My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0315.000 2018-2020
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2018-2020
>
COM 0315.000 2018-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2019 2:34:42 PM
Creation date
5/31/2019 9:37:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2018-2020
Communication
0315
Point
000
Author
Harry Kim, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2019/06/18 2018-2020
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2019/07/23 2018-2020
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 083 Draft 01 2018-2020
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2018-2020
BIL 084 Draft 01 2018-2020
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2018-2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
discussed, addressed, and successfully resolved the BLNR violation in 2018. At this time, <br />the BLNR has not provided the applicant with any documentation to support that claim. <br />In a January 2019 telephone conversation with Planning Department staff, SHPD staff <br />indicated that the violation was no longer being pursued and the applications could move <br />forward. Based on this information, the applicant requested that the applications be <br />placed on the April 2019 Windward Planning Commission agenda. During a subsequent <br />phone conversation in March 2019, SHPD staff indicated that they may be changing <br />course and resurrecting the violation at the BLNR. Planning Staff has asked for a <br />determination in writing and re -circulated a request for HRS Chapter 6E review of the <br />proposed project. The Planning Department has not received a response from SHPD at <br />the time of this writing. <br />19. Public Access: There is no known public access to the mountain or shoreline that <br />traverses through the subject properties. <br />20. Traffic: According to the applicant, as they are proposing to develop 49 habitable lots <br />the AM/PM peak hour traffic should be less than 50 movements, therefore no traffic <br />study was prepared for the subject application. It should be noted, however, that based on <br />the requested zoning, approximately 89 lots (excluding land area to be set aside for roads, <br />park expansion and cemetery preserve), could be created through subdivision, triggering <br />the need for a Traffic Impact Analysis Report. <br />PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES <br />21. Access: Current access to the subject parcels is via a driveway to Parcel 26 from <br />Amau`ulu Road, which is under private ownership in the section fronting the subject <br />properties. Thus, the applicant is proposing all access to the project site via the <br />construction of a new, County dedicable standard, fifty (50) -foot wide roadway running <br />mauka-makai along the northern end of Parcel 26, intersecting to Wainaku Street as the <br />main access way and terminating at the mauka property line of parcel 27. The applicant <br />also proposes to build a County dedicable standard, fifty (50) -foot wide cul-de-sac within <br />the proposed RS -10 zoned area between the proposed spine road and terminating prior to <br />reaching Amau`ulu Road. Finally, the applicant proposes to construct two (2), twenty <br />(20) -foot wide private, non-dedicable roads within the proposed FA -1 a zoned area <br />between the proposed spine road and terminating prior to reaching Amau`ulu Road. The <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.