Laserfiche WebLink
CLARKSON: And, so I have a question for the Director. So, at the time this property was <br /> rezoned, even though it's in Medium Density Urban, apparently, the County Council felt that it <br /> was appropriate to rezone it because of the possibility of getting affordable housing. Now, do <br /> you believe that that was a mistake on the part of the Council to rezone the property and it should <br /> have always remained Residential 7,500? <br /> YEE: In the presentation, we said at this time it doesn't make sense. You know, obviously, if <br /> the market forces were there to have it happen, it probably would be happening, and I <br /> remembered my question so let him answer this question,because this is kind of important. So, <br /> prior to buying this property, Mr. Tai, did you have experience,upzoning properties? <br /> TAI: Yes, I do, many times. <br /> YEE: Okay, thank you. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you, Mr. Tai. We're going to move into public testimony. <br /> JACKSON: Chair Raffipiy, if I may ask Mr. Tai one more question before—, <br /> RAFFIPIY: Go ahead. <br /> JACKSON: —public testimony. Mr. Tail-as far as I understand, Public Works in their <br /> January 30th email to you said that the Backyard Monkey, report that was done and Mr. Barrios' <br /> February 4th letter only addressed or evaluated trees that were related I to the June 2019 unsafe <br /> flora violation. And,then you were,issued another"violation-letter in January of this year? <br /> TAI: June 31 [sic]. <br /> JACKSON- June of last year? <br /> TAI: No,you said January? <br /> HALL: Twenty-eiglith. <br /> JACKSON: January 28'1'of this I year. <br /> TAI: January 281h, 1 didn't get it until January 30th, yeah, but is that the one you're talking <br /> about? <br /> JACKSON: Yes. <br /> TAI: I'm sorry. <br /> JACKSON: Yes. <br /> TAI: The one that dated January 28thq <br /> DRAFT <br /> 15 <br />