COM 0315.001 2018-2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

remember reading in the report that it will be incumbent upon the developer to be sure that anybody buying those lots, the 10,000-square acre [sic] lots or the 1-acre lots become completely informed that that is going to be agriculture right next door. So, if let's say that first acre lot in the middle on the bottom row was raising pigs, and the people in that subdivision don't like it, that's just too bad. They get to raise pigs on the one acre. Is that correct? FUKE: That's correct. That's, you know, of course, if you're doing a piggery, you know, subject to Department of Health rules and all that stuff REPLOGLE: Correct. FUKE: Yes, but then you do have that Right-to-Farm Act, so that prevails. REPLOGLE: Okay. I just wanted to be sure that that was a clear intent here. Thank you. CLARKSON: Any further questions for the Applicant's representative?`If not, is there a motion? FUKE: Mr. Chainnan, you know,just because this is already in the record, it's not new information, but I just kind of like, you know, in response to whether there were public notices on the cemetery portion. There was this,'you know, preservation plan that was prepared and submitted in conjunction with the application, and I was scanning through it, and then there was. a public notice about the burials. I think it was published in November of 2016. It's found in your packet. CLARKSON: Thank you. At this time, the Chair-will request a motion for action. AU: Mr. Chair, I'm prepared to make a motion. I move that we favorably, a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council on application State Land Use Boundary Amendment, Docket No. 17-[0]00049 based on the Planning Director's recommendation shall be adopted. CLARKSON: Is there a second? REPLOGLE: Second: CLARKSON: Is there any discussion or any proposed amendments to this motion? If not, will you call the vote, please? KAY: Yes, thankY ou Mr. Chair. Commissioner Au? AU: Aye. KAY: Commissioner Replogle? REPLOGLE: Aye. 21