Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> I <br /> ver much. Please go ahead. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you Y <br /> : <br /> name is Charlene Nishida, and we own a hom <br /> NISHIDAe at 16 Hale Nani Place which is <br /> My <br /> adjacent to Mr. Tai, and our property back in 2011 was one of the ones that had one of Mr. Tai's <br /> and cause property damage of which State Farm actually paid the <br /> trees actually hit our property p p y <br /> claim, and I find it ironic that Mr. Tai referred to to aour pproorch and being caused to a the main bedroom, <br /> "shed"because it was actually my home. It fell o p <br /> so I find offense in the fact that he can't even acknowledge have t in the <br /> multipge requests toe that has rhim in email, <br /> done. So, since 2011, we have, my husband and I h p <br /> and are documented, requesting that his trees are a hazard and to have them maintained and <br /> removed. This [ <br /> Ms. Nishida hada <br /> wood stump and two br°anehes'on the table] uahomet °d his <br /> his trees which are mo trees, are overhanging our home, actually over o <br /> home. So,these <br /> was othene of the branches that was removed on Monday. That was over neighboring pr perties <br /> not trees that are on his property sou ds, and this olely. They are overhanging <br /> one small sliver of a branch that was <br /> This right here weighs aboutp <br /> se branches,they show decay. Th <br /> hanging over at my home,not my shed. The <br /> ere is worm rot in <br /> them. These are branches that came from the pruning that was done that landed in our yard. <br /> Commission's recommended <br /> us neighbors, we attended the Planning <br /> In 2014, we,many of2014, Mr. Tai states that he will <br /> community meeting, and at that time,this is on February <br /> y lines, <br /> ut <br /> preserve the already extensive growth of vegetation and tdredealongrthf pt that he trees he is <br /> is <br /> growth is overgrown weeds and not a planned landscape gn <br /> referring have caused previous property damage to our home e invashen one <br /> ive,frapid growing,whichell on our roof above g <br /> porch and main bedroom. These trees are non-native,they ar <br /> requires reoccurring trimming, and hese concerns are td here adrenno <br /> 'any trees proposed <br /> in Mr. Tai's on there. <br /> development, and if you look on his proposed develop <br /> So these problems have been in existence going back to 2011.resented to the PlanningWea Commive ts ion on <br /> mentation <br /> usly <br /> that where hghad—that on 8-page,e let e to property owners within 300 feet of his. He states, <br /> November 20 ', 2013,m <br /> "As you know,there are existing heavy growth of vegetation and mature trees next to the <br /> existing stone walls at the property lines•••Some of thesesubmitted for plan approel trees and val in due on will e <br /> removed and some will stay....A landscape plan will b <br /> course." <br /> in <br /> pages of testimony that is in writing that he has stated over and over <br /> emaintaining <br /> rnag fain ng his <br /> I have threep g responsible <br /> incident on May 15, 2017,in an eneailt address the problem.Tai states he is not <br /> he goes on to say that we do not <br /> trees and for us to consult an attorn y Again,ss March 15, 2017, on April 16, 2019, again he <br /> have permission to enter his--property. g <br /> there was no provision regarding maintenance particularly tree <br /> ipropertbranches extending <br /> saidernes. That is a neighbor's responsibility to remove as <br /> over the fence and into neighboring properties. la <br /> they wish. The Toma's are in their eighties, and they're <br /> his has beeving to n a o n intent behav or'that <br /> understand the insanity of it,but what I do know is t <br /> has been going on back to 2011. Thank you• <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you, Ms. Nishida. Mr. Tama? <br /> DRAFT <br /> 22 <br />