1 WIEU,fP81C SPACE 9tWD/W1�DL = ,• -------i'- —L_��L .SWOP. fi -- - �_ 2 __.1_ 7 = Dar 111110`r r — • 1111 `�,L-,t 7:7,• t " — 1 / - _,1. © � , APO/MUTE FLOW: CPS 0-.,... e � __AAAA_- . - � � I o ,..a.. S. t PROPOSED CRATE �, I I 1< swne"oneD, 0� -'." I IS RuieCVWMOE I ee I ODE YARD I t 19 ` I 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26: 25 24 23 22 I AST . $L1 — —,. - C� 8 6111, DZW-- - Mr x - MIER u PwR 000 6 x 95 I r t¢d LIN ,su',el )—PROPO D MINE 3 T I 5 '14 1 Z 4 BANK OF HAWAII O l I BUILDING7.5C0 SF nm 4 X13 I r 1 I 15 to �Y, FF T(ASSUMED) 3 F 1 Z,dCU'(ill') I I I ` G m srPu ,dar 2 '8 $11• I PROPOSED CAME PAST 1 COST -1 1 m art. - .m suua It OE. M WNW TIYB _ -__ -, SEiBAPC IY-0' I ,r „ , ,. ' - • WI. R \ RT,.,',".. -- mj, —.— FLOW DR EOTICA STALL . 51AE£ --� - ECM.SEWER IA,aAL EMT 0 I \� EMTMR COST CB AKA�`T'. ��i N LCO RCM' ma�cn M uE — - - —LANIKAULA STREET z - • --- - ss I -'- SZ - -L I t 0 -- SETsou-v __-___-___ _-___-___ MD CIVIL SITE ASSESSMENT FOR ,..... : __-___-___-__--_-------- -Q� �T -__---_-----_.STS------___-_ BANK OF HAWAII PROPERTY-Y,-'-: �;�:, - EXHIBIT A -----Wa- I BANK OF HAWAII HILO fl°% CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY SITE $ 447,169 WATER $ 28,485 DRAIN $ 80,000 SUBTOTAL $ 555,654 20% CONTINGENCY $ 111,131 TOTAL $ 666,785 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT B TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT TMK: (3) 2-2-024: 003 HILO, HAWAII Prepared by SSFM INTERNATIONAL July 27, 2018 FINAL Bank of Hawaii Proposed location at 1339 Kinoole Street Tax Map Key 2-2-024: 003 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Hilo, Island of Hawai'i July 27, 2018 Prepared for Bank of Hawaii Prepared by 1=1"M International Bank of Hawaii SSFM International Table of Contents I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 A. Geometric Configuration 4 1. Land Use 4 2. Roadway Configuration 4 B. Volumes 6 1. Vehicular Volume 6 2. Bus Transit Volumes 8 3. Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes 8 C. Level of Service 12 1. Methodology 12 2. Intersection Level of Service Results 13 III. FUTURE CONDITIONS 14 A. Surrounding Area Conditions 14 B. Volumes 14 1. Future Without Project Volumes 14 2. Project Related Volumes 15 3. Future With Project Volumes 16 C. Future Level of Service 24 1. Intersection LOS Results for Future without project conditions 24 2. Intersection LOS Results for Future With project conditions 27 3. Mitigation 30 IV. SUMMARY 31 V. REFERENCES 32 Bank of Hawaii SSFM international List of Figures Figure 1: Project Location Map 2 Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan 3 Figure 3: Existing Land Use Map 5 Figure 4: Existing 2018 Lane Configurations 7 Figure 5: Kinoole Street(Mohuli Street to Lanihuli Street), 24-Hour Volume Distribution (2015) 9 Figure 6: Lanikaula Street(Kalanikoa Street to Laukapu Street), 24-Hour Volume Distribution (2015)....10 Figure 7: Existing 2018 Peak Hour Volumes 11 Figure 8: Future 2023 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 17 Figure 9: Future 2028 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 18 Figure 10: Future 2038 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 19 Figure 11: Project Related Trips 20 Figure 12: Future 2023 With Project Peak Hour Volumes 21 Figure 13: Future 2028 With Project Peak Hour Volumes 22 Figure 14: Future 2038 With Project Peak Hour Volumes 23 List of Tables Table 1: Roadway Traffic Volumes 6 Table 2: LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections 12 Table 3: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections 13 Table 4: Existing 2018 Intersection Level of Service 14 Table 5: Estimated Trips Generated by Project 15 Table 6: Future 2023 Without Project Intersection Level of Service 24 Table 7: Future 2028 Without Project Intersection Level of Service 25 Table 8: Future 2038 Without Project Intersection Level of Service 26 Table 9: Future 2023 With Project Intersection Level of Service 27 Table 10: Future 2028 With Project Intersection Level of Service 28 Table 11: Future 2038 With Project Intersection Level of Service 29 Table 12: Future 2038 With Project Intersection Level of Service with Mitigation (alternate phasing) 30 List of Appendices Appendix A—24-Hour and Peak Period Traffic Counts Appendix B—Bus Route Schedule and Map Appendix C—Analysis.Reports Existing(2018)Conditions Appendix D—Analysis Reports Future(2038)Without Project Conditions Appendix E—Analysis Reports Future(2038)With Project Conditions ii Bank of Hawaii - SSFM International I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Bank of Hawaii is proposing to construct a new bank at 1339 Kinoole Street in Hilo, Hawaii.The property is at the corner of Kinoole Street and Lanikaula Street. The bank will be replacing four single family dwelling units that currently exist on the property. The property is 40,282 square-feet in area, of which the proposed bank will be 7,500 square-feet.The project's complete build out and operation is expected by 2020. Bank of Hawaii is seeking a change in zoning for the existing parcel.Currently,the property is zoned Single- Family Residential(RS-10). Bank of Hawaii is requesting to re-zone the parcel to General Commercial (CG- 20).This traffic impact analysis report (TIAR) is being completed in support of the County of Hawaii's re- zoning application. In accordance with the 2016 Hawaii County Code, the TIAR includes projections for future growth in traffic for five,ten and twenty years into the future. The project location, along with the study intersections associated with the TIAR, are shown in Figure 1. Bank of Hawaii's proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2. 1 ta 0 3 8 r s .d '1 "s�dt ;est a� „,14,,,...::: m”yam, . �-, > _d 'Zi., -�Y "44 rtt a>n a ��ZJ�""Lyy" 'est '' `axsry K` 2� - :: E io; 14101i §fir I.,"ca Y `� ,,,{ z 'd^ 1414 ` ?, w % t «F"s� nom ` YgPa 5";,-.7:-.,'. � � r, . Y & '?"-0� s 5 S E iilr+' S�� s.°' h X.n"s ' �3 - 4,114,141.84:*tr"."7,'7---10NI:i Island ofHawait fir` $ 6sP � r T,}� tli V. Lt , % ��e li s .ir". s . r�`e 6 , ,, y"-1 '64?ra"< N 7,11.,:. b zed,,, �.;�� 39 '�' �.�' e a'"; c/...,„7,-04.w IA, �L erg '' � r t< E� .� ��>`-�r�-:,e,5-,_.t--.1.,.., 3.�.,.. .�;t"��p 'n x zF ts'a./ • ,zi -s ',,A,';‘,, ,2,%,1. r o Z ee°, t f, Y Fid' r '' r -,,,,.1,-„,„;''i n _ � ",� .Atm-47,y", zr?` r o tax ..''' '''''',-;1° { '�` 5. .*';?.-.46;7 � Y.�r Y ,`t. P is flk,irltrayA4 '' .7,-..; Ili 1,14, ''� LJ rq x£ft3 �, "d"�' ">,x�z� x.: �+ ,„,-.111-,4 �_ `Y t �i 3 x r +28 ,,,,_ -f-A4••A-,,41,t„,41'As-IA=-\-441.°14,-.,..,--Zo, 41,;(0,i,,,;, ..",A- ir._.a.,,tl'jl:irmrfl#:*4A,t:''f:V)1:;:;;.:*l''t;ot:iU,,tt ., ,.., �. ,....a. -rH' ..�'-g,',� x.... ��`�"�.{�r�'� '.x°,�f. �" :. a 3/E ., rd"�`�'a. t� a } .sr � m- S' 'Y' _.�.+_. "_..." � � end: � Rrc,�tt cite Studylntersecilans � Bus Stop - Hele-an Bus Route Figure 1:project Location Mapco a BankofHawaiiHiloOffice-Hila,Hawaii '�t"rr t ona w o. a 0 03 ..._.............._....., .»..,.................- ._...... _._...._._....,.. ........................_....e._..........._......__..._............_».»......_............_.-, ..............»...,...,._._...W.............................-, -- w................. 0 ir X'R 1{ 3:9 iv 9 ,G' 7V O • - .ire-_^ -�- _ -_ 1 .Abri k, .-r..r"-,�aM..r,. macro —__r " p _1......__.;W: ✓sass �ewxxc 4lY!'. L‘N. .. G ,!,;.1.`,!!'1.1!!;!'„'',:; f 1 `.,EEE 'gyp € n `$) , . '1110,;;,4" E E i ,. ` J ate 20 a 3 0 m Hp •d MGC I SHAWN ORTISIL ... k i 4A �� 24 23 22 1.9 18 1�w 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29`:28 1 27 26 25 NK Q cm 1 �{� . t �. 8 1 t. ro u ;/ 3 ':jo(-:' ' ' ._.. l ...0 o " E j. 5 m 4$ 1 iP ��, I BANK OF HAWAII 1 1 0- , / § i py, _ !,. BUILDING 4 1 13 K �s c�t" �. � ..�., rro..rr.xsnwn5 ...r.:..- 3 12esgo'i*Y?V CD e li VEE PIK € I VAS .._....�...,.. STALL 1 CU ! E {E I i Ivey mat(f Wt.'2 $ ft 11 - r Y 4 ` i LY ( `fir \ k 10 I. --.1.1oft-''''t----- 4111 al_ .1. -10, Cft.-.:) 3 SEE . -' (7) L.:,: r )1 „ , ,h; :............4 ....r.a._..•a"...... .....ir. _........a.rt._..,. .,.rwrr....:e11irw § 4%5T( 1*Ft EAST LI Driveway E §€!, r E ro !�,k mrvr rig? sw4s,,,aFmtr4.94wvei o E 'E Figure 2 :Site Planet E I� � c Bank of Hawaii Hilo Office-HiloHawaii Intern tinnal ^t 0 3 Q Bank of Hawaii SSFM International II. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Geometric Configuration 1. Land Use Currently,the property is zoned Single-Family Residential (RS-10). Bank of Hawaii is requesting to re-zone the parcel to General Commercial (CG-20). As per the Hawaii County Code 1983 (2016 Edition, as Amended), the RS district provides for lower or low and medium density residential use, for urban and suburban family life. It applies to areas having facilities, and to carry out the above stated purpose. The CG district applies to an area suitable for commercial uses and services on a broad basis to serve as the central shopping or principal downtown for a city or region. A financial institution is listed as a permitted use in a CG district.As shown in the existing land use map (see Figure 3), along the same block of Kinoole Street and Lanikaula Street, CG properties exist. 2. Roadway Configuration a) Kinoole Street The proposed bank will have an exit and entrance driveway on Kinoole Street. Kinoole Street is an undivided,two-lane, County collector road, oriented in the north-south direction. Kinoole Street is one of the primary north-south corridors between downtown Hilo and the Waiakea residential neighborhood. It starts from Waianuenue Avenue in the north and ends at Haihai Street in the south. The posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour(mph). It has dedicated left turn lanes at most major intersections. b) Lanikaula Street The proposed bank will have one exit and entrance driveway onto Lanikaula Street, along the south side of the property. Lanikaula Street is an undivided, two-lane, County collector road, generally oriented in the east-west direction. Lanikaula Street extends from Kalili Street to Kanoelehua Avenue (Mamalahoa Highway). Northwest of Kilili Street, Lanikaula Street transitions to Kumukoa Street, maintaining similar design criteria,to its intersection with Kukuau Street. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. It has dedicated left turn lanes at most major intersections. c) Mamalahoa Highway Where it crosses Lanikaula Street, Mamalahoa Highway (also named Route 11 and Kanoelehua Avenue) is a divided, six-lane, State Route 11 arterial, oriented in the north-south direction. Mamalahoa Highway extends from Kamehameha Avenue (Route 19) in the north to the intersection with Keaau Pahoa Road (Route 130)where it turns into Volcano Road in the south.The posted speed limit varies from 35-55 mph. 4 Do a v-F ii S� ' 1 MI.-20 f I ML 20 2 gip i I a t � q - { 1 ; .. ...., 44 -- --------i „.44,...t.,,,,Jt;" , ,S - _ '+ it'¢ - x+E . _... ' , , , r/ , „„_, 1- , ., . . ..... ..... d t tenant St. 3 a,. LL . . i .,,, „;_. ; ,-, , , a O Rs-lo _� - .1? i oa. Legend -n r b5 s ‘, ..1440.:,,, .' CG-10 `� �a Ingle milt'Residential District : Ct3-20 � . - ro ff RS 10 W '.G 111 ....,,111. lte ��ib _ - Multiple f amtly Residential District x TCvlK.2-2-024.0(1, tr'e ajntkAula St i ,, RM 1 . RM-1.5 ; RM-4 RS-10 S � r �� '_. : .. :.. Double Family Residential District u, � as i i r— G, 1 1I RD-3 75 of �� lF"Z o - C - S �' !,< .704.10,V,4:43.4:`gym �i i ' �,a. va ' V Open District �, o X25-4o y �.� `;,; 0,,,,`\ °� ��5A4s �\ ���� General Commercial District v �„ • , A - di 0\0 orb �tit,; CC 7.5 CG 10 CG 2 t` �4 ,-' � ' Neighborhood Commercial District �. 4ICN-10 CN-20 x z sl RM; ' RS-10 Industrial Commercial Mixed District F, MCX-20 e o �i ' Limited Industrial District A �'` ,-'11:11!:'4',17,11111.-. \'Sr �. ,4.-14i, e� ML 10 ML 20 v, ,t \GN14 � _, in T Not to Scale 4 3"a��� S. Figure : Land Use Map Bank of Hawaii Hilo Office-Hilo,Hawaii international "` " ``o"a naw o' 3 0 Bank of Hawaii SSFM International The study intersections include the following: 1. Lanikaula Street and Kinoole Street a. Four-leg signalized intersection with dedicated left turning lanes for all approaches. 2. Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Avenue a. Four-leg signalized intersection with dedicated left turning lanes for all approaches. 3. Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway a. Lanikaula Street intersects with the southbound approach of the divided Mamalahoa Highway making it a three-legged unsignalized intersection with a stop sign for the eastbound Lanikaula Street approach and free flow along Mamalahoa Highway. At this intersection all the vehicles from Lanikaula Street going eastbound can only make a right turn to merge with the southbound approach of Mamalahoa Highway. Existing(2018) lane configurations and traffic controls at the study intersections are shown in Figure 4. B. Volumes 1. Vehicular Volume a) Roadway Traffic Volumes Average daily traffic (ADT) and peak hour volumes along Lanikaula Street and Kinoole Street in the study area are shown in Table 1. The ADT is based on Hawaii DOT traffic counts included in Historical Traffic Station Maps, 2015. Table 1: Roadway Traffic Volumes ''Roadway Location , 2015 ADT Kinoole Street Between Mohuli Street and Lanihuli Street 12,500 Lanikaula Street Between Kalanikoa Street and Laukapu Street 5,100 Source: Historical Traffic Station Maps (H DOT) The 24-hour traffic volume distribution along Kinoole Street(see Figure 5)and Lanikaula Street(see Figure 6) at the traffic count stations shows a variation in travel patterns throughout the day. Detailed 24-hour counts are included in Appendix A. Along Kinoole Street, during the morning peak hour of 7:00 - 8:00 AM, there are approximately 410 vehicles per hour(vph)travelling southbound and 630 vph travelling northbound for a total of 1,040 vph. During the afternoon peak hour of 4:00—5:00 PM,there are approximately 580 vph travelling southbound and 440 travelling northbound for a total of 1,020 vph. Along Lanikaula Street, during the morning peak hour of 7:30 — 8:30 AM, there are approximately 125 vehicles per hour (vph) travelling westbound and 250 vph travelling eastbound for a total of 375 vph. During the PM peak hour, there are approximately 150 vph travelling westbound and 340 vph travelling eastbound for a total of 490 vph. 6 cc a I/ x Z Kinoote Street Kilauea Street 0 a a CI A 4 ❑. 11 C 4 �'`� V 1 ,'"� Lanikaula Street # r -'-• 4 At S _.�... __ ( T ....-7 Lanikaula Street :rib 1 m x L7• Mamalahoa a a v Highway • NJ 4 O V 00 DO I— OJ l = Lanikaula Street el r Lanika tau Street: 0 Ln tri11 Legend , Signalized C) Unsignalized Stop Sign 1;n �J Intersection Intersection a Figure 4:Existing(2018)Lane Configurations ° TZAR--Bank of Hawaii,-Hila, Hawaii International Bank of Hawaii SSFM International b) Intersection Peak Hour Volumes Manual intersection turning movement traffic counts were taken at the three study intersections during the peak periods: 1) Lanikaula Street and Kinoole Street, 2) Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Street, and 3) Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway. Counts were collected on Wednesday, April 11, 2018 and included tabulation of passenger vehicles, heavy trucks, pedestrians, and bicycles. The Existing (2018) peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 7. Detailed peak period counts are included in Appendix A. 2. Bus Transit Volumes The County of Hawaii's transit system (Hele-on Bus) has two bus routes that travel along Lanikaula Street near the study area.The closest bus stops to the proposed project site are located at University of Hawaii at Hilo 0.3 mile away and near the corner of Kilauea Street and Kohola Street. The bus routes Intra Hilo Waiakea-Uka and Intra Hilo — Keaukaha service these stops. Figure 1 shows these routes in the project area. The buses operate between 7:30 AM to 4:30 PM, Monday to Saturday. Appendix B includes the detailed bus route schedule and map for these routes. 3. Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes Kinoole Street and Lanikaula Street both have paved sidewalks with landscaped buffers along either side of the road. South of Lanikaula Street, Kapiolani Street has bike route signage with a shared travel way for bikes and cars. With the recently constructed Kapiolani Street extension, bike lanes were included between Lanikaula Street and Mohouli Street. There is significant pedestrian and bike activity near UH- Hilo,especially when UH-Hilo is in session. However,only minor pedestrian and bike activity was observed at the study intersections during the peak hours. A total of 14 pedestrians and 5 bicycles were observed at the intersection of Kinoole Street and Lanikaula Street during the AM peak hour and 14 pedestrians and 9 bicycles during the PM peak hour. At the Kilauea Avenue and Lanikaula Street intersection, 9 pedestrians and 3 bicycles were counted during the AM peak hour, and 4 pedestrians and 7 bicycles were counted during the PM peak hour. 8 CO 0 7 x T c 74 ' I ' i : 1 i . F 1 ' i 1 i ...............Total o 3 ' 1 j, H i 1 , 1 ...... South Bound' t000 i '' l ► ► v, I 1 1 g ` . 411*1•11.1111f North Bound 1 � ,44 } € t 4 1 1. 3 1 1 , 800 i , . 1 F s1 1 � c c 1 3 < I F , , PM Peak Hour t 3 VI ro ; ' AM Peak Hour I 1 4:00-5;00 PM _ t 11111 , 700-8:00 AM x t ' 1 1 I I -p 5 600 ' t , s 1 1 : it 0 11 1 £ & f � Ij3 1.40044:14e1"S a,RwM I i rji £ L (Iyq {{¢ t (# S "' 3 Y. 3 B 3 11 1 £ 3 . 4 € 2 } } d. 1 f 1 C ¢ 1 1 I t i d , L„*1 14„I4 3..Ah S t 64.1 .,. i. 1 j t ip 7 V1 400 g f 1 S . t,�+ 3 tt f t A� 8044. 44 3 7 II fD 1 , r€ € e 1 :-. ; "Jr a s t i % t I I I }} F NJ } '4i Ilr 1 1 i l• ' 1 it ' I 441 s 3 ; 3 F 1 f ! a : • , i1 s +� • • 2110 x 1 ,, p1 3 1 Y �i4 s i { icy j � i.�t 3 3 € Ili , £ fB cif t I [ ' 1 8 i 3 I I § - 3 ry►'.r.r*.els..1 0. r!tt � yr. 1 r E I i j °t I 11 _ 1 �MII: F 11 :11, , Q ti v 00 6' 6, t 6O `�4 7 7X, 7�g 7. 'RC1 uP., 0C? 6f> 6'l3 404) f3 `?O 7o 7, vi 0 N O ci N Q VI Figure 5:Kinoele Street Between Mohuli Street and Lanibuii Street,24-Hour Volume Distribution E i .r"r'^� a TiAR—Bank of Hawaii,-Hilo, Hawaii intert r'a n a l 0 to T o C Ii t 1 - Totalo C i t 3 € 1 ? 1 i € f d ! € a 7 i i s € ftr...West Bound - 07 54Q t s aiittli 1. E 3 Vi i 1 I q j € t ; € i craw.• East Bound rt € 1 I 1 1 1 1 ( : i p '; 1 1 l 1 s l' i , i { d 400 p $ { ; d . s C1 1. I 1 • ,1 l 1 Peak Hour € l 3 € ' ' y m 6 S t 3:00 4;00 PM ' 1 1[ AM Peak Hour ' € 1 € dd i Tal ogd {{ £ t ( > rt n : 1 I ii. 1 l'' ci 1 11 I L I Lil ' • ir I. P. # E f ff k 1 f ffiwf .�f$ff4.1... +f xf� aff fx x .. 1 1 ( C 100j % • 1 , , .Y 14.4;. 1 ` f , 1 .. • ... $[ $ (3l -r ; x 1 ( # ]3 i € 1 3 • 1 f}.:€ to., i 1 j i q f , p 1 I ,., B ;; gg I g ; 3 1 i s s ! +. fffx. � ,y C r 1 1�fok i +.f£ 1 , ; £ , . 1 j i l i 1 f Itliil ( •f T'f�ff , m q ' '•o i, .i. v.O 420 ,' 6. . 6. .0 e0 0 9 ra .7, ' F. �o qt.) . sa 6. ''d c9' �� rv: rr. 171 C o' 3 ;D N F 1. IO' Figure 6:Lanikaula Street Between Kaianikoa Street and Laukapu Street,24-Hour Volume Distribution � f ° 3 f tfternatton:fi o PAR-Bonk of Nawar,-Hilo, Hawaii to a a x- 4, Z 0 Kinoole Street Kilauea Street a � _ ole 1-1 . A `N` A (o A 2 58( (3 �._.. 104(114) C i ....,_ 4 4 252(324) 1 215(278) 1 - ig(40) .1*-- 10(za) Lanikaula Street �r^ T �/ 0714.)4)T(4T(4 Lanikaula Street C (36)47 (96}78 v1351)359' I► (342)347 —4 4 m (70)78 N a (70)62 ^"" �x• = A Mamalahoa �r —to 'V N Highway V OV m `ry N O ig F co00 d �._- 285 (144) 2 Lanikaula Street o .r q ► (256)127 lLanikaula Street < ri0 C rroo ti to w ♦ w iv in Legend Peak Hour Volumes S Signalized V Unsignalized AL. Stop Sign #(#) AM(PM) 0 Intersection Intersection 3 (vehfhr) M Figure 7:Existing(2018)Peak Hour Volumes a ilAR-BankofHawaii,-Hilo, Hower international o o• 7 CI Bank of Hawaii SSFM International C. Level of Service 1. Methodology Level of service (LOS) is an operational analysis rating system used in traffic engineering to measure the effectiveness of roadway operating conditions. There are six LOS ranging from A to F. LOS A is defined as being the least interrupted flow conditions with little or no delays,whereas LOS F is defined as conditions where extreme delays exist. Guidelines from the Statewide Uniform Design Manual for Streets and Highways (HDOT, 1980) and A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (AASHTO, 2011)state that an appropriate peak hour LOS for an urban arterial is LOS C or D. Intersection LOS and delay were determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software and analyzed using HCM 6th Edition (TRB, 2016) methodologies. As stated in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition (TRB, 2016), LOS for a two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersection is determined by the measured control delay (see Table 2) and is defined for each minor movement, not for the intersection as a whole. Vehicles traveling along the major, free- flow road, of a TWSC intersection, proceed through with minimal delay or no delay at all. Those vehicles approaching the intersection along the minor movement are controlled by a stop sign and thus experience delay attributable to the volume of vehicles passing along the free-flow road and the gaps available. Table 2: LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Average Cc�ntrot©elayF i t Sbyv/c*Ratio , s/vehj " ' 041 A t "i, ;.{) 5 10.0 A F >10 and 5515 B F >15 and _5.25 C F >25 and 535 D F >35 and 550 E F >50 F F Source: HCM(TRB, 2016) The LOS analysis for signalized intersections is based on average total vehicle delay based on the methodologies of the HCM (TRB, 2016), as shown in Table 3. High numbers of vehicles passing the intersection, long cycle lengths, inappropriate signal phasing,or poor signal progression can result in long delays, and consequently poor LOS. Another measure of intersection delay is the volume to capacity(v/c) ratio.This is the ratio of the volume of traffic utilizing the intersection compared to the maximum volume of vehicles that can be accommodated by the intersection during a specific period of time. A v/c ratio under 0.85 means the intersection is operating under capacity and excessive delays are not experienced. An intersection is operating near its capacity when v/c ratios range from 0.85 to 0.95. Unstable flows are expected when the v/c ratio is between 0.95 and 1.0. Any v/c ratio greater than or equal to 1.0 indicates that the intersection is operating at or above capacity which results in a LOS F.A traffic movement can have a poor LOS but low v/c which suggests that the traffic volumes along that movement are low but have to wait a 12 • Bank of Hawaii SSFM International long time to make the movement. This is common for low volume protected turn movements or side streets that have to wait through a long cycle length for their split to come up. Table 3: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections 5 10.0 A >10 and 5520 B F >20 and 535 C F >35 and 555 D F >55 and 580 E F >80 F F Source: HCM(TRB, 2016) 2. Intersection Level of Service Results Existing intersection and movement LOS and average delay(in seconds per vehicle)were determined for the AM and PM weekday peak hours. All movements at the signal controlled intersections at Lanikaula Street & Kinoole Street and Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Street resulted in appropriate LOS D or better during the AM and PM weekday peak hours. The overall intersection LOS was C for both intersections during AM and PM weekday peak hours.At the unsignalized intersection of Lanikaula Street&Mamalahoa Highway,the eastbound right turning movement has LOS F during the weekday PM peak hour.This is due to high southbound volumes and 256 eastbound right turners in the PM peak hour. The v/c ratio for the movement is 1.3.The Levels of Service for all the movements are shown in Table 4. 13 Bank of Hawaii SSFM International Table 4: Existing 2018 Intersection Level of Service 000 A gW Control ` Inte ectio yof r AM PM , ,1 �1 t t s k I a' a`# �� cF}'rt i Dela �eia vg A,pproacjt f I ovemen' -4 k ri Y v/c LOS y vjc LOS x arS &f s t... i.t - " - t o; 9Crt 6t74rool � a_ < @4'044,s. „.;1;..,,,,.2. oo .. ..0 . ,:s a_bF- ..al� ; . . , s .., . �4e .:� . ..,. L 15.1 0.17 B 17.2 0.18 B Eastbound TR 33.3 0.88 C 39.0 0.90 D L 16.4 0.11 B 17.9 0.22 B Westbound TR 20.5 0.66 C 29.0 0.81 C Signal L 13.4 0.30 B 15.1 0.32 B Northbound TR 22.9 0.69 C 18.5 0.44 B L 13.8 0.34 B 13.1 0.27 B Southbound TR 18.1 0.49 B 24.8 0.73 C Lanikaula St&KIau ea Avenue E § 9 z w� � +' L i -5 1 16.7 0.32 B 20.6 0.49 C Eastbound TR 28.1 0.83 C 31.7 0.83 C 1 1 16.7 0.06 B 18.3 0.11 B Westbound TR 27.3 0.82 C 43.7 0.91 D Signal L 12.2 0.15 B 18.8 0.39 B Northbound TR 40.4 0.93 D 27.5 0.71 C L 17.1 0.56 B 14.7 0.51 B Southbound TR 17.9 0.55 B 41.8 0.94 D nLi 0,1 ,$t$cf l,[ai'ri aii0a 11gi'rWa'�f� i , - . ., _ s}:- ,E �.,� ..r,m, ,s ,, s �„ = :.. > i ,, a.°;� ..,>.,.. ¢S!R bf' .�' '. �7' �."urC 0�,s_'t�1�^W n ne.V`g;-; Eastbound R Stop 16.3 0.34 C 199.7 1.3 F III. FUTURE CONDITIONS Full build-out and occupancy of the bank are expected by 2020. A. Surrounding Area Conditions No significant developments or construction projects are expected in the project area that would significantly affect the roadway geometrics or traffic volumes at the study intersections. This is based on research completed on May 1'2018 at the State of Hawaii Office of Environmental Quality Control(OEQC) website and the Statewide Transportation Improvements Program (STIP). B. Volumes 1. Future Without Project Volumes 14 Bank of Hawaii SSFM International The project study area within Hilo is experiencing modest growth. HDOT ADT counts on Kinoole Street between Mohuli Street and Lanihuli Street showed a growth rate of 0.5% per year from 2011 to 2015. Some ADT counts near the study area had growth rates of zero. Although no major developments are anticipated in the vicinity of Bank of Hawai'i's proposed location,a background growth rate of 1%per year was assumed, to account for additional traffic at the study intersections. The estimated future volumes without the project for the years 2023, 2028 and 2038 are shown in Figures 8, 9 and 10. 2. Project Related Volumes The proposed Bank of Hawai'i facility is planned to include 7,500 sf of bank space. Trips generated from the proposed bank were estimated using nationally accepted land use rates from Trip Generation, 10' Edition (ITE, 2016). ITE defines the Drive in Bank Land Use [912] as follows: "a drive-in bank provides banking facilities for motorists who conduct financial transactions from their vehicles; many also serve patrons who walk into the building." The analysis used area of 7,500 sf as the independent variable to estimate new trips expected from the proposed project. Retail-oriented businesses like banks have customers already on the street system for a different purpose. These sites attract a portion of their trips from traffic passing the site on the way to their intended destination. Thus these "pass by" trips do not add new traffic to the adjacent street system and may be subtracted from the total external trips generated by the study location.To estimate the total number of new trips generated by the project, and to accurately assess the bank's impact on traffic,the pass by trips need to be subtracted from the total trips generated.According to the ITE Trip Generation Handbook(3`d Edition), for Drive in Bank Land Use [912], studies have shown that pass by trips account for 29% of the total trips in the AM peak period and 35% in the PM peak period. To be conservative, only a 20% pass-by trip factor was used in this analysis for both AM and PM peak periods. The estimates for new trips generated by the project are shown in Table 5. Table 5: Estimated Trips Generated by Project AM PM Land Use [ITE Code] Average Rate Average Rate Drive in Bank[912] 8.83 trips per 1,000 sf 27.15 trips per 1,000 sf x7,500 sf bank 66 new trips in AM peak hour 204 new trips in PM peak hour - Pass by Trips(20%) - 13 -41 New Trips 53 163 In' Out In Out 58% 42% 50% 50% 31 22 82 82 The proposed project has two driveways: one provides access to Lanikaula Street and the other provides access to Kinoole Street. Both driveways allow entering and exiting movements.The volumes of entering and exiting vehicles were estimated and distributed according to existing traffic patterns. The resulting 1 In and Out split provided by Trip Generation, 10th Edition (ITE 2016)for Land Use 912 15 Bank of Hawaii SSFM International project-related peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 11. 3. Future With Project Volumes Project related trips were added to the Future Without Project volumes to estimate Future With Project peak hour volumes.The volumes for future with project conditions for 2023, 2028 and 2038 are shown in Figures 12, 13 and 14. 16 71. co o o + a•- Kinoole Street4_265 (340) Kilauea Street 120296((129202)) 4110 Z o , o I co vr C.; ko 4 m IN ,I Ft ) j t\'', 4 •...... 61(63) . 4,---- 20(42) /4! 1 ,4,,--- 11(21) -I ro Lanikaula Street co -44– 0 — •-ccfri-n;•g ) r' 0 (38)49 (10182 Lanikaula Street (369)377 * 1-4 ta to (359)364 —4 NJ8 i•-. UT CY YI o (74)82 " "*. co .4— (74)65 LU LII CO Mamalahoa tn i•-.. 4t. .—... Highway — 74: g El o a. -0 ) i r D in 299(131) Lanikaula Street ro ofU -------.............. A- (269)133 Lanikaula Street ... . oft ..„.4 o ( c E < .g. y. I U 3 *.. — ro V I', to . cn 14 -n Legend Peak Hour Volumes Signalized (i7) Unsignalizecl .ja. Stop Sign 5' #tin AM(PM) 0 intersection V.:.7 intersection ;1:7 (veh/hr) to rz. Figure 8:Future(2023)Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 99 P11"1 o o o TiAR-Bonk of Hawaii,-Hilo, Howe! laternationat to 0 ) 1 . o ti x- o Kinoole Street ....., 4_ Street v �: c F., a a :1 m ry �! 1t 64(66) 114(126) `•t -- 278(357) 4— 237(307) c i 21(44) 12(22) co Lanikaula Street to g 0 (40)51 rLanikauta Street c I (to6}86 al (387)396 ► Wl. (377)382 -- 4 N Fo (78)86 `-- a.� (78) 68 µ co ni g. g Mamalahoa a' n Highway K s o 00 cc l 00 sr, ) 1 o, rs .-e 314 )159) Lanikaula Street fDUcu or I (282)140 T rLanikaula Street 0 c Ci N O E -,7-,C w. 3 w et, lit in vl T Legend Peak Hour Volumes S� Signalized , Unsignallzed * Stop Sign #(1f) AM(per) Intersection Intersection rti (veh/hr) c Figure 9:Future(2028)Without Project Peak Hour Volumes l� — o' o T1AR-Bonk ofHawaii,-Hilo, Hawaii internatianat 0 to 0 a 2o 4 IIZ Kinoote Street Kilauea Street Z N Nn N m N. N 70(73) '''•,,,..- 125 (139) clii' ) C --306(393) ) 1 \4 4 261(338) C jjj 23(48) 13(24) m Lanikaula Street 4 o S. -n (, Lanikaula Street (44)56 4)T-r — �� ' (117)95 D (426)436----4 µ (415)420 �, G (86)95 (86)75 "-" w - Mamaiahoa +' 00 V Highway V ) 1 Lanikaula Street 345 (175) fD _ y x- (310)154 s, Tr Lanikaula Street O C O_ O w g 3 A v in V1 tal -n Legend Peak Hour Volumes S Signalized Unsignalized .a.. Stop Sign #(d) AM(PM Intersection Intersection rb (veh/hr) e Figure 10:Future(2038)Without Project Peak Hour Volumes ..��' o o TZAR—Sankaf Hawaii,-Hilo, Hawai'i Inte.rnationat a m o Kinoole Street Kilauea Street • ,. a en N N N ki) I c Lenikeula Street ! '2(12j S 4. (16}7 (511 L.anikaule Street. ", (16), a t ,5. —1' 1 cre h.7y ro 1-` Mamalahoa N Highway C NJ CD O rt 7 N €D CD } r JJ o' Lanikaula Street (1 ) i anikaufa Street in cil in Legend Peak Hour Volumes S._ Signalized 0 Unsignalized _IL Stop Sign 3 ro #(#) AM(PM) intersection Intersection (veh/hr) e Figure 11.Project Related Trips z irererrzati na[ MR—B nk,of Hawaii,-Hilo, Howcii`f to a +. x- o 9* Z Kinoole`street Kilauea street F C3 . m. aw. cal a ;61(63) C ``:,�,� 109'(120) .447) d 1 -n 4_ 267(351) 4— 234(317) Lanikauia Street N ;+ ". LanikauleStreet (54)56 (4 (1061 83 c (335) .384" r F (375)369 mux co (74)82' 0 as 77 561. °n.K o N L'Il ea Marna1ahoa` ej, w r o Highway NS .g N -0 , w E. ro.- m Lanikaula Street 259(151) te o (281)135. 1y, 1 Lanikaule Street o e LII E w co co ts.7 1.n tn ° let tea 3 Legend eakt nrt'r VolumesS Signalized Unsigrialized _A. Stop;Sign 5 AM(PM) _ intersection intersection ro3 (veh/hr) w Figure 12:Future(2023)With Project P ak Hour Volumes a ? intoroationat: PAR -Bank of Hawaii,-Ilk Hawoi. Kilauea Street 0 3 IL Kinoole StreetC vt-, a to O t pi to C31 e�y N.N `\,, 64(66) 13.4.(126) _T i �— • _280(36$) iv) �.� ---~— 2d5 (332) Ca-i11 a ter- 23(56) 22(22) e Lanikaula Street. *,� m T4)Tr Lenikaula Street c (56)58 (111) 1ir .- (403)403 ------1~ w /2 (393)387 ----•w-4 m (78)$6` n m (81}69 C° 1.0 ._....„. W y 0 Maia(ahoa /~ Co v Highway Fri N S a N .9 tM 1 CD 1 159 .. 314(159) d Lanikaula Street x• w x (294)142 ,, f4 Lanikaula Street oc o w 0 µ CD W ��N in VI II Legend Peak Hour Voumes Signalized 0 Unsignalized Stop Sign rt #((t) AM(PM) Intersection 4�J Intersection ro (veh/hr) .9 rt Figure 13:Future_(2028)With Project Peak Hour Volumes o o Interfa.tionit TrAIf-,gttrtk of Hawaii,-'Hilo,'Hawaii! rA c a Kinoole Street Kilauea Street lit o a oao ui tirn, .74 a�tNt' sN � � ' N co N:N IN" ,i „—70(73) .4 `,-.,.... 125 (139} i• ) 1c 4---.a0a(404) 4— 269(36 3) T 13(24)0,73 t/"` 25 60) Lanikaul5treeta o. ro a T J�` tanikauia Street 1 l'(4, .4. (442)44a (131}425. aim ro m � (86)95 , (89)76 " r v . Y T t no w m N v IS4amalahoa Qcc V x WHighway ', 74: OD'o N S lfl CO W .., d i ...,O al Lan ikaula Street (175} D (322)156 LanikaulaStreet T O 42, C O N a' o 3 ca tn T Legend Peak Hour VolumesS Signalized U Unsignalized �.. Stop Sign #(#) AM(PM) intersection 'J Intersection 3 (veh/hr) ro �` F' Figure 14.Future(203$)>VllithProject Peak Hour Volumes ° g° c TZAR—Bank:of Hawaii,-Hilo, Hawaii lstcr�tation;+1 a c Bank of Hawaii SSFM International , C. Future Level of Service 1. Intersection LOS Results for Future without project conditions Using the Volumes from Figure 8,the Levels of Service were determined for Future 2023 Without Project. The signalized intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kinoole Street is expected to have overall intersection LOS C with all the movements LOS D or better for AM and PM peak hours, which suggests acceptable operations.The signalized intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Street is expected to have LOS D or better for all the movements during AM and PM peak hours with an exception of westbound right turning movement which has an LOS E during PM peak hour.The overall intersection operates at LOS D or better for both AM and PM which suggests acceptable operations. For the stop controlled intersection at Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway,during the PM peak hour,the eastbound right turn movement is operating at LOS F and has v/c of 1.46(>1).The results are shown in Table 6. Table 6:Future 2023 Without Project Intersection Level of Service Intyerse • -- t„rs+y. y. k,04,�- ,o, I 3 * AlYl'�. ^,,€. F r 4' z3 s �2U g Ts 'i'�; iki �r s x" T �`' m ,t '� ¢F r ti s o -Almv o a I• Delay i � P ' Lie 4 � z r;Ap�a11c1,Mvemen ,ali2 : V/C� xLQS � i � ' /10 d5 gY gi3 -� miia g $� < ; yP Ev � : pvz fik ;, ' o p Yt ` m �+io3 ��,��r� k � s F ��.�y{3'�u,�rr � � gee - � � rs `��^�r ��- �oa� ��t�,� k't a i g ,t 'a _ Fc + i r s fk r a }r r a i Y ,�Y C ra.M1^...-,..Y�i.�:. u,,._vr ... _,,e<r�» &,.<.,.z,�,..�,.....a.a3��.,�;.;'!1�am y;. -�,"E�.:r�czx "�5,. �w',<.+.s�aa��.,�t��.: .� ,.1�2`;... _�h�c`l��l��?.�. ... +.'`... a_..�i,w';i� ,`��t L 16.1 0.18 B 18.4 0.20 B Eastbound TR 36.9 0.90 D 43.1 0.92 D L 17.7 0.12 B 19.3 0.25 B Westbound TR 22.2 0.68 C 31.3 0.82 C Signal L 13.6 0.31 B I 16.3 0.34 B Northbound TR 25.2 0.72 C 20.4 0.47 C L 14.6 . 0.35 B 13.9 0.29 B Southbound TR 19.6 0.51 B 28.2 0.77 C i�� !Ia ,s.:` IRY a g.� G � moI s ¢_ � .:01,14',L., llk � `�, � Pa+� <Yv ....(. G . sg.�., Y . .A .. - av .,.NZy � 1,af;�'i.-:. m �4sw :� IK.,,.;�., .�al 1 19.2 0.38 B 25.1 0.59 C Eastbound TR 37.1 0.88 D 40.6 0.89 D Westbound L 18.9 0.07 B 20.6 0.14 C TR 35.5 0.86 D 65.9 0.99 E Signal Northbound L 12.5 0.15 B 19.2 0.40 B TR 37.1 0.91 D 26.8 0.69 C L 17.6 0.55 B 15.0 0.53 B Southbound TR 17.6 0.53 B 41.3 0.93 D t3ra -ai`ar`+} _'re�c -_- ,r' a�it�,.�, u,� a, f�,�" �`..cP� � W � a�.x � F. ' ag��trl�ac�la S{�;��Iktl`arr��i�hc�a��-t l� a �� r � � � Y �� ,� .,._:f z ....t..ti.,, ., .., ..,.. , �a ' SPI 4��:s r$ S s f�r P,f.,114 N,...,_., ^a m.,_z...>,i ra��r P>�� x3hl S,,.,z�.,,�t�'.P.,�.r.,.ar�ts.,_.,. .._:.�,.,'P�'r ,.,,..,,�� �,��r<-tea..�'..,..,...s�.�.�. ..,;�N #. Eastbound R Stop 17.2 0.37 C `267F; 4146 'F, . K FF" 24 Bank of Hawaii SSFM International Using the Volumes from Figure 9,the Levels of Service were determined for Future 2028 Without Project. The signalized intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kinoole Street is expected to have overall intersection LOS C with all the movements LOS D or better for AM and PM peak hours, which suggests acceptable operations.The signalized intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Street is expected to have LOS D or better for all the movements during AM and PM peak hours with the exception of westbound through/right movement which has LOS F and has a v/c of 1 during PM peak hour.The overall intersection • operates at LOS D or better for both AM and PM which suggests acceptable operations. For the stop controlled intersection at Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway, during the PM peak hour, the eastbound right turn movement is operating at LOS F and has v/c of 1.64 (> 1).The results are shown in Table 7. Table 7:Future 2028 Without Project Intersection Level of Service ' :-w r I e�y�f �! `r".-•ns i t..,�.Yt E. ,� IPARM Y u?t:v Y s �.�, 'n �� "S? s, ro,y�Y `' . ; ,' ; :,yn i 1 �. = 5. ct Iia lJ I{,l swc r s s 4n. & n �"a 3 M in4lni lRT,Tig t Tli a r mplfelftlyw $ o vk AM s a s i PM r€ 8`' s�''�c�,a y �cI�'�la��-s ,.c�.{E�.,��ili{by�uaW��^�T;�`�Mkt E i�, sF�q.� ,` � �r Yy� .,x hF s +jam..- s*,�3,- k � ? x. _� h,.,iffro'I E 1 rt7 a'f• "`'f `=94.'� iu X Y r sRv'''i:y i r 'Eof' "� iP'�,y §s f t 1 .3 i' 's A `" r..4ac �+en�ea lry a Delay(s), v/c OS RFAV,*{sJ v/c LOS 1'i?f ii6E W tll d j..iPr r 41 IARYAR E�`F it Y ms.5`"v#a`�a,ct{) a i s r:. , . 9 iixr y`".a d .,ns� s'3 t�'k a*" a E.. ik 5. Viaz k � le ° � oKgfigi , ° �i 4e r .adlett6apdafigikAS4n ,f,�tvF ur� �, i ih�da.iisti.titfik .% 3t .�K�vtA�li6 .- h uz^ tt�itft �l. k� L 17.2 0.19 B 20.0 0.21 C Eastbound TR 40.7 0.92 D 43.5 0.92 D L 19.0 0.14 B 21.2 0.28 C Westbound . TR 24.0 0.69 C 32.2 0.81 C Signal L 14.3 0.33 B 18.3 0.38 B Northbound TR 25.7 0.72 C 22.1 0.47 C L 15.9 0.38 B 15.2 0.30 B Southbound TR 21.1 0.53 C 29.3 0.77 C pair r � gzkt& ikFMu, AkTa, wf d:S* A'b3 '0',F R �i�u irie E42tglt' 93'a_P.vroD d„ 3X • al nkaa5: r,onaeuav r itEnidi, kr1;! ty1,60' iii0t4mot5 , ^ tt L 21.2 0.43 C 30.2 0.65 C Eastbound TR 43.8 0.91 D 42.7 0.89 D L 20.7 0.09 C 23.0 0.16 C Westbound TR 42.4 0.89 D x 0g 9 ,x ,,%. 1,4:10!6_„e.:.z g YV4 �F r, Signal L 13.1 0.15 B 22.0 0.46 C Northbound TR 39.6 0.92 D 28.6 0.69 C L 19.7 0.59 B 17.0 0.56 B Southbound TR 18.1 0.53 B 44.5 0.94 D ro , ayE r ' r [ r. k ( tS ,tr ', MM r Zr wti«m,b � ' ' Ek ° 3ait Nrs. Na �R# aikaulanSidg,, Aarnaidha HrhwY., h�" . - tii" o � ie friw� r ia:i,,,, .T I wrrR .xT x�-g . i `aza; . oti5,�vn.".Ca5�ac. a�� JAi.. ,r . 0: ,�;M?ikY, � � ait�w, wCGss�t ` �. t4tca moog Eastbound R Stop 18.3 0.4 C ,347,5,`,�', 16t ;z . ;,, F.riN 25 • . SSFM International Bank of Hawaii Using the Volumes from Figure 10,the Levels of Service were determined for Future 2038 Without Project. < The signalized intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kinoole Street is expected to have overall intersection LOS C or D,with all the movements LOS D or betterforAM and PM peak hours,which suggests acceptable operations. The signalized intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Street is expected to operate at LOS D for both AM and PM peak hours. However the westbound and southbound through/right lanes are operating at LOS F during the PM peak hour. For the stop controlled intersection at Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway, during the PM peak hour, the eastbound right turn movement is operating at LOS F and has v/c of 2.1 (> 1).The results are shown in Table 8. Table 8: Future 2038 Without Project Intersection Level of Service v(� j b <, d��a`�h�`�" -czd an # -m gyp* "E y`�,�1 �"Y ,� V '< Sv ,sa, iii z' c r"§ ' � A L F ttY K ( Qela we Amitt ch tau r � y Y j J: Delay f#5 X11 ( y ii* LOS>_ � vJr Los iti m ' tens/ �: w �S 2t s rs'., t7 .��'^,- r,,;, ,u. Y a r 3'a'�' a t w,- r sw +.`� x 9K - z .u -.1,42,;'SM} a `Icavli�z4gtRMl-:7 "�yu yf�a, , `� `y'7 `' K1 ,�' ��r7r �r# ar - ;au-s- a "tt u__-:r. ` s,a ",� ......�.E,. ..M.� ., r< ,.... °,._x ,,,,gam ;^.+�s ..a:+.+ .Fdzf._..... r' dz..x t Ar... wE<.r.,. :�a L 20.5 0.22 C 22.7 0.25 C Eastbound TR 44.9 0.92 D 53.3 0.95 D L 23.4 0.17 C 24.7 0.35 C Westbound TR 28.1 0.69 C 38.9 0.85 D Signal 1 17.1 0.37 B 21.8 0.48 C Northbound TR 31.7 0.76 C 25.3 0.51 C L 19.4 0.44 B 17.2 0.35 B Southbound TR 25.2 0.54 C 36.1 0.83 D ��q �L i uta Oe � -�.it '��€-�<t� ;s4.�.0 tt, x Baan 5 s�a` :x "7-04-4)e ;. kr �s .: , aCuea Avetlu �, yx sru �` z �,� � 1 No 9� 4� a 41 0 ur-1405.,400 1 ^s 00 , .a6x:v. '',3;��, 7 75,�«, . E - .....r �'. :�?11,1.. :::;;„i. .,,.. , ,.fix,a���.,., '�E ,�,�.�(�, :5�.,�:5 .N, ..,.....«�..: ?� „i, ��w,a��F'..`:fi ,� L 28.5 0.55 C 39.0 0.73 0 Eastbound TR 55.4 0.94 E 53.2 0.94 D Westbound L 26.7 0.13 C 26.1 0.20 C TR 56.3 0.93 E 88 0 10 �s Signal N� ... L 15.2 0.17 B 31.9 0.64 C Northbound TR 44.3 0.93 D 33.8 0.75 C L 27.3 0.68 C 22.1 0.67 C r rS 01 " FSouthbound 20.4 0.53 C 64 ( §%" k " •TR " iI . T l .7,48 4eTsa / 43)4 Ctrac .aF ,zu .nE ,$ + RN T7k ��. i� a.s<ifs , :. ;l• - a[ ;W < ` F_ tPo �, y ^ h ra . . C 518 „ 2. ,. _ .�w':# ap0.48"1isni{ � }»v ���es. mac _ 21.1StopREastbound 26 Bank of Hawaii SSFM International 2. Intersection LOS Results for Future With project conditions A similar analysis was performed Future 2023 With Project conditions,using volumes from Figure 12.The signalized intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kinoole Street is expected to have overall intersection LOS C with all the movements LOS D or better for AM and PM peak hours, which suggests acceptable operations.The signalized intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Street is expected to have LOS D or better for all the movements during AM and PM peak hours with the exception of the westbound through/right lane,which has LOS E during the PM peak hour.The overall intersection operates at LOS C or D for both AM and PM, which suggests acceptable operations. For the stop controlled intersection at Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway,during the PM peak hour,the eastbound right turn movement is operating at LOS F and has v/c of 1.53 (> 1).The results are shown in Table 9. Table 9: Future 2023 With Project Intersection Level of Service 3 r & n - ---.,',,:„,,::MgK3. k �, 5W TN * v A , yi ptNAii! .Nr � dir5p7 ',; t � mh, r r wZ, L { � a4 � d wa. s 3 swlif1E wcv/c LOS' 'wk .a --, s 44¢ zi RS� 40 • n v - tOS Dlyi1A�p mWime e31, :it,w ,,,,, ,,. ; -� yF 3-p� wwx „ u 4 n� _ .4,-w� f " g*',4 . � ni140.-am.--, ,.pr,,. w'w Y St" - A5a,fir -zT Lk"au} yeoe ,. aA BcC 0.28L 16.2 0.21 ittrk • ItixEastbound TR 37.9 0.91 D 46.5 0.92 D L 17.8 0.13 B 22.2 0.34 C Westbound TR 22.6 0.68 C 34.9 0.83 C Signal L 13.8 0.32 B 17.9 0.35 B Northbound TR 25.8 0.73 C 21.7 0.45 C L 14.8 0.37 B 15.0 0.31 B Southbound TR �Ag 20.1 0.52 C 28.3 0.76 C £b+r r�"` 3U ..A:#" +e+7 s `f �..�a F,'') 4 "1'�x�Es .^� '54-27-c ?4' 't"i 1 xr s 4 t,Pfr"„�S3o ALM` - "�E F S ;;Viall �Lan#ka rl;� C�latl Aver uen � �3 .2 ,��. ��3 ,.� � 0 �£n�nr�lq�i„4,,,.4„.m,, ,., .*:o T'w4 H„ ... ,,,„,ltn is .c_` fs'r,bt'd4#s; ffi,�a d�mna�d'2R�t�.€"CdltihE z«�uSne XU6xn r,�sk'&,t,tn,_ .ag<.a?w. s'$?,,;f,�'AbR .u,F s�s..�;f,�.,. ...'�.,,M1"#z`}a :a .€ L 19.3 0.39 B 29.0 0.64 C Eastbound TR 37.5 0.88 D 39.4 0.87 D I L 18.9 0.07 B 22.6 0.14 C Westbound TR 36.5 0.87 D 65.7 0.99 E Signal L 12.7 0.15 B 21.6 0.45 C Northbound TR 37.9 0.91 D 27.7 0.66 C L 17.9 0.56 B 16.4 0.53 B Southbound TR 17.9 0.54 B 41.7 0.92 D ,-, #oswami- ,�w r r s z� ' iah k -,fie , d : i#iiiwzvmta ,45pa ' a 153 f Eastbound R Stop 17.3 0.38 C 2968 : r . 4 ., 27 Bank of Hawaii SSFM International A similar analysis was performed Future 2028 With Project conditions using the volumes from Figure 13. The signalized intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kinoole Street is expected to have overall intersection LOS C with all the movements LOS D or better for AM and PM peak hours, which suggests acceptable operations.The signalized intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Street is expected to have LOS D or better for all the movements during AM and PM peak hours with the exception of westbound through/right lane,which has LOS E during the PM peak hour.The overall intersection operates at LOS D or better for both AM and PM which suggests acceptable operations. For the stop controlled intersection at Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway, during the PM peak hour, the eastbound right turn movement is operating at LOS F and has v/c of 1.72 (> 1).The results are shown in Table 10. Table 10: Future 2028 With Project Intersection Level of Service rKs !mitt k Ff - ntM a Control ,� V �- W 3�" p i s ^x <tri 1,. l "`}aG.�{J aft^� .. � a a _ ;`'� ":A �:�.�a.,_. ..wrvs, 1,__a_R.a�r'-*m a�ra�`a_3.-_�.a-�� v,, �a }t'E M C - �. �'�+rz *Y t^ «a' '� .� s ^a e .}ts-x4`Snl'3&1 �� ,k� e'fir �Sit x�'r`...- a "� � 4 �_ "� `�5� ',�`i�� ��s� �K. - '� SAppr a MoW men ' � �� �XDelay(s) v/c LOS' v/c 4".rd' 6 .) ?.. a e 3 tah.G". ii,,��,,S� �fi�yJi �r ����' ��a r� t#y.".�" �� �:.'���C� E ,�.. � r* ! ��a �� v� '��u��'' i�� sh�"S`�""i v��f7S� �i� „ k7'� '��' `"` ` ,wisA S6&Kinoolei�'St�` , 'S 2 r �' PVIM 33`f�r -f�'F wE 35, 3'=. .,, ,>aa�, �,�:vi e <. .m.;.,�worm a ns.,-'}:a tt.uS ..Vt; L 17.8 0.22 B 21.0 0.30 C Eastbound TR 39.0 0.91 D 50.6 0.94 D L 19.9 0.15 B 22.5 0.37 C Westbound TR 24.6 0.68 C 35.8 0.84 D Signal L 14.9 0.33 B 19.3 0.41 B Northbound TR 27.8 0.73 C 23.0 0.49 C L 16.2 0.38 B 15.6 0.33 B Southbound TR 21.8 0.53 C 31.5 0.80 C grOVV,�. -. ,'r y �` .a`-3'.k .z,� 'YF; �`' �o;� it � .'i a y ,�e .k�ti "t',� ata ti`''Y a� '�, s r s' 311k Ia:: tKilauea/ n 5 r, t! R a aiM1 NAM& , 7..,o 1 23.1 0.46 C 33.2 0.67 C Eastbound -. - - - TR 46.5 0.92 D 40.7 • 0.87 D L 22.5 0.10 C 24.7 0.15 C Westbound TR 48.8 0.91 D 68.3 0.99 E Signal L 13.4 0.16 B 26.1 0.54 C Northbound TR 35.7 0.88 D 30.8 0.68 C L 19.1 0.56 B 19.0 0.58 B Southbound TR 18.2 0.51 B 48.8 0.95 D ms's ,^� -1 i� f�: `x.'1114 qE { a rY ,y -..t f :.'n'"t.,t��`.-{ t � nrkao� & ann lahoa4�f ighwa , ; v k a sgk �v.`�Se ac..5..+z 9 t > af$11.s-k;;" P..�" .,..xW �..x.!?r>:,'�.i„ �.a Ito itsi.; '.aft' ��.e$`7"s"��`€�kg �`�`,. ' '4T.�t� 4.,., .,:,.,a. ,�xr�'u, if�E_.,.�...a;...K. Eastbound R Stopr , ' < X 18.4 0.41 C 380 8�.. �` T71 28 Bank of Hawaii SSFM International • A similar analysis was performed Future 2038 With Project conditions using volumes from Figure 14.The signalized intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kinoole Street is expected to have overall intersection LOS C or D, with all the movements LOS D or better for AM and PM peak hours, with the exception of the eastbound through/right lane,which will operate at LOS E.The signalized intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Street is expected to operate at LOS D for the AM peak hour and at LOS E during the PM peak hour.The westbound and southbound through/right lanes are slightly over capacity during the PM peak hour, bringing down the overall intersection LOS. For the stop controlled intersection at Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway, during the PM peak hour, the eastbound right turning movement will be operating at LOS F and has v/c of 2.2 (>1).The results are shown in Table 11. Table 11: Future 2038 With Project Intersection Level of Service »s -N - tri r - N T a 2tit I z 1 xi�f�. .tee � x ,�. r �Q�I'Q- €'�3,?Szk*¢a✓ p�,�A �"u � ��5� � '�' � � '�^s� '� ��� . 5!!� intersection ��;��y, -s° it r- 0.-A :_� IUI ,y }€� x i° M ry. w 7l i,e. :`i;..k Temismfi'iEU�. mo a... '-,�t'a,,,._�.tOstp z ka E.- ,5. 'fae 3 3 u, .' € i_ :. � sm g r'i n v.as a -ti e -^�x �rra'x x .� _ >�a a. _ u.� a�h r ; �s^�'�' �E�� �z!�` E z s�a '�'k"- `� ..b x�+5 € � - � �f � ,g s �C tea+, 7� x, {�,aAp r` ach j Movemenfi'r� - blvi s , vjc 's'� LOS Delay(s)• v v/c N � � OS z'r+i tswiph ssa" f s i P,�:. z r x- s �. .,€� � m �,'�, E s --srs 'fir I �lag' s r i X :I : n Lanikaufa t 3M ino ole t E, � � . : :, 9°88 t�......r„'.,c'� �'.�.��.c,!l ��:,�4+'�.`���,�.rr.>,�.��:���.�;'�-,=a.r 't���.�' c r � �5fi r��,N7� 3 h��� �� .N. �� 4 ..m w.s..:_.�. -,: �, �.�_ s_.a... ..,rr4 �.,����� ...a _�-a,-`a �kw-b y.C:, j,0 -S.„ i L 20.5 0.24 - C 23.4 0.35 C 1 Eastbound TR 46.2 0.93 D 58.2 0.97 E L 23.6 0.19 C 25.9 0.46 C Westbound TR 26.2 0.69 C 40.0 0.86 ' D Signal L 17.5 0.38 B 23.6 0.52 C Northbound TR 32.7 0.77 C 26.5 0.53 C L 19.8 0.46 B 17.8 0.38 B 1 Southbound TR 25.9 0.56 C 41.6 0.89 D . r tp b . j'.} , i✓ sr £ €w ` A .aajxvtytei > � ..p. - Dj60 E . Lani ulaSt&Ktauea: enu 5 , L 28.8 0.56 C 42.7 0.77 D Eastbound ,TR 54.9 0.94 D 61.3 0.98 E L 26.6 0.13 C 26.7 0.23 C Westbound z TR 57.0 0.93 E105.3` 1.11 t yv F Signal L 15.5 0.18 B 35.3 0.68 D Northbound TR 45.9 0.94 D 32.8 0.74 C L 28.2 0.69 C 22.7 0.67 C Southbound TR 20.8 0.54 C 658 g 5703 ` F4 ` "�r"r4 N i i, (af s5 £"trr a n aae � s a +n °w g - rr, a _ m La ulna t arn�aiahria gi i if ici ash r h m� � 7 � _, 3....,., ? .a, .,,._. 'a=r ...K...,00k,,,koz:: ,k_,,,., .�.ta i ...'ara t;OSIY e' ,z..�n """�, ..,Ea€s`fr w:.,I _�„�'"P,alife.�b§ti :.. tiac- ,, .xQi211,:k.;�11 Eastbound R Stop 21.3 0.48 C 592 8 2.19 si4X'F� a` Aft 29 Bank of Hawaii SSFM International 3. Mitigation The intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Avenue is projected to operate at overall intersection LOS E in the 2038 "with project" scenario for PM peak hour. The westbound and southbound through/right lanes are expected to be over capacity(v/c= 1.11 and 1.03).The results in Table 11 used the existing signal phasing(leading left arrows followed by green lights for opposing movements) in the analysis.The westbound left turn volume is low, and the left arrow could probably be left out,which would allow more green time for the other movements. With this change in phasing,the overall intersection LOS would improve slightly to LOS D. This phasing would still allow westbound left turns, but they would be permitted only/on a green light. With only 24 vehicles making that left turn movement in the PM peak hour,that would only be about 0-2 cars per cycle. Table 12: Future 2038 With Project Intersection Level of Service with Mitigation (alternate phasing) ,` r i� r -a ri m4, "er 4E z aG,f � ������ 6'&;r4i sNali,��ffT,"�'.� �x� �'� �sea`,�i�"' �s��l ac ,met , r � �k� ^�' � rrY !,*-e14 *d'Op +� �-e e a s .c ., +,r r a .4 wI �'3`y���lar�Ekaula�4<{K�ialf�a��'1/�hi����z �v:",..a��4 ���..,.i; �� � s�hta :..,n. L 42.3 0.77 D Eastbound - TR 31.5 0.81 C L 37.4 0.16 D Westbound TR ( 1053 +11.1 L F Signal �,.,_..,. .. . . L 34.7 0.68 D Northbound — TR 32.8 0.74 C L 22.7 0.67 C Southbound TR 65 8 103F At the stop controlled intersection at Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway,the eastbound right movement has LOS F in 2018, and the delay and v/c will get higher in the future with or without the project. People making this movement have various alternate routes for getting to Mamalahoa Highway southbound:they can use E. Kawili Street or Makaala Street to the south, or Leilani Street to the north, or from the proposed bank, people can take Kinoole Street or Kilauea Avenue to Puainako Street. 30 Bank of Hawaii SSFM International IV. SUMMARY Bank of Hawaii is planning to build a new branch at the corner of Kinoole Street and Lanikaula Street in Hilo,the Island of Hawaii. It will be 7,500 sf in size on a 40,282 sf lot.Two driveways are planned, one on Lanikaula Street and one on Kinoole Street; both will allow entering and exiting traffic.The bank is expected to generate approximately 31 entering and 22 exiting new trips in the AM peak hour and 82 entering and 82 exiting new trips in the PM peak hour. It was assumed 20%of the total trips will be pass-by trips,from vehicles that are already on the streets. In 2018, during the existing AM and PM weekday peak hours, both signalized study intersections are functioning acceptably,with overall intersection LOS C.The eastbound right turn movement at Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway has LOS C in the AM peak hour and LOS F in the PM peak hour. The expected LOS for'Future Without Project'for 2023, 2028 and 2038 is LOS C or D for both signalized intersections in AM and PM peak hours.The westbound and southbound through/right lanes at Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Avenue are expected to experience longer delays in the PM peak hour and LOS F.The eastbound right turn lane at Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway will continue to experience LOS F delays in the PM peak hour. The J expected LOS for'Future With Project'for 2023 and 2028 is LOS C or D for both signalized P g intersections in the AM and PM peak hours. In 2038,the intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Avenue is expected to function acceptably in the AM peak hour(LOS D), but is expected to have LOS E in the PM peak hour. By removing the green arrow phase for the westbound left turners, additional green time can be reallocated to other movements, and raise the overall intersection LOS to D. 31 Bank of Hawaii SSFM International V. REFERENCES American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2011. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation, 10th Edition:An ITE Informational Report, September, 2017. Office of Environmental Quality Control. EA and EIS Online Library,Accessed May 2018. <http://oeqc.doh.hawaii.gov/default.aspx>. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation. Federal-Aid Functional Classification Update:Policy and Procedures, December,2012. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation. Historical Traffic Station Maps, 2015. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation.Statewide Transportation Improvements Program, Accessed April 2018. <http://hawaii.gov/dot/highways/STIP>. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation.Statewide Uniform Design Manual for Streets and Highways, 1980. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Highway Capacity Manual,Washington, D.C., 6th Edition. 32 APPENDIX A 24 Hour and Peak Period Traffic Counts Traffic Data Service Traffic Station Sketch N Island:Hawaii Area:Hilo Section ID/Station#:B71193000115 Mohouli Street D2 �- Kinoole Street D1 1 Lanihuli Street Meter# File Name GPS 1.bw93 D0806013 B71193000115 19.71099,-155.08 2. D0806014 B71193000115 Station Description: Kinoole Street: Mohouli Street to Lanihuli Street Survey Beginning Date/Time: Survey Ending Date/Time: 8/6/15@ 0000 8/7/15@ 2400 Survey Method: Road Tube Data Type: Class Survey Crew: LM C1B Sketch Updated: By: SR Remarks: 998 FACILITY NAME JURI FUNC AREA ROUTE CLASS TYPE NO. MILE Kinoole Street 16 1930 D1=Direction to End DI:Lanihuli Street/Haihai Street D2=Direction to Begin D2:Mohouli Street/Wailuku Drive Run Date:2016/05/19 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2015 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71193000115Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 12500 Functional Class:URBAN:MINOR ARTERIAL Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 1930 Location: Kinoole St: Mohouli St to Lanihuli St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 08/06/2015 12:00-12:15 12 4 16 06:00-06:15 27 32 59 12:00-12:15 121 143 264 06:00-06:15 88 81 169 12:15-12:30 12 1 13 06:15-06:30 49 73 122 12:15-12:30 129 160 289 06:15-06:30 93 67 160 12:30-12:45 6 4 10 06:30-06:45 59 100 159 12:30-12:45 124 107 231 06:30-06:45 75 108 183 12:45-01:00 8 3 11 06:45-07:00 65 140 205 12:45-01:00 136 114 250 06:45-07:00 79 87 166 01:00-01:15 6 1 7 07:00-07:15 89 142 231 01:00-01:15 128 145 273 07:00-07:15 70 65 135 01:15-01:30 91 10 07:15-07:30 110 166 276 01:15-01:30 139 88 227 07:15-07:30 51 31 82 01:30-01:45 4 1 5 07:30-07:45 119 97 216 01:30-01:45 108 134 242 07:30-07:45 58 47 105 01:45-02:00 7 3 10 07:45-08:00 123 128 251 01:45-02:00 126 119 245 07:45-08:00 51 38 89 02:00-02:15 7 6 13 08:00-08:15 103 157, 260 02:00-02:15 111 76 187 08:00-08:15 42 70 112 02:15-02:30 2 1 3 08:15-08:30 89 109 198 02:15-02:30 150 128 278 08:15-08:30 37 48 85 02:30-02:45 1 3 4 08:30-08:45 83 113 196 02:30-02:45 171 107 278 08:30-08:45 38 37 75 02:45-03:00 2 4 6 08:45-09:00 109 126 235 02:45-03:00 141 117 258 08:45-09:00 28 26 54 03':00-03:15 4 7 11 09:00-09:15 86 116 202 03:00-03:15 122 127 249 09:00-09:15 40 49 89 03:15-03:30 11 3 14 09:15-09:30 95 145 240 03:15-03:30 137 109 246 09:15-09:30 30 23 53 03:30-03:45 21 3 09:30-09:45 107 130 237 03:30-03:45 118 130 248 09:30-09:45 30 33 63 03:45-04:00 3 14 17 09:45-10:00 97 132 229 03:45-04:00 149 111 260 09:45-10:00 31 12 43 04:00-04:15 3 5 8 10:00-10:15 120 113 233 04:00-04:15 140 114 254 10:00-10:15 26 23 49 04:15-04:30 9 6 15 10:15-10:30 119 126 245 04:15-04:30 122 125 247 10:15-10:30 23 32 55 04:30-04:45 20 12 32 10:30-10:45 111 100 211 04:30-04:45 151 88 239 10:30-10:45 12 17 29 04:45-05:00 8 18 26 10:45-11:00 147 117 264 04:45-05:00 167 144 311 10:45-11:00 13 12 25 05:00-05:15 12 15 27 11:00-11:15 135 123 258 05:00-05:15 159 124 283 11:00-11:15 17 12 29 05:15-05:30 18 20 38 11:15-11:30 128 105 233 05:15-05:30 150 85 235 11:15-11:30 14 3 17 05:30-05:45 24 18 42 11:30-11:45 107 128 235 05:30-05:45 130 94 224 11:30-11:45 18 11 29 05:45-06:00 25 27 52 11:45-12:00 141 113 254 05:45-06:00 104 88 192 11:45-12:00 11 10 21 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:15 PM to 05:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 455 548 1003 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 599 481 1080 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.39 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.96 AM-D(%) 45.36 54.64 100.00 PM-0(%) 55.46 44.54 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM 06:30 AM to 07:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:30 PM to 05:30 PM 04:15 PM to 05:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 455 548 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 627 481 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:001 PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:15 PM to 05:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 455 548 1003 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 599 481 1080 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.39 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.96 AM-D(%) 45.36 54.64 100.00 PM-D(%) 55.46 44.54 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 2,418 2,831 5,249 PEAK HR TIME - 12:15 PM to 01:15 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 2,633 3,009 5,642 PEAK HR VOLUME 517 526 1043 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 3,233 2,777 6,010 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 4,208 3,719 7,927 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 6,841 6,728 13,569 PEAK FIR VOLUME 573 544 D(%) 50.42 49.58 100.00 • Run Date:2016/05/19 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2015 Program Count-Summary Site ID:671193000115 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 12500 Functional Class:URBAN:MINOR ARTERIAL Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 1930 Location: Kinoole St: Mohouli St to Lanihuli St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 08/07/2015 12:00-12:15 10 8 18 06:00-06:15 41 59 100 12:00-12:15 110 120 230 06:00-06:15 , 95 70 165 12:15-12:30 5 4 9 06:15-06:30 36 105 141 12:15-12:30 109 131 240 06:15-06:30 101 86 187 , 12:30.12:45 12 5 17 06:30-06:45 45 128 173 12:30-12:45 145 128 273 06:30-06:45 74 55 129 12:45-01:00 3 8 11 06:45-07:00 76 156 232 12:45-01:00 123 149 272 06:45-07:00 108 41 149 01:00-01:15 6 5 11 07:00-07:15 72 188 260 01:00-01:15 108 128 236 07:00-07:15 94 49 143 01:15-01:30 5 5 10 07:15-07:30 93 154 247 01:15-01:30 75 129 204 07:15-07:30 64 45 109 01:30-01:45 5 4 9 07:30-07:45 97 217 314 01:30-01:45 106 129 235 07:30-07:45 85 17 102 01:45-02:00 6 5 11 07:45-08:00 114 163 277 01:45-02:00 136 122 258 07:45-08:00 63 17 80 02:00-02:15 4 5 9 08:00-08:15 99 127 226 02:00-02:15 112 94 206 08:00-08:15 62 28 90 02:15-02:30 6 7 13 08:15-08:30 77 166 243 02:15-02:30 115 111 226 08:15-08:30 68 21 89 02:30-02:45 2 2 4 08:30-08:45 85 176 261 02:30-02:45 113 52 165 08:30-08:45 54 40 94 02:45-03:00 3 6 9 08:45-09:00 82 75 157 02:45-03:00 126 98 224 08:45-09:00 43 18 61 03:00-03:15 9 '2 11 09:00-09:15 100 115 215 03:00-03:15 156 130 286 09:00-09:15 40 25 65 03:15-03:30 3 4 7 09:15-09:30 87 127 214 03:15-03:30 155 104 259 09:15-09:30 77 18 95 03:30-03:45 2 5 7 09:30-09:45 103 156 259 03:30-03:45 131 103 234 09:30-09:45 39 12 51 03:45-04:00 6 8 14 09:45-10:00 124 240 364 03:45-04:00 133 108 241 09:45-10:00 48 15 63 04:00-04:15 4 6 10 10:00-10:15 119 166 285 04:00-04:15 133 119 252 10:00-10:15 40 18 58 04:15-04:30 9 4 13 10:15-10:30 96 127 223 04:15-04:30 136 88 224 10:15-10:30 40 21 61 04:30-04:45 7 13 20 10:30-10:45 133 121 254 04:30-04:45 155 86 241 10:30-10:45 19 9 28 04:45-05:00 12 18 30 10:45-11:00 115 164 279 04:45-05:00 150 116 266 10:45-11:00 21 15 36 05:00-05:15 12 32 44 11:00-11:15 132 114 246 05:00-05:15 140 72 212 11:00-11:15 16 12 28 05:15-05:30 14 45 59 11:15-11:30 113 108 221 05:15-05:30 129 108 237 11:15-11:30 21 17 38 05:30-05:45 33 23 56 11:30-11:45 101 133 234 05:30-05:45 109 119 228 11:30-11:45 18 18 36 05:45-06:00 28 34 62 11:45-12:00 99 128 227 05:45-06:00 110 65 175 11:45-12:00 14 6 20 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:00 AM to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 376 722 1098 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 575 445 1020 AM-K FACTOR(%) 8.00 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.44 AM-D(%) 34.24 65.76 100.00 PM-0(%) 56.37 43.63 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM 07:00 AM to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:15 PM to 05:15 PM 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 403 722 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 581 445 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 09:30 AM to 10:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 12:15 PM to 01:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 442 689 1131 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 485 536 1021 AM-K FACTOR(%) 8.25 1 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.44 AM-D(%) 39.08 60.92 100.00 PM-D)%) 47.50 52.50 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) •6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 2,239 3,413 5,652 PEAK HR TIME 09:30 AM to 10:30 AM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 2,445 3,671 6,116 PEAK HR VOLUME 442 689 1131 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 3,015 2,609 5,624 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 4,319 3,282 7,601 PEAK HR TIME 10:30 AM to 11:30 AM 09:15 AM to 10:15 AM 24 HOUR PERIOD 6,764 6,953 13,717 PEAK HR VOLUME 493 689 D)%) 49.31 50.69 100.00 Run Date: 2016/05/19 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2015 Site ID: B71193000115 Route No: 1930 Date From: , 2015/08/06 0:00 Town: Hawaii Direction: +MP Date To: 2015/08/07 23:45 Location: Kinoole St: Mohouli St to Lanihuli St Functional Classification: 16 URBAN:MINOR ARTERIAL ' REPORT TOTALS-48 HOURS RECORDED VOLUME % NUMBER OF AXLES Cycles 292 1.07% 584 PC 21474 78.70% 42948 2A-4T 5074 18.60% 10148 LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS 26840 98.37% 53680 HEAVY VEHICLES Bus 19 0.07% 47 SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 36 0.13% 72 3A-SU 210 0.77% 630 4A-SU 85 0.31% 340 SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 41 0.15% 164 5A-ST 16 0.06% 80 6A-ST 2 0.01% 12 MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 0 0.00% 0 6A-MT 25 0.09% 150 7A-MT 12 0.04% 84 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS 446 1.63% 1579 CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 27286(A) 100.00% 55259 (B) UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 0 0.00% AXLE ROADTUBE CORRECTION FACTOR(A/C)= 0.988 EQUIVALENT(B/2)= 27630 (C) %TOTAL HPMS PEAK HOUR PEAK PEAK 24 HOUR K-FACTOR VOLUME: 1098 HOUR HOUR TRUCK %OF (PEAK/AADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) 2015/08/07 07:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT (65A-1) (65A-2) TRUCKS(TYPE 4-7) 16 1.46% 175 ' 1.40% 8.78% COMBINATION (65B-1) 12500 (65B-2) (TYPE 8-13) 9 0.82% 48 0.38% 8.78% 1 Traffic Data Service Traffic Station Sketch N Island:Hawaii Area:Hilo Section ID/Station#:B71282000009 Kalanikoa Street D2 4 Lanikaula Street DI —► 1 Laukapu Street Meter# File Name GPS 1. bz94 D0930013 B71282000009 19.70707,-155.0659 D0930014 B71282000009 Station Description: Lanikaula Street: Kalanikoa Street to Laukapu Street Survey Beginning Date/Time: Survey Ending Date/Time: 9/30/15@ 0000 10/1/15@ 2400 Survey Method: Road Tube Data Type: Class Survey Crew: LM C1B Sketch Updated: By: SR Remarks: FACILITY NAME NRI FDNC AREA ROUTE CLASS TYPE NO. MILE Lanikaula Street 17 2820 D1=Direction to End Dl:Laukapu Street/Mohouli Street D2=Direction to Begin D2:Kalanikoa Street/Kaonoelehua Avenue Run Date:2016/07/14 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2015 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71282000009 • Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 5100 Functional Class:URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 2820 Location: Lanikaula St-Kalanikoa St to Laukapu St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 09/30/2015 12:00-12:15 2 3 5 06:00-06:15 2 17 19 12:00-12:15 34 74 108 06:00-06:15 26 45 71 12:15-12:30 0 1 1 06:15-06:30 9 27 36 12:15-12:30 44 67 111 06:15-06:30 29 51 80 12:30-12:45 2 2 4 06:30-06:45 16 47 63 12:30-12:45 31 69 100 06:30-06:45 17 38 55 12:45-01:00 1 3 4 06:45-07:00 17 46 63 12:45-01:00 37 61 98 06:45-07:00 15 35 50 I 01:00-01:15 1 0 1 07:00-07:15 29 54 83 01:00-01:15 28 68 96 07:00-07:15 21 42 63 1 01:15-01:30 0 2 2 07:15-07:30 18 55 73 01:15-01:30 27 75 102 07:15-07:30 18 21 39 01:30-01:45 0 1 1 07:30-07:45 40 59 99 01:30-01:45 26 72 98 07:30-07:45 13 23 36 01:45-02:00 0 2 2 07:45-08:00 32 59 91 01:45-02:00 30 78 108 07:45-08:00 9 18 27 02:00-02:15 0 3 3 08:00-08:15 27 67 94 02:00-02:15 36 78 114 08:00-08:15 5 19 24 02:15-02:30 0 0 0 08:15-08:30 36 57 93 02:15-02:30 34 81 115 08:15-08:30 8 25 33 02:30-02:45 0 . 1 1 08:30-08:45 44 37 81 02:30-02:45 25 65 90 08:30-08:45 8 16 24 02:45-03:00 0 0 0 08:45-09:00 27 51 78 02:45-03:00 31 86 117 08:45-09:00 8 14 22 03:00-03:15 1 1 2 09:00-09:15 30 52 82 03:00-03:15 32 89 121 09:00-09:15 3 18 21 03:15-03:30 0 0 0 09:15-09:30 26 54 80 03:15-03:30 44 73 117 09:15-09:30 3 19 22 03:30-03:45 0 3 3 09:30-09:45 28 59 87 03:30-03:45 42 79 121 09:30-09:45 6 9 15 03:45-04:00 2 1 3 09:45-10:00 30 59 89 03:45-04:00 33 79 112 09:45-10:00 8 13 21 04:00-04:15 2 2 4 10:00-10:15 29 '72 101 04:00-04:15 37 76 113 10:00-10:15 4 10 14 04:15-04:30 2. 0 2 10:15-10:30 35 61 96 04:15-04:30 36 78 114 10:15-10:30 1 10 11 04:30-04:45 3 8 11 10:30-10:45 39 78 117 04:30-04:45 49 69 118 10:30-10:45 2 6 8 04:45-05:00 2 10 12 10:45-11:00 35 60 95 04:45-05:00 38 86 124 10:45-11:00 0 8 8 05:00-05:15 2 3 5 11:00-11:15 30 70 100 05:00-05:15 38 65 103 11:00-11:15 1 4 5 05:15-05:30 3 6 9 11:15-11:30 31 74 105 05:15-05:30 26 62 88 11:15-11:30 0 7 7 05:30-05:45 6 18 24 11:30-11:45 45 77 122 05:30-05:45 29 55 84 11:30-11:45 1 3 4 05:45-06:00 7 16 - 23 11:45-12:00 34 58 92 05:45-06:00 21 50 71 11:45-12:00 2 2 4 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 135 242 377 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 151 320 471 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.02 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.77 AM-0(%) 35.81 64.19 100.00 PM-D(%) 32.06 67.94 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:45 AM to 08:45 AM 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:15 PM to 05:15 PM 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 139 242 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 161 320 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:001 PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 10:45 AM to 11:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 02:45 PM to 03:45 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 141 281 422 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 149 327 476 . AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.86 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.87 AM-D(%) 33.41 66.59 100.00 PM-D(%) 31.30 68.70 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) '6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK - AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 689 1,350 2,039 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 725 1,436 2,161 PEAK HR VOLUME 126 310 436 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 808 1,735 2,543 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 1,016 2,191 3,207 PEAK HR TIME 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 1,741 3,627 5,368 1 PEAK HR VOLUME 157 310 D(%) 32.43 67.57 100.00 Run Date:2016/07/14 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2015 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71282000009 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 5100 Functional Class:URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 2820 Location: Lanikaula St-Kalanikoa St to Laukapu St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 10/01/2015 . 12:00-12:15 2 2 4 06:00-06:15 4 28 32 12:00-12:15 42 77 119 06:00-06:15 27 35 62 12:15-12:30 1 1 2 06:15-06:30 11 27 38 12:15-12:30 38 80 118 06:15-06:30 32 37 69 12:30-12:45 0 0 0 06:30-06:45 14 34 48 12:30-12:45 35 73 108 06:30-06:45 31 50 81 12:45-01:00 1 0 1 06:45-07:00 26 53 79 12:45-01:00 34 69 103 06:45-07:00 28 31 59 01:00-01:15 1 1 2 07:00-07:15 22 44 66 01:00-01:15 39 55 94 07:00-07:15 13 45 58 01:15-01:30 2 1 3 07:15-07:30 37 65 102 01:15-01:30 31 72 103 07:15-07:30 21 27 48 01:30-01:45 1 3 4 07:30-07:45 34 61 95 01:30-01:45 39 69 108 07:30-07:45 12 31 43 01:45-02:00 1 1 2 07:45-08:00 23 70 93 01:45-02:00 36 79 115 ,07:45-08:00 12 24 36 02:00-02:15 1 1 2 08:00-08:15 32 62 94 02:00-02:15 21 85 106 08:00-08:15 6 34 40 02:15-02:30 0 0 0 08:15-08:30 24 61 85 02:15-02:30 36 62 98 08:15-06:30 16 21 37 02:30-02:45 0 3 3 08:30-08:45 40 51 91 02:30-02:45 41 85 126 08:30-08:45 9 20 29 02:45-03:00 0 1 1 08:45-09:00 25 72 97 02:45-03:00 39 74 113 08:45-09:00 7 16 23 03:00-03:15 0 0 0 09:00-09:15 28 77 105 03:00-03:15 45 90 135 09:00-09:15 6 16 22 03:15-03:30 2 0 2 09:15-09:30 47 60 107 03:15-03:30 29 80 109 09:15-09:30 6 23 29 03:30-03:45 •1 2 3 09:30-09:45 22 57 79 03:30-03:45 34 89 123 09:30-09:45 8 14 22 03:45-04:00 1 1 2 09:45-10:00 28 80 108 03:45-04:00 35 91 126 09:45-10:00 6 4 10 04:00-04:15 0 3 3 10:00-10:15 27 73 100 04:00-04:15 49 75 124 10:00-10:15 1 10 11 04:15-04:30 2 1 3 10:15-10:30 31 72 103 04:15-04:30 47 54 101 10:15-10:30 2 8 10 04:30-04:45 2 2 4 10:30-10:45 39 64 103 04:30-04:45 37 75 112 10:30-10:45 1 8 9 . 04:45-05:00 2 7 9 . 10:45-11:00 35 81 116 04:45-05:00 41 87 128 10:45-11:00 2 9 11 , 05:00-05:15 1 8 9 11:00-11:15 26 90 116 05:00-05:15 41 80 121 11:00-11:15 1 2 3 05:15-05:30 4 10 14 11:15-11:30 29 72 101 05:15-05:30 27 69 96 11:15-11:30 0 4 4 05:30-05:45 11 11 22 11:30-11:45 44 68 112 05:30-05:45 25 64 89 11:30-11:45 0 2 2 05:45-06:00 2 18 20 11:45-12:00 26 76 102 05:45-06:00 32 54 86 11:45-12:00 - 0 5 . 5 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 126 258 384 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 143 350 493 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.77 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.69 ' AM-0(%) 32.81 67.19 100.00 PM-D(%) 29.01 70.99 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 126 258 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 174 350 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 10:45 AM to 11:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 134 311 445 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 143 350 493 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.85 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.69 AM-0(%) 30.11 69.89 100.00 PM-0(%) 29.01 70.99 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS • DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 674 1,498 2,172 PEAK HR TIME 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM AM'12-I-IR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 712 1,575 2,287 , PEAK HR VOLUME 150 301 451 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 873 1,788 2,661 DIRECTIONAL PEAK _ PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 1,120 2,264 3,384 PEAK HR TIME 11:30 AM to 12:30 PM 10:45 AM to 11:45 AM 24 HOUR PERIOD 1,832 3,839 5,671 PEAK HR VOLUME 150 311 13(%) 32.30 67.70 100.00 Run Date: 2016/07/14 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2015 . Site ID: B71282000009 Route No: 2820 Date From: 2015/09/30 0:00 Town: Hawaii Direction: +MP Date To: 2015/10/01 23:45 Location: Lanikaula St-Kalanikoa St to Laukapu St Functional Classification: 17 URBAN:COLLECTOR REPORT TOTALS-48 HOURS RECORDED VOLUME % NUMBER OF AXLES Cycles 89 0.81% 179 PC 8737 79.15% 17474 2A-4T 2061 18.67% 4122 LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS 10887 98.63% 21775 HEAVY VEHICLES Bus 27 0.24% 68 SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 46 0.42% 92 3A-SU 39 0.35% 117 4A-SU 10 0.09% 40 SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 4 -0.04% 16 5A-ST 5 0.05% 25 6A-ST 2 0.02% 12 • MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 1 0.01% 5 6A-MT 12 0.11% 72 7A-MT 6 0.05% 42 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS 152 1.38% N 489 CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 11039(A) 100.00% 22263 (5) ' UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS -0 -0.00% AXLE ROADTUBE CORRECTION EQUIVALENT B/2 - 11132 (C) FACTOR(A/C)= EQUIVALENT(B/2)- 0.992 %TOTAL HPMS PEAK HOUR PEAK PEAK 24 HOUR K-FACTOR VOLUME: 493 HOUR HOUR TRUCK %OF (PEAK/AADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) 2015/10/0115:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT (65A-1) (65A-2) TRUCKS(TYPE 4-7) 10 2.03% 61 1.20% 9.67% COMBINATION (65B-1) 5100 (65B-2) (TYPE 8-13)' 2 1 0.41% 15 0.29% 9.67% ! - , . Prepared by National Data&Surveying Services Kinoole St & Lanikaula St Peak Hour Turning Movement Count IDKinoole St „-, Day: Wednesday : 18-02044-001 , „ ••• .. .... ,- . City: Hilo ' SOUTHBOUND 0 i6, 234 ic;, 0 „ ,,: AM 06'30 AM-0830 AM c 0 Date 04/11/2018 : 07:15 AM-08:15 AM 4It4 , , ,. z et --i m ' NOON NONE ' -u 0 m I NONE 0 ct PM-, 6:4'•• 401 '':119 0: 268 PM .00 PIVI, -05:7 PM ,c°, Oli 04:00 PM-05:00 PM NOON' AM • ', ' ' Jr 4 (j' ' '' • PM • , 2, AM NOON' PM -, , ' ', ', ' ''' '.• ' -• • 0 .0” 58." 0 0 0 0 0 e -H— „Atim , '— '-' 0 11•1 , 252 , r ° 400 0 449 _= ' .CONTROL '., ' 324 01 ii <Dli 0 0. 0 - ' q ' 0 , 0 r_ 40- 019 ... jomi 0 • 0, : 0 0 '3:- '1,:13.- • 47 6 36 j 0 TEV 1671 01728 AM N u PM -: vi, , :: : • , ,, :, w ' ' '1 ..i0% 0 PHF 0.92 0.89 ,, r=>'. 500 0 495 78 • 70'-'1cc, 0 ' l'' d' ,,,o‘ , • — o.; '; ' - '`'n '-, '''' ,• S' ', .,-,` , ' ' AM .., `,.• ' - , ' '' ' '''' '- '''.' :: - :2 j1,- n.,,41 f *,i PM NOON AM NOON PM ' — .,- -•‘•`. Cars (AM) PM' ' '' ' • - .172 30-` Pi:+i, HT(AM)' 511-- ':'0 ' 71 ' - , ', . ' 0 NOON0 cn 0 , , NOON 0 , , , , , ‘, . 0 0 0 0 j ' t 0 4 4 Lo 47J t58 AM 31 340 ,34 -,..fil! , ,- ,• 352,4 .,, li-243' 7• -, 77c 19 w' NORTHBOUND .,„ 1 1 ' r 0 '1 . "-- *1 + & , Kii.,60,,st,„ ,, r.) a Cars (NOON) HT(NOON) , 2 2 z e d3+ Pedestrians(Crosswalks) lb ..54 z Z Z z z 0 °4' 0 N/A J t N/A ° 2 0 -94 0 '..1,4 N/AJ4j 4' I.t NiA C) + ,. 2 0 < z o. o ,.. N/A4 4411:P. 4-N/A 0 `,1- 2_, N,,,. ,,,,.-oe ._ N/A N/A i ' 4”N/A N/A'. r N/A lik ,4... c, r,,, ,-1 0 C3 n 1-1 3 PM ----1 Z T PM t., ..„%„ 3 0 NOON .-1zZZ ••••-•.. ---- ""-- ,:.-,,,„ > > > NOON 0 4" '•••„, 4,4',61,, 4 AM Cars (PM) AM - 1 <4) ,rati;,.,* 2 AM HT(PM) __I L + - `-* NOON 0 1_, 0 '''' i''';''' PM 3 i 0 NOON II+ 1_, +. 2 PM (JJ 0 l' 0 ., ,,,,,,, t 1 36J t 59 Jf ,,, z z 11—k—c) 3 .4. k,"A'---kt, 4.3 , , 0 :„ 3484 !*7", , 4-321 -; • 0 0 2 0 2 () E 0 z ta. • 0 147 p. Z < < 0 1 ..'' , ç0 701, C 40 0 ii) ct IC) 4% • ro 4-1 f ro 7 ....„•.4, +0 ,,, —1 . . . 1--- —I -i - - IV • J Jx J J�� h'. F M T m N m O f g, Q'n N F M Y N M..N M N H m V p g O.my N Ml I0�1 ?Imp1 fN�1 o N No rio o fP�I m Y m M N O W 1 7 0 o O W t 0 o b mmmmv may O O 000000000 001 eQ '". 0�0 000000000 ; v .: vowalf ,�I ��a�� U ,8',..1. Z ^tim n^--1.Miti �m Ztc O3NN Nm-�.M,,.^...-..M-i.M..-.m OOm 3 m •,Om T O r ,c,.. ,,..,1,2, .:.-24 ac y� Qo u to o rvmVAZT,�°6 v^ uYo ;: 3o .Ovm1N.Nona-osp.n1v Mmm n X K ,. 1 m v ''a*' 0 ...timMVMMm 3(^,;y. m,� o3mrnm2^towm^�^.,2 §"8'3i17.§... §... ",.. 4F a00000000w ;ag 0�w000000000000 w aoy UI Z .~., 0O1,6 mm0^M......y momm kph : '1"I ^a � 0 O m i-1 a ^ , .a— m d o41-674 ,4 OL.,,,,V,m „y W N t�<£ Mm OL O1MF:.mOb.^Ol�Tm nay LI- �1 ^ ,:M p 111 3 0 IV O Ti fi owNmMmtiX4.. w, m � 0w..vmv Mm0M,M0�y w"K m p3 o /1 O0o00 o00p0 0 0 F3p0,. .....0....... 0 0 o" 0 e CU M O,Q M �g b£`l tD ' ".Zp M*tPO, y .r K M YOf , Z K^tiN K ,, `,, M ? h QOM .... n .1..ni MM i,y m"m N ped g tom " es 1-1- ,SE N 5 F �m U w20,..,..„"..o ri, $ -�Q 59,0tlrmn(:Pnnm:e^,^P^^, ri,$ voq M O_,,—..r.,..,, .—+mm NN N M N M ? .6h .W NMN.0,,,,....N. -�NN N N PIXN N M M -,''DD F^ N , p N O v .i O 2 p p 0 p p p p p 0 >.O b 1 .2............ 0 0 0 G p =: cn fE '=0Z N v m „ mm Z^�HA ?OZ1�O„�MM�D.O o r 00 m Zp^0 ' ,Ng ,ps ^^ WNrO0tva . Ftom �On 4',Fzn-1- aMmaMMO 1 .L X ax Q . 0 Z.7..^.NNNf.1m- Z^N k;:N r OZ.my.y N.Zi Mn.y ti.1i.m-�.Mip F1 20ip ii$''„ N Hp M1 EEF EFFff aiaaiinEEEEfa ..y+sr z L:1 aaouaaaaa ^ �$K oMo 2�x J�t Ip Co y M V oM.P-6"4 f Y'"L^'' o.M-iMY O.y m T 8L4R T f Y,'g , V N .Drt:ri ri Odid O U u.aC NiV iV iV nlMt+lm??T�f J U< 9 3Lai >°o enlIZE >otXaLLc Z FQ :< g F6 W 6 POMP i3 Prepared by National Data&Surveying Services Kilauea Ave & Lanikaula St Peak Hour Turning Movement Count ID: 18-02044-002Kilauea Ave Day: Wednesday City: Hilo • ‘SOUTHBOUND Date: 04/11/2018 cn 07:15 AM-08:15 AM AM 63 226,`0 o 0 689' AM 06:30 AM-08:30 AM m 0 cez m a NONE NOON 0 0 0 0 0. NOoN NONE a 04:00 PM-05:00 PM PM 89 449 177 ..0.; 547 PM 02:00 PM-05:00 PM o° AM NOON PM .$r 4" 10 PM • NOON AM•, 0 0 0 0 0 t 114_: 0 ' 104 329 0 436'. ,� 3 'i t%� 2 C'ONTROLv. 0 278 0 215, r. M � v to 0 0.` 0 . 0' 0 0 20r 0 10 = om 'Y f— 78 .0' 96 J 0 "TEV. 1795 0 2056 0 0 0 0 CI c AM NOON PM 03 goC LLI347 0; 342. 0. PHF 0-92 0•93 e > 534 0 479 62 0 70 ". 0 0. 0. 0 0 AM NOON PM f PM NOON AM" Cars (AM) PM 539 0 i 69. 337 , 15 ' PM ' HT(AM) 10 N NOON 0 - 0 'I O• 0 0 NOON' N vii__ M M O 774 4.0 ♦ �t 103 AM 298 0 � 51 :. 507 19 .AM 1 S� �t 1 342♦ r 208 „ 5 4 4' 7 62 * 1- F �r9- - NORTHBOUND s OZ r1 *1 . r° r-- `' ° Kilauea Ave o N —1 u1 HT(NOON)OZN )Cars (NOON) a Q 'IL- Q. d Pedestrians(Crosswalks) 2447O O ° 1 < 1 < I ', 4 t. 2 ON/A 1 t. N/A+ ~t N/A O ° `s a ¢ ¢ a14, QN/A.? OPz z N/AN/A. r N/A 0 0 Lt_ N/A�► xR ♦ N/A ♦ r► o o .-i �- o rel N/A Z� * er N/A 7 Z Z Z PM �► ♦ PM � � � 0 0 D D D D D D NOON 0 j Q NOON Cars (PM) AM 1 1-4 Q AM m AM 1 ,A � ,s 1 :Nr:OAON HT{PM) coo ch N NOONQ * , ♦ Q I+ b PM Q y4Q •J + 4 1 n 941 t114 Po o r• o 0 0 � z J t0 338.+► F 278 O o o O 4.� ,, ♦. 0 70 ` r 20 0 is a Z a a ° . Pct o o o W ~ � OO � SrkI c� N I00T avmpW mnmm Fm �;.m a; 1-mmmvmiNrvTmmmuNim-. H Hv1p m' pp FN N m cv mm Om .�„fb1 F V V,,,TT a-V PT Vl 41 ON p N O ply 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,g ,10,_&:,=.;Y03000.00.00.0.0 3 0 Nao ) O` yj`.,Z O3H�NNMN em-i N 3^`� �',. Z 03NNm Mm MN N MNry N 3 H�'', ro Wry 0 « '2c v - r1K m Mo u to �,,,*3o nnmv�ivmjvud'T $0,a$0 3m '^n�n.^ole.SR'Pm.^omn ✓No E F. V2 000 VNSF.-.MN 3 j,j F Qw o3ul .n.n..Nvin Nmrv.nr v,,, ,No n ate: z 000000000 W app }-' 0=000000000000 W ▪ pp z o WJ ' yZ ,.v:.,,1 ^ � �.i. m.^I .-. ZN NOH ro 'tai ,,-h a ^a ruvcloilImmmn r+ '^Nxz o'' 0 MP"n.`�on.monmo92 ruTr 0 JJ ..„ N C� S O �� Od mN H.N.N.m.H.m-1 W m 00 o�Nti`m.m-gym N...n-o,,N NM dm ltl0 d. .. N 1� pt0 U i-° c l ,, 0 N 0 0 0 O O O O O O b C 0 N 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 O O Y b O 'y Cl)fA a S�?ON m1�Ny-i m.m-i N r�i.moi y.j b} O Uwj.~iNm N.N..MiN.mi.^iNnIN /IN{8 Imo'',;:yy5 0 4 ON m • , :8 F. q �q j"'1 "d'J,. .ryW <W. cn U .oilvczi1T- mnvl^n W='"i .-ra.ss. 51oi8m1m`.�S..m.2m.rv." �0 } rpt , . i) ' Oj/I.i tiff Nj+Im MN = O t/j Vof v10't nNl tmf.YQ V'Nb V •:. tO 3 , N O : 0 � £ o Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z -b p O Z O O O o O o O O O o O O 2.6 .0-p„, � Z o1. Z..nb n mit o r' Z V< 4, Z o Z.+M*m.mmulmmv M Z./jM G N ,, top, ,-,.?, M Wim'd' 00,00. N Q% tf.�'. �' {-,,-,:i4 ,-1. A aZzomo-,,---,-- .2,,,d,„„nIOm zb�em mmm.on Z .ir42 9 mmm�mn mb ,,a. M b ,, i.l G ( t 4 j, o N OZm,myNHnz m.M-I Z ssjlYj L' OZm.ntin n.l..NNrHN Z V,.,N gO O • F P E P f f.i 6 a F Z Z F E 8 F Y F S r" Z oL'Q Fdaa¢aa¢Q '^ tea adaaao_o_mmn. ,O ou o�b�o ,`�o m wo.o.o�o� s▪dao 1p C my o my 0.�-. J=]C rj g .,mv0.,my my j=5' Nt u s .Ohll�I�a0e0 V xQ C lV NiV rV i.lnlnli.f?<YC U A S.C S bQm 3' bau`", } yQ !:.1:2741 N FK ,,na g. aE I Z 8 Q y4j F 6 ,- ., Prepared by National Data&Surveying Services Mamalahoa Hwy & Lanikaula St Peak Hour Turning Movement Count ID: 18-02044-003 Mamalahoa HWy Day: Wednesday City: Hilo . SOUTHBOUND Date: 04/11/2018 0) 07:15 AM-08:15 AM AM „47 661 0 0 1507 AM ; 06:30 AM-08:30 AM 0 z I NONE NOON 0 .0 0 0 0 NOON NONE m ug 7] a 03:45 PM-04:45 PM PM 78 1427 0 0 . � 1336 PM 02:00 PM-05:00 PM AM NOON PM 4 w` 4 4 PM . NOON< .AM 0 0 0 0 0 ' 144 0 285 -� CONTROL 0 4 0 0 0 ,2 rn m 0 0 0 0 00 o r o o 0 -,.i I- 0 0' 0 0 TEV 2398 0 3180 0 C 0 0 0 0 AM NOON PM C ,03 J `- 'Q 0 0 0 0 PHF 1.00 0.89 r 83 0 56 127 0 256 ! 0 o , 0 0 0 AM NOON PM • f h f r0 PM NOON AM Cars(AM) PM ,' 1683. 0 0 1192 83 PM HT(AM) I I NOON O 0 0 0 0 NOONI st mO.., i 16. 01 t 266 AM 788 , 0" 0 1222. 56 AM' 0 1 t 19 04 4_ 4.0 •. 1251 �r o NORTHBOUND 2 z CO 7Jr— Mamalahoa Hwy o N Cars (NOON) HT(NOON) I" I Z Z Z c� Pedestrians(Crosswalks) 2 d� Z Z Z L► O �°° Oz 2O °°y + Li N/A1 t N/A O P,t a z ¢ a z a -747 . 0`" N/A I t N/A N/A4-N/A p O N/A 4- N/A N/A'. ♦ rr N/A 0 0 0 0 0 o I N/A z� * rt. N/A Z Z z PM 0 ♦ 4' 0 PM Z Z Z D 3.--> 33-, F--- NOON 0 4' ,,xi ♦ 0 NOON I D D D 1?s� AM 0 ,0t ,F 0 Cars(PM) AM i r ;,z; AM HT(PM) 2 2 err, �� 0 AM I °o 72-I I NOON 0 f ""',"' M. 1 0 NOON CC PM 0 ~ ~ 0 PM ♦v-I 1.� 01 C L + ~t140 �0 0 0 0 o cm F. 0 j t4 0 04 -4 4-0 O z z I '�0 0x 256'3 r 0 0 '4, a z° a ¢ z a P� O 0♦ a 0 E-in�ry ommoo F uoi ��' Qi+ N rn v Nm II M v§Nn LT,n 2 m m F"'N r�m m'. Fv LO* 0 L LA 00 Fes•v N d: FtON nN{Nnm NNn co r, Off , M o ; p 53.p4a..;. qq 0 3........ 3 o Q p 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 ;o p SCJ; M to ai �1 O Ul e� t� N ..-..,..-',-1/4. N .z o3 el P•]'n nl mM VM' 3 Z0 ... Z p3CC�V rn NM?V.NV.M7 M 0 IA NN 3,rp V"� Q m Lo O t Nm 5 f W O IL p "»�kiO O t ,,30 oo0o0000 o e00.•...91,.... 30 000000000000 o€;goy U a '' \ E 0 0 � ' 0300000000 300 b, 030 0000000000 3 •,p /l 1 4Q ? a a V/ < Wt 2 \I 0o ' a 5 ,n O W O O O o O O coO O W O O p : o W o O O o o O o O o O O o W 1 1G (l 11 'Z O W N m rn M N V'M T N p0 K Q Z o W 0 0 0 N.0 Ln 0 b N 0 V'0 CO W n p,..„,;„4. m 1, rq Se . t a p 4-4 p& 0 } lL\ 0p"f Ob o W O o 000000 w 0 Y 0� 0000000000 00 O\g L LL, O r ,,,,,„....,,';',,,,,0,,,,,,,, y C „a o 'O o N o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o a,#a % 0 x 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o o a0, V n oz > Z 0 T N c m.-I 0O In N.p-§ §fin rn cr.^ f.n O N.Mi 1.CV ti m rn...N ti NI m N N In re M N T}"SN N�^��'lh p a BA m :iii: m a � m,x x T �.O ti O�N O I�O<b O y r1�• O 0 0 N n n O.O N O.V I N ^ O• uu N V)O H.i.moi.0-i.Mr.O-.N N N NQ O r:“?,M M M M M N M M•7 M S m-,••,,S0:-°3*:',, O j O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o •p ,„„...„ O N O O O o 0 0 O O O O 0 0Q„,.,.„...:,,,,,,,,,i o b r� o Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 p p$ ' O Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0•t,,,,=,:„.5,,,.,,,, ;��,,e 1 , •E tt) E :fn", \{act+, V:Z 0 ce 0.N-�.N-i.Ml LnN•i, cc OM�y TOS t Z 0d'4 .'M°.I\- '''°Ln.M mN .'��V' 0 'D 2•y Z ? 14g n• 0 Z.'y N N.-1 N N Z tO Or *71 M ' ^ rn V .ro; 0m.-„mNFi 3OIC Nu1— �" Z O�MT N n O m 34 n2 Nln H ,:,, 2 �NMNMMNMN N M N MNMNMMNNMN MM .N Cn a_ Ar �Gyk ' (gam ,. - O Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z O p 'O ui ;. O Z 000000000000 Z O Q O p RS E o o 4a ' . .. f FFFFf f fI D o b ¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ h U b y o1n 0ln oul §n C L M oT O...M V'O.y •V YMI ,O 1�h 1:1�c0 a0 •�` ;YS k S r APPENDIX B Bus Route Schedules and Map INTRA HILO WAIAKEA-UKA BUS SCHEDULE Operates Monday through Saturday Effective January 19,2016 • Downtown Hilo to Walalcea-Uka(Bus Is marked"6 WAIAKEA-UKA") *Kilauea Ave./ 2020 Kinoole Mooheau Aupuni Hilo Shopping U.H.H. H.C.G. Prince Kuhio E.Kahaopea Senior Housing Haihai/ Waiakea-Uka Bus Terminal Center Center Plaza Street (**Kino'ole Plaza) Ail 7:05 7:15 7:18 7:20 7:25 7:30 7:40 7:42 7:45 5la Gym : 7:50 9:30 9:35 9:40 9:45 9:47 9:50 9:55 9:57 10:00 10:50 10:55 11:00 11:05 11:07 11:10 11:15 11:17 11:20 ---- 12:05 12:10 12:15 12:20 12:22 12:25 12:30 12:32 12:35 12:40 . 320 3:25 3:28 3:33 3:36 3:40 3:50 3:52 3:55 4:00 Walakea-Uka to Downtown Hilo(Bus is marked"7 DOWNTOWN HILO") Waiakea-Uka Life Care Prince Kuhio H.C.C. U.H.H. Hilo Shopping Aupuni Banyan Mooheau Bus Gym Center Plaza Center Center Drive Terminal 7:50 7:55 8:05 8:10 8:15 8:20 8:25 --- 8:30 ---- ---• 10:10 .--- ---- 10:20 10:25 ---- ---- 11:30 --- ---- ---- ---- 11:40 11:45 12:40 12:45 12:50 ---- ---- ---- 1:05 1:10 4:00 4:05 4:20 4:25 4:28 4:33 4:38 •--- 4:45 Bold=Morning• "'Pick up/Drop oft on Kilauea Ave.,Before E.Kahaopea St.AT DESIGNATED BUS STOP SIGN • "Pick up/Drop off at 2020 Kinoole Senior Housing for Kino'ole Plaza=State Unemployment Office,Section S County Housing Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Employer and Provider INTRA-HILO WAIAKEA-UKA COUNTY OF HAWAII MASS TRANSIT AGENCY 961-8744 Hilo Bay T N INTRA-HILO WAIAKEA-UKA BIISSCHEDULE �e ts Opera eszbfonday Saturday li e.1 In consideration of others and for your safety: I 7a� z� '� Rara:ea • 1. Shirts and footwear are required. 09 oS'' Pond "' 4u � ' _ 2. Remain seated. The following are prohibited on transit buses: 1. Obstructing or interfering with operator. 7 2. Smoking. � � 3. Refusing to vacate priority seating for the v� elderly and disabled passengers. 4. Consumption of food and beverage. E KAWILI ST 5. Talking on cell phones. 6. The playing of radios,tape players.dvd Zo players,without headphones/earphones. 'y 7. Horse laying,yellingor talking loudly. S. KLJKILA ? 8. Surboards and bodyboards. A ' 0 MMKALA O ��.- 9. Flammable,explosive or toxic materials. 10.Expectorating or spitting. o The following will be charged 51.00: o' 1. Pets provided they are kept in an enclosed pet a a carrier or cage(except service animals). TV PUiI1tAKO ST 2. Any item larger than 16"x 10"and/or more than one item(51.00 per item). 3. Bicycle 4. Skateboard How to board the bus: 1. Please utilize designated bus stops zones whenever possible, 2. Wait on the proper side of the roadway for the N bus. u.. 3. Flag the bus(please call for bus stop w KAµ'AILAt'iI ST information). "' 4. Wait until the bus makes a complete stop. How to exit the bus: 1. Before reaching your desired"get of spot, pull cord located by the window of the bus. a 2. Remain seated until the bus comes to a a complete stop. a FLJAAI S7 3. Exit from front of bus. �e DISCLAIMER: The County of Hawaii will not be 4 responsible for any inconvenience,expense,or damages resulting from the failure to depart or c arrive at stated times or for any items brought on Bus Route the bus. .......Downtown/Waiakea-Uka For more information visit www.co.hawaiihi.us Caunt ofHmvmi IS an Equal Opporalni0,Emolq er and Provider 74610 A_ 4 0 .P w N N 1-. 0 00 "l .7°o t•-• � � O U i.:) OCil tt er 4,._Geck G a IIIyI iUal CUs 4 .A w N N . 0 00 J 'y[s7 000000 �• � 9Up [ 4 eC • H 'A w N N F~+ O :� "li�'e1/1„ A w .-• N• I:: FP J 0 cn www �^, wwww �/OShop CHr1 0000000oki�"s O r- ► CeU1ep�U6' LdUd� C 4, w N N F+ O CD J G '�' ? w r- N i~+ \p oo J g C�1�17 in w - N W F+ t1� W Oil IJ O A• lJ O A N O kaki r! 00 00 00 op Op 00 OO 00 tea a ,icy w w w w W W W W /�.Q�aO �+y �l waiiCA °F *-3 - 1 f CLQ"l dole W ?o O G" cn W N .-• 0 . J • (x�j .p w .-� N � 00 -.4 aJ km tAi� LALA (mLAtN1� Coin wadi P 000 oO0 o00 ONO . 00 000 000 rOdlap�a [��iyJ O PI co eq• 'e>a Uaole G: lie ha Si cn w N .-• F~.. 0 .o � A e w .-. N 0 . .• oo mea kdhaJ �, a tri p 00000000 �4eek 43 ; • " Aldz4h�o OeseTkire6 t"• p In A N .-' N 0 oo .p W •- N �O Co �l ake oU1J is D 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 4i/44), L/° VWi to (�i� N .�+ Vii VWi fJ �d A q. UydU CD , _ �or! �1)�'e 0 d�0 to .p N N O s.0 ...7'.......\,....,......., A w N N 0 CO J 'J U a O O O O 0 C O C Aa �atA„ ,Nnkil �O VAi UNi °ehedU C 4f41'''.42 T�1ilU4s W In A N �-' N O op "iv w w w www w ;.:L ssae 4Sss eb beer LA A N W N 0 C CO\ w (J• in w W e LA cn L° v, LA Cu Cuvi R as,O, esla e X44/ tm 4, w .r t•-) `. ` •D CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j,Cs Ld Act4 KEAUKAHA COUNTY OF HAWAII MASS TRANSIT AGENCY TAt-7';',,,,:.4v1„'.-,46.,,,o.,:iiii-',,r... -,;:.'„ � " ',tea Bai, a a 961-8744 1, , _,... -4ore*-,,-'. : • •:,- I. • • q k .uTf t. , } BUS SCHEDULE I � - ��4 ,g /tili ; ext ' ,, Effective 4/20/15 f - s .„,,,,,,,,,. ,.::•, ., ., , . C '.,i1414411'.— ,. .tg", k • `4 '" "ia £+ a a �it v°`d .8.w_` -',‘'‘,019r,,,,' r/�,1.�\>Jfi ' a ` " ;rte t t ci,-4,.: y •,..,,,i.„,...,.-? tf ti �P `.y - S a � .�iP. ta. SWQ 11:, { -:aJ F�* 'n '�'{ ai, i= "' + tr ,k� 3 " In consideration of others and for your safety: $t I' ro ya - " ''° _ � ,s'a s �' „,,-,,,..,:.,„40,-:,,i,...„,,,,,,,,..:0,., 1. Shirts and footwear are required. U i S,y .1 z ti s 2. Remain seated. _ 7!�` Cocb �, �1P The following are prohibited on transit buses: �< �Se�+�� # � ” �O KpyPc I. Obstructing or interfering with operator. y t «a"g tl „,,.;-,,:,.,„„.„-n.',.--, to Lakoaka x „ #” 4 p 4. Pond 2. Smoking. ziw � -,e. $ .t y ' 3. Refusing to vacate priority seating for the fs • �Pp�$ co elderly and disabled passengers. rte,sok "° '" mQ. 9� 4. Consumption of food and beverage. a �Y.. A 5. Talking on cell phones. ` ,SS ,.....1'. 6. The playing of radios,tape players,dvd ME=wAvF �4P players,without headphones/earphones. PAUAHF,. _ _4.,s- 7. Horseplaying,yelling or talking loudly. 8. Surfboards and bodyboards. SGA 4* 9. Flammable,explosive or toxic materials. O' Hilo 10.Expectorating or spitting. A4wetiikee KEKUAN:•AST The following will be charged$1.00: Pond Airport 1. Pets provided they are kept in an enclosed pet 'F >" carrier or cage(except service animals.) ) 2. Any item larger than 16"x 10"and/or more it 's. than one item($1.00 per item.) TL 3. Bicycle 4. Skateboard s,p How to board the bus: �`� E KAwn.t ST I. Please utilize designated bus stops zones ��•P Waitwheneverthe pr possible. �rA 2. Wait on the proper side of the roadway for the of bus. yy 3. Flag the bus(please call for bus stop UH ` ` E MAKAALA C information). Hilo dor ,C 4. Wait until the bus makes a complete stop. �o How to exit the bus: o 1. Before reaching your desired"get off"spot, 4typn tom° pull cord located by the window of the bus. 2. Remain seated until the bus comes to a complete stop. 3. Exit from front of bus. DISCLAIMER: The County of Hawai'i will not be responsible for any inconvenience,expense,or damages resulting from the failure to depart or arrive at stated times or for any items brought on the bus. Bus Route For more information visit www.heleonbus.org • Mooheau/Keaukaha County ofHowal'i is an Equol oppomoeoy Employer and Provide APPENDIX C Existing (2018) Conditions HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 1: Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & Kinoole Street 05/31/2018 J ± c '- & 4\ t t \* 1 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR fBL :; . ix ! e Lane Configurations ) . vi 1+ ) 1+ Traffic Volume(veh/h) ,, ,, ' 47 359 78 19 252 58 112 340 34 102 234 36 Future Volume(veh/h) 47 359 8 19 252 58 112 340 34 102 234 36 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 . L.,::.,„,.:,:,:, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pb?) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1,00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj ' 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,001,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 r.. 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 51 390 85 20 268 62 126 382 38 112 257 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.94 0,94 0.94 0,89 0.89 0.89 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 302 441 96 189 405 94 421 554 55 332 524 81 Arrive On Green 0.03 0 30 0.30 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.04 0.33 0.33 0.04 0.33 0.33 SatFlow,veh/h 1781 1479 322 1767 1449 335 1781 1668 166 1781 1578 246 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 51 0 475 20 0 330 126 0 420 112 0 297 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 0 1801 1767 0 1784 1781 0 1834 1781 0 1824 0 Serve(g s), s 1.2 0.0 14.4 0,5 0.0 9.4 2.5 0.0 11.4 2.4 0.0 7.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.2 0,0 14.4 0,5 0.0 9,4 2.5 0.0 11.4 2.4 4,,,p.0 7.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0 18 1,00 0.19 1,00 0.09 1.00 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 302 0 538 189 0 499 421 0 609 332 , , 0-4:,, 605 V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.00 0.88 0.11 0.00 0.66 0.30 0.00 0.69 0.34 0.00 0 49 Avail Cap(c_a),<veh/h 309 0 582 230 0 576 421 0 609 332 ' 04 605 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 ' 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.0040.0O 4 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 14.8 0.0 19.i 16.1 0.0 18.2 13,0 0.0 16.6 13.2 0.0 15.3 lncr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.3 0.0 14.2 0.2 0.0 2.3 0.4 0.0 6.3 0.6 0.0 l; 2.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 wile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 7.5 0.2 0.0 3,8 1.0 0,0 5,3 0.9 ' 0.0 3.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.1 0.0 33.3 16,4 0.0 20.5 13.4 0.0 22.9. 13.8 - 0.0' 'I"18.1, LnGrp LOS B A C B A CB A C , B A B Approach Vol,veh/h 526 350 546` 409 Approach Delay,s/veh 31.6 20.3 20.7 16.9 Approach LOS C C C , B r, Timer-'Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 rr,,, .� .7, s=r Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 7,0 23,5 5.2 21,6 7,0 23.5 6.3 20.5 , Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 2.5 19.0 2.0 18,5 2.5 19.0 2.0 18,5A `' . fir .a it Mai, ; Clear Time(g_c+11).s 4.4 13.4 25 16.4 4.5 9,4 3.2 1,4 Green Ext Time(p_c),s; 0.0 1.3 0.0 0,6 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.1., ,3 i4 ""fr. ... Intersection Summar ' ' % / ,: rxc , 'T-7/''''' sic= « -z HCM 6th C:td D.;lay 22,9 � HCM 6th LOS C --- 180426 2018 AM sIl RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue I 05/31/2018 -♦ 1 4-- 4\ t t * • 4/ Movement EBL„ ,. .a a . _ a.. _ , ....'; .,.. Q #3 s t Lane Configurations T., Ta Traffic Volume(veh/h) 78 347 62 10 215 104 51 507 19 113 226 63 Future Volume(veh/h) 78 347 62 10 215 104 51 507 19 113 226 63 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/Rn 1870 1870', 1870 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 82 365 65 11 244 118 57 563 21 138 276 77 Peak Hour Factor 0:95 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.82 0.82 082ned, ,12,, t, a ';< Percent Heavy Veh. % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap;veh/h 254 437 198 298 144 391 605 23 248 501 140 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1537 274 1767 1177 569 1781 1791 67 1781 1406 392 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 82 0 430 11 0 362 57 0 584 138 0 353 Grp Sat'Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1811 1767 0 1746 1781 0 1858 ';1781 0 1798 r K Q Serve(g s), s 1.9 0.0 12.5 0.3 0.0 11.0 1.2 0.0 17.1 2.9 0.0 8.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 12,5 03 0.0 11.0 1.2 0.0 17.1 2.9 0.0 8.8 lk.q Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.33 1,00 0.04 1.00 0.22 Lane Grp Cap(c),'veh/h 254 0 515 198 0 443 391 0 627 248 0 640 W ,.) V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.00 0.83 0.06 0.00 0.82 0.15 0.00 0.93 0.56 0.00 0.55 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 254 0 583 249 0 559 398 0 627 248 0 640 ,'': ' 'c4 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 ;0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 . .. n,H 4 Uniform Delay(d). s/veh 16.0 0.0 18.9 16.6 0.0 19.8 12.1 0.0 18,0 14.4 0.0 14.5 incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.7 0.0 9.2 0.1 0.0 7.5 - 0.2 0.0 22.4 2.7 0.0 3A. t Initial 0 Delay(d3).s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/Ir0.8 0.0 6.0 0.1 0.0 4.9 0.4 0.0 10.3 1.2 0.0 3 8 „� r=; -mpg Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.7 0.0 28.1 16.7 0.0 27.3 12.2 0.0 40.4 17.1 0.0 17.9 LnGrp LOS B ACB A CB ADB AB Approach Vol,vehlh 512 373 641 491 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.3 26.9 37.9 17.7 Approach LOS C C D Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s7.4 23.5 4.9 20.5 6.4 24.5 6.6 18.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max`Green Setting Gmaxr.9 19.0 2.0 18.1 2.1 19.8 2.1 18.0 b � " Max Q Clear Time(g_c+114, 19.1 2.3 14.5 3.2 10.8 3.9 13.0 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1,4 0.01.0 MX-r,M .,<,3. ''' Intersection Summary, HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.0 HCM 6th LOS C 180426 2018 AM sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 05/31/2018 1.7 .. _.t <fi.f T.. .• ds t,x.dlyC,,,,37 s..., c�,�7F:za�, fi,k..: "�:&...3.4Yd 1�..)q�°�r'� .. <: -- � ""V._. <���,�- ,c - -- ��.A.� s< Int Delay,s/veh 13.2 Movement L �T 1 ; � N :NBL ' � `�..k� ; �* Lane Configurations r +1' +tt prafficVol;vehlh , 0 N'' 0 1 1271 285 0 1222 56 0 661` 47 Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 127 0 0 285 0 1222 56 0 661 47 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None None - - Free - None Storage Length - - 0 - - 0 - - - - - - Veh in Median ora e �y{y - Grade,% ,St 9 f,• 0 �� 0 - 0- sem..._ � : 0- 00 Peak Hour Facts . .. ,< 77 77 79 79° 49 96 96 96 81 81 81 .?-: Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 7 7 7 5 5 5 6 6 6 Mr/rot Ftow ; ` O 0 165 0 .0 i 361 _ 0 1273 58 0 816 58 lYfa. &T�. �if� ' �'g�,! E 6: ��b.'i^�? ��i: 8r'Y' ✓ '" � ,i�' �. k' 'g 9' Conflicting Flow All - - 439 - - 637 - 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - Critical H wy 714 7,24 �; A F1' Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.92 - - 3.97 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver r .e.,:.., 0 484 0 .,. 0 —351 0 0 0 = . ,:dake a ' Stage 1 0 0 Stage 2 " ». � 0 ° f r 0 0 8 © t o ,a ,g, ,s; s Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver illtt - 483 � 351 - -- air - . , _A Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - _ Stage 1 ;, 5z Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - " - s Approach ES ' \,%.s 110. .r, SB HCM Dorrtral Delay s16.3 90.7 NCM _CS C . .b „ yt�,F T�+U R'4L U' ltf3'dk j, #` i ..}{, j}! (�.j'} l{S „Y.s�ittS,+�. {..: 3` k C1lt.n1 BLn SF3T se R. Capacity(vehih) 483 351 HCM Lane V/C Raua - 0.341 1 :i'8 HCM Control Delay(s) 16,3 90 7 HCM Lane LOS C F - - HCM 05th%tile Q(veh) Notes-,;,•' .'. .-.:.` _< : ' ,' et `�rt ,� '�J'�r ,' �'.FT ,s�#' ' -:Volume exceeds capacity 5:Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined *:All major volume in platoon >., 180426 2018 AM sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 1 : Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & Kinoole Street 05/31/2018 TI' ,; x a *rad, i s !1 fi WRi o'ti.014 d 1 `r it � t;l'F?° A` u... Lane Configurations ) i ) 11 I Traffic Volume(veh/h) 36 351 70 40 324 60 71 172 30 119 401 54 Future Volume(veh/h) 36 351 70 40 324 60 71 172 30 119 401 54 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Ad) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Ad)Sat Flow,veh/Mn 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 40 394 79 44 360 67 96 232 41 127 427 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 228 437 88 196 447 83 302 526 93 465 582 78 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.29 0.29 0.03 0.29 0.29 0.04 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.36 0.36 SatFlow,veh/h 1781 1503 301 1781 1525 284 1781 1540 272 1781 1614 215 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 40 0 473 44 0 427 96 0 273 127 0 484 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh/In 1781 0 1805 1781 0 1809 1781 0 1812 1781 0 1830 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 0.0 16.0 1.1 0.0 13.9 2.2 0.0 7.4 2.9 0.0 14.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c).s 1.0 0.0 16.0 1.1 0.0 13.9 2.2 0.0 7.4 2.9 0.0 14.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 228 0 525 196 0 530 302 0 619 465 0 659 V/C Ratio(X) 0.18 0.00 0.90 0.22 0.00 0.81 0.32 0.00 0.44 0.27 0.00 0.73 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 244 0 554 208 0 555 302 0 619 465 0 659 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 16.8 0.0 21.7 17.3 0.0 20.8 14.5 0.0 16.2 12.8 0.0 17.7 InorDelay(d2),s/veh 0.4 0.0 17.4 0.6 0.0 8.2 0.6 0.0 2.3 0.3 0.0 7.1 Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BackOfQ(50°%),vehlln 0.4 0.0 8.7 0.4 0.0 6.6 0.9 0.0 3.2 1.1 0.0 6.8 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 17.2 0.0 39.0 17.9 0.0 29.0 15.1 0.0 18.5 13.1 0.0 24.8 LnGrp LOS B A D B A C B A BB A C Approach Vol,veh/h 513 471 369 611 Approach Delay,s/veh 37.3 27.9 17.6 22.4 Approach LOS D C B C Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 . >. .,fi. , 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 8.2 26.2 6.2 23.0 7.0 27.4 6.0 23.1 Change Period(Y+Rc). s 4.5 4.E 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 3.7 21.7 2.1 19.5 2.5 22.9 2.1 19.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11), s 4.9 9.4 3.1 18.0 4.2 16.6 3.0 15.9 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.9 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.7 HCM 6th LOS C 180426 2018 PM sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 05/31/2018 _�,�d ��µ,., Lane Configurations vi 'rt 1 Traffic Volume(veh/h) 96 342 70 20 278 114 69 337 15 177 449 89 Future Volume(vehlh) 96 342 70 20 278 114 69 337 15 177 449 89 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Fed-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus;Adj too 1.00 1,00 _1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow rrehthlln1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 ,Y= 1870 1870 ..1870 1870. 1870 1870 1870 :ft ` Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 107 380 78 22 312 128 78 383 17 208 528 105 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 ,0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.88 0,88 0.85 0.85 0.854 : Percent Heavy Ven. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,\tehth 216 456 94 197 343 141 198 539 24 404 563 112 Arrive On Green 0,04 0.30 0.30 0.01 0.27 0.27 0.03 0.30 0.30 0,10 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1505 309 1781 1249 513 1781 1777 79 1781 1508 300 Grp Volume(v),vehlh 107 0 458 22 0 440 78 0 400 208 0 633 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1814 1781 0 1762 1781 0 1856 1781 0 1808 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 15.3 0.6 0.0 15.6 2,0 0.0 12.4 4.8 0.0 21.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 2.7 0.0 15.3 0.6 0.0 15.6 2.0 0.0 12,4 4.8 0.0 21,9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 216 0 549 197 0 483 198 0 563 404 0 676 V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.00 0 83 0,11 000 0.91 0,39 0.00 0.71 0.51 0.00 0.94 kvail r„ap(c_a),veh/h 216 0 549 '-232 0 490 198 0 563 408 0 676 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 0,00 100 1.00 0.00 1.00 .P,. r , Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 18.8 0.0 21.0 18.1 0.0 22.7 17.5 0.0 20.0 13.7 0.0 19.5 ;tom Incr Delay(d2),siveh � 1.7 � 0.0 10.6X 0.2 0.0 21:0 _ 1.3 0,0 7.4 1.1 0.0� 22.2 j �:li ,,� Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 E fi %ile E3ackQfQ(50%),veh/Irt1,2 0.0 7.5 0,2 0,0 8.8 - 0.8 0.0 6.1 1.8 0.0 12,3 ' A , �"�� ,� Unsig.Movement Delay, sh✓eh LnGrp Dela d,s/veh 20,6 0.0 31.7 18.3 0.0 43,7 18.8 0.0 27.5 14.7 0.0 41.8 LnGrp LOS C ACB ACB ACB AD Approach Vol,veh'h 565 462 478 841 r Approach Delay, s,weh 29.6 42.5 26.1 35.1 Approach LOS C D C Tune-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4. 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),t1,2 24.1 5.3 24.1 6.6 28.7 7.2 22.3 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax ,8 19.5 2.1 18.6 2.1 24,2 2.7 18.0 " . % Max 0 Clear Time(g_c+116,8 14,4 2.6 17.3 4.0 23.9 4.7 17,6 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 11 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 01 s /+ 6ttr Gtr<111 ., 1_}\sr�. a" a ei' HCM 6th LOS C °` 180426 2018 PM sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 05/31/2018 flitiqfniififitfSSlgretti7'ZA,;Z,:iget-jigfililiail:EEN'::TCk.,12!;;ifjfl-ft17 !7Eg.;TK17:::;lfL7. Int Delay,s/veh 19.2 ,-:7;;; 'Egg-7 i'-:':',',141r7'-Vgikrfitiffr''N •itr7§grttA*71.777-' Lane Configurations r r +14+ Traffic Vol,vehih 0 0 256 0 0 144 0 1192 83 0 1427 78 Future Vol.veh/h 0 0 256 0 0 144 0 1192 83 0 1427 78 Conflicting Peds.#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - Free - - None,5I Storage Length - - 0 - - 0 - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 78 78 78 92 92 92 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles. % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 0 0 320 0 0 185 0 1296 90 0 1679 9211FFIlt,::0111Aiiiaig Conflicting Flow All - - 886 - - 648 - 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 . itjatttC:';..'-,,gfti"-Zfl!if,*ig'$,PYtrlftttrtil.447.J:t14flratigi4MVV;g Stage 2 - - - - - - 7 _ - _ _ Critical Hdwy 14:;:I4iftittlit011;AritNfiiiraltAiiillt;tielir9104q1:41:01Viodnify* Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 7 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ,:!Z:-,:ieVinailifj,;5-AtliNlillf:!OngitilTiMe.';t:inFigi'..!'i7:I:74:Zilritgifill,r5iffri:MIK Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.92 - 7 3.93 - - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver71 0 7,11illtfilit!;,:iiiititi,;i:!tif.17.:4,:iyel'Ity41,Aginffiatilpatiktikli,.* 0)5:,,y:r,,,!,;:t740,,,iihiggi: Stage 1 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 - - Stage 2 q.)elaPf'#ti*:;i:'gtii'rf,CiValifrP,41lNilOilltiPit41;;Z:SAVAitlitj.tatftftAl Platoon blocked, % - - May CaP-1 Maneuver IrtIR!04,174,1i1N.-titi*A*Y:. Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - - - - - - Stage 1MtttlrtiAiltttjAtr9AM:TdSIAC:;:';iMWArgtPIR, Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - - - Approach EB ; WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 199.7 , 26 0 0 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Myrnt. NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT Capacity(veh/h) - 247 352 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 1.296 0.524 - - HCM Control Delay(s) - 199.7 26 - - I HCM Lane LOS - F D - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 16.4 2.9 - - Notes . -.Volume exceeds capacity 8;Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined ',All major volume in platoon 180426 2018 PM sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 APPENDIX D Future Without Project Conditions Future (2023) Without Project HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 1: Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & Kinoole Street 05/31/2018 4\ t P 1 a>. : 17 " .f." . t 'I far '-EBR,, f1� r=,K:: � l4 Lane Configurations 'r, 11 1+ 1+ Traffic Volume(veh/h) 49 377 82 20 265 61 118 357 36 107 246 38 Future Volume(veh/h) 49 377 82 20 265 61 118 357 36 107 246 38 �nttlal 4(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4, 0 .,..... 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 100 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Ad 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1 00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 I Work Zone On Approach No No No No W.. Adj Sat Flow,'veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 18701870" '1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 53 410 89 21 282 65 133 401 40 118 270 42 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,94 0,94 0.94 0.89 0.89 0:89 0.91 0.91 j 0.91: Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 4 , 292 455 99 175 418 96 426 559 56 334 529 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.31 0.31 0.01 0.29 0.29 0,06 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, 1781 1480 321 1767 1450 334 1781 1668 166.E 1781. 1578 '.r Grp Volume(v),veh/h 53 0 499 21 0 347 133 0 441 118 0 312 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh/In1 1781 1802 1767*` 0 1784 1781 _ 0 1834 1781 0 1824 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 16.5 0.5 0.0 10.7 3.1 0.0 13.1 2.7 0.0 8.6 Cycle Q C1ear(g c},s '11`;'':4.41.,-11.3F'4` s 16 5 `; 0.5 0.0 10.7 3.1 0.0 13.1 2.7 0.0 8.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 292 01,;',554 175 0 514 426 0 615 334 0 611 V/C Ratio(X) 0.18 0.00 0.90 0.12 0.00 0.68 0,31 0.00 0.72 0.35 0.00 0.51 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 295 0 !592 213 0 587 426 0 615 334 0 611 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1,00' 0.00 1.00 1,00 ' 0.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1;00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 15.8 0.0 20.7 17.4 0.0 19.6 13.2 0.0 18.1 13.9 0.0 16.6 !nor Delay(d2),s/veh 0.3 0.0 16.2 0.3 0.0 2.6 0.4 0.0' 7.0 0.6 0.0 3:0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.5 0.0 8.8 0.2 0.0 4.4 1.1 0,0 6.2 1.0 0.0 3.8 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrpnDelay(d),stveh 16.1 0.0 36.9 17.7 0,0 22.2 13.6 0.0 25.2 , :14.6 0.0 19.6 LnGrp LOS B A DB A CB A CB A B Approach Vol,veh/h 552 368 574 430 Approach Delay, slveh 34.9 21,9 22.5 18.3 Approach LOS C C B Timer-Assigned Phs .. 1 2 3 4 5 ' " T'.; ,""7.4- ..8, ,747 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 8.0 25.4 5.3 23.7 8.0 25.4 6.5 22.5 , Change Period (Y+Rc) s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 3.5` 20.9 2.1 20.5 3.5 20.9 2.1 20.5 Max Cl Clear Time c+11 s 4,7 15.1 2 5 18 5 5,1 10.6 3.3 12.7 (9 � Green Ext,jime(p e),.s:, 0.9 14 0 0 0 6 0.0 13 .: 0.0 13 HCM 6th LOS 180426 2023 AM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 05/31/2018 --. � c +- 44\ t 4 Lane Configurations '1 / T. T. Traffic Volume(veh/h) 82 364 65 11 226 109 54 532 20 119 237 66 Future Volume(veh/h) 82 364 65 11 226 109 54 532 20 119 237 66 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 ,t Work Zone On Approach No No No No e ;dam Adj Sat Flow,vehftilln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 86 383 68 12 257 124 60 591 22 145 289 80 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.88. 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.82 0.82 0 82 u ; Percent Heavy Veh % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 225 435 77 169 ''299 144 411 652 24 263 549 152 ' ` ° Arrive On Green 0.04 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow,vehth 1781 1538 273 1767 1 178 568 1781 1791 67 1781 1409 390 7 ' Grp Volume(v),veh/h 86 0 451 12 0 381 60 0 613 145 0 369 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/1n1781 0 1811 1767 0 1747 1781 0 1858 1781 0 1799 Q Serve(g_s). s 2.3 0.0 15.0 0.3 0.0 13.1 1.3 0.0 19.7 3.2 0.0 9.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c).s 2.3 0.0 15.0 0.3 0.0 13.1 1.3 0.0 19.7 3.2 0.0 9.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.22 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 225 0 513 169 0 443 411 0 676 263 0 701 V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.00 0.88 0.07 0.00 0.86 0.15 0.00 0.91 0.55 0.00 0.53 Avail Ca c_a ,veh/h 225 0 524 215 0 499 446 0 676 263 0 701 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 00 A r Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 18.2 0.0 21.5 18.7 0.0 22.4 12.4 0.0 19.0 15.1 0.0 14.7 !nor Delay(d2),sfveh 1,1 0.0 15.6 0.2 0.0 13.1, 0.2 0.0 18.1 2.5 0.0 2.84113%,:i; r Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °bile BackOfQ(50%),veh/Ir0.9 0.0 8.0 0.1 0.0 6.6 0.5 0.0 10.9 1.3 0.0 4.2 °,t, i'` ti gi Unsig. Movement Delay s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.2 0.0 37.1 18.9 0.0 35.5 12.5 0.0 37.1 17.6 0.0 176 ,41 1 ^7.'.:7::- LnGrp 7 LnGrp LOS B A D B A D B A D B A B Approach Vol,vehlh 537 393 673 514 Approach Delay. s/veh 34.3 35.0 35.0 17.6 Approach LOS C C C B Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s8.3 27.4 4.9 22.3 6.7 29.0 68 20.5 Change Period (Y+Rc). s 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax .8 22.9 2.1 18.2 3.4 23.3 2.3 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time(g o+115. 21.7 2.3 17.0 3.3 11.9 4.3 15.1 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.7 1ittrsenin.;Sct `roar HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.6 HCM 6th LOS C 180426 2023 AM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 05/31/2018 biters A, �. , A 7 , NOO.� . : Int Delay,s/veh 18 Movement '11177,777.57'''1EBL EBT EBR t!t WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ++1 t' i Traffic Vol,vehlh 0 0 133 0 0 299 0 1283 59 0 694 49 Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 133 0 0 299 0 1283 59 0 694 49 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized z - - None None _ - Free - - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage,'#'-' 0 - `0 - 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 79 79 79 96 96 96 81 81 81 Heavy Vehicles % 2 2 2 7 7 7 5 5 5 6 6 6 Mvmt Flow 0 0 173 0 0 378 0 1336 61 0 857 60 Malan t or Rltrnor2 m,. J, a tiajor1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - - 461 - - 668 - 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 s��� � _ - - z� Critical Hdwy ...7.14 &°;' 1gnil",ifill Critical Hdwy Stg 1 �a`a woe� is g"r of ._. �� �Critical Hdwy Stg 2 • Follow-up HdwyPot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 468 0 0 --334 0 - 0 OSItigittlifinttailltiOkAt` Stage 1 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 - - Stage 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. _ �� '��` t� Platoon blocked, % - � � � Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 467 - —334 y F ,_ fl L `:.,41 j-rf;:#" Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - - - - _ - Stage 1 _ EMEI . Stage 2 Rm a<i. � � a_C 7 1. f_ Y.' 04as ...w* ;-_ v,��ua.'`. .... 4�:, , �r`�-3� .�.,.. Control Delay,s 17.2 125.7 0 0 HCM Cont F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) - 467 334 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.37 1.133 - HCM Control Delays) - 17.2 1257t�<` a" .. HCM Lane LOS - C F" - HGM 95#h%tile clveh 1.7 —:Volume exceeds capacity , Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation,Not Defined ... x:All"major volume in platoon 180426 2023 AM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 1: Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & Kinoole Street 05/31/2018 Lane Configurations ' T+ "I 1 "1 1 ' 1, Traffic Volume(veh/h) 369 74 42 340 63 75 181 32 125 421 57 Future Volume (veh/h) 38 369 74 42 340 63 75 181 32 125 421 57 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 . .,.. . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,uehlhlln ,,,,,,,.. 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 " 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 43 415 83 47 378 70 101 245 43 133 448 61 Peak Hour Factor 0,89 0.89 0.89 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.24 0,94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 '2 2 2 40P,veh/h 219 452 90 185 463 86 295 524 92 465 580 79 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.30 0.30 0.03 0.30 0,30 0.05 0 34 7 34 0.07 0 0.36 gat Flow,veh/h 1781 1504 301 1781 1527 233 1781 1541 271 1781 1610 219 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 43 0 498 47 0 448 101 0 288 133 0 509 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh/In 1781 0 1$E5 1781 0 1810 1781 0 1812 1781 0 1829 Q Serve(g_s), s 1,2 0,0 18.4 1.3 0,0 15.9 2.5 0.0 8.6 3.3 0.0 17.0 Cycle Q Ciear(g c);s 1.2 0,0 18.4 1.3 0.0 15.9 2.5 0.0 8.6 3.3 0.0 17.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 219 0 543 185 0 548 295 0 616 465 0 659 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.00 0.92 0.25 0.00 0.82 0.34 0.00 0.47 0.29 0.00 0.77 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 228 0 562 18.9 0 563 295 0 616 496 0 659 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1,00 0.00 1.00 1;00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 Uniform Delay(d). s/veh 17.9 0.0 23.3 18.6 0.0 22 3 15.6 0.0 17.9 13.6 0.0 19.6 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.4 0.0 19.8 0,7 0.0 9.0 0.7 0.0 2.5 0.3 0.0 8.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackofQ(50%);veh/In 0.5 0.0 10.2 0.5 0.0 7,6 1.0 0.0 3.8 1.2 0.0 8.2 Unsig.Movement Delay.s/veh LnGtp Delay(d),s/veh 18.4 0,0 43.1 19.3 0.0 31.3 16.3 0.0 20,4 13.9 0.0 28.2 LnGrp LOS B A D B A C B A C B A C Approach Vol,veh/h 541 495 389 642 Approach Delay,s/veh 41.2 30.2 19,4 25.2 Approach LOS D C B C Timer Assigned Phs 1 .__' 2 -__ ' '3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration_(G+Y+Rc),s 9.4 28.0 6,4 2:5.3 8.0 29.4 6,3 25.4 Change Period(Y+Rc). s 4 5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Galax),s 6.1 22.3 2,1 21,5 3.5 24.0; 2.1 21.5 3 Max Q Clear Time(gcA j1 js 5 3 :;r, . 2 2c < 1 19 _ 3 2 Green Ext Time(p s),s 0.0 1,3 .0.0 0.4 0.0 1 i);0 1.0 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay HCM 6th LOS C 180426 2023 PM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 05/31/2018 4- Lane Configurations v Traffic Volume(veh/h) 101 359 74 21 292 120 72 354 16 186 471 93 fiign ". %" Future Volume(veh/h) 101 359 74 21 292 120 72 354 16 186 471 93 Initial Q(Qb);veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,98 Parking Bus,Adj 1,00 1.00 1.00" 1.00 1,00 1.00... 1.00- .1.00 1,00,_1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow;veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 ` 1870' 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 '" A : Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 112 399 82 24 328 135 82 402 18 219 554 109 Peak Hour Factor 0,90 -0,90 0.90 0.89 0,89 0,89 0.88 0.88 0,88 0,85 0.85 0,85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap;veh/h 189 447 92 168 330 136 204 582 26 414 594 117 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.30 0.30 0,01 0.26 0,26 0 04 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.39 0,39 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1504 309 1781 1248 514 1781 1776 80- 1781 1511 297 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 112 0 481 24 0 463 82 0 420 219 0 663 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1813 1781 0 1761 1781 0 1856 1781 0 1808 ;,la - m • , " Q Serve(g_s), s 3.2 0.0 17.8 0.7 0.0 18.4 2.1 0.0 13.8 5.3 0.0 24.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 3.2 0,0 17.8 0.7 0,0 18.4 2,1 0.0 13,8 5.3 0.0 24,6 t " z= Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.16 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 189 0 539 168 0 466 204 0 608 414 0 710 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.00 0.89 0.14 0.00 0.99 0.40 0.00 0.69 0.53 0.00 0.93 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 189 0 539 196 0 466 204 0 608 446 0 7107 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 . . , Uniform Delay(d), s/veh 20,2 0.0 23.5 20.2 0.0 25.7 17.9 0.0 20.5 13.9 0.0 20.4 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 4,9 0,0 17,1 0.4 0.0 40.2 1.3 0,0 6.3 1,0 0,0 20,9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In1,5 0.0 9.6 0.3 0.0 12.4 0.9 0.0 6.6 2.0 0.0 13.4 Atillatitilintailii Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.1 0.0 40.6 20.6 0.0 65.9 19.2 0.0 26,8 15.0 0.0 41.3 r LnGrp LOS C ADC A EB ACB AD Approach Vol,veh/h 593 487 502 882 Approach Delay. s/veh 37.7 63.7 25.6 34.7 Approach LOS D E C C ". Timer-`Assigned Phi .,. 1 .. ;'r 5 6; 8 ., Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc), 1.8 27.4 5.5 25.3 7.2 32,0 7.8 23.0 Change Period (Y+Rc) s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting Gmaxg.5 21,7 2,1 19.7 2,7 27.5 3,3 18,5 /. ;;jiscidlijkLdaijgrNVTMttiMtK Max 0 Clear Time(g_c+11J,I 15.8 2.7 19.8 4.1 26.6 5.2 20.4 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.1 1.3 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.4 0 Q D 0, 0 r � Intersection summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay .,.,., „ 39.3 HCM 6th LOS D 180426 2023 PM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 05/31/2018 Int Delay,s/veh 25.5 iriVa•ViP ,. ....5 N n a nk ti ,li . • , -,,,, 6� Lane Configurations j ++1 Traffic Vol veh/h 0 0 269 0 0 '151 0 1252 87 0 1498 82.. N i 1 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 269 0 0 151 0 1252 87 0 1498 82 Conflicting Peds,Whr 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ :.GAi' Sign CotrolChannelized Stop Stop Sop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT - - one None - Free - None,;;;A4,6 .;: Storage Length - - 0 - - 0 - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 fib' '0 0 z Grade. % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 78 78 78 92 92 92 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 0 0 336 0 . 0 6 " 0361 95 0. 1762 ii Conflicting Flow All 929 - 681 0 0 Stage 1 , `° at1... .... . ` ' . ' ... .. i 6 Stage 2 - - - .:. Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ��� �_ �x, �, . .. . _ � . � � ' � � .����.,: t Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.92 - - 3.93 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 --231 0 0 335 0 a a � h ,`. Stage 1 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 Stage 2 0 P.. 0 0 x �" �... ._ k b� .Y.rP .t :n_ Platoon blocked. % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver, f,, zoan,.;'-,231' r ,. 335,41,rz- u.1 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Stae 1 sf "f tt,; fZs ;'-` d <. *` '3 Stage 2 - - - - - - Y 5NJa`tR C " ,. `> � Y��•. pak�:.�S +P' nbg, f >�t. ,vx. .p x., r�4. � � sa'n,.,+.� �._ ,,. �,,r,.`Y" � M .,,,'�..i�,.c �a�x. HCM Control Delay, s 267 29.5 0 HCM LOS F D Capacity(veh/h) - 231 335 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 1.456 0.578 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 1I '.. - 267 29.5 ,. HCM Lane LOS - F D - - HCM 95th%tile Q(ven) - 19.6 3.4 7 ., , -, , itli ?t 3 : , w:Volume exceeds capacity $:Delay exceeds 300s }:Computation Not Defined *:All major volume in platoon 180426 2023 PM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 Future (2028) Without Project HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 1: Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & Kinoole Street 05/31/2018 ' I- ks' t }�t (\�►} l' I .. 1'. _ 5 �` a `l a N �Q DT tn.,Y BR-71. 9 '`5 l.'i ;1VB �5" :5'tat T" 3�,., y -,,,max - 4F ..0 -� ;. ....., _ .fit �'x5,_..,.�,.. _„3_- i# �..�. � .< �. Lane Configurations 'i I+ j+ 1 I+ ) 1+ Traffic Volume(veh/h)1,,,I,::= 51 396 86 21 278 64 124 375 38 112 258 40 Future\/olume(veh/h) 51 396 86 21 278 64 124 375 38 112 258 40 Initial Q(Qb),veh �: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj ' 1:00 1.00 1.00 1-.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehth/ln 1870 1870 1870- 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h55 430 93 22 296 68 139 421 43 123 284 44 Peak Hour Factory ,' .. 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.89 0,89 0.89 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veil',% 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h ''''''284 470 102 162 431 99 425 587 60 322 538 83 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.06 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.34 0.34 SatFlow,veh/h '' 1781 1482 320 1767 1451 333 1781 1664 170 1781 1579 , 245 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 55 0 523 22 0 364 139 0 464 123 0 328 Grp SatFlow(s);veh/h/ln 1781 0 1802 1767 0 1784 1781 0 1834 1781 0 1824 O Serve(g_s).s 1.4 0.0 18.9 0.6 0.0 12.2 3.4 0.0 14.9 3.1 0.0 9.8 Cycle Cl Clear(g_c),s 1.4 ,p.0„ 18.9 0.6 0.0 12.2 3.4 0.0 14.9 3.1 0.0 9.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c).veh/h 284 " 0 571 162 0 530 425 0 647 322 0 622 V/C Ratio(X) 0.19 0.00 0.92 0.14 0.00 0,69 0.33 0.00 0.72 0.38 0.00 0.53 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 291 0 598 194 0 582 425 0 647 322 0 622 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 16.9 0.0 22.3 18.7 00 21.0 13.9 0.0 19.0 15.1 0.0 17.9 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 0.3 0.0 18.5 0.4 0.0 3.0 0.4 0.0 6.7 0.7 0,0 3.2 Initial 0 Delay(d3);s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 10.3 0.2 0.0 5.2 1.3 0.0 7.0 1.2'' 0.0 4.4 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d)s/veh 17.2 0.0 40.7 19.0 0.0 24.0 14.3 0.0 25.7 15.9 0.0 21.1 LnGrp LOS B A D B A C B A C B A C Approach Vol,veh/h 578 386 603 451 Approach Delay,s/veh 38.5 23.7 23 1 19.7 Approach L0S : � 4 .'t, « ; ,.i h' C .. _. .. . s diz g..;,;_.---,i;:„.,..,, B Ttmei �ssigne ' hs - R 11"7,1$ 2 7,1. '. "4 4- 7 5 v+,f77 tr r _ T. gs 7rx ^- Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 8.0 28.4 5.4 26.0 8.8 27.6 6.7 24.6 0,amu_,, ,�, a Change Period(Y+Rc).s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4 5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 3.5' 23.9 2.1 22.5 4.3 23.1 2.5 22.1 i t- , -. ,„ Max 0 Clear Time(g c+11) s 5.1 16.9 2.6 20.9 5.4 11.8 3.4 14.2 Green)txt11 p p),.5 � 1.7 0.0 0.6 0.0 1 5 0 0 ��y :, � -.,..... ,�.,...,�.�-� ��,„..�,, y mow, .�, .,.,.1-4.,,,,,,:,:::: , ,.,., , . :�, ..�,�� : "' ,.;„2 ""ar.�, r: s , rpt°s`. . ,. z'-i'r r 5 r tip+ .. FY7; ;TT7 s lnterse �€t;'rhnary �= , . . :.... HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.9 HCM 6th LOS C 180426 2028 AM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 05/31/2018 C .- 4\ t t ► Movement EBL: EBT EBR WBL _WBT WBR NBL NBT . NBR . SBL SBT'- SBR Lane Configurations 1, 'fir j Ir Traffic Volume(veh/h) 86 382 68 12 237 114 57 559 21 125 249 69 $ Future Volume(veh/h) 86 382 68 12 237 114 57 559 21 125 249 69 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _1.00 . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 - `' ',=' Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 91 402 72 14 269 130 63 621 23 152 304 84 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0:.90 0.82 0.82 0.82 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 210 442 79 151 302 146 411 675 25 258 574 159 r 1 's' Arrive On Green 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.01 0.26 0.26 0.04 0.38 0.38 0.07 0.41 0.41 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1536 275 1767 1177 569 1781 1792 66 1781 1410 389 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 91 0 474 14 0 399 63 0 644 152 0 388 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/1n1781 0 1811 1767 0 1747 1781 0 1858 1781 0 1799 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.6 0.0 17.4 0.4 0.0 15.1 1.5 0.0 22.7 3.6 0.0 11.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 2.6 0.0 17.4 0.4 0.0 15.1 1.5 0.0 22.7 3.6 0.0 11.2 `' Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.33 1,00 0.04 1.00 0.22 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 210 0 521 151 0 448 411 0 700 258 0 732 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.00 0.91 0.09 0.00 0.89 0.15 0.00 0.92 0.59 0.00 0.53 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 210 0 521 190 0 480 441 0 700 258 0 732 a HCM Platoon Ratio 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d), s/veh 19.8 0.0 23.6 20.4 0.0 24.6 12.9 0.0 20.4 16.2 0.0 15.4 Incr Delay(d2),sfveh 1.4 0,0 20.2 0.3 0.0 17.7 0.2 0.0 19.2 3.5 0.0 2,7 A f Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In1.1 0.0 9.8 0.2 0.0 8.1 0.6 0.0 12.6 1.5 0.0 4.7 # .,r;� lfWilWV _ Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),sfveh 21.2 0,0 43.8 20.7 0.0 42.4 13.1 0.0 39.6 19.7 0.0 18.1 LnGrp LOS C ADC A D B AD B AB Approach Vol,veh/h 565 413 707 540 Approach Delay, S/veh 40.1 41.6 37.2 18.6 Approach LOS D D D B TEmer-AssignedPhs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 - Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s9.0 30.4 5.1 24.3 6.9 32.5 7.2 22.1 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax)t.5 25.9 2.1 19.5 3.6 26.8 2.7 18.9 Max Q Clear Time(g c+115.& 24.7 2.4 19.4 3.5 13.2 4.6 17,1 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.3 HCM 6th LOS C 180426 2028 AM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 05/31/2018 Int Delay,s/veh 24.3 v'� ent 7 "-7 ,.`LCL` -B ` EBR Wtir7VVBT WBR NBA° NBT N8R SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 140 0 0 314 0 1347 62 0 729 51 �rt Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 140 0 0 314 0 1347 62 0 729 51 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 ; Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free :ree RT Channelized - - None - - None - Free - None �_ 4_: Storage Length - - 0 - - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 79 79 79'71' 96 96 96 81 81 81 M Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 7 7 7 5 5 5 6 6 6 s Mvmt Flow 0 0 182 0 0 397 0 1403 65 0 900 63 ^r. r Conflicting Flow All 484 702 0 0 Stage 1 . ..`."s. �9. ,x�'ai.-,�.�..<.. .3�3 tea.. <x Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - - - Critical 27 24...xa14.1i! , ,sigg, Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - 3.97 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ;, 0 1`0 452d' , s 0 —317 0 5 ` f1s'1g'` . Stage 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stage 2 Platoon blocked % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver , - 451 3173:ifr!f!*N***ttf. :*:a'illf,4t,O.*:,!-1CtljtittiWjgii Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - Stage 1 'F; z5, a.. , rt}a` .o;;i4:7..£.1,'.. ..w..._:. ``.., . ,.7: sok _ Al Stage 2 Approach �_,. . ... EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 18,3 "` 17t8 0 0 HCM LOS C F `s $:`a NBT EBLn1WBLn1 SBT Capacity(veh/h) - 451 317 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.403 1.254 - - HCM Control Dela s 183 171.8 ''`4 i HCM Lane LOS - C F - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 1.9 18.2._ ..:"". _.. � ' m45..f,'44 . b r3 j Y'e 4+' ,1. 'r Notes • -:Volume exceeds capacity S: Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined `.All major volume in platoon 180426 2028 AM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 1: Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & Kinoole Street 05/31/2018 Lane Configurations ) l* '1 1+ ' 1+ /1 1 Traffic Volume(veh/h) 40 387 78 44 357 66 79 190 34 131 442 60 1 Future Volume(veh/h) 40 387 78 44 357 66 79 190 34 131 442 60 Initial 0(Ob),veh 0 0 ,,,a,, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj 1,00 1.00 . i ij ,.1.00 1.00 1.00 ;., 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlhlln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 '1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate.veh/h 45 435 88 49 397 73 107 257 46 139 470 64 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 213 475 96 177 487 90 279 541 97 458 610 83 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.32 0.32 0.03 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1501 304 1781 1529 281 1781 1536 275 1781 1610 219 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 45 0 523 49 0 470 107 0 303 139 0 534 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 0 1805 1781 0 1810 1781 0 1811 1781 0 1829 0 Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 21.7 1.4 0.0 18.6 3.0 0.0 10.1 3.8 0.0 20.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c).s 1.3 0.0 21.7 1.4 0.0 18.6 3.0 0.0 10,1 3.8 0.0 20.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 213 0 571 177 0 577 279 0 638 458 0 693 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.00 0.92 0.28 0.00 0.81 0.38 0.00 0.47 0.30 0.00 0.77 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 219 0 614 183 0 620 279 0 638 489 0 693 HCM Platoon Ratio 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 19.5 0.0 25.6 20.4 0.0 24.4 17.4 0.0 19.6 14.8 0.0 21.2 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.5 0.0 17.9 0.8 0.0 7.8 0.9 0.0 2.5 0.4 0.0 8.1 Initial 0 Delay(d3).s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Toile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 11.6 0.6 0.0 8.8 1.2 0.0 4.5 1.5 0.0 9.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.0 0.0 43.5 21.2 0.0 32.2 18.3 0.0 22.1 15.2 0.0 29.3 LnGrp LOS C A D C A C B A C B A C Approach Vol,veh/h 568 519r 410 673 Approach Delay, s/veh 41.6 31.2 21.1 26.4 �` 'a`8V$'t: Approach LOS ° . D .. ; C - A: :: C C ,, Timer-Assigned Phs:s''' T; 9 2777:7 '3 4 . ;: 5 67+ 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.0 32.0 6.8 29.2 8.0 34.0 6.6 29.3 ,,1„,,„„,,:,'.,,,,, ., r � ,,„ Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.9 26.1 2.5 26.5 3.5 29.5 2.3 26.7 " 4*r :, .y.: Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1). s 5.8 12.1 3.4 23.7 5.0 22.0 3.3 20.6 Green Ext Time(p c),s 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.9 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.5 ' . E`; _ . ' J Intersection Summary , i ' W;o , ,. • HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30 5 .,.. .�d. a.::. i ,. ':,-...,',,,,,.,'::>-•.-..---,...,,!,.„-..,,,., HCM 6th LOS C 180426 2028 PM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 05/31/2018 M C4YE i ...._. ..` m r< Sr r;T.o'$ 'y," .:.,:VI:..,41,7,`_: a Com,.. ,<§° Lane Configurations '1 1 'I t 'I + Traffic Volume(vehlh) 106 377 78 22 307 126 76 372 17 195 495 98 Future Volume(veh/h) 106 377 78 22 307 126 76 372 17 195 495 98 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 =i !.I. . Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00... 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 : Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 118 419 87 25 345 142 86 423 19 229 582 115 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.85 ;: k :; ,f _ Percent Heavy Veh % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Ca ,veh/h 181 469 97 158 345 142 187 611 27 406 617 122@ig ',.11E7,.1 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.04 0.34 0.34 0.10 0.41 0.41 Sat Flow,vehth 1781 1501 312 1781 1248 514 1781 1776 80 1781 1510 298 ' M. 4 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 118 0 506 25 0 487 86 0 442 229 0 697 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1813 1781 0 1762 1781 0 1856 1781 0 1808 i s 4 ;_,4. 0 Serve(g_s), s 3.8 0.0 21.3 0.8 0.0 22.1 2.5 0.0 16.4 6.2 0.0 29.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 3.8 0.0 21.3 0.8 0.0 22.1 2.5 0.0 16.4 6.2 0.0 29.7 1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.04 1.00 0 16 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 181 0 567 158 0 487 187 0 639 406 0 739, 1:--,41,46#tiW °i: V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.89 0.16 0.00 1.00 0.46 0.00 0.69 0.56 0.00 0.94 Avail Cap(c_a),vehfh 181 0 567 178 0 487 187 0 639 433 0 739r; c .. HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 00m,1*.- �. fi Uniform Delay(d), s/veh 22.2 0.0 26.2 22.6 0.0 29.0 20.2 0.0 22.6 15.6 0.0 22.8 Iner Delay(d2),s/veh 8.0 0.0 16.4 0.5 0.0 41.0 1.7 0.0 6.1 1.5 0.0 218 : 1 :'i; _. , , Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °!wile BackOfQ(50°%),veh/Iri1.9 60 11.3 0.3 0.0 14.4 1.1 0.0 7.9 2.5 0.0 161 " , 4.. V, , Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.2 0.0 42.7 23.0 0.0 69.9 22.0 0.0 28,6 17.0 0.0 44.5''.15F: , LnGrp I_OS C ADC A F C A CB AD Approach Vol,vehth 624 512 528 926 Approach Delay,s/veh 40.3 67.6 27.6 37.7 Approach LOS D E C D T'rner ssigned Phs 1 21. 3 4 5 6, . .'7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),X2.8 32.0 5.7 29.5 7.6 37.2 8.6 26.6 ,k ,,,; s ., n,� ... �.,. ,i,. ,,, ,,,,,,,,:ii ,.::„ Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax .5 26.3 2.1 24.1 3.1 32.7 4.1 22.1 i _ 4 P` tiles ..,;` , Max 0 Clear Time(g_c+118,8 18.4 2.8 23.3 4.5 31.7 5.8 24.1 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.1 1.7 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 iiiiktedotsiii,3 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.2 HCM 6th LOS D 180426 2028 PM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 I HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 05/31/2018 Int Delay,s/veh 32.9 Movement EBLI-EBT) EBR WBL WBT SBL nRT�� Lane Configurations rr r ++1* 4414 Traffic Vol,vehlh 0 0 282 0 0 159 0 1315 91 0 1573 86 Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 282 0 0 159 0 1315 91 0 1573 86 Conflicdngpedu,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - ' None - - None . . Free ��� ' None Storage Length - 0 - 0 - - ' ' Veh�Med�nS�m�e # -,� �O���- O Grade. % 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 78 78 78 �92 92 92 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles. % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 0 0 353 0 0 204 ', 0 1429 99 0 1851 10 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl ---��� � �' Major1 �� Conflicting Flow All 976 - 715 - 0 - ' O Stage 1 Critical Hdwy 1 - 7.16 Critical Hdwy Stg1 - - ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ' ' Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 - 3.93 - - - - - Pot Cap 1 Maneuver0 0 -215 0 318 0 - 0 0 Stage 0 00 0 - 0 ' 0 O ' ' rQ Stage 2 O 0' �0���� Platoon blocked,% - ' - MovCap-1 Maneuver� �316 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - ' - ' - - ' ' ��� Stage Stage HCM Control Delay,s$347.5 34.5 0 MCMuOS Minor Lane/MNIvmt NBTFBLn1VVBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(vehlh) 215 318 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.64 0.641 - - HCM Control Delay(s) -$347.5 HONLO3 F D - Lane - - --' — qp ~ ~~ ~~ -^` -:Volume exceeds capacity $:Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined t:All major volume in,platoon 180426 2028 PM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 Future (2038) Without Project HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 1: Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & KinooleStreet 05/31/2018 * 1 144 t rxr"� ass ^1 � t �, r} �r><°� � p e ent I � q 8f :...._. ' '1$` .t. ; d ` ' � . ��x a�dia.,. .. ���k..r .l�'fl ,!Al ,_� . �E - .�...si. .. .,, ��'I'"�:. �1'L:_-..�.a.���_�'.. �. �, p Lane Configurations ) I+ 11 T+ li T. li 'I+ Traffic Volume(veh/h) 56 436 95 23 306 70 136 413 42 123 284 44 Future Volume (veh/h) 56 436 95 23 306 70 136 413 42 123 284 44 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/1n 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 61 474 103 24 326 74 153 464 47 135 312 48 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 275 513 112 140 474 108 416 613 62 306 573 88 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.01 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.37 0.37 0.06 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1480 322 1767 1455 330 1781 1665 169 1781 1581 243 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 61 0 577 24 0 400 153 0 511 135 0 360 Grp Sat FIow(s),veh/h/In 1781 0 1802 1767 0 1785 1781 0 1834 1781 0 1824 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.0 0.0 26.7 0.8 0.0 16.9 4.6 0.0 21,2 4.1 0.0 13.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 2.0 0.0 26.7 0,8 0.0 16.9 4.6 0.0 21.2 4.1 0.0 13.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0,18 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 275 0 625 140 0 581 416 0 675 306 0 661 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 0.92 0.17 0.00 0.69 0.37 0.00 0.76 0.44 0.00 0.54 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 280 0 676 158 0 645 416 0 675 306 0 661 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 20.1 0.0 27.2 22.8 0.0 25.4 16.6 0.0 24.0 18.4 0.0 22.0 Incr Delay(d2),sfveh 0.4 0.0 17.7 0.6 0.0 2.7 0.5 0.0 7.8 1.0 0.0 3,2 Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.8 0.0 14.0 0.3 0.0 7.3 1.9 0.0 10.2 1.7 0.0 6.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 20.5 0.0 44.9 23.4 0.0 28.1 17.1 0.0 31.7 19.4 0.0 25.2 LnGrp LOS C A D C A C B A C B A C Approach Vol,veh/h 638 424 664 495 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.6 27.9 28.4 23.6 5 - C C Approach LOS D Timer Assigned Phs 1 2-7.'""'''''3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.0 36.4 5.7 34.5 10.5 35.9 7.6 32.7z „,,,F , hµ .1‘ a Change Period (Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 5.5 31.9 2.1 32.5 6.0 31.4 3.3 31.3 . 4, '�'IN_e 1,Tr ", Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11), s 6.1 23.2 2.8 28.7 6.6 15.6 4.0 18.9 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 2.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 �„ ,��a, lnterseution Summary ... . , , HCM 6th Ctrl Delay -.. ..... , F . , ..,,... 31.3 �. f,,ti_-. _.M ;_ ... HCM 6th LOS C 180426 2038 AM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 05/31/2018 c 4 4\ t {)/nrf^rtinif .. Lane Configurations 'ti /i T. T. T Traffic Volume(vehth) 95 420 75 13 261 125 63 615 23 138 274 76 Future Volume (veh/h) 95 420 75 13 261 125 63 615 23 138 274 76 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,?" ti: .�,,r" Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehfi!(n 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 � (� Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 100 442 79 15 297 142 70 683 26 168 334 93 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 ' 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.82 0.82 0.82. ; r ,�. . Percent Heavy Veh % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 182 468 84 117 319 153 411 735 28 247 630 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.30 0.30 0.01 0,27 0.27 0.04 0.41 0.41 0.07 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1537 275 1767 1182 565 1781 1790 68 1781 1407 392 "'6" ; ' Grp Volume(v),veh/h 100 0 521 15 0 439 70 0 709 168 0 427 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1811 1767 0 1748 1781` 0 1858 1781 0 1799 Q Serve(g s) s 3.6 0.0 25.1 0.6 0.0 21.9 2.0 0.0 32.5 4.7 0.0 15.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 3.6 0.0 25.1 0.6 0.0 21.9 2.0 0.0 32.5 4.7 0.0 15.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.22 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 182 0 552 117 0 472 411 0 763 247 0 805,� � V/C Ratio(X) 0.55 0.00 0.94 0.13 0.00 0.93 0.17 0.00 0.93 0.68 0.00 0.53 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 182 0 552 143 0 483 435 0 763 249 0 805r 5 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 �"� fiL, Uniform Delay(d), s/veh 25.0 0.0 30.3 26.2 0.0 31.8 1.5 0 0.0 25.1 20.1 0.0 17.9 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 3.5 0.0 25.1 0.5 0.0 24.5 b'2:: 0.0 19.2 7.2 0.0 2.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s''veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/Intl.6 0.0 14.3 0.2 0.0 12.1 0.8 0.0 17.5 2.3 0.0 6.6 Unsig. Movement Delay;s/veh Ln Grp Delay(d),s/veh 28♦5 0.0 55.4 26.7 0.0 56.3 15.2 0.0 44.3 27.3 0.0 20.4 "''ry ` t : 4 ` LnGrp LOS C AEC A EB ADC AC Approach Vol,veh/h 621 454 779 595 Approach Delay s/veh 51.0 55.3 41.7 22.3 Approach LOS D E D C Trmer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),t1.1 41.2 5.3 31.7 7.8 44.5 8.4 28.6 Change Period(Y+Rc).s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting Gmax .i 36.7 2.1 26.5 4,5 38.9 3.9 24.7 Max O Clear Time(g_c+11).7 34.5 2.6 27,1 4.0 17.4 5.6 23.9 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0,0 2.7 0,0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.9 HCM 6th LOS D 180426 2038 AM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 05/31/2018 r+iela ,i,',.74x.77#; - 7"1:�& Otii a. 1 w `" a .'4i.A:r-, :„oor'- , i ..t., Int Delay,s/veh 40.3 Movement $ ,.-rEBT "'e�-a, d-.' � 01 3 l ' , 4;7:7_..� '1._ 4,t i .a ,.'_ < — Lane Configurations F F iitt, tie Traffic=dol,veh/h 0 0 154 0 0 345 0 1482 68X0 802 56 . s° `''1 E. Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 '5 t 0 0 345 0 1482 68 0 802 i 56 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fl' 2 .', F._ �. .. Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - None - - free None 1. Storage Length - 0 - 0 - s None. in Median Storage,# 0 0 - 0 , '9 a', v�, ` l' w ��_ , . was .. . 3,,. , Grade. % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 79 79 79 96 96 96 81 81 81Lbw 9 Heavy Vehicles. % 2 2 2 7 7 7 5 5 5 6 6 6 Mvmt Flow 0 0 200 0 0 437 0 1544 71 0 990 69 t, - 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 - -Conflicting Flow All - - 532 - - 772 !' _ - ,, Stage 2 - - Critical Hdwy 7.14 7.24 , - �d Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -. - .. x , M...„ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - �`,?, , _ `}. �' L...r ¢0.r,. ,i. ,, Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.92 - - 3.97 - Ti - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 421 0 0 a 285 0. .._,.. 0 av, -''. .5... ,, r -. ::4!'lii!i-i:744.fli-.:17,:,,, ,-.tii:-.:k ,,'',:.,j': Stage 1 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 - - Stage 2 0 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 , Platoon blocked, % - _ - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver =". 420 2.._., 285 p . , :i. Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - _ _ _ _ '` Stage 1 : '' 4 w,., �, �� �.. Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - - - 4 .. . Approach '1,sr,"� a f,"r.1, .a r; a y_r s ,�.. ,1 B'`' - �.,,.5 ,. C? iia �s;�,.-"�,.� t r .ai.>,� HCM Control Delay,s 21 1 289,2 0 4 � , HCM LOS C Fp r MinorL"aneiMajortvivrni NBT EBLn1�i'f3Ln1 SCT SBR , .f � r °. ' R ' t� , Capacity(veh/h) - 420 285 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.476 1.532 M Control delay(sj 211 28g.2:f $ µ HCM Lane LOS C F - - HCM 95th%tileQ(veilj 2.5 25.4 , . ,, w� + 1 P i wig NOtS '', l e i V" {PARPi i7 °f" �`" ,1„,,,,,,,,1 szi u,, `$ M:Volume exceeds capacity $ Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined *.All major volume in platoon 180426 2038 AM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 1: Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & KinooleStreet 05/31/2018+ Lane Configurations '+ 1+ T+ 1 Traffic Volume(veh/h) 44 426 86 48 393 73 87 209 :37 144 486 66 Future Volume(veh/h) 44 426 86 48 393 73 87 209 37 144 486 66 Initial Q(Qb);'Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 y t}" 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj : ...1X00"., .. 1.00 l 00 00 _top 1.00, 1.00 . x..1.00 1,09,,, , 1.00., 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach NoNo No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/hon ,, ; 1870 1870 1870 .1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870....' 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 49 479 97 53 437 81 118 282 50 153 517 70 Peak Hour Factor 4..:.0.89 1:89 0,89 0.90 0.90 ,0.90 0.74 0.74 0.74 0,94 0,94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veli 192 505 102X151 513 ,�" 95 248 555 98' 440 620 ` 84 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.36 0.36 0.07 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow,veh/h `''r r Tf8T Zitb. 304 1781 1527 !1 1781 1539 273 1781 1611 218 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 49 0 576 53 0 518 118 0 332 153 0 587 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1805 1781 0 1810 1781 0 1812 1781 0 1829 Q Serve(g s), s 1.6 0.0 27,9 1.7 0.0 23.9 3.7 0,0 12.9 4.8 0.0 26.1 .L... Cycle Q'Clear(g_c),s 1.6 0.0 27,9 1.7 0,0 23.9 " 3.7 • 0,0 12.9 4.8 0,0 26.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.16 1,00 0.15 1.00 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 192 0 607 151 0 608 248 0 653 440 0 704 V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.00 0.95 0.35 0.00 0.85 0.48 0.00 0,51 0.35 0.00 0.83 Avail Cap(c_a) veh,/h 195 0 614 151 0 612 248 0 653 488 0 704 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1"00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Upstream Filter(1) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d), s/veh 22.0 0.0 29.0 23.3 0.0 27.7 20.4 0.0 22.4 16.7 0.0 25.0 !nor Delay(d2),slveh 0.7 0.0 24.3 1.4 0.0 11.1 it' 1.4 0.0 2.8 0,5 0.0 11.2 Initial CI Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/in 0.7 0.0 15.6 0.8 0.0 11.8 1.6 0.0 5.8 1.9 0.0 12.9 Unsig. Movement Delay.slveh nGrp Delay(d)Ne r 22.7 0.0 53.3 24.7 0.0 38.9 21.8 0,0 ' 25.3 17.2 ` 0.0 ` ' 36.1 LnGrp I_OS C ADC A DC A CB A D Approach Vol,veh/h 625 571 450 740 Approach Delay;s/veh 50.9 37.5 24.4 32.2 Approach LOS .777,7777'7777' Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 11.2 36.8 7.0 34.6 9.0 39.0 7,0 34.6 -14" , .,,,,, Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4 5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 9.1 29.9 2.5 30,5 4,5 34.5 2.7 30.3 Max 0 Clear Time(g_c+11) s 6,8 14.9 3,7 29.9 5.7 28,1 3.6 25.9 Green Ext Time"p c,'s 0.1 1,7 0.0 0.3 0.0 2,1 0,0 1.4 %,gip ) 11Ite3Se,( i??L s:. zw5 �m, 3 � x M £ e�ut��3fi ' r zc: HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36 9u ,... ,z 1x 1r1 ,r1 1 HCM 6th LOS D 180426 2038 PM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 05/31/2018 0 ( .➢ � kit 1� WI3 � T .Yi r'� '�^� Y.%*S'Hi, �a1rf+ '4,'t'�•C 5 1 7,Y. Lane Configurations , , 'I 1. Traffic Volume(veh/h) 117 415 86 24 338 139 84 409 19 215 545 108 Future Volume(vehlh) 117 415 86 24 338 139 84 409 19 215 545 108 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus,Ad] 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 ;1.00 1.00 1,00 1:00 1,00 1,00. Work Zone On Approach No No No No 6,40flow,veh/h/1n1870 1870 '1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Row Rate,veh/h 130 461 96 27 380 156 95 465 22 253 641 127 PeaklHour Factor 0.90 0.90 0:90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.88 0,88 0.85 0,85 0,85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 177 489 102 132 359 148 149 618 29 380 632 125 '-„„..,;!:,tri Arrive On Green 0 05 0.33 0.33 0.02 0.29 0.29 0.04 0,35 0.35 0.11 0.42 0.42 Sat Flow,veh/h 17811501 312 1781 1249 513 1781 1771 84 1781 1509. 29111 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 130 0 557 27 0 536 95 0 487 253 0 768 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/1n 1781 0 1813 1781 0 ' 1762 1781 0 1855 1781 0 1808 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.6 0.0 26.9 1.0 0.0 25.9 3.1 0.0 20.9 7.7 0.0 37.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s _ 4.6 0.0 26.9 1,0 0,0 25,9 3,1 0,0 20,9 7.7 0.0` 37 7 ,', . r , 45. T„ Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 177 0 591 132 0 507 149 0 647 380 0 757a' M " 1 V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.00 0.94 0.20 0.00 1.06 0.64 0.00 0 75 0.67 0.00 1.01 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 177 0 591 145 0 507 149 0 647 398 0 757 .., £ , HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 24.3 0.0 29.5 25.3 0.0 32.1 23.3 0.0 25.9 18.2 0.0 26,2 Incr Delay(d2);s/veh 14,6 0.0 23;7 0.8 0.0 55,9: 8.6 0.0 7,9 3.9 0,0 36.2 N . Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile EackOfQ(50%),veh/Ire.6 0.0 15.1 0.4 0.0 18.5 1.6 0.0 10.3 3.4 0.0 22.8 Unsig.Movement Delay;s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39,0 0,0 53.2 26.1 0.0 88.0 31.9 0,0 33.8 22.1 0.0 62.4 LnGrp LOS D ADC A F C ACC A F Approach Vol,vehlh' 687 563 582 1021 Approach Delay,s/veh 50.5 85.0 33.5 52.4 Approach I..OS D F C Timer ssigni Phs 1 2 3 4 5 fa / b Phs.Duration(G+Y+R(),t4.3 35.9 6.0 33.8 6.0 42,2 9.4 30,4, Change Period(Y+Rc).s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmaklli 30.5 2,1 28.7 3,5 37.7 4.9 7 . h mi Max 0 Clear Time(g_c+119,7s 22,9 3.0 28.9 5.1 39.7 6.6 27.9 Green Ext Time(p c);s 0,1 1.9 0.0 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 `0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 54.5w.,. HCM 6th LOS 180426 2038 PM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 05/31/2018 Int Delay,s/veh 52.1 Wemet.t :"< 5T EBi ' V BT w `Trac- NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations rir rr Traffic Vol,veh/h ,42,- 0 44 310 0 0 175 0 1447 100 0 1730 95 "r li, Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 310 0 0 175 0 1447 100 0 1730 95 Conflicting Peds,#/hr- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.'', 7'4'; Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - Free . - - None,,. i .,, Storage Length 0 - - 0 - - - Veh inMedian Storage,# 0 - 0 - 0 0 % 44, kis„ „ aM Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 78 78 78 92 92 92 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 0 0 388 0 0 224 0 1573 109 0 2035 112r, ... .: ; ,a IY['c arfiYl - u Y 1w0 rz S 1 0 • 3�R . ! � -�'.`3�� .. �_�c�� ,.� � .����,_�a.�4--a,�' Conflicting Flow All 1074 787 0 - 0 Stage 1 x ......... :: N tV._ al ate . `ot Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.14 b" p ., ," .,.... - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2V', I xi , . . ti? :: .; .....,. . a . . 's s Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - 3.93 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 17 0 °:0 —185 0 0 ' ;inr 3111. 1E.,1 Stage 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stage 2 Platoon blocked. % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver. r1:2e � :_ b ', Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - StageigM,.. Itw.,1M-r*„:4Ant01,5tw „�;.� <<$ et.M Stage_2 Approach EB WBS NB SB HCM Control Delay, s$551.8 52 4: '1,:::441, 0 � `�: 0 . . HCM LOS777777777:7F F kk�� '�t>h3K.`'J?e.��."�.�.:5��z d, a 47r. z.,aar.�'"CaFa�4` 4,. rF- Minor Lane/Major Mvr4 NBT EBLn1WBLn1: SBT SBR � � 5 ` Capacity(veh/h) 185 285 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 2.095 0.787 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 551.8 52 HCM Lane LOS - F F - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 30.1 6.1 4 •1I1II 1 ° Notes • --:Volume exceeds capacity 5:Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined `.All major volume in platoon 180426 2038 PM WO sll RG.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 APPENDIX E Future With Project Conditions Future (2023) With Project HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 1: Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & Kinoole Street 07/19/2018 r Lane Configurations 1+ 1 Traffic Volume(veh/h) 56 384 82 22 267 61 118 358 37 109 248 41 Future Volume(vehih) 56 384 82 22 267 61 118 358 37 109 248 41 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0,97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking*s,Adj 1.00 1.00_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' LOU 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,'veh lhRn 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 61 417 89 23 2.84 65 133 402 42 120 273 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 297 460 98 175 417 95 418 553 58 328 521 86 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.31 0.31 0.01 0.29 0.29 0.06 0.33 0.33 0.06 0.33 0.33 Sat! icw,vehih 1781 1486 317 1767 1452 332 1781 1659 173 1781 1563 258 Grp`;'clume(v),veh/h 61 0 506 23 0 349 133 0 444 120 0 318 Grp Sat Flow(s)veh/hlln 1781 0 1803 1767 0 1784 •1781 0 " 1833 1781 0 t 1821 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 16.9 0.6 0.0 10.9 3.1 0.0 13.4 2.8 0.0 8.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s , _' r 1.5 0.0 16,9 0.6 0.0 10.9 3.1 0.0 13.4 2.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.19 1,00 0.09 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp pO Ca c,veh/h b, 297 0 559 175 0 512 418 0 611 328 4�,� �`' 0 607 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.00 0.91 0.13 0,00 0.68 0.32 0,00 0.73 0.37 0.00 0.52 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 'j 297 0 590 210 0 578 418 0 611 328 0 2,607 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 4 _ 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 15.9 0.0 20.7 17.5 0.0 19.8 13.3 0.0 18,4 14.2 0.0 16.9 jhcr Delay(d2),s/veh� � 0.3 0.0 17.1 0.3 0.0 2.8 0.4 0.0 7,4 0.7 0.0 3.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 4"0.6 0.0 9,1 0.2 0.0 4.5 1.2 0.0` 6.4 1.1 0.0 3.9 Unsig Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/vehi16.2 0.0 37.9 17,8 0.0 22.6 13.8 0.0 25.8 14.8 0.0 20.1 LnGrp LOS B A DB A C B A CB A C Approach Vol,veh/h :;' 567 372 577 438 Approach Delay,s/veh 35.5 22.3 23.0 18.6 Approach LOS D Timer=Assigned Pns 1�._ 2 " 4 _ .. 5 6 s l�.. HF 1 «, ` '-' �r" ' ?i ,s Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 8.0 25.4 5.4 23.9 8,0 25.4 6,8 22.5 Change Period(Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4 5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 3.5 20.9 2.1 20.5 3.5 20.9 2.3 20.3 Max Cl Clear Time(g_c+11) s 4.8 15.4 2.6 18.9 5.1 10.8 5 12.9 ,• Green Ext Time(p c),s 0:0 1.3 0.0 0:5 0.0 1,3 0.0 1.2 Mterst,ctlon HCM 6th CLI Delay 25 5 mow.,_ . ...' HCM 6th LOS ., 180719 2023 AM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM Intemational Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 07/19/2018 ♦ 8 � egtog,7 Lane Configurations 111 111 Tratc Volume(veh/h) 83 369 66 11 234 109 56 532 20 119 237 _ 68 Future Volume(veh/h) 83 369 66 11 234 109 56 532 20 119 237 68 initial LI(0b),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . Ped-Bike Adi(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Ad1:00 1.00 1:00 1.00 , 1.00 1.*:, 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00` 1.00 1 1,00.-:.1.41%;,*.q.lik., Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/hftn 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856' 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate veh/n 87 388 69 12 266 124 62 591 22 145 289 83 . . xm Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0:95 0,88' 0.88 0,88 '0.90 0.90 0„90 0,82 0.82 0.82 Percent Heavy Veh % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 222 440 78 168 306 143 406 649 24 2611 540 155 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.01 0.26 0.26 0.04 0.36 0,36 0.06 0.35 0.39 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1538 273 1767 1193 556 1781 1791 67 1781 1396 _401. __iAr4, Grp Volume(v) veh/h 87 0 457 12 0 390 62 0 613 145 0 372 Grp Sat-Flow(s),veh/h/M1781 0 1811 1767 0 1749 1781 0 1858 1781 ' �0 1797 1.3 a Q Serve(g s) s 2.3 0.0 15.2 0.3 0.0 13.5 1.4 0.0 19.9 3,2 0.0 10.1 Cycle 0Clear(g_c).s 2.3 0.0 15.2 0:3 0.0 46' 1.4 0.0 19.9 3.2 0.0 101 Prop In Lane 1,00 0.15 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.04 1 00 0.22 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 222 0 519 168 0 449 406 0 673 260 0 695 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0,00 0,88 0.07 0 00 0.87 0.15 0.00 0.91 0 56 0.00 0.54 Avail Cap(c a),veh/h 222 0 521 215 0 498 438 0 673 260 0 695 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0:00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 0:00 1,00 1.00 0.00 1 00 a {;, F Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 18,2 0.0 21.5 18.7 0.0 22.5 12.5 0.0 19.2 15.2 0.0 15.0 lncr Delay{d2) sfveh 1.1 0.0 16.0 0.2 0:0 14.1 0.2 0:0 18.7 2.7 0.0 2,9 AT Initial 0 Delay(d3).s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BackOfQ(50°%),veh/Ir0.9 0.0 8:2 0.1 0.0 6,9 0.5 0,0 11.1 1.3 0.0 43,; 11 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),sfveh 19.3 0.0 37.5 18:9 0.0 36.5 12.7 0.0 37.9 17.9 0.0 '17.9 0 4,A agivistiog LnGrpLOS B ADB AD B AD B AB Approach Vol,vehlh 54 402 675 517 Approach Delay; s/veh 34.6 36.0 35.6 17,9 Approach LOS C B �... a 74777- ,�77r ice+ " `� 1�r 0 a�f!5 - ice' .., 4�.; :, �1�.. � 7 �. 8 „�,. Phs Duration(G4-Y+Rc),s8,3 27.4 4.9 22.6` 6.7 29.0 6.8 20.8 Change Period(Y+Rc).s 4 5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax .8 22.9 2.1 18.2 3.4 23.3 2.3 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time(g c+11`;a 21.9 t.3 17.2 3.4 12.1 4.3 15.5 Green Ext Time'(p c) s* 11' , 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.7 0 Or htti Sect1(1t1?St1mm .,. i c �a � a a n Y k _�S aa,�.,w".w...�., ...,t.- .::�s.,,.�..a �.�'a,r.�.,:, ,.C�..:.5._,�,.�..a Vii•. HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31:2'`�s ...F.n"..° .". .. .1syr Ott35 .,..,. g ,. HCM 6th LOS C 180719 2023 AM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 07/19/2018 ,'3.... ,14�... Int Delay,s/veh 18 Lane Configurations r r 'fir Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 135 0 0 299 0 1283 59 0 694''':':44.11,414.S11:::.46*` Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 135 0 0 299 0 1283 59 0 694 51 Conflicting Peds,#/fir 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 r ': Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None None - - Free - - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # ,., 0 ..,, .... 0 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 0 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 79 79 79 96 96 96 81 81 81 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 7 7 5 5 5 6 6 6 Mvmt Flow 0 0 175 0 0 378 0 1 336 61 0 857 63 ..: Conflicting Flow All - - 462 - - 668 - 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 Critical Hdwy .... 7.14 ''''''.7.17,77f 7.24 'r rgfg .g 741 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.92 - - 3.97 - - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 :;., 0 467 0 0 a 334 0, Stage 1 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 - - Stage 2 0 0 0 0 0 ' Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuvers - 466 - 334 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - - - _ - - Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - - _ - • # .,.�. �° rk* ,:r;�m' .Ss,�`'�-.."ym¢. .''�.`�`a ,'.w'��'...:a .+' �,.;,�m"�`.`A� ?r.,e, ,tv� .�i?»x';>��°P.`wt,'„,.ya �� we`��mx,:�'!'�:..<` .,<fi �, �` HCM'Controtflelay,s,,.-`;17.3 125.7HCM LOS C F Minor lvlvrnt ' M3T EBL i1UY3Ln1 Capacity(veh/h) 466 334 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.376 1.133 - - HCM Control Delay(s) ' - 17;3 HCM Lane LOS - C F - - HCM 95th(13/utile Q(veh) ..._17 15 - Notes —:Volume exceeds capacity S Delay e,-,feeds 303s 4: Computation Not Defined ,*:Ail major volume in platoon 180719 2023 AM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 1: Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & Kinoole}Street 107/19/2018 -- I p i 4/ Lane Configurations 1 '9 1+ '5 1+ '5 1+ Traffic Volume(veh/h) 54 385 74 54 351 63 75 183 34 137 433 68 Future Volume(veh/h) 54 385 74 54 351 63 75 183 34 137 433 68 Initial 0(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1,00 0.97 1.00 0.99 ParkingBus,Adrti,i ;: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vetfhflrt v 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 '18701870 1870 ' 1870 Adj Flow Rate.vehlh 61 433 83 60 390 70 101 247 46 146 461 72 Peak Hour Factor0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h "_,-„ ._.. 218 469 90 177 471 84 287 546 102 475 610 95 Arrive On Green 0.03 0,31 0.31 0.03 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.36 0.36 0.07 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow,vehlh, 1781 1517 291 1781 1536 276 1781 1525 284 1781 1578. 246 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 61 0 516 60 0 460 101 0 293 146 0 533 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1807 1781 0 1811 1781 0 1809 1781 0 1824 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 0.0 21.8 1.8 0.0 18.6 2.8 0.0 9.8 4.0 0.0 20.0 Cycle Q Clear(g c),s 1.8 0.0 21,8 1,8 k�0 ;. 18.6 2.8 0.0 9.8 4.0 0.0 20.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 218 0 558 177 'a 555 287 0 647 475 0 705 V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.00 0.92 0.34 0.00 0.83 0.35 0.00 0.45 0.31 0.00 0.76 Avail Cap(c_a)„veh/h . , 218 0 584 177 0 581 287 0 647 500 0 705 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(!) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d). s/veh 20.1 0.0 26.4 21.0 0.0 25.4 17.2 0.0 19.4 14.6 0.0 21.0 Incr.Delay(d2),sfveh 0.7 0.0 20,1 1.1 0.0 9.4 0.7 0.0 2.3 0.4 0.0 7.4 Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 0.8 0.0 12,0 0.8 0.0 9.0 1.1 0.0 4.3 1.6 0.0 9.4 Unsig.Movement Delay, s/veh L.nGrp Delay(d),stveh 20.8 0.0 46,5 22.2 0.0 34.9 17.9 0.0 21.7 15.0 0.0 28.3 LnGrp LOS C ADC A CB A C B A C Approach Vol,veh/h 577 520 394 679 Approach Delay,s/veh 43.8 33.4 20.7 25.5 Trier` "'gssrJned#'t�s 1 2 3 4 5 t6 7 8 Phs Duration(G±Y+Rc),s 10.3 32.7 7:0 28.9 8.0 35.0 7,2 28„ �_. �_. Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4 c, 4 5 4.5 4 5 ' 5 Max Green Setting(Gnax) ,s 6,9 2.7.1 2.5 25,5 3.5 30.5 2:7 25.3 124 " - Y Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11), s 6.0 v� 1 22.0 3.8 20.6 Green Ext Time(p c),,e ,0.0 - -a1.5 , 0.0 0.6 0.0 2,3 0.0 1.2 HCM 6£h Ctri rDelaY ., 31A HCM 6th LOS 180719 2023 PM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM Intemational Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 07/19/2018 t 4\ t I `� / x1,, Lane Configurations vi �, 1+ Traffic Volume(veh/h) 106 375 77 21 317 120 77 354 16 136 471 100 Future Volume(veh/h) 106 375 77 21 317 120 77 354 16 186 471 100 Initial Q(Qb),veil 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1:00 1.00, 1.00 b, Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh7ltn 1870 1870 1870 1870''1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 '� :i Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 118 417 86 24 356 135 88 402 18 219 554 118 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0:89 0.89 0.89 0.88; 0,88 0.88 0,85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 186 478 99 166 360 137 197 609 27 413 601 128 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.04 0.34 034 0.10 0.40 0 40 SatFlow,veh/h 1781 1503 310 1781 1282 486 .1781 ,-1776 80 1781 1488 = 317 41" P ' r- .,;. Grp Volume(v),veh/h 118 0 503 24 0 491 88 0 420 219 0 672 Grp Sat Flow(s);veh/h11n1781 0 1813 1781 0 1768 1781 0 1856 1781 0 1804 i`, Q Serve(g_s),s 3.8 0.0 20.9 0.8 0.0 22.1 2.6 0.0 15,4 6.0 0.0 28.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 3.8' 0.0 20:9 0.8 0.0 22.1 2.6 0,0 15.4 6.0 0.0 283 ,, <�: 5 .,x y. , ,i Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.18 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 186 0 577 166 0 497 197 0 636 413 0 729 '5,J„:„ <.-,m V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.00 0.87 0.14 0.00 0.99 0,45 0.00 0,66 0.53 0.00 0.92 Avail Cap(ca),veh/h 186 0 577 187 0 497 197 0 636 438 0 729 h ' , , HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1,00 0.00 1;00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00f w Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 22.0 0.0 25.7 22.2 0.0 28.6 20.0 0.0 22.3 15.4 0.0 22.7 lncr Delay(d2),s/veh 7.0 0.0 13.7 O.4 , 0.0 37.1 1,6 0.0 5.3 1.1 0.0` 19,0 Initial 0 Delay(d3).s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/Int.8 0.0 10.7 0:3 0.0 14,0 1.1 0.0 7.3 2:3 0.0 14.9 7 'N Unsig Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp;Delay(d),s/veh 29.0 0.0 39.4 22.6 0:0 65.7 21.6 0Q 27.7 16.4 0.0 41.7 LnGrp LOS C ADC AEC ACB A D Approach Vol,veh/h 621 515 508 891 Approach Delay,s/veh 37.4 63.7 26,6 35.5 Approach LOS D P: . Timer Assigned f'hs,.,...7.1.,< .;; 2 ; 3 4 5 6 1 8 . Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),x,2.5 31,9 5.6 30.0 7.6 36.? 8.6 27,0 _..0»Y.y . :: * � � Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 ' S 5 -19) g ,1 ; Max Green Baffin (t' mai .s 2Fi. 2,� 24,5 �,1 32.3 .1 2��, , `' � � :µ F � Max Q Clear Time(g_c+110,Cs 17.4 2.8 22 9 4.6 35 rt 5.r 1. Green Ext Time'(o c),s 0.1 1 7 0.0 0.5 OQ = ,0.9 3,0 11,0 �gf " ;11 intersection summa �� ., �t � ; tef HCM 6-tit 0tri Delay HCM 6th LOS L 180719 2023 PM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 07/19/2018 W'' i! t o , ..r at ` 1s�r,�f ;.' 11! a"v,.Ke ..2"'i Int Delay,s/veh 29.1 , �7 ,�.., ..t.r,,..��n Lane Configurations ` r + ++1 Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 281 0 0 151 0 1252 87 0 1498 89 3��k, � _ Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 281 0 0 151 0 1252 87 0 1498 89 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0` - 0 0 0 0l , .it.: ,. .. :". 1,i'll#1, . 01 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None. None Storage Length 0 0 - Veh in Median Stora e,#' 0 0 _ 0 ',,117Z11' Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 - PeakHour Factor= . , 80 8011;,78, , 78 78 92 92 92''',7!':!,85 85 Heavy Vehicles % 2 2 2 33 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 Mvmt l=low ° 0 351 ,.. ...[t 0 194 0 1 361 95 0 1762 105 '; ,. 1, t. ,. . . A6 ' '-`per' ,t,, a^�g r l s'� �*���"�„».s ..��-�.�,v.k�0.a,�•J., ,, .• Conflicting Flow All 934 681 - 0 0 Stage 2 - - - - Critical'Hdwy 5; .. ., ; Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 �, Follow-up Hdwy 3.92 3,93 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 - Stage ig . Platoon blocked, Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ,. ,.P 1.' i'°, Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 ' Stage 2 - - � ' �, ,.., „' .2.4;1 71 Abf '� 1 *e 4sk a •fib€ s,xsa`t 10 s 9 s t�.,� .��..�a... '•... �.,�i :?...r--.,...�..�-»..........�.:,fit ,����txxw. cca���,�: ._�v._.,�,�xt�:d,..:T,arl�.m3s�«:, - �4,. z «%.,. �v�`�*�:��m�r.rsr•.o-t�"�, a��t�aa� HCM Control Delay,s 296.8 29.5' x: Q "7;16:iifirr � HCM LOS F D ewe '7 a »ss € '" 5 f "y # @.-: inz g.F:-";� r�z, tr 7t a .., . .., °t,`�., •< a P. �.tt4.' `alis r ,�: _,� ��� �n�� `��_�, , .. �, ta�;,�. a.� �.... � HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.527 0.578 - - HCM Control Delay '.:. 7313} i ' 1, , (4 ._ ° _ ; 101 HCM Lane LOS - F D - - HCM 95th%tile,Q/veh, ZWd; 8 4 ,Ir14:,, Vdlur ekexceeds capacity . 8:'Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined *:All major volume in platoon. 180719 2023 PM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 I - _ Future (2028) With Project HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 1: Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & Kinoole Street 07/19/2018 t ' - C L 4\ t P ' 1 4/ tauertteihC , 3 LT '(EBT EBI, . . .iW iTgMA Im MF � SBC... T BR Lane Configurations /I 1 ) I 'II I+ 1+ Traffic Volume(veh/h) 58 403 86 23 280 64 124 376 39 114 260 43 Future Volume(veh/h) 58 403 86 23 280 64 124 376 39 114 260 43 initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 63 438 93 24 298 68 139 422 44 125 286 47 Peak Hour Factor S":: 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h ' '. it 290 483 103 163 439 100 422 576 60 328 543 89 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.06 0.35 0.35 0.06 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1487 316 1767 1453 332 1781 1660 173 1781 1564 257 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 63 0 531 24 0 366 139 0 466 125 0 333 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1803 1767 0 1785 1781 0 1833 1781 0 1821 Q Serve(g_s) s 1.7 0.0 20.2 0.7 0.0 12.9 3.6 0.0 16.0 3.2 0.0 10.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.7 0.0 20.2 0.7 0.0 12.9 3.6 0.0 16.0 3.2 0.0 10.5 1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c),,vehlh ' 290 0 586 163 0 :539 422 0 636 328 0 632 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 0.91 0.15 0.00 0.68 0.33 0.00 0.73 0.38 0.00 0.53 Avail Cap(c_a).vehm l. 301 0 641 189 0 "610 422 0 636 328 0 632 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.001;4;1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 17.5 0.0 23.2 19.5 0.0 22.0 14.4 0.0 20.5 15.5 0.0 18.7 lncr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.4 0.0 15.8 0.4 ,IIC 2.61-1 0.5 0.0 7.3 0.7 0.0 3.1 Initial 0 Delay(d3).s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 0.0 10.5 0.3 0.0:41, 5.5S::, 1.4, 0.0 7.6 1.3 0.0 4.7 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),sfveh 17.8 0.0 39.0 T199 10 0 .x„24.6 ' 14.9 l 0.0 27.8 16.2 0.0 21.8 LnGrp LOS B A D B A C B A C B A C Approach Vol,veh/h 594 390 :, ',1,,, , 605 ,, 458 Approach Delay.s/veh 36.7 24.3 24.8 20.3 Approach LOS 0 C ' g w�:,.. C :,11:ii rain: C Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 l'l7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc).s 9.0 29.4 5:5 27.8 9.0 29.4 7.2 26.1 ,�,3, .. .6 .� �» Change Period (Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4 5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 4.5 24.9 2.1 25.5 4.5 24.9 3.1 24.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11) s 5.2 18.0 2.7 22.2 5.6 12.5 3.7 14.9 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 1.7 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.5 (nt .: �rsed€toh'$Su�ninarylll _. � ".-'llll l. . HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.2 HCM 6th LOS C 180719 2028 AM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 07/19/2018 --. c � k- 4\ t P 4 'EBL ' BT EBR WBL .WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT; SBR Lane Configurations , '5 1+ Traffic Volume(veh/h) 87 387 69 12 245 114 59 559 21 125 249 71 0iN Future Volume(veh/h) 87 387 69 12 245 114 59 559 21 125 249 71 Initial Q(Qb),veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1 00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 100 t- ;_i24' Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veN/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 92 407 73 14 278 130 66 621 23 152 304 87 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.82 0.82 0.82 itarnriat, Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 200 444 80 141 305 143 424 703 26 274 593 170 Arrive On Green 0.04 0,29 0.29 0.01 0.26 0.26 0.04 0.39 0.39 0.07 0.42 0.42 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1535 275 1767 1192 557 1781 1792 66 1781 1397 400 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 92 0 480 14 0 408 66 0 644 152 0 391 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/1n 1781 0 1811 1767 0 1749 1781 0 1858 1781 0 1797 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 0.0 19.1 0.4 0.0 16.9 1.6 0.0 24.0 3.7 0.0 11.9 Cycle Q Ciear(g_c).s 2.8 0.0 19.1 0.4 0.0 16.9 1.6 0.0 24.0 3.7 0.0 11.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.04 1,00 0.22 xs Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 200 0 524 141 0 448 424 0 729 274 0 763 �'I )? , V/C Ratio(X) 0.46 0.00 0.92 0.10 0.00 0.91 0.16 0.00 0.88 0.56 0.00 0.51 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 200 0 524 177 0 460 443 0 729 274 0 763 1111.47 °' a" HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 ' ie:: Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 21.5 0.0 25.6 22.2 0.0 26.9 13.3 0.0 21,1 16.6 0.0 15.8 !nor Delay(d2);s/veh 1.7 0.0 20.9 0.3 0.0 21.9 0:2 0.0 14.7 2.5 0.0 2.5 % g Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 /vile BackOfQ(50%),vehllrtl.2 0.0 10.8 0.2 0.0 9.4 0.6 0.0 12,5 1.6 0.0 5.0 0 0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),sfveh 23.1 0.0 46.5 22.5 0.0 48.8 13.4 0.0 35.7 19.1 0.0 18.2 LnGrp LOS C ADC ADB ADB AB Approach Vol.veh/h 572 422 710 543 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.7 47.9 33.6 18.5 Approach LOS D D C B �, ` Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 7776.7777 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s9.6 33.7 5.1 26.0 7.2 36.1 7.6 23,6 w. Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax .1 29.2 2.1 20.6 3.5 30.8 3.1 19.6 , gx i ItWit, :: 5 .. Max Q Clear Time(g_c+115, 26.0 2.4 21.1 3.6 13.9 4 8 18.9 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0,0 2.2 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay HCM 6th LOS C 180719 2028 AM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 07/19/2018 i t Int Delay,s/veh 24.3 he art ° "', r7:t L °EBT EBRE"W BR 141§TNl7 Ngft7Ts"F; 581.. tgff., , rf Lane Configurations t ++1+ Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 142 0 0 314 0 1347 62 0 729 53 Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 142 0 0 314 0 1347 62 0 729 53 Conflicting Peds;#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 ,41 ' Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - Free - None v `o Storage Length 0 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 ,<- �` 0 .•<.,0 TIFSM14111,4 7,1:11ftninfiltake..iiii, Grade. % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 79 79 79 96 96 96 81 81 MiraPatigil Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 7 7 7 5 5 5 6 6 6 Mvmt Flow 0 0 184 0 0 397 0 1403 65 0 900 65, 4..i .. t E'f�".."�-i '�a -y` - � �0 r� i �kP��, ��'���� '3� �;k", .• - t. f� Y timet ffr,a tea`(�+ 9:� L',dmw �x w rr f w.� __. _, ..s� �.�. ►� ... � � ,.,.fi. _�.., r tvlafor�` `'��fo�-.,.,- Conflicting Flow All 485 702 0 0 Stage 1 "L, Stage 2 - - Critical Hdwy 41, = 7.14 a, 4��� 11 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 7 - `r " W .�... ~,._.._ Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - 7 3.97 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 452 0 'ry t:Z*4 iR ' E Stage 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stage 4%;�0410....., � °�� Qj .,otel .- ° Platoon blocked % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 4/;',,.. - 459 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - Stage 2 - AirobC,� !�R, .,frnn•'n, ,i,:=t "r.4„ :mt r:rY z. *4 .t•",64, 1 a x a HCM Control Delay,s 18.4 171.8 0 0 HCM LOS C F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NST EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 451 317 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.409 1.254 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 18.4 171.8;; i . 't . _. . gg`i ,:-£ . ,`.... . - ar ' . . .,.> . : HCM Lane LOS - C F - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh); - 2 18.2' .. ro Volume exceeds capacity 5:Delay exceeds 300s +' Computation Not Defined `.All major volume in platoon 180719 2028 AM W sll RG_new dwysyn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 1: Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & Kinoole Street 07/19/2018 C 4\ tt �► 1 I frdFi figs# _ ,: .. ". 5/ .,1', 1r1:... `:,a,X11" �,i `�...t ": s�..:4:4.�;5! 44:119141° Lane Configurations T. /1 T. T Traffic Volume(veh/h) 56 403 78 56 368 66 79 192 36 143 454 71 Future Volume(vehlh) 56 403 78 56 368 66 79 192 36 143 454 71 Initial QQb,veh E ) as_ 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj 1 00,41.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow;veh/h4n 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 63 453 88 62 409 73 107 259 49 152 483 76 Peak Hour Factor 111,",,i, 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h " " 210 481 93 168 488 87 261 531 101 457 602 95 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.32 0.32 0.03 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1513 294 1781 1537 274 1781 1521 288 1781 1576 248 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 63 0 541 62 0 482 107 0 308 152 0 559 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 0 1807 1781 0 1811 1781 0 1808 1781 0 1824 0 Serve(g_s), s 1.9 0.0 23.3 1.9 0.0 19.8 3.1 0.0 10.7 4.3 0.0 21.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.9 0.0 23.3 1.9 0.0 19.8 3.1 0.0 10.7 4.3 0.0 21.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 210 0 574 168 0 575 261 0 632 457 0 696 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.00 0.94 0.37 0.00 0.84 0.41 0.00 0.49 0.33 0.00 0.80 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 210 0 577 168 0 578 261 0 632 482 0 696 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d), s/veh 20.2 0.0 26.5 21.2 0.0 25.3 18.3 0.0 20.4 15.2 0.0 22.0 Incr Delay(d2),.s/veh 0.8 0,0 24.1 1.3 0.0 10.4 1.0 0.0 2.7 0.4 0.0 9.5 Initial 0 Delay(d3),s!veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOf0(50%),veh/In 0.8 0.0 13.3 0.8 0.0 9.7 1.3 0.0 4.8 1.7 0.0 10.6 Unsig.Movement Delay. s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.0 0.0 50.6 22.5 0.0 35.8 19.3 0.0 23.0 15.6 0.0 31.5 LnGrp LOS C A D C A D B A C B A C Approach Vol,'veh/h 604 544 415 711 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.5 34.3 22.1 28.1 Approach LOS C C 7h�k Timer=Assigrred.F'hs �. 1 2 3 4 5. „r fi,r,, v,�. 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.6 32.4 7.0 29.9 8.0 35.0 7.0 29.9 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 7.2 26.8 2.5 25.5 3.5 30.5 2.5 25.5 Max C Clear Time(g_c+11) s 6.3 12.7 3.9 25.3 5.1 23.8 3.9 21.8 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.6 HCM 6th LOS C 180719 2028 PM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 07/19/2018 } --► c ~ k *\ t P �► 1 Lane Configurations "j "ta 11 1 Traffic Volume(veh/h) 111 393 81 22 332 126 81 372 17 195 495 105 Future Volume(veh/h) 111 393 81 22 332 126 81 372 17 195 495 105 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 telii:+11:45;114int Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlhiln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 123 437 90 25 373 142 92 423 19 229 582 124 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 ,0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.85 1e4 ' : ll:t Percent Heavy Veh % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 183 504 104 161 377 143 173 619 28 398 612 130'4' Arrive On Green 0.06 0.34 0.34 0.01 0.29 0.29 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.41 0.41 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1504 310 1781 1280 487 1781. 1776 80 1781 1487 317 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 123 0 527 25 0 515 92 0 442 229 0 706 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh/In1781 0 1814 1781 0 1767 1781 0 1856 1781 0 `1804 , r ; . **ifi' 0 Serve(g_s), s 4.3 0.0 24.5 0.9 0.0 26.1 3.0 0.0 18.3 7.0 0.0 34.1 Cycle Q Ctear(g_c).s 4.3 0.0 24.5 0.9 0.0 26.1 3.0 0.0 18.3 7.0 0.0 34.1 `_ Prop Ir. Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.18 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 183 0 608 161 0 520 173 0 647 398 0 742 afi,. V/C Ratio(X) 0.67 0.00 0.87 0.15 0.00 0.99 0.53 0.00 0.68 0.58 0.00 0.95 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 183 0 608 177 0 520 173 0 647 437 0 742 frilArTtii x _ HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 000 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 23.9 0.0 28.0 24.3 0.0 31.6 22,9 0.0 25.1 17.4 0.0 25.6 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 9.3 0.0 12.6 0.4 0.0 36.7 3.0 0.0 5.8 1.5 0.0 23.2 " ;; itis„ M, ,r,,«£ Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BackOfQ(50%),vehllr2.2 0.0 12.3 0.4 0.0 16.0 1.3 0.0 8.8 2.9 0.0 18.5 Unsig. Movement Delay.s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.2 tip 40.7 24.7 0.0 68.3 25.9 0.0 30.8 19.0 0.0' '48.8 t LnGrp LOS C ADC A EC A CB AD Approach Vol,veh/h 650 540 534 935 Approach Delay,s/veh 39.3 66.3 30.0 41.5 Approach LOS D E C D Amer gnedPhs 1.�;. :2: 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),13.6 35.9 5.8 34.7 8.0 41,5 9.5 31.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmat)1,.3 29.4 2.1 29.4 3.5 37.0 5.0 26.5 Max 0 Clear Time(g_c+119.0 20.3 2.9 26.5 5.0 36.1 6.3 28 1 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.1 1.8 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 0,0 0.0 fin�rsefrrrtlnat+° HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.7 HCM 6th LOS D 180719 2028 PM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 07/19/2018 Int Delay,s/veh 37.1 .fi -n,_ Lane Configurations F tti tt Traffic Vol,veh/h Cr0 294 0 0 159 0 1315 91 0 1573` 93 Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 294 0 0 159 0 1315 91 0 1573 93 Conflicting Peds #jhr, 0...: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111‘7%;;.!Atettlipil,444 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized *,-.None None - - Free None Storage Length - - 0 - - 0 - -• - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 # `:'. 0 ,:Otli r irta Grade,% 0 _f. _... 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 78 78 78 92 92 92' 85,'T 85` 85 . Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow: fl w., 0 368 0 0 204 0 1429 99 0 1851 109 Conflicting Flow All - - 980 - - 715 - 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 H Ft. -', �� s �Y " , : Stage 2 _. - . A- _ _,:: �r $ . ., Critical Hdwy 7,14 7,16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - �.. . Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.92 - - 3.93 - - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 --214 0 0 318 0 �0 0 Stage 1 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 - - Stage 2 0 0 - 0 0 Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap 1 Maeuver �. 14 ,. � 2�4 ,,. - 318 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - - - - - - � ti Stage 1 ...,� �.,.., „mamtf,' 4. " :.Asmitt7jvW .r. .. ,, ., e:. �. r Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 _ ;fit "z�,...�.f9.cu�a',es` '.d >,�, �3�' k�.�.zcb„ns�.,�� k` �. ,... a :, « .. e Approach - S ,.,,sx n,r A z ,4i u >2 HCM Control Delay sS 380.8 34,5 0 HCM LOS F U ''°�' a,,- .... do-.- -�.- � ,_ va � ✓� �' Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLr 1VVBLn1 SBTRR`t.Y 4, 'll ct " l;XASI MINWME Capacity(veh/h) - 214 318 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 1.717 0.641 - - HCM Control Delay(s) -$380.8 34.5 ,, »l ._ HCM Lane LOS - F D - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 24.8 40r Notes <,;` �>5 z�A -ail ttw„�.s 1»„a+,'z;mf �`y �t, > A�^ C a �i•*+a'? Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined *:All major volume trt platoon 180719 2028 PM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 Future (2038) With Project HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 1: Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & Kinoole Street 07/19/2018 Movement EBL . EBTfps, ° __ ,T . WgL:TWATtrrgmO MT ,l �:�s ` SW .. , 1M Lane Configurations ! li I ) T* li T. Traffic Volume(veh/h) 63 443 95 25 308 70 136 414 43 125 286 47 Future Volume(veh/h) 63 443 95 25 308 70 136 414 43 125 286 47 Initial 0(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fed-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .,;....1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 68 482 103 27 328 74 153 465 48 137 314 52 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.94 0,94 0.94 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 279 519 111 141 477 108 407 606 63 301 560 93 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.02 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.36 0.36 SatFlow,veh/h 1781 1486 317 1767 1457 329 1781 1662 172 1781 1562 259 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 68 0 585 27 0 402 153 0 513 137 0 366 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781` 0 1803 1767 0 1786 1781 0 1833 1781 0 1821 Q Serve(g s), s 2,2 0.0 27.3 0.9 0.0 17.1 4.7 0.0 21.5 4.2 0.0 14.1 Cycle 0 Ciear(g_c),s 2.2 0.0 27.3 0,9 0.0 17,1 4.7 0.0 21.5 4.2 0.0 14.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 279 0 630 141 0 584 407 0 668 301 0 653 V/C Ratio(X) 0.24 0.00 0.93 0.19 0.00 0.69 0.38 0.00 0,77 0.46 0.00 0.56 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 279 0 671 155 0 640 407 0 668 301 ' 0 653 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(1) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 20.1 0.0 27.4 22.9 0.0 25.5 16.9 0.0 24.5 18.7 0.0 22.5 lncr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.4 0.0 18.8 0.7 0.0 2.8 0.6 0.0 _ 8.3 1.1 0.0 3.5 Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.9 0.0 14.4 0.4 0.0 7.4 1.9 0.0 10.5 1.7 0.0 6.4 Unsig Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh,:,, ,, 20.5 0.0 46.2 23.6 0.0 28.2 17.5 0.0 32.7 19.8 0.0 25.9 LnGrp LOS C A D C A C B A C B A C Approach Vol,veh/h 653 429 666 503 Approach Delay, s/veh 43.5 28.0 29.2 24.3 Approach LOS ,,y - D C C c.;,-. Timer-Assigned Fhs ' '17' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 °.17, Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.1 36.3 5.9 35.0 10.6 35.8 7.8 33.1 ..... ,k1ai,, ; ea ''.,A,,,,,,,".-, . Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gm ax),s 5.6 31.8 2.1 32.5 6.1 31.3 3.3 31.3 , >«w , ;w Max 0 Clear Time(g__c+11), s 6.2 23.5 2.9 29.3 6.7 16.1 4.2 19.1 Green Ext Time c ,s 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.01' Intersection Summary ,� - ; r HCM 6th Ctrl Delay ,w ,. . . a,.._. _ 32.0 x ,, ,.,,v :n ti,iMme, ra,_,., .,-.. - '� ,.. , ., HCM 6th LOS C 180719 2038 AM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 07/19/2018 f --► c k 41 t \► i, '/ i8 1 3 .. b,r71, :£.^ s ffi.„- c.... »v t ,�..�.w ,ma ..i.. .v......... Lane Configurations 1 Traffic Volume(veh/h) 96 425 76 13 269 125 65 615 23 138 274 78 , Future Volume(veh/h) 96 425 76 13 269 125 65 615 23 138 274 78 initiai'Q_(Qb},veft`` D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OP! Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1 00 0 99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1:00 1,00 1:00 1.00 1 00 _a, `.0 . ' , Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj sat Flow;vehlhlin 1870 '1878 1870 1856:'-f85 `. '' 6 ;1856 1870 1870 1870 1870" 1870 1870 s 4 :::,. ,�,� Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 101 447 80 15 306 142 72 683 26 168 334 95 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.82 0.82 0 82 ,. ,>.'..f . „„q; Percent Heavy Veh './0 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap;veh/h 181 474 85 118 327 152 406 729 28 243 621 177-,L Arrive On Green 0.04 0.31 0.31 0.01 0.27 0.27 0.04 0.41 0.41 107 0.44 0.44 Sat Flow,veh/h; 1781 1536 275 1767 1195. „ 555 1781 1790 68 1781 1400 398 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 101 0 527 15 0 448 72 0 709 168 0 429 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh'h/ln1781 0 1811 1767 0 1750 1781 0 1858 1781 0 Q Serve(g s) s 3.6 0.0 25.4 0.6 0.0 22.4 2 1 0 r.? 32.8 4.8 0.0 15.6 Cycle Q beam ,'4.77v 0.0 25.4 06 0,0 22.4 2.1 0.0 32.8 4.8 0.0 15 6', u .. Prop In Lane 1 00 0.15 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.22 11 0 479 406 0 757 243 0 Lane Grp Gap(c),veh/h 181 0 559 6 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0,00 0.94 0.13 0 00 0.93 0 18 0.00 0 9,1 0 69 0 00 0.54 Avail Cap(o_a),veh/h 181 0 559 143 0 486 445 0 757 244 0 797 F ,.w;;ital,; . HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 25 0 0.0 30.2 76 ' 0 0 31,7 15.3 0.0 25.4 20.3 0.0 18.2 Incr(,7e'♦y(d2),,sfveh 3.8 0.0 24:7 0.5 0.0 25.3 0.2 0.0 20.5 7.9 0.0 2,6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile B<lek0fQ(53%);veh/lr1i.7 0.0 14.5 0.2 0.0 12.5 0.8 0.0 17.9 2.3 0,0 6.7 7 i ,,!..: t Unsig.Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.8 0.0 54.9 26.6 0.0 57.0 15.5 "0.0 45.9 28.2 0,0 20.8 LnGrp LOS C ADC ABB ADC AC Approach Vol,veh/h 628 463 781 597 Approach Delay, s/veh 50.7 56.1 43 1 a60740ch LOS F D r, rger Assigned Phi , 3 IV 5 '7.767777'77,i7-7-8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),t1.2 41:0 5.3 32.2 7.9 44.2 8,4 29.0 Change Period (Y+Rc) s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4 5 Max Green Setting(Gmax . 36,5 2,1 26:7 5.4 37.8 3.9 24.9 Max Q Clear Time(g c+115,8 34.8 2.6 27.4 4.1 17.6 5.6 24.4 Green Ext Time(p x s 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 ,, 4 0 .. 0.2 I,� ` g MC 's , ti : HCM 6th Ctr!Delay 42.6 ,... , x. HCM 6th LOS D 180719 2038 AM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 • HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 07/19/2018 Int Delay,s/veh 40.3 ���.,}. ��](pp, . . SB . �vp7 . ,:$a'„6t;?T tVt3�� i7GTL' iJLTt Lane Configurations ` r 141. Traffic Vol,veh/ 0 0 156 " fl ...0. 345 0 1482 68 0 802 58 .� 't : M Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 156 0 0 345 0 1482 68 0 802 58 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0:11', 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 , ' ilN ... Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free fthannelized - - None - None - - Free - None Storage Length - - 0 - - 6 - - - - - .in Median Storage,# 0 ,._ .. - - 0 .... . 0 ,. s ......N .. a Grade,% - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - 77 77 79, , ..79 ` 79 96 96 '96 81 81 81 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 7 7 7 5 5 5 6 6 6 203 Q 0 : 437.: : 0....1544 71 990 72 ._.. . . ,,, Conflicting Flow All - - 533 - - 772 - 0 - - - 0 Stage 1 ...,�' ,.... .�. � , 2 s . n , . Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 7 24rim m { ,$! Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - CriticatHd stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy - - 3.92 - - 3.97 - - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 ;-' 0 ,421 0 0 —285_:... 0 . �� : 0 : _' . ,,. 4 Stage 1 0 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 - - Stae 2 0 ; 0 0 0 0 0 01 ,,, Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 420 -285 >, ..git. sir - 2174 , Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - - - - - Stage ;!:lailjijg.4tjtigfgtililiilti0.t•r.l;Etlrtap.12.EilljOeftf.% Stage - - - - - - - - - - - - 11277, .. HCM Control Of l3 s 21.3 289.2 HCM LOS C F • a.,..,,..�.. .__. <., „<.. ..,. n,,._........ >�-.�ims�°,..�.�}E. __ ��,-r�_ i.,_ w ..��. ,✓I�=.A.:. =�� tai`' Capaciti(veh/h) - 420 285' . = ° 1 :.. `,Y. :` 9r z .iYi*OtifittaitatO HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.482 1.532 - - HCM Control[Dela s - 21:3 289.2. 'R RI � ��- �: � �' HCM Lane LOS - C F - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 2,6 25.4 - —:Volume exceeds capacity $`Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined *:All major volume in platoon z 180719 2038 AM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 1 : Lanikaula Street / Lanikaula Street & Kinoole Street 07/19/2018 f - c 4- 4\ t P \* l d Lane Configurations 5 T. ') I '1 i4 1 T. Traffic Volume(vehlh) 60 442 86 60 404 73 87 211 39 156 498 77 Future Volume (veh/h) 60 442 86 60 404 73 87 211 39 156 498 77 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 67 497 97 67 449 81 118 285 53 166 530 82 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 191 512 100 146 520 94 226 536 100 433 599 93 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.38 0.38 SatFlow,veh/h 1781 1512 295 1781 1534 277 1781 1526 284 1781 1580 244 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 67 0 594 67 0 530 118 0 338 166 0 612 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 0 1807 1781 0 1811 1781 0 1809 1781 0 1824 Q Serve(g_s), s 2,2 0.0 29.1 2.2 0.0 24.6 3.8 0.0 13.4 5.3 0.0 28.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c).s 2.2 0.0 29.1 2.2 0.0 24.6 3.8 0.0 13.4 5.3 0.0 28.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 191 0 612 146 0 614 226 0 635 433 0 691 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.00 0.97 0.46 0.00 0.86 0.52 0.00 0.53 0.38 0.00 0.89 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 191 0 612 146 0 614 226 0 635 462 0 691 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d), s/veh 22.3 0.0 29.3 23.7 0.0 27.8 21.5 0.0 23.3 17.2 0.0 26.1 Incr Delay(d2),siveh 1.1 0.0 28.9 2.2 0.0 12.2 2.2 0.0 3.2 0.6 0.0 15.5 Initial 0 Delay(d3).s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °bile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 17.0 1.0 0.0 12.3 1.7 0.0 6.1 2.1 0.0 14.6 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),stveh 23.4 0.0 58.2 25.9 0.0 40.0 23.6 0.0 26.5 17.8 0.0 41.6 LnGrp LOS C A EC A DC A CB A D Approach Vol,veh/h 661 597 456 778 Approach Delay. s/veh 54.7 38.4 25 i 30.5 Approach LOS D q _. D; " ,. ., , _ C 0 6,''';',17:'.7t-7 8._ Timer-Assigned�'hs <'1 2 '''''7,"'"A,7:,."-•:7-7±.:'0'6'-"`''''''''';-Phs Duration(G4-Y+Rc),s 11.7 36.1 7.2 35.0 9.2 38.6 7.2 35.0 Change Period (Y+Rc). s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gm ax),s 8:7 30.1 2.7 30.5 4.7 34.1 2.7 30.5 v ; _ , Max C Clear Time(g_c+I1) s 7.3 15.4 4.2 31.1 5.8 30.2 4.2 26.6 Green Ext Time(p_c).s 0.1 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.2 '1 ...:rte 1n r`secfian S b a 5 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 39.8 HCM 6th LOS D 180719 2038 PM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 07/19/2018 " v c - t4\ t M`lGC,..�t �,8�q .cam&t�„ ��^[[yy �a�^ ay��g w mr"� w (G��yy `6�" i r ,it Pw4EBLr T. #"'R �'j � ` a r �4 la S 3 '�Y CR .t.,..e 1.� ..4h�rR.NS. .,�. ,.., P�* ......, , f...,....„a .... .-+t....T: .. .. .... Lane Configurations vi Traffic Volume(veh/h) 122 431 89 24 363 139 89 409 19 215 545 115 Future Volume(veh/h) 122 431 89 24 363 139 89 409 19 215 545 115 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/hfIn 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 :41.v�u_, ,mo , Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 136 479 99 27 408 156 101 465 22 253 641 135 Peak Hour Factor 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0,88 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.85 ! 4 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 177 490 101 118 368 141 149 628 30 377 625 132 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.33 0.33 0.02 0.29 0.29 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.42 0.42 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1503 311 1781 1278 489 1781 1771 84 1781 1491 314 Grp Volume(v).veh;h 136 0 578 27 0 564 101 0 487 253 0 776 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/1n1781 0 1813 1781 0 1767 1781 0 1855 1781 0 1805 15:2140 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.8 0.0 28.4 1.0 0.0 25.9 3.3 0.0 20.7 7.7 0.0 37.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 4.8 0.0 28.4 1.0 0.0 25.9 3.3 0.0 20.7 7.7 0,0 37J ,,,, i _ e.3 „,. Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 177 0 591 118 0 509 149 0 657 377 0 756 ` '> '-';').4144.0791 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.98 0.23 0.00 1.11 0.68 0.00 0.74 0.67 0.00 1.03 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 177 0 591 131 0 509 149 0 657 377 0 756 ,;' ti .;°,, HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 i 4.11AAViiktit Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 24.4 0.0 30.0 25.7 0.0 32.1 23.2 0.0 25.4 18.1 0.0 26.2 !nor Dela (c12),s/veh 18.3 0:0 31.3 1.0 0.0 73,2 11,5 0.0 7,4 4.6 0.0 39.6 !ItrigaSair Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/IrQ.8 0.0 17.0 0.4 0.0 21.0 1.8 0.0 10.1 3.4 0.0 23.5 `it , z. ag Unsig.Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 42.7 0.0 61.3 26.7 0.0 105.3 34.7 0.0 32.8 22.7 0.0 65.8 `4,117". LnGrpLOS D AEC A F C ACC A F Approach Vol,veh/h 714 591 588 1029 �" ' � " ce Approach Delay, s/veh 57.7 101.7 33.1 55.2 Approach LOS E F C Aiiittidigletta Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 _4 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),t3.8 36.4 6.0 33.8 8.0 42.2 . 9.4 30.4 Change Period (Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax)1.3 31.9 2.1 28.7 3.5 37.7 4.9 25.9 , "4F E °��t s 7,412. ;';1 Max 0 Clear Time(g_c+119, 22.7 3.0 30.4 5.3 39.7 6.8 27.9 Green Ext Time.{p c),.s 0.9 2.1 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 60,8 HCM 6th LOS E 180719 2038 PM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM 3: Lanikaula Street & Mamalahoa Highway 07/19/2018 9 k$ vn_4tt�.T .ter •S'lja .�+ i e ,�<d ,.rK .'t C' .. �P2",`I�' Int Delay,s/veh 57.5 .. : EBL- EBT. EB wsi WBR NBL • NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r +fid Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 322 0 0 175 0 1447 100 ; 0 1730 102 � � �� 0 Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 322 0 0 175 0 1447 100 0 1730 102 Conflicting Peds. #Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None None - - Free - - None Storage Length 0 - 0 - 7 Venin Median Storage, - �0 `� 0 - Grade, % - - 0 - - 0 - - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 78 78 78 92 92 92 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles % 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 0 0 403 0 0 224 0 1573 109 0 2035 120 'x Conflicting Flow All - 1078 787 0 0 Stage 1 } - 'OtteS 4i ; C' 2.:2;;.,.h 14410 . .. ... :'._ . 1- Stage 2 - - .. ' "` a Critical Hdwy 7.14Z„ .,� ,716 ,,. Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - �� Critical Hdwy Stg 2 a tt ,. ._ tOrt Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - 3.93 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 ,0 —184 011'0 285 '07;"7 0 0 ' Stage 1 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0 Stage 2 0 ":"0 .... ': ..... .0 - 0 �:b .. .` 0 0_ S pom Platoon blocked, Mov Cap-1 Maneuver E' x, ' :gLC .bZPV b. ',, r Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - Stage 1 :` . j, �, .ff. X �,.�-, .��:.. day _ 4.,�,�:,.�n.. •.. : �sy��, �.. Y��;: Stage 2 - - - - - - - :��},>[,}raa�� ,� 'TC HCM Control Delay,s$592.8 52 0 0 HCM L.OS F F Minor LLnetMajor Mvmt NBT EBLn1WBLn1; SBT Capacity(veh/h) - 184 285 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 2.188 0.787 HCM Control Delay(s) -$592.84WV:1M 4�M, HCM Lane LOS F F s'< Volume exceeds capacity $:Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined `:All major volume in platoon 180719 2038 PM W sll RG_new dwy.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Lanikaula Street & Kilauea Avenue 07/25/2018 c4- 4\ * Moveret ° 77r „ ,EBT EBR VOL WBT WBR`" trs NBT NBR Swart " .. Lane Configurations 'j 'i 1 '1i T T Traffic Volume(vehih) 122 431 89 24 363 139 89 409 19 215 545 115 Future Volume(veh/h) 122 431 89 24 363 139 89 409 19 215 545 115 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fed-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus,Adj 1;00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlhiln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 136 479 99 27 408 156 101 465 22 253 641 135 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap;veh/h 177 589 122 170 368 141 149 628 30 377 625 132 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.39 0.39 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.42 0.42 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1503 311 835 1278 489 1781 1771 84 1781 1491 314 Grp Volume(v).veh/h 136 0 578 27 0 564 101 0 487 253 0 776 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/Ir ;. 1781 ;1814 835 0 1767 1781 0 1855 1781 0 1805 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.7 0.0 25.6 2.7 0.0 25.9 3.3 0.0 20.7 7.7 0.0 37.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s It., 4.7 0.04 25.6 18.9 0.0 25.9 3.3 0.0 20.7 7.7 0.0 37.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c),`veh/h`b 177 , 0l 711 170 0 509 149 0 657 377 0 756 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.81 0.16 0.00 1.11 0.68 0.00 0.74 0.67 0.00 1.03 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 177 0 1(;'711 170 0 509 " 149 0 657 377 0 756 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(1) 1.00 0.00 :1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d), s/veh 24.0 0.0 24.4 37.0 0.0 32.1 23.2 0.0 25,4 18.1 0.0 26.2 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 18.3 0.0 0`1` 7.1 0.4 0.0 73.2 11.5 0.0 7.4 4.6 0.0 39.6 Initial 0 Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 2.8 0.0 11.8 0.6 0.0 21.0 1.8 0.0 10.1 3.4 0.0 23.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 42.3 0.0 31.5 37.4 0.0 105.3 34.7 0.0 32.8 22.7 0.0 65.8 LnGrp LOS D A CD A F C A CC A F Approach Vol,veh/h 714 591 588 1029, Approach Delay. s/veh 33.6 102.2 33.1 55.2 Approach LOS C F C Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 A w a Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 13.8 36.4 39.8 8.0 42.2 9.4 30.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 9.3 31.9 35.3 3.5 37.7 4.9 25.9 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11), s 9.7 22.7 27.6 5.3 39.7 6.7 27.9 Green Ext Time(p_c),s Q.0 2.1 2.3 0.0 8.0 -0.0 00 �� F*7 ,0,E Intersection Summary SY m.,lr,' 71fff "T a A+ 7 r17 rOl TrYI "7 77Wit7M 77, HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 55.0 HCM 6th LOS D 180719 2038 PM W sll RG_new dwy mitigation.syn Synchro 10 Report SSFM International Page 1 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY OF HAWi34 g Nrill pr 1 ' n1 HILO, HAWAII DATE: November 5, 2018 Mottneutotase TO: Michael Yee, Planning Director FROM: partment of Public Works, Engineering Division SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 18-000231) Request: RS-10 to CG-20 Applicant: Bank of Hawaii TMK: 2-2-024:003 Sorry for the delay. We have reviewed the subject request forwarded by your memo dated October 4, 2018 and offer the following comments for your consideration: All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on site and not directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared and the recommended drainage system shall be constructed meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works. The drainage study and improvements must be completed prior to the construction of any proposed structures. The subject parcel is in an area designated as Zone X on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Zone X is an area determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain. Based on the proposed zoning, we recommend the applicant provide improvements to the subject property's entire Kinoole and Lanikaula Streets frontage consisting of a "full width" concrete sidewalk of 10' width meeting the requirement of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the approval of the Department of Public Works. The driveway connections on Kinoole and Lanikaula Streets shall also conform to Chapter 22, County Streets, of the Hawaii County Code. Install streetlights and traffic control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works. The applicant shall be responsible for the design, purchase, and installation of such devices. Questions may be referred to Robyn Matsumoto at 961-8924. Planning Dept. 121524 Exhibit 3 Kay, Christian Mil ff i Hill 1 ' From: Takaba,Aaronr �� Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 9:24 AM�r'i1 ,. ;' 'r TNT To: Kay, Christian ,un,'t,'f 1 6, lii;"'.'.'-\I! Subject: Bank of Hawaii Change of Zone Application REZ 18-000231 Christian, My only comment would be to restrict access on Lanikaula St to right in/right out. I think there will be concerns with cars trying to turn left into the Lanikaula St d/w,especially considering the proximity of the driveway to the intersection and the heavy traffic in area. Aaron Flonning Dept., t 2 21 oq JWATE, ,. 19j J. ' DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY • COUNTY OF HAWAII //,/'` � 345 KEKUANAO A STREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAII 96720 TELEPHONE (808) 961-8050 • FAX (808) 961-8657 October 17, 2018 TO: Mr. Michael Yee, Director Planning Department _- FROM: Keith K. Okamoto, Manager—Chief Engineer x -O SUBJECT: Change of Zone Application (REZ 18-000231) -B Applicant: Bank of Hawaii Request: RS-10 to CG-20 Tax Map Key 2-2-024:003 • ca We have reviewed the subject application and have the following comments and conditions. Water can be made available from an existing 8-inch waterline within Kino`ole Street and Lanikaula Street which front the subject parcel in accordance with the Department's existing water availability conditions, which are subject to change without notice. The Department has no objection to the proposed application subject to the applicant understanding and accepting the following conditions: 1. The Department requests that the applicant submit estimated maximum daily water usage calculations for the proposed use, prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii, for review and approval. The water usage calculations should include the total estimated daily water usage in gallons per day and the estimated peak flow in gallons per minute (GPM), including irrigation use. Upon receipt of the water usage calculations above, the Department will make a determination as to the water commitment deposit amount and prevailing facilities charge, which is subject to change,to be paid. Based on the water demand calculations, the Department will determine the appropriate service lateral and meter-size required. 2. The proposed zoning will require the installation of a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly, within five (5) feet of the meter on private property. If a larger or additional meter is required, a backflow prevention assembly will also be required for that meter. The installation of the backflow prevention assembly(s) must be inspected and approved by the Department before water service can be activated. r . . . Water, Our dost Precious Resource. . . 7(a Waif ?Cane. . . z1e' al� Dept. t F The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer. Mr. Michael Yee, Director Page 2 October 17,2018 3. Subject to other agencies' requirements to construct improvements within the road right-of-way fronting the property affected by the proposed development,the applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and adjustment of the Department's affected water system facilities, should they be necessary. Please be informed that the existing 8-inch waterline within Kino'ole Street is adequate to provide the required 2,000-gallons per minute of flow for fire protection,as per the Department's Water System Standards. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Troy Samura of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070, extension 255. Sincerely yours, 1/4V411411/441aP Keith K. Okamoto, P.E. Manager—Chief Engineer TS:dfg copy— Mr. Sidney M. Fuke Bank of Hawaii Harry Kim � William A.Kucharski Mayor Director Wilfred M.Okabe •• .N•:1�. Diane A.Noda Managing Director Deputy Director Euixnfg of Painat`t DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 345 Kekuanao'a Street,Suite 41 •Hilo,Hawai`i 96720 Ph:(808)961-8083•Fax:(808)961-8086 cohdem@co.hawaii.hi.us http://www.hawaiicounq.gov/environmental-management/ MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Yee, Director Planning Department H FROM: William A. Kucharski, Directordi ( ! t—• Environmental Management Dep. ,;'','-••t DATE: October 11,2018 - 3 r SUBJECT: Change of Zone Application(REZ 18-000231) Applicant: Bank of Hawai`i Request: RS-10 to CG-20 Tax Map Key: (3)2-2-024:003 The Solid Waste Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Solid Waste Division for details): (X ) No comments. ( ) Commercial operations, State and Federal agencies,religious entities and non-profit organization may not use transfer stations for disposal. ( ) Aggregates and any other construction/demolition waste should be responsibly reused to its fullest extent. ( ) Ample and equal room should be provided for rubbish and recycling. ( ) Green waste may be transported to the green waste sites located at the West Hawai`i Organics Facility and East Hawai`i Organics Facility, or other suitable diversion programs. ( ) Construction and demolition waste is prohibited at all County Transfer Stations. ( ) Submit Solid Waste Management Plan in accordance with attached guidelines. ( ) ExistingSolid Waste Management Plan is to be followed. Provide update to the department on current status. ( ) Other: 121142 County of Hawai`i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer "fl ail _J a kap Mr.Michael Yee,Director October 11,2018 Page 2 The Wastewater Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Wastewater Division for details): ( ) No comments. (X) Require connection of existing and/or proposed structures to the public sewer in accordance with Section 21-5 of the Hawaii County Code. ( ) Require Council Resolution to approve sewer extension in accordance with Section 21- 26.1 of the Hawai`i County Code. Complete Sewer Extension Application. ( ) Require extension of the sewer system to service the proposed subdivision in accordance with Section 23-85 of the Hawai`i County Code. (X) Check or line out as applicable: [ ] If required by the Director of the Department of Environmental Management("Director of DEM"), [X] applicant shall conduct a sewer study in accordance with the then applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. Applicant shall provide such sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require,which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation of impacts of the proposed project. Contact Wastewater Division Chief for details. ( ) Other: WK:mef • Nrilt 1 �1 cm 0 -�,roe":\,,1 �,: � - � l Harry Kim uo?N••:== 0wa�' Darren J. Rosario ai or i _'• L++ 1� Fire Chief Lance S.Uchida 111 •+�..-„,'a - - Deputy Fire Chief 11,`14-O;-• NP, Countp of R9atuat`t HAWAI`I FIRE DEPARTMENT 25 Aupuni Street•Suite 2501•Hilo,Hawaii 96720 (808)932-2900•Fax(808)932-2928 November 7,2018 TO: MICHAEL YEE, PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: DARREN J. ROSARIO,FIRE CHIEF SUBJECT: Change of Zone Application (REZ 18-000231) Applicant: Bank of Hawaii Request: RS-10 to CG-20 Tax Map Key:2-2-024:003 In regards to the above-mentioned Change of Zone application, the following shall be in accordance: NFPA 1,UNIFORM FIRE CODE,2006 EDITION Note: Hama?State Fire Code, National Fire Protection Association 2006 version, with County of Hawed?amendments. County amendments are identified with a,preceding "C—"of the reference code. Chapter 18 Fire Department Access and Water Supply 18.1 General. Fire department access and water supplies shall comply with this chapter. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature, or where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy, or where access for fire apparatus is unduly difficult, or areas where there is an inadequate fire flow, or inadequate fire hydrant spacing, and the AHJ may require additional safeguards including, but not limited to, additional fire appliance units, more than one type of appliance, or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved. • 18.1.1 Plans. 18.1.1.1 Fire Apparatus Access. Plans for fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. WA . • 121674 .y ;4; fir` Harming Dpi .: ,F Hawai'i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. Is-�a • v Michael Yee November 7, 2018 Page 2 18.1.1.2 Fire Hydrant Systems. Plans and specifications for fire hydrant systems shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. C— 18.1.1.2.1 Fire Hydrant use and Restrictions.No unauthorized person shall use or operate any Fire hydrant unless such person first secures permission or a permit from the owner or representative of the department, or company that owns or governs that water supply or system. Exception: Fire Department personnel conducting firefighting operations, hydrant testing, and/or maintenance, and the flushing and acceptance of hydrants witnessed by Fire Prevention Bureau personnel. 18.2 Fire Department Access. 18.2.1 Fire department access and fire department access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Section 18.2. 18.2.2* Access to Structures or Areas. 18.2.2.1 Access Box(es). The AHJ shall have the authority to require an access box(es) to be installed in an accessible location where access to or within a structure or area is difficult because of security. 18.2.2.2 Access to Gated Subdivisions or Developments. The AHJ shall have the authority to require fire department access be provided to gated subdivisions or developments through the use of an approved device or system. 18.2.2.3 Access Maintenance.The owner or occupant of a structure or area, with required fire department access as specified in 18.2.2.1 or 18.2.2.2, shall notify the AHJ when the access is modified in a manner that could prevent fire department access. 18.2.3 Fire Department Access Roads. (*may be referred as FDAR) 18.2.3.1 Required Access. 18.2.3.1.1 Approved fire department access roads shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building hereafter constructed or relocated. 18.2.3.1.2 Fire Department access roads shall consist of roadways, fire lanes,parking lots lanes, or a combination thereof. 18.2.3.1.3* When not more than two one- and two-family dwellings or private garages, carports, sheds, agricultural buildings, and detached buildings or structures 400ft2 (37 m2) or less are present, the requirements of 18.2.3.1 through 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be modified by the AHJ. Michael Yee November 7,2018 Page 3 18.2.3.1.4 When fire department access roads cannot be installed due to location on property, topography, waterways, nonnegotiable grades, or other similar conditions, the AHJ shall be authorized to require additional fire protection features. 18.2.3.2 Access to Building. 18.2.3.2.1 A fire department access road shall extend to within in 50 ft(15 m) of at least one exterior door that can be opened from the outside that provides access to the interior of the building. Exception: 1 and 2 single-family dwellings. 18.2.3.2.1.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13,NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R,the distance in 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be increased to 300 feet. 18.2.3.2.2 Fire department access roads shall be provided such that any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located not more than 150 ft (46 m) from fire department access roads as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. 18.2.3.2.2.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13, NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R,the distance in 18.2.3.2.2 shall be permitted to be increased to 450 ft(137 m). 18.2.3.3 Multiple Access Roads. More than one fire department access road shall be provided when it is determined by the AHJ that access by a single road could be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, or other factors that could limit access. 18.2.3.4 Specifications. 18.2.3.4.1 Dimensions. C- 18.2.3.4.1.1 FDAR shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20ft with an approved turn around area if the FDAR exceeds 150 feet. Exception: FDAR for one and two family dwellings shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 15 feet, with an area of not less than 20 feet wide within 150 feet of the structure being protected. An approved turn around area shall be provided if the FDAR exceeds 250 feet. C- 18.2.3.4.1.2 FDAR shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less then 13ft 6 in. C- 18.2.3.4.1.2.1 Vertical clearances may be increased or reduced by the AHJ,provided such increase or reduction does not impair access by the fire apparatus, and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating such approved changes. Michael Yee November 7,2018 Page 4 18.2.3.4.1.2.2 Vertical clearances shall be increased when vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to accommodate fire apparatus. C- 18.2.3.4.2 Surface. Fire department access roads and bridges shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads(25 Tons) of the fire apparatus. Such FDAR and shall be comprised of an all-weather driving surface. 18.2.3.4.3 Turning Radius. C- 18.2.3.4.3.1 Fire department access roads shall have a minimum inside turning radius of 30 feet, and a minimum outside turning radius of 60 feet. 18.2.3.4.3.2 Turns in fire department access road shall maintain the minimum road width. 18.2.3.4.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 ft(46 m) in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the fire apparatus to turn around. 18.2.3.43 Bridges. • 18.2.3.4.5.1 When a bridge is required to be used as part of a fire department access road,it shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with county requirements. 18.2.3.4.5.2 The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 18.2.3.4.5.3 Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges where required by the AHJ. 18.2.3.4.6 Grade. C— 18.2.3.4.6.1The maximum gradient of a Fire department access road shall not exceed 12 percent for unpaved surfaces and 15 percent for paved surfaces. In areas of the FDAR where a Fire apparatus would connect to a Fire hydrant or Fire Department Connection, the maximum gradient of such area(s)shall not exceed 10 percent. 18.2.3.4.6.2*The angle of approach and departure for any means of fire department access road shall not exceed 1 ft drop in 20 ft(0.3 m drop in 6 m)or the design limitations of the fire apparatus of the fire department, and shall be subject to approval by the AHJ. 18.2.3.4.6.3 Fire department access roads connecting to roadways shall be provided with curb cuts extending at least 2 ft(0.61 m)beyond each edge of the fire lane. Michael Yee November 7,2018 Page 5 18.2.3.4.7 Traffic Calming Devices. The design and use of traffic calming devices shall be approved the AHJ. 18.2.3.5 Marking of Fire Apparatus Access Road. 18.2.3.5.1 Where required by the AHJ, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained to identify fire department access roads or to prohibit the obstruction thereof of both. 18.2.3.5.2 A marked fire apparatus access road shall also be known as a fire lane. 18.2.4* Obstruction and Control of Fire Department Access Road. 18.2.4.1 General. 18.2.4.1.1 The required width of a fire department access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including by the parking of vehicles. 18.2.4.1.2 Minimum required widths and clearances established under 18.2.3.4 shall be maintained at all times. 18.2.4.1.3*Facilities and structures shall be maintained in a manner that does not impair or impede accessibility for fire department operations. 18.2.4.1.4 Entrances to fire departments access roads that have been closed with gates and barriers in accordance with 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be obstructed by parked vehicles. 18.2.4.2 Closure of Accessways. 18.2.4.2.1 The AIIJ shall be authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across roads, trails, or other accessways not including public streets, alleys, or highways. 18.2.4.2.2 Where required, gates and barricades shall be secured in an approved manner. 18.2.4.2.3 Roads, trails, and other access ways that have been closed and obstructed in the manner prescribed by 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be trespassed upon or used unless authorized by the owner and the AHJ. 18.2.4.2.4 Public officers acting within their scope of duty shall be permitted to access restricted property identified in 18.2.4.2.1. Michael Yee November 7, 2018 Page 6 18.2.4.2.5 Locks, gates, doors, barricades, chains, enclosures, signs, tags, or seals that have been installed by the fire department or by its order or under its control shall not be removed, unlocked, destroyed, tampered with, or otherwise vandalized in any manner. 18.3 Water Supplies and Fire Hydrants 18.3.1* A water supply approved by the county, capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are hereafter constructed, or moved into or within the county. When any portion of the facility or building is in excess of 150 feet(45 720 mm) from a water supply on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on- site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided when required by the AHJ. For on-site fire hydrant requirements see section 18.3.3. EXCEPTIONS: 1. When facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system the provisions of section 18.3.1 may be modified by the AHJ. 2. When water supply requirements cannot be installed due to topography or other conditions, the AHJ may require additional fire protection as specified in section 18.3.2 as amended in the code. 3. When there are not more than two dwellings, or two private garage, carports, sheds and agricultural. Occupancies, the requirements of section 18.3.1 may be modified by AHJ. 18.3.2*Where no adequate or reliable water distribution system exists, approved reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, fire department tanker shuttles, or other approved systems capable of providing the required fire flow shall be permitted. 18.3.3*The location, number and type of fire hydrants connected to a water supply capable of delivering the required fire flow shall be provided on a fire apparatus access road on the site of the premises or both, in accordance with the appropriate county water requirements. 18.3.4 Fire Hydrants and connections to other approved water supplies shall be accessible to the fire department. 18.3.5 Private water supply systems shall be tested and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25 or county requirements as determined by the AHJ. 18.3.6 Where required by the AHJ, fire hydrants subject to vehicular damage shall be protected unless located within a public right of way. Michael Yee November 7, 2018 Page 7 18.3.7 The AHJ shall be notified whenever any fire hydrant is placed out of service or returned to service. Owners of private property required to have hydrants shall maintain hydrant records of approval, testing, and maintenance, in accordance with the respective county water requirements. Records shall be made available for review by the AHJ upon request. C— 18.3.8 Minimum water supply for buildings that do not meet the minimum County water standards: Buildings up to 2000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 3,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings 2001- 3000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 6,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, 3001- 6000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 12,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, greater than 6000 square feet, shall meet the minimum County water and fire flow requirements. Multiple story buildings shall multiply the square feet by the amount of stories when determining the minimum water supply. Commercial buildings requiring a minimum fire flow of 2000gpm per the Department of Water standards shall double the minimum water supply reserved for firefighting. Fire Department Connections (FDC) to alternative water supplies shall comply with 18.3.8 (1)- (6)of this code. NOTE: In that water catchment systems are being used as a means of water supply for firefighting, such systems shall meet the following requirements: 1) In that a single water tank is used for both domestic and firefighting water, the water for domestic use shall not be capable of being drawn from the water reserved for firefighting; 2) Minimum pipe diameter sizes from the water supply to the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be as follows: a) 4" for C900 PVC pipe; b) 4" for C906 PE pipe; c) 3"for ductile Iron; d) 3' for galvanized steel. Michael Yee November 7, 2018 Page 8 3) The Fire Department Connection(FDC) shall: a) be made of galvanized steel; b) have a gated valve with 2-1/2 inch,National Standard Thread male fitting and cap; c) be located between 8 ft and 16 ft from the Fire department access. The location shall be approved by the AHJ; d) not be located less than 24 inches, and no higher than 36 inches from finish grade, as measured from the center of the FDC orifice; e) be secure and capable of withstanding drafting operations. Engineered stamped plans may be required; f) not be located more than 150 feet of the most remote part,but not less than 20 feet, of the structure being protected; g) also comply with section 13.1.3 and 18.2.3.4.6.1 of this code. 4) Commercial buildings requiring a fire flow of 2000gpm shall be provided with a second FDC.Each FDC shall be independent of each other,with each FDC being capable of flowing 500gpm by engineered design standards. The second FDC shall be located in an area approved by the AHJ with the idea of multiple Fire apparatus'conducting drafting operations at once, in mind. 5) Inspection and maintenance shall be in accordance to NFPA 25. 6) The owner or lessee of the property shall be responsible for maintaining the water level, quality, and appurtenances of the system. EXCEPTIONS TO SECTION 18.3.8: 1) Agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and shade houses with no combustible or equipment storage. 2) Buildings less than 800 square feet in size that meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements. 3) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and detached garages 800 to 2000 square feet in size, and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements,the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 1000 feet. 4) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, and storage sheds greater than 2000square feet,but less than 3000 square feet and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements,the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 500 feet. Michael Yee November 7, 2018 Page 9 5) For buildings with an approved automatic sprinkler system, the minimum water supply required may be modified. If there are any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Fire Prevention Bureau at(808) 932-2911. DARREN J. ROSARIO Fire Chief CB:ds DAVID Y.IGE o „- BRUCE S.ANDERSON PhD. GOVERNOR OF HAWAII ti� oea � DIRECTOR OF HEALTH ; .fly _ 1,' STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 171 P.O.BOX 916 ,1 HILO,HAWAII 96721-0916 MEMORANDUM ;- .-1 D t • -J DATE: October 12, 2018 zi TO: Mr. Michael Yee Planning Director, County of Hawaii FROM: Eric Honda yl}� District Enviro mental Health Program Chief SUBJECT: Change of Zone Application(REZ-18-000231) Applicant: Bank of Hawaii Request: RS-10 to CG-20 TMK: 2-2-024:003 The applicant would need to meet the requirements of our Department of Health Air Pollution Rules, Chapter 60.1,Title 11, State of Hawaii for fugitive dust control. If there is need to discuss these requirements, please contact our Clean Air Branch staff at Ph. 933-0401. Construction activities must comply with the provisions of Hawaii Administrative Rules, Chapter 11-46, "Community Noise Control." 1. The contractor must obtain a noise permit if the noise levels from the construction activities are expected to exceed the allowable levels of the rules. 2. Construction equipment and on-site vehicles requiring an exhaust of gas or air must be equipped with mufflers. 3. The contractor must comply with the requirements pertaining to construction activities as specified in the rules and the conditions issued with the permit. Should there be any questions on this matter,please contact the Department of Health at 933- 0917. We recommend that you review all of the Standard Comments on our website: http://hawaii.zov/heal th/environmental/env-planning/landuse/landuse.html. Any comments specifically applicable to this project should be adhered to. The same website also features a Healthy Community Design Smart Growth Checklist (Cl-lecklp}st) created by Built Environment Working Group (BEWG) of the Hawaii State Michael Yee October 12, 2018 Page 2 of 2 Department of Health. The BEWG recommends that state and county planning departments, developers,planners, engineers and other interested parties apply the healthy built environment principles in the Checklist whenever they plan or review new developments or redevelopments projects. We also ask you to share this list with others to increase community awareness on healthy community design. II DAVID Y.IGE 4t. o►ft. JADE T.BUTAY GOVERNOR t� iaao DIRECTOR /J 1 Noll U 1 q''I ' '1 `S , ' Deputy Directors 'k : 4: y ROY CATALANI ,p � 7r ROSS M.HIGASHI • EDWIN H.SNIFFEN V'tvnvrN"'... is 1 DARRELL T.YOUNG STATE OF HAWAII IN REPLY REFER TO: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STP 18-119 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET STP 8.2552 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813-5097 November 2, 2018 Mr. Michael Yee Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department East Hawaii Office 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Mr. Yee: Subject: Bank of Hawaii Change of Zone Application (REZ 18-000231) Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii TMK: (3) 2-2-024:003 The Applicant is proposing to construct a 7,500 square feet single-story office building with 36 parking stalls to house its banking functions at this site. The Department of Transportation's comments on the subject project are as follows: Airports Division 1. The nearest point of the proposed bank site parcel is approximately 1.1 mile from the end of Runway 3 at Hilo International Airport(ITO). Every proposed development within 5 miles from a state airport is subject to the State of Hawaii, Office of Planning, Technical Assistance Memorandum (TAM): http://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/docs/TAM-FAA-DOT-Airports 08-01-2016.pdf. 2. The proposed project may be exposed to fumes, smoke, noise, vibrations, odors, etc., resulting from aircraft flight operations. The developer should also be cognizant of potential single event noise impacts from aircraft arriving and departing ITO, although the site is located outside of the 55 Yearly Day-Night Average Sound Level Noise Contour as depicted on the attached ITO Future 2018 Noise Exposure Map. 3. It is recommended that you submit a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Form 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration according to the Code of Federal Regulations,Title 14, Part 77.9, if construction or alteration, including construction cranes, is within 20,000 feet of a public use or military airport which 121644 n2211g 1JVA- q Mr. Michael Yee STP 18-119 November 2, 2018 STP 8.2552 Page 2 exceeds a 100:1 surface from any point on the runway of each airport with its longest runway more than 3,200 feet. This form and criteria for submittal can be found at the following website: https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaalexternal/portaLjsp 4. If the proposed development includes photovoltaic (PV) installation, the glint and glare from a PV array can create a hazardous condition for pilots approaching ITO. Thus, a glint and glare analysis must be submitted to FAA for review. The following website may assist you with preparation of a glint and glare analysis: www.sandia.eov/glare. PV system installations have also been known to emit radio frequency interference (RFI) to aviation-dedicated radio signals, disrupting the reliability of air-to-ground communications. The responsible PV system owner must ensure that the PV installation will not create any RFI with the aviation communication frequency. If there are any questions, please contact Mr. Blayne Nikaido of the DOT Statewide Transportation Planning Office at (808) 831-7979 or by email at blayne.h.nikaido@hawaii.gov. Sincerely, JADE . TAY Director of Transportation Attachment Sponsor's Certification Legend The Norse Exposure Maps and accompanying ,. _ .__ _- -. _f. .___ --._.._.__._t _.. _ _. -__._, - _ 2018 DNL Contours documentation for HAo International Airport, - submitted in accordance with 14 C.F.R. `-`--• ---1--.._._ `. DNL 75 Pert 150 with the best available information area hereby certified as true and complete to the best - 'DNL 70 of my knowledge end belief.I verify trial the data O DNL 85 C I I.used to develop V119 Future (2018) Noise ae ' ' j (,' _ Exposure Map is representative of existing 1 CL� E ts'--N 4 - I DNL 60(local use only) conditions.Interested persons have been afforded - , , - adequate opportunity to submit their views data s^^^=DNL 55(local use only) and comments concerning the correctness !D E � 1 - Boundary and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Maps. ----- - ----� - Airport B dary ;: -- - __._ Facility ' '7'3 ok,....4- 'A' KaoA..11o t rr Noise-sensitive ve Date of Glenn M.Okimoto,Ph.D .F t ti i - ,lr.A. r ',moi . ru ca Church Signature Director of Transportation ' • MMlRe. ( s.n J r.'k _. i School State of Hawaii �d I r• ".....•' 1 /,'. ,,,r, Nen Compatible Land Use tt r. • R b + `.�" -I •+.� " fes- ... 4r� Proposed D r nada r' sN� ✓ w - Residential 6"r® . 8cy ,`.'.+}i. '"' ;,,b,.t„ .-�.. t 10s,. �_' __ _ .---- _•... ••-- The County of Hawaii has jurisdiction 1 `��NN I _ qq q��3•11aqsr�� 2-.. r:...'''rr�� . ._7 -- -, ,y __ ._ -_.._.pry i " over land uses around the airport. , t f H a a it -. l4 n^ �.r�•', - •�•-� •• ate' DOT 0 DM_is the State of �g, n. . �, 1 4°' ..."- �� - The 55 DNL is the disclosure area. "r.._ R, wars, ' I� _ � -'- ---- - The DNL 55 and 60 aro shown for ' • r. / t L� `t Stale of Hawaii purposes only and It, •• ' gV � w " f :�' e!. .'44,' ,41411 eis r ® i 1` are not part of the NEM. ` W I .� ~� eel r , , \F Y � r N. x-,A,.sooe1r W n 4. r - -r Y C is 11110, . li;\`���a-7 r 4L. RTV. ri 4,614 tti 1 1'..\".-.4.4-.1.-,c � � — eminal Hell..d " .. ;r+v5AXtA � ,, E I ! `� . �71 i Mllita Hell.ad ��,, b. •artt4ed - i, .. _ _ i 1 o -- �, 1itia / • NAPA NRR aY R aVATXIN' - /'•� r Aall . . ff k • i / p 5. a . IIT\sv ilAft c+r 4 -117/08/11' •`,....0 % r \...- 4t Inch....24;;8812 f • ,0' HID Inrsrrw6onslAirport 7l1JD Exhibit NEM-2:Future(2018)Noise Exposure Map 111811118 • SUZANNE D.CASE Cl LMRIE NS)N DAVID Y.ICE r�, \9S9 y BOARD Dr LAND AND NCIVKAI.RFSIII'RCF. GOVERNOR OF HAWAII y r . '\,,-' COMMISSION ON WATER \IANAGEMEN t I IJ i a ROBERT K.AIASI[)4 ... F ;l FIRM IJEI'IRY j iv,r4 1 #; •Ter-if j. f JEFFREY T.PETERSON nEVI❑Y nIRE OR IVA TER r ,G AAAI OCEAN ar +C, WAVING OFCf CONVEYANCES R CNS' IN BVRF.WATREOURI G Sl. n +F•, ffTM:SIISSNSE V TION A RESOURCE 41\V:\C:F.AtF.S"1 �.,-, � r✓` CONSERVATION AND Cl1 VSt:\I LANDS L .L+,���,1^• STATE OF HAWAII aINSI:RVVIION AND RESOURCES ENDIRCEMINIENGLKEERIND ' FORESTRY AND WEIR lEh DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES H LSTORIC INFSFRVAIltu Stat O( a't K;VIOI)[AWF.ISLAND RESERVE COMMISSION STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISIONsi PARKS KAKUHIHEWA BUILDING 601 KAMOKILA BLVD,STE 555 KAPOLEI,HAWAII 96707 November 30,2018 IN REPLY REFER TO: Michael Yee,Planning Director Log No. 2018.02358 County of Hawaii - Doc.No. 1811 SN20 Department of Planning Archaeology Pauahi Street,Suite 3 Hilo,HI 96720 Dear Mr. Yee: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review— Rezoning Application from RS-10 to CG-20—Bank of Hawaii(REZ 18-000231) Waiakea Ahupua`a,South Hilo District,Island of Hawaii TMK: (3)2-2-024:003 This letter provides the State Historic Preservation Division's (SHPD's) review of the request for rezoning of the subject parcel that was received by our office on October 4, 2018. The applicant, Bank of Hawaii, is requesting rezoning (REZ 18-000231) of the subject parcel from Residential (RS-10) to Commercial (CG-20) to build a single-story, 7,500 sq. ft. office building, parking and related infrastructure. The proposed project area consists is • the entire 0.9247-acre parcel. A review of our records indicates that this project area has not been subjected to an archaeological inventory survey. There are no known historic properties within or near the general vicinity of the proposed project area.The submittal indicates that there are four single-family residences within the project area, however, these structures are not subject to historic preservation review. The project area has been fully impacted by urban development. There are no outstanding mitigation commitments for the parcel and aerial photographs confirm that this project area has been previously impacted. Based on available information, SHPD's determination is no historic properties affected for the proposed rezoning application. Pursuant to HAR §13-284-7(e), when the SHPD agrees that the action will not affect any significant historic properties, this is the SHPD's written concurrence and historic preservation review ends. The historic preservation review process is ended. Therefore,the application process may proceed. Please contact Sean N8leimaile at (808) 933-7651 or at Sean.P.Naleimailei&hawaii.aov for any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Aloha, ,¢lair Doweet Alan S.Downer,PhD Administrator,State Historic Preservation Division Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer cc. Christian Kay,Christian.Kav(Thhawaiicounty.gov Melissa Dacayanan,Melissa.Dacayanan(ahhawaiicounty.gov Jeff Darrow,Jeff.Darrowahawaiicountv.gov Sid Fuke, sidfuke( hawaiiantel.net _ c: nn nq e 3c v PtE OF�q SUZANNE D.CASE DAVID V.IGE w 3� CHAIRPERSON , GOVERNOR OF HAWAII f' iiiU' 2! 1 q p(TJ 1 i 1 BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES p(�.; 1 - • ' 1 t- v COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE 7,,„,,,tC' :, '4• MANAGEMENT ds. . .y! s 1 iT _- STATE OF HAWAII ;, 6 DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 November 1, 2018 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attention: Mr. Christian Kay via email: christian.kav(c�hawaiicounty.00v 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Mr. Kay: ' SUBJECT: Change of Zone Application (REZ 18-000231) from Single-Family Residential (RS-10) to General-Commercial (CG-20) located at the Corner of Lanikaula and Kinoole Streets, Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3)2-2-024:003 on behalf of Bank of Hawaii Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment,on the subject matter. The Land Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) distributed or made available a copy of your request pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR's Divisions for their review and comments. At this time, enclosed are comments from the (a) Engineering Division, (b) Division of Forestry & Wildlife, and (c) Land Division — Hawaii District on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call Darlene Nakamura at(808)587-0417. Thank you. - Sincerely, Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc: Central Files �,.--g rd P�J .I, 1-]! 'T � 2 2 2 i. -J SE.OF..~q SUZANNE D.CASE DAVID Y.IGE 49-> 19sa y .CHAIRVERSON GOVERNOR OF HAWAII y r. BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE ?` ' )••: MANAGEMENT d%yndandN c:ti{ I I Nat •; •e c� Edi V: :p.— +1 1 Q. . , _ STATE OF HAWAII S�ofHa s DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION -; POST OFFICE BOX 621 r- - . HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 . _ i •- 1`i c.".:._:, O int October 12, 2018 - .-- (DfM MEMORANDUM _= 1:._-o '--cam cm DLNR Agencies: �_. _Div. of Aquatic Resources ' O _Div. of Boating &Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division X Div. of Forestry&Wildlife MI Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management ►l _Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Division-Hawaii District z...-; X Historic Preservation % — F -ussell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator S Z., ........7%_____ .SUBJECT: Change of Zone Application (REZ 18-000231)from Single-Family Residential (RS-10)to General-Commercial (CG-20) LOCATION: Corner of Lanikaula and Kinoole Streets, Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3)2-2-024:003 APPLICANT: County of Hawaii Planning Department on behalf of Bank of Hawaii Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. We would appreciate your comments by October 31, 2018. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at 587-0417. Thank you. ( ) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. (,/ ) Comments ar- .ttached2 Signed: ( 7----- I Print Name: Ca S. hang, Chief Engineer Date: (6 ?''' I Attachments cc: Central Files DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LD/Russell Y. Tsuji Ref: Change of Zone Application (REZ 18-000231) from Single-Family Residential(RS-10) to General-Commercial (CG-20), Corner of Lanikaula and Kinoole Streets,Waiakca, South Hilo,Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-2-024:003 COMMENTS The rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44CFR), are in effect when development falls within a Special Flood Hazard Area(high risk areas). State projects are required to comply with 44CFR regulations as stipulated in Section 60.12. Be advised that 44CFR reflects the minimum standards as set forth by the NFIP. Local community flood ordinances may stipulate higher standards that can be more restrictive and would take precedence over the minimum NFIP standards. The owner of the project property and/or their representative is responsible to research the Flood Hazard Zone designation for the project. Flood Hazard Zones are designated on FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), which can be viewed on our Flood Hazard Assessment Tool (FHAT) (http://gis.hawaiinfip.org/FHAT). If there are questions regarding the local flood ordinances,please contact the applicable County NFIP coordinating agency below: o Oahu: City and County of Honolulu, Department of Planning and Permitting (808) 768-8098. o Hawaii Island: County of Hawaii, Department of Public Works (808) 961-8327. o Maui/Molokai/Lanai County of Maui,Department of Planning (808)270-7253. o Kauai: County of Kauai, Department of Public Works (808) 241-4846. Signed: r� f CAR, Y S C CHIEF ENGINEER Date: 1 / ! 2vJ SUZANNE D.CASE DAVID Y.IGE 4'9,tB S9 qy CHAIRPERSON GOVERNOR OF HAWAII • ' • - r y: 41'78 BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES a t COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE :4$,9, \''1 MANAGEMENT Et �t3e cynd and Nar - .y �� '-V IPS• _ .. ._... . i.., _.• -444>:5-U4? '�.. ♦'. STATE OF HAWAII SwreoPHa+fd� _ DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LANA DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 October 12, 2018 MEMORANDUM „--- -TO: DLLNR Agencies: _Div. of Aquatic Resources (` _Div. of Boating &Ocean Recreation ..Engineering Division X Div. of Forestry&Wildlife _Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands • X Land Division- Hawaii District X Historic Preservation 101 • FROM: •ussell.Y.Tsuji, Land Administrator SUBJECT: l Change of Zone Application (REZ 18-000231)from Single-Family amity Residential (RS-10)to General-Commercial (CG-20) LOCATION: Corner of Lanikaula and Kinoole Streets,Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3)2-2-024:003 APPLICANT: County of Hawaii Planning Department on behalf of Bank of Hawaii Transmitted\for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. We would appreciate your comments by October 31,2018, • If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at 587-0417. Thank you. - • • ( ) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. ( }te) Comments are - = . ed , C-3 Signed: Print Name: DA a fae'all,Administrator Date: 2- m Attachments cc: Central Files SUZANNE D.CASE F y - DAVID Y.TGE , 'C ......O...... q _ CFLAIRPERSON RESOURCES . BOARD or LAND AND NATURAL GOVERNOR OF HAWAII .0 P',,19.59 '• COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 'it±'-j s. ` � ROBERT K.SIASUDA t E t.1,4.1.-,10,,04. = ; FIRST DEPUTY fi 44 p2 • COC fi} 4` �x •Q�aJEFFREY T.PEARSON,P.E. DEPUTY DLQECTOR-WATER •$ a ra0''." AQUATIC RESOURCES BOATING AND OCEAN RECREATION ..(14 BUREAU OF CONVEYANCES STATE OFH [=J� COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT '9'0412141 At STATE HAWAII CONSERVATION CONSERVATION RESOURCES NFOLANDS EMF:NS DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES NGLNEERENG DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE Fu ORT,PRESERVATION 1151 PUNCHBOWL STREET,ROOM 325 I:AHOOLAWE ISLAND SERVE COMMISSION LAND HONOLULU,HAWAII 96813 STATE PARKS OCT 262619 MEMORANDUM: TO: Russel Y. Tsuji, Administrator Land Division ATTN: Darlene Nakamura pes FROM: David G. Smith, Adminis SUBJECT: Division of Forestry and Wildlife Comments on proposed Change of Zone Application (REZ 18-000231) from Single-Family Residential (RS-10) to General-Commercial(CG-20). The Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) has received your inquiry regarding the proposed change of zone application from Single-Family Residential (RS-10)to General-Commercial (CG-20) for the parcel of land located at the northeastern corner of Lanikaula Street and Kinoole Street in Waiakea, Hilo on the Island of Hawai'i, TMK: (3) 2-2-024:003. The land parcel is 40,282 square feet with 4 single-family dwellings on the site. The proposed project would consist of removing the residential dwellings and the construction of an approximately 7,500 square foot single-story office or bank building for the Bank of Hawaii, a drive-through ATM, 2 access roads, and 36 parking stalls. You state no surveys of flora or fauna at the site have been conducted. The State and Federally listed Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project area and may roost in trees. To avoid the potential for impacts to this tree-roosting species, site clearing should be timed to avoid disturbance during the bat birthing and pup rearing season(June 1 through September 15). If this cannot be avoided woody plants greater than 15 feet(4.6 meters)tall should not be disturbed, removed, or trimmed without determining if bats are using them. We note that artificial lighting can adversely impact seabirds that may pass through the area at night causing disorientation which could result in collision with manmade artifacts or grounding of birds. For any nighttime lighting that is required at the facility, DOFAW recommends that any lights be fully shielded to minimize impacts. Nighttime work that requires outdoor lighting should be avoided during the seabird fledging season from September 15 through December 15. This is the period when young seabirds take their maiden voyage to the open sea. DOFAW recommends using native plant species and avoiding those that are potentially invasive for landscaping and revegetating disturbed areas. The native plants should be appropriate for the area(i.e., climate conditions are suitable for the plants to thrive, historically occurred there, etc.). i _ DOFAW recommends using native plant species for landscaping that are appropriate for the area (i.e.climate conditions are suitable for the plants to thrive,historically occurred there,etc.). Please do not plant invasive species. You may refer to www.plantpono.org for guidance on selection and evaluation for landscaping plants. Finally,you should avoid moving soil or other plant material within the island due to the potential presence of pathogens (e.g., Rapid Ohia Death). Consider the recommendations in the Hawai'i Interagency Biosecurity Plan at http://dlnr.hawaii.gov/hisc/plans/hibp/ in planning, design, and construction. • We appreciate your efforts to work with our office for the conservation of our native species. Should the scope of the project change significantly, or should it become apparent that threatened or endangered species may be impacted, please contact our staff as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact Jim Cogswell, Wildlife Program Manager at (808) 587-4187 or James.M.Cogswell@hawaii.gov. Ac SidneyFuke, Planning Consultant 100 Pauahi Street,Suite 212•Hilo,Hawaii 96720 . L(!I.; l►2 fifl 1,1 nn7 •Planning•Variance•Zoning •WI Telephone:(808)969-1522•Fax:(808)969-7996 L `, •Subdivision•Land Use Permits E-mail:sidfuke@hawaiiantel.net • •Environmental Reports December 12,2018u1'I'i' i v'- Mr.Michael Yee,Director Planning Department COUNTY OF HAWAII 101 Pauahi Street Hilo,HI 96720 Dear Mr.Yee: Subject: Rezoning Application(REZ 18-000231) Applicant: Bank of Hawaii TMK:2-2-024: 003 Thank you for providing me with agency and related comments to date on the subject matter. In response to those comments,we would like to note the following: 1. Fire Department("FD"): The fire flow and related requirements will be complied with and addressed in conjunction with the processing of the appropriate building permit for the proposed structure,which will also include compliance with the Department of Water Supply's standards. Please note that the FD is one of the approving agencies for a building permit,and as such,without its approval,the project cannot be constructed. 2. Water Department: The Department noted that water is available from its system. The applicant will provide the required water usage calculations by a Hawai'i licensed engineer to determine the appropriate water commitment fee. In conjunction with the • water improvements for the project,the appropriate meter size and backflow preventer will also be installed. This will also include any off-site improvements fronting the property. 3. Police Department: The Department noted that it did"not anticipate any significant impact to traffic and/or public safety concerns." 4. Department of Environmental Management: The Solid Waste Division had no comments on the request. Per the Wastewater Division's comments,if needed,a sewer study can be prepared and submitted for said Division's review/approval. Further,the project will connect to the County sewer line. 5. Department of Public Works("DPW"): A site drainage plan will be prepared and -submitted to the DPW for its review and approval in conjunction with the Plan Approval process. The plan will reflect on-site containment of all project generated water through a system of drywells or other appropriate means. The construction plans will be reflected on the building plan that must be reviewed and approved by DPW-Engineering. 3;-'9 : cnn ng nent, 122095 g u1�h ocR /� Mr.Michael Yee,Director December 12,2018 Page 2 Further,the applicant intends to make the necessary ADA-compliant sidewalk improvements fronting the subject property;make driveway improvements consistent with the County's standards;and install,if needed,necessary street lights(as opposed to traffic lights)and traffic control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division. These will all be done prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for the project. 6. State Department of Health:The construction noise and dust control requirements of the Department of Health will be adhered to by the appropriate contractors. 7. State Department of Transportation—Airports Division: ' The Airports Division noted the subject site is a little more than a mile from the airport runway and is thus subject to the State Office of Planning,Technical Assistance Memorandum. The applicant's architect will review and assure that the structure addresses the Memorandum. Further the applicant understands and accepts(as are all residences and businesses in this area)of the possible single-event air flight or noise issues. The FAA Form 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction is not applicable,as the project site is more than 20,000 feet from the airport. Finally,there is a potential that the project may include photovoltaic(PV) system. If so,a glint and glare analysis will be submitted to the FAA,for its review prior to its installation. 8. State Historic Preservation Division: In its letter, dated November 30,2018,the SHPD confirmed that"no historic properties"would be affected by the proposed development. We trust that the above adequately responded to the comments to date. If not or if there are further questions or comments on this matter,please let me know. Thank you very much. incerely, vv.) S NEY M.FUKE Planning Consultant Copy—Bank of Hawaii w/agency comments via email Kay, Christian i??R rtrI r.m From: Sid Fuke <sidfuke@hawaiiantel.netp ,','. : • - ',?.-; �FNT Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 10:56AM:., •, To: Kay, Christian Cc: 'Fogle, Natalie'; 'Yani, Mike' • Subject: BOH Hilo BC-Agency Comments for BOH REZ-18-231 Attachments: 2038 AM W Report.pdf;2038 PM W Report.pdf; 180727 Final TIAR.pdf; Appendices_finaLpdf Aloha Christian, I would like to share the traffic consultant's response to DPW-Traffic comments for your information and appropriate action. The argument here is that full movements at Lanikaula Street is feasible without significantly compromising LOS movements;and if it does,the applicant would be willing to install the restriction as noted in the response. Hope that helps. FYI also,the consultant will also be present at the meeting to answer questions. LMK if you have further questions on this matter. Thanks and have a ho, ho, ho Holiday Season! Sid We've completed an analysis of the Lanikaula driveway and the results are attached (along with the TIAR and appendices for reference).This is for worst case conditions,2038 with project, PM peak hour.We've also added AM peak hour to verify it is better than PM conditions. Findings: 1. The expected number of vehicles making the left in movement is 17 in the PM peak hour(avg 1 every 3.5 minutes) 2. The left in movement has a very low volume/capacity ratio of 0.02, expected wait time of 9 seconds(LOS A) and 95th percentile queue of less than 1 vehicle. 3. The expected number of vehicles making the left out movement is 11 in the PM peak hour(avg 1 every 5 minutes) 4. The left out movement has a very low volume/capacity ratio of 0.12, expected wait time of 18 seconds (LOS C) and 95th percentile queue of less than 1 vehicle. 5. If queuing occurs from the left out vehicles,the queuing will be on the BOH property and therefore will not affect traffic flow on the public street. 6. The EB and WB through traffic at the driveway is free flow/uninterrupted and has assumed LOS A. 7. The driveway above was analyzed independently from the adjacent signalized intersection at Lanikaula and Kinoole, so it also needs to be considered that the driveway is about 215 ft east of the signal.Westbound traffic on Lanikaula is expected to queue back up to 340 feet or more during a red light(50th percentile queue of 17 veh,see App E of TIAR),so Eastbound left turners would need to have a gap at the driveway for them to make their move right away. If no gap is open in the queue,the left turner would need to wait until traffic clears to make their move. However, in an observation April of 2018,traffic easily cleared during every cycle of the traffic signal, even during the PM peak hour. 8. If driveway traffic is restricted to right in right out at the Lanikaula driveway, the"left in" traffic will shift and add to the left turn traffic at the EB leg of Lanikaula at the adjacent traffic signal. 9. If driveway traffic is restricted to right in right out at the Lanikaula driveway,the "left out"traffic will shift and add to the left turn traffic at the SB leg of Kinoole at the adjacent traffic signal. My conclusion, based on Synchro 10 analysis findings(HCM methodology) is that theEastboundleft turn vehicles at the Lanikaula driveway should have sufficient gaps to make their movement without a lot of queueing/waiting,even 20 years into the future using a 1%annual growth rate for background traffic.The one complicating factor is the queue n 122217 from Westbound traffic from the signal. However,the low number of vehicles expected to make the movement(17)will likely be able to find sufficient gaps to turn into the driveway, either while the queue is still or after traffic clears.The alternative, making the driveway a right in right out only,will shift the traffic to the Kinoole/Lanikaula signal, adding to those left turn volumes. Recommendation: keep the driveway full access when the project opens. Customers don't like to wait either and will, in general, navigate the fastest route into and out of the bank after a few visits. If queueing on Lanikaula becomes problematic in the future, a "no left turn 3-5 PM"sign can be added on Lanikaula for EB traffic, along with a no left turn out sign at the driveway.A queueing problem outside the peak hours is not anticipated and a general "No Left Turn" applying all day would be an excessive/unnecessary treatment. Please feel free to contact me with questions. Mahalo, Sue Susan LeBrun, P.E., PTOE I Sr. Traffic Engineer I Traffic Team Leader International PROGRESSIVE-INTEGRITY•NURTURING•CLIENT FOCUSED • 501 Sumner Street, Suite 620 I Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 T 808.628.5824 I F 808.521.7348 slebrun@ ssfm.com I www.ssfm.com Solving Hawaii's Housing Crisis NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may contain confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration, dissemination or distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message In error, or you are not an authorized recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies. 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Driveway . - 12/18/2018 • ntersectionT;i5:,:,";..,1.::',IIN:'..1,1c.3k(,'iVW:::.:;::''.,,,1 '.4' !.. ':(r....1:24",,,,, ,,:';',,::.:f,.2.:•.;*.:,:..,:,',.."'.;,:'''./'.V.---..7.;-;•:t E:4'-1,:'.4:ia::4.4.;.1,1''.':?,1''.-:-;'...:',.;-..:',,i3K-0,,,,..::F•':.;t03.0F, n0',. Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 Movement 4-- -..4`24:5'i,:'EB ''-':-",'EBT7, WBP--!•::WBFW:SB',',..`.SBRr-',.,---Z,l';i''::••••;',;''',A-2;'!:•?..,.`,,,,",--,,,';':-,;,,,,T.-1,'Al,,,..z-S':'..t:1;'i5.1,?,: :',1,-..::,-,1;;:i,,I,,.1.,*,;:::ie-•-..,..47.0.• Lane Configurations 4 ii Ire ..-• __,..._ ,_,..----- ... ......_,. •-_,.._ ,_..„.„.._,, _,,...,--„,...._,..,____,-,,,,,,,..„..., Traffic Volven . :,:7 549 : 36312 4, ' 5 •,,,,,,,,_,_-,___, ,,,._,,, ._,,,,,,„..,„„„•,,,,, „,„,,„,,,,,,_,,,,„,,,•„,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,',-,d Future Vol,veh/h 7 549 363 12 4 5 to-dicing 15ecis-AT: 00 OO-ii--.-6---'7 ' Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop kr diiinellied -7-..'- 7Riiii------Wii-----.'None . ,. .., . . • A,u3......1..-5....".P,T.Y.4.n..14...,. ”,'.I't,M•. V-, ,care Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage # ' -• • 0 • 0„ -. 0 • - • • • • • ' • Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - — _ _ . ,peak Hour Factor . 92_92,,,,,,,9 92 • ',92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 f37---4'-'--5--" ' ----'-- .--------------'---7:-.77'7""7:1 ... ., ,. -.., ,,,, .:, •,, 'u.Sup...,,,C '..9 , MajcirlMin-OTF.n kilajcifiK7-7:MajOiV;-:?.-2:::.Milio-r2 ".‘,:P'.'•F27,-.,'?'.."?.';'5'..',,,7- ..5.':•--.c•-:-;•;•:.',', f':7.,..."P,', -:r.•:,'4A,•':..',I':'.:-,I1W",r'tlili',: riei.7147.7:1 , Conflicting Flow All 408 0 - 0 1015 402 StageT" ' ".- '--402- Stage 27 - 613 - - , tiiiiCari-ldpy-,----7' 4.12- : 7: ---1.---" ---6A2 6.2f- - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.42 - . Critrcal"Hdwy' Stg 2 :, - - - 542 - ? , Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 . 1 Pot Cap-I Maneuver _,11511„,,.,.,.-, :,_,7,..,2.264 ,„,648 :,..,_,,,,,,•,,,,,,,,,,,, . L ,,,, ,,,__,•',,,,, Stage 1 - - - - 676 - Stage 2 ' - • - . - - 541 ' - • .. • ,' 'f , _ , , ,. ,, , - —• •,. ,,,.. . ,.., Platoon blocked,% - - - „ , . . ,,, , • ., ,, , ,. , x Moy Cap;71,Meneuver 1151• -,,,,..,...7_,,,,,__-_,,,,,261,,,,,,,,§48,,,,___________,,,,____________,•,„„,,,,,,,,,,,,•,,_,,,,,,;„,,,:,,_,,,,,,,,1 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 261 - '--Staiel --------7"--- - '''''------ :- 669 : 7.- . '— .---•-•"-..-------- ----7: 77--.--'--7-`-"r1 _ , , .., , , - . ...1 . , Stage 2 - - - - 541 - - 1 - „ •Approabh,','l•-,;.:F,,',..4:•:`,',--...,,,!. E:•i'Va;;i:i'rr‘•,-;-WB:„.=,'.', 4,.';-'7"ti3"79,77:77.7.777 ''!!:'•'."-,i•T' '2413,17%7;::'?a.'!'-'i'.f,'.6'.:j.:',. .,-,',•'0';.,•''.,,`..,'',,,,,,:',.4i: i.,:::1,1••ZI.,F-'N-E.;','.. I:1CM Control.Delay,,s_,,:_0,1_,,,,,,,,,,, ._,,,,O,,',,,,_,,,,,j4.4 _.,,,_, _,,,•,,,_____ " - ' '':-• -' ' , • : i - HCM LOS B ,. , . • . i , ,„, 9 , , • , ,.,, ,,,,,,,,,„, . , ,... ..1.4, .1. ..,L , . , . ,,.,.•, RiFoi-176765.EFFM7E717.7'3:-EU=;: EITTWBTA.WIA"STI:nif'1,',CF:•'.:,','•-••J.-. ';'1'.,'=:',.;:-...,;•;-'',.:-:;.:6,--.:;:::;,;:'•:• 0•::=',-:P.i.:•.:.-'!-:.'=:i,:•-;=;•ile'r4A. ;1,1,".6',::•'..i'•41?-;-;:i'",•44,. P.PP:qcity(veh/h) • 1151 '- '-- - 391 • - '-• " ' ' '-',-' ' ' 1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - - 0.025 . HCM Control Derey6F-- 8:1 0 :"--: , - - i4.4 ., . -,..... ..., HCM Lane LOS A A - - B Eigkl 5t1•17/,-0,tildO(V'eh) r 0 :---'"--"'"- ----d.i --- - --'-'- - -------7------""' '1'-7-7..'-'•--'-`11 181218 2038 AM W RG.syn Synchiro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TVVSC • 2: Driveway , 12/18/2018 Trifersectiati•,,. .:1!,-,1T,•.-Mi?i,:k',. •4:2,;i:••';'•..',;•,;,-;;;-:;:i. !-----s-1-.-g-.•.,••;-•••, :.....•• •:,,-,,,,•„,;-, •;•:•,::,::,F v,,,..,:.:,••:--,..:,„•.:•:,,,,?,•!,-,,,_,;.,-i•:-,7„)1,-;; -..:,-•,-;:i•:,;,,.,:•:i..,:,1,n:••,,,,,,,:j,.„--Jr.-7,,.7,7:,,?J'---5,---,0..,,,„0,q,••:•„7: Int Delay,s/veh 0.6 MOVernent ',..--;44.:,;,g'•,t:','.:,.. ',";EBLiq'EBT:::-WBT WBR 'SBL "SBR:•-.;•-;'-.7.. .4.1,••-!•?:::1'.1.•:-.;•,.-:,:',r,...•,•,:f'•;:•:4-.. ,',•'•';':i:k!1-••'7.A'2•.•:'-::1*-2-4i7;;4••',.M50-..(c.49. Lane Configurations +1' Traffic Vol yehlh-:' -17'. 620 '530 37 11 ' 23 , . ., • „ ,....L. , .,...1 _ _ . ___ Future Vol,veh/h 17 620 530 37 11 23 COnfliainiPe-ds,#/lii. .--"ti 0,, ,,,0 ..., Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop ) klitria.lized Non-e :::: ::,-,No'rie,27:,7,,2"7 :::::7:7::::::77:7‘2,,,L.,,,,,,_...:.L,„,:____" Storage Length . - - - - 0 Vellin deifiati,_$11ofiga7,4-: 7-`11"-"V ----:o"--,'•-:—. - 77 ---77:77-777.717-7,_-7:117.":„:1 Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factoe : 92 92_,•,,_92 92 92 o?_,,,._,,,__,,,,____ _,__,„:___ __,,„„,:____, Heavy Vehicles,%- 2 2 2 2 2 2 • Mvmt FIOW"--777 "16674"'576 746---;71r26-----"'"''-*---"""-----------'7'-'---""---77 - alor/Minor'.•:•'1,:'•.:',4f,:',,:ii'Major11: .•-•i".•Major2•••-•'',i.'••• 1Mitior2.,:ir....*?:?,••••:•::::•'•::::,;:,[''.-..--.F,'::::-Iii•?:-.1:.,.;,-5,',!;•,%.,:ie'''.'ilr :',ic;,--.1-4.;;:"....i••.:•1•:', 47,: :•,1 ,•-,Y,%,:,,4:17.•••, ?•Y.: Conflicting Flow All 616 0 0 1306 596 -, Stage 2 - - - 710 . „ Critical Hdwy 4.12 , - - 6.42 6.22 • • Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - , Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 • [- , -. . .. . . . , rot CaRAManduver_,.._964: ,...- ._7...,,.,, ,,_, .176__504 _ ,..1__i,_ „ll Stage 1 - - - - 550 - Stge 2 - - .. - -• 487 - . • . _.• . • , Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 ManeUyer • 964 - : 171 504 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 171 - 11 Stage 1 - - ' , -„ -.• ,_, - 53 . - • • • • J 1 Stage 2 - - - 487 - . 1 AiiiiiOaCh'',Yn.'2IT:qi; ;•',L:EB•:S-;',..t.=.: '.1,••q•.Wg„'.-1•'•••T,,;,:••2•'•,:.,,BB•;.,i!,.'!..44:',•"':,•':',...:"P•`,1;':•' 7;;;."-14'./.;','.,•,I'••';'.i=1,':'•;;;.';•1:;-',,,s2, 1"•:1:1e3tdst:F•VV,?, ;V::;`1:F,';:7•X'!,;,?Rat..,11 HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 : : ' , 0•. • , .18.2 ..4 HCM LOS C , .: . . ••.. •,- j „. . . Minor Latie/Majdi MVa'P.:7-• i'•2:EBL-' `lir T7TINT171-IVB P,SBLn 1:7';'.;'-' 7;-•":-471-:.---Ta.:77.7.:!•- •171''FRPF;:';',;,;77•FIXifikii":•:r.'.•.ie.Y'rv-;ily 1 Capacity,(yeh/h) :• 964 - - . • , 309 . . . . ` - A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 - - - 0.12 HCM Lane LOS . A - C . .• •-•,. I-1CM 95th,%tila 0(veh),,,,:.,_ • '0.1 __"_7.",___,,,,,:.___• OA 181218 2038 PM W RG.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 2 SidneyFuke, Planning Consultant 100 Pauahi Street,Suite 212 •Hilo,Hawaii 96720 •Planning•Variance•Zoning Dila Telephone:(808)969-1522• Fax:(808)969-7996 •Subdivision•Land Use Permits E-mail:sidfuke@hawaiiantel.net •Environmental Reports December 20,2018 Mr.Michael Yee,Director Planning Department COUNTY OF HAWAI'I 101 Pauahi Street Hilo,HI 96720 Dear Mr. Yee: Subject: Rezoning Application (REZ 18-000231) Applicant: Bank of Hawaii TMK: 2-2-024: 003 Thank you for providing me with a copy of the State Department of Land and Natural Resources comments on the subject matter. Its Engineering Division noted the necessity to comply with applicable National Flood Insurance Program requirements. In this case,the subject site is designated"X" or areas outside of the 100 year storm on the FIRM maps and, as such,the regulations are not applicable. Its Land Division—Hawai'i,District had no objections to the request. The Division of Forestry and Wildlife ("DOFAW")noted, as in other similar land use applications, the potential of the Hawaiian Hoary Bat to frequent this area and may roost in trees. In that regard, it offered suggestions to limit removal of any trees or site cleaning to certain periods. In this situation,the site has limited vegetation with little or no significant trees and is typically residential/commercial in character. As such,the applicant does not believe that such a restriction would be necessary or appropriate. Further,relative to lighting and seabirds, the proposed use will be diurnal and not nocturnal in operation. Accordingly,the nocturnal lighting impacts to the seabirds should be minimal,if at all. Finally, it is the applicant's intent—as also reflected in Planning Commission Rule No. 17 relating to landscaping—to landscape the project with native plant species. Understandably, invasive specifies will not be a part of the project's landscape regime. Although there is no threatened or endangered species on the subject site, in the unlikely event there is such an inadvertent finding, at the appropriate time the project landscaper will discuss its planc with the division's Wildlife Program Manager. Mr. Michael Yee,Director December 20, 2018 Page 2 We trust that the above adequately responded to the comments to date. If not or if there are further questions or comments on this matter,please let me know. Thank you very much. incerely, SIDNEY M. PUKE Planning Consultant Copy—Bank of Hawaii w/agency comments via email Kay, Christian ,i,.s _ , • From: - Sid Fuke <sidfuke@hawaiiantel.net>; . Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 8:47 AM To: 'Martin Mcginn' • Cc: Darrow, Jeff; Kay, Christian Subject: RE: rezoning request Attachments: GP LUPAG.png; Zoning Map.pdf; 2018-07-23 BOH Hilo_Conceptual Layout.pdf- Dear Mr. Mcginn, Thank you for sharing your comments with me, which were also shared and discussed with the _H applicant. Please note that the applicant has taken your comments to heart and hopes that with your input, appropriate mitigation measures can be developed to address your concerns. By way of background, the most significant land use policy document in guiding and managing the growth of an area is the County of Hawai'i General Plan (GP). That is the principal basis from which land use decisions are made. Relative to this site - including your property-the GP Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide map designates this area "HIGH DENSITY URBAN". (SEE ENCLOSED GP LUPAG MAP) Such a designation suggests the following land use: General commercial, inulrlple-/amily residential and related Services (residential- up 10 87 units per acre. I am attaching a copy of the map showing this designation for your use and information. You will note that this High Density Urban designation includes properties both fronting Kilauea and Kinoole Streets. In accordance with this GP designation, over the past 15-20 years, properties in this general area have been gradually rezoned into the commercial zone. Please see the ENCLOSED ZONING map, with the subject property marked by an X. Those areas shaded in brown are commercial zonings, including the property in pink, located kitty corner(southwest) of the subject property. At any rate, the applicant's proposed commercial zoning is consistent with this GP designation and the evolving commercial zoning in this area. It was on this basis and confirmation of these designations and land use appropriateness with the Planning Department that the applicant elected to proceed with its request. Please also note that while the historical emphasis on land use has been segregation of uses, the emphasis today is more one of mixed uses, which this project would have. That is the reason why, although not necessarily adjacent to your property, you see some commercial uses popping up in this area. i attach a copy of the zoning map which shows this. Notwithstanding this GP designation which suggests the appropriateness of this use and the evolving commercial zoning in this area, the applicant would like to find) ways to mollify your specific concerns. .In that regard, I am also attaching the proposed site plan which, while conceptual. can still be used for discussion purposes to address your concerns. As you can see, there is room for 3 vehicles before any possible backup or queuing occurs at the start of your property. It is undeniable that at times, there will be more than 3 vehicles lining up. In that regard, the applicant is willing to construct a fence and plant trees and other landscaping to help address perceived visual, noise, and air emission issues. The applicant would be willing to work with you and/or your potential buyer in determining the appropriate fencing and landscaping. Planning Dept. lirf,• d fl I t I t • On behalf of the applicant and in the interest of being neighborly, I would be more than willing to meet with you to discuss this matter further in the hopes of finding measures to further address your concerns and developing mitigation measures that are acceptable to both you and the applicant. I look forward to hearing and possibly meeting with you. Thank you very much! Sid Puke p.s. Please note that I have copied the appropriate staff at the Planning Department for its information and record. From: Martin Mcginn<mcginnmar@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, October 18, 2018 9:46 AM To: sidfuke@hawaiiantel.net Subject: rezoning request • We received your notice regarding the Bank of Hawaii request to rezone the lots at the northeast corner of Kinoole and Lanikaula. We own the flag lot at 1331 Kinoole. This change of zoning will have a huge negative impact on the livability of those in adjacent properties. This proposed bank is more suited to Kilauea where everything is commercial already. The timing of this could not be worse. We just recently signed a contract to sell this lot to Brian McBride who intends to build a house on it. He was buying it with the understanding that this was a nice quiet residential neighborhood. So this would be devastating if this is approved. This bank will have 36 parking stalls and worse, a drive through right along our property line. So there will be cars idling within a few feet of our property all day long. If this was adjacent to another commercial lot it would not be an issue. The noise and air pollution are not what we bargained for when we purchased this property. Our limited understanding of modern planning principles is that new commercial development is to be placed within established commercial zones so not to negatively impact a well established residential neighborhood. We strongly object to this Rezoning Request. Martin and Susan McGinn • Virus-free oisb4`i.adaSt corn • 2 i . 1 • . I I ,../ A: 0. . WV , • I % E..2SnAt ,alai,C..,0" P... t,osED CoCRCS-, ' t .. CRYA'*I ,0'0'-0- . :hut vont ' ' • I .,,i.,..‘... r 1.0..4.‘,SIALL...,SH.P.AVINCI SP...1. ..',..stv Dane,; r 4'.i,• - ------------.--- , t , -- ---' --------- --------- ' - -4.4-74\'... .'.---2-4‘....... ....7 ,. -7. .f/ • .,'' • 7 • „• • ( .1 ••• /4 • . ; f•-•-"2"4-.4.1-..F.'.,!,-.74""'1"-I-, .7” . '•:LT.:4:-',•‘7.7:-Tf".•-•••,'^•," .:14'-'',I 4/ .. .' • • • , I; ' H.- ..4.4-.•-./ I :8. • • •, • -t '-' L - . . . .....',t,A •. " . •Rt , n99.- . t-..•• I t.'*. 1.'..\*'; ' ! t, I I- ......, , .• .._ . • . . •o F „.. i :„. . _____ .,..,. . 1..LET.....m, '20 I : •• . .... s.41.040.DRI'VaL -.--. --- '• 1 1-- DT N.,to 15 SIA,LS 0 Vtli :A' ! .,7;',.• ,....._ 4 :il'..;:.1...: 'I I i . , 1 i ' • 1 . 1:.7.:.:4;...„..;•' 19 • I , • • i i ..T.Z.'''.1.`• I C 36 135 1 34 1 33 1 32 1 31 I 30 I 29 1 28 1 27 1 26 25 24 1 23 1 22 ........, : . . . XST ' ;r!` •1 I i • i ; k.'.,,.',.'.',:.-•-:',, 18 • taw'r i. i'''I".t.." I 1 Ei* ; I ! I ' 1 * I • : . I ' . • I , - • • ._::•12.:._:,12..1.. ._...,„, : I IS1 .,, . ._.:. .1 . . •.. .. ..... .......-...,..—.• . • • r 0.../ 1, ... . ., 17 ••- ,1" t • ;-:..t.--•-40-tit. --- -. 8....t.'; '1'.. ,,•3 • . nCI.11,10 an,. i . , ...TER t..1ERK. , 7 r" 16 ;',.....1,-.• I: tie I I • ., I I( A ' 1 A _________ , 1 15 \-.....'I. • .... 6 . j't"!"...."---'•'•": .-','''.1'..-.----•----••—.--. _..;.-.-.0,00.05C0 SwAti . 7 . I • 5 14 I 1 • z 1 n . I BANK OF HAWAII 'Iii-.• :,,... 1. BUILDING 4 1 1 I r— - 1 13., ,- rnI. ...............___ . __ ___.... . cn 3 12.._..(rm. 1 1 „ I E0141 l'nI • ; 'I i .?'R*';. 11 "?TE 00 -1; 11/,D,iITtir4Fl ; 010(001 0*00 • i 10 SElb.0,7 1.-0. . 1_ A. LEQUID4 I 1 i PROPOSED StEtEE- • - ____ ;;;;' 1 III --.-- FLOW DIREERON 1 * ' _.:____ ---ti S.'.?‘..LL ' ....*;•.t.'-'-',161,0',l'il ; '.: ;". q - ottE - )1 PR0P0sED C.Ir..--,,..„.. .,... . . -. r-4-'ll.1 --- ''''''' 1 • MITLI)lj"OFFI,Pat ,F4-1 , • ,' .- ' I • 0 • 11 , ' : . .. . . V;1;;T:-.1.-4-,---- r-i—.—?7---.--:!—7-"'." 1 • 'i. • !,' • `, • ' -;.--' ..` .' '', k0.0,...--47".'.....__ _...------1 .. .. ...:• . . ._ . •. „. I . Z0.._0a_. • ..... ., - - - --.. ,......F.... •. -•;-.J.'.._•-- sE AE,4-00-11 ,, 1 ; _ , .., . -' „ • . SCSIEMT- • „ - . . (04,0 001 AURAL . . I 7 L., y OW,f .:„ . . : % ,P/ • . . I ,..,40,3:::-'1.-3:'•-':-".':C.7S7 . 'stirPOsEr."DRAY • • , SE. MLANIKAULA STREET AN.,,-o• • -..... -.-..-.__.-.. . • . .. . ..„ .. . .- . . I IIII:EERDCE ••,• I CIVIL SITE ASSESSMENT FOR ...,-....: ,., 041040011 ' BANK OF HAWAII PROPERTY r5.- (.: ..:.,-:,::_:',., ".Y.!• 7.1'.1. . , - . . .. _ . . . • . . _ I I I / ...„,-,-,,,,,,...*„.-04 , -'—*:'•444.~..,..-.0.- ,4,3.rer rr br,....3 23 3.4230a,WAr'3.,-xts',-41;..,-;,,, , is,„,2.,;11-••14.,-* 4,44F-.4 tk,k41-4,VAN-VV:rnii,,, "L'tv,•4 ‘,„7,,,,,,,.._, ivi 4 •., , .......„.._14 „0„,4,,„....,,v,40.,•..„..,0.44:,e,,„,i1,,•71-,1-34.,.‘ ;!til.,$, ..,'r5,7,---,.,,„ z4,15,55-A5,w,75-51,5,444,-,-;:y4,-,5-_,-..4...15t-,:5: ...,5 5,474 --.1:2*,4541°-lit%TrI74- .AiWt4Z44*ii;:L4=515.5-,:7631? ''' - 4 6 ' 1 ---5— ---'' - -' --- -r,i,--Allta"1,` -1,-;'‘-‘' 4,-.'z'•avf,r '',, ."3,',4t>t'et,r4-4.!-,44-,,at. Ile.----or-;,..-...%‘,5-5•N‘t se-,--t,".55. ,i , 1, 1 ,,,..,,„„.„. !!,-..., ..-,..,+;;L,14.p.,14-tt -.;„:„.,,,„ 4,,,,o!,3!!!!,,,3,4'143'• .,7,.. ...II'''. !,,,-,_" ,t,i4a4art.„ .3;4\4 .1.1 .,f,12,trk.,,V.,r _,-- ! -h,:6 ',, , _—--— il i 491*%3 r) i r---,7;•—r----jirm,l6H.j , *-`:., -—--- 1 1 4,0ftkN .,,o, 0, M Li ' -- -4 ''' 61 AN" ,,,,,‘„ ,, 1 ..,.....,. ,. 0-ph airf- - - ii: ,, ' A 1,4'1•:','.'-''', _ ,, ;v.(1,- . 1"! "j*:!It..„. Z .,,,,,z3 0 ''' V ..... )KU LN Lti. ,,,. 1 0 t .. ...................... _ _ ..... ___ ___ ........._ ) 74Aie 5,,C4t s ',i'":1' ,t-,'' ,,,ey,,,57-51; •-',,,,--..5 _ - -- ,—N — _ 4 c 0_, ,....,,, '11 41 -.--- 1 1" -rg'crf..3 ' 4 1 , : , g 3_ ..; /7-.4.4 -33P ......_ - ra4 i , R 1 ; r---- , _,—, - i - . 1 7MAZ 1 A L ; I -- T_5 ,-`-3 1 m „: - , .,..-,v.,-:,7--1,--,•"-,,,--....4`...tA ' rr ; A ,4'.. .,t,. r, 1iI '-^.. i I r CBankOf lawaiiREZrevisedcond.doc 1.2.19 BANK OF HAWAII CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 18-000231) REVISED RECOMMENDATION AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The subject parcel consists of three(3) separate lots of record(Lot 17, Lot 18 and Grant 9646). The applicant plans to construct the proposed bank office building and related improvements across these lot lines. As such, the Director finds it prudent to require consolidation of the three(3) lots into one(1). Therefore, the Planning Director recommends adding a new Condition C requiring consolidation of the three lots within the subject parcel and re-letter the remaining conditions. C. Prior to issuance of Final Plan Approval,the applicant, successors or assigns shall obtain Final Consolidation Approval for consolidation of the three(3) lots of record within the subject parcel. B B ankO tHa w a i i REZ.c rk.12.19.18 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION BANK OF HAWAII CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 18-000231) Upon careful review of the request against the guidelines for granting a change of zone, the Planning Director is recommending that a favorable recommendation of the Change of Zone request be forwarded to the County Council. Since this recommendation is made without the benefit of public testimony, the Director reserves the right to modify and/or alter this position based upon additional information presented at the public hearing. This favorable recommendation is based on the following findings: The applicant is requesting a Change the zoning district from Single-Family Residential — 10,000 square feet (RS-l0) to General Commercial —20,000 square feet (CG-20) zoning district for 40,282-square feet of land in order to develop a new, single- story, 7,500 square-foot office building to house banking functions at this site. The height of the structure is not expected to exceed forty-five (45) feet, the maximum allowable by the Zoning Code. While higher than normal for a single-story building, this added height is designed to provide for the option to accommodate a mezzanine within the structure to accommodate office and related uses. Additionally, the applicant is proposing a drive- through ATM along the northern boundary of the subject property. This new structure would provide the bank the option to either relocate some of its operations or to provide another branch in proximity to the University of Hawai`i at Hilo and this area of the community. The applicant is proposing a 36-stall parking lot (including two handicapped stalls) to accommodate customer and employee parking. This on-site parking and landscaping would be provided as required by the Zoning Code. In order to consider an area for any type of zoning designation, the applicable goals, policies and standards of the General Plan must be adequately addressed. It is only through such a comprehensive policy analysis approach that evaluations and decisions can be made to better time and stage developments to achieve growth determined by the General Plan and related planning documents. The implications of these evaluations and decisions must also be considered as they may have an impact on similar areas in the County. The change of zone request from an RS-10 to a CG-20 zoning district conforms to applicable goals, policies and standards of the General Plan. The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical relationship among the various land uses. The request to change the zoning to a CG-20 district conforms to the LUPAG Map, which designates the property and the surrounding area as High Density Urban. Such designation allows general commercial, multiple family residential and related services (multiple family residential- up to 87 units per acre). In addition to being consistent with the LUPAG Map, the request would also support the following goals and policies of the General Plan Land Use element: • Provide for commercial developments that maximize convenience to its users. • Provide commercial developments that complement the overall pattern of transportation and land usage within the island' s regions, communities, and neighborhoods. • Commercial facilities shall be developed in areas adequately served by necessary services, such as water, utilities, sewers, and transportation systems. • Commercial development shall maintain or improve the quality of the present environment through the consideration of visual, access, landscaping, and other design elements in their development. • Preference shall be given to commercial lands with a reasonably level topography. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of the Kino`ole Street/West Lanikaula intersection. The property is rectangular in shape with about 220 feet of frontage along West Lanikaula Street and 160 feet of frontage along Kino`ole Street. The topography is fairly level. According to tax records there are four (4) single-family -2- dwellings on the site, three (3) of which were constructed in 1946, while the other, in 1928. These dwellings will be removed and/or relocated for possible housing use, if deemed appropriate and salvageable, by the contractor. The property is surrounded by a mix of commercial and residential uses. There is an office building directly across of and kitty corner of the subject site on property zoned Neighborhood Commercial (CN-20). There is also a small commercial complex zoned General Commercial (CG-10) on the corner of Lanikaula and Kilauea Avenue, less than 200 feet east of the subject parcel. The University of Hawai`i at Hilo campus begins approximately 500 feet to the west at Ululani Street. There are also some scattered single- family residences north of the subject site along Kino`ole Street and an apartment complex fronting West Lanikaula Street, zoned Multiple-Family Residential (RM-4). Despite the transitioning nature of the neighborhood from residential to commercial zoning and the proposed zoning's consistency with the General Plan, there are still several residentially-zoned lots in close proximity to the subject property. The applicant received a letter of opposition from the owner of parcel 2-2-024:031, which is situated directly adjacent to the north of the subject property. The owner objected to the noise and air pollution caused by cars accessing the bank parking lot and drive up bank teller service. Additionally, the lot owner is in the process of selling the lot with the expectation of the buyer that he was purchasing a lot in a quiet, residential neighborhood. In response, the applicant proposed the installation of privacy fencing and landscaping along the shared boundary to mitigate noise and visual impacts. The preceding will be added as a condition of approval. The applicant will provide basic infrastructure needed to support commercial uses such as County potable water, connection to the County sewer system, sidewalk improvements along West Lanikaula and Kino`ole Streets, and electrical service. Thus, the applicant's request is consistent with surrounding land uses and zoning and the goals, policies and standards of the General Plan. All essential utilities and services are available to the site. Proposed access to the subject parcel is via two (2) full-movement driveways from West Lanikaula Street and Kino`ole Street positioned as far from the intersection as possible. Both West -3- Lanikaula Street and Kino`ole Street are two-lane, paved County roadways with curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements fronting the subject parcel, all within a 60-foot wide right-of-way. Additionally, there is a signalized intersection, complete with dedicated left-turn lanes fronting the subject site. Based on the proposed zoning, the Department of Public Works (DPW) recommends that the applicant provide improvements to the subject property's entire Kino`ole and West Lanikaula Streets frontage consisting of a"full width" concrete sidewalk of ten (10) foot width meeting the requirement of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the approval of DPW. DPW further recommends that the applicant install streetlights and traffic control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works. The applicant shall be responsible for the design, purchase, and installation of such devices. Finally, DPW requires driveway connections shall also conform to Chapter 22, County Streets, of the Hawai`i County Code. The proposed bank use is anticipated to generate approximately 31 entering and 22 exiting new trips in the A.M. peak hour and 82 entering and 82 exiting new trips in the P.M. peak hour. Based on the preceeding and in accordance with the Zoning Code's concurrency requimrent, the applicant prepared a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR). The TIAR studied and evaluated the project's traffic impact at three (3) intersections: West Lanikaula and Kino`ole Streets; West Lanikaula Street and Kilauea Avenue; and East Lanikaula Street and Mamalahoa Highway. The TIAR found that with or without the proposed project and based on a five (5) and ten (10) year projection (2023 and 2028), the overall intersection Level of Service (LOS) would continue to be "C" at the Kino`ole Street/West Lanikaula Street intersection, and LOS C and D, at the Kilauea Avenue/West Lanikaula Street intersection. The LOS, however, for westbound movements on West Lanikaula Street at Kilauea Avenue (the through and right turn lane) would move from "D" to "E" during the PM peak hours. At the Mamalahoa Highway, the LOS would continue to be unchanged at "F." DPW-Traffic Division recommended restricting driveway access on West Lanikaula Street to right in/right out movements. In response, the applicant's traffic engineer provided analysis indicating that incidence of left hand turns into the property -4- from West Lanikaula Street and associated traffic queuing would be minimal, and therefore restricting movements at that driveway would be an excessive/unnecessary treatment. Despite this analysis, DPW-Traffic Division reiterated their concerns about vehicle queuing to the intersection, citing observations of higher congestion along that roadway at certain times (PM peak hours and lunchtime), which may not be captured by assumptions based in part on national data found in the Trip Generation Handbook. Therefore, DPW-Traffic Division upheld their original recommendation restricting driveway access from West Lanikaula Street to right in/right out movements. The Planning Director generally defers to DPW-Traffic Division's expertise on traffic related issues on county roadways, therefore, the restriction of driveway access from West Lanikaula Street to right in/right out movements will be added as a condition of approval. The project site has no severe geological or topographical problems which cannot be properly rectified, or which would render the land unusable. The property is located in flood zone"X"which is an area determined by FEMA to be outside the 500-year flood plain. County water is available from an existing from an existing 8-inch waterline within Kino`ole Street and Lanikaula Street which front the subject parcel. The 8-inch waterline is capable of providing the required pressure of 2,000 gallons per minute of water flow for fire protection for commercial zoning. The Department of Water Supply (DWS)will determine the appropriate water commitment deposit, prevailing facilities charge, and appropriate service lateral meter size required once the applicant provides estimated maximum daily water usage calculations for the proposed commercial land use. The DWS also recommends a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly be installed. The preceding will be added as conditions of approval. The subject property is accessible to the County sewer. The Department of Environmental Management(DEM)has indicated that any existing or new structure is required to connect to the public sewer in accordance with Section 21-5 (Sewers) of the County Code. In addition, DEM requires the applicant conduct a sewer study in accordance with the then applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval -5- to connect to the County sewer system. Finally, the applicant shall provide such sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require, which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation of impacts of the proposed project. The preceding will be added as conditions of approval. There are no municipal.waste collection services in the County. According to the application, solid waste will be handled by commercial haulers who will dispose of the refuse at the county landfill in Hilo and eventually to the West Hawai`i Sanitary Landfill. Electrical and telephone services are available to the property. Police and fire services and medical services are available nearby in Hilo. Lastly, this recommendation is made with the understanding that the applicant remains responsible for complying with all other applicable governmental requirements in connection with the proposed use, prior to its commencement or establishment upon the subject properties. Additional governmental requirements may include the issuance of building permits, the installation of approved wastewater disposal systems, compliance with the Fire Code, installation of improvements required by the American with Disabilities Act(ADA), among many others. Compliance with all applicable governmental requirements is a condition of this approval; failure to comply with such requirements will be considered a violation that may result in enforcement action by the Planning Department and/or the affected agencies. Based on the above findings, the request to rezone the property from a Single- Family Residential - 10,000 square feet(RS-10) to General Commercial - 20,000 square feet (CG-20) zoned district would result in an appropriate land use pattern that would further benefit the general public. The accompanying draft bill to amend Section 25-8-33 (City of Hilo Zone Map), Article 8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) of the Hawai`i County Code, is provided for your favorable consideration. Please note the proposed conditions of approval attached to the draft bill. -6- el17,,,Lz .... COUNTY OF HAWAII .i.4:- ��-.f/i. STATE OF HAWAII •••.•,,t&OF•H� _ BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. OthoNtkii tpr> AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-33 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP), ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2016 EDITION, AS AMENDED), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL— 10,000 SQUARE FEET (RS-10) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL—20,000 SQUARE FEET (CG-20) AT WAIAKEA HOUSE LOTS 2ND SERIES, WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY: 2-2- 024:003. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. Section 25-8-3, Article 8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) of the Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2016 Edition, as amended) is amended to change the district classification of property described hereinafter as follows: The district classification of the following area situated at Waiakea House Lots 2nd Series, Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawai`i, shall be General Commercial—20,000 square feet (CG-20). , Beginning at a pipe on the east side of Kino`ole Street, the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station "HALAI" being 3,697.74 feet south and 6,771.18 feet east, as shown on Government Survey Registered Map No. 2705, and running by true azimuths: 1. 148° 10' 84.00 feet along east side of Kino`ole Street; 2. 238° 10' 240.00 feet along Lot 16; 3. 328° 10' 168.20 feet along Grant 9172 to R. Wong; 4. 58° 10' 220.00 feet along the Northwest side of Lanikaula Street; -1- 5. Thence along the intersection of Lanikaula and.Kino`ole Streets, on a curve to the right with a radius 20.00 feet, the chord azimuth and distance being: 103° 10' - 28.28 feet; 6. 148° 10' 64.20 feet along the East side of Kino`ole Street to the point of beginning and containing an area of 40,282 Sq. Ft. All as shown on the map attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 25-2-44, Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2016 Edition, as amended), the County Council finds the following conditions are: (1) Necessary to prevent circumstances which may be adverse to the public health, safety and welfare; or (2) Reasonably conceived to fulfill needs directly emanating from the land use proposed with respect to: (A) Protection of the public from the potentially deleterious effects of the proposed use, or (B) Fulfillment of the need for public service demands created by the proposed use. SEE ATTACHED CONDITIONS SECTION 3. Severability. If any provision of this ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. -2- SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAI`I , Hawai`i Date of Introduction: Date of 1st Reading: Date of 2nd Reading: Effective Date: -3- • R5-10 R5-10 CG-20 CG-10 CG-10 R5-10 CG-20 R5-10 7 RS-10 CG-10 R5-10 R5-10 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-10,000 SQUARE FEET(RS-10)TO --- CG-20 GENERAL COMMERCIAL-20,000 SQUARE FEET(CG-20) 40,282 SQUARE FEET CG-10 CG-20 RS-10 ' R5-10 R5-10 PS.\ �p � CG-10 \1.1( R5-10 R5-10 R5-10 CG-10 R5-10 3,697.74'5 R5-10 6,771.18'E "HALM" 1 V R5-10 R5-10 R5-10 CN-2 R5-10 RS-10 R5-10 Feet 0 125 250 375 500 AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-33 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP) ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2016 EDITION, AS AMENDED), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - 10,000 SQUARE FEET (RS-10)TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL - 20,000 SQUARE FEET (CG-20) AT WAIAKEA HOUSE LOTS 2ND SERIES, WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII MAP PREPARED BY: TMK:(3)2-2-024:003 COUNTY OF HAWAII, PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE:October 2,2018 EXHIBIT"A" Bank of Hawaii Mao: 1402 CBankOfHawaiiREZ.crk.12.19.18 BANK OF HAWAII CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 18-000231) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. The applicant, successors or assigns shall be responsible for complying with all of the stated conditions of approval. B. Construction of the proposed development, as substantially represented by the applicant, or as permitted by the zoning district classification, shall be completed within five(5) years from the effective date of this ordinance. As represented by the applicant, the applicant, successors or assigns shall install a privacy fence along the northern boundary of the property to mitigate adverse noise and visual impacts to adjacent properties. Prior to construction, the applicant, successors or assigns shall secure Final Plan Approval for the proposed development from the Planning Director in accordance with Section 25-2- 70, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Hawai`i County Code. Plans shall identify all proposed structure(s), paved driveway access and parking stalls associated with the proposed development. The privacy type fence and landscaping shall be indicated on the plans for the purpose of mitigating any adverse noise or visual impacts to adjacent properties in accordance with the requirements of Planning Department's Rule No. 17 (Landscaping Requirements) standards for CG zones adjoining a RS zone. C. Prior to submitting plans for Plan Approval, the applicant shall submit for all uses on the property, the anticipated maximum daily water usage calculations as prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawai`i to the'Department of Water Supply (DWS). A water commitment deposit shall be paid to the DWS prior to issuance of Final Plan Approval in accordance with Rule 5 of the Department of Water Supply's Rules and Regulations. The applicant shall construct necessary water system improvements as required by the DWS. D. The applicant shall install a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly within five(5) feet of the existing water meter and any additional water meters on private property, which must be inspected and approved by the Department of Water Supply. E. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for a commercial use on the property, the applicant, successors, or assigns shall provide improvements to the subject property's entire Kino`ole Street and West Lanikaula Street frontages consisting of a"full width" concrete sidewalk of 10-foot width meeting with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the approval of the Department of Public Works. F. Driveway connection(s) to Kino`ole Street and West Lanikaula Street shall conform to Chapter 22, County Streets, of the Hawaii County Code. G. Access to the West Lanikaula Street driveway shall be limited to right-in/right-out movements for any use established after the effective date of this ordinance. Plans submitted for Plan Approval shall indicate this restriction. H. The applicant shall be responsible for the design, purchase, and installation of streetlights and traffic control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works. Should the applicant, successors or assigns develop an additional land use which the Planning Department, in consultation with the Department of Public Works, determines will generate over 50 peak hour trips, a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) shall be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Public Works prior to Final Plan Approval. The applicants shall implement, when required by the Department of Public • Works, at no cost to the County, any transportation system improvements that may be deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works. J. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on site and shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer and submitted to the Planning Department prior to Final Plan Approval. Any recommended drainage improvements, if required, shall be constructed meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to receipt of a Certificate of Occupancy. K. The applicant, successors, or assigns shall conduct a sewer study prior to connection to the County sewer system. The applicant shall provide sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require, which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation of impacts-of the proposed project. L. The property shall connect to the public sewer in accordance with Section 21-5 of the Hawai`i County Code prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. -2- M. In the unlikely event that surface or subsurface historic resources, including human skeletal remains, structural remains (e.g. rock walls, terraces, platforms, etc.), cultural deposits,.marine shell concentrations, sand deposits, or sink holes are identified during the demolition and/or construction work, cease work in the immediate vicinity of the find, protect the find from additional disturbance and contact the State Historic Preservation Division at(808) 933-7651. Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearance from DLNR-SHPD when it finds that sufficient mitigation measures have been taken. N. Should the applicant, successors, or assigns develop residential units on the subject property, the applicant shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the property with respect to parks and recreation, fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution for each unit shall be based on the actual number of residential units developed and shall become due and payable prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval. The fair share contribution in a form of cash, land, facilities or any combination thereof shall be determined by the County Council. The fair share contribution may be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective date of this ordinance, based on the percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index (HCPI). The fair share contribution shall have a combined value of $9,195.34 per multiple family residential unit ($14,329.89 per single family residential unit). The total amount shall be determined with the actual number of units according to the calculation and payment provisions set forth in this condition. The fair share contribution per multiple family residential unit(single family residential unit) shall be allocated as follows: 1. $4,535.80 per multiple family residential unit($6,910.13 per single family residential unit) to the County to support park and recreational improvements and facilities; 2. $143.36 per multiple family residential unit ($333.35 per single family residential unit) to the County to support police facilities; 3. $440.97 per multiple family residential unit ($658.40 per single family residential unit) to the County to support fire facilities; -3- • 4. $196.54 per multiple family residential unit ($288.25 per single family residential unit) to the County to support solid waste facilities; and 5. $3,878.67 per multiple family residential unit ($6,139.77 per single family residential unit) to the County to support road and traffic improvements. In lieu of paying the fair share contribution, the applicant may contribute land and/or construct improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation, fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads within the region impacted by the proposed development, subject to the review and recommendation of the Planning Director,upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the County Council. O. Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance. P. To ensure that the Goals and Policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan are implemented, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 11, Article 1, Hawai`i County Code relating to Affordable Housing Policy. This requirement shall be approved by the Administrator of the Office of Housing and Community Development prior to Final Plan Approval. Q. The applicant, successors or assigns shall comply with all applicable County, State and Federal laws, rules, regulations and requirements. R. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the ordinance may be granted by the Director upon the following circumstances: 1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and that are not Y Pp � the result of their fault or negligence. 2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. 3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of the change of zone. -4- 4. The time extension shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance(i.e., a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for up to one additional year). 5. If the applicant should require an additional extension of time, the Planning Director shall submit the applicant's request to the County Council for appropriate action. S. Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Planning Director may initiate rezoning of the subject area to its original or more appropriate designation. -5- BANK OF HAWAII CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION NO . 18-000231 i / 7 /f , \ ,, , ., -ik, '\\1 -470° \ .\\ .\„ --,*7., -, ,.,,. \\\\ ---v- !,„!!! , jilrfr'''' . ,- v \\\ ,„ ,- \' \'' ,----": "'-'\ \ „,„:--; \\ ,,, -'\ \>-' . :'"-:-K -.-\ , 8\ --- ! ' , !.! 1111111111i `.-, ' ''' % � vit, •\_\\ Mill 1 I I I ill } MI 1. j 4.4., , ,„ ' „„-- E ('4IV‘ , _ 1JH 1 LOCATION MAP THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING: • A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- 10,000 SQUARE FEET ( RS- 10) TO A GENERAL COMMERCIAL- 20,000 SQUARE FEET ( CG-20) ZONING DISTRICT FOR 40,282 � SQUARE FEET OF LAND IN ORDER A DEVELOP A NEW, SINGLE- 5 STORY, 7,500 SQUARE-FOOT OFFICE BUILDING TO HOUSE BANKING FUNCTIONS AT THIS SITE. N • THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A 36-STALL PARKING LOT Q ( INCLUDING TWO HANDICAPPED STALLS) TO ACCOMMODATE CUSTOMER AND EMPLOYEE PARKING. • THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PROPOSING A DRIVE-THROUGH ATM c4,1(- ALONG ALONG THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. REASON FOR THE REQUEST: • THE PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING WOULD PROVIDE THE BANK THE OPTION TO EITHER RELOCATE SOME OF ITS OPERATIONS tr--) Lu OR TO PROVIDE ANOTHER BRANCH IN PROXIMITY TO THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT HILO AND THIS AREA OF THE O w COMMUNITY. ce cn � PROJECT TIMETABLE & COST: z • THE APPLICANT INTENDS TO FINALIZE THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND BEGIN CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE NEXT YEAR . THE ANTICIPATED OPENING WOULD BE IN 2020. a_ • THE APPLICANT ESTIMATES COST S S THE OF THIS PROJECT AT $2.5 MILLION . / / 77 1 7 7- / \ ' \ / / / ;.„ \ ,,,' z No / \ s ..- 7 y= / 10k4\,: . , . ."____ ' 4: m COUNTY ZONING / /'� % j %� \ 2, w / i / I - >- �, / ;--- �� ��V LANwKAULAST Ce % / 7,71 7 // • Z • 17.11 • / / O/ URBAN J' t� �. /' /. \ • �' 10 7-7' i ! 7 i7 �, �F/ Q �/ ! \ _.....1 / / 7 • 13 U Z GENERAL PLAN LUPAG MAP 6 \' . x w re F✓ ,: „ -, •w ,,1 ., , fiA .rte. . ,' , yF ^a'" PP , a� .-^ ,. .. • r „ -. „ ,-`",' "` ,","- -1 Ili AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH • ow ' OT 1--- ILtG. II..11001‘141.004'.Q 0,...1.0/p y.tu. f j, 10 10 11 k 1 • I ,. .vU 3.47 ` £ 4 4 L1/4—. `. 17. kg nf �� 21— ..›.q t I ,.. °.,_ L)' J .;1, .,VALS.Y.011 001.41.00.101m01‘.. -j • 1..- �� i �_, f' 36 135 ` , 33 32 31 30 29 26 2�7 6 25 24 23 22-1,i,\ ._ 19 Ott d r 18 W s OM an �.u�w a 7 L -) ) c/) 2 2 C� 6 ,!31 Y„ HN'OM 15 f (1) ff marcs®9.10E z 5 14 llatilli } I m BANK OF HAWAII 1 4 l� 1 , I 6 r BUILDING oov 4 l/ tJ m T'_D>.F �-- fF•..^fAS.l;irss' 4Mil.4. 3 12,eart*a? �(� m I rnmr \ Lr 1010 I r\`, M f f a 2 ' V t.sr -1 j j v00 _ ,.or�t�.� g g 11 rrrwnr,0.0110``"."oer'0QL —1 ease,rx 1sa'1I ✓axssr116. A ...I oil 1=1A:. o orosen WW1 @ I 1010. 00.-010arEntri SIMI VA fmrlm OVA ,, I_- -.-_ __ ..._ll-�4 1010. =VI _-._ „o•a.f LME u'•1.OW " — — — "'_ — — — — — .mai ; 7� S 9 swE A, = — .— — . SOO 1 • Y 11 L..! 1a a 1 c G' /� 2 1 . . S6. r - tt CL .f ��, 1 1 LIYE_ _1R-tl' 1 W .-- nc smnwr �. a Hasa ura LOW/ Q _1010.1010 1010... _.DM, Mt f30001 I yo . .ws..N 10,171R . r f.OrlSm s.slE ,o—r7"..,.'"7. - s I'----�...�" [T `21 �. paa.T rua LANiKAULA STREET _-....,=-.7‘--,,,, _.___ 10____10-_— _. •-------10_10_,fs MO ----------1010_.-------�- ---- SMACK,IV-a. _ � .-1010 — — .Y— — 1_ rawmega 1 I CIVIL SITE ASSESSMENT FOR FIR ril el‘ 11p1 LK >< „. BANK OF HAWAII PROPERTY 13, Iq eCad M.n.T y w-A —.-1010—_----.1wa— .- 1010 VIEW OF THE PROPERTY FROM ACROSS KINO`OLE ST. ' , f. ,,44 , l w_ -� ANr ( 1.. ..� ,. '� (r) • Oe. a '"'i- 8 O r T `f 0— d i , s „f v s, + a 6 ' '7:7 ''a?,,,,,,,.-- '' ..,,Pe ' :0,V4‘4,'ifilLAtti'd ‘i `7-1W,,-.:'1'-'1.:j Li 1-1J LLI ."..,.. ..„ '-'-' ......,i 0. r u d , VIEW OF THE PROPERTY FROM ACROSS W. LANIKAULA ST. VIEW OF KINO`OLE STREET LOOKING SOUTH xxg �•.� 4 { , J� .fes . ' IIII ,; , At - .. ...1. 1, ,:sio',,,,,w,,, 4._ -,i • . ,,,,,, i, ittno,„.. ,, -•. - 0 0 , ft 11 > *,,I �4a ', ' ;i ��$K sA art` - A� : `'44:. v - � �ar —_ a{ , - , I.... VIEW OF KINO`OLE STREET LOOKING NORTH VIEW OF W. LANIKAULA STREET LOOKING EAST ‘,A,...„.1 .- iii, ,r f -::-. ft-:;e-r,i '411 "'"t---..fi 1pf. it--..4.....,,, -;',1 0 0 i D, e : -'' 7: . � t T -1,1;7+1 7101190 � LI 1 ` ry(i iiiiiir s t{ � 1 Z4n s -.+4,0,•$'4,4,‘ 0 , VIEW OF W. LANIKAULA STREET LOOKING WEST R$-10 RS-10 \ C&_P0 CG-30 C6-10Z RS-10 C6-20 RS-30 \ 0 CG-10 C. C ` LOT 17 yL 1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-10,000 SQUARE FEET(RS-10)TO R$-10 GENERAL COMMERCIAL-20,000 SQUARE FEET(CG-20) T 19,740 SQUARE FEET 0 X RS-10 \ CG-20 LOT 18 j /�1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-10,000 SQUARE FEET(RS-10)TO \/'-'/\/ GENERAL COMMERCIAL-20,000 SQUARE FEET(CG-20) 19,701 SQUARE FEET \ CG-10 U CG-20 RS-10 R$-30 0 iii GRANT 9646 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-10.000 SQUARE FEET(RS-10)TO 1 GENERAL COMMERCIAL-20,000 SQUARE FEET(CG-20) 1 ■ � 841 SQUARE FEET \ 0 RS-SO \ ' S� Z .• JSP CS-to W 9. \ ,-, R$-10 RS-10 R$-10 LLJ 0 CG-10 '‹i L,'^,,, v R$-10 $697.74'5 RS-10 \ 0 6,771.18 E \\l "11419.1" N Cl_ R$-10 R5-10 / 0 R$-10 CN-7 RS-10 R5-10R5-10 CZ CL Feet 0 125 250 375 500 Z Q PLANNING DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION a FORWARD A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO 8 THE COUNTY COUNCIL FOR CHANGE OF ZONE ce APPLICATION NO . 18-000231 -" 0 U w D WINDWARD PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY OF HAWAI`I HEARING TRANSCRIPT JANUARY 3, 2019 A regularly advertised hearing on the application of the BANK OF HAWAII (REZ 18-000231) was called to order at 9:03a.m. in the County of Hawai`i Aupuni Center Conference Room, 101 Pauahi Street, Hilo, Haw. with Chairman Joseph Clarkson presiding. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Joseph Clarkson, Donald Ikeda,Thomas Raffipiy, John Replogle. ABSENT & EXCUSED: Gilbert Aguinaldo, Donn Dela Cruz. ALSO PRESENT: Michael Yee (Planning Director), Malia Hall (Deputy Corporation Counsel for the Windward Planning Commission), Jeff Darrow (Planning Program Manager), Maija Jackson(Planner), Christian Kay(Planner), Alex Roy(Planner), Jessica Andrews (Planner), and Sarah Hata-Finley(Commission Secretary). And 18 members from the public in attendance. APPLICANT: BANK OF HAWAII (REZ 18-000231) Application for a Change of Zone from Single-Family Residential-10,000 square feet (RS-10) to a General Commercial-20,000 square feet(CG-20) zoning district for approximately 40,282- square feet of land. The'subject property is located at 1339 Kino`ole Street, at the northeast corner of its intersection with West Lanikaula Street, Waiakea Houselots, South Hilo, Hawai`i, TMK: (3) 2-2-024:003. CLARKSON: With that,we'll proceed to the first item on the agenda which is a rezone application from Bank of Hawaii, and Christian Kay will be making a presentation to the Commission KAY: Yes, good morning, Mr. Chair and Members of the Windward Planning Commission. Happy New Year it's good to see your smiling faces in 2019. If I can turn your attention to the screen, as the Chair stated, this is an application for Change of Zone No. 18-000231, Applicant Bank of Hawaii. The subject parcel is located in the South Hilo District of Hawaii Island; more specifically, in the Waiakea Houselots area and is outlined here ini red. It's located at the corner of Kino`ole Street and West Lanikaula Street. The Applicant is requesting a Change of Zone from a Single- Family Residential— 10,000 square feet, RS-10 to a General Commercial—20,000 square feet, CG-20 zoning district, for 40,282 square feet of land in order to develop a new single-story, 7,500-square foot office building to house banking functions at the site. The Applicant is proposing a 36-stall parking lot including two handicapped stalls to accommodate customer and 1 employee parking. The Applicant is also proposing a drive-through ATM along the northern boundary of the subject property. The Applicant stated reasons for the request is the proposed office building would provide the bank the option to either relocate some of its operations or to provide another branch in proximity to the University of Hawaii at Hilo and this area of the community. Project timetable and costs, the Applicant intends to finalize the construction plans and begin construction within the next year. The anticipated opening would be in 2020. The Applicant estimates the cost of this project at $2.5 million. County zoning for the subject parcel and much of the surrounding`'area is Single-Family Residential– 10,000 square feet as indicated in the yellow color. Again, for reference, we've got West Lanikaula Street running generally east-west through the slide, and Kino`ole Street running generally north-south. The subject parcel outlined here in black There have been other rezones from Single Family Residential to more commercial-type zonings as indicated in the various shades of red. There is some General Commercial– 10,000 square feet and 20,000 square feet and some Neighborhood Commercial zoning as well in the area, as well as some Multi-Family Residential indicated in the brown colors. The Open_-zoning here is the DOFAW Arboretum. The State Land Use Boundary designation for the subject parcel and surrounding area is Urban as indicated in pink. The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map designation for much of the surrounding area is High Density Urban which allows for this commercial-type rezoning again with Open-pardon me, Open-L. PAG designation synonymous with the arboretum indicated in.-green. Here's an aerialphotograph of thesubject parcel outlined in red. Again, we've got West Lanikaula Street running generally east-west and Kino`ole running north-south. Got Kilauea Avenue here at the top right of the slide. This is a"lunch shop plaza essentially with Subway and other lunch shops. The subject parcel currently has four single-family dwellings on the property. The Applicant has stated that those will beremoved from the property to facilitate this project. Here's the Applicant's submitted.site plan. We've got Kino`ole Street running here north-south through the left side-of the slide and West Lanikaula Street running at the bottom of the slide east-west. The Applicant-is proposing two accesses both each—one each from Lanikaula and from Kino`ole. Here's the Bank of Hawaii office building, the parking lot and; again, the proposed drive-through ATM at the northern boundary of the parcel. Here's a view of the property from across Kino`ole Street with the subject parcel here on the corner. A view of the property from across Lanikaula Street with the subject property here, the four existing dwellings here indicating the property. Here's a view of Kino`ole Street looking south. The subjectparcel is on the left-hand side; if you're looking north, the subject parcel on the right-hand side. And, a view of West Lanikaula 2 Street looking east again with the subject parcel here on the left, and a view of West Lanikaula Street looking west with the subject parcel on the right. / We are proposing adding a condition. This is something that when we initially accepted the application, we spoke with the Applicant. There are actually three lots of record that are within the subject parcel. There were some concerns about building across those lot lines so as we i spoke with the Applicant, and it was agreed upon at the beginning, we're going to add a condition to require consolidation of these three parcels into one, three lots into one parcel prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval. Also, you would have received today a proposed amendment to Condition G, which is the condition that indicates limiting access from West Lanikaula Street to right-in, right-out. Department of Public Works, Traffic Division had some concerns over traffic backing up making a left-hand turn into the bank property from Lanikaula and backing up into the Lanikaula- Kino`ole intersection at certain times of the day._ At any rate, the Planning Director is recommending that we forward a favorable recommendation to the County Council for Change of Zone Application No. 18-000231 with the additional Condition C added. I'd be happy to answer any questions that the Commission may have. W.= CLARKSON: Yes, are there any questions forstaff from the Commission? RAFFIPIY: Question, so with adding on Condition C and say we're re-lettering the remaining conditions? KAY: Correct. RAFFIPIY: So, everything's going to be all changed. KAY: Correct, and the other thing, the brief paragraph above the proposed condition, we would also add into an amended recommendation report just so there is that history and connection, but, yeah, that's correct. Everything else; would be re-lettered throughout the rest of the conditions. RAFFIPIY: All right, thank you. KAY: Thank you. CLARKSON: I just have a little question about the narrow piece of property. KAY: Yes. CLARKSON: It kind of looks like a right-of-way or a road. Has it been determined that no other party has any interest in that real estate? KAY: I'm going to—I believe that's the case, but I'm going to let the Applicant address that. 3 CLARKSON: Okay. If there are no further questions, will the Applicant or their representative please come forward? Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter before the Commission today? FUKE/PACKARD: I do. CLARKSON: Please use the microphone when you speak. Please introduce yourself and who you're representing or in what capacity you're representing the Applicant and proceed. FUKE: Sure. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission. My name is Sidney Fuke. I'm a planning consultant. I'm here representing the Applicant. With me today also are the Applicants, Ms. Natalie Fogel and Keene Fujinaka both with the Bank of Hawaii. My business address is 100 Pauahi Street. PACKARD: Aloha, my name is Mike Packard. I'm a traffic engineer with SSFM. I'm here representing Bank of Hawaii. FUKE: Mr. Chair, before I start, could I ask the staff to go back again and show the I guess the Google Earth picture of the property which shows the subject property in relation to, all the way down to, I think you had it down to Kilauea? KAY: Yes, sir. FUKE: Thank you. Mr. Chairman, the Applicant has had a chance to review the staff's report, and as always, reportcomprehensive,staff's is com rehensive and there's no additions or corrections to them. As far as the proposed conditions and also the condition that was articulated this morning, the Applicant has no issues with all of those conditions, you know, with the exception of one, and that's the reason why I had requested the staff to direct your attention to what's on the screen there. What we would like to propose is to have and which is before you, is to give the Applicant the ability to have full movement access along Lanikaula Street at least for a one-year period because that's the reason why I had Mr. Packard coming up here in case there are specific questions dealing with the traffic study. But, his study basically had concluded that there really would not be any significant impact to the Lanikaula-Kino`ole Street intersection, you know, by allowing left-turn movement. On the other hand,both the Department and the Traffic Division, you know, said that well, maybe not so, but although there is no substantiated studies along that line. So, what the Applicant would like to propose is that to provide an opportunity for them to have full movement access along Lanikaula Street, you know, within a year's period,just for a trial run, and should at that point in time after a year or for that matter, two or three years down the road, that Public Works, Traffic Division, determine that, no, you have to make some changes to that area and then you have to limit that access point to just one way in and one way out, then it becomes incumbent upon the Applicant to so make the change within the six-month period. And, that's essentially what we're 4 proposing here as the proposed language, and, you know, we respectfully request your consideration, you know, on that. Just prior to coming up over here, I was talking to Mr. Packard about how possibly this can be accommodated, and he did have like a possible solution, but which hasn't been vetted with the Traffic Division, but that's the reason why I wanted to put that screen up, so—Mike? PACKARD: The primary concernthat was relayed to us was that left-turning vehicles on Lanikaula would delay the potential for through-travelling vehicles to continue and that theoretically would back up through the signalized intersection ;;So, the way we achieve the relief from that typically at an intersection is to provide a dedicated left-turn lane. Well, if you look at the aerial as it is today, you can see how the left—turn--lane has been, for the signal has been delineated this way. And, as you get further back_ towards Kilauea, you have a hatch median over here. So, it shows that the width of the road retained is the same width throughout. So, instead of having the left-turn lane start at this location, the taper could be a lot shorter;.and you could actually delineate the road for three lanes with a center either two-way leftturn lane or just have a very short left-turn lane which would,allow those left turning vehicles to get out of the throughput way and not have to back up�into the intersection' The amount of traffic that's projected to go to the bank is fairly low. All it takes is one vehicle to cause that delay and back up,into the intersection, and so_that's why I thought just the shortest storage lane would allow for.'vehicles to provide that relief and continue operations. It's something very common and that's_been done in Hilo,'and so it's something that I thought would be appropriate for consideration here. FUKE: So essentially, what_would happen would be similar to—wait, where's the button, oh, I'm sorry, oops, oh okay.. [Mr. Fuke was using-the laser pointer on the presentation screen.] So, it would be similar to this shopping complex. As-you can see, there is kind of like currently right now, there's.like left-turn allowance over here, and then it kind of like follows through over here. So, that same kind of concept over here would also be applied over here. And, so that's what the Applicant is basically requesting to at least give them a chance to institute that at their cost, and after a one-year period or even beyond, should Public Works determine sorry, it's just not working, then it becomes incumbent on the part of the Applicant to make all of those changes at their cost. CLARKSON: I have a question. I don't quite understand. You want to leave the lining the way it is for one year? Or you want to put in the shorter third lane, the turn lane for one year? FUKE: It, the lane—the existing left-turn lane heading mauka on Lanikaula Street over here would have to be reduced a bit to allow for a dedicated left-turn lane, you know, into the site. So, all of this would have to be done pursuant to a plan that they're going to have to develop, run it by Traffic Division, they sign off on it, and then they implement it. 5 CLARKSON: Are there any questions about any of the Applicant's presentation by any other Commissioners? RAFFIPIY: Question. You were saying there are two proposals—one is to make that left-turn short and one is to create did you say create, that center lane, to make the left turn in all, in always? PACKARD: So, it could be one of two ways. You could, you could just concentrate just that the, at the, the one end and just delineate that one little left-turn lane. However, if you look at the stretch of the entire road, it has three lanes at the one intersection at the other. So, you could continue it throughout, which would allow for left-turns in and out throughout the entire stretch of road which there are other residential and commercial properties. So, they would all benefit from having that delineation. RAFFIPIY: Thank you, sir. CLARKSON: Any other questions? Does the Planning staff have any comment? YEE: What—Michael Yee, Planning Director. What's the opposition for folks travelling along Lanikaula and then making a left-turn on-Kino`ole and then making a right turn into the property? They're still going to make aleft turn. They just gotta make one additional right turn. PACKARD: Yeah, absolutely, and it's all about circulation and expected movements, and your hope is that the majority of people that would come to the bank would over time understand that and change their route. The issues`become the unexpected-person heading in that direction and then reaching this restriction, would the sign actually stop thein from turning in or are they going to do it anyway, because people are creatures of habit and they do what they do. So, instead of trying to force things through signage, we were trying to find a way to alleviate that. But you're right. The turns are not more difficult RAFFIPIY:. Question. What are your:proposed hours of operation? FUJINAKA (from.,audience): Our proposed office hours are— CLARKSON: —Wait HALL: —You have to speak FUJINAKA (from audience): Oh, I'm sorry—. CLARKSON: Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter before the Planning Commission today? FUJINAKA: I do. To answer the question, our proposed ours of operation are going to be similar to our current branches which are Monday through Friday—Monday through Thursday, 8:30 to 4; Friday 8:30 to 6. 6 CLARKSON: And you are? FUJINAKA: Oh, sorry. I didn't get the memo. My name is Keene Fujinaka. I'm the market manager here for East Hawaii at Bank of Hawaii. RAFFIPIY: Thank you. FUKE: I'm sorry, like um, I forgot to answer your question. So, the three parcels are all owned by the bank right now. CLARKSON: And, no one has easements over that— FUKE: —No— CLARKSON: —skinny parcel? FUKE: Correct. CLARKSON: Okay, thank you. Any further questions? At this time then, thank you, gentlemen. We'll proceed to public testimony. We have two people signed up to testify on this matter. Will Dwight Vicente and Martin McGinn please come forward? Please raise your right hand. VICENTE: I'm going to object at this time to the swearing. My understanding is that each and every one of your took an oath to the U.S. Constitution, and your nationality is in question. CLARKSON: You can—do you swear to tell the truth on this matter before the Planning Commission today? MCGINN`.Yes. CLARKSON: Unsworn testimony may be totally disregarded. Just as long as you understand that. Introduce yourself whoever would like to go first and please proceed with your testimony. VICENTE: My name is Dwight Vicente. I represent the Hawaiian Kingdom. The lands here are either under the 1840 Mahele—it's either Crown or government lands. The United States used the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875 to apply the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 to this Kingdom as it did elsewhere around the world. And, that's why you have the TMK rather than the use of the Crown and government contracts, the land leases. And, you have, like in this case here, you have—or back to the treaty, the treaty was not signed by King Kalakaua nor was it signed by U.S. President Grant. It was signed by three individuals who could be pretty well called "The Three Stooges." Three American citizens who was not authorized by either the Hawaiian Kingdom or the United States Constitution to do a treaty. And, this is what brings us to this hearing today is because the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875 has led us to this, this hearing. It was illegal back then. It's illegal now. The amendment to the 1875 Reciprocity Treaty is illegal. It 7 was for Pearl River or Pearl Harbor. What the United States tried to do with the treaty is to make this Kingdom a part of the Ohio River Valley under the Northwest Ordinance which is Article 5, and we are still not part of it. In the 1898, 1.8 million acres of the Republic of Hawaii gave to the United States, that was not under lease by the Hawaiian Kingdom. The 2.4 million acres were under lease. Under King Kalakaua, it's 25 years. And, you're going to notice that the, the guys that leased the lands all claim they own the lands. They did an adverse possession against the Hawaiian Kingdom. So, that's questionable whether these foreigners could be here because the Reciprocity Treaty was illegal to begin with, and all the other treaties of the other countries all ended in 18-1887, or should I say 97. The other point I want to make is the banks here are not chartered under the Hawaiian Kingdom, and the money used is not based on gold and silver .Its Federal Reserve notes which is "In God We Trust." Don't trust the money. So, the money is questionable.-You are passing around fake money that's not authorized by the Hawaiian Kingdom_ nor under the U.S, Constitution. The U.S. Constitution recommends gold and silver. So, allowing these illegal developments to continue here and to prosper based on funny money is questionable. Usually, they use funny money when they're trying to take over another country. Like Vietnam and all these other countries, they did that, that scam. So, with that, I'll reserve the rights of this Kingdom under the Queen's Protest of January 17, 1893, against U.S. Minister Stevens, Article3, Section 2, Clause-2-:..„Jt has yet to make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, andthe other one is:the constitutionality'of;the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875 since the—King Kalakaua nor the U.S. President signed it. Thank you. CLARKSON: Thank you for your testimony. Next, please. MCGINN: My name,is Martin McGinn, and I'm a property owner of the lot just to the north of the proposal, proposed lot,and I just want to talk about livability question with the proposed— especially with the drive-through being right on the property, basically ten feet from our property, and'so, there wouldbe cars constantly going through the drive-through, and there is no privacy barrier included in the plans, andyou know, I just think if Bank of Hawaii is going to be a good neighbor,:then they really need to build a wall, a privacy wall between the properties. Because, I mean, we have, there'-s going to be constant, there's going to be cars idling all day long basically. So, there's air pollution, there's noise pollution. So, if I'm in my garden, I'm going to be ten feet away froth these cars that are idling, and, you know, there's going to be all kinds of vehicles, loud ones,people with their monster trucks. You name it, and basically, I realize that this is probably, this proposal is probably a forgone conclusion,but at least they should be a good neighbor and put up a privacy wall. Thank you. CLARKSON: Thank you. Any questions for either of the testifiers from the Commission? RAFFIPIY: I have a question, Mr. Chairman. What is a privacy wall? What kind of privacy wall? What do you have in mind? What kind of wall? 8 MCGINN: I'm thinking of a rock wall— CLARKSON: —Please speak into the microphone. MCGINN: Sorry. I'm thinking of a rock wall that would go all the way on the north side of the property, of their property, so that it would cut down on the air pollution and also the noise from the cars. You know, if you look at the proposal, that, that drive-through is right on the line. Right on the north line. CLARKSON: Thank you. Oh, another question. Go ahead, Commissioner Ikeda. IKEDA: No, not to this gentleman. I'd like to call Mr. Fuke up. CLARKSON: Okay, if there are no further questions for either of these testifiers, at this time, we'll have, there being no other— IKEDA: —Mr. Clarkson, it's in regard to this gentleman's concern that I'm calling Mr. Fuke. CLARKSON: Thank you. At this time, the Chair will request a motion to close public testimony. REPLOGLE: Are we not going to want to hear from this gentleman again after we speak with Mr. Fuke? IKEDA: That's right,because I want—. KAY: If I may interject, Mr. Chair,this might help. There,was discussion as part of the early notification of this application where Mr.McGinn and Mr. Fuke had some back and forth emails. Based on that, we did add as-part of Condition B a requirement. It's the third line down. "As represented by the applicant, the applicant, successors or assigns shall install a privacy fence along the northern boundary of the property to mitigate adverse noise and visual impacts to adjacent properties." So, that has been added as a condition of approval. CLARKSON: Yeah, well, after public testimony, we'll want to query the Applicant on the nature of that fence. I certainly will. IKEDA: My concern is what they're proposing, is it, is the gentleman satisfied with the condition that they just stated? MCGINN: I'm sorry. I didn't understand. IKEDA: They made a condition that they had to put up some kind of a safeguard or privacy fence, and so, did you receive any information on that or—? MCGINN: No, I didn't receive anything like that. 9 IKEDA: That's the reason I wanted to call Mr. Fuke up. CLARKSON: Okay. IKEDA: Because I wanted to see—. CLARKSON: Yes, we can do that after public testimony is closed. Is there a motion to close public testimony? close public testimony, we call upMr. IKEDA: Excuse me, Mr. Clarkson. I think if you _,. Fuke, p Y I'm not sure we can get the gentleman back on to hear his concerns if it was satisfied, because I want to satisfy his condition. MCGINN: Thank you. CLARKSON: My understanding is that even after public testimony is closed— IKEDA: —That we can call him back— CLARKSON: —we can call— IKEDA: —We cannot, right? Malia, we cannot,right— - [Ms. Hall shook her head -no. ''] CLARKSON: —Cannot talk to a"member of the public? [Ms. Hall shook her head "no. ] IKEDA: Malia, we-that's right. And, that's my concern. CLARKSON: All right, I stand corrected. Please be seated, but those of you who are sworn in will remain sworn in, and at this time, I'dlike to call the Applicant and their representatives forward. VICENTE: Dwight Vicente. I want to enter into the record the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875. CLARKSON: Please—please do that with the staff at the front desk as written testimony. VICENTE: All right, thank you. CLARKSON: Please be seated for the time being. IKEDA: Mr. Fuke, you heard the gentleman, and I do support what he's saying, so I wanted to hear what you guys propose, and if it satisfies his conditions. 10 FUKE: Thank you very much, Commissioner Ikeda. Planning Department, Exhibit—I think its 15 or 13 but, you know, reflects that email discussion between myself and Mr. McGinn, and I closed it by basically saying that they will be able to, you know, construct a fence or some sort of barrier in that area and that if Mr. McGinn had any further suggestions, to please contact me, but, you know, there has, aside from today, there have been no contacts. But, the preliminary thought was along these lines. Obviously, you cannot have a fence that exceeds six feet because that will mean that you have to have a setback requirement. So, the thought was to have like a standard fence,probably 5-1/2 foot high, and then you would have a stream of landscaping, probably some kind of cypress or things that kind of like it's narrow and it grows tall and such that it would provide that visual and noise barrier. It won't totally eliminate noise I must confess,but at least it will help modify or at least mitigate the concerns. So,; that was the thought, and the staff had indicated earlier that there is a condition that requires such, requires that the Applicant address that in conjunction with the Plan Approval process;so, they would have to come up with a landscaping plan generally along the lines of what,I was just sharing with you. IKEDA: Mr. Chairman, can I call Mr. McGee [sic] up. I want to know what he, what he thinks about it. CLARKSON: Okay, you have a question for Mr. McGinn? IKEDA: Mr. McGee [sic], you heard the Applicant's ant's statement. Do you agree with it? Do you have any more concerns about it? MCGINN: I guess I'd like to know what, excuse me, the_type of fence it is and also just the construction of it and if it will, I guess if it's aesthetically pleasing. You know, I'm not sure what the intent was, and I think, I also wonder if it seems like it should be written in the plan rather than something that's just said, well, you know, it might be, you know,put in there, but I guess I'd like to see it in writing. IKEDA: Mr. Fuke, isn't it part of the conditions? FUKE: Yes, the condition right now reads, "privacy type fence and landscaping shall be indicated on the plans for the purpose of mitigating any adverse noise or visual impacts to adjacent properties"in accordance with the Planning Department's landscaping rules. So, the Planning Department,they have that obligation to look at not only Rule 17 relating to landscaping,but with this added restriction. The only thing I can suggest,-Mr. McGinn, and the Applicant is here, is that during the course of the Applicant's architect preparing the appropriate plan,perhaps that can be, you know, you'd be in a position to review it, and I can't make that commitment,but Ms. Fogel can, right here, and she is nodding and affirmatively so. MCGINN: I guess I'd just like to know the height, you know. If it's six feet, is the max, I guess I'd like to see it six feet without having that other restriction coming into play. And, then, I guess, I would like to know the material of the—preferably, you know, I've talked to the other 11 owners, too, and on the adjacent properties, and they would also like to have a rock wall because it's more in keeping with Hawaiian culture and aesthetics. CLARKSON: Any further questions? I have a question, Christian. Could you please display the site plan for the new facility? KAY: Sure. CLARKSON: I just want to check the traffic pattern along the—okay, so you have parking, entry, okay, thank you. My personal feeling is that both of those property lines should have an acoustic barrier of a masonry type wall of maximum height, and I sympathize, indeed, with being a neighbor next to a high-traffic area, and I'm going to hope that one of the Commissioners who makes the motion for action will make that part of their motion. Any further questions'? Thank you both, gentlemen. At this time, the Chair will ask for a motion for action on this matter. IKEDA: Mr. Chairman, I'll— CLARKSON: —Oh, now we close public testimony, motion for closing public testimony. IKEDA: Mr. Chairman, I'll close public testimony. REPLOGLE: Second. CLARKSON: All thosein favor? COMMISSIONERS: Aye. CLARKSON: Opposed? Public testimony is closed. Now, a motion for action, please. IKEDA: Mr. Chairman, I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council on the application for Change of Zone, Docket No. REZ 18-000231 based on the Planning Director's recommendation which shall be adopted. Also, can we add in that, on that, is it Condition G where they were going to put the barrier between the property. Could it be a stone wall? KAY: That would be Condition B. IKEDA: B, yeah. KAY: Yeah, it's in the third line of Condition B. Right now, there are two places that read "privacy" or"privacy type fence" in that condition. IKEDA: Okay. 12 KAY: So, would you like to— IKEDA: —amend it and put in, is it a rock wall? Stone? Is it a stone wall? MCGINN (from audience): It's rock—. IKEDA: Rock stone wall, whatever. KAY: So, it will read then, "As represented by the applicant, the applicant, successors or assigns shall install a stone wall—" IKEDA: —Yes— KAY: —"along the northern boundary of the property to mitigate adverse noise and visual impacts to adjacent properties." And, further down in the condition where i speaks to the landscaping, it says, "The privacy type fence and landscaping shall be indicated..." Shall I change that to "the stone wall and landscaping?" IKEDA: Yes, yeah. KAY: Okay. RAFFIPIY: I second that motion. CLARKSON: Can—is it too late to add, north boundary, add east boundary, too? HALL: You would need a motion to amend the motion? CLARKSON: I move to amend the motion. HALL: Not you, somebody else has to do it. Sorry. REPLOGLE: So,what is it you want? = . CLARKSON: I think the masonry wall should be along the east boundary as well as the north boundary. There's a house right next door to— REPLOGLE: —Excuse me,`'`I'd like to make a motion to amend the motion so that we include the wall not only on the north boundary, but the east boundary as well. KAY: For consistency sake, can I say—it reads "northern." Can I say"eastern"boundary? REPLOGLE: That's fine. That's fine. KAY: Okay. Thank you. So, it will read now, "As represented by the applicant, the applicant, successors or assigns shall install a stone"pardon me, a stone"wall along the northern and 13 eastern boundaries," we'll change boundary to boundaries, "of the property to mitigate adverse noise and visual impacts to the adjacent properties."And, then it says, "The stone wall and landscaping shall be indicated on the plans" for the proposed mitigation, so that shouldn't change. There's no differentiation there on location. RAFFIPIY: I second the amended motion. CLARKSON: All those in favor? COMMISSIONERS: Aye. CLARKSON: Opposed? Ok, the amendment carries. Now,we'll do a roll call,please on the original motion. KAY: All right. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I can take that vote. There's still the question of Condition G in terms of the access limitation. Did you want to address that as well? CLARKSON: Thank you for the reminder. KAY: Thank you. IKEDA: Do we have to make another amendment? Withdraw? Can—? KAY: Yeah, it might be better to withdraw the motion. IKEDA: We'll withdraw the motion, and we'll add on—is it to shorten the left—was it shorten— HALL: I think just add this condition. IKEDA: We'll just add, we'll add Mr.-. RAFFIPIY: Question, Mr. Chairman. So that the issue right now is to, as stated in this Condition G—to choose between.the—? IKEDA: —No, no, we're just going to add on. RAFFIPIY: So, we just add on? IKEDA: Yes. RAFFIPIY: Okay. KAY: If I may, if you're going to move forward with the proposed Condition G, you would have to delete the existing condition limiting right-in, right-out restriction or restriction to right- in, right-out and replace it or come up with some different language to replace that. 14 IKEDA: Okay. Okay, so I move to replace the present Condition G and replace it with this new Condition G. KAY: One other thing that just came to mind. There was the other Condition C that we were going to add which would then shift all of the other conditions down, so if we make a vote with respect to Condition G, then that may jack us up if we work on that additional Condition C. So, we may just say proposed amendment to new Condition H? IKEDA: Okay. As stated. KAY: Okay, perfect. So, and Jeff mentioned that it might be good to indicate a minimum height limit for your wall. The maximum limit is six feet, but you may want to put a minimum just to clarify. IKEDA: Okay, minimum six feet that would be preferable to the— KAY: Okay, so with all of that said, we're still waiting for a motion for action on everything. CLARKSON: No— KAY: Or maybe I'm wrong. IKEDA: Okay, so— CLARKSON: I think weneed a vote on the amendment to Condition, new Condition H regarding the left-turn lane.' IKEDA: Right. KAY: So,my understanding is Mr.Ikeda removed his motion that was on the floor. There is no current motion on the floor. IKEDA: Okay, so we need to make a new motion about the walls on all the north, east, and the boundaries? KAY: And, then adding Condition C, and the new Condition H. IKEDA: Right. KAY: So, if it's helpful, I can go ahead and read what the amendment to Condition B would read, "As represented by the applicant, the applicant, successors or assigns shall install a six-foot stone wall along the northern and eastern boundaries of the property to mitigate adverse noise and visual impacts to adjacent properties." I don't know that we need to repeat that at the bottom to say six-foot stone wall again since we've already indicated it,but that's the call of whoever is making the motion. 15 • IKEDA: Let's be sure that it's in there. KAY: Okay, I'll add it to both. FUKE: Mr. Chairman, I just need to make one clarification if I may. I'm sorry, out of protocol, but if it's six feet, then it requires a setback, so the wall has to be less than six feet. REPLOGLE: Five feet nine. IKEDA: Five feet nine, yeah. KAY: Okay. That's a good height. All right, sounds good, and I'll put that in both places that it indicates a stone wall. Okay, and then new Condition C_would be the yellow sheet in front of you, the language regarding consolidation. And, then finally new Condition H is either what the Applicant has proposed as proposed amendment to Condition G or whatever other language you'd like come up with. There is a suggestion from staff that in front of, "No earlier than one year," it read"If approved by DPW." The Traffic Division ultimately, they're going to make the call on traffic treatments and, you know, treatments on the roadway, so there was a concern that this proposed left-hand turn lane, restriping, may or may not be workable, and there's no language in this existing condition that speaks to that. All this is saying is they have a year to determine whetheeor not there's going to be any impact from the left-hand turn lane despite what was said on the record, so if you'd like to clarify that and add something to that, that's-- IKEDA: hat's=IKEDA: —Yes, we would like to add in what the Applicant was requesting about giving them a one-year trial period. KAY: Okay, with"As written by the Applicant?" IKEDA: Right. KAY: So, we'll go ahead and replace now Condition H with, "No earlier than one year after issuance of an occupancy permit for the proposed project and any time thereafter, should the County Department of Public Works determine that the Lanikaula Street access be modified and limited to right-in, right-out movements, only to address impacts at the intersection of Lanikaula Street and Kino`ole Street directly attributable to left-turn movements into the site from Lanikaula Street,the access shall be so modified in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Public Works with the applicant's and/or its successor's cost within six months of receipt of such a notification." One more clarification, couple more clarifications here. I'd like to for consistency sake, would like to make it West Lanikaula Street and add the proper Hawaiian diacritics. IKEDA: That's all right. 16 CLARKSON: Okay, is there any further discussion of this motion? Is there a second? KAY: There was not a second yet. REPLOGLE: Second. CLARKSON: There being no— RAFFIPIY: —So, the motion, the motion incorporated their, their requirement? KAY: That's correct. So, the motion incorporated their proposedlanguage as Condition G which is now going to be Condition H with my suggested changes in terms of the West Lanikaula and the proper Hawaiian diacritics. RAFFIPIY: With a one-year, one-year— KAY: —Correct. RAFFIPIY: Okay. KAY: Aswritten as far as I understand. -7 CLARKSON: Together with the other amendments to-the consolidation of the properties and the five foot, nine inch stone-walr on both. RAFFIPIY: But, didn't we just read this no earlier than one year after the issuance of an occupancy permit? KAY: Yeah, that'-s._correct. That is Condition—that's'going to be new Condition G, pardon me, new Condition H. It was proposed as Condition G from the Applicant this morning. So, aside from the'minor changes for clarity on the road name and the Hawaiian diacritics, it will go as written. Is that,correct, Mr. Ikeda, so my-understanding is correct? RAFFIPIY: But, that will only give them the one year. It wouldn't give after one year that they're asking for. KAY: As written, it would;give"them the one year to essentially determine whether or not the left-turn is going to have impacts. RAFFIPIY: Okay, got it. KAY: After which Department of Public Works can require limiting access or other improvements. RAFFIPIY: Okay, thank you, yeah, makes sense. 17 KAY: There's also another condition in here that kind of captures it as well. It's the standard condition that we add. It says, "The applicant shall be responsible for the design, purchase, and installation of streetlights.and traffic control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works." So, if at that point, as they're talking about going and approaching this restriping concept, then that condition would also kind of capture that as well. RAFFIPIY: Thank you very much. Appreciate it. KAY: Thank you. CLARKSON: If there are no further, if there is no further discussion, I'll ask staff to poll the Commission on this matter. KAY: Yes, thank you Mr. Chair. Commissioner Ikeda? IKEDA: Aye. KAY: Commissioner Replogle? REPLOGLE: Aye. KAY: Commissioner Raffipiy? RAFFIPIY: Aye. KAY: And Chair Clarkson. CLARKSON: Aye. KAY: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Motion carries four, nothing. CLARKSON: And, the Applicant, you'll be notified in writing of the action of the Commission today. The discussion ended at 9:52 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Sarah Y. Hata-Finley, Secretary Windward Planning Commission 18