Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> KAY: The language that they use is that the lot is within the area. I'm not sure— <br /> VITOUSEK: Portion of the lot. <br /> KAY: Yeah— <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. <br /> KAY: —so, the portion of that lot is within the service area, therefore the lot could be serviced. <br /> VIOTUSEK: Got you. <br /> KAY: I'm not sure, and maybe Jeff can address it, if the home would have to be built within that <br /> area or if they can bring it up. I'm not as familiar with that as possible, so. Thanks, Jeff. <br /> DARROW: Thank you, Commissioner Vitousek. So my understanding is that the actual meter <br /> itself has to abut the lot, and so in this particular case I'm not sure if it's going to be a situation <br /> where they can actually do the meter at the highway because they are proposing a flag lot. But <br /> the reality is even if they move it up to the lower portion of the upper lot, it would meet the <br /> requirement, then from there they can run a line. They would be responsible for the line from the <br /> meter to their house at that point. <br /> UNGER: And then the other question I heard was are there any plans for the applicant to <br /> actually do farming? As it sits now, is there a plan to begin fanning? And I'll summarize from <br /> what I've heard, and I can stand corrected when you come up and answer the question; it's my <br /> understanding based on what I heard that there are no plans right now to farm. The only thing I <br /> heard about the possibility of farming would be if you were to get a farmer's dwelling permit, <br /> part of that application then would be to submit a full farming plan showing exactly where, what <br /> crops are going to be planted, etcetera. But again, there are no plans to farm right now. If that's <br /> correct, then we can, then we—would you like to speak? Yes, you can come up and address that. <br /> KERN: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Yeah, I'll address the activities on the farming. The applicant <br /> basically doesn't have immediate plans of doing it currently right now, and would make sense <br /> because they are in the process of acquiring the property. And what would occur in the future <br /> could be a different story. And with the ability, or the possibility, of having some intensive, <br /> intense agriculture on there or greater agriculture on there, the ability to have a farm dwelling <br /> would seem advantageous. Do you want to add to that, Mr. Kenknight? <br /> KENKNIGHT: Yeah, I would. It's beautiful property and we became very interested in it <br /> because it was going to be sold. And so as we looked at it, there was a few cows on the property, <br /> a real nice guy named Bert,he lives Kona side, so he brings cows over. But really, and I'm a <br /> layperson on this, but really not viable for a fulltime kind of ranching situation. And so we know <br /> we want to do, we see that it's going to be an ag, but we don't have a specific plan for right now <br /> what with the flooding, and then the question with respect to the size of the lots, and things like <br /> that. But if we were to go for a, my understanding is you don't automatically get an additional <br /> farm dwelling; you have to apply for a farm dwelling. So what we are asking is that we are not <br /> 20 <br /> DRAFT <br />