Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> I <br /> i <br /> i <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you. I would like to just say that the eight-to ten-foot piles of branches <br /> and rubbish will eventually present another threat, and that's fire. <br /> i <br /> RAFFIPIY: Thank you very much. You may take your seat. Is there anybody in the audience <br /> that would like to testify on this item? If none, I need a motion to close public testimony. <br /> i <br /> REPLOGLE: I move that we close public testimony. <br /> i <br /> CLARKSON: Second. <br /> RAFFIPIY: It's been moved and seconded that we close public testimony. All in favor? <br /> COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Any opposed, nay? Motion carried. Now, I need a motion for action on this item. j <br /> REPLOGLE: I move that we have a favorable recommendation to the Planning Director's <br /> initiated Vincent Tai REZ 13-[0]00167 be adopted. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Any second? <br /> I <br /> CLARKSON: I'll second. <br /> RAFFIPIY: It's been moved and-.seconded that this item be a favorable recommendation. All <br /> those in favor say"aye?" <br /> COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Oh, excuse me. Any discussion on this matter at this time. <br /> CLARKSON: Yes, I'd like to explain my second. <br /> RAFFIPIY: Go ahead. <br /> CLARKSON: But, I'll defer to my, Mr. Replogle if you wish to go first. <br /> REPLOGLE: No,please do. ' <br /> CLARKSON: My reason for recommending that the County Council revisit this is that <br /> apparently there has been significant change in financial circumstances all around and that the <br /> Planning Director who has been intimately involved with this believes that the original zoning or <br /> at least as it exists now is a mistake, and I'd like to give the County Council a chance to revisit <br /> that and if they choose to maintain the existing zoning, put additional conditions on it that would <br /> hopefully make Mr. Tai or whoever succeeds him do a good job in developing the property. <br /> REPLOGLE: I would— <br /> DRAFT <br /> 24 <br />