Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0337.000 2018-2020 J�.(Y OF Hew o - - +. Wil Okabe •'` �,`)t' Managing Director Harry Kim +c i• tllayor Barbara J.Kossow Deputy Managing Director EOFN�' (offirr axf for flavor 25 Aupuni Street,Suite 2603 • Hilo,Hawaii 96720 • (808)961-8211 • Fax(808)961-6553 KONA: 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy.,Bldg.C • Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 (808)323-4444 • Fax(808)323-4440 June 14, 2019 Aaron S. Y. Chung, Council Chair .. and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Chair Chung and Members: SUBJECT: Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 07-105 (REZ 06-000052) Applicant: AutoZone Parts, Inc. (formerly Ginger Patch DP, LLC) Request: Amendments to Condition C (Time to Complete Construction), Condition D (Lot Consolidation), Condition E (Traffic Report Timing), Condition F (Access from Kekela Street), Condition G (Access from Puainako Street), Condition H (Parldng Requirements) and Condition N (Fair Share Contribution) Tax Map Key: 2-2-034:012 As required by Chapter 7, Sec 6-7.5 (a), County Charter, transmitted herewith for the County Council's consideration and action are the Windward Planning Commission's letter and enclosures regarding the above-referenced requests. Sincere,W, HARY KIM Mayor MTransCounc i lAutoZoneREZ06-052 Enclosures cc: Planning Department Comm. No. �1 _ 1" V� Ref.to: O tl County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. Ref. safe JUN 1 8 2019 i �' Y oF'"''+ Joseph Clarkson Chair Harry Kim �o.. .,, p , Thomas Raffipiy,Vice Chair *i i* Gilbert Aguinaldo Wil Okabe Dean An rllmnaging Director •.':M-M: '�` Dorm Dela Cruz 1rEOF VAP' John John Replogle County of Hawai i WINDWARD PLANNING COMMISSION Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 • Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)961-8288 Fax(808)961-8742 JUN I a ZOM i Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii 25 Auptmi Street Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Chair Chung and Council Members: SUBJECT: Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 07-105 (REZ 06-000052) Applicant: AutoZone Parts,Inc. (formerly Ginger Patch DP, LLC) Request: Amendments to Condition C (Time to Complete Construction), Condition D (Lot Consolidation), Condition E (Traffic Report Timing), Condition F (Access from Kekela Street), Condition G (Access from Puainako Street),Condition H(Parking Requirements) and Condition N(Fair Share Contribution) Tax Map Key: 2-2-034:012 The Windward Planning Commission,at its duly held public hearing on June 6,2019,recommended for your approval the proposed legislative bill for an amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 07-105. The subject property is located at along the north side of East Puainako Street between Kilauea Avenue and Kekela Street,across from the KTA Super Stores complex,Waiakea Homestead House Lots, South Hilo, Hawaii. I' The applicant, AutoZone Parts, Inc., has submitted an application to amend several conditions of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 07-105, which was originally approved on August 1, 2007, and reclassified approximately 88,317 square feet of land from a Single- Family Residential-10,000 square feet (RS-10) to a Neighborhood Commercial-40,000 c square feet(CN-40) zoning district. wwcyhiplaEt,n€,r� clep t.,cagn Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer p,hn11in'rr haw ai€C unty ov Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii Page 2 The applicant is requesting amendments to the following conditions: ■ Five (5)-Year Time Extension for Condition C (Time to Complete Construction) ■ Delete Condition D (Lot Consolidation) ■ Delete Condition E (TIAR Timing) ■ Modify Condition F (Access from Kekela Street) ■ Modify Condition H (Parking Requirements) ■ Modify Condition N (Fair Share) When the change of zone was granted in 2007, the original applicant proposed to develop two pads of commercial real estate or business center ranging in size from 9,600 to 10,132 square feet and 130 parking stalls.The current applicant is proposing a much smaller commercial development consisting of an approximately 9,046 square-foot commercial storefront, a minimum of 57 paved parking stalls, landscaping and related improvements. The applicant is requesting condition amendments to accommodate this new, scaled-down development proposal and to delete conditions that have already been complied with. The applicant's amendment requests,along with reasons,are stated below.We will address each condition specifically by stating the applicant's request and reasons for the request and state the Planning Director's recommendation and reasons for the recommendation for each requested condition amendment. Language proposed to be deleted is in brackets, language proposed to be added is underlined. Applicant's Requested Amendment of Condition C (Time to Complete Construction): Construction of the proposed ilnprovements shall be completed ii4thin five (5)years fi-om the effective date of this ordinance, cis amended This time period shall i>7chide securing Final Plan Approval froin the Planning Director in accordance ii�ith the Zoning Code.Plans shall idetlti)proposed strztctirre(s),fire pr-otectioi7 neaslWes, access roadit,ay, driveit,ay and parking stalls. Landscaping shall be indicated 019 the plans for the ptnpose of initigating any potential adverse noise or visual impacts to adjoining Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii Page 3 parcels. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of Planning Department's Ritle No. 17(Landscaping Requirements), Chapter 25(Zoning Code),Hmvaii County Code. Landscaping shall include rock walls orfences on the northern boundaries, cis agreed upon behveen the applicant and owners of lands adjacent to such northern boundaries, as may be evidenced by an))lvritten agreements in existence cis of the effective date of this rezoning. Applicant's Reasons for Amending Condition C: The five (5)-year deadline required by Condition C of the subject Change of Zone Ordinance would have required the previous developer to complete construction by August 14, 2012.The previous developer was granted a five(5)-year administrative time extension to complete construction by August 14, 2017, however the original project was abandoned and the property was returned the back to the fee owner. Effective September 2, 2015 AutoZone Parts,Inc.entered into a 15-year ground lease with the property owner but realized they would not be able to meet the 2017 construction deadline for their proposed auto parts store project.Therefore,the applicant is requesting a five(5)-year time extension to complete construction of the proposed project. The applicant anticipates that construction of the proposed project will commence shortly after issuance of Final Plan Approval. Planning Director's Recommendation for Amending Condition C: The Planning Director supports this time extension request as it meets the following criteria for granting a time extension: The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant,successors or assigns,and that are not the result of their fault or negligence.The current applicant entered into a lease with the landowner less than two years shy of the required construction deadline articulated under Condition C and subsequent approved administrative time extension.The applicant initially submitted their request for time extension and other amendments on October 18,2017 after consulting with the Planning Department and realizing they would not have enough time to meet the aforementioned construction deadline.Since then,the applicant has been working to address access and traffic issues with DOT and updating their TIAR to determine roadway improvement requirements to allow the project to move forward. Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii Page 4 Approval of this request would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code nor the original reasons for granting the Change of Zone. The applicant is proposing to develop an AutoZone commercial storefront consisting of approximately 9,046 square feet,with landscaping and a minimum of 57 paved parking stalls, calculated at one(1)stall per 160 square feet of commercial uses, including areas for handicap accessible parking and loading area.Proposed operating hours are from 7:30 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., seven (7) days a week, and will employ approximately twenty (20) individuals. Port deliveries of four(4) to six(6)pallets from Hilo Harbor and/or Kawaihae Harbor will occur once a week,which will be transported to the proposed subject parcel via small box trucks.Nissan Frontier vehicles will be utilized by AutoZone in its daily six(6)to eight (8) round trip commercial deliveries to local Auto repair shops. It should be noted that since the site was rezoned,there has not been any significant land use regulatory change in this area.The Hilo Community Development Plan has not been updated, and thus, the only relevant planning policy document still rests with the County General Plan. The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical relationship among the various land uses. The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the County.The project area is designated a split of High Density and Medium Density Urban on the LUPAG Map. The Neighborhood Commercial zoning is consistent with the High and Medium Density Urban designations on the LUPAG Map for this area of Hilo. Furthermore,the request conforms to the goals,policies and standards of tile General Plan in that the proposed development will be developed in an area adequately served by necessary services such as water, utilities and transportation systems.The proposed project conforms to the Commercial Development goal which states, "provide commercial developments that complement the overall pattern oftransportation and land usage within the island's regions, communities, and neighborhoods." The land uses in the area are a mix of residential and commercial uses. To the east across Kekela Street is the Minute Stop Gas Station (formerly the Ginger Patch Market and Deli)and the Firestone Tire and Service Center similarly zoned Neighborhood Commercial (CN-10). The KTA Super Stores complex is located to the south of the Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii Page 5 project site across Puainako Street and is zoned CN-10.There are single-family dwellings to the west along Kilauea Avenue and adjacent properties to the north are zoned Single-Family Residential (RS-10) and in single-family residential uses. In response to the request by adjacent property owners to minimize the visual impacts of the proposed project, the applicant has agreed to construct a perimeter rock wall along the property's northern boundary with adjoining,residential property owners(this requirement is articulated and will remain in Condition Q. The original reasons for the approval of the change of zone are still applicable, and the request is not contrary to these reasons. The change of zone was originally approved in 2007 to allow the development of two pads of commercial real estate or business center ranging in size from 9,600 to 10,132 square feet and 130 parking stalls.The current proposed project is much smaller in scale, consisting of an approximately 9,046 square-foot commercial storefront, a minimum of 57 paved parking stalls, landscaping and related improvements. Based on the preceding, the proposed commercial project will continue to complement the existing commercial land uses and will provide for an orderly development of the area. Finally, the Director is recommending a slight alteration to the applicant's requested condition language to reflect standard condition language and allow for the time extension to complete construction of the proposed project or any other use permitted in the zoning district. Applicant's Request to Delete Condition D (Lot Consolidation) and Reason: The applicant has is requesting deletion of Condition D, which required the consolidation of former Parcels 31, 57, 68 and 69 into one TMK, as the required consolidation was complete on May 16, 2012 (Consolidation No. 12-000214). Planning Director's Recommendation for Deleting Condition D: The Planning Director supports the deletion of this condition as the required consolidation is complete. Applicant's Requested Amendment to Condition F (Access from Kaela Street): [" Access to the pioiect site fi ons Kekela Street shall be alloi>>ed[�] forgeneral_public and delivei),vehicles r.. "ecce �i•delivei•y v e Teles may 'e Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii Page 6 site, if aii,,L,ftem Kekelct IFee4]and shall conform to Chapter, 22 (County Streets) of the Haiiwii County Code. Applicant's Reasons for Amending Condition F: According to the applicant, the proposed auto parts retail store use is anticipated to generate approximately 574 daily vehicle trips, including 20 A.M. peals hour(15 inbound/5 outbound) and 56 new trips in the P.M. peak hour(27 inbound/29 outbound). Based on the preceding and in accordance with the Zoning Code's concurrency requirements,the applicant prepared a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TZAR). The TZAR studied and evaluated the project's traffic impact at three(3)intersections:Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue,Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway ("Kekela intersection") and Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue.Kekela Street is a County owned and maintained road, with jurisdictional review by the County DPW The TZAR concluded that the Level of Service (LOS)at the Kekela intersection currently operates at LOS"F"in the P.M.peak hour,and is anticipated to still operate at LOS "E" or "F" in the future (5-, 10- and 20-year forecasts) without the proposed project.Due to the modest scale of the proposed project,the addition of the project related trips from would not further degrade the current LOS "E" or "F" operations.The TIAR further concluded that both project driveways are anticipated to serve relatively low traffic volumes during the peak hours, therefore, no operational issue are anticipated at the Puainako Street or Kekela Street driveways. The 2017 TIAR concluded that trips traveling southbound on Kekela Street which are turning left to go eastbound on Puainako Street are experiencing the highest delay at this intersection. The existing southbound lane on Kekela Street is approximately 24 feet wide, which is sufficient to provide two 12-foot wide lanes. As recommended in the TIAR, potential mitigation to address the current and 5-year projected forecast of the TIAR would be to restripe the southbound Kekela Street to provide a left/through lane and a separate right-tum lane,which would: (1) improve operations at this intersection since the right-turn movement will no longer be impeded by a queue waiting to turn left,(2)minimize disruption to the southbound right-tum, which is the predominant movement at this approach, and (3) maintain traffic flow. Finally, according to the applicant, DPW has informed them that it did not recommend any access restrictions (i.e., limited to delivery vehicles) on Kekela Street Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawai`i Page 7 during the original rezoning action, and would not object to an amendment to remove the limited access restriction,provided the project ingress/egress on Kekela Street conformed to County standards. Planning Director's Recommendation for Amending Condition F: The Planning Director is generally supportive of this amendment as it will provide a secondary,full-movement access for the general public to the project site and relieve some of the traffic issues that could arise should there only be one, limited movement access point to the property as is required by current ordinance language.This support also assumes that the applicant install appropriate traffic mitigation improvements required by DOT and DPW to ensure the traffic safety on roadways in the vicinity of the project. The DPW-Traffic Division replied with "no comment" on the original request for comments on the project in 2017. Subsequent conversation with Traffic Division indicated that they are generally supportive of allowing vehicular access to the general public to the project from Kekela Street,provided that the predominant movement is the right turn and as long as the right turn lane is sized to be long enough relative to the left/through queue in the peak hours. This means that right turn storage pocket should be sized according to the left/through queue so left/through cars don't end up blocking the right turn lane. DPW indicated that it would like to review an updated TIAR to ensure that these requirements are addressed. Applicant's Requested Amendment of Condition H (Parking Requirements): [ 91ii t-h,tmgdM Seetioii 25 4 s 1(9(3) *jThe project shall provide a iuininuou of one parking space for each 160 square feet of gross floor area for commercial uses, or the requirements of Section 25-4-51, nvhichever is greater. The inininnnn off-street parking spaces for this project shall[IW- }+J be [4-23]57 spaces. Applicant's Reasons for Amending Condition H: The applicant is proposing to continue to comply with the 160-square foot to one(1) parking stall ratio but would like to apply it to the smaller proposed square footage of commercial space of the current proposed project(9,046 square feet).The previous developer planned a significantly larger commercial project which was twice the size of the currently proposed project. Instead of applying the Zoning Code requirement of one (1)parking stall for every 300 square feet of gross floor area for commercial space, the Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii Page 8 Hawaii County Council prescribed a formula of one(1) parking stall for every 160 square feet of gross floor area for commercial uses (or 123 stalls based on the previously proposed project size). If that ratio is applied to the current proposed project size(9,046 square feet), the new minimum number of off-street parking and loading spaces would be 57. Planning Director's Recommendation for Amending Condition H: The Planning Director supports the proposed amendment to Condition H as the applicant will continue to apply the County Council imposed ratio of one(1)parking stall per 160 square feet of gross floor area for commercial uses but will apply that ratio to a smaller overall gross floor area.Thus,the director supports the reduction of minimum parking spaces articulated in the proposed amendment. Applicant's Requested Amendment of Condition N (Fair Share) and stated reasons: The applicant has requested to update the Fair Share contribution dollar amounts to current(2018)levels.Although the applicant is not proposing the construction of residential units on the subject property, this proposed amendment seeks to update the fair share contribution amounts based on the current percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index (HCPI) being utilized by the Planning Department from 2007 levels to the current levels. PlanninfZ Director's Recommendation for Amending Condition N: The Planning Director supports this amendment as it is already standard practice for the Planning Department to update Fair Share amounts for change of zone amendments,even if the applicant does not request it. Please note that as the amendment application was submitted in 2017, the Fair Share contribution amounts contained in the applicant's stated amendment request are different(smaller)than those articulated in the Condition attached to the Planning Department's draft Ordinance. Applicant's Request to Delete Condition E (TIAR Timing) and Reason: The applicant has is requesting deletion of Condition E,which requires the submittal of a Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR) to the State Department of Transportation for review and approval prior to issuance of Final Plan Approval. Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii Page 9 The applicant submitted a draft TIAR prepared by Fehr&Peers(June 2017)with the amendment application in 2017.The TIAR analyzed potential project-related traffic impacts and operations at three intersections: (a) Puainako Sheet/Kilauea Avenue, (b) Puainako Sheet/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center east driveway, and (c) Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue.The Report concluded that the level of service(LOS)at the two study areas: (a) Puainako Street/ Kilauea Avenue, and (b) Puainako Sheet/Kanoelehua Avenue intersections operate at an overall desirable (LOS "D" or better) during both peak hours. The Kekela intersection currently operates at LOS "F" in the P.M. peak hour and is anticipated to still operate at LOS `B" or "F" in the future (5-, 10- and 20-year forecasts) without the proposed project.Due to the modest scale of the proposed project,the addition of hips from the proposed project would not further degrade the current LOS `B" or "F" operations.The TZAR further concluded that both project driveways are anticipated to serve relatively low traffic volumes during the peak hours, therefore, no operational issues are anticipated at the Puainako Street or Kekela Street driveways. The applicant is not proposing any modification of the "right-in, right-out" access from Puainako Street,and will be required to construct improvements on the Puainako Street right-of-way meeting with the approval of the DOT. Therefore, according to the applicant, deletion of this condition will not release them from complying with the DOT's construction I requirements imposed under Condition G,which states that "[ajcess to the project site ftom Pitainako Street shall be limited to tight-in, right-out movements only, and shall meet with the approval of the Department of Transportation. The applicant shall construct any improvements on Pitainako Street as required by the Department of Transportation. " Planning Director's Recommendation for Amending Condition E: The Planning Director does not support this requested amendment for a number of reasons. First, in their response to request for comments on the application, DOT-Highways Division (DOT) objected to the applicant's request to delete Condition E, stating that they did not consider the applicant's justification that Condition G,which requires the applicant to construct improvements on Puainako Street as required by DOT to be sufficient.They further cited several deficiencies in the 2017 draft TZAR submitted with amendment application, stating that, at a minimum, subsequent TIARs should include a discussion of a development's impact on Kanoelehua/Puainako Street intersection and Kekela Street/Puainako Street intersections and should include an inked Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii Page 10 stamp of the professional engineer who prepared the TZAR.DOT also stated that the site plan included within the TIAR did not reflect the report's recommendations. Finally, DOT indicated that no additional access would be permitted from the property to Puainako Street. Based on the last point,the Director recommends amending Condition G to include language limiting access to the subject parcel from Puainako Street to a single driveway. Second, as a standard practice, when a change of zone or any amendments thereto require a TIAR, the Planning Department relies on agency review (in this case DOT and DPW) to inform appropriate conditions for roadway improvements to mitigate traffic impacts.Traffic in this area is known to be problematic and the Director wants to ensure that the appropriate agencies get ample opportunity to review,affir►n,and approve the TIAR and any mitigation recommendations therein. The applicant recently provided the Planning Department with an updated TIAR dated May 20, 2019, however, with the exception of a new site plan and a new site access evaluation section describing proposed new striping treatments for Puainako Street an limitation of access from Puainako Street to a single driveway(starting on page 52),the TIAR is nearly identical to the report submitted in 2017, including all of the same traffic data,analyses,and recommendations.Based on the timing of recent submittal, neither DOT or DPW have had a chance to review and comment on the TIAR analysis and appropriateness of proposed mitigation measures.Based on the preceding, the Director does not support the deletion of Condition E as it would eliminate the opportunity for reviewing agencies to vet and approve the TIAR and require suitable mitigation measures for identified traffic impacts caused by the project. Finally, these change of zone amendments do not require the applicant to develop their currently proposed project. Should AutoZone choose to expand the size of their store now or in the fixture or should any successor applicant wish to develop a different or larger project, retaining this condition will ensure that any increased traffic impacts would be studied, and proposed mitigation of those impacts would be reviewed and approved by appropriate agencies (State DOT and County DPW). Furthermore, as the project will take access from both State and County roadways,the Director recommends amending Condition E to include DPW-Traffic Division as a required review and approving agency. Finally,the Director recommends adding a stipulation to this condition that the applicant construct any roadway improvements that may be required by DOT and/or DPW prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Lastly, to the Planning Director recommends the following addition of a condition and revisions to several other conditions: Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii Page 11 ■ New Condition D (Future Road Widening Strip): By letter dated April 14, 2008 DOT permitted access to the project site from Puainako Street, subject to eleven(11)conditions, including dedication of additional right-of-way(ROW)to the State for the implementation of the Puainako Street realignment and improvement project between Komohana Street and Kanoelehua Avenue as well as several other design, engineering and permitting requirements.According to the letter,"The applicant shall dedicate to the State ofHrnvai`i, Department of Transportation (HDOT) approximately (ten) 10 feet of additional right-of- rvay along the western property boundary and along the northeasterly curb return at the intersection of Kilauea Avenue and Patainako Street. The applicant shall also dedicate additional right-of-way, varying behveen zero (0) to ten (10)feet, along the southerly property line to provide a minim nn 70 foot road right-of-way cis measured froin the Puainako Street centerline. Dedication of such property to DOT shall be in fee simple interest,free and clear of liens and encinnbrances, excepting those imposed by government authorities. ■ By email dated May 14,2019,DOT indicated that since the State still plans to realign and improve Puainako Street between Komohana Street and Kanoelehua Avenue in the future, the ROW dedication should remain. Furthermore, the other ten (10) conditions are still applicable,but can be amended or deleted by agreement with DOT.Through subsequent phone conversations, DOT staff indicated that they would be amenable to the applicant setting aside a future road widening strip to be provided at no cost to the State upon request of DOT.Based on the preceding,the Director is recommending a new Condition D requiring the future ROW dedication. ■ Amend Condition B (Water Commitment): The Director is recommending updating this condition to reflect the payment of the required water commitment for the project in 2017 and add standard condition language requiring the applicant to maintain valid water commitments until such time that the water facilities charge is paid in full. ■ Update Condition L (SHPD): The Director is recommending updating to current standard condition language regarding inadvertent finds during construction. ■ Amend Condition R (Administrative Time Extension): The Director is recommending updating this condition to require the applicant to come back to the Planning Commission and County Council for any further time extension requests. Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair and Members of the County Council County of Hawaii Page 12 Based on the preceding findings, the Planning Director recommends that a favorable recommendation for amendments to Conditions C, D, F, H and N, and an unfavorable recommendation for applicant's request to delete Condition E of Ordinance No. 07-105 be forwarded to the County Council.The accompanying draft bill to amend Ordinance No.07-105 is provided for your favorable consideration.Please note the proposed conditions of approval attached to the draft bill.Material to be deleted is bracketed and struck-through;new material is underscored. We are enclosing copies of the staff Background,Planning Director's Recommendation,the Power point presentation and a draft transcript of the hearing for your information will be provided under separate cover. Sincerely, Jose h B, Digitally signed by Joseph 1) B.Clarkson Date:2019.06.13 Clarkson 20:55:11-10'00' Joseph Clarkson, Chairman Windward Planning Commission LAutozoneatnendREZ06-052NN,pc2 Enclosures cc: Steven S.C. Lim, Esq., Carlsmith Ball LLP Department of Public Works Department of Water Supply Ronald Kim, Esq., Corporation Counsel BAutoZoneAmendREZ,erk.5.28.19 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT AUTOZONE PARTS, INC. (FORMERLY GINGER PATCH DP, LLC) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 07-105 (REZ 06-000052) AUTOZONE PARTS, INC. has submitted an application to for a time extension request for Condition C (Time to Complete Construction) and amendments to Condition D (Lot Consolidation), Condition E (TZAR Timing), Condition F (Access from Kekela Street), Condition H (Parking Requirements) and Condition N (Fair Share) of Ordinance No. 07-105, which reclassified approximately 88,317 square feet of land from a Single Family Residential- 10,000 square feet (RS-10) to a Neighborhood Commercial-40,000 square feet (CN-40) zoning district in 2007. The subject property is located along the north side of Puainako Street between Kilauea Avenue and Kekela Street, across from the KTA Super Stores complex, Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii, TMK: (3) 2-2-039:031. APPLICANT'S REQUESTS AND REASONS 1. Applicant's Requests: The applicant is requesting amendments to the following conditions of Ordinance No. 07-105: ■ Five (5)-Year Time Extension for Condition C (Time to Complete Construction) ■ Delete Condition D (Lot Consolidation) ■ Delete Condition E (TIAR Timing) ■ Modify Condition F (Access from Kekela Street) ■ Modify Condition H (Parking Requirements) ■ Modify Condition N (Fair Share) 2. Applicant's Reasons for the Requests: When the change of zone was granted in 2007, the original applicant proposed to develop two pads of commercial real estate or business center ranging in size from 9,600 to 10,132 square feet and 130 parking stalls. The current applicant is proposing a much smaller commercial development consisting of an approximately 9,046 square-foot commercial storefront, a minimum of 57 paved parking stalls, landscaping and related improvements. The applicant is requesting condition -1- amendments to accommodate this new, scaled-down development proposal and to delete conditions that have already been complied with. The applicant's requested amendment language and reasons for each request are discussed in greater detail in the Director's recommendation report. 3. Current Proposed Plan: The applicant is proposing to develop an AutoZone commercial storefront consisting of approximately 9,046 square feet, with landscaping and a minimum of 57 paved parking stalls, calculated at one (1) stall per 160 square feet of commercial uses, including areas for handicap accessible parking and loading area. Proposed operating hours are from 7:30 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., seven (7) days a week and will employ approximately twenty(20) individuals. Port deliveries of four (4) to six (6) pallets from Hilo Harbor and/or Kawaihae Harbor will occur once a week, which will be transported to the proposed subject parcel via small box trucks. Nissan Frontier vehicles will be utilized by AutoZone in its daily six (6) to eight(8)round trip commercial deliveries to local Auto repair shops. 4. Landowner: H. Shiroma, Inc. 5. Supportive Information: The applicant has submitted the attached in support of the request: (P.D. Exhibit 1 - Application for Time Extension and Amendments to Ordinance No. 07-105 dated October 18, 2017) CHRONOLOGY OF LAND USE PERMITTING 6. August 14, 2007: Effective date of Change of Zone Ordinance No, 07 105, approved by the County Council to change the zoning of four(4) parcels (TMKs 2-2-039:031, 057, 068 and 069) from a Single-Family Residential-10,000 square feet(RS-10) to a Neighborhood Commercial-40,000 square feet (CN-40) zoning district to develop two pads of commercial real estate or business center ranging in size from 9,600 to 10,132 square feet and 130 parking stalls. (P.D. Exhibit 2 - Ordinance No. 07 105) 7. August 1, 2008: Final Plan Approval (PLA-08-000365) was issued by the Planning Department to allow for the establishment of the Ginger Patch Commercial Center, including 127 parking stalls on approximately 80,000 square feet of the total 83,317 square feet the project site. These plans have since been abandoned. -2- 8. May 16, 2012: Effective date of Consolidation No. 12-000214 which consolidated TMKs 2-2-039:031, 057, 068 and 069 into the current subject parcel. 9. May 8, 2015: The Planning Director granted an administrative time extension to Condition C (Time to Complete Construction)until August 14, 2017. 10. September 2,2015: Date of an unrecorded ground lease agreement between the fee owner of the property, H. Shiroma, Inc. as lessor and the applicant, as lessee, for the subject property for a period of 15 years. The effective date of the ground lease is the first day of the month following the earlier of: (1) the date that applicant opens the store for business with the public; or(2) 180 days after the approval period. The ground lease allows for six (6) separate options to extend the term of the lease for five (5) years each. 11. October 18, 2017: Date the applicant submitted their request for time extension and other amendments to Ordinance 07-105. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 12. State Land Use Designation: Urban, 13. General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map: Medium Density Urban(MDU) and High Density Urban(HDU). MDU allows for village commercial, neighborhood commercial, single-family and multiple-family residential uses up to 35 units per acre, and related functions. HDU allows general coininercial, multiple family residential and related services (multiple family residential uses up to 87 units per acre). 14. Hilo Community Development Plan (CDP): The Hilo CDP, adopted by Resolution No. 1 on May 21, 1975, identifies the area as Single-Family Residential-10,000 square feet (RS-10). 15. County Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial (CN-40). According to the Zoning Code, the Neighborhood Commercial (CN) district applies to strategically located centers suitable for commercial activities which shall be of such size and shape as will accommodate a compact shopping center which supplies goods and services to a residential or working population on a frequent need or convenience basis. This district is distinguished from a central commercial district which provides general business and broad services to a city or region. (P.D. Exhibit 3 —Zoning Code Requirements for -3- Neighborhood Commercial Districts) 16. Special Management Area (SMA): The SMA is a part of the Coastal Zone Management Program regulated by the County. The property is not within the County's Special Management Area(SMA) and is located approximately two (2) miles from the nearest shoreline. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA 17. Project Site: The subject, "L" shaped property is situated on the north side of Puainako Street between Kekela Street and Kilauea Avenue and is approximately 88,317 square feet in size. The subject property once consisted of four (4) separate properties that were consolidated into one (1) in 2012. Those properties were previously used for residential purposes and as the site of a red ginger farm. The subject parcel is currently vacant of any structures or other improvements. 18. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: To the east across Kekela Street is the Minute Stop Gas Station (formerly the Ginger Patch Market and Deli) and the Firestone Tire and Service Center similarly zoned Neighborhood Commercial (CN-10). The KTA Super Stores complex is located to the south of the project site across Puainako Street and is zoned CN-10. There are single-family dwellings to the west along Kilauea Avenue and adjacent properties to the north are zoned Single-Family Residential (RS-10) and in single-family residential uses. In response to the request by adjacent property owners to minimize the visual impacts of the proposed project, the applicant has agreed to construct a perimeter rock wall along the property's northern boundary with adjoining property owners Don Kouchi at TMK: (3) 2-2-039:055, Michiko Yamamoto 1998 Trust at TMK: (3) 2-2-036:076, and Dwayne Miyashiro at TMK: (3) 2-2-039:070. Attached are copies of the letter agreements with these neighbors (see Exhibit 6 of the application). 19. FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM): Zone X(area of minimal flood hazard determined to be outside of the Special Flood Hazard Area). 20. Archaeological/Historical Resources: ASM Affiliates conducted a 100% surface field inspection of the subject parcel and submitted a report to the Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division(SHPD) on October 7, 2016 (see -4- Exhibit 5b in the application). By letter dated January 3, 2017, SHPD issued a"no historic properties affected" determination for the proposed Project (see Exhibit 5a in the application). PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 21. Access: Proposed access to the project site is from Kekela Street and Puainako Street. Kekela Street is a County roadway with a 42-foot wide pavement and concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks within a 60-foot right-of-way. Condition F of Ordinance No. 07-105 limits access from Kekela Street to the project site to delivery vehicles only. The applicant is requesting to amend Condition F to remove this limitation in order to allow the general public to access the project site from Kekela Street. There is an existing residential driveway intersection to the subject parcel at Kekela Street that is proposed to be widened to a commercial standard to accommodate public traffic. Puainako Street is under the jurisdiction of the State Department of Transportation(DOT) with an approximately 100-foot wide pavement within a varied width right-of-way (between 110 and 134 feet fronting the subject parcel). Condition G of Ordinance No. 07-105 limits access to the subject parcel to right-turn in and right-turn out movements only from Puainako Street. There is an existing asphalt driveway connection on the western side of the property that likely serviced the farm use, however, the applicant is proposing a new driveway access further east of the existing driveway and directly across from KTA's mauka driveway. By letter dated April 14, 2008 to the previous developer, DOT permitted access to the project site from Puainako Street, subject to eleven (11) conditions, including dedication of additional right-of-way to the State for the implementation of the Puainako Street realignment and improvement project between Komohana Street and Kanoelehua Avenue as well as several other design, engineering and permitting requirements (P.D. Exhibit 4—April 14, 2008 letter). By email dated May 14, 2019, DOT indicated that Since DOT plans to realign and improve Puainako Street between Komohana Street and Kanoelehua Avenue in the future, the ROW dedication should remain. Furthermore, the other conditions are still applicable, but could be amended or deleted by agreement with DOT (P.D. Exhibit 5—May 14, 2019 email). -5- Through subsequent phone conversations, DOT staff indicated that they would be amenable to the applicant setting aside a future road widening strip to be provided at no cost to the State upon request of DOT. 22. Traffic: According to the applicant, the proposed auto parts retail store use is anticipated to generate approximately 574 daily vehicle trips, including 20 A.M. peak hour(15 inbound/5 outbound) and 56 new trips in the P.M. peak hour (27 inbound/29 outbound). Based on the preceding and in accordance with the Zoning Code's concurrency requirements, the applicant prepared and submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) with its 2017 amendment application (see Exhibit 7 in the application). The TIAR studied and evaluated the project's traffic impact at three (3) intersections: Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue, Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway("Kekela intersection") and Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue. Kekela Street is a County owned and maintained road, with jurisdictional review by the County Department of Public Works. The TIAR concluded that the level of service (LOS) levels at the two study areas: (a) Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue, and (b) Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue intersections operate at an overall desirable LOS (LOS "D" or better) during both peak hours. The Kekela intersection currently operates at LOS "F"in the P.M. peak hour and is anticipated to still operate at LOS "E" or"F" in the future(5-, 10- and 20-year forecasts) without the proposed project. Due to the modest scale of the proposed project, the addition of trips from the proposed project would not further degrade the current LOS "E" or "F" operations at the Kekela intersection. The TIAR further concluded that both project driveways are anticipated to serve relatively low traffic volumes during the peak hours, therefore, no operational issues are anticipated at the Puainako Street or Kekela Street driveways. Finally, the TIAR recommended the re- striping of Kekela Street to provide a left/through lane and a separate right-turn lane. In addition, the TIAR recommended that the applicant pay their fair share toward the Puainako Street extension and widening project. DOT-Highways Division responded to a request for comment on the subject application in 2017 stating that they had no objection to the proposed amendments of Condition C, D, -6- F, H and N. However, they disagreed with the applicant's request to delete Condition E, which requires the applicant to submit a Traffic TIAR to the State DOT for review and approval prior to issuance of Final Plan Approval. DOT further indicated that they did not consider the applicant's justification of Condition G's requirement that the applicant construct any improvements to Puainako Street that may be required by DOT to be sufficient. DOT further stated that subsequent TIARs should include a discussion of a development's impact on Kano elehua/Puainako Street intersection and Kekela Street/Puainako Street intersection. DOT also stated that the Site Plan included within the TIAR did not reflect the report's recommendations. Finally, DOT indicated that no additional access would be permitted from the property to Puainako Street. The applicant's 2017 amendment request represented that the applicant wished to keep the Puainako Street access right-in/right-out limitation intact, however by letter dated January 16, 2019, the applicant changed course and requested an amendment to Condition G to allow full-movement access to the project site from Puainako Street. The request was accompanied by an updated TZAR recommending mitigation to both Puainako Street and Kekela Street to accommodate the request. Additionally, DOT submitted a letter approving the updated TIAR and the proposed mitigation therein. However, by letter dated May 22, 2019, the applicant withdrew that amendment request citing concerns by KTA over potential negative traffic impacts to KTA patrons from the proposed full-access driveway. This letter was accompanied by an updated TIAR dated May 20, 2019, however, with the exception of a new site plan and a new site access evaluation section describing proposed new striping treatments for Puainako Street an limitation of access from Puainako Street to a single driveway(starting on page 52), the TIAR is nearly identical to the report submitted in 2017, including all of the same traffic data, analyses, and recommendations. Please note, as the majority of the TIARs are identical, we will only include the pages that are different from the 2017 TIAR (P.D. Exhibit 6—May 22, 2019 letter and Updated TIAR Pages) The DPW-Traffic Division replied with a "no comment" on the original request for. comments on the project in 2017. By email dated May 17, 2019, DPW-Traffic Division -7- indicated that they are generally supportive of allowing general public access to the project from Kekela Street provided that the predominant movement is the right turn and as long as the right turn lane is sized to be long enough relative to the left/through queue in the peak hours. This means that the right turn storage pocket should be sized according to the left/through queue so left/through cars don't end up blocking the right turn lane. Traffic Division indicated that it would like to review the applicant's updated TIAR to ensure that these requirements are addressed. (P.D. Exhibit 7—May 17, 2019 email). 23. Airports: According to DOT—Airports Division, the subject property is located approximately 1.18 miles north east of the end of Runway 3 and 1.87 mile north of the end of Runway 8 at Hilo International Airport. According to DOT, every proposed development within five (5)-miles from a State Airport is subject to the State of Hawaii, Office of Planning, Technical Assistance Memorandum (TAM), which articulates, among other things, requirements for projects that wish to utilize photovoltaic (PV) systems, mitigation of potential wildlife hazards, etc. 24. Water: As part of the change of zone amendmentprocess, the applicant submitted water usage calculations, estimating average daily water demand at 400 gallons per day(GPD). By letter dated February 23, 2017 (see Exhibit A in the application), the Department of Water Supply(DWS) accepted the calculations and determined that water could be made available from an existing 12-inch waterline along Kekela Street. Additionally, DWS determined that a 5/8-inch water meter would be adequate to support the water demand of the proposed project. By letter dated March 14, 2017, DWS confirmed payment of a water commitment deposit and granted a water commitment for one (1) additional unit of water at an average of 400 GPD until March 31, 2020, with conditions requiring water system improvements, payment o facilities charges, and compliance with other applicable policies and requirements of DWS rules and regulations. 25. Wastewater: There is no County sewer line in the vicinity of the subject parcel. Individual wastewater systems) will be constructed to comply with the requirements of the State Department of Health. 26. Solid Waste: Solid waste will be disposed of by private hauling contractors or -s- individuals to approved transfer stations, the Hilo landfill site or the Pu`uanahulu landfill site when the Hilo landfill has reached capacity. Condition J of the Change of Zone Ordinance requires the applicant to submit a Solid Waste Management Plan for approval by the Department of Environmental Management (DEM)prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 27. Essential Utilities, Police, Fire and Medical Services: All essential utilities are available to the subject parcel. Police and fire services are available nearby in Hilo. AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS' COMMENTS 28. Department of Water Supply: (P.D. Exhibit 8—March 14, 2017 letter) 29. Fire Department: (P.D. Exhibit 9—November 28, 2017 letter) 30. Department of Land and Natural Resources - Engineering Division: (P.D. Exhibit 10—November 14,2019 memo). 31. State Department of Transportation - (P.D. Exhibit 11 —January 16, 2018 letter) AGENCIES - NO RESPONSE 32. Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR)-Land Division. AGENCIES -NO COMMENTS/NO CONCERNS 33. Department of Public Works—Engineering Division, Department of Public Works— Traffic Division Department of Environmental Management, Police Department, State Department of Health PUBLIC COMMENTS 34. As of the date of this writing, the Planning Department has not received any comments or objections from the general public or adjacent landowners on the subject request. -9- CARLSMITH BALL LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 WAIANUENUE AVENUE P.O.Box 686 HILO,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAx 808.935.7975 W W W.CARLSMITH.COM !v SLIM@CARLSMITH.COM C= c`2 -+ October 18, 2017 `- ? 00 Michael Yee -;I r -13 Planning Director T -) Planning Department17) 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 M Hilo, Hawaii 96720 —+ Attention: Christian Kay RE: Time Extension Request (Condition C) and Amendment to Conditions D, E, F, H and N of Rezoning Ordinance No. 07-105 Successor Applicant: AutoZone Parts, Inc.I, a Nevada corporation TMK No.: (3) 2-2-039:031 ("Property") Dear Mr. Yee: i This firm represents Applicant AutoZone Parts, Inc.2 ("Applicant" or "AutoZone"), the developer of the proposed AutoZone Store on the above-referenced Property("the proposed Project"). Rezoning Ordinance No. 07-105 ("Ord. 07-105"), effective August 14, 2007, amended the district classification for the Property from Single-Family Residential-10,000 square feet (RS-10) to Neighborhood Commercial-40,000 square feet (CN-40), affecting the original TMKs: (3) 2-2-039:031, 057, 068 and 0693. A. Applicant. From humble beginnings in 1979, founder J.R. "Pitt" Hyde, III, opened the first Auto Shack store in Forrest City, Arkansas, which was established on the core business foundation of providing a clean, well-organized store with accessible products and exceptional customer service that would allow individuals to upkeep their personal vehicles. Today, Auto Shack is AutoZone, a Fortune 500 company and a leading retailer and distributor of automotive replacement parts and accessories serving all 50 US states, the District of Columbia, Puerto I Original applicant was Ginger Patch DP,LLC. 2 Attached is a copy of the Lessee's Letter of Authorization(Exhibit la). s Pursuant to Condition D of Ord. 07-105,TMKs: (3)2-2-039:031,057, 068 and 069 were consolidated under CON-12-000214,effective May 16,2012 (see Exhibit 3-2017 annual report). Planning-,,Dept- HILO KONA MAUI Los ANGELES Exhibit_ Michael Yee October 18, 2017 Page 2 Rico, Mexico and Brazil, with more than 65,000 employees. AutoZone also offers value-added services and technical advice and solutions, including electronic automotive diagnostic services to the general public, and provides delivery of automotive replacement parts and accessories to professional technicians. AutoZone recently entered the Hawaii market with the opening of its retail operations on Oahu (Fort Weaver Road and Salt Lake Boulevard) and on the Big Island (Henry Street in Kailua-Kona), with projected openings soon in Waipahu on Oahu and Lihue on Kauai. Effective September 2, 2015, the fee owner of the Property, H. Shiroma, Inc.4, a Hawaii corporation, as Lessor and the Applicant, as Lessee, entered into an unrecorded Ground Lease for the Property for a period of 15 years. B. Project History. 1. Prior Development. Prior developer, Ginger Patch DP, LLC proposed to develop two pads of commercial real estate or business center ranging in size from 9,600 to 10,132 square feet with 130 parking stalls. Final Plan Approval (PLA-08-000365) was issued by the Planning Department on August 1, 2008 to allow for the establishment of the Ginger Patch Cormnercial Center, including 127 parking stalls on approximately 80,000 square feet of the total 83,317 square feet Property. These plans have been abandoned. 2. Applicant's Proposed Development(Exhibit 2). The Applicant is proposing to develop a much smaller Project. The AutoZone commercial storefront will consist of approximately 9,046 square feet, with landscaping and a minimum of 57 paved parking stalls, calculated at 1 stall/ 160 square feet of commercial uses, including areas for accessible parking and loading area. The store will operate from 7:30 ain to 10:00 pm, Sunday to Saturday, and will employ approximately 20 individuals. Port deliveries of 4 to 6 pallets from Hilo Harbor and/or Kawaihae Harbor will occur once a week, which will be transported to the proposed Project via small box trucks. Nissan Frontier vehicles will be utilized by AutoZone in its daily 6 to 8 round trip commercial deliveries to local repairs shops. a. Annual Report. The Applicant's compliance with the conditions of approval under Ord. 07-105 is summarized in the 2017 annual report (Exhibit 3). b. Community Information Meeting. A community informational meeting was held at the proposed Project site on August 3, 2016, in which the Applicant shared its proposed development of the AutoZone store and proposed amendments to conditions of approval under Ord. 07-105 (Exhibit 4). 4 Attached is a copy of the Lessor's Letter of Authorization(Exhibit lb). 5 The effective date of the Ground Lease is the first day of the month following the earlier of: (1)the date that Applicant opens the store for business with the public or(2) 180 days after the Approval Period. The Ground Lease allows for six separate options to extend the term of the lease for five years each. Michael Yee October 18, 2017 Page 3 C. Historic Preservation Review. Although an Archaeological Inventory Survey was not prepared for the Property, ASM Affiliates conducted and prepared a 100% surface field inspection report (October 7, 2016) (Exhibit 5a). By letter dated January 3, 2017, the Department of Land and Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Division issued a "no historic properties affected" determination for the proposed Project (Exhibit 5b). C. Amendment Requests to Conditions of Approval. The Applicant is seeking an amendinent to the following conditions of approval under Ord. 07-105. Deleted text is [br-aeketed and strieken] and new text is underscored. 1. Request No. 1 - Time Extension to Condition C (completion of improvements). C. Construction of the proposed improvements shall be completed within f ve (5)years ftom the effective date of this ordinance, as amended. This time period shall include securing Final Plan Approval f oin the Planning Director in accordance with the Zoning Code. Plans shall identify proposed structure(s),fire protection measures, access roadway, driveway and parking stalls. Landscaping shall be indicated on the plans for the purpose of mitigating any potential adverse nice or visual impacts to adjoining parcels. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of Planning Department Rule No. 17 (Landscaping Requirements), Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Hawaii County Code. Landscaping shall include rock walls or fences on the northern boundaries, as agreed upon between the applicant and landowner of lands adjacent to such northern boundaries, as may be evidenced by any written agreements in existence as of the effective date of this rezoning. Reason: The Planning Department by letter dated May 8, 2015, granted the prior developer a five-year administrative time extension within which to comply with Condition C (time to complete construction) from August 14, 2012 to August 14, 2017. The prior developer did not proceed with its proposed project and returned the Property back to the fee owner. Effective September 2, 2015, the Applicant and the fee owner of the Property, H. Shiroma, Inc., a Hawaii corporation, entered into a new 15-year Ground Lease. As the new Lessee and developer of the Property, the Applicant respectfully requests an additional 5-year time extension from August 14, 2017 to August 14, 2022, within which to complete construction of its proposed Project. The Applicant anticipates that construction of the proposed Project will commence shortly after the issuance of the Final Plan Approval. Michael Yee October 18, 2017 Page 4 In addition, in response to the request of the adjacent property owners to minimize the visual impacts of the proposed Project, the Applicant has agreed to construct a perimeter rock wall along the Property's northern boundary with adjoining property owners Don Kouchi at TMK: (3)2-2-039:055, Michiko Yamamoto 1998 Trust at TMK: (3) 2-2-036:076, and Dwayne Miyashiro at TMK: (3) 2-2-039:070. Attached are copies of the letter agreements with these neighbors (Exhibit 6). 2. Request No. 2 -Delete Condition D (secure final consolidation approval). a te fthis a Reason: This proposed deletion is appropriate as parcels 31, 57, 68 and 69 were consolidated by the Planning Department's approval under Consolidation No. 12-000214 on May 16, 2012 (see Exhibit 3 - 2017 annual report). The newly assigned TMK for the consolidation parcels is TMK: (3) 2-2-039:031. 3. Request No. 3 -Delete Condition E (submit a TIAR to the State Department of Transportation). This proposed amendment seeks to delete the requirement to prepare a TIAR to be approved the DOT prior to issuance of Final Plan Approval. all appr-bre- mynay• �o e . „ t ` F4Hal g P-c -rr the A „ 1 4 eepy f t1 747 shall J L 1 tt 7 t t1 i oca 'mob f- Reason: The Draft TIAR prepared by Fehr &Peers (June 2017) submitted with this application, analyzed the potential project-related traffic impacts and operations at three intersections: (a) Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue, (b) Puainako Street/ Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center east driveway, and (c) Puainako Street/ Kanoelehua Avenue. The Applicant is not proposing any modification of the "right- in, right-out" Project access along Puainako Street, and will construct improvements on the Puainako Street right-of-way meeting with the approval of the DOT. Therefore, deletion of this condition will not release the Applicant from complying with the DOT's construction requirements imposed under Condition G, which requires that "[a]cess to the project site from Puainako Street shall be limited to right-in, right-out movements only, and shall meet with the approval of the Department of Transportation. The applicant shall construct any improvements on Puainako Street as required by the Department of Transportation." Michael Yee October 18, 2017 Page 5 4. Request No. 4 -Amend Condition F (off-site parking). This proposed amendment seeks to allow the general public full Project access from Kekela Street. F [Xopi��eeta Access to the prect site Froin Kekela Street shall be.allowed[exec ]for general public and delivery vehicles[ 4eeessfier delivery,vehieles niqy he allowed by the only if the use eaH be liniWd to�4eeess to the prejee site1Vai ,. eni e" -4] and shall conform to Chapter 22 (County Streets) of the Hawaii County Code. Reason: a. Standard. In compliance with § 25-2-46(d), HCC, a Draft TIAR was prepared by Fehr &Peers (June 2017) ("Report") for the proposed amendment request (Exhibit 7), even though the proposed Project generates only six (6) trips above the threshold for which a TIAR is required under § 25-2-46, HCC. Section 25-2-46(e), HCC, requires mitigation if the Level of Service ("LOS") is either: (a) currently worse than the acceptable LOS, or(b) projected to become worse than the acceptable LOS during the 5-year period of the TIAR. Where the LOS deficiency is due to roadway or intersection deficiencies in the immediate vicinity of the project, the conditions of zoning shall require "local mitigation". "Local mitigation" consists of improvements to road and intersections that are in the immediate vicinity of a project, including channelization of intersection, turn lanes into a project and similar improvements. b. TIAR. The Report analyzed the potential project-related traffic impacts and operations at the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center east driveway("Kekela intersection"), and two additional intersections6. Kekela Street is a County owned and maintained road, with jurisdictional review by the County Department of Public Works ("DPW"). The Report concluded that the LOS levels at the two study areas: (a) Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue, and (b) Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue intersections operate at an overall desirable (LOS D or better) during both peak hours. The Kekela intersection currently operates at LOS F in the PM peak hour, and is anticipated to still operate at LOS E or F in the future (5-, 10- and 20-year forecasts) without the proposed Project. Due to the modest scale of the proposed Project, the addition of the Project trips from the proposed Project would not further degrade the current LOS E or F operations. The Report further concluded that both Project driveways are anticipated to serve G The study area also included the: (a)Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue and(b)Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue intersections. Michael Yee October 18, 2017 Page 6 relatively low traffic volumes during the peak hours, therefore,no operational issue are anticipated at the Puainako Street or Kekela Street driveways. C. Proposed Mitigation. The Report concluded that the Project trips traveling southbound on Kekela Street which are turning left to go eastbound on Puainako Street are experiencing the highest delay at this intersection. The existing southbound lane on Kekela Street is approximately 24 feet wide, which is sufficient to provide two 12-foot wide lanes. As recommended in the Report,potential mitigation to address the current and 5-year projected forecast of the TIAR would be to restripe the southbound Kekela Street to provide a left/through lane and a separate right-turn lane, which would: (1) improve operations at this intersection since the right-turn movement will no longer be impeded by a queue waiting to turn left, (2)minimize disruption to the southbound right-turn, which is the predominant movement at this approach, and (3)maintain traffic flow. The DPW has preliminarily informed the Applicant that it did not recormnend any access restrictions (i.e., limited to delivery vehicles) on Kekela Street during the original rezoning action, and would not object to an amendment to remove the limited access restriction, provided the Project ingress/egress on Kekela Street conforined to County standards. 5. Request No. 5 -Amend Condition H (off-site parking). This proposed amendment seeks to conforin the number of off-site parking and loading spaces at the 1:160 ratio based on the reduced square footage of project from the commercial uses from 9,600 to 10,132 square feet to 9,046 square feet. H. The project shall provide a minimum of one parking space for each 160 square feet ofgross floor area for commercial uses or the requirements of Section 25-4-51, whichever is greater. The minimum off-street parking spaces for this project shall[tnitia4yj be[�3] 57 spaces. Reason: The prior developer had contemplated a significantly larger commercial project which was twice the size of the currently proposed Project. At the last Hawaii County Council ("Council"),hearings on the prior developer's plan, and in lieu of following § 25-4-51(a)(4), HCC, which requires one parking stall for every 300 square feet of gross floor area for commercial uses (or 66 stalls), the Council utilized a formula of one parking stall for every 160 square feet of gross floor area for commercial uses (or 123 stalls). The commercial space of the proposed Project of 9,046 square feet. Therefore, the reduction in the number of off-site parking and loading spaces to conform to the parking requirements of one parking stall for every 160 square feet of gross floor area for commercial uses is 57 stalls. Michael Yee October 18, 2017 Page 7 6. Request No. 6 -Amend Condition N (fair share). Although the Applicant will not be developing residential units on the Property, this proposed amendment seeks to update the fair share contribution based on the current percentage change in the HCPI being utilized by the Planning Department. N. If the applicant, successors, or assigns develop residential units on the subject property, the applicant shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the property with respect to parks and recreation,fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution shall become due and payable prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval. The fair share contribution for each lot shall be based on the actual number of residential units developed. The fair share contribution in a form of cash, land, facilities or any combination thereof shall be determined by the County Council. The fair share contribution may be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective date of this ordinance, based on the percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index (HCPI). The fair share contribution shall have a maximum combined value of [Q6,6. 'J$7,514.35 per multiple family residential unit -510,�=o,36&57$11,710.26 per single family residential unit). The total amount shall be determined with the actual number of units according to the calculation and payment provisions set forth in this condition. The fair share contribution per multiple family residential unit(single family residential units) shall be allocated as follows: 1. [Q2��J$3,706.61 per multiple family residential unit ([Q�'�T-99-.WJ$5,646.90 per single family residential unit) to the County to support park and recreational improvements and facilities; 2. [$103.73]$117.15 per multiple family residential unit ([$2140]$272.41 per single family residential unit) to the County to support police facilities; 3. [$349,471$360.36 per multiple family residential unit ([$476-39]$538.03 per single family residential unit) to the County to support fire facilities; 4. $[1424. 1]$160.61 per multiple family residential unit ([$2884-7]$235.56 per single family residential unit) to the County to support solid waste facilities; and Michael Yee October 18, 2017 Page 8 5. [$2,40A-46]$3,169.62 per multiple family residential unit ([$,44240]$5,017.36 per single family residential unit) to the County to support road and traffic improvements. In lieu ofpaying the fair share contribution, the applicant may contribute land and/or construct improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation,fire,police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads within the region impacted by the proposed development, subject to the review and recommendation of the Planning Director, upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the County Council. On behalf of AutoZone Parts, Inc.,we respectfully request the County of Hawaii's favorable approval of the Time Extension Request (Condition C) and Amendment to Conditions D, E, F, H and N of Rezoning Ord, No. 07-105, and enclose the additional following items: 1. Original and 20 copies of this zoning amendment request; 2. Filing fee in the amount of$250; 3. Listing of surrounding property owners within 300 feet; and 4. Real Property Tax clearance. Please direct all future communication relating to this matter to our office. Please feel free to contact me should you require any additional infonnation, or if you have any questions regarding this submittal. Very truly yours, Steven S.C. Lir SSL/KYL Enclosures xc w/enclosures: Client H. Shiroma, Inc. LESSEE'S LETTER OF AUTI-IOPJZATION Tax MapKey: (3)2-2-039.031 Waiakea, South Hilo Island, County and State of Hawaii The undersigned is the Lessee of the real property above-identified and hereby authorizes Car lsmith Ball,LLP to communicate with,apply for, execute and process any and all County,State and federal governmental pmnit applications, and to participate in proceedings related to said real property. A photostatic or facsimile copy of this executed authorization shall.also be considered as effective and valid as the original. AUTOZONE PARTS, INC. ., a Nevada corporation By _^ It ly, ILI Subscribed and sworn(or affirmed)before the this jo day i 1 3 ✓_ 2417. Ai�lulli���i -D'...NbF STATE"",.. ,� i _ �4 . ' � - - OF i��btary 1'�t ic, Mate of__(gK � -- - NOTARY My commission expires: 0 1� a - , PUBLIC1� A t�',tarn Slip aealy 4b y\,�' 8 ytC� ���titw����\ Appmyed by AutQo e Legal a sualneg pen t EXHIBIT la FEE OWNER'S LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Tax Map Key: (3) 2-2-39: 69, 68, 31 & 57 Waiakea Homestead Houselots,District of Hilo, County and State of Hawaii The undersigned is the fee owner of the real property above-identified, and hereby authorizes Carlsmith Ball LLP, to apply for, execute and process any and all County, State and Federal governmental permit applications, and to participate in proceedings related to said real property. A photostatic or facsimile copy of this executed authorization shall also be considered as effective and valid as the original. H. Shiroma Inc. Its Manager Address: 1989 Kilauea Avenue ( Hilo,Hawaii 96720 State of Hawaii County of Hawaii Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of May , 2006 Sharon H. P. Ogata Name: C1 ► Notary Public, State of Hawaii My Commission expires: October 1, 2008 ( 5/2/06 4817-0096-4512,1 EXHIBIT lb 5/2/06 ® Jj,_ I I I I = 1 14 �I, 1,21 X _ 7f Al Ix�n'do-.ut�m host Y— '= Jl 1 _sfiS):`l_5 l.= �c ry - -- 61 it AUTOZONE o ^m STORE No.5204 0 PIAN VIEW CARLSMITH BALL p 20 PM i 33 A LIMrrED LIABILITY LAW PARNERSMP PLANNI •G OFRIIPTMENT 121 WAIANUENUEAVENUE ,/OUNTY Or HAWA! P.O.Box 686 HILO,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935,6644 FAx 808.935.7975 WWWCARLSMITH,COM SLIM`CARLSMITH COM September 19, 2017 Michael Yee Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attention: Jeff Darrow Re: 2017 Annual Report Successor Applicant: AutoZone Parts,Inc. Rezoning Ordinance No. 07-105 ("Ord. 07-105") TMK No.: (3).2_22039:031______ Dear Mr. Yee: In compliance with Condition Q (Annual Report) of Rezoning Ordinance No. 07-105, enclosed please find the Applicant's 2017 Annual Report. The Applicant, as new lessee of the Property from H. Shiroma, Inc. and as new developer of the Property will shortly be submitting its request to amend several conditions of approval under Ord. 07-105 to allow for the development of a much smaller commercial project, Please contact me or my paralegal Katherine Luga should you have any questions on this 2017 Annual Report. Very truly yours, 4x-, Steven S.C. L' SSL:KYL Enclosure xe w/enclosure: Client 4822-7734A848.1 HONOLULU HILO KONA MAUI GUAM Los ANGELES EXHIBIT 3 AUTOZONE PARTS, INC. Rezoning Ordinance No. 06-52 Condition of Approval Matrix Condition �� Requirement Status s — _ -- _ B The required water commitment payment shall be submitted to Satisfied. the Department of Water supply in accordance with the"Water Commitment Guidelines Policy" within 180 days from the By letter dated February 23 2017, the 1 effective date of this ordinance. DWS confirmed the availability of water from an existing 12-inch waterline along Kekela Street,subject to construction of the necessary water system improvements and remittance of the facilities charge for one(1)unit of water(Exhibit A). C _ Construction of the proposed improvements shall be The Planning Department by letter dated completed within five(5)years from the effective date of this May 8,2015,granted a five-year ordinance. This time period shall include securing Final Plan administrative time extension within Approval from the Planning Director in accordance with the which to comply with Condition 5(time "Zoning Code. Plans shall identify proposed Aructure(s),fire to complete construction)from August t protection measures,access roadway,driveway and parking 14,2012 to August 14,2017. Effective stalls. Landscaping shall be indicated on the plans for the September 2,2015,the Applicant and fee I propose of mitigating any potential adverse nice or visual owner of the Property,H. Shiroma,Inc.,a j impacts to adjoining parcels. Landscaping shall be provided in Hawaii corporation entered into a 15-year accordance with the requirements of Planning Department Ground Lease. j Rule No. 17(Landscaping Requirements),Chapter 25(Zoning Code),Hawaii County Code. Landscaping shall include rock The Applicant is seeking an amendment r to this condition. walls or fences on the northern boundaries,as agreed upon I between the applicant and landowner of lands adjacent to such � northern boundaries,as may be evidenced by any written agreements in existence as of the effective date of this rezoning. D The applicant shall secure Final Consolidation Approval of Satisfied. parcels 32,57,68 and 69 within one year from the effective date of this ordinance. The Planning Department approved Consolidation No. 12-000214 on May 16, j 2012(Exhibit B). The newly assigned iI TMK for the consolidation parcels is TMK:(3)2-2-039:031, The Applicant is seeking an amendment I to delete this condition. r E Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR)shall be submitted to The Applicant is seeking an amendment i the Department of Transportation Highways Division, through to delete this condition. t the Hawaii District Office for review and shall be approved I' prior to the issuance of Final Plan Approval. A copy of the TIAR shall also be submitted to the Planning Department, F No project access from Kekela Street shall be allowed except The Applicant is seeking an amendment i for delivery vehicles. Access for delivery vehicles may be to this condition, allowed by the planning director,in consultation with the director of public works,only if the use can be limited to Access to the project site,if any,from Kekela Street shall conform to Chapter 22(County Streets)of the Hawaii County Code. 1 Condition Requirement— - -- -- Status -� G� Access to the ro3ect site from Puainako Street shall be limited The Applicant will comply with this to right-in,right-out movements only,and shall meet with the condition. approval of the Department of Transportation.The applicant 1 ! shall construct any improvements on Puainako Street as E required by the Department of Transportation.These i improvements shall include extending the existing paved and 1 striped edestrian walkwa from Kekela St.to Kilauea Ave. P�L?_W__ y _ H Notwithstanding Section 25-4-51(a)(3),the project shall The Applicant is seeking an amendment 1 provide a minimum of one parking space for each 160 square to this condition. feet of gross floor area for commercial uses,or the i requirements of Section 254-51,whichever is greater. The j II minimum off-street parking spaces for this project shall 1 initially be 123 spaces. I 1 I All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site The Applicant will comply with this and shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties.A condition, i drainage study shall be prepared and the recommended i drainage system shall be constructed,meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works,prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. i 7 AS --idbVaste lti4anagement Plan shall be submitted to the The Applicant will comply with this j Department of Environmental Management for review and condition, approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. t K All earthtivork activity shall conform to Chapter 10,Erosion The Applicant will comply with this and Sedimentation Control,of the Hawaii County Code. condition, L f Should any remains of historic sites,such as rock walls, The Applicat?t will comply with this terraces,platforms,marine shell concentrations or human condition. burials be encountered,work in the immediate area shall cease and the Department of Land and Natural Resources State Historic Preservation Division(DLNR-SHPD)shall be immediately notified.Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearance from the DI.NR-SHPD when it finds i that sufficient mitigation measures have been taken. M To ensure that the Goals and Policies of the Housing Element The Applicant will comply with this I of the General Plan are implemented,the applicant shall condition,as applicable. comply with the requirements of Chapter 11,Article 1,Hawaii ICounty Code relating to Affordable Housing Policy.This i requirement shall be approved by the Administrator of the i Office of Housing and Community Development prior to Final i Plan Approval or Final Subdivision Approval,whichever is applicable. - —------- - — --- — —- —— --——------ --- -- J Condition Requirement Status N ` If the applicant,successors,or assigns develop residential The Applicant will comply with this units on the subject property,the applicant shall make its fair condition,as applicable, share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the property with respect to parks and recreation,fire,police, j solid waste disposal facilities and roads.The fair share contribution shall become due and payable prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval.The fair share contribution for each lot shall be based on the actual number of residential units developed.The fair share contribution in a form of cash,land, 1 facilities or any combination thereof shall be determined by the County Council.The fair share contribution may be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective date of this ordinance,based on the percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index(HCPI).The fair share contribution shall have a maximum combined value of $6,653.40 per multiple family residential unit($10,368.57 per single family residential unit).The total amount shall be determined with the actual number of units according to the calculation and payment provisions set forth in this condition. The fair share contribution per multiple family residential unit (single family residential units)shall be allocated as follows; 53,281.93 per multiple family residential unit(54,999.91 per single family residential unit)to the County to supportpark and { recreational improvements and facilities; $103.73 per multiple family residential unit($241.20 per single family residential unit) to the County to support police 4 facilities; 1 $319.07 per multiple family residential unit($476.39 per f single family residential unit)to the County to support fire facilities; $142,21 per multiple family residential unit($208.57 per single family residential unit)to the County to support solid i waste facilities;and $2,806.46 per multiple family residential unit($4,442.50 per single family residential unit)to the County to support road and traffic improvements. In lieu of paying the fair share contribution,the applicant may i contribute land and/or construct impro veme n ts/facd i ties related to i a p rhs and recreation,fire,police,solid waste disposal facilities and roads within the region impacted by the proposed development,subject to the review and recommendation of the Planning Director,upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the County Council. i 0 Should the Council adopt an Unified Impact Fees Ordinance The Applicant will comply with this setting forth criteria for imposition of exactions or the condition. assessment of impact fees,conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance, P The applicant shall comply with all applicable County,State The Applicant will comply with tlu�s­-----� and Federal laws,rules,regulations and requirements. condition. j Condition Requirement Status �` Q An annual progress report shall be submitted to the Planning This 2017 annual report is submitted in Director prior to the anniversary date of enactment of the compliance with this condition. ordinance.The report shall include,but not be limited to,the status of the development and the extent to which the conditions of approval have been satisfied.This condition shall remain in effect until all of the conditions of approval have { been satisfied and the Planning Director acknowledges that further reports are not required. P, i An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions The Applicant will comply with this within the ordinance,as amended,may be granted by the C condition. Planning Director upon the following circumstances: 1. Non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, 1 successors or assigns,and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. 2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the f f General Plan or Zoning Code. 3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of the change of zone. 4. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance(i.e.,a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for ! I up to one additional year). t ' S. If the applicant should require an additional extension of time, the Planning Director shall submit the applicant's request -- to the County Council for appropriate action, I 10 ;Q DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY COUNTY OF HAWAII Op 345 KEKOANAD'A STREET, SUITE 20 HILO, HAWAII 96720 TELEPHONE (808) 961.8050 • FAX (808) 961-8657 February 23,2017 Mr.Neal Fukumoto Wesley R. Segawa&Associates, Inc. 736 South Street, Suite 203 Flonolulu, HI 96813 Dear Mr.Pukumoto: Subject: Water Usage Calculations for AutoZone Hilo Change of Zone Ordinance No. 07-105 Tax Map Key 2-2-039:031 (Portion) We have reviewed the revised water usage calculations prepared by Mechanical Enterprises, Inc,,and find them acceptable. Based on the calculations provided, the estimated average daily water demand for the project is 400 gallons per day(GPD),or one(1)equivalent unit of water. A 5/8-inch meter is adequate to support that demand for the proposed project. Water can be made available from an existing 12-inch waterline along Kekela Street fronting the subject parcel in accordance with the Department's existing water availability conditions,which are subject to change without notice, Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Department's Rules and Regulations,a water commitment may be effected for the proposed development. The Department requests that the applicant remit a water commitment deposit of $150.00 as soon as possible so that a water commitment may be formally effected. The commitment will be in writing with specific dates and conditions stated, The water commitment deposit will be credited toward the final facilities charge,which is subject to change and due upon completion of the required water systeni improvements. ,Vater service to the proposed project will be contingent on compliance with the following conditions: 1. Construct necessary water system improvements,which shall include, but not be limited to,the following: a. installation of an appropriately-sized service lateral to accommodate a 5/8-inch meter, b. installation of a reduced pressure type backflow prevention_assembly on private property within Five feet of the new meter,and c. subject to other agencies' requirements to construct improvements within the road right-of-way fronting the property affected by the proposed development, the applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and adjustment of the Department's affected water system facilities,should they be necessary, Water, Our.ry(ost Precious Q?§source. . . Ka'WaiA pane. . . The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer EXHIBIT A 5 1 Mr.Neal Fukumoto Page 2 February 23,2017 Submit construction plans prepared by a professional engineer,registered in the State of Hawaii, for review and approval, 2. Remit the prevailing facilities charge,which is subject to change,as shown below: FACILITIES CHARGE(FC): one(l)additional unit t $5,500.00/unit OS 500 00 Total FC 05,500.00 These are due and payable upon completion of the installation of the required water system improvements and prior to final approval being granted. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070,extension 256, Sincerely yours, Keith K. Okamoto,P.E. Manager-Chief Engineer RQ:dfg copy— Planning Department DWS Customer Service Section(Hilo) DWS Cross-Connection Section r _ zUf K 1 L A U E A A V E N U E TO vooxroTH Hao �p c p— n � O tr _ o 0 175'40— 7.50 TSE k0kM N 6 y y r l I Ill,w�p t S �p0 ♦/ :I l �. mo om n �+ z b m N b 9 N n f r O �O O m F va L.XII : en dory �. arua) F D� IN -- --' ------ ----'------T -------�$-•-- -R-122374 __ G� 5'40 '�12237t mf XL �, .SO.tLI yy h�yy 03 ..; wTp41y o � t W t" ID 0tj a9 3'083°0 OAD C. 72 �' rJ 35940' — 24E.52 t ro K E K E L A S T R E E T v RodE2 R r:s CJ 0 2 JIDYY'112112.02 BRINY SNIR0MVCON50LIDATION U&P.&,2 11W11111AMOZ000 123 S. Front Street, Memphis,Tennessee 38103 Phone(901)495-8729 NOTICE OF INFORMATIONAL MEETING for the proposed AutoZone Store at the corner of Puainako Street/Kekela Street Location: 40 Kekela Street, Hilo, Hawaii Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 Time: 5:00p in. —6:00 p.m. Dear Kekela Street Resident, Tenant or Owner, AutoZone Parts, Inc. ("AutoZone") and H. Shiroma, Inc. would like to invite you to an informational meeting to update residents, tenants and owners on its proposed development of the AutoZone store on vacant lands located at the corner of Puainako Street and Kekela Street on TMK: (3) 2-2-039:031 ("Property"). AutoZone is leasing the Property from H. Shiroma, Inc. and as the new developer is proposing to construct a 9,046 square feet commercial'retail building, with 57 parking stalls and landscaping. The proposed AutoZone store will be significantly smaller than the prior project proposed at the Property. We will also present an overview of the Project's proposed traffic pattern at Puainako Street and Kekela Street. AutoZone will be seeking an amendment to conditions of approval under the Rezoning Ordinance to be considered by the Windward Planning Commission and Hawaii County Council in the near future. If you are unable to attend, but have questions on the proposed development,please feel free to contact our attorney, Steven S.C. Lim, Carlsmith Ball LLP, 121 Waianuenue Avenue, Hilo, Hawaii 96720,Telephone No.: (808) 935-6644 or email at: slim@carlsmith.com. Thank you. EXHIBIT 4 SI ZAV4F D.CASE DAVID N.1W i1'jL-H,�� III\I'AvF'i iU\ t trtTR`.I ll(f)f 11\U 111 ltr n 1968 �`� \ ltir':V lllrc x'-1)UI I-utt R I I R1 XA:P.;f'. ��?at•xt\i1t51♦I\1\x'1lRRI vii R4:1\l1`.\x!-.II•.I J b!j• \. S J f .5 hr.KOA KALI 11Mand d ; j rmcrlvrtlx Jr-ri-iwi-r.Pr rrltso% yt 1 k �• j M: 11117 t11IR NAtf; gyp+ Ls :: .` L4 ry....�.......�'�� \t•t it t RI v k Nl c� V 111r IFI UAL r 11'v ilt \(7,IR1V ill i!I.0 li[rl..l,f 1�\:li C'J-- I•Etil�i'1.1�1'v\t llr it ktxl`11H4E\i l\l�.l\I1 til ' r ll1\}.Rt 11V1\\V;1t(rt�111 Lt�tll +L '± �` l<I`.\fit llHl•.1'•I1 Rtv;Rti t�:iiNlT\I!\I STATE OF HAWAII SrarFoirars` DEPARTMENT OF LAND.41`ID NATURAL RESOURCES nn nxu\rx_,!u:I��Io� STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISiON KAKt'HIHEWA BUILDING 601 KAMOKILA BLVD,STE 555 KAP'OLEL HAWAII 96707 January 3, 2017 Dr. Robert Rechtman Log No. 2016.02116 ASM Affiliates Doc,No. 1701SN02 507 A East Laniknula St. Archaeolog} Hilo,H1 96730 Dear Dr. Rechtman: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review— Archeological Field Inspection Report for AutoZone farts, inc. Waiakea Ahupna`a,South Hilo District,Island of Hamil'i TINIK:(3)2-2-039:031 Thank you for the opportunity to reiieAc this archaeological field inspection report in anticipation of a Count) ol' I-Im\m`i grading permit application that mas received bti our of-rice on October 7,3016. According to the letter, AutoZone Parts, Inc., lessee under IL Shiroma (landol\ner), plans to grade the subject parcel. Our records indicated that this parcel had not been subjected to an archaeological inventory survey. ASN( Affiliates conducted a !00% surface field inspection of the parcel. The field inspection identified no historic properties on the parcel. The propertq has been in agricultural use since the 1930s and in the 1960s the parcel %Nas cultivated for ornamental ginger. The entire parcel has been mechanically impacted. Additionally, no historic properties N%ere identified in the near vicinity of the current project area. SHPD concurs N%ith the field inspection report findings and determination of no historic properties affected for the proposed project.Therefore,issuance of a permit for the grading activities m1y proceed. Attach to permit: in the unlikely event that historic properties such as lava tube openings, concentrations of artiracts, structural remains or htuman skeletal remains are found during construction activities please cease �Nork in the immediate vicinity of the rind, protect the Find from additional disturbance, and contact the State Historic Preservation Division at(808)933-7651. Please contact Sean Naleimaile at (808) 933-7651 or at SCan.P.Nalei maile @1hawaii.eov if fou have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Aloha, Q , Susan A. Lebo,PhD Archaeology* Branch Chief \ EXHIBIT 5a f , i ( i A15 a. ASM PN 27000.00 October 7,2016 Sean Naleimaile, M.A. Assistant Hawaii Island Archaeologist DLNR-SHPD 40 Po`okela Street Hilo, HI 96720 email: sean.p.naleimaile@hawaii.gov Subject: Archaeological Field Inspection ofTMK: (3)2-2-039;031, Waiakea Ahupua`a, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii. Dear Sean: On behalf of AutoZone Parts,Inc.lessee under H.Shiroma, Inc.(landowner)and in anticipation of County of Hawaii grading and building permit applications,ASM Affiliates (ASM)conducted an archaeological field inspection of TMK: (3) 2-2-039:031, in Waiakea Ahupua`a, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii. The purpose of the current field inspection was to determine if undocumented historic properties exist on the parcel.The 2.027-acre subject parcel(Figures 1,2,and 3)was formerly portions of Lot l and Lot 12(Grant 9507 to Joaquin Z. Jeremiah) of the Waiakea House lots Block 401 (Figure 4) located at the corner of Kilauea Avenue and Pu`ainak6 Street. A review of a 1930 Waiakea Mill Company map (Figure 5) indicates that none of the plantation infrastructure (rail lines, flumes, etc.) was located across the subject property. The property was acquired by the Shiroma family in the 1930s, and according to Brian Shiroma(personal communication 2016), at that time the land was cultivated in sugarcane.The Shiroma family transitioned the agriculture to papayas and anthuriums, and then beginning in the late 1960s the subject parcel was used for the cultivation of ornamental flower ginger; these farming operations lasted until the early to middle 1990s. As part of the fanning operation, the southwestern potion of the property (near the corner of Kilauea Avenue and Pu`ainak6 Street)was the location of the packing and processing shed,where wholesalers would come to purchase and pick up the agricultural products. On September 20, 2016, Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D. conducted a surface field inspection of the subject parcel,the boundaries of which were clearly identifiable in the field.The property is bounded on its northern side by developed residential lots; on its southern side by Pu`ainak6 Street; and on its western side by Kilauea Avenue, and on its eastern side by Kekela Street (see Figure 2). The ground surface has been extensively altered.Land use history indicates that this property was used for the cultivation as early as the 1930s, and likely earlier, and if as indicated on historic maps (see Figure 4) this area was Vd,then there was no doubt significant mechanical alteration of the ground for agricultural purposes. Currently, there is an asphalt pavement overgrown with grass (Figure 6) covering the southwestern portion of the property (the former location of the processing and packing shed).and a modern drywell/drainage feature(Figure 7) in the northeastern portion of the property.The entire parcel has been mechanically levelled and is currently planted in lawn(Figure 8),which had been recently mowed at the time of the field inspection.The periphery of the property is compacted Vii adjacent to the asphalt paved roadways (Figure 9). ��ISz.g0 CSP,u[ts.292'-, 'D7 ti LSi ''x Hawn,i{..7<0 ,moi`/tY�$I�s�Pi t(iGttyS tiG�l EXHIBIT 5b October 7,2016 Archaeological Field Inspection TMK:(3)2-2-039:031 Page 2 of 9 Based on our field inspection,it is concluded that the proposed development of TMK:(3)2-2-039:031 will have no effect on historic properties. However, in the unlikely event that archaeological resources are encountered during grading activities, such activities will be halted and DLNR-SHPD contacted. Should you have any questions,or if you would like further information please feel free to contact me directly. Sincerely, Bob Rechtman, PER Principal Archaeologist October 7,2015 Archaeological Field Inspection PI/K.(3)2-2-039:031 Page 3 of i i v Subject preel ; f + i 7 'i 4 f } P i �'I.fil ut ti 7 i iL.i (i� _,:I��,f}�+,r1� !-liii-,. �It {-,qi Figure 1. Study area location. October 7,2016 Archaeological Field 9n:'pectionTh4K.(3)2-2-039:031 Page 4 of 9 i _ - i_ CDCL y 3d � i i f %J to Q1 rJ ! CJ ! t /'1 Ly". �^' October 7,2016 Archaeological Field Inspection TMK:(3)2-2-039:031 Page 5of9 4� f � �u b Cu 0 r n N (b CL a bb F 1 1 � F+ Y p a October 7,2016 Archaeological Field InspectionTIVIK:(3)2-2-039:031 Pa.-c 6 of 9 is cn Ln L) O cli ami LO Cd Ell Q) CIS 0 (U October 7,2016 Archaeological Field Inspection TMK:(3)2-2-039:031 Page 7 o f 9 RAILROAD ATM fLUMF,] 1JQJ[`Or-WAys THROUGH WAIMEA HOMTEAi) LoT5 &GOVERNMENT 1_AI'iD, HiLC, HASIA11. p. I ? Z_ I 4:11 E � !I .0 r�r_ � ._> �:.:.a��� ...<_ 'fie � � ,�.=yam.-�`ti1•}4z�,��C ?� „��,_��.� i r r1 ? ar 3. 77 Figure 5. 1930 Waiakea Mill Company map with location ofcurrent study parcel shaded red. October 7,2016 Archaeological Field Inspection T,MK:(3)2-2-039:031 Page 8 of 9 I, Pi t Figure 6.Asphalted area in southwestern portion of subject parcel, view to the east. '=1 i r `li 4 L ' F a 6 t > t f as q l s Figure 7. Drywell grate,view to the northwest. Octtlber 7.2016 Archacologied 1 icid ln,pcetion 3 NK(3)2-2.039:031 Page 9 o1'9 I' t r �c `f '3 ti 1 Figure 8. Study parcel,view to the east. 11 t s l s`a �yy 4 Figure 9.Typical margin area of study parcel,view to the east. iy CARLSMITH BALL LLP A UmITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 WAIANUENUEAVENUE P.O.Box 686 HILO,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935,6644 FAX808.935.7975 W W W.CARLSMITH.COM SLtM_,CARLSMITH COM August 25, 2017 Michiko Yamamoto 1998 Trust 366 Chester Street Daly City, California 94014-2804 Re: AutoZone Parts, Inc. Rezoning Ordinance No. 07-105 TMK: (3)2-2-039:031 Dear Trustee: I We are sorry that you were unable to attend AutoZone's informational meeting on August 3,2017. AutoZone is leasing the Property from H. Shiroma, Inca and as the new developer is proposing to construct a 9,046 square feet commercial/retail building,with 57 parking stalls and landscaping, and will be amending several conditions of approval under Rezoning Ordinance No. 07-105, The AutoZone Project is substantially smaller than the prior Ginger Patch proposed project at this property(see attached site plan). i During the initial rezoning action in 2007, your neighbors inquired on the possible construction of a perimeter CRM wall along the Project's northern boundary. AutoZone wishes h to be a good neighbor and by this letter confirms its commitment to construct a 6-foot high CRM or similar type stone wall along the entire northern boundary of its Project. This solid wall will abut the southern boundaries with your parcel at TMK: (3) 2-2-003: 076 and neighbors Duane Miyashiro and Don Kouchi. Attached is a site plan depicting the location of the proposed solid wall as a red line. HONOLULU HILO KONA MAUI LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 6 Michiko Yamamoto 1998 Trust August 25, 2017 Page 2 If this is acceptable to you, we would appreciate your authorization to transmit the executed copy of this letter to the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting AutoZone's commitment, and your favorable support of its Project before the Windward Planning Commission and Hawaii County Council. Please feel free to contact me or my paralegal Katherine Luga should you have questions. Thank you. Very truly yours, t Steven S.C. im SSL:KYL Enclosure Acknowledgement,Acceptance and Support of AutoZone's Project: [ Trustee o the Michiko tmoto 1998 rust Dated: a w >r w a u a v t t i n t I r I 1 i r ` i t P ` P t :r 4, A 4 � AUT020NE STORE No.5204 d t PtANVIEW r RECD SEP CARLSMITH BALL LLP 2017 A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 WAIANUENUE AVENUE P.O,Box 686 HILO,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAX 808.935.7975 W W W.CARLSMIlTH.CON4 SLIM+ CARLSNIITH_COM August 24, 2017 Don Kouchi 1975 Kilauea Avenue, Apt. 2 Hilo,Hawaii 96720-6514 Re: AutoZone Parts, Inc. Rezoning Ordinance No. 07-105 TMK: (3)2-2-039:031 Dear Mr. Kouchi: We are sorry that you were unable to attend AutoZone's informational meeting on August 3, 2017. As my office informed you, AutoZone is leasing the Property fiom H. Sbiroma, Inc. and as the new developer is proposing to construct a 9,046 square feet commercial/retail building, with 57 parking stalls and landscaping, and will be amending several conditions of approval under Rezoning Ordinance No. 07-105. The AutoZone Project is substantially smaller than the prior Ginger Patch proposed project at this property(see attached site plan). During the initial rezoning action in 2007, you inquired on the possible construction of a perimeter CRM wall along the Project's northern boundary and your Property at TMK: (3)2-2-039:055. AutoZone wishes to be a good neighbor and by this letter confirms its commitment to construct a 6-foot high CRM or similar type stone wall along the entire northern boundary of its Project. This solid wall will abut the southern boundaries with your parcel and neighbors Duane Miyashiro and Michiko Yamamoto Trust. Attached is a site plan depicting the location of the proposed solid wall as a red line. HONOLULU HILO KONA MAUI Los ANGELES `t t Lon Kouchi August 24, 2017 Page 2 If this is acceptable to you, we would appreciate your authorization to transmit the executed copy of this letter to the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting AutoZone's commitment, and your favorable support of its Project before the Windward PIanning Commission and Hawaii County Council. Please feel free to contact me or my paralegal Katherine Luga should you have questions. Thank you. Very truly yours, Steven S.C. m SSL:KYL (� Enclosure Acknowledgement, Acceptance and Support of AutoZone's Project: Don Kouchi Dated: y i� w -F- la 13 g 1 1 g 0 I I + I n d r - I I i - i �I l M t 5 1 I f I 7 ~ I 7 J i ' - 1 r- 1 1 r f AUTOZONE STORE No.5204lf� sh s PLAN VIEW' „i ! RECD O C T 04 2017 CARLSMITH BALL LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 WAIANUENUE AVENUE P.O.Box 686 HILO,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAX 808.935.7975 WWW,CARLSMITH.COM SLUvl@CARLSMITH.COM September 26, 2017 Dwayne Miyashiro 1969-B Kilauea Avenue Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Re: AutoZone Parts, Inc. . Rezoning Ordinance No. 07-105 TMK: (3)2-2-039:031 Dear Mr. Miyashiro: Thank you for attending AutoZone's informational meeting on August 3, 2017. This letter follows up on your inquiry relating to the construction of a perimeter CRM wall along the Project's northern boundary. AutoZone wishes to be a good neighbor and by this letter confines its commitment to construct a 6-foot high CRM or similar type stone wall along the entire northern boundary of its Project. This solid wall will abut the southern boundaries with your parcel and neighbors Don Kouchi and Michiko Yamamoto Trust. Attached is a site plan depicting the location of the proposed solid wall as a red line. If this is acceptable to you, we would appreciate your authorization to transmit the executed copy of this letter to the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting AutoZone's commitment, and your favorable support of its Project before the Windward Planning Commission and Hawaii County Council. Please feel free to contact me or my paralegal Katherine Luga should you have questions. Thank you. Very,. ruly yours, 4 Steven S.C. SSL:KYL Enclosure Acknowledgement, Acceptance and Support of AutoZone's Pro•ect: Ow�veMi s Dated: �� I 0 f HONOLULU HILO KONA MAUI LOS ANGELES A N W A J A O� Cn J � _ F F Ta 0 I ® ul . f t ! I — I ; ► j i l o ! - s 4 t -AL-)S 1 f � � AUTOZONE ai q t STORE No.5204 a PLAN VIEW n vg, , - z .:.� EF E KS -F R,� jt June 2017 Prepared for AutoZone L. SD16-021"1 r wZ0 J---1--jov l F b � i EXHIBIT 7 a AutoZone in Nilo,Nl=Draft Transportation Impact Analysis;Report June 8,'k 7 7 Fable 0$ Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................5 2.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................7 2.1 Project Description.............................................................................................................................................7 2.2 Project Study Area...........................................................................................................................................10 2.3 Traffic Analysis Methods...............................................................................................................................11 2.3.1 Signalized Intersections-................................................................................................................11 2.3.2 Unsignalized Intersections.............................................................................................................12 2.3.3 Significant Impact Criteria..............................................................................................................13 2.4 Report Organization.......................................................................................................................................14 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS..................................................................................................................15 3.1 Existing Transportation Faciliities..............................................................................................................15 3.1.1 Existing Roadway System...............................................................................................................15 3.1.2 Existing Transit Services..................................................................................................................16 3.1.3 Existing Bicycle Facilities.................................................................................................................16 3.1.4 Existing Pedestrian Facilities..........................................................................................................17 3.2 Existing Intersection Volumes and Lane Configurations..................................................................18 3.3 Field Observations...........................................................................................................................................18 3.4 Existing Intersection Levels of Service.....................................................................................................20 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS..................................................................................................24 4.1 Project Trip Generation Estimates.............................................................................................................24 4.2 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment..............................................................................................2S 5.0 FUTURE YEAR CONDITIONS..........................................................................................................25 5.1 Future Year Forecasts.....................................................................................................................................28 5.1.1 Regional Traffic Growth..................................................................................................................28 5.1.2 Future Transportation Improvements.......................................................................................28 5.2 Intersection Operations.................................................................................................................................29 5.2.1 Year 2021 Levels of Service...........................................................................................................29 5.2.2 Year 2026 Levels of Service...........................................................................................................36 4i� AutoZone in Htlo,,Hl Draft.T�ansportation Impact Analysts`Reporf lune 8 2017. 5.2.3 Year 2036 Levels of Service...........................................................................................................43 5.3 Potential Traffic Improvements..................................................................................................................50 Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway (Int. 2)...........................50 Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue (Int. 1)..................................................................................................51 6.0 ASSESSMENT OF SITE ACCESS, ON-SITE VEHICLE CIRCULATION AND PARKING..................52 7.0 MULTI-MODAL ASSESSMENT.......................................................................................................53 Appendices Appendix A:Traffic Count Data Appendix B: Existing LOS Worksheets Appendix C:Future Years LOS Worksheets �LL A"utaZa�e in Kilo;Hl-Draft rransportattan/mpactAnafysiu,,Report. June 8,2017 Last ®f Figures Figure1 Project Location..............................................:............................................................................................................8 Figure2 Project Site Plan..............................................................._..........................................................................................9 Figure 3 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations—Existing (2016) Conditions......................19 Figure 4 Peak Hour LOS by movement— Existing (2016) Baseline Conditions.................................................23 Figure5 Project Trip Distribution.........................................................................................................................................26 Figure6 Project Trip Assignment.........................................................................................................................................27 Figure 7 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations—Year 2021 Baseline Conditions..............30 Figure 8 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations—Year 2021 Plus Project Conditions.......31 Figure 9 Peak Hour LOS by Movement—Year 2021 Baseline Conditions...........................................................34 Figure 10 Peak Hour LOS by Movement—Year 2021 Plus Project Conditions....................................................35 Figure 11 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations—Year 2026 Baseline Conditions..............37 Figure 12 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations—Year 2026 Plus Project Conditions.......38 Figure 13 Peak Hour LOS by movement—Year 2026 Baseline Conditions...........................................................41 Figure 14 Peak Hour LOS by movement—Year 2026 Plus Project Conditions....................................................42 Figure 15 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations—Year 2036 Baseline Conditions..............44 Figure 16 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations—Year 2036 Plus Project Conditions.......45 Figure 17 Peak Hour LOS by Movement—Year 2036 Baseline Conditions...........................................................48 Figure 18 Peak Hour LOS by Movement—Year 2036 Plus Project Conditions....................................................49 i AutoZone.in:Hifo, Transportation lmpgctAnalysis Report June 8,201`7, te Last of Tables Table 1:Signalized Intersection LOS Criteria..........................................................................................................................11 Table 2: Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions......................................................................................13 Table 3: Existing (2016) Intersection Levels of Service........................................................................................................21 Table 4: Project Trip Generation Estimates.............................................................................................................................24 Table 5:Year 2021 Intersection Levels of Service.................................................................................................................32 Table 6:Year 2026 Intersection Levels of Service.................................................................................................................36 Table 7:Year 2036 Intersection Levels of Service.................................................................................................................43 AutoZone in Htio,HI-Draft Transportations lmpactAnalysis Report June 8;2077' EXECUTIVE SUMWY This report presents the results of the transportation impact analysis report (TZAR) for the proposed AutoZone development in the community of Hilo on the island of Hawaii. The proposed project is an 8,941- square foot auto retail store located on Puainako Street between Kekela Street and Kilauea Avenue. The proposed project would provide access via a full access driveway on Kekela Street and a right-in-right-out driveway on Puainako Street. The impacts of the proposed project to the surrounding transportation system were evaluated following guidelines established by the County of Hawaii and the Hawaii Department of Transportation— HighwaY5 Division (HDOT). The operations of three intersections were evaluated during the weekday morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak hours for Existing (2016), Year 2021, Year 2026, and Year 2036 conditions without and with the project. Project-generated trips were estimated using vehicle trip rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) for auto retail stores. The proposed project is estimated to generate 574 daily vehicle trips, including 20 AM peak hour (15 inbound/5 outbound), and 56 in the PM peak hour (27 inbound/29 outbound). It is important to note that the proposed project only generates six(6)trips above the threshold for which a comprehensive TIAR is required according to draft County of Hawaii TZAR guidelines. The addition of project trips is expected to slightly degrade or exacerbate undesirable operations at the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway (Intersection 2) under Year 2021, 2026, and 2036 Plus Project conditions, and the Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue (Intersection 1) under Year 2036 Plus Project Conditions, which results in two significant intersection impacts. The traffic improvements required to mitigate the proposed project are: i Puainako Street/Kekela Street/IOTA Shopping Center East Driveway — Restripe southbound Kekela Street to provide a left/through lane and a separate right-turn lane The existing southbound lane on Kekela Street is approximately 24 feet wide,which is ample width to provide two 12 foot lanes. All of the project trips traveling southbound on Kekela Street are turning left to go eastbound on Puainako Street. The southbound left-turn movement experiences the highest delay at this intersection, as it is difficult to find gaps in traffic on Puainako Street for both directions. Providing a separate left-turn/through lane on southbound Puainako Street would improve operations at that intersection since the right-turn movement is not impeded by a queue waiting to turn left. While this improvement would not improve operations for the southbound 5 AutoZone ire Htio,H/ DraftrTrgnsportat�on"lmpactAnalysisReport lune left-turns or through movements to LOS D or better, it would minimize disruption to the southbound right-turn,which is the predominant movement at this approach, and would maintain traffic flow. Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue — Pay fair-share towards Puainako Street Extension and Widening Project To mitigate this impact, additional capacity would have to be provided at this intersection in the form of additional through or turn lanes.As discussed in the "Future Year Conditions" section, the Puainako Street Extension and Widening Project is a project identified in HDOT's Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Fiscal Year 2015 to 2018. The project would extend Puainako Street to Saddle Road and widen the existing two-lane roadway to four lanes from Komohana to Kilauea Avenue. The widening on Puainako Street would provide additional capacity to serve the future traffic demand on the corridor, and the project contributes 1%to the total peak hour traffic at the intersection. The proposed project is not expected to substantially increase the walking, biking, or transit demand to a level where it could not be accommodated by existing or planned facilities. The project is also not expected to conflict with any existing facilities and planned pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements. Y I� 6 1 AutoZone in Hilo;H!-Draft Transportation lmpactAnaI n( port. Re June 8;201 4 2,0 1INTRODU CT 10 N This transportation impact analysis report (TZAR) presents the results of the study conducted by Fehr & Peers for a new auto parts retail store operated by AutoZone in Hilo on the island of Hawaii. The purpose of this analysis is to identify the impacts of the proposed project on the surrounding transportation system. The TZAR includes a description of the assumptions and methods used to conduct the study, as well as a discussion of the results. This TIAR was conducted in accordance with guidelines and standards of the affected agencies. Figure 1 illustrates the study area, and Figure 2 illustrates proposed site plan. The proposed AutoZone is located in the northwest corner of the Puainako Street and Kekela Street intersection. The site is generally bounded by Puainako Street to the south, Kekela Street to the east,Kilauea Avenue to the west, and residential units to the north. The proposed project would develop an 8,941- square foot (s.f.) auto parts retail store operated by AutoZone. The project applicant proposes to provide one full-access driveway on Kekela Street and one right-in-right-out driveway on Puainako Street. l" i 7 D ' i. i 1 1 ! _ ! 1 � 1 / 1X171 3 60 � i„ aw-m®m- ff� 1� !mow g 3� rP Study Intersection Pi Study Area ! Study Area v � UN ; c Eijip-X9.1 .6 {epi ! Ln Hama". Ala 3 . _— -�:r �'j�---'J—�— I�` — if1�f�C�`���'L'`�--� _'.� cY `y!7 I II II •i , ; kyutF q eI t It ti ! =! tlit .t--- { Iii I13;;! its I l r'i I Il t t ' lop t UT I _ ��r� I( It it LI i l F ' d. AutoZone in Hcio Nl Draft Trgnsportatioii lmpactAnatyscs Report lune 8,2077 i... The study analyzed the potential project-related traffic impacts under typical weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions assuming full build-out in 2018.The transportation analysis evaluated the operations at four intersections in the vicinity of the proposed project.The analyzed intersections are listed below and are shown on Figure 1: 1. Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue 2. Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway 3. Puainako Street/ Kanoelehua Avenue The operations of the study intersections were evaluated during the weekday morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak hours for the following scenarios: ® Existing (2016) Conditions—The analysis of existing traffic conditions was based on 2015 counts collected for the analyzed peak hours. The existing conditions analysis also includes a description of key area roadways and an assessment of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities and services near the site. ® Year 2021 Baseline Conditions — Five-year future volumes were projected by increasing traffic volumes using an annual growth factor to account for ambient growth. ® Year 2021 Plans Project Conditions—This traffic scenario provides projected traffic volumes and an assessment of operating conditions under Year.2021 Baseline Conditions with the addition of project-generated traffic. The future year impacts of the proposed project on future (Year 2021) traffic conditions were identified. ® Year 2026 Baseline Conditions — Ten-year future volumes were projected by increasing traffic volumes using an annual growth factor to account for ambient growth. • Year 2026 Plus Project Conditions—This traffic scenario provides projected traffic volumes and an assessment of operating conditions under Year 2026 Baseline Conditions with the addition of project-generated traffic. The future year impacts of the proposed project on future (Year 2026) traffic conditions were identified. ® Year 2036 Baseline Conditions—Twenty-year future volumes were projected by increasing traffic volumes using an annual growth factor to account for ambient growth. ® Year 2036 Plus Project Conditions —This traffic scenario provides projected traffic volumes and an assessment of operating conditions under Year 2036 Baseline Conditions with the addition of project-generated traffic. The future year impacts of the proposed project on future (Year 2036) traffic conditions were identified. 10 AutoZone in,Hito,�HI-Draft Tr,.anspol rtation mpactAnaRrt tysis_ epo ` dune 8,�20i17 `, The analysis of roadway operations performed for this study is based on procedures presented in the Highway Capacity Manual(HCM), published by the Transportation Research Board in 2010.The operations of roadway facilities are described with the term level of service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative description of traffic flow based on such factors as speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Six levels are defined from LOS A, with the least congested operating conditions, to LOS F, with the most congested operating conditions. LOS E represents "at-capacity" operations. Operations are designated as LOS F when volumes exceed capacity, resulting in stop-and-go conditions. The methodologies for signalized and unsignalized intersections are described below. .'_.3.'1 SIGMA ] ELS INTE SSC T JOS J The method described in Chapter 18 of the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 was used to prepare the LOS calculations for the signalized study intersections. This LOS method analyzes a signalized intersection's operation based on average control delay per vehicle. Control delay alone is used to characterize LOS for the entire intersection or an approach.Control delay includes the initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The average control delay for signalized intersections is calculated using the Synchro 9.0 software and is correlated to a LOS designation as shown in Fable 1. TABLE 1: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS CRITERIA Level o Dela in f Description Seconds econds Progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. A Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low _< 10.0 delay. B Progression is good, cycle lengths are short, or both.More vehicles stop than with > 10.0 to 20.0 LOS A,causing higher levels of average delay. Higher congestion may result from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both. C Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level, though many still pass > 20.0 to 35.0 through the intersection without stopping. The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result D from some combination of unfavorable progression,long cycle lengths,or high V/C > 35.0 to 55.0 ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. This level is considered by many agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay.These E high delay values generally indicate poor progression,long cycle lengths,and high > 55.0 to 80.0 V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. 11 AutoZone in Hdo,Ht Draft Zransportatcon Impacf 9nalyscs Report June 8,201-7 Level of Delay in Service Description Seconds This level is considered unacceptable with oversaturation,which is when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection.This level may also occur at high V/C F ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures.Poor progression and long cycle ' 80.0 lengths may also be contributing factors to such delay levels. Source:Highway Capacity Manual,Transportation Research Board,2010. 2.3.2 UNSIGNAL IZ ?� INTERSECTIONS The operations of the unsignalized intersections were evaluated either using the method contained in Chapter 19: Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections or Chapter 20:All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections of the HCM 2010. LOS ratings for stop-sign-controlled intersections are based on the average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. At all-way stop-controlled intersections the overall intersection delay and LOS is reported, and the LOS is characterized solely on control delay.At two-way or side-street-controlled (SSSC) intersections, the average control delay is calculated for each minor-street stopped movement and the major-street left turns, not for the intersection as a whole. For approaches composed of a single lane, the control delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane. For approaches with multiple lanes,the control delay is computed for each movement;the movement with the worst(i.e., longest) delay is presented for SSSC.The average control delay for unsignalized intersections is calculated using Synchro 9.0 analysis software and is correlated to a LOS designation as shown in Table 2. 12 AutoZone to Hi(o,HI-Draft Transpor#atton'ImpactAnalys�s Report lune a 2017' TABLE 2: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS Level of Average Control Delay Per Vehicle Description Seconds Service (Seconds) A Little or no delay. <_ 10.0 B Short traffic delay. > 10.0 to 15.0 C Average traffic delays. > 15.0 to 25.0 D Long traffic delays. > 25.0 to 35.0 E Very long traffic delays. > 35.0 to 50.0 F Extreme traffic delays with intersection capacity > 50.0 exceeded. Source:Highway Capacity Manua(,Transportation Research Board,2010. Notes: ' For approach-based and intersection-wide assessments,such as that used for AWSC intersections,LOS is defined solely by control delay. 2.3.3 SIGNIFICANT P/1PA T CRI-rERIA Based on previous studies conducted for the County of Hawaii,the desirable minimum operating standard for a signalized intersection is LOS D. Additionally, HDOT strives to maintain LOS D intersection operations on their facilities. Both agencies typically define a significant intersection impact when project implementation causes the operation of an intersection,turning movement/approach,or roadway segment to degrade from LOS D or better to LOS E or F. This change is deemed a direct project-related impact. For unsignalized intersections, if the addition of project traffic causes the intersection to degrade from LOS D or better to LOS E or F and satisfies the peak hour signal warrant criteria published in the 2009 edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD), then the impact is considered project-specific. The project is determined to have a significant cumulative impact when it adds traffic to a study location that includes a controlled approach that operates at an unacceptable level (i.e., LOS E or F), and satisfies the peak hour signal warrant. In the evaluation of an intersection's approach LOS at any location, other factors should be considered in the analysis, such as traffic volumes, volume-to- capacity (V/C) ratios (should ideally be less than 1.00), and secondary impacts to pedestrian, bicycle, and transit travel. Neither the County of Hawaii, nor HDOT, specify impact criteria for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit impacts, However, these impacts are generally evaluated based on whether a proposed project would: 1) conflict 13 AutoZone m Hcfo,H% Draft TransportationJrnpactAnafyslsReport June 8 ZO17 with existing or planned pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities,or 2) create walking, bicycling,or transit use demand without providing adequate and appropriate facilities for non-motorized mobility. The existing amenities for pedestrians, bicycles,and transit users were inventoried to evaluate the quality of the facilities in place today. This report is divided into eight chapters, The existing transportation system serving the project site and the current operating conditions of the key intersections are described in Chapter 3 Existing Conditions. Chapter 4 describes the project trip generation, distribution, and assignment used in the transportation impact analysis.Chapter 5 summarizes the methodologies used to forecast future cumulative project traffic volumes and the resultant forecasts, and presents the analysis for Years 2021, 2026, and 2036 Conditions without and with the proposed development. This chapter also presents a baseline against which the project's impacts are identified. Chapter 6 contains an assessment of the site access and on-site circulation of the proposed project,while Chapter 7 includes an assessment of the potential future effect of the project on existing and future transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. 14 AutoZone in Hifo, Hl-Draft Transportation'Im'p 'gtAnaysis Report tJune 8,'2077 10 EXISTING COHDITIONS This chapter describes the existing roadway network and includes a discussion of the bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities located in the project study area.This chapter also includes a discussion of the existing intersection LOS results. A comprehensive data collection effort was undertaken to identify existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the proposed project. The assessment of existing conditions relevant to this study includes an inventory of the street system, traffic volumes on these facilities, and operating conditions at key intersections. Existing public transit service and bicycle and pedestrian facilities are also described. III EXISTING IRC)ADWAY The key roadways providing access to or in the vicinity of the site are described below. Figure 1 illustrates the proposed project location and the surrounding roadway system. Descriptions of these roadways are presented below. ® Puainako Street begins at Railroad Avenue and extends westerly to Kaumana Drive. Within the study area, Puainako Street has a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour(mph), includes four travel lanes,two in each direction, and is separated by left-turn pocket lanes. Immediately adjacent to the project site,this roadway is generally fronted by retail in the immediate study area and provides direct access to th'e KTA retail center and Ginger Patch Market. West of Kilauea Avenue,the roadway narrows to an undivided two lane road and is fronted by residential units on I the south side and school campuses on the north side. In the future, Puainako Street is planned to be widened to four lanes from the Waiakea Intermediate School to east of Kilauea Avenue, near Kekela Street. Puainako Street is operated and maintained by the State of Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT). • Kanoelehua Avenue is a divided, north-south major arterial that connects the Keaau and Hilo communities. Kanoelehua Avenue is located east of the project site and generally contains five lanes,three southbound and two northbound, with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. The roadway widens at intersections to provide separate turn lanes. Kanoelehua Avenue is also operated and maintained by the State of Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT). • Kilauea Avenue is a two-lane, north-south roadway that begins in downtown Hilo and extends southerly and connects to Kanoelehua Avenue. This County of Hawaii-maintained roadway is 15 y, AutoZone 44Ncto lmpactAnalysis Report, lune,£,2017 generally four lanes in the study area, but narrows to two lanes with a center two-way-left-turn lane south of Puainako Street. It has a posted speed limit of 25 mph and is fronted by residential units on both sides of the roadway. ® Keketa Street begins at Ohea Street in the north and extends southerly to its terminus at Puainako Street. It is a two-lane, undivided cul-de-sac roadway and has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Kekela Street is the east boundary of the project site and is operated and maintained by the County of Hawaii. 3. 1.2 EXISTING TRANOI SERVRCES "Hele-On Bus"is the County of Hawaii's primary form of public transit that offers fixed-route transit services in the Hilo and Kona districts. There are currently no bus stops directly on Puainako Street serving the project site,but two Intra-Hilo(Waiakea-Uka and Kaumana)transit routes utilize on Puainako Street,Kilauea 4 Avenue,and Kanoelehua Avenue. The closest bus stop is located approximately half a mile from the project site on Ohohu Street at the Makaala Shopping Center. 3.i.3 EXISTING BICYCLE ;ACI?.ITIH Bicycle facilities generally consist of three types of facilities, which are outlined below: ® Bike or Shared Use Paths provide a completely separate right-of-way and is designated for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with vehicle and pedestrian Grass-flow minimized. Generally,the recommended pavement width for a two-directional shared use path is ten (10)feet. r w i ® Bike Lanes provide a restricted right-of-way and are designated for the use of bicycles with a striped I lane on a street or highway. Bicycle lanes are generally five (5) feet wide. Adjacent vehicle parking and vehicle/pedestrian cross-flow are permitted. I x r- s 16 i I a AutoZone in Ht(o,.f if Draft Transportation impac_ aysis Report -lune 8,2077 i_ ® Bike Route or Signed Shared Roadways provide for a right-of-way designated by signs or shared lane pavement markings, or"sharrows,"for shared use with pedestrians or motor vehicles. 2 i r � '07 No bicycle infrastructure is currently provided within the direct proximity of the project site;thus, bicyclists are required to share the roadway. However, according to the Bike Plan Hawaii, there are two proposed bicycle facilities in the study area: ® Bike lane on Kilauea Avenue between Waianuenue Avenue and W. Puainako Street ® Bike lane on W. Puainako Street between Komohana Street to Kinoole Street 3.-1.4 'EXIS lNIG PED1 STRIAN FACILITIES Pedestrian facilities consist of sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals at signalized intersections. No formal sidewalks are currently provided on majority of the study roadways, with the exception of Kanoelehua Avenue north of Puainako Street and Puainako Street east of Kanoelehua Avenue. Therefore, pedestrians typically use the shoulder to reach their destination. Striped crosswalks are provided on all legs of the two signalized study intersections(Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue and Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue), except for the south leg at the Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue intersection. The two unsignalized intersections on Puainako Street at the KTA Driveway and at the Kekela Street intersection currently does not provide striped crosswalks on any of the approaches. It was observed that pedestrians would dangerously cross Puainako Street at the Kekela Street/ KTA Shopping Center East Driveway intersection during peak commuting hours,when heavy traffic volumes were traveling on Puainako Street. 17 PAa AutoZone in Hifo,Hl-Draft,Transpbrtgtion In pact.Angfysis Report. June"8,2017 The operations of the three existing study intersections were evaluated during weekday morning (6:00 to 9:00 AM) and evening (3:00 to 6:00 PM) peak-period conditions. Traffic counts were collected during the weekday AM and PM peak periods at the study intersections in August 2016, when local schools were in session.The weekday AM peak hour of traffic for the study area generally occurs between the hours of 7:20 to 8:20 AM. During the weekday evening, the PM peak hour of traffic generally occurs between the hours of 3:30 PM and 4:30 PM. Existing lane configurations and signal controls were obtained through field observations.Figure 3 presents the existing AM and PM peak-hour turning movement volumes, corresponding lane configurations, and traffic control devices. Raw traffic count data sheets are provided in Appendix A. Field observations were conducted to identify existing traffic operational deficiencies and to confirm the accuracy of calculated levels of service. The purpose of this effort was (1) to identify any existing traffic problems that may not be directly related to intersection level of service and (2) to identify any locations where the level of service calculation does not accurately reflect level of service in the field, Field observations were conducted on Thursday,August 25, 2016, during the AM and PM peak periods. During this time, all schools were in session,weather conditions were normal, and no major accidents occurred on adjacent roadways-that would potentially alter typical traffic conditions. Long vehicle queues were observed on Kilauea Avenue, Puainako Street, and Kanoelehua Avenue. On Puainako Street,the average westbound vehicle queues extended from Kinoole Avenue on the west to the KTA Shopping Center West Driveway to the east. During the PM peak hour,the longest westbound vehicle queue observed on Puainako Street was from Kilauea Avenue to Kanoelehua Avenue, which temporarily impeded the southbound right-turn and northbound left-turn movements from Kanoelehua Avenue to Puainako Avenue. This maximum queue occurred approximately 10 minutes of the PM peak hour. An eastbound queue on Puainako Street was also observed during the AM and PM peak periods; however, it was not as bad/long as the westbound queue. The eastbound queue would typically extend from Kanoelehua Avenue to roughly halfway between the two KTA Shopping Center driveways. 18 Ij r w I tt t ( 1 7 st { �M1 i1 1.Kilauea Ave/E Puainako St 2.Kekela SUKTA East Dvy/E Puainako St 3.Kanoelehua Ave/E Puainako St N 364(297) C �� 33(32) o N 48(104) N y a�250(375) r e-568(650) m —183(319) 21(51) 91(163) 84(252) E P—..51 .. EP.*-5I EPvina4o St qF A _ 49(16) I 38(31) 282(246) 346(415) o r 458(558) o N m 207(281) 38(65) N mN N 36(90) 87(165) NS_ coov� � N mcorn N N GO 1�r rn Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations - Existing Conditions AutoZone cn Hllo K1 Draff TranspQrtattoa lmpactAna(ystsReport June 8 2Q 17 Although Puainako Street experiences high vehicle delays during the peak hours, long queues or delays were not observed at the side-street stop controlled movements from the KTA Shopping Center Driveways or Kekela Street. This is because 1) drivers of vehicles on the side-streets were observed to move more aggressively to cross Puainako Street, and 2) vehicles on Puainako Street were typically more accommodating to the vehicles at the driveways and slowed down or stopped to provide gaps in traffic on Puainako Street to allow KTA or Kekela Street vehicles to cross. 41 ..x. n. - � 3 f A A2 it, wn # m Eastbound queue at the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway intersection. Vehicle exiting the KTA East Driveway is peeking into Puainako Street, as eastbound vehicles on Puainako Street slow down to let the vehicle cross. Due to the congestion observed on Puainako Street, intersection saturation flow rates were also calculated to use in the intersection operations analysis. The observed flow rates were applied to ensure that the calculated delay and LOS were accurate and best representative of observed conditions. �,1 F - � (list } ,.lc� Existing peak-hour volumes, lane configurations, signal timings, and observed saturation flow rates were used to calculate levels of service for each of the study intersections.The results of the existing LOS analysis are presented in 'Table 3 and the corresponding LOS calculation sheets that contain each intersection movements delay, LOS and v/c`s are included in Appendix B. 20 f AutoZone to Hilo,.141=Drdit TransPortatcon;ImpactAna(ysis7Report TABLE 3: EXISTING (2016) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Intersection Traffic Peak Delay LOSS Control' Flour (sec/veh)z AM 33.1 C 1. Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue Signal PM 31.3 C 2 Puainako Street/Kekela AM 3.5(24.8) A(D) Street/KTA Shopping Center East SSSC Driveway4 PM S.0(42.8) A(E) 3.Puainako Street/Kanoelehua AM 42.1 D Signal Avenue PM 44.4 D Source:Fehr&Peers,2017. Notes: 'SSSC=Side-street stop controlled z Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop-controlled intersections.The vehicular delay for the worst movement is reported for side- street stop-controlled intersections. a LOS calculations performed using the Highway Capacity Monual(HCM)2010 method.Undesired LOS and corresponding seconds of delay per vehicle are highlighted in bold. ^For SSSC delay and LOS represented as:overall intersection(worst cast movement) The results of the LOS calculations indicate that all study intersections operate at an overall desirable service level(LOS D or better),with the exception of the following: 2. Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway—During the PM peak hours, the southbound left-turn stop controlled intersection operates at LOS E conditions. Puainako Street serves heavy eastbound and westbound volumes during both peak hours,which makes it difficult for vehicles on the side-streets to find gaps in traffic flow to cross the intersection. However, as discussed in the previous field observations section, drivers on Puainako Street are typically accommodating to those on the side-streets and will either slow down or stop to provide a gap in traffic to allow vehicles exiting the KTA driveways or Kekela Street to pass. The majority of vehicles traveling through this intersection are those on Puainako Street and experience minimal delay. The remaining three study intersections operate at a desirable LOS (LOS D or better) at an overall intersection-level during both peak hours. However, it should be noted that it is possible for individual turning movements/approaches to operate below LOS D even when the overall intersection is operating at a desirable LOS.The identified movement LOS at each location are displayed in Figure 4. 21 p' iptozdne in Hilo,H! Draft Transportation ImpgctAnatysis Report," June&,<20i7 _ As shown in Figure 4, the majority of the movements operating at LOS E or F are left-turns. This is attributed to the permitted/protected left-turn phasing at the Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Ave intersection where the signal timing allocates more green time to the through movements,which in most cases has caused the left-turn movements to operate at LOS E or F in at least one of the peak hours. Additionally,the eastbound and westbound through at the Puainako Street/Ka noel ehua Avenue intersection also operate at LOS E or F for at least one peak hour. This is due to the limited amount of green time allocated to those movements. 22 \ , / ! \ t/ . d \ \ \ % \ \ t R+�StlKilauea Ave z�.o St/Kekekla SUKTA Easte z&A�mG�ke Ave °(U ??R 3!A) zoo 0(D) J%o �P, 20u E(E) . k� °(D) �� °F �, \\� , ._ . ._ . . . E{g C(D) /// ®�J %// E(F) E/7 c( )o uoo »(g�z z « < o|m roc § � e,.w ' overall Inte, eLOS;A + E& =Movement LOS;AM(PM) Intersection Movement Existing %M and PM Peak Hour Conditions AutoZonen Hilo HI Drat lrarasportatton.lmpactAna(ysts Report c ; lun"e 8 2017 y 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS This chapter describes the anticipated number of vehicle trips and directionality of those trips that would result from implementation of the proposed project. Future traffic added to the roadway system by the project is estimated using a three-step process: (1) project trip generation, (2) trip distribution, and (3)trip assignment.The first step estimates the amount of project-generated traffic will be added to the roadway network. The second step estimates the direction of travel to and from the project site. The new trips are assigned to specific street segments and intersection turning movements during the third step. This process is described in more detail in the following sections. Vehicle trip rates presented in Trip Generation 91 Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012)were used to estimate the number of trips to and from the proposed project site. To provide a conservative analysis, no pass-by vehicle reductions were taken for the proposed project. The estimated new number of trips generated by the proposed project is summarized in Table 4. TABLE 4: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Units AIV! Peak Flour2 PM Peak Hour' Land Use quantity � ®ailyz In Out Total In Out Total Auto Parts Store 8.941 ksf 574 15 5 20 27 29 56 Source:Fehr&Peers,2016 Notes: ksf= 1,000 ksf 2 Based on best fit equation rates from ITE Trip Generation(9`h Edition) Daily:T=81.02(x)—150.75 AM:T=2.76(x)—4.34 PM:T=7.87(x)—14.86 The proposed project is estimated to generate 574 daily vehicle trips, including 20 trips AM peak hour (15 inbound/5 outbound), and 56 trips in the PM peak hour(27 inbound/29 outbound). 24 C AutoZone in.Hilo,,H1'-D,raft Transportation,IrnpactAnatysis.'Reporf, lune 8,2017 The distribution of traffic generated by the project onto the roadway system was based on: ® Existing traffic volumes ® The location of complementary land uses (e.g. residential neighborhoods) ® Surrounding population densities ® Locations of other similar land uses Based on these factors, the vehicle trips distribution of the project-generated traffic is estimated to be: ® 30%to/from the West along W Puainako Street ® 20%to/from the North along Kilauea Avenue ® 10%to/from the South along Kilauea Avenue ® 15%to/from the North along Kanoelehua Avenue ® 15%to/from the South along Kanoelehua Avenue ® 10%to/from the East along E Puainako Street Figure 5 illustrates the project trip distribution pattern described above. Using the estimated trip generation and the distribution patterns discussed, the traffic generated by the proposed project was assigned to the study intersections based on the characteristics of the streets within the study area, anticipated congestion, and directness of route. Figure 6 shows the assignment of trips generated by the proposed project. i' 25 15 49 st 0 0" /0, 9 f lam y 0 a O O �l Study Intersection r®! Study Area Trip Distribution I ` j j 1+ ' 1 I 1 i if i OJ ,-a d 11 1111 1.Kilauea Ave/E Puainako St 2.Kekela St/KTA East Dwy/E Puainako St 3.Kanoelehua Ave/E Puainako St O O v 1 (6) — a 1(2) 7N O0 0O aQ/(O1/3 �0(0( ) EPux4 ) "- (Q EPYvI]kE 51 � q 0(0) 9(16)x+ I 1(4)� 5(8) 0(0)_-so 000 1(3), aoo Q(Q) O O N On (4) N O O Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations - Project Trip Assignment AutoZone in H�loy H! Dran JmpactAncrlys�s Report June 8 2017 530 FUTURE YEAR CONDITION: ,� �� '- F tt� I•J R r i.i`. � 7 I To evaluate the potential impacts of traffic generated by the proposed project on the surrounding street system,it was necessary to first develop estimates of future traffic conditions in the area without the project. Future traffic conditions without the project reflect traffic increases due to_ regio natl growth and development, as well as traffic increases generated by other specific developments nearAe project site. These conditions are referred to as the baseline condition (i.e.,"no project"condition).The forecasted future or cumulative baseline traffic volumes were then used to identify impacts on the roadway system. Development of these future traffic scenarios is described in this chapter. The future year forecasts were developed for five-year(2021), 10-year(2026), and 20-year(2036) conditions. 5.1.1 REGIONAL TRAFFIC GROWTH The Hawaii Regional Long-Range Land Transportation Plan (LRLTP) prepared by HDOT included development of an island-wide travel demand forecasting model for purposes of forecasting future traffic volumes. The model includes land use and socioeconomic attributes in Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) to generate trips and assign traffic across the roadway network, which can then be used to provide AM and PM volume projections along major facilities across the island. A review of the trip assignment shows that significant employment and housing growth is projected between 2007 and 2035, especially new housing units in the Keaau and Pahoa communities. The model growth rates derived between base year (2007) and the horizon year (2035) traffic projections provided by the LRLTP model were applied linearly to the existing traffic counts. The calculated annual growth rate of the project study roadways is 1%. This growth factor was applied to existing intersection traffic volumes collected in August 2016 to account for regional growth. The growth rates were compounded over a five-year, 10-year,and 20-year timeframe to yield 2021, 2026, and 2036 year forecasts. The growth factor described above accounts for projects further away that will contribute to overall traffic growth. 5.1.2 FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVE:MENITS One planned transportation improvement was identified in the study area that could possibly affect vehicle circulation in the future: the Puainako Street Extension and Widening Project. This project would extend Puainako Street to Saddle Road and widen the existing two-lane roadway to four-lanes from Komohana 28 �t ] E ( ! E tl t t 1 i ! E ' t L� f St 1.Kilauea Ave/E Puainako St 2.Kekela SUKTA East Dwy/E Puainako St 3.Kanoelehua Ave/E Puainako St - In - u� X386(321) 36(37) N n� x E�55(110) M r 47-267(404) 605(694) a 4—197(338) 26(58) 95(165) 90(265) E Fu.2rvi:o 51 E Pu�nin 51 E Pumaia 51 55(20) )� 0(0)ga —> 1vo)ommT T0�r 221(303)370(448) 301(264) 40(70) 465 )— 96 179 40(90) c- = V NN Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations = Year 2021 Baseline Conditions 1 ' F fft �t 1 l � pqe I®r 1.Kilauea Ave/E Puainako St 2.Kekela SV KTA East Dwy/E Puainako St 3,Kanoelehua Ave/E Puainako St r o r 386(321) m N`✓' as 36(37) N N x ag—55(110) ' N aa-267(404) a 605(694) ry d —197(338) 26(58) °r 95(165) 90(265) E Pu,in�o 51 '� E Pua'nuo Si E Puinato 51 55(20) 501) 301(264) 370(448)-+ o ui ci 49( )� ui`n o 221(303) 40(70) o 4840(90) o v 96(179) N m r n r n N o 0 u�co co o eo Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations - Year 2021 Plus Project Conditions AutoZonein Htfo Hl Draft Transportation impact,,4natysu Report -; lune 8,2077 TABLE 5:YEAR 2021 INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Year 2021 Baseline Year 2021 Plus Project Intersection Peak Control' Hour Delay LOSS Delay LOSS a from (sec/veh)2 (sec/veh)2 Baseline 1.Puainako Street/Kilauea AM 43.3 D 44.8 D 1.5 Avenue Signal PM 42.6 D 43.7 D 1.1 2 Puainako Street/Kekela AM 4.2 (33.0) A(D) 4.8 (36.3) A(E) 0.8(3.3) Street/KTA Shopping Center East SSSC Driveway4 PM 6.4(59.3) A(F) 12.7(126.7) B (F) 6.3 (67.4) 3.Puainako Street/Kanoelehua AM 44.5 D 44.8 D 0.3 Avenue Signal PM 46.3 D 46.8 D 0.5 Source:Fehr&Peers,2017. Notes: 'SSSC=Side-street stop controlled 'Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop-controlled intersections.The vehicular delay for the worst movement is reported in parentheses for side-street stop-controlled intersections. a LOS calculations performed using the Highway Capacity Manual(HCM)2010 method.Undesired LOS and corresponding seconds of delay per vehicle are highlighted in bold.Shaded cells represent project impact. "For SSSC delay and LOS represented as:overall intersection(worst cast movement) The analysis results indicate that three (3)study intersections are forecasted to operate at overall LOS D or better under Year 2021 Baseline and Plus Project Conditions. The stop-controlled movements at the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center West Driveway intersection are expected to operate at LOS E and LOS F during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. Similar to Existing Conditions, the side- street movements at Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center West Driveway are anticipated to operate at undesirable levels (i.e. LOS E or F) due to the heavy traffic flow on Puainako Street and the limited gaps in i traffic. The addition of project traffic would exacerbate operations at the unsignalized intersection,which would result in a potentially significant impact: 2. Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway—The worst-case movement degrades to LOS E operations during the AM peak hour, and LOS F operations will be exacerbated during the PM peak hour. While the project is expected to increase the side-street stop controlled delay,especially for the southbound approach at Kekela Street, it is important to note that this delay is only experienced by a relatively small portion of the total vehicles traveling through that intersection. Overall, the intersection as a whole would operate at LOS D or better. The chart below shows the PM peak hour approach traffic volume and LOS for the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center West East Driveway intersection under Year 2021 32 'AutoZone.in Niio;,lV-Draft Zranrportgtton.Impoct Analysis Report . On 8;2077 Plus Project conditions. As shown, for the northbound (NB) and southbound,(SB) approaches, only 13% (7%for NB and 6%for SB) of the total traffic volume is estimated to experience undesirable vehicle delays at the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway intersection, while the remaining 87% of vehicles would experience minimal delay. i'.a3.n.iS ,r',;,_ ,<_ Gt,;y,rJ•tw E.:74' vq riL,epmidtV+3hW0,'(1 1,0 ,t t r) G. :r F It should be noted that some individual turning movements/approaches are projected to operate below LOS D, even though the overall intersection is operating at a desirable LOS.The identified individual LOS at each location is displayed in Figure 9 for the Year 2021 Baseline Conditions, and Figure 10 for the Year 2021 Plus Project Conditions. Similar to Existing Conditions,the majority of the poorly operating movements are left-turn movements and through movements on Puainako Street. The poor left-turn operations are attributed to the permitted left-turn phasing at Puainako Street/Kilauea Ave intersection or at the Puainako Street/Ka noel ehua Ave intersection where the signal timing allocates more green time to the through movements,which in most cases has caused the left-turn movements to operate at LOS E or F in at least one of the peak hours. Additionally, all the through approaches at the Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue intersection also operate at LOS E or F during the AM and PM peak hours. This is due to the provision of a single travel lane in each direction and the permitted left turn phasing,which impedes through traffic at the intersection. 33 3 t �1 i 1 � s M ! r 1 1.Puainako SUKilauea Ave 2.Puainako St/Kekekla SUKTA East Dwy 3.Puainako SUKanoelehua Ave 9 ...�77-u� mac, (;) ?;;� �-' (=•) u_ u. �, C(E) z : �A( ) vI �E(E) (E) (��' �111� E(E) EF�4n'.a 51 EPuan�.n 51 V d EPY�muO Sl �, (;`)� _T E(C)M E(F) JJ r U-1 Uj i< Legend W IN =Overall Intersection LOS;AM PM i+'i =Movement LOS;AM(PM) Intersection Movement LOS Year 2021 Baseline AM and PM Peak Hour Conditions .5 r r !V I t f „ s r T, i r t � I 1.Puainako St/Kilauea Ave 2.Puainako SUKekekla SUKTA East Dory 3,Puainako Sf/Kanoelehua Ave ,aC(F) <: :tw ( ) zvu_ E(E) C(F) ( ') E(E) Eyu.,rn+Eo sl ® @ EVua•nun St J j EFua�a4nM @ @ E(D) �I \(�)� ® E(D)T E(D) 1(A) wv- E(F)� wvi� E(D) Legend =Overall Intersection LOS;AM PM C(C) =Movement LOS;AM(PM) Intersection Movement LOS Year 2021 Plus Project AM and PM Peak Hour Conditions I AutoZone iri Hi(o,.Nt-Draft'. gsport6tion,mpactAnaysis Report :a -June 8,:20 7,7 5.22 YEAR 2026 LEVELS OF SERVICE The one percent annual growth rate was applied to the existing traffic volumes to yield Year 2026 Baseline traffic volumes. Under Year 2026 Plus Project Conditions,traffic estimated and assigned to the study intersections was added to 2026 Baseline traffic volumes. The 2026 roadway network is the same network as Existing Conditions. Figure 11 and Figure 12 illustrate the AM and PM peak-hour turning movement volumes, lane configurations, and traffic control dives at the study intersection for Year 2026 Conditions without and with project related traffic, respectively. The results of the LOS analysis for the study intersections under Year 2026 Conditions are presented in Table 6. The corresponding LOS Calculation sheets that specifies each intersections delay and LOS by movement are included in Appendix C. TABLE 6:YEAR 2026 INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Year 2026 Baseline Year 2026 Plus Project Intersection Traffic Peak Control' Hour Delay 3 Delay 3 A from (sec/veh)z LOS (sec/veh)z LOS Baseline 1.Puainako Street/Kilauea AM 52.7 D 54.3 D 1.6 Signal Avenue PM 53.5 D 53.9 D 0.4 2 Puainako Street/Kekela AM 4.3 (36.0) A(E) 4.9 (39.8) A(E) 0.6(3.8) Street/KTA Shopping Center East SSSC Driveway4 PM 7.0(72.1) A(F) 14.3 (150.5) B (F) 7.3 (78.4) 3. Puainako Street/Kanoelehua AM 47.1 D 47.3 D 0.2 Signal Avenue PM 48.4 D 48.9 D 0.5 Source:Fehr&Peers,2017. Notes: 'SSSC=Side-street stop controlled 'Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop-controlled intersections.The vehicular delay for the worst movement is reported for side-street stop-controlled intersections. 3 LOS calculations performed using the Highway Capacity Manua((NCM)2010 method.Undesired LOS and corresponding seconds of delay per vehicle are highlighted in bold.Shaded cells represent project impact. 'For SSSC delay and LOS represented as:overall intersection(worst cast movement) i 1 I 3 36 1 Iz / } J� ( t I I fr yt 1.Kilauea Ave/E Puainako St 2.Kekela SUKTA East Dwy/E Puainako St 3.Kanoelehua Ave/E Puainako St o j3,* to[�➢� O N (ham T u 405(330) cO 2t�35(35) N o ag 55(115) 275(415) n a 625(715) a a 205(355) 25(60) 95(165), °r 95(280) EPuiw-.kn5 �`F EPu,ir�4aS EPuvvity 5 S 55(20) �' �� 40(35) 315(275) 385(460)—�- v o n 505(615)--i o 230(310) 45(75) 0 40(90)+'_ 100(185) -t Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations - Year 2026 Baseline Conditions ,r, t a4,ti i_ int•-t� �'l�.',r`` *, �+J� Iry � ~ 's3 1.Kilauea Ave/E Puainako St 2.Kekela St/KTA East Dwy/E Puainako St 3,Kanoelehua Ave/E Puainako St - o — N 406(336) m N S Y ��36(37) r o e�55(115) N <r 277(424) M 630(724) a-207(358) 26(63) I 11-195(165) 95(280) EPvando 51 _a� EPuuaia s� �a EPusna:o s 55(20) 1 �� 0(0).5, t 316(279) 390(468) ui o m 49(51)� , N V o 231(313) 45(75) o�? 5040(90) 5" N 101(189)1 MN Cm N N N N O O Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations - Year 2026 Plus Project Conditions Autozoin Hito,J l--Draft Transportation'Impact A`natysis Report ne` June$,2077,' Similar to Year 2021 Conditions,the analysis results indicate that three (3)study intersections are forecasted to operate at overall LOS D or better under Year 2026 Baseline and Plus Project Conditions. The stop- controlled movements at the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center West Driveway intersection is expected to operate at LOS E and LOS F during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. Similar to Existing Conditions, the side-street movements at Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center West Driveway are anticipated to operate at undesirable levels (i.e. LOS E or F) due to the heavy traffic flow on Puainako Street and the limited gaps in traffic. The addition of project traffic would exacerbate operations at the one unsignalized intersection,which would result in significant impacts: 2. Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway—The addition of project traffic is expected to exacerbate LOS E and LOS F operations during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. While the project is expected to increase the side-street stop controlled delay,especially for the southbound approach at Kekela Street, it is important to note that this delay is only experienced by a relatively small portion of the total vehicles traveling through that intersection. Overall, the intersection as a whole would operate at LOS D or better. The chart below shows the PM peak hour approach traffic volume and LOS for the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center West East Driveway intersection under Year 2026 Plus Project conditions. As shown, for the northbound (NB) and southbound (SB) approaches, only 13% (7%for NB and 6%for SB) of the total traffic volume is estimated to experience longer vehicle delays at the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway intersection, while the remaining 87% of vehicles would experience minimal delay. 39 k. AutoZone in Hilo, Tronsortaionnp! DrnHact Anal ysisRep ort, . June 8,2017 ;f Year 211,26 PhJ5 PrOject MM Ate, P0412° �3il cl tn:7 itis S�Pt^G if{l'fr,fA 1,�ZjiYs't?i n_r}�, 1�: r�•lf� App-4. :" E�it4U tnc 37ISj LOS } !0S A E It should be noted that some individual turning movements/approaches are projected to operate below LOS D, even though the overall intersection is operating at a desirable LOS.The identified individual LOS at each location is displayed in Figure 13 for Year 2026 Baseline Conditions, and Figure 14 for Year 2026 Plus Project Conditions. Similar to Existing Conditions,the majority of the poorly operating movements are left-turn movements and through movements on Puainako Street. The poor left-turn operations are attributed to the permitted left-turn phasing at Puainako Street/Kilauea Ave intersection or at the Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Ave intersection where the signal timing allocates more green time to the through movements,which in most cases has caused the left-turn movements to operate at LOS E or F in at least one of the peak hours. Additionally, all the through approaches at the Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue intersection also operate at LOS E or F during the AM and PM peak hours. This is due to the provision of a single travel lane in each direction and the permitted left turn phasing,which impedes through traffic at the intersection.. 40 f �+ {• � 1 j1 , 16, 1.Puainako SUKilauea Ave 2.Puainako SUKekekla SUKTA East Dwy 3.Puainako SUKanoelehua Ave u u C(F) =.w �—`(') r ca u `y—E(E) C(F) P( ) E(E) EPuJniFe S ® 9 EPuslu4e 51 -� EPuanake El E(E) )f E(D)T E(E) wvz• ;(:) w7t E(F)� E(E) ' :o=L D(D) LL u Legend =Overall Intersection LOS;AM PM C(C) =Movement LOS;AM(PM) Intersection Movement LOS Year 2026 Baseline AM and PM Peak Hour Conditions t J i?r 1 1 t 1� f F 1.Puainako St/Kilauea Ave 2.Puainako St/Kekekla SUKTA East Dwy 3.Puainako SUKanoelehua Ave -71 as C (F) UJ a (°:) v u E(E) (F) '(`) 'r E(E) EEvmi4e si Ew, psi -1 Evu„,�o si a �. 3 (_i lar 4i F(E) E(F) > w F(E) Legend =Overall Intersection LOS;AM PM =Movement LOS;AM(PM) Intersection Movement LOS Year 2026 Plus Project AM and PM Peak Hour Conditions Aft#oZone_ir�Hi(o,Hl-DraftTransporfatlon lmpac#AnaLYs Report, June 8-2677, 5.23 YEAR 2036 LEVELS OF SERVICE Similar to the Year 2021 and 2036 forecasts,a one percent annual growth rate was applied to the existing traffic volumes to yield Year 2036 Baseline traffic volumes. Under Year 2036 Plus Project Conditions, traffic estimated and assigned to the study intersections was added to 2036 Baseline traffic volumes. The 2036 roadway network is the same network as Existing Conditions. Figure 15 and Figure 16 illustrates the AM and PM peak-hour turning movement volumes, lane configurations, and traffic control dives at the study intersection for Year 2036 Conditions without and with project related traffic, respectively. Table 7 presents the results of the LOS analysis for the study intersections for Year 2036 Conditions. The corresponding LOS Calculation sheets that specifies each intersections delay and LOS by movement are included in Appendix C. TABLE 7:YEAR 2036 INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Year 2036 Baseline Year 2036 Plus Project Traffic Peak Intersection Control' Flour DelayLO53 Delay LOS' A from (sec/veh)z (sec/veh)z Baseline 1.Puainako Street/Kilauea AM 78.5 E 81.0 F 1.6 Signal Avenue PM 79.5 E 77.3 E -2.2 2 Puainako Street/Kekela AM 4.3 (44.8) A(E) 4.9 (50.4) A(F) 0.6(3.8) Street/KTA Shopping Center East SSSC Driveway° PM 7.0(108.0) A(F) 14.3 (236.7) B (F) 7.3(128.7) 3.Puainako Street/Kanoelehua AM 52.6 D 52.9 D 0,3 Signal Avenue PM 52.9 D 53.4 D 0.5 Source:Fehr&Peers,2017. Notes: 'SSSC=Side-street stop controlled 'Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop-controlled intersections.The vehicular delay for the worst movement is reported for side-street stop-controlled intersections. 3 LOS calculations performed using the Highway Capacity Manual(NCM)2010 method.Undesired LOS and corresponding seconds of delay per vehicle are highlighted in bold.Shaded cells represent project impact. For SSSC delay and LOS represented as:overall intersection(worst cast movement) 43 y f � 1 rr i I OF 1.Kilauea Ave/E Puainako St 2.Kekela SVKTA East Dwy/E Puainako St 3.Kanoelehua Ave/E Puainako St vNi in = m cri - o 440(360) m Ll� x ate-35(35) o r 60(125) 300(450) n a—685(780) �� —220(385) I 30(65) 95(165) )j 1� 105(305) EPviv.�av 51 s�, � EPua�.ta 51 EP-51 5 60(20) �� 40(35) 340(300) 420(500) o 0 0 550(670) 250(340) 50(80) 40(90)moi'_ N 105(200) N O r N N O O Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations - Year 2036 Baseline Conditions (ll 1 - q 1 1.Kilauea Ave/E Puainako St 2.Kekela SUKTA East Dwy/E Puainako St 3,Kanoelehua Ave/E Puainako St IFocoo - cn �Z:�r o� 441(366) m G!a aR 36(37) N N e�60(125) 302(459) a-690(789) `n,�,ter, �--222(388) 31(68) ° 95(165) 105(305) E p�,.;,�y E Puiri4o 51 E pusnako 51 9 60(20) 0(0 341(304) ( )--�a o o co 49(51) 42 —s r ui�0 251(343)—> v o ui 50(80) Q r 550(670)4 o �N V 106(204) �CN n cn N 40(90) m coo v r t2 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations - Year 2036 Plus Project Conditions AutoZone in Hi 6,,H Draft Transportatlon.(mpact Anatyscs Report .~ ,lune 8,,Z01 Z, Under Year 2036 Baseline Condition,the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway and Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue intersections are forecast to operate at overall LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. However, similar to the previous year analyses (i.e. Existing, 2021, and 2026), the stop-controlled movements at the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center West Driveway intersection are expected to operate at LOS E and LOS F during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. Similar to Existing Conditions, the side-street movements at Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center West Driveway are anticipated to operate at undesirable levels (i.e. LOS E or F) due to the heavy traffic flow on Puainako Street and the limited gaps in traffic. Furthermore,the Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue intersection is anticipated to operate at undesirable LOS E operations during the AM and PM peak hours under Year 2036 Baseline Conditions. As discussed in the "Future Year Forecasts"chapter,the Puainako Street Widening Project was not included in the analysis given the uncertainty in construction schedule and funding. Consequently,the existing single travel lane in each direction on Puainako Street is not expected to adequately serve the future traffic demand on that corridor, which would result in undesirable operations (i.e. LOS E or F) during the peak hours. The addition of project traffic would exacerbate operations at the following two intersections,which would result in significant impacts: 1. Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue—degrades LOS E to LOS F operations in the AM peak hour. 2. Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway—degrades LOS E to LOS F operations in the AM peak hour and exacerbates LOS F operations during PM peak hours. During the PM peak hour at the Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue intersection,the delay slightly decreases with the addition of project trips; however, the service levels still remain at undesirable LOS E. This delay decrease is due to the weighted delay average and traffic being added to movements with high volumes with low delays,such as through movements on Puainako Street. 46 AutoZone in Hilo;HI-Drgft Transportgtton/rnpactAn6ysis Report r:- While the project is expected to increase the side- � ar?<t'a Pfu1;prrJe:ft-PM PE'.I!t Hour street stop controlled delay, especially for the Pus,ykla";ss;r:�;:J °4:'.<�S,rv�!!KIA t 0,,vy Approach Volnmo mid LOS southbound approach at Kekela Street, it is important to note that this delay is only experienced by a relatively small portion of the i total vehicles traveling through that intersection. Overall,the intersection as a whole would operate at LOS D or better. The chart below shows the PM peak hour approach traffic volume and LOS for the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center West East Driveway intersection under Year 2026 Plus Project conditions. As shown, for the northbound (NB) and southbound (SB) approaches, only 12% (6%for NB and 6% for SB) of the total traffic volume is estimated to experience longer vehicle delays at the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East UOS F• F Driveway intersection,while the remaining 88%of vehicles would experience minimal delay. It should be noted that some individual turning movements/approaches are projected to operate below LOS D, even though the overall intersection is operating at a desirable LOS.The identified individual LOS at each location is displayed in Figure 17 for Year 2036 Baseline Conditions, and Figure 18 for Year 2036 Plus Project Conditions. Similar to Existing Conditions,the majority of the poorly operating movements are left-turn movements and through movements on Puainako Street. The poor left-turn operations are attributed to the permitted left-turn phasing at Puainako Street/Kilauea Ave intersection or at the Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Ave intersection where the signal timing allocates more green time to the through movements, which in most cases has caused the left-turn movements to operate at LOS E or F in at least one of the peak hours. Additionally, all of the approaches at the Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue intersection also operate at LOS E or F during both AM and PM peak hours. This is due to the provision of a single travel lane in each direction and the permitted left turn phasing, which impedes through traffic at the intersection. 47 I . Ir� � 3 i� t � t cD } t oil,� It 0-S IF �t t 1.Puainako St/Kilauea Ave 2.Puainako St/Kekekla St/KTA East Dwy 3,Puainako SUKanoelehua Ave (F) eu <— C1 ; f u_ F—E(E) =(F) (0) E(E) xo 51 EPu�auU Si A / EPuanvosl � ��' F(F) `)� A(:)�r E(L') F(F) E(F) �. u u F(F) u u A(A) r Legend =Overall Intersection LOS;AM PM C -,C) =Movement LOS;AM(PM) Intersection Movement LOS Year 2036 Baseline AM and PM Peak Hour Conditions 1� ) � � l 1 ) , r r r i p1 Sl ! 1.Puainako St/Kilauea Ave 2.Puainako SVKekekla SUKTA East Dwy 3.Puainako SVKanoelehua Ave i �E(F) ,: LL O zUU. E(E)��(F) ,� - ( ) �lll� EP�+nto 51 -z EPus.rv�m F(F) `�f ( ,�r 1 E(D) F(F) u ,i ` ( )� u E(F)� Vvia F(F) 4 Legend =overall Intersection LOS;AM PM C(C) =Movement LOS;AM(PM) Intersection Movement LOS Year 2036 Plus Project AM and PM Peak Hour Conditions AutoZone cn Hclo FIl Drc7ftTransportatton=/n�pact 4nalysis'Repgrt June. r PC-)T� �'`r A 5 t Fr r i� Potential traffic improvements were developed to increase the capacity and/or efficiency of the roadway system at the locations where the addition of project-related traffic would cause or contribute to poor operating conditions. The emphasis was to identify physical and/or operational improvements that could be implemented within the existing or planned roadway rights-of-way. The potential measures to address the identified traffic impacts are described in this chapter. Each of the initially identified impacts would be reduced such that future operations would be at the minimum desired LOS (LOS D)for the overall intersection with the project in place.Although the County and HDOT strive to maintain LOS D or better conditions at the movement level, measures to improve turning movement operations are only proposed where feasible and appropriate from a traffic engineering perspective since adding lanes or signal control just to achieve the desired LOS fora particular movement also has secondary negative impacts to the environment and to active transportation modes. The range of improvements that address both project-related and/or cumulative traffic impacts are discussed in detail below. PUAINIAK0 STREET/KE1(LLA STR ET/KT A SH P!-)I G CENTER EAST DRIVEWAY (INT. 2) Significantly impacted under Year 2021, 2026, and 2036 PIUS Project Conditions. This intersection currently operates at LOS F in the PM peak hour, and is anticipated to still operate at LOS E or F in the future (i.e. 2021, 2026, and 2036) without the project, The addition of project trips would exacerbate the LOS E or F operations. Potential Improvement: Restripe southbound Kekela Street to provide a left/through lane and a separate right-turn lane. The existing southbound lane on Kekela Street is approximately 24 feet wide, which is ample width to provide two 12 foot lanes. All of the project trips traveling southbound on Kekela Street are turning left to go eastbound on Puainako Street. The southbound left-turn movement experiences the highest delay at this intersection, as it is difficult to find gaps in traffic on Puinako Street for both directions. Providing a separate left-turn/through lane on southbound Puainako Street would improve operations at that intersection since the right-turn movement is not impeded by a queue waiting to turn left. While this improvement would not improve operations for the southbound left-turns or through movements to LOS D or better,it would minimize disruption to the southbound right-turn,which is the predominant movement at this approach, and would maintain traffic flow. 50 I{ AutoZorie,in Hito,.HI Draft Transportation%mpacf Analysis=Report June&2017. , The following transportation improvements were also considered; however, these were not considered feasible due to reasons described below: 1. Eliminating Southbound Left-Turns at Kekela Street- would reduce the total volume for the stop- controlled movement on Kekela Street,which would reduce vehicle delays and improve operations. However,this improvement is not considered practical for both AutoZone, as well as the existing residents on Kekela Street.Without a left-turn out movement,vehicles from Kekela Street would have to make a circuitous path to access Kanoelehua Avenue or the KTA shopping center. In addition,this restriction would not reduce delays for northbound traffic turning left out of the KTA Shopping Center driveway. 2. Alternative Access on Kilauea Avenue— relocating the project driveway from Kekela Street to Kilauea Street (north of Puainako Street)would reduce the amount of project traffic traveling through the Puainako Street/Kekela Street intersection and reduce overall delays. However,the new driveway is considered infeasible since it would have to be located less than 75 feet from the channelized right-turn movement from westbound Puainako Street to northbound Kilauea Avenue. In addition,the site driveway on Kilauea Avenue would have to be restricted to right- in/out only movements, which would also result in overly circuitous travel for store customers and would potentially add trips to streets that should be on regional facilities like Kanoelehua Avenue. PUANNAK0 STR EET,';+ i� .5` JCA TNUE (INIT, -1) Significantly impacted under Year 2036 Plus Project Conditions. This intersection currently is projected to operate at LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours. The addition of project trips would exacerbate the LOS E operations. Potential Improvement: Pay fair-share towards the Puainako Street Extension and Widening Project To mitigate this impact, additional capacity would have to be provided at this intersection in the form of additional through or turn lanes. As discussed in the "Future Year Conditions" section,the Puainako Street Extension and Widening Project is a project identified in HDOT's Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Fiscal Year 2015 to 2018. The project would extend Puainako Street to Saddle Road and widen the existing two-lane roadway to four lanes from Komohana to Kilauea Avenue. The widening on Puainako Street would provide additional capacity to serve the future traffic demand on the corridor, and the project contributes 1%to the total peak hour traffic at the intersection. 51 l' -_to to Ht1o,H! Draft Transpartatton;lmpactAnalys{s Report June 8 2077 - 6.0 ASSESSMENTOF SITE ACCESS, ON-SITE VEHICLE CIRCULATION AND PARKING The following section provides a summary of site access, on-site circulation, and parking for the proposed AutoZone. The construction of a new AutoZone building is proposed on the parcel located west of Kekela Street and north of Puainako Street. The site plan, as provided by the project applicant and illustrated in Figure 2, shows the vehicular access would be provided via a new driveway on Puainako Street and a second driveway on Kekela Street, with the building located on the northwest corner of the site. The site would provide 57 right angle parking stalls along the perimeter of the building and along the Puainako Street and Kekela Street frontages. Of the 57 stalls, three are designated as ADA accessible stalls and are located near the southeast corner of the building at the main entrance. The internal roadways would allow for two-way travel. A loading zone for delivery trucks is provided north of the project building near the Kekela Street driveway. Given the location of the loading zone and the layout of the internal roadways and parking, it is assumed that the delivery truck would reverse into the loading zone from the Kekela Street driveway.A truck turning analysis should be conducted to ensure that adequate truck access is provided. A "Keep Clear" designation is recommended to be striped in both directions on Puainako Street at Kekela Street to ensure that existing residential and future project traffic is not impeded by queues on Puainako Street. This would minimize the potential for vehicles to block the intersection, and would also keep the Kekela Street intersection clear for turning movements into and out of the KTA driveway when queues form on Puainako Street. Overall, each project driveway is anticipated to serve relatively low traffic volumes during the peak hours, therefore, no operational issues are anticipated at the Puainako Street or Kekela Street site driveways. 52 v 4'utoZone[n Hi(o,Hl Draft�ransportat�on_lrnpGctAr afys�s Report 7.0 M " ' DAL ASSESSMENT As noted previously, no existing pedestrian facilities connect to the proposed facility on Puainako Street. According to the site plan (Figure 2),the project proposes to construct a sidewalk on the east side of the site on Kekela Street. The site plan does not show any additional pedestrian improvements along the project frontage on Puainako Street. To enhance the pedestrian connectivity along the project site, it is recommended that a pedestrian sidewalk also be implemented on Puainako Street, as it could connect to the adjacent crosswalks at the signalized intersections. Additionally, pedestrians were observed to cross Puainako Street from Kekela Street or the KTA Shopping Center during the peak periods. This pedestrian movement is challenging given the lack of pedestrian facilities and traffic control at the intersection. The proposed signal at the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway that would mitigate the intersection traffic impacts would also benefit pedestrians at this location as it would provide a controlled crosswalk for pedestrians crossing each leg of the intersection. Bike Plan Hawaii(2003),a State master plan for bikeways,is intended to serve as one basis for future bikeway planning and development decisions in Hilo. Within the project study area, Bike Plan Hawaii indicates planned bike lanes on Kilauea Avenue between Waianuenue Avenue and W Puainako Street, and on W Puainako Street between Komohana Street and Kinoole Street. No designated bike facility has been identified or proposed immediately at the project frontage along Puainako Street or Kekela Street. While it is possible that some project employees or patrons may commute to the site by bicycle, it is unlikely that a high volume of individuals traveling to the site would use their bicycle, and would not likely justify construction of separate bicycle facilities; thus, the implementation of the project is not expected to significantly impact or conflict with existing or planned services. However, bicycle racks should still be provided near the building entrance to provide a dedicated location for bike parking and secure storage. While it is possible that some project employees or patrons might take transit to the project site, it will not be conducive to transit use given the lengthy distance to the closest transit stop. Again, the project is not expected to conflict with any existing or proposed transit facilities and services, and therefore, no transit improvements are needed. Generally, the proposed project is not expected to substantially increase the walking, biking, or transit demand to a level where it could not be accommodated by existing or planned facilities. The project is also expected to not conflict with any existing facilities and planned improvements.Thus, the project's impacts to pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities and services are therefore considered less-than-significant. 53 f APPENDIX A, TRAFFIC COUNT DATA 73 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Kilauea Ave-- Puainako St QC JOB#: 13873001 CITY/STATE: Hilo, HI DATE:Tue,Aug23 2016 371 1059 Peak-Hour: 6:55 AM- 7:55 AM � 4 1.3 0.7 sa 258 5s Peak 15-A 7:15 ANI--7:30 AM S .1 0.0 12 3.6 Ld 3 b g b 461 A'p 41 S 408 4�746 w -9 2 el.3.0 2.4 0.7 1.9 319 10.96 ; 318 2.2 3.1 387 27 h 0 ry 20 41 501 2.3 3.7 4 5.0 2.2 85 610 127 ," ) 3 1.6 44 305 822 1.6 1.1 1 L 0 0 0 L 4 4- . 0 3 4 0 l 2 0 0 O F $ NA NA L L 4 3 / Z NA NA NA D h NA .g NA F NA 5-Min Count Kilauea Ave ; Kilauea Ave Puainako St ; Puainako St Total Hourly Period (Northbound) _ _(Southbound) _ (Eastbound) i _ (Westbound) j Totals �—---- Beginning At' Left Thru Right U 1 Left Thru Right U 1 Left Thru Right U Lett Thru—R,,ht U 6:25 AM I 5 27 12 0 j 4 8 0 0 ' 0 20 2 0 I 0 24 26 0 I 128 6:30 AM I 5 31 5 0 I 3 14 1 0 1 24 4 0 0 14 22 0 124 6:35 AM I 5 14 7 0 1 2 12 1 0 1 30 5 0 0 20 19 0 I 116 6:40 AM I 6 39 10 0 i 6 10 1 0 1 2 26 6 0 ! 2 9 18 0 135 6:45 AM 1 3 33 16 0 4 10 3 0 i 3 30 0 0 i 1 34 27 O I 164 ; --"4_-_4519 _.._ 0 I _ 6- 14 2 0 .- 2 34 3 0 �. 0 25 34 0 188_. 6 55 AM 11 33 15 0 4 14 2 6 1 31 4 0 5 29 37 0 186 1463 7 00 AM 9 53 10 0 4 14 3 0 0 40 2 0 0 35 35 0 205 1607 7'05 AM 13 43 10 0 6 15 1 0 2 29 4 0 t 39 36 0 199 1744 7 10 AM 11 53 15 0 3 22 5 0 3 20 2 0 1 27 33 0 195 1858 715Ati1 4 55 10 0 1 2 48 6 0", 1 fit 29� �0 0 186 1945:. 7.20:A7A } 4 Sfi T, 0 t '!-5 32r 6 0 205 2031 . 8 g _ 6. 13. _ 4.-i- 0 ?- 1 D _ - 3 38 7}6 0 "'.2'12 I --:211 Q 7.30 AM 4 62 7 0 5 31 7 0 2 22 2 0 1 0 12 30 0 184 2175 7:35 ANI 5 54 10 0 2 19 3 0 3 18 1 0 3 24 36 0 178 2237 7,40 AM 8 53 9 0 5 29 7 0 4 22 3 0 2 18 37 0 197 2299 7:45 AM 6 47 9 0 5 24 6 0 6 25 4 0 0 14 35 0 181 2316 7;SO t1Pi)- 351 - 14 -.0- '- 6 -- 22 S -8- _ 0-, _ 5_...2 . .._ 1__ ..0_ 3 26 - 25 0.._:_- 198 2326 7:55 AM 5 57 16 0 I 6 17 2 0 4 26 7 0 4 17 25 0 1 186 2326 8:00 AM 6 44 8 0 4 18 0 0 5 37 6 0 1 16 23 0 I 168 2289 8:05 AM 7 56 12 0 7 32 1 0 2 29 2 0 3 13 21 0 185 2275 8:10 AM 2 43 8 0 ; 9 17 2 0 I 1 40 6 0 1 26 25 0 i 180 2260 8:15 AM 5 47 14 0 I 3 23 0 0 3 41 5 0 1 19 33 0 194 2268 8:20 AM 8 45 14 0 4 25 1 0 1 0 26 2 0 1 33 23 0 182 2245 Peak 15-Min I _ N_orthbound Southbound I Eastbound ( Westbound Flowrates F Left Thru Fight U 1 Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Total All vehicles 1 60 644 1'12 0 52 272 64 0 60 320 16 0 20 376 416 0 2412 Heavy Trucks 4 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 16 4 36 Pedestrians `: 4 0 I 0 4 8 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses' Comments. Report generated on 9/1/2016 2:32 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Kilauea Ave--Puainako St QC JOB#: 13873002 CITYISTATE: Hilo, HI DATE:Tue,Aug23 2016 743 593 Peak-}-lour:3:30 PM- 4:30 PM 0.9 03 39 6 Peak 15-aMin:3:35 PM--3:50 PM 3 � 543 101L 26 11 0.0 a a t* 488 4-16 °� __ �' 297 723 1 08 4.00 j 0.3 4' 07 415 1 0.96 �'` 375 5_ 4 `}' 08 496 A 65 -4 11 4 r 51 697 - 4 8 4 1.5 1 20� 37 74 280 121IIII� 7' 3 2 I 0. U3t! f- Cc,),J�t-` 0.0 04 25 659 475 y 3 4 12 08 o D 0 0 ',.,',..,, 0-1 F ¢? 0 0 0 F 0 o-i 4 k* L NA L PIA fi 3 4 I T 9 o f NA NA NA `D 4NA $ NA F NA F 5-Min Count! Kilauea Ave Kilauea Ave Puainako St Puainako St i Total Hourly Period j (Northbound) ; (Southbound) (Eastbound) ( (Westbound) I Totals -- _ _ a Beginning At. Left Thru Rigid' U I Left Thru kWht,TU I Left Thru Right U 1 Left Thru Right U i 3.30 PM_ ' 2_ 25 10 0 12 43 1 _ 0 2_ 31 9 0 ! 3 36 _ 31 0 205 �. 3:35 PA/l 7 : 27; 6 0 13T 44- 4 -0 1 44 2 0 3 .33. 34 0 ; 2:18 ; — 3:40 PM 9 ' 28 7 '0 16 52- 3 01 28 4 0 1. 2 31 27 ;0 1 208 $. •-`f`� -�-- - ----0- 1- -0 _0- 3 50 Prv1 j 7 17 13 0 18 43 2 0 1 39 4 0 f 5 28 23 0 II 200 3:55 PAA 3 30 9 0 i '15 48 4 0 1 32 8 0 3 33 15 0 l 201 ` 4:00 PM ! 5 13 12 0 ! 17 45 2 0 3 38 7 0 5 35 15 0 i 197 4:0525 8 0 17 45 5 0 i 0 32 4 0 I 3 19 32 0 ! 202 410 PPM Nl 12 6: 23 10 09 47 4 0 1 27 5 0 7 38 , 25 0 1 PM 202 ` 4 15 .4 22 15 0 ! 16 38 2 0 3; 31 4 0 6. 39 27 0 207 4 20 PPil 7 23' 7 0 1 10. 58 5 0 2 25 4 0 4 6 24 16 0 184 _ 4.25 Pfvl 5 21 12 Q 10 39. 3 0 f_ __)_ 42 7 0 I _g 33 26. 0 _203 -_237. 4:30 PM i 4 16 9 0 12 43 2 0 4 33 7 0 C 5 32 27 0 194 2426 4:35 PM 5 18 9 0 11 43 4 0 2 39 7 0 5 36 22 0 j 201 2409 4:40 PM 11 28 13 0 10 48 5 0 j 2 28 4 0 4 29 28 0 210 2411 4:45 PM j 5 26 7 0 6 53 3 0 1 31 9 0 10 32 29 0 212 i 2413 4:50 PM j 11 30 10 0 j 10 49 1 0 0 33 16 0 4 24 27 0 215 2428 4:55 PM i 5 26 9 0 8 48 3 0 1 37 8 0 7 26 19 0 I 197 2424 5:00 PM ! 13 30 10 0 1 17 37 4 0 j 2 37 6 0 0 36 13 0 j 205 2432 5:05 PM 7 15 9 0 16 45 3 0 1 34 11 0 7 28 25 0 201 2431 5:10 PM 2 21 4 0 i 11 46 4 0 2 38 6 0 5 32 11 0 i 182 2411 5:15 PM i 7 20 15 0 i 13 36 3 0 i 3 31 11 0 5 29 19 0 192 2396 5:20 PM i 9 19 8 0 14 51 2 0 j 0 32 60 1 27 24 0 i 193 2405 5:25 PM i 7 20 10 0 12 31 3 0 I 1 31 8 0 ( 5 34 16 0 i 178 2380 Peak 15-Min I Northbound ! Southbound_ Eastbound _ j -__Westbound_-_ .i Flowrates Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Ri ht U I Left Thru Ri htht U Left Thru Ri ht U i Total All Vehicles 92 324 100 0 148 560 44 0 8 472 52 0 1 36 360 348 0 2544 Heavy Trucks 0 4 4 0 8 0 0 20 4 0 0 0 40 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses: Comments: Report generated on 9/1/2016 2:32 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Kekela St/Shopping Dwy -Puainako St QC JOB#: 13873003 CITY/STATE: Hilo, HI DATE:Tue,Aug23 2016 86 ss Peak-Hour: 6:45 AM 7:45 AM � 4 3.5 1.7 se 3 zs Peak 15-Min: 6:55 AM--7:10 AM d 3 b �1.7 0.0 4 L 759 `t'26 _t L 31 791 Gti 3 & b L 47 1.8 0.0 3.2 1-9 451 ( 0.92 684 1.6 _ 1.8 518 41 �' 11� 4N� 76 563 1.5 0 2.4 1 �4r 2.6 0 1.9 17 2 87 a I t 5.9 0,0 1.1 120 106 4 .,� 2.5 1.9 2 0 0 0 L 0 9 0 0 0 0 � i' 0 r�s 0 i � N s 1 3 4 —> „e qA t, L T J P� b NA 4= NA - NA NA I h 4 r'r S �jI1 ¢.._.NS � NA NA 5-Min Count I Kekela St/Shopping Dwy I Kekela St/Shopping Dwy Puainako St Puainako St Total j Hourly Period I (Northbound) (Southbound) _1— (Eastbound) (Westbound)__ I Totals Beginning At; Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U i Lett Thru Ri ht U 6:15 AM I 1 0 9 0 2 0 2 0 I 1 35 1 0 j 10 24 0 0 85 6:20 AM I 1 0 6 0 I 1 0 1 0 i 3 33 3 0 8 39 4 0 99 6:25 AM ' 3 0 12 0 1 0 3 0 2 30 3 0 I 6 42 -3 0 ( 105 6:30 AM I 2 0 7 0 3 1 10 I 2 28 4 0 1.1 31 4 0 94 6:35 AM 1 0 3 0 ( 4 0 3 0 0 33 3 0 6 31 7 0 91 6;40 AM L 1 0 9 0 `- 4- 1 7 0 1 0- - 35 - 4 0 ' 9.. . 28. 3 _0-- �_ _101 - 6:45 AM 0 0 12 0 1 0 5 0 0 44 7 0 6 48 2 0 125 6:50 AM 1 0 4 0 a 3 1 4 0 1 50 4 0 9 54 2 0 i _133 6.55 F M :,2 0' 14' ; 0 ,;, 0 0` 1 I 0 -0 4f) 1 0 4 70 2 0 145 1166 i 7 00 AM � 5 0 9 0 1 0 5 ,+ 0 ` 2 49 3 0 4 42 T OS.AM . z ..'� 6 4.._, 7:10 AM 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 4 0 1 32 F 0 5 60 2 0 113 1355 7:15 AM 1 3 0 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 35 5 0 4 49 6 0 { 118 1388 7.20 AM 1 1 9 0 2 1 8 0 5 34 3 0 10 53 3 0 130 1419 7:25 AM 0 0 4 0 6 0 3 0 2 35 3 0 6 65 2 0 12"0 1440 7:30 AM 2 0 10 0 5 0 4 0 3 29 1 0 6 55 2 0 117 1463 7:35 AM 1 0 4 0 2 0 5 0 2 24 3 0 6 44 6 0 97 1469 _7.40AM_ 2- _ -1:_. _.�_. 0 [ 3 _9 -7-- 0 4 --3? 4-. Q 7 60 -. .0 0 745 AM 1 0 10 0 ! 5 0 5 0 I 3 38 3 0 i 6 34 3 0 108 1 1484 �- - 7:50 AM 0 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 6 44 0 0 i 3 47 5 0 115 1466 7:55 AM I 1 0 6 0 1 0 8 0 0 43 2 0 7 38 0 0 106 1427 8:00 AM 0 0 7 00 1 109 1 0 1 0 3 43 2 0 10 40 2 1409 8:05 AM 1 2 1 7 0 5 0 3 0 1 2 37 4 0 I 15 43 3 0 I 122 1394 8:10 AM 1 2 0 9 0 2 0 5 0 5 48 6 0 1 8 46 4 0 135 i 1416 Peak 15-Min I Northbound _ Southbound j _ Eastbound Westbound Flowrates F Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Ri ht U I Total All Vehicles ; 28 0 104 0 4 4 48 0 ! 24 544 28 0 68 760 24 0 I 1636 Heavy Trucks 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 12 0 28 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 0 Railroad Stonoed Buses. i Comments Report generated on 9/1/2016 2:32 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCA7I0N. Kekela St/Shopping Dwy- PUainako St QC JOB#: 13873004 CITYISTATE: Hilo, HI DATE:Tue,Aug23 2016 lob 64 Peak-Morar:3:30 PM--4:30 PM 4 1.9 1.6 774 25 Peak 15-Min:3:30 Pili--3:45 PMa �J �o0 00 eoL r9 3 4 a b 735 31 '' _ Q' 32 4.845 0 7 4.0.0 3 it. 3 1 0.7 558 1 0.96 4- 650 4.1 0.8 679 90 ,., - 163 09 692 s ,� 4 3.5 1.1 00 38 ( 12 1 109 u � icy 1 )F�t• 0.0 0.0 09 257 122 4 1 0.4 08 0 0 0 0 L L n -t 0 o 00 0 �� o a r o °� r, o o � a— � 0 9 0 � r NA - -0 NA 3 3 1_ a� NA � a NA NA __ 4. NA 3 3 d" �i 't• a° � NA � � I NA 5-Min Count I Kekela St/Shopping Dwy 1 Kekela St/Shopping Dwy ! Puainako St Puainako St I Total ` Hourly Period i (Northbound) (Southbound) Eastbound V�estbound i Totals --... .. --- . .. Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru P;aht U Left Thru R;ght U Left Thru Rlg_ht U I 13 30 Pj*,A 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 , b 1 51 5 0A11- 62 3 0 i 147 I 3,-35 PNI I 4 0 = o A I 1 0 7 "0 1 6 42, I 10 0 13 57 4 - 0 150 Z 0 Al 0 55 - 5. . .0, 12._ 66 "t0 ! 158'' i 1 3:45 PLl ! 0 0 11 0 j 1 0 3 0 1 46 9 0 15 50 0 0 136 i 3:50 PM 2 - 0 12 0 -1 1 5 0 3 55 9 0 i 11 46 1 0 j 146 3;55 PM 0 0 13 0 0 2 7 0 4 45 9 0 10 51 2 0 143 ! 4:00 PM '1 1 10 0 j 3 1 5 0 2 56 12 0 l 7 47 3 0 148 4:05 PM 1 0 10 0 5 0 7 0 4 33 10 0 16 57 3 0 146 4 10 PM 1 0 11 0 3. 0 5 0 6:' 34 6 0 16 60 r: 1 0 -143 I} 4.15 PM 0 0 8 0 4 0 14 0 ! '0. 54 5 0 16_ 55. .' 2 0 i 158 2 420.PN1 1, - D 7 0 9 0 6 0 1; 33 6 0 20. 42 5 0 1,23 4:25 - -1-- 0 - 8 --Q j- ------n-- 5---� -3 _54- L_.___0 __16... 57 ____4 0. _-154 4:30 PM i 2 0 7 0 I 4 0 6 0 i 1 46 6 0 1 11 57 1 0 141 1746 4.35 PM 1 2 0 7 0 I 2 0 9 0 1 3 51 8 0 15 47 1 0 145 1741 4:40 PM f 0 0 8 0 2 1 6 0 1 4 35 8 0 19 60 4 0 147 •1730 4:45 PM 1 1 8 o I 1 1 9 0 1 3 39 9 0 i 17 50 2 0 141 1735 4:50 PM 1 0 10 0 i 0 0 7 0 i 1 40 5 0 j 21 53 1 0 j 139 1728 4:55 PM ! 0 0 17 0 I 1 2 6 0 3 50 8 0 I 19 48 0 1 155 1740 5:00 PM 0 0 8 0 3 1 5 0 1 1 49 13 0 ! 12 39 2 0133 1725 5:05 PM j 1 0 16 0 1 0 6 0 1 1 47 10 0 i 19 42 2 0 145 1724 5:10 PM ? 1 0 9 0 i 0 0 4 0 j 2 45 3 0 5 45 1 0115 ' 1696 5-15 PM 0 0 6 0 1 1 3 0 1 48 8 0 8 41 1 0 118 1656 5:20 P(VI 2 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 3 40 4 0 1 11 60 0 0 I 130 1 1663 5:25 PM 1 3 0 17 0 i 0 1 0 0 2 41 6 0 1 10 33 0 0 113 i 1622 Peak 15-Min _ __ Northbound ? Southbound (_____.___,Eastboundl_ Westbound _ Flowrates I Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Ri ht U ! Left Thru Ri htht U 1 Left Thru Right U 1 Total All Vehicles 20 0 76 0 16 0 80 0 28 592 80 0 144 740 44 0 1820 Heavy Trucks i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 8 0 36 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Busesl Comments.- Report omments:Report generated on 9/1/2016 2:32 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Kanoelueha Ave(Mamalahoa Hwy)-- Puainako St QC JOB#: 13873005 CITY/STATE:. Hilo, HI DATE:Tue,Aug23 2016 710 1538 Peak-flour: 7:35 AM 8:35 AM $ 8.0 3.1 4 151 515 44 Peak 15-Min: 8:00 AM--8:15 AM 1,4,3 7.4 11.4 J 3 b ,J 4 b 647 272 J47_ 47 287 4b 1 Q. •k I4 4.0 3.7 6.4 7.7 233 1 -0—.94 150 fi 21 2.7 585 80 g Nr 90 505 _ 2.7 1.3 1 h � r,.� 16.7 3.2 346 1219 228 3 2.9 2.6 � 685 1793 4 ¢ F 7.9 2.7 1 0 0 0 LL� � b 0 -� IL 0 5 1 0 z¢ 0 J11 ! � µ ._ 0 h a• N 0 y 1 t� NA � —> � NA —a 1 ► 1r a � : s� b� NA 4' NA NA NA . .�. r'3" 3 NA $ NA F 5-Min CounKanoelueha Ave(Mama lahoah.°.--rrAelueha Ave(Mamalahoa wy) Puainako St I Puainako St Total ! Hourly Period i (Northbound) _(Southbound) _ (Eastbound) (Westbound) ( Totals Beginning Atl Left Thru Right U ! Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U T E_ Thru Right U 1 7:00 AM 1 28 95 28 0 1 3 32 10 0 i 25 22 6 01 10 4 0 264 2575 i 7:05 AM 37 82 11 0 1 34 '15 0 I 25 24 3 0 10 30 4 0 I 276 2746 7:10 AM ( 25 83 8 0 j 0 39 10 0 I 18 8 9 0 I 21 30 1 0 252 I 2855 7:15 AM 33 104 6 0 2 51 9 0 1 21 16 2 0 1 5 18 5 0 i 272 2946 7:20 AM 38 96 10 0 3 30 7 0 23 16 11 0 j 13 21 2 0 270 3013 7:25 AM I 35 87 7 0 1 2 30 10 0 22 7 6 0 i 8 29 4 0 241 i 3033 7:30 AM j 36 104 8 0 1 33 11 0 26 9 10 0 i 3 15 8 0 ! 264 ' 3067 7:35 AM 30 118 11 0 2 39 11 0 20 10 7 0 8 16 1 0 273 3119 7:40 AM i 38 97 7 0 3 38 11 0 15 13 7 0 5 22 7 0 263 3165 7:45 AM 26 102 15 0 4 47 10 0 27 18 6 0 3 7 5 0 270 3174 7:50 AM 29, 88 18 0 9 38 '10 0 'y 27 26 2. 0 5 '16 3 0 i 271 3152 7 55 AM 24 103 19 0 7 42 5 _ 0 22 16 _ 8 0 4 17 6 0 278 3200 3 37= 12 0 _19 ° 23 5 0 ? 9 12 2 0 276 3912 S OSAb1 I 35 111 27 0 I .'454;; 15 :.' 0 30 18 3 0 1 7 10 2 0 -.316 1. 3252 3'LQAM' )> 0. 174.,' _ 2�_ 0 0 30`' 1�z 0 '('27. 27'- ..10 0 i-.14' .=12 ._ _1 t 0 ;_:309' 8:15 AM 27 83 33 0 3 37 12 0 j 22 24 12 0 5 6 7 0 271 3308 8:20 AM 27 104 18 0 4 52 22 0 16 20 7 0 10 10 2 0 292 3330 8:25 AM 28 91 19 0 2 42 14 0 1 29 25 3 0 10 15 1 0 j 279 3362 8 30 Mi'l 26 95 . 170 5_ _53 _13 0 18-__ 13 ,- 10_ 0 !. 10 7 _'(0 0_._. 277. 3375 _ 8:35 AM 24 61 14 0 I 3 58 14 017 28 6 22 7 0 i 259 3361 8:40 AM 27 89 10 0 5 48 14 0 I 17 22 4 0 12 16 4 0 1 268 3366 8:45 APA 32 57 13 0 6 61 16 0 18 17 4 0 i 6 12 5 0 ` 247 3343 8:50 AM 23 81 22 0 1 53 14 0 18 18 3 0 6 21 3 0 263 3335 8:55 AM 29 80 14 0 3 39 15 0 22 15 6 0 10 13 5 0 ( 251 i 3308 Peak 15-Minj� Northbound i Southbound_ I Eastbound l Westbound Flowrates I Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 1 364 1332 284 0 20 508 172 0 ! 304 272 72 0 ! 120 136 20 0 3604 Heavy Trucks 0 44 4 0 24 24 8 0 0 i 28 8 0 140 Pedestrians 0 4 12 0 16 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments.' Report generated on 9/1/2016 2:32 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Kanoelueha Ave(Mamalahoa Hwy)--Puainako St OC JOB#: 13873006 CITY/STATE: Hilo, HI DATE:Tue,Auq 23 2016 1571 094 - Peak-Hour:3:30 PM--4:30 PNI 2.2 5.3 s161128 129 Peak'15-Min:4:05 PM--4:20 PM � � 1 4L 6 2 6 24. S Qe1.1 4 is L 836 235 104 671 - 1 0 4'5 5 '� e- 38 1.8 271 0.96_. 315 30 > 10 671 165 4, 252 570 ,> ^�, ,� 41 34 1.2 h r> 2.0 2.8 205 655 170 r"-� 4 1.. �_l �_I .')`;_1 f'i 1.5 55 2.9 1543 1030 4" (# 2.3 43 1 L 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 I 0 - 0 0 4-- 0 0 1 F NA 1 - + NA 4 q 1 IL— _4 1- el a) I I (, NA `1' 4' NA NA NA -> 3 ff S 4 3 NA4 F NA 5-Min CounXanoelueha Ave(MamalahoaP8iPAelueha Ave(Mamalahoa Hwy) Puainako St Puainako St I Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) i Totals Beginning At; Le f Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 7-1-eft Thru Right U i Left Tfiru Right U 3.30 PM 23 59 13 0 ; 11 79 26 0 j 23 23 16 0 1 29 31 9 0 1 342 3:35 PM 15 59 12 0 j 12 104 25 0 1 11 15 10 0 1 19 32 10 0 1 324 3:40 PNI 25 57 22 0 i 15 91 30 0 14 13 9 0 18 24 8 0 326 3:45 PM 13 59 19 0 14 104 26 0 24 22 17 0 j 24 24 11 0 357 150 PM 18 55 16 0 11 92 24 0 22 29 17 0 ; 19 19 5 0 327 3:55 PAA i 15 55 18 0 8 92 18 0 I 25 24 10 0 26 22 6 0 ! 3.19 -1.00 PM 16 47 _ 13 _0 r '15_ 81 19 0 _23 3016 0 12 21 6 0 _ 299 i i 4 05,PPn j.'15 55 17 0 1 3 99, 29 0 - 17: 90. 7-lib 0 16 39. 9 0 335 1 3 j, 4 10 Pfil i 15 r 57 9 0 I 1' 112' 31'. 0 14; 15"''7 18 0 i 31" 32,. 18 0 I 366 s L-415-P1V1. ! 1.1 . SG' _8 86 28 D a 29' 29' _�2 0 j8 27_' 1 _0 �?4A. 4:20 PM 15 43 8 0 10 100 27 0 15 23 10 0 22 23 4 0 i 305 A.-25 PM 1 24 48 10 0. t S— 8-6. -.33 -0 I 1_8 28 -_14- 0 .0_j$ .. 21 11 - 0 t- 319 3943-.-- 4:30 PM 15 54 11 0 9 113 38 0 26 21 11 0 19 18 3 0 i 338 3939 4:35 PM j 9 43 11 0 10 76 26 0 17 24 16 0 16 25 10 0 283 3898 4:40 PM 23 47 8 0 11 85 36 0 18 17 9 0 22 29 7 0 !! 312 3884 4-45 PM 14 54 15 0 ( 15 '119 27 0 19 19 14 0 20 17 4 0 I 337 3864 4:50 PM 14 44 13 0 15 78 36 0 21 17 15 0 ! 24 24 8 0 309 3846 4:55 PM j 13 29 9 0 ; 6 85 35 0 24 26 14 0 20 21 7 0 289 3816 5:00 PM 10 48 10 0 7 95 24 0 1 25 17 18 0 18 14 11 0 297 3814 5:05 PM 10 35 5 0 8 92 32 0 27 18 25 0 20 19 3 0 294 3773 5:10 PM 13 40 10 0 7 101 21 0 i 16 28 7 0 22 16 6 0 j 287 3"094 515 PM 11 39 4 0 I 2 94 23 0 20 29 12 0 17 17 6 0 j 274 3644 5:20 PM 1 17 35 13 0 7 80 19 0 15 17 15 0 26 36 7 0 I 287 3626 5:25 PM I 4 33 6 0 1 5 84 21 0 i 27 13 18 0 15 18 2 0 246 3553 Peak 15-Min i Northbound I _ _Southbound_. I Eastbound LVestbound i - i - o - - -------- _. .. --- - ----- -1 Flowrates , Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Ri ht U I Left Thru Ri ht U Total All Vehicles 164 672 156 0 100 1188 352 0 240 256 184 0 260 392 136 0 4100 Heavy Trucks 0 24 8 0 44 4 20 12 0 4 0 4 120 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 1 Railroad Sto ed Buses' Comments Report generated on 9/1/2016 2:32 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http:/Iwww.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 APPENDIX B: EXISTING LOS WVORK HEFTS HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Existing 1: Kilauea Ave & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour �- Movement. .. OUL- Et3T. ., EBR. ...` 8 Lane Configurations �414� Traffic Volume(veh/h) 49 346 38 21 250 364 62 620 125 65 282 46 Future Volume(veh/h) 49 346 38 21 250 364 62 620 125 65 282 46 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1200 1176 1200 1200 1'127 '1176 1471 1447 1500 147'1 1471 1500 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 52 368 33 22 266 0 66 660 0 69 300 35 Adj No.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 5 5 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 84 399 34 61 427 423 353 698 0 115 623 73 Arrive On Green 0.42 0,42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow,veh/h 85 944 81 36 1011 1000 822 1447 0 609 1293 151 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 453 0 0 288 0 0 66 660 0 69 0 335 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1110 0 0 1047 0 1000 822 1447 0 609 0 1444 Q Serve(g_s),s 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 36.5 0.0 4.0 0.0 13,2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 33.3 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 0.0 18.1 36.5 0.0 40.5 0.0 13.2 Prop In Lane 0.11 0,07 0.08 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 517 0 0 488 0 423 353 698 0 115 0 696 WC Ratio(X) 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.95 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.48 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 517 0 0 488 0 423 353 698 0 115 0 696 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 23.4 0.0 0.0 18.8 0.0 0.0 20.8 20.7 0.0 41.2 0.0 14.7 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 16.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 21.8 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 12.5 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 18.7 0.0 1.9 0.0 5.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.3 0,0 0.0 21.2 0.0 0.0 21.0 42.5 0.0 49,4 0,0 15.2 LnGrp LOS D C C D D B Approach Vol,veh/h 453 288 726 404 Approach Delay,s/veh 39,3 21.2 40.6 21.0 Approach LOS D C D C 7�nreiN Assigned Phs 2 4 6£ 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.5 39.5 44.5 39.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 40,0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 38.5 35.3 42.5 18.6 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 1.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 k U��`.�'_ �,'��_� ��%x-. , ��. :�� £.�.._ �_._, �_.�sx�-��- �`,a;�„� ;.•,�.�.,�� - .'�,��' HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 33.1 HCM 2010 LOS C Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2: Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Puajnako St ANI Peak Hour Intersection . Int Delay,s/veh 3.9 ��lovement EBL 'EBT EBR WBL INBT IIIrBP N3L NBT UBR SBL SBT? SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 38 458 36 91 568 33 14 3 85 33 1 60 Future Vol,vehlh 38 458 36 91 568 33 14 3 85 33 1 60 Conflicting Peds,Nhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None None - None Storage Length 75 - 200 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 3 2 3 3 12 7 2 2 3 2 3 Mvmt Flow 40 487 38 97 604 35 15 3 90 35 1 64 Pilajor/Minor Majorl Majoi-2, Minorl Nlinor2 Conflicting Flow All 639 0 0 526 0 0 1083 1420 263 . 1092 1421 320 Stage 1 - - - - - - 587 587 - 815 815 - Stage 2 - - 496 833 - 277 606 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 5.36 - 7.09 6.54 7.14 7.01 6.54 6.96 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 7.44 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.64 5.54 - 6.76 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3.13 3.72 4.02 3.92 3.68 4.02 3.33 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 941 - 655 - 191 135 627 194 135 673 Stage 384 495 - 327 389 Stage 2 495 382 - 668 485 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 941 655 147 110 627 139 110 673 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 147 110 139 110 - Stage 1 368 474 313 331 - Stage 2 - - 380 325 544 464 - Approach EB WB AIB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.6 1.5 17.5 24.8 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR.,WBL >WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(vehlh) 395 941 - 655 280 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.275 0.043 - - 0,148 0.357 HCM Control Delay(s) 17.5 9 - - 11.4 - 24.8 HCM Lane LOS C A - - B C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.1 0.1 - - 0.5 1.6 Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 2 ICM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summanj Existing 3: Kanoelehua Ave & E PLfainako St AM Peak Hour Lane Configurations t r � ' � �' � r ttt Traffic Volume(veh/h) 282 207 87 84 183 48 379 1216 199 39 461 130 Future Volume(vehlh) 282 207 87 84 183 48 379 12'16 199 39 461 130 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1845 1863 1863 1652 1820 1900 1863 1845 1863 1681 1776 1759 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 300 220 8 89 195 0 403 1294 96 41 490 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 3 2 2 15 4 4 2 3 2 13 7 8 Cap,veh/h 373 381 322 225 346 0 443 2099 948 51 2.438 752 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.10 0.00 0.13 0.60 0.60 0.03 0.50 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1757 1863 1572 1573 3548 0 3442 3505 1583 1601 4848 1495 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 300 220 8 89 195 0 403 1294 96 41 490 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1757 1863 1572 1573 1729 0 1721 1752 1583 1601 1616 1495 Q Serve(g_s),s 24.3 17.0 0.7 8,2 8.6 0.0 18.5 37,6 4.1 4.1 8.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 24.3 17.0 0.7 8.2 8.6 0.0 18.5 37,6 4.1 4.1 8,9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 373 381 322 225 346 0 443 2099 948 51 2438 752 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.58 0.02 0.40 0.56 0.00 0.91 0.62 0.10 0.80 0.20 0,00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 473 381 322 430 562 0 452 2099 948 250 2438 752 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d), s/veh 53.0 57.4 50.8 62.0 68.7 0.0 68.8 20.4 13.7 .76.9 22.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 7.8 2.1 0.0 1.1 1.4 0.0 22.1 1.4 0.2 23.6 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 12,6 9.0 0.3 3.6 4.2 0.0 10.1 18.6 1.9 21 4.0 0,0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.8 59.5 50.9 63.1 70.1 0.0 90.9 21.8 13.9 100.5 22.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS E E D E E F C B F C Approach Vol,veh/h 528 284 1793 531 Approach Delay,s/veh 60.1 67.9 36.9 28.2 Approach LOS E E D C , €�� _011. t am u, Tinter 6 -�`�--� Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 9.1 99.9 14.2 36.8 24.6 84.5 30.9 20.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s *4 *6.4 *4 7.0 *4 6.4 *4 7.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s *25 *55 *31 28.0 *21 *59 '36 23.0 Max Q Clear Time(9_c+11),s 6.1 39.6 10.2 19.0 20.5 10.9 26.3 10.6 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.1 10.6 0.2 1.6 0.1 20,8 0.6 0.9 viler •'.1 an HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 42.1 HCM 2010 LOS D ANN Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Existing 1: Kilauea Ave & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Movement 'EBL. EBT: EBR V!/BL WOT WBR NBL NBT N8R,1 SBL SB T: SBR Lane Configurations c Traffic Volume(veh/h) 16 415 65 51 375 297 74 280 121 161 543 39 Future Volume(veh/h) 16 415 65 51 375 297 74 280 121 161 543 39 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1400 1329 1400 1400 1373 1373 1569 1569 1600 1471 1470 1500 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 17 432 57 53 391 0 77 292 0 168 566 35 Adj No.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 52 469 60 81 418 493 166 756 0 397 661 41 Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow,veh/h 18 1109 143 79 990 1167 686 1569 0 855 1370 85 Grp V011ime(v),veh/h 506 0 0 444 0 0 77 292 0 168 0 601 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1270 0 0 1069 0 1167 686 1569 0 855 0 1455 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 9.4 9.9 0.0 13.1 0.0 30.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 32.0 0.0 0.0 34.7 0,0 0.0 40.0 9.9 0.0 23.0 0.0 30.6 Prop In Lane 0.03 0.11 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 581 0 0 500 0 493 166 756 0 397 0 701 V/C Ratio(X) 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.39 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 581 0 0 500 0 493 166 756 0 397 0 701 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 23.0 0.0 0.0 22,8 0.0 0.0 36.8 13.8 0.0 21.2 0.0 19.2 Incr Delay(d2), s/veh 13.9 0.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 10.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I %ile Back OfQ(50%),veh/In 13.4 0.0 0.0 12.6 0.0 0.0 1.9 4.4 0.0 3.2 0,0 14.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 36.9 0.0 0.0 40.8 0.0 0.0 38.8 14.1 0.0 21.9 0.0 29.5 LnGrp LOS D D D B C C Approach Vol,veh/h 506 444 369 769 Approach Delay,s/veh 36.9 40.8 19.3 27.8 Approach LOS D D B C Timer ` 1 2" 3 6 . ; 7- s .. 8, Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.5 39.5 44.5 39.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4:5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 40.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 42.0 34.0 32.6 36.7 Green Ext Time (p c),s 0.0 0.7 4.0 0.0 Intersection Summary,-:.'-,,: HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 31.3 HCM 2010 LOS C Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 1 NCM 2010 TWSC Existing 2: Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Int Delay,s(veh 5.6 Lane Configurations tti� Traffic Vol,vehlh 31 558 90 163 650 32 12 1 109 25 4 77 Future Vol,veh/h 31 558 90 163 650 32 12 1 109 25 4 77 Conflicting Peds,4/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - - None Storage Length 75 - 200 - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 8 2 2 MvmtFlow 32 581 94 170 677 33 13 1 114 26 4 80 �laloT/Minor �ilajor1 Mjor2 . Mr<or1 M�nor2. Conflicting Flow All 710 0 0 675 0 0 1373 1743 338 1331 1773 355 Stage 1 - - - 693 693 - 1033 1033 Stage 2 - - 680 1050 - 298 740 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 5.34 - 6.99 6.54 7.14 7.11 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 7.34 5.54 - 6,66 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.86 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3.12 - - 3.67 4,02 3.92 3.73 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 885 560 - - 127 86 562 128 82 641 Stage - - - - - 333 443 - 233 308 - Stage 2 - - - - 395 302 - 636 421 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 885 560 - - 78 58 562 75 55 641 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 78 58 - 75 55 - Stage 1 - - - - 321 427 225 215 - Stage 2 - - 236 210 488 406 - Approach' HCM Control Delay,s 0.4 2.7 22.2 42.8 HCM LOS C E Capacity(vehlh) 334 885 - - 560 - - 201 HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.38 0.036 - - 0.303 - - 0.549 HCM Control Delay(s) 22.2 9.2 - - 14.2 - - 42.8 HCM Lane LOS C A - - 8 - - E HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.7 0.1 - - 1.3 - - 2.9 Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Existing 3: Kanoelehua Ave & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Movement . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT , ;NBR. : SBL SBT SBP. Lane Configurations t ' tt r ttt r Traffic Volume(veh1h) 246 281 165 252 319 104 205 655 170 129 1126 321 Future Volume(veh/h) 246 281 165 252 319 104 205 655 170 129 1126 321 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking ,BusAd' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1792 1845 1863 1863 1854 1900 1863 1810 1845 1863 1845 1863 Adj Flow Pate,veh/h 256 293 5 262 332 0 214 682 58 134 1173 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 5 3 2 3 2 Cap,veh/h 363 344 295 303 649 0 263 1678 765 156 2519 792 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.19 0:19 0.14 0.18 0.00 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.09 0.50 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1707 1845 1583 1774 3615 0 3442 3438 1568 1774 5036 1583 Grp V011lme(v),veh/h 256 293 5 262 332 0 214 682 58 134 1173 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1707 1845 1583 1774 1761 0 1721 1719 '1568 1774 1679 1583 Q Serve(g_s),s 19.6 24.6 0.4 19.3 13,6 0.0 9.8 20.3 3.1 11.9 24.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 19.6 24.6 0.4 19.3 13.6 0.0 9.8 20.3 3.1 11.9 24.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 363 344 295 303 649 0 263 1678 765 156 2519 792 V/C Ratio(X) 0.70 0.85 0.02 0.87 0.51 0.00 0.81 0,41 0.08 0.86 0.47 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 510 357 307 404 649 0 452 1678 765 277 2519 792 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 46.3 62.9 53.1 47.8 58.8 0.0 72.7 26.2 21.8 71.9 26.1 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 2.5 17.1 0.0 13.9 0.7 0.0 6.0 0.7 0.2 12.4 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 9.5 14.2 0.2 '10.6 6.7 0.0 4.9 9.8 1.4 6.4 11.3 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 48.8 80.0 53.1 61.8 59.5 0.0 78.7 26.9 22.0 84.4 26.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS D F D E E E C C F C Approach Vol,vehlh 554 594 954 1307 Approach Delay,s/veh 65.4 60.5 38.2 32.6 Approach LOS E E D C Timer 1 2 3 4 5, 6 7 & Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 18.1 82.2 25.9 33,8 16.2 84.0 26.3 33.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s F 4 *6.4 *4 7.0 t 4 *6.4 *4 7.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s F 25 *55 `31 28.0 `21 '59 `36 23.0 Max Q Clear Time(g c+11),s 13.9 22.3 21.3 26.6 11.8 26.3 21.6 15.6 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.2 17.4 0.5 0.3 0.5 17.3 0.6 2.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 44.4 HCM 2010 LOS D Notes Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 3 APPENDIX C, FUTURE YEARS LOS ORKSHEETS 2021 Baseline NCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary AM Peak Hour 1: Kilauea Ave & E Quainako St EBL EBT EBR �PJBL 0113T INBR NBL NBA NBft SBL', SBT SBR MovementVi 70 300 50 Lane Configurations 265 385 70 655 135 vehih 55 365 40 25 265 385 70 655 135 70 300 50 Traffic Volume( ) 55 365 40 25 2 12 1 6 16 Future Volume(vehih) 8 18 5 7 4 1a 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number 0 0 p 0 0 1,00 1.00 1.00 Initial Q(Qb),veh 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1,00 Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'00 11076 1471 1447 1500 1471 1471 1500 Parking Bus,A ) 1200 1176 1200 1200 1125 697 0 74 319 Adj Sat Flow,vahlhlln 59 388 36 27 282 0 74 0 1 1 0 Adj Flow Rate,vehih 1 p p 1 1 1 1 Adj No.of Lanes 0 a 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0,94 0.94 4 2 2 Peak Hour Factor 2 2 5 5 2 0 gg 620 76 Percent Heavy Veh;% 87 385 34 64 405 423 336 698 Cap,vehih a 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0'48 Arrive h/Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0 41 .42 000 805 1447 0 588 1286 157 91 910 81 0 0 74 697 0 74 0 358 Sat Flow,vehih 483 0 0 309 0 588 0 1443 Grp Volume(v),vehih 1082 0 0 999 0 1000 805 1447 14.4 0.0 0.0 5.9 40.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 16 4 0.0 0,0 0.0 14.4 s s o.0 20.2 40.4 0.o 40.5 0.0 Q Serve(g_ ), 35.5 0.0 0.0 19.1 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.11 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 0.07 0.09 1.00 1.00 0 86 6 0.12 0 690 Prop In Lane 505 0 0 469 0 423 336 698 0.00 0.51 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehih 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.22 1.00 0'00 0's6 0 696 VIC Ratio(X) 505 0 0 469 0 423 336 698 Avail Cap(c_a),vehih Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0 00 16 0 HCM platoon0.0 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 00.0 0.00 19. 0' 0.0 22.0 21.7 0.0 53. 0.6 25.0 0.0 0.0 19,3 0.0 0.0 0.3 33.8 0.0 53.2 0.0 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 29 3 0,0 0,0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 0 0 p,0 0,0 0.0 0 0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0,0 6.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 22.4 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),vehih 15.2 p 0 0.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 22.3 55.5 0.0 95.F 0.0 15.B LnGrp Delay(d),shieh 54.2 0,0 C C E D 771 432 LnGrp LOS 483 309 29.3 Approach Vol,vehih 54.2 C D 23,3 52.3 C Approach Delay,slveh D Approach LOS 6 7 8 1 2 3 41, 5 Timer, 4 6 8 244.5 39.5 Assigned Phs 44 5 39.5 4.5 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 35.0 40.0 35.0 Gmax s 40.0 42.5 21.1 Max Green Setting( ) 42 4 37.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 0.0 0,0 6.0 0.0 Green Ext Time(p-c),s Intersection Summary 43.3 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay D HCM 2010 LOS Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Hilo Autozone TIAR HCM 2010 TWSC 2021 Baseline 2: Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour IItLIS2clb� 3 ` ._ h. Int Delay,s/veh 4.6 lo� m.ent . r% €BLE13 ; $f .. B �NBTa ?1�I,BR , PSL_ -hlB ..,hlR. ,_ . ...53L NSBT _513 Lane Configurations 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 40 485 40 95 600 35 15 5 85 35 5 60 Future Vol,veh/h 40 485 40 95 600 35 15 5 85 35 5 60 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - None Storage Length 75 - 200 - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 3 2 3 3 12 7 2 2 3 2 3 Mvmt Flow 43 516 43 101 638 37 16 5 90 37 5 64 Nlajo'r/Nlinork. - ` Nlajor1 'Majoi2 ,. Crhnor1 � Minor2 - Conflicting Flow All 676 0 0 559 0 0 1146 1500 279 1153 1503 338 Stage 1 - - - - - - 622 622 - 859 859 - Stage 2 - - - 524 878 - 294 644 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 5.36 - 7.09 6.54 7.14 7.01 6.54 6.96 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 7.44 5.54 - 6.56 5,54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.64 5.54 - 6.76 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3,13 - - 3.72 4.02 3.92 3.68 4.02 3.33 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 911 - - 632 - 173 121 612 176 120 655 Stage 1 - - - 363 477 307 371 - Stage 2 - - - 477 364 652 466 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 911 632 - 127 97 612 122 96 655 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 127 97 122 96 Stage 1 - - - 346 454 293 312 - Stage 2 - - 356 306 523 444 - ?approach= EB, WB NO 5B~ HCM Control Delay,s 0.6 1.5 20.7 33 HCM LOS C D P lOOFtanelfulalar llvmt}. Capacity(veh/h) 340 911 - - 632 - 232 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.329 0.047 - - 0.16 - - 0.459 HCM Control Delay(s) 20.7 9.1 - - 11.8 - - 33 HCM Lane LOS C A - - B - - D HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.4 0.1 - - 0.6 - 2.2 Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2021 Baseline 3: Kanoelehua Ave & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour Movement, EBL EBT EBR VVBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT 8 B Lanz Configurations Traffic Volume(veh/h) 300 220 95 90 195 55 400 1280 210 45 485 140 Future Volume(veh/h) 300 220 95 90 195 55 400 1280 210 45 485 140 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(0b),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Atlj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1845 1863 1863 1652 1819 1900 1863 1845 1863 1681 1776 1759 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 319 234 16 96 207 0 426 1362 107 48 516 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0,94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 3 2 2 15 4 4 2 3 2 13 7 8 Cap,veh/h 388 396 334 231 356 0 452 2037 920 60 2367 730 Arrive On Green 0,18 0.21 0.21 0.07 0.10 0.00 0.13 0.58 0.58 0.04 0.49 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1757 1863 1572 1573 3547 0 3442 3505 1583 1601 4848 1495 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 319 234 16 96 207 0 426 1362 107 48 516 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1757 1863 1572 1573 1728 0 1721 1752 1583 1601 1616 1495 Q Serve(g_s),s 25.8 18.1 1.3 8.8 9.1 0.0 19.6 42.6 4.9 4.8 9.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 25.8 18.1 1.3 8.8 9.1 0.0 19.6 42.6 4.9 4.8 9.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 388 396 334 231 356 0 452 2037 920 60 2367 730 V/C Ratio(X) 0,82 0.59 0.05 0.41 0.58 0.00 0.94 0.67 0.12 0.80 0.22 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 472 396 334 429 562 0 452 2037 920 250 2367 730 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 52.0 56.7 50.1 61.2 68.5 0.0 68.9 22.9 15.0 76.4 23.4 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 9.4 2.3 0.1 1.2 1.5 0.0 28.5 1.8 0.3 20.6 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 13,5 9.6 0.6 3.9 4.4 0.0 11.1 21.1 2.2 2.5 4.4 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.5 59.1 50.2 62.4 70.0 0.0 97.4 24.7 15.3 97.0 23.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS E E D E E F C B F C Approach Vol,veh/h 569 303 1895 564 Approach Delay,s/veh 60.1 67.6 40.5 29.9 Approach LOS E E D C Timer_ 1 2 ,3 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.0 97.1 14.9 38.0 25.0 82.1 32.4 20.5 Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2021 Baseline 1: Kilauea Ave & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations14 Traffic Volume(vehlh) 20 440 70 55 395 315 80 295 130 170 575 45 Future Volume(veh/h) 20 440 70 55 395 315 80 295 130 170 575 45 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/hlln 1400 1329 1400 1400 1373 1373 1569 1569 1600 1471 1470 1500 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 21 458 62 57 411 0 83 307 0 177 599 41 Adj No.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 54 459 61 79 384 493 135 756 0 386 656 45 Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow,veh/h 23 1086 143 73 909 1167 662 1569 0 843 1360 93 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 541 0 0 468 0 0 83 307 0 177 0 640 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/n/In 1252 0 0 982 0 1167 662 1569 0 843 0 1453 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 10.6 0.0 14.4 0.0 34.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 35.5 0.0 0.0 35.5 0.0 0,0 40.5 10,6 0.0 25.0 0.0 34.2 Prop In Lane 0,04 0.11 0.12 1.00 I.00 0.00 1,00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 574 0 0 463 0 493 135 756 0 386 0 701 V/C Ratio(X) 0.94 0,00 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.41 0.00 0,46 0.00 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 574 0 0 463 0 493 135 756 0 386 0 701 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 0,00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 24.3 0.0 0.0 24.3 0,0 0.0 40.1 14.0 0.0 22.0 0,0 20.1 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 24.5 0.0 0.0 44.4 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.3 0.0 0.8 0,0 16.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 16.4 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 0.0 2.2 4.6 0.0 3.4 0.0 16.7 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 48.8 0.0 0.0 68.8 0.0 0.0 48.0 14.3 0.0 22,9 0.0 36.6 LnGrp LOS D F D B C D Approach Vol,veh/h 541 468 390 817 Approach Delay,s/veh 48.8 68.8 21.5 33.6 Approach LOS D E C C Assigned Phs2 4 _ �.. 6 � 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.5 39.5 44.5 39.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5I Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 40.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g c+11),s 42.5 37.5 36.2 37.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 42.6 HCM 2010 LOS D Hilo Autozone TIAR Timing Plan:PM Peak Hour Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2021 Baseline 2, Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Intersection., Int Delay,s/veh 7.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR VV8L 'bWBT UW3R NBL NBT '.NBP. SBL . SBT_ SBR Lane Configurations 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 35 590 90 165 685 35 15 5 110 25 5 80 Future Vol,veh/h 35 590 90 165 685 35 15 5 110 25 5 80 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None - - None None - - None Storage Length 75 - 200 - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - 0 0 Grade,% - 0 - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 8 2 2 Mvmt Flow 36 615 94 172 714 36 16 5 115 26 5 83 Major/Minor Major.l Major2 iNlinor1Minot2 Conflicting Flow All 750 0 0 708 0 0 1437 1828 354 1397 1857 375 Stage - - - 734 734 - 1076 1076 Stage 2 - - - - - - 703 1094 - 321 781 Critical Hdljvy 4.14 5.34 6.99 6.54 7.14 7.1'I 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 7,34 5.54 - 6.66 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.54 5.54 - 6.86 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3.12 3.67 4.02 3.92 3.73 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 855 - 540 - - 115 76 548 116 73 623 Stage 1 - - 312 424 - 219 294 Stage 2 - 383 288 - 615 403 Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 855 540 67 50 548 62 48 623 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 67 50 62 48 Stage - - - - - 299 406 210 200 Stage 2 - - - - 220 196 460 386 Approach EB i7/B NB HCM Control Delay,s 0.5 2.7 35.7 59.3 NCM LOS E F Minor LanelMajor Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL NBT WBR SBLni Capacity(veh/h) 248 855 - 540 173 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.546 0,043 - 0.318 - 0.662 HCM Control Delay(s) 35.7 9.4 14.7 59.3 HCM Lane LOS E A B - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3 0.1 - 1.4 - - 3.9 Hilo Autozone TIAR Timing Plan:PM Peak Hour Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2021 Baseline 3: Kanoelehua Ave & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations � � � � tt r �� ttt Traffic Volume(veh1h) 260 300 175 265 335 110 220 690 180 140 1185 340 Future Volume(veh/h) 260 300 175 265 335 110 220 690 180 140 1185 340 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1792 1845 1863 1863 1854 1900 1863 1810 1845 1863 1845 1863 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 271 312 15 276 349 0 229 719 69 146 1234 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0,96 0,96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 5 3 2 3 2 Cap,vehlh 375 357 307 309 671 0 279 1610 734 169 2433 765 Arrive On Green 0.15 0,19 0.19 0.14 0.19 0.00 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.10 0.48 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1707 1845 1583 1774 3615 0 3442 3438 1568 1774 5036 1583 Grp V011ime(v),veh/h 271 312 15 276 349 0 229 719 69 146 1234 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlln 1707 1845 1583 1774 1761 0 1721 1719 1568 1774 1679 1583 Q Serve(g_s),s 20,6 26.3 1.2 20.2 14.2 0.0 10.5 22.5 3.9 13.0 26.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 20,6 26.3 1.2 20.2 14.2 0.0 10.5 22.5 3.9 13.0 26.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 375 357 307 309 671 0 279 1610 734 169 2433 765 V/C Ratio(X) 0,72 0,87 0.05 0.89 0.52 0.00 0.82 0.45 0.09 0.87 0.51 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 511 357 307 400 671 0 452 1610 734 277 2433 765 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 45.2 62,6 52,5 46,9 58.2 0.0 72.4 28.6 23.6 71.4 28.3 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 3,2 20.4 0.1 18.3 0.7 0.0 6,3 0.9 0.3 14.4 0.8 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 10.0 15.5 0.5 11.5 7.0 0.0 5.2 10.9 1,7 7.0 12.6 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 48.4 83.0 52.6 65.2 58.9 0.0 78.7 29.5 23.9 85.8 291 0.0 LnGrp LOS D F D E E E C C F C Approach Vol,vehlh 598 625 1017 1380 Approach Delay,s/veh 66.6 61.7 40.2 35.1 Approach LOS E E D D a sem- N �� - ,z:,-� �rx� Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 19.2 79.0 26.8 35.0 17.0 81.3 27.3 34.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s *4 *6.4 *4 7.0 `4 '6.4 =4 7.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s z 25 '55 *31 28.0 x 21 *59 :36 23.0 Max Q Clear Time(g c+11),s 15.0 24.5 22.2 28.3 12.5 28.8 22.6 16.2 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0,2 17.8 0.5 0.0 0.5 17.6 0.6 2.3 y _ HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 46.3 HCM 2010 LOS D t?t0 � v r 'gym a s 01 � s'- z Hilo Autozone TIAR Timing Plan:PM Peak Hour Page 3 NCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2021+Project 1: Kilauea Ave & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour fylovementEBL .EBT EBRII/BL. V1/BT U!ISR N6L NBT- -NBR SBL < .SBT SBP Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vehlh) 55 370 40 26 267 386 70 655 137 73 300 50 Future Volume(vehlh) 55 370 40 26 267 386 70 655 137 73 300 50 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1200 1176 1200 1200 1125 1176 1471 1447 1500 1471 1471 1500 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 59 394 36 28 284 0 74 697 0 78 319 37 Adj No.of lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 5 5 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 86 384 34 65 401 423 338 698 0 86 624 72 Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 90 910 79 43 949 1000 806 1447 0 588 1294 150 Grp Voltlme(v),veh/h 489 0 0 312 0 0 74 697 0 78 0 356 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1079 0 0 991 0 1000 806 1447 0 588 0 1444 Q Serve(g_s),s 15.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 40.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 14.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 35.5 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 20.1 40.4 0.0 40.5 0.0 14.2 Prop In Lane 0.12 0.07 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 504 0 0 466 0 423 338 698 0 86 0 696 V/C Ratio(X) 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.22 1.00 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.51 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 504 0 0 466 0 423 338 698 0 86 0 696 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 25.2 0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 21.9 21.7 0.0 42.0 0.0 15.0 Incr Delay(0),s/veh 32,6 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 33.8 0.0 65.9 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 15.8 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 1.3 22.4 0.0 3.4 0.0 5.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.8 0.0 0.0 23.7 0.0 0.0 22,2 55.5 0.0 107.9 0.0 15.6 LnGrp LOS E C C E F B Approach Vol,vehlh 489 312 771 434 Approach Delay,s/veh 57,8 23.7 52.3 32.2 Approach LOS E C D C Timer 1 .` 23, 5 6 Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.5 39.5 44.5 39.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 40.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11), s 424 37.5 42.5 21.6 Green Ext Time(p c),s 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 44.8 HCM 2010 LOS D Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2021+Project 2; Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour i;tPrsection _- _ ------------ . Int Delay,s/veh 4.9 loyemer(i EBS EBT 'EBI , y_' I11+BL /BT !NSP,, ,y =NIL . 1B7IILR P. _ SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 49 485 40 95 605 36 15 5 85 37 5 60 Future Vol,veh/h 49 485 40 95 605 36 15 5 85 37 5 60 Conflicting Peds,W/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - - None Storage Length 75 - 200 - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 3 2 3 3 12 7 2 2 3 2 3 Mvmt Flow 52 5'16 43 101 644 38 16 5 90 39 5 64 rdi/f�trinr,, PtlaJorl; .. Major2. Mmor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 682 0 0 559 0 0 1168 1525 279 1178 1528 341 Stage - - - - - - 641 641 - 865 865 - Stage 2 - - 527 884 - 313 663 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 5.36 - - 7.09 6.54 7.14 7.01 6.54 6.96 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 7.44 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.64 5.54 - 6.76 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3.13 - 3.72 4.02 3.92 3.68 4.02 3.33 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 907 - - 632 - 167 117 612 170 116 652 Stage - - - - - 352 468 - 305 369 - Stage 2 - - 475 362 - 635 457 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 907 - 632 - 121 93 612 117 92 652 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 121 93 - 117 92 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 332 441 - 288 310 - Stage 2 - - - 354 304 504 431 - A`jproaehr' _ [~Q_ U?76 h16 SB, HCM Control Delay,s 0.8 1.5 21.2 36.3 HCM LOS C E �lnor Lanz/�rlafoY t Vett 1�lBLn4 t 3� EST_JEBR �UBL ,ti�1BT,,V�16R SBLra ° x Capacity(veh/h) 332 907 - 632 - 220 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.336 0.057 - 0.16 0.493 HCM Control Delay(s) 21.2 9.2 - 11.8 - 36.3 HCM Lane LOS C A - - B - - E HCM 95th°/utile Q(veh) 1.4 0.2 - 0.6 - 2.5 Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2021+Project 3: Kanoelehua Ave & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour I Movement EBL EBT EBR V�1BL >>/BT �VBP, NBL NBT �IBft SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations _ t t ' 'f'''t`'C` Traffic Volume(veh/h) 301 221 96 90 197 55 402 1280 210 45 485 142 Future Volume(vehln) 301 221 96 90 197 55 402 1280 210 45 485 142 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Ob),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1845 1863 1863 1652 1819 1900 1863 1845 1863 1681 1776 1759 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 320 235 12 96 210 0 428 1362 107 48 516 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 3 2 2 15 4 4 2 3 2 13 7 8 Cap,veh/h 389 398 336 232 359 0 452 2033 918 60 2361 728 Arrive On Green 0,18 0.21 0.21 0.07 0.10 0.00 0.13 0.58 0,58 0.04 0.49 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1757 1863 1572 1573 3548 0 3442 3505 1583 1601 4848 1495 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 320 235 12 96 210 0 428 1362 107 48 516 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/nlln 1757 1863 1572 1573 1728 0 172'1 1752 1583 1601 1616 1495 Q Serve(g_s),s 25.8 18.2 1.0 8.8 9.3 0.0 19.7 42.7 4.9 4.8 9.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 25.8 18.2 1.0 8.8 9.3 0.0 19.7 42.7 4.9 4.8 9.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 389 398 336 232 359 0 452 2033 918 60 2361 728 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.59 0.04 0.41 0.58 0.00 0.95 0.67 0.12 0.80 0.22 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 472 398 336 430 562 0 452 2033 918 250 2361 728 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 51.9 56.6 49.8 61.1 68.4 0.0 69.0 23.1 15.1 76.4 23.6 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 9.6 2.3 0.0 1,2 1.5 0.0 29.4 1.8 0.3 20.6 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 13.6 9.6 0.4 3.9 4.5 0.0 11.2 21.1 2.2 2.5 4.4 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.5 58.9 49.9 62.3 69.9 0.0 98.4 24.8 15,4 97.0 23.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS E E D E E F C B F C Approach Vol,veh/h 567 306 1897 564 Approach Delay,s/veh 60.2 67.5 40.9 30.0 Approach LOS E E D C Timer 3 4, 5 6 7. 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10,0 96.9 14.9 38.2 25.0 81.9 32.4 20.6 Change Period (Y+Rc),s '4 *6.4 *4 7.0 t 4 `6.4 *4 7.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 25 55 `31 28.0 21 *59 *36 23.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.8 44.7 10.8 20.2 21.7 11.8 27.8 11.3 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.1 7.9 0.2 1.6 0.0 22.5 0.6 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 44.8 HCM 2010 LOS D Nous Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 i WSC 2021+Project 2: Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay,slveh 12.7 Pilovemi nt EBL EBT EBR. VVBL _V)IBT 101BR NBL NBT NBR. SBL SBT= SBR Lane Configurations W) ) tl) 4� 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 51 590 90 165 694 37 15 5 110 37 5 83 Future Vol,veh/h 51 590 90 165 694 37 15 5 110 37 5 83 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None None - - None Storage Length 75 200 - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 0 Grade,% - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96' 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 8 2 2 Mvmt Flow 53 615 94 172 723 39 16 5 115 39 5 86 MoorlMinor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 761 0 0 708 0 0 1476 1873 354 1441 1901 381 Stage 1 - 768 768 1086 1086 Stage 2 - - - 708 1105 355 815 Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 5.34 - - 6.99 6.54 7.14 7.11 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 7,34 5.54 6.66 5,54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 6.86 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3.12 - - 3.67 4.02 3.92 3.73 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 847 - - 540 - - 108 71 548 108 68 617 Stage 1 - - - - 296 409 - 216 291 - Stage 2 - - - - - 381 285 586 389 Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 847 - 540 - 61 45 548 56 43 617 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 61 45 - 56 43 - Stagel - - 277 383 202 198 - Stage 2 - - - 217 194 429 365 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 2.7 39.9 126.7 HCM LOS E F Minor Lane/Majorlylvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR. wBL aj'/8T VVBRSBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 233 847 - 540 - 137 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.581 0.063 0.318 - - 0.95 HCM Control Delay(s) 39.9 9.5 - - 14.7 - 126.7 HCM Lane LOS E A B - - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3.3 0.2 1.4 - 6.6 Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 T WSC 2021+Project 2: Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay,slveh 12.7 n P/Iovement EBL EBT EBR VVBL, W13f WBR NSL NBT NBP,, SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 t Traffic Vol,veh/h 51 590 90 165 694 37 15 5 110 37 5 83 Future Vol,veh/h 51 590 90 165 694 37 15 5 110 37 5 83 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None None - - None Storage Length 75 - 200 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - 0 0 - Grade,% - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96' 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 8 2 2 Mvmt Flow 53 615 94 172 723 39 16 5 115 39 5 86 Major/Minor Major'] Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 761 0 0 708 0 0 1476 1873 354 1441 1901 381 Stage - - - - - 768 768 - 1086 1086 - Stage 2 - - - - 708 1105 - 355 815 Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 5.34 6.99 6.54 7.14 7.11 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 7.34 5.54 6.66 5.54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.54 5.54 6.86 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 3.12 - - 3.67 4.02 3.92 3.73 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 847 - - 540 - - 108 71 548 108 68 617 Stage 1 - - - - 296 409 - 216 291 - Stage 2 - - - - - 381 285 - 586 389 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 847 - 540 - 61 45 548 56 43 617 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 61 45 56 43 - Stage 1 - - - - - 277 383 202 198 - Stage 2 - - - 217 194 429 365 - Approach. EB , WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 2.7 39.9 126.7 HCM LOS E F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR kiVBL WBT WBR SBLn1: Capacity(veh/h) 233 847 - - 540 - 137 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.581 0.063 - - 0.318 - 0.95 HCM Control Delay(s) 39.9 9.5 - 14.7 - 126.7 HCM Lane LOS E A - B - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3.3 0.2 - 1.4 - 6.6 Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2021+Project 3: Kanoelehua Ave & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations t �' tt r ttt Traffic Volume(veh/h) 264 303 179 265 338 110 224 690 '180 140 1185 344 Future Volume(vehih) 264 303 179 265 338 110 224 690 180 140 1185 344 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1792 1845 '1863 1863 1854 1900 1863 1810 1845 1863 1845 1863 Adj Flow Rate,vehih 275 316 9 276 352 0 233 719 68 146 1234 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 5 3 2 3 2 Cap,veh/h 376 357 307 307 664 0 283 1609 734 169 2425 763 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.14 0.19 0.00 0,08 0.47 0.47 0.10 0.48 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1707 1845 1583 1774 3615 0 3442 3438 1568 1774 5036 1583 Grp Volume(v),vehih 275 316 9 276 352 0 233 719 68 146 1234 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlin 1707 1845 1583 1774 1761 0 1721 1719 1568 1774 1679 1583 Q Serve(g_s),s 21.0 26.7 0.7 20.3 14.4 0.0 10.7 22.5 3,9 13.0 26.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 21.0 26.7 0.7 20.3 14.4 0.0 10.7 22.5 3.9 13.0 26.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehih 376 357 307 307 664 0 283 1609 734 169 2425 763 V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0,88 0.03 0.90 0.53 0.00 0.82 0.45 0.09 0.87 0.51 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 508 357 307 397 664 0 452 1609 734 277 2425 763 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 45.3 62.8 52.3 47.1 58.5 0.0 72.3 28.6 23.7 71.4 28.5 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 3.6 22.1 0.0 19.3 0.8 0.0 6.6 0.9 0.3 14.4 0.8 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 10.2 15.8 0.3 11.5 7.1 0.0 5.3 10.9 1.7 7.0 12.6 0,0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 48.9 84.8 52.3 66.4 59.3 0.0 78.9 29.5 23.9 85.8 29.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS D F D E E E C C F C Approach Vol,vehih 600 628 1020 1380 Approach Delay,s/veh 67,9 62.4 40.4 35.2 Approach LOS E E D D Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 19.2 Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2026 Baseline 1; Kilauea Ave & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour Movement EBL E8T EBR Y�BL WB-T- WBR NBL NBT -NBR' SSL Sb SBP. Lane Configurations ci Traffic Volume(veh/h) 55 385 45 25 275 405 70 685 140 75 315 55 Future Volume(veh/h) 55 385 45 25 275 405 70 685 140 75 315 55 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1200 1176 1200 1200 1126 1176 1471 1447 1500 1471 1471 1500 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 59 410 41 27 293 0 74 729 0 80 335 45 Adj No.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 5 5 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 84 381 36 63 406 423 319 698 0 86 612 82 Arrive On Green 0,42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow,veh/h 86 902 86 40 961 1000 789 1447 0 571 1270 171 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 510 0 0 320 0 0 74 729 0 80 0 380 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1074 0 0 1001 0 1000 789 1447 0 571 0 1440 Q Serve(g_s),s 15.1 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 40.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 35.5 0.0 0.0 20.4 0.0 0.0 21.7 40.5 0.0 40.5 0.0 15.6 Prop In Lane 0,12 0.08 0.08 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 502 0 0 469 0 423 319 698 0 86 0 695 V/C Ratio(X) 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.23 1.04 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.55 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 502 0 0 469 0 423 319 698 0 86 0 695 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 25.7 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 22.9 21.8 0.0 42.0 0.0 15.3 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 44.4 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 46.4 0.0 75.1 0.0 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/wile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 17.8 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 1.4 25.1 0.0 3.6 0.0 6.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 70.1 0.0 0.0 24.2 0.0 0.0 23.3 68.1 0.0 117.1 0.0 16.2 LnGrp LOS F C C F F B Approach Vol,veh/h 510 320 803 460 Approach Delay,s/veh 70.1 24.2 64.0 33.7 Approach LOS E C E C Timer 1 2°: 3. : 4' 5, - 6 7 8;.,. Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.5 39.5 44.5 39.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 40.0 35,0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 42.5 37.5 42.5 22.4 Green Ext Time(p c),s 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 52.7 HCM 2010 LOS D Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2026 Baseline 2: Shopping Center Dwy/Kekeia St & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour Int Delay,s/veh 4.8 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 40 505 40 95 625 35 15 5 85 35 5 60 Future Vol,veh/h 40 505 40 95 625 35 15 5 85 35 5 60 Conflicting Peds,4/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length 75 200 Veh in Median Storage, - 0 0 - 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 3 2 3 3 12 7 2 2 3 2 3 Mvmt Flow 43 537 43 101 665 37 16 5 90 37 5 64 Maj M4 or. -,?;:Majors Major2 lmor f y" pflmor2 _ Conflicting Flow All 702 0 0 580 0 0 1181 1548 290 1189 1551 351 Stage - - - - - - 644 644 - 886 886 - Stage 2 - - - 537 904 - 303 665 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 5,36 - 7.09 6.54 7.14 7.01 6.54 6.96 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 7.44 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.64 5.54 - 6.76 5.54 _ Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3.13 - - 3.72 4.02 3,92 3.68 4,02 3.33 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 891 - 617 164 113 603 167 113 642 Stage - - - - 350 466 - 296 361 - Stage 2 - - - 468 354 644 456 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 891 - 617 - 119 90 603 114 90 642 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 119 90 - 114 90 - Stage 1 - - - 333 444 - 282 302 - Stage 2 - - - 346 296 515 434 - Apprflaca _ _ ES WB HCM Control Delay,s 0.6 1.5 21.7 36 HCM LOS C E NlinorLapp(NIa4i1Vm�.., N.Bt,61 EBL_ mEBT EBRD!��IBL V�IBT ''34 Y Capacity(veh/h) 326 891 - 617 - 219 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.343 0.048 - 0.164 - 0.486 HCM Control Delay(s) 21.7 9.2 12 - 36 HCM Lane LOS C A - B - - E HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.5 0.1 - - 0.6 - - 2.4 Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 2 NCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2026 Baseline 3: Kanoelehua Ave & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour Movement EBL EBT EBR W6L WBT >VBR (1BL "NBT NBA SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t e t �S t Traffic Volume(veh1h) 315 230 100 95 205 55 420 1340 220 45 510 145 Future Volume(veh/h) 315 230 100 95 205 55 420 1340 220 45 510 145 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0,99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1845 1863 1863 1652 1819 1900 1863 •1845 1863 1681 1776 1759 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 335 245 21 101 218 0 447 1426 118 48 543 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 3 2 2 15 4 4 2 3 2 13 7 8 Cap,veh/h 401 410 346 237 366 0 452 2001 904 60 2317 715 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.22 0.22 0,07 0.11 0.00 0,13 0.57 0,57 0.04 0.48 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1757 1863 1573 1573 3548 0 3442 3505 1583 1601 4848 1495 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 335 245 21 101 218 0 447 1426 118 48 543 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1757 1863 1573 1573 1728 0 1721 1752 1583 1601 1616 1495 Q Serve(g_s),s 27.0 18.9 1.7 9.2 9.6 0.0 20.7 47.1 5.5 4.8 10.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 27.0 '18.9 1.7 9,2 9.6 0.0 20.7 47,1 5,5 4.8 10.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehlh 401 410 346 237 366 0 452 2001 904 60 2317 715 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.60 0.06 0.43 0.60 0.00 0.99 0.71 0,13 0.80 0.23 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 471 410 346 430 562 0 452 2001 904 250 2317 715 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 51.2 56.1 49.3 60.6 68.3 0.0 69.4 24.8 15.9 76.4 24.5 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 10.9 2.4 0.1 1.2 1.6 0.0 39.5 2.2 0.3 20,6 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 14.2 10.0 0.7 4.1 4.7 0.0 12.3 23.4 2.5 2.5 4.8 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.2 58.5 49.4 61.8 69.8 0.0 108.9 27.0 16.2 97.0 24.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS E E D E E F C B F C Approach Vol,veh/h 601 3,19 1991 591 Approach Delay,s/veh 60.2 67.3 44.8 30.6 Approach LOS E E D C Timer 1 2 3 4 . 5 6 7 . 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.0 95.5 15.3 39.2 25.0 80.5 33.6 20.9 Change Period(Y+Rc),s *4 *6.4 4 7.0 *4 *6.4 *4 7.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s '25 `55 '31 28.0 x 21 *59 x 36 23.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.8 49.1 11.2 20.9 22.7 12,5 29.0 11.6 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.1 4.8 0.2 1.6 0.0 24.0 0.6 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 47.1 HCM 2010 LOS D Notes Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2026 Baseline 1: Kilauea Ave & E Puainako St Pell Peak Hour Lane Configurations �14 1� Traffic Volume(veh/h) 20 460 75 60 415 330 85 310 135 180 600 45 Future Volume(veh/n) 20 460 75 60 415 330 85 310 135 180 600 45 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1400 1329 1400 1400 1373 1373 1569 1569 1600 1471 1470 1500 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 21 479 67 62 432 0 89 323 0 188 625 41 Adj No.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 54 458 63 80 371 493 114 756 0 375 658 43 Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow,veh/h 22 1085 148 76 879 1167 646 '1569 0 831 1364 89 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 567 0 0 494 0 0 89 323 0 188 0 666 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1255 0 0 954 0 1167 646 1569 0 831 0 1454 Q Serve(g._s),s 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 11.3 0.0 16.0 0.0 36.8 Cycle Q Cfear(g_c),s 35.5 0.0 0.0 35.5 0.0 0.0 40.5 11.3 0.0 27.3 0.0 36.8 Prop In Lane 0.04 0.12 0.13 1.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 575 0 0 451 0 493 114 756 0 375 0 701 WC Ratio(X) 0.99 0.00 0.00 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.43 0.00 0,50 0.00 0.95 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 575 0 0 451 0 493 114 756 0 375 0 701 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 25.1 0.0 0.0 24.4 0,0 0.0 41.4 14.2 0.0 23.1 0,0 20.8 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 34.0 0.0 0,0 70.3 0.0 0,0 28.0 0.4 0.0 1.0 0.0 22.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 18.5 0.0 0.0 19.2 0.0 0.0 2.9 4.9 0.0 3.8 0.0 19.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 59.1 0.0 0.0 94.7 0.0 0.0 69.4 14.5 0.0 24.1 0.0 43.3 LnGrp LOS E F E B C D Approach Vol,veh/h 567 494 4'12 854 Approach Delay,s/veh 59.1 94.7 26.4 39.1 Approach LOS E F C D Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.5 39.5 44.5 39.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 40.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g c+11),s 42.5 37.5 38.8 37,5 Green Ext Time(p, c),s 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 53.5 HCM 2010 LOS D Hilo Autozone TIAR Timing Plan:PM Peak Hour Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2026 Baseline 2: Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 8,4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL /BT U}/BR Ni3L NBT `NBR SBL'.SBTSBR: Lane Configurations W) c i 4 Traffic Vol,vehlh 35 615 90 165 715 35 15 5 110 25 5 80 Future Vol,veh/h 35 615 90 165 715 35 15 5 110 25 5 80 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None - - None - None - None Storage Length 75 200 - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 8 2 2 Mvmt Flow 36 641 94 172 745 36 16 5 115 26 5 83 Major/Minor' Majorl Major2 Minorl Nlinor2 Conflicting Flow All 781 0 0 734 0 0 1479 1885 367 1439 1914 391 Stage - - - - - - 760 760 - 1107 1107 - Stage 2 - - - - 719 1125 - 332 807 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 5.34 - 6.99 6.54 7.14 7.11 6,54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 7.34 5,54 - 6.66 5.54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.54 5.54 6.86 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 3.12 - - 3.67 4,02 3.92 3.73 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 832 - 525 - 108 70 538 108 67 608 Stage 1 - - 299 413 209 284 - Stage 2 - 375 278 606 392 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 832 525 - 62 45 538 56 43 608 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 62 45 - 56 43 - Stage - - - 286 395 200 191 - Stage 2 - - 212 187 450 375 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0:5 2.7 39.9 72.1 HCM LOS E F MinorLane/Major Mvmt N8Ln1 EBL EBT EBR WBL ,WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 233 832 525 - 158 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.581 0.044 0.327 - 0.725 HCM Control Delay(s) 39,9 9.5 15.2 - 72.1 HCM Lane LOS E A C - - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3.3 0.1 1.4 - 4.4 Hilo Autozone TZAR Timing Plan:PM Peak Hour Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2026 Baseline 3: Kanoelehua Ave & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations ' t r tt r ttt r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 275 310 185 280 355 i 15 230 725 190 145 1240 355 Future Volume(veh/h) 275 310 185 280 355 115 230 725 190 145 1240 355 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1792 1845 1863 1863 1854 1900 1863 1810 1845 1863 1845 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 286 323 26 292 370 0 240 755 79 151 1292 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 5 3 2 3 2 Cap,veh/h 381 357 307 315 674 0 290 1573 718 174 2377 747 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.19 0.00 0.08 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.47 0.00 Sat Flow,vehih 1707 1845 1583 1774 3615 0 3442 3438 1568 1774 5036 1583 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 286 323 26 292 370 0 240 755 79 151 1292 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1707 1845 1583 1774 1761 0 1721 1719 1568 1774 1679 1583 Q Serve(g_s),s 21,7 27.4 2.2 21.5 15.2 0.0 11.0 24.4 4.6 13.4 29.2 0,0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 21.7 27.4 22 21.5 15.2 0.0 11.0 24.4 4.6 13.4 29.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 381 357 307 315 674 0 290 1573 718 174 2377 747 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.90 0,08 0.93 0.55 0.00 0.83 0.48 0.11 0,87 0.54 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),vehih 504 357 307 393 674 0 452 1573 718 277 2377 747 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 44.8 63.0 52.9 46.9 58.4 0.0 72.1 30.2 24.8 71.2 30.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 4,4 25.3 0.1 24.6 0.9 0.0 7.3 1.1 0,3 15.6 0.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 10.7 16.5 1.0 14.9 7.5 0.0 5.5 11.8 2.1 7.3 13.7 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.2 88.4 53.0 71.5 59.4 0.0 79.4 31.2 25.1 86.8 30.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS D F D E E E C C F C Approach Vol,vehih 635 662 1074 1443 Approach Delay,s/veh 69.3 64,7 41.5 36.8 Approach LOS E E D D ' a � Trw- hAw0..� Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 19.7 77.3 28.0 35.0 17.5 79.5 28.4 34.6 Change Period(Y+Rc),s *4 '6.4 *4 7.0 4 "6.4 4 7.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s x 25 F 55 *31 28.0 *21 '59 #36 23,0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 15.4 26.4 23.5 29.4 13.0 31.2 23.7 17,2 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.2 18.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 17.7 0.7 2.1 NCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 48.4 HCM 2010 LOS D Hilo Autozone TIAR Timing Plan:PM Peak Hour Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2026+Project 1: Kilauea Ave & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour Movement EBL EBT" EBR " WBL VVBT fNBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 4 Traffic Volume(veh/h) 55 390 45 26 277 406 70 685 142 78 315 55 Future Volume(veh/h) 55 390 45 26 277 406 70 685 142 78 315 55 Number 7 4 . 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bine Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,vehlhlln 1200 1176 1200 1200 1125 1176 1471 1447 1500 1471 1471 1500 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 59 415 41 28 295 0 74 729 0 83 335 43 Adj No.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 5 5 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 83 381 36 64 402 423 321 698 0 86 616 79 Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.00 0,48 0,48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow,veh/h 84 901 85 41 952 1000 790 1447 0 571 1278 164 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 515 0 0 323 0 0 74 729 0 83 0 378 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1070 0 0 994 0 1000 -790 1447 0 571 0 1442 Q Serve(g_s),s 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 6.1 40.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 35.5 0.0 0.0 20.9 0.0 0.0 21.6 40.5 0.0 40.5 0.0 15.5 Prop In Lane 0.11 0.08 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.11 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 500 0 0 467 0 423 321 698 0 86 0 695 VIC Ratio(X) 1.03 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.23 1.04 0.00 0.97 0.00 0.54 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 500 0 0 467 0 423 321 698 0 86 0 695 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 25.7 ' 0.0 0.0 19.7 0.0 0.0 22.8 21.7 0.0 42.0 0.0 15.3 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 48.2 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.3 46.4 0.0 86.4 0.0 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 18.2 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 1.3 25.1 0.0 4.0 0,0 6.3 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 73.9 0.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 0.0 23.2 68.1 0.0 128.4 0.0 16.1 LnGrp LOS F C C F F B Approach Vol,vehlh 515 323 803 461 Approach Delay,s/veh 73.9 24.6 64.0 363 Approach LOS E C E D Timer 1 2 3 4' : 5. ' I" "'6'. 7" :8 . Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.5 39.5 44,5 39.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 40.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 42.5 37.5 42.5 22.9 Green Ext Time(p c),s 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 Intersectjon$Ummary ' HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 54.3 HCM 2010 LOS D Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2026+Project 2: Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Pualnako St AM Peak Hour li�ter�ect�on _ _ " Int Delay,s/veh 5,1 hAovemerafi_. :- EBL rB3- FB;? %SL , Bfi_ U�1BP N NBL. B,T t�JBR,., SSL; SBTN_<'.SBR Lane Configurations ` ._ 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 49 505 40 95 630 36 '15 5 85 37 5 60 Future Vol,veh/h 49 505 40 95 630 36 15 5 85 37 5 60 Conflicting Peds,A/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - - None Storage Length 75 - 200 - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 0 - - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 3 2 3 3 12 7 2 2 3 2 3 Mvmt Flow 52 537 43 101 670 38 16 5 90 39 5 64 MajorlMinor:- 14t1ajoc1 ilajor2 Minorl PAinor2 Conflicting Flow All 709 0 0 580 0 01 1203 1574 290 1213 1575 .. 354 Stage - - - - - - 663 663 - 891 891 - Stage 2 - - - 540 911 - 322 684 Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 5.36 7.09 6,54 7.14 7.01 6.54 6.96 Critical Hdvvy Stg 1 - 7.44 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.64 5,54 - 6.76 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3.13 - 3.72 4.02 3.92 3.68 4.02 3.33 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 886 - 617 - 158 109 603 161 109 639 Stage - - - - 340 457 294 359 - Stage 2 - - 466 351 - 627 447 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 886 - - 617 114 86 603 109 86 639 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 114 86 - 109 86 - Stage 1 - - 320 430 277 300 Stage 2 - - 345 294 - 495 421 - Approach' E3 vUB. HCM Control Delay,s 0.8 1.5 22.3 39.8 HCM LOS C E �hnof,Lan.'e/,�r1alorWBT �UBRtSBLn1 ,. Capacity(veh/h) 318 886 - 617 208 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.351 0.059 0.164 - - 0.522 HCM Control Delay(s) 22.3 9.3 - - 12 39.8 HCM Lane LOS C A - - B E HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.5 0.2 - - 0.6 - 2.7 Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 2 NCM 2010 Signalized Intersection SLImmary 2026+Project 3: Kanoelehua Ave & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour l Movement EBL EBT EBR I/VBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBP SBL SBT SBP Lane Configurations t 1r, tt if '� ttt r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 316 231 101 95 207 55 422 1340 220 45 510 147 Future Volume(veh/h) 316 231 101 95 207 55 422 1340 220 45 510 147 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 0,99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1845 1863 1863 1652 1820 1900 1863 1845 1863 1681 1776 1759 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 336 246 17 101 220 0 449 1426 118 48 543 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 3 2 2 15 4 4 2 3 2 13 7 8 Cap,veh/h 401 411 347 238 368 0 452 1998 903 60 2313. 713 Arrive On Green 0,19 0.22 0.22 0.07 0.11 0.00 0.13 0.57 0.57 0,04 0.48 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1757 1863 1573 1573 3548 0 3442 3505 1583 1601 4848 1495 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 336 246 17 101 220 0 449 1426 118 48 543 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),Veh/h/In '1757 1863 1573 1573 1729 0 '1721 1752 1583 1601 1616 1495 Q Serve(g_s),s 27.0 19.0 1,4 9.2 9.7 0.0 20.9 47.2 5.5 4.8 10.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 27.0 19.0 1.4 9.2 9.7 0.0 20.9 47.2 5.5 4.8 10.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 401 411 347 238 368 0 452 1998 903 60 2313 713 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.60 0.05 0.42 0.60 0.00 0.99 0.71 0.13 0.80 0.23 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 471 411 347 431 562 0 452 1998 903 250 2313 713 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Upstream Filter([) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 51.1 56.0 49.1 60.5 68.2 0.0 69.4 24.9 16.0 76.4 24.6 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 11.1 2.4 0.1 1,2 1.6 0.0 40.7 2.2 0.3 20.6 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 14.3 10.0 0.6 4.1 4.7 0.0 12.5 23.4 2.5 2.5 4.8 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.2 58.3 49.2 61.8 69.8 0.0 110.1 27.1 16.3 97.0 24.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS E E D E E F C B F C Approach Vol,veh/h 599 321 1993 591 Approach Delay,s/veh 60.2 67.3 45.2 30.7 Approach LOS E E D C Timer I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Kilauea Ave & E PuainalCo St 2026+Project PM Peak Hour (vlov�ment Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(veh/h) 20 468 75 63 44 336 85 310 138 185 600 45 Future Volume(veh/h) 20 468 75 63 424 336 85 310 138 185 600 45 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parkin Bus,Ad' 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 9 1 1.0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1400 1329 1400 1400 1373 1373 1569 1569 1600 1569 1568 1600 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 21 488 66 66 442 0 89 323 0 193 625 41 Adj No.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 54 467 62 82 364 500 139 747 0 387 693 45 Arrive On Green 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.43 0.43 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.47 Sat Flow,veh/h 21 1090 144 78 850 1167 646 1569 0 886 1455 95 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 575 0 0 508 0 0 89 323 0 193 0 666 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1256 0 0 928 0 1167 646 1569 0 886 0 1551 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 11.4 0.0 15.4 0.0 33.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 36.0 0.0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 11.4 0.0 26.8 0.0 33.1 Prop In Lane 0,04 0.11 0.13 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 583 0 0.00 387 0.06 0 446 0 500 139 747 0 387 0 738 WC Ratio(X) 0.99 0.00 0.00 1.14 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.43 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.90 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 583 0 0 446 0 500 139 747 0 387 0 738 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 Uniform Delay(d), s/veh 24.9 0,0 0.0 24,1 0.0 0.0 40.0 14.5 0.0 23.4 0.0 20.2 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 33.8 0.0 0.0 86.5 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.4 0.0 0.9 0.0 14.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 18.7 0.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 5.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 17.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 58.7 0.0 0.0 110,6 0.0 0.0 49.5 14.9 0.0 24.3 0.0 34.5 LnGrp LOS E F D B Approach Vol,veh/h C C 575 508 412 859 Approach Delay,s/veh 58.7 110.6 22.4 32.2 Approach LOS E F Timer C C Assigned Phs .2 � - • 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44,0 40.0 44.0 40.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 39.5 35.5 39.5 35.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 42.0 38.0 35.1 38.0 Green Ext Time(p c),s 0.0 0,0 2.9 0.0 (ntersectton-S�rnmary. __,:_ `: HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 53.9 HCM 2010 LOS D -Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Pagel HCM 2010 TWSC 2026+Project 2: Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Pulainako St PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 14.3 P�lovement EBL EBT EBR- "�rVBL tiVBT MRNBL NBT 'NBP, SBL SBT, SBR Lane Configurations ' W4 '� 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 51 615 90 165 724 37 15 5 '110 37 5 83 Future Vol.veh/h 51 615 90 165 724 37 15 5 110 37 5 83 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None None - None Storage Length 75 200 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% 0 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor .96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 8 2 2 Mvrnt Flow 53 641 94 172 754 39 16 5 1'15 39 5 86 MajodMinor Major'l Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 793 0 0 734 0 0 1517 1930 367 1482 1958 396 Stage - - - - - - 794 794 - 1117 1117 - Stage 2 - 723 1136 - 365 841 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 5.34 6.99 6.54 7.14 7.11 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 7,34 5.54 6.66 5.54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 6.86 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3.12 - 3.67 4.02 3.92 3.73 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 824 525 - 101 66 538 101 63 603 Stage 1 - - 283 398 - 206 281 Stage 2 - - 373 275 - 578 379 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 824 - 525 - - 56 42 538 52 40 603 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 56 42 - 52 40 Stage 1 - - - 265 372 - 193 189 Stage 2 - - - 209 185 - 420 355 Approach EB wB iiia SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 2.7 44.5 150.5 HCM LOS E F Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR. WBL - WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 220 824 - - 525 128 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.616 0.064 - - 0.327 - 1.017 HCM Control Delay(s) 44.5 9.7 - - 15.2 - 150.5 HCM Lane LOS E A - - C - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3.6 0.2 - - 1.4 - - 7.1 Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2026+Project 3: Kanoelehua Ave & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations >> tt ) ttt Traffic Volume(veh1h) 279 313 189 280 358 115 234 725 190 145 1240 359 Future Volume(veh/h) 279 313 189 280 358 115 234 725 190 145 1240 359 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1792 1845 1863 1863 1854 1900 1863 1810 1845 1863 1845 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 291 326 20 292 373 0 244 755 78 151 1292 0 Adj No,of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 . 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0;96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 5 3 2 3 2 Cap,veh/h 382 357 307 315 669 0 294 1570 716 174 2365 744 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.19 0.00 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.47 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1707 1845 1583 1774 3615 0 3442 3438 1568 1774 5036 1583 Grp Vollime(v),veh/h 291 326 20 292 373 0 244 755 78 151 1292 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1707 1845 1583 1774 1761 0 '1721 1719 1568 1774 1679 1583 Q Serve(g_s),s 22.2 27.7 1,7 21.7 15.4 0.0 11.2 24.5 4.6 13.4 29.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 22.2 27.7 1.7 21.7 15.4 0.0 11.2 24.5 4.6 13.4 29.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 382 357 307 315 669 0 294 1570 716 174 2365 744 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.91 0.07 0.93 0.56 0.00 0.83 0.48 0.11 0.87 0.55 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 502 357 307 391 669 0 452 1570 716 277 2365 744 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(1) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 44,8 63.2 52.7 47.6 58.7 0.0 72.0 30.3 24.9 71.2 30.3 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 4.9 26.8 0.1 24.8 1.0 0.0 7.6 1.1 0.3 15.6 0.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 10.9 16.8 0.7 14.9 7.6 0.0 5.6 11.9 2.0 7.3 13.7 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.7 90.0 52.8 72,4 59.8 0.0 79.7 31,3 25.2 86.8 31.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS D F D E E E C C F C Approach Vol,veh/h 637 665 1077 1443 Approach Delay,s/veh 70,4 65.3 41.8 37.0 Approach LOS E E D D Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 19.7 77.1 28.2 35.0 17.7 79.2 28.8 34.4 Change Period(Y+Rc),s *4 *6.4 *4 7.0 *4 *6.4 *4 7.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s *25 *55 *31 28.0 *21 *59 %36 23.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 15.4 26,5 23.7 29.7 13.2 31.3 24.2 17.4 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.2 18.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 17.6 0.7 2.1 raw t �tl1�ry HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 48.9 HCM 2010 LOS D r t Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2036 Baseline 1: Kilauea Ave & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour Movement EBL EBT E-BR WBL 'VYBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR; Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(veh/h) 60 420 50 30 300 440 75 745 150 80 340 60 Future Volume(veh/h) 60 420 50 30 300 440 75 745 150 80 340 60 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1200 1176 1200 1200 1124 1176 1471 1447 1500 1471 1471 1500 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 64 447 46 32 319 0 80 793 0 85 362 50 Adj No.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 5 5 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 82 359 35 66 392 423 296 698 0 86 610 84 Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow,veh/h 80 848 84 45 928 1000 766 1447 0 538 1265 175 Grp VOhime(v),veh/h 557 0 0 351 0 0 80 793 0 85 0 412 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1012 0 0 974 0 1000 766 1447 0 538 0 1440 Q Serve(g_s),s 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 7.1 40.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 35.5 0.0 0.0 25.6 0.0 0.0 24.6 40.5 0.0 40.5 0.0 17.5 Prop In Lane 0,11 0.08 0.09 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 476 0 0 458 0 423 296 698 0 86 0 694 V/C Ratio(X) 1.17 0.00 0,00 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.27 1.14 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.59 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 476 0 0 458 0 423 296 698 0 86 0 694 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 0.0 0.0 20.7 0.0 0.0 24.7 21.8 0.0 42.0 0.0 15.8 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 97.5 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 78.3 0.0 94.3 0.0 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 23.8 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 1.5 31.3 0.0 4.2 0.0 7.1 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 123.3 0.0 0.0 28.9 0.0 0.0 25.2 100.1 0.0 136.3 0.0 17.1 LnGrp LOS F C C F F B Approach Vol,veh/h 557 351 873 497 Approach Delay,s/veh 123.3 28.9 93.2 37.5 Approach LOS F C F D Timer 1 2 3.. 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.5 39.5 44.5 39.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 40.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l l), s 42.5 37.5 42.5 27.6 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 78.5 HCM 2010 LOS E Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2036 Baseline 2.- Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour (intersection r� ; Int Delay,s/veh 5.2 Mouernent _. .' EBL EBT ESP. ,s; U!1$L >13T 1/IBP = IBL,ANB i, .i?]i3R sBt S,BT=_ SBS Lane Configurations W) Traffic Vol,veh/h 40 550 40 95 685 35 15 5 85 35 5 60 Future Vol,veh/h 40 550 40 95 685 35 15 5 85 35 5 60 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 75 200 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade,% 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 3 2 3 3 12 7 2 2 3 2 3 Mvmt Flow 43 585 43 101 729 37 16 5 90 37 5 64 ��lajor/P�linor °'._. Pilajort �Malor2 f inor1 '' P�linor2 Conflicting Flow All 766 0 0 628 0 0 1260 1659 314 1271 1662 383 Stage 1 - - - - 691 691 - 949 949 - Stage 2 - - - - - 569 968 - 322 713 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 5.36 - - 7.09 6.54 7.14 7.01 6.54 6.96 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 7,44 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.64 5.54 - 6.76 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2,22 - 3.13 - - 3.72 4.02 3.92 3.68 4.02 3.33 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 843 - 586 - - 145 97 582 147 96 612 Stage - - - - - 325 444 - 271 337 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 448 330 - 627 434 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 843 - 586 - - 103 76 582 98 75 612 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 103 76 - 98 75 - Stage 1 - - - 308 421 - 257 279 - Stage 2 - 326 273 - 496 412 - s Approach_, , EB WB NB S3 1 HCM Control Delay,s 0.6 1.4 24.6 44.8 NCM LOS C E Mi lvmt NBLn_1EBL_ .EB,I EBR,'WBL UVST Capacity(veh/h) 294 843 586 - - 192 HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.38 0.05 0.172 - 0.554 HCM Control Delay(s) 24.6 9.5 - 12.4 - 44.8 HCM Lane LOS C A B - - E HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.7 0.2 - 0,6 - - 2.9 I i I Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2036 Baseline 3: Kanoelehua Ave & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour Movement EoL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations �` tT4 '�'� tt �` ttt Traffic Volume(vehlh) 340 250 105 105 220 60 455 1460 240 50 555 160 Future Volume(veh/h) 340 250 105 105 220 60 455 1460 240 50 555 160 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,vehlhlln 1845 1863 1863 1652 1819 1900 1863 1845 1863 1681 1776 1759 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 362 266 27 112 234 0 484 1553 139 53 590 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 3 2 2 15 4 4 2 3 2 13 7 8 Cap,vehlh 421 428 361 245 379 0 452 1931 872 66 2238 690 Arrive On Green 0,20 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.11 0.00 0.13 0.55 0.55 0.04 0.46 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1757 1863 1573 1573 3548 0 3442 3505 1583 1601 4848 1495 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 362 266 27 112 234 0 484 1553 139 53 590 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1757 1863 1573 1573 1728 0 1721 1752 1583 1601 1616 1495 Q Serve(g_s),s 29.0 20.5 2.2 10.2 10.3 0.0 21.0 57.2 6.9 5.2 11.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 29.0 20.5 2.2 10.2 10.3 0.0 21.0 57.2 6.9 5.2 11.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 421 428 361 245 379 0 452 1931 872 66 2238 690 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.62 0.07 0.46 0.62 0.00 1.07 0.80 0.16 0.80 0.26 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 470 428 361 428 562 0 452 1931 872 250 2238 690 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 49,9 55.4 48.3 59.6 68.0 0.0 69,5 29.0 17.7 76.0 26.4 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),siveh 13.7 2.8 0.1 1.3 1.6 0.0 62.8 3.7 0.4 19.1 0.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 15.7 10.9 0.9 4.5 5.0 0.0 13.9 28.6 3.1 2.7 5.4 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 63.7 58.1 48.4 60.9 69.6 0.0 132.3 32.7 18.1 95.1 26.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS E E D E E F C B F C Approach Vol,vehlh 655 346 2176 643 Approach Delay,s/veh 60.8 66.8 53.9 32.3 f Approach LOS E E D C Timer I 2 3 4 5 6, 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.6 92.2 16.4 40.8 25.0 77.9 35.6 21.6 Change Period(Y+Rc),s "4 6.4 '4 7.0 `4 '6.4 `4 7.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s z 25 %55 `31 28.0 *21 *59 K 36 23.0 Max Q Clear Time(g c+11),s 7.2 59.2 12.2 22.5 23.0 13.9 31.0 12.3 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.5 0.0 26.8 0.5 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 52.6 HCM 2010 LOS D Notes Hilo Autozone T IAR Synchro 9 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2036 Baseline 1: Kilauea Ave & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Movement, � L EBR VBR' . NI3L _.NBT.. ,NBR Lane Configurations 4 4 , S� Traffic Volume(veh/h) 20 500 80 65 450 360 90 340 150 195 655 50 Future Volume(veh/h) 20 500 80 65 450 360 90 340 150 195 655 50 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 '1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1400 1329 1400 '1400 1373 1373 1569 1569 1600 1471 1470 1500 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 21 521 72 68 469 0 94 354 0 203 682 46 Adj No.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 53 461 62 81 359 493 86 756 0 353 656 44 Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow,veh/h 20 1091 148 77 851 1167 610 1569 0 808 1362 92 Grp VOIUme(V),veh/h 614 0 0 537 0 0 94 354 0 203 0 728 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1259 0 0 928 0 1167 610 1569 0 808 0 1453 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.7 0.0 18.9 0.0 40.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 35.5 0.0 0.0 35.5 0.0 0.0 40.5 12.7 0.0 31.5 0.0 40.5 Prop In Lane 0.03 0.12 0.13 1.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 576 0 0 440 0 493 86 756 0 353 0 701 V/C Ratio(X) 1.07 0,00 0.00 1.22 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.47 0.00 0.57 0.00 1.04 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 576 0 0 440 0 493 86 756 0 353 0 701 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 25.4 0.0 0.0 24.4 0.0 0.0 42,0 14.5 0.0 25.1 0.0 21.8 Incr Delay(0),s/veh 56.0 0.0 0,0 117,8 0.0 0.0 125.8 0.4 0.0 2.2 0,0 44.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 22.3 0.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.5 0.0 4.4 0.0 24.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 81,4 0,0 0.0 142.2 0.0 0.0 168.0 15.0 0.0 27.3 0.0 66.3 LnGrp LOS F F F B C F Approach Vol,veh/h 614 537 448 931 Approach Delay,s/veh 81.4 142.2 47,1 57.8 Approach LOS F F D E im2r ;1 -2 :3 =a G 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.5 39.5 44.5 39.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 40.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 42.5 37.5 42.5 37.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 79.5 HCM 2010 LOS E Hilo Autozone TIAR Timing Plan:PM Peak Hour Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2036 Baseline 2; Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 10.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT IIVRR NBL NBT NOR SRL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 35 670 90 165 780 35 15 5 110 25 5 80 Future Vol,veh/h 35 670 90 165 780 35 15 5 110 25 5 80 Conflicting Peds,4/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None None Storage Length 75 - 200 - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% 0 0 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 8 2 2 Mvmt Flow 36 698 94 172 813 36 16 5 115 26 5 83 Major/Minor Nlajor'l Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 849 0 0 792 0 0 1571 2011 396 1529 2039 424 Stage 1 - - - - - - 818 818 - 1174 1174 - Stage 2 - - - - 753 1193 - 355 865 Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 5,34 - - 6.99 6.54 7.14 7.11 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 7.34 5.54 - 6.66 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.86 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3.12 - 3.67 4.02 3.92 3.73 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 785 - 493 - 93 58 '515 94 56 579 Stage 1 - - - - 273 388 190 264 Stage 2 - - 358 258 - 586 369 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 785 493 - 50 36 515 46 35 579 Mov.Cap-2 Maneuver - 50 36 - 46 35 Stage 1 - 260 370 - 181 172 Stage 2 - - 194 168 429 352 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.4 2.7 54.7 108 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Nivmt N8Ln1 EBL EBT EBR. WK WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 199 785 - 493 133 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.68 0.046 - 0.349 - 0.862 HCM Control Delay(s) 54.7 9.8 - - 16.2 108 HCM Lane LOS F A - C - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 4.2 0.1 - - 1.5 - 5.5 Hilo Autozone TZAR Timing Plan:PM Peak Hour Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2036 Baseline 3: Kanoelehua Ave & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations _t �' '� tt r '� ttt �r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 300 340 200 305 385 125 250 790 205 155 1355 390 Future Volume(veh/h) 300 340 200 305 385. 125 250 790 205 155 1355 390 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1792 1845 1863 1863 1854 1900 1863 1810 1845 1863 1845 1863 Adj Flow Pate,veh/h 312 354 41 318 401 0 260 823 95 161 1411 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 5 3 2 3 2 Cap,veh/h 395 357 307 340 689 0 310 1498 683 184 2266 712 Arrive On Green 0.16 0,19 0.19 0.17 0.20 0.00 0.09 0.44 0.44 0.10 0.45 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1707 1845 1583 1774 3615 0 3442 3438 1568 1774 5036 1583 Grp Volume(v),vehlh 312 354 41 318 401 0 260 823 95 161 1411 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/in 1707 1845 1583 1774 1761 0 1721 1719 1568 1774 1679 1583 Q Serve(g_s),s 23.6 30,6 3.4 24.2 16.5 0.0 11.9 28,4 5.8 14.3 34.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 23.6 30.6 3.4 24.2 16.5 0.0 11.9 28.4 5.8 14.3 34.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 395 357 307 340 689 0 310 1498 683 184 2266 712 VIC Ratio(X) 0.79 0.9.9 0.13 0.93 0.58 0.00 0.84 0.55 0,14 0.88 0.62 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 498 357 307 389 689 0 452 1498 683 277 2266 712 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 43.9 64.4 53.4 49.1 58.4 0.0 71.7 33.5 27.1 70.7 33.6 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 6.6 44.9 0.2 27.9 1.2 0.0 9.1 1.5 0.4 18.1 1.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 11.8 20.1 1.5 16,5 8.2 0.0 6.1 13.8 2.6 7.9 16.2 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.5 109.3 53.6 76.9 59.7 0,0 80.7 34.9 27.5 88.8 34.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS D F D E E F C C F C Approach Vol,vehlh 707 719 1178 1572 Approach Delay,s/veh 80.1 67.3 44.4 40.4 Approach LOS F E D D Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 20.6 73.8 30.6 35.0 18.4 76.0 30.3 35.3 Change Period(Y+Rc),s *4 *6.4 *4 7.0 *4 6.4 *4 7.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s *25 55 *31 28.0 "21 *59 '36 23.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 16.3 30.4 26.2 32.6 13.9 36.3 25.6 18.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.3 17.7 0.4 0,0 0.5 16.6 0.7 1.9 I11`tef5QC�0���aI»�1ry�: HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 52.9 HCM 2010 LOS ' D I�ote.Sa ...v'"✓ �,"�`�: �. '..,�.lx..'-y`{y t':? �'+-_. ��.t-..-..._.:,_�, Y .,.�i..�'_3�/S_ ^,�.3�'a:3=a�:'_ .�?.,-. ?n._#� .:� -fl$...? _ $ Hilo Autozone TZAR Timing Plan;PM Peak Hour Page 3 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2036+Project 1: Kilauea Ave & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour f!Aovement EBL EBT EBR WBL W_BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI SBT SBP, Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(veh/h) 60 425 50 31 302 441 75 745 152 83 340 60 Future Volume(veh/h) 60 425 50 31 302 441 75 745 152 83 340 60 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1200 1176 1200 1200 1124 1176 1471 1447 1500 1471 1471 1500 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 64 452 46 33 321 0 80 793 0 88 362 48 Adj No.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 5 5 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 Cap,veh/'n 81 357 35 66 389 423 297 698 0 86 613 81 Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.00 0,48 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow,veh/h 79 844 82 46 920 1000 767 1447 0 538 1272 169 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 562 0 0 354 0 0 80 793 0 88 0 410 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1005 0 0 967 0 1000 767 1447 0 538 0 1441 Q Serve(g_s),s 9,2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 7.1 40,5 0.0 0.0 0,0 17.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 35.5 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.0 0.0 24.4 40.5 0,0 40.5 0.0 17.3 Prop In Lane 0.11 0.08 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 472 0 0 455 0 423 297 698 0 86 0 695 V/C Ratio(X) 1.19 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.27 1.14 0.00 1.03 0.00 0.59 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 472 0 0 455 0 423 297 698 0 86 0 695 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 25,8 0.0 0.0 20.8 0.0 0.0 24.6 21.7 0.0 42.0 0.0 15.8 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 104.8 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.5 78.3 0.0 '104.7 0.0 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 24.6 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 1.5 31.3 0.0 4.5 0.0 7.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 130.5 0.0 0.0 29.7 0.0 0.0 25.0 '100.1 0.0 147.1 0.0 17.1 LnGrp LOS F C C F F B Approach Vol,veh/h 562 354 873 498 Approach Delay,slveh 130.5 29.7 93.2 40.0 Approach LOS F C F D Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 : Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.5 39.5 44.5 39.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 40,0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 42.5 37.5 42.5 28.3 Green Ext Time(p c),s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 Intersection Summary. HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 81.0 HCM 2010 LOS F Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 TVVSC 2036+project 2: Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour r Int Delay,s/veh 5.6 taoyement EBL ,gT ESR : NIBL_..V'V ,�1Bf NBL NB> __1 3P. SBL SBT.. _SBR Lane Configurations tO t1 4 Traffic Vol,vehlh 49 550 40 95 690 36 15 5 85 37 5 60 Future Vol,veh/h 49 550 40 95 690 36 15 5 85 37 5 60 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 75 200 - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 3 2 3 3 12 7 2 2 3 2 3 MvmtFlow 52 585 43 101 734 38 16 5 90 39 5 64 fytajorl��lior, .{ Iylajorl Major2. �Ainor,1 PAirior2 Conflicting Flow All 772 0 0 628 0 0 1283 1685 314 1296 1687 386 Stage - - - 711 711 - 955 955 Stage 2 - - - - 572 974 - 341 732 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 5.36 - 7.09 6,54 7.14 7.01 6.54 6.96 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 7.44 5.54 - 6.56 5.54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.64 5.54 - 6.76 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3.13 - 3.72 4.02 3,92 3.68 4.02 3.33 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 839 - 586 - 140 93 582 142 93 610 Stage - - - - 314 434 - 269 335 - Stage 2 - - 446 328 - 611 425 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 839 - - 586 - 98 72 582 94 72 610 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 98 72 94 72 - Stage 1 - - - 295 407 252 277 - Stage 2 - 324 271 - 478 399 - Approach, ., EB r. W8 NB HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 1.4 25.5 50.4 HCM LOS D F Nlinortarie/�1lafor.`_P/1�rnt„- NBLn1b- ESP, VVL. UVT W88 58Ln1_ , Capacity(veh/h) 285 839 - - 586 - 182 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.392 0.062 - - 0.172 - 0.596 HCM Control Delay(s) 25.5 9.6 - - 12.4 - 50.4 HCM Lane LOS D A - - g - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.8 0.2 - - 0.6 - 3.3 Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 2 Q HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2036+Project 3; Kanoelehua Ave & E Puainako St AM Peak Hour Movement EBL EBT EBR V113L VVBT VVBR NBL NBT ': NBP. SBL SBT SBP, Lane Configurations t e t14 tt e ttf Traffic Volume(veh/h) 341 251 106 105 222 60 457 1460 240 50 555 162 Future Volume(veh/h) 341 251 106 105 222 60 457 1460 240 50 555 162 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1845 1863 1863 1652 1819 1900 1863 1845 1863 1681 1776 1759 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 363 267 23 112 236 0 486 1553 139 53 590 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh;% 3 2 2 15 4 4 2 3 2 13 7 8 Cap,veh/h 422 430 363 246 381 0 452 1927 871 66 2234 689 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.11 0.00 0.13 0.55 0.55 0.04 0.46 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1757 1863 1573 1573 3548 0 3442 3505 1583 1601 4848 1495 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 363 267 23 112 236 0 486 1553 139 53 590 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1757 1863 1573 1573 1728 0 1721 1752 1583 1601 1616 1495 Q Serve(g_s),s 29.1 20.6 1.8 10.2 10.4 0.0 21,0 57.3 6.9 5.2 12.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 29.1 20.6 1.8 10.2 10.4 0.0 21.0 57.3 6.9 5.2 12.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 422 430 363 246 381 0 452 1927 871 66 2234 689 V/C Ratio(X) 0,86 0.62 0.06 0.46 0.62 0.00 1.08 0.81 016 0.80 0.26 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 470 430 363 429 562 0 452 1927 871 250 2234 689 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 49,9 55,3 48.0 59,5 68.0 0.0 69.5 29.1 17.8 76.0 26.5 0.0 Incr Delay(0),s/veh 13.9 2.7 0.1 1.3 1.6 0.0 64.2 3.7 0.4 '19.1 0.3 0,0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back OfQ(50%),veh/In 15.7 10.9 0.8 4.5 5.1 0.0 14.0 28.6 3.1 2.7 5.4 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 63.7 58.0 48.1 60.8 69,6 0.0 133.7 32.8 18.2 95.1 26.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS E E D E E F C B F C Approach Vol,veh/h 653 348 2178 643 Approach Delay,s/veh 60.8 66.8 54.4 32.4 Approach LOS E E D C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.6 92.1 16.4 40.9 25.0 77.7 35.6 21.6 Change Period(Y+Rc),s `4 *6.4 *4 7.0 k 4 x 6.4 x 4 7.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s `25 *55 *31 28.0 '21 *59 "36 23.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 7.2 59.3 12.2 22.6 23.0 14.0 31.1 12.4 Green Ext Time(p c),s 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.4 0.0 26.8 0.5 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 52.9 HCM 2010 LOS D Notes Hilo Autozone TZAR Synchro 9 Report Page 3 5' HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2036+Project 1: Kilauea Ave & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour iloyemert, EBL„ Et3T, �16R SBL SBT. SBI Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(veh/h) 20 508 80 68 459 366 90 340 153 200 655 50 Future Volume(veh/h) 20 .508 80 68 459 366 90 340 153 200 655 50 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1400 1329 1400 1400 1373 1373 1569 1569 1600 1569 1568 1600 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 21 529 71 71 478 0 94 354 0 208 682 46 Adj No,of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/'n 53 463 61 82 352 493 100 756 0 371 700 47 Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow,veh/h 20 '1096 144 79 833 1167 610 1569 0 861 1452 98 Grp VOIUme(v),veh/h 621 0 0 549 0 0 94 354 0 208 0 728 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1260 0 0 912 0 1167 610 1569 0 861 0 1550 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 12.7 0.0 17.9 0.0 38.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 35.5 0.0 0.0 35.5 0.0 0.0 40.5 12.7 0.0 30.6 0.0 38.5 Prop In Lane 0.03 0.11 0.13 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 0.06 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 577 0 0 434 0 493 100 756 0 371 0 747 V/C Ratio(X) 1.08 0.00 0.00 1.27 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.47 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.97 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 577 0 0 434 0 493 100 756 0 371 0 747 HCM Platoon Patio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0,00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 25.4 0.0 0.0 24.5 0,0 0.0 41.8 14.5 0.0 24.8 0.0 21.3 Incr Delay(0),s/veh 59.7 0.0 0.0 136,9 0.0 0.0 70,2 0.4 0.0 1.9 0.0 26.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 22.9 0.0 0.0 26.5 0.0 0.0 4.1 5.5 0.0 4.4 0.0 21.9 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 85.0 0.0 0.0 161.4 0.0 0.0 112.0 15.0 0.0 26.6 0.0 47.7 LnGrp LOS F F F B C D Approach Vol,veh/h 621 549 448 936 Approach Delay,s/veh 85.0 161.4 35.3 43.0 Approach LOS F F D D Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 44.5 39.5 44.5 39.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 40.0 35.0 40.0 35.0 Max Q Clear Time(g c+11),s 42.5 37.5 40.5 37.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 77.3 HCM 2010 LOS E Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 1 e HCM 2010 TWSC 2036+Project 2: Shopping Center Dwy/Kekela St & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 19.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL �WBT WBR NBL NBT P1BP,, SBL SBT. SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 51 670 90 165 789 37 15 5 110 37 5 83 Future Vol,veh/h 51 670 90 165 789 37 15 5 110 37 5 83 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length 75 200 - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 8 2 2 Mvmt Flow 53 698 94 172 822 39 16 5 1'15 39 5 86 Major/iAinor Major'l Major2 Minorl Nlinor2 Conflicting Flow All 860 0 0 792 0 0 '1608 2055 396 1573 2083 430 Stage 1 - 851 851 1185 1185 Stage 2 - 757 1204 388 898 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 5.34 - 6.99 6.54 7.14 7.11 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 7.34 5.54 6.66 5.54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.54 5.54 6.86 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 3.12 - 3.67 4.02 3.92 3.73 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 777 - 493 - 88 55 515 88 52 573 Stage 1 - - - 259 375 - 187 261 - Stage 2 - - 356 255 - 560 356 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 777 - 493 - - 46 33 515 42 32 573 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 46 33 42 32 - Stage 1 - - - 241 349 174 170 - Stage 2 - - - 191 166 - 400 332 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.6 2.7 62.1 236.7 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/hilajor lvlumt NBLn1 EBL ERT EBR WBL WBT_WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 188 777 - 493 106 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.72 0.068 0.349 - - 1.228 HCM Control Delay(s) 62.1 10 - 16.2 236.7 HCM Lane LOS F A C - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 4.6 0.2 1.5 8.7 Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 2 k HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2036+Project 3: Kanoelehtua Ave & E Puainako St PM Peak Hour (viayemert EBL, EBT -EL „ ?T BL ;_ Non,_NBR, SBL SST .='SBP _. Lane Configurations r ttt r ttt r Traffic Volume(veh1h) 304 343 204 305 388 125 254 790 205 155 1355 394 Future Volume(vehlh) 304 343 204 305 388 125 254 790 205 155 1355 394 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/hlln 1792 1845 1863 1863 1854 1900 1863 1810 1845 1863 1845 1863 Adj Flow Pate,veh/h 317 357 35 318 404 0 265 823 94 161 1411 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.98 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 5 3 2 3 2 Cap,.veh/h 396 357 307 340 680 0 315 1498 683 184 22.59 710 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.19 0.00 0.09 0.44 0.44 0.10 0.45 0.00 Sat Flow,vehlh 1707 1845 1583 1774 3615 0 3442 3438 1568 1774 5036 1583 Grp V011ime(v),vehlh 317 357 35 318 404 0 265 823 94 161 1411 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1707 1845 1583 1774 1761 0 1721 1719 1568 1774 1679 1583 Q Serve(g_s),s 24.0 31.0 2.9 24.2 16.7 0.0 12.1 28.4 5.8 14.3 34.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 24.0 31.0 2.9 24.2 16,7 0.0 12.1 28.4 5.8 14.3 34.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 396 357 307 340 680 0 315 1498 683 184 2259 710 V/C Ratio(X) 0,80 1.00 0.11 0.93 0.59 0.00 0.84 0.55 0.14 0.88 0.62 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 495 357 307 389 680 0 452 1498 683 277 2259 710 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d), s/veh 43.9 64.5 53.2 49.0 58.8 0.0 71.6 33.5 27.1 70.7 33.8 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 7.4 47.3 0.2 27.9 1.4 0.0 9.5 1.5 0.4 18.1 1.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 12.2 20.5 1.3 16.5 8,3 0.0 6,2 13.8 2.6 7.9 16.2 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 51.3 111.8 53.3 76.9 60.2 0.0 81.0 34.9 27.5 88.8 35.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D F D E E F C C F D Approach Vol,veh/h 709 722 1182 1572 Approach Delay,s/veh 81.9 67.6 44.7 40.6 Approach LOS F E D D Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 20,6_ 73.8 30.6 Hilo Autozone TIAR Synchro 9 Report Page 3 £I3y1t; ,(1 rh � .i ��MS<M Mme, i S (j:• �i COUNTY OF HAWAII STATE OF HAIWAIII BILL NO. 74 ORDINANCE NO. 07 105 (Mn 3) { AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-33 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP), , ARTICLE 8,CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE)OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2005 EDITION), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL— 10,000 SQUARE FEET(RS-10)TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL— 40,000 SQUARE FEET(CN-40)AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY 2-2-39:31, 57, 68 AND 69, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: I SECTION 1. Section 25-8-33,Article 8,Chapter 25 (Zoning Code)of the Hawaii 1 County Code 1983 (2005 Edition),is amended to change the district classification of property described hereinafter as follows: 1 The district classification of the following area situated at Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii,shall be Neighborhood Commercial-40,000 square feet(CN-40): Beginning at the southeast corner of this parcel of land,also being the southwest corner of Kekela Street on the northerly side of Puainako Street,the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station"HALAI"being 7,790.70 feet south and 10,213.71 feet east and running by azimuths measured clockwise from true south: Following along Puainako Street on a curve to the right with a radius of 1,223.74 feet,the chord azimuth and distance being: 1. 800 16' 24" 230.05 feet; 2. 850 40' 146.95 feet along Puainako Street; Thence along Puainako Street on a curve to the right with a radius of 80.00 feet,the chord azimuth and distance being: -1- t Planning Deft` Exhibit d 3. 1300 40' 113.14 feet; 4. 1750 40' 57.50 feet along Kilauea Avenue; 5. 2650 40' 242.00 feet along Lot 2 of Waiakea Homestead House Lots,Block 401 and the remainder of Grant 9507 to Joaquin Zacheus.Jeremiah; 6, 1710 05' 131.06 feet along the remainder of Grant 9507 to Joaquin Zacheus Jeremiah; 7. 265° 40' 224.45 feet along Lot 5-13 and 5-A; 8. 3550 40' 246.52 feet along Kekela Street to the point of ¢ beginning and containing an area of 88,317 f Sq. Ft. All as shown on the map attached hereto,marked Exhibit "A"and by reference made part hereof. j SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 25-2-44,Hawaii County Code 1983 (2005 Edition),the County Council finds the following conditions are: I (1) Necessary to prevent circumstances which may be adverse to the public 1 health, safety and welfare;or (2) Reasonably conceived to fulfill needs directly emanating from the land use ii proposed with respect to: (A) Protection of the public from the potentially deleterious effects of the proposed use,or (B) Fulfillment of the need for public service demands created by the proposed use. g E A. The applicant,successors or assigns shall be responsible for complying with all of j the stated conditions of approval. l I B. The required water commitment payment shall be submitted to the Department of 1 l i Water Supply in accordance with the "Water Commitment Guidelines Policy" E ` within 180 days from the effective date of this ordinance, f i C. Construction of the proposed improvements shall be completed within five (5) years from the effective date of this ordinance. This time period shall include securing Final Plan Approval from the Planning Director in accordance with the Zoning Code. Plans shall identify proposed structure(s),fire protection measures, access roadway,driveway and parking stalls. Landscaping shall be indicated on the plans for the purpose of mitigating any potential adverse noise or visual impacts to adjoining parcels. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of Planning Department's Rule No. 17(Landscaping Requirements), Chapter 25 (Zoning Code),Hawaii County Code. Landscaping i shall include rock walls or fences on the northern boundaries,as agreed upon between the applicant and owners of lands adjacent to such northern boundaries, as may be evidenced by any written agreements in existence as of the effective date of this rezoning. D. The applicant shall secure Final Consolidation Approval of parcels 31, 57, 68 and 69 within one year from the effective date of this ordinance. E. A Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR)shall be submitted to the Department of Transportation Highways Division,through the Hawaii District Office for review and shall be approved prior to the issuance of Final Plan Approval, A copy of the TIAR shall also be submitted to the Planning Director. F. No project access from Kekela Street shall be allowed except for delivery vehicles. Access for delivery vehicles may be allowed by the planning director,in I consultation with the director of public works,only if the use can be limited to -3- t 4 i � I _ delivery vehicles, excluding the general public. Access to the project site,if any, ( from Kekela Street shall conform to Chapter 22 (County Streets)of the Hawaii County Code. l I fG. Access to the project site from Puainako Street shall be limited to right-in,right- out movements only,and shall meet with the approval of the Department of Transportation. The applicant shall construct any improvements on Puainako Street as required by the Department of Transportation. These improvements shall include extending the existing paved and striped pedestrian walkway from i Kekela St.to Kilauea Ave. H. Notwithstanding Section 25-4-51(a)(3),the project shall provide a minimum of one parking space for each 160 square feet of gross floor area for commercial uses,or the requirements of Section 25-4-51,whichever is greater.The minimum off-street parking spaces for this project shall initially be 123 spaces., ' i r I. A11 development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site and shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared and the recommended drainage system shall be constructed, meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works,prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. I A Solid Waste Management Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Management for review and approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. • F K. All earthwork activity shall conform to Chapter 10,Erosion and Sedimentation Control,of the Hawaii County Code. t -4- t 4 � l L. Should any remains of historic sites,such as rock walls,terraces,platforms, marine shell concentrations or human burials be encountered,work in the immediate area shall cease and the Department of Land and Natural Resources— State Historic Preservation Division(DLNR-HPD)shall be immediately notified. ` t Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearance from the DLNR-SHPD when it finds that sufficient mitigation measures have been taken. s M. To ensure that the Goals and Policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan F are implemented,the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 11, `t Article 1,Hawaii County Code relating to Affordable Housing Policy. This k requirement shall be approved by the Administrator of the Office of Housing and Community Development prior to Final Plan Approval or Final Subdivision 1 p 3 Approval,whichever is applicable. N. If the applicant,successors,or assigns develop residential units on the subject } property,the applicant shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the r potential regional impacts of the property with respect to parks and recreation, fire,police,solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution jshall become due and payable prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval. The fair share contribution for each lot shall be based on the actual number of residential t t units developed. The fair share contribution in a form of cash,land,facilities or any combination thereof shall be determined by the County Council. The fair t share contribution may be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective date of this ordinance,based on the percentage change in the Honolulu i Consumer Price IndexCPI . The fair share contribution shall have a {H ) e maximum Icombined value of$6,653.40 per multiple family residential unit($10,368.57 per single family residential unit). The total amount shall be determined with the -5- actual number of units according to the calculation and payment provisions set l j forth in this condition. The fair share contribution per multiple family residential i unit(single family residential units)shall be allocated as follows: E 1. $3,281.93 per multiple family residential unit($4,999.91 per single family j residential unit)to the County to support park and recreational I, improvements and facilities; j 2. $103.73 per multiple family residential unit($241.20 per single family residential unit)to the County to support police facilities; � t 3. $319.07 per multiple family residential unit($476.39 per single family residential unit)to the County to support fire facilities; I 4. $142.21 per multiple family residential unit($208.57 per single family ! 1 residential unit)to the County to support solid waste facilities; and 5. $2,806.46 per multiple family residential unit($4,442.50 per single family residential unit)to the County to support road and traffic improvements. In lieu of paying the fair share contribution,the applicant may contribute land and/or construct improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation,fire, police,solid waste disposal facilities and roads within the region impacted by the proposed development,subject to the review and recommendation of the Planning Director,upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the County Council. f f s E -6- G t I fS 3 i i ( I I ' i i I i I � r O. Should the Council adopt an Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria I for imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees,conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees i Ordinance. P. The applicant shall comply with all applicable County, State and Federal laws, I rules,regulations and requirements. i ! Q. An annual progress report shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the anniversary date of enactment of the ordinance. The report shall include,but not be limited to,the status of the development and the extent to which the conditions I of approval have been satisfied. This condition shall remain in effect until all of, the conditions of approval have been satisfied and the Planning Director acknowledges that further reports are not required. j R. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within,the ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: 1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been I foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant,successors or assigns, ► and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. I I � } 2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan I or Zoning Code. I r I i 3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of the change of zone. 3 I -7- a t s j, I i i 4. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance(i.e.,a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for up to one additional year). i 1 5. If the applicant should require an additional extension of time,the i Planning Director shall submit the applicant's request to the County Council for appropriate action. Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely 34 fashion,the Planning Director may initiate rezoning of the subject area to its original or more appropriate designation. t SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid such i invalidity shall not affect the other parts of this ordinance. i i SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. i i ' INTRODUCED BY: I ; € COUNCIL MEMBER,COUNTY OF HAWAII 1 � I Kona ,Hawai`i Date of Introduction: June 1, 2007 Date of 1"Reading: June 1, 2007 } Date of 2nd Reading: July 25, 2007 Effective Date: August 14, 2007 I '• I 3 RirfERLyCE: Comm. 255,x6 1 ¢ � 1 1 1 � i i J § 1 ` RS40 RS 10 R !0 KMIOptF ST RS 10 r RS-10 RS-10 -f0 10 t 10 RS 10 Mfg 7, 89, S 9, 54. 5E CN-i0 10 " A cw-fo 10 RS-10RS 10 R f0 } min SINGLf:-FA�111Y :%'`F�is RESIDENTIN.,-10 000 SQ.FT.F&101 RS• 0 TO NEIGH8MOOD COMMERCiAL-40 000 M FT.tCN 10 .s'::,: :•':s 88,317 S4 FT, W RS C to CN-lo RS-10 &'2 RS-10 RS-10 CO-20 {r OPEN � fl[ I RS-10z CG620 20 41t or x OPEN .41t f 10 Pft IAAA ST CG-20 �N fo C420 360 180 0 360 720 1080 -1440 1 Feet AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CGDE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-33 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP) ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2005 EDITION), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-10,000 SQ. FT. (RS-10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL-40,000 SQ. FT. (CN-40) AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF HAWAII K:2-2-039:031,057,068 069 Date:December 27 2006 EXHIBIT"A" (Ginger Patch,DP,LLC:1214) i I ! f OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK County of Hawaii Kona, Hawaii Draft 2) Introduced By: Brenda Ford RQLL CALL VOTE Date Introduced: June 1, 2007 AYES'' ''NOES ABS EX First Reading: June 1, 2007 Ford X Published: June 9, 2007 Higa }{ Hoffmann X REMARKS: Ikeda X June 20, 2007 — Amended to Draft 3 Jacobson X j and held over pursuant to Council Naeole X Rule 25 (e) ; July 10, 2007 — Postponed Pilago X to July 25, 2007 Council Meeting Yagong X i i Yoshimoto X Second Reading: July 25, 2007 7 1 1 0 (Draft 3) To Mayor: August 2, 2007 ROLL CALL VOTE Returned: August 14, 2007 AYES NOES ABS EX Effective: August 14, 2007 Ford g Published: August 24, 2007 Higa X Hoffinann X i REMARKS: Ikeda X Jacobson X Naeole X Pilago X Yagong X Yoshimoto X 5 4 0 0 1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing BILL was adopted b the County Council published as indicated above. APPROVED AS TO FO AND LEGALITY: AD COUN r DEPU CORPORATION CO SEL COUNTY OF HAWAI'I COUNTT.f"LL*K Date Bill No.: 74 (Draft 3) pprov Disapproved this (�" day Reference: C-255.6/PC-31 1Orduj to S 20 0 No.: 07 :.0.5 OR, CO U T OF HAWAI`I € 1. i f Ordinances Numbered 07-105,07-106,07-107,07-108,& 07-109 I hereby certify that the following Ordinances passed second and final reading at the meeting of j the County Council on July 25,2007,by vote,as listed below: 1 ' f Ordinance 07-105(Bill 74,Draft 3):An Ordinance Amending Section 25-8-33 (City of Hilo Zone Map),Article 8,Chapter 25(Zoning Code)of the Hawaii County Code 1983 (2005 Edition),by Changing the District Classification from Single-Family Residential— 10,000 Square Feet(RS-10)to Neighborhood Commercial—40,000 Square Feet(CN40)at Waiakea,South Hilo,Hawaii,Covered by Tax Map Key 2-2-39:31,57,68 and 69. AYES: Council Members Higa,Ikeda,Naeole,Yagong,and Yoshimoto—5;NOES:Council Members Ford,Jacobson, Pilago,and Chair Hoffmann—4;ABSENT:None;EXCUSED:None. Ordinance 07-106(Bill 82,Draft 3):An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No.02-21, which Amended Ordinance No.98-87,which Amended Ordinance No.90-008,and which Reclassified Lands from Agricultural—20 Acre(A-20a)to Agricultural—3 Acre(A-3a)at Kahua I",North Kohala,Hawaii,Covered by Tax Map Key 5-9-007:007. AYES:Council Members Ford,Higa, Ikeda,Jacobson,Naeole,Pilago,Yagong,Yoshimoto,and Chairman Hoffmann—9;NOES: None;ABSENT:None;EXCUSED:None. Ordinance 07-107(Bill 106,Draft 4):An Ordinance Amending Chapter 19,Article 1 (Administration), Section 19-2,and Article 7(Tax Maps;Valuations),Section 19-53,of the Hawaii County Code 1983(2005 Edition),as Amended,Relating to Affordable Rental Housing L Classification. AYES: Council Members Ford,Higa,Ikeda,Jacobson,Naeole,Pilago,Yagong, Yoshimoto,and Chairman Hoffmann—9;NOES:None;ABSENT:None;EXCUSED:None. Ordinance 07-108(Bill! 110):An Ordinance Amending Section 25-8-33 (City of Hilo Zone Map),Article 8,Chapter 25(Zoning Code)of the Hawaii County Code 1983(2005 Edition),by 1 Changing the District Classification from Agricultural 1-Acre(A-la)to Neighborhood x Commercial—20,000 Square Feet(CN-20)at Ponahawai,South Hilo,Hawaii,Covered by Tax Map Key 2-3-037:011. AYES:Council Members Ford,Higa,Ikeda,Jacobson,Naeole,Pilago, Yagong,Yoshimoto,and Chairman Hoffmann—9;NOES:None;ABSENT:None;EXCUSED: None. Ordinance 07-109(Bill 115):An Ordinance Amending Chapter l 1 (Housing Code)of the Hawaii County Code 1983(1995 Edition),as Amended by Ordinance 05-23,by Amending I Sections H-3 (5)to Require Affordable Units to be the Primary Residence of a Buyer or Renter and H-5 (C)to Ensure that Developers Maintain Affordability and Compliance with Resale s Restrictions. AYES:Council Members Ford,Higa,Ikeda,Jacobson,Naeole,Pilago,Yagong, Yoshimoto,and Chairman Hoffmann-9;NOES:None;ABSENT:None; E USED:None. I Casey Zqhdan County Clerk ; (Hawai`i Tribune-Herald—August 24,2007) (West Hawaii Today—August 24,2007) Note: The original Digest/Affidavit is attached to Ordinance No. 07-105. i Serving the Interests of the People of our Island Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employrr 3 I ZONING § 25-5-98 (c) Plan approval shall be required for all new structures and additions to existing structures in the V district, except for construction of one single-family dwelling and any accessory buildings per lot. (d) Exceptions to the regulations for the V district regarding heights, building site areas, building site average widths and yards, may be approved by the commission within a planned unit development. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2005, ord 05-155, sec 9; am 2015, ord 15-33, sec 4.) Division 10. CN, Neighborhood Commercial Districts. Section 25-5-100. Purpose and applicability. The CN (neighborhood commercial) district applies to strategically located centers suitable for commercial activities which shall be of such size and shape as will accommodate a compact shopping center which supplies goods and services to a residential or working population on a frequent need or convenience basis. This district is distinguished from a central commercial district which provides general business and broad services to a city or region. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-101. Designation of CN districts. Each CN (neighborhood commercial) district shall be designated by the symbol "CN" followed by a number which indicates the minimum land area, in thousands of square feet, required for each building site. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-102. Permitted uses. (a) The following uses shall be permitted in the CN district: (1) Adult day care homes. (2) Automobile service stations. (3) Bed and breakfast establishments, as permitted under section 25-4-7. (4) Boarding facilities, rooming, or lodging houses, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (5) Business services. (6) Cemeteries and mausoleums, as permitted under chapter 6, article 1 of this Code. (7) Churches, temples and synagogues. (8) Community buildings, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (9) Convenience stores. (10) Crematoriums, funeral homes, funeral services, and mortuaries. (11) Crop production. (12) Day care centers. 25-101 Planning Dept. Exhibit_ § 25-5-102 HAWAII COUNTY CODE (13) Dwellings, double-family or duplex, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (14) Dwellings, multiple-family, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (15) Dwellings, single-family. (16) Family child care homes. (17) Farmers markets. When the vending activity in a farmers market involves more than just the sale of local fresh and/or raw produce, plant life, fish and local homegrown and homemade products for more than two days a week, the director, at the time of plan approval, shall restrict the hours of use, maintenance and operations and may require improvements as determined appropriate to ensure its compatibility with the existing character of the surrounding area. (18) Financial institutions. (19) Group living facilities. (20) Home occupations, as permitted under section 25-4-13. (21) Medical clinics. (22) Meeting facilities. (23) Model homes, as permitted under section 25-4-8. (24) Museums. (25) Neighborhood parks, playgrounds, tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar neighborhood recreational areas and uses. (26) Offices. (27) Personal services. (28) Photography studios. (29) Public uses and structures, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (30) Repair establishments, minor. (31) Restaurants. (32) Retail establishments. (33) Schools. (34) Telecommunication antennas, as permitted under section 25-4-12. (35) Theaters. (36) Utility substations as permitted under Section 25-4-11. (b) Buildings and uses normally considered directly accessory to the uses permitted in this section shall also be permitted in the CN district. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2012, ord 12-28, sec 12.) Section 25-5-103. Height limit. The height limit in the CN district shall be forty feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) 25-102 ZONING § 25-5-104 Section 25-5-104. Minimum building site area. The minimum building site area in the CN district shall be seven thousand five hundred square feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-105. Minimum building site average width. Each building site in the CN district shall have a minimum average width of sixty feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-106. Minimum yards. The minimum yards in the CN district shall be as follows: (1) Front and rear yards, fifteen feet; and (2) Side yards, none, except where the adjoining building site is in an RS, RD, RM, RCX or V district. Where the side yard adjoins the side yard of a building site in an RS, RD, RM, RCX or V district, there shall be a side yard which conforms to the side yard requirements for dwelling use of the adjoining district. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-107. Landscaping of yards. (a) All front yards in the CN district shall be landscaped, except for necessary access drives and walkways, and except for the construction of one single-family dwelling and accessory buildings per lot. (b) Where any required side or rear yard in the CN district adjoins a building site in an RS, RD, RM or RCX district, the side or rear yard shall be landscaped with a screening hedge not less than forty-two inches in height, within five feet of the property line, except for necessary drives and walkways, and except for the construction of one single-family dwelling and accessory buildings per lot. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2005, ord 05-155, sec 10.) Section 25-5-108. Other regulations. (a) In conjunction with plan approval, the director may require the construction of a continuous eave overhanging the front property line in the CN district. The director may also require that the eave be of similar height and design in any one block of the CN district. (b) Plan approval shall be required for all new structures and additions to existing structures in the CN district, except for construction of one single-family dwelling and any accessory buildings per lot. 25-103 § 25-5-108 HAWAII COUNTY CODE (c) Exceptions to the regulations for the CN district regarding heights, building site areas, building site average widths and yards, may be approved by the commission within a planned unit development. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2005, ord 05-155, sec 11; am 2015, ord 15-33, sec 4.) Division 11. CG, General Commercial Districts. Section 25-5-110. Purpose and applicability. (a) The CG (general commercial) district applies to an area suitable for commercial uses and services on a broad basis to serve as the central shopping or principal downtown area for a city or a region. (b) No CG district shall be established until there is a demonstrated need for such action and no two CG districts shall be established in such relationship to each other that they cannot act as one center and yet are too close together to serve two distinct regions. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-111. Designation of CG districts. Each CG (general commercial) district shall be designated by the symbol"CG" followed by a number which indicates the minimum land area, in thousands of square feet, required for each building site. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-112. Permitted uses. (a) The following uses shall be permitted uses in the CG district: (1) Adult day care homes. (2) Amusement and recreation facilities, indoor. (3) Art galleries, museums. (4) Art studios. (5) Automobile service stations. (6) Automobile sales and rentals. (7) Bars, nightclubs and cabarets. (8) Bed and breakfast establishments, as permitted under section 25-4-7. (9) Boarding facilities, rooming, or lodging houses, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (10) Broadcasting stations. (11) Business services. (12) Car washing, provided that if it is mechanized, sound attenuated structures or sound attenuated walls shall be erected and maintained on the property lines. (13) Catering establishments. (14) Cemeteries and mausoleums, as permitted under chapter 6, article 1 of this Code. 25-104 I � 1 LINDA LINGLE BRENNON T.MORIOKA GOVERNOR DIRECTOR ; 208 RPR < t 1 6 f o M ? ,y 8 t ` Deputy Directors MICHAEL D.FORMBY it 4r, d FRANCIS PAUL KEENO ^�F,TMENT � �p, as BRIAN H.SEKIGUCHI UOUINT`Y OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII IN REPLY REFER TO: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET HWY-PS HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813-5097 2.7557 April 14, 2008 Mr. Jon Gomes Jon Gomes &Associates LLC Real Estate Development 900 Alewa Drive Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Dear Mr. Gomes: I Subject: Ginger Patch DP, LLC,Request for Direct Access to Puainako Street Hawaii, South Hilo,TMK: (3) 2-2-039:57, 68 and 69 Pursuant to the County of Hawaii, Change of Zone Application (REZ 06-000052), Ordinance No. 07-105, access to the subject Ginger Patch project site from Kekela Street is I restricted to delivery vehicles only and project access to Puainako Street is limited to right-turn in and right-turn out movements only. Since the County of Hawaii has prohibited vehicular access to the project site from Kekela Street and pursuant to your discussions on August 21, 2007 with Highways Division staff, a driveway access from your proposed Ginger Patch 1 development onto Puainako Street may be permitted subject to several conditions. The K following is offered as clarification of these conditions: x 1. The Applicant shall dedicate to the State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation (HDOT) approximately 10-feet of additional right-of-way along the western property boundary and along the northeasterly curb return at the intersection of Kilauea Avenue and Puainako Street. The applicant shall also dedicate additional right-of-way,varying between 0 to 10 feet, along the southerly property line to provide a minimum 70-foot road right-of-way as measured from the Puainako Street centerline. Dedication of such property to HDOT shall be in fee simple interest, free and clear of liens and encumbrances, excepting those imposed by government authorities. This additional road right-of-way is needed to accommodate the proposed roadway cross-section to be constructed as a part of the phased implementation of the Puainako Street realignment and improvement project between Komohana Street and Kanoelehua Avenue. F Planning Dept. 040338 Exhibit_. �' ._ i t Mr. Jon Gomes HWy-PS Page 2 2.7557 r � i i C E Please contact our Highways Division, Right-of-Way Branch at(808) 692-7325 to coordinate the exact right-of-way requirements and to complete the dedication of this additional right-of-way. 2. Access from the project site to Kilauea Street, as shown on your February 21, 2008 site improvement plan, should be removed. This proposed project driveway will negatively impact the Kilauea Avenue/Puainako Street intersection and would be a safety concern due to its proximity to the Puainako Street westbound right-turn lane to northbound Kilauea Avenue. 3. Thea applicant shall improve Kekela Street to provide shared - pp p p a s a ed through/left turn lane and t dedicated right-turn lane on the southbound approach at the Puainako Street/Kekela Street intersection. The southbound approach of Kekela Street shall be properly improved and striped to provide for the storage of a minimum of two (2)vehicles. i i� 4. Vehicular access along Puainako Street between Kekela Street and Kilauea Avenue shall be restricted to a single driveway where movements shall be limited to right-turns into and out from the project site. This driveway access shall only serve the proposed 2.02-acre project site at its currently proposed use and density. Modifications to the proposed project, including connection of this project site to adjoining land areas and/or developments that increase the potential traffic demand at this driveway access shall be prohibited. 5. In the interim, until Puainako Street is widened to its planned improved configuration,the applicant shall construct a channelized driveway access to the project site along with deceleration and acceleration auxiliary lanes into the project site on Puainako Street. The channelized driveway access shall include raised curbs to prevent vehicles from turning left into and out from the project driveway but allows proper access to the site by emergency j vehicles. This channelized driveway access must also be properly designed and•constructed to accommodate pedestrian passage, compliant with ADA requirements. Appropriate i regulatory signs and striping that restrict movements to right-turns into and out from the project driveway shall also be provided by the Applicant. 4". The Applicant is hereby advised that the interim project driveway will be reconfigured with the future Puainako Street improvement project. The interim driveway channelization and the auxiliary lanes will be removed to accommodate the future Puainako Street roadway cross section. A raised center median on Puainako Street will prevent left-turn movements into and out from the project site and additional restrictions may be implemented to facilitate safe traffic operations. s` 1 Mr. Jon Gomes HWY-PS Page 3 2.7557 i 6. The Applicant shall construct appropriate asphalt shoulder and ADA improvements along Puainako Street and along the northeasterly curb return of the Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue intersection. 7. On-site parking and vehicle circulation shall be designed to minimize the potential for project-generated traffic backing up onto Puainako Street creating congestion. A"throat" area should be created on-site at the driveway entrance by restricting parking along the P driveway entrance aisle and restricting the intersection of cross circulation aisle in close proximity to the driveway entrance. Vehicles parking and/or waiting for parking create congestion that can result in vehicles backing onto the adjoining roadway. Similarly, the intersection of parking aisles in close proximity to the driveway entrance results in turning movement conflicts and congestion. 8. A written request for access must be submitted to the Highways Right-of-Way Branch. A grant of access document, which includes a metes and bounds survey, must also be submitted to the Right-of-Way Branch and recorded at the Bureau of Conveyances. Conveyance, f including document preparation and recordation at the Bureau of Conveyances, must be at no ' cost to the State and must be completed before final plan approval. 9. A permit to construct any improvements within the State highway right-of-way is required. Plans for such construction must be submitted along with a permit application to HDOT, Highways Division, Hawaii District office for review and approval. All improvements within the State's right-of-way must meet applicable federal and state standards and requirements and must be completed at no cost to the State. The Applicant is also advised t that no additional storm water may be discharged into the State Highway right-of-way, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit is required for construction activity disturbing one(1) or more acres of total land, and construction plans must include storm water post construction Best Management Practices (BMP's). 10. If the conveyance of highway property rights, including, but not limited to easement/use and occupancies for utility connections, is required, such rights may need to be appraised for their & fair market value and consideration paid to the DOT. r 11. The Applicant is also hereby advised that Chapter 343, of the Hawaii Revised Statues(HRS) requires that the appropriate lead governmental agency has made the necessary e environmental finding before a permit to work within the State right-of-way may be issued. 1 Please revise the project site plan to incorporate the conditions identified above and resubmit it for our review and approval. The revised site plan should properly identify all design dimensions to facilitate expedited review and approval. P i t f s I . Mr. Jon Gomes HWY-PS Page 4 2.7557 If you have any questions,please contact Ken Tatsuguchi,Engineering Program Manager, Highways Division, at 587-1830. Ve tru ours, i i BRENNON T.MORIOKA,Ph.D.,P.E. Director of Transportation c: Councilmember Pete Hoffman and Members,Hawaii County Council Christopher Yuen-Director, Hawaii Planning Department Norman Hayashi - Planner, Hawaii Planning Department Bruce McClure - Director, Hawaii Department of Public Works Steven S.C. Lum- Attorney, Carlsmith Ball LLP i I I j 1{ I I F i 7� 7 III E I, F i 1 I i E I i I I 1 t i i 1 {I Cay, Christian .e From: Thirugnanam, Jeyan <jeyan.thirugnanam@hawaii.gov> - , Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 8:49 AM Y Y � To: Kay, Christian Cc: Iwasa, Russell Subject: Re: AutoZone(Formerly Ginger Patch) Rezone Amendment Hi Christian, Since HDOT plans to realign and improve Puainako Street between Komohana Street and Kanoelbhua Avenue in the future, condition number 1 in HDOT's April 14, 2008 letter relating to ROW dedication should remain. Furthermore, all other conditions in the 2008 letter are applicable. If the applicant wishes to delete any of the conditions, they should discuss the matter with HDOT (contact Jeyan Thirugnanam, 587-6336). Please call me if you have any questions. Best, Jeyan From:Thirugnanam,Jeyan Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 1:16:00 PM To: Christian.Kay@hawaiicounty.gov Cc:Tatsuguchi, Ken Subject: Re: AutoZone (Formerly Ginger Patch) Rezone Amendment Hi Christian, Thank you for checking with us. We don't have a response yet but will get back to you by Tuesday next week after some research. Best, Jeyan Thirugnanam 587-6336 From: Tatsuguchi, Ken Sent:Thursday, May 9, 2019 11:22:12 AM To:Thirugnanam,Jeyan Cc: Ho,Tracy Subject: FW: AutoZone (Formerly Ginger Patch) Rezone Amendment Ken K. Tatsuguchi,P.E. Planning Program Engineer Hawaii DOT,Highways Planning Branch Planning Dept. 1 25 325 f Exhibit--5— 869 Punchbowl St, Rm 309 Honolulu, Hl 96813-5097 Phone: 808-587-1830 This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review,use,disclosure or distribution by unintended recipients is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,please destroy all copies of the original e-mail message and contact the sender by e-mail reply. Thank you. From: Kay, Christian <Christian.Kay@hawaiicounty.gov> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 11:20 AM To:Tatsuguchi, Ken <ken.tatsuguchi@hawaii.gov> Cc: Darrow,Jeff<Jeff.Darrow@hawaiicounty.gov>;Jackson, Maija <Maija.Jackson@hawaiicounty.gov>; Smith, Donald L <donald.l.smith@hawaii.gov> Subject:AutoZone (Formerly Ginger Patch) Rezone Amendment Aloha Ken, I'm working on an amendment request to Change of Zone Ordinance 07 105 (REZ 06-000052), which changed the zoning from a Single Family Residential-10,000 square feet (RS-10) to a Neighborhood Commercial-40,000 square feet(CN-40) zoning district to develop two pads of commercial real estate or business center ranging in size from 9,600 to 10,132 square feet and 130 parking stalls.According to the current ordinance, access to the subject Ginger Patch project site from Kekela Street is restricted to delivery vehicles only and project access to Puainako Street is limited to right-tum in and right-tum out movements only. The applicant (now AutoZone) is requesting several amendments to Conditions of the Ordinance, including a 5-year time extension to complete construction and a request to allow for full-turn access to the project site from Puainako street & a request to allow for a second full driveway access from Kekela Street. In support of this request, the applicant conducted an updated TZAR, which DOT reviewed and according to your December 12, 2018 letter(attached) addresses concerns of the HDOT-HWY branch and requires the applicant to implement TIAR recommendations as agreed upon with HDOT. As I was researching the rezone file, I came upon a letter from DOT to then Developer Jon Gomes, dated April 4, 2018 (attached) indicating access to the project from Puainako Street could be permitted subject to 11 conditions. Of particular interest is Condition No. 1 requiring the applicant to dedicate additional ROW to DOT, "...needed to accommodate the proposed roadway cross section to be constructed as part of the a part of the phased implementation of the Puainako Street realignment and improvement project between Komohona Street and Kanoelehuo Avenue."A review of our records indicates no such ROW subdivision/dedication has occurred. The approved TIAR references the widening project, but is silent on the ROW dedication requirement, recommending that the applicant pay their fair share toward the project instead. Furthermore,the applicant's current site plan (attached) takes its building/improvements setbacks from the current property line that does not appear to incorporate the additional ROW required in the 2008 letter. I forwarded this letter to the applicant and they responded as follows: The HDOT's April 14, 2008 comments were based on a larger scale project. See Exhibit C to the Planning Department's 12/19/06 background report. As such, those comments either don't apply to AutoZone's current scope of development, were addressed by HDOT's in its approval of the Final TIAR with the Applicant's agreement to implement mitigative conditions, and/or the Applicant will comply with all requirements of the HDOT. Further, Condition G as originally imposed and our proposed amendment still incorporates the requirements imposed and approved by HDOT: G. Access to the project site from Puainako Street shall be imited to r4ght in, r4ght eut n4evefflents GR4L, .Jpermitted, provided the applicant: (1)installs 2 appropriate warning signage and special notification to drivers in the area during the first two weeks after the project is opened for business (2)re-stripes Puainako Street to remove the existing painted median and to provide an eastbound left-turn pocket to serve the proposed Project (3)the Department of Transportation Highways Division Hawaii District Engineer may at his sole discretion require the applicant at its sole cost to mitigate any operational or safety issues associated with the Puainako Street/project driveway operations and (4)construct any improvements on Puainako Street as required by the Department of Transportation. These improvements shall include extending the existing paved and striped pedestrian walkway from Kekela Street to Kilauea Ave. In order to appropriately Condition our rezone amendment, I need to know,what if any of the conditions articulated in your 2008 letter still apply to access to this project area. At a minimum tI want to ensure that DOT gets the ROW it needs to facilitate the Puainako Street widening project. Please respond as soon as you can as I need to finalize the reports for Planning Commission by the end of next weei. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mahalo, Christian Christian Kay, Planner County of Hawaii Planning Department Aupuni Center, 101 Pauahi Street, Suite No. 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Phone: (808) 961-8136 Fax: (808) 961-8742 Email: christian.kay@hawaiicounty.gov 3 CARLSMITH BALLP��Y �� �, ? :,,a ,T,II A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 wAIANUENuE AVENUE t-M NTl' OF HAWI V P.O.Box 686 • i i,,nQ HILO,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAx808.935.7975 ` W W W.CARCSMI`I'H.COM ' p ;;=•L 3: iJ SLIMcCARLSMITH.COM May 22, 2019 VIA HAND-DELIVERY Michael Yee Planning Director Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attention: Christian Kay RE: Supplemental Request to Time Extension Request (Condition C) and Amendment to Conditions D, E, F, H and N of Rezoning Ordinance No. 07-105 Successor Applicant: AutoZone Parts, Inc. a Nevada corporation TMK No.: (3) 2-2-039:031 ("Property") Dear Mr. Yee: By letter dated October 18, 2018, Applicant AutoZone Parts, Inc. ("Applicant" or "AutoZone"), the developer of the proposed AutoZone Store on the above-referenced Property ("the proposed Project") submitted its request for a time extension to Condition C and amendment to Conditions D, E, F,H and N (collectively "the amendment request") of Rezoning Ordinance No. 07-105 ("Ord. 07-105"). The Applicant prepared and submitted a draft Traffic Impact Analysis Report ("TIAR") with its October 18, 2018 amendment request. Over several months, the Applicant's consultant Fehr and Peers met with the State Department of Transpiration ("HDOT") to address concerns raised in its January 16, 2018 comment letter. HDOT approved the Final TIAR dated July 10, 2018 by letter dated December 12, 2018. Recently, the Applicant received comments from KTA Super Stores, expressing concern for their Puainako Store patrons who were seeking to turn left onto Puainako Street from the mauka exit of their parking lot. Based upon these comments, the Applicant voluntarily agreed that the main access driveway leading into AutoZone's parking lot from Puainako Street would be limited to I Original applicant was Ginger Patch DP,LLC. a a tl ® U t. HfLO KONA MAUI Los ANGELES Exhibit 125 508 Michael Yee May 22, 2019 Page 2 a right-in/right out ("RIRO") driveway. An updated TZAR is attached to reflect this change. Attached is a revised Site Plan to reflect the limited RIRO access from Puainako Street. Due to this change the Applicant withdraws its request to amend Condition G in Ord. 07-105 On behalf of AutoZone Parts, Inc., we respectfully request the County of Hawaii's favorable approval of the Time Extension Request (Condition C), and Amendment to Conditions D, E, F,H and N of Rezoning Ord. No. 07-105, as further outlined in the Applicant's October 18, 2018 submittal. Please feel free to contact me should you require any additional information, or if you have any questions regarding this submittal. Very truly yours, WSteven S.C. Lim SSL/KYL Enclosures xc w/enclosures: Client H. Shiroma, Inc. 4812-4745-7431.1 911213AV Y3f1YIDI TRUE NORTH �,I IEfc FEt q I qq I l I T l—'--- p IEIi 1 I I 1 1 I ;?i O 1 � C i I eix I� I R I I TY ® vFn - o Z LA i 1 L ,ter KEEP r _ {► I i I I II 1 i i i I . I i I I I I I i 1 I I I a i I 1 I I I I I I I rip 1 1 I 1 I I _ I a F P e 4 S wTc otis R =:£Nott AUTOZONE I, o T a STORE No.5204 SITE PLAN N Mn Wwa aw.fD1 Mti Iw.��NSSMTt "ITf 1 F E H R PEERS Y t May 20, 2019 Prepared for AutoZone - _— SD16-0211 X-5,1 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER No. 14278 F�udrxAo FINAL REPORT Transportation Impact Analysis for the AutoZone Development in Hilo Prepared for: k AutoZone May 20, 2019 SD16-0211 FE EERS F Aut�aZone"fn ffzfo,.N1-Finat7ei Araci(yas Fport flay 2�7,2a?1 J r 1 .0 I This report presents the results of the transportation impact analysis report (TZAR) for the proposed AutoZone development in the community of Hilo on the island of Hawaii. The proposed project is an 8,941- square foot auto retail store located on Puainako Street between Kekela Street and Kilauea Avenue. The proposed project would provide access via: 1) a right-turn in and out only driveway on Puainako Street (opposite the existing western KTA driveway), and 2) a full access driveway on Kekela Street. The impacts of the proposed project to the surrounding transportation system were evaluated following guidelines established by the County of Hawaii and the Hawaii Department of Transportation — Highways Division (HDOT). The operations of three public street intersections were evaluated during the weekday morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak hours for Existing (2016), Year 2021, Year 2026, and Year 2036 conditions without and with the project. Project-generated trips were estimated using vehicle trip rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) for auto retail stores. The proposed project is estimated to generate 574 daily vehicle trips, including 20 AM peak hour (15 inbound/5 outbound), and 56 in the PM peak hour (27 inbound/29 outbound). It is important to note that the proposed project only generates six(6)trips above the threshold for which a comprehensive TZAR is required according to draft County of Hawaii TIAR guidelines. The addition of project trips is expected to slightly degrade or exacerbate undesirable operations at the Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway(Intersection 2) under Year 2021, 2026, and 2036 Plus Project conditions,and the Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue (Intersection 1) under Year 2036 Plus Project Conditions,which results in two significant intersection impacts. The traffic improvements required to mitigate potential impacts of the proposed project are: Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping_Center East Driveway — Restripe southbound Kekela Street to provide a left/through large and a separate right-turn lane The existing southbound lane on Kekela Street is approximately 24 feet wide,which is ample width to provide two 12-foot lanes for 285 feet along the entire length of the project site frontage. All of the project trips traveling southbound on Kekela Street are turning left to go eastbound on Puainako Street. The southbound left-turn movement experiences the highest delay at this intersection, as it is difficult to find gaps in traffic on Puainako Street for both directions. Providing a separate left-turn/through lane on southbound Puainako Street would improve operations at that intersection since the right-turn movement is not impeded by a queue waiting to turn left. While 5 1t f s�Dlae, r Nato;, #tfzn&`V spar IItcon 3n cfc y3 s�sR port yr 1 this improvement would not improve operations for the southbound left-turns or through movements to LOS D or better, it would minimize disruption to the southbound right-turn,which is the predominant movement at this approach, and would maintain traffic flow. Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue — Pay fair-share towards Puainako Street Extension and Widening Project To mitigate this impact, additional capacity would have to be provided at this intersection in the form of additional through or turn lanes.As discussed in the"Future Year Conditions" section,the Puainako Street Extension and Widening Project is a project identified in HDOT's Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Fiscal Year 2015 to 2018. The project would extend Puainako Street to Saddle Road and widen the existing two-lane roadway to four lanes from Komohana to Kilauea Avenue. The widening on Puainako Street would provide additional capacity to serve the future traffic demand on the corridor, and the project contributes 1%to the total peak hour traffic at the intersection. At the project's proposed Puainako Street driveway opposite the western KTA center driveway, the median on Puainako Street will be re-striped to prohibit left turns into and out of the AutoZone site. Channelized lanes will be striped to maintain full access for vehicles turning into and out of the KTA property.The detailed design of this striping configuration will be subject to approval by HDOT.. r' The proposed project is not expected to substantially increase the walking, biking, or transit demand to a level where it could not be accommodated by existing or planned facilities. The project is also not expected to conflict with any existing facilities and planned pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements. r 6 A�rt� one }f tJ at Tracsportivt� rnacttnc�Yyst Rpc� f 7- s 2.0 INTRODUCTION This transportation impact analysis report (TZAR) presents the results of the study conducted by Fehr & Peers for a new auto parts retail store operated by AutoZone in Hilo on the island of Hawaii. The purpose of this analysis is to identify the impacts of the proposed project on the surrounding transportation system. The TIAR includes a description of the assumptions and methods used to conduct the study, as well as a discussion of the results. This TZAR was conducted in accordance with guidelines and standards of the affected agencies. Figure 1 illustrates the study area,and Figure 2 illustrates proposed site plan. 2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed AutoZone is located in the northwest corner of the Puainako Street and Kekela Street intersection. The site is generally bounded by Puainako Street to the south,Kekela Street to the east,Kilauea Avenue to the west, and residential units to the north. The proposed project would develop an 8,941- square foot(s.f.) auto parts retail store operated by AutoZone. The project applicant proposes to provide one right-turn only driveway on Puainako Street and one full-access driveway on Kekela Street. 7 1l�xfo bh#C t—P fli tr�a1 rr s o i`Qra I pa raly�cs 'ep rt 2ILf319 t 4,2 i^. R !J F.`_F TRIP D IST 9{..IJIT101"l AND 9- SSIG I S'M LNT The distribution of traffic generated by the project onto the roadway system was based on: ® Existing traffic volumes ® The location of complementary land uses (e.g. residential neighborhoods) ® Surrounding population densities ® Locations of other similar land uses Based on these factors,the vehicle trips distribution of the project-generated traffic is estimated to be: ® 30%to/from the West along W Puainako Street ® 20%to/from the North along Kilauea Avenue ® 10%to/from the South along Kilauea Avenue ® 15%to/from the North along Kanoelehua Avenue ® 15%to/from the South along Kanoelehua Avenue ® 10%to/from the East along E Puainako Street Figure 5 illustrates the project trip distribution pattern described above. Using the estimated trip generation and the distribution patterns discussed, the traffic generated by the proposed project was assigned to the study intersections based on the characteristics of the streets within the study area, anticipated congestion, and directness of route. Figure 6 shows the assignment of trips generated by the proposed project. It should be noted that this assignment assumes that only right-turn in and out access would be provided at the Puainako Street driveway. 25 © s�2� 0172(ll'. I�D Trcrnsportatlon Impac s � May20 201Az�ly epi °0 ASSESSMENT OF SITE ACCESS ®N- L SITE VEHICLE CIRCULATION AND PARKING The following section provides a summary of site access, on-site circulation, and parking for AutoZone. p g the proposed . 1 S)TE A(--(-E-5 EVAILUATION The site plan, as provided by the project applicant and illustrated in Figure 2, shows the vehicular ess would be provided via a new driveway on Puainako Street and a second driveway on Kekela Ste, ith the building located on the northwest corner of the site. A "Keep Clear" designation is recommended with the to be striped in both directions on Puainako Street at Kekela Street to ensure that existing and future roect traffic at this intersection is not impeded b p � " ko Street. vehicles to block the intersection, and will alsokeep the aKek la Streetsiwill minimize the potential for movements into and out of the KTA driveway when queues form on Puainako Streettion clear for turning Implementation of the project site driveway on Puainako Street opposite the western KT ay require re-striping of Puainako Street to prohibit left-turns into and out of the site. As shown on Figure re 21 this re-striping will include modification of the existing striped median and provision of channelizedg for the westbound left turn movement into the KTA site and for a refuge lane to accommodate nor hlanes left-turn movement out of the site(towards westbound Puainako Street). To reduce the number fconf bound points on Puainako Street, HDOT has requested that no other driveway accesses will be permitted aloing the north side of the street between Kekela Street and Kilauea Avenue. This will require elimination of any existing driveway access easements on the street, and it will require shared access from thero osed driveway to any adjacent properties developed in the future. p p Overall, each project site driveway is anticipated to serve relatively low traffic volumes durin hours, and no operational issues are anticipated as Ion y the peak 9 as appropriate signage and striping is installed. 52 utoanen H�io,t!J al Trans artatian 1Fnpnc Analysis Repan P iia 2t7 2079° f�,sl C;)i` -`IiI GI;( ULA .IC`N The site would provide 57 right angle parking stalls along the perimeter of the building and along the Puainako Street and Kekela Street frontages. Of the 57 stalls,three are designated as ADA accessible stalls and are located near the southeast corner of the building at the main entrance. The internal roadways providing access to the parking spaces will allow for two-way travel and no dead- end aisles are proposed. On-site parking operations are not expected to cause any queuing issues at the intersection of the site driveway and the adjacent public street. near the A loading zone for delivery trucks is provided north of the project building near the Kekela Street driveway. Given the location of the loading zone and the layout of the internal roadways and parking,it is assumed that the delivery truck would reverse into the loading zone from the Kekela Street driveway. A truck turning analysis should be conducted to ensure that adequate truck access is provided. 53 Kay, Christian From: Takaba, Aaron Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 11:23 AM To: Kay, Christian Cc: Darrow,Jeff;Jackson, Maija Subject: RE:AutoZone Change of Zone Amendment Christian, In concept, yes. We'll review the details in the plan review process. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Kay, Christian Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 11:18 AM To:Takaba, Aaron <Aaron.Tal<aba@hawaiicounty.gov> Cc: Darrow,Jeff<Jeff.Darrow@hawaiicounty.gov>; Jackson, Maija <Maija.Jacl<son@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject: RE: AutoZone Change of Zone Amendment Aloha Aaron, The applicant is updating their TIAR to respond to your& DOTs comments. Attached is the updated site plan that 4; indicates the striping treatment for Kekela Street tat will be incorporated as part of the TZAR. Will this suffice to address your concerns? Please advise. Mahalo, Christian Christian Kay, Planner County of Hawaii Planning Department Aupuni Center, 101 Pauahi Street,Suite No. 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Phone: (808) 961-8136 Fax: (808) 961-8742 Email: christian.kay@hawaiicounty.gov -----Original Message----- From:Takaba, Aaron <Aaron.Takaba@hawaiicounty.gov> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 9:32 AM To: Kay, Christian <Christian.Kay@hawaiicounty.gov> Cc: Darrow,Jeff<Jeff.Darrow@hawaiicounty.gov>;Jackson, Maija <Maija.Jackson@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject: RE: AutoZone Change of Zone Amendment Christian, Planning Dept. 1 Exhibit_ I am not involved with permitting, but I think they would need one to work within the ROW to do work on Kekela St. Confirm that with Ben Ishii. The consultant can,through the traffic study propose a pocket length for the right turn lane based on the traffic counts. My recommendation is to provide a right turn pocket length at least long enough that the queueing left and through vehicles don't end up blocking the right turn lane. The right turn volume would be another consideration to make sure the pocket is long enough for. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Kay, Christian Sent:Tuesday, May 14, 2019 8:34 AM To:Takaba,Aaron <Aaron.Takaba@hawaiicounty.gov> Cc: Darrow,Jeff<Jeff.Darrow@hawaiicounty.gov>;Jackson, Maija <Maija.Jackson@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject: RE: AutoZone Change of Zone Amendment Aloha Aaron, Mahalo for the response.Will the applicant have to get a permit to work within the County ROW to restripe Kekela Street? If so, do you at that point have the authority to prescribe the treatment you recommended below? I just want to clarify so that I can condition the ordinance appropriately. Mahalo, Christian Christian Kay, Planner County of Hawai'i Planning Department Aupuni Center, 101 Pauahi Street,Suite No. 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Phone: (808) 961-8136 Fax: (808) 961-8742 Email: christian.kay@hawaiicounty.gov -----Original Message----- From: Takaba, Aaron <Aaron.Tal<aba@hawaiicounty.gov> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 6:41 PM To: Kay, Christian <Christian.Kay@hawaiicounty.gov> Cc: Darrow,Jeff<Jeff.Darrow@hawaiicounty.gov>;Jackson, Maija <Maija.Jackson@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject: RE: AutoZone Change of Zone Amendment Christian, I'm okay with it if the predominant movement is the right turn and as long as the right turn lane is sized to be long enough relative to the left/through queue in the peak hours. Meaning right turn storage should be sized according to the left/through queue so left/through cars don't end up blocking the right turn lane. Aaron 2 From: Kay, Christian Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 4:15 PM To:Takaba, Aaron Cc: Darrow,Jeff,Jackson, Maija Subject: AutoZone Change of Zone Amendment Aloha Aaron, I'm working on an amendment request to Change of Zone Ordinance 07 105 (REZ 06-000052), which changed the zoning from a Single Family Residential-10,000 square feet (RS-10)to a Neighborhood Commercial-40,000 square feet (CN-40) zoning district to develop two pads of commercial real estate or business center ranging in size from 9,600 to 10,132 square feet and 130 parking stalls. According to the current ordinance, access to the subject Ginger Patch project site from Kekela Street is restricted to delivery vehicles only and project access to Puainako Street is limited to right-turn in and right-turn out movements only. The applicant (now AutoZone) is requesting several amendments to Conditions of the Ordinance, including a 5-year time extension to complete construction and a request to allow for full-turn access to the project site from Puainako street& a request to allow for a second full driveway access from Kekela Street. In support of this request,the applicant conducted an updated TIAR (attached), which we sent for your review and comment on March 27, 2019. DOT has reviewed and accepted the TZAR and is allowing a full-turn movement access to the property from Puainako Street (a DOT facility in this area). The TIAR also recommends the following mitigation to Kekela Street(a County facility): Restripe southbound Kekela Street to provide a left/through lane and a separate right-turn lane (pp. 5-6 of the TZAR) P The existing southbound lane on Kekela Street is approximately 24 feet wide, which is ample width to provide two 12- foot lanes. All of the project trips traveling southbound on Kekela Street are turning left to go eastbound on Puainako Street. The southbound left-turn movement experiences the highest delay at this intersection, as it is difficult to find gaps in traffic on Puainako Street for both directions. Providing a separate left-turn/through lane on southbound Puainako Street would improve operations at that intersection since the right-turn movement is not impeded by a queue waiting to turn left. While this improvement would not improve operations for the southbound left-turns or through movements to LOS D or better, it would minimize disruption to the southbound right-turn, which is the predominant movement at this approach, and would maintain traffic flow. (Please see attached site plan for visual depiction of the proposed mitigation) In order to appropriately Condition our rezone amendment, I need to know if you concur with the findings of the TIAR and proposed mitigation for Kekela Street. Please respond as soon as you,can as I need to finalize the reports for Planning Commission by the end of next week. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mahalo, Christian Christian Kay, Planner County of Hawai'i Planning Department Aupuni Center, 101 Pauahi Street, Suite No. 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Phone: (808) 961-8136 Fax: (808) 961-8742 Email: christian.kay@hawaiicounty.gov<mailto:christian.kay@hawaiicounty.gov> 3 Q�of WATE►�SGA • t 1Y� .4•f , DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY COUNTY OF HAWAII 345 KEKUANAO'A STREET, SUITE 20 HILO, HAWAII 96720 TELEPHONE (808) 961-8050 FAX (808) 961-8657 v March 14,2017 =; Mr. Mitch Bramlitt AutoZone Development Corporation 3 123 South Front Street Memphis,TN 38103 - Z o Dear Mr. Bramlitt: Subject: Water Commitment for AutoZone Hilo Change of Zone Ordinance No.07-105 Tax Map Key 2-2-039:031 (Portion) This is to acknowledge receipt of the required$150.00 water commitment deposit for the subject application. We are enclosing Receipt No. 286355 for your files. Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Department's Rules and Regulations, a water commitment for the proposed development in the amount of one(1)additional unit of water at an average of 400 gallons per day, is hereby granted until March 31,2020,with the following conditions: 1. Construct necessary water system improvements,which shall include,but not be limited to,the following: a. installation of an appropriately-sized service lateral to accommodate a 5/8-inch meter, b. installation of a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly on private property within five feet of the new meter,and C. subject to other agencies' requirements to construct improvements within the road right-of-way fronting the property affected by the proposed development,the applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and adjustment of the Department's affected water system facilities,should they be necessary. Submit construction plans prepared by a professional engineer,registered in the State of Hawaii,for review and approval. 2. Remit the prevailing facilities charge,which is subject to change,as shown below: FACILITIES CHARGE(FC): One(1)additional unit Ca.$5,500.00/unit $5,500.00 Total FC $5,500.00 WATER COMMITMENT DEPOSIT CREDIT(WCD): One 1)additional unit Cad$150.00/unit ( 150.00) Total Amount $5,350.00 Planning ep 6 ?Nater, Our Wost Precious W§source. . . 4�WaiA Rdne. . 110398 The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer Exhibit Mr. Mitch Bramlitt Page 2 March 14,2017 These are due and payable upon completion of the installation of the required water system improvements and prior to final subdivision approval being granted. For your information,water commitment deposits are credited towards the final facilities requirement for the development. Note that the amount of water commitment deposit may exceed the prevailing facilities charge amount;for example,when requests for time extensions continue and are approved. Until the development is finally completed,these are separate and unrelated items. In the event that water commitment deposits exceed the facilities charge, no refunds are applicable. 3. Comply with all other applicable policies and requirements of the Department's Rules and Regulations. Noncompliance may be cause for voiding this water commitment, at which time availability will be subject to change in accordance with prevailing water system conditions,policies,and Rules and Regulations. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070,extension 256. Sincerely yours, Keith K.Okamoto,P. Manager-Chief Engineer RQ:dfg Enc. copy(Planning Department Mr.Neal Fukumoto, Wesley R. Segawa&Associates, Inc. Harry Kiln <r or A4. �; Darren J.Rosario hfayor Fire Chief Renwick J.Victosw +r•• r,„"��` Deputy Fir�']tief ti 7. O Countp of '7r-aWai`i 00 HAWAII FIRE DEPARTMENT OCD 25 Aupuni Street•Suite 2501•Hilo,Hawaii 96720 1 r 7 (808)932-2900•Fax(808)932-2928 November 28,2017m �y O TO: MICHAEL YEE,PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: DARREN J.ROSARIO,FIRE CHIEF SUBJECT: Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 07-107 (REZ 06-000052) Applicant: AutoZone Parts, inc. (Formerly Ginger Patch DP,LLC) Request: Amendment to Condition C(Time to Complete Construction), Condition D (Lot Consolidation),Condition E(TIAR Timing), Condition F(Access from Kekela Street),condition H(Parking) and Condition N(Fair Share) of Ordinance No. 07-107 Tax Map Key:2-2-039:031 In regards to the above-mentioned Change of Zone application,the following shall be in accordance: NFPA 1,UNIFORM FIRE CODE,2006 EDITION Note:Hawaii State Fire Code, National Fire Protection Association 2006 version, with County of Hawai`i amendments. County amendments are identified with a preceding "C"of the reference code. Chapter 18 Fire Department Access and Water Supply 18.1 General. Fire department access and water supplies shall comply with this chapter. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature,or where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy,or where access for fire apparatus is unduly difficult,or areas where there is an inadequate fire flow, or inadequate fire hydrant spacing,and the AHJ may require additional safeguards including,but not limited to,additional fire appliance units, more than one type of appliance,or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved. 18.1.1 Plans. 18.1.1.1 Fire Apparatus Access. Plans for fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. PAW qri a Planning Dept. 19.5172 Exh l iot Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. 1 Michael Yee November 28, 2017 Page 2 18.1.1.2 Fire Hydrant Systems.Plans and specifications for fire hydrant systems shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. C—18.1.1.2.1 Fire Hydrant use and Restrictions.No unauthorized person shall use or operate any Fire hydrant unless such person first secures permission or a permit from the owner or representative of the department, or company that owns or governs that water supply or system. Exception:Fire Department personnel conducting firefighting operations,hydrant testing, and/or maintenance, and the flushing and acceptance of hydrants witnessed by Fire Prevention Bureau personnel. 18.2 Fire Department Access. 18.2.1 Fire department access and fire department access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Section 18.2. 18.2.2* Access to Structures or Areas. 18.2.2.1 Access Box(es). The AHJ shall have the authority to require an access box(es)to be installed in an accessible location where access to or within a structure or area is difficult because of security. 18.2.2.2 Access to Gated Subdivisions or Developments. The,AHJ shall have the authority to require fire department access be provided to gated subdivisions or developments through the use of an approved device or system. 18.2.2.3 Access Maintenance. The owner or occupant of a structure or area,with required fire department access as specified in 18.2.2.1 or 18.2.2.2,shall notify the AHJ when the access is modified in a manner that could prevent fire department access. 18.2.3 Fire Department Access Roads. (*may be referred as FDAR) 18.2.3.1 Required Access. 18.2.3.1.1 Approved fire department access roads shall be provided for every facility,building, or portion of a building hereafter constructed or relocated. 18.2.3.1.2 Fire Department access roads shall consist of roadways, fire lanes,parking lots lanes, or a combination thereof. 18.2.3.1.3* When not more than two one-and two-family dwellings or private garages, carports, sheds, agricultural buildings, and detached buildings or structures 400ft2(37 m2)or less are present,the requirements of 18.2.3.1 through 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be modified by the AHJ. Michael Yee November 28,2017 Page 3 18.2.3.1.4 When fire department access roads cannot be installed due to location on property, topography,waterways,nonnegotiable grades,or other similar conditions,the AHJ shall be authorized to require additional fire protection features. 18.2.3.2 Access to Building. 18.2.3.2.1 A fire department access road shall extend to within in 50 ft(15 m)of at least one exterior door that can be opened from the outside that provides access to the interior of the building.Exception: 1 and 2 single-family dwellings. 18.2.3.2.1.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13,NFPA 131),or NFPA 13R,the distance in 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be increased to 300 feet. f 18.2.3.2.2 Fire department access roads shall be provided such that any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located not more than 150 ft (46 m)from fire department access roads as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. 18.2:3.2.2.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13,NFPA 131),or NFPA 13R,the distance in 18.2.3.2.2 shall be permitted to be increased to 450 ft(137 m). 18.2.3.3 Multiple Access Roads.More than one fire department access road shall be provided when it is determined by the AHJ that access by a single road could be impaired by vehicle congestion,condition of terrain,climatic conditions, or other factors that could limit access. 18.2.3.4 Specifications. 18.2.3.4.1 Dimensions. C—18.2.3.4.1.1 FDAR shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20ft with an approved turn around area if the FDAR exceeds 150 feet. Exception: FDAR for one and two family dwellings shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 15 feet, with an area of not less than 20 feet wide within 150 feet of the structure being protected.An approved turn around area shall Ir be provided if the FDAR exceeds 250 feet. C—18.2.3.4.1.2 FDAR shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less then 13ft 6 in. C—18.2.3.4.1.2.1 Vertical clearances may be increased or reduced by the AHJ,provided such increase or reduction does not impair access by the fire apparatus,and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating such approved changes. Michael Yee November 28,2017 Page 4 18.2.3.4.1.2.2 Vertical clearances shall be increased when vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to accommodate fire apparatus. C~18.2.3.4.2 Surface.Fire department access roads and bridges shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads(25 Tons)of the fire apparatus. Such FDAR and shall be comprised of an all-weather driving surface. 18.2.3.4.3 Turning Radius. C—18.2.3.4.3.1 Fire department access roads shall have a minimum inside turning radius of 30 feet, and a minimum outside turning radius of 60 feet. 18.2.3.4.3.2 Turns in fire department access road shall maintain the minimum road width. 18.2.3.4.4 Dead Ends.Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 ft(46 m)in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the fire apparatus to turn around. 18.2.3.4.5 Bridges. 18.2.3.4.5.1 When a bridge is required to be used as part of a fire department access road,it shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with county requirements. 18.2.3.4.5.2 The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 18.2.3.4.5.3 Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges where required by the AHJ. 18.2.3.4.6 Grade. C—18.2.3.4.6.1The maximum gradient of a Fire department access road shall not exceed 12 percent for unpaved surfaces and 15 percent for paved surfaces. In areas of the FDAR where a Fire apparatus would connect to a Fire hydrant or Fire Department Connection,the maximum gradient of such area(s)shall not exceed 10 percent. 18.2.3.4.6.2*The angle of approach and departure for any means of fire department access road shall not exceed 1 ft drop in 20 ft(0.3 m drop in 6 m)or the design limitations of the fire apparatus of the fire department,and shall be subject to approval by the AHJ. 18.2.3.4.6.3 Fire department access roads connecting to roadways shall be provided with curb cuts extending at least 2 ft(0.61 m)beyond each edge of the fire lane. Michael Yee November 28,2017 Page 5 18.2.3.4.7 Traffic Calming Devices.The design and use of traffic calming devices shall be approved the AHJ. 18.2.3.5 Marking of Fire Apparatus Access Road. 18.2.3.5.1 Where required by the AHJ, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained to identify fire department access roads or to prohibit the obstruction thereof of both. 18.2.3.5.2 A marked fire apparatus access road shall also be known as a fire lane. 18.2.4* Obstruction and Control of Fire Department Access Road. 18.2.4.1 General. 18.2.4.1.1 The required width of a fire department access road shall not be obstructed in any manner,including by the parking of vehicles. 18.2.4.1.2 Minimum required widths and clearances established under 18.2.3.4 shall be maintained at all times. r 18.2.4.1.3*Facilities and structures shall be maintained in a manner that does not impair or impede accessibility for fire department operations. 18.2.4.1.4 Entrances to fire departments access roads that have been closed with gates and barriers in accordance with 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be obstructed by parked vehicles. 18.2.4.2 Closure of Accessways. 18.2.4.2.1 The AHJ shall be authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across roads,trails,or other accessways not including public streets, alleys, or highways. 18.2.4.2.2 Where required, gates and barricades shall be secured in an approved manner. 18.2.4.2.3 Roads, trails, and other access ways that have been closed and obstructed in the manner prescribed by 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be trespassed upon or used unless authorized by the owner and the AHJ. 18.2.4.2.4 Public officers acting within their scope of duty shall be permitted to access restricted property identified in 18.2.4.2.1. Michael Yee November 28, 2017 Page 6 18.2.4.2.5 Locks, gates, doors,barricades, chains, enclosures, signs, tags,or seals that have been installed by the fire department or by its order or under its control shall not be removed, unlocked, destroyed, tampered with,or otherwise vandalized in any manner. 18.3 Water Supplies and Fire Hydrants 18.3.1* A water supply approved by the county, capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are hereafter constructed,or moved into or within the county. When any portion of the facility or building is in excess of 150 feet(45 720 mm) from a water supply on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building,on- site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided when required by the AHJ.For on-site fire hydrant requirements see section 18.3.3. EXCEPTIONS: 1. When facilities or buildings,or portions thereof, are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system the provisions of section 18.3.1 may be modified by the AHJ. 2. When water supply requirements cannot be installed due to topography or other conditions,the AHJ may require additional fire protection as specified in section 18.3.2 as amended in the code. 3. When there are not more than two dwellings, or two private garage, carports, sheds and agricultural. Occupancies,the requirements of section 18.3.1 may be modified by AHJ. 18.3.2* Where no adequate or reliable water distribution system exists, approved reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, fire department tanker shuttles, or other approved systems capable of providing the required fire flow shall be permitted. 18.3.3* The location,number and type of fire hydrants connected to a water supply capable of delivering the required fire flow shall be provided on a fire apparatus access road on the site of the premises or both, in accordance with the appropriate county water requirements. 18.3.4 Fire Hydrants and connections to other approved water supplies shall be accessible to the fire department. 18.3.5 Private water supply systems shall be tested and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25 or county requirements as determined by the AHJ. 18.3.6 Where required by the AHJ, fire hydrants subject to vehicular damage shall be protected unless located within a public right of way. Michael Yee November 28,2017 Page 7 18.3.7 The AHJ shall be notified whenever any fire hydrant is placed out of service or returned to service. Owners of private property required to have hydrants shall maintain hydrant records of approval,testing, and maintenance, in accordance with the respective county water requirements. Records shall be made available for review by the AHJ upon request. C—18.3.8 Minimum water supply for buildings that do not meet the minimum County water standards: Buildings up to 2000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 3,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings 2001-3000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 6,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, 3001-6000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 12,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, greater than 6000 square feet, shall meet the minimum County water and fire flow requirements. Multiple story buildings shall multiply the square feet by the amount of stories when determining the minimum water supply. Commercial buildings requiring a minimum fire flow of 2000gpm per the Department of Water standards shall double the minimum water supply reserved for firefighting. Fire Department Connections (FDC)to alternative water supplies shall comply with 18.3.8 (1)- (6) of this code. NOTE:In that water catchment systems are being used as a means of water supply_for firefighting,such systems shall meet the following requirements: 1) In that a single water tank is used for both domestic and firefighting water,the water for domestic use shall not be capable of being drawn from the water reserved for firefighting; 2) Minimum pipe diameter sizes from the water supply to the Fire Department Connection (FDC)shall be as follows: a) 4"for C900 PVC pipe; b) 4"for C906 PE pipe; c) 3"for ductile Iron; d) 3' for galvanized steel. Michael Yee November 28,2017 Page 8 3) The Fire Department Connection(FDC) shall: a) be made of galvanized steel; b) have a gated valve with 2-1/2 inch,National Standard Thread male fitting and cap; c) be located between 8 ft and 16 ft from the Fire department access. The location shall be approved by the AHJ; d) not be located less than 24 inches, and no higher than 36 inches from finish grade,as measured from the center of the FDC orifice; e) be secure and capable of withstanding drafting operations.Engineered stamped plans may be required; f) not be located more than 150 feet of the most remote part,but not less than 20 feet, of the structure being protected; g) also comply with section 13.1.3 and 18.2.3.4.6.1 of this code. 4) Commercial buildings requiring a fire flow of 2000gpm shall be provided with a second FDC. Each FDC shall be independent of each other,with each FDC being capable of flowing 500gpm by engineered design standards. The second FDC shall be located in an area approved by the AHJ with the idea of multiple Fire apparatus'conducting drafting operations at once,in mind. 5) Inspection and maintenance shall be in accordance to NFPA 25. 6) The owner or lessee of the property shall be responsible for maintaining the water level, quality, and appurtenances of the system. EXCEPTIONS TO SECTION 18.3.8: 1) Agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and shade houses with no combustible or equipment storage. 2) Buildings less than 800 square feet in size that meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements. 3) For one and two family dwellings,agricultural buildings,storage sheds, and detached garages 800 to 2000 square feet in size,and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements,the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 1000 feet. 4) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings,and storage sheds greater than 2000square feet,but less than 3000 square feet and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements,the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 500 feet. Michael Yee November 28,2017 Page 9 5) For buildings with an approved automatic sprinkler system,the minimum water supply required may be modified. If there are any questions regarding these requirements,please contact_the Fire Prevention Bureau at(808) 323-4760. DARREN J. ROSARIO Fire Chief KV:ds SUZAN\E D.GASB r`P�•" "•'�.;/ CHAIRPERSON DAVID Y.IGE GOVERNOR OF HASVAII y,' BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES •rt A '•� : COMUSSION ON WATER RESOURCE i scl,���'ili t• MANAGEMENTY :. STATS;OF HAWAII S+dteotHa+a DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE SOX 621 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 November 30, 2017 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attention: Mr. Christian Kay via email: planning@hawaiicountygov 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Mr. Kay: SUBJECT: AutoZone Parts, Inc.'s Application for Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No..07-107 (REZ 06-000052)for property located at 40 Kekela Street, Hilo, Island of Hawaii;TMK: (3)2-2-039:031 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Department of Land and Natural Resources' (DLNR) Land Division distributed or made available a copy of your report pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR Divisions for their review and comment6.'- At this time, enclosed are comments from the Engineering Division on the subject matter. Should you have any questions,please feel free to call Darlene Nakamura at(808) 587- 0417. Thank you. Sincerely, Russell Y.Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosure cc: Central Fifes sIanning Dept. exhibit. .�= DAVID Y.IGE J".lP: .\959 v i�N' CHAIRPEILSON GOVERNOR OF HAWAti BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ONIPATER RESOURCE MANAGEMEN J," a�'I'af t+f ix 0 -- :•, STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OITICE BOX 621 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 r November 14,2017 r` MEMORANDUM DLNR Agencies: Div. of Aquatic Resources Div. of Boating& Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division Div. of Forestry&Wildlife `- ^Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management Office of Conservation& Coastal Lands X Land Division— Hawaii District o X Historic Preservation1 ZUBJECT: Y.Tsuji, Land Administrator Amendment to Change of Zone Ordipance No. 07-107(REZ 06-000052) i LOCATION: 40 Kekela Street, Hilo, Island of Hawaii;TMK: (3) 2-2-039:031 APPLICANT: AutoZone Parts, Inc. Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. We would appreciate your comments by November 28, 2017. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at 587-0417. Thank you. ( ) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. (�) Comment ar attached. Signed: � Print Name: Lart S. hang, Chief Engineer Date: Attachments cc: Central Files DAVID Y.IGE �� o „� JADE T.BUTAY GOVERNOR INTERIM DIRECTOR `t Deputy Directors Y F ' ROSS M.HIGASHI EDWIN-H.SNIFFEN•, A _ DARRELL T.YOUNG �r STATE OF HAWAII IN REPLY REFER TO: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STP 17-091 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET STP 8.2290 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813-5097 January 16, 2018 t Mr. Michael Yee Planning Director oz - County of Hawaii —; w Planning Department Cl�, East Hawaii Office 'n`; 0 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 ; Hilo, Hawaii 96720 ry i Dear Mr. Yee: "► i Subject: AutoZone Parts,Inc. Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 07-107 (REZ 06-000052) Hilo,Hawaii TMK: (3)2-2-039:031 The applicant,AutoZone Parts,Inc.,proposes to develop a commercial store to act as a location for sale of auto parts and for receipt of and deliver of auto parts to local repair shops. The facility is proposed to be approximately 9,046 square feet with at least 57 parking stalls. The applicant is a successor developer to Ginger Patch DP, LLC, which had intended to develop a large commercial business center but those plans were abandoned. In 2007,the parcel was rezoned under Ordinance 07-105 from residential, RS-10 to Neighborhood-Commercial, CN-40 which affected TMK: (3)2-2-039: 031, 057, 068, and 069. The applicant proposes to amend Condition C (Time to Complete Construction),deletion of Condition D (Lot Consolidation) and Condition E(Traffic Impact Analysis Report), amend Condition F(Restriction of General Public Access from Kekala Street), Condition H(Off-street Parking), and Condition N (Fair Share). The Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT)comments on the subject project are as follows: Highways Division 1. We have no objection to the proposed actions for Conditions C,D,F,H, or N. 116486 Planning Dept. ,xhiit Mr. Michael Yee STP 17-091 January 16, 2018 STP 8.2290 Page 2 2. We object to the proposed deletion of Condition E,which requires the applicant to submit a Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR)to HDOT for review and approval prior to Final Plan Approval. The applicant has submitted a TIAR(Fehr&Peers, June 2017)with the proposal to amend Ordinance 07-105. 3. We do not consider the justification that Condition G(not part of the amendment action) which requires the applicant to construct improvements on Puainako Street as required by HDOT to be sufficient. 4. The TIAR shall have an inked stamp of the professional engineer who prepared and/or supervised the preparation of the TIAR on the Final (HDOT accepted)version of the TIAR. 5. The TIAR should include and discuss this development's impact to the Kanoelehua Avenue and Puainako Street intersection. 6. In the TIAR, the Kekela Street and Puainako Street intersection should be discussed in detail due to its proximity to Kanoelehua Avenue. 7. Exhibit 2, Plan View does not reflect recommendations in the TIAR. 8. No additional access will be permitted to Puainako Street. Airports Division 1. The subject project is located approximately 1.18 miles north east of the end of Runway 3 and 1.87 miles north of the end of Runway 8 at Hilo International Airport. Although,no solar panels arrays appear to be part of the building proposal, the developer should be aware that photovoltaic (PV) systems, located in or near the approach path of aircraft into an airport, can create a hazardous condition for a pilot due to possible glint and glare reflected from the PV array, and potential radio frequency interference. The following website may assist with preparation of a glint and glare analysis: www.sandia.gov/ lg are. 'i 2. Every proposed development close to airports creates a concern about wildlife attractants and wildlife hazards to airports operations. The Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 150/5200-3313,Hazardous Wildlife Attractants On or Near Airports, requires a minimum distance of five miles between the farthest edge of the Airports Operations Area and potential hazardous wildlife attractants, and provides guidance for developments within five miles of an airport. i Mr. Michael Yee STP 17-091 January 16, 2018 STP 8.2290 Page 3 3. The applicant/developer must be aware of the duties of the state and county agencies to implement the Technical Advisory Memo related to thisproject and all projects within 5 miles of an airport: http://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/op cs/TAM-FAA-DOT- Airports 08-01-2016.pdf. If there are any questions,please contact Mr.Norren Kato of the Department of Transportation Statewide Transportation Planning Office at telephone number(808) 831-7976. Sinc rely, l• J T. BUTAY Interim Director otTrans ration i' c i RAutoZoneAmendREZ.c rk.5.28.19 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION AUTOZONE PARTS, INC. (FORMERLY GINEGER PATCH DP, LLC) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 07-105 (REZ 06-52) Upon careful review of the request to amend conditions of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 07-105, the Planning Director is recommending that a favorable recommendation for amendments to Conditions C,D, F, H and N and an unfavorable recommendation for applicant's request to delete Condition E of Ordinance No. 07-105 be forwarded to the County Council. Since this recommendation is made without the benefit of public testimony, the Director reserves the right to modify and/or alter this position based on additional information presented at the public hearing. This recommendation is based on the following findings: The applicant, AutoZone Parts, Inc., has submitted an application to amend several conditions of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 07-105, which was originally approved on August 1, 2007, and reclassified approximately 88,317 square feet of land from a Single-Family Residential-10,000 square feet (RS-10) to a Neighborhood Commercial-40,000 square feet(CN-40) zoning district. The applicant is requesting amendments to the following conditions: ■ Five (5)-Year Time Extension for Condition C (Time to Complete Construction) ■ Delete Condition D (Lot Consolidation) ■ Delete Condition E (TIAR Timing) ■ Modify Condition F (Access from Kekela Street) ■ Modify Condition H (Parking Requirements) ■ Modify Condition N (Fair Share) When the change of zone was granted in 2007, the original applicant proposed to develop two pads of commercial real estate or business center ranging in size from 9,600 to 10,132 square feet and 130 parking stalls. The current applicant is proposing a much smaller commercial development consisting of an approximately 9,046 square-foot commercial storefront, a minimum of 57 paved parking stalls, landscaping and related improvements. The applicant is requesting condition amendments to accommodate this new, scaled-down development proposal and to delete conditions that have already been complied with. The applicant's amendment requests, along with reasons, are stated below. We will address each condition specifically by stating the applicant's request and reasons for the request and state the Planning Director's recommendation and reasons for the recommendation for each requested condition amendment. Language proposed to be deleted is in brackets, language proposed to be added is underlined. Applicant's Requested Amendment of Condition C (Time to Complete Construction): Construction of the proposed improvements shall be completed within five (5)years from the effective date of this ordinance, as amended. This time period shall include securing Final Plan Approval front the Planning Director in accordance with the Zoning Code. Plans shall identify proposed structure(s),fire protection measures, access roadway, driveway and parking stalls. Landscaping shall be indicated on the plans for the purpose of mitigating any potential adverse noise or visual impacts to adjoining parcels. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of Planning Department's Rule No. 17 (Landscaping Requirements), Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Hawaii County Code. Landscaping shall include rock walls or fences on the northern boundaries, as agreed upon between the applicant and owners of lands adjacent to such northern boundaries, as may be evidenced by any written agreements in existence as of the effective date of this rezoning. Applicant's Reasons for Amending Condition C: The five (5)-year deadline required by Condition C of the subject Change of Zone Ordinance would have required the previous developer to complete construction by August 14, 2012. The previous developer was granted a five (5)- year administrative time extension to complete construction by August 14, 2017, however the original project was abandoned and the property was returned the back to the fee owner. Effective September 2, 2015 AutoZone Parts, Inc. entered into a 15-year ground lease with the property owner but realized they would not be able to meet the 2017 construction deadline for their proposed auto parts store project. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a five (5)-year time extension to complete construction of the proposed project. The applicant anticipates that -2- construction of the proposed project will commence shortly after issuance of Final Plan Approval. Planning Director's Recommendation for Amending Condition C: The Planning Director supports this time extension request as the it meets the following criteria for granting a time extension: The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. The current applicant entered into a lease with the landowner less than two years shy of the required construction deadline articulated under Condition C and subsequent approved administrative time extension. The applicant initially submitted their request for time extension and other amendments on October 18, 2017 after consulting with the Planning Department and realizing they would not have enough time to meet the aforementioned construction deadline. Since then, the applicant has been working to address access and traffic issues with DOT and updating their TIAR to detennine roadway improvement requirements to allow the project to move forward. Approval of this request would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code nor the original reasons for granting the Change of Zone. The applicant is proposing to develop an AutoZone commercial storefront consisting of approximately 9,046 square feet, with landscaping and a minimum of 57 paved parking stalls, calculated at one(1) stall per 160 square feet of commercial uses, including areas for handicap accessible parking and loading area. Proposed operating hours are fiom 7:30 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., seven(7) days a week, and will employ approximately twenty(20) individuals. Port deliveries of four(4) to six (6)pallets from Hilo Harbor and/or Kawaihae Harbor will occur once a week, which will be transported to the proposed subject parcel via small box trucks. Nissan Frontier vehicles will be utilized by AutoZone in its daily six (6) to eight (8) round trip commercial deliveries to local Auto repair shops. It should be noted that since the site was rezoned, there has not been any significant land use regulatory change in this area. The Hilo Community -3- Development Plan has not been updated, and thus, the only relevant planning policy document still rests with the County General Plan. The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical relationship among the various land uses. The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the County. The project area is designated a split of High Density and Medium Density Urban on the LUPAG Map. The Neighborhood Commercial zoning is consistent with the High and Medium Density Urban designations on the LUPAG Map for this area of Hilo. Furthermore, the request conforms to the goals, policies and standards of the General Plan in that the proposed development will be developed in an area adequately served by necessary services such as water, utilities and transportation systems. The proposed project conforms to the Commercial Development goal which states, "provide commercial developments that complement the overall pattern of transportation and land usage within the island's regions, communities, and neighborhoods." The land uses in the area are a mix of residential and commercial uses. To the east across Kekela Street is the Minute Stop Gas Station (fonnerly the Ginger Patch Market and Deli) and the Firestone Tire and Service Center similarly zoned Neighborhood Commercial (CN-10). The KTA Super Stores complex is located to the south of the project site across Puainako Street and is zoned CN-10. There are single-family dwellings to the west along Kilauea Avenue and adjacent properties to the north are zoned Single-Family Residential (RS-10) and in single- family residential uses. In response to the request by adjacent property owners to minimize the visual impacts of the proposed project, the applicant has agreed to construct a perimeter rock wall along the property's northern boundary with adjoining, residential property owners (this requirement is articulated and will remain in Condition C). -4- The original reasons for the approval of the change of zone are still applicable, and the request is not contrary to these reasons. The change of zone was originally approved in 2007 to allow the development of two pads of commercial real estate or business center ranging in size from 9,600 to 10,132 square feet and 130 parking stalls. The current proposed project is much smaller in scale, consisting of an approximately 9,046 square-foot commercial storefront, a minimum of 57 paved parking stalls, landscaping and related improvements. Based on the preceding, the proposed commercial project will continue to complement the existing commercial land uses and will provide for an orderly development of the area. Finally, the Director is recommending a slight alteration to the applicant's requested condition language to reflect standard condition language and allow for the time extension to complete construction of the proposed project or any other use permitted in the zoning district. Applicant's Request to Delete Condition D (Lot Consolidation) and Reason: The applicant has is requesting deletion of Condition D, which required the consolidation of former Parcels 31, 57, 68 and 69 into one TMK, as the Ir required consolidation was complete on May 16, 2012 (Consolidation No. 12-000214). Planning Director's Recommendation for Deleting Condition D: The Planning Director supports the deletion of this condition as the required consolidation is complete. Applicant's Requested Amendment to Condition F (Access from Kekela Street): [No prejeet alAccess to the project site fr6m Kekela Street shall be allowed[eyc- ]for general public and delNeiy vehicles[ 4eess-f aeU+, ,. +,ehieles may be allowed by the planning direetar—, in eonsft It-ati-e- Sw�e ]and shall conform to Chapter 22 (County Streets) of the Hawaii County Code. Applicant's Reasons for Amending Condition F: According to the applicant, the proposed auto parts retail store use is anticipated to generate approximately 574 daily vehicle trips, including 20 A.M. -5- peak hour(15 inbound/5 outbound) and 56 new trips in the P.M. peak hour (27 inbound/29 outbound). Based on the preceding and in accordance with the Zoning Code's concurrency requirements, the applicant prepared a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR). The TIAR studied and evaluated the project's traffic impact at three (3) intersections: Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue, Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center East Driveway("Kekela intersection") and Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue. Kekela Street is a County owned and maintained road, with jurisdictional review by the County DPW The TIAR concluded that the Level of Service (LOS) at the Kekela intersection currently operates at LOS "F" in the P.M. peak hour, and is anticipated to still operate at LOS "E" or"F" in the future (5-, 10- and 20-year forecasts) without the proposed project. Due to the modest scale of the proposed project, the addition of the project related trips fiom would not further degrade the current LOS "E" or "F" operations. The TIAR further concluded that both project driveways are anticipated to serve relatively low traffic volumes during the peak hours, therefore, no operational issue are anticipated at the Puainako Street or Kekela Street driveways. The 2017 TIAR concluded that trips traveling southbound on Kekela Street which are turning left to go eastbound on Puainako Street are experiencing the highest delay at this intersection. The existing southbound lane on Kekela Street is approximately 24 feet wide, which is sufficient to provide two 12-foot wide lanes. As recommended in the TIAR,potential mitigation to address the current and 5-year projected forecast of the TIAR would be to restripe the southbound Kekela Street to provide a left/through lane and a separate right-tum lane, which would: (1) improve operations at this intersection since the right-turn movement will no longer be impeded by a queue waiting to turn left, (2) minimize disruption to the southbound right-turn, which is the predominant movement at this approach, and (3) maintain traffic flow. Finally, according to the applicant, DPW has informed them that it did not recommend any access restrictions (i.e., limited to delivery vehicles) on Kekela Street during the original rezoning action, and would not object to an amendment -6- to remove the limited access restriction, provided the project ingress/egress on Kekela Street conformed to County standards. Planning Director's Recommendation for Amending Condition F: The Planning Director is generally supportive of this amendment as it will provide a secondary, full-movement access for the general public to the project site and relieve some of the traffic issues that could arise should there only be one, limited movement access point to the property as is required by current ordinance language. This support also assumes that the applicant install appropriate traffic mitigation improvements required by DOT and DPW to ensure the traffic safety on roadways in the vicinity of the project. The DPW-Traffic Division replied with"no comment" on the original request for comments on the project in 2017. Subsequent conversation with Traffic Division indicated that they are generally supportive of allowing vehicular access to the general public to the project from Kekela Street,provided that the predominant movement is the right turn and as long as the right turn lane is sized to be long enough relative to the left/through queue in the peak hours. This means that right turn storage pocket should be sized according to the left/through queue so left/through cars don't end up blocking the right turn lane. DPW indicated that it would like to review an updated TIAR to ensure that these requirements are addressed. Applicant's Requested Amendment of Condition H (Parking Requirements): [X,.twitr tai .b . e ,f e c A 51(q)(3) f]The project shall provide a minimum of one parking space for each 160 square feet of gross floor area for commercial uses, or the requirements of Section 25-4-51, whichever is greater. The minimum off-street parking spaces for this project shall[i��] be [4-23]57 spaces. Applicant's Reasons for Amending Condition H: The applicant is proposing to continue to comply with the 160-square foot to one (1) parking stall ratio but would like to apply it to the smaller proposed square footage of commercial space of the current proposed project (9,046 square feet). The previous developer planned a significantly larger commercial project which was twice the size of the currently proposed project. Instead of applying the -7- Zoning Code requirement of one (1)parking stall for every 300 square feet of gross floor area for commercial space, the Hawaii County Council prescribed a formula of one (1) parking stall for every 160 square feet of gross floor area for commercial uses (or 123 stalls based on the previously proposed project size). If that ratio is applied to the current proposed project size(9,046 square feet), the new minimum number of off-street parking and loading spaces would be 57. Planning Director's Recommendation for Amending Condition H: The Planning Director supports the proposed amendment to Condition H as the applicant will continue to apply the County Council imposed ratio of one (1)parking stall per 160 square feet of gross floor area for commercial uses but will apply that ratio to a smaller overall gross floor area. Thus, the director supports the reduction of minimum parking spaces articulated in the proposed amendment. Applicant's Requested Amendment of Condition N (Fair Share) and stated reasons: The applicant has requested to update the Fair Share contribution dollar amounts to current (2018) levels. Although the applicant is not proposing the construction of residential units on the subject property, this proposed amendment seeks to update the fair share contribution amounts based on the current percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index (HCPI)being utilized by the Planning Department from 2007 levels to the current levels. Planning Director's Recommendation for Amending Condition N: The Planning Director supports this amendment as it is already standard practice for the Planning Department to update Fair Share amounts for change of zone amendments, even if the applicant does not request it. Please note that as the amendment application was submitted in 2017, the Fair Share contribution amounts contained in the applicant's stated amendment request are different (smaller) than those articulated in the Condition attached to the Planning Department's draft Ordinance. Applicant's Request to Delete Condition E (TIAR Timing) and Reason: -8- The applicant has is requesting deletion of Condition E, which requires the submittal of a Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR) to the State Department of Transportation for review and approval prior to issuance of Final Plan Approval. The applicant submitted a draft TIAR prepared by Fehr&Peers (June 2017) with the amendment application in 2017. The TIAR analyzed potential project-related traffic impacts and operations at three intersections: (a) Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue, (b) Puainako Street/Kekela Street/KTA Shopping Center east driveway, and (c) Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue. The Report concluded that the level of service (LOS) at the two study areas: (a) Puainako Street/Kilauea Avenue, and (b) Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue intersections operate at an overall desirable (LOS "D" or better) during both peak hours. The Kekela intersection currently operates at LOS "F"in the P.M. peak hour and is anticipated to still operate at LOS "E" or"F" in the future (5-, 10- and 20-year forecasts) without the proposed project. Due to the modest scale of the proposed project, the addition of trips from the proposed project would not further degrade the current LOS "E" or "F" operations. The TIAR further concluded that both project driveways are anticipated to serve relatively low traffic volumes during the peak hours, therefore, no operational issues are anticipated at the Puainako Street or Kekela Street driveways. The applicant is not proposing any modification of the"right-in, right-out" access from Puainako Street, and will be required to construct improvements on the Puainako Street right-of-way meeting with the approval of the DOT. Therefore, according to the applicant, deletion of this condition will not release them from complying with the DOT's construction requirements imposed under Condition G, which states that "[a]cess to the project site from Puainako Street shall be limited to right-in, right-out movements only, and shall meet with the approval of the Department of Transportation. The applicant shall construct any improvements on Puainako Street as required by the Department of Transportation. " -9- i Planning Director's Recommendation for Amending Condition E: The Planning Director does not support this requested amendment for a number of reasons. First, in their response to request for comments on the application, DOT- Highways Division(DOT) objected to the applicant's request to delete Condition E, stating that they did not consider the applicant's justification that Condition G, which requires the applicant to construct improvements on Puainako Street as required by DOT to be sufficient. They further cited several deficiencies in the 2017 draft TIAR submitted with amendment application, stating that, at a minimum, subsequent TIARs should include a discussion of a development's impact on Kano elehua/Puainako Street intersection and Kekela Street/Puainako Street intersections and should include an inked stamp of the professional engineer who prepared the TIAR. DOT also stated that the site plan included within the TIAR did not reflect the report's recommendations. Finally, DOT indicated that no additional access would be permitted from the property to Puainako Street. Based on the last point, the Director recommends amending Condition G to include language limiting access to the subject parcel from Puainako Street to a single driveway. Second, as a standard practice, when a change of zone or any amendments thereto require a TIAR, the Planning Department relies on agency review (in this case DOT and DPW) to inform appropriate conditions for roadway improvements to mitigate traffic impacts. Traffic in this area is known to be problematic and the Director wants to ensure that the appropriate agencies get ample opportunity to review, affirm, and approve the TIAR and any mitigation recommendations therein. The applicant recently provided the Planning Department with an updated TIAR dated May 20, 2019, however, with the exception of a new site plan and a new site access evaluation section describing proposed new striping treatments for Puainako Street an limitation of access from Puainako Street to a single driveway (starting on page 52), the TIAR is nearly identical to the report submitted in 2017, including all of the same traffic data, analyses, and recommendations. Based on the timing of recent submittal, neither DOT or DPW have had a chance to review -10- and comment on the TIAR analysis and appropriateness of proposed mitigation measures. Based on the preceding, the Director does not support the deletion of Condition E as it would eliminate the opportunity for reviewing agencies to vet and approve the TIAR and require suitable mitigation measures for identified traffic impacts caused by the project. Finally, these change of zone amendments do not require the applicant to develop their currently proposed project. Should AutoZone choose to expand the size of their store now or in the future or should any successor applicant wish to develop a different or larger project,retaining this condition will ensure that any increased traffic impacts would be studied, and proposed mitigation of those impacts would be reviewed and approved by appropriate agencies (State DOT and County DPW). Furthermore, as the project will take access from both State and County roadways, the Director recommends amending Condition E to include DPW-Traffic Division as a required review and approving agency. Finally, the Director recommends adding a stipulation to this condition that the applicant construct any roadway improvements that may be required by DOT and/or DPW prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Lastly, to the Planning Director recommends the following addition of a condition and revisions to several other conditions: ■ New Condition D (Future Road Widening Strip): By letter dated April 14, 2008 DOT permitted access to the project site from Puainako Street, subject to eleven (11) conditions, including dedication of additional right-of-way(ROW) to the State for the implementation of the Puainako Street realignment and improvement project between Komohana Street and Kanoelehua Avenue as well as several other design, engineering and permitting requirements. According to the letter, "The applicant shall dedicate to the State of Hawai`i, Department of Transportation (HDOT) approximately (ten) 10 feet of additional might-of-way along the western property boundary and along the northeasterly curb return at the intersection. of Kilauea Avenue and Puainako Street. The applicant shall also dedicate additional right-of--way, varying between.zero (0) to ten (10)feet, along the southerly property line to provide a minimum 70 foot road right-of-way as -11- measured from the Puainako Street centerline. Dedication of such property to DOT shall be in fee simple interest,free and clear of liens and encumbrances, excepting those imposed by government authorities. By email dated May 14, 2019, DOT indicated that since the State still plans to realign and improve Puainako Street between Komohana Street and Kanoelehua Avenue in the future, the ROW dedication should remain. Furthermore, the other ten (10) conditions are still applicable,but can be amended or deleted by agreement with DOT. Through subsequent phone conversations, DOT staff indicated that they would be amenable to the applicant setting aside a future road widening strip to be provided at no cost to the State upon request of DOT. Based on the preceding, the Director is recommending a new Condition D requiring the future ROW dedication. ■ Amend Condition B (Water Commitment): The Director is recommending updating this condition to reflect the payment of the required water commitment for the project in 2017 and add standard condition language requiring the applicant to maintain valid water commitments until such time that the water facilities charge is paid in full. ■ Update Condition L(SHPD): The Director is recommending updating to current standard condition language regarding inadvertent finds during construction. ■ Amend Condition R (Administrative Time Extension): The Director is recommending updating this condition to require the applicant to come back to the Planning Commission and County Council for any further time extension requests. Based on the preceding findings, the Planning Director recommends that a favorable recommendation for amendments to Conditions C, D, F, H and N, and an unfavorable recommendation for applicant's request to delete Condition E of Ordinance No. 07-105 be forwarded to the County Council. The accompanying draft bill to amend Ordinance No. 07-105 is provided for your favorable consideration. Please note the proposed conditions of approval attached to the draft bill. Material to be deleted is bracketed and struck-through; new material is underscored. -12- JN�Y os N,'y. O.• q COUNTY OF HAWAII '' STATE OF HAWAII '1TE OF.N'�1 BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 07 105 WHICH RECLASSIFIED LANDS FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL— 10,000 SQUARE FEET(RS-10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL-40,000 SQUARE FEET (CN-40) AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY 2-2-039:031, 057, 068 AND 069. 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 07 105 is amended as follows: "SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 25-2-44, Hawaii County Code 1983 [(2-00 (2016 Edition, as amended), the County Council finds the following conditions are: (1) Necessary to prevent circumstances which may be adverse to the public health, safety and welfare; or (2) Reasonably conceived to fulfill needs directly emanating from the land use proposed with respect to: (A) Protection of the public from the potentially deleterious effects of the proposed use, or (B) Fulfillment of the need for public service demands created by the proposed use. INSERT CONDITIONS SECTION 2. Material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New material is underscored. SECTION 3. [Ir, the event that afty ,,,a-ie e fth s ordinance is ao„lama iftvalid, e invalidity shall not ^��et the ether-pafts of ths efdi,.nee j Severability. If any provision of this ui v ui ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAII Hawaii Date of Introduction: Date of 1st Reading: Date of 2nd Reading: Effective Date: -2- RS-10 RS-10 I R 10 KINCOLE S7 RS 10 L RS-10 RS-10 a C -10 a !0 10 RS-10CN-10 7, 69, S 9, 54, 5 E CN-10 f9 Aum A CN-10 10 RS-10 RS-10 R 10 CN-10 SINGLE-FAMILY "= RESIDENTIAL-10,000 M FT.(RS-10) Y MID 61 RS- TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL-40,00O M FT. CN-40 88,317 SQ.FT, w RS c -10 CN-10 RS-10 W-20 RS-10 RS-10 CG-20 �c OPEN RS-10 z CG•20 kgti w .4 OPEN OPEN Alt S•i 10 PIup ST M20 CC-20 �F4 10 360 180 0 360 720 1,080 1.440 1 Feet AMENDMENT TCS THE ZONING CODE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-33 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP) ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2005 EDITION), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-10,000 SQ. FT. (RS-10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL-40,000 SQ. FT. (CN-40) AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII PREPARED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF HAWAII [TMK:2-2-039:031,057,068,068 Date:December 27 2006 EXHIBIT"A" (Ginger Patch,DP, LLC:1214) FOR REFERENCE ONLY CAutoZoneREZAmend.crk.4.28.19 AUTOZONE PARTS, INC. (FORMERLY GINGER PATCH DP, LLC) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 07-107 (REZ 06-000052) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. The applicant, successors or assigns shall be responsible for complying with all of the stated conditions of approval. B. [The required water- eammitment pa��ent shall be submitted to the Depa-Arnent of Water Supply in aeeordanee with the "Water Commitment Guidelines Pohey"within 180 days from the off etive date of this or-din nee ] The applicant is responsible for maintaining valid water commitments to support the proposed use until such time that required water facilities charges are paid in full in accordance with Rule 5 of the Department of Water Supply's Rules and Regulations. C. Construction of the proposed [' ] project or other use pennitted in the zoning district shall be completed within five (5) years from the effective date of this amended ordinance. This time period shall include securing Final Plan Approval from the Planning Director in accordance with the Zoning Code. Plans shall identify proposed structure (s), E fire protection measures, access roadway, driveway and parking stalls. Landscaping shall F be indicated on the plans for the purpose of mitigating any potential adverse noise or visual impacts to adjoining,parcels. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of Planning Department's Rule No. 17 (Landscaping Requirements), Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Hawaii County Code. Landscaping shall include rock walls or fences on the northern boundaries, as agreed upon between the applicant and owners of lands adjacent to such northern boundaries, as may be evidenced by any written agreements in existence as of the effective date of this [rte] amended ordinance. D. [The appheant shall seeure Final Genselidation.Appr-oval of par-eels 31, 57, 68 and 69 E within one year from the effeetive date of this ,,i!di . nee] To accommodate for the implementation of the State's Puainako Street realignment and improvement project, a fixture road widening strip of approximately(ten) 10 feet of additional right-of-way along the western property boundary and along the northeasterly curb return at the intersection of Kilauea Avenue and Puainako Street and a future road widening strip of an additional right-of-wa , varng between zero (0) to ten (10) feet, along the property's Puainako Street frontage to provide a minimum 70-foot road right-of-way as measured from the Puainako Street centerline, shall be delineated on plans submitted for Plan Approval. All building setbacks shall be taken from the future road widening strip. Upon the request of the State Department of Transportation, the applicant, it's successors or assigns shall subdivided the land encumbered by the future road widening and shall dedicate it to the State at no cost. E. A Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) shall be submitted to the Department of Transportation Highways Division, through the Hawaii District Office and to Department of Public Works—Traffic Division for review and shall be approved prior to the issuance of Final Plan Approval. A copy of the TIAR shall also be submitted to the Planning Director. The applicant shall construct any improvements required by the State Department of Transportation and County Department of Public Works—Traffic Division prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. F. [ale pia] Access to the project site from Kekela Street shall be allowed [e_xe€pt] for theeg_neral public and delivery vehicles[. Aeeess for delivety vehieles may be allowed by the planning direetof, in eansultation with the direeter-of publie works, only if the iise be limited to delivery ve-hieles, exeluding the general publie. Aeeess to the pr-0jeet site,-4 ny , f o Kekela Street] and shall conform to Chapter 22 (County Streets) of the Hawaii County Code. G. Access to the [prejeot sib] subject parcel from Puainako Street shall be limited to a single driveway access with right-in,right-out movements only, and shall meet with the approval of the Department of Transportation. [The apph ant shall eonstf et Its on Puainako Stfeet as re"if ed by the Departme-FA of T-Fansportation. T .... ts shall inelude extending the existing paved and striped pedestrian walkway F. from Kekela St. to Kilauea Ave. H [Notwithstanding Seeti,,, 25 n 51(a)[(3)] (4), +] The project shall provide a minimum of one parking space for each 160 square feet of gross floor area for commercial uses, or the -2- requirements of Section 25-4-51, whichever is greater. The minimum number of off-street parking spaces for this project shall [initially] be [423] 57 spaces. I. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site and shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared and the recommended drainage system shall be constructed, meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. J. A Solid Waste Management Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Management for review and approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. K. All earthwork activity shall confonn to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, of the Hawaii County Code. L. [ , marine shell eopeentrations or-human burials be eneoufttered, work in the immediate area shall eease (DLNR 14PD) shall be immediately notified. Subsequei�A work shall proeeed upon a haeologioal elearanee fiom the DL-NR SHPD when it finds that suffieient mitigation .,sures have been taken.] In the unlikely event that surface or subsurface historic resources, including human skeletal remains, structural remains (e.g. rock walls, terraces, platforms, etc.), cultural deposits, marine shell concentrations, sand deposits, or sink holes are identified during the demolition and/or construction work, cease work in the immediate vicinity of the find, protect the find from additional disturbance and contact k the State Historic Preservation Division. Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearance from DLNR-SHPD when it finds that sufficient mitigation measures have been taken. M. To ensure that the Goals and Policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan are implemented, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 11, Article 1, Hawaii County Code relating to Affordable Housing Policy. This requirement shall be approved by the Administrator of the Office of Housing and Community Development prior to Final Plan Approval or Final Subdivision Approval, whichever is applicable. -3- N. If the applicant, successors, or assigns develop residential units on the subject property, the applicant shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the property with respect to parks and recreation, fire,police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution shall become due and payable prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval. The fair share contribution for each lot shall be based on the actual number of residential units developed. The fair share contribution in a form of cash, land, facilities or any combination thereof shall be determined by the County Council. The fair share contribution may be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective date of this ordinance, based on the percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index(HCPI). The fair share contribution shall have a maximum combined value of[$6,653.40] $9,430.86 per multiple family residential unit ([$ 0�.57] $14,969.92 per single family residential unit). The total amount shall be determined with the actual number of units according to the calculation and payment provisions set forth in this condition. The fair share contribution per multiple family residential unit (single family residential units) shall be allocated as follows: I. [$3,'81.93] $4,657.97 per multiple family residential unit ([$4,°�z] $7,087.11 per single family residential unit) to the County to support park and recreational improvements and facilities; 2. [Q'�] $147.03 per multiple family residential unit ([$241.20] $341.89 per single family residential unit) to the County to support police facilities; 3. [$319.07] $452.27 per multiple family residential unit ([$4763#] $675.26 per single family residential unit) to the County to support fire facilities; 4. [$342.21] $201.58 per multiple family residential unit ([$208.57] $295.64 per single family residential unit) to the County to support solid waste facilities; and 5. [$2,896:46] $3,978.01 per multiple family residential unit([$4,442.50] $6,297.02 per single family residential unit) to the County to support road and traffic improvements. In lieu of paying the fair share contribution, the applicant may contribute land and/or construct improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation, fire,police, solid waste -4- disposal facilities and roads within the region impacted by the proposed development, subject to the review and recommendation of the Planning Director, upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the County Council. O. Should the Council adopt [an] a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance. P. The applicant shall comply with all applicable County, State and Federal laws, rules, regulations and requirements. Q. An annual progress report shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the anniversary date of enactment of[the] this amended ordinance. The report shall include, but not be limited to, the status of the development and the extent to which the conditions of approval have been satisfied. This condition shall remain in effect until all of the conditions of approval have been satisfied and the Planning Director acknowledges that further reports are not required. R. [An initial extension of time for-the performance of eonditions within the ordinanee may be granted by the PlUllrlg Dlr ev+v' upon the followingeir-eunistanees: i. The non peFfoffiianee is the result of eonditions that eould not have been feFeseen oF a-re beyond the eontr-ol of the a pheant, sueeessoi:s or assigns, and that are not the result oterfault iufhior l , 2. t rr nti„ of the+i, xte would not be ,,, + + +D r 1 Plan va..al+��++�Va �iaV �aillV extension YYVN 11V� V VVllll Ul}' CV 1 t Zoning Code. 3—. Granting of the t1, . ei+cisroiwould not be cvir+raiy to the original for- the 7rli , d Th +' + + ,7 hall be foo o not t 0 ee theperiod �. iiiV �1111V V11�VilUi Vl1 bl 11�Vu J11Ull VV LVl U rJV11V originally granted fo €6i iEei., a condition to be puformed within ....e y'.+ul 111uy be vliwuuvu 1v1 up to 54 If the applicant should require an additional extension of time, the Planning Director shall submit the applicant' s request to the County Council for appropriate action. -5- Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Planning Director may initiate rezoning of the subject area to its original or more appropriate designation. r -6- D m 00 > rn ;;aoz C om � O oz � N � Z 0 G) Z � rn D -0 z > 0 1 rn n D 02 O m n O Z 0 z • D z n rn Z 000 v 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ n n n O O rn rn r^ cn 3 O rn Z Z Z rn p C X Z C � D D O Ocz_ C7 rn rn O 7� V rn � D O o ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 = = D 0 0 _ m O E-/-5rn Z O < rn C D rn � z rn � - O m �' o C rn m 0 z Z O D 7 m „ D D z Z cn n - n � rn rn -I Z - n D Z D z � rn D z m = D -� O c„ � D Q° mO D O z D rn Q° -� n rn -o „ O w Do rn rn rn �Z O cn 00 O rn z m m O Z O D =' - -Z-i G� - (� -o c/ rn u Z O -o Z rn m 0 � D rn O � D � Q � -Z-i � C � D n O z -o D O rn O w -u z rn z rn T, m rn 0 � -u Z cn Z rn D C —i Z Z n = O Z O 0 rn Oz viOO > � m O D � z rn > z �! D D r- z O rn O Z -o rn r- O 0 0 C/') 0 D r- m rn -uO 70 I- C -n = z z 0 0 O O n OO 20 � o, o � z (Dj y n p o � rn m rn D (� O = rn 0 D O n rn r 0 � O Z N r O cry O D N 70 O Z ---In G� rn D r .x 7a � I AWH- ; I Iii I 1 � I � y ®............�o � 11 rt�V-11 �@���`��is{� 11 � 1 4 J Iii LOCATION • I � i I ` 1 I i o 1 I ` i o I - - j-----� I � I canes` n 0 t \ � E c � t I i 1 1 1 4 I ; l BOUNDARY , . j l 4 I L! I I I V P ' E � 1 5 � i I E t I E L PLAN LUPAG MAP 3 " I $a � �Fri1 IX a `i F 1 '�iX rc w {" ti R• _ iF n A IAL HOTOGRAPH t`® v vst v 4 I 8y6 Z r -,iii - - 3 d33)4 EAR - - KEEP II I ; , I I __�_ aftJ rn � � O -n 0 ?. 00 rn O c p rn D r r: ... f �i. I i � TT /V 'a 0 L,y O rn rn M�. SITE PHOTOS .n Z. ti� O ' c _w rn D z Q z O S I - PHOTOS 0 000 o >> m Z z U 0 o _ z 0 > r-11 Z > 0 0 Z 0 -u-i] o -/0 m � � - C� 0 < 0 > C C:� 0 azo z � ` r- ° m n M r- 0 m o rn znn ��o 0 M . 0 � o 0 C) A 0 m 0 KZ z ' u m CYA 0 :Z u z 0 Z _ o -n O 0T' p Z DIRECTOR ' S • • ■ ;v ` m D -i - D � -: y -' Z � z OD OZ r<n m m � c m m 0 Z m c., cam, O Z C C Z Z m v, m Z D O D m D Q -C v Q Q m D O = Q n r� m C1 r c z m � m m Z Z T Q n Z D m 0 cam, p Z y O m D = D = m -, --irn Z O � m z 0 r D Z D D � 0 Q Z m m - M = n Z n a� z -c p z m 0 0 —, z m G� D C, D = C::: w n O m m D D z = r m n D D z � Z m o rn D � 'n D r D m O G� � m n � O o Q z z _ni D m O m Z ~ Z y m n Cn -mi - Oz 70 I (D 7u rn ` �D0 <<m = OZ Q Q D QC) D � r O Dz > O �O� X rn m m < D OrnZT m � m D � D z D z = n z 0 -i O Z O -0 D rn D cm ,� m 0 D C m 0 Q � c D n � m _- n � z c., 0 � D C C" z OZ N 2 O z C D Z m z W cn O -i C� -i Q m z n QZ J T -� 2 rn < c, z m n r r 0 p = Q m Q C D z D O z m Q m Z z rn D '' O `" O m cDi� Z N n-1C 0 r r �, 0 D < � m0 0 m rn O O nm = Q y D O O D r;70 rn _, Z m m rn 0 D n n70 Q � D m Q N D -� ,T D O z Z N C) -� � O MD O z G� ?o Z rn Cn rn D m D z O rn z m n -mi r-- O -., Q D C, D m - rn n D m o n -' D z o = Q DC0 2 r- > 2 D > -< --o m m rn m Z D oo O m rnz < REASONS O n n lJ O = T, O = c O O mc > rn C > cZi� cZi� D O D N O O O -� 0 (-- o F- O O c = z z n D o > n v D D D r n D Z Z < Q m C pN = ® i 0 0 m � C- Ozoo � � Om C1 n ' D �' m O Q m Q m m z i Q Cco O rn z C =+ 70 D � � rn O n (� O m �'' `1'i Z 1 � 0 z C m Z m rn C D D z o y o v z Z � w = Q Q° m !?° n m -� X 0 n 0 c f r- 0 D O n oj O =m u m Z Q Z rn C -° m N 0-1O O � Z z 0 r D o G) Z = nN 0 -� D cn = Z = n Z m ---iD N n O v> m z0 Z rn O z 0 m Z n rn > 0 D z = m W O m m C Q m '- n Z O cr> O C_ Z z Z Z O m 70 Z D m G) , m Q m N rn r o n m n D rn = � O 7UO D Z D CA Z D O N rn m Q O 0 � 1 � rn m C C QC i — 0 = D rn rn Z � © )a , D D O O D 2 70 70 O m -� Cn —1 D O '- z in n rn m n D = O \ = 60 z O m N z Cn rn rn Z 7C m n 70 rn n O O rn � -� m D M y 7C - 70 m rn S O D D � rn (� O O pZ z D rn ( = D - � z Z � vZ C/) O oz O -i C -' rn prn rn z = Drn c c C O T Z n z W D p Z Z nr pZ < O 71 �Zrn m mm DQ D m m C/) n m -< X C/)O z 0 O n< ,70 D m rTi -i = D C m D O �_ p Z m Q Z rn 7C O rn _� O D p e r rm- ,- m rn p Z Z rn D -, rn rn O D D mX cn p H r N m = nrn O < Z O -' M m Z < 70 � rn c 7� Z ="' mi n r O Z p< p � F- m007u n <n Or- D�p7 zrD r C < rn > D O p z Dz Icn(")rnr D 70 ---1 �m = D D m rn -� r O C) n �' z n p = Oc i = O r y C/') n = p Cn F" 0 z ,mm �7 2 cn rn D _ < cn r p rn = m D Z70 > iC,-) 2 � m m C O rn m z �' n T 7 = O Z = 7n C/) rn = r O z Z (m OHO DZn Trn mac_ Cn m -� zZm z � 0 � � -+ Drn rn m -U D n O Q Z '- N O � OD < n = p0 N O p70 N D m T m O = o m n p _O Z z T Z � rn < m Z p � m 0 O = m n z rn rn O D D O m m C m m -i r --u D z T rn m N m 7 p D O D n D cn 0 1 Z O C/) -+ O n -' O z G� C„ `" '�, m n ? m 00 Gtr D -mirri O <„ Z Z C/) C/)tzi) C p m C 0 ---1 0 = O 70 D r � r rn D m � � Co D = O p 7 T r m -� rn , n m O `Zrn" O O O m Z -+ D � p Z p z D Crn O v' r m C/) - +Z D m REASONS Z O m O 70 m Oz O C z 7" Dz -0 z n Cj D m Z G� � --nm D O n �'i O m z � 0 m ,,T n � Q v D z = y Om> cO Orn O F- z m D D r m m 2 70 � m o � c z -i z 0 °' Om C/) D p c? z Z C/) O r m yn 0 0 O O O ---iz n m m c" 0 0 w rn D m C nm n = O � O rn 0 D D n D Z r m � O z O o N D o' m Y 2 m > Z n Qrn O -o --j �C/) r m G) O kj �` C/) O 0 O m -G cn C_ o n O D m � ::� C) m 0 Z � m 2 C O O _ n m rn n D ---ir m O y Z = m = m 7U r -� m 'T rn ni cn m < 0 m M O D -i c0 c m Z p rn m m cn O rn C/-) OD m CO = --o cm rn O c 0 CD 0 O y y � _ m 0 0 0 O D D � ~ r z O rn 0 � � O M , m rn n c, p vm � - O y Z D n 0 m m c m ~ = DO 0 O 70 m O n O O D O O v, 0 0 m -n C p A � C G p n Z7 r Z m C , O O � rn D r- n 70 < 70 rn C/-) O r c_ -n O n D m D rn O m r- > D D n 2 n = D = N D m M D Q D Q Q r Q D m m 0 r m n 0rn y n Q O C r -1 c Z /-7 D y Z D D m O Q D z O z DD D Q v Z 2 � m n m Z W M z rn D S O =' D O r D m � Z O Q O D D O D z m D = m =' T D 0 ---ir O n z O � _ m 7 z D =D D OZ -' rnO0pz Q 0O � nm m < O Dm0 �: Di D r- 0 rnD D - O n n n QD + C � zQ m O O m c z � O '' n Z �m y Q 0 0 c z m CIO --- --n O T O Q O O n O N O 0 rn rn y - Z -� � = T Qc O ma _ Q m � m D = C - y ;;U 0 n r Z7 rriO Z = O m = D r 2 m rn O Z = D Z D m r D m z ~ D n Q 7-1 O D zz M C_- C/')C/') = O Z = O O D C: rn 0 rn m DD y D y rn Z O r zrn Dm � � � zDm nO0 Dn o OT o 'n = `" D O c�ii m O m m D Q -i rn - T O n m 0 m O D r D � y z z D REASONS FOR REQUEST ■ ■ s Z C o D o C _ = p � � = � c O z p Z O D n O = v O 0 p n D n 0 C� Ol n rn O n M 70 _ '�' J rn w rn rn = 0 .p Z Z D Z O 70 Ccn Goo O rn n Z D Z A D Z Q n n N m O C z O Co rn Z Z rn C O rn -U M rn ,-ni rn 0 cDi, rn p Z O p rn = p rn O O O0 N 0 rte- � rn rn O D 1 0 0 D z _' /0 D 0 0 0 m D ci' rn z z � 0 -� _ Z D Z D rn 0 rn r M D _ rn O 70 - Z cn z D -o -� Z rn c„ Z -� z O "' ? rn O O '-'� Q O ` D O 0 (� p n c , O rn Z 0 rn D v' m Z Z 70 rn O c z �' 0 0 cn -! n D cn z n y vO ; ° z - C �, c„ n � Z rn D Z D n 0 G� O Q = rn Z D 0 rn D D p D D Q c0 ON Z rn z Z Z N O (= z z _ z 00 -� C O n O 0 z y rn rn D Z _ nM r- O c Z D rn m D i n _ Q Z rn rn D r Z cD„ O rn rn rn rn -+ � Z rn rn D rn D D = __ C 0 - m D -' C) c" c" Z D m _ 0oz pm z Zvn O D D D O rnz - O O rnm 0 0 p m p o D N O p D T � = � z Co rn D rn 0 rn rn T' D = 0 rn � = p o n z O _ C) o rn Z D w rn � Q-' I- c" D D p rn N O < D rn = c„ Z -n rn = OT rn gni n -i D O z O O o 0 = 0 z -0 - O D rn D rn - -i v) p n z 0 O D T = C� 0 0z D m o D z � z n � rn -n 0 0000 z � ZQ > > � 0 © z z n n-I > 4 > � zZ �. Q) � CU) 0 C� 0 ----1 > � z 0FIR 0 /0IA m > � 00 0 0 > o c) Z uo z ° m Di m r_ 0 n lc �' U rn Z C) 7;0 o z M 0 m 0 m0O0 Z ® m OO m > Z cn Z � � ® z0 D Z --� O -n _ � -n O O \ 17 Z DIRECTOR 'S RECOMMENDAITONi