Laserfiche WebLink
Hawai`i County Charter Commission -9 March 8, 2019 <br />The eminent domain, I think if it is yours, it is yours and then it will cut the <br />funding options, so I wanted to oppose CA -27. That was my personal testimony <br />and then I am also an executive member on the Surf Rider Kona Kai Ea chapter <br />and we have over a thousand members and we would also like to support CA -18 <br />and oppose CA -27. Thank you. <br />TONI <br />WITHINGTON: Proposal No. CA -18 in support and Proposal No. 27 in opposition. <br />MS. WITHINGTON: Good morning Commissioners and thank you again for all <br />the work that you are doing. We really appreciate it. I represent several groups in <br />North Kohala. I will name them. Ka Makani 0 Kohala `Ohana, Kohala Lihikai, <br />Malama Wahi pana 0 Kohala, Maika`i Kamakani 0 Kohala, and Malama Kohala <br />Kahakai. Isn't that great, I got through it all. Thank you very much. I want to <br />tell you that these groups have been working with the Open Space Fund every <br />year since 2006. We have been working with the maintenance fund since it was <br />started. <br />We support CA -18 and we oppose CA -27 and I will explain why. Our groups <br />have participated in the purchase of seven projects along our coastline totaling <br />390 acres that has been placed in open space since we started. We have raised <br />20.9 million dollars from seven different sources including the County open space <br />fund. The groups are stewarding now for projects of coastal land including two <br />through the maintenance fund. The maintenance fund has needed improvement <br />since it was started and we have been working with the PONC to help this come <br />about and we believe that what you have here particularly in light of some <br />possible amendments you might see later today, are very much what is needed to <br />fix the maintenance fund and we will continue to participate in the maintenance <br />fund. <br />I'd like to speak on CA -27 which I thank you for introducing it because you bring <br />up a lot of... Mr. Roehrig, because you bring up some questions that are good for <br />the Commissioners to know about how the process of acquiring funds takes place <br />since we have been involved in quite a number of them and then we also have <br />eight projects on the current priority list for public purchase from PONC. We <br />deal a lot with land trust, with property owners, and with government agencies. <br />So, first off the provision for preferring to have conservation easements, I don't <br />think we need to change the wording of the current rules because that is a given. <br />Everybody involved in this prefers to take the easier road and in many cases it is <br />the easier road. But in many cases it is not possible. We have owners who do not <br />want to be involved in long term... in a project and so, I don't think we need to <br />change the rules on that. The other portion on eminent domain, that is to me and <br />our groups, alarming and for this reason, you heard several good reasons why it is <br />alarming and I am going to tell you the reasons why we are very alarmed about it. <br />And that is that in order to bring parcels to nomination and in order to bring <br />Page 8 <br />