Laserfiche WebLink
and the intention on small farms and ranches in those specific areas is important to pay attention <br /> to, and I think that the feasibility of ag use in that lower flooding area is not reasonable. And the <br /> applicant being the property owner and their intention to just sell the property, I think I would be <br /> a little bit more supportive or sympathetic, if there was family involved, but that's not the case. <br /> So I'll be voting no. <br /> UNGER: I'll be voting in favor of it. I agree with Commissioner Kealoha. This will be a <br /> different discussion for me, if we were talking six lots on this parcel; we are not. I think a good <br /> settlement is one where nobody is happy. I think the neighbors will still have their concerns, I <br /> understand that. I think the applicant, it was mentioned highest and best use, six-lots certainly is <br /> a higher and better use,but two lots, considering everything including the flood issue, I think this <br /> is a good position to be in. I would not be in favor of allowing a second dwelling for farm <br /> dwelling, again,balanced against flooding issues; if flooding issues were not there, this would be <br /> a different discussion. I'm not in favor of using both driveways. Keeping the existing driveway, <br /> I, I'm hearing the applicant saying it's more convenient to keep the first one, but the fact is that <br /> inconveniences the thousands of cars that are traveling in front of Mamalahoa Highway with two <br /> driveways there, and so yes to work through easements for the back lot. I understand that's an <br /> inconvenience to the applicant, but not so much, but better for members of the public. So I will <br /> be voting in favor of the motion. <br /> SHIMAOKA: I'm not going to vote in favor primarily for two reasons. I'm not satisfied with <br /> the answer on how you are going to control flooding. I've been on two occasions driving past <br /> the property and the adjacent properties where you.got above-knee height of water. That's a lot <br /> on that highway when you get a deluge of water at, you know, a specific time, I mean there is a <br /> lot of water. And I've seen where,the particular house there,where the water came almost up to <br /> where the door is, and there's like about four, five steps up to the door. The other issue is, yeah, <br /> of course, is the two entryways, you've got one that's existing and the other one that–again, I <br /> don't know if, and you guys couldn't answer that, if the extension or the widening of the <br /> highway goes past thatproperty, too, because they are working from Hilo towards Waimea <br /> Town on the widening of the highway. Jeff? I don't know. <br /> KAY: Yeah,unfortunately, wewere unaware of the extent of the project. The 15-foot road <br /> widening setback is for the future. <br /> UNGER: To clarify, if this motion gets approved, there will only be one driveway on the <br /> Honoka`a side. <br /> KAY: As written, the driveway will be outside of the AO flood zone— <br /> UNGER: Correct, correct. <br /> KAY: —a single driveway outside of the AO flood zone. <br /> UNGER: Correct. <br /> SHIMAOKA: Yeah, but my issue was that's two turn-ins that you've got there in that small <br /> area, yeah, okay. <br /> 24 <br /> DRAFT <br />