My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0798.001 2018-2020
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2018-2020
>
COM 0798.001 2018-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2020 10:47:15 AM
Creation date
3/6/2020 9:45:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2018-2020
Communication
0798
Point
001
Author
Michael Yee, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
FC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2020/07/07 (2018-2020)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2020/07/21 (2018-2020)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As far as I'm aware, from Public Works, the report that was done by the arborist does not <br /> address trees related to the more recent DPW unsafe flora violation letter that they issued in <br /> January of this year. <br /> So, the landowner has been aware that the overgrown trees on his property are negatively <br /> affecting his neighbors. Properties for several years now, when the property was rezoned in <br /> 2014, there was discussion on that transcript and in that Planning Commission meeting of the <br /> large trees on the property, so this has been an ongoing issue for some time. It wasn't until last <br /> year that I believe the landowner started to actually file complaints with Public Works to address <br /> the issue. <br /> So, the landowner was directed to remove the trees byPublicWorks in June and January of this <br /> year, and the Planning Director has provided ample time. The department's first letter to the <br /> landowner went out in October, so he's had several months to comply with the County Code and <br /> conditions of the ordinance. Over this period of time, I think, as the record,reflects, you'll see <br /> that the landowner has consistently shown a lack'of concern for the well-being,einof the <br /> neighborhood and has not taken responsibility for properly maintaining his pr,operty. The <br /> landowner did not make a serious effort to resolve the violation until the Planning Department <br /> informed him the Director may -To <br /> initiate procedures to down-zone the property. So that relates to a <br /> - <br /> lack of compliance with Condition R. The next few slides will,talk about the property being for <br /> sale and the developer not intending to develop the property with RM zoning. <br /> So, this is a site plan that was submitted by the landowner forjhe 2014 Change of Zone. It <br /> shows Hualdlai Street Here,the entrance to the -POrtv. This-4, the Hale Nani neighborhood, <br /> and you see a driveway- ,into the property and the- multi-family residential units along the north <br /> and south side of the property. A community gard e-n is this shaded area on the bottom, and then <br /> a community playground at the end of the parking lot., <br /> This is an aerial view of the property and surrounding community. You can see again Hual5lai <br /> Street, Halle Nam Street here., I believe that these, these are the neighboring properties that are <br /> subject to the unsafe flora violation letters.-These, this is Mr. Tai's property. You can see a lot <br /> of the very large invasive trees surrounding the property boundaries. There is also one single- <br /> family dwelling on the property and a pool that was built several years ago. <br /> And just as a note, the property l,if it were to be developed under Single-Family Residential— <br /> 7,500 square foot zoning which is what the Director is recommending, it would allow 18 more <br /> residential lots or units on the property as opposed to the 88 units that were proposed in 2014. <br /> So, there has been a lack of development of the property. Although the landowner has attempted <br /> to development multiple-family housing units on the property, as well as affordable housing <br /> units on the property, as of the date of this hearing, the landowner has not developed the <br /> property, and the property has been listed for sale since April of 2019 for$3 million. The <br /> landowner also has not submitted any plans to the department. I'm sure the Commission is <br /> aware there is always that condition in the rezone ordinances that say please submit plans for <br /> Plan Approval or a Final Subdivision Approval, and there has been no movement on any grading <br /> DRAFT <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.