Laserfiche WebLink
Hawai`i County Charter Commission -9 March 8, 2019 <br />STATEMENTS <br />FROM THE <br />PUBLIC ON <br />AGENDA ITEMS: <br />DOUG SENSENIG: <br />The Chair directed the Commission to proceed to the next order of business, <br />Statements from the Public on Agenda Items. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Thank you. My understanding is that Commissioner Hopkins is <br />excused and that Commissioner Galimba is on her way here. At this time we will <br />take statements from the public on agenda items. If I could ask our Hilo side who <br />we have, how many do we have in Hilo? <br />MS. MURAMOTO: Good Morning Chair, we have four testifiers in Hilo. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Four, great. We have six here. Alright, we will start here in <br />Kona then and then we will intersperse our Hilo testifiers throughout. So if I <br />would ask Doug Sensenig and Debbie Hecht please to come to the table, the <br />testifier's table here in Kona. Again I would remind our testifiers to please make <br />sure that the mic is on, to please provide your name, the agenda item or items you <br />are speaking to, and if it is one agenda item there is a three minute limit and if it is <br />more than one, there is a five minute limit. Mr. Sensenig. <br />Proposal No. CA -18 in support and Proposal No. 27 in opposition. <br />MR. SENSENIG: I am Doug Sensenig of Waimea. I am a former attorney and <br />have been involved in land conservation since the late 1980's. As an attorney, I <br />drafted conservation easements and afterwards served as board Chair and <br />Executive Director of Coastal Mountains Land Trust in Maine and as Executive <br />Director of Hawai`i Island Land Trust until its merger with the land trusts on <br />Maui, O`ahu, and Kaua`i in 2011. <br />I am here to urge you to approve CA -18 because it improves the operation of the <br />2% land fund so that it can implement the mandate of the voters. There have <br />clearly been bottlenecks in the process, and CA -18 should remedy them. <br />As to CA -27, I urge you to reject the amendment referring to the use of eminent <br />domain using 2% land funds. I say it refers to the use of eminent domain because <br />the proposed language in subsection (h) does not add to or subtract from the <br />powers that the County already has. It's redundant and unnecessary. The <br />proposed language does, however, add a discordant note to the fund that also <br />needs to be considered. <br />Historically, the federal government has frequently utilized eminent domain, <br />mainly for large infrastructure projects such as damns, airports, military bases, <br />and interstate highways. Large-scale eminent domain has also been used to create <br />national parks and other conservation areas, especially during the Depression <br />when government wanted to move quickly to create jobs. Perhaps the most <br />notorious use of eminent domain for public parkland was in the creation of <br />Shenandoah National Park. The forcible removal of hundreds of families from <br />their homes and farms created bitterness that persists to this day. Eminent domain <br />Page 2 <br />