My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0798.001 2018-2020
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2018-2020
>
COM 0798.001 2018-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2020 10:47:15 AM
Creation date
3/6/2020 9:45:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2018-2020
Communication
0798
Point
001
Author
Michael Yee, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
FC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2020/07/07 (2018-2020)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2020/07/21 (2018-2020)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> i <br /> i <br /> i <br /> AU: Maija, can you bring up a slide for me, please? So, Mr. Tai, this is a question in regards to <br /> the other issue that the Planning Director has, the slide with the proposed development. So, <br /> from—from what Maija had said that if this property was to be rezoned based off the Planning <br /> Director's recommendation, we're going to be adding more units. So the, your existing proposed <br /> development, you're saying, 88 units. Is that correct? <br /> TAI: No, sir. I'm not sure your understanding, maybe Maija didn't mean 19 additional. <br /> JACKSON: Yeah, the existing zoning, the RM-1.5 allows for this development, which is 88 <br /> units, and that's the development that Mr. Tai proposed back in 2014 when he got the RM-1.5 <br /> zoning. If it were to be rezoned as the Director is recommending, it would allow for 19 units on <br /> the property instead of 88, so it's a downzoning. <br /> AU: So, Mr. Tai, you know, another slide indicated that your property is on sale for $3 million, <br /> it's listed. Do you have any potential inquiries or developers that are interested in that property? <br /> TAI: I think we're moving on to the second subject. Now, I assume that we,_are done with the <br /> first one which is Condition R that, claiming that I have not satisfied with the removal, I mean, <br /> satisfying the violation decided by Public Works Department,which I accept. In my belief, I <br /> have already done that because I submitted more than a`letter. In addition, even though I'm not <br /> required, I'm doing everything as option one even thoughI picked option 2. So, I assume that <br /> we are done with the Condition R. Then L'11 mov& on to the properties. May 1 do that? <br /> AU: Could you— <br /> RAFFIPIY: —Yes—sorry. <br /> AU: Could I have my question answered first before you move on? I just want— <br /> TAI: What is your question to me?. <br /> AU: —a brief answer. So, my question is do you have any inquiries about your property at this <br /> point? <br /> TAI: Okay. In orderto_answer your question, I have to start with 2014, the year that it was <br /> rezoned to [RM-]1.5. I sent the Commission a letter dated February 4th. It's a relatively long <br /> letter. I don't know if you had the chance to read it or any one of the Commissioners had a <br /> chance to read it. If not, I'll go into more detail. May I ask if you read the letter of February 4th <br /> about the use of the property and the process that I went through in trying to build affordable <br /> housing? Have you seen that letter? <br /> DELA CRUZ/AGUINALDO: [Nodded yes.] <br /> TAI: Okay. Then, I'll be brief, okay? I can tell you, this property I put it on the market in April. <br /> If what happened to me had happened on February 15 of the same year, this property would not <br /> be on sale. Now I'll explain that. Now, ever since the property was rezoned to RM-1.5, my <br /> DRAFT <br /> 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.