Laserfiche WebLink
Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair <br /> and Members of the County Council <br /> Page 5 <br /> The request is not contrary to Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statues, relating to <br /> Coastal Zone Management. The property is not located in the Special Management Area. The <br /> site is located over five (5) miles mauka of the shoreline and therefore will not be impacted by <br /> coastal hazard and beach erosion. There are no identified recreational resources, public access to <br /> the shoreline or mountain areas, scenic and open space preserves, coastal ecosystems, or marine <br /> resources on the subject property. The property does contain significant natural resources in that it <br /> is heavily forested with native species that provide a food source to several native and endangered <br /> bird species. <br /> In view of the Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH" and "Ka Pa'akai 0 KaAina <br /> decisions,the issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights must be addressed in <br /> terms of the cultural,historical,and natural resources and the associated traditional and customary <br /> practices of the site: <br /> Investigation of valued resources: The property is located within the boundaries of a pre- <br /> contact age upland agricultural system known as the Kona Field System,which is listed in the State <br /> Inventory of Historic Places. The area was the subject of a reconnaissance survey and test <br /> excavations in 1970 and 1971 by Hu'ehu'e Ranch, the developers of the Kaloko Mauka <br /> Subdivision. In addition, the National Park Service published a report in 1991 entitled, "An <br /> Ahupua'a Study: The 1971 Archaeological Work at Kaloko Ahupua'a,North Kona." This study <br /> also identified remains of an agricultural field system up to the 3,500-foot elevation at certain <br /> locations. At the request of the Leeward Planning Commission, the applicant commissioned an <br /> Archeological Reconnaissance Survey (ARS) of the subject Parcel. The ARS was conducted by <br /> Glenn Escott, et. al. of Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. and submitted to the Planning <br /> Department on February 7,2020.According to the ARS,there were no archaeological sites and no <br /> historic properties identified on the subject property. A copy of the application was sent to the <br /> State Historic Preservation Division with a request for comments, but no comments have been <br /> received as of the date of this writing. The Planning Department has no record of any cultural or <br /> historic resources on the property.The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has conducted studies of the <br /> general area over the years and have identified numerous endangered and native bird species in the <br /> native forest in the subdivision. <br /> The valued cultural, historical, and natural resources found in the rezoning area: Per the <br /> previously mentioned ARS,there were no archaeological sites and no historic properties identified <br /> on the subject property. Furthermore, according to the applicant, there is no evidence of any <br /> traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the property.The property is <br /> covered in native forest. <br /> Possible adverse effect or impairment of valued resources:Native plants may be destroyed <br /> by construction or ground alteration. There is no evidence that the flora in the area are particularly <br />