Laserfiche WebLink
Hawaii County Energy Code Bill <br /> Annotated Draft <br /> 11127119 <br /> to the farthest most point of the overhang divided by the vertical distance <br /> from the first floor level to the bottom most point of the overhang <br /> 3. Concrete, CMU, and similar mass walls are 6 inches or greater in <br /> thickness. <br /> The R-value of integral insulation installed in concrete masonry units shall not be <br /> used in determining compliance with Table C402.1.3. <br /> "Mass walls" shall include walls: <br /> 1. Weighing not less than 35 psf(170 kg/m ) of wall surface area. <br /> 2. Weighing not less than 25 psf(120 kg/m2) of wall surface area where the <br /> material weight is not more than 120 pcf(1900 kg/m 3). <br /> 3. Having a heat capacity exceeding 7 Btu/ft2• OF (144 kJ/m2• K). <br /> 4. Having a heat capacity exceeding 5 Btufft2• OF (103 kJ/m2• K), where the <br /> material weight is not more than 120 pcf(1900 kg/M3).,, <br /> Comments: <br /> A. State Justification: Modeling analysis shows that R-13 is the most <br /> impactful level of insulation for buildings and that removing continuous <br /> insulation on steel frame walls does not significantly impact whole <br /> building energy use. Adding shading to the wall system with a projection <br /> factor of at least 0.3 eliminates the need for continuous insulation in <br /> exterior wall systems resulting in an energy equivalent installation. In a <br /> tropical climate, the impact of wall insulation is diminished for <br /> commercial buildings with more importance placed on roof insulation and <br /> window solar heat gain coefficient(SHGC). Envelope trade-offs for <br /> residential construction can be extrapolated to commercial construction <br /> for wall systems allowing the trade-off for a projection factor on wall <br /> systems to work for both residential and commercial buildings. <br /> Adding reflective coatings on wall systems is also an effective trade-off for <br /> continuous insulation in residential exterior wall systems. As with the <br /> projection factor, this trade-off can be transferred to commercial <br /> buildings as an energy neutral trade-off A reflective coating trade-off for <br /> continuous insulation is appropriate for commercial wall systems by <br /> providing an energy neutral trade-off The full analysis is contained in the <br /> "Analyses and proposal of Hawai`i amendments to the 2015 International <br /> Energy Conservation Code, " dated May 2016 <br /> See: State ECC at§3-181.1-9, HAR. <br /> B. Maui County Justification:Additionally, exception 3 will reduce the <br /> footprint of the structure when using mass wall, which will reduce <br /> construction costs. See: §16.1613.C402.2.3, MCC. <br /> C. Kauai County also incorporated change at§12-6.4(13), KCC. <br /> 10 <br />