My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0313.001 2018-2020
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2018-2020
>
COM 0313.001 2018-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2020 10:27:40 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 8:17:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2018-2020
Communication
0313
Point
001
Author
Michael Yee, Planning Direcrtor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2019/06/18 2018-2020
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
REP PC 025 2019/06/18 2018-2020
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLARKSON: At this time, we'll take public testimony, if any. There is no one who wishes to <br /> testify on this matter apparently. At this time, I'd like to receive a motion that public testimony <br /> be closed. <br /> RAFFIPIY: So moved. <br /> AGUINALDO: I second. <br /> CLARKSON: All those in favor? <br /> COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br /> CLARKSON: Opposed? Motion carried. Public testimony isyclosed. Is there any further <br /> discussion on this? <br /> HALL: Motion first. <br /> CLARKSON: Hm? <br /> HALL: Motion first, then discussion. <br /> CLARKSON: Oh, motion first, then discussion. Is there a motion for action? <br /> RAFFIPIY: I'll make a motion,Mr. Chairman. I move that a favorable recommendation be <br /> forwarded to the County Council on the application for Change of Zone Docket No. 19-000234 <br /> based on the Planning Director's recommendations which shall be adopted. <br /> AGUINALDO: I second. = _ <br /> CLARKSON: It's been moved and seconded. Now is there any discussion? Feel free, don't <br /> hesitate if you have a question. <br /> REPLOGLE: I sort of do. Is this leading eventuallyto breaking up ag land into—this is more <br /> for the Director I guess—into smaller and smaller pieces? Not that everybody wants to farm 20 <br /> acres, but next year,they'll5be back asking for 2-acre lots, and the next year 1-acre lots. And, <br /> Laupahoehoe will be covered with people instead of food. <br /> YEE: That's certainly not our intent that, to go there. So, first of all, we, we're very cognizant <br /> around the density issues; hence why we put the condition on not adding additional farm <br /> dwelling units. So, it's not the situation where they, they're trying to create more density, more <br /> lots that they want to sell. It clearly was for estate planning for this owner. When it comes to <br /> issues around our approach to agricultural lands on the island, it's a much larger conversation <br /> then,l could probably have here right now at this moment. <br /> But know that we're very sensitive over the uses and how we approach agricultural lands on this <br /> island, and it is a big question. We are'very attuned to important ag lands and often you see in <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.