Laserfiche WebLink
RAFFIPIY: All right, thank you. It's been moved by Commissioner Au and seconded by <br />Commissioner Aguinaldo that this application be forwarded the County Council on, based on the <br />Planning Director's, Planning Director's recommendation. Any discussion? Okay, Joe, go <br />ahead. <br />CLARKSON: Yes—this is, I'm having a hard time remembering where we're at on this time <br />limit condition. This to me looks like a perfectly natural case where this property could, should <br />be, and easily could be in commercial zoning. Can't we delete the time limit so that it just— <br />[noise disturbance] they can do it whenever they want to and not do it or sell the property or <br />whatever and a—and if Christian could mute there, thank you..What is the recommendation of <br />the Director? _= <br />CLAY: That would be great to lift the time limit, esp <br />everything is right now, maybe we can extend it. <br />CLARKSON: Director Yee, what is your re <br />YEE: I want Jeff to chime in. <br />REPLOGLE: Go ahead, Jeff. <br />RAFFIPIY: Jeff, go ahead. <br />DARROW: Thank y <br />Council with one of, -.t <br />timing requirement, <br />were, they really, it fi <br />applications --_The-p ai <br />with. This ri-e =I�thi <br />the condition that, the way <br />just removing <br />issues wi <br />year time limit? <br />limits, please. <br />recently went to County <br />fission did take out the <br />-etty tough battle up there. So, I mean, they <br />wants to see a timing factor on the <br />as some factors that they, they were okay <br />=°°that this is a brand-new rezoning. There <br />hasn't_byeen anything done mmthere's provem&fff The, I understand your direction, <br />Commissioner Clarkson,�t1f ur 1 king—I mean and this is what we discussed about going <br />through all ffibse hearings on -diming aiff__ e extensions and everything that the, if the area is <br />appropriate for tie zoning, wh=y is timing such an issue, you know? Why do we care about <br />when they build � f =you know, were concerned about the land use, and again we agree with that, <br />but I think overall,_` have to come to a consensus between the Department, the Commission, <br />and the Council. I mean ==the=_ mission has every right to forward a recommendation to the <br />Council, and we can go iq@ and speak with them again about it, but they, I kind of feel that <br />on this particular one, they may feel differently on the last one. They understand the whole <br />picture that we were trying to get at, that the Commission was trying to present as far as timing <br />shouldn't be a matter in these issues, but they wanted to see some pressure on the actual <br />development of the property for those commercial uses and for the improvements that are <br />required in connection with those improvements. <br />Again, if—if the matter of the five years is an issue, that can be adjusted, but I think our, the <br />Department "—" the Commission consider the timing condition to go forward up to Council. <br />on <br />